Bannon's War Room - Episode 4467： Media Continues To Lie About Trade Policy; Reshoring Manufacturing And Rebuild Our Economy

00:00:00.000 Trump keeps saying we're spending $200 billion a year to subsidize Canada.

00:00:05.580 But for fact's sake, that is not remotely true.

00:00:09.140 It's not even clear what he's talking about.

00:00:11.380 He might be talking about the trade deficit.

00:00:14.600 But last year, America's trade deficit with Canada in goods and services was only about $45 billion.

00:00:20.500 Even when you look at just the goods, the deficit was $63 billion.

00:00:24.880 But there is a bigger problem.

00:00:26.600 This is not a subsidy to begin with.

00:00:30.000 And I want you to think about this.

00:00:31.640 Think about this administration for a moment.

00:00:34.020 It is filled with the wealthiest group of businessmen we have ever seen in any modern White House.

00:00:40.260 Yet not a single one of them has explained to the president that when the richest country in the world, that's us,

00:00:46.800 buys more stuff from other countries than they buy from us, it's not a subsidy.

00:00:52.540 We want and need the stuff that those other countries make. 0.94

00:00:55.820 We don't have the resources to make everything in America, or we've chosen not to.

00:01:00.000 Part of capitalism is American companies making choices about whether or not they would rather produce things here or import them from other countries.

00:01:09.120 Importing is not necessarily a bad thing.

00:01:12.340 A trade deficit is not necessarily a bad thing.

00:01:14.920 And the businessmen surrounding the president in this White House, they know that.

00:01:19.600 But they appear to have no interest in telling him, which leaves our economy in the hands of someone who apparently wants to isolate America as the rest of the world economy is moving on without us.

00:01:33.880 These cases involving the administration and immigration policy.

00:01:37.400 We keep hearing about due process applying to non-citizens.

00:01:41.460 Many people are asking why.

00:01:42.700 Can you explain this?

00:01:44.500 Absolutely.

00:01:45.300 Due process is guaranteed by the Constitution in two different places.

00:01:49.900 It was one of the foundational guarantees that the founders of this country insisted upon.

00:01:55.120 It was a key cause of the revolution.

00:01:57.700 It traces its roots all the way back to the Magna Carta in 1215.

00:02:01.140 And I say all that because these are not just words on a page.

00:02:04.800 This is one of the most foundational promises of a free and democratic society.

00:02:11.180 Without due process, any of us can be snatched up off the street, imprisoned, deported, without any trial, without any hearing, without a judge even taking a look to see if there are charges against us, to see if those charges are legitimate.

00:02:25.260 It is fundamentally anti-American to reject the premise of due process.

00:02:30.120 After the Civil War, one of the very first things that the Reconstruction Congress did was apply the guarantee of due process to the states so that everyone would be protected.

00:02:38.740 The states, the federal government, the president himself, every single government official in this country must respect every person's right to due process.

00:02:47.940 Not just every citizen, not just every lawful immigrant, but every person.

00:02:52.240 That's not me riffing.

00:02:53.280 That is the language of the Constitution.

00:02:55.200 It literally could not be clearer.

00:02:57.100 Yeah, I'm kind of surprised to see that this completely unthought out, sort of off-the-cuff tariff deal hasn't resulted in China bending to American wheel.

00:03:10.620 Will, who could have predicted that?

00:03:12.900 Everyone.

00:03:13.560 Anyone who has ever studied economics, global economics, or China could have told you that.

00:03:18.640 So, you have to wonder what the endgame is here, because it just has seemed to be so haphazard and random and just simply not strategically thought out.

00:03:32.560 I don't know what they thought was going to be the outcome of this unforced error of just declaring a war on our closest trading partners and allies.

00:03:43.400 It kind of beggars the imagination.

00:03:47.080 Have we ever seen our Constitution been tested in this way like this before?

00:03:52.300 I think only the Civil War could be a comparison to our current moment.

00:03:56.820 To see a president and, frankly, also a Congress abandon these basic premises of our Constitution.

00:04:04.380 You know, the framers really did not envision a president as corrupt and lawless as Trump entering office.

00:04:11.640 They constructed an office whose holder would not be able to wield so much power and push down so many checks and balances.

00:04:20.320 Unfortunately, the United States Supreme Court took away a lot of the checks and balances on the president in decisions like the horrible immunity ruling from last summer.

00:04:29.440 And so, we are left now with a president who feels, understandably, that he's empowered to push aside any constitutional restrictions that clash with his agenda.

00:04:38.320 He came in saying he wanted to do mass deportations.

00:04:41.680 And the reality is you cannot do deportations at that scale without violating due process, the rights of both immigrants and citizens who will be caught up in those raids.

00:04:52.480 I mean, we had ICE raids here in Washington, D.C. today, masked agents bursting into restaurants, attempting to arrest undocumented immigrants.

00:05:00.760 What if a citizen was there and was Hispanic and didn't have their passport on them and got snatched up and put on a plane that was sent to El Salvador?

00:05:08.880 Without due process, that person is gone, possibly forever.

00:05:13.000 That's why the Supreme Court intervened recently to try to put some restraints on what Trump is doing here.

00:05:18.120 But the Supreme Court has not been a consistent protector of liberty under this administration yet.

00:05:22.640 And I really hope it wakes up to the threat that Trump poses.

00:05:24.980 This is the primal scream of a dying regime.

00:05:32.740 Pray for our enemies.

00:05:34.680 Because we're going medieval on these people.

00:05:37.960 I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people.

00:05:42.220 The people have had a belly full of it.

00:05:44.140 I know you don't like hearing that.

00:05:45.580 I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that.

00:05:47.320 But you're not going to stop it.

00:05:48.260 It's going to happen.

00:05:49.520 And where do people like that go to share the big lie?

00:05:52.920 Mega Media.

00:05:53.820 I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.

00:05:59.700 Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?

00:06:03.460 If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.

00:06:09.820 War Room.

00:06:10.680 Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

00:06:13.040 All right.

00:06:19.000 Morning, everyone.

00:06:19.640 Dave Bratt sitting in with the great Stephen K. Bannon.

00:06:22.660 He's out on assignment today.

00:06:24.520 So I got a thousand newspapers in front of me.

00:06:27.400 Yesterday was a little bit slower news day.

00:06:30.300 Today is absolutely huge.

00:06:32.500 I'll just start off with a few remarks.

00:06:37.460 Stephanie Ruel from MSNBC there.

00:06:40.780 The whole world is moving on without us.

00:06:43.780 The whole world is moving on without us.

00:06:46.380 I was in a room with 20 ambassadors last night who love the United States and are in trade

00:06:52.460 talks with us.

00:06:54.560 They're not moving on without us.

00:06:55.880 They want us.

00:06:56.660 They want to be friends.

00:06:57.700 So she missed those 20.

00:06:59.340 And I think she's wrong on a whole host of other countries that are moving our way.

