Stephen K. Vann and Natalie Winters join me in the Unite the Kingdom War Room to talk about the recent events in China, including the massive pro-China rally in Tiananmen Square, the pro-democracy protest in the streets of Hong Kong, and the upcoming Texas primary election.
00:01:49.940and an early voting Monday for Ken Paxton in this incredibly important Senate runoff.
00:01:58.900Okay, I want to bring in Natalie Winters.
00:02:01.280Natalie, you had the great honor, and it's because of your coverage and your single-handed focus,0.75
00:02:07.000I would almost say maniacal focus, on the unrestricted warfare of the Chinese Communist Party
00:02:11.500against the United States of America, but also Lao Bajing.
00:02:15.680You were invited and gave an incredible interview with the vice president of Taiwan.
00:02:21.740Given I wanted to wait till it all settled in and everybody was back, your observations of what occurred over the last couple of days in Beijing, ma'am?
00:02:32.380Well, always an honor to be in the war room, though.
00:02:35.040I guess if we were to let Xi Jinping rename the show, he would probably call it the strategic stability room because that is now the new euphemism for war.
00:02:43.700as we've heard in Beijing. There's so much to unpack. I think if you go back to some of these
00:02:51.780seminal texts that guide CCP thought, whether it's military, economics, all of that, of course,
00:02:57.920being cut from the same cloth, just remember that all warfare is deception, to quote Sun Tzu,
00:03:05.380and that they are not our friend, they are not our partner. I think to call them our rival
00:03:11.940is even an understatement. They are our existential threat and our enemy. And frankly,
00:03:17.500I think I share some of the, probably, I don't want to use the word concern, but there's sort
00:03:21.960of an unnerving aspect, I think, to what transpired in Beijing. I don't think the United States
00:03:27.800at the highest levels of the CCP has ever been talked to like that. Of course, we've seen the
00:03:32.960advent of wolf warrior diplomacy, some of these younger, more junior guys, remember berating
00:03:38.260Biden apparatchiks, and they just took it. But coming from Xi Jinping, talking about the
00:03:44.460Thucydides trap, stuff like that, really is an escalation. I also think that it's important to
00:03:51.000contextualize this, right? A lot of focus has been put, and rightly so, on the Chinese readouts,1.00
00:03:55.080comparing that to the United States, which we'll get into the language. The Chinese, they really0.93
00:04:00.200appreciate and care about language, not that we don't, but it really holds deeper significance
00:04:05.560there. But if you compare and contrast this to the readout, you know, back in Trump one,
00:04:10.960the type of language that is being used is so wholly disparate. It's quite jarring.
00:04:18.060Back in 2017, it was, we're going to, quote, expand fields of mutually beneficial cooperation.
00:04:23.940We're going to, quote, control differences, deepen mutual understanding, enhance mutual trust,
00:04:28.580and build a, quote, sound working relationship. The most important thing there, and this is
00:04:33.040something that you heard regurgitated from virtually every prc or ccp mouthpiece de facto
00:04:39.500or du jour and it was that they would quote not take the old path of big powers which seek
00:04:43.960hegemony once they grow strong right the idea that china is not a threat they want to just exist
00:04:49.340they would probably pause it in a unipolar world order whereby the united states is the top global0.87
00:04:54.040hegemon we have maintained on the show much like the origins of covid much like the prc's takeover
00:04:59.580of this country, the purchases of farmland, you name it. But that's not the case. They want their
00:05:04.220own version of a unipolar world order, whereby they are the top dog. They're not even content
00:05:08.940with a multipolar world order. And I think you see this on full display with the language that
00:05:14.240they're using, talking about how we are partners, not rivals. This new concept of strategic stability
00:05:21.560and a, quote, transformation that we have not seen in a century. And if you read Chinese state media,
00:05:28.320But Xinhua says the two sides stand, quote, a new historical starting point.
00:05:34.240And of course, I think this is the most direct you've seen the Taiwan issue mentioned, not
00:05:39.620just by the press, but by Xi Jinping, CCP spokespeople themselves.
00:05:44.400And I think a lot of people are honing in on the insult that was the Thucydides trap
00:05:49.040line, which I wanted to contextualize that.
