00:00:55.960So we talked about Brexit, England, this issue of migration.
00:01:02.940Over the last couple of days, including the weekend, there's been a complete throwdown between Georgia Maloney, prime minister in Italy, and President Trump.
00:01:12.740And first off, I want to get back to the G7 meeting last week, what happened there.
00:01:17.200Also this rift between Maloney and Trump, but it's been there for a long time.
00:01:22.780She continues to try to sell the Italian media and the European media, which buys this without asking questions.
00:01:31.980She's the bridge between President Trump and the MAGA movement and the populist nationalist right in Europe.
00:01:49.280Look, you're right about the mainstream media narrative on this, and without any irony whatsoever, they've segued from doing the bridge point to saying now that Trump has upset one of his great allies in Europe, which of course was never the case.
00:02:14.780But never mind, put that aside. I mean, you've got all the press leading with headlines of that kind of nonsense.
00:02:24.180Firstly, I want to say the point is, having studied President, I mean, you obviously know him very well, I've never met him,
00:02:30.620but having studied him for the last, what, 10 years since he blazed onto the political scene,
00:02:39.120And the one thing that really I find remarkable about his personal character, and this goes really very against the mainstream media caricature of him, Steve, is how magnanimous he is.
00:02:52.520He doesn't bear grudges. So I have journalists here sort of calling me saying, is this permanently damaged his relationship?
00:03:02.520And this is what I'm saying. President Trump, by everything I've seen of him, is a very magnanimous guy.
00:03:10.220You can fall out with him. You can come back into the tent.
00:03:14.100You can have supported other candidates in 2015. No problem whatsoever. Full endorsement.
00:03:21.840I am more petty, right, when it comes to remembering slights and perceived slights than Donald Trump.
00:03:30.440very magnanimous he expects one thing he expects the um the the respect due to him that that's what
00:03:38.580he wants as far as i can tell um and if if if as long as you're prepared uh to on that relationship
00:03:45.260he'll let he'll he'll let you in back in so i would say with regards to georgia maloney the ball
00:03:51.720is in her court now some people have said to me okay harnwell um so how do you explain the fact
00:03:59.860that he came out with these, with this.
00:04:02.460And I'd say, firstly, don't over read what has happened
00:04:07.680because Donald Trump, he can say these things
00:06:28.500Because the basis, I understand Spain and even England, to a degree, I mean, Spain more in your face and England, you know, try to, oh, give us six hours.
00:06:36.720But the Italians particularly, I think, hit him because he doesn't really have a relationship in Spain.0.54
00:06:42.080You know, Maloney supposedly says she's so close to him and she's always trying to kiss up to him and she's presenting himself in the media,
00:06:49.480which he sees that. This one in Italy, and then how she came back and talked about Italian
00:06:54.520sovereignty. And it plays right into the hands of those of us who say, look, this whole NATO thing,
00:07:01.160it's just been a disaster now because the individual countries will not put up money
00:07:06.000to defend themselves. They're still dependent by the United States, but it's contingent.
00:07:10.220You know, we got to go beg them. We got to go be a supplicant, which is just not going to happen.0.86
00:07:13.760It's particularly not going to happen with Trump. How do you see this thing playing out? And how's
00:07:18.360playing in domestic politics because now she's trying to spike the football saying hey you've0.79
00:07:23.700lost your popularity over here uh you're at eight percent i'm higher and uh you know worry about your
00:07:29.220own popularity sir um well you mentioned pedro sanchez the appalling the quite appalling prime
00:07:38.080minister in spain he didn't go around touting himself as the bridge between america and europe
00:07:46.340And neither did Keir Starmer, because they both fundamentally had more respect for Donald Trump, even though disagreeing with him substantially on the same issues like Georgia Maloney.
00:07:57.120They weren't so shameless. The thing is with Donald Trump, he values personal, direct, face-to-face relationships.
