00:02:50It will be performative, but really they're going to sign up to it.
00:02:54Andrea, Managing Director of Bundeswehr der Freiheit,
00:03:00height based in Switzerland, helping to promote free speech cases, even financially, across the
00:03:08European Union. And we'll be giving an update towards the end of our briefing with Andrea.
00:03:15But Andrea, is that synthesis broadly correct? That is what Ursula von der Leyen, the European
00:03:22Commission, the European Union, that is exactly what they're trying to do. Folks might remember,
00:03:27because i i really think for something so important there ought to be a lot more media
00:03:32attention on this um and therefore this has been sort of passing all but the the civil liberties
00:03:39warriors by on this i think i think a lot of people are asleep at the wheel but most people
00:03:45at least people within the that the um the apple um eco system will be aware of this a few years
00:03:54ago, because Apple, presumably at the behest of the European Union, had tried to implement
00:04:00this mechanism under the outer guise of child protection of automatically scanning every
00:04:11Apple user's phone that was on their phone.
00:04:16So if you have like an iPhone and you take a photo of someone, then the child protection
00:04:22mechanism would kick in and apple's computers would scan the photo its ai would kick in and
00:04:33indicate whether there was anything child sexual abuse related that of course just being the
00:04:40pretext and apple did back down on that and that was a couple of years ago again presumably that
00:04:46will be on a shelf somewhere, Andrea Seaman, waiting to be dusted off and brought back into use.
00:04:55Yes, as you correctly point out, when Trump came into office for the second time,
00:05:01the EU backed off and was very shocked. So it relented from its incessant drive to censor
00:05:09the internet within the EU and globally. However, if Trump now goes out of office and we see a
00:05:17Congress dominated by the Democrats, and even if a person who is from the Democrats comes
00:05:24into the office of US President, the EU will double down on its censorship agenda.
00:05:31This is a terrible prospect. Now, it is obviously interesting what Reason magazine reports,
00:05:37which is that the UK and the EU are using child protection as a pretext to censor European citizens' speech.
00:05:48Now, the way they're doing it seems to be that they declare that something could potentially harm children
00:05:56and that anything that possibly could harm or cause trauma to children is harmful content and therefore needs to be censored.
00:06:05What we see basically, this is related to the Digital Services Act of the EU, is that the Digital Services Act obligates platforms such as X and Facebook and Instagram to delete so-called illegal content.
00:06:24This is in principle and in practice a complete fiction.
00:06:28When Facebook deletes your comment in the EU and calls it illegal, that is simply an allegation of illegality.
00:06:38Facebook has said that your content is illegal, but allegedly illegal content is not illegal.
00:06:46You can have this in the US, I think your viewers will understand.
00:06:59So you're talking effectively there about the total denial of due process, right?
00:07:04About the right of being considered to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law,
00:07:11preferably by a jury, where that still exists.
00:07:16Yes, precisely. In the US, that would be a jury.
00:07:20In Switzerland or in Germany, that would be a courtroom judge.
00:07:25What I am suggesting is that the Digital Services Act of the EU, by definition, only censors legal content and nothing but legal content.
00:07:38In other words, it is logically impossible for the Digital Services Act to delete or censor illegal content.
00:07:46Why? Because the EU and the various countries which compose it already have laws on the books in their criminal codes which disallow, which ban illegal things which are found to be illegal by a courtroom judge to be illegal and then it must be banned.
00:08:05This Digital Services Act, which was tested in its first instance in Germany under its own domestic law called the Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz, the Network Enforcement Act, was basically a trial run of it.
00:08:22There already we saw that they were deleting only legal content.
00:08:26Well, it's quite obvious, you see, if you already have laws on the books which prohibit illegal things, the only way to censor legal stuff is to make a separate act for it, which is what the DSA is.
00:08:42Let's look a little bit about the situation in the UK, which is covered quite generously in the Reason magazine article here, citing specifically the 2023 Online Safety Act.
00:08:55The figure here in the article is produced of 50,000 arrests per year in the UK for speech and conduct issues.
00:09:06And allied to that, and this is absolutely horrific, and I didn't know this was the case,
00:09:13but in the UK, you don't even, and I'm citing the article, which, as I say, we had it up on the screen.
00:09:19We'll try and sort of get that out so people can see this.
00:09:22in the uk and i quote in the uk you don't need to break the law to be arrested so someone says
00:09:29that they feel that they've been harmed by what you've said then you can be arrested and if
00:09:34someone says that what you said is deeply offensive and they're distressed by it then
00:09:38you can be arrested um and of course the article goes on to explain how people have been imprisoned
00:10:03And that's absolutely true because prima facie,
00:10:06this wouldn't be able to take place in the United States.
