Nikki Haley is in Iowa and is gaining ground in the polls, but is it enough to defeat Donald Trump in the first primary state on Tuesday? Is it possible for her to take the lead in New Hampshire? Is she the only candidate with momentum heading into the mid-term elections? And will she be able to hold on to her lead?
00:01:19.340Do you think somebody needs to drop out before New Hampshire primary takes place for Nikki Haley to make up those 15 points in order to win the state?
00:11:11.100You can support us because we're a small team.
00:11:14.040And we're doing our best to make sure that these things not just resonate, but they actually make an impact.
00:11:19.000And I think you've seen from what J.D. Vance said today, you know, directly channeling the editorial that I wrote just a couple of days ago.
00:11:41.900Kyle Cheney and Politico, I think it is, is that Colorado Supreme Court holds that Trump is disqualified.
00:11:48.000Disqualified from holding the presidency and therefore will not be on the Colorado ballot.
00:11:53.440Want to read this in this appeal from a district court proceeding under the Colorado Election Code.
00:11:58.580The Supreme Court considers whether former President Donald J.
00:12:01.560Trump may appear in the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot in 2024.
00:12:06.040Majority of the court holds that President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of the presidency under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
00:12:15.560Because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the election code for the Colorado Secretary of State to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot.
00:12:26.880The court stays its ruling until 4 January 2024, subject to any further appellate proceedings.
00:12:33.480People have to understand the ballots for the primary get printed, I think, on the 6th in Colorado.
00:12:41.320We're going to track down Mike Davis and maybe a couple other people and redo our program here to get on this.
00:12:47.660Remember, they won at the district court level, but it was appealed.
00:12:53.580It was appealed by the groups that brought it.
00:12:55.540That was overturned, it looks like, in Colorado, and they have declared that President Trump, the Colorado Appellate Court, actually Colorado Supreme Court has, let me just get this right, has ruled that the Colorado Supreme Court holds that Donald J.
00:13:11.220Trump is disqualified from holding the office of the presidency.
00:13:18.960Like I said, we're going to track down Mike Davis and maybe a couple, three of the other lawyers, Boris and others, that are working on this.
00:13:30.900Your thoughts on this, Raheem, you've covered this pretty closely also, your thoughts on this, particularly given the big push for Nikki Haley and others.
00:13:39.240This is just going to throw gasoline on the fire.
00:13:43.840Well, yeah, I'm just reading through it as well, Steve, right now.
00:13:46.480The mechanics of this should be quite obvious to people.
00:13:53.740There was always going to be some court.
00:13:55.960There was always going to be some group of people that tried to, you know, successfully ram this through.
00:14:00.780Obviously, we're going to see appeals against this.
00:14:06.820And you will end up in a situation where two sets of ballots have to be printed in advance so that the state is ready to be able to use either or when it comes to that date.
00:14:17.940I mean, we've spoken about this before.
00:14:19.760We've spoken to the same people about this before.
00:14:22.500The conflation of the phrase officer of the United States, as it is stipulated in the 14th Amendment, actually has no application to the president of the United States.
00:14:35.140And if it does, by the way, have application to the president of the United States, then there are a lot of other officers of the United States in the country's history that can be pulled up on different things here.
00:14:44.760So this this will obviously be looking into who is on that Colorado Supreme Court and how this decision has been made.
00:14:53.460But as you say, it is certainly significant breaking news this afternoon.
00:14:58.760And it's going to be driven by all the opponents.
00:15:02.180You're going to see the Sununas, everybody all over it.
00:15:04.080We're obviously going to get in front of this.
00:15:33.240So I think the first thing we discussed on Sunday when talking about this is how probably the biggest story over the weekend wasn't featured on the Sunday morning shows.
00:15:43.540They were all kind of leading with this with this CBS YouGov poll.
00:15:46.520The biggest story, I think, and I thought in the GOP primary from over the weekend was the fact that Jeff Rowe, the head of Never Back Down, backed out.
00:15:55.620The longstanding DeSantis and Youngkin and Adam Laxalt advisor packing it in is a pretty big deal.
00:16:33.860Immediately it struck me that the sample size was not big enough to make any serious takeaways from this poll.
00:16:40.640Well, the advertised sample size was something along the lines of 900.