00:08:05.740He doesn't need, he's never needed an interlocutor to interpose themselves and augmenting their own political credibility in doing so between Donald Trump and anyone else.
00:08:19.740That, I think, was the really patronizing maneuver on her behalf.
00:08:24.520You asked me where do I think this is going.0.98
00:08:26.320Well, first, I think the Italians should calm down a little bit and treat the president with more respect.
00:08:34.240That is the most important thing. They need to treat Donald Trump with respect. And you see that they're not prepared to do that because the first thing on day one of this, who are Antonio Tajani, who's the foreign minister, member of the coalition, Berlusconi's air, political air from Forza Italia.
00:08:55.200He said, I said, I'm quitting. I'm not going to go to America next week because he was going to go over for some bilaterals. He called it off. Right. This guy is an absolute scumbag. Former president of the European Parliament, former vice president of the European Commission, the European Union's Politburo.
00:09:13.500this steve is the guy who cancelled on the day the back in the famous conference um the youth
00:09:22.120conference for called atreu um which georgia maloney had you on as the keynote speaker back
00:09:29.800when she was on three percent and i tell you folks having been there and watch it i have never seen
00:09:34.960a press gaggle in my life as substantive and mobbing someone as they piled in on steve bannon
00:09:42.360when he was there being welcomed at the gate by Georgia Maloney.
00:12:05.440And certainly there was nobody there willing to criticise her and attack her because they were hoovered up into the coalition government.0.64
00:12:15.820The fact now that he is there as a credible person, as a credible alternative, will be interesting because what Georgia Maloney did from day one onwards was she pivoted.
00:12:27.160She won the election and she then pivoted within 24 hours to the political centre.
00:12:32.660um and that's where she's been since so now that there is somebody a credible figure on the right
00:12:39.580that can that can uh challenge her her right flank is totally uh exposed to him that's going
00:12:45.720to be interesting and that's why i make the comparison um to to rupert low i think he will
00:12:50.440fulfill the same dynamic with regards to nigel farage's reform uk uh you're here on the war room
00:13:00.120Monday excuse me Wednesday Thursday Friday the show is on fire if you want to understand the
00:13:05.960world you have to come and listen to Ben and his guest Ben social media where can people put up
00:13:11.580all your BD cynical BDI you know your cynical BDI analysis of news of the day sir thank you
00:13:19.720for remembering the adjective this time around look for folks who came in and tuned in to the
00:13:53.020getter is my social media platform of choice at harnwell um and i also do have an account i'm not
00:14:01.660going to promote it because i'm not going to promote elon musk's dirty work but i do have
00:14:05.420an account on x and even though my analysis my original analysis goes out exclusively
00:14:11.440on getter if you do want to to pick up my hits and media appearances then i do also post them
00:14:18.780out on twitter on x thank you thanks steve thanks very much god bless appreciate you sir um
00:14:25.440dr bradley thayer actually in the war room dr thayer um there's been this huge kind of firestorm
00:14:34.900in the in the consulting class gop about the ccp and the data centers of course we're the leading
00:14:40.960uh organization institution and i'm kind of the leader of the anti-ccp hardcore anti-ccp
00:14:46.960pro-Laoboxin movement in the United States and probably arguably the world. And so we're
00:14:55.020definitely anti-CCP. But right now, what you see here is the broligarchs wanting to defending their1.00
00:15:00.460privileges or saying, oh, let's start at the CCP. Clearly, the CCP is trying to do anything0.97
00:15:06.260possible to the detriment of the United States. And I want you to walk through. You're coming
00:15:10.720out with a book on the 100-year fight we've had with communism. Mao and the Chinese Communist
00:15:16.580Party take a major role in that. You're one of the country's leading experts. Andy Marshall,
00:15:21.160who's one of the greatest strategists this country's ever had, commissioned you personally
00:15:26.100to write a book about China and the Chinese Communist Party. That's how much the most
00:15:32.680serious people in this country dealing with this issue, Andy Marshall and the net assessment group
00:15:36.880over at the Pentagon or the Department of War, felt. Walk me through everything the CCP's doing,
00:15:43.220And then let's put it in perspective, this data centers, because I'm sure they're trying to work the data centers against us, no doubt about it.
