00:03:59.080Let's go ahead and play the cold open from the Oval Office today.
00:04:03.980Let's go ahead and play that, and then we're going to bring in our own Neal McCabe.
00:04:07.060Today we're thrilled to announce that Mesabi Metallics will be building the largest steel plant in American history in the great state of Iowa.
00:04:16.720It's the largest plant, one of the largest plants in the world, but it's the largest plant in America by far.
00:04:23.220We're also pleased to be joined by Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnik, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright,
00:04:29.880Senator Joni Ernst, who's done a wonderful job, and I'm going to miss you, Joni.
00:04:34.020I can't believe you. But you are right. Are you sure?
00:04:41.620Thank you, Mr. President. Governor Kim Reynolds, representatives Marionette Miller-Meeks and Ashley Hinson.
00:04:49.140And I saw some good polls just recently. You're doing well, Ashley. I saw that. Looks like you're doing well. You should do well.
00:04:56.920Iowa Attorney General Brenna Byrne has been with me right from the beginning and Export-Import Bank Chairman John Jovanovic.
00:05:04.020who is a fantastic young man, actually.
00:08:16.820Independent media is getting the same pool feed that the mainstream media gets.
00:08:21.640And now with the notes and kind of the way we're framing it so people can actually understand what's going on and see it with their own eyes with disintermediate the mainstream media for the next orders of the world.
00:08:33.680And people are using it to really drive traffic to their their pages as they should or to their Twitter feeds as they as they should.
00:08:42.460Neil McCabe, a bunch going on tomorrow.
00:08:44.280First off, how did you rate, and Parker tells me he loves the picture.
00:09:59.500It's modern, you know, modern equipment.
00:10:02.180And there's a live view backpack that replaced the satellite truck.
00:10:07.540And so back in the day, when you're dealing with satellite trucks and dishes and everything else, yeah, it was a problem and you needed a big corporation.
00:10:17.980And so Rav is able to do the job that everyone else can do and no one can tell the difference.
00:10:23.560The cartel media is just flipping out.
00:10:26.400They're wailing and ganashing their teeth.
00:10:28.340And in the New York Times, the former president of the White House Correspondents Association said that at one point, Rav put the president's life in danger because of their coverage.
00:10:39.380And I was thinking, really? You mean like that dinner you hosted for him earlier this year?
00:10:45.100It's it's the dinner with no security, the dinner with the shotgun.
00:12:12.040And I think, Rav, it's better color, better cameras.
00:12:14.300And now with the with the rav rav pool dot org, you go there, you sign up for the for the the notes, you sign up there for how you can contextualize exactly where these photos taking place.
00:12:28.400it makes independent journalists and particularly people that are on social media it gives them
00:12:34.180a a constant flow of high quality content that they can then take a take and put their you know
00:12:40.680their their contextual uh meaning onto what's going on neil neil mccabe well as a good catholic
00:12:48.600i'm not thrilled with the invention of the printing press because it tended to overturn a
00:12:53.600lot of my world but there was a decentralization of this technology that empowers other people
00:13:01.160and so maybe not talk about Guggenheim but talk about Thomas Paine and that's kind of where we're
00:13:06.840at and you know these guys they they really did strut around here with that attitude and it was
00:13:14.580uh it was I don't want to say obnoxious because that wouldn't be polite but there definitely was
00:13:19.860that chip on their shoulder that they were part of a different class or cast,
00:13:24.900and it's completely overturned because we've solved the mystery, right?
00:19:09.240How could they let these individuals go?
00:19:11.300What is the situation here with these courts?
00:19:13.420Well, let me give you an example. So I believe this was heard in Westminster Magistrates' Court. And Westminster Magistrates' Court, one of the magistrates there, one of the judges, is a chap called Tanwir Ikram.
00:19:25.720And Tanwur Ikram last year released, or rather they were charged and sentenced these Palestine solidarity activists in London who were marching around with Hamas-style paragliders.
