00:00:53.580it's natalie winters hosting today friday june 19th in the year of our lord 2026 we've got a bit
00:01:00.620of a special show for you today i'm honored to be able to do this for you guys i know there's been
00:01:05.240so much with iran so much it's hard to follow so i wanted to sort of take a step back bring on not
00:01:11.740just a new guest but focus on something that i think this audience should both be very interested
00:01:17.200in but also very very passionate and i think find a lot of hope in which is where i think we have
00:01:23.400found the kind of new American fighting spirit, which is in the kind of defense tech movement,
00:01:28.200this new movement to really re-industrialize the defense industrial base and actually make
00:01:33.400American national security, our weapons systems, our procurement, take your pick, really actually
00:01:40.100efficient and actually capable of defending this country. And I'm honored to have on, I think,
00:01:45.560it's fair to say one of the leaders of this movement, Justin Fulcher, who was one of the
00:01:50.460founders of Doge. You were there since day one, frankly, a little even before. You also were at
00:01:57.380basically the highest levels of the Pentagon. You were a senior advisor to Secretary Hegseth
00:02:01.400for a while there through some of the craziest times. You saw a lot. You learned a lot.
00:02:06.640Before we get into everything I was kind of talking about, the really interesting stuff
00:02:10.080that I think the audience is really going to enjoy hearing about, give us just a little bit
00:02:13.900about your background, how you ended up in two very powerful and kind of unique worlds.
00:02:20.460Well, I've had somewhat of a unique career.
00:02:23.000I started as a tech entrepreneur and built a telehealth company that helped bring health care to millions of people's lives across the globe.
00:02:30.860That took me all across Asia, places like Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan.
00:02:36.660And that gave me really a front row seat to how these different countries think about national power, economic development and long term strategy.
00:02:44.680More recently, as you mentioned, I had the opportunity to serve as a senior advisor to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon.
00:02:52.500I was able to work on issues around readiness, technology, and really revitalizing the defense industrial base.
00:02:59.740Before that, I was an early member of DOGE, where, you know, government reform efforts were a huge priority.
00:03:05.260But honestly, I think these jobs matter a little bit less than the lessons learned, which, you know, over the past decade or so,
00:03:11.820I've spent years watching how different countries operate, how they compete on national scale.
00:03:16.580And ultimately, that's what I've become obsessed with.
00:03:19.400You know, why do some societies retain that ability to build, execute and win and while others slowly lose it?
00:03:25.860Well, I think you're selling yourself short.
00:03:27.860I remember reading all the legacy media meltdown about the doge cuts, how, you know, you guys were all destroying the government.
00:03:34.460But if you really looked at the numbers, it really was mainly the VA where they were really getting just the number of personnel actually down.
00:03:41.240Those are the cuts that actually were able to materialize through their legal stuff.
00:03:45.360And that was, of course, the at least one of the Doge kind of efforts that you directly led.
00:03:49.580We're going to we're going to get into that.
00:03:50.700But I want to focus first on what you sort of saw when you were at the Pentagon that made you realize now.
00:03:56.460I know you're focusing more on the kind of the defense space, but what the current state, the state of affairs are with our defense industrial base, you know, the weapon shortages or stockpiles and how you kind of came to the conclusion.
00:04:09.880and we've seen it with what the Trump administration is doing, that, you know, that's in need of some
00:04:14.040serious reform, picking up the pace, making it more up to par with the challenges that this
00:04:18.400country is facing. Right. And I think, you know, one of the most stark things I witnessed after
00:04:24.180President Trump took office was the real disconnect between military power on paper, but the back end
00:04:31.160industrial might that actually supports that. And I think, you know, it's obvious that America has
00:04:36.880the absolute best warfighters, the best military in the world, the best innovators, and overall
00:04:41.820incredible capabilities. But one of the things that, you know, we stopped doing as a country
00:04:46.880was really focusing on producing those wartime quantities of weapons, munitions,
00:04:52.360and other critical systems. And all that matters because, you know, when you think about deterrence
00:04:57.580and, you know, reestablishing American power on the world stage, it's not just about, you know,
00:05:03.100what does the arsenal look like on day one of a conflict, but really how much can you produce on
00:05:08.060day 30, day 180, or even year two or three of a conflict? And I think, you know, what really
00:05:15.520worried me the most was not that America lost its ability to innovate. I think ultimately we lead
00:05:20.940the world in that bar none. But what concerned me is that we're becoming really a country that can
00:05:27.100invent brilliant things, but struggled to produce them at scale. And that's a dangerous place for a
00:05:31.480great power to be. Talk about some of those timeline deficits. How did a country as powerful,
00:05:36.980as innovative as ours, get in a position where even the most rudimentary things,
00:05:42.400you know, we either can't produce ourselves or it takes way too long that's even acceptable?
00:05:49.320Yeah, I think as in many things, it happened slowly and then very suddenly. After the Cold
00:05:55.500War, America convinced itself that industrial capacity and might was not that important. We
00:06:02.420believed in just-in-time supply chains, globalization, efficiency, and we prioritized
00:06:08.420quarterly market cycles over actually having a resilient defense industrial base. And that
00:06:15.360worked in a world where the U.S. was frankly an uncontested superpower and our adversaries
00:06:20.300weren't actively trying to undermine and sabotage the global supply chain and our supply chain.
