Breaking news from inside the White House on the Muslim Brotherhood and the response from President Trump and his team to a reporter's question about whether or not to designate the group as a terrorist organization. Plus, the latest on the James Comey scandal.
00:06:46.380Criminal charges brought against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James have been dismissed.
00:06:53.280A federal judge found that Lindsay Halligan was unlawfully appointed to the role of interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.
00:07:01.300And because Halligan alone presented the case to the grand jury and alone signed the indictments, the indictments are now null and void.
00:07:09.860The Justice Department will likely appeal the ruling, but it is a major victory for both James and Comey.
00:07:16.780Comey was indicted on charges of making a false statement to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation.
00:07:24.100James was charged with bank fraud and making false statements.
00:07:27.520Both pleaded not guilty and both accused the current administration of using the Justice Department as a tool for the president's retribution.
00:07:37.360I'm grateful that the court ended the case against me, which was a prosecution based on malevolence and incompetence and a reflection of what the Department of Justice has become under Donald Trump, which is heartbreaking.
00:07:50.580But I was also inspired by the example of the career people who refused to be part of this travesty.
00:07:56.200It cost some of them their jobs, which is painful, but it preserved their integrity, which is beyond price.
00:08:06.040I was very lucky that some of the best lawyers in America stepped forward to represent me.
00:08:10.680I hope they serve as an example to more and more lawyers, especially at some of the big firms, to participate in protecting our liberty, protecting the rule of law.
00:08:20.280We just spoke about this a couple of days ago.
00:08:22.780I told you that I thought the case was a choose your own adventure of procedural errors.
00:08:26.860And here we are, because this was a huge one.
00:08:29.960And as we also discussed, Halligan being appointed after the 120 days of the interim appointment had been exceeded was a huge problem.
00:08:40.000And indeed, the court agreed that she was unlawfully appointed.
00:08:44.040And the problem here is that Halligan did everything on her own.
00:08:47.340And so now these indictments can't stand.
00:08:49.740Now, with respect to have you seen anything like this before?
00:08:52.180I mean, I just heard the conversation.
00:08:54.080We did see the Mar-a-Lago case being dismissed on similar but different grounds.
00:09:00.400The legal grounds of why the Jack Smith Mar-a-Lago indictment was ultimately dismissed with Jack Smith's unlawful appointment is different here, but, you know, similar broadly.
00:09:12.400But prior to these two indictments, not really, right?
00:09:17.020Like, usually, usually DOJ follows proper process and procedure.
00:09:23.360And now we see what happens when DOJ attempts to do it and run around those procedures.
00:09:27.760The cases have now been dismissed and probably delivered a humiliating defeat to the Trump administration.
00:09:36.160And just to be clear, we're talking about today's opinion says very clearly, and in both opinions, there's a Comey opinion, there's a James opinion, they're substantively identical,
00:09:46.160that Lindsay Halligan was unlawfully appointed under the federal statute that was used as the basis for her appointment.
00:09:52.760That allows the attorney general to appoint an interim U.S. attorney for 120 days.
00:09:58.400And basically what the judge is saying here is you already had somebody in that position for 120 days.
00:10:03.240You can't use these 120-day periods successively.
00:10:07.140When that 120-day period is over, you've got two choices.
00:10:10.360You can either let the district judges appoint someone on their own, or the president can nominate someone and the Senate can confirm them.
00:10:18.660But you can't do what Lindsay Halligan did here, which is effectively walk off the street from the White House with no prosecutorial experience and then charge a case only to have this issue being raised by defendants.
00:10:31.540And the attorney general saying after the fact, oh, everything that she did is totally fine by me, I fully endorse it.
00:10:38.280What the judge is saying here is not only was she unlawfully appointed from the beginning, but the attorney general does not have the right sort of ex-post to say that's okay with me.
00:10:50.640So in order to get there, you say that no matter what, they first have to appeal it.
00:10:54.260And that process could be the thing that runs out the clock, because in theory, I think they could probably nominate somebody and potentially get them to the Senate in a shorter period than six months.
00:11:03.380Well, think about who represents the state of Virginia in the Senate.
00:11:06.280And so long as the blue slip process is active, remember that U.S. attorneys are still subject to the blue slip process in the United States Senate.
00:11:14.120It basically gives home state senators a choice in order to block the nomination or the floor consideration of someone who is nominated to be a district judge or a U.S. attorney.