00:07:04.420 But she's not alone.

00:07:06.380 MSNBC on the more liberal progressive side of things is in agreement with the Wall Street

00:07:13.340 Journal.

00:07:13.940 One of our favorite papers here at the War Room, tongue in cheek, Washington's trade

00:07:19.260 war spurs other nations to make deals.

00:07:22.860 So here's the Wall Street Journal.

00:07:26.280 You think they would know their business and economics here.

00:07:29.100 Let me read a couple of lines.

00:07:30.220 The U.S. is backing away from free trade under President Trump, but much of the rest of

00:07:36.140 the world is not.

00:07:37.720 Huh.

00:07:38.260 The U.S. is backing away from free trade with whom, dear Wall Street Journal, with China?

00:07:47.220 Can you do free trade with a country that's a communist totalitarian surveillance state?

00:07:52.120 Wall Street Journal, I'd love to hear a response to this.

00:07:55.080 Are you serious that you can do, that we can do, the U.S. can do free trade with China?

00:08:01.060 Please just answer me just that one, right?

00:08:04.060 And that's a good start.

00:08:05.940 The rest of the countries, the G20 people, the Trump chart that came up that's kind of

00:08:13.280 correlated with the size of the trade deficits, is mirrored by exactly Bank of America with

00:08:20.120 a similar chart, Bank of America, World Bank, PricewaterhouseCoopers, I think.

00:08:26.200 All the G20 countries have 200 to 300 percent higher tariff and non-tariff barriers against

00:08:32.480 us than we have on them, two to three times, 300 percent, all of the G20 rich countries.

00:08:41.440 Tariffs against us.

00:08:42.780 Are they free trade?

00:08:44.180 We're backing away from free trade.

00:08:46.360 And now they're moving toward free trade.

00:08:49.420 They're lowering their tariff and non-tariff barriers.

00:08:52.060 And the Wall Street Journal, I mean, come on, guys.

00:08:54.740 This is just really bad.

00:08:56.280 Who wrote this thing?

00:08:56.940 Max Colchester and Kim McRiel, quote, the U.S. is acting as an accelerant to the lowering

00:09:04.860 of tariffs by everyone else later in the story.

00:09:08.280 I mean, he's got economic theory.

00:09:12.380 You know, when you do science, the theory is supposed to try to match the data or have

00:09:16.060 the tell a story that matches the data.

00:09:18.180 And that's what theory is.

00:09:19.060 You guys are not shooting straight here.

00:09:22.160 And this reporting by the Wall Street Journal, it seems similar in tone.

00:09:27.760 You can tell when I hope you can tell when I'm joking.

00:09:31.240 No one can match the great Steve Bannon.

00:09:32.860 And so I try to use humor as my source.

00:09:36.360 But the Wall Street Journal, let me shift over to another great newspaper that the Wall Street

00:09:42.340 Journal seems to be mind-melting with is the China Daily, the China Daily paper.

00:09:48.740 China, China.

00:09:51.060 Their headline today, Tariff Barrage Hits Harder in Washington.

00:09:56.420 Washington's so-called reciprocal tariffs, this is China writing, by the way, right, are

00:10:01.360 hurting the U.S. more than China. 0.76

00:10:03.600 I don't think so.

00:10:04.680 Because if you go out on YouTube right now, you're going to see riots and rebellions and

00:10:11.400 marching in the streets of people who are not getting paid.

00:10:14.140 They're not getting their wages.

00:10:15.800 They're not getting their retirement benefits.

00:10:18.440 They're not getting paid.

00:10:21.400 Their jobs have laid them off.

00:10:22.840 They're moving on to other people.

00:10:24.020 In China, what they do to solve that problem is they arrest the employer.

00:10:27.940 That's a novel idea.

00:10:29.260 So all the people concerned about civil liberties and justice in the news clips you just saw,

00:10:35.680 you might want to contact China on that one.

00:10:38.900 In an exclusive interview with China Daily, Justin Yifu Lin, dean of the Institute of the

00:10:43.940 New Structural Economics at Peking University, said that the U.S. ignores basic economic rules

00:10:52.600 when it claims to suffer losses from trade with China.

00:10:56.120 The U.S. is missing the rules.

00:11:00.260 So we've set up the rules-based order that made the whole world rich after World War II.

00:11:05.940 Those rules are great.

00:11:07.200 We follow them.

00:11:07.940 We put them in place, right?

00:11:08.960 We founded the World Bank, the IMF, the United Nations, all of it.

00:11:12.900 We allow China into our trade regimes.

00:11:15.060 They cheat.

00:11:15.580 They steal our intellectual property rights.

00:11:18.840 They violated every trade agreement we've had.

00:11:22.860 Navarro's gone over that.

00:11:23.980 He's got books on it.

00:11:24.900 And China writes the following.

00:11:30.040 Trade is mutually beneficial.

00:11:33.280 Different countries have different comparative advantages.

00:11:35.640 The U.S. buys Chinese products because they are of better quality and cheaper than those

00:11:40.020 produced in the U.S. and vice versa, et cetera.

00:11:42.680 It does not make any sense for the U.S. administration to claim it suffers losses from trade with China.

00:11:48.860 Look at our trade deficits.

00:11:50.280 Look at the gutting of 5 million manufacturing jobs.

00:11:54.520 We, the United States of America, is only doing $2.5 trillion of manufacturing this year.

00:12:00.160 China is doing $5 trillion worth of manufacturing.

00:12:03.200 A lot of that came from the United States.

00:12:05.260 That's why Trump is doing what he's doing.

00:12:07.440 He is moving manufacturing and therefore capital equipment back.

00:12:11.540 As we said on the show yesterday, we have $2 trillion commitments from U.S. firms, as Steve pointed out,

00:12:16.640 and $7 trillion total capital investment promises, commitments made to President Trump.

00:12:23.080 $7 trillion, the last administration, no other administration I've never even heard of a strategy that's in the ballpark here.

00:12:32.260 So there's going to be a few ripples along the way.

00:12:34.720 It'd be nice if the Federal Reserve would accommodate that, right, to give American people jobs.

00:12:39.440 They accommodate $2.5 trillion government spending deficits every year without question.

00:12:45.140 They accommodate Wall Street bailouts without question, but their dual mandate, which includes jobs and employment,

00:12:53.120 it seems to be good to put the American worker back to work at wages that matter.

00:12:58.720 So that's the China Daily.

00:13:00.320 And then just one other piece of interest, if you want to know who China likes and who they don't like,

00:13:09.000 and this is a hint for the politicians in the U.S.

00:13:12.520 I've heard a lot of folks not talking polite and not being nice to our war room friends around town here when I get up here.

00:13:21.280 And so here's another headline.

00:13:23.140 I want you to see it because Steve says the print matters.

00:13:26.360 This is China Daily again.

00:13:28.640 Navarro still up to his anti-China tricks.