00:05:51.480I will say, I think, hat tip to our audience watching a lot of the Western press try to
00:05:56.380you know, understand or reconcile what was going on over there. You have Fox News, you know,
00:06:00.440taking people on a tour of the subway system. Our audience has known about the Thucydides trap for
00:06:06.620years. But I think what was equally insulting, frankly, directly to this audience, almost
00:06:12.460laughing, spitting in our face, was saying that, you know, she is the CCP can work. And I quote
00:06:19.240hand in hand with MAGA, particularly, I think, preying on President Trump's kind of anti-war
00:06:26.340instinct and trying to misappropriate that to the Taiwan issue. Of course, they love that we're in
00:06:33.000these prolonged engagements, whether it's Ukraine, the Middle East, take your pick.
00:06:37.820But I find that extremely insulting and just outlandish. And if anything, having spent
00:06:43.720considerable time in Taiwan. It's more of the Taiwanese people that have a lot in common with
00:06:49.680MAGA, not just because they're on the front lines of the Chinese Communist Party, but they really
00:06:55.160care about, I mean, you see a whole civil society, civil defense kind of surging and forming in
00:07:00.840reaction to the increasing aggression and belligerence of the Chinese Communist Party.
00:07:06.320They're very grassroots, very of the mindset of personal responsibility, and they love America.0.86
00:07:12.040So I think that is, I mean, psychological and cognitive warfare at its absolute finest. And to link this to what you were talking about with the Islamic takeover of Texas, they like to say Islam is peace. We know it really means submission to a way of life that's wholly different from the United States.0.97
00:07:31.540You know, you got Lululemon making hijabs now. Don't buy Lululemon anymore. But that's in the same way that, you know, I think Beijing defines Taiwan's peace as being submissive to a new world order in which the Chinese Communist Party is in charge.1.00
00:07:47.860And when you look at the direct reference of the Thucydides trap, I think to sort of track the historical usage of that term, that was something that was mainly contained to like the most explicit and aggressive United Front groups, right, the groups that were explicitly set up to sort of propagandize on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party here in the West, sort of the fake pseudo-intellectual academic backbone.0.52
00:08:11.280I think maybe the 21st century version of this idea of, oh, let's let China enter the WTO because we have to. Their economy is so great. Shout out to NVIDIA for selling away the future of the United States. I'm glad they get some fake spikes in their stock.
00:08:26.220But what exactly the Thucydides trap is, and this is something that we've, I think, really
00:08:30.120picked apart on this show, it sort of shrouds what is, I think, a very shoddy theory in
00:08:37.320a lot of pages, a lot of words, a lot of verbose text, a lot of history, a lot of euphemisms.
00:08:42.360They describe, you know, China's economic warfare as just geoeconomics.0.84
00:08:46.620You know, China's just risen in the international world order because they're just better than0.86
00:08:51.720No mention of, you know, the predatory lending, anything like that.
00:08:54.260but the author of the Thucydides trap someone by the name of Graham Allen he used to be the dean
00:09:00.280at Harvard Kennedy School so that should give you a little insight into the type of diplomats that
00:09:04.500school is pumping out but this is someone who is sure vaguely American but you know he is so
00:09:12.400bought and paid for by the Chinese Communist Party I don't think he's ever had an original thought
00:09:16.400it's the equivalent of academic treason so I guess only fitting that he wouldn't be at Harvard
00:09:21.280but this is someone who has you know repeatedly visited China he has all this connectivity to
00:09:26.640these communist influence groups the CAIFC the CPAFFC QCF put it this way in 2024 when he went
00:09:33.440over to meet with the foreign minister Xi Jinping he also quietly met with Xi Jinping so that should
00:09:39.160tell you all you need to know about this guy but I think the important part and what really
00:09:44.200is both the falsehood of this theory but the unfortunate I think lived reality and practical
00:09:51.260outcome of the acceptance of and among the American elite class is this idea that America
00:09:56.880is a declining power just by nature of the fact that China is a rising power and that it's
00:10:02.660inevitable. And they sort of, I think, strawman the argument by saying that, oh, well, people are0.78
00:10:07.400saying that it's war that's inevitable. It's not necessarily war. If we continue to fuse our
00:10:12.360economies, it's the end of history. We'll all be good. But that's not, I think that's a complete
00:10:17.960Stroman. The inevitability part that I pick an issue with is that America's decline is inevitable.
