On this episode of the Real America's Voice podcast, Senior Political Commentator Matt Boyle joins us to discuss the latest in the Trump vs. Hillary Clinton campaign. President Trump rallies in North Carolina on Sunday night, and then heads to Florida on Tuesday morning to campaign for Hillary Clinton.
00:02:08.180I want to bring in and want to thank Real America's Voice, Parker and Rob Sigg for allowing us and giving us additional time here on a Sunday.
00:02:21.040We're back, obviously, tomorrow morning, 10 to noon and then 5 to 7.
00:02:24.380And then we're going to go to Tuesday show from the war room and then shift the flag over to for our on our spectacular Washington coverage from the imperial capital, the heart of the imperial capital on Tuesday.
00:03:04.420It went up early this afternoon at Breitbart, and it's pure analytics of exactly where we stand through the eyes of a very smart guy who's the national political editor at Breitbart.
00:03:16.720Can you walk us through, and if Denver can put the article up, and if Grayson Moe can get it not only on the site, but I want to push this out on social media.
00:03:25.340Because I think it's the best way to end the weekend thinking about where we are with the math, not with a bunch of guesswork, but really with the math.
00:03:36.560Yeah, so, Steve, what I did was I went through all the polls, all the early vote data, and this is what I'm doing constantly in an election is I'm trying to make sense of it.
00:03:46.080I'm listening to and reading all the top analysts, guys like Nate Silver, Sean Trendy, Nate Cohn, right?
00:03:54.440And what I'm trying to do is make sense or heads or tails of what's going to happen.
00:03:58.540I don't want happy talk from either side.
00:04:01.300And the picture that I think emerges here is that all the fundamentals are there for a Donald Trump victory on Tuesday.
00:04:09.420The baseline stuff is there for the polls to be off.
00:04:15.700Now, by the way, if the polls are exactly right, generally speaking, Trump might win a squeaker victory, right, like what we're seeing across battleground states.
00:04:24.080But if the polling error and if there is a polling error and if it's as profound as we saw in both 2016 and 2020, the only other two times we've seen Donald Trump on the ballot, then that would suggest that Donald Trump's headed for a landslide victory across the across the country.
00:04:41.600Right. And there's a lot of people that are really smart that are suggesting that that might be the case.
00:04:47.160Again, guys like Sean Trendy from RealClearPolitics, again, not not not not the most conservative guy in the world.
00:04:53.980He's just an analyst straight up trying to call it right.
00:04:56.640Like people like JMC Analytics, people like the like I said, Nate Cohn at The New York Times in the when releasing their final polls this weekend, which were kind of a mixed bag.
00:05:45.940And then when you look at things like, you know, that have come out, you know, the biggest thing that probably came out over the last 24 hours here is the Des Moines Register poll.
00:05:56.200And frankly, Ann Seltzer is revered by the establishment media.
00:06:00.360Right. Like so they they look at her as though she is the oracle of what will happen, that the best pollster in the country, you'll hear people say they'll say it's the gold standard, et cetera.
00:06:11.640And they put out this Des Moines Register poll as Kamala up three in Iowa.
00:06:15.980And that's a shocker. Right. Like to a lot of people.
00:06:18.480But then you on the same side, you've got another poll that came out from Emerson College that shows Donald Trump up double digits and doing better than his numbers in 2020.
00:06:28.200So both things really can't be true unless you're at the extreme ends of both margin of error and that, you know, there's a little crossover there at the extreme ends of both polls if that if that ends up being the case.
00:06:41.920But the question really becomes, you know, this gets down to the picture of what we've been talking about here, which is that the early vote numbers suggest across the board that this is all going to be a game day operation on Tuesday.
00:06:56.900And Donald Trump is in a position to win if his supporters come out on mass, if men vote on mass, if white working class voters vote on mass and if Latinos and black voters break a little bit more for Trump than we've seen in the past, as everything is suggesting, then, you know, things are looking good for him.
00:07:17.560Right. Like so we see leads by Republicans in early voting in Nevada, North Carolina and Arizona in Georgia.
00:07:27.600We don't have partisan breakdown, but the numbers across the board in Georgia look strong in Pennsylvania.
00:07:33.920We are seeing significant drop, a significant drop off in turnout in the blackest precincts in the areas like Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
00:07:43.740We're seeing a similar drop in black turnout in North Carolina, Georgia and other places around the country.
