Bannon's War Room - November 19, 2024


Episode 4065: Investing Into A Healthy Country


Episode Stats


Length

55 minutes

Words per minute

161.69382

Word count

9,023

Sentence count

600

Harmful content

Misogyny

7

sentences flagged

Hate speech

5

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In the wake of President Trump's picks for the Justice Department and other key Cabinet posts, some are questioning the motives behind them and whether they are part of a larger strategy to destabilize the White House. Alex Blumberg and Nickels Schulte break down what they think of them, and why they think they should be confirmed.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Together, Trump's candidates constitute an attempt to wreck the American government.
00:00:05.380 All three of Trump's most high-profile picks, Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth, and Matt Gaetz,
00:00:11.480 are defined publicly, both by the things they've said in the contempt they have for the role of
00:00:19.500 the departments they're now going to lead, and the views that they have that are in stark contrast
00:00:24.680 to many of the Republicans who have now been asked to vote to confirm them to lead those agencies.
00:00:30.460 Here's how Steve Bannon reacted to the choice of Matt Gaetz as A.T.
00:00:34.900 Matt Gaetz is the fiercest of the fierce warriors. He is the firebrand of firebrands.
00:00:40.240 He's going to hit the Department of Justice with a blowtorch, and that blowtorch is a guy named Matt Gaetz.
00:00:48.500 I could say a lot of things about Bannon, but at least he says it all out loud, right?
00:00:55.440 And he's been saying it for years.
00:00:58.300 Trump's picks are part of this project that Bannon has described for years now publicly
00:01:04.660 as the destruction of the administrative state, the fulfillment of a vision Bannon has been fighting for for years.
00:01:12.700 Here he is making that point earlier today.
00:01:14.560 We're going to burn some of these institutions down to the ground because you know why?
00:01:20.200 They need to be burned down to the ground.
00:01:22.680 I think that the first time that Steve Bannon ever said the phrase, and it actually is the deconstruction
00:01:28.180 of the administrative state, which is the same thing as the destruction of it, but I think the
00:01:32.280 first time he said it out loud to everybody in the world was in February of 2017 at CPAC,
00:01:38.440 where he was, the Trump forces were ascendant at that point.
00:01:43.200 Steve was in the White House at that point, and he was, I think, interviewed on stage at
00:01:47.760 CPAC by Reince Priebus, or at least was on stage with Reince Priebus, but I think it was Priebus
00:01:52.600 talking to Bannon, and Bannon talked about the big priorities in the Trump term.
00:01:57.180 He talked about nationalism in terms of foreign policy.
00:02:00.160 He talked about nationalism in terms of economic policy.
00:02:02.340 And then the third thing he talked about was this deconstruction of the administrative state.
00:02:06.840 And, you know, it's a, the one thing you can, Steve is not only someone who's been saying
00:02:10.940 this out loud forever, for, you know, through that entire, from the moment they walked in
00:02:15.600 the doors there in January of 2017 until now, when he was out, when Trump was out of office,
00:02:21.300 he's also someone who's very, he's, who is unlike Donald Trump, an extraordinarily well-read
00:02:26.980 and sophisticated thinker.
00:02:29.620 And, and when I say sophisticated, I don't want anybody to think that that means I think he's
00:02:32.880 a good thing in terms of some of these thoughts, but I mean, he is someone who has thought a lot
00:02:38.180 about this stuff.
00:02:38.840 He's read his, he's read his Lenin, and that's what this is really.
00:02:42.020 It's a, it's a Leninist project.
00:02:44.040 And I think to your point, Nicole, I think there's a lot of things going on with these,
00:02:48.120 with these, some of it is directed at the media, and that's the frame that you were just putting
00:02:51.800 on it, which is to create chaos in, in terms of how we cover it.
00:02:54.880 But it's also, I really importantly, these are tests of the Republicans in the Senate.
00:03:02.640 It is not a coincidence that, that Trump dropped the Matt Gaetz announcement to basically break
00:03:08.340 up John Thune's welcome party, his victory party, as having won as majority leader on
00:03:13.520 the, on the Senate side, on the Republican Senate side.
00:03:15.740 It was, it was like dropping a, a turd in his punch bowl at his party, basically, and sort
00:03:21.480 of saying, okay, um, this is the most unacceptable, or among the most unacceptable people you could
00:03:27.120 ever put in this job.
00:03:28.660 Now, Mr. Thune, pass him, please.
00:03:33.980 This is the primal scream of a dying regime.
00:03:38.880 Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people.
00:03:44.100 Here's the one that I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people.
00:03:48.360 The people have had a belly full of it.
00:03:49.860 I know you don't like hearing that.
00:03:51.780 I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to
00:03:53.940 stop it.
00:03:54.400 It's going to happen.
00:03:55.680 And where do people like that go to share the big line?
00:03:59.080 Mega media.
00:04:00.420 I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.
00:04:05.840 Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?
00:04:09.620 If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.
00:04:15.800 War Room.
00:04:16.820 Here's your host, Stephen K.
00:04:18.760 It's Monday, 18 November, Year of the Lord, 2024.
00:04:27.280 Okay, we're going to have Jeff Clark is going to do a reprise of the little bit we had on
00:04:31.560 the morning show.
00:04:33.060 Because we have to talk about the big fight is the confirmation fight.
00:04:38.020 They're getting to the judges fight, which we will talk about in the second hour.
00:04:41.740 Clark's here on this.
00:04:45.020 I guess what they're taking to be a radical idea about the president forcing both houses
00:04:50.520 of Congress into recess where he would put some of these nominees forward.
00:04:56.560 Of course, a firestorm at Capitol Hill today.
00:04:58.460 Really, Pete Hexeth and Matt Gaetz drawing the fire.
00:05:01.980 I think it says a lot when you see Nicole Wallace and Hallman and all of MSNBC in the focus on
00:05:08.400 Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hexeth, Matt Gaetz.
00:05:11.340 Right now, Christy Noem and believe it or not, RFK Jr. getting a pass, which I guess is some
00:05:18.280 strategy there.
00:05:19.760 We're going to talk about Tina Peters out in a nine-year prison sentence in Colorado.
00:05:25.540 I've got Julie Kelly here. 0.69
00:05:26.860 The NBC News is doing some amazing reporting on the Justice Department and the lawyers there
00:05:33.520 leaving in droves before Matt Gaetz arrives.
00:05:36.820 And also, we're going to go to Silicon Valley, talk about venture capital.
00:05:40.780 Brian Costello is going to be here talking about the venture capital firms there and their
00:05:45.940 involvement in all this.
00:05:47.100 So we'll get to that in a moment.
00:05:48.560 Honored to have Nicole Shanahan join us.
00:05:51.460 She was a vice presidential candidate with RFK, came forward and supported President Trump.
