Trump's trip to Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries is a must-listen, especially in the wake of the State of the Union address, where he met with Saudi Arabia's King Salman and other important leaders. He also delivered a stern message to Iran about its nuclear ambitions.
00:03:49.540Just a historic day, Tuesday, May 13th in the year of our Lord 2025.
00:03:54.540It's Natalie Winters hosting War Room today.
00:03:57.540As I always say, don't go anywhere. Luckily, with President Trump back in office, we always have a packed show.
00:04:02.540Though actually for good reasons, not for the reasons we used to have to pack them in under Joe Biden.
00:04:08.540No honorific title there. You saw that cold open.
00:04:12.540This is what it's like to be respected by the rest of the world again.
00:04:16.540I guess they always say what it's better to be feared than loved.
00:04:20.540I don't think Joe Biden even had the chance to have either.
00:04:24.540I think, though, the reception that President Trump has received from the Saudis is truly indicative.
00:04:30.540A man who was, what, on trial for like 18 different felonies would be sitting in prison had Kamala Harris won.
00:04:36.540He now gets a better reception, frankly, than Democrats gave him at the State of the Union.
00:04:40.540I saw more American flags during today's processions than I think I saw maybe at even the fake LARPy DNC they had this year.
00:04:49.540I think the only time we ever saw that level of organized and well thought through reception really was from Joe Biden greeting illegal aliens at the southern border.
00:05:01.540You guys, I'm sure, have seen the split screen images, images of what Joe Biden received versus what President Trump received from the Saudis, which are, you know, no, no perfect vessel, shall we say.
00:05:14.540Obviously, a lot to get into there, which we're going to get into throughout this show.
00:05:18.540But there is a small, well, I guess actually massive victory.
00:05:22.540The first federal judge, a Trump appointee.
00:05:25.540It's funny how when it's a Trump appointee, oftentimes the outcomes seem to be a little different.
00:05:30.540And actually, I don't know this bizarre word constitutional, but ruling that President Trump can actually invoke the Alien Enemies Act to deport Trendy Aragua members.
00:05:43.540It's a massive win. We've seen, I think, all the sort of Democrat or more established Republican appointed.
00:05:48.540Justice is essentially rebuke that idea.
00:05:56.540But, you know, here in the war room, we're not about victory parties.
00:05:59.540We are about action, action, action, and trying to upend the administrative state.
00:06:05.540And I guess their new strange bedfellow, the new odd couple that is the Tech Bros, which we saw, I think, on full display with their quirkiness in Saudi Arabia.
00:06:15.540I know David Sox has been over, I think, in the UAE for a while.
00:06:19.540Striking a lot of, shall we say, curious deals, which I want to drill into.
00:06:25.540Maybe it's confirmation bias or maybe it's genuinely a, as we call it, a NATSEC threat.
00:06:34.540But particularly when it comes to semiconductors and chips, obviously there was, what, 600 billion plus worth of announcements of investments released today between the Saudis and the United States.
00:06:46.540But one vertical that is particularly concerning that has a lot of China hawks, which I proudly consider myself to be, and I'm sure you guys do, too, concerned is the sharing of advanced semiconductor chips, stuff in kind of that realm of the technological sphere.
00:07:00.540With the Saudis and with the Emiratis, particularly with firms that have deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
00:07:08.540In the case of the Emirati firm, I believe it's G42, they actually used to work with Huawei, which you may recall was the sanctioned, if not just outright blacklisted Chinese, essentially military proxy telecommunications firm, very advanced in the whole 5G race.
00:07:25.540Really, I think, illustrative of the military civil fusion that you see going on in China, how these companies are used as effectively in some cases just outright or sometimes more clandestinely, but as state owned assets, whether it's intellectual property theft or sometimes just outright espionage.
00:07:40.540But these are the kind of firms that are now likely going to receive, I think, in some cases, potentially hundreds of thousands of these highly sensitive chips, which, like we said, have, you know, there's been case after case, indictment after indictment of Chinese nationals coming overseas or trying to pull Western researchers overseas to gain access to this technology.
00:08:02.400This is, right, what the whole Made in China 2025 initiative really is about, right?
00:08:08.360High tech is the way that they are attempting to rule the world.
00:08:11.900The crux of that, of course, I think, being Taiwan.
00:08:14.360So it seems rather, I would posit curious that all these tech bros are sort of trying to, I think, undermine what President Trump is doing in terms of, you know, whether it's the most favored nation status when it comes to China.