00:16:46.360When you actually got to the question that, you know, whether or not people would want to vote for Nikki Haley, the sample size halved.
00:16:53.480And they didn't advertise that fact, which is, by the way, a really weird thing to do in polling.
00:16:57.520There's all sorts of tricks that you can deploy in polling.
00:16:59.380But you rarely ever see a sample size change within the same poll.
00:17:04.200So some, what I always say, jiggery-pokery going on there for sure by CBS and YouGov.
00:17:10.720The other part of it that stood out, however, there are several elements of that poll that weren't represented on the news as they started to report.
00:17:19.160Just the parts that they wanted to talk about in that.
00:17:21.600For instance, I'll give you an example.
00:17:23.660The sample size of independents and self-identified moderates was way out of whack from what you would usually see.
00:17:30.600They had actually oversampled independents and self-identified moderates in that poll, which led to a significant shift in not just the Nikki Haley numbers, but also other questions that they had asked in that poll.
00:17:42.620Questions related to abortion, questions related to other policy areas, questions related to immigration, so on and so forth.
00:17:49.140You saw them all shift from the last CBS YouGov poll, which I did a side-by-side comparison of.
00:17:55.480And just to give the audience an understanding of what it means to do a side-by-side comparison of crosstabs in a poll like this, well, each of those documents is about 130 pages long.
00:18:05.700And each page is just a swathe of percentage points and numbers across the page.
00:18:10.040So there I am on a Sunday morning going through about 260 pages of data and passing that down into this article that we got up in pretty good time, pretty short order.
00:18:20.300The other interesting thing about that poll that I found was that the way that they had reported it, the way that they had kind of tried to present it to people,
00:18:30.400was, oh, this is Nikki momentum, and it's very clear that she's stealing votes away from Donald Trump.
00:18:35.940Actually, Donald Trump didn't lose numbers in that poll.
00:18:40.160The numbers were coming from don't knows, Vivek, Christie, DeSantis, and so forth.
00:18:47.340And even their numbers showed that Trump's decided voter base was really not shifting.
00:18:59.280And so even if you accept the premise that Nikki Haley has momentum in New Hampshire, you have to therefore also accept the other premise found in that same poll that she has actually a pretty low ceiling.
00:20:04.340I live across the street from the mill, and I used to have a really great relationship with the management.
00:20:11.680In fact, they would even, you know, over any simple kind of press release or anything, they would give me a heads up, and they never mentioned to me at all.
00:20:18.340And, of course, they never checked in with the union, so that, to me, that tells two things.
00:20:22.940One, that they don't have to care what happens to the union, and two, with my reputation and my reputation.
00:20:35.140And, you know, so from my perspective, there must be one of two things, that they don't ever have to care about us much longer,
00:20:42.220and that they must have a very, very gold kind of parachute here as well.
00:21:21.260You've already had J.D. Vance come out, Josh Hawley has come out, Marco Rubioff come out.
00:21:26.360They've already sent a letter questioning this to want to slow this thing down and really look at it.
00:21:30.720What's your thoughts about the politics of it with neoliberal, neocon Nicky?
00:21:34.100Well, firstly, I'll say and do a little bit of an advertisement again.
00:21:41.140The National Pulse is issuing editorials now as the next step in our work in representing the news correctly and fairly and also driving the agenda.
00:21:55.540I think there is a serious gap in detailed analysis like this, not necessarily long analysis, by the way.
00:22:03.760We don't believe in that and in wasting people's time like that, but quick but detailed analysis on things like that.
00:22:11.000One of the ones that we're going to be reporting on over the next 24 hours is, quite frankly, that John Fetterman, for all his problems, for all of the silliness we saw over the course of his campaign,
00:22:24.620appears to be representing Pennsylvania residents far better than somebody like Dr. Oz would have done, especially when it comes to an issue like this.
00:22:33.520You've got to be able to accept, and you taught me this in a big way, Steve, when your opponents are flexing, when they're showing talent, when they're showing verve, when they're showing capability, and when they're outmanoeuvring you.
00:22:48.780And Barack Obama was very good at this.
00:22:51.540I remember, you know, listening to you back in the day on the old radio show talking about how Obama had been sidestepping and outmanoeuvring Republicans in Washington, D.C. on a day-to-day basis.