00:05:58.880 Nicole, the reason I wanted to have you on here is to kind of kick this off.
00:06:01.940 We haven't had a lot of opportunity to really focus on what RFK is doing over HHS as he
00:06:06.860 starts to man up and will be announcing it.
00:06:08.800 But in his whole thing of make America healthy again, a huge aspect of that that nobody's
00:06:15.300 talking about and that we pray President Trump is just as aggressive as he's been on
00:06:20.780 these other nominations is the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
00:06:25.020 Can you just walk our audience through?
00:06:26.160 Because you spent a lot of time on this.
00:06:27.500 That merger, when we talk about make America healthy again and everything RFK is going to
00:06:33.100 do with big pharma and big medicine and that whole biopharma, biopharmaceutical industrial
00:06:39.740 complex, you're coming at it from a different angle and that's agriculture.
00:06:43.780 Walk us through your construct, ma'am. 0.60
00:06:47.040 Yeah.
00:06:47.320 First, thanks for having me, Steve.
00:06:48.840 It's a real honor to be here on your show.
00:06:51.000 Well, it's going down right now.
00:06:53.740 The nomination for head of the USDA is happening right this moment and there's an opportunity
00:07:01.980 for the first time ever to get somebody in there who's a real farmer, who's going to look
00:07:08.720 out for the small family farms and who's going to revitalize our soil systems. 0.99
00:07:13.660 I came to agriculture through a very narrow lens of looking at climate change and this
00:07:22.820 is almost 10 years ago now and I'm a technologist here in Silicon Valley and I looked at every
00:07:30.040 one of the climate schemes that they had brought up that were being brought up and sold as these
00:07:39.340 green energy programs and none of them made sense to me looking at just the science and
00:07:45.420 just the business of it.
00:07:47.000 If we just look at carbon through this myopic lens of we have excess CO2 in the atmosphere
00:07:57.440 and that is allegedly leading to a heating and climate change and climate change patterning.
00:08:05.640 If you just look at it through that, you actually, and you spend time on the science and you realize
00:08:12.240 the opportunity of soil and you realize the many, many benefits of tending to our farmland.
00:08:19.320 There's about 900 million acres of farmland in the United States and you look at the history
00:08:26.320 of our relationship with soil.
00:08:28.140 When you don't take care of the soil, you get the dust bowl.
00:08:30.940 When you don't take care of the soil, people go hungry.
00:08:34.080 When you cut down American farmland, you get inflation, you get expensive food products
00:08:41.860 because the supply chain gets disrupted.
00:08:46.240 And we saw that during the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdowns.
00:08:50.840 So you can't talk about any of these really big issues like inflation or climate without
00:08:55.320 actually addressing the soil.
00:08:57.500 You can't talk about health without addressing the soil.
00:09:00.620 In this country, we use an enormous amount of glyphosate.
00:09:05.360 Glyphosate has been tied for decades now to all kinds of autoimmune issues and cancers.
00:09:12.680 In fact, Bayer and Monsanto, Bayer acquired Monsanto, has paid out over $11 billion in damages
00:09:20.960 due to people getting sick from glyphosate and farmers getting sick.
00:09:26.500 And these very well-defined cancers that have been defined and linked conclusively to glyphosate
00:09:34.020 exposure.
00:09:35.280 You cannot address so many of the issues we have in America without addressing the USDA.
00:09:41.180 Tom Vilsack, the current head of the USDA, he was the head of the USDA under Obama as well,
00:09:47.500 is it's even hard to call him a commodities guy.
00:09:53.060 He's just he is somebody who is a puppet who's put in there to keep this whole system running as it is.
00:10:01.040 He's made no major changes to say that he's dedicated anything towards things that liberals
00:10:07.420 care about, such as conservation, is, you know, we've seen no movement there.
00:10:13.260 The farm bill is something we don't hear much about that we really ought to be listening and
00:10:19.740 paying much more close attention to in terms of what's going into it.
00:10:23.480 These are five and then 10-year bills, budgets.
00:10:27.700 The next one that's up right now is going to be the first 10-year farm bill that exceeds a trillion dollars.
00:10:35.640 So, you know, this is stuff that we have to be paying attention to.
00:10:41.000 The farm, calling it the farm bill doesn't even make sense.
00:10:44.440 It's over a trillion dollars mostly going to the SNAP program.
00:10:50.080 Fruit stamps and very unhealthy.
00:10:52.680 Hang on for a second.
00:10:54.060 As you know, this is a populist nationalist show with a huge mega audience and we always try to support
00:10:59.860 the little guy.
00:11:00.460 But when you have 900 million acres, and we love family farms and the family farmer and
00:11:07.140 the little guy, but isn't that just fond nostalgia for an America that's passed?
00:11:11.960 I mean, to feed America and to feed the world or to help feed the world, don't you need massive
00:11:18.600 agribusiness?
00:11:19.700 Don't you need Archer Daniel Midland?
00:11:21.620 Don't you need Masanto?
00:11:22.580 Don't you, isn't this something that scales up and why people, I think, appreciate the
00:11:27.960 fact, you know, your show, Back to the People and all your things are related to family farmers
00:11:32.700 and the soil and all the stuff that's going.
00:11:34.760 Isn't that, isn't that just nostalgia, ma'am?
00:11:38.840 I don't think so.
00:11:41.420 I've looked at the science and when you take care of the soil, you get long-term yields.
00:11:47.820 You get higher yield in the density, nutritional density of the food.
00:11:54.180 So if you really do want to feed people, you have to tend to the soil.
00:11:58.300 And look, if there's large-scale production that is producing high nutrient-dense foods,
00:12:07.460 I'm all for it.
00:12:08.680 But those nutrient-dense foods have to actually translate to healthy people.
00:12:14.520 And that's not what we have going on right now.
00:12:17.620 We have commodities, massive commodities, that a lot of it results in high-fructose corn syrup,
00:12:27.400 which we know doesn't nourish human bodies.
00:12:32.060 We know causes all kinds of dysregulated behavior in small children.
00:12:38.880 So this is, you know, not about nostalgia.
00:12:41.460 I mean, I'm not sure how to reference this idea of nostalgia.
00:12:45.040 I'm talking just strictly efficiency about if we want to invest dollars in to healthy people,
00:12:52.120 we have all the land.
00:12:53.960 We have more land.
00:12:55.120 Actually, you know, in the latest consensus of the 900 million acres that we have in the United States,
00:13:01.120 we're farming only about 500 million acres of them.
00:13:04.580 That number is going down year over year.
00:13:07.040 And, in fact, here in the state of California, where we produce half of the fruits and vegetables in this country,
00:13:15.320 half of the fruits and vegetables come from the state of California.
00:13:18.600 And the state of California currently has a plan to cut water down 40% to farmers,
00:13:24.620 which means we're going to lose 40% of the fruit and vegetable production coming from the state of California,