00:19:42.960They were subsequently found guilty of doing that. But the magistrate, this Tanwar Ikram, effectively sentenced them to a 12-month conditional discharge, which meant they served no time for the crime.
00:20:00.120they were found guilty of. Another terror legislation charge, by the way. And to add
00:20:07.480to that one of the most heinous things I think I've seen in a long time, this magistrate,
00:20:15.020Tanwe Ekram, was then found having liked a post on LinkedIn, and I'm going to read it to you here,0.76
00:20:21.880that said, free, free Palestine to the Israeli terrorists, both in the United Kingdom,
00:20:27.240the United States, and of course Israel. You can run, you can bomb, but you cannot hide.0.94
00:20:33.440Justice will be coming for you. He wasn't reprimanded. He said that he simply made a
00:20:39.720mistake in liking that post. And so I'm not accusing Tanwar Ikram of doing anything in this
00:20:45.420case. In fact, I don't even know yet if he was the magistrate in this case. But that gives you,
00:20:51.300and it's a very small magistrate's court, it gives you an example of precisely how the court system
00:20:56.740works here in London. It's small, but a lot of important cases come because of Westminster.
00:21:04.160How are magistrate judges selected? Is this a Labour government selecting these? Is there
00:21:08.880some sort of process of their selection that they have to go through confirmation like you do here
00:21:13.560in the States and get blue slip here so that the minority in this case, Nigel Farage or the Tory
00:21:21.180Party can stand up to? How are these judges picked? You know, that's a question for the
00:21:26.900legally minded. I'm not entirely aware of how the magistrates court select their magistrates,
00:21:31.940but the fact that he was caught doing this and faced no penalty suggests that the court system
00:21:39.640itself, and of course, you know, people know this. One of the things you hear all over this country
00:21:44.360at the moment is that there isn't an effective sentencing counsel. There isn't an effective
00:21:50.480court system. You know, the backlog is extraordinary. We have no prison places left in
00:21:55.020this country. And the Labour government refuses to build any more capacity. It's a broken system,
00:22:03.120a completely broken system. And so to remove these people, I'm sure would be extremely,
00:22:08.700extremely difficult. We still get videos all the time that Christians praying outside of0.99
00:22:15.060abortion centers are rounded up. Tommy Robinson, I think, was stopped the other day for like the
00:22:19.840fourth time his phones and everything were taken. Is the system weighted against people that
00:22:27.540heretofore thought they had free speech liberty in the United Kingdom, that even Christians praying0.93
00:22:33.060outside of abortion clinics or people demonstrating against this Islamic takeover0.90
00:22:38.820are the ones that are targeted, whereas the Islamists, I mean, it's kind of mind-boggling
00:22:42.760that somebody that was associated with a terrorist attack that's actually charged with some element0.78
00:22:48.920associated with it, and bail set can be let out in 24 hours. I mean, people are pretty gobsmacked
00:22:56.600about that, sir. I mean, if you wanted to create mass panic, that's one of the ways to create it,
00:23:03.080right? Because they haven't given any further information as to how these people can move
00:23:07.300about. They've said the conditions on their movement. What conditions on their movement?
00:23:10.860Where can they go? These people were from London. This attack happened, or attempted attack,
00:23:15.280as we're told happened uh some some two hours outside london so is it there is it here um you
00:23:21.760know it just completely unclear um extremely little detail that we're being given um and and
00:23:29.840you know you talk about the the social contract effectively right that how that's all uh broken
00:23:37.520down people i mean people will remember the case of henry novak right whose whose last words uh
00:23:43.840you know, well, I think I've been stabbed, and the police said to him, don't think you have me.
00:23:49.460There is multi-tiered policing and multi-tiered justice going on in the United Kingdom.
