Stephen K. Bannon and John Solomon join host Stephen K. B. to discuss the latest in the Trump administration's search for a new head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They also discuss the new nominee for the next BLS chief economist, E.J. Anthony.
00:00:00.000Anthony is on our show a lot, President Trump announcing he's going to nominate Heritage Foundation Chief Economist E.J. Anthony to be the next commissioner of the BLS, our loss, maybe the BLS's gain.
00:00:12.000He's going to replace Erica McEnterfer, who just, you know, seems like a fine person, but that name every time.
00:00:23.280This is an uptick there, a lot easier.
00:00:40.700Yeah, no one at home is going to know either way, so I'm going with McEnter, who President Trump fired on August 1st, following a worse than expected jobs report.
00:00:51.260At this point, I would have learned her name, so I'm a little worried about, I hope the CPI isn't like crazy, because, you know, we do have to trust these numbers.
00:01:01.620These are, as good as it gets, probably around the world, most of the numbers that we do generate.
00:01:06.860The president had accused the last BLS director of manipulating the data, and then when we spoke to the president, I tried to talk him into, look, the data's so bad, and it hasn't been improved,
00:01:19.420that there's plenty of reasons maybe to try and get somebody else to do it without saying that it was politically motivated.
00:01:26.160Antony, by the way, was a contributor to the project 2025 policy blueprint, frequent squawk box.
00:01:33.920Guest President Trump, advisor Steve Bannon, had been pushing for him to be nominated.
00:01:38.940This is the primal scream of a dying regime.
00:01:46.440Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people.
00:01:51.660Here's the reason I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people.
00:01:55.920The people have had a belly full of it.
00:02:36.000John Solomon's going to be here with kind of a blockbuster he scooped everybody on last night about these seditious conspiracy charges, grand jury, all of it.
00:02:48.400Certain whistleblowers and informants coming out.
00:03:05.860He's the director of grant strategy at the Quincy Institute and author of an amazing book I read, I think it was last year it came out, called The Russia Trap.
00:03:15.580Sir, what is The Russia Trap and how is this going to play into this historic summit that's going to take place in our own Alaska on Friday, sir?
00:03:28.920I read The Russia Trap in 2019, and I was warning about a collision course that the United States and Russia were on that I thought was going to end potentially in escalation into direct military conflict.
00:03:43.180And I laid out the case for why that was in train and what we needed to do to avoid it.
00:03:52.340Unfortunately, I think a lot of the things that I said were going to lead toward this collision were things that the Biden administration actually did.
00:04:01.420And we wound up in all but direct military conflict with Russia, with real dangers of escalation into nuclear weapons use.
00:04:11.280And I think to his great credit, President Trump has said, you know, we can't continue on that path.
00:04:19.320We're going to have to find a way to settle the war in Ukraine and to put the U.S.-Russian relationship on a much safer path than it has been on.
00:05:24.100So when you talk about framework, what is your best guess right now of what the optimum framework is for the bilateral relationships of the United States and Russia?
00:05:36.680You know, we've been defending the Europeans.
00:05:38.760And like I say about World War II, virtually none of the nations in NATO, their leaders,
00:05:44.000almost all those countries were either neutral, leaning towards the fascists and the Nazis or actual partners with them that our real ally were not the Bolsheviks.
00:05:57.380They're as bad as the Nazi leadership, but the Russian people.
00:06:01.300So what framework do you think is the optimum for a bilateral beginning of a rapprochement between the United States and Russia?
00:06:08.540Well, I think the biggest issue in the relationship between Russia and the United States since the end of the Cold War has been the shape of Europe's security order.
00:06:20.860You know, the United States essentially said, OK, we've ended the Cold War.
00:06:25.320We had a Europe split between NATO and the Warsaw Pact.
00:06:32.580And we very quickly said, you know, and that new era is going to be NATO-centric.
00:06:38.240NATO is going to be the organization that has overarching security responsibility in Europe.
