00:00:00.000Bill, it's not uncommon for a prosecutor to do this.
00:00:04.420It's actually a smart move with the trouble that he's having with the now former, but as of an hour ago, current indictment.
00:00:14.400He now supersedes, he streamlines, and he tries to take that indictment further.
00:00:22.940I mean, it really is a smart move on Jack Smith's part.
00:00:26.680Whether it'll survive is unclear right now, but it is a slick move.
00:00:32.600Instead, the very first words of this are not Donald Trump was the 45th president of the United States, but it now says Donald Trump was a candidate for president in 2020.
00:00:42.060And it frames it in all of these instances as a candidate for office as opposed to a president engaging in official conduct.
00:00:50.920I think it's clearly an effort to try to do more election interference from Jack Smith.
00:00:54.340He should be ashamed of himself, and it's one of the reasons why we have to win, because he should not be anywhere near power.
00:00:59.660This is the primal scream of a dying regime.
00:01:07.380Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people.
00:01:12.600Here's the time I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people.
00:01:16.860The people have had a belly full of it.
00:07:25.880And what the Democrats want to do is make it about other things.
00:07:30.440And what Jack Smith at the Department of Justice, injustice in all our minds now, has done is abruptly bring us back to the grim reality that the Democrat elites running the Democrat Party into the ground will do anything they can to stop Donald Trump.
00:07:50.780I mean, think about it just from a media campaign kind of thing perspective.
00:07:56.420There's this thing called the news cycle, right?
00:07:58.540It's what the commentators pay attention every day.
00:08:01.660What Jack Smith has done is disrupt the news cycle.
00:08:06.480It was trying to focus, trying to focus on the key issues in that campaign.
00:08:10.600I mean, even the left-wing media is getting tired of Kamala's act, refusing to talk about anything issue related to the press.
00:08:23.220And by the way, as a digression, I mean, the first interview she agrees to is going to be with CNN.
00:09:39.020And look, what this is all about is interfering with the 2024 election.
00:09:48.880Oh, by the way, Jack, Merrick, Kamala, that's a felony.
00:09:56.720You can now make the case against Jack Smith that it is also domestic terrorism using the same logic of the Merrick Garland, Jack Smith Department of Justice.
00:10:08.600I think you can even make the case that this is just pure treason.
00:10:13.500I mean, it's like overthrow the government type stuff.
00:12:55.940It's Jack Smith, Merrick Garland, Fonnie Willis in Atlanta, Alvin Bragg in Manhattan, and Judge Marchand, who's Bragg's bitch, essentially.
00:13:06.240At this point in time, there's no question there was coordination or at least tacit collusion between and among all five of those people,
00:13:18.280and their agenda was to take Trump down.
00:13:21.980They—even if they couldn't put him in prison, their agenda has been to throw enough mud on him,
00:13:29.380to throw enough stink on him that the voters would stay away from him.
00:13:33.220It's backfired in the sense that he's tended to go up in the polls and raise more money.
00:13:39.520But the net—on net, I'm not so sure they haven't been successful in already interfering with this election.
00:13:47.980I mean, they say, like, OK, Donald Trump, are you going to accept the results if it's a fair election?
00:16:57.160The more folks who listen to Steve's War Room, better chance we have a fighting back against the fake news, putting Trump back in the White House and taking back Congress.
00:17:08.280Subscribe to Bannon's War Room if you haven't on Apple Podcasts.
00:17:12.100And if you are a subscriber, write a review.
00:17:14.840That helps get the War Room out to the broadest possible audience.
00:17:19.820All right, I want to bring in Mike Davis right now and quickly turn the microphone over to him.
00:17:28.460The thing, two things I want you to do, if you would, Mike.
00:17:31.700I want you to explain exactly how Jack Smith, the special prosecutor, is trying to end run the Supreme Court.
00:17:42.000But more importantly to me, answer if there's a case to be made with charging Smith down the road and others with a felony for election interference.
00:18:03.060Yes, and yes, yes, this Biden-Kamala special counsel, Jack Smith, is ignoring two recent monumental Supreme Court decisions.
00:18:17.020The Fisher case, in which the Supreme Court held that the Biden-Kamala Justice Department illegally contorted, politicized, and weaponized a post-Enron obstruction of justice statute intended to go after corporate fraud that the Biden-Kamala regime used to go after Trump and his supporters on January 6th.
00:18:40.360That 18 U.S.C. 1512, those are two of the four charges in Jack Smith's original complaints and in his superseding complaint, his new complaint, his new indictment that he just filed.
00:18:55.020So that's two of the four that the Supreme Court said in Fisher you can't do, right?