00:08:25.460And really reasserting fair trade, not just free trade, but that we'd be working to bolster and embolden the Chinese Communist Party, particularly on the technological front.
00:08:37.600And I guess we'll return to war room tradition, our roots of being, what is it?
00:08:44.200I think conversion therapy for rhinos.
00:08:49.080But, unfortunately, congressional Republicans, we can toss the tweet up on screen, really have nothing to say about this except one three-tweet thread and a strongly worded letter.
00:09:03.580I guess old habits die hard from the select committee on the Chinese Communist Party, the chairman of it.
00:09:21.280Deals like this require scrutiny and verifiable guardrails.
00:09:23.880We raised concerns about G42 last year, that's the Emirati firm, for this very reason.
00:09:28.620And we need safeguards in place before more agreements move forward.
00:09:33.760Now, if only I knew of people or a little body called the United States Congress that I don't know also right now happens to be negotiating stuff that directly interplays with all of this.
00:09:45.440If only, Chairman Moulin-Yar, if you, I don't know, looked in the mirror.
00:09:50.660I don't know about you guys, but I'm getting pretty sick and tired of the, shall we say, pandemic of passive voice with the Republican Party.
00:09:59.720It seems to plague them, where all they can do is tweet about these problems and put out strongly worded letters and statements.
00:10:09.040Now, are you guys too busy canceling votes on codifying the doge cuts or canceling the hearings on the radical judges?
00:10:16.060Maybe that's what's taking up all your time, right?
00:10:18.360And you certainly can't say that it's because you've been sending, what is it, a bunch of legislation over President Trump to sign into law.
00:10:25.820Because if I have my facts straight, you guys have sent fewer bills to President Trump than any Congress over the last 70 years.
00:10:33.560Now, you know, we always bring the receipts, shall we say.
00:10:39.920And I want to bring a very specific receipt in terms of this select committee on the Chinese Communist Party,
00:10:45.900which, as far as I'm concerned, was set up by Mike Gallagher, only so he could, what, use it as a stepping stone to go work at Palantir?
00:10:51.440That doesn't quite reek of understanding the threat of the Chinese Communist Party.
00:20:20.340And therefore, it's in a U.S. national interest, U.S. geopolitical leadership,
00:20:25.900to bolster our IP rights system rather than weaken it, as we've been doing.
00:20:30.920And this has been sort of an ongoing debate.
00:20:35.340You wrote a great book on it, The Big Steel, Ideology, Interest, and the Undoing of Intellectual Property.
00:20:41.980But why is this sort of re-emerging now?
00:20:47.400Yeah, it's coming up now just as it came up at the dawn of the Internet.
00:20:51.740Something I talk about in my book is platforms such as YouTube.
00:20:57.520You've got a new technology, makes it easy to take content without paying for it.
00:21:02.840There's pressure on courts, pressure on legislators to favor that business model.
00:21:08.080But we should take lessons from the way the digital content markets have evolved and have matured.
00:21:14.720If you take the streaming platforms today, they all rely on technologies that regulate access.
00:21:20.460And that's a good thing because it allows markets to form, allows prices to be attached to content,
00:21:26.740and it ultimately delivers remuneration back to the individuals and the smaller entities that have produced that content.
00:21:33.800There's no reason to revisit this debate again in the AI ecosystem.
00:21:38.160It's the same question, and what we should be looking for is an equitable legal regime that enables markets to form licensing solutions
00:21:49.720that will deliver value to creators without unduly impeding the growth of AI platforms and models and apps.
00:21:58.100So can you sort of flesh out what a world, what the world would look like if they were, you know, they being whatever we call them, the tech bros,
00:22:07.700maybe that's too cutesy a term, much like deep state is for the administrative state.
00:22:11.900But if they were to get what they want or whoever within the Trump administration sort of orchestrated, you know,
00:22:17.600the removal of some people from the copyright office, which for valid reason, they were kind of far left crazy,
00:22:22.880giving Lizzo the flute probably not a good idea, but I think there definitely were ulterior motives there,
00:22:28.340as I think both of those officials had sort of expressed the idea that maybe they wanted to stand up for the copyright privileges
00:22:35.860But if they're able to sort of just steamroll over this office and continue this, what does that mean for our audience?
00:22:43.060What does that world ultimately look like?