00:06:44.060And Russia is simply going to have to swallow that.
00:06:46.460And Russia doesn't really have a significant role to play in all of this.
00:06:50.840Russia can be a junior partner to NATO.
00:06:53.140It can basically endorse decisions that the NATO allies agree to.
00:06:57.980But it can't really be a decision maker in all of this.
00:07:01.160And the Russians said, hey, no, wait a minute.
00:07:03.620That's not what we thought we were agreeing to.
00:07:07.220Europe should be a player in European security decision making.
00:07:13.160And Russia has to make sure that NATO doesn't put military forces in close proximity to Russia's own border
00:07:22.060and pose a military threat, as Russia sees it, to Russian interests.
00:07:27.840And this has been the central issue, I think, between Russia and the West, between Russia and the United States ever since.
00:07:38.240And the Russians have urged a way to try to find a compromise that respects both European security interests and Russia's own security concerns.
00:07:50.800And the West has essentially said, no, you know, we're not going to talk about that.
00:07:57.920And eventually we reached the point where the Russians said, OK, if you're not going to talk about it at the diplomatic table,
00:08:02.740we're going to settle this matter on the battlefield.
00:08:06.020We can exercise a veto over whether Ukraine becomes a member of NATO or not.
00:08:11.740We can exercise a veto over whether the West puts military forces on Ukrainian territory.
00:08:18.620If you're not willing to address this at the negotiating table, we'll address it on the battlefield.
00:08:23.360And we're now at a point where the United States has said, OK, we do need to address this at the negotiating table.
00:08:31.580If we can settle that issue and it's going to take a lot to address this, Ukraine is part of it.
00:08:38.920You know, settling the war in Ukraine on a compromise basis is a big part of addressing this bigger issue.
00:08:44.640But it doesn't by itself solve all the issues that have to be addressed.
00:08:48.340We have to look at arms control. We have to look at confidence and security measures in Europe.
00:08:54.540We need to recognize that Russia has to have a voice on European security issues that directly affect Russia's core security concerns.
00:09:05.780So I think that is something that has to be addressed in a framework.
00:09:10.720We have to put the conflict in Ukraine on a path toward a compromise.
00:09:15.960And I think that the two presidents are going to do that in Alaska.
00:09:21.080But we also have to put in place an understanding that these broader issues about Europe's security, both conventional military issues and nuclear matters,
00:09:35.300have to be on the table that Russia, Europe and the United States have to be negotiating over these.
00:10:42.240And this helps ensure that they play that role.
00:10:45.340I mean, when you look at it, though, I remember when I came off of sea duty and went back to the Pentagon in 1980, the Red Army coming across the North German plain, the folded gap, you know, the forward deployment of Persian missiles, all of it to stop the Red Army.
00:11:01.080You've got guys three years into a war.
00:11:03.660They really haven't taken all the much new territory from what they had.
00:11:26.180I think they can put forward outside of the United Kingdom two combat divisions if you put them all together.
00:11:32.840They don't really want to pay for the military.
00:11:34.880So are we overblowing the fact that you've got an army that really can't take anything and is after a million casualties, can't take Odessa, and absent tactical nuclear weapons?
00:11:47.000And you have Europeans that's really not a military threat, the Russian army.
00:11:51.340And in addition, they don't want to pay for anything.
00:11:53.440They want the Americans to pay for it, sir.
00:11:59.420The Russians were fighting on territory that was extremely favorable to them, short supply lines right on the Russian border, in a country that they were intimately familiar with.
00:12:14.600Their military officers knew Ukraine, its territory, its terrain, the way that Ukrainians fight.
00:12:23.140All of that were essentially optimum conditions for the Russian military.
00:12:28.460And they still have inched forward for years on this.
00:12:33.780They've not overwhelmed Ukraine militarily in any quick sense.
00:12:39.300So to look at their performance in Ukraine and say, we worry that the Russians are going to take Germany or Poland or France, I think is absurd.