00:13:31.380 which is responsible for half.
00:13:34.160 I mean, so this is merely looking at it strictly through the lens of, you know, not flowers and bunnies and things.
00:13:43.440 I'm looking at it strictly from a business lens.
00:13:46.640 And hang on one second.
00:13:49.740 We're going to go to break.
00:13:50.560 That was a great answer.
00:13:51.560 No, we have nostalgia for the small farmer, too.
00:13:55.240 But you come at it from science and from technology.
00:13:58.360 We're going to take a short commercial break.
00:14:00.820 We're going to return in a moment.
00:14:02.480 Johnny Kahn takes us out with American Heart.
00:14:06.080 You know, one of our anthems here, one of my favorite songs.
00:14:08.640 We're packed today.
00:14:10.640 These cabinet nominations, and I think Nicole Shanahan's got some recommendations.
00:14:16.540 As she tries to shake up the United States Department of Agriculture in the MAGA Revolution,
00:14:22.360 President Trump is a blunt force instrument for change, an anti-systems person, as is RFK, Tulsi Gabbard, Matt Gaetz,
00:14:33.920 and the rest of their compatriots now into the Department of Agriculture.
00:14:37.480 Incredibly important as it works together with HHS to make America healthy again.
00:14:45.500 Short commercial break.
00:14:46.280 Back in a moment.
00:14:46.700 I suggest you take a look inside.
00:14:53.580 Because I think you've changed already.
00:14:58.180 You went and lost your...
00:15:00.260 The elites are getting desperate.
00:15:02.400 They now want to use the technology behind Bitcoin for their own Orwellian purposes.
00:15:06.860 Their gold?
00:15:07.760 To dominate our economy by forcing everyone to use central bank digital currencies, which they control.
00:15:14.100 Imagine your every purchase being called into question, your every move tracked, like you live in a communist country. 0.87
00:15:21.800 This is not the America we want, but it is the America they want to create.
00:15:26.320 Fortunately, you can fight back.
00:15:28.660 I believe owning gold is the best solution.
00:15:31.000 Why?
00:15:31.360 Because it keeps you in control and safeguards your savings.
00:15:34.680 Plus, with a gold IRA from Birch Gold, you can move your IRA or 401k into physical gold without paying any taxes or penalties.
00:15:44.600 To learn more, get a free info kit by going to birchgold.com slash Bannon.
00:15:49.360 That's birchgold.com slash Bannon.
00:15:52.180 Birch Gold is the only gold company I trust to help patriots defend their savings.
00:15:57.420 Let me repeat that.
00:15:58.740 Birch Gold Group is the only gold company I trust to help patriots defend their savings.
00:16:04.520 So take a stand right now.
00:16:06.560 Go to birchgold.com slash Bannon and get your free info kit on gold IRA.
00:16:13.400 Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
00:16:19.260 Okay.
00:16:21.080 RFK Jr. is putting together his team at HHS and getting ready for what will be a firestorm by Big Pharma and Big Medicine when he comes forward to end that nomination process.
00:16:33.260 I had a chance to spend a few minutes with RFK Jr. at Mar-a-Lago on Friday, and we caught up with the great Tony Lyons.
00:16:43.080 Nicole Shanahan was the vice presidential candidate running as an independent on the ticket with RFK.
00:16:49.660 She's very focused on the agricultural department.
00:16:52.080 I just want to frame this.
00:16:55.360 First time you've been on, and I want to make sure our audience is very focused on family farms and the small farmer.
00:17:03.180 The current head of the USDA, this is his second turn in the barrel.
00:17:07.280 I think it was Obama's.
00:17:09.180 He's now under Biden.
00:17:10.480 He's been the governor of Iowa, which is obviously one of the states that are the breadbasket of the country and the world.
00:17:18.100 Are you saying – and he's a guy with a liberal perspective, progressive.
00:17:24.300 Are you saying he's failed to make the changes that a Nicole Shanahan or the people she supports to head the USDA would make?
00:17:34.040 I mean I think most of the audience would find that shocking.
00:17:36.240 He's worked for Obama, arguably the most progressive president of modern times.
00:17:41.980 He's now back with Biden.
00:17:43.680 He's had two shots in Iowa.
00:17:45.900 I think people are kind of stunned.
00:17:48.100 He has not helped a small farmer.
00:17:49.680 He does not have the perspective you have that you think is a cornerstone of make America healthy again, ma'am.
00:17:57.040 Yeah, it's hard for me to categorize Tim Vilsack as either corrupt or uninformed and quite stupid.
00:18:07.400 I think it's more of the former.
00:18:11.460 I think that there's a great deal of corruption that has been hidden under the mask of progressive values around conservation and climate management.
00:18:25.960 And I'm really concerned, having seen some of the actions under this administration, how they have treated farmers around this country like criminals.
00:18:35.680 We've seen more raids of small family farms, organic farms.
00:18:40.720 I mean this wasn't happening in the 90s.
00:18:43.540 We've seen attacks on raw milk production.
00:18:48.140 We've seen raids of Amish farms in this country.
00:18:53.140 I've seen, you know, I've seen the words conservation and aquifers floated around.
00:18:59.420 But when you actually look at the behaviors here in the state of California, we've been out of a drought for the last three years.
00:19:05.700 Now would have been the time to invest.
00:19:08.280 I have a full map of every farm in the state of California and how we should have been investing in those farms and restoring those aquifers.
00:19:17.120 Instead, they're paying farmers to fallow their lands. 0.78
00:19:22.020 They have a pilot program here to fallow their lands.
00:19:24.500 And we know that California is a test bed for these policies.
00:19:27.640 And if they work here, they spin them out into the rest of the country. 0.94
00:19:30.780 Tom Vilsack has very much been a puppet of what I think is this climate death cult that looks at human and human needs through this very negative lens.
00:19:44.380 And they are blind to this whole other body of science, the body of soil science that says if we restore the soil organic matter, S-O-M, soil organic matter of our soil by like 5%,
00:19:58.560 we can pay off an enormity of our carbon debt and our emissions debt.
00:20:04.280 And we get the added benefit of feeding people healthy, nutritious food.
00:20:08.260 Because when you increase the soil organic matter of our lands, it goes directly into the seeds and the roots and the leaf.
00:20:17.100 And we get to consume all of that.
00:20:21.780 You're very focused on this, on the current, what's going to happen in the USDA.
00:20:25.300 Walk us through, who do you recommend that, if you were talking to President Trump right now,
00:20:30.220 who do you recommend that President Trump and his transition team put forward as the new leadership in the USDA?
00:20:37.160 And what do you want them to focus on?
00:20:40.200 You know, the beneficial remark that I'd like to share right now, full of optimism,
00:20:46.760 is that we have a list of 20 people who would all be amazing, amazing leadership of the USDA.
00:20:55.500 And these are farmers.
00:20:56.560 These are people who work with other farmers and train other farmers in need and help turn farms around who are going into debt.
00:21:04.600 Farming is a hard business.