00:13:32.640 So who does China name by name when they want to play hardball and make a point, 0.93

00:13:39.960 and they're spending money on this print?

00:13:42.520 Peter Navarro seems to be over the target.

00:13:45.600 China is upset with Peter Navarro, not the old establishment.

00:13:50.000 In Congress, right, the congressmen in this town, they always say,

00:13:54.180 well, there's the Freedom Caucus.

00:13:56.060 They're a bunch of show horses. 0.97

00:13:57.500 We're the workhorses.

00:13:58.760 Well, those workhorses on the intelligence committees, et cetera, have missed a thing called China for the past 30 years.

00:14:05.980 That's why we're in the ditch.

00:14:07.760 Those workhorses in Congress and the Senate have also put us $37 trillion in debt.

00:14:13.120 So the next time you hear your congressman or woman or senator mention they're the workhorse, they're working hard,

00:14:20.020 while these show horses are just out making noise, you may want to educate them,

00:14:24.580 and you might want to ask them for their statements in writing, right?

00:14:27.280 Ask them, where have you put in writing your commitment on this new budget deal for $7 trillion in spending?

00:14:33.100 Let's see what the workhorses have to say on paper on the endless wars,

00:14:37.920 on the $10 billion border invasion, on the $37 trillion in debt.

00:14:42.560 Make sure they use numbers when they make their promises to you.

00:14:46.300 Ask them for it in writing, and then share that with all your friends.

00:14:49.380 If you've got a good congressman, woman, or senator, that's great.

00:14:53.140 But the War Room is keeping an eye on everybody.

00:14:56.000 Back in a second after the break.

00:14:59.980 This July, there is a global summit of BRICS nations in Rio de Janeiro,

00:15:04.680 the bloc of emerging superpowers, including China, Russia, India, and Persia,

00:15:10.460 are meeting with the goal of displacing the United States dollar as the global currency.

00:15:15.840 They're calling this the Rio Reset.

00:15:18.680 As BRICS nations push forward with their plans, global demand for U.S. dollars will decrease, 0.57

00:15:23.780 bringing down the value of the dollar in your savings.

00:15:27.000 While this transition won't not happen overnight, but trust me, it's going to start in Rio.

00:15:32.880 The Rio Reset in July marks a pivotal moment when BRICS objectives move decisively

00:15:38.880 from a theoretical possibility towards an inevitable reality.

00:15:45.180 Learn if diversifying your savings into gold is right for you.

00:15:48.680 Birch Gold Group can help you move your hard-earned savings into a tax-sheltered IRA and precious metals.

00:15:54.720 Claim your free info kit on gold by texting my name, Bannon, that's B-A-N-N-O-N, to 989898.

00:16:02.360 With an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers,

00:16:07.780 let Birch Gold army with a free, no-obligation info kit on owning gold before July.

00:16:13.620 And the Rio Reset.

00:16:16.160 Text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, to 989898.

00:16:20.580 Do it today.

00:16:21.420 That's the Rio Reset.

00:16:23.640 Text Bannon at 989898 and do it today.

00:16:27.700 Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

00:16:36.800 All right, everybody, back in the war room.

00:16:38.980 We've got E.J. and Tony on the economics coming up.

00:16:42.200 Eric Tietzo with the Russ Vote Group on the budget.

00:16:45.620 Eric, why don't you set the table for us on updates on the budget talks?

00:16:52.680 So what can we expect?

00:16:53.640 The war room's been all over that.

00:16:55.380 Bannon's been all over the debt.

00:16:57.500 And the bond market vigilantes paying attention to the debt.

00:17:01.660 And so bring us up to speed.

00:17:03.740 Eric, thank you.

00:17:05.620 Yeah, thanks, Dave.

00:17:06.340 It's great to be with you.

00:17:07.660 You know, the American people hired the president again because they're fed up with this woke and weaponized government.

00:17:13.760 And they're looking for somebody who's going to get into it and rip it down from the inside.

00:17:18.560 And that is exactly what is reflected in the president's budget proposal that just came out late last week.

00:17:25.260 You're talking about a 17 percent net cut in spending year over year compared to FY25.

00:17:33.880 That's unprecedented.

00:17:35.460 I know people are thinking 17 percent.

00:17:38.040 How about 70?

00:17:39.500 Trust me.

00:17:40.460 We share your view.

00:17:41.720 We'd like to get there.

00:17:43.480 And in some cases, this budget actually does get there.

00:17:47.560 When we say it's a net 17 percent cut, that includes a massive investment in national security.

00:17:54.320 You know, the one thing that the federal government is, like, supposed to do, defend the American people and secure the border.

00:18:00.620 The president is investing in an unprecedented way in national defense while also cutting the woke and weaponized government along the way.

00:18:10.300 This would be spending levels, non-defense discretionary federal spending at the same level as 2017.

00:18:20.420 So people talk about getting to pre-COVID spending levels.

00:18:23.240 This is actually the spending levels under Barack Obama's last year in office before the first President Trump term had his opportunity to get in there and sort of make his mark on spending.

00:18:35.060 If you include inflation over the years, this would be the lowest level of non-defense discretionary spending since the early aughts when I was still in college.

00:18:45.860 So this is exactly what the people elected the president to do.

00:18:49.740 The big question, obviously, is what next?

00:18:51.940 You know, traditionally, the president's budget has been kind of symbolic, maybe a marker.

00:18:57.740 And then the House and the Senate start their appropriations process, such as it is or isn't, and work from there.

00:19:05.880 I think this time is going to be different.

00:19:07.920 The president means it.

00:19:09.180 You see that in Doge.

00:19:10.260 You see that in the work that Russ and the team are doing at OMB.

00:19:13.100 And I think that this is going to be the framework for the actual FY26 appropriations.

00:19:21.000 And we should expect nothing less than this budget from the members of the House and Senate.

00:19:25.840 Great. That's great, Eric.

00:19:28.000 Hey, maybe can you explain to the war room also, I mean, the real good news here is this is going into law.

00:19:35.260 So this budget will become law.

00:19:37.140 And then, you know, the left in the future, they'll have to change the law if they still believe in the rule of law.

00:19:42.720 But can you explain to them maybe there's some interaction effects between what Doge has been doing, the personnel cuts?

00:19:50.160 How does all that work together?

00:19:52.080 That's not clear to many of us.

00:19:53.980 So you've got the good budget cuts you're talking about.

00:19:58.720 But Doge has been doing work.

00:20:01.040 There's a lot of news on USAID, for example.

00:20:04.140 Huge personnel cuts there.

00:20:06.560 University funding cuts.

00:20:08.080 How do all those stories kind of fit together just in a minute or two overview?

00:20:14.580 Sure.

00:20:15.100 Happy to do my best to create some clarity here.

00:20:17.820 You know, after 15 years in Washington, if there's one thing I'm convinced of, it's that they make this complicated on purpose in order to avoid accountability.