00:23:03.280And as far as sort of a left-leaning, you know, you may say, you may say, I don't think he even classes himself as a quote-unquote progressive, but certainly a left-leaning America first philosophy, you know, is, exists, as far as it exists.
00:23:22.460Then John Fetterman, you know, actually is showing quite a lot of verve there.
00:23:27.280He's at least leading the way for his party to take it away from foreign interests, to take it away from, you know, flying Palestinian flags in the streets, and actually to representing the interests of the American worker.
00:23:40.300And I think John Fetterman, not in an electoral sense, I don't mean it when I say this, but John Fetterman, at least in a philosophical sense and in an attraction to the policies that he's representing sense, is far more of an assailant to a right-leaning America first movement than somebody like Joe Biden.
00:23:56.500And frankly, it makes Nikki Haley look further to the left than him.
00:24:03.840You're going to have, your guy Upton is doing a big piece.
00:24:07.980It's going to break on National Pulse tomorrow to analyze all this, the former Treasury, over at Trump's Treasury Department.
00:24:37.040Yeah, that's what we're trying to do is outmaneuver them because they've got all of this cash, all the CNN billions and the Atlantic and all of these guys.
00:24:45.920And we have, you know, a couple of us, right, you know, this network, the RAV Posse and the War Room Posse and the National Pulse.
00:24:54.380So you can go to thenationalpulse.com forward slash war room.
00:25:50.180Now we're going to get into the U.S. deal, what is populist economics.
00:25:53.220One thing I can tell you that we oppose is the flooding of the fiscal irresponsibility, fiscal irresponsibility.
00:26:00.620That's the legislature and the executive branch passing and spending, doing these massive Keynesian infusions, named after John Maynard Keynes, the massive government intervention, these massive spending bills, the massive deficits, which just destroyed the dollar even more.
00:26:17.040And the fiat currency pumped in by the Federal Reserve, our central bank, which has been one of the issues in this republic from its foundings.
00:26:26.100The way you encounter that in your own personal life is understand, you have to understand, nobody's going to do it for you, only you, is precious metals, particularly gold.
00:26:35.540Why it's been a hedge in times of turbulence for mankind for 5,000 years of recorded history.
00:26:41.880Go to the team at Birchgold, birchgold.com slash Bannon to get the end of the dollar empire to talk to Philip Patrick and the team.
00:27:05.540Are you tired of progressive corporations and exhausted trying to keep up with all the virtue signaling when you're simply trying to buy products?
00:27:17.520Progressive corporate America continues to push messaging that further alienates conservative Americans, all while eroding the future of the American dream.
00:28:14.500Public Square is an app and website where you can get connected to tens of thousands of businesses from all different industries that share your value for life, family, and freedom.
00:28:24.560Whether you're looking to buy coffee, find a new athletic clothing that knows what a woman is, and shop for clean skin care, or simply find a new restaurant in your community that won't lecture you about your political views, PublicSQ.com is your resource.
00:28:40.900Public Square also offers discounts to many high-quality businesses on the platform so that you can actually receive incentive for spending money with companies that don't hate you.
00:28:50.940Public Square is free to join as a consumer or a business owner, and you can get started today at PublicSQ.com.
00:28:59.780Remember, either as a consumer or a business owner, download the app now.
00:29:11.200I know this is hard to believe, but we're up against another government shutdown later this month, and our wise leaders deal with it how they always do.
00:32:38.500But, Christy, I want to start with you on this particular issue.
00:32:41.020This is not the first state that there's been an attempt to be able to disqualify Trump being able to be on the ballot.
00:32:47.620But what's intriguing about it is that it's now being done in a way where the judicial system is having a say in terms of whether or not somebody can be on a ballot.
00:32:58.380Your thoughts about what we're hearing coming out of Colorado at this time?
00:33:01.500Well, it is an interesting decision because the Colorado District Judge, Sarah Wallace, last month, when she made her decision,
00:33:12.720she had a really puzzling decision where she found, based on the evidence, that Trump had engaged in insurrection,
00:33:19.720but essentially said, well, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, it doesn't apply to presidents.
00:33:26.020He's not an officer such that it applies to him, which was a really odd result.
