00:00:00.000We had a conversation, Willie, about the notion of an authoritarian government or an authoritarian administration coming into play.
00:00:06.460But most of that has been rooted in the rhetoric that we've heard from Donald Trump.
00:00:10.480Yesterday, these Supreme Court decisions, particularly the two that we've been discussing with regards to the FTC and the Fed, they made that more of a reality.
00:00:18.640And I was very curious going into yesterday how they were going to toe the line between the two agencies and make a difference.
00:00:25.200And it seems to me that the impact that they understood these justices knew that this could have with respect to Lisa Cook and the Federal Reserve on the economy as a whole and the implications going forward likely played a role in how they decided that case.
00:00:40.980On the other hand, when you're talking about the amount of power that has now been given to the president and the executive branch to make these unilateral decisions about administrative agencies, that is a scary thing to think about because of the fact that these, Willie, are supposed to be independent organizations.
00:00:57.500These are supposed to be independent agencies that don't get into the type of politicized nature of what Donald Trump would like to see happen from his leadership.
00:01:05.620Look, it was a good day for democracy. I mean, you point out that that Donald Trump has been trying to undermine free and fair elections for almost as long as he's been in public life.
00:01:14.940I mean, remember, this is the guy who spread the birther conspiracy about about Barack Obama and whether he was eligible.
00:01:19.840And in 2020, I remember very well those cases in Nevada, which we were happy to win in route to winning more than 60 cases against Donald Trump.
00:01:28.840won a big election contest in Nevada that year, written actually by a Republican trial judge and
00:01:35.400affirmed unanimously by the state Supreme Court. And look, today's decision should have been a
00:01:39.340unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, but it wasn't. But, you know, we take a win where we
00:01:44.140get it. And in addition to the good news out of the Supreme Court today, I'm also happy to report
00:01:48.920that we handed the Department of Justice its 11th defeat in its effort to get access to state voter
00:01:54.980files, this time in New Hampshire. Funny about the last day of the Supreme Court is that it's
00:02:00.680the only day where we actually know which decisions we're going to get. So, of course,
00:02:04.080we've been speculating that birthright citizenship might come last. And in fact,
00:02:08.120that is going to be one of the decisions that we get today. That'll be the landmark case of this
00:02:12.660term, no doubt. And the court looks poised to uphold that, saying that if you are born on0.96
00:02:16.940American soil, you are an American citizen. Of course, the president day one in office tried to
00:02:21.940overturn that, saying that if your parents were here illegally or temporarily, you can't do that.
00:02:27.600And they made these interesting arguments about birth tourism that the solicitor general was
00:02:31.800pushing during arguments, and the court seemed really skeptical of that. But that is going to
00:02:37.040be the biggest case that we will be talking about for days to come. There are three other cases
00:02:41.140still on the docket for the justices to decide today. There's a pair of cases involving transgender
00:02:45.680athletes, female transgender athletes who want to play on girls and women's sports teams.
00:02:50.640And those cases involve a pair of state bans on on that participation.
00:02:55.020And it looks like the court is poised to uphold those bans.
00:02:58.420Now, notably, that decision would likely not affect the entire country, just the 27 states that have laws like that on the book blocking those transgender athletes from playing.
00:03:07.840And then the other case, of course, involves campaign finance.
00:03:10.420And this has the potential to fundamentally shift power away from super PACs and back to the political party organizations.
00:03:16.420organizations. And the big thing to note there is that this will have major impacts on the midterm
00:03:21.160elections for the Republican Party, especially. Of course, they're really, really skilled at
00:03:26.300fundraising. And so if this power moves away from super PACs and back to the RNC, the NRSC,
00:03:31.800the NRCC, that could have major implications for this year's midterms. But we're expecting
00:03:36.180decisions in all four of those cases at 10 a.m. here at the court.