00:06:25.500But China took a very different approach there. China understood that factories are power, shipyards are power, energy is power, minerals, manufacturing depth, all of those are core aspects of national power.
00:06:38.440Meanwhile, in previous administrations, we let the entire industrial ecosystem atrophy, which was terrible.
00:06:44.240You know, we put machine tools, casting, forging, energetics, all of those critical capabilities aside.
00:06:51.420And, you know, we really made skilled trades something that were low class and not not important, which today that couldn't be further from the truth.
00:07:01.140When you think about the tragedy and how we outsource so much of the physical foundation that really undermined American industrial power.
00:07:10.240it's encouraging to see what Secretary Hegseth and Deputy Secretary Feinberg have done to take
00:07:16.800that arsenal of freedom and really actualize that and implement that moving forward.
00:07:21.780And trying to understand, you know, whether it's the military industrial complex, however you want
00:07:26.520to classify it. I know you saw that firsthand, both running DOJ at DOD, but also being, you know,
00:07:32.660Secretary Hegseth, essentially number two. But what exactly is it that causes that? Is it the
00:07:39.280consolidation of all of these companies into one, these defense primes, they just become,
00:07:43.920you know, accepting of really low standards. What actually is the animating factor,
00:07:49.060the driver behind that really serious existential problem?
00:07:53.800Well, I think the monopsony structure created these cartel-like incentives, which, you know,
00:08:00.420in defense world, there's this famous story of this concept called the Last Supper. And so imagine
00:08:06.180this. The Cold War ends. The Soviet Union collapses. America is the uncontested superpower.
00:08:12.260And Washington, and frankly, the Pentagon, looks at the defense industry and basically says,
00:08:17.060look, we don't need a defense industrial base this large anymore. And so the CEOs of the major
00:08:23.380defense companies were invited by the Secretary of Defense at the time to a dinner at the Pentagon.
00:08:29.860And the message was clear. Budgets are going down. Consolidation is going to happen. And a lot of
00:08:35.280companies at this table aren't going to exist over the next few years. And so that was the
00:08:39.720beginning of a very different era. These companies merged, a bunch of competitors and competition
00:08:45.360vanished. And what, you know, at the time was a very broad and deep defense industrial base
00:08:51.220got hollowed out. And so, you know, the incentives changed here. And when only a few of the largest
00:08:57.460defense primes can actually compete for a lot of these big programs, and the government knows it
00:09:03.380can't afford to lose that, the system stops acting like a market-driven economy and a market-driven
00:09:08.520system because there's less pressure, there's less need to innovate, and there's less need to deliver
00:09:13.280quickly at scale. And so I think ultimately, the answer is pro-competition, pro-adaptation,
00:09:20.660pro-production. And we need the primes, but we also need to open the gates to these new builders,
00:09:26.280defense tech startups, drone companies, machine shops, software firms, all of these companies
00:09:31.360solving the hard problems. I think we've seen a lot of this sort of come to the forefront
00:09:36.120with regard to what's going on in Iran, even in Ukraine, right? These articles talking about the
00:09:42.140depletion or just at least a concerning rate, not that it's necessarily at a, you know, five alarm
00:09:47.220fire position right now, but with some of our weapons, ammunition, munitions, all those kinds
00:09:53.400of things. I want to get granular, though. Take the Tomahawk, for example, right? There's been a
00:09:58.240lot of discussion about that in the context of what's going on in Iran. Walk us through,
00:10:04.300like actually put us in the room, everything that you can, how that actually like gets made,
00:10:10.760why there are so many delays, because the time it takes to make things that are, you know,
00:10:15.300shot off in seconds or minutes, it's really quite staggering.
00:10:19.740Right. And I think, you know, the Tomahawk problem is a perfect example of that difference between,
00:10:25.020operational needs and operational speed versus industrial capacity and might and the speed of
00:10:32.020that. Because as you said, a commander can launch a tomahawk in seconds or minutes, but replacing
00:10:37.800that missile is not just a matter of pushing a button like an Amazon order. It can take years
00:10:43.640to replenish those stockpiles. And so when you look at what actually makes and compose a tomahawk,
00:10:50.040You need rocket motors, guidance systems, energetics, all of these different suppliers.
00:10:55.300And if there's delays in any parts of that supply chain, it compounds and it can take something that, you know, maybe historically with a robust defense industrial base would take something like, you know, weeks to months to produce.
00:11:07.720It can end up causing these like multi-year delays.
00:11:10.920And so when you think about the Tomahawk issue, I really think that's a warning light that's flashing for the entire defense industry.
00:11:18.600And, you know, thankfully, you know, President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have heeded that warning and are massively investing to really solve that problem, but also the second and third order effects that come from that.
