00:01:35.120I mean, the question asks, do you want to, quote, restore fairness to the process?
00:01:39.140Who's going to realistically vote no on that?
00:01:41.000I mean, a lot of people did, but it's slanted.
00:01:43.220I don't know if it's slanted enough to win the legal challenge.
00:01:46.660But the second category is the procedural challenges.
00:01:49.380And that's where I think the challengers have some real heft behind their arguments.
00:01:53.700For example, one of the laws says if you're going to do this, the Virginia General Assembly has to pass a law, and then voting, the referendum, can't start for 90 days after the law is passed.
00:02:04.240Here, we're not even 90 days out now, and the voting's done.
00:02:07.800So I don't know how Virginia's going to defend that.
00:02:10.600There's another procedural quirk, I guess, that says the way you have to do this is the Virginia General Assembly has to pass a law, then you need to have an intervening election, then a second General Assembly needs to pass the law again.
00:02:22.860And the argument here that you're hearing from the defenders is, well, the 2025 governor election, that's the intervening election.
00:02:29.760The problem is that overlapped with the first vote.
00:02:32.560So there's some procedural nuance here that I think is going to be a real problem for people defending this outcome.
00:02:39.080And I think it's going to give the Republicans a chance to actually get it knocked down on the legal challenges.
00:02:44.080This isn't the only legal challenge, right?
00:02:45.960I mean, this, this referendum, this is a constitutional amendment, uh, and this effort
00:02:50.920has already come through the Virginia court system. It's well acquainted with this judge,
00:02:55.320as it were. Talk to us about that. So this judge, the same judge in Tazewell County
00:02:59.000has tried to block the referendum, even from happening twice. It went up to the Virginia
00:03:04.320Supreme Court, which essentially said, we're not going to block it. We're going to let it happen.
00:03:09.260However, they did not bless it. What the Virginia Supreme Court said is we're going to let the
00:03:13.340referendum happen. If it's a no vote, it's moot. We don't have to get involved. Now it's a yes
00:03:18.700vote, though. And so I believe it's clearly headed back to the Virginia Supreme Court. But important
00:03:23.620to know, you'll read some of the coverage, which will say, oh, the Virginia Supreme Court has
00:03:26.860already rejected this twice. That's not quite right. What the Virginia Supreme Court has said
00:03:30.680is, if it's a yes, come back to us then. And we're not giving you any opinions yet. There's still a
00:03:36.440step or two before it gets there, right? So what happens now? So the Virginia Attorney General
00:03:41.060has said he will appeal. It'll go to the mid-level
00:17:06.240Rob Lockwood, amazing piece in the Washington Post to kind of kick off our commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the birth of our country.
00:17:18.400President, we're going to be rolling out every day.
00:17:21.500There's going to be other things the administration is doing to get us to July 4th and beyond.
00:17:26.180You've got a piece in the Washington Post.
00:17:52.300one of the most lasting gifts that we can give this country is actually rebranding our language
00:17:57.920to what it is. It's no longer American English. We can make it American. And I think that it's
00:18:02.920something that could be a fantastic addition to all of the festivities that the president and
00:18:07.200the Congress and the executive branch have planned. So I wrote a piece today in the Washington Post
00:18:11.920arguing for that. It's something that going back to our founders generation has been debated amongst
00:18:17.000great thinkers and great minds and 250 years overdue in my mind. So I think this is the time
00:18:21.960to do it if we ever wanted to and plant our flag and say hey we're speaking american from here on
00:18:27.240out okay so i know you you're a very serious guy used to be bergam's guy uh you've had some of the
00:18:34.840biggest media jobs around you're one of the smartest strategists out there is this a goof
00:18:40.440or is this because you're trolling the english because the king's coming over uh i think the
00:18:46.280daily mail's bragging they're gonna have the king at one of their receptions or parties is it because
00:18:51.220King Charles is coming over. Lockwood, are you trolling him? Are you serious about this?
00:18:57.520Dead serious. And I say this to somebody whose surname is English. I think we won and it's time
00:19:02.600that we do this. We should dump English as the official language. Like we dumped the T in 17,1.00
00:19:07.480I think it was 74 actually, but not 76. But no, dead serious on the timing of this. I wrote this
00:19:12.400piece months ago and the timing's coincidental with the king coming. But it's also impactful.
00:19:18.160And it's something when you look at what President Trump did last year with the naming of renaming the Gulf of America.
00:19:24.060I thought that was tremendously important. It was something that was executed at the Department of the Interior.
00:19:29.000And when you look at the importance in celebrating American greatness, our language, the tongue we speak, there's nothing greater.
00:19:36.360Or like I said, it could have a longer lasting impact than rebranding as American.