00:03:39.680tuesday 30 june year of order 2026 um so today supreme court let's go to the steps of the supreme
00:03:49.760court outside the supreme court our own neil mccabe uh neil uh what do i hear there's cheering
00:03:55.320from the from the girls uh is this about the transgender this is about what do you got
00:04:00.700this is uh protecting girls sports and that's uh i believe uh guessing from the group it was
00:04:09.460the West Virginia decision or the West Virginia rule that says that, uh, biological males cannot
00:04:15.140compete with biological females. And, uh, maybe three minutes ago they started cheering saying
00:04:22.020we won, we won. And, uh, I have an emissary heading over there to, uh, to see if we can
00:04:28.660get one of them to come over. Uh, obviously. Well, hold it. They, they have, they're, they're,
00:04:35.520They're hardwired into the into the into the room itself.
00:04:39.260Right. They've got they've got an early warning system that we don't have.
00:04:45.900Are you talking about women in general or these particular plaintiffs, Steve?
00:04:49.700No, no, no. All the just the plaintiffs themselves.
00:04:52.520The plaintiffs always seem to know a minute or two.
00:04:54.460Oh, yeah, yeah. They are before the media.
00:07:09.720Of course, the NDAA has got plenty of problems in it, including a merger of the industrial defense bases of Israel in the United States and also, I think, intelligence sharing.
00:07:21.300So I'm not so sure NDA should pass on its own.
00:07:24.380And I know it's a must pass, but we've got to have a fight about that.0.99
00:07:27.580Neil, talk to me about the transgender.1.00
00:14:14.540We have Penny Nance from Concerned Women of America that has had a huge victory in men and women's sports, one of President Trump's top priorities.
00:14:24.900He's going to break it all down for us, particularly also yesterday, which we didn't have time to spend about this decision on slaughter.
00:14:32.460That reinforces what Mike Davis has been saying for a while.
00:14:36.020The Article II powers of the president of the United States as chief executive of the U.S. government.0.95
00:14:42.640Natasha Owens is going to take us out.
00:14:44.260We've got Neil McCabe on the steps of the Supreme Court, Penny Nash from Concerned Women of America, and Mike Davis from the Article III Project, all next in the War Room.
00:14:59.760Buy gold and put some silver in your pocket.
00:20:34.600Does this mean because they've reinforced West Virginia and Idaho, does this mean, I
00:20:40.320think it's 18 other states, does this mean this is going to be fought at the state legislature
00:20:45.060level now, Tennessee, Alabama, all these states have got to go get a statute like the one
00:20:50.380that passed muster in Idaho and West Virginia, and that's the way you do it?
00:20:54.260The court's basically saying, hey, we uphold the state's rights to do this, and people
00:20:58.700are going to have to go do it at that level?
00:21:00.460It actually may be a Title IX violation under our federal statutes when you let boys go beat up girls in sports because you're not providing equal opportunity for girls to participate in sports, which is what Title IX says you have to do.
00:21:19.020So if you're letting boys go beat up girls, how the heck does that provide equal opportunity for girls that that ruins opportunity for girls?0.99
00:21:29.100And so I I would think that the message coming out of the Supreme Court today with this nine to nothing decision is boys need to get the hell out of girls sports and they need to get the hell out of girls locker rooms.0.93
00:21:42.020Mike, hang on for a second. We've got a lot more to get to with you.0.97
00:22:13.540she's the one steve what do you got so i so ask her what is what is the is there a legislative
00:22:18.900strategy now since they reinforce west virginia and idaho do you have a strategy to go throughout
00:22:23.880the nation okay so having uh now that this this is settled what is the strategy moving forward
00:22:33.000state by state and what are the key challenges yeah well here's the thing only 27 states actually
00:22:39.480have protection for women's sports that are explicitly saying that men can't compete on
00:22:44.860women's sports. But we have Title IX. That's federal legislation that applies to all 50 states
00:22:48.800on the basis of sex. And we just heard conclusively from the court that sex matters in law. That's how
00:22:54.060we protect women. But we'll still work to clarify that in all the states. And like I said, this was1.00
00:22:58.980a unanimous decision. So hopefully we won't see a big fight between the red states and the blue
00:23:02.760states. What are the states now where you're turning your attention? Yeah, well, we've seen
00:23:06.940some movement in New Hampshire and Pennsylvania. There's also a couple of ballot initiatives like
00:23:11.320in Arizona, even Colorado, where the state legislatures have continued to kick girls0.99