00:21:05.960 And we have got some of the best farmers in the world in this country.
00:21:11.740 And we are not leveraging that expertise.
00:21:14.160 But if I'll give you some names, amongst those that we think would just be wonderful,
00:21:20.560 Congressman Thomas Massey would be wonderful.
00:21:24.560 We know he's very busy right now.
00:21:26.020 And if you know Massey, he's tried many times to present bills that are very pro-farmer,
00:21:33.440 very protective of the family farm, and really all about food freedom.
00:21:38.360 If not Thomas Massey, we've got this wonderful farmer, Jimmy Emmons,
00:21:44.780 who is loved by the left and loved by the right and loved by every farmer he meets
00:21:52.080 and is just this jovial, wonderful, brilliant man who's a farmer and a soil scientist.
00:21:58.020 He was a farmer first, became a soil scientist.
00:22:01.820 He's got a huge following.
00:22:04.160 And the list goes on.
00:22:05.460 There's Frank Nicely, who's wonderful.
00:22:08.560 He'd be a great deputy secretary at the USDA or ahead.
00:22:13.040 Um, he's a Republican member of the Tennessee State Senate.
00:22:17.640 He's fantastic.
00:22:19.180 Also a farmer, also understands the bureaucracy.
00:22:22.200 He understands where the money is, where the bodies are buried.
00:22:26.020 Um, and, you know, this list goes on and on.
00:22:28.480 And, and I've published it on my ex, uh, who I'd love to see out there.
00:22:34.000 Um, and I just, you know, the, the thing we have to remember is we have every tool to turn
00:22:39.580 this around.
00:22:40.120 And this is something that's going to impact every budget item related to the government.
00:22:47.440 Let me talk real quickly.
00:22:49.800 Uh, we'd love, um, the audience loves learning nomenclature.
00:22:54.320 When you've used this term food freedom, what does that mean?
00:22:58.060 It's the right to grow our own food and it's the right to, um, be able to afford a lifestyle
00:23:07.240 that lets us thrive as human beings.
00:23:11.680 Um, one of the, you know, biggest issues around food freedom today is that we aren't able to
00:23:20.120 grow, for example, dairy products the way that we'd like to.
00:23:26.200 Um, we are now on the precipice of being forced to inject our cattle with the mRNA vaccine.
00:23:34.820 So just like we talk about medical freedom for humans and the desire to not have mandates
00:23:41.220 telling us what we have to put in our bodies, food freedom is an extension of that.
00:23:48.020 We want the ability to eat meat that isn't, um, that full of these inputs.
00:23:55.580 Um, we'd also like to be fully informed.
00:23:57.980 I mean, let's talk about the Nuremberg trials, right?
00:24:00.460 The idea that humans have a right to be fully informed about what they're putting into their
00:24:07.000 bodies.
00:24:07.440 Um, food freedom is a really big part of that.
00:24:11.620 Okay.
00:24:12.100 Nicole, so hang on.
00:24:13.140 So MSMEC, the Progressive Channel, if they would say, in fact, when they see this tonight
00:24:19.480 or tomorrow, they'll say, look, if you let a nutcase like Bobby Kennedy take over, um,
00:24:25.640 HHS, every kid's going to have measles and every other disease.
00:24:29.080 And if Nicole Shanahan has her way at the USDA, you can be drinking raw milk and other dairy 0.99
00:24:34.100 products and getting all kind of, uh, uh, bacillus and diseases in you that, that these people
00:24:39.860 are anti-modern science.
00:24:41.600 In fact, they're anti-modernity.
00:24:43.380 They want to take America back to the 17th or 16th, 15th or 16th century.
00:24:49.020 Uh, and, and these things are impractical.
00:24:51.760 They can't scale.
00:24:53.100 And Shanahan's almost as dangerous as Bobby Kennedy.
00:24:56.360 Your response, ma'am?
00:24:57.460 I am very pro science.
00:25:00.740 In fact, we are just on the frontier of probably one of the most exciting, exciting scientific
00:25:06.200 discoveries, which is the soil microbiome.
00:25:10.360 There is so much life in a handful of healthy soil, and we're going to understand how that
00:25:18.340 soil interacts with our health and can actually feed us in ways that, you know, we haven't
00:25:25.440 even explored in terms of crop production.
00:25:28.720 Um, I, I think that if you talk to a PhD here at Stanford university, um, who's studying
00:25:35.840 ecosystem science and you ask them, what is the most interesting breakthrough area of the
00:25:41.980 field of, of conservation?
00:25:43.880 They're going to tell you it's this microbiome.
00:25:47.280 There is this whole world of life under our feet and we can solve so many of humanity's
00:25:54.520 greatest issues, um, by exploring, uh, the majesty of soil.
00:25:58.720 Um, Nicole, you've got to know, you've got a foundation, you have a venture capital fund.
00:26:06.100 You've also got a media platform.
00:26:07.600 Walk people through where they can go.
00:26:09.480 Cause I'm telling you, the audience is fascinated about this.
00:26:12.000 We're a huge believer in, uh, the family farm and the, uh, and the little guy, uh, particularly
00:26:17.820 against agribusiness and this farm bill, which you're correct.
00:26:20.960 It's, it's not simply that snap is food stamps, but the food, they're not really buying food.
00:26:26.440 They're buying food product, right?
00:26:28.460 And this is what's destroying the health of the country.
00:26:30.480 So I think you and you and, uh, I would talk to Bobby though, about, about eating the big
00:26:34.760 max on, uh, on president Trump's plane coming back from the UFC.
00:26:37.540 I guess he gets so jacked up in the gladiator arena.
00:26:40.060 He lost himself on the French fries.
00:26:42.340 Um, where do people go for all your platforms and the following you on social media, ma'am?
00:26:46.860 Well, first of all, I'd like to put a plug in for big max.
00:26:50.080 I think we can make big max great again.
00:26:52.640 And, uh, I, I grew up eating McDonald's and it's, it's really not so much the fact that
00:26:58.620 it is a big Mac.
00:26:59.380 The big Mac is a genius invention.
00:27:00.840 It's delicious.
00:27:02.020 Um, but it's the contents of the big Mac.
00:27:04.880 It's, um, the quality of the meat.
00:27:07.760 It's the, um, dough conditioner in the dough that is linked to all kinds of GI issues.
00:27:14.300 Um, we can make big max great again.
00:27:16.680 And, and I, and, and, you know, frying French fries in seed oils, it'd be much better if
00:27:23.860 we could fry our French fries and beef tallow, um, or coconut oils.
00:27:28.160 I mean, there's so many, there's so much we can do and innovate around in terms of healthier
00:27:33.240 food science, especially at scale.
00:27:35.180 And especially with, you know, these branded American, um, nostalgic things.
00:27:41.160 Like I grew up eating, uh, happy meals.
00:27:44.320 So, um, but to answer your question, uh, you know, check me out on X.
00:27:49.120 I am very, very active on X.
00:27:51.180 Many of the posts, majority of the posts are my own.
00:27:54.700 And that's me just, you know, sharing what my heart wants to share and, uh, getting information
00:28:01.860 out there in a timely way.
00:28:04.260 Um, back to the people podcast as well.
00:28:06.820 We'll put the other ones up.
00:28:08.160 Yep.
00:28:08.740 Thank you very much.
00:28:09.320 Thank you, Nicole Shanahan.
00:28:10.340 Honor to have you on here, ma'am.
00:28:12.980 I've been telling you about cyber scammers who try to steal Graceland.
