Stephen K. Bannon is back in the War Room to discuss the latest in the Trump administration, including the indictments of Jair Bolsonaro and Andrew Yang, and the potential replacements for Chuck Hagel and Robert Dole.
00:03:41.000You know, Darren Beattie brings us up over at Revolver.
00:03:44.000And that there, there's, there's not as much edge on the transition this morning as it was on, was it Wednesday morning or Thursday morning or before Gates punched out?
00:04:15.000But, you know, Gates was the tip of the spear.
00:04:18.000In making sure that we keep great nominees that President Trump wants, Jeff Clark, you've done an extraordinary job of, and already there's a tweet out.
00:04:32.000He ran Heritage Action for a long time when Heritage was trying to reboot themselves and get a little more activist and get a little more Trumpy.
00:04:41.000They set up Heritage Action kind of off the Tea Party.
00:05:25.000And that is going back to, you know, ancient Rome and Greece and, you know, these these great books by Justinian on the law and up through the European tradition until we come to the era of the English common law and the English common law than many lawyers who've been practicing for 50, 60 years.
00:05:45.000So he's my secret weapon. We've worked on this paper.
00:05:51.000And they're working on formatting for the Web.
00:05:54.000And it's actually grown, Steve, to about over 40 pages because we found very new, important research about results about the recess appointment power.
00:06:05.000And in particular, we found that there are the analog of the presidential adjournment clause in the U.S. Constitution in various state constitutions that existed at the same time.
00:06:17.000And those clauses have been, in some instances, litigated.
00:06:22.000And when there are disagreements between the House, it has the same basic structure and the Senate in the state, then the governor can decide whether to send them into recess, sometimes with time caps, other times without time caps.
00:06:37.000What happens when the governor in these gubernatorial adjournment clauses says that that that there's a disagreement between the houses and he sends them into recess?
00:06:47.000The courts stay out of it and the courts say that the governor is the last word.
00:06:52.000Just as that is true and we established that as a historical matter in this paper, the president has that power under the U.S. Constitution, Steve.
00:07:09.000Because this is not, I'm not a constitutional lawyer.
00:07:12.000And I don't know this like Levin and these other guys do who know it backwards and forwards.
00:07:16.000When you say that, can you cite me where in the Constitution you're getting this, that he has this power?
00:07:24.000He has this power in Article 2, Section 3.
00:07:28.000And it provides that in a case of disagreement about adjournment, the president shall decide whether to send them into that adjournment for as long as he sees fit.
00:07:41.000And the only cap on that is that there's a separate constitutional requirement that Congress meet at least once a year starting in January.
00:07:49.000So the president doesn't have the power to do what the English king could do.
00:07:56.000The framers gave him a more limited power, but they gave him a power when the two houses disagree about going into adjournment to send the two houses into disagreement.
00:08:06.000And he is the judge of whether there's a disagreement or not.
00:08:09.000And once there is a recess, whether it happens because the president uses that power or whether it happens because the two houses agree to go into adjournment, the president has recess appointment power under Article 2, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, Steve.
00:09:32.000But I just want to make sure we clear this up.
00:09:35.000The House would actually want to go into recess for at least 10 days, correct?
00:09:41.000That would be that would be the initiator of the action.
00:09:44.000The president would then take the side of the House and force he would be the tiebreaker.
00:09:48.000He could essentially force the Senate into a 10 day recess is keep it simple to, you know, treat me like a golden retriever here or a small child, as they said in the movie Margin Call.
00:10:00.000So that the House would do it. And that's what Axios is saying.
00:10:04.000Don't think this is so simple because already you have members of the House and we have a what a one or two seat majority, three seat majority that Johnson doesn't have the bandwidth that he thinks he may have because there's still never Trump forces in the House.
00:11:09.000I mean, you know, that's obviously a dispute between the two houses of Congress.
00:11:16.000So right now, just for the audience, because this is going to be this is a this is a tool in the toolbox that could be a massive tool, a sledgehammer.
00:11:27.000I just want to reiterate right now, the blowback you're getting is not even from the left.
00:11:32.000The Jamie Raskins of the world have not jumped in here yet, correct?
00:11:35.000Right now you're getting it from you're getting it from establishment Republicans, sir.
00:11:41.000Yes, we're getting it from establishment Republicans.