00:15:50.680But the GOP consultants are really the running dogs of the of the broligarchs here.0.82
00:15:58.820They're avoiding the plank in our eye to look at a potential splinter.
00:16:08.060that the CCP penetration of American politics, media, universities, Hollywood, business,
00:16:16.520Wall Street, of course, is almost complete. And so we need to prioritize in order to deal with
00:16:26.420the threat that we face. I agree with you 100 percent. Yes, the data centers is an issue,
00:16:32.780but it's not the most important issue that we face. It needs to be addressed.
00:16:38.680But fundamentally, we need to recognize the nature of that penetration. And that means
00:16:45.960cutting off the CCP from American investment. Secondly, cutting off the CCP ability to steal
00:16:54.420through illegal means or to take through legal means our intellectual capital. It means removing
00:17:01.280the students here who are in American universities, in STEM disciplines, as well as others, the 500,000
00:17:12.080Chinese students we've talked about many times on this show, and you've called attention to time
00:17:17.600and again, to begin to reverse that penetration. Looking at, additionally, penetration in our media
00:17:25.680is absolutely going to be essential as well.
00:17:30.800So the data centers are important, but there are far, if you will,
00:17:36.700bigger fish to fry in terms of reversing CCP penetration
00:17:40.280and fundamentally getting the CCP on the back foot.
00:17:44.600Let's stop playing defensive and let's go on the offensive against the CCP.
00:17:49.960And that's the approach that we ought to take here, Steve.
00:17:52.520so when you talk about that talk about going on the offense you you've written definitive books
00:17:59.140about this a new book will come out later in the summer early in the fall
00:18:02.900is another volume of this what when you say go on offense well and by the way if they have any
00:18:08.780involvement in any of these front groups on the anti uh data centers that should be absolutely
00:18:14.000found out and and broomed and criminal charges should be made but when you say going on offense
00:18:18.920overall on the infiltration they've made in our cultural institutions, our political process,
00:18:25.200our financial institutions, corporately, because right now they wouldn't be a player in artificial
00:18:31.480intelligence, which they're arguing right now. Oh, they're trying to shut down the data centers
00:18:35.840so they can take the lead. The only reason they're even close to being competitive
00:18:40.400is because of equipment we've sold them, chips we've sold them, training we've given them,
00:18:45.840education we've given them, et cetera. So when you say go on offense, Dr. Bradley Thayer,
00:18:51.460people pay attention. What do you mean by that? So going on offense means first recognizing the
00:18:57.360illegitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party. There's no reason whatsoever that the CCP should
00:19:03.180be recognized as a legitimate government of China. Nobody voted for the CCP. Stalin put them in power.
00:19:10.220It was a product of Soviet imperialism that put these guys in power, coupled with gross American strategic mistakes that we made at the end of World War II and in the immediate aftermath of World War II.
00:19:25.920So that's the genesis of these guys.0.51
00:19:29.340We need to recognize, of course, that lack of legitimacy has important implications.
00:19:35.620They should be treated as a pariah, and anybody interacting with them also should be treated as a pariah.
00:19:42.880And, Steve, that means taking the bold steps necessary.
00:19:46.560No investment, no intellectual transfer, no chips, and recognizing that because they're illegitimate, we need to start looking for alternatives.
00:19:58.600We need to start looking for, as you've worked for many years, a new government of China that really meets the needs and reflects the Chinese people, not a Soviet product, not the product of Soviet imperialism, which these guys are.
00:20:17.180And when we look at the situation that way, we can see that what needs to be done, right, that means a cold break with these guys.
00:20:27.340That's going to require the United States to recognize once we see that they're illegitimate, all of the folks who profited from their relationship with the CCP need to be held to account.