00:28:17.080 The FBI calls this house stealing and it's a real threat.
00:28:21.300 If you own a home or any real estate, pay close attention.
00:28:25.360 When was the last time you checked the title to your home?
00:28:27.740 With an average of 90% of your net worth in your home, criminals are targeting homeowners
00:28:33.700 like never before.
00:28:35.620 They can transfer your home title, take out loans in your name, and leave you with a financial
00:28:40.740 nightmare.
00:28:42.200 Act now to protect your home's equity with triple lock protection from home title lock.
00:28:47.800 Go to hometitlelock.com, enter your address, and find out if your title is still in your
00:28:53.160 own name.
00:28:53.700 Use promo code BANNON to get a complete title scan and your first 30 days of protection free.
00:28:59.820 That's 30 days of free protection and peace of mind.
00:29:03.540 Do not wait.
00:29:04.680 Take action right now to protect your most valuable asset.
00:29:09.060 Visit hometitlelock.com and use promo code BANNON.
00:29:12.000 That's hometitlelock.com.
00:29:14.100 Promo code BANNON.
00:29:15.080 Please do this today.
00:29:17.900 Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
00:29:23.700 Welcome back.
00:29:26.640 Jeff Clark joins me.
00:29:29.200 Jeff, Julie Kelly, we're going to get Julie Kelly in a moment.
00:29:32.920 NBC News is reporting that Merrick Garland was stunned and shocked about 5 November's results
00:29:40.940 and that their senior lawyers in the Justice Department were weeping openly about the results,
00:29:47.400 and now they're all panicked.
00:29:48.700 They're checking their passports.
00:29:50.260 They're lawyering up.
00:29:51.400 They say we didn't do anything wrong, but Trump and these evil people like Jeff Clark
00:29:57.320 are coming after us.
00:29:58.260 And Matt Gaetz, your thoughts, sir?
00:30:00.640 Look, Steve, I spent a total of six and a half plus years at the Justice Department in
00:30:07.180 two different presidential administrations.
00:30:08.800 I can tell you and the audience with great assurance that at no point did I ever break down weeping
00:30:14.480 about any election results or even any case results were supposed to be adults at this
00:30:21.820 point, right?
00:30:22.360 I was about to say men, and I recognize that maybe that's a little bit, you know, too male-centric.
00:30:28.400 But still, look, I think these reports are amazing in that they show the nature of the people who've
00:30:34.500 come in under the Democrat umbrella.
00:30:37.360 And, you know, I don't have a lot of sympathy for them.
00:30:40.540 I hear that they're making arguments of, you know, well, we're going to have to be bedeviled
00:30:44.560 by lawsuits and lawfare, et cetera.
00:30:47.100 Well, welcome to the club.
00:30:48.000 I've spent the last four years being bedeviled by those things just for doing my job at the
00:30:53.340 Justice Department.
00:30:54.660 And, you know, if there is some turnabout on that from the new Congress and from any
00:31:01.400 investigations that might take place, you know, that's what they signed up for when
00:31:06.320 they started weaponizing the Justice Department against their political opponents, Steve.
00:31:11.120 Walk us through.
00:31:11.900 It was pretty – they're freaking out about this proposal you put forward to actually get
00:31:17.980 – to get to that point, we've got to get Matt Gaetz and Todd Blanch and people actually
00:31:22.340 in the Justice Department.
00:31:25.200 And all day long, they're talking about, oh, they're going to block this, although
00:31:28.000 it's pretty evident no other Republican congressmen have come forward – well, first
00:31:32.420 of all, I don't think anybody's come forward and said they actually will not vote for Matt
00:31:35.240 Gaetz.
00:31:35.600 Murkowski and I think Collins have indicated that he's got a tough sell.
00:31:39.500 But walk us through – and if Denver can put up his report, at least the eight-pager,
00:31:46.420 and we have, I guess, a 37.
00:31:47.720 Walk us through this eight-pager because the president – there's two things out there
00:31:51.580 now.
00:31:52.180 President Trump's talked about this Act of 1998 that he's prepared to use, and you're
00:31:57.520 offering him another alternative in case we can't go through the normal process of
00:32:02.220 advice and consent in the Senate to get his nominees across the finish line.
00:32:06.420 Let me start, if I could, Steve, by talking about English law.
00:32:11.720 So the English king had two sets of powers.
00:32:15.380 Eventually, the parliament made inroads against the first one especially.
00:32:19.820 But the king could have the power to dissolve the parliament or to suspend it or what was
00:32:27.180 called pro-rocket.
00:32:28.420 And the framers, in their wisdom, completely appropriate, since they wanted to have three
00:32:34.060 standing branches of government that were co-equal, they denied to the president the
00:32:38.980 analog of the power to dissolve Congress.
00:32:41.700 It's a body that continues in existence from election to election.
00:32:46.500 The president doesn't have the power to do that.
00:32:49.280 But they decided that some form of the power to prorogue essentially would be conferred on
00:32:54.480 the president.
00:32:54.940 But they put another check and balance on it, Steve.
00:32:57.860 They put on it the idea that the president can order the two houses of Congress into a
00:33:04.840 recess if the two houses disagree with each other as to whether to go into that recess.
00:33:11.660 And so if that disagreement between the houses exists, the president can send them into recess
00:33:16.700 for as long as he sees fit.
00:33:19.440 And there are arguments floating around from the Wall Street Journal, from Ed Whelan, for
00:33:25.460 the National Review, from Andy McCarthy.
00:33:28.520 Hang on for a second.
00:33:29.340 Hang on for a second.
00:33:31.000 The republic's been around.
00:33:32.320 The Constitution is, what, 235 years old.
00:33:34.460 We're coming up next April, folks, the 250th anniversary, so that's a quarter of a millennium,
00:33:41.440 of the shot heard around the world, Lexington and Concord, next 19 April 2025.
00:33:47.500 Has this ever been even talked—has it ever been tried anywhere in any presidency?
00:33:53.880 And has it even been discussed, what you're talking about?
00:33:57.740 Well, this is where one house would say, I want to go into recess.
00:34:00.580 The other house wouldn't.
00:34:01.800 And the president can use that one house saying they want to go into recess.
00:34:05.260 So this kind of is a reveal, but why Mike Johnson, who has nothing to do with confirmations,
00:34:12.580 said out of the blue, oh, well, I support the recess nominations process.
00:34:19.580 So Johnson could put the house into recess, and Trump could use that house recess to force
00:34:26.100 the Senate to force, if Mitch McConnell and John Thune didn't want to do it, to force the
00:34:30.700 house into a recess and then put his nominees through?
00:34:33.540 Short answer is yes, and what the president's given in the Constitution is a tie-breaking
00:34:37.860 power.
00:34:38.380 If the two houses disagree with each other, the president can send them both into recess.
00:34:43.340 Where is that in the Constitution?
00:34:44.820 That is in the article about adjournments.