00:11:44.000You mentioned the the Mike Pence think tank with Chapman.
00:11:49.000And then there's Ed Wayland at the the epic think tank, another conservative think tank.
00:11:58.000And why did they they're they're both Chapman over Pence's shop and Wayland are specifically saying you're wrong.
00:12:16.000But Ed Wayland is at least launching arguments and he's been putting those out both on X and on the National Review or National Review online.
00:12:25.000And, you know, the one one argument is that the text of the Constitution talks about the time of adjournment.
00:12:31.000I've seen some suggest that unless there's a disagreement about the exact duration of the recess as opposed to whether to go into recess or not, that would somehow turn the claws off.
00:12:43.000I don't think that makes any sense. And then the other argument is the one that I sketch for you, Steve, that if the Senate simply says they want to stay in session, there's no power for the House to disagree with that.
00:12:56.000But therefore, there's not a disagreement. And I would you know, I described this to you before in a prior appearance.
00:13:02.000But if there are two people, one who wants to do one activity and the other one who wants to do a different one, then they have a disagreement.
00:13:09.000And in this instance, if the House wants to go into recess, there's a disagreement that relates to going into recess.
00:13:19.000Jeff Clark, thank you very much. Where do people get you at CRA? Where do you get you on social media?
00:13:24.000Sure. So we are at AmericaRenewing.com and that's where the piece will go up once it is formatted.
00:13:31.000And I am at Jeff Clark US on X and Getter and at Real Jeff Clark on Truth Social, Steve.
00:13:55.000A source contacted me at the end of the 10 o'clock hour and wanted to reaffirm and appreciated this contact close to President Trump.
00:14:06.000I appreciated what we did and making sure all the information was out about Mike Rogers and particularly that hit that he did today on Fox when Fox and Kill Mead and all that were pushing him so hard that Rogers is now officially out of the running for director of FBI.
00:14:24.000Cash is not there yet, but Rogers is out.
00:14:27.000We're going to take a short commercial break.
00:16:31.000He keeps the criminal case alive, but it's all been kind of shut down, the sentencing.
00:16:37.000From Stephen Chung, the great comms director over at, over with President Trump and one of our guys for years here.
00:16:45.000In a decisive win for President Trump, the hoax Manhattan case is now fully stayed and sentencing is adjourned.
00:16:52.000President Trump won a landslide victory as the American people have issued a mandate to return him to office and dispose of all remnants of the witch hunt cases.
00:17:03.000All of the sham lawfare attacks against President Trump are now destroyed and we are focused on making America great again.
00:17:11.000End quote from Stephen Chung, comms director for the, for the transition and the White House.
00:17:17.000Our own Stephen Chung, one of the greats.
00:17:19.000So, Natalie Winters, I want to talk, Norm Eisen's tweet is out first.
00:17:25.000Start with this, their lawfare and Norm Eisen's in the mumble tank this morning, a blockbuster ruling out of New York.
00:17:33.000And then I want to talk about the rest of the resistance, ma'am.
00:17:36.000Yeah, I mean, I couldn't think of a better segue into everything that we're going to get into, right?
00:17:42.000Obviously, this is a temporary victory for the Trump team, but you can already see Norm Eisen in the lawfare brigade saying, well, this is just a temporary halt.
00:17:51.000And you've already sort of seen the refrain on MSNBC become, well, for these four years, we can pause the prosecutions against President Donald J. Trump.
00:17:59.000But once he's out of office, we're just going to resume and we're going to pick all these shenanigans up.
00:18:04.000Which is why it's so important to go after these people justifiably and set the precedent that there will be no accountability, no amnesty, not just for the 10 million plus illegals, but for these lawfare apparatchiks.
00:18:15.000And I think it's worth noting, just real quick, off of the discussion you were having with Jeff Clark, if you want to get signal, not noise, Jamie Raskin is now jockeying to lead the Judiciary Committee.
00:18:26.040He was previously heading oversight, coming for the one and only Jerry Nadler to try to take over.
00:18:32.200It was announced via Axios yesterday, so I think you can really see that the lawfare strategy is not going to go away.
00:18:39.260They're just doubling down, so we can celebrate these temporary victories, but they're just that.