00:07:51.580There are a lot of smart data guys like Patrick Ruffini from Echelon Insights who have been flagging this stuff.
00:07:59.060JMC Analytics, John Cuvion has been flagging it as well.
00:08:03.640So these are smart people that are going through the data.
00:08:06.160And so what I tried to do here is pull together a picture of where we're at.
00:08:10.920And by the way, there's there's tons and tons more, if you notice at the end of the article.
00:08:28.440But I do kind of lay out throughout the story that all the fundamentals are there for a Trump victory and that people wouldn't be shocked if and when it happens.
00:08:36.420And, you know, the smart people across the media have been saying this and warning their side about it for some time.
00:08:42.780But at the same time, Trump voters shouldn't rest on their laurels here going into Tuesday either.
00:08:49.500They need to turn out like their lives depend on it because, frankly, they do.
00:08:54.180And the idea that this is in the bag, it's not.
00:09:12.220You said something that if you take the numbers as they are in reviewing the numbers that, you know, people have put out that and not question whether there's been response bias or there's this traditional Trump under polling,
00:09:27.280because I think you get into dangerous territory there, particularly given, hey, it happened in 16.
00:09:32.080You and I know that because we were very confident we were going to win and we did win.
00:09:36.980We were down, I think, three and a half the night before.
00:09:47.360Keep the numbers are your walk, walk us through why that is a squeaker victory and what is the path of that victory if the numbers are exactly like they say they are.
00:09:58.180So the place I would look for that is the Atlas Intel polls.
00:10:01.640Atlas Intel was the most accurate pollster in the 2020 election, and they have Donald Trump currently leading every single battleground state.
00:10:12.140Like so I don't have the numbers exactly in front of me, but I mean, we're talking less than two or three points in North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
00:10:24.200But Donald Trump leads all seven, according to the final polling from Atlas Intel that came out last night.
00:10:30.700So the that poll would be, you know, that would suggest that.
00:10:35.900In addition to that, we see an NBC News poll today, which is a national poll that has Donald Trump leading by one in a crowded field.
00:10:45.080Right. Like if you include all the third party candidates and tied straight up with Kamala Harris.
00:10:50.740But the the thing that I would and if Donald Trump wins the national popular vote by one percent, he's going to win the Electoral College.
00:10:57.540I mean, it's hard to see him not winning the Electoral College if that's the case.
00:11:02.100Right. Like so that is a big deal. And I think that a national popular vote victory for Trump would go a very long way to solidifying his position if he were to win the election on Tuesday.
00:11:15.280Now, on the flip side of the coin, there are a lot of cautionary tales out there.
00:11:20.900Right. Like so you don't want to pick and choose and just believe the polls that you that you like.
00:11:25.120Right. Like so there's also an an ABC News poll today that has Kamala Harris up three nationally.
00:11:31.360That's a dangerous territory for Trump. And so, again, it depends on which ones you you believe.
00:11:38.040Right. It depends on which polls you you you trust in which data you look at that, you know, to inform the picture you've got.
00:11:47.020The easiest path for Donald Trump to the 270 electoral votes is he holds together everything he had in 2020, including Maine's second district in North Carolina.
00:11:58.540North Carolina is the only battleground state in there of the seven that we talk about that Trump won in 2020.
00:12:03.960He flips back Georgia and he flips Pennsylvania.
00:12:06.920If he does that, Donald Trump gets to exactly 270 votes without anything else.
00:12:12.080Right. Like without talking about Arizona or Nevada or Wisconsin or Michigan.
00:12:16.340But there are other pathways for Trump.
00:12:18.500So in addition to that pathway, if Trump holds everything hinges here on holding North Carolina.
00:12:25.480And so that's that's really important.
00:12:27.160And the early vote data in North Carolina is the most promising of any of the states, I would say, because we get the most data.
00:12:33.980There's been more than four point four million people that have voted in North Carolina already.
00:12:38.240And the Republicans finished early voting.
00:13:37.080He holds North Carolina and then he flips Georgia back.
00:13:40.720Then if you know, you're you're you're talking about the not getting Pennsylvania, you need then need Arizona plus Wisconsin or Arizona plus Michigan.
00:13:52.260Or you could do it with Nevada plus Michigan.