00:11:29.460The numbers really are staggering. I'm curious, you know, these don't just exist in a vacuum, really only matter so much so as it's compared to our existential threat, which is, of course, the Chinese Communist Party and their ability to build, which they certainly outpace us.0.93
00:11:44.900But the actual numbers, when you really get into it, are quite concerning.
00:11:48.860Can you sort of compare, contrast how we stack up against China when it comes to the manufacturing of these kinds of items?
00:11:56.580Well, in some instances, that contrast is pretty brutal.
00:12:01.100China, for example, isn't just building a navy.
00:12:04.740They're building really the entire industrial system behind that to try to dominate shipping writ large.
00:12:10.620If you think about China and commercial shipbuilding, they commanded over 50% of the entire market share over the past couple of years.
00:12:20.060And when you think about comparing that to the United States, which was producing roughly a fraction of a percent compared to China.
00:12:27.620And there's a very powerful example of a Chinese state-owned shipbuilding company, CSSC, which in one year alone produced more ships than the entire U.S. shipping industry has since World War II.
00:12:43.240I mean, the numbers are absolutely staggering.
00:12:45.760But that doesn't mean that China would automatically win a war here.
00:12:49.780The U.S. still has enormous, enormous advantages from our allies, our innovation, of course, our men and women in uniform, and everybody who supports them.
00:13:00.760And so while the industrial gap is real, there's a ton of work that's going into actually addressing some of those core challenges.
00:13:08.180Do you think that lag in production capabilities, China's ability to sort of take over and really outpace us in some fields is almost by design?0.80
00:13:15.600That's what the Chinese Communist Party has wanted for a very long time.0.80
00:13:18.360Oh, 100%. I mean, China has absolutely methodically attacked the supply chain. They've done specific things around rare earth, some of the refining and other components like drone motors, actuators and others to really create a global chokehold on these products. And they're doing this in a systematic and very methodical way.
00:13:38.920i'm curious just preview we got about a minute before we have to jump to break one of those
00:13:44.860areas where the chinese seem to really be honing in on is the cheap drones obviously america
00:13:50.260dominates in these super cool really expensive interesting looking things i've seen some of
00:13:56.820them they're quite cool but these cheap drones you have also seen it obviously in iran and ukraine
00:14:01.420have really become sort of the new thing in at least kinetic conflict just real quick before
00:14:07.600we bounce. Give us kind of the landscape there. What is that evolution of the battlefield? What
00:14:13.340is that looking like? Well, Ukraine changed that mental model. And China has long known this,
00:14:18.880which is why with DJI and other companies there, they've really subsidized the consumer drone
00:14:24.080market, which gave them an advantage. Now, drone dominance at the Pentagon is really addressing
00:14:29.000that and moving out quickly. DIU is doing a great job, Owen West over there. But ultimately,
00:14:33.640China has taken a strategic approach here, and the U.S. is playing a bit of catch-up,
00:14:37.420but moving very quickly. All right. Hang with us through the break. I know,
00:14:41.400I believe you helped author that drone dominance initiative, and now here you are talking about
00:14:47.140on War Room. So we're honored to have someone who has been behind the scenes on a lot of these very
00:14:51.700important reforms here in the War Room on Juneteenth. How about that? We'll be right back
00:15:26.700Let me repeat that. Birch Gold will help you now convert an old 401k from a previous employer or an IRA into a physical IRA in gold.
00:15:38.080You know, something that's a hedge against inflation.
00:15:41.580Listen to this right now. Birch Gold is going to give you a special America 250, one ounce silver round for every $10,000 you purchase by July 10th.
00:19:11.140Because ultimately, we can't fight last year's war
00:19:15.700or last decade's war, if we don't rapidly iterate and rapidly field some of these new capabilities,
00:19:21.520because the battlefield's changing every single week. And until we address that underlying
00:19:27.380procurement system, we couldn't actually get after some of the core issues.
00:19:31.960Sort of converging this with what I want to talk about next, which is the procurement,
00:19:36.820these channels, the processes. I know you were really, I think, one of the leaders on this when
00:19:41.920you were at the Pentagon, but changing how that system works. I'm curious what exactly, you know,
00:19:49.580kind of what is procurement? What were the changes that needed to be made? What were the changes that
00:19:55.040were made? And what are these sort of novel things that the administration is doing? Things like,
00:20:00.180you know, OSC come to mind or Mountain Pass, a sort of interesting fusion of public and private
00:20:05.380capital to fix these very critical gaps? Right. So procurement is essentially how the government
00:20:12.560buys things. And so it's not as simple as just going on Amazon or an online store and pushing
00:20:18.800a button and buying now. In many cases, for example, buying software, which you may be able
00:20:24.880to just go online and subscribe to almost instantaneously, could actually take years.
00:20:32.080And so one of the first things Secretary Hegseth did was this concept of software acquisition reform, which took on average from three years to three months to really field some of this new software.
00:20:43.480But the same thing is applied to things like drones and other weapons systems.
00:20:48.300And Secretary Hegseth boldly laid out in this warfighting acquisition strategy, which outlined numerous changes to how that gets done.
00:20:56.400Because ultimately, we can have the best technology. But if it takes us three or five years to buy, to test and to field those technologies, it doesn't really matter if they can't be integrated.