00:12:54.120I think they also have no desire to do so.
00:12:56.720They're not even going to take all of Ukrainian territory.
00:13:00.500The vast bulk of Ukraine is going to remain independent once this war is over.
00:13:07.240And the Russians have no capability to occupy and govern the rest of Ukraine either, let alone conquer it.
00:13:14.500It would require an enormous occupation army, far bigger than what the Russian military has.
00:13:21.240So we have to understand that the Russian threat, quote unquote, to Europe really is not a threat of military invasion.
00:13:30.300It's the threat of unintentional escalation into a nuclear confrontation that the Russians don't want and we don't want, the Europeans don't want.
00:13:41.460That's the big danger. And that's why we have to be negotiating over a nuclear relationship.
00:13:48.780That's the trap. George, where do people get you at the Quincy Institute?
00:13:52.220We want to have you back on. Where do people go for social media and your website?
00:17:01.100As we told you, the most important thing everyone's working on, and the president has raised the stakes on this, is this seditious conspiracy investigation currently underway, John Solomon.
00:17:12.240John, you broke pretty big blockbuster news last night, late at night, over at Just the News in Solomon, John Solomon Reports.
00:17:21.120Walk us through what last night's scoop was, why it's important, and where it's going to lead to, sir.
00:17:27.260We've been talking about a long time how much the legacy news media were a co-conspirator in the creating of false narratives that hampered American elections and hampered an American president.
00:17:36.820Over the next few days, we're going to try to lay out how the media became so deeply involved.
00:17:42.560And last night, we released our first example.
00:17:45.060The FBI has known since 2017 that Adam Schiff was accused of leaking classified information by one of his own staffers.
00:17:53.420A longtime Democrat staffer on the House Intelligence Committee went to the FBI four times between 2017 and 2023 to say that Adam Schiff, starting when he was ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, leaked classified information.
00:18:11.080He was in a meeting where Schiff authorized the leak of information.
00:18:15.380Obviously, Schiff wouldn't do it himself.
00:18:16.800He'd ask some of his people downstream from him.
00:18:18.820That staffer told the FBI he considered Schiff's instructions to be illegal, unethical, and treasonous, the same word that Tulsi Gabbard first used a few weeks ago, despite having four interviews with this gentleman and getting very specific information from him.
00:18:35.560And by the way, he was a career national security officer who got assigned to the House Intelligence Committee.
00:18:55.260They could show from an eyewitness that Adam Schiff had approved classified leaks.
00:19:00.160They chose – the Justice Department chose not to bring a prosecution.
00:19:03.700So this is – and folks, when you get into the weeds here, which we're going to have to do, it's mind-blowing because the timeframe you said is 2017, and it's a Democratic staffer on the – he was on the House Intelligence Committee.
00:19:28.480A guy named Donald John Trump was actually president of the United States, and there was an FBI director at that time that was removed, Comey.
00:19:38.500But then another one that was approved, Ray.
00:19:41.360Plus, Paul Ryan was speaker of the House.
00:19:44.560Devin Nunes, he removed Devin Nunes, and remember, forced Devin Nunes to recuse himself and put Trey Gowdy in charge of the thing.
00:19:52.720Those leaks that came out, wouldn't the Republicans immediately know that Schiff had basically leaked classified information, and this is what he went on TV every night and hammered President Trump about?
00:20:06.320I mean this is not – what's shocking here is not that Schiff did it.
00:20:11.300What's shocking is that you had a Democratic staffer that went to the FBI and said this is happening multiple times.
00:20:17.040The FBI never informed the president of the United States.
00:20:19.260And more importantly, Trey Gowdy and Paul Ryan are up to their neck in this thing.
00:20:24.440You could have seen immediately – you would have seen immediately that this was classified documentation.
00:20:28.580And I think what's going to come out is that people on the staff – I don't know, people like – I'm going to throw out some random names.
