00:04:48.100for this artificial intelligence. So it's a highly leveraged bet on these massive productivity
00:04:53.340increases that also people are kind of wishing away the fact that you're going to have mass
00:04:58.300layoffs of high value added jobs for folks with careers and are taxpayers and are good
00:05:04.540householders in our communities will be wiped out if these projections are to be hit to make
00:05:11.120these equities worth anything of value, sir. Right. So Steve, you know, and you mentioned
00:05:16.240the great financial crisis, you know, 07, 08, I think that the more apt comparison probably is
00:05:20.780the dot-com bubble following the year 2000. And for this reason, because what you have to realize
00:05:26.860is ultimately what was promised from the internet did in fact come to fruition, right? I mean,
00:05:32.300in other words, the internet was as revolutionary to our lives as projected and still the market
00:05:38.180crashed, right? Because it was too far ahead of itself, even though, again, the underlying theme,
00:05:43.960the underlying fundamentals were actually there. They were accurate. So the same could happen with
00:05:48.300AI. Like AI can be everything that we're being promised right now by the tech crowd and the
00:05:53.620market can still crash because a bubble still forms because that's just human nature. We are
00:05:58.140emotional beings in many ways and we often misallocate capital on a big basis. But here's
00:06:03.820the difference and here's what scares me compared to there was enough damage from the dot-com bubble
00:06:09.620But here's the difference. We went into that with almost no debt. All right. Because the budget had been balanced in the 1990s. So we were not a deeply indebted nation. We are now. And so I think it's far more frightening, actually, because if we now have that bubble burst, let's say let's say it is a bubble and AI crashes.
00:06:27.320You know, to your point, we've never been more dependent on the wealthy in all of American history to finance this massive debt because the wealthy pay almost all of the taxes.
00:06:37.540And we have such a massive interest bill that we are totally dependent on the wealthy.
00:06:42.300The wealthy derive most of their wealth, not from income, but from assets.
00:06:46.140So if you have an asset crash, which is possible in these stocks, if you have an asset crash, we are going to have massive problems paying our bills, simply paying the interest on the debt that we've already accumulated.
00:07:00.980It's a combination of the dot-com and the 08 because you've got the highly leveraged power for the nation and also for the individual companies.
00:12:36.420Their lives will never be the same. Some of those children are never going to read at grade level or at age level because of what Tony Fauci did to them, because of his crimes and treachery.
00:12:47.160So, you know, given how manifest the effects of his crimes were and are going forward and going forward as well, I think it has to be priority number one.
00:12:56.580Absolutely. For the DNI and the DOJ, we need even more transparency and then we need justice.
00:13:03.020We need accountability, and don't use the pardon as an excuse.
00:13:10.340I've got to get to this pre-vost documentary, the post-documentary making, because it ties in with the 10th anniversary of Brexit.
00:13:17.780What caused Brexit, why it has not been implemented.0.70
00:13:21.140But before I leave, Steve, you were the first voice back in old war room pandemic that would come on here and talk about the R word, reparations from the Chinese Communist Party.0.78
00:17:12.340The Tories have not implemented, on the 10th anniversary,
00:17:15.020The Tories had eight years. Labor's been there, too. For eight years, the Tories allowed, and I think of the 13 million that have come in the last 10 years to England, which only had a population at the time, I think, of 70 million, eight or nine million, 10 million came in under Tories, you know, just a floodgate.
00:17:36.980And we had, I'm going to play at the end of this thing, a part of the cold open, where they're now taunting.
00:17:42.860And when you start rolling them up, they're sitting there going, it doesn't matter.
00:17:54.940Right now, correct me if I'm wrong, you're number one on Twitter news trending with just what you put out so far, some of this footage you put out so far?