00:21:07.840And, you know, you mentioned the Office of Strategic Capital, OSC, as it's called in the Pentagon. And I think this is a good, innovative, new example of how you can take some of this procurement reform and really get creative.
00:21:22.320And Deputy Secretary Feinberg and, of course, OSC lead David Lorch have done a great job in terms of using creative financing structures, offtake agreements, and even doing very favorable debt to some of these companies that allow really the defense industrial base to get revitalized and to invest in some of these core resilient strategic capabilities.
00:21:46.960is. Similarly to, you know, the software issue or this idea that you can have all this wonderful
00:21:52.500technology, but if you can't actually have it in your hands, then it doesn't really matter. I think
00:21:57.100rare earths and the shortages there come to mind, right? We can want to build all these wonderful
00:22:01.560systems, but if you can't actually build them, whether it's because of shortage of human capital
00:22:05.820or in this case, you know, whatever, rare earth critical minerals, that's a big thing. We've
00:22:10.480covered that extensively on the show. We've seen how it's been used against President Trump in
00:22:14.380negotiations, certainly by the Chinese Communist Party. Can you talk us through, first of all,
00:22:19.060why these things are so important and how the Trump administration slash the Pentagon together
00:22:25.620have worked to rectify some of these shortages? And if that shortage is not fixed, how much of
00:22:33.080a doomsday scenario something like that would be for the United States? Well, rare earths are really
00:22:39.580the things that power all of our modern everyday life from the chips that go in our smartphones to
00:22:47.060our trucks that we drive to really everything that powers modern life. But as far as the
00:22:54.240military is concerned, they're in things like magnets, which move things, steer things, guide
00:22:58.920things, sense things, and really power all of our modern communication. And so when you think about
00:23:04.220whether it's drone motors or missile guidance or really any of those kind of core military
00:23:10.480capabilities, they rely on magnets and some of these rare earth processing capabilities.
00:23:16.100But the key issue isn't just mining here. It's really processing and getting those into the
00:23:21.560supply chain as quickly as possible. Now, President Trump and the Pentagon took the lead.
00:23:27.040And one of the first deals that they did was this deal of Mountain Pass in California,
00:23:31.620which really, for the first time ever, brought magnet processing and creation back to the United States, which is incredible.
00:23:40.900Because over the past decade, China has taken an extremely strategic approach in terms of actually trying to put a chokehold on this global supply chain,
00:23:52.840but more importantly, to try to dominate this area to maintain leverage over the United States.
00:23:57.760And so we're not at a complete nightmare scenario because President Trump's leadership has really pushed this to the forefront, but it's not just about digging rocks out of the ground. It's a lot more than that. When you think about it, it's the nightmare scenario is if we stop pursuing this issue with the speed that we are and really invest in the processing and refining and those sorts of capabilities.
00:24:20.120And just give us some of the numbers, like the percentages on what that monopoly, the Chinese monopoly actually looks like, both on the raw material side, but also the refinement side.
00:24:31.120For the past decade, China has taken a strategic approach to really capture nearly 90 percent of the entire global supply chain.
00:24:40.280Japan, Australia are in secondary places there with the U.S. lagging behind.
00:24:46.920But what's fascinating about this entire scenario here is that the U.S. invented so many innovative
00:24:52.940capabilities to do this quickly. And, you know, God has blessed the United States tremendously
00:24:57.200with some of the most incredible resources right here in our country. And so, you know, ultimately
00:25:02.820it's how can we get back to doing what America does best, which is building things here,
00:25:08.360making things here, and really taking the resources that we've been blessed with and
00:25:12.220putting them into our supply chain. We're going to get into China. We'll probably do that. The
00:25:16.860next break because i want to dedicate a lot of time to that i know you're a very close follower
00:25:21.220and i can only imagine having been inside the pentagon all the things you must know um but
00:25:26.540this idea of sort of you know reinvigorating re-industrializing the american defense base
00:25:31.860i'm sure the chinese communist party does not like that they would like it to be very stagnant
00:25:36.560but i think one of the key drivers of that is this kind of defense tech movement um i think maybe
00:25:42.240when our audience hears that, even, you know, for myself, when I first heard it, you know,
00:25:47.100it sort of sounds reeks of, you know, Silicon Valley investors, the shady stuff that it's just
00:25:53.120all about profit. You know, I think the American people are probably scarred from seeing their tax
00:25:56.760dollars go to subsidize these companies where, you know, the consultants and the CEOs, the C-suite
00:26:01.500gets the upside. But then the taxpayers are left with lessened and weak national security systems
00:26:08.320that don't work or delays, and they're robbed, basically. So what is this defense tech movement?
00:26:15.040And why do you think our audience should find some hope in it for the future of American defense?
00:26:21.260I think you're right. When many Americans hear defense tech, they probably think of Silicon
00:26:26.620Valley selling overpriced software to the Pentagon. But I think really the more interesting
00:26:32.700story that's happening in defense tech is that the tech industry is really becoming physical again
00:26:40.720And if you look at El Segundo or, you know, the Gundo culture, as it's colloquially known,
00:26:46.000you have founders building drones, rockets, satellites, sensors, all these incredible capabilities
00:26:51.880and really getting back to like hard, old school manufacturing, but applying new techniques.