00:20:35.180Kash Patel, the general counsel of the committee, and Derek Harvey and others warned people about what was happening.
00:20:41.760So this scandal is horrible for Schiff, but there's a lot of blame to go around here about why this concerted effort by Paul Ryan, the Republican establishment, Trey Gowdy, Chris Wray, another Republican, why they were in on this to take down President Trump, sir.
00:21:00.040Yeah, so as best we can tell, the majority staff was not fully alerted to the FBI's investigation.
00:21:07.900It looks like this goes to some career official in the U.S. attorney's office on Donald Trump's watch, and it dies there.
00:21:13.760So the questions that we all need to be asking, and we are asking right now, is what did Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, know?
00:21:20.120What did Rod Rosenstein, the acting attorney general for All Matters Russia, know?
00:21:37.440But it may have died in the deep state.
00:21:39.840One little hand may have pulled it in the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, D.C., put it in a closet, and nobody else knew about it until Kash Patel got to be FBI director and then dug these documents up.
00:21:50.400Tonight, we're going to learn about a similar circumstance.
00:21:52.880Tonight, we're going to learn about what James Comey's own inner circle, the people he trusted most in his inner circle, what they knew about leaks of classified information coming from the FBI, what they told the FBI and the Justice Department, Inspector General, and what the Justice Department did not do under President Trump and under President Biden to bring some form of accountability to those leaks.
00:22:18.300The leaking of classified information was essentially sanctioned by a lack of accountability.
00:22:25.300And the false stories allowed to stand because no one was arrested for the leaking of this information.
00:22:32.060Now, let me remind people, most of the statutes on classified information are just five-year statute of limitations.
00:22:38.520But there is one provision of the Espionage Act that extends the statute of limitations to 10 years, and that is knowing and willful leaking, meaning you authorized the leak.
00:22:50.940Certainly, the whistleblower on Adam Schiff said it was knowing and willful, because Schiff even says at some point, or his staff says, don't worry about it, we'll be protected by the debate and speech clause of the Constitution.
00:23:02.700So that does sound like it could lean into knowing and willful.
00:23:05.480And the question for Pam Bondi is, are you going to look at this under the 10-year statute?
00:23:09.740That's something we're asking today of the Justice Department right now.
00:23:17.480Given the story last night, the implications are, do you think this rises to the level of, for Schiff, let's just take Schiff, forget all the other, because there's so much other stuff going on, but just on Schiff and what you've reported, do you think that's the type of thing that you could see, particularly if they decide on the 10-year, that you could actually see indictments on?
00:23:39.580I mean, the Justice Department will have to make a decision on whether the debate and speech clause protects a member from leaking something in his official capacity or her official capacity.
00:23:49.320These are not the equities of the House Intelligence Committee.
00:23:52.920These are federal executive branch equities, meaning the intelligence is owned by the executive branch.
00:23:57.380So I think you can overcome the speech and debate clause in that circumstance.
00:24:01.880But those are things that have to be worked through.
00:24:03.520I think the other way to look at it is, is Adam Schiff now one of those co-conspirators in a long-running 10-year conspiracy against the American people and Donald Trump?
00:24:52.520We'll hopefully have that out by the time we all go to bed, and we'll give you an update tomorrow on that.
00:24:58.480And we've got a lot more stuff coming ahead, Steve.
00:25:00.740And the other thing I've been working on this week, some jaw-dropping evidence of just how often the FBI and the Justice Department was protecting Hillary Clinton from real allegations of corruption.
00:25:11.880We've seen some documents that have literally blown me away in terms of their specificity.
00:25:16.580Later this week, we're going to lean into the Clinton Foundation and how much obstruction of justice occurred there.
00:25:58.260Every day I think you're getting another bombshell.
00:26:00.700This also goes back to this Paul Ryan forcing Devin Nunes to recuse himself and essentially shutting down cash as general counsel and Derek Harvey as chief investigator and essentially turning the House Intelligence Committee on President Trump's first term over to shift into Swalwell.