00:23:56.440And of course, it's more than just talking about Islam and the way minorities are treated.0.55
00:24:04.360You have to talk about specifically how white people are being treated as second-class citizens
00:24:11.280in their own home nations at the moment.
00:24:13.840rahim you know and doing uh doing obviously being with us and and and having uh your own
00:24:21.940podcast and launching national pulse you've been one of the leading voices and that platform's been
00:24:27.380one of the leaders of kind of telling people in the united states what's exactly going on and you
00:24:32.600where the trump administration has been uh has uh failed to act in certain areas you guys have
00:24:38.700on top of that, Rav here now, we're in the middle of this fight of providing a pool feed 24-7. And
00:24:46.500by the way, I think it's close to 3,000 people have already signed up for the newsletter coming
00:24:51.680out of there. I'll give more details on that later. But do you feel constrained that when you
00:24:56.020spend time or you go over to the UK to assist Nigel and do other things, are you able? Because
00:25:01.740when I look at the legacy media there, it's 10 times worse than here. I mean, BBC and Sky and
00:25:08.240all these that you get a completely different picture of what's being reported is more repressive
00:25:13.480there than even in the united states against the legacy media um it is one of the most stifling
00:25:23.460environments to speak um that i've ever experienced um the the number of warnings
00:25:32.020that even my just my friends that are my friends in the legal industry give me about the things
00:25:39.280that I tweet while I'm over here the things that I say to you while I'm here you know I honestly
00:25:47.140can't believe it I really can't believe it and you know me I throw caution to the wind on these
00:25:53.620things if you want to come at me for telling the truth come at me for telling the truth and we'll
00:25:58.020have that argument out in any courtroom you want and in the court of public opinion.
00:26:03.660Specifically, I wrote a book, No Go Zones, in 2016 and 17, which was a bestseller, which laid
00:26:10.900out everything that was going on, not just here in the United Kingdom, but also across Europe,
00:26:17.520also across the United States. You know, I remember in that book, I warned what was coming
00:26:22.720in michigan and look at what the uh what the election cycle looks like right now um for uh
00:26:29.180for november in michigan and uh i wrote another book called enoch was right which you know if
00:26:36.200enoch powell the the infamous parliamentarian uh from the 50s and 60s and 70s had said what he said
00:26:43.080then about a nation heaping up its own funeral pyre with mass migration no doubt in my mind no
00:26:50.720doubt in my mind that he would at the very least had a knock on the door with the police telling
00:26:56.960him uh you want to watch yourself mate because this is this is unlawful speech um so i don't
00:27:03.040care i will keep speaking the truth if they want to make me a martyr on that basis they're more
00:27:09.040than welcome to it um but what it does steve is it is it especially for younger people coming up in
00:27:14.940this environment watching their world change around and watching their neighborhoods change
00:27:18.620around them. It terrifies them. It discourages them. The level of despondency, political
00:27:24.560despondency that is here in the United Kingdom right now. I've never seen anything like it
00:27:29.280anywhere or at any time in my life. And there are just a few happy warriors out there like
00:27:35.920Nigel Farage, like the people around him. We're still fighting that fight and trying to get their
00:27:40.220countries back. So, you know, I'm honoured to be here again, you know, helping out in whatever
00:27:45.400ways I can. And we'll have more information on that as time goes on. Hang on one second. We're
00:27:53.120going to hold you through the break. Raheem Kassam. Wow. Reporting live from the United Kingdom next
00:29:48.280Bannon. Make sure you go check it out. Immerse yourself in the details of America's health
00:29:53.400share. You will not regret it. War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
00:30:00.420Welcome back, and thank you. Andy Brown joins us now, the China editor for Summerforce. So, Andy,
00:30:06.820we covered wall-to-wall because we were the pool feed now when the mainstream media kind of cut
00:30:12.940off the access to or wouldn't put up anything on the summit. One of the things we kept hearing in
00:30:18.720that, and I thought the business element of this was under an hour. There was a lot of pomp and
00:30:23.980circumstance and a lot of obviously folks, you know, spending time at dinners and things like
00:30:29.960this, but the actual business part of it was quite concentrated. Although you come and make a great
00:30:36.060point that you saw this, even for maybe the lack of substance that occurred in these meetings
00:30:42.440or anything that was announced or any of the readouts, that the headline to your piece is
00:30:46.960the U.S.-China tectonic plates have shifted. So a tectonic plate shift in the relationship. Can
00:30:55.340you explain, how did you derive that from what you saw? What is your evidence and what does it mean?