00:11:25.820This is why Trump is relying on all these interim appointments in the first place, because in states where there is at least one blue state senator or one Democratic senator,
00:11:36.560he feels as if he cannot nominate the people he wants in those positions.
00:11:40.660That's why you've got Alina Hava in the district of New Jersey.
00:11:43.200That's why you've got Seagal Chata in the district of Nevada, Bill Assaylee in the central district of California, which is Los Angeles.
00:11:49.740He thinks that the real fundamental problem here is the blue slip process.
00:11:53.780And Chuck Grassley in particular, he's called out for real criticism for not getting away with, not doing away with the blue slip process.
00:12:02.880Arizona senator and retired Navy captain Mark Kelly is under investigation by the Pentagon for what it claims are serious allegations of misconduct.
00:12:10.380In relation to a video he and other lawmakers released last week reminding military members that they can refuse illegal orders.
00:12:47.480I mean, it just shows that there are there are no lengths to which this administration will not go to use the process of investigation in an effort to punish people it perceives as its adversaries, whether there's any justification or not.
00:13:00.840And it also shows that we're a government that's based on good faith, the idea that people aren't going to abuse investigative powers, because this isn't a significant power that the military has over everyone who's ever served in uniform.
00:13:13.920The threat to call somebody back into active duty to court martial them, regardless of whether there's any merit.
00:13:19.860And I think fair-minded people can look at that and decide for themselves whether there's any merit to the allegation here.
00:13:29.160It would be it could be emotionally painful, probably not for Mark Kelly, because he's defiant and he's a famous member of Congress.
00:13:34.760But imagine for someone else that has to go through this, it's a significant threat, just the investigation, just the recall to active duty.
00:13:42.080And the Trump administration and the Defense Department has now shown that they are willing to to to use this lever of power to just another thing that they're willing to do to pursue their enemies.
00:13:52.360When I was a kid, my parents would wake us up for school every morning by snapping open the shades and saying, time to rise and shine and show the world what you're made of.
00:17:13.800I want to thank Patriot Mobile and everybody down in Texas that worked on putting this issue in front of Governor Abbott and the pressure it was put on.
00:17:22.720Governor Abbott, you've got to give a hat tip.
00:17:24.320Governor Abbott wrote a very tough, as Brian Harrison said, it's all about the execution, but a very tough executive order from himself on the Muslim Brotherhood and care.
00:17:35.000And so the White House today come along.
00:17:38.600And this is a huge contention because, remember, the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated, as well as the Chinese Communist Party, many different aspects of our government.
00:18:10.140All this controversy has the clock run out.
00:18:13.120You've got Big Tish James with the multiple bank frauds and mortgage.
00:18:16.860Just explain to people what was the actual ruling day because they're spiking the football over mainstream media, MSNBC or ShamWow, whatever it is, ShamWow MS right now.
00:18:29.080They're spiking the football, this humiliation for Halligan, this humiliation for Pam Bondi, this humiliation for Trump.
00:18:37.200Well, the district judge dismissed both of the indictments against Comey and James on the grounds that Lindsey Halligan wasn't properly appointed as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.
00:18:51.020It's probably going to get reversed by the Fourth Circuit and almost certainly it's going to get reversed by the Supreme Court.
00:18:55.720I mean it's wrong in terms of reading the statute, which is a broad grant of authority to Attorney General Bondi to appoint interim U.S. attorneys.
00:19:03.900And it's also wrong because the district court's interpretation runs headlong into the separation of powers in our Constitution.
00:19:10.440It would vest complete authority to appoint U.S. attorneys to district court judges.
00:19:15.320That's not how our Constitution works.
00:19:18.660Prosecution is an executive authority.
00:19:20.580There's no world where Article III has the right, the sole and exclusive right to appoint Article II officials.
00:19:28.700So, Will, you've got this controversy.
00:19:30.520Explain to the audience what this interim appointment is because you've got Elaine Habab in New Jersey.
00:19:36.740And you've got our own Seagal Chatter, the warrior out in Nevada.
00:19:42.100And what is the president's, as the chief magistrate and chief law enforcement officer, what is his ability to appoint these people on interim bases?
00:19:50.520And why have – and you've got this whole concept with blue slips, particularly in places like New Jersey, in Nevada, in Virginia, in Maryland, where you can't – you know, the people – he's asked, just like he's asked for the filibuster to be reversed.