00:19:40.080So, yeah, it's a marketing play, but it's one I think is highly appropriate for our country.
00:19:43.780And on the 250th birthday, it's a great gift that we can give ourselves.
00:19:48.160Do you, is there, you, you call it American English. A lot of people still just refer to
00:19:52.740English. Is there enough about the language itself that's actually structurally changed
00:19:57.260or the words we use, or that maybe the cadence that actually backs up your point that, Hey,
00:20:03.000this is, we speak American. Uh, we don't really speak English.
00:20:07.480Yeah. So there's plenty of words that, I mean, the way we spell things are different. They use
00:20:11.620O-U-R, they use C-E instead of S-E. There's a lot of different structural linguistic things
00:20:17.500that academics look at. I quote this in the piece I wrote. There's a book written in 1919 by H.L.
00:20:23.980Mencken, where he talks about how the American tongue has evolved itself where it's truly distinct.
00:20:29.440And so, yeah, there's plenty of structural stuff. But for me, like I said, this is a branding thing.
00:20:34.540This is about celebrating American exceptionalism and American greatness. And it's in line with
00:20:39.700things that the president has done. It's in line with things that a lot of other thinkers have
00:20:43.960thought over 250 years in america and so now is the time more than ever if we wanted to do it
00:20:48.880to actually put this plan into action and uh you know so that's why i wrote the piece okay
00:20:53.920i want everybody to read this i'm gonna have you back on maybe i have you on with rahim
00:20:57.900um lockwood where do people go to your social media to get all your all your current thinking
00:21:04.380sir rob lockwood on x or twitter whatever people like to call it yeah i love it as soon as i read
00:21:11.560this. I got to get Lockwood on for this. Thank you, sir. Appreciate you. Thanks, Steve. Rob Lockwood.
00:21:18.140Grace and Mo and Elizabeth, we can push this out and have everybody in the posse read it. Okay,
00:21:23.080Wren's with us. I want to play Honig for maybe not the whole thing. Let me play Honig and then
00:21:28.920I'm going to get Caroline up. It is not over. So if you look at their various challenges here
00:21:34.100brought by the RNC and other Republican entities, they're basically making two types of challenges
00:21:39.140here. One is substantive. So they're arguing that the way the question was phrased on the ballot was
00:21:44.820unfair, was misleading. And there is some legitimacy to that. I mean, the question asks,
00:21:50.240do you want to, quote, restore fairness to the process? Who's going to realistically vote no
00:21:54.740on that? I mean, a lot of people did, but it's slanted. I don't know if it's slanted enough
00:21:58.920to win the legal challenge. But the second category is the procedural challenges. And
00:22:03.700that's where I think the challengers have some real heft behind their arguments. For example,
00:22:08.560One of the laws says if you're going to do this, the Virginia General Assembly has to pass a law, and then voting, the referendum, can't start for 90 days after the law is passed.
00:22:18.300Here, we're not even 90 days out now, and the voting's done.
00:22:21.860So I don't know how Virginia's going to defend that.
00:22:24.660There's another procedural quirk, I guess, that says the way you have to do this is the Virginia General Assembly has to pass a law, then you need to have an intervening election, then a second General Assembly needs to pass the law again.
00:22:36.920And the argument here that you're hearing from the defenders is, well, the 2025 governor election, that's the intervening election.
00:22:43.820The problem is that overlapped with the first vote.
00:22:46.620So there's some procedural nuance here that I think is going to be a real problem for people defending this outcome.
00:22:53.140And I think it's going to give the Republicans a chance to actually get it knocked down on the legal challenges.
00:22:58.140This isn't the only legal challenge, right?
00:23:00.020I mean, this this referendum, this is a constitutional amendment and this effort has already come through the Virginia court system.
00:23:08.000It's well acquainted with this judge, as it were. Talk to us about that.
00:23:10.960So this judge, the same judge in Tazewell County, has tried to block the referendum even from happening twice.
00:23:16.840It went up to the Virginia Supreme Court, which essentially said we're not going to block it.
00:23:22.140We're going to let it happen. However, they did not bless it.
00:23:25.360What the Virginia Supreme Court said is we're going to let the referendum happen if it's a no vote.