00:34:50.380 And it goes to, you know, normally, right, the houses decide for themselves when they're
00:34:55.360 in session.
00:34:55.920 Well, the Senate has not been out of, was never out of session the entire first Trump
00:35:03.340 presidency.
00:35:04.220 Mitch McConnell did not trust, this was a, the only reason he did that was because he
00:35:08.700 did not trust Trump to slide in a couple of nominations, correct?
00:35:13.180 They created this pro forma process where they basically gaveled themselves in, and they were
00:35:20.760 supposedly in session, but they really weren't in session.
00:35:24.800 But the Supreme Court upheld that in this case called Noel Canning versus the NLRB.
00:35:29.780 And so, you know, now it's well established that the Senate can use these pro forma adjournments,
00:35:36.400 and they're not, you know, pro forma coming into session when they're actually not there
00:35:41.040 doing business.
00:35:42.020 The Obama administration tried to say that during those, you know, sessions where they're
00:35:47.080 really not available, they're actually in recess, and therefore President Obama had
00:35:51.140 the recess appointment power.
00:35:52.600 But the Supreme Court disagreed.
00:35:54.380 They said that as we read the Constitution and its history, a recess of three days or less
00:36:02.620 is clearly insufficient to trigger the recess appointment power.
00:36:06.400 For recesses 10 days and longer, they said that that is long enough, then the power definitely
00:36:11.920 exists in the president.
00:36:13.220 And then they said that recesses essentially between the three days and the 10 days presumptively
00:36:17.620 are not long enough in order for the president to use the power.
00:36:20.800 So if the president wants to use the power and not have it be questioned, a recess has to
00:36:25.560 last 10 days or longer.
00:36:27.780 And what, and that, could the House say, I want a 10-day recess?
00:36:31.740 Yes.
00:36:32.140 And the president can force the Senate into a 10-day recess, and then he can put certain
00:36:38.200 of his nominees through?
00:36:39.440 Yes.
00:36:40.280 And so here are the response arguments.
00:36:43.020 Whelan, is it Whelan or Whelan?
00:36:44.860 Whelan, Ed Whelan.
00:36:45.620 Ed Whelan at National Review, put up a National Review online?
00:36:49.600 Yes.
00:36:50.200 Ed Whelan disagreed with you?
00:36:52.400 Yes.
00:36:52.740 And who is Ed Whelan?
00:36:54.520 Ed Whelan was at the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department.
00:36:58.180 So Office of Legal Counsel is the internal law firm for the Justice Department.
00:37:02.640 It kind of writes the opinion letters.
00:37:04.020 When you give them an executive order, they write essentially an opinion letter and helps
00:37:09.100 with the, make sure it's constitutional, correct?
00:37:11.200 Yes.
00:37:11.720 They're very serious people.
00:37:13.020 Yes.
00:37:13.520 And indeed, others...
00:37:14.740 And Ed Whelan is a very serious individual?
00:37:17.360 He is, yes.
00:37:18.480 You know him?
00:37:19.320 I do, yeah.
00:37:19.980 I've worked with him and, you know, I think he's a good guy.
00:37:23.940 I sort of tweeted about him today.
00:37:25.780 Look, you know, Ed, our kids had even played together at one point when we were both younger
00:37:29.660 men.
00:37:29.800 Had a play date?
00:37:30.900 We went, you know, mutual friend.
00:37:32.420 All of our kids were playing out in the house in Arlington.
00:37:36.340 And he's a very smart guy.
00:37:38.060 Like, I appreciate him, but I think...
00:37:39.800 Did he take you to task on this?
00:37:42.260 Or was it around the edges?
00:37:44.100 I think maybe he thinks he did, but I didn't think it was a very effective response.
00:37:48.240 So one of his responses, which he had launched before me, and now then he kind of used it
00:37:53.940 and put it in motion against me as well, is this idea that there would not be a disagreement
00:37:58.700 between the houses about recess, but rather the Senate would simply decide to stay in session.
00:38:04.040 So this seems to me to be quite a semantic argument, Steve.
00:38:09.000 So let me indulge your viewers and you to use what one of my law professors used to call a homely
00:38:14.480 analogy, by which he would mean he would try to take some complicated legal subject and turn it
00:38:19.600 into something everyone could understand.
00:38:21.420 So I'm going to blast back.
00:38:23.160 I'm 12 years old.
00:38:24.480 I'm over a friend's house, and we're shooting baskets, you know, against the backboard on his
00:38:30.660 driveway. And I say, hey, you know, this has been fun, but why don't you come over to my house
00:38:36.240 and we'll play air hockey? And, you know, he says, no, I want to keep playing basketball and
00:38:43.700 shoot the hoops, right? Well, what Ed is saying is that, you know, there's essentially an agreement
00:38:48.980 about, disagreement about whether to keep shooting hoops. There's not a disagreement about whether
00:38:53.920 to go over to my house and play air hockey, right? But in reality, they're just the flip side of each
00:38:58.440 other, right? A recess and a continuance of the Senate in session are just, you know, binaries,
00:39:04.340 like two different sides of the same coin. So to say that it's a dispute about staying in session
00:39:10.020 versus in recess, it's inherently a dispute about whether to take a recess. Therefore, if the two
00:39:14.800 houses disagree, whatever the Senate tries to say, like, well, we're not disagreeing with you about
00:39:19.160 a recess. We just want to stay in session. I don't think that's going to be good enough to stop
00:39:23.660 the president from using this power if he wants to. All right. Your scheme or your proposal here
00:39:29.700 to the president, would you use it after he tried? What was the act in 1998 that today he actually said
00:39:37.760 if I believe he said on a true social or said, if John Thune does not move my candidates,
00:39:45.400 my nominees through quickly on an orderly process, I will use this, what, the Avoidance Act of 1998?
00:39:56.360 So that statute's called the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, Steve, the FBRA. And it arose out of
00:40:03.640 disputes with a Clinton official, Lonnie Chen, who seemed to serve at the Civil Rights Division forever
00:40:11.220 without Senate confirmation. And so they put this act in place. But before I kind of unpack that act
00:40:16.120 a little bit, let me say, look, whenever you're dealing with relationships between the political
00:40:21.020 branches, you're dealing with a situation in which, you know, deals can be made, right, in which
00:40:27.020 arrangements can be struck. Maybe the president talks to the Senate and he, you know, leads senators,
00:40:33.700 and there are a few people that he wants to try to get recess appointed, you know, maybe,
00:40:38.840 and there are others that he makes an agreement, you know, they'll go through the full process or
00:40:42.540 whatever. These, these kinds of things may be taking place behind the scenes. And I think the
00:40:46.580 framers anticipated that before you go to the cudgels about something that might actually show up in
00:40:51.200 the courts, you exercise those softer persuasive, you know, tools that you have. All right. So now
00:40:58.040 about the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. So, hang on, because we're going to go to break. You can stick