00:13:55.800But there are plenty of different pathways that Donald Trump has to the 270 electoral votes at Arizona looks like it is going to go for Trump.
00:14:04.680Right. Like so based off of what we're seeing in the early vote data, the guys like Charlie Kirk and Turning Point Action have done what they said they were going to do.
00:14:13.900They went out and they turned out these low propensity voters.
00:14:17.020That's what the data shows at this point.
00:16:45.480And so if you look at North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, it really she's got to be focused on holding the blue wall or she's done.
00:16:52.580And that's where she's spending her time.
00:16:54.900Now, a lot of operatives, Democratic operatives, and they're going, oh, they just have to have an above average game day turnout on Tuesday and they can win North Carolina.
00:17:04.060It seems to me, and you're dialed into a lot of the Democrats behind the scenes.
00:17:10.500It seems to me that no one in the Democratic Party wants to address the elephant in the room.
00:17:17.040And that is they are in free fall with black men as far as coming out to vote for them.
00:17:33.220That's why, Matt, on the day before election, she's going back to Philadelphia where if you've got to go back to some place that should be your base, you've got a big problem.
00:18:21.020And frankly, one of the things I cite in this story is, again, JMC Analytics, John Kuvian, he's one of the better data guys in the country, tends to be a Republican pollster.
00:18:30.060But what he did, he's based in New Orleans.
00:18:37.020Donald Trump is going to win the state of Louisiana.
00:18:38.960That's not even close to in question here.
00:18:42.460But what you can glean from states like Louisiana with their early vote numbers is some of the national trends, right?
00:18:49.260Like, so when you see a massive drop in black vote in Louisiana, that's a major problem for the Democrats nationally because it's a trend that's happening across the country, coast to coast.
00:18:59.860Now, I am not spiking the football in the back of the end zone yet, okay?
00:19:04.120Like, we're not doing the Lambeau leap here, right?
00:19:06.280Like, it's time to, like, we need to actually see this actually through and see it play out.
00:19:12.460Believe me, I have seen this movie a million times before where everybody's saying the black vote's not coming, the black vote's not coming, and then the black vote comes on Election Day, right?
00:19:21.180A perfect example reminds me a lot of his Alabama Senate race in 2017, the special election there, right?
00:19:28.560But the difference between then and now is that then we were basing this on polls.
00:19:32.640And, yes, we've seen polling data throughout the course of this year where everybody has been warning about this.
00:19:37.740In fact, one of the things I cite in that big story is Harry Anton from CNN, another one of these data guys who knows what he's talking about,
00:19:45.460who said that the stuff has all the warning signs have been there all along if Donald Trump ends up winning this thing.
00:19:51.420Now, he also did a similar segment saying the warning signs would be there all along if Kamala wins this thing.
00:19:57.080And, again, I'm not calling the election right now, and I'm not making a prediction.
00:20:00.780But what I am saying is that the fundamentals are there for Trump if this demographic shift seems to hold.
00:20:07.720And it looks like it is based off of the early stuff that we're seeing.
00:20:10.720Now, they still have until Tuesday night when the polls close to be able to deliver these votes.
00:20:14.500So, you know, we'll see if they can get it done.
00:21:43.660They didn't win the game, but, you know, the kids got a lot to learn.
00:21:48.780In the case of Kamala Harris, she is not Barack Obama, okay?
00:21:52.180Like, it is abundantly clear that she does not have the influence and the sway over their base and their folks are not as fired up as that.
00:22:01.920Now, again, never discount the ability of Democrats to actually turn it around and possibly pull it off, right?
00:22:08.040So that's the word of caution here, but there is a lot of – a lot to be optimistic about headed into Tuesday.
00:22:13.720So I do think that it is unlikely that the Democrats all of a sudden, for the first time ever,
00:22:21.720develop the best-ever Election Day turnout operation that we've never seen before out of them, at least in the modern era.
00:22:29.140And I do think that on the Republican side, we are going to see very strong numbers.
00:22:34.060I think it's safe to say that Donald Trump is going to perform at or possibly even above his 2020 performance in many respects,
00:22:44.580in that I think that Kamala Harris is going to have real trouble putting up Joe Biden numbers, right?
00:22:52.160But as for all of these different groups, it's a new novel way of doing things, so it's hard to judge at this point.