00:26:58.180And that's a completely different model than what happens in Silicon Valley.
00:27:02.640This isn't just about building some other consumer app or something that's more vapid.
00:27:08.560It's about building things that America needs to survive and win.
00:27:12.440And frankly, I think what is so different about Silicon Valley and El Segundo, for example, is that many of these founders aren't embarrassed to say that they're building for America.
00:27:23.020There's a patriotic capitalism here that really just underscores all of the different things happening across the industry.
00:27:30.620And a lot of these founders want to solve real problems, rebuild the defense industrial base, and get back to having America win again on the global stage.
00:27:39.740I want to ask you after the break, because I think our audience, which is full of people who I'm sure would love to work in this movement, in these factories, these are the people whose jobs were either outsourced to China.
00:27:51.780I'm sure we still got a lot of welders and wonderful people like that in the war room
00:27:55.420policy, but it seems like such a different approach to actually involving the people
00:28:00.620who are working the factory floor and the company, as opposed to just extracting what
00:28:04.540they can from it or from them treating their employees horribly.
00:28:08.540You know, I think that's something we harp on a lot about the war room, which I think
00:28:11.620a lot of maybe our left wing listeners do, certainly to Steve might kind of scratch their
00:28:15.600heads at and not get, but I think that's something that's really cool and makes this
00:28:19.460whole new movement very kind of you know maga america first coded um we got to take a break
00:28:24.600we got to pay the bills but we will be back after this short break with more justin fulcher more of
00:28:29.460a deep dive into the chinese communist party all things defense tech and some good news for
00:28:35.380american national security which i guess is bad news for the prc we'll be right back
00:28:39.480everyone's focus on how the conflict in the middle east is raising oil prices but there's
00:28:46.400another grim reality to this contention. Oil isn't the only resource being constrained. About
00:28:53.060one-third of global fertilizer trade happens through this region. And with spring planting
00:28:58.840season on top of us, American farmers are sounding the alarm, with some saying they can't afford to
00:29:04.200plant their fields. When one piece of the supply chain gets hit this hard, you know what comes next.
00:29:10.000Higher fruit prices, reduced availability, maybe even panic buying. That's why having an
00:29:16.000emergency food supply at home makes so much sense and that's where our friends at my patriot supply
00:29:22.860come in right now at preparewithbannon.com that is preparewithbannon.com we've set up an entire
00:29:30.140just site for the war room posse you go to preparewithbannon.com that's all one word
00:29:37.520preparewithbannon.com you get a three-month emergency food supply they'll include a free
00:29:43.660mega protein upgrade, an incredible $200 bonus you don't want to miss. It's a simple way to
00:29:50.800protect your family from whatever comes next. Go to preparewithbannon.com. That is preparewithbannon.com
00:29:59.440to get your emergency food supply today. That's preparewithbannon.com. Do it today. Go check it out.
00:30:08.160One thing you can control right now that doesn't cost you anything out of pocket is diversifying
00:30:12.340your retirement savings. Birch Gold will help you convert an old 401k from a previous employer or
00:30:16.920an IRA into a physical IRA in gold. You know, something that's a hedge against inflation.
00:30:21.520Right now, Birch Gold is going to give you a special America 250 one ounce silver round for
00:30:25.000every $10,000 you purchase by July 10th. Text Bannon to 989898 to take advantage of free
00:30:30.300America 250 silver with qualifying purchase before July 10th. Again, text Bannon to the number 989898
00:30:36.280today. Don't forget Father's Day is this weekend and you can get 25% off site-wide at all family
00:30:42.260pharmacy through june 22nd with code bannon 25 it's a great time to order medications for yourself
00:30:47.040or your family and save while you're at it they offer hundreds of prescription medications including
00:30:51.280antibiotics allergy medications blood pressure medication ivermectin hydroxychloroquine and much
00:30:56.500more just go to allfamilypharmacy.com slash bannon complete a quick online medical form and a licensed
00:31:01.100doctor will review your information and determine if a prescription is appropriate don't miss the
00:31:05.880father's day sale visit allfamilypharmacy.com slash bannon use code bannon 25 for 25 off
00:31:11.080site-wide through June 22nd. That's allfamilypharmacy.com slash Bannon code Bannon25.
00:33:43.220And I think that the erasure of that is not just about crippling our defense base.0.58
00:33:48.600Obviously, China loves that, but it's more to the point there's a cultural aspect to it as well.
00:33:53.940And I think that is what is so cool, appealing and frankly exciting about this re-industrialized movement.
00:34:00.100And it has that same sort of, you know, Trump energy of like wanting people to get involved because it's it's so inspired by human agency.
00:34:07.520We always talk about that here in the war room of people being able to do things or just talk about it, build it right.
00:34:13.300Action, action, action. That is the the strapline of the war room.
00:34:18.180I'm sure the Chinese Communist Party does not like this idea of reindustrializing.