00:18:44.000They're temporary, and to that point, I'm sure Norm Eisen is probably hit a little bit hard by the news coming out of New York today.
00:18:50.880But there's an interesting story that I think sort of confirms really what we've been hammering home on this show, and this takes us out to the great state of Arizona.
00:19:00.680The Daily Signal is able to obtain exclusive documents if Denver wants to toss it up on screen.
00:19:07.720But it basically shows that Norm Eisen, who leads this group, States United Democracy Center, it's part of sort of the left-wing election integrity apparatus.
00:19:19.580They are always hurling the insults of, you know, we're anti-democracy, we're autocrats.
00:19:24.500Norm Eisen, of course, being a key figure, a color revolution extraordinaire who's practiced these sort of regime change optics and antics overseas.
00:19:33.520Now, of course, bringing, like they always do, those tactics here at home.
00:19:38.340But this document, it's a 43-page memo that Norm Eisen's group circulated to the Arizona Attorney General, Chris Mays, about a year before that AG office eventually brought indictments to, what, 18 alternate electors and just Trump supporters more broadly,
00:19:57.740outlining with painful detail how exactly they thought that this prosecution should materialize both, A, encouraging the office to just pursue the case at face value.
00:20:09.060But more importantly, if you look at the symmetry between what they were suggesting, not just in terms of the identities, but the charges that they should pursue, it's nearly the same.
00:20:18.540This organization was also tweeting about how the AG was looking in to all of these individuals and potentially pursuing criminal indictments months before anything was made public.
00:20:30.640So when you talk about this sort of lawfare collusion, I think this is a perfect example.
00:20:35.220But, Steve, I think this also dovetails quite nicely and almost concerningly with what we're seeing go on, particularly when it comes to establishment Republican opposition,
00:20:44.620because so many of the board members, in addition to color revolution extraordinaire Norm Eisen, of this group that was encouraging the Arizona AG to go after Trump supporters, people like Kelly Ward, are the bushy Republican types.
00:20:58.900Michael Steele, former RNC chair, was intimately involved in this effort.
00:21:03.680So when you see the resistance coming from both wings of both the establishment wing of the Republican Party and Democrats, I think this story is another perfect example.
00:21:11.760And to sort of use this to now backtrack into giving you an update on the status of the resistance, if Denver wants to toss it up on screen, there's an interesting press release coming out showing, I'll read the,
00:21:25.100it's 280 organization coalition launches multimillion dollar legal effort to combat threats to people, democracy expected in Trump fans' administration.
00:21:35.380And you can guess, who do they quote in the press release?
00:21:38.160It's none other than Norm Eisen, and they go through rattling off all the groups, whether it's the Brennan Center, American Atheists, right?
00:21:47.900It's a whole slew of just awful, awful far left groups.
00:21:51.740But it shows you, I think, what we've been talking about, that what you're seeing be hurled against all of President Trump's nominees right now.
00:22:00.560It's just a continuation of this bogus lawfare.
00:22:04.920Just two more points to bring up resistance updates, since apparently no one else in conservative media wants to focus on this.
00:22:11.520They all just want to have premature victory parties.
00:22:15.460The governors, the state's rights sort of leg of the stool that is shaping up to be so imperative to the resistance.
00:22:22.380We've got some new reporting on who's exactly funding the new Democratic Governors Group.
00:22:28.740It runs through people who are linked to the Lincoln Project, Pierre Omidar.
00:22:32.400But more interesting, GovAct is the sort of umbrella organization that oversees so much of this.
00:22:39.040And one of their board members is none other than Sally Yates, of course, the former acting AG from the first 10 days of the Trump administration.
00:22:49.920Another cautionary tale of why we need to have the landing teams in there and delousing so much of these corrupt agencies.
00:22:58.120And I think to wrap this all up for people who say, oh, Natalie, your hair's on fire over the resistance.
00:23:06.680Well, the Communist Party USA just had their resistance 2.0 meeting.
00:23:11.600And I was able to obtain transcripts from some of their November 16th committee speeches.
00:23:18.480And, of course, it's really actually fun to read.
00:23:21.060It's riddled with a bunch of comrade references.
00:23:23.780But they talk about how they're openly collaborating with a lot of these key resistance groups like Indivisible and that they are very supportive.