00:20:05.180This blue – the blue slip, which is you've got to get approval from the senators, the two senators in your – in the state.
00:20:14.480And people have said, well, this is a minority – this protects minority rights when the republicans are out of power.
00:20:20.100But it's been looked at for years, has it not, as a way to – for local politicians not to have people in the opposite party actually look at them as far as fraud goes, money laundering, kickbacks, crony capitalism, et cetera.
00:20:35.660So explain the blue slips, why the president is upset about it, and also these interim appointments.
00:20:42.580So the blue slip is a process whereby local U.S. attorneys and local district judges aren't going to be confirmed by the Senate unless they have a Senate of the two senators where that district is.
00:20:54.780So in this case, it would be – you would need both of the Virginia senators, Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, to consent to Lindsey Halligan to be permanently appointed as the Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney.
00:21:06.080But U.S. attorneys are inferior officers, and that means that their appointment doesn't have to be done only by presidential advice and Senate consent – or, sorry, presidential appointment and Senate advising consent.
00:21:17.720Rather, it can be done by methods prescribed by statute, and so one of those methods comes from a statute, 28 U.S.C. 546, the vacancy statute, which lays out a way for the attorney general to make interim appointments.
00:21:32.780And that's precisely what Pam Bondi did a couple months ago, I think, back in September, when she appointed Lindsey Halligan to be the U.S. attorney for the East District of Virginia.
00:21:44.740Now, there's some sort of – the issue being that this – Lindsey Halligan is not the first interim U.S. attorney that has been appointed to the Eastern District of Virginia by Pam Bondi.
00:21:56.640The prior holder of the office, Eric Siebert, was appointed back in January and had his term extended by the district court in Virginia.
00:22:06.220So basically, I mean, you heard all these progressive arguments if you were listening to that 10-minute clip, which was kind of like being subjected to a clockwork orange torture session.
00:22:13.840I'm sorry just making you listen to James Comey like that is – you know, it's not a nice thing to do to your guests, Steve.
00:22:21.380So I'm a little – I'm still a little – you know, I kind of compose myself.
00:22:34.620But yeah, so you listened, you know, to what they were talking about and just the greed on their faces.
00:22:41.500Like they were like, aha, this blue slip process allows us to defeat the functioning of the federal government.
00:22:46.220And that should be a tell that this isn't going to stand up.
00:22:48.620There's no way that the Supreme Court is going to stand for a process by which, you know, Article III judges and home state senators are able to completely defeat federal prosecutions.
00:23:05.980You're one of his deputies over at Article III.
00:23:08.440You seem pretty adamant that this is going to get reversed either at the appellate level or if it has to go in the emergency doctrine of the Supreme Court.
00:23:15.080One of the reasons people are saying is that this is huge is that they think this gets Comey off because of the statute of limitations.
00:23:21.380And that was the whole thing was done for by the judge.
00:23:26.180The statute of limitations issue was resolved by a different statute, 18 U.S.C. 3288.
00:23:31.580So even if the administration loses on the question of whether Lindsay Halligan was properly appointed, they still will have a six-month window to bring the appointment because – I'll just quote from the statute.
00:23:44.140Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months.
00:23:57.700And the only exception to that is if you brought the indictment past the statute of limitations in the first instance.
00:24:02.380So for any reason includes the U.S. attorney who brought the indictment was properly appointed.
00:24:08.800So the DOJ will have six months to fix this even if they don't prevail on appeal.
00:24:14.820But you believe that they're working right now and they're going to go appeal this immediately?
00:24:20.900I mean this isn't the first case where we've seen it.
00:24:23.120We've already – we have appeals going on actually.
00:24:25.320The cases you talked about, the HABA appeal has already been argued at the Third Circuit.
00:24:29.480So we're probably going to get an opinion from the Third Circuit there and something I've talked about with some lawyer friends of mine.
00:24:35.220We wouldn't be surprised to see DOJ try to ask for a certiorari before judgment in one of these cases because you keep seeing this – it's a pure legal dispute about the meaning of this statute.
00:24:46.880And the implications are being felt all over the country in these various U.S. attorneys' offices because the Democrats are refusing to confirm the president's appointees.
00:24:54.920So I think the Supreme Court could be persuaded to resolve all of these issues in one fell swoop and just resolve what this law actually means.
00:25:04.700You know, this audience, they want to see – they're Trump's biggest supporters.