00:26:19.520Swalwell, who we now know, was compromised by a Chinese Communist Party agent of influence.
00:26:48.540Now, John made the point there's a five-year statute on leaking classified information, but it's 10 years of its knowing and willful, et cetera.
00:27:09.600In a conspiracy, you start it from the last act, not the first act.
00:27:13.840So the first act may have been in 2016 or 2017.
00:27:16.940But if they were still conspiring and taking actions and having conversations, et cetera, in furtherance of that, as late as 2021 or 2022, et cetera, or even more recently, then throw five years on top of that.
00:27:45.560Also, two very special people, Michael Patrick Leahy and Jeff Shepard on their new film that's going to be released today on the War Room site.
00:28:09.820You'll talk to a U.S. citizen in a call center in the United States of America about shifting your service today to the best mobile service in the country.
00:28:44.840It just cannot keep up with that demand.
00:28:47.220I don't know about you, but I don't like the idea of being without power, even for a day.
00:28:51.320That's why I got the Grid Doctor 3300 from my Patriot Supply.
00:28:56.560It's a powerful solar generator that runs refrigerators, A.C. units, medical devices, power tools, anything you need to write out a blackout.
00:29:05.180And right now, for their Christmas in July event, they're including over $1,000 in free survival gear with your generator, including emergency food supply, water filtration, survival twos, and more.
00:29:43.240So, Jim Merkerts, give me your assessment on the run-up to Alaska in this summit.
00:29:53.100With everything John Solomon's showing daily and other reports are coming out about this conspiracy, a seditious conspiracy against President Trump.
00:30:01.940President Trump said yesterday at the press conference, hey, it's kind of a sign of weakness.
00:30:07.220We have a capital that's out of control with crime and degeneracy, but he's stepping in to take action on that.
00:30:15.040And what are the things the audience should be looking for as we run up to the meeting on Friday in Alaska, sir?
00:30:21.660Well, the one we already mentioned, Steve, is that this is much broader than Ukraine.
00:30:27.880It involves basically all the security arrangements for Europe undoing or at least going beyond what was set up at the end of World War II.
00:30:36.240The Russians, the Soviets at the time, disbanded the Warsaw Pact, but we never disbanded NATO.
00:30:41.340I don't know how many Americans understand.
00:30:43.440Article 5 in NATO says, you know, an attack on one member is an attack on all.
00:31:36.940The Russians have been methodically surrounding Prokhorovsk, which is a major logistics hub.
00:31:41.660When they take Prokhorovsk, and they're close to doing it, the entire logistics, rail lines, roads, access, supplies, etc., for the Ukrainian eastern front will collapse.
00:31:52.000And then there won't be much standing between the Russians and the Dniper River.
00:31:55.160So, and by the way, the Ukrainians have lied about everything.
00:31:58.880So if you gave them a ceasefire, what would they do?
00:33:23.760So what Trump did, he bought time with China so he could talk to Putin, but he's not going to get what he wants from Putin.
00:33:29.100And so I think Trump has painted himself into a corner on tariffs and ceasefire because he's listening to the warmongers.
00:33:38.140By the way, you talk about that, the same great powers, geopolitical issues still faces today.
00:33:45.560They face Richard Nixon back in the early 1970s when Richard Nixon did the rapprochement with the Chinese Communist Party and laid the predicate for Ronald Reagan later to bring down and destroy the evil empire.
00:34:00.460We've got an amazing film and two great people here to talk about.
00:34:03.920Let's go ahead and play the trailer and I'll bring in Jeff Shepard and Michael Patrick Leahy.
00:34:07.92049 states, 520 Electoral College votes, the largest presidential landslide in American history.
00:34:16.320But less than halfway through his term in office, Richard Nixon was gone.