00:22:45.100And that's going to be a world where the value generated by content will flow to a relatively small number of platforms,
00:22:54.740as opposed to a world in which that value is far more widely distributed among the far more numerous creators
00:23:03.300and individuals and entities that contribute to making content, promoting content and distributing content.
00:23:11.000And the AI ecosystem can thrive under a robust copyright regime with adaptations that account for the specifics of AI ecosystems.
00:23:21.660But there's no reason to run roughshod over the property rights of creators.
00:23:26.640Property rights in creative markets are necessary to sustain markets, just as they are in any other kind of market that we're familiar with.
00:23:34.940It sounds like kind of the digital equivalent of you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
00:23:46.060The committees on energy and commerce, it was sort of not leaked, but, you know, came out today and caused, I think, a bit of an outrage online.
00:23:55.760They were debating what's called the Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative.
00:24:01.040And I want to just read a section for you. I'm just curious to get your sort of top line assessment.
00:24:06.620But one of the subsections says that, quote,
00:24:09.320no state or political subdivision may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models,
00:24:15.440artificial intelligence systems or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this act.
00:24:23.620In other words, it kind of sounds like they want a 10-year amnesty.
00:24:26.980I don't like any time the word amnesty is said on Capitol Hill, but I think especially in the field of of A.I.,
00:24:33.100what's your sort of take on maybe just more broadly, you know, who exactly is pushing for this just sort of laissez-faire,
00:24:40.900you know, own goal, open goal shots or shots on goal for the kind of A.I. community?
00:24:46.020Yeah, I'm not specifically familiar with what transpired today, but that language is most likely reflecting the vision coming out of the White House,
00:24:59.580David Sachs in particular, which I think makes sense, which is a light touch approach to the A.I. ecosystem,
00:25:06.640allowing the U.S. market to grow organically and giving us an advantage over the approach that's been taken in the European Union in particular,
00:25:17.240which is a top-down approach or regulation-heavy approach that's typical of the European approach.
00:25:23.320And you can easily compare the difference between the innovation performance in Europe, which is weak, heavy regulation,
00:25:30.020and the U.S. approach, which is lighter on regulation, and we shine in terms of innovation.
00:25:36.880And I think that's what you're seeing in that language. It's reflecting the messaging coming out of the White House.
00:25:41.180And I think as a general matter, if we want to have an A.I. ecosystem that is a world leader,
00:25:48.560I think that vision coming out of the White House is the right one.
00:25:54.660Jonathan, thank you so much for joining us.
00:25:56.580If people want to follow you, stay up to date with everything you're working on,
00:25:59.920and most importantly, get the book, really read up on it, because it's an important kind of...
00:26:03.820Don't sleep on it. It's an important topic. Where can they go to do all that?
00:26:07.980Sure. The book is most easily available through the Amazon or Barnes & Noble websites
00:26:15.280or directly from the publisher, Oxford University.
00:26:19.420And links are also available through my LinkedIn page.
00:26:22.680Thanks very much to speak with you today.
00:26:24.200Thank you, sir, for joining us. We'll have you back on.
00:26:26.060Warren Posse, while you're at it, make sure you're checking out birchgold.com
00:26:32.420slash Bannon, texting Bannon to 989898, giving the guys over there a call, an email, download the books.
00:26:55.540But now the White House Correspondent Association is melting down that some of the reporters were kicked off of Air Force One or can't do the wire service.
00:27:03.400I don't know about you guys. I'll be able to go on without having AP or Reuters poorly written, probably propaganda written wires influencing my coverage.
00:27:11.660But one of my favorite quotes from their statement was, quote,
00:27:14.160They've reliably covered every president for decades, for the millions of Americans who depend on their reporting every day.
00:27:22.800Talk about crisis acting and stolen valor.
00:27:25.220I think you'd be hard pressed to find, I don't know, maybe hundreds of thousands of Americans who take anything that the AP or Reuters says seriously.
00:27:31.760But let's get to the crux of what they're doing with this Joe Biden limited hangout.
00:27:36.260It was never about the fact that the press corps covered up for his age.
00:27:39.800That's what they want you to think is the biggest scandal of the Biden regime.
00:27:42.540No, it's because if you actually had to understand what this regime did from the southern border, the invasion, the Green New Deal, Afghanistan, take your pick, any issue.
00:27:54.660It's more palatable from their eyes for you to have you think that Joe Biden was out to lunch and this was all just a result, really, of the age old question we've always asked here in the war room, right?