00:18:59.880And so then there are two others that Jack have in here.
00:19:04.100The problem with that is that Jack Smith is ignoring the Supreme Court's recent presidential immunity decision where you cannot charge a president.
00:19:14.000You can't even get evidence of the president's official acts.
00:19:18.580You can't charge the president for what he does in his official capacity as the president of the United States and including the outer perimeter of that official capacity according to a 40-year-old precedent in the civil as opposed to the criminal context, the Nixon case.
00:19:39.080And the bigger problem here is that Jack Smith didn't just do this alone.
00:19:43.940He had to have gotten Biden-Kamala Attorney General Merrick Garland's sign-off to do this.
00:19:50.960So Merrick Garland definitely signed off on this.
00:19:53.800And there's no question, there's no doubt that President Biden at a minimum and likely Vice President Kamala Harris were made aware of this before this happened.
00:20:03.260This is a continuation of the lawfare and election interference against President Trump.
00:20:09.540His top aides like you, Peter, who they sent to prison for four months, Steve Bannon, who's sitting in prison right now and you're filling in for him, Jeffrey Clark, John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, Trump's attorneys who they're making go through hell, they politically persecuted Trump supporters on January 6th.
00:20:28.800Yes, politically persecuted per the Supreme Court's Fisher decision.
00:20:33.520So to your second question, Peter, about whether there's consequences.
00:20:37.120Hang on. Before we get there, I want to ask you a quick question here.
00:20:40.400Is it possible, probable, or likely that Kamala Harris and her campaign team would have been asked whether Jack Smith should do this?
00:20:53.560Because it's clearly a political gambit, but the question would be whether it would help or hinder her campaign.
00:21:00.820Wouldn't it have to be the case that Kamala knows about this, or at least her handlers?
00:21:07.080I mean, she's the Vice President of the United States, and President Biden, we know, has his fingerprints directly on all four of these unprecedented,
00:21:16.920and it's republic-ending prosecutions against a former and likely future president.
00:21:22.980We know that. We know that President Trump personally waived Trump's claim of executive privilege leading to the Mar-a-Lago raid.
00:37:48.940And within those counties, you can even look at the districts that have higher independence or higher, you know, undecided.
00:37:55.040Back in 2016, Brad Parscale made a, a, a very big deal and over-exaggeration of how important he was in terms of using social media to win the election.
00:38:21.240So if you look at the overall voting composition, 60% of voters are 50 plus.
00:38:26.740So we still have, the vast majority still have a TV at home and they want to put the evening news on.
00:38:31.10010% and that number keeps growing every election, are 30 and under.
00:38:35.880The, the younger you are, the less likely you are to be paying for cable at home.
00:38:40.740And so you, you have a significant part of the voting block that gets their news online.
00:38:45.700So whether that's X or Facebook or Google ads, so a lot of the campaigns.
00:38:51.300Do we, do we know which of the social media companies cater to which demographics or, or, or, it's, it's, it's, they're, they're evenly split.
00:39:00.180What we do know is the social companies have different age demographics within them.
00:43:26.540I want to warn you of a huge change that could be coming to our money and our bank accounts.
00:43:31.840First, think back to 9-11, shortly after the government pushed through the Patriot Act.
00:43:35.840This gave the government power to spy on innocent Americans by monitoring our phone and email and tracking our movement across the Internet.
00:43:43.860Now, Jim Rickards, editor of the independent financial newsletter Strategic Intelligence and New York Times bestselling author, is warning about a coming event that could elevate this governmental surveillance to a terrifying new level.
00:43:57.540In fact, some of the guests I've had on the war room believe that the government will soon expand their powers to track our every move.
00:44:05.540If we say the wrong things on social media, donate to the wrong causes, buy firearms, or even vote MAGA, the government may be able to shut us out of our bank accounts.
00:44:16.320I can't say for sure if this will happen, but it's an interesting and dire warning.
00:44:21.740Fortunately, Jim Rickards, an American patriot and friend of mine, has made it his mission to educate us on what he believes is coming and how to protect yourself from the possibility of programmable money.
00:44:34.340Watch Jim's warning video now, before it's censored like I've been in the past.
00:46:39.540So to me, it's fascinating hearing the stories from the author, the president, and it's the only book that he's publishing this year, but also to hear it from you firsthand.
00:46:48.500So if you can take us to this event, I believe it was Wisconsin.
00:46:51.620I immediately see this picture, and it's the Marinette Shipyard, Sergio.
00:46:57.880What President Trump, early on in the term, looked at me in the old one and said, save the Philly yard.