00:20:41.220And that's going to be a long list, but those bold steps are necessary to bring about really what is absolutely essential, recognizing the nature of the threat, recognizing that that threat thrives from its relationship with us, and it continues to oppress the Chinese people and target the American people.
00:21:04.560Major national security threat directly and deliberately targeting the United States and the American people through military means, but also through fentanyl, through the steps that they've taken to strip our manufacturing, the way they have, frankly, bought off the American elite.0.91
00:21:26.420Again, in so many areas, whether that's in business or in politics, in our media, in our culture industry, and the ideas industry more broadly, universities, of course, K through 12 education.
00:21:42.940So when we recognize that, we need to see what needs to be done.
00:21:46.940We need to see how we need to change course and to recognize the immediacy, that this is an urgent problem that needs to be addressed.
00:21:57.940And it's one which really, Steve, is one it's shared throughout the West.
00:22:03.320our elites have broken the social contract with their peoples, whether we're talking about
00:22:09.120Starmer in Great Britain or Andy Burnham in Great Britain, or we're talking about in the United
00:22:14.520States. The elites really abandoned their peoples through links to the Chinese Communist Party and0.75
00:22:24.300taking the investment, the money from the Chinese Communist Party, facilitating mass immigration0.91
00:22:30.800into Western societies. When we see that, we can see nobody voted for this. We didn't sign up for
00:22:38.320it. And it has to be reversed urgently. Social contract has to be restored between the peoples
00:22:46.560of the West and their governments. That begins recognizing that the CCP is illegitimate. It's
00:22:54.520worked with a lot of folks on the political left who are neo-Leninists like George Soros, his son,
00:23:02.200and his institutions that he's created, Neville Roy Singham and his group, and the many really
00:23:09.620hundreds of organizations that Singham has created and controls, and other actors as well. Steve
00:23:18.140Jobs Widow, of course. Emerson Foundation is another group that's working in this area.
00:23:25.080These folks are really working to undermine the peoples of the West, and they need to be held to
00:23:30.380account, and it needs to be reversed. And we need to start talking about our agenda,
00:23:36.300a nationalist agenda, which is going to be a big part of the antidote to what they're attempting
00:23:42.620to achieve. If you talk about a nationalist agenda, how can I think there's a breaking
00:23:48.200story today about West Germany selling equipment that the issue before us that has to be dealt
00:23:54.120with immediately. And there's so many other deeper ones that they we've allowed them
00:23:57.760to infiltrate this country. But the one that's before us right now is artificial intelligence
00:24:02.680in the race for artificial intelligence. You could argue, oh, we had a Sputnik moment
00:24:07.400And we now need to we now need to make sure we win this.1.00
00:24:11.620The Bologarics are doing this in fact, saying it.0.97
00:24:14.580Oh, we got to do it at the same time we arm the equivalent of the Russians in the race for the hydrogen bomb.0.99
00:24:21.980What say you? Clearly, we are supporting the CCP to what they couldn't do on their own to make them competitive in A.I.
00:24:30.240And obviously, they've always wanted to break and decouple.
00:24:34.480They're working on their own technology to surpass us.
00:24:37.080But you saw the story today about Germany and other people selling them equipment.
00:24:40.720What is your recommendation for us to absolutely make sure we shut down the CCP so there's no more conversation about them being competitive?
00:24:49.320What would you do? And I'm going to hold you through the break.
00:24:51.440We've got a couple of minutes here. What action would you take?
00:24:55.680Well, the action is first to recognize the illegitimacy of it.
00:24:58.680Once we recognize they're a pariah and they're not friendly in any way, shape, or form, they don't hold our best interests at heart, they are the existential threat that the United States faces and the West faces, that's the starting point.
00:25:13.840Secondly, cutting them off from capital, the fact that they're still raising money.
00:25:18.480We're still investing in, in essence, the Chinese Communist Party.