00:31:00.460Okay, so what I saw was lavish ceremony. And the ceremony begins on the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews, where President Trump is there waiting for Xi Jinping, the Chinese leader, to emerge from his Air China Boeing 747.
00:31:23.440The first time that a U.S. leader has met a foreign leader at the airbase since 1962, when John F. Kennedy met Harold Macmillan.
00:31:37.440The difference being that the U.K. then and still is a close partner of the United States.
00:31:42.960And China is America's paramount adversary.
00:31:47.660And, you know, what we've seen over the weekend is the Chinese state media cock a hoop over this symbolism.
00:31:57.580And what this tells the people of China through state media is the United States president, the Chinese leader, are now equals.
00:32:10.260It's Goldust because next year he's got a big Communist Party meeting where he's expecting to get a fourth five-year term in office, 20 years altogether, emperor for life.
00:32:25.240But also it's very, very significant for the Chinese people.0.90
00:32:28.960I mean, they know propaganda when they see it. But what they're looking for really is for foreign leaders, foreign governments to endorse their leader and their system.
00:32:41.220And that's exactly what we saw, that the number one hashtag on social media over the weekend was the U.S. and China are now equals and and pointing and specifically, specifically pointing attention to that greeting on the tarmac at Joint Air Base Andrews.
00:33:03.220was there other things because i'm gonna bring up two about the um about the they're saying how
00:33:12.760we were allies in world war ii and also the facility's trap but outside of the greeting
00:33:19.100at andrews which i agree with it was extraordinary i mean harold we met uh he met harold mcmillan
00:33:26.120and i think mcmillan was the first conservative prime minister after churchill and we were only
00:33:32.020what, 16 years after World War II. And that relationship was so central. There's so many
00:33:39.380things happening against the Soviet Union, particularly about nuclear weapons. And, you
00:33:45.600know, Kennedy was very, you know, trying to push a test ban treaty. I mean, going out to greet
00:33:50.960Harold Macmillan didn't seem so extraordinary at the time. This is kind of breathtaking because
00:33:56.280Americans have just never seen it in living memory.
00:34:02.020Yeah, I was going to say, I mean, breathtaking when you think about the headlines that, you know, were being generated here in the United States as he's landed,
00:34:11.680which is all giving a breakdown of how China is supplying Iran with parts to make their ballistic missiles more accurate, with imaging technology to help these missiles kill U.S. service personnel in Jordan.
00:34:31.600Similar, very similar playbook to what we see in Ukraine, China arming Russia to pummel Ukraine.
00:34:41.940You know, and it's such a contrast between, you know, how the geopolitical reality of this relationship and then the, you know, the messaging that we're getting out of the White House, which is solicitous, is deferential, and of course all this now being played out in the Chinese media.
00:35:03.480What about the rest of the time? I mean, the state dinner, the meetings President Trump showing him around, the teas, all that. How did that play into that, the solicitous nature of this?
00:35:17.000Yeah, you know, it's interesting what you say about World War II. I mean, it's good that you
00:35:23.400picked up on that. I mean, if you look at the readout, the Chinese readout and the U.S. readout,
00:35:30.840one of the items in the Chinese readout was that the U.S. and China had agreed to keep going with
00:35:37.000the search for U.S. missing military personnel from the Vietnam War, from the earlier Korean War,
00:35:44.400And then from World War II, when, of course, the United States and China were allies. That was, of course, during the nationalist administration in China. But what that's really all about is anti-Japan, right?