00:10:24.660America's decline is only possible by what can be seen as the picture of those so-called business
00:10:29.760leaders kowtowing, doing the new version, you know, for their lust for market access in the
00:10:35.860name of the new opening up, the new, you know, tributes in exchange for I don't know what. I
00:10:40.320don't think the American people will see any upside of that. That is the inevitable part of
00:10:46.100it, right? American business leaders selling out to China. And I think you can't disentangle what
00:10:51.400went on in Beijing from the California mayor, from the, you know, New York police station that was
00:10:56.600somehow operating on behalf of the Chinese government. Make that make sense. They have
00:11:01.560whole scale bought up and sold out this country. And I guess my biggest critique to Xi Jinping
00:11:06.780would be, it's not MAGA that you could walk hand in hand with, it's the Democrat party
00:11:11.880that you actively are walking hand in hand with. I think the last point I would say just to more
00:11:19.140broadly contextualize this is, I think you've sort of seen a surge in what is Chinese rhetoric
00:11:27.240coming, whether it's from the media outlets, officials themselves, and to the standing of
00:11:32.140America, right? They used to at least sort of lie to our faces and say, we're partners,
00:11:36.740we're going to do this together, which is still not totally accurate. They're our enemy.
00:11:40.780But a lot of analysis, even going back to under Biden, for example, there was a lot of analysis done about their official statements in 2025. This concept of American decline has doubled the use of that.
00:11:55.220They analyze thousands of statements. They think, you know, Biden was more of a systemic threat than President Trump. They think he's really transactional. I don't think they quite understand Trump. Or frankly, I think the Trump that you saw in Trump one is very different than the Trump that you saw now and how he is engaging with China.
00:12:13.780And I think to me, the most unsettling part of all of this and why I think it's sort of doomed for a repeat of whether it's ascension to WTO, including them and all these sort of, you know, weird globalist organizations, letting them into our stock market markets, you name it.
00:12:29.160Like at least the arguments that they made back then, they were lying to kind of like the WMD to Iraq, now Iran, you don't really get a justification.
00:12:37.160But they're not even really trying to explain it to us that it's actually a benefit.0.78
00:12:41.520I mean, you can't make the case. It's just except the 500,000 students, except that China should like buy more farmland. There's no inherent value to that. They're not students. They're spies. For the love of God, please stop using the term students. These people are military combatants. And even if they are students, I don't think we should be training the next generation of people that we might.
00:13:02.620Well, we're certainly sitting on the economic information and cyber battlefield right now, but certainly not on the kinetic battlefield.
00:13:09.120So I would say, I think you said it best in one of your speeches of the new federal state of China.
00:13:13.960F Xi for saying that MAGA has anything in common with what he pushes there is absolutely a joke.0.78
00:13:20.240MAGA has much more in common with the Taiwanese people and the Thucydides trap.0.77
00:13:24.800I guess kudos to the PRC for buying off so many Americans.0.76
00:13:28.640But American decline does not have to be inevitable.1.00
00:13:31.820It does when you have elites like the stupid business leaders that went over there.1.00
00:13:36.740It was the reason President Trump came to power in 2015, 2016.0.99
00:13:41.280The central thesis of the campaign was the managed decline of the United States of America by an elite that was manifested by Hillary Clinton, by the Clinton and the Democratic Party, but also the controlled opposition of the Republican Party.
00:13:55.200It was managed decline of the United States.
00:13:56.820This is why Trump, the pivot, the turnaround, even the construct was immense.
00:17:34.320How does that how do we how do we get off the topic, Natalie, of holding the Chinese Communist Party accountable for the reparations they've done for the bioweapon that they launched in the United States?0.85
00:17:45.960ma'am. I can't believe we're still talking about Fauci and he's not in prison. But that aside,0.95
00:17:54.060I mean, I think there's probably no better example of the distorted relationship that we have with the
00:17:59.060PRC than that of the origins, lived experience, the pandemic of COVID. But then, of course,
00:18:05.960the fallout, right, which is these euphemistic terms they would call increased scientific
00:18:10.580research, you know, promoting strategic stability and international cooperation, as we found out
00:18:15.660a bunch of U.S. tax dollars have gone to promote Chinese research by military entities in the
00:18:20.940field of chips, rare earths, all the industries that they are now seeking to dominate us.
00:18:25.580But when push comes to shove, when there's actually a crisis, a flashpoint, what did0.85