00:34:37.440sent me something earlier today that said, the same Democrats that were content to let the
00:34:42.360Department of Homeland Security go unfunded while the nation was in combat against the world's
00:34:47.760leading sponsor of terrorism are now apoplectic that the National Counterterrorism Center might
00:34:54.200be scaled back. This would be the same National Counterterrorism Center that got involved in the
00:35:00.3402021 ODNI assessment, which later inspired the then President Joe Biden to declare that the
00:35:07.700white supremacists were the greatest threat to the United States of America. So I think there's some
00:35:13.000really deep analysis needs to go into what were they doing? How come there are so many people
00:35:19.240there? Why are they involved with making assessments that were politicized? What did
00:35:24.500they do with the elections? Why did they miss the China threat? Okay, the China threat goes0.83
00:35:31.720back beyond the creation of the ODNI. But let's just say since the ODNI has been around, how come
00:35:37.360the ODNI hasn't made more about the China threat? Who are the China hands inside that organization?
00:35:44.000So there's a lot to be investigated. And right now, the hair on fire from DC is generally0.94
00:35:51.080exaggerated, greatly exaggerated. And what we know is that most of the things that are happening
00:35:57.280right now up front are you get seconded, as you said, to your parent organization,
00:36:03.320National Geospatial Agency, National Security Agency, Office of Naval Intelligence, or one
00:36:08.860of the services. And you get sent to the ODNI and you work there. It's kind of on loan. Now they're
00:36:15.800being sent back to their parent organization. So people have to ask themselves, well, how come we
00:36:20.760have so many people at these parent organizations? How come there's so much fat there? And why was
00:36:25.860there so much fat at the ODNI? And what were those people really doing? I was in when the ODNI was
00:36:31.560created. I was wearing a uniform. And the entire time that I was in uniform, the Office of Director
00:36:36.680of National Intelligence did nothing to support our national security interest in the Western
00:36:42.820Pacific against the main thing, the People's Republic of China. And they were supposed to be
00:36:47.860there to help coordinate amongst the 18 different intelligence agencies to make us have better,
00:36:53.800more authoritative assessments. And instead, what's happened over all these years since it
00:36:58.320was established, almost 20 years, is that they've grown to become their own intelligence agency and
00:37:04.980making their own assessments. So they've become just another voice amongst many, and they use it
00:37:11.100for political purposes, as I referenced about 2021, and this notion that white violent extremists
00:37:17.740was the greatest threat to the United States of America at a time when we had so many other
00:37:22.360clear existential threats facing us. So I wish Mr. Pulte all the best. I hope that he does fire
00:37:30.960people because it's way, way top heavy. It's got people that are making nearly $200,000 a year,
00:37:37.200and they do very, very little except go to work and write politicized reports that helps
00:37:42.820that administrations, whether they, or the deep state's view of what they want to promote,
00:37:50.460regardless of who's president. And this is really dangerous. And I think it needs to be scaled back.
00:37:56.220How do we, how do you explain to people how you balance it when the cut, a lot of people
00:38:01.280calling for the cuts want to see, you know, the cottons of the world, they want to see the
00:38:06.760supremacy of the CIA over everything again, because the CIA was the one they're most in
00:38:11.900business with. What is the danger to the Republic, having come from naval intelligence, of having a
00:38:18.960supremacist mentality at the CIA over all the intelligence agencies, sir?
00:38:25.920Well, I think there's a risk there, obviously, that CIA has had way too much on their plate as
00:38:34.120well. And so there needs to be an examination of what's going on at CIA. I think Sam Fattis has
00:38:40.480call for that. Somebody should be asking the director, the current director, so when are you
00:38:45.480going to start firing people at CIA? When are you going to have major reform, just like we're
00:38:52.480trying to do at ODNI? We've got way too many people in the intelligence community for the
00:38:57.980failures that we have not gotten in front of. We didn't get in front of what happened when the
00:39:04.720Soviets collapsed, and everything since 1991, you could say there's been strategic failure.