00:10:09However, with the regulation of free speech via the abolition of anonymity, that is what you're going to get to via the backdoor.
00:10:22Could you just break that down and explain what the mechanism is there on how the removal of total anonymity for social media communications is a backdoor route to controlling free speech?
00:10:41well obviously in the past when we didn't yet have the internet a lot of dissidents who
00:10:48criticized the government or the powers that be had to publish anonymously under pseudonyms and
00:10:56so on to protect themselves from censorship or worse punishments which would follow if it ever
00:11:02got to light that they were the people making all this havoc about the government's policies
00:11:07Now, these days, the Internet with social media, of course, allows everyone to publish anything they like, which can be viewed a thousand times over across the globe.
00:11:17So rather than censoring people, the government would rather first abolish anonymity online
00:11:26by imposing things like digital ID and it also wants to impose upon people the obligation
00:11:34to register themselves online under their proper real name.
00:21:23where they can tell the tech agencies that aren't based in the UK whatsoever
00:21:30to hand over to the UK government the private DM chat and what have you,
00:21:37the profile activity of Americans using American services like Twitter
00:21:45or what have you, and to give that to the UK government.
00:21:48And they did this when there was still Joe Biden in charge, and I call me cynical, Andrea, but my suspicion was that the UK government was simply being used as a willing cipher here on behalf of the US government administration and services.
00:22:08They couldn't directly order this to take place without a warrant in the United States, not legally.
00:22:15So they wanted to do it via the UK so that they could spy on Americans' activities on social media, on the Internet, and then get them via the UK government.
00:22:29There has been, in the closing minutes that we have you, Andrea, I'd like you just to outline a potential glimmer of hope, which is the Granite Act in the United States, which might actually protect Americans and give them some protections regarding this foreign pushed snooping on Americans' internet activities.0.60
00:22:54yes um so what you were basically saying and i'd agree with that your theory has some merit
00:23:02that the american government or the american state or deep state was pushing for that in britain
00:23:07to subvert the first amendment in the u.s um however one should never underestimate european
00:23:14censors ambition to censor their own people and the entire world so i would say that you know
00:29:12In other words, say goodbye to out-of-network limitations
00:29:15They make health care affordable, transparent, and aligned with your values, free from surprise bills or skyrocketing premiums.
00:29:24For as low as $68 a month, an individual can get great health care coverage minus the complications and price gouging from health care providers.
00:29:33You can completely scrap your current insurance or use America's HealthSphere to supplement your existing policy, even with Medicare.
00:34:09Dear old President Zelensky has raised the alarm
00:34:14because he feels that Shenson, the Shenson Summit, could be this Yalta-like redistribution of the spheres of influence for the 21st century.
00:34:25So my opening question to you, Dr. Thayer, is, is he right to have that concern? And would that be such a bad thing?
00:34:36I think he's not right to have that concern.
00:34:42And I think that if Putin, Xi, and President Trump get together at the APEC summit next week, November 18th and 19th in communist China, they're going to have a lot to discuss.
00:35:01Artificial intelligence, they're going to perhaps talk about nuclear issues as well.
00:35:06inevitably, the war is going to come up, Ukraine-Russia war. Those three actors have
00:35:13very different self-interests. Xi Jinping wants that war to continue. Ben, as you've argued time
00:35:22and again for years now, Zelensky also wants that war to continue for his own selfish purposes,
00:35:31for his political purposes. President Trump and Putin are a little bit closer together in terms
00:35:41of their interest and desire, we would hope, to end the conflict in Putin's sense. Trump definitely
00:35:49wants to end the conflict. So the three coming together, Putin, Xi Jinping, and President Trump,
00:35:56are defined by two elements. One, they have differing incentives to end the conflict.
00:36:03And secondly, they have different elements of power in international politics. President Trump
00:36:12is far more powerful than Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping. So he's got and should have the dominant
00:36:20voice. So is it like Yalta? No, it's not like Yalta. And Zelensky, of course, is fearful that
00:36:30Trump and Putin may come together and actually work out some type of a modus vivendi, some type
00:36:37of at least an ascent agreement that would allow a ceasefire that Zelensky does not want. Again,
00:36:51Don't you think a Yalta-like delineation formally agreed to by,
00:36:57at least by America and China, but also by Russia,
00:37:04don't you think that would have a stabilizing influence on the world
00:37:08if everybody knew basically what the red lines were territorially?