00:28:14.180And I hope congressional Republicans would, I don't know, do something for once and hold some hearings to try to figure out who, I don't know, orchestrated the invasion of the southern border.
00:28:39.460Criminals forge your signature on one document, use a fake notary stamp, pay small fee with your county, and boom, your home title has been transferred out of your name.
00:28:50.680Then they take out loans using your equity or even sell your property.
00:28:54.860You won't even know it's happened until you get a collection or foreclosure notice.
00:29:02.100So let me ask you, when was the last time you personally checked your home title?
00:29:07.000If you're like me, the answer is never.
00:29:11.100And that's exactly what scammers are counting on.
00:29:51.880Welcome back to The War Room, where I think we have always pushed back on the idea that it is akin to the first law of thermodynamics that the Chinese Communist Party is going to rise, that there is some Thucydides-esque trap going on here.
00:30:10.440I think that that rise of China, you know, we always say, has not occurred in a vacuum, it has occurred at the hands, if not outright, I think, sell out, although I think that's too nice a term, it's not just elite merger, or rather elite capture, it's elite merger, I think, between the United States or the West more broadly and the Chinese Communist Party.
00:30:27.360But it's happened because they've been buttressed, and really, I think, able to ascend geopolitically, financially, take your pick, because American elites have sold out to them, or they've just stolen the IP theft, take your pick, it's all bad, they get away with it.
00:30:43.340But someone who is far more of an expert on me, you know, I could rattle on about the United Front Work Department for days, one day I will be able to do that again, is Isaac Stonefish, who is the CEO of Strategy Risks,
00:30:55.920a kind of consulting firm that ranks companies on their exposure to China, you're all over the media, I think you probably won't take offense if I call you a China hawk, but I wanted to have you on to talk about what is going on with these chips, the new deal, that I think is sort of already underway, your overall assessment of the national security risks that could potentially be posed by sending over, in some cases, hundreds of thousands of chips, NVIDIA or otherwise, to the Saudis, to the Emirates,
00:31:25.920and eventually, and eventually, maybe even the Chinese Communist Party.
00:31:29.700There's a very worrying deal that's being discussed, and possibly even going to go through as early as this week, that will send hundreds of thousands of NVIDIA cutting-edge chips to companies that have ties not only to the Saudi and Emirati governments, but also to the Chinese Communist Party.
00:31:46.380And the problems are multifold, two that I'll point out right now.
00:31:51.940One is the idea that when you are sending cutting-edge technology to the Saudi and Emirati government, we have very little guarantee that those two governments aren't sharing those with the Communist Party.
00:32:06.720And then this particular entity, G42, does have problematic ties to the Communist Party.
00:32:16.080I think they were formerly working with Huawei, then they allegedly abandoned it in favor so they could deal with Microsoft, which I would argue is almost equally ardently controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.
00:32:26.320But give us just sort of a sense of the landscape within the chip space, right?
00:32:30.380A lot of these companies are already at face value, sort of heavily exposed to the PRC.
00:32:39.820One is the exposure that we know about.
00:32:42.820The Wire China, an excellent publication, did a great report on that company's ties to the Communist Party.
00:32:49.680The Select Committee has amplified those concerns.
00:32:53.920And the ties to Huawei, to the party, possibly to the People's Liberation Army, which, as you know, is the armed wing of the Communist Party, we know some of those.
00:33:05.540And so the problem with this is, here is this opaque corporate structure that has entities in China.
00:33:12.940Are we comfortable giving them all of this access?
00:33:16.520And the deal with Microsoft that you pointed out was, Microsoft tried to convince the U.S. government that they would be trusted hands in working with G42.
00:33:26.420And I got to say, politely, that raises a lot of questions.
00:33:30.260It seems like, you know, and I think it's probably been at the forefront of everyone's mind with a debate going on about the tariffs, right?
00:33:40.300But this is almost a weird form of, like, consensual intellectual property theft where it's maybe, like, delayed a few years.
00:33:47.640So, you know, through maybe one intermediary, it's somehow going to end up in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.
00:33:53.240I'm curious, from your perspective, having, you know, analyzed so many companies and just sort of see deals like this play out time and time again.
00:33:59.260In your experience, what are sort of the motivating factors, whether it's from a company or even country perspective, to pursue deals like this, which are, you know, not advantageous to America's national security?
00:34:10.480Is this something where it's just a difference in ideology, like, you know, the tech bro faction, the David Sachs of the world who are pushing this, just maybe don't view the Chinese as much of a threat as maybe we do here in the war room or, you know, your firm do?