00:36:00.360I mean, who were the United States and who was the United States? These pilots, the flying tigers who then flew over the hump, bringing supplies from allies to China. Who were they fighting against? They were fighting against Japan.
00:36:13.760And Japan, of course, is now China is trying to establish the idea that Japan is a resurgent militarist power in the Asia Pacific.
00:36:24.940And so they're trying to sort of bring the United States at least optically on board this idea that the two of them now need to fight against Japanese militarism in Asia,
00:36:35.640which is, of course, complete nonsense since Japan has, of course, spent the intervening years since the end of World War II spreading development around the world and being essentially a model global citizen.
00:36:49.660So we picked up on two. One was World War II. The other was Thucydides Trap.
00:36:55.040Both of them were in the talk, the remarks, in the foyer and then at the dinner that night.0.87
00:37:00.560And when the Chinese go out of their way with the limited time that they had to make both of them, one, we take pride in, we think it's a response to war room because we have a huge through VPN audience in mainland China of Lao Bai Jing, which is the anti-CCP movement or Lao Bai Jing's old hundred names, but fuels the anti-CCP movement.0.95
00:37:23.940We have made arguments forever. You know, Wan Shishan and others have been on this big analysis of the legitimacy of their rule.0.87
00:37:32.540And this gets to the Chinese Civil War and the end of World War II.
00:37:36.120The Chinese Communist Party, we hammer this all the day.
00:37:38.460Lao Ba Jing and the Chinese people were our allies.
00:37:40.560I think they lost 35 million people fighting the Imperial Japanese Army and, quite frankly, bled them out to the degree they could in Manchuria and other places.
00:37:49.200If those frontline troops had been in the three-island chain, we'd still be fighting across to get LeMay's bombers to Saipan.0.93
00:37:58.780But the Chinese – it was as corrupt and incompetent as Chiang Kai-shek and the nationalists were.0.97
00:38:11.180They were waiting for after the war, for a civil war that they were going to initiate.0.73
00:38:15.900And then the United States later, the State Department, essentially when they won, quote unquote, the battles, some of the big battles in the Civil War, we turned the country over to them.
00:38:26.520That's a sore point, part of their legitimacy.
00:38:29.860And they're trying to make a thing like we were allies in World War II.
00:38:33.820We were allies with the Chinese people like we were allies to the Russian people.
00:38:38.300Stalin and the Bolsheviks and the Soviets, maybe not.
00:38:41.940But the Russian people gave 60 or 65 million.0.67
00:38:44.400The Chinese people bled out in World War Two. And to bring that up twice shows you it's a it's a it's a subject that they're trying to work around, does it?
00:38:53.500Because they don't bring things up. Every time I tell people when they make these talks, you should take it like a paper bowl.
00:39:00.100They they work these things through. Nothing is they don't wing anything.
00:39:05.660Anything is very thought through. And I thought it was extraordinary that twice they brought up the situation in World War Two.
00:39:11.060and they put out the great eight things that happened over the weekend, the eight outcomes,
00:39:16.740I think the alliance in World War II was number four, which would shock me.
00:39:21.820But they're purposely trying to drive this message.
00:39:29.240That, you know, it's interesting that, well, of course, you're completely right.
00:39:34.340The communists were husbanding their resources after the Japanese invaded.
00:39:41.220And it was the nationalists that was doing most of the nationalist armies that were doing most of the fighting.
00:39:46.780There's a line of argument that says, well, you know, it's not it's not terrible to have these these summits, these high level meetings between U.S. and Chinese leaders.
00:39:57.340You know, George Or is better than World War.
00:40:00.360But as my friend Matt Pottinger says, Matt was a former colleague of mine at the Wall Street Journal and ended up in the National Security Council and the first Trump administration.