00:34:23.440um there's anything else you want to talk about on when it comes to these companies um you know
00:34:28.920any really interesting companies or stuff like that they think the audience should be looking
00:34:32.320out for feel free but i want to pivot i can't believe we're already more than halfway through
00:34:37.360the show but that is i think what undergirds a lot of this new philosophy which is that
00:34:43.140the chinese communist party is our existential threat it's not climate change it's not whatever
00:34:47.960it's not some of this you know woke stuff we've seen um do you think i'm crazy for saying that0.87
00:34:53.060you know, do you think China really is our existential threat? Absolutely. China is by far
00:34:59.340our number one adversary and our top existential threat. But, you know, ultimately, I think,0.97
00:35:05.960you know, the threat is the CCP strategy there. But, you know, there are tremendous amount of
00:35:10.760companies and new defense tech and innovation happening all across the country. That gives me
00:35:15.980a lot of hope. And, you know, there's a whole bunch of, you know, models of companies like
00:35:21.780like Hadrian, for example, which make even welders the heroes again and give them equity
00:35:25.780in the company and making manufacturing cool. That being said, I mean, the PRC is by far the
00:35:32.640top adversary and it's a whole of society competitor. But what does that actually mean?
00:35:38.000It means that the CCP uses espionage, cyber operations, it's military, economic warfare,
00:35:45.920political influence, lawfare, and all of these gray zone tactics to really come after the United
00:35:52.300States and her allies. And so I'm not saying this because we should panic, but rather more can and
00:36:00.740should be done to take this threat extremely seriously. America has enormous advantages,
00:36:06.600absolutely enormous advantages, but ultimately we have to start acting like we're in a real
00:36:11.480competition across every single domain, not just one or two areas. Yeah, I mean, it's a whole of
00:36:17.340society approach to respond to a whole of society approach coming from them, right? They were the
00:36:22.380ones that declared the people's war on us first and probably released a bioweapon, but that was0.85
00:36:28.940this morning's topic. I digress on that, but I'm curious what you think that actual flashpoint of
00:36:34.600potential kinetic conflict. We know the Chinese, I know the book of unrestricted warfare is somewhere
00:36:39.800around here usually. Steve would always hold it up. If I could find it, I would do the same.1.00
00:36:43.820But that they would obviously prefer to not go there. You know, the prevailing consensus being
00:36:49.680that Taiwan is probably the first kinetic flashpoint. What do you think that that would
00:36:54.560actually look like? Well, I think many Americans and, you know, many scholars may think that
00:37:02.220and have this image that China invading Taiwan will be some large scale D-Day style invasion.0.99
00:37:09.000I mean, that's certainly possible. But I would say, you know, it's probably wouldn't be the first move. The more likely scenario would probably be below the threshold of full war. For example, blockades, quarantines, cyber attacks, even, you know, cutting and severing undersea communication cables, lawfare, drone harassment, all of these sorts of things that just really slowly undermine Taiwan and her allies.
00:37:38.380And so I believe that China will probably try to create a scenario with Taiwan where they're slowly strangled and the United States is then forced to decide whether or not Xi will need to escalate.
00:37:50.640And that's why deterrence, when we think about that from the American perspective, I believe should be a lot broader than just aircraft carriers and missiles.
00:38:01.720But really, it's really going beyond that to, you know, a whole of government approach around resilient communications, cyber defense, cable protection, stockpiles, all of that.
00:38:12.620Because, you know, it's not just about how we can win, you know, the first first battle.
00:38:17.000We certainly can and we definitely would.0.62
00:38:19.240But it's really about how can we sustain a defense long enough that China cannot achieve their objectives there and more importantly, won't even attempt to try it.
00:38:27.260So talking about these gray zone tactics, where have we seen those both already applied in the United States?0.89
00:38:35.460We only have, you know, God knows how many military age Chinese males in this country.0.90
00:38:40.240We can't even keep count. Thank you, Joe Biden.
00:38:43.220But also the vulnerabilities that we have that could, you know, expose us to even more.0.93
00:38:48.860Well, I think, as you mentioned, you know, under the previous administration, we've had thousands of Chinese military age males enter the United States and we have no idea who they are or what they're doing here.0.60
00:39:01.900And, you know, this isn't about ethnicity. I mean, it's really about the CCP's threat and use of their access, influence and all of these, you know, unrestricted warfare efforts to undermine the United States.0.64
00:39:14.540And the CCP has had an absolutely long history of using students, researchers, business networks, and all of those different tools of unrestricted warfare to actually put pressure on these overseas Chinese communities and their operatives to advance the causes of the Chinese Communist Party in the US.
00:39:33.840And so, you know, gray zone warfare means that the battlefield is not necessarily kinetic.
00:39:41.820And it can be right here at home in our ports, in our universities.
00:39:45.920And, you know, whenever you see some of these, you know, factories explode or fuel port disruptions, it really begs the question, are these really accidents?
00:39:56.220Or is there perhaps something more sinister and sabotage going on there?