00:30:28.680Now, that's a mouthful. Freedom4Health.org. That's Freedom4Health.org slash Bannon and discover why tens of thousands of patriots are joining America's health share.
00:30:43.080America's health share reduces your health care costs by an average of 60 percent, and it's accepted everywhere.
00:30:50.260In other words, say goodbye to out-of-network limitations.
00:30:53.300They make health care affordable, transparent, and aligned with your values, free from surprise bills or skyrocketing premiums.
00:31:02.280For as low as $68 a month, an individual can get great health care coverage minus the complications and price gouging from health care providers.
00:31:11.480You can completely scrap your current insurance or use America's HealthSphere to supplement your existing policy, even with Medicare.
00:32:16.640First, it explains the ideological upheaval
00:32:19.160that we face now in the U.S.? How is it that we have the rise of the election of these
00:32:24.940so-called socialist mayors, the rise of a hard left in the Democratic Party?
00:32:32.260That's the product of really a process which has been ongoing for 100 years
00:32:36.820since the Bolsheviks came to power in the Soviet Union. They've been working to generate0.91
00:32:42.280the biggest external threats that we face, the Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist Party,0.90
00:32:47.180but they've also worked to undermine us at home in the United States by undermining our educational system,0.88
00:32:54.860by undermining our political system, and by attacking our identities and Western civilizations.
00:33:01.020Secondly, if you want to understand the Chinese Communist Party, it's a great study to look at that.
00:33:06.020And lastly, because the antidote to communism is American identity and the return of the embrace of Western civilization.
00:33:15.580So understanding the American spirit and who we are really goes a long way in giving us the antidote that we need to have in order to win the hundred years that we've been fighting communism.
00:33:30.920So the book is America's Hundred Years' War, How to Win Against Communism.
00:33:34.460Thanks very much, Steve, for calling attention to it, and thank you for writing the foreword to it.
00:33:38.600It's a great foreword. Folks should look at the book for that reason alone.
00:33:42.180it's a it's a tough it's a tough book you take these guys on one more time where do people go
00:33:48.420and what's your social media and folks can always find me at brad theron x and bradley
00:33:54.340theron getter and the truth thank you brother appreciate you coming to the war room today i
00:33:58.980know you're busy going on offense okay your heads are about to blow mike mccormick mike thank you
00:34:08.060for joining us here on a Monday. Appreciate it. Yeah, it's Steve. Good to see you again.
00:34:13.320So tell us, just get the audience up to speed, because I'm going to get into this Obama library,
00:34:17.800but not the way other people are attacking it. What is your expertise given Biden, Obama?
00:34:23.440Why are you a subject matter? Why are you considered a subject matter expert, sir?
00:34:29.160Because I was there as a witness with Joe Biden when he traveled abroad through the Obama years
00:34:36.240as vice president to China, to Ukraine, to Honduras, around the world. And I was there
00:34:44.740with the press. My job as a stenographer, a white house stenographer, was to record whatever he said
00:34:49.880in the press. But I traveled in the Air Force, too, with them. So I saw behind the scenes things.