00:23:33.220And they're working burning down the phone lines to get all of these judges confirmed and that they're already setting up these sort of premature collective action networks because, of course, to help fight against the mass deportation.
00:23:45.540And so the New York Times may have their lead story on the resistance, if Denver wants to toss it up, that gets somebody else to do it.
00:23:54.260But I think it's pure Sun Tzu strategy where it's appearing weak when you're strong because I think this resistance is pretty darn strong on both sides of the aisle.
00:24:03.140I want to go back to how this is all in the way they the way they fight because there's there's smart, tough people.
00:24:13.780I mean, hey, you didn't build this administrative and deep state by being morons because it's been very effective for them.
00:24:20.800You talk about it. This fight we're having up on the on the on the on the hill with the Senate on the judges is inextricably linked to their they look at a battlefield and political warfare and information warfare is all inextricably linked.
00:24:36.880And this is why Icing these guys in the in the the part about Jamie Raskins is hugely important.
00:24:43.760You're kind of having a revolt. The one thing that happened on the 5th of December, one of the many things that happened, Pelosi thought she was going to break me by putting in a federal prison and take me off the battlefield.
00:24:55.160But it turned out the next man up. You guys did a magnificent job.
00:25:00.280I was able to kind of give a little bit of guidance from Danbury, but you guys stepped up and it was just magnificent about one thing.
00:25:05.980It wasn't about there was no strategy decisions had to be made.
00:25:09.840This is all about mass mobilization to get out the vote of low information voters, low, low, you know, low propensity, low information voters and also to fill out all the billets on the voter integrity side.
00:25:23.760And that was done magnificently by this audience. Right. And and it pulled it off.
00:25:29.720Nancy Pelosi was broken on the 5th. She came into that all powerful.
00:25:34.280And she thought since she was the one that made the move on Biden and got to Kamala Harris, but her screw up was not having a mini primary, just anointing Harris.
00:25:43.200They thought, let's just jam it in. We can beat Trump because we control the media.
00:25:47.060We control the billionaires. We control it all.
00:25:49.640Her failure has led to a revolt on Capitol Hill on their side.
00:25:52.740Now, they don't get the media coverage we get because obviously they want to see every time there's fighting, either in Trump world or between Trump world, MAGA movement and the establishment.
00:26:02.660It's covered with 10 reporters at The Washington Post and New York Times.
00:26:06.800They never really cover theirs. But to your point, and it's the first time I've heard somebody bring it up.
00:26:11.320But Jamie Raskin and these are making a move on some of the older guys around the committee said, you guys are too old.
00:26:18.560Right. You're too set in your ways. We need to be on offense constantly.
00:26:23.120And the resistance is a major political operation will be on Capitol Hill in these committees in minority positions.
00:26:30.360And you're about to see where we kept saying, hey, we're kind of hapless in the minority.
00:26:35.100We should be much more powerful. You're about to see the tools the minority has because Raskin and these guys are smart and tough.
00:26:42.040Give me a minute on that before we go to break, Natalie.
00:26:45.240Well, look, the Communist Party USA and their speeches about resistance 2.0, they gave several shout outs to the MAGA grassroots, this audience.
00:26:53.500We beat them at their own game of community organizing.
00:26:56.500But to that point, I mean, I think look no further than what they've done to the border, what they've done to Ukraine.
00:27:01.940Right. When something is broken, when something is so destroyed beyond repair, you can rebuild it.
00:27:07.160Right. You can be unburdened by what has been. That's a Marxist talking point.
00:27:10.860And that's what they'll try to do with the Democratic Party.
00:27:13.300They will get the civil war that they always wanted to rebuild the Democratic Party in the image of people who are actual fighters like Jamie Raskin.
00:27:21.640Not these old, you know, blob and no pun intended people like Jerry Nadler.
00:27:26.060So they're going to have the fight that they've always wanted.
00:27:28.660And you can see the mass mobilization from the grassroots side already bubbling up.
00:32:44.740I think it was the deep state that forced me to be a pundit for four months when they tossed you into prison.
00:32:50.720I'm glad we get to return to tradition where I get to do actual reporting.
00:32:55.460I know the New York Magazine piece said that we focus here in the war room on asymmetric warfare, of course, information warfare being a key component of that.