00:33:33.760So when that was appealed, I think a lot of people had been scratching their heads and thought the appeal was appropriate.
00:33:39.100And, you know, I haven't read the basis of this, but it sounds like at least the Colorado Supreme Court said no.
00:33:45.820Actually, if he engaged in insurrection, yes, he is an officer and the 14th Amendment would apply to him.
00:33:52.680It would be a perverse result otherwise to have it apply to members of Congress and others in lower elected officials
00:33:59.040and not to the president of the United States.
00:34:01.680So it sounds like Colorado Supreme Court got it right in finding that this should apply to the president
00:34:08.080and presumably determines that the factual findings of the district court and finding that he engaged in the insurrection were upheld.
00:34:18.360So it is a result that is interesting.
00:34:21.960It is a result that seems like the right result.
00:34:24.480The big question will be whether or not it holds, because this is surely going to the U.S. Supreme Court.
00:34:29.540And I have a lot less confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will decide that Donald Trump should be disqualified from the ballot,
00:34:37.300given that conservative majority on that court.
00:34:40.420Because only the trial court judge gets to see the witnesses as they testify,
00:34:45.820assesses their demeanor and reaches factual findings.
00:34:49.900So the fact that the trial court judge, in the estimation of the Colorado Supreme Court,
00:34:55.180got the legal conclusion wrong and the Colorado Supreme Court basically reviewed that de novo from jump
00:35:04.440and reached a different conclusion, that's one thing.
00:35:09.060But the fact that we have these factual findings from a trial court should, frankly, continue to win the day
00:35:15.240up through the appellate court system, up to and including the Supreme Court.
00:35:19.960Because as long as those factual findings are supported by evidence of record, and they were,
00:35:26.920you know, this is going to be a real danger zone now moving forward for Donald Trump.
00:38:43.760She donated to an anti-Trump January 6th PAC in October after the Democrat governor named her as a judge in August.
00:38:53.760Two months later, while she's waiting to take the bench in January, she donated to this anti-Trump January 6th PAC to chase Republicans out of office.
00:39:06.480So she set this up for the Colorado Supreme Court.
00:39:09.200She said that – she found that there was somehow an insurrection on January 6th, even though they were unarmed, right?
00:39:14.760And then she said that the president is not an officer under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
00:39:20.980So it was very easy to tee this up for the seven Democrat appointees on the Colorado Supreme Court, seven of seven Democrat appointees.
00:39:29.180And so it was very easy for these four most radical Democrat partisans on the Colorado Supreme Court to say, you know what?
00:39:35.920We're going to go with her factual finding that there was an insurrection, but we're going to reverse her legal finding that Section 3 does not apply.
00:39:42.680We're going to ignore the precedent from 150 years ago that in order to disqualify, you have to have a federal criminal statute and a federal criminal conviction.
00:39:50.960And we're just going to take him off the ballot.
00:39:52.860Now it goes from the Colorado Supreme Court.
00:39:56.640There's going to be probably an emergency cert petition to the Supreme Court of the United States.
00:40:03.220The Supreme Court does not have to take this case.
00:40:14.000Why do you believe the Supreme Court cannot ignore this case?
00:40:18.360Because if these Democrats, partisan prosecutors and attorneys and judges and juries and these Democrat hellholes think that they get to decide this next election through their bogus impeachments, two bogus impeachments,
00:40:32.820their four bogus indictments for non-crimes, their bogus civil fraud lawsuit in New York to bankrupt Trump for the non-fraud of paying back sophisticated Wall Street banks in full-on time as agreed with interest,
00:40:47.840there are two illegal gag orders that you would do in China and not in the United States.
00:40:53.620That's all Trump's now beating President Biden like a drum on November 5th, 2024.
00:40:58.140If the Democrats think, okay, now our legal Hail Mary is to go to these Democrat judges and just take them off the ballot so the American people don't have a choice,
00:41:07.480these are republic-ending tactics by the Democrats.
00:41:10.880There is no way in hell this is going to fly with the American people.
00:41:14.560And if the Supreme Court of the United States wants our country to devolve into a third-world Marxist hellhole, then they won't do a damn thing about this.