00:39:11.300Yes, we have operational and tactical success, but those operational and tactical successes
00:39:16.860are in large part not just because we have an ODNI or a CIA. They're because we have people
00:39:23.720out in our combatant commands and out forward that are doing the operational and tactical successes
00:39:29.600that we hear about and read about, like in Epic Theory or other things, where we're successful
00:39:34.940in those smaller engagements. But at a strategic level, we missed the rise of the People's Republic
00:39:41.900of China, and we undercut and threat deflated their military capability and their strategic0.66
00:39:48.200intentions to harm the United States and the Western world. We missed that big time. And that's0.86
00:39:54.180after we built the ODNI. We missed what narco-terrorists were doing in our own hemisphere.1.00
00:40:00.400We missed how China was propping up Cuba. We missed how Venezuela was involved with maybe0.88
00:40:07.160our elections or in the narco-terrorism arena. We missed what Iran was doing with Hezbollah
00:40:13.300and Hamas and things in the Middle East. So we have a lot of strategic failures. So all this
00:40:18.820hand-wringing about, well, we have to have this. We have to have these agencies because it's for
00:40:23.160our national security doesn't wash with what's happened. Let's scale back and have some really
00:40:28.800smaller organizations with people that are hungry and worried about being fired for failure.
00:40:35.540We promote people for failure. We need to start promoting people based on successful
00:40:40.460analytic capabilities. You wouldn't promote somebody who goes in baseball and bats 100.
00:40:48.040You know, you're going to want Ted Williams. You want somebody who's going to be a 400 hitter.
00:40:51.120And we don't even get close to a 100 hitter with the IC on many, many things.
00:40:56.540And that's the stark reality that no one in D.C. wants to admit.
00:41:00.420And what they'll do is they'll each come individually, each senator, each congressman, each IC agency and say, you know, we had a success in this area.
00:41:10.000But they don't add up to the strategic issues that we failed on.
00:41:13.920And that's the real check that I think Mr. Pulte and President Trump and the rest of this administration better get after, because if you don't cut it back now, it'll just it's like a weed.
00:41:25.000It'll it'll grow back even stronger. And we need to have congressional systemic reform.
00:41:30.180We don't need to have these people there for 40 years doing what they're doing.
00:41:35.560That kind of long-term duration is good in some technical areas, but what we've done is we've created a class of people that they think they know best and they don't answer to anyone, and they'll just wait until this administration or that administration leaves so that they can get back on their agenda.
00:50:22.580That's what that system's for, and they're working on one.
00:50:25.120So they're working on a multifaceted system,
00:50:27.860and what we need to do is get into offensive thinking as well,
00:50:30.940And that's where President Trump in his first administration, and now in this administration, is trying to focus more attention and money on building our own hypersonic missiles and systems, in addition to the defensive things that we're doing with, like, integrated, comprehensive, layered defenses or distributed maritime operations that have a defensive capability.
00:50:52.140So, in offense and defense, we've neglected the offense for too long.
00:53:48.760Why wait till you're down to your last pill, stuck traveling or dealing with a packed pharmacy when you can already have your medications on hand?
00:53:57.100Seriously, you know what you normally take.
00:53:59.980You already know what your family could need.
00:54:03.720Smart families don't operate like that.
00:54:05.560That's why I love All Family Pharmacy.
00:54:08.020They're built a better, simpler system to get your prescription medications.
00:54:12.900You go online, fill out a quick medical form, licensed doctors review your request, prescribe if appropriate, and your medications are shipped directly to your door.
00:54:23.240No waiting rooms, no pharmacy lines, no insurance nonsense.
00:54:27.260People are traveling more, schedules are getting crazier, and have your medications already on hand just makes your life easier.
00:54:33.880Because being prepared isn't paranoia, it's common sense.
00:54:37.500Go visit my friends at allfamilypharmacy.com.
00:54:40.680That's one word, allfamilypharmacy.com slash Bannon, and use code Bannon10 to save 10% on your next order.
00:54:49.340Again, that's allfamilypharmacy.com slash Bannon, and use code Bannon10.