00:20:26.700 Right.

00:20:27.400 So here's what we're talking about.

00:20:28.960 There was a budget resolution that was passed, and that has to do with teeing up reconciliation.

00:20:34.440 That is an entirely separate thing from what we're talking about here.

00:20:39.320 What we're talking about is the president's budget proposal for FY 2026, looking forward.

00:20:47.240 Reconciliation has to do with reconciling spending that's already been passed into law with a budget resolution.

00:20:53.480 What we're talking about here is the future.

00:20:55.860 Where are we going?

00:20:56.840 And what Congress is supposed to do now is take this budget that the president has proposed and use it as the framework for the FY 2026 appropriations process that they'll go through.

00:21:09.600 In an actual world, that means that the 12 appropriations subcommittees go through the budget line by line and figure out exactly how they want to spend taxpayer money, right, moving forward.

00:21:20.580 This is the president saying, I think you should do it this way.

00:21:23.640 And when it comes to DOGE, what you see in this president's budget is the DOGE-identified opportunities for cuts put into law, put into writing.

00:21:34.020 So when the president says, we got to get rid of all of this weaponized and wasteful and progressive money that's going to NGOs through international aid programs, that is reflected in the cuts that he's proposed in this budget and so on and so forth.

00:21:51.760 And now, as I said, it becomes incumbent on Congress to actually take that proposal and make it real.

00:21:58.500 Right. Very good. Excellent. Outstanding.

00:22:00.720 Eric, hang with us. EJ and Tony is also with us.

00:22:05.060 He's got a bombshell.

00:22:06.500 You're going to your heads are going to explode on this one.

00:22:09.500 EJ, let us have it.

00:22:11.240 David, I tell you what, the big downward revisions for Biden administration era data keep coming in thick and fast.

00:22:20.900 The latest that we literally just got this morning at 10 a.m. from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that in the third quarter of last year, a period when we were previously told the economy added 399,000 jobs.

00:22:35.740 It turns out that private sector job growth in that quarter was precisely zero.

00:22:41.300 We added no private sector jobs during that time.

00:22:45.120 Say that again. 0.71

00:22:45.240 Again, that's the latest data.

00:22:46.800 Hit rewind. Say that one again.

00:22:49.400 In the third quarter of last year.

00:22:53.300 So that's the period from the end of June through the end of September.

00:22:58.020 We were told that last year the economy added 399,000 jobs after all the already existing downward revisions.

00:23:07.080 We supposedly added almost 400,000 non-farm payrolls, as they're called.

00:23:13.080 And now the latest data from the Business Employment Dynamics report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

00:23:18.540 These are official government numbers shows the private sector added exactly zero jobs on net during that time.

00:23:26.820 In other words, all the job losses equaled the job gains, a net zero change.

00:23:33.160 So there goes 399,000 jobs that we supposedly had.

00:23:38.040 Once again, David, this is an example of where we got data that was inaccurate.

00:23:44.040 Of course, it was inaccurate to the upside.

00:23:46.280 In other words, things looked better than they actually were.

00:23:49.360 And this is a big reason why President Trump got reelected last November.

00:23:53.620 People could only be told so much.

00:23:55.540 Don't believe your lying eyes and don't believe your empty wallets.

00:23:58.400 It didn't matter how many times the media told us everyone has jobs.

00:24:02.700 There were a lot of people sitting there who couldn't get jobs, at least not very good ones.

00:24:06.580 And this report confirms that.

00:24:08.960 Now, of course, these these data that we got today are essentially going to be part of the annual revisions.

00:24:17.200 But those annual revisions don't come out right away.

00:24:19.880 As the name implies, annual, they only come out once a year.

00:24:23.620 And they cover a period from March of one year to March of the next.

00:24:28.740 So that means that we're not actually going to get these data until next year.

00:24:34.500 In other words, we're not going to see the the total impact on the jobs numbers during the Biden during the entirety of the Biden administration until 2026.

00:24:43.740 What was last year's what was last year's revision, just as a reminder to the war room?

00:24:49.340 It was a downward revision of eight hundred thousand.

00:24:53.240 I mean, it was absolutely massive.

00:24:54.760 And and what that what that essentially covers, though, is just so people understand, these aren't calendar years.

00:25:01.800 The way the Bureau of Labor Statistics does this is from March of one year to March of the next.

00:25:08.700 So it essentially includes a quarter quarter one of a certain year and quarter two, three and four of the previous year.

00:25:17.200 Again, it runs from March of one year to March of the next.

00:25:20.200 So it doesn't quite line up with the calendar.

00:25:23.460 Yep. Outstanding.

00:25:25.100 E.J., give me an Eric, if you're still with us, give us you know, we we cover the downers and the reality of the papers.

00:25:32.060 But President Trump, you know, two trillion capital investment committed by U.S. firms, seven trillion overall from other countries coming this way.

00:25:40.580 What how would you frame that good news for the American workers, for manufacturing, for jobs back E.J. and then Eric?

00:25:48.540 Well, we got to remember when we're talking about all this investment pouring into this country, what are people getting in exchange for this investment?

00:25:55.980 In other words, this capital surplus, all this capital flowing into the country, which is going to create American jobs, it's going to create revenue streams for Americans, right?

00:26:06.800 We're going to see a return on investment here as well as return on investment abroad.

00:26:11.620 That's great when we see capital flowing into the country.

00:26:14.740 That's the flip side of the trade deficit.

00:26:17.760 We we often look at the trade deficit and we think that it's always and everywhere bad.

00:26:22.380 It's really not that you think of a trade deficit like putting on weight.

00:26:27.160 You can put on weight for a good reason or a bad reason.

00:26:29.400 You can either be gaining muscle because you're working out or you can be gaining fat because you're eating too much and not working out.

00:26:35.400 When we talk about all this investment pouring into the country, that's like putting on muscle.

00:26:40.760 Conversely, when we're selling off all of our farmland to the Chinese Communist Party, that's like putting on fat.

00:26:46.360 So when we talk about trade and we talk about all these trade negotiations, remember, we're trying to get a better deal for American exporters and for American workers.

00:26:55.880 We are not trying to eliminate the trade deficit.

00:26:58.560 The trade deficit very oftentimes gets a bad rap.

00:27:01.880 But the flip side of the trade deficit right now is an investment surplus.

00:27:06.460 And that's a good thing.

00:27:08.220 We don't want to see that go away because that investment surplus is how we get, again, more American jobs and more return on investment.

00:27:15.840 Eric, why don't you close this out?

00:27:17.440 One minute left.

00:27:18.320 Eric, why don't you close this out?

00:27:20.820 Just think about what EJ is saying.

00:27:22.940 Every job that was created under the Biden administration was a government job.

00:27:27.400 Every single job.

00:27:29.400 That's not an economy.

00:27:30.720 I agree with EJ.