00:34:21.300Secret meetings between judges and prosecutors, evidence hidden from defense attorneys, biased juries, an unaccountable prosecution force packed with political enemies,
00:34:33.420congressional leaders who are out to get the president and a dishonest media.
00:34:37.920All told, a corrupt judiciary, unaccountable prosecutors, and an overreaching Congress violated the due process rights of Richard Nixon and the Watergate defendants more than a dozen times.
00:34:51.120We will document all those due process violations, something that no one else has ever done over the course of more than half a century.
00:35:00.140This is how the deep state took down a president and created the playbook they've used ever since.
00:35:07.920Okay, Michael Patrick Leahy and Jeff Shepard join us now.
00:35:14.440This film is totally free to War Room Posse members.
00:35:17.860All you have to do is go to warroom.film.
00:35:37.840The conventional wisdom is that the CIA, the FBI, Woodward and Bernstein, the Washington Post, all the president's men, Ben Bradley and Kay Graham, they took down Richard Nixon.
00:35:54.040This takes a much more sophisticated look at actually how the deep state actually did it and actually took down Nixon.
00:36:00.720And what's so haunting about this and the reason we're so proud to put it up for two weeks only for free to the War Room Posse, it really, I think, sends chills down your spine about how close this is to what they're trying to do to President Trump right now with this radical judiciary.
00:36:33.120But we document the due process violations.
00:36:36.440It's the first time anyone has ever put together what we call the dirty dozen due process violations that violated the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights of Richard Nixon and all the Watergate defendants.
00:36:48.620And the reason we were able to do this is because I interviewed Jeff Shepard, who had worked in the Nixon White House back in April of last year.
00:36:58.740And when he revealed all this to me, I said to him, Jeff, can you document, put all this in a list and let's do a documentary on this?
00:37:11.200So I give all the credit to Jeff Shepard for working in the Nixon White House and having basically the receipts on these due process violations.
00:37:19.740Jeff, when you say the due process violations, for those of us not lawyers, that seems it is the way they did it, but it's a little refined.
00:37:31.480But what you bring up in the film is that you had Leon Jaworski, who's a quite controversial figure and actually links back to the Warren Commission, right?
00:37:41.820You have Jaworski, you have the House, you have House Judiciary, they're having meetings, they have a blueprint.
00:37:48.920You exposed all this by going into the archives because you were there as a young man.
00:37:52.740And I guess you figured something was not right.
00:37:55.520I mean, the way you connect the dots here between Judge Sirica, who's presented as a hero, the House Judiciary Committee, how they work together with the Justice Department.
00:38:05.100This is why post-Watergate, the Justice Department was kind of hermetically sealed because these radicals could essentially control the legal process of the country.
00:38:15.240I mean, how did you go, how many years did it take you to compile all this to show us that this was a vast conspiracy, a vast legal conspiracy against President Nixon?
00:38:29.980Of course, I lived through it 50 years ago, I was the youngest lawyer on President Nixon's Watergate defense team, and it ended badly.
00:38:38.360We suspected things weren't going as they should.
00:38:42.460But I started really looking into it about 20 years ago when I discovered that the Watergate Special Prosecution Force were really government employees.
00:38:52.300So their records, those that survived, were kept at National Archives, and I've become a strong customer of the National Archives ever since.
00:39:01.420But what really held things up, Steve, is the top four lawyers took their records with them when they left office, and they stayed unavailable to researchers and didn't even start to surface until 2013.
00:39:18.860Just a little over 10 years ago, just a little over 10 years ago, the real dirt started to come out.
00:39:25.440And this is like researching your family's genealogy.
00:39:30.380If you find interesting stuff, it encourages you to look further and further and further.
00:39:36.280And I've really been through this and uncovered an incredible paper trail.
00:39:42.600Picture a triangle with each branch of government at the points.
00:39:47.800There were people from each of the three branches secretly communicating, secretly meeting, secretly orchestrating Nixon's demise.