00:23:30.020it's moot we don't have to get involved now it's a yes vote though and so i believe it's
00:23:34.900clearly headed back to the virginia supreme court but important to know you'll read some
00:23:38.740of the coverage which will say oh the virginia supreme court has already rejected this twice
00:23:42.260that's not quite right what the virginia supreme court has said is if it's a yes
00:23:46.340come back to us then and we're not giving you any opinions yet there's still a step or two
00:23:50.980before it gets there right so what happens now so the virginia attorney general has said he will
00:23:55.620appeal it'll go to caroline rent i want to do this first and then i'm gonna get to florida
00:24:02.620so talk to me about what you just heard i am just i'm pretty skeptical about the legal
00:24:09.360process of virginia that's about to play out i mean as you mentioned virginia the supreme court
00:24:13.700justices they're not appointed by the governor or elected like in many states in fact there's
00:24:18.480only two states where the justices are actually elected by the state legislature so these seven
00:24:23.520justices are elected by the Virginia state legislature. They serve 12-year terms and come
00:24:28.160up for re-election. But here's the kicker. The Democrats in Virginia have a large majority in
00:24:32.920both the state house and the state senate. So the same Supreme Court justices that are going to rule
00:24:38.360on this redistricting effort also have to be re-elected by this hyper-partisan Democrat
00:24:44.340state legislature in Virginia. So like, forgive me that I am not overly confident in this. And as
00:24:50.480he did mention, you know, they have already rejected this twice. And even if they let it
00:24:55.480come through into them, I just don't see them. They'll use the excuse of we're not we're not
00:24:59.240going to overturn the will of the voters. I can already probably write exactly what they're going
00:25:03.200to say to have their cop out, even though it was blatantly unconstitutional, blatantly illegal.
00:25:07.220But they don't care. So, yeah, I mean, you've heard, Ellie, and it's pretty big to get honing
00:25:14.220to agree with anything that MAGA believes in, even with those legal arguments, the procedural
00:25:20.160arguments that i think are pretty cut and dry you're saying the politics itself and particularly
00:25:26.340as is specifically as virginia is becoming more radicalized because this was such a radical
00:25:32.380process to essentially take fairfax county the home of all these foreign-born globalist deep
00:25:38.540staters and basically infect uh five congressional districts do the lobster map uh you're saying
00:25:46.260Anybody that would do that, anybody that would have a Supreme Court that wouldn't shut this thing down immediately, don't look for them to save you even if the law is in your favor?
00:25:57.520No, I think Virginia Democrats have a super majority in the House.
00:26:01.240Like they're – I think it's 64 to like 30 Republicans, something absurd.
00:26:04.600So if you're a Virginia Supreme Court justice, but there are only seven, again, they get reelected or reappointed by the legislature and you get the way you get elected by the legislature is just a simple majority vote.
00:26:16.220And so by you would be signing your death sentence from if you overturn, you know, this this referendum.
00:26:23.660And so, well, yes, I agree. It is blatantly illegal, blatantly unconstitutional.
00:26:28.100But I think that these justices will go with the political wins, unfortunately.0.99
00:26:33.100How did, I'm going to hold you through the break, and then Rosemary Jenks is also going to join us on this H-1B visa act from legislation from Eli Crane.
00:26:42.160How did Virginia get in this situation?
00:26:45.200How did Youngkin and the establishment completely destroy, literally destroy the MAGA movement and the Republican Party in one of the most important states in the union, ma'am?
00:26:55.660i know a lot of people didn't even think virginia was going to go through with this but governor
00:27:00.400spamburger has chosen to or has come in extremely hot very very aggressive since she's come in a
00:27:05.880very you know partisan left-leaning democrat and they they did i mean it's i'm impressed with what
00:27:12.260they did i wish republicans fought as hard as the democrats are on this stuff it's like unbelievable
00:27:16.320to me in states like indiana we can't get this done and they did something like this in virginia
00:27:20.440which is, you know, a purple left-leaning state, though.
00:29:43.340Okay, that far-left community, remember her from years ago, Margaret Cho, not actually very funny, but went on a—this is a gateway pundit, one of their lead stories—went on another unhinged tirade on a podcast this week, first accusing President Donald Trump and his administration of having a sexual kink for cruelty to immigrants, trans people, children, and the poor.0.97
00:30:05.880And then she wished for a feral, bloodthirsty, violent Democratic Party to rise up and punish members of his cabinet.
00:30:17.680I keep telling people, Caroline Wren, these people are demonic, they're deranged, and they're coming to destroy President Trump, his family, his cabinet, his administration, and the MAGA movement.
00:30:29.120Now, what we've got to do is start playing hardball again and not softball.
00:30:36.340That's going to take up down in Florida next week.
00:36:52.760It would pause all H-1B visa issuances for a period of three years.
00:36:58.720During that three-year period, every H-1B visa holder who is currently in the United States would have to leave.