00:27:31.560 You do want this capital investment, but you want it to flow into real productive capacity, real industry.

00:27:40.440 And I'm excited that the president is leading America into a place where all these government workers,

00:27:44.580 whose budget he's cutting, will have a place to go and get a real job before long.

00:27:50.400 Yep.

00:27:50.960 Great news.

00:27:51.560 EJ, Antony, Eric Tietzel, thanks for being with us.

00:27:54.720 You're not going to get two smarter guys together.

00:27:57.220 Only on The War Room.

00:27:58.420 Make sure you're sharing this show, this platform, and all the hard work Steve Vann puts in every day with all your friends.

00:28:06.560 This, I have people, I go across the country talking now, and everywhere I go, people, once they watch this show, the other news shows are just weak.

00:28:17.720 It's the only way to put it.

00:28:19.460 The War Room stands unique.

00:28:21.460 What Steve puts together every day with these hundreds of newspapers, unbelievable.

00:28:25.720 Stay tuned.

00:28:26.140 Are you a yo-yo dieter?

00:28:30.540 You diet, lose weight, but gain it all back, plus a few extra pounds for the effort?

00:28:35.920 Then later, you lose it again and regain it again and on and on and on.

00:28:40.160 I think I resemble this.

00:28:42.480 It's dangerous.

00:28:43.160 Studies show that you can increase your risk of heart attack, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and other health problems.

00:28:49.720 Breaking free of your yo-yo diet pattern is a main reason doctors created Lean.

00:28:54.920 Lean is a supplement, not an injection, and you don't need a prescription.

00:29:00.080 The science behind Lean is impressive.

00:29:02.780 It's studied natural ingredients, target weight loss in three powerful ways.

00:29:07.300 Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar.

00:29:09.840 It helps control appetite and cravings.

00:29:11.920 And it helps burn fat by converting fat into energy.

00:29:16.460 Listen, if you're tired of losing weight and gaining it back, if you want to lose meaningful weight at a healthy pace, Lean was created for you.

00:29:23.820 Let me get you started with 20% off when you enter Bannon20.

00:29:27.780 That's B-A-N-N-O-N-20 at TakeLean.com. 0.96

00:29:31.980 That's code Bannon20 at TakeLean.com.

00:29:36.420 Bannon20, that's 2-0, at TakeLean.com.

00:29:40.500 Lose it and keep it off.

00:29:42.540 Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

00:29:48.400 All right, Dave Braden, War Room, sitting with the great Stephen K. Bannon out on assignment.

00:29:53.380 I'm just going to share one quick headline today.

00:29:55.580 It's huge.

00:29:56.240 New York Times lead opinion piece.

00:29:59.860 Again, just total distortion of reality coming from the elitist crew.

00:30:04.800 The presidency has become too powerful by Jack Goldsmith.

00:30:09.340 President Trump's wrecking ball second term has revealed the full latent power of the presidency.

00:30:16.000 Thank God.

00:30:17.380 Perhaps Jack Goldsmith has forgotten about the latent power of President Biden that he exerted bringing in 10 million illegal immigrants.

00:30:26.620 It's strategically coordinated events, a million dead boys laying over Ukraine, Russia that could have been easily avoided, 37 trillion in debt.

00:30:37.220 Biden pardons everybody on the way out the door.

00:30:40.440 And Jack Goldsmith, the opinion leader here at the New York Times, instead of weighing in, he was, I think he was under George Bush, it says, yeah.

00:30:51.540 So instead of going after Congress, right, why isn't anybody going after Congress?

00:30:55.340 If the president's too powerful, well, why don't you write a letter about the Congress not doing anything?

00:31:00.960 That seems to be a more profitable way to go.

00:31:04.600 Anyway, on that note, we've got Dave Walsh coming in to explain how President Trump is using his full latent powers to restore our economy and restore energy.

00:31:14.580 And so, Dave, give it to us.

00:31:16.640 I think you've got to chart it up for us.

00:31:18.540 And so just call for it when you need it.

00:31:20.040 Yeah, you know, electrification in abundance at low cost is certainly at the core of any ability to reshore manufacturing and restructure and rebuild the economy and for us to export heavily again, industrial products.

00:31:33.500 We've had recently a majority of the major grid coordinators, PJM, MISO, the Southwest Power Pool, SWAC, which is California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, before Congress reporting out in more vigorous terms than I use the electrification shortage in all of their regions.

00:31:54.040 And these regions include 280 million U.S. citizens.

00:31:59.120 We've got half of the regions in the country under warning by NERC for the National Electoral Liability Association for shortages and brownouts like the one in Spain, affecting possibly up to half the people in the country across the upper Midwest, the West in SPP, PJM, which is where you're sitting, Dave.

00:32:17.480 Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Eastern Ohio, MISO, which is 15 states in the Midwest, covering about 40 million people, warnings in the peak days of the summer heat, the peak days of winter cold, the accelerated possibility of brownouts due to not enough electrification.

00:32:37.760 MISO has made a big point of this.

00:32:39.100 I have a slide, one slide to show about that, how this works.

00:32:42.700 If you look, the blue line across 2042, this is within MISO, again, 15 states across the Midwest, 40 million people.

00:32:51.520 The blue line is the advertised rating plate capacity of new generation being added out there, which looks like a lot, looks like close to 60 gigawatts.

00:33:01.580 The trouble is that's momentary maximum capacity, that number, the rating plate number.

00:33:06.740 The real energy capacity is the red line, and you can see net capacity on continuous energy is reducing in the same period by close to 38 percent, because all of the resources being bid in to be built in the next 20 years across MISO basically are solar.

00:33:27.680 The big part now is solar, secondly, wind, third battery storage, a little bit of gas turbine combined cycle that actually runs all the time.

00:33:37.040 But in the vast majority, 80 percent of the queue, what investors are bidding in to MISO to erect and PJM to erect, and actually around the country, is all solar and battery storage based on taking advantage of these huge incentives.

00:33:50.000 Incentives to buy equipment from China, install it here, and go ahead and electrify with vastly reduced energy equipment.

00:33:58.960 So you've got a lot of the country under warning for brownouts, just the same as Spain had. 0.99

00:34:03.400 And we came perilously close last summer in SPP, the Southwest Power Pool, 15 states, on three separate days in August of losing the grid there under severe warnings of a resource advisory on August 23rd,

00:34:17.040 August 25th, a conservative operations advisory, and finally on the 26th, an emergency alert, because 37,000 megawatts of wind in that region, in that huge region of 15 states, dropped to 1,200 megawatts all of a sudden.

00:34:31.880 So we had warning advisories that we were that close on a, if you go to a Monte Carlo simulation or gambling, we were that close to losing that whole grid last summer.

00:34:41.620 Texas, just two years before, eight separate days, we were that close, within 5% to 6% of losing the entire grid because of now not enough electrification due to the mass adoption of part-time, very part-time devices.