00:41:25.100But if they actually want to use their lifetime tenure, their pay protection, and actually find their backbones and follow the law,
00:41:33.000including 150 years of controlling precedent on this point that Congress must pass a federal criminal statute to disqualify,
00:41:41.080if they're not going to do that, we're not going to have a country left.
00:41:46.540I want to go to – so if the Supreme Court doesn't do it, is there any other way to get this reversed?
00:41:51.940Given in Colorado, the Supreme Court 4-3 with the four radical Democrat judges voting to remove Trump
00:41:58.620and said that Trump reversed the decision of the actual – the left-winger that held the trial.
00:42:26.120He's not going to win Colorado anyway.
00:42:27.480But then you're going to see Minnesota and Michigan and New Hampshire and these other states take another crack at taking them off the ballot in these swing states.
00:42:36.660And if they think that they're just going to take Trump off the ballots and in key swing states and President Biden or Gavin Newsom
00:42:44.100or whoever the hell the Democrats run in 2024, if they think that they're just going to let that Democrat win by default,
00:42:50.900even though President Trump has the support of the American people, this is not going to fly.
00:43:18.640He was instrumental in in the White House.
00:43:21.300He was the White House counsel for the vice president time.
00:43:24.440He was on the committee with me to select the Supreme Court nominees.
00:43:29.880And you work very closely with that team, Mike.
00:43:34.040There's pressure now about Justice Thomas recusing himself in these issues that are coming for the court on J6.
00:43:42.140Do you feel confident that Roberts and these other will be able to take the pressure?
00:43:47.180Because I mean, enormous pressure to try to mold that even if it goes to the Supreme Court to try to mold the court.
00:43:52.340So they have a liberal majority or the pencil necks like Roberts to make the decisions here, sir.
00:43:59.260There's no chance in hell that Justice Clarence Thomas should recuse from any of these cases.
00:44:03.720There is a presumption that Supreme Court justices do not recuse from cases, unlike the lower federal courts,
00:44:11.400where recusal is easier because you can interchange judges.
00:44:16.500You can bring in judges from all over the country.
00:44:18.660You can't do that with the Supreme Court.
00:44:20.780So there is a presumption that they do not recuse.
00:44:23.460And why the hell should Justice Clarence Thomas have to recuse because of his wife's personal political views that she's held for her entire adult life long before?
00:44:33.840She was a Republican activist long before she met Clarence Thomas.
00:44:37.940She was a Republican activist long before Clarence Thomas went on the Supreme Court.
00:44:42.360And the Senate conforms him anyway, knowing this.
00:44:44.760So why the hell should he have to recuse?
00:44:46.500And if it's the standard that these people need to recuse based upon their spouse, then why the hell is Jack Smith not recused as special counsel?
00:44:54.160Because his wife is a Democrat partisan activist, an Obama supporter, a Biden supporter.
00:45:00.680She donated to these political campaigns.
00:45:03.180She produced a documentary for Michelle Obama.
00:45:06.280If that's the standard, if your spouse's political views is now the new standard, there are a lot of judges and a lot of prosecutors who have to recuse.
00:46:03.740We've warned people that these radicals in Colorado, that this might be a possibility, even though we won at the district level against a radical.
00:46:18.000The Supreme Court, these radicals in the Colorado Supreme Court, wrote up this long, long opinion and put out what they want to happen,
00:46:24.540which is sort of their wish list to have President Trump off the ballot.
00:46:27.760But then they said not to disrupt the status quo.
00:46:31.620Their own decision has stayed until January 4th.
00:46:35.000But if the president appeals to the United States Supreme Court, which, as we said in the statement last several minutes, will happen absolutely,
00:46:44.940then the state continues indefinitely until the Supreme Court rules.
00:46:50.500Now, and very important to point out that in Colorado, January 5th is when ballots are printed.
00:47:08.900Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme Court, we stay our ruling until January 4th, 2024,
00:47:17.500the day before the secretary's deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot.
00:47:22.320If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires in January 4th, 2024,
00:47:27.100then the stay shall remain in place, and the secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot
00:47:34.400until the receipt of any order and mandate from the Supreme Court.
00:47:38.140So what you see there is these terrible, woke, runaway liberals with a horrific opinion, over 200 pages of nonsense,
00:47:48.480and then they say, well, we actually don't have any power, and it's all up to the United States Supreme Court.