00:34:55.140What happened was, after the fraudulent 2020 election, I got a hold of the Hunter Biden
00:35:03.340a laptop. Garrett Ziegler said, you should have this. Marco Polo's Garrett Ziegler gave me a copy
00:35:09.060of that laptop. And what I was able to do was go through the laptop and see the email traffic that
00:35:15.100was going on between Hunter and his investors or Hunter and his dad and compare it with my memories
00:35:21.660of where we had been in Ukraine or China. And it all fit together in a gigantic timeline. So I
00:35:28.460started writing a substack. The substack is Midnight in the Laptop of Good and Evil. And
00:35:34.560out of that substack came two books, An Almost Insurmountable Evil and The Case to Impeach
00:35:42.240and Imprisoned Joe Biden. And so those books were based on things that I had produced and
00:35:48.580put into the Obama library through the Obama website. Obama had a whitehouse.gov website
00:35:55.380for years and photos speeches transcripts of of interviews transcripts of white house briefings
00:36:03.700were in that website what i found and put on my sub stacker last couple weeks is 95 percent of
00:36:11.680the material i used to see on that website when i was researching these books is gone vanished
00:36:18.460it all pertains to what joe biden did most of it is okay hold it hang on hang on slow down slow down
00:36:24.740slow down slow down slow down oh i just want i just because they had the big celebration on on
00:36:31.360friday to to right honor the stone i guess it's it's the architecture is also some ethiopian stone
00:36:37.740or something along those lines they had they had that and now the thing's open for the people to go
00:36:44.220or scholars can study because presidential libraries have two basic purposes the one of
00:36:49.840purposes is to explain the presidency of whoever it is, George Bush or, and by the way, one of the
00:36:55.800things we will cover this week is, I think it's next week, excuse me, the president is going
00:37:04.320to, I think, plan to go to North Dakota for the Teddy Roosevelt Presidential Library, some aspect
00:37:09.860of it. It is to explain that presidency and to explain it so people understand it in the current
00:37:16.220time, the others to be an official housing mechanism or apparatus so that scholars can
00:37:22.240go in and do deep dives on the papers and everything associated with it so they can
00:37:41.780And this website that I'm referring to, this was the website that Obama used throughout his presidency, and on January 21st, 2017, at noon, and I was in the White House that day working on the first inaugural speech of President Trump, they froze that website in time and put it into a website that was managed by the National Archives.
00:38:06.740It's just it's archived information. It was frozen in time. And now that's changed.
00:38:15.720So hold it. How long did they start immediately that afternoon on the 20th of January 17 to have the archives and have that set up and people could put information in it?
00:38:27.720Did it start at that time or did it start later when they realized they were going to have a presidential library?
00:38:32.360no as soon as my understanding is someone we were told this when we worked in the white house by
00:38:38.980obama people our website and everything all our materials gets frozen at noon when trump comes in
00:38:45.580his website is now the new website you guys are going to submit your transcripts to that that
00:38:51.000office and they'll load them into the website so that's how they did it and so the obama website
00:38:55.920then went online. It stayed online. You could go to, you could Google Obama white house.gov
00:39:01.720and find the entirety of the website. That was from 2017 through about a year ago. And all of a
00:39:08.440sudden about a year ago, I started noticing as they were building this library, there were changes
00:39:13.620in the website. There were things that were missing. And I contacted their librarian, their
00:39:19.140archivist. And I said, there's something funny going on. I can't search. I can't go to this
00:39:24.360website and search do a word search for say obama g like i did five years ago why is that and they
00:39:32.400came back and they said we had a glitch we're setting it up and we had to redo it thanks for
00:39:37.920the information well just recently i went back as they were launching this web this new library
00:39:43.380hang on hang on hang on hang on so they acknowledged they acknowledged when you
00:39:49.440contacted him and said, hey, I'm trying to, you know, do some stuff for Obama, Xi, for the
00:39:54.020relations with China and, you know, the pivot to Asia, all these things he tried to do.
00:39:58.640And I can't get access or it doesn't come up like it did in the years running up to that. And they
00:40:04.000said, oh, we had a glitch. We're reworking it. Just, just stand by and we'll have this thing
00:40:09.840sorted. It wasn't that it wasn't going to be accessible. They were essentially saying there's
00:40:14.500some mechanical or technical problem. We'll work it out. We'll get back to you and you will have
00:40:19.160full access at that time, right? That was the implication? That's correct. And I sub-stacked
00:40:24.400about that. I sub-stacked about there's a problem at the website. And then I sub-stacked about I
00:40:29.740contacted the people at the website and then they got back to me and I sub-stacked about
00:40:33.760it looks like it's fixed. That was all a year ago in like August of 2025.