00:39:59.020And it's three different federal judges and all the Watergate prosecutors, the politically recruited and appointed Watergate Special Prosecution Force,
00:40:10.060and the congressional staff on the House Judiciary Committee.
00:40:13.940And you put the puzzle together, and I grant you, you go off in the weeds because this gets really deep.
00:40:21.840But what I was able to provide for Michael when he asked for help was to isolate 12 of the most important due process violations that occurred during the Watergate prosecutions.
00:40:37.180And he did a brilliant job of making this understandable.
00:40:43.440One of the things I've struggled with for 20 years is how to explain to people how this was pulled off.
00:40:52.560But the Watergate story is every bit complex back then as some of the stuff we're discovering going on today.
00:41:01.840You've got to work really hard to pay attention and understand the interconnection and interplay.
00:41:09.100And that's where this documentary makes it clear.
00:41:12.860Michael has done really a superb job in focusing just on due process.
00:41:17.880You know, we use the term, it's bandied about, everybody wants due process, it's in the Bill of Rights, the Fifth Amendment.
00:41:26.440But nobody's quite sure what it is, because it's an amalgamation of a whole bunch of different decisions, much like the English common law.
00:41:38.220People trying to figure out what was fair, what was the right way to do things.
00:41:43.740And you have statutes, you have court decisions, you have the U.S. Attorney's Manual that all lay out what comes down to an effort to give defendants a fair trial.
00:41:58.540And at least from my point of view, there are four characteristics.
00:42:02.080You get an unbiased judge who's subjective and not picking on one side or the other.
00:42:10.840You get even-handed nonpartisan prosecutors who don't invent new laws or new interpretations to target particular people.
00:42:21.580You get a jury of your peers that is untainted by adverse publicity and not politically biased.
00:42:29.900And, of course, the jury pooled in Watergate was all out of the District of Columbia, which is the most politically biased place in America.
00:42:39.380And finally, you get a right of appeal to an appellate court that's equally unbiased.
00:42:45.120But the Watergate defendants got none of these things, absolutely none.
00:42:49.680We picked out, Michael and I, the 12 most important due process violations.
00:42:56.180But your viewers can go through it and watch the movie and say, well, gee, I think I understand that one.
00:43:03.920I didn't realize that that was a requirement.
00:43:06.880Or, gee whiz, imagine the judges meeting in secret.
00:45:12.920This is how the deep state took down a president and created the playbook they've used ever since.
00:45:17.960This film is going to blow your head up.
00:45:22.880Many things you thought, and particularly with the Woodward and everything like that, you're about to see the real way they took down Richard Nixon and the template for how they ran the Justice Department for 50 years afterwards and how they tried to come after President Trump.
00:45:58.840Where do people go and get you, sir, in your radio show?
00:46:01.960The radio show is michaelpatricklahe.com.
00:46:04.620The very best way to get the latest on this is go to my ex-account, Michael P. Leahy.
00:46:10.320Michael P. Leahy will be putting clips out, and also, for your information, clips of this will be available at the Nixon Foundation later this week as well.
00:48:50.940There were a couple guardrails around it.
00:48:53.580But it basically confirmed what Nixon said.
00:48:55.920Nixon was a very good lawyer, by the way.
00:48:57.600So 47 years had to go by before the Supreme Court said that basically if the president does it, the Congress cannot make the president a criminal because of separation of powers.
00:49:09.400And so it's actually bigger than due process, although due process is included.
00:49:51.120We're going to have you on towards the end of the week, hopefully for more observations about this summit, which you've been one of our Sherpas here for the last couple of years.
00:51:04.420This audience is working over there, driving the narrative in Texas, fighting all over the place, making big changes, saving their country.
00:51:12.840What kind of deal you got for them, sir?
00:51:15.660Well, we've extended where the two sales collided.
00:51:18.720This is the free shipping on everything, you guys, from our beds to our mattress toppers, everything, and our employee pricing special.