00:47:54.300And right now, as of this moment, the district court decision controls because there's a stay in the appellate court,
00:48:00.940and that decision keeps President Trump on the ballot.
00:48:03.220So the hysteria from the left-wing media, CNN, oh, big day in history, wrong.
00:48:09.200These liberals not only got everything wrong, they were so gutless, they didn't even stand behind their own decision.
00:48:16.960What do you anticipate, Christie, Neocon, Nikki, Sununu, Fox, Murdoch News,
00:48:23.060they're going to be dancing on Trump's grave on this, are they not, sir, trying to turn it into something?
00:48:27.100Let them dance, just like the Florida governor tried to dance after the corrupt, horrible, weaponized Manhattan D.A. indictment in March,
00:48:36.280only putting another nail in the coffin of his own, at that point, non-existent campaign,
00:48:40.520where Ron DeSantis made a stupid joke about President Trump when the woke radical D.A. Bragg indicted him in Manhattan.
00:48:47.460If these neocons, if these rhinos, if these pretenders want to do a dance, let them.
00:48:53.120The MAGA Republican Party, the war room posse, the Trump Party are only going to disdain them more and more and more.
00:49:01.560President Trump's already at about 70, 75, only going up from here.
00:49:05.020Unless this weaponization and targeting of law enforcement is allowed to take place,
00:49:14.700but President Trump will never back down.
00:49:17.000He'll continue to fight, and he will absolutely not cow-dow or cower to these four radical judges in Colorado.
00:49:26.160We'll go to the United States Supreme Court, and every federal court that's ruled on this pathetic election interference attempt so far
00:49:33.760has ruled against the radical Democrats and for President Trump,
00:49:38.220who's going to be on the ballot in every state, will win the election,
00:49:42.600and will walk back into the Oval Office, Jan 20, 2025.
00:49:48.240Boris, your social media people are going to want to follow you tonight. Where do they go?
00:49:52.100No doubt. BorisCP.com is the website. It's hot. BorisCP.com.
00:49:55.460Hot on the getter at BorisCP. Twitter at BorisCP.
00:49:57.960True social, hot at Boris. Hottest on the gram, Boris underscore Epstein.
00:50:01.360But stay strong. Do not cower. All offense. And God bless.
00:50:08.360Boris, thank you very much. I'll be up on getter all night.
00:50:11.100Also, tomorrow morning at 10 when we come back. We're going to be all over this.
00:50:14.120I'll have Mike Davis. We'll be breaking it all down.
00:50:16.540Very important, particularly how Nicky and these guys try to spin it.
00:50:19.700Let me go to Ashton Hanson. We just left Amfest.
00:50:23.500I've got Raynor Jackson's got a report of what happened on the border and at Phoenix Airport.
00:50:28.960I want to hold that for tomorrow because I don't want to rush it. It's too important.
00:50:32.180Raynor, one of the top voices in MAGA, saw things that were unbelievable and only he can report it.
00:50:38.180Ashton, tell us, coming out of there, the spirit, the energy, walk me through what you do for Turning Point.
00:50:44.660And what did you think of the overall Amfest?
00:50:47.960Hi, Steve. Thank you so much for having me on.
00:50:50.720I'm president and founder of the Williamson County Activism Hub in Franklin, Tennessee.
00:50:56.680So what I do is I lead the Activism Hub. We have different events every month with keynote speakers.
00:51:05.880Having that many people who are like-minded and similar age to me in just one space over four days is fantastic.
00:51:14.140You can't find anything like that anywhere else.
00:51:16.800I mean, the fact that I could just walk anywhere and try to give up a conversation with anybody and we would be able to converse about different ideas and ideologies and be able to respectfully have each other on a level that we understand, even though we have differing opinions about something, we can still respect each other.
00:51:36.940Another key aspect is being able to see speakers that we have never been able to see in person.
00:51:45.120I mean, being able to see Charlie Kirk or Mike Lindell or even you in person is fantastic because that's something that would be unattainable for someone like me.
00:51:55.320Otherwise, I'm just a college student.
00:51:57.520I'm not going to Washington, D.C. on a daily basis or I'm not going to the Capitol building.
00:52:02.520And the energy, the atmosphere, the amount of people that were there, it's unexplainable.