00:40:41.700So talk to me about the fix. When you saw it fixed, were you able to get the kind of access
00:40:46.800to the type of keyword searches that you wanted to have
00:40:51.600or had something fundamentally changed
00:41:56.040You could do a search for Biden-Ukraine and see some material more than is there now, but much less than was there when I first started searching it in 2018, 2019.
00:42:10.060Are you saying they selectively curated negative information and negative articles or articles that researchers could help take them in certain directions, that they curated that out of the archives of Obama?
00:42:26.080Or they just do what archivists should do, which is, you know, I guess we can't have everything.
00:42:32.140Some of this stuff is marginal, just took out the marginal.
00:42:35.340Or do you think they actually broomed relevant, pertinent material?
00:42:38.640Oh, they definitely curated relevant material. I mean, I wrote a sub stack today about it. And what I found in the sub stack was they actually hacked. So in these two books, book one on almost insurmountable evil, book two of my shoulder right there, the case in impeachment prison, Joe Biden.
00:42:58.360In those two books, I took the links that I used when I was developing my material off of the Obama website that was working, and I put the links at the bottom.
00:43:10.200I published that, published in text form the documents that were there, where there was a transcript of a gaggle.
00:43:18.780There's a gaggle that Jake Sullivan did on Air Force Two in April of 2014 that's really significant.
00:43:25.680And I took a text and I put that in my book.
00:43:28.980Well, the link to that was also at the bottom of the book.
00:43:32.340I've gone back in the recently and look, that link has been hacked.
00:43:53.340And that's why I'm like, wait a minute.
00:43:55.680First, they took out pertinent materials, then they covered it with a hack of my materials that I published in these books.
00:44:02.540These books are the only place you can see these documents right now, documents of Joe Biden being involved with Xi, documents of Lisa Monaco coming out in January of 2014 and saying we're going to have a global viral surveillance program.
00:44:20.400She was involved in it right all through the Obama presidency and then the Biden presidency, covering up what happened with Joe Biden's involvement with this company Metabiota that Tulsi Gabbard released information on.
00:44:38.460Metabiota was involved in the bio labs, and Lisa Monica was part of that, and part of the cover-up that occurred during Biden's presidency.
00:44:49.740So first, there's a rollout of this information. And then Trump wins. They didn't expect Trump to win. So then they had to start this whole process behind the scenes of rolling out a fake pandemic, the plandemic. And that's what's in that book right there.
00:47:44.860What have you done vis-a-vis Congress?
00:47:47.300In June, May 2023, I was interviewed by investigators of the House Oversight Committee and the Homeland Security Governmental Affairs Committee.
00:48:00.000What I knew about Joe Biden's corruption in Ukraine and the fact that the special counsel, David Weiss at the time, wasn't investigating him.
00:48:13.240And I had reached out to him to investigate what I knew, interview me for, you know, what I can tell to the grand jury.
00:48:19.080And so I talked to those investigators. They use some of my information to in interviews later of Devin Archer and Hunter Biden.
00:48:27.900but they didn't use all of it. They kept some of it behind. And that's why I wrote the books
00:48:32.880because they didn't come out with it. They didn't follow up on what I told them.
00:48:37.540What did you do with the U.S. Attorneys? You said you went to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
00:48:42.540I went there in January of this past January, 2026. And I said, look, I've got information.
00:48:50.100They were investigating at the time, the Seditious Six. I said, part of the information I have
00:48:55.800developed over the years is pertinent to the seditious six investigation. And I went to the
00:49:01.560lobby. There was a sort of a witness, you know, receptionist in the lobby. And I sat there for
00:49:08.700about half an hour. Finally, she comes out and sits down with me with a clipboard. I said,
00:49:12.700I want to talk to somebody in the public corruption section. She goes, what do you want?
00:49:17.320And I explained to her everything. She wrote it down on a clipboard. And then she said,
00:49:22.340I will email this to the public corruption section.