00:40:00.180some of these kind of doomsday scenarios we've seen depicted they almost seem like they're out
00:40:05.540of science fiction movies i'm curious uh we i think covered it on war room i remember i think
00:40:11.060i talked about it from from the white house um but the threat i think everybody next to me is
00:40:16.640looking at me like what is this girl talking about um but that is the threat of an emp attack
00:40:49.380When it comes to EMP attacks and potential for attacks, a lot of times people think about EMPs as they're associated with nuclear weapons and that's electromagnetic pulse that's emitted after some sort of explosion.
00:41:05.440And EMPs, those pulses can actually disable and destroy electronics like modern communication, smartphones, and these sorts of everyday tools that power our lives.
00:41:16.240Now, EMPs are really an interesting potential threat, especially with new delivery mechanisms that don't have to be a result of a nuclear explosion, but perhaps drones or other saboteurs by the CCP.
00:41:32.840So I think ultimately, you know, there's a lot of things that we need to be doing a lot more of.
00:41:39.040And, you know, the Trump administration has done amazing work to get behind, you know, drones and drone defense.
00:41:47.480But ultimately, this is a huge threat that it really reshapes how we think about warfare.
00:41:52.920In talking about the Chinese Communist Party, you obviously follow the dynamics there quite closely.
00:41:58.040there's been a lot of movement, right, that people have been tracking, whether it's with
00:42:01.280Xi Jinping and his generals, the Central Military Commission, and a lot of people have tried to kind
00:42:06.000of discern or take away some sort of insight on what that could look like, whether with regard
00:42:11.760to Taiwan, their posture towards the United States. Can you sort of walk us through those
00:42:16.080changes that have people intrigued, but also then your assessment of what that actually means for
00:42:21.960the fate of Taiwan, the United States, their, you know, kinetic movements? Well, since Xi Jinping
00:42:28.380has come into power over the past decade, he's taken a systematic approach to really consolidating
00:42:34.900power and unifying central control in a level not seen since Mao Zedong and the founding of
00:42:42.940the CCP and communist China. I think, you know, these purges, a lot of people, you know, think
00:42:49.920about it, it could be a sign of strength, but it could also reveal weaknesses inside the system.
00:42:54.980For example, corruption among the People's Liberation Army, distrust, huge amounts of
00:43:01.640factionalism that are occurring all over key aspects of the Chinese Communist Party leadership.
00:43:08.280And I think, you know, ultimately, these purges especially have accelerated in the past couple
00:43:14.260years where you've had more than 100 key military leaders, even as senior as the central
00:43:19.200military commission itself be purged. And so there's real dysfunction here. But that being
00:43:26.480said, Americans shouldn't necessarily take too much comfort from that because as we've seen
00:43:31.520throughout history, authoritarian systems can become extremely brittle and dangerous both at
00:43:37.640the same time. And so a leader who distrusts his own military may become more cautious or he may
00:43:45.560become more desperate and want to lash out irrationally externally. Justin, if you can
00:43:50.020hang with us through one more break. We appreciate your time. One of the leaders, not just of the
00:43:55.460defense tech movement, but I think from the anti-China space to former founder, one of the
00:44:01.220co-founders of Doge and a senior advisor to Secretary Hegsteth. We will be right back after
00:44:05.640this short break. Listen up, patriots. President Trump is dropping a $100 trillion bomb on the
00:44:12.100globalist. Jerome Powell's term has come to a close, and he's installing a real America First
00:44:19.140Fed chair who will, according to Jim Rickards, slash rates and supercharge our reindustrialization.
00:44:26.940This is what one man is calling Trump's gift on America's 250th anniversary, unleashing a historic
00:44:33.640super cycle in American mining, rare earths, uranium, and gold. The same forces that turned
00:44:40.280$5,000 into over a million in less than five years during China's booms are hitting here now.
00:44:46.800Jim Rickards, the former CIA, Pentagon, and White House advisor, has the battle plan. The gold
00:44:53.180royalty stock that could skyrocket in the next few years and the uranium power for AI. Don't miss
00:45:01.580this. Go to RickardsWarRoom.com now for a risk-free trial of Rickards Strategic Intelligence. Get
00:45:08.240all five free reports for just 49 bucks 90 days to test it love it or keep the research and get
00:45:15.640your money back this is your shot patriots america is rising make sure you participate
00:45:21.680once again rickardswarroom.com for your risk-free 90-day trial do it and do it today
00:45:29.040for 250 years the promise of america has been the freedom to build something of your own and
00:45:34.500for millions of families that dream begins with owning a home but in a blink of an eye
00:45:37.980that American dream can turn into a nightmare.
00:45:40.400With just some public information and a forged signature,
00:45:42.560criminals can legally transfer your home ownership into their name,
00:45:45.400and you won't find out about it until you get a foreclosure notice.
00:45:48.480Getting back months, even years, thousands of legal fees
00:45:57.160they're giving all of us 25% off up to two years in title fraud protection,
00:46:00.520plus a free title history report to ensure you're not already a victim.
00:46:03.340Use promo code Steve25 at HomeTitleLock.com to get protected today.