00:22:58.540I tend to cast a lot of doubt on these establishment media reports, ripping Elon Musk's groups and Charlie Kirk's group and all the other ones.
00:23:25.980What are you going to look for in the next 24 hours?
00:23:30.380What are the things that Matt Boyle's looking for tonight and tomorrow up to the eve of game day?
00:23:38.140Yeah, so John Ralston in Nevada from the Nevada Independent is supposed to make a prediction this evening or tomorrow about what he thinks is going to happen in Nevada.
00:23:46.400If he predicts that Donald Trump will win Nevada based off the numbers, because what we've seen is the in-person vote ended in Nevada,
00:23:55.260and Kamala Harris – or the Democrats kind of caught up a little bit.
00:23:59.320It's not technically by the candidates, it's by the party.
00:24:02.140But the Democrats kind of caught up a little bit in the first little batch of mail afterwards.
00:24:06.340But the Republican lead there in Nevada is very strong.
00:24:08.960So if his prediction starts – you know, comes down with a Trump prediction or a Trump likely prediction or something like that,
00:24:16.260that I think would be a bad sign for Kamala Harris.
00:24:19.100Now, Nevada doesn't really fit into too many, you know, tight paths to 270,
00:24:24.860but it is the furthest left of the battleground states, at least traditionally.
00:24:28.900It's the one battleground state that Trump has never won, right?
00:24:31.840Like, Trump did not win Nevada in 2016 or 2020, and he has won each of these other states at least once, right?
00:24:39.720Like, and he's been on the ballot twice, this is his third time on the ballot as a presidential candidate.
00:24:44.200So I will be very much watching Nevada for that reason.
00:24:48.240I'm also keeping close eyes on Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, obviously any sign that we can get out of those places
00:25:39.220But Nevada is – they still have little bits of mail.
00:25:42.920But the problem is that the Democrats aren't catching up in these – enough in these mail things in terms of cutting into the Republican lead.
00:25:50.860So the question is, is what's that Republican lead look like going into Election Day?
00:25:56.520If it's north of 30,000 – right now it's north of 40,000.
00:26:35.060Yeah, the data in Wisconsin show that it's a lot easier to make up the difference from the 2020 margin with low propensity voters.
00:26:46.700The guys at Turning Point zoned in on this very early this year.
00:26:51.100And I know they have their ballot chasing operation and full-time staffers on the ground in Wisconsin.
00:26:56.660It's tough to tell with Wisconsin because you don't have the partisan data coming out with regard to the early vote numbers.
00:27:03.300But what we are seeing are anecdotal data from, you know, rural areas that are Trump-heavy that look strong, and the cities are looking low.
00:27:12.380In fact, that trend that we were talking about with the black vote, Milwaukee City, seems very low in terms of the turnout in the early votes.
00:27:20.500So a lot of good signs out of Wisconsin for Trump.
00:27:26.100Boyle, social media, Breitbart, where do they go?
00:27:28.680Yeah, just mboyle1 on Twitter or X, and true social, at real Matt Boyle, and just go to breitbart.com.
00:27:37.220Our team's going to be working around the clock.
00:32:51.340So NBC, I think, clearly recognized there was a potential problem.
00:32:55.360And the last time that this was an issue was in 2015, when NBC did, in fact, provide airtime to Republican primary candidates after an SNL episode hosted by then-candidate, now President Trump.
00:33:07.120NBC recognized that this was a legitimate request and granted airtime to those candidates on broadcast affiliates in swing states.
00:33:13.960So I guess I would say that the doctrine is pretty straightforward.
00:33:18.080If you read the Communications Act, it's in Section 315.
00:33:20.940It says that broadcasters have to provide equal time, and that means in terms of minutes of access to their broadcast signal, to legally qualified candidates for public office on their airwaves.
00:33:32.580I think, you know, I think President Trump is pretty much the classic case of a legally qualified candidate for public office.
00:33:41.440The only exception to this is what's called a bona fide news exception, and I don't think SNL has such an exception.
00:33:48.760So I think, you know, when Commissioner Carr started identifying the legal issue here, he was in the right to identify it and bring it forward.
00:33:54.420So there's only, what, 24, 48 hours before Election Day.