00:40:13.340You know, he says that China uses these discussions constantly to probe for U.S. weaknesses.
00:40:19.920And this is one of the weaknesses that they're probing for is they're trying to drive a wedge between the United States and Japan.
00:40:29.200and probing for weaknesses, generally in the U.S. posture in the Asia-Pacific, and specifically, and very, very importantly, over Taiwan.
00:40:39.840And Taiwan did come up. We heard from David Perdue, the U.S. ambassador to China, that they did discuss arms sales to Taiwan.
00:40:50.400And of course, you know, under the 1982 six assurances that the Reagan administration gave to Taiwan, the U.S. is not supposed to be discussing arms sales to Taiwan.
00:41:08.160They did. And then mind-blowingly, the U.S. president suggests that, you know, the U.S. might actually sell military equipment to China.
00:41:20.660And this is from straight from the U.S. ambassador.
00:41:24.620It's, you know, what did he mean by that?
00:41:31.220If so, you know, I don't think that Taiwan, I don't think that Japan, I don't think that the Philippines suffering now from, you know, Chinese intimidation, military bullying, saw the joke.
00:41:47.280No, but the good news is from what Perdue said, there's no change to the relationship.
00:41:53.400And President Trump said there's not going to be a change now.
00:41:56.840They have not publicly committed to getting, I think it's a $14 billion additional sale.
00:42:02.220I don't think that's been actually moved forward.
00:42:07.420And look, you know, he also made the point that the Trump administration has sold more arms to Taiwan than the Biden administration ever did.
00:42:17.240They've already sold $11 billion worth of equipment.
00:42:19.980There's $14 billion now in the pipeline.
00:42:47.320And let's also see what the mix of the arms sales to Taiwan is going to be.
00:42:52.360Very important for Taiwan right now to be buying the right stuff to give them the best shot at deterring a Chinese invasion, you know, amid this unprecedented military intimidation, which includes which includes overtly practicing by China for a blockade or quarantine of China, of Taiwan, of course, with the goal of getting Taiwan to run up the white flag.
00:43:20.440This is not exercises anymore. They're training. These are training exercises. This is not, you know, this is like planning for events.
00:43:32.020Birch Gold, take your phone at Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, 9-8-9-8-9-8, the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump.
00:43:40.000Also, you get access totally free, no charge, to the end of the dollar empire.
00:43:44.700Understand about Bretton Woods and why the dollar is the backbone of the world's financial system, the prime reserve currency.
00:43:52.840And he talked to Philip Patrick and his team and do it today.
00:43:56.040If you're 65 or already on Medicare, listen up, folks, and grab a pen, maybe even a number two pencil.
00:46:42.640And to the degree that guy can be moved.
00:46:44.760It was quite you could tell he was moved and talking about about what had happened to his family, particularly his mother's side of the family in World War Two.
00:46:51.760So it's a big deal. He also mentioned twice Thucydides' trap.
00:46:56.320And this comes off it being his opening volley in the Beijing meetings.
00:47:00.940Now, Andy, we took umbrage with that because in the war room's interpretation, that means he's implying that we're the declining power and declining powers in Graham Allison and Henry Kissinger's construct of Athens and Sparta and Thucydides' trap.
00:47:18.360The declining power is always the dangerous one because they wildly grasp at certain ways to stop the ascending power.
00:47:27.020Well, I think that's exactly right, that this is a rhetorical play.
00:47:35.360They've adopted Graham Allison, the author of The Thucydides Trap, as their favorite U.S. figure, in a sense, a sort of the latter-day Henry Kissinger.
00:47:48.080But as you say, it's a framing that's designed, and by the way, even in its original, there is no such thing as a Thucydides Trap.
00:47:56.380It doesn't exist. But the way that they framed it and the way that Alison frames it in this book is this idea, yes, of a declining power, lashing out at a rising power with China being the rising power.