00:23:16.680to the curb. And so voters have taken this issue into their own hands. So Colorado, New Hampshire,0.94
00:23:21.100and what's the other one? So Colorado has it on the ballot, as well as Arizona and a couple
00:23:25.560other states. But Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, there's a couple other states where we think
00:23:29.500this should really embolden them to protect their female athletes. Sir? So what is her contact,0.84
00:23:36.080her Twitter. Where do we go? The audience wants to learn more about this and her group and her
00:23:41.480efforts. Where do they go? Okay, where do people go? What are your socials? Yeah, they can go to
00:23:48.220concernedwomen.org. And we're on all platforms as far as social media is concerned. And I would
00:23:53.540just charge that every single state, all of the remaining 23 should take swift action to clarify
00:23:59.040that men should not be competing in their sports because women shouldn't be protected based on
00:24:03.400their zip code it should be everywhere here in the land of the free thanks mason very macy very
00:24:08.500appreciate it mason thank you so much thank you thank you neil great mike uh mike davis yep yep
00:24:15.580go ahead i was just saying i just saw a runner go by uh i just saw a runner go by a lot of times
00:24:25.320the interns will run with decisions to their bosses and so i'm going to check to see if the
00:24:30.640new decisions come out. Okay, please do that. So, Mike, you think, I know Eric Schmidt put
00:24:38.040some amendments into the Save America Act. You're saying for right now, we're good. It's 9-0. It
00:24:43.660reinforces Title IX. There's no need to jump the gun. We maybe not have to put it in the Save
00:24:48.760America Act that we can maybe revert to this decision and maybe not get, because the Save
00:24:55.940America Act, as you know, is going to be such an intense fight. We may not have to encumber that
00:25:00.480with this, with President Trump wants, because he's adamant about getting men out of women's1.00
00:25:05.480sports, sir. Well, first, I think we have some breaking news. There's a six to three
00:25:09.960decision out of the Supreme Court. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the opinion again, where they
00:25:15.960struck down these campaign finance limits. So that that is just breaking. I have not
00:25:22.240seen the opinion yet uh but that's coming out uh now as for the uh that as for the uh what you
00:25:32.580were saying about the save america act about the title nine uh with title nine what i what i think
00:25:39.040is going to happen is these states that allow boys to participate in girls sports they're going
00:25:44.980to get sued under Title IX and these states are going to lose for taking away opportunities for
00:25:54.700girls. And so I would say to parents, to girls, to women who are participating in sports and have
00:26:05.900boys and men invading your sports in your locker rooms, I would sue and sue very aggressively
00:26:12.100under Title IX, under the Save America Act. What we're going to see, I presume, today
00:26:19.520is the Supreme Court is going to rule maybe under a 1950s statute, maybe the 14th Amendment,
00:26:27.640but probably a statute that there's somehow birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
00:26:32.660and other birth tourists. What this will do is give Congress the opportunity to close this
00:26:39.940this bogus, to overturn this bogus ruling via statutes, amend the statute and make it clear
00:26:47.620that we do not give birthright citizenship to Chinese birth tourists, to Trende Aragua,
00:26:54.380to MS-13 and other illegal aliens who come to America. So we shall see how the Supreme Court0.85
00:27:05.080rules at any moment. Are you concerned since we had a win in birthright citizenship and that was
00:27:13.100number one, I think you would consider it a win 6-3 on the campaign financing. We got two wins
00:27:20.560that you anticipate they'll hold the medicine to the end? Yes, because that's a very chiefy thing
00:27:29.240to do. He, like yesterday, everyone, the liberals should have been very angry that the Supreme
00:27:38.200Court overturned precedent from 80 years ago, 90 years ago, and said that the president can fire
00:27:46.600executive branch officials like the FTC commissioner. But then the Supreme Court on the same
00:27:53.980day said that the president somehow can't fire a governor on the Federal Reserve. It's a very
00:27:58.940chief he moved from the chief justice he uh he likes it when conservatives are angry uh with a
00:28:06.860decision because he can keep his base the uh the new york times and the washington post editors
00:28:14.560and reporters he can keep his base happy in the cocktail circuit in georgetown the viceroy mike
00:28:21.440davis is with us we're anticipating a uh a historic and monumental decision momentarily we're also
00:28:28.060We'll get into the slaughter. Mike Davis has learned us up over the last couple of years about the Article two powers of the presidency at the Article three project.