00:25:11.400You're seeing now DOJ, I think, be much more aggressive but also over the Department of War.
00:25:16.240You see today they're actually talking about – Pete Hex is in the Department of War talking about recalling Mark Kelly to active duty to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
00:25:26.660Your thoughts on the Seditious Six and what action should be taken because the Department of War looks like they're very serious about going – I mean they're looking at the alternatives right now over at JAG on recalling Kelly to active duty and court-martialing him, sir.
00:25:41.060Well, you actually might have a better handle on the UCMJ than I do given that you served and I didn't and I'm not a military law expert.
00:25:48.060I don't think the excuses being made by the Seditious Six are particularly persuasive.
00:25:52.360They knew exactly what they were doing.
00:25:53.740They were putting out statements about how you need to disobey unlawful orders and implying extremely strongly that there are some unspecified unlawful orders being issued.
00:26:04.360I think that – what's the term good order and discipline?
00:26:07.960I can think a few things more disruptive to good order and discipline than to put rank-and-file service members into the position of wondering exactly which orders they're being given are unlawful without basis or without any real provocation or any reason to bring that thought into their minds.
00:26:24.040So I think my understanding is that – go ahead.
00:26:26.720No, do you think Slocking gave away the game yesterday when they asked her point blank on ABC on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, which is not known as a show that brings the hammer to liberals?
00:26:38.660They asked her – would give us an order and she says they haven't – President Trump hasn't initiated yet.
00:26:43.120Did that kind of undercut their argument?
00:26:44.900Yeah, it undercuts their argument dramatically.
00:26:48.460It also means that there's not really a good argument for the speech and debate clause to immunize their conduct here because for the speech and debate clause to come into play, there has to be some legitimate legislative activity.
00:26:59.400But if they have no suspicion that there's been any unlawful orders, they can't point to anything, then what are they doing other than trying to disrupt good order and discipline among the rank-and-file?
00:27:10.400And it's the vice where he tells us they've lost 20 – they've lost 21 or 23 times when they've gone.
00:27:18.060The Supreme Court's had their back about these orders, particularly with the ICE units.
00:27:21.540Will, where do people go for Article III and where do they go to get your coordinates on social media, sir?
00:27:28.140So, yeah, Article III project on X, a3paction.com to look at our various projects where you can tell your senators what you think they should be doing and make it clear.
00:27:39.060I know the War Room Posse has been very good about that in the past for a lot of our projects.
00:27:43.960And then finally for myself, at Will Chamberlain on X, I'm pretty prolific there.
00:29:52.520It's the process that what strives value and what gold has been historically.
00:29:57.420Now, gold has been a hedge against times of financial turbulence.
00:30:01.460Now, here recently, it's resetting to become actually a major asset class like it was really, I guess, before the 19th century or before the Great Depression when first Roosevelt and then Nixon took us really off the gold standard.
00:30:16.500The gold is now, I think, the number two asset in a lot of these central banks after all this buying.
00:30:20.520And one of the reasons is the stealing of the Russian people's assets.
00:30:51.640It's one of the reasons the central banks are going back to people don't want to take the euro, right?
00:30:56.600They're not even taking government securities.
00:30:58.220They got cash, U.S. dollars, and they got gold.
00:31:00.360The individuals brought this out the best, I think.
00:31:04.020And also going to Rio and talking about the Rio Reset and the de-dollarization program is our guest, of course, Philip Patrick.
00:31:09.580Philip, one thing I just want to get on the table, like you got on the goal is becoming this kind of new asset class that hasn't been in decades,
00:31:19.860And just the fact that, and I think people got to look at this, crypto, I think, has lost $1.2 trillion in market cap or value in the last three or four weeks.
00:31:30.280And our concern here is not simply about crypto and part of the audience that owns crypto, but what it can mean as far as pattern recognition.
00:31:37.780Because what's important here is, as I keep saying, the world has $370, approximately $1 trillion of debt, and we're concerned about the world's largest margin call.
00:31:49.960And is this potentially the canary in the mine shaft, sir?
00:31:57.700First of all, it was just a huge amount wiped off the crypto market in a very short space of time, as you say.
00:32:05.280This isn't just a price drop that we saw, it was a forced deleveraging event.
00:32:10.580And I think once the big drawdown started, every leveraged player in the space had to unwind positions, and that turns what is a downturn into a cascade.