00:37:14um no because they never work don't you think that don't you think that this part of the strife
00:37:21of the present situation is the ambiguity of which countries um are satellites which countries
00:37:28are buffers you know and uh forces countries into um into taking risky adventurous behavior
00:37:37and then other countries into defending their their national interests i mean the whole ukraine
00:37:43thing is doesn't that arise out of nato basically overstepping the the prudential lines that were
00:37:53somewhat ambiguously left yes and putin's folly his supreme folly in thinking that he could have
00:38:01a quick and decisive victory in that conflict which turned into his world war one uh with
00:38:07tremendous humanitarian consequences for the people of ukraine and the people of russia
00:38:12and we're not out of the woods yet ben in this conflict it could escalate uh still so uh no i
00:38:21i don't believe for a moment that things are clearer because spheres of influence are always
00:38:26an illusion uh they're always violated uh so i don't i know what i know perfectly well why you're
00:38:35not gonna buy the um spheres of influence thesis on this and we're going to come back to that in
00:38:41just a moment that's taiwan of course i will come back we'll come to that point in just a moment
00:38:47after after i do a shout out to um to the two sponsors of the second half of the show let's
00:38:55start off with home title lock they have um they million dollar triple lock protection offer and
00:39:03And what that involves is they monitor your home title 24-7.
00:39:09And if anything should take place to try and change the ownership, the legal ownership of the title to your property, which is probably going to be the most expensive, the most high value asset you own.
00:39:23then under the triple lock protection scheme if you are such a victim then HTL will spend up to
00:39:35one million dollars fixing that fraud and restoring your title to you and folks this happens all the
00:39:41time sometimes on the war room when I'm talking about home title lock I will pick up articles
00:39:47from the mainstream media where precisely this type of theft has taken place.
00:39:56It really does happen and it's happening all the more now with the fact that thieves and fraudsters
00:40:03are using artificial intelligence that gives the means of forging signatures
00:40:11far more readily on official-looking paper
00:41:56And they were founded specifically to help ordinary regular Americans, especially seniors, especially people on Medicare, get health care coverage.
00:42:08And if you phone them on that number, I'll give it again in a moment.
00:42:12In under 20 minutes, they can find you the best plan for your needs at the lowest cost.
00:42:17That's what they do. And it's a free phone call and there is no pressure whatsoever.
00:42:22So the number, once again, and a free phone call will cost you nothing, is 845-WAR-ROOM.
00:42:30And please do tell them that the war room shuffled you along in their direction.
00:43:14So why would we respect the sphere of influence of that regime, of that evil totalitarian regime?
00:43:25So I don't, for a moment, think that we should lay or abide by any effort that they're attempting to restrain us or to establish any type of equality.
00:43:37They are an illegitimate regime that are beyond the bounds of international society, and they should be expelled from it.
00:43:44And then as a practical matter, Ben, spheres of influence never work because by the laws of power politics that define a great power behavior, what's mine is mine and what's yours is mine, right?
00:44:00Great powers have a tendency to be rapacious, and so respect for spheres of influence very seldom works.
00:44:14So we should never respect—communist China is not the legitimate government of China.
00:44:21It does not represent the people of China, and so we should not recognize that at all.0.92
00:44:31It's beyond the bounds of international society.0.99
00:44:34So from my perspective, we need to recognize that.
00:44:40the true legitimate government of China is going to be determined by the Chinese people
00:44:46themselves. And I think the sooner that we arrive at that conclusion and act like that,
00:44:53that would be a very positive step for hastening the day when the Chinese Communist Party,
00:44:58led by that Stalinist dictator, Xi Jinping, because this is a man who is purging his party.
00:45:05This is a man who has ambitions that are rivaled only by Stalin and Mao, and that is very dangerous for the Chinese people, but also for American national security.
00:45:21And we and, of course, other states and international politics need to recognize just how dangerous that man is, Xi Jinping.
00:45:31Okay. On the likening, on the comparison of President Xi to Stalin,
00:45:40the FT had a blinder of an article this week, quite an in-depth article,
00:45:48talking about Xi's purges, and just recently for their fifth plenum of their Congress,
00:45:59of their central committee there was um the the the interesting fact that the purges now have
00:46:06reached the highest point going back 50 years in china what do you make of that um in terms of she's
00:46:14trying so desperately to solidify his power within the within the ccp party um do you think there's
00:46:24any potential, or at least that he fears that his fourth, his unprecedented fourth mandate
00:46:31that I think is due to start, is it next year, the following year? Might that be 2027? Might
00:46:39that be under threat? Are the purges increasing of the party apparatchiks, even at relatively
00:46:47low level? Is this a sign of paranoia and desperation that she thinks his regime is
00:46:54coming to an end? That's an interpretation which is certainly defensible when you're looking at
00:47:00this. You could make a strong argument that he's fearful, and so he's purging. More purging
00:47:08generates more fear of his own, and he needs to go further and purge more. I see it that what he's
00:47:17attempting to do is the man truly is a communist. He believes in communist ideology. He believes
00:47:25in political education and the importance of political education. And he is determined to
00:47:33impose his will on the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army.