00:34:23.160Or is it something more nefarious where you think a lot of people who are tied up in this deal, there's room for, you know, actual compromise or blackmail or more traditional kind of methods of, you know, PRC infiltration or espionage?
00:34:35.480Great question. One is short-term thinking that is common in boardrooms where they think, okay, how do I handle this for Q3, Q4, as opposed to thinking ahead in several years?
00:34:47.820Second is an inability to price externalities, even within an own firm.
00:34:51.220So thinking that, oh, great, I'm going to do this deal. It's going to bring in $300, $400 million of revenue, but it's going to hurt our firm overall because it's going to give the Chinese access to cutting-edge IP.
00:35:02.000Another one is this misguided, just quixotic view that the Communist Party does not want to steal U.S. technology, is not in a competition and arguably something even more dire with the United States.
00:35:20.680And this sort of kumbaya, we can all get along and dance together happily type of view that you still see sometimes among companies.
00:35:29.660And so my worry with many major U.S. corporations, especially those in cutting-edge technology, is the sense that if it's not banned explicitly by law, we're going to find a way to do it with China or with other governments.
00:35:44.900And there's also this transit of property there, the, oh, maybe we can't sell directly to the People's Liberation Army, but we can sell to an entity that would give it to the People's Liberation Army.
00:35:52.880And that, in my mind, is also quite problematic.
00:35:56.260It also seems sort of like, for lack of a better word, like a negating almost foil or counter to what I think TSMC did here, right, by trying to make us more reliant, independent, stop the intellectual property theft.
00:36:08.640Can you maybe explain to our audience why these chips just, you know, from the get-go are so important in sort of the dual-use technology, the military-civil fusion, how this isn't just, you know, they want it for their toasters or advanced electronics.
00:36:24.200There's nefarious applications that the Chinese are seeking these chips for.
00:36:29.040Absolutely. And there's plenty of people who have a much more sophisticated understanding of the underpinning technology.
00:36:34.620I'll say the chips, you could see them as building blocks for AI or what companies need to build cutting-edge AI models.
00:36:43.000And the problem with the Communist Party having that, again, twofold.
00:36:47.980One is it allows for them to compete or beat the United States in the global AI race.
00:36:57.520And the second is, as you said, the very dual-use nature of these chips and this technology.
00:37:04.560And this is not only about human rights abuses in China, the ability to build better prisons and better monitoring systems through AI, but also all of the military implications.
00:37:14.780And again, here's where the links between the Communist Party and the military are very important.
00:37:20.480The PLA is the armed wing of the Communist Party.
00:37:24.660It's a very different system than we have here.
00:37:27.300So civil-military fusion where, say, companies like Tencent or Alibaba, which aren't officially state-owned, work with the military is one thing.
00:37:35.340But every Chinese SOE is under the same family as the Communist Party.
00:37:40.280And so it's already much more fused than I worry that people will say, oh, I'm worried about, say, Bank of China or ICBC or these other Chinese companies and their links to the party and the military.
00:37:50.080Well, they're already part of the party in the military.
00:37:52.800And so we have to understand that from the get-go.
00:37:54.400And just last question before we let you go, do you see any bright spots from a regulatory perspective or legislative perspective or maybe even from a certain company's perspective that are refusing to collaborate or anything like that, that our audience can look to or that you think the Trump administration should replicate or sign into law if there's something coming from Congress?
00:38:15.380Or have their influence efforts successfully, I think, prevailed through most of D.C.?
00:38:22.380I'm glad that being tough on the Communist Party is bipartisan in Congress.
00:38:29.200And there are some really bright people in the Trump administration who are pushing really hard on these issues.
00:38:35.540My worry, and it's hard to end on an optimistic note, is that corporations will not focus on national security and longer-term concerns and more focus on what's right in front of them.
00:39:21.700I wish congressional Republicans would do something about it.
00:39:25.040So often when you hear people talk tough on China, it's a bipartisan consensus because the Uniparty thinks that they can deceive you by using it, frankly, just to justify a, what, trillion-dollar defense budget?
00:39:36.540Yet in reality, you have people working to send over the very same chips that the PLA is ultimately going to use to manufacture the weapons that they're going to use to fight us, even though they don't want to go kinetic.
00:39:46.880Or, I don't know, the same people who are going to be probably fighting us potentially on that kinetic battlefield, or at least certainly in the economic, information, political, and other spheres.