00:34:55.920 This just doesn't work mathematically.

00:34:58.340 And the grid management are saying it's very loud and clear.

00:35:02.060 Yep, good.

00:35:02.800 Dave, give us a closing minute.

00:35:05.040 How did we get here?

00:35:06.360 The border, right, the border invasion, 10 million, orchestrated, this almost, you know, no one's, no one's this incompetent.

00:35:16.100 How did this happen, and how long will it take us to turn it around in about a minute?

00:35:21.660 The left and Sierra Club put a wrecking ball to nuclear power about 35 years ago.

00:35:26.700 Basically, we stopped erecting new nuclear in this country that we now love again, thank God.

00:35:31.460 We stopped erecting it 35 years ago.

00:35:33.420 The capacity to build that now is very, very limited here.

00:35:36.960 Then, under the Obama administration, his eight years in office put a wrecking ball, and this is well documented through his DOE and EPA, to the coal industry.

00:35:45.500 So, where we were, about 53% coal-fired, continuous duty, base load, coal pile equals storage, four months' worth of storage, put a wrecking ball to that industry, wanted to terminate coal.

00:35:56.680 And those were the words of his EPA, which helped us attack the Clean Power Plan via SCOTUS, that they were overreaching their power and their charter in doing so.

00:36:07.540 But he put a wrecking ball to coal.

00:36:09.700 Biden, during his administration, put a wrecking ball to gas-fired combined cycle power plants, which is now 42% of the electrification of the country, stuff that runs all the time, based on American natural gas.

00:36:20.800 He put in place EPA mandates to discontinue, unless carbon capture were applied, natural gas-fired power within about six years.

00:36:29.800 So, the Democrats have consistently made moves under the guise of no strategy, only a carbon reduction strategy, nothing about added energy, to sap the electrification of the country.

00:36:42.480 So, look at the last six years.

00:36:44.240 We've added supposedly 330,000 megawatts of equipment, adding only 0.4% growth in energy, because it's all part-time stuff.

00:36:52.640 It's 90% of it's battery storage and solar, which operates five hours a day and two hours a day, respectively.

00:36:59.440 That's a disaster.

00:37:00.740 Very outstanding.

00:37:02.460 Dave, we've got to bring in Eric Prince on the latest India-Pakistan news.

00:37:06.460 How do people get you, Dave?

00:37:08.380 Okay, Dave, you can reach me on Getter, TruthSocial, and X, at DaveWalshEnergy.

00:37:12.480 Thank you, Dave.

00:37:13.520 Thanks.

00:37:14.340 Hugely important.

00:37:15.440 Dave Walsh, follow him.

00:37:17.500 Eric Prince in the headline, Washington Post today, India hits Pakistan and retaliatory strikes.

00:37:22.900 Pakistan says they're going to punch back.

00:37:25.420 How serious is this?

00:37:27.240 Eric Prince with us.

00:37:29.820 He's one of the most knowledgeable guys about all things military in the world.

00:37:34.840 Lucky to have him on the war room.

00:37:35.980 Welcome, Eric.

00:37:36.680 What's going on over in India, Pakistan?

00:37:38.980 That's quite an intro, Dave.

00:37:40.760 Thank you.

00:37:41.260 Look, the last time that India hit back at Pakistan some years ago, all of their bombs missed. 0.97

00:37:48.520 They had spent a lot of money, and it's very dangerous when you spend a lot of money to think that spending money equals capacity.

00:37:56.420 Because clearly, the last time they hit, the targeting data, the geo-coordinates and elevation have to be exactly right for the bomb to hit where it's supposed to.

00:38:07.520 I think, in this case, the attacks, which were obviously done by Muslim extremists inside India, I'm not convinced that it was with any kind of actual Pakistani government sponsorship.

00:38:22.760 The fact is, the Pakistani military is battling the Pakistani Taliban, takes up about 60 percent of the military's efforts, combating them along the Afghan border.

00:38:34.900 However, I would not be surprised if those same Pakistani Taliban stimulated this attack to cause this level of trouble with India. 0.99

00:38:43.000 But both the Indian military is not very capable, and Pakistan will try to hit back.

00:38:52.240 I don't see this going anywhere because both of those countries would suffer massively if they got into an actual dust-up with tens of millions of refugees on top of displaced people, casualties and mayhem. 1.00

00:39:07.380 Both of those countries are kind of living on the edge as it is.

00:39:09.740 The last thing they need is, the last thing they need is a war.

00:39:13.180 Good.

00:39:14.120 Good.

00:39:14.660 Well, hey, that's positive.

00:39:17.280 More positive news.

00:39:19.420 You won't hear it on any of the mainstream media.

00:39:22.820 The Wall Street Journal I just covered today, just total misinformation on the progress Trump's making on trade.

00:39:28.380 One of the biggest moves is with India.

00:39:30.280 Modi, they had a great meeting.

00:39:33.680 It looks like India has made a bunch of moves that are pro-U.S. 0.96

00:39:37.860 Trump likes win-wins.

00:39:39.740 Are you following India?

00:39:41.900 How do you think we're doing with India?

00:39:43.220 And then any more you want to report on the trade wars and how that's going to make the U.S. great again?

00:39:50.520 You know, I would not be that excited if we got to a zero-zero trade deal with India because their cost of labor is a micro-fraction of what ours is in the United States. 1.00

00:40:01.600 Their cost of environmental compliance is zero compared to what it is in the United States.

00:40:06.520 It would put a lot of U.S. manufacturing at a significant disadvantage.

00:40:10.560 Look, Dave, I'm very old school on tariffs.

00:40:13.960 I think a flat 10% or 15% tariff on anything coming into the United States is a good thing. 0.87

00:40:19.120 I think protecting domestic manufacturing is a very good thing.

00:40:22.920 And until the idea of free trade with a country where less than 50% of the people actually use toilets is a fool's errand.

00:40:34.020 And the last time I was in Delhi was four years ago.

00:40:36.800 And there was a big billboard in the airport from the National Ministry of Health saying,

00:40:43.140 help us reach our goal this year of 50% toilet use across the country.

00:40:47.320 So I don't get all excited about anything to do with India. 0.97

00:40:51.580 Culturally not like us at all.

00:40:53.520 And a long ways to go until their manufacturing has the same cost structure that America's does.

00:41:00.360 And I would rather protect the American heartland versus in any way making India great. 0.99

00:41:07.300 Yeah, I agree with you.

00:41:08.820 I think that's all spot on.

00:41:10.380 And I think that is part of the trade framework.

00:41:13.880 It's trade, non-trade, unfair practices.

00:41:17.320 All that's in the negotiation.

00:41:18.980 I think you know all that.

00:41:20.820 And that's why you said the 10%, there's a buffer until we get there.

00:41:24.120 The good news in my mind there had to do with the second most populous country on earth, India, as a strategic vehicle versus China.