00:41:02.940 around, right? Sure. What the, what the left is saying on TV and the Democrats are that these
00:41:12.220 appointments are in your face to actually take the government and start to tear it apart. And they,
00:41:20.260 defenders of the established order, are going to use the powers in the constitution of the Senate
00:41:27.720 basically being the human resources department. And that the FVRA option that President Trump,
00:41:34.420 I think, tweeted out earlier, and that Jeff Clark's idea are kind of these radical
00:41:40.160 tools that one reaches for when one can't get a cabinet nominee through a standard process.
00:41:51.460 Your response, sir?
00:41:52.340 Quick response is this case that I discussed with you, Noel Canning, which is the leading precedent on
00:41:58.260 the recess appointments clause. It's one where Obama was using it. He tried to put people on the
00:42:05.900 National Labor Relations Board during, you know, one of these short kinds of non-recesses because
00:42:12.640 they didn't go for long enough. I didn't hear anything from the Nicole Wallace's of the world 0.81
00:42:17.120 or the New York Times about like how terrible it was that Obama was trying to put recess
00:42:22.040 appointees in. It's only when they think their ox is being gored that they magically turn around.
00:42:27.100 Indeed, there was, I retweeted it today, there was, somebody put clips of Lawrence O'Donnell,
00:42:31.720 and I think it was Nicole Wallace, but it might have her wrong, but at least Lawrence O'Donnell
00:42:36.140 put out clips saying, you know, there's a constitutional power called the recess appointments
00:42:39.860 clause, and the president clearly has this power, right? So, you know, it's time for those
00:42:43.900 clips to get jammed back in their face, right? If Obama's exercising the power, they're totally good
00:42:48.480 with it, but if Donald John Trump wants to, they say no. Okay, hang on. We got a lot to get to.
00:42:53.100 Julie Kelly's going to join us. We got Brian Costello about the venture capitalists and business
00:42:58.040 with the Chinese Communist Party. Now, maybe an investigation is going to go on. We're going to
00:43:02.640 talk to Tina Peter's lawyer. Jeff Clark's going to stick around. We've got a lot going on.
00:43:06.100 Birchgold.com slash Bannon, or go to Bannon at 9-8-9-8-9-8 to get all the information from
00:43:14.340 Birchgold. Short commercial break. Back in a moment. Do you ever think, how can I work this
00:43:18.960 hard and still be in debt? The piles of overdue bills, the threatening phone calls, and never having
00:43:25.040 money to do anything. It just won't stop. You're trapped in debt. Done with debt is the way out.
00:43:32.080 They've developed aggressive new strategies to end your debt permanently. Done with debt stands between
00:43:38.660 you and harassing bill collectors. They tirelessly negotiate with your creditors to lower or even
00:43:44.460 forgive what you owe. And they do it all without bankruptcy or new additional loans. As one client
00:43:51.820 raved, quote, our phone call saved us a fortune. I wish we did this long ago, end quote. Bottom line,
00:44:01.080 done with debt has unique strategies to get you out of debt faster and put more money in your pocket
00:44:06.580 every month. But you need to hurry because some debt solutions are time sensitive and you don't
00:44:12.500 want to miss out. Visit donewithdebt.com. Talk with one of their debt relief strategists for free.
00:44:19.080 Let me repeat that. Go to donewithdebt.com and talk to one of their debt relief strategists for free.
00:44:24.320 You have nothing to lose except your debt. Go to donewithdebt.com. That is donewithdebt.com.
00:44:32.140 Do it today. Action, action, action. Here's your host, Stephen K. Mann.
00:44:41.440 Okay. Mike Lindell joins us. Mike, we missed you this morning on the morning show. The audience is
00:44:47.820 hankering for a deal. What do you got for his brother? Well, as you see, the bathrobes came in,
00:44:53.700 everybody. All the new bathrobes are on sale for the warm room posse, but we're running
00:44:57.980 the flannel sheets. We ran out a couple colors, but you guys get them. There's only a limited
00:45:04.720 stock in of the flannel sheets. It's Steve's favorite. It's the warm room posse's favorite.
00:45:09.640 They're as low as $59.99. There they are. Most of them are still in, you guys, but there's very low
00:45:17.200 supply. Get them while you can at this price. They're normally as high as $99.98, $50 off just on
00:45:26.860 that one, $59.98. And then if you go to the website, scroll down. There it is, everybody,
00:45:33.420 free shipping on your entire order. And no matter what you order, there's the flannel sheets. We have
00:45:39.920 the robes like I'm wearing. There they are, right? All the MyPillow clothing that's in,
00:45:44.260 that's a warm room exclusive. And remember, we have the $9.88 MyPillows. If you've never tried a
00:45:51.280 MyPillow, get the multi-use MyPillow, $9.88 and free shipping. I mean, you can't beat that. If
00:45:57.640 you've never tried, go, I'm not going to try it. You try it. It'll be the most amazing pillow you
00:46:01.780 ever slept on. And the mattress toppers, the mattress toppers, you guys have all took advantage of
00:46:09.000 those. The mattress toppers, 100% made, the USA, the queen size at $99.98. I mean, it's the lowest
00:46:17.420 price in history. And king size, I think, is $20 more. But you guys, it'll turn any bed into the
00:46:24.720 best bed in history. So it's a win-win-win. You're helping MyPillow employees. You're helping.
00:46:30.860 We love sponsoring the War Room, the best show on TV. And you're helping yourself to the best sleep
00:46:36.740 and best products in history. I'll tell you, you can't beat the new robes coming in, everybody.
00:46:41.280 So thanks, Steve. And thanks, War Room Posse. You guys have been absolutely amazing in supporting
00:46:46.900 our employees. Mike, we love you. And you did such a great job on election integrity. We actually won
00:46:53.080 in a landslide. Thank you, brother. Got a lot of work to do. Paper, ballast, same day voting. I got it.
00:46:58.220 And count the same day. Can we play the call over for Julie Kelly? Let's go and play it.
00:47:02.720 Yeah. How has the choice of Matt Gaetz changed the equation or has it?
00:47:08.340 It has. And that's the difference. There was worry about congressional investigations.
00:47:12.980 They expected that. But the choice of Gaetz, which was, I think, a real surprise to many people inside
00:47:17.760 the DOJ, you know, signaled everywhere, yes, that he, you know, he's a lawyer, but he's had no
00:47:23.180 experience prosecuting cases. But most of all, he is a firebrand loyalist, a very vocal supporter
00:47:29.000 of President Trump. And it's seen by people as a choice. It's someone who trusts, who Trump trusts,
00:47:35.780 and someone who, given the ethics investigation, sort of owes Trump. Trump is sort of protecting
00:47:40.560 him by giving him this new job just before the ethics report comes out. So it has raised fears
00:47:46.040 that there could actually be criminal investigations and prosecutions by the Trump administration of
00:47:51.760 career DOJ and FBI officials.
00:47:54.000 How would you quantify or can you quantify?
00:47:56.140 That plays much, much longer. We'll play that maybe in the next hour with Jeff Clark.