00:48:08.000And this is, of course, mirrored in the phrase that you often hear from Xi Jinping, that the West is declining and the East is rising.
00:48:22.680And as the West declines, as the U.S. declines, it is at its most dangerous because it's tempted to lash out because it is weak and because it is afraid.
00:48:34.460And, of course, that is a framing that Xi Jinping uses domestically and, of course, wildly underestimates the strengths of the United States and underestimates the weaknesses of China, which are very manifest now in an economy that is in great distress.
00:48:53.300Indeed, it's one of the reasons why Xi is not unhappy to come to the United States and just talk because it buys him time.
00:49:02.400And similarly, on the U.S. side, the U.S. needs the time to manage some of the difficulties that it has with China, not least rare earths and a whole range of other choke points that China now has on the U.S. can use against the U.S. economy.
00:49:20.240Andy, given how, because this is an imperial court, you can't understand the Chinese Communist Party unless you understand the imperial history of our oldest and arguably one of our greatest civilizations, China.0.53
00:49:35.780This is a calculated insult to us, is it not?0.58
00:49:39.980Because when they mentioned Thucydides' trap in the context of China and the United States, Graham Allison, Henry Kissinger, Xi, they buy into the fact that we're the declining power, that they are the rising power, right?0.61
00:50:00.700I was shocked when he – at Beijing in the opening volley, I was like, wow, because I had Greg Madison here for lunch one time for three hours plus and went through all of this in great detail, of which I'm not a huge fan of their analysis.
00:50:14.760But it's a calculated insult, is it not, that say in the White House and then at the form of dinner where the declining power and by the theory – by the city's trap theory, you're the dangerous one because you're going to strike out as you slip into oblivion, sir?
00:50:32.100Yeah, it's essentially calculated to load all of the blame for problems in the US-China relationship on the US side.
00:50:43.360It's the declining power lashing out and, you know, blame on the trade side, on frictions over technology and so on.
00:50:52.160And plus the implication that as a declining power, the United States will do anything and everything to hold China down, to prevent it from rising.
00:51:03.580And it uses that to justify sanctions and tariffs and corporate blacklists and so on.
00:51:09.340And this, of course, is Xi Jinping's agenda.
00:51:11.980Part of his agenda here in the United States is to get the U.S. to drop some of that or at least to soften some of that, particularly the sales of semiconductors and chip making equipment and so on.
00:51:23.480But it's all neatly packaged in this Thucydides trap framing.
00:51:29.100Andy Brown, where do we get you at Semaphore and where do we get you on social media, sir?
00:51:34.260Please sign up for the Semaphore China newsletter once a week coming out tomorrow morning.
00:51:39.360We'll be talking about trade tomorrow.
00:51:41.900Sign up for that newsletter and all of the other letters in the Semaphore News Suite.
00:51:49.140It's amazing what Ben Smith and you guys have done with us.
00:52:35.920My point, there's not a bigger globalist than the AI oligarchs, and particularly Jensen Wong, the biggest globalist ever, says it doesn't matter what country wins the AI race, it doesn't matter what company wins it, which is exactly counter to President Trump's philosophy.
00:52:52.160We're not the declining power, but we ought to stop acting like it.
00:53:28.280Tax Network USA is currently offering business owners a complimentary business review.
00:53:37.760An opportunity to have an experienced tax professional take a fresh look at your business structure, tax strategy, and overall compliance.
00:53:47.480The goal is to identify potential issues, missed opportunities, or areas that may need attention before they become more costly or even more complicated.
00:53:58.280With several important business tax deadlines approaching, it's an ideal time to make sure your business is properly structured and on track.
00:54:06.820While this complimentary review is specifically designed for business owners, Tax Network USA is a full-service tax firm serving both businesses and individuals.
00:54:17.280If you're dealing with the IRS or state tax issues, unfilled returns or unfiled returns, penalties, collections, or other tax concerns, our team offers comprehensive services to help.