00:46:07.980war room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Vann. You are back in the war room sitting down with
00:46:17.760one of the founders of Doge. You were what? Like you're one of the first people there. So we'll
00:46:24.200have to have you on again to do a deep dive into everything that you saw there. Probably the
00:46:30.260closest anyone in this audience has ever come to the deep state bureaucrats. We'll talk a little
00:46:37.280bit about it. But I have one last question I want to ask you on the China front, which is
00:46:40.700in relation to, you know, Belt and Road, I think that gets most of the attention for China's,
00:46:45.620you know, quest for geopolitical hegemony expansionism. What exactly is that? Is the
00:46:53.340real push for that to get access to ports, infrastructure, rarest, critical minerals,
00:46:57.360all that? And, you know, take Panama, for example, what Secretary Hexeth is doing down there.0.56
00:47:03.320What are some examples of how the Trump administration has been pushing back on that stranglehold?
00:47:09.360I think, as you mentioned, the Belt and Road Initiative is really China's geopolitical operating system for how they systematically and methodically go after key strategic infrastructure all over the globe.
00:47:24.520So what does that look like? That looks like, you know, subsidizing and supporting their state-owned entities going out to buy strategic ports, strategic, you know, telecom networks, industrial parks, energy projects to really create as much as they can an attempt at, you know, global control of key strategic terrain.
00:47:45.860And so, you know, Panama is a perfect example of why Americans really can start thinking a lot more in terms of strategic terrain.
00:47:54.900So early on in the Trump administration, I had the opportunity to go visit Panama with Secretary Hegseth and the team.
00:48:03.260And the team did amazing work securing absolutely critical key agreements and MOUs to help maintain American strategic control of the canal and not allow that to fall in to PRC and CCP hands.
00:48:18.720And so the same is true all over the world in critical ports, undersea cables, mineral corridors, and all these logistics hubs.
00:48:27.700And President Trump has made that a priority, not just at the Department of War, but across the entire U.S. government to really get after how America can relearn making strategic geography a top priority.
00:48:46.880I want to start with just overall broad assessment.
00:48:50.460What do you think the legacy of DOGE is?
00:48:55.560I think, you know, unfortunately, DOGE didn't solve completely the core problem that it was trying to do, which I think everyone serious can admit that.
00:49:08.000But it did expose something that Washington had spent years hiding in plain sight, which is the federal government often cannot tell you what people are doing, what programs actually work, where some of these dollars go, and whether or not when you spend billions of dollars, do better outcomes actually come as a result.
00:49:28.040And that's not a small inefficiency here. What Doge exposed successfully were massive inefficiencies and huge scale of waste, fraud, and abuse that was happening across the federal government. And so I don't think the legacy of Doge should be something like nostalgia or just funny memes. I think it should be, and it was, the beginning of a more serious effort that the Trump administration has picked up, which is rolling out how can we make government more measurable, more accountable, and more mission-driven.
00:49:58.040Talk to us a little bit about what you saw at the VA there.
00:50:02.080I mean, I don't think anybody who's interfaced with the stuff going on there.
00:50:05.440I'm sure this audience has horror stories, nightmare stories.
00:50:08.760But what the systems you saw there that perpetuated that incompetence and just that lag, how is that allowed to exist?
00:50:18.980And what did you cut, more importantly?
00:50:20.340Well, I think the VA is an interesting example because you have an organization which, when President Trump came back into the Oval Office and Secretary Collins at the VA inherited, was a VA that had nearly 500,000 employees, which, to put that into context, is larger than the entire U.S. active duty army.
00:50:44.020So an incredibly large organization spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year, of course, for an incredibly important and noble mission, which is taking care of our veterans and giving them all the benefits that they deserve, absolutely, and they've earned.
00:50:58.760That being said, I can't tell you how many times I've interacted with veterans and almost none of them have any sort of perfect experience with the VA.
00:51:08.200Now, you know, Secretary Collins has done a lot to address some of those. But when you look at an organization that size, you had thousands of people that were involved in touching these different processes that in some cases could have been automated, could have been really streamlined to make it a lot easier for veterans to get access to the health care they need, to the benefits, processing their claims and all of that.
00:51:33.520But, you know, ultimately, we encountered a deep state bureaucracy in many cases that were completely absorbed with focusing on the process in many cases rather than outcomes.
00:51:46.280So talk to us a little bit about just the sheer scale of the organization.
00:51:51.700How did it, or the department rather, how did it get so big and how can you have actual substantive measures to sort of assess?
00:53:53.180You go online, fill out a quick medical form, licensed doctors review your request, prescribe if appropriate, and your medications are shipped directly to your door.
00:54:03.540No waiting rooms, no pharmacy lines, no insurance nonsense.
00:54:07.540People are traveling more, schedules are getting crazier, and have your medications already on hand just makes your life easier.
00:54:14.180Because being prepared isn't paranoia, it's common sense.
00:54:17.800Go visit my friends at allfamilypharmacy.com.
00:54:20.960That's one word, allfamilypharmacy.com, slash Bannon, and use code Bannon10 to save 10% on your next order.
00:54:29.560Again, that's allfamilypharmacy.com, slash Bannon, and use code Bannon10.