00:48:01.980 Julie Kelly, NBC News is reporting that Merrick Garland was shocked and stunned by the results,
00:48:09.360 that senior officials in DOJ were weeping on Tuesday the 5th in the evening as the results
00:48:17.240 came in. And now they're petrified. One of the segments all day long in every show,
00:48:21.980 one segment is about the fear inside the Justice Department for, of course, these uncalled for
00:48:28.660 criminal investigations. Your thoughts, ma'am?
00:48:32.100 Yes, I think it's legitimate. I've talked to people who are closer to DOJ than I am who say
00:48:36.800 that the fear and terror is real, not just among top DOJ officials, including Special Counsel Jack
00:48:44.480 Smith and his team. We could talk about his being a flight risk and leaving as Mark Zaid is recommending
00:48:52.220 top targets to flee the country around Inauguration Day. Just crazy talk. But that even lying prosecutors
00:48:59.660 are terrified that they are going to be investigated, which they should, for violating the 1A,
00:49:06.120 4A, 5A, 6A, 8A constitutional rights of January 6th defendants conspiring with the FBI and federal
00:49:15.260 judges to deny due process to Americans, most the overwhelming majority of whom had no criminal
00:49:22.020 record, committed no crime, but nonetheless had their lives destroyed at the hands of this bloodthirsty
00:49:28.860 DOJ led by Merrick Garland, Lisa Monaco, and of course, the D.C. U.S. attorney, Matthew Graves.
00:49:34.740 So the fear is real. It is gratifying to see the tables turn on this vengeful DOJ who has destroyed
00:49:43.000 so many lives over the past four years. And I'm sure that they're shocked, Steve, because I was in
00:49:51.060 courtrooms leading up to Election Day, seeing how they're treating J6ers. There was no indication 1.00
00:49:56.860 that they thought for a minute Donald Trump would win, that the January 6th, what they call the Capitol
00:50:02.520 siege investigation, would end, that pardons would take place, and furthermore, the tables turned,
00:50:10.060 as you said, the hunted becoming the hunters, which is precisely what's happening.
00:50:16.760 Mark Zayed, the lawyer, he's actually saying that Brother Jack Smith should exit the country
00:50:24.280 starting the afternoon of the 20th of January. Am I correct in saying that that's what he said?
00:50:29.180 He did not say it specifically, but Mark Zayed, as you know, the lawyer who represented Eric
00:50:36.240 Kiaramella, sorry, it's been a while since I've said his name, the so-called whistleblower in
00:50:43.460 Ukrainegate that prompted the first impeachment of Donald Trump, also Mark Zayed, just a long-time
00:50:49.100 dirty, dumb operative, openly recommending that people who fear prosecution, and this is DOJ officials, 0.72
00:50:57.400 but also past officials from the national security state, John Brennan, Jim Clapper. He also listed
00:51:03.500 Liz Cheney, this article in Politico listed Liz Cheney, to leave the country around Inauguration Day. 0.69
00:51:10.080 Now, why would he say that? Is he saying, well, these officials, former and current, should wait to see
00:51:16.520 what Donald Trump does on Inauguration Day, sign executive orders related to pardons or investigations?
00:51:23.580 Also, his acting attorney general and acting DCUS attorney, more importantly, will really decide how to
00:51:31.580 investigate those offices, right? Main justice, the special counsel's office, and then the DCUS attorney
00:51:38.020 investigating what happened in that office with those prosecutors and investigate. Are they going to
00:51:42.980 wait to see what happens the first few days and decide from there if they're going to become
00:51:47.080 fugitives and not return? Keep in mind, Steve, where was Jack Smith and David Harbaugh, also one of his
00:51:54.520 top prosecutors in a classified documents case that I covered? They were at the Hague in 2022,
00:52:01.620 overseeing the war crimes trial of the former president of Kosovo. Mayor Garland dispatched them here
00:52:08.460 from the U.S., they could easily go back.
00:52:11.060 Julie, just hang here for one second. You'll hold through the break. Tina Peters' lawyer, 1.00
00:52:17.100 Jeff Clark, will still be here. Tina Peters' lawyer is going to join us. And Brian Costello,
00:52:21.540 talk about Silicon Valley's participation in all this. Birchgold.com slash abandon the end of the
00:52:29.360 dollar empire. I will get into more of that in the second hour. Billy Strings takes his-
00:52:35.060 You owe back taxes, right? Here's the question. Why is the IRS targeting you and not millionaires
00:52:42.240 who owe a fortune compared to you? Rich people have tax attorneys. You probably don't. Tax Network
00:52:49.040 USA are patriots you want on your side to solve your IRS tax problems quickly and painlessly. Their
00:52:56.840 attorneys, strategists, and expert negotiators employ brilliant strategies designed to solve your IRS
00:53:03.980 problem quickly in your favor. They have a preferred direct line to the IRS. They know which agents to
00:53:12.320 talk to and which to avoid. And Tax Network USA learned of a limited-time special IRS offer. The IRS is
00:53:21.160 willing to forgive $1 billion in tax penalties. Find out if you qualify before it's too late. Schedule your free
00:53:29.940 confidential consultation now. Look, Tax Network USA has resolved over $1 billion in tax debts and they
00:53:38.560 offer a best-in-class client satisfaction guarantee. This is the team I recommend to solve your IRS problems
00:53:45.580 so you can get your life back. Call 1-800-958-1000 or visit TNUSA.com slash Bannon. TNUSA.com slash Bannon.
00:54:00.680 We'll include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients, and other additives that really aren't
00:54:05.760 benefiting your health. So that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of
00:54:10.880 quality supplements. And of course, the beef liver being our flagship products. For those who don't
00:54:16.480 know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10,
00:54:24.080 etc. And because it is 100% grass-fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better
00:54:31.560 than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general. So we have some
00:54:38.700 other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com
00:54:42.860 and cheers to your health.
00:54:45.180 700,000 Americans every year. Yes, heart disease is the number one killer every year, year in and year
00:54:51.540 out. Heart disease builds over time. Hypertension, high blood pressure, bad cholesterol, diabetes, all of
00:54:56.920 it affects our heart. A healthy heart is key to being energetic as we get older. It is never too early
00:55:04.800 to take care of your heart. You see, heart disease sneaks up on us. You can start in your 30s and when
00:55:11.100 this happens, you're at serious risk by the time you turn 60. If you want to take care of your heart
00:55:15.800 and those you care about, please go to warroomhealth.com. That's warroomhealth.com. All one word,
00:55:23.960 warroomhealth.com. Use the code warroom at checkout to save 67% of your first shipment. That's code warroom
00:55:31.220 at checkout to save 67%. Do it again. Warroomhealth, all one word, warroomhealth.com. Go there
00:55:38.300 today. You need, if you're going to be part of the posse, you need a strong heart. You need a lion's
00:55:43.260 heart. How we're going to do that is with Salty. Go there, do it today. Check it out.