00:28:36.040We'll get into all of that with Neil McCabe at the Supreme Court in a moment.
00:28:41.820Listen up, patriots. President Trump is dropping a one hundred trillion dollar bomb on the globalist.
00:28:47.700Jerome Powell's term has come to a close, and he's installing a real America first Fed chair who will, according to Jim Rickards, slash rates and supercharge our reindustrialization.
00:29:01.900This is what one man is calling Trump's gift on America's 250th anniversary, unleashing a historic super cycle in American mining, rare earths, uranium and gold.
00:29:13.380The same forces that turned $5,000 into over a million in less than five years during China's booms are hitting here now.
00:29:21.840Jim Rickards, the former CIA, Pentagon, and White House advisor, has the battle plan.
00:29:27.700The gold royalty stock that could skyrocket in the next few years and the uranium power for AI.
00:30:40.060And if you look just 10 years ago, the types of decisions we were getting at the Supreme Court, this is actually shocking to see this turnaround this quickly.
00:30:49.500And that's all largely due to President Trump, the Supreme Court justice he has put on, but also the political fights that he has made this.
00:30:57.040He injected this issue into the elections, and he made sure that it was clear that voters were deciding that men shouldn't be in girls' sports, even if they should be women, right?0.69
00:31:08.180We still need to pass national legislation to protect girls all across the country, but we need to rack up as many of these victories as possible because the left is unrelenting when it comes to the pursuit of their horrific and ridiculous agenda.0.93
00:31:21.020Hang on. This is what I asked Davis. I don't understand how the three amigos over there, the core of the left wing, how they actually voted for it.
00:31:29.340This is such a transgender ideology is such a central beating heart of the Marxist culture of Marxist movement.1.00
00:31:36.620How did they possibly come our way?1.00
00:31:37.960Mike says, look, it's a tactical retreat because this thing's so egregious.
00:31:50.580But we have to say what they believe outright.
00:31:53.800They don't believe there should be men.
00:31:56.100They don't believe that there should be women.
00:31:57.700They think that there should be infinite identities that anyone can choose from and that to limit your identity as a man or limit your identity as a woman,
00:32:06.120it actually causes society great harm.0.99
00:32:42.860They're responding essentially to the left's claims in here that they're not allowed to restrict sports on the basis of biology due to Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause.
00:32:53.360I just wish it was more robust and strong in arguing that, no, actually, the 14th Amendment and Title IX actually do require you to segregate sports and private facilities on the basis of sex.
00:33:04.820That's literally what they do. But they were responding to the left's arguments here in this legal case.
00:33:10.560And I wouldn't read too much into it. Terry, hang on for one second.
00:33:15.640Carrie Sheffield, you've been at the forefront of fighting this issue. Your thoughts, ma'am.
00:33:21.020Hey, good to see you. And hey, Terry. Terry and Carrie. Yeah, I mean, this is a huge win.
00:33:26.560And just to piggyback off what Terry said, the legal ruling here about the Equal Protection Clause, Steve, you and I have been talking about this literally for years.
00:33:37.460So equal protection means case law for hundreds of years have recognized biological differences between men and women.0.75
00:33:46.140And that's why we have separate prisons.
00:33:50.060This goes far beyond just sports when you're talking about the Equal Protection Clause, which means that in order for the full weight of the Constitution to fully protect someone who is female, there is a distinct set of legal precedent for that.
00:34:03.740And so what was really interesting was in the Bostock case that that really was perverted, because unfortunately, I think it was Gorsuch and others, that he basically said that a man could dress like a woman and therefore he was not, he couldn't face violation because he was a man who thought he was a woman.