00:33:05.360I think we've really been focusing how post-2024 election, right, all these ideas that it's misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy theories that cost Kamala Harris, particularly among young men.
00:33:20.520It's a report from Open the Books talking about how under Biden's administration, they spent over a quarter of a billion dollars on studies, grants, research related to combating what they describe as the spread of misinformation.
00:33:37.380It was a 44-fold increase from the entirety of the Trump administration, which accounts to about 3,700 percent uptick in money spent on misinformation studies.
00:33:52.300Now, I would also add that the numbers probably even more because they only looked at studies that explicitly said misinformation, and you know that they sort of like to use euphemistic terms and they're not super direct in the information warfare landscape.
00:34:06.120But I think this is very, very critical because it shows something that I think we've hammered on this show, which is the idea that misinformation is such an existential threat to democracy, to the world, you know, more broadly.
00:34:19.160Misinformation was something, misinformation was something that was never really around until President Trump won.
00:34:24.980And if you look at the broader tracking of government grants to what they say or they describe as combating misinformation, there wasn't a single grant really on the books until President Trump came around.
00:34:35.640And I'm inclined to bring up one study in particular that we had, I think, two years ago in December, and it had to do with money coming from the National Science Foundation to do what they called pre-bunking populist messaging, particularly around the COVID-19 pandemic.
00:34:52.300And this really gets to the heart of it, which I think there's a significant overlap with what you're seeing going on right now in Brazil, how they're using the same playbook.
00:34:59.580But misinformation has always been a key and critical part that they've used to quash the populist movement and decry anything we say is incorrect.
00:35:09.240I would just ask the New York Times that said that this show was the number one spreader of misinformation because of what we said about what, election fraud and COVID vaccines?
00:35:17.460Well, how have the facts panned out since that piece?
00:35:19.560I noticed, Steve, they didn't try to come back and run another hit piece on us the preceding year, saying that we were still the number one spreader of misinformation because newsflash, we were right on everything.
00:35:30.620But I think the cautionary tale of this story, and it's something that we've had Mike Benz and Darren Beatty on to really hammer home, is that they will double and triple down on the idea that it was misinformation and disinformation that cost them the election.
00:35:43.880Ergo, they're going to double and triple down on the censorship efforts and how they're going to do that.
00:35:49.340They're going to do the strategy they've always done, where the United States can provide the capital through private funding ventures.
00:35:55.840But it's going to be overseas globalist institutions like the Center for Countering Digital Hate, the Global Disinformation Index, the United Nations to usher in this new era of censorship.
00:36:06.100Case in point, just two days ago, the United Nations announced that they have a new climate change disinformation agenda where they're going to be bringing all their member states together to push back and fund studies that are going to quash what they say are bogus narratives about climate change, pushing for, of course, green energy, green energy type deals.
00:36:26.840Also, another case study, I think you're going to see a lot of these misinformation efforts start to come from the hotbeds of resistance, right?
00:36:35.900It's going to be state and local officials to this point out in Michigan.
00:36:41.120They just, I believe, Democrats in the state house just passed a bill that would fine Michigan residents for spreading what they say is election misinformation.
00:36:49.900So you're going to see a reorientation of the censorship efforts because they no longer technically, at least du jour, control the apparatus of the State Department and USAID, though I do think the selection of Marco Rubio makes that a little bit more of a precarious fight.
00:37:05.980But they're just going to reshuffle the board and how they come for us via censorship.
00:37:09.340Over at DHS and State, what's your recommendation, right, if you were on the transition team or in there, about making sure we gut this?
00:37:20.080Because you're going to have to gut it, right?
00:37:22.040And all those guys in those departments are going to play nicey-nicey with Rubio and Nome and these teams that are going in.
00:37:28.060So you have to know this at the level of Ben's or yourself.
00:37:37.520I would take all of the taxpayer funds that they have appropriated for censorship and create some sort of free speech First Amendment commission where Americans have a hotline that they can call when they're censored and people actually go after and look into those reports while they're actively working with, not in the clandestine, behind-closed-doors secret way trying to deplatform and debank Americans, but out in public working and pressuring these social media companies to uphold principles of free speech.
00:38:04.820And I think you could probably trim most of the workforce.
00:38:07.720You only need a few people doing that.