00:47:39And this is what we're witnessing. Ben, we've had remarkable events in the last two years, and particularly at the Fifth Plenum. You've had basically one quarter, one out of four members, whether they're voting members or non-voting members, did not show up to this.
00:48:03And that is extraordinary. You know, if you are a member of the Central Committee, you show up unless you are extraordinary circumstances.
00:48:12So it was basically it was basically empty. Right. The panel of the panel was was just empty spaces because they'd all been purged.
00:48:22But let's look at the figures. It reminds you of the commissar vanishes. It reminds you of the commissar vanishes. Right. Folks are disappearing.
00:48:30they're being airbrushed out in real time but under Xi's predecessor Hu Jintao that was the
00:48:39guy if you remember the last congress he was escorted out um quite astonishing quite astonishing
00:48:45and to this day Dr Thea I'm not sure we've ever been given the world or even the Chinese people
00:48:51have ever been given an explanation as to why that took place they said at the time that he
00:48:56was feeling unwell but he certainly didn't seem to be um in fact he was resisting uh his forcible
00:49:02removal but still under the then president jintai um there was an average 145 000 per year
00:49:16under president she in the middle of his unprecedented third term there's just a little
00:49:28under a million these are that's to say a million purges of party apparatchiks these are huge huge
00:49:34numbers dr bradley thayer and it strikes me that there is something else going on there than
00:49:41simply the desire to stamp out corruption because corruption is rife, has always been
00:49:49rife. And it is part of the reason that the CCP one party system exists. So when they're
00:49:56throwing their hands up, it's like that scene in Casablanca, isn't it? When Captain Renault
00:50:01closes down Rick's Casino, he says, I'm shocked, shocked that there's gambling going on here.
00:50:08And just as the place is running up, someone goes, you're winning, Captain.
00:50:40The world needs to see Xi Jinping in the same way they see Mao Zedong
00:50:44or Joseph Stalin, communist tyrants who purged their parties ruthlessly
00:50:51with an effectiveness which was terrifying, of course.
00:51:00Xi Jinping is able to do it so effectively, Ben, because this communist China is a surveillance all the 24-7, of course, and he's able to police his cadres very effectively.
00:51:47And so think of Stalin or Mao when you're thinking of Xi.
00:51:50all right folks if you want more of this analysis from the guy that's just been expounding the
00:52:00recent events in china this is a great book for you to get just very quickly dr bradley
00:52:06where do people go um and broaden and deepen their knowledge
00:52:12folks can find me at bradthera on x or bradley thera getter and truth and uh the book is
00:52:19available at amazon thank you very much ben okay but there it is up on the screen america's 100
00:52:26years war how to win against communism great book um as i said i've got it here go online
00:52:33click on it today thanks to spencer a real america's voice vittorio santi franco for putting
00:52:39this show together and steve the man himself back in the chair 10 a.m tomorrow god bless for now
00:52:44If you're 65 or already on Medicare, listen up, folks, and grab a pen, maybe even a number two
00:52:52pencil. Call 845-WAR-ROOM. That's 845-WAR-ROOM. Call it right now. I'm serious. Call it.
00:53:00Now, here's why. The insurance companies and their lackeys in the Washington swamp have built a
00:53:05Medicare system designed to confuse you and rip you off. Rising premiums, denied claims,
00:53:12fine print nobody but a lobbyist understands. Millions of American seniors are paying too much
00:53:18and getting too little. And worst of all, most don't even know it. Hey, that could be you.
00:53:24That's why if you're already on Medicare or will be soon, you need to talk to our friends at
00:53:30Chapter. They have a team of advisors trained to serve American seniors, not the insurance companies.
00:53:35In under 20 minutes, they can find you the best plan for your needs at the lowest cost. Why?
00:53:42They're a data company. They have all the data on every plan. It's totally free. There's no pressure, no BS, just straightforward, honest help from fellow patriots. So don't wait. Call 845-WAR-ROOM right now. That's 845-WAR-ROOM. Tell them Bannon sent you.
00:54:00Now, listen, in the first couple of days of the launch of this company with the Warren Posse, Posse members saved tens and up to hundreds of thousands collectively of dollars in these fees.
00:54:11Go check it out today. That's chapter. Call 845-WAR-ROOM. Do it today.