00:32:20.920When it comes to crypto, there's stress in a number of different areas.
00:32:24.140Funding rates have flipped deeply negative, so traders are now paying to stay short.
00:32:29.120Stablecoin flows have now gone flat, so there's no fresh money entering into the system.
00:32:33.760And exchanges have seen the biggest sell-off since 2022.
00:32:37.960People are taking assets off the platform.
00:32:43.360But as you mentioned, when you zoom out, there's another layer to this.
00:32:47.640Crypto was supposed to be the high beta expression of the AI boom, but now we've got the AI story wobbling, we've got liquidity thinning, we've got a Fed that's split right down the middle.
00:32:58.740So the entire speculative complex is losing oxygen at the same time, which means crypto collapse is not an isolated storm.
00:33:07.480As you put it, I think it's the canary in the coal mine.
00:33:10.560We've seen this exact pattern over and over again.
00:33:13.900We saw it at the turn of the century in 2000.
00:33:15.840We saw it in 2008, we saw it briefly in 2022.
00:33:19.460When the system gets shaky, traders dump the lowest quality, highest volatility assets to raise cash and essentially lower their risk exposure.
00:33:29.220So, yes, crypto is the first domino, but it's not the only one wobbling.
00:33:33.100We're seeing wider spreads in credit markets.
00:33:35.560We're seeing hedge funds now deleveraging.
00:33:38.440Retail investors are pulling to the sidelines.
00:33:40.500This is a classic flight to quality moment, but the big problem is the so-called risk-free assets, they're not working either.
00:33:51.100Government debt has been a major loser for the last five years.
00:33:54.840Cash is a sure loser when we adjust for inflation, and the dollar, as we've discussed many times, is just not acting like the safe haven it once was.
00:34:04.580The big problem I see is that the safety valve of the financial system is also broken.
00:34:11.980And when risk assets grow up, you're supposed to move to stable ones.
00:34:16.240But with over a trillion dollars in annual interest costs, $38 trillion in national debt, and a Fed that's clearly divided on the path forward, those safe haven assets today are now looking risky.
00:34:28.780So, I think the crypto crash is really a stress test for the entire financial structure.
00:34:35.960If the riskiest corner is collapsing and the safe corner isn't truly safe, it's telling us something very important.
00:34:43.120Investors are running out of places to hide within the financial system.
00:34:48.020And when risk assets crack and safe assets wobble, you need a third category, assets outside of the system.
00:34:55.320And I think that's why the global rotation into gold will continue, not because of fear, but I think because investors are finally starting to realize that it's the system itself that is the risk.
00:35:08.280And I think gold will continue to see a pickup.
00:35:11.320So, yeah, it was a bad month and a bit for crypto, but I think there's a lot worse to come, unfortunately.
00:35:24.980That wasn't, because people had leveraged positions, and that caused kind of a cascade.
00:35:29.960In 2008, you kind of had a macked at it because that was all these instruments that nobody really realized, and the system almost went down.
00:35:37.680In fact, if it had not been for a cash infusion of a trillion dollars, I think on the afternoon of 17 September of 2008, it's a famous story.
00:35:46.900If it hadn't been a trillion dollars of cash infusion, things might have unraveled quite quickly.
00:35:52.240Here, you use a term, and don't bury the lead.
00:35:56.360When I say that we are $370 trillion globally of debt, and that's every piece of debt that's out there,
00:36:01.700from your credit card debt in every country in the world to the junk bonds, the government debt, all of it,
00:36:07.480you used a term that makes people quiver.
00:36:11.260I said, or makes them shake in their boots on Wall Street, the toughest of the tough.
00:36:14.920That is a forced deleveraging or a margin call.
00:36:19.420It's basically that there's too much debt.
00:36:21.240Some of the crypto positions were highly leveraged because they wanted more bang for the buck.
00:36:29.120I talked to Philip and I said, hey, I'm very concerned that this crypto meltdown of over, what, $1.2 or $1.5 trillion here recently is going to lead to something else.
00:36:39.500And I think you just perfectly described it.
00:37:28.520Listen, a world run by Putin or the Chinese is a frightening proposition for us in the West.
00:37:33.560But listen, if you're Russian, it doesn't make sense for you to hold dollars anymore.
00:37:38.340If you're Chinese, it's making less and less and less sense.
00:37:41.920The reality is we forced their hands, and now they're capitalizing.