00:41:36.320 From what I'm, and I want to get you on to hear what you're hearing in China.

00:41:41.300 I mean, I'm out on YouTube and there's riots and protests in the streets across China.

00:41:47.400 It's not a one-off.

00:41:49.100 People, wages not getting paid, no benefits.

00:41:52.300 It's retirement is out of whack.

00:41:54.940 The youth are upset.

00:41:56.860 Xi could be in trouble, according to some folks.

00:41:59.260 What do you know on that one, Eric?

00:42:01.460 Even before this trade dust-up, what I can even tell you from Trump administration 45,

00:42:06.920 the Chinese Communist Party was very concerned about Trump's policy on trade and actually getting tough with them.

00:42:12.580 Now that he's actually clearly gotten tough with them, it is a massive threat.

00:42:18.740 The Chinese people kind of have this deal with the Chinese Communist Party that they're supposed to deliver economic development.

00:42:25.300 And in exchange, people have effectively no rights and no actual freedoms.

00:42:29.580 And now that the economic growth is very much in peril in the short term, there's going to be major unrest because of it.

00:42:40.580 And on top of that, Xi's war on corruption before that really crushed a lot of the entrepreneur class and created the small-medium enterprises,

00:42:51.220 which were creating the jobs, that's all largely dried up.

00:42:56.520 And when you take Jack Ma, who's the Bezos, Steve Jobs of China, and you disappear him from society and he reemerges six months later having embraced supervision because he said something negative against his state, that's a problem.

00:43:11.780 So China has – they rode a wave of massive economic expansion for years, and Xi has crushed that innovation and the freedom of maneuvering on the north.

00:43:21.680 Can you hold with us over the break, Eric?

00:43:25.060 We're going to break.

00:43:26.080 I'd love to get you back.

00:43:26.920 I want to see if there's other even more hardline power brokers in line to replace Xi.

00:43:33.380 Your comments on that after the break.

00:43:35.520 Stay tuned.

00:43:36.440 War Room Posse back in one minute.

00:43:39.320 What if he had the brightest mind in the War Room delivering critical financial research every month?

00:43:49.820 Steve Bannon here.

00:43:50.880 War Room listeners know Jim Rickards.

00:43:52.540 I love this guy.

00:43:54.000 He's our wise man, a former CIA, Pentagon, and White House advisor with an unmatched grasp of geopolitics and capital markets.

00:44:01.100 Jim predicted Trump's Electoral College victory exactly 312 to 226, down to the actual number itself.

00:44:10.980 Now he's issuing a dire warning about April 11th, a moment that could define Trump's presidency in your financial future.

00:44:18.500 His latest book, Money GPT, exposes how AI is setting the stage for financial chaos, bank runs at lightning speeds, algorithm-driven crashes, and even threats to national security.

00:44:30.080 Right now, War Room members get a free copy of Money GPT when they sign up for Strategic Intelligence.

00:44:36.840 This is Jim's flagship financial newsletter, Strategic Intelligence.

00:44:41.640 I read it.

00:44:42.760 You should read it.

00:44:43.820 Time is running out.

00:44:44.680 Go to RickardsWarRoom.com.

00:44:46.520 That's all one word, Rickards War Room, Rickards with an S.

00:44:49.880 Go now and claim your free book.

00:44:52.320 That's RickardsWarRoom.com.

00:44:54.880 Do it today.

00:44:56.760 Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

00:45:00.080 All right, Dave Bratt in the War Room with the great Stephen K. Bannon.

00:45:04.900 Today, one of the War Room favorites, Eric Prince.

00:45:09.240 Everyone weighs his words very carefully.

00:45:11.900 Eric, give us a closing two-minute summary on China's weakening and Xi's position within that weakening apparatus of the CCP.

00:45:23.140 So, even in China, there's political factions.

00:45:27.840 Xi is part of the young prince legs.

00:45:29.900 His father literally rolled with Mao back in the day for the long march.

00:45:33.660 There's the Shanghai faction, which he really crushed over COVID, and the Communist Youth League.

00:45:40.380 Those two segments have been degraded a lot.

00:45:43.540 However, the weakening of the economy, the uncertainty around economic growth and all those things have definitely made Xi's inevitability impaired.

00:45:57.360 On top of that, all the generals that surround him have all paid for their positions.

00:46:03.480 And so, it's a very interesting quandary what they're going to do on Taiwan, because the generals, I'm sure, are saying, let's go.

00:46:12.980 They believe they're high on their own supply.

00:46:16.940 Xi needs to make a deal to have some kind of economic pathway through this.

00:46:24.140 So, I think Trump is in a very good position to hold their feet to the fire and to correct it.

00:46:30.300 If Trump had not done this, the consolidation of manufacturing in China, outside the United States, was getting to the point of no return.

00:46:42.540 And so, it is high time to bring a lot of that manufacturing back to America, whether it's pharmaceuticals, chips, electronics, a lot of things we take for granted.

00:46:53.220 It makes sense to make it in America, not in China, not with people that hate our constitution, our freedoms, and our way of life.

00:47:03.700 Yeah, excellent.

00:47:05.140 Outstanding overview.

00:47:07.060 Last short question, is China past the point where they can just crush their population, social media, communication over there? 0.90

00:47:17.800 If the hardliners come in, I think the Taiwan play, like you said, is a way they can pull that off.

00:47:24.780 But can they still just 100% repress their people like Tiananmen? 0.95

00:47:30.480 Well, that was a very small segment.

00:47:33.720 There was a few thousand people. 0.99

00:47:34.940 They brought troops from the most rural areas, the most ignorant troops to come in and smash them. 0.85

00:47:45.700 I'd say, just like the Soviet Union, what the United States did with the Catholic Church and the British MI6, we weakened the ability in Poland and inside the Soviet Union for the state to control everything. 0.72

00:48:03.120 China has dozens of different ethnicities.

00:48:06.580 And if you look at China's history over the last two millennia, they come together under a strong dictator and then they fragment apart.

00:48:12.880 And I think if we help China come apart and come apart into some of its component parts where it's not all under the Chinese Communist Party, that is in our interest. 0.95

00:48:22.200 That's in the neighbor's interest.

00:48:25.180 And that is a better to reduce the hegemony that China has over their neighbors.

00:48:31.700 And that will require some strong trade practices.

00:48:35.120 And I would say some strong covert action and cleverness by the U.S. government.

00:48:39.060 I'm not convinced.

00:48:39.900 We're there on the trade.

00:48:41.160 I'm not convinced in the covert action side.

00:48:43.500 The agency is up to it yet.

00:48:44.920 But who knows?

00:48:46.200 Maybe the leadership will come through.

00:48:48.360 Yeah, unbelievable.

00:48:49.820 Eric Prince, National Treasure, a blessing.

00:48:52.280 Eric, thanks for being on with us.

00:48:53.660 God bless you.

00:48:54.520 Thanks, Dave.