00:34:24.300And so it would be a violation of his equal protection as a man who thought he was a woman.
00:34:29.900And it's just it totally undermined the actual broad understanding of equal protection, the equal protection clause for women, biological sex of women.
00:34:42.120And so I would have loved to see more, like Terry said, in this specific case, because in some ways it was almost like a negative versus a really affirmation of the equal protection clause.
00:34:52.260but a win is a win and so i will take it absolutely perfect i know you guys got a
00:34:58.080lot more work to do by the way the 14th amendment has come in uh we're gonna bounce carrie you're
00:35:02.640actually singing you're multi-talented you're singing this weekend at one of these events
00:35:08.060can you give our audience where it is yeah absolutely that's the flyer there it's going to
00:35:13.320be on july 4th so the super bowl of all days on the main stage of the great american state fair
00:35:19.880and I have to tell you, Steve, because again, you know my story. We've been talking about this for
00:35:24.640years. My father passed away yesterday and I plan to give him a tribute from the stage.
00:35:31.700I will be hosting and leading that whole hour. It's going to be an hour of patriotic music,
00:35:36.460patriotic sing-along. We are going to intersperse it with prayers and intercessors who will be
00:35:41.560praying for America. We're kicking it off with the VA secretary who is in Trump's cabinet and
00:35:46.660he is a retired military chaplain so it's going to be perfect that he will set the tone for us
00:35:51.420but we're going to be singing along we'll have the lyrics on the screen so everyone can sing
00:35:55.240together uh songs like god bless america uh my country tis of thee uh amazing grace and uh and
00:36:03.320you know for all of the complications of my father he was a music professor and he was a professor of
00:36:09.360music composition and music performance and he taught me how to sing and he taught me how to play
00:36:14.740piano at age four. And so I will give him that tribute, even though he was abusive to me. He
00:36:21.480suffered. He was molested as a child. And so he passed down, unfortunately, a lot of abuse to my
00:36:27.200seven siblings and I. But, you know, in some ways, it's very symbolic of America that, you know, we
00:36:32.720were not a perfect country. We've never been a perfect country. But at the same time, we can
00:36:37.200still recognize the beauty of our legacy as a nation. And for me personally, in my family.
00:36:42.080what time what time we're going to be covering this 24 7 so what what time are you on i am live
00:36:50.180from the main stage from 3 30 to 4 30 p.m on july 4th and we'd love to have you there steve and all
00:36:56.260of your viewers come on by come sing with us uh you can see our intercessors there carrie lake
00:37:01.660will be right after the va secretary we've also got frank pavone who i i'm saying it here he's
00:37:07.480going to get his collar back with the new Pope. And Lance Wallnau, who is a very renowned pastor,
00:37:12.900will be giving prayers. It's going to be phenomenal. So come sing with us and come
00:37:16.640pray with us on July 4th at 3.30. We're looking forward to it. Carrie, what's your social media?
00:37:22.420Where do people go get you? Yeah, at Carrie Sheffield, all across the socials.
00:37:28.680Carrie, thanks. Look forward to seeing you on the 4th of July. Beautiful. Thank you, Steve.
00:37:33.940God. Terry Schilling, can you give us your coordinates? People are going to want to
00:37:39.800dig down deep into this and figure out where we go on this transgender ideology, sir. We know0.99
00:37:44.500we've got a lot of work to do. Great start, though, today. Yeah, thanks, Steve. It's just
00:37:48.920Schilling 1776 across all social media platforms. And check us out at AmericanPrinciplesProject.org
00:37:55.700and get all the updates you need. Terry, thank you, brother. We'll get back to you.
00:38:00.840Mike Davis, the big enchilada has been delivered.
00:38:08.660Well, it's as bad as it gets from the Supreme Court.
00:38:12.440We have a five to one to three ruling with the five with the chief justice, Justice Amy Coney Barrett and the three Democrat appointees ruling that's under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.0.51
00:38:30.840And anyone born in the United States apparently gets birthright citizenship, including, it seems, I haven't read the opinion in full, but it seems illegal aliens, Chinese birth tourists, Trendy Aragua.
00:38:45.080There's a one, Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion where he would have more modestly decided this under a statute that can be amended by Congress.
00:38:56.900and the three true constitutionalists, Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch,
00:39:03.780my former boss, dissented and dissented strongly. I will say that my boss, former boss, Justice
00:39:10.780Gorsuch, is the only Trump-appointed justice who did not go the wrong way on these cases.
00:39:20.000So I want to commend him for that. He actually did what he is supposed to do, which is
00:39:26.520to follow the law as written and as intended by the American people when it was enacted.
00:39:35.780And I'll say that this 14th Amendment decision, this birthright decision case is an abomination
00:39:40.960by the Chief Justice and the five others, Justice Barrett, the professor.
00:39:47.580It shouldn't surprise you that she joined this.
00:39:50.560It's truly an awful ruling because it constitutionalizes birthright citizenship, meaning it's nearly impossible to change.
00:40:00.020And this is not what we ever intended when we gave birthright citizenship after the Civil War to the children of the freed slaves.
00:40:08.060It's all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction, meaning allegiance to the United States.
00:40:17.200And the Chief Justice and Justice Barrett and the three liberals just scratched out that second part, subject to the jurisdiction, and they just rewrote a constitutional amendment.
00:40:27.260This is the most egregious judicial activism imaginable.
00:40:32.940It is the most egregious violation of our most crucial sovereign power as we the people, as the sovereign citizens of America, to determine who comes and goes and who becomes one of us.
00:41:19.760Is that what Kavanaugh's angle of attack was about that?
00:41:23.760I think I was mistaken by a 1940 law. I think it was a 1952 law or something like that. I haven't had a chance to read Kavanaugh's concurring opinion, but I presume that's what he is saying, that we can interpret this on statutory grounds and we don't have to reach the constitutional grounds, the constitutional avoidance that courts are supposed to do.
00:41:47.880When they don't have to decide a constitutional ground, they shouldn't. But this is just delusions of grandeur by the chief justice. You saw him with the Fed case with Lisa Cook. As Justice Barrett pointed out, he wrote this grandiose sweeping opinion that did not need to be written to decide the Lisa Cook matter.
00:42:11.700he's done the same thing here. He's written this delusional grand opinion on birthright
00:42:19.840citizenship that did not need to be written. And it's just, it is wrong. It's not what the
00:42:26.500American citizens agreed to when we agreed to give birthright citizenship to the children of
00:42:33.640the freed slaves after the Civil War. And we did it through the 14th Amendment after the Dred Scott
00:42:39.260decision. It was to overrule the Supreme Court's dreadful Dred Scott decision that said that the
00:42:45.640children of freed slaves are not American citizens. I don't know how the Chief Justice can say that
00:42:52.540illegal aliens get birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, but American Indians did not.0.98
00:43:01.060Remember that American Indians did not get birthright citizenship because they were not0.78
00:43:05.500subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. They were subject to the jurisdiction of their
00:43:10.940tribes. And so Congress, I believe it was in 1924, extended birthright citizenship to American
00:43:18.420Indians. And Congress could do that now with illegal aliens, Chinese birth tourists,1.00
00:43:24.540Trendy Aragua, MS-13. But the Chief Justice and Professor Barrett and the three liberals just
00:43:31.560said, oh, we're just, we're just going to hand out citizenship like we're handing out candy at the
00:43:37.820fair. Mike, can you hang on for one second? One more block. I want to drill down on this about
00:43:44.720does this slam the door totally? Also about the slaughter decision on what you've taught us on
00:43:49.620the article two powers of the president. Mike Davis, the Viceroy is with us. We got Neil
00:43:54.260McCabe over at the Supreme Court. A lot more to come on a grim Tuesday in the war room.
00:44:26.480That's why we've had so many victories.
00:44:28.240Had a couple of three defeats, but we're still fighting on some of those.
00:44:30.960You know, we're still fighting. Talk to me about this, because I don't often hear you say, hey, Bannon, this is as bad as it gets, particularly the way you've teed me up and you've teed the audience before.
00:44:42.360We weren't going to win this. OK, you did not think we were going to win this.
00:44:45.820And you've been doing a good job, I think, of getting people ready for this.
00:44:49.540Why now is it Mike Davis saying, hey, I don't know if we can reverse it.
00:44:53.220I don't know if we can turn this one around, sir.
00:44:55.060What the Chief Justice, John Roberts, his wingwoman, Professor Amy Coney Barrett, and the three liberals have done with this birthright citizenship ruling is they have ruled that anyone who comes to America and plops out a child has birthright citizenship for that child and you can't get rid of them.0.91
00:45:18.580That means Chinese birth tourists can come here, have their kid, 1.5 million of them have done this already, Chinese birth tourists come to America, have their kid in America, on American soil, take their Chinese kid back to Beijing, never step foot again on American soil, have no allegiance to the United States.0.86
00:45:41.720And that kid gets American citizenship. That kid gets Social Security. That kid gets American benefits. That kid can mail in his ballot to vote in American elections from Beijing when he's 18 years old and never have stepped foot in the United States.0.86
00:46:00.520That's what this birthright citizenship ruling does. This is an egregiously bad, wrong ruling. It is the most serious violation of our most crucial sovereign power as American citizens, as we the people, the sovereign citizens of America, to control who comes and goes and who becomes one of us.
00:46:25.800We have taken this post-Civil War birthright citizenship provision to give birthright citizenship to the children of the freed slaves, and now these narcissistic justices, the Chief Justice John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, along with their three Marxist Democrat appointees, have opened the door and given birthright citizenship to anyone who steps foot in America and plops out a child.
00:46:54.600So here is the solution. There would have to be a constitutional amendment to change this, which is nearly impossible to do. So here is the solution.
00:47:05.920The Senate must pass the Save America Act now. The Senate must move immediately. And then the Trump administration, Mark Wayne Mullen, needs to move immediately to deport, to detain every illegal immigrant that they can find, especially birthing age women, birthing persons, as Democrats call these women.
00:47:31.700And any woman, illegal alien, who is capable of having a child needs to be rounded up first.0.96
00:47:37.440They need to be put in third countries while they're going through the immigration process,1.00
00:47:42.480and then they need to be expelled immediately.1.00
00:47:45.240If you're going to constitutionalize birthright citizenship, as the Supreme Court has done0.97
00:47:50.880today for illegal aliens, Trendy Aragua, MS-13, Chinese birth tourists, we need to get
00:47:57.220vicious with our immigration enforcement.1.00
00:48:01.700Last thing, I'm going to get to this. I'm going to get you back on to slaughter. I know you got to go. You got media hit after media hit. Does the recognition and the expansion of President Trump's control of the administrative state with slaughter yesterday? Does that help us in any way with what you're saying the solution is, is that you got DHS, you got the money, you got the manpower. Mark Wayne Mullins has got it. It's now mass deportations. Does that help us at all in President Trump's execution of this plan?0.98
00:48:31.700Apparently, other than the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and maybe the Kennedy Center, everyone else in the executive branch works for the president of the United States, just about everyone else.
00:48:44.240And so he can fire anyone in the executive branch, other than a Fed governor, apparently, for any reason or no reason.
00:48:51.780So I would say to Mark Wing, Walt Mullen, and his new buddy, his new ICE nominee, who's his buddy from Oklahoma, get moving on immigration enforcement.1.00
00:49:04.820Get moving on getting birthing persons, these women who can have kids, the illegal aliens that have kids, put them to the top of the queue, get them the hell out of our country.1.00
00:49:15.380Mike Davis, where do they go for Article 3? Where do they go for social media to follow you?1.00
00:49:21.580And are you going to have a lot to say about this over the next couple of days, sir?
00:49:25.660Again, cheers to my old boss, Justice Neil Gorsuch, for not being an effing coward, like we saw with Barrett, like we saw even with Kavanaugh from time to time.
00:49:37.080Gorsuch was the rock-solid Trump appointee, so thank you to my old boss.