00:37:46.300Well, and people should know that one of the key parts of this negotiation they're having, in fact, I think it's the central key part, because the Europeans, once more, President Trump had him in the Oval Office eight weeks ago, and Macron and Starmer, they all talk big.
00:44:43.960Today, we are proud to announce a big step in keeping our rental housing markets fair and competitive.
00:44:49.980This Department of Justice has taken a major step in lowering the cost of rent in a settlement with RealPage.
00:44:57.920Our settlement, combined with prior settlements with some landlords, is as good as any relief we would get from a court order after a lengthy and expensive trial.
00:45:08.100And importantly, it brings that relief to American consumers now, not three years from now.
00:45:13.680RealPage is an algorithmic pricing system that many large landlords use to coordinate rental prices instead of competing for tenants.
00:45:23.840Landlords fed their confidential data into a shared algorithm that generated daily rent recommendations.
00:45:31.260RealPage was replacing competition with coordination, and renters paid the price.
00:45:37.100We reached a settlement that stops RealPage from coordinating pricing with its customers.
00:45:41.920Under the settlement, the company must stop using competitors' landlords' secret data to set rents in real time.
00:45:50.480And its software can no longer generate hyper-localized pricing that pushes rents up block by block.
00:45:57.340And RealPage must eliminate features that discourage landlords from lowering prices or that nudged competitors toward the same rent levels.
00:46:07.560What does this mean for you and your family?
00:46:09.900It means more real competition in local housing markets.
00:46:14.880It means rents set by the market, not by a secret algorithm.
00:46:19.300It is a win for renters, and it means more affordable options for Americans trying to make ends meet.
00:46:26.340The cost of living is top of mind as we continue to do our important work at the Trump Antitrust Division.
00:46:32.600Thank you for your attention to this matter, and thanksgiving wishes to you all, even the haters.
00:47:04.520So, it's a piece of software that algorithmically was sorting prices that were going up across millions of rental properties across the country.
00:47:13.760And it was analyzing the pricing data, sending it back to the markets, to the landlords.
00:47:19.880One landlord that we settled with already had a million rental units under management.
00:47:25.040And those prices, those rental prices in those local markets were going up, not down.
00:48:12.240And we, unlike the Biden administration, they didn't settle too many cases.
00:48:16.640We took the view that this was one we could settle.
00:48:18.460We could get a better deal for consumers today than if, even if we went to court.
00:48:22.980And three years from now, we prevailed after a very costly litigation involving a lot of taxpayer money and our own resources that could be better spent elsewhere.
00:48:33.040So, that's what we're about, and that's where we got to today.
00:48:35.960We're very happy with the results here.
00:48:38.980And what's the, if I'm some millennial and renting an apartment, what does this mean for me starting tomorrow morning?
00:48:44.980Tomorrow morning, it should mean that your landlord is going to start looking harder at those rental contracts and revising those rents downwards.
00:48:55.820And we are already seeing price drops in the relevant markets where we, you know, we know we had a lot of units under the control of Graystar.
00:49:06.560Will you take, if people don't go back to the free market and continue to kind of use this, will you go to court and try to shut them down or bring penalties against them?
00:49:21.580We can enforce an order violation if we see conduct that's contrary to the conduct they signed up for under this order.
00:49:28.180Okay, Gail, can you hang on for a second?
00:49:32.560Gail Slater over at Maine Justice, she's the head of the Antitrust Division, which is one of the biggest and most powerful and most important of all the divisions within the Department of Justice.
00:49:42.660And we've known Gail from the first term.
00:49:44.720Gail was in the White House with us in the National Security Council.
00:49:47.920She'll join us at the 6 o'clock hour in a few minutes to discuss more things about antitrust.
00:49:54.420We know everybody in the war room is a once entrepreneurial capitalism, entrepreneurial finance.
00:49:59.820Mike Lindell, we couldn't get a better entrepreneur than you.
00:50:02.240They've been trying to put you out of business.
00:50:04.320I got to introduce you to Gail Slater, man.
00:50:06.440You could use the Justice Department coming in on your side.
00:50:09.100They've been trying to shut you down forever, sir.
00:50:12.140I spent all afternoon, Steve, with lawyers today filling out interrogatories for both a machine company, I won't mention no names, I all know who they are, and our AG in Minnesota attacking MyPillow's, I mean, the Lindell Recovery Network.