00:48:55.240 Have a good one.

00:48:56.640 You too.

00:48:57.540 All right.

00:48:57.940 Mark Lucas on deck.

00:48:59.440 Mark, you with us?

00:49:01.020 And if you want to comment on anything you just heard, and I think you got an ad we're going to play and you can explain that one.

00:49:07.000 But any comment on the previous?

00:49:10.660 Yes, Dave.

00:49:11.200 Thanks for having me on.

00:49:12.080 And we sure live in a very volatile world.

00:49:14.640 And I think it is just a testimony to the complete freedom of maneuver that Joe Biden gave to America's enemies.

00:49:22.020 You know, I saw this in Afghanistan.

00:49:23.500 I came in in 2010.

00:49:24.960 And the enemy was given quite the freedom of maneuver.

00:49:27.980 And we had to stir up a hoarding nest.

00:49:29.820 So President Trump is America's first foreign policy.

00:49:32.860 It's going to take some time to get its footing, whether it's with the Houthis or with the Ukraine war.

00:49:37.000 But I'm very optimistic that President Trump is also our negotiator-in-chief.

00:49:41.560 It looks like he landed a solid deal with the Houthis because we want peace and veteran action and warfighters like myself.

00:49:49.280 We do not want to get entangled in these forever wars.

00:49:53.000 Yep.

00:49:53.540 And I got a clip.

00:49:54.440 Why don't you set us up for the clip before you play it?

00:49:56.320 Give us 10 seconds on what we're about ready to see and why veteran action is what you're doing.

00:50:01.060 Pete Buttigieg is coming to my home state of Iowa next week for a veteran town hall.

00:50:06.340 And we want to remind Iowans and the whole country about Pete Buttigieg's woke and radical agenda for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

00:50:15.940 Okay, Denver, you want to roll it?

00:50:17.980 Pete Buttigieg is fighting Donald Trump's VA reforms, and he's pushing a woke agenda.

00:50:25.540 He backed taxpayer-funded sex changes and wanted to rewrite Lincoln's VA motto, making it more gender-inclusive.

00:50:35.340 Buttigieg wants to take us back to Joe Biden's broken, woke VA.

00:50:39.760 All right, Mark, give us the overview, what you're up to with your group.

00:50:53.560 And all political views are my own, but Mark, I've had it.

00:50:57.000 Well, veteran action, I built this to be a smash-mouth, grassroots political organization that fights for our veterans and promotes President Donald Trump's America First foreign policy.

00:51:09.760 And we're not going to allow these radical leftists like Pete Buttigieg to come to Iowa to attack President Trump and his VA agenda.

00:51:18.060 You know, Pete Buttigieg, he won the Iowa caucus in 2020.

00:51:21.920 He narrowly lost the New Hampshire primary.

00:51:24.620 He was a very formidable candidate, and he turned in to be one of the most effective surrogates for Joe Biden.

00:51:31.720 So no Democrat is going to come into Iowa uncontested, and veteran action is going to bring this smash-mouth philosophy.

00:51:38.440 That I learned with my good friend, Mike Davis.

00:51:41.280 You know, Mike Davis and I went to college together at the University of Iowa.

00:51:44.640 He's my senior counsel at Veteran Action.

00:51:46.840 And I helped build the A3P Action Center, which I'm bringing that same approach to Veteran Action.

00:51:52.440 So not only can you see that ad, but we're encouraging the War Room Posse to go to VeteranAction.org,

00:51:59.540 click on the Take Action button, and contact your lawmakers.

00:52:02.740 Tell them to pass the Veteran Access Act.

00:52:06.220 We believe that veterans deserve choice in their health care.

00:52:09.760 They should get expedient care.

00:52:11.940 We shouldn't have to wait for arbitrary wait times like a 30-minute drive or a 20-day wait.

00:52:17.940 So Veteran Action, you can contact your lawmaker via phone, email, and on social media.

00:52:23.440 You can take all three of those actions in less than five minutes.

00:52:27.240 This strategy is proven.

00:52:28.220 We used it to promote President Trump's cabinet.

00:52:31.660 Cash Patel and Pete Hegseth, they told Mike Davis and I that those nominees were dead on arrival.

00:52:38.080 A3P changed the politics. 1.00

00:52:39.980 And now Veteran Action is doing the same thing for vets.

00:52:43.560 Great.

00:52:44.080 Hey, Mark, we're going to hold you over the break.

00:52:46.100 Stay with us for a minute.

00:52:47.360 You can close it up.

00:52:48.460 And we thank you for what you're doing for the veterans.

00:52:51.120 Get your comments right after the break.

00:52:52.780 Stay with us.

00:52:55.100 Health isn't just a personal issue.

00:52:56.960 It's a family issue, a community issue.

00:52:59.720 We're living in unpredictable times.

00:53:01.480 Supply chains can break down.

00:53:02.780 Hospitals can get overwhelmed.

00:53:04.200 And let's not even start on the natural disasters.

00:53:07.420 These aren't hypotheticals.

00:53:08.620 They're happening.

00:53:09.260 You see it here in the war room, and we all know it.

00:53:12.060 The question is simply, are you ready?

00:53:15.020 That's where Jace comes in.

00:53:17.720 This isn't just a kit.

00:53:19.040 This is a Jace case.

00:53:20.900 It's a lifeline.

00:53:21.980 It's a personal supply of prescribed emergency medications that puts the power back in your hands.

00:53:29.300 Whether it's an unexpected illness or a global disruption of supply chains, you can act fast and protect yourself and your loved ones.

00:53:37.740 This February, show them you care in a way that really matters.

00:53:41.220 Be prepared.

00:53:41.900 Get the Jace case today so you'll have the right meds on hand the moment you need them.

00:53:48.320 Visit JaceMedical.com and use the code Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, at checkout for a discount on your order.

00:53:54.900 That's JaceMedical.com, promo code Bannon.

00:53:57.540 Get the Jace case and do it today.

00:54:02.680 Hey, war room.

00:54:03.660 Hope you're all doing well.

00:54:04.780 My name is Trevor Comstock.

00:54:06.160 I'm one of the co-creators of Sacred Human, and I wanted to share just a little bit more about our brand for those who may not know of us yet.

00:54:12.660 But about six months ago, we decided to launch Sacred Human with really the simple mission being to provide American-made natural supplements without all the artificial nonsense.

00:54:22.940 So, unfortunately, as many of you know, a lot of these big corporate supplements will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients, and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health.

00:54:34.440 So, that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements.

00:54:39.580 And, of course, the beef liver being our flagship product.

00:54:42.500 For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc.

00:54:51.660 And because it is 100% grass-fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general.

00:55:04.860 So, we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com.

00:55:10.500 And cheers to your health.

Bannon's War Room - May 07, 2025

Episode 4467： Media Continues To Lie About Trade Policy; Reshoring Manufacturing And Rebuild Our Economy

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript