00:00:00.880Did Dave Moran ever bring documents to your house?
00:00:05.280On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:00:12.300Did you ever receive a text about your work at NIAID to your personal cell phone?
00:00:17.860On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:00:25.420Did any text about your work at NID that went to your personal cell phone ever become part of federal records?
00:00:32.840On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:00:40.020Did you maintain a personal email account while serving as director?
00:00:44.300On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:00:50.660Did you ever receive work-related communications on that Gmail account from David Morinz?
00:00:56.520On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:01:04.020Did you preserve any work-related communications on that Gmail account from David Morinz?
00:01:09.560On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:01:15.660Did Dave Morantz ever provide you with documents outside of those two ways that would violate NIH policy for four-year compliance?
00:01:23.940On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:01:32.880Now let's look at two other communications.
00:01:35.400You emailed Dave Morantz on January 26, 2020, quote,
00:01:39.220It is important that I speak with you tonight. Please call me at home.
00:01:43.220This is part of Exhibit 2 that you have in front of you.
00:01:45.660This email is sent the same day, the exact same day you write in an internal document, quote, now we know the market was not the source. It was the amplifier, unquote.
00:01:59.220Would you call the origins of COVID-19 a substantive issue?
00:02:04.060On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:02:11.380Did you discuss COVID-19 origins with Dan Morantz on this phone call?
00:02:17.800On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:02:26.140Now, let's take a closer look at the last time you testified before Congress.
00:02:30.480This is part of what you have in front of you is Exhibit 4, which is part of the record.
00:02:33.860In June 2024, you testified to Dr. Morant's quote, was not an advisor to me on institute
00:02:59.040So today under oath, your testimony remains that Dr. Morant's was not an advisor to you
00:03:03.100on institute policy or substantive matters.
00:03:07.220On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:03:14.440I've got Exhibit 5, which you have in front of you.
00:03:16.800On October 24, 2021, David Morant texted you to provide information about and advocate for the controversial EcoHealth Alliance grant.
00:03:25.440You thank him and tell him you will check the information.
00:03:28.300Would you agree that this shows an advisory relationship between David Morant and yourself?
00:03:33.100On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:03:41.680Do you agree that you two were discussing a substantive issue?
00:03:46.340On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:03:53.100If documentary evidence establishes that Dr. Morans advised you regarding EcoHealth Alliance, COVID origins, or grant policy, then your June 2024 testimony would have been inaccurate, correct?
00:04:04.780On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:04:11.300Is there any document in your possession today that would contradict your prior congressional testimony?
00:04:15.540on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth
00:04:21.840amendment of the constitution have you deleted destroyed or instructed anyone to destroy records
00:04:26.620after learning congress and investigating these matters on the advice of counsel i respectfully
00:04:32.880decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth amendment of the constitution are you aware
00:04:37.920of anyone who did on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my
00:04:45.160rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. As you know, Dr. Marantz,
00:04:49.300don't face his charges related to destroying records while you distance yourself from him.
00:04:53.020Is that fair to a decades-long friend? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully
00:04:58.700decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:05:03.600When is the last time you spoke to him?
00:05:07.360On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth
00:05:12.580Amendment to the Constitution. In hindsight, are you disappointed how you handle COVID? Do you have
00:05:17.840any regrets? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my
00:05:24.140rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Dr. Fauci, I want to close with this.
00:05:29.740Here's how you impacted my family and people close to me. I have daughters with children.
00:05:34.280You can't imagine the questions they had around vaccines for their kids and themselves,
00:05:38.000and the pressure, the unbelievable pressure to make the right decision for their health.
00:05:43.360I can tell you pregnant women who worked with me were so scared because every time they went
00:05:47.760to the doctor, they were told something different about taking the vaccine. And you caused this.
00:05:53.100Imagine being a mom trying to protect their kids or an expectant mother trying to figure out what
00:05:57.320to do. Every three weeks, a doctor tells you a new set of guidance on a vaccine. The haphazard
00:06:02.760information you released and pushed on the American people with little research is appalling.
00:06:08.000and why there is so much distrust in our institutions today.
00:06:12.980That trust is crucial to public health,
00:06:15.200and you, more than any person or event in my lifetime,
00:06:18.540have destroyed that trust for millions of Americans.
00:06:21.400You lied to hundreds of millions of people
00:06:23.320amid the worst public health crisis in its century.
00:06:26.760You failed to follow your own guidance.
00:06:29.220You forced people to watch their loved ones die alone over the phone.0.99
00:06:33.200You destroyed the federal government's credibility when it comes to public health.0.82
00:06:36.460We have entire generations of Americans who rightfully so do not trust our institution to keep people safe because of you.
00:06:44.120This has destroyed decades of progress and lifetimes of work because you want to fuel your own ego and be the center of attention.
00:06:51.340What would you do differently knowing what you know today, Dr. Fauci?
00:06:55.820On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:07:02.780All the evidence is right here, and you still can't bring yourself to tell the truth or apologize
00:07:06.960because you received an auto-pinned pardon from a staffer in the Biden White House.
00:07:11.120If we have another pandemic tomorrow, millions could die because of what you did,
00:07:15.280what you did to make Americans lose trust in their government when it comes to medicine and health care.
00:07:20.480How many families have you apologized to had to watch their loved ones die alone?
00:07:25.200You breached public trust, and now you're hiding behind a fraudulent pardon.
00:07:29.220Your legacy will not be as a man that saved America from COVID, but as a man who destroyed the public trust in America's public health institutions in exchange for five minutes of fame.
00:07:38.380This is how history will remember you. I yield back.
00:07:57.580it's not what you deserve. I just want to say and start by just saying thank you to you for
00:08:06.040your service to this nation. I didn't know much about you prior to the pandemic. I came to learn
00:08:16.800about you from how many Americans did, but I also had the opportunity to talk to you and engage with
00:08:21.840you as someone who is a member of the select committee on the coronavirus crisis over in the
00:08:26.340House of Representatives. When I learned about your background, 38 years as the director of the
00:08:33.340National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, appointed by President Reagan, served
00:08:40.220under seven presidents, four Republicans and three Democrats. I admire that greatly. I myself had a
00:08:49.840chance to serve in the executive branch serving government under both a Republican president and
00:08:56.060Democratic president. And I believe that we need more of that, more of that type of work,
00:09:03.380a place where we can understand our jobs not as coming from a place of partisanship and politics,
00:09:09.900but that of just public service. And right now, I feel the hyper-partisanship growing in this
00:09:17.900country in dangerous ways. I feel it much more present here on the Hill than I did back when I
00:09:23.780served as a nonpartisan career public servant at the State Department and I
00:09:28.700worry about it. I worry about what kind of trajectory we're on as a country and
00:09:33.560what this causes when it comes next for public service and those willing to step
00:09:40.220up for our nation. And it's not just in the attacks but we see it brought out
00:09:46.160with the cuts to funding to the firing of federal workers to the demonization of
00:09:52.780their motivations people calling our public servants criminals thinking that they are there
00:10:00.780solely to undermine others that are trying to engage i look at it right now you know it's not
00:10:09.740just that the people are being attacked our public servants being attacked but that it's undermining
00:10:15.900the very nature of the work of governance you know these cuts cuts to hhs funding to nih funding
00:10:23.880to the grants cuts to the researchers doing the critical work to find cures and medicines
00:10:29.800these firing these cuts they're creating a chilling effect honestly a chilling effect for
00:10:37.040the next generation of people who might consider stepping up to serve our nation to be the next
00:10:43.740OK, upon further further review, I can't stand. Listen, these Democrats, I can't stand. I'm listening to glazing this murderer, Fauci.
00:10:50.960Just to put this in context, the folks we're going to cut back as soon as you get to a Republican, because I got to hear Fauci.
00:10:58.420I got to hear Fauci taking the Fifth Amendment. He's a monster. He's a monster.0.97
00:11:03.420And I'm asking the FBI and whatever. Why is why? When Fauci walks off of there today, is he not cuffed?0.98
00:11:09.520This is the problem. This is why we this is why we have a lack of urgency and lack of intensity, the grassroots in the base.
00:11:17.980People are furious today to cut on this and see Fauci hiding behind the Fifth Amendment because he's a murdering monster and he should die in prison.0.99
00:11:30.200He should be in prison for the rest of his life. Where are we on this?0.98
00:11:34.780Where's the Justice Department? Where's the FBI? Where are we on this?
00:11:39.100We've had now a year and a half to plan.
00:11:41.380This monster comes up and on very straightforward questions.
00:11:45.320And I really want to give a hat tip to Senator Rand Paul and to the Republicans for just really straightforward, great questions.
00:11:52.140And he takes a fifth. He's a monster.0.97
00:11:54.940Please remember, we were banned on everywhere to YouTube, Facebook, all of it for advocacy of the stolen about the stolen election being stolen, which it was.0.95
00:12:05.660Now, we know that. And also about going after Fauci. And look who was right and look who was wrong.
00:12:13.100This guy's a monster. Let's go to Neil McCabe. We're on Neil McCabe. It's not the White Hill State. He's up on Capitol Hill.0.98
00:12:18.720Neil, put us in the room. What's it been like?
00:12:22.580Yeah, it was very, very tense in the beginning because everyone was waiting to see how Dr. Fauci would react.
00:12:29.540And of course, he's taken the I don't know. I lost track. Maybe a thousand times he's invoked the Fifth Amendment.
00:12:34.980Of course, he has been auto-penned pardoned.
00:12:39.780Senator Johnson in the hallway told me that he sees no way of undoing or challenging the auto-penned pardon.
00:12:47.220But if you have immunity, like he does—
00:12:58.840Two U.S. Code 192 basically makes it a misdemeanor failing to testify before Congress.
00:13:04.700He has he has no legal jeopardy. And so, in effect, he's obstructing a congressional investigation, which is the point that Chairman Rand Paul made.
00:13:14.280And of course, the great drama is when Fauci's attorney, who Chairman Paul said could not sit at the table and would not be recognized to speak.
00:13:24.640David Shirtler, Fauci's attorney, continued to protest, object, say the hearing was bogus.
00:13:32.780He wanted to be recognized, and he was warned at least three times to be quiet and respect the proceedings because he wasn't recognized, and he was escorted out of the room.
00:13:43.900The Democrats have all asked – they haven't asked any questions.
00:13:48.440They've all just sort of given speeches because if Fauci actually answers one of their questions – go ahead.
00:25:39.680What does the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution say?
00:25:45.340on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights
00:25:54.680on the fifth amendment of the constitution no i'm just asking you what it says
00:25:58.940on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth
00:26:04.740amendment to the constitution i'm going to give um the constitution to my aid he'll bring it over
00:26:09.880to you so you can have it for future reference i think it's something that every american should
00:26:14.560know what the Constitution says. Do you know who wrote the Fifth Amendment? On the advice of
00:26:19.740counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the
00:26:24.200Constitution. So you're invoking a right that you don't know who wrote it or what it says. Is that
00:26:28.760correct? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the
00:26:34.500Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Wow. Well, let me tell you who David Shirtler is for the
00:26:39.880audience because he was ejected by the chairman. He's a high-profile criminal attorney. He's
00:26:46.440represented some really great people like Senator Bob Menendez. Maybe that's somebody who my
00:26:52.780Democrat colleagues may remember took gold bars as bribes from the Egyptians. And there's an0.96
00:27:01.320article here in the Washington Free Beacon that talks about why you would hire Guy Lake Dever
00:27:07.040Schertler and the comment is if you're in deep that's who you call. Do you feel like you're in
00:27:11.840deep? On the advice of counsel I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the
00:27:18.700fifth amendment to the constitution. Clearly what you think today is that somehow you're above
00:27:28.360reproach. Somehow you feel like you don't need to be treated like a normal American.
00:27:39.720Can you do me a favor in the audience and stand up if during the time of the COVID pandemic,
00:27:47.380you were called a racist for calling the virus a Wuhan virus or the China virus.0.89
00:27:52.800If you thought the six foot rule was total crap, if you thought the vaccine wasn't something that you should take, if you thought it was outrageous the way the mass policy was rolled out, if you were fired from your job for not taking that vaccine, including members of the military, if you thought closing schools was catastrophically stupid and that you thought that during these times saying these things made you somehow a lesser human being.0.93
00:28:22.800you're not willing to do that is not a question it's not a question to your lawyer is not a0.97
00:28:38.060question it's a request all you have to do is look up from your lawyers and look at the people
00:28:45.820who were absolutely shamed for saying what we know now to be the truth.
00:35:08.420Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding this important hearing today.
00:35:14.800Dr. Fauci, Americans haven't forgotten the tragic stories of people who lost loved ones during COVID
00:35:24.580and those that were denied a chance to say goodbye to their family members that were in hospitals
00:35:33.520or residing in nursing homes because of the COVID-19 protocols.
00:35:39.440Americans haven't forgotten the mandates, the adverse reactions to vaccines,
00:35:44.640the government misinformation, social media censorship, hotlines to tattle on their neighbors,
00:35:54.180the forced school closures the tragic rise in suicides or those businesses that were forced to
00:36:07.460close during lockdowns. Americans haven't forgotten the hundreds of billions of dollars
00:36:16.020spent by taxpayers for COVID relief stolen by fraudsters who bought Royals, excuse me, Rolls,
00:36:27.160Royces and yachts. These were taxpayer dollars. Americans have lost trust in science and government
00:36:37.060after the COVID response. Trust which will be incredibly difficult for us to gain back.
00:36:44.840Dr. Fauci, you said that the science was evolving and that your recommendations evolved with it.
00:36:52.180But Americans remember you as the public face of the coronavirus response.
00:37:02.380As one of the nation's most trusted voices, you urged policies you said were absolutely necessary,
00:37:10.440even when those policies came at an enormous human and economic cost.
00:37:19.360And Americans deserve answers about reports that you may have worked with others
00:37:25.900to pressure the president into adopting the slow the spread strategy
00:37:34.000and why you later sought an unconditional pardon for crimes
00:37:38.680you may have committed dating back to 2014.
00:37:44.840Dr. Fauci, in 2022, you had a taxpayer-funded salary of $480,000 a year.
00:37:52.500You were, in fact, the highest-paid federal employee in the entire federal government,
00:37:59.540even making more than the NIH director and the president of the United States.
00:38:05.680According to now public documents, that was due in large part to your work on biodefense.
00:38:15.560Unreported is how NIAID spent over $1 billion from 2009 to 2026 in biodefense and influenza federal contracts and subcontracts.
00:38:29.660My office uncovered records on usaspending.gov that show from 2015 to 2020, NIAID paid out $515,418 in subcontracts to Harbin Veterinary Institute in Harbin, China, including $100,000 a few days after it opened a BSL-4 biolab in 2018.
00:38:58.360That very same institute was criticized for doing gain-of-function bird flu research in 2013.
00:39:08.880And yet you were funding them for years after that, sending U.S. taxpayer dollars to China.
00:39:16.700These contracts, which we also traced to NIAID, show U.S. taxpayers funded gain-of-function researchers
00:39:23.820in the Netherlands and in Wisconsin, funding the same folks whose controversial work led
00:39:30.620President Obama to pause this exact type of dangerous pandemic research.
00:39:38.160Dr. Fauci, did you know that the NIH's billion-dollar Sears contract programs were funding
00:39:46.420gain-of-function researchers in China, the U.S., and in the Netherlands?
00:39:53.820on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth
00:40:00.880amendment to the constitution dr fauci dr deborah burks wrote in her book that you and president
00:40:09.980obama's former cdc director were at a saturday march 14th were at a saturday march 14th yes
00:40:19.2202020 meeting at her home two days before the president announced his 15 days to slow the
00:40:26.480spread effort. Your now-released diaries said the meeting was a week before that. Dr. Birx said you
00:40:33.840all were trying to trap the president into having no other options. She wrote, your plan was to
00:40:42.280quote, block any of the president's escape routes. So, quote, he'd have no choice but to agree to
00:40:50.360our flatten the curve measures. Yes or no, Dr. Fauci, did you try to block or trap President
00:40:58.380Trump into the slow the spread, flatten the curve measures in March 2020? On the advice of counsel,
00:41:06.380I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:41:11.200When the COVID-19 virus broke out in Wuhan, China, you, Dr. Fauci, knew pretty much right away that NIH had funded Chinese labs, including those doing coronavirus research.
00:41:24.260There's email traffic from early January 2020 where your staff was flagging for you that NIH funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab through EcoHealth Alliance.
00:41:35.600Yet few Americans knew we funded the Wuhan lab because the funding went through a sub-award and was not reported to the public database like usaspending.gov as it should have been.
00:41:50.120Also, EcoHealth violated federal law by failing to report in its research papers how much taxpayer funding it spent on that research.
00:41:59.760At my request, the Government Accountability Office helped track down that $1.4 million of U.S. taxpayer money that was sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, both by you, Dr. Fauci, and through USAID.
00:42:15.680But first, it passed through EcoHealth Alliance, which I helped to get defunded through the NDAA.
00:42:21.440Dr. Fauci, did you intentionally use subaward funding to obscure NIH funding of Chinese
01:06:52.160We just don't quite understand natural immunity.
01:06:54.320My favorite quote from that is from Martin Koldorf from Harvard.
01:06:59.100You called him one of the people he had to take down, the fringe epidemiologist, which I've never, ever heard a scientist call another scientist that.
01:07:06.400But he jokingly said on Twitter, he said, yeah, we knew about natural immunity from 486 B.C., from the time of the Athenian plague.
01:11:48.520But the only treatment we really approved, monoclonal antibodies, which I think basically worked pretty well, but those weren't particularly available.
01:11:55.240They were denied an awful lot of patients.
01:11:56.720it was all remdesivir based on a study that the NIH changed the endpoint from mortality because
01:12:03.900it had no impact on mortality today's recovery a drug that the WHO recommended against its use
01:12:09.560in COVID in November of 2020 but a drug that cost over three thousand dollars for a course of
01:12:16.300treatment versus things like ivermectin hydroxychloroquine who even Dr. Fauci and I should
01:12:23.960have got that one out because I want to take this time to enter things in the record said you know
01:12:27.700we need to have a very tight protocol on remdesivir because it's unknown but hydroxychloroquine I mean
01:12:32.060that's approved some side effects but we have a long history of it let's put up my my latest chart
01:12:37.140again I was tracking adverse events on on the experimental injection but I use this chart as
01:12:45.780a comparison so you've got ivermectin hydroxychloroquine these are average again
01:12:51.160evaders doesn't prove causation, but you know, there's correlation. It's there for safety
01:12:57.360signals. So ivermectin, over 30 years of FDA reports, 17 deaths per year. Hydroxychloroquine,
01:13:03.940over 38 years of reporting, 142 deaths per year. Remdesivir, over five and a half years,
01:13:13.100546 deaths per year. The COVID injection, almost 7,000 deaths per year. Which is safest? What
01:13:20.640what did the FDA freak us out about ivermectin hydroxychloroquine when they turn a complete
01:13:26.200blinds eye toward the injections injury so i want to enter the quote from the surgeon by the way
01:13:32.220here's here's the answer uh cheryl atkinson in an interview said that when it comes to money we
01:13:37.440check financial ties among experts on the government panel devising coronavirus treatment
01:13:41.980guidelines which had the effect of dialing back hydroxychloroquine use and giving an edge to
01:13:46.660remdesivir we found the 11 members reporting links to a drug company nine of them named
01:13:51.420relationships to remdesivir's maker gilead seven more including two of the committee leaders have
01:13:56.100ties to gilead beyond the 11 months they had to disclose two were on gilead's advisory board
01:14:02.060others were paid consultants who received research support and honoraria by the way within the study
01:14:07.000i think one of the study participants was employee of gilead bunch also had conflicts with gilead so
01:14:13.520gee, I wonder why. You know, there are conflicts of interest. Gilead made billions of dollars off
01:14:18.180remdesivir and people died. In terms of ignoring safety signals, you can probably put that down now.
01:14:26.100This has come to light. This is Dr. Drew Weissman, who got the Nobel Prize for the mRNA
01:14:31.680platform. He wrote to Dr. Fauci on February 8th of 2020. Tony, I wanted to alert you to some new
01:14:38.400data we generated with our mRNA LNP vaccine. Now, it was a higher fold dose, but that mRNA LNP
01:14:46.960go to the placenta and fetus measured by translation of the mRNA and cause of immune
01:14:52.440response in an amniotic fluid. So that same day, Dr. Fauci responds, it'd be interesting to see
01:15:00.640what human dose levels given intramuscular do so about a month later dr weisman replies he said we
01:15:10.680still have some concerns over the data after they tested it im now again there's more documentation
01:15:16.740in terms of the fda blew it off it's like i don't worry about that there was a whole thing that's
01:15:22.180that's what peter marx did when he was said shown that his algorithm was going to mass safety
01:15:27.440signals the last thing i want to enter in the record here is and i want to make the point you
01:15:33.860know why is this important that they buried the treatment of severely injection injured
01:15:41.240the fact that we haven't acknowledged these injection injuries these people can't get
01:15:45.120treatment they're being gaslit by their doctors so it's all in your head the rate of the injection
01:15:51.460injured of suicides is increasing because they've given up hope because our medical establishment
01:15:56.540federal health agencies completely failed him failing to acknowledge it so again
01:16:00.060dr nath was treating diagnosing and treating injection injured in march of 2021
01:16:04.960this concerned people so you had dr walter koroshetz writes dr fauci one of the points
01:16:15.300he made there's been a steady slow stream of reports to me of post-vaccination neurological
01:16:19.680conditions dr nath has been collecting a bunch he has reports sent out to publish
01:16:25.340well that alarmed everybody boy you can't let the public know what's actually happening you can't
01:16:31.320actually let the public know what the science is showing so on april 29th a email from francis
01:16:40.640collins head of nih2 that to dr korshets says i find this approach troubling and will have the
01:16:47.940main consequence of feeding vaccine hesitancy and social media over overreaction then dr lawrence
01:16:55.160Tabak writes to Francis Collins, I don't understand what Walter, why Walter does not
01:17:02.360shut this thing down. Why don't you shut down that Dr. Nath who's actually treating injection
01:17:08.260injured? Why? Because of vaccine hesitancy. And because we haven't acknowledged that. And the
01:17:14.880reason I've been advocating for this is because I know the injection injured. I know people who
01:17:21.100have lost loved ones within days of the injection. And we've turned our backs on them.
01:17:28.720They deserve acknowledgement. They deserve to be heard, seen, and believed so they can get
01:17:34.080treatment. I also know the doctors whose careers were destroyed because you denigrated things like
01:17:41.180ivermectin and denied ivermectin to people in hospitals who got their kidneys knocked out by
01:17:46.820randesivir but got put on ventilators never got to hug their loved ones goodbye because those
01:17:53.200hospital protocols that's what your science did to people so dr. Fauci my only question is
01:17:59.660based on your lack of testimony here today uh based quite honestly on our our investigation
01:18:06.440into the cover-up of safety signals and injection injuries we have issued letters to a number of
01:18:13.080former FDA officials to come in for transcribed interviews, you'll be getting a letter today
01:18:18.180asking for a volunteer transcribed interview. So I'd be asking, will you comply or will I have
01:18:25.320to subpoena you? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully
01:18:29.220decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:18:32.820Expecting subpoena. Thank you. Senator Scott.
01:18:37.640Dr. Fauci, did you personally receive any royalty payments connected to COVID-related
01:18:41.760intellectual property? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my
01:18:48.140rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Given that NIH receives royalty
01:18:51.940payments from certain pharmaceutical companies, why would any American believe these financial
01:18:55.880ties did not influence decisions about which treatments were promoted or restricted?
01:19:01.020On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth
01:19:05.760Amendment to the Constitution. Why doesn't NIAID publicly disclose these payments?
01:19:12.640On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:19:19.080Did you partner with Bill Gates on global health initiatives or vaccines?
01:19:24.300On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:19:30.920How much did Bill Gates entities provide in funding to NIAID collectively since 2005?
01:19:36.140On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:19:42.380To your knowledge, did Bill Gates partner with China on sensitive research?
01:19:46.720On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:19:53.280Specifically, dual-use research such as countermeasures or gain-of-function?
01:19:57.760On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:20:04.500Do you know if Bill Gates entities partnered with U.S. government classified programs?
01:20:09.020On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer, based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:20:14.540Do you know if Bill Gates maintains an active national security clearance?
01:20:18.640On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer, based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:20:24.200Did you advocate a request for Bill Gates to receive a security clearance?
01:20:28.220On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer, based upon my rights, under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:20:33.740Do you have any knowledge that NIAID or NIH through HHS sponsored or requested a security clearance for Bill Gates?
01:20:41.500On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:20:47.220Around 2010, my understanding is that the government shifted its approach to biodefense countermeasure research.
01:20:52.420Did NIAID, under your leadership, partner with the Obama White House or any other U.S. government classified entities on sensitive countermeasures research?
01:21:00.900On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:21:06.920Did your office take steps to drive biological research investments?
01:21:11.760On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:21:17.480What was private industry's take on the type of research in the 2010 time frame and before?
01:21:22.400On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:21:27.900Was it considered too dangerous to conduct an industry that was hesitant to take this on and invest in?
01:21:33.640On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:21:39.860Why did you take steps to mature the government's approach to biodefense?
01:21:44.040On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:21:49.980Were there any specific lines of effort or actions you felt were needed during this time to improve the research development and fielding model?
01:21:57.900on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth
01:22:01.820amendment to the constitution how was dual use in gain and function incorporated are accounted
01:22:05.980for in maturing biodefense countermeasures on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer
01:22:12.060based upon my rights under the fifth amendment to the constitution did you ever discuss moving
01:22:15.900gain of function countermeasures research out of government space to private industry space
01:22:21.820on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth
01:22:26.140amendment to the constitution how were these private organizations regulated through government
01:22:30.220oversight while conducting risky research including gain of function or gene editing technology
01:22:35.340on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the fifth
01:22:39.740amendment to the constitution did the obama white house or any government entities take steps to
01:22:43.660inject funding into private industry on the advice of counsel i respectfully decline to answer based
01:22:49.260upon my rights under the fifth amendment to the constitution how do you ensure that our national
01:22:53.740security and public health is protected when private organizations work with foreign countries
01:22:57.560of concern and have the no government oversight such as the eco health alliance research grant
01:23:03.280you funded in a CCP military lab. On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer
01:23:10.520based upon my rights under the fifth amendment to the constitution. Given the culture of the
01:23:16.420pay to play at NIAID, did you or anyone acting on your behalf make any payment or injure any
01:23:23.260arrangement in any way or fashion of secure influence the broad pardon you receive from
01:23:28.460President Biden? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my
01:23:33.480rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'd like to ask unanimous
01:23:38.680consent to enter into the record a letter from the Department of Energy that confirms during
01:23:44.100Anthony Fauci's tenure that Bill Gates was given Q security clearance from 2014 to 2021 without
01:23:52.800objection that will be entered into the record. I'd also ask you to ask consent to enter into the
01:23:57.160record the contents of the folder of authorities provided to Dr. Fauci, including the pardon.
01:24:09.260Let's be clear today, you know, what we've seen. I really did want to hear from Dr. Fauci. I wanted
01:24:16.960to hear perhaps an apology, perhaps some semblance of being sorry for what happened or that judgment
01:24:26.320errors were made. We didn't hear any of that. But he was subpoenaed here to testify, refused to
01:24:31.720answer any questions, even after being directed by the chair and being advised of the law requiring
01:24:36.720him to do so. He has cited a privilege that is unsupported because of his blanket pardon and
01:24:42.720because he waived the privilege by testifying at the start.
01:24:46.280I'm going to give you one more opportunity
01:25:40.160under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
01:25:42.260Because you refuse to answer, citing a privilege that is unsupported because of your pardon,
01:25:47.960and after being denied to do so, this committee is scheduled to vote next week on a resolution certifying your contempt.
01:25:55.660I think we have another question or two from Senator Langford.
01:26:01.140Mr. Chairman, really this is a question for you, and it's a question to try to figure out how do we get a good answer on this.
01:26:08.180because clearly Dr. Fauci's attorneys were saying that he has a Fifth Amendment right.
01:26:14.400We've also subpoenaed him to be able to compel his testimony to be able to be here.
01:26:18.780I happen to be in the committee. We're also dealing with Lois Lerner.
01:26:22.860Lois Lerner came and testified, gave an opening statement, and then took the Fifth Amendment.
01:26:30.060The committee then held her in contempt for that, saying you can't do both.
01:26:34.100You can't both testify and say I'm not going to answer questions.
01:26:38.180So the parliamentary question that I think we've got to be able to deal with is, is this consistent with Lois Lerner?
01:26:43.560What she also did when she came before Congress, gave an opening statement testimony, so made a statement and then refused to answer questions.
01:26:51.960Are we dealing with the same issue here where someone is making you can't make a statement and say, I'm not going to make statements at the same time?
01:26:59.300I think it's a very good question. I think that's something all of us will examine over the next week.
01:27:03.640We're going to have a vote next week on contempt.
01:27:06.240I think there's another legal question that the courts may have to decide upon, and that
01:27:12.180is whether or not a presidential pardon that offers you complete immunity, that you can
01:27:18.020still claim that you need protection from immunity when you've been protected.
01:27:22.360Because Dr. Fauci isn't liable for anything, as long as he tells the truth.
01:27:25.740Even if he admits that he destroyed records on a routine basis, his assistant said she
01:30:11.520But Fauci ought to burn in the deepest pit of hell.0.99
01:30:17.600We've got to be very smart about this.0.98
01:30:20.720I think people, too, and I hope this rejuvenates some urgency.
01:30:27.920What do you think Mandani and this crowd or Ossoff or Newsom or any of these nutcases on the left
01:30:34.260or what happens when Jamie Raskin takes charge here?
01:30:38.720I understand things are not perfect. I understand there's a lot of things that people are not happy with.
01:30:45.460I understand that we're not happy here. But if you didn't have Trump, you wouldn't have a country.
01:30:50.880And right now you got to go back to that and you can see what's going to happen.
01:30:56.220The Fauci's of the world are going to be in charge. And I realized they were, you know, oftentimes empowered by those around us.0.99
01:31:06.200But you've got to cut to the heart of it. We can never allow those people to be back in charge.
01:31:11.620Also, we haven't eviscerated enough the guilty over in the deep state medical and scientific apparatus.
01:31:19.720Neil McCabe, you were in the room from the beginning, and we're going to try to do it in this evening.
01:31:24.000And tomorrow we're going to try to mash some of this together for the dramatic context of it, because it's quite dramatic and very important and must be remembered.
01:31:31.980It must be acted on. I was actually talking to people.
01:31:38.120Maybe let's say some in some levels of authority, like, why are we not in paneling a ground?
01:31:42.340First off, why is this guy not in handcuffs being perp walked out after this?
01:31:46.720Number two, why are we not in paneling a grand jury this afternoon in maybe one of these cities that he destroyed, which is like a lot of them?
01:31:57.120Neil McCabe, you were there. Thoughts?
01:31:58.640well you know we've talked about the fact that jay clayton was fast-tracked for confirmation
01:32:04.680he was confirmed by the senate yesterday and uh you know a lot of times there's problems with
01:32:10.860nominations but not for jay clayton i'll tell you someone else who was fast-tracked and that was
01:32:15.720judge janine pierro because my boss ed martin was unacceptable to the republican leadership
01:32:22.540I'll tell you, if Ed Martin was the U.S. attorney in D.C., people would be in cuffs.
01:33:53.280COVID caused millions of deaths, trillions in lost treasure.
01:33:58.800Years of our lives were lost to misery.
01:34:03.380Kids learning will suffer tremendously, particularly poor minority kids who don't have the resources like others to weather the COVID storm.
01:34:13.140They were abused. They were neglected. I mean, they're already behind in life. And then you have this monster, Tony Fauci, lying about this, lying about how lethal COVID is. So we have our world shut down, making up the six foot rule, making up the mask mandate.
01:34:31.980He was just pulling this so-called science out of thin air.
01:34:36.400And when any of the scientists or others questioned him, he had them censored.
01:34:42.040He had them fired. He had them canceled.
01:34:44.460This guy is a monster. Right. And that's why he had to get his Biden part.0.97
01:34:49.980So we come to today. He either has that Biden pardon and he's not subject to criminal liability for truthfully testifying today.
01:35:01.440and he refused. He pled the fifth illegally. So therefore, Rand Paul should hold him in contempt
01:35:07.740of Congress. They should refer him to the Trump Justice Department. He should face
01:35:13.880criminal contempt charges. He should face obstruction charges, obstruction of a
01:35:20.060congressional proceeding. Alternatively, if he didn't take that pardon, if he didn't accept
01:35:26.120the pardon from biden he should face charges for his crimes against humanity including mass murder
01:35:33.120of millions of people this guy i we there are very few people in the history of this world
01:35:40.920who are as evil as tony fauci i a thousand percent agree with you uh we're gonna go to
01:35:48.840the gagland for a moment i want to go to that i'm gonna get you back on about this i got to
01:35:52.580ask you, though, real quickly. Todd Blanche, you got President Trump's best friend. Remember,
01:35:57.700we spent three months down in Texas on this thing and with Paxton. President Trump's best friend,
01:36:02.860John Cornyn, remember that? His best friend is now holding up, even coming to a committee for a vote
01:36:09.780unless he sees full documentation and he signs off on the contract about the weaponization just up
01:36:16.440in President Trump's face. Is there an alternative? I mean, why are we acting like a supplicant to
01:36:21.480john cornyn right we ought to be stripping him of everything why are we acting as a supplicant
01:36:25.900as hard as everything is is there an alternative for todd blanchett say screw it right now and he
01:36:31.300goes back as a special government whatever and we get through the midterms and then we come back
01:36:35.420after we hold the senate and get rid of cornyn and crush these guys and just confirm him then sir
01:36:40.320look i would say this i i worked on the senate judiciary committee i handled nominations as
01:36:45.760the Cheek House for nominations. I worked with Cornyn. I would say to John Cornyn, I don't think
01:36:51.300that he is going to tank a president's attorney general pick, including an attorney general pick
01:36:59.720of a president of his own party. I think they're going to get this resolved. I think cooler heads
01:37:05.080are going to prevail between now and the committee vote on Thursday, and Todd Blanche will be
01:37:12.180confirmed by August honor before August 5th. And so John Cornyn will come to the right result here
01:37:21.200because he knows that Todd Blanche is extremely qualified. John Cornyn voted for Todd Blanche to
01:37:27.940be the deputy attorney general. By statute, the deputy attorney general has all of the powers,
01:37:33.100almost all of the powers as the attorney general. Todd Blanche has been a federal prosecutor. He's
01:37:37.560been a big law partner. He put that all on the line to defend President Krupp against the
01:37:43.880unprecedented Republican in lawfare. Todd Blanche has done a great job as the Deputy Attorney
01:37:48.560General and the Acting Attorney General. I think that we're going to let cooler heads prevail here
01:37:53.560and Todd will get confirmed. As you know, we're not cooler heads here in the war room. That's
01:37:58.220where we bring you in, Vice Roy. Vice Roy, where do people go to Article 3? Thank you for jumping
01:38:02.100in. I'm going to have you back on about Fauci. Where do they go? Article3project.org, Article
01:38:06.980number three project dot or donate follow us on social action items let's go get todd blanche
01:38:11.960confirmed right now call contact both of your home state senators patch through phone calls
01:38:17.180emails social media post democrat and republican home state senators help republicans find and
01:38:23.520keep their backbones and rattle the democrats yeah thank you you know fauci had a big-time
01:38:28.920criminal lawyer when he's got a big-time criminal lawyer i think fauci and the lawyer are telling us
01:38:33.220The auto pen pardons are no good. I'll take I'll take Fauci's fifth today calling back for something.
01:38:38.480But this pardon is no good and none of them are good. So, Junior, Joe Biden's a perverted, demented son ought to think about running his mouth.0.94
01:38:48.680Because I think we ought to go after all of them and indict them all. Mike Davis, thank you so much.0.89
01:38:52.960Starting with when you hear Jeff Clark, we're going to indict frickin Biden for giving away highly classified information.
01:39:00.060OK, they're doing a gaggle right now with Rand Paul. Let's hit it.
01:39:03.220He advocated for monetary awards, and when there was a question for monetary awards,
01:39:07.520he was responding, you know, do we have to get the yes on this?
01:39:10.940And it's not an insignificant amount of money.
01:39:12.880We're talking about an award in a dinner certificate.
01:39:15.140It took about a million dollars, and not only was he advocating for himself,
01:39:18.840he was asking others to fill out applications for him to get the million-dollar prize.
01:39:23.540He specifically wanted the money and wanted the waiver.
01:39:26.420I think it is the only way to use your employees to try to get monetary awards.
01:39:30.320The other most important thing that came from the diaries is that privately in January 2020, he was already acknowledging that he didn't come to the wet market.
01:39:39.480That's just dishonest. It may not be a crime, but he knew in January 2020 that the earliest cases did not come from the wet market.
01:42:20.720of people have questions about and now what's going to happen is people can now follow this map
01:42:25.360to sort of dig in themselves into what happened i thought josh holly was great talking about
01:42:31.260the money that fauci made and how fauci used his on the federal payroll we're searching for awards
01:42:39.980strong arming the ethics yeah even some of the stiffs were great they were great today um
01:42:46.420Neil also I want some inside baseball like Fetterman but when the a lot of Democrats you
01:42:52.940know size it up and said I don't want anyone to be on I don't want to be on camera I don't want
01:42:56.860to cut a 30 second spot with me defending Fauci or anything Democrats at the at one point just
01:43:02.240headed for the hills emptied out and never going to defend him why is that important Fauci's got
01:43:07.320no air cover even mainstream media because they're going to watch their culpability in this
01:43:12.060And quite frankly, their liability. So you're going to see, by the way, some of the some of the MSNBC crowd is going to come in hard.
01:43:18.960But today, the big tell for me is that a lot of the Democrats would not even run cover for him, sir.
01:43:24.860Well, Gary Peters used his opening statement, the vice chairman, the Democrat from Michigan, who is returning to private life.
01:43:33.260Peters took his opportunity in his opening statement to basically go after Rand Paul, saying that he was pursuing a personal vendetta.
01:43:40.780But all the other Democrats refused to ask Fauci any questions because they didn't want to risk him answering a question, which would set up perhaps a legal jeopardy.
01:43:52.200But of course, John Fetterman, the Democrat from Pennsylvania, he was very tough. He was very honest and sincere. He had a gaggle in the hallway.
01:44:00.860and as he was talking about his concerns and his disappointment that Dr. Fauci wouldn't answer the
01:44:07.720questions so we could just find out what happened two mainstream media reporters tapped their
01:44:13.960videographers and said we're out of here Fetterman's not giving us anything we can use
01:44:18.820and so that's where we're at Steve uh Neil uh social media where do you go to track you down
01:44:24.980great job today you can find me on all the socials at reporter McCabe Steve
01:46:46.980We'll be back in the warm in just a moment.
01:46:59.200We wouldn't be celebrating America 250
01:47:01.760if it wasn't for a strong foundation set by the framers.
01:47:06.260Hamilton built America's financial foundation
01:47:08.700on the principle of sound, stable money, a principle later embodied by the gold standard.
01:47:15.240However, we abandoned that discipline in 1971 and have since seen inflation erode the dollar's value.
01:47:22.800What is the foundation of your savings?
01:47:25.260It is gold or something that can be shaken, disrupted, or devalued?
01:47:30.700Birch Gold Group has been helping Americans solidify their savings with gold for the past 15 years.
01:47:35.980They help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax-sheltered IRA in gold.
01:47:43.060Learn how gold fits into your portfolio by texting my name, Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, to the number 989898.
01:47:50.940You'll receive a free, no-obligation info kit.
01:47:54.180With an A-plus rating, with a better business bureau, and countless five-star reviews, let Birch Gold help build your foundation with gold.
01:53:11.420Um, but investigators were looking into these properties that were being transferred, um,
01:53:17.780after a, a, the first person that discovered it were going to try to refinance their home.
01:53:24.140And then the company found out that it was no longer in his name and someone else somewhere
01:53:28.600else, uh, we're doing a, uh, county property records search and revealed that the deed
01:53:34.600had been transferred out of their name because they were trying to transfer it to their grandchild,
01:53:38.560their son or grandson. And all of these things kind of came up in different areas. They had no
01:53:44.320clue that this was all connected. And they found out by looking at each of these items that someone
01:53:50.000had taken the information from real notaries, altered the stamps, ordered them on the big
01:53:57.100online retailer whose name that I can't really say, but it's orange and black lettering,
01:54:02.620and just changed the information and went and filed these with the county. And so they started
01:54:06.700finding, um, transfer document after transfer document. And they found out that they were
01:54:11.520slow down, slow down, slow down. Cause I'm, they didn't, they went online, did what? Explain,
01:54:19.060explain that to me again, folks, if you don't think in this rudimentary system, you don't think,
01:54:24.580okay, let me be very simple about this. Uh, in modern America, if you're lucky enough to own a
01:54:31.200home. And if you're under 40, you probably don't. But if you own a home, that home is obviously
01:54:38.220your castle. It's every dream you've had is in there. However, it also happens to be essentially
01:54:44.500your retirement program. That is the basic savings of the American people. Social Security,
01:54:50.040even if it sticks around, is not going to cover you. You know that. It's that net worth. It's the
01:54:55.700It's the net worth, your equity in that home, which is, I think, on average, 80% or 90% of American people's net worth if you're lucky enough to own a home.
01:55:04.020The system that protects this is rudimentary.
01:55:07.600You need tough people, smart people on your side.
01:55:10.500That's what $1 million triple lock protection gets.
01:55:12.880But it also gets you in the game for pennies a day to avoid what happened here.
01:55:17.980What did they do when they went online?
01:55:19.620Because these people are, first off, with AI and cyber, I don't know how you're going to stop it, right?
01:55:24.420This is why you need a home title lock.
01:55:27.240But even without using that, these people are so crafty, so cunning, and so smart.