00:38:10.200And I would use the outstanding resources and do what the American people elected President Trump to do and what the DHS is set up for, and that's the damn mass deportations.
00:38:20.640CISA, by the way, there's an interesting clip.
00:38:22.960Maybe we'll play it, you know, come in a few days.
00:38:25.760But the former, I believe, deputy director or lead at CISA for some level of infrastructure capacity building, she's on tape saying that we realize that the cybersecurity and infrastructure components of the newly formed CISA agency in 2018, yeah, that was all a smoke show.
00:38:45.700It was all about social media and policing disinformation.
00:38:49.480And I truly think that that clip may be some of the most important speech or just talk that you've had about the origins of CISA since its inception because that's the quiet part out loud, right?
00:39:00.600That's the admission that they use as a Trojan horse, these lofty ideas, whether it's, you know, oh, we need to protect cybersecurity.
00:39:09.300Yeah, how many hacks have we seen lately going on?
00:39:11.460I don't think they're doing all that good of a job, but they use that to Trojan horse in these huge, lofty censorship efforts, and they're going global, too.
00:39:21.980They don't do anything on the cybersecurity front, and if they do, they're all incompetent, so I would fire all of them.
00:39:27.700Just look at the CrowdStrike hack we recently had.
00:39:30.240But these people are there for one thing only.
00:39:32.420They might be career civil servants, but what they're doing is purely political, and it's censoring Americans, their fellow Americans, because they dare to criticize Joe Biden or COVID origins or election fraud.
00:39:45.580And it's going to, unless we defund it or take down the apparatus inside the administrative and deep state, it's going to continue on.
00:39:53.060It's a cancer inside Trump's second term, correct?
00:39:58.180I mean, look, just in the same way that the Atlantic called for pandemic amnesty, that's what these people want, because they know if they can get away with it, they'll do it again, right?
00:40:07.380And they're going to keep trying to censor us.
00:40:09.260They're going to keep trying to say that everything we say is disinformation and conspiracy theories.
00:40:15.560And it's not just that they get away with it, Steve.
00:40:17.460They see their budget continually balloon because House Republicans not just refuse to vote to tank the CISA director salary to zero, but they continually increase their budget every single year to censor their constituents.
00:40:30.760So CISA, DHS, whatever you want to say, they're only more emboldened.
00:40:35.480And keep in mind, the DHS is being targeted and harassed right now by all of these resistance-type activists who want them not just to cancel any future contracts when it comes to building detention centers, they want to empty the current detention centers that we already have.
00:40:50.820And there's reporting out yesterday in the New York Post that the Biden regime is already getting ready to let in massive waves of migrants.
00:40:59.240They're actually building a new app in early December to help with ICE processing and jamming these people through the system.
00:41:06.780So if they want to say it's retribution, stop victim-blaming.
00:41:10.120It's justice because they're trying to destroy the country.
00:42:18.380Your Republican senators, one of their top priorities was to make Gates commit that if we confirm you, the shit I want to trade off is no going after Fauci.
00:46:02.320Why is this audience excited about the ground beef?
00:46:05.400Not just the size, the 30-pound blowout.
00:46:07.880But what's so special about your ground beef, ma'am?
00:46:11.080Well, actually, Steve, as of this week, there was a huge recall from a facility in, I believe it was Minnesota, because they had E. coli in their burger.
00:46:25.120So our facility here in Wyoming is USDA inspected.
00:46:30.080It is the cleanest facility you've ever seen.
00:48:05.220But, you know, we are a full-service USDA-sanctioned processing facility right here in Wyoming where we raise all, you know, really high-quality beef, high-quality genetics, no hormones, no antibiotics.
00:48:21.100So we can offer you guys the best and healthiest product on the market.
00:51:41.480We're going to continue on the fight in the transition to make sure that the programs and people and policies of President Trump and the Trump movement, MAGA,
00:52:04.580I think that one got delayed or maybe even canceled because of the big sweeping victory that you guys helped President Trump with on the 5th of November.
00:54:06.700We'll include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients, and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health.
00:54:14.000So that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements.
00:54:18.980And, of course, the beef liver being our flagship product.
00:54:22.200For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc.
00:54:31.060And because it is 100% grass-fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general.
00:54:44.160So we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to SacredHumanHealth.com.