00:39:54.920Well, I guess we're educating 350,000 of them at the behest and outright, sometimes funding.
00:40:02.140You know, the Chinese Scholarship Council, which is responsible for funding so many foreign students here in the United States, they actually assess which Chinese people they will give scholarships to based on how allegiant they are to the Chinese Communist Party.
00:40:13.840Of course, always caveated that the Lao Bajing, the Chinese people, are the greatest victim of the Chinese Communist Party.
00:40:36.120I want to hold you through the break, but let me get this straight.
00:40:38.480Mark Elias and the lovely, crazy, lefty lawfare brigade, they're busy suing you because you want to make sure that only citizens vote in our elections.
00:40:50.200We're back, and we predicted it, that Mark Elias and the radical leftists would be suing us on our proof of citizenship for registering to vote requirement.
00:41:01.260And this is the failed Russian hoaxer who has been sanctioned by the Fifth Circuit, Mark Elias, who, as Steve Bannon notes, he does fight, though.
00:41:10.360And so we have to take this seriously because they're clearly trying to set up a test case on proof of citizenship for registering to vote.
00:41:18.280Because our proof of citizenship requirement is so aligned with the SAFE Act, they're trying to win in this case to throw out proof of citizenship at the federal level and across our nation.
00:41:29.900So we have to win, and we're going to defend the law.
00:41:32.760We're going to defend our strong proof of citizenship and proof of residency registration requirement that we put into place in the 2025 legislative session.
00:41:43.000When you say test case, can you walk the audience through how it would sort of get worked up potentially to the federal level or why you think they're starting with Wyoming?
00:41:54.420Elias filed in federal court, and I think that tells you something.
00:41:59.900And he talks about in the complaint how aligned this law is with documentary proof of citizenship, how strong it is and how aligned it is with a true documentary proof of citizenship requirement, which other states that have reported to do this have all these carve-outs.
00:42:20.580We have the real thing along the lines with the SAFE Act.
00:42:24.140And this is a common sense measure to enforce the law.
00:42:29.980Only citizens should be voting in elections, period.
00:42:35.140And this is merely enforcing the law by putting in place a proof of citizenship requirement.
00:42:41.340But by filing in federal court and by noting in, as it goes through the bill, how aligned it is with the SAFE Act, which is proof of citizenship for registering to vote at the federal level, which passed the U.S. House, it's pretty clear what he's trying to do here.
00:43:02.760But I guess maybe hat tip there, I guess reverse hat tip there, exposing their plans.
00:43:08.080The enemy is revealing that they really are keen on having non-citizens vote.
00:43:12.420Though what I'm pretty sure I was told, what, for months last year that, you know, oh, it's a fake, it's a misinformation threat that was created by the right wing to suppress apparently non-citizens from voting.
00:43:23.520So thank you, Mark Elias, for delivering your own fact check and proving shows like The War Room correct.
00:43:31.940In the meantime, make sure you're checking out birchgold.com slash Bannon, texting Bannon to 989898, getting the latest installment of the wonderful works that Steve, Philip Patrick, and the team have all written.
00:43:43.040We'll be right back after this short break.
00:44:16.580Now he's issuing a dire warning about April 11th, a moment that could define Trump's presidency and your financial future.
00:44:24.120His latest book, Money GPT, exposes how AI is setting the stage for financial chaos, bank runs at lightning speeds, algorithm-driven crashes, and even threats to national security.
00:44:35.600Right now, War Room members get a free copy of Money GPT when they sign up for Strategic Intelligence.
00:44:41.920This is Jim's flagship financial newsletter, Strategic Intelligence.
00:52:41.820War room posse, thank you as always for hanging with me.
00:52:44.880My parting thought, just imagine what today's Saudi experience would have looked like had it been Kamala Harris.
00:52:53.060And I'm not just talking about the gaffes, but I don't think you would probably feel as proud to be an American if she had been over there.
00:54:07.440But about six months ago, we decided to launch Sacred Human with really the simple mission being to provide American-made natural supplements without all the artificial nonsense.
00:54:20.740So unfortunately, as many of you know, a lot of these big corporate supplements will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients, and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health.
00:54:30.820So that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements, and of course, the beef liver being our flagship products.
00:54:39.680For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc.
00:54:48.540And because it is 100% grass-fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general.
00:55:01.760So we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to SacredHumanHealth.com.