00:35:51.460Couldn't you just get the broadcast, their own and operated stations, which are the biggest stations in the biggest markets in the country,
00:35:58.360just have Trump on Skype or have Trump in a studio and let him do a two-minute riff?
00:36:04.200I mean, after all, we saw on the Rogan show that doing a two-minute riff would not be a huge challenge for President Trump.
00:36:10.840So I agree with your analysis about how easy it would be to remedy this in the closing hours of the campaign.
00:36:17.960I want to point out that Commissioner Carr conjectured in his statement on this that the SNL appearance was designed to deprive the Trump campaign of the opportunity to make a legitimate request for equal time.
00:36:30.580Now, I'm not sure what the campaign is doing internally, but it would certainly send a signal if they were to make such a request and such requests were not to be granted.
00:36:38.180As you point out, it would be something that President Trump is demonstrably able to fulfill.
00:36:43.480Now, one of my advisors commented that the appearance on SNL by the Democratic candidate was so wooden and unfunny that maybe NBC should actually deduct time from the Trump campaign somehow.
00:36:57.320I found that sort of amusing. But setting that to one side, I guess the point is that if the Trump campaign doesn't have time to get this done for whatever reason, that's hardly their fault.
00:37:10.700And it's hardly their fault that they've been put in a position to have to deal with this at the last moment when, you know, President Trump's schedule has no doubt been booked down to the second for months in advance.
00:37:21.940I guess what I would say is it just seems like an unforced error on the parts of of people who should be aware that there are equal time requirements.
00:37:32.020Oh, holy, hang on. Ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, yo, yo, bro. It's not an unforced error. Nothing's right now. Nothing's going to happen. That's their advantage. The unforced error is on the FCC.
00:37:44.160I'm not pointing fingers at you guys, but they thought this through. They thought this through. They knew later on a Saturday night, you'd have a Sunday with Trump running around you guys out, you know, not in the office and then Monday and then it's done.
00:37:55.800So it's not an unforced error. It's very well thought through and it's kind of in your grill. My question is the law is the law. Are you going to let NBC game the system or is the FCC going to sit there and go, no, hey, you're going to give them two minutes and then throw it back to the Trump campaign?
00:38:12.160Right. If the Trump campaign doesn't use the two minutes, that's on the Trump campaign. You're not you're not responsible for what they do, but you're the FCC is definitely responsible for not letting the demons at NBC and Lauren Michaels.
00:38:26.320These guys perfectly get they game the system. So if they're not held accountable. So go ahead.
00:38:33.420No, you make a great point there. The requirement is that equal time be provided. And it's you know, there's there's no there's no proviso in there that, you know, if logistics don't make it possible.
00:38:43.580No, you make a I think a really good point that this is, in fact, a challenge to the FCC to see whether we're serious about broadcast regulation issues that were thought to be non controversial, including by NBC and SNL leadership until, you know, until five minutes ago or whenever this clip initially aired.
00:39:02.120As far as far as what the FCC can do in practical terms, our governance doesn't give me a way to unilaterally act on this.
00:39:11.660Unfortunately, the the chair could initiate action and the the chair could it could call up staff and request that action be initiated.
00:39:20.280As far as I'm aware, that's not happening. And and there's there's no way for me or for the Republican minority on the commission to force a vote on this.
00:39:29.260Unfortunately, we can protest strongly for all the good it'll do.
00:39:34.020But but there's no way we can force a vote. There's no mechanism that we can use to compel the staff to act on this.
00:39:40.820So because the the commission is controlled by Democrats and that's traditional when Republicans, there's controlled by Republicans, they can game the system, essentially break the law and and just get away with it.
00:39:55.780That's so it's just it's just the rule of these are the guys that believe in democracy so much they believe in the rule of law.
00:40:01.000We get lectured about that every day. We just have to suck on it.
00:40:07.720Well, put it this way, if if we were to if we were to see an in kind contribution or free airtime in some way provided to humanize and make President Trump relatable on, for example, Fox broadcast,
00:40:21.540I have a hard time believing that that that would that that it would be politically acceptable for Democratic Commission leadership to let that pass without comment.
00:40:31.800And so you're asking now that the shoes on the other foot, are we are we left without a remedy?
00:40:37.440And I would say that we probably are left without a remedy before Election Day, unless unless unless the commission chair decides to act on this.
00:40:48.940Obviously, you know, I've got a point of view on this. Commissioner Carr's got a point of view on this.
00:40:52.460I would say that it's just enough in the cracks and crevices as far as whether or not this constitutes violation of the equal time rule that it's possible for the chair to punt and to say, well, maybe it does.
00:41:04.740Maybe it doesn't. Let's convene. Let's convene a group to consider the issue.
00:41:08.380Other than that, I don't know. Don't know what the remedy is on this short notice.
00:41:11.260Now, as for as for post-factor remedies such as, you know, such as a lawsuit or other process, obviously, those still remain on the table.
00:41:19.500However, I think your point is that the election may obviate the opportunity to reach those remedies.
00:41:25.600Yeah. Nathan, how do people track you down on social media? How do they follow you?
00:41:31.140Well, I'm at Symington FCC on X, formerly known as Twitter. That's the main way.
00:41:35.940I'm not typically all that active on social media. I'm a more behind the scenes technical type.
00:41:42.140But but lately with with media regulation, I've had to get a little bit more active.
00:41:47.520And, you know, and and of course, apart from that, I really do answer my email and my staff answer their emails as well.
00:41:55.020We were public servants and we take this take this seriously.
00:41:58.380Just last week, we had in someone, for example, who had sent us a cold email about being kicked out of the RDOF rural broadband program.
00:42:05.340So it's your audience should absolutely feel free to reach out to their public servants if they want information about how the complaint mechanism works at the commission.
00:42:14.660That's obviously something that we'd be happy to provide as well as support through the process.
00:42:22.500Nathan, thank you so much for coming on and talking to us on a Sunday evening. Appreciate you.
00:42:27.220It's my pleasure, Steve. Good to have you back.
00:42:29.460You know, you knew it doesn't you don't need to talk about the bias of Saturday Night Live is pretty very obvious for, you know, decades and decades and decades.
00:42:41.400It's just the the blatant Lauren Roberts saying, I'm not going to do this.
00:42:45.400And then at the last second, they slip it in.
00:43:19.160I want to warn you of a huge change that could be coming to our money in our bank accounts.
00:43:24.520First, think back to 9-11 shortly after the government pushed through the Patriot Act.
00:43:28.520This gave the government power to spy on innocent Americans by monitoring our phone and email and tracking our movement across the Internet.
00:43:37.380Now, Jim Rickards, editor of the independent financial newsletter Strategic Intelligence and New York Times bestselling author,
00:43:44.040is warning about a coming event that could elevate this governmental surveillance to a terrifying new level.
00:43:50.600In fact, some of the guests I've had on The War Room believe that the government will soon expand their powers to track our every move.
00:43:58.060If we say the wrong things on social media, donate to the wrong causes, buy firearms or even vote MAGA,
00:44:05.100the government may be able to shut us out of our bank accounts.
00:44:08.340I can't say for sure if this will happen, but it's an interesting and dire warning.
00:44:14.420Fortunately, Jim Rickards, an American patriot and friend of mine, has made it his mission to educate us on what he believes is coming
00:44:21.260and how to protect yourself from the possibility of programmable money.
00:44:27.020Watch Jim's warning video now before it's censored like I've been in the past.
00:45:14.460They're prepared to walk you through this, tell you how it works, but keep the bad guys away from grabbing your castle
00:45:22.060and monetizing it and having you, unfortunately, have to pay off either the second or fight them with expensive lawyers to get your home back.
00:47:15.460Real clear politics, and I keep saying the real clear politics average is the best way to get a sense of it.
00:47:21.200And they've got an analysis out today of kind of their poll of polls of everything, Dave Bratz, where they say, hey, Trump has a, quote, unquote, narrow path to a victory.
00:47:33.340Now, I know a lot of guys say it's going to be a landslide and there's going to be a blowout.
00:47:42.440But the basic core of this, of the game, is to get to 270 and to hold the House of Representatives, even if it's only by a couple of seats.
00:47:51.700And I think we may have a pickup or two.
00:54:00.200So unfortunately, as many of you know, a lot of these big corporate supplements will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients, and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health.
00:54:10.280So that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap with quality supplements, and of course, the beef liver being our flagship products.
00:54:19.140For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc.
00:54:28.000And because it is 100% grass-fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general.
00:54:41.100So we have some other amazing products.
00:54:43.260But if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com.