00:37:06.680that they would not be able to get an extension of their visas. They would not be able to switch
00:37:13.080to a different visa status. They would have to leave the United States. So that would open up
00:37:19.040all of the jobs that are currently being held by H-1B visa holders. After the three-year period,
00:37:27.780the number of H-1B visas would drop by about three quarters from well over 100,000 to 25,000
00:37:36.080per year. Every H-1B employer, every employer who wants to bring an H-1B into the United States
00:37:43.360would have to agree to pay that person a minimum of $200,000 plus pay the $100,000 Trump fee for
00:37:54.000every single applicant. The employer would have to attest that he has tried to find an American
00:38:02.920worker to fill that job, which is not a requirement right now. He would also have to
00:38:07.780show that he has had no layoffs for the previous 12 months and will have no layoffs for the
00:38:13.300following 12 months. Basically, any new H-1B who comes into the country would be here for0.91
00:38:22.880a maximum period of three years. No extensions, no adjustment of status. They come, they fill the0.96
00:38:30.020supposedly temporary labor gap, and then they leave. So first of all, it will be more expensive
00:38:38.180under this bill for an employer to bring in a foreign worker than to hire an American,0.89
00:38:43.620and that is the goal. Second, even if an employer really is determined to spend all this money and
00:38:51.400rely on H-1B workers, that employer is going to have to train a new H-1B worker every three years
00:38:59.120because none of them are allowed to stay longer than three years. And by the way,
00:39:05.300the prohibition on adjustment of status, which is how people switch from an H-1B or an L visa to
00:39:14.220some other kind of visa, it's how foreign students switch to H-1B visas. That is all prohibited under
00:39:21.720this bill. So foreign students cannot get employment authorization. So the bill ends
00:39:27.460OPT, optional practical training. It prohibits H visa holders from bringing their families here.
00:39:33.960So no more H-4 EADs for the spouses of H-1B holders. So, I mean, this is, it is groundbreaking.0.98
00:39:44.240It would have a massive impact on A, the number of jobs that open up for Americans and B,
00:39:50.980The incentives for both employers to hire foreign workers and the incentives for the foreign workers, because if you're in another country and you're determined to come to the United States permanently, the H-1B is no longer going to be the way to do that because you cannot stay under the provisions of this bill.0.60
00:40:12.580And you can't bring your family, right?0.83
00:40:26.500You, with your experience, work with Eli and the staff and others,
00:40:29.520you guys went through all the big issues and problems with H-1B visas.
00:40:37.460And understand you can't go where we want to go today,0.95
00:40:40.980which is shut the whole freaking thing down and send them home.
00:40:43.260You guys took the key things that are the problems and drive this massive assault that these HB1s have led to, and you tried to mitigate the problems in each category, correct?0.68
00:41:00.360I mean, Congressman Crane came to me and said that he wanted to introduce an H-1B reform bill that would actually make a difference, that would help Americans and put American workers first.
00:41:12.800And I said, let's do it. And this is what we came up with. His staff has been amazing. He has been amazing. This has been a fantastic process. And I think it is a fantastic bill. It is not the elimination of the H-1B program. But I'll tell you what, I don't see how we could get that through Congress.
00:41:32.860I think this is a bill that has the possibility of getting enough support to actually start moving.
00:41:41.240I think that it is possible that we'll have hearings on this, potentially a markup in the Judiciary Committee.0.74
00:41:47.320I think this is a realistic solution, and it's a damn good one.
00:41:53.520By the way, and that's why we need people on this bill.
00:41:56.380Now, we're going to go to the Oval Office, by the way, on an update on Israel and Hezbollah and Lebanon momentarily.
00:42:07.280So I need you right now, Rosemary Jenks.
00:42:09.840Where do people go to see the analysis that your group has done on this bill?
00:42:19.620And if you just type in the search bar at the top, Crane, C-R-A-N-E, you will find all the information about this bill and the co-sponsors of it and, you know, who you need to contact to get more co-sponsors.
00:42:32.900The contact information for all your members of Congress are on this page, IAPaction.com.
00:51:49.540If they're putting mines down, it's a big mistake for them, I will say.0.70
00:51:53.180Are you angry at China for what they sent to Iran?0.50
00:51:55.740No, no, I guess we do the same thing, don't we? With other countries, you know, it's like one of those things. But nothing better. It wasn't earth shaken. Yeah, no, but if he came, it would be probably very helpful.
00:52:20.960You know, I've said a long time ago when they made the G8, the G7, they threw Russia out before my time.
00:52:30.280That was Obama and a certain prime minister from a place called Canada, Strudeau.1.00
00:52:38.320And I said, that's a stupid thing to do.1.00
00:53:43.700Right now, Tax Network USA is offering a completely free IRS research and discovery call to show you exactly where you stand and what they can stop before it's too late.
00:53:56.960Their powerful programs and strategies can save you thousands or even eliminate your debt entirely if you qualify.