On today's show, Steve is joined by Natalie Winters in Palm Beach, Florida, Jeff Clark in West Palm Beach and Jillian Barbary of Done With Debt to talk about why you should get back on track with your finances.
00:01:32.320Jillian, this is the second anniversary for Done With Debt as a sponsor and now more than ever as the deteriorating financial condition for working class people.
00:01:41.740This is the reverse side of why Donald Trump is winning these votes.
00:01:45.860And this is why these low-propensity voters, there's such a massive outreach.
00:01:49.220These are the exact people that are going to turbocharge our movement.
00:01:54.060What can Done With Debt, the company and your process, do for folks so they don't actually have to declare bankruptcy, ma'am?
00:02:04.400You and Dr. Navarro had the, I think, greatest conversation, the cost of living.
00:02:08.300How about add on to that death, IRS problems, disease, in my case breast cancer, divorce, anything that comes up that is unexpected and it just throws your life into a tizzy.
00:07:11.760We've managed to cannibalize every C4 within a thousand-mile radius of Las Vegas, whether that's American majority, whether that's turning point action.
00:07:22.300We've got all hands on deck here to ensure that Nevada gets delivered to Trump.
00:07:32.080I know you can't talk about the independents, but is you guys, I take it, are enormously happy coming out of the early voting?
00:07:39.580And then tell me about the mass mobilization, because we've got to represent next Tuesday.
00:07:45.160Well, we still have two days of early voting.
00:07:47.440Early voting goes through tomorrow night.
00:07:50.160And then what we have is we have mail-in ballots.
00:07:53.860Don't forget that in 2020, the Nevada legislature actually decriminalized ballot harvesting.
00:08:00.440So we are doing everything to ballot harvest, whether they want to call it voter assistance or voter registry or whatever they want to call it.
00:08:09.400The bottom line is we are harvesting ballots.
00:09:52.540You're one of the hardest workers I know, and that says – we know a lot of them here at the War Room, and you're just amazing.
00:09:57.260So it blows me away, these people that are in these states, Jeff, that just jump on it, and they're game-changers, right?
00:10:05.240She's one, and you just see the energy, all of it.
00:10:09.000I want to go – do we have the clip of – before we play that, and Natalie's going to jump in here, Politico.
00:10:19.120Politico is kind of one of the – the axiots in Politico are kind of the inside baseball, but it's the way the apparatus kind of thinks.
00:10:26.700Politico has a story, and I hate these stories.
00:10:29.960I hate these stories because they – we haven't won, and we've got so much work to do to even win, but they're already saying who's going to be in Harris' cabinet, who's going to be in Trump's.
00:10:38.140They put you in the top tier, Politico, for attorney general.
00:10:43.520What is that – they're trying to set you up for a target?
00:10:45.700They're trying to have people melt down?
00:11:01.140As you said on Monday, the focus has to be on getting President Trump across the finish line and getting Congress – both houses of Congress this time.
00:11:16.160Let's play Jamie Raskin, and we're going to bring in Natalie Winters and Jeff Clark.
00:11:19.980But the court is not going to save us, and so that means the only thing that really works is people in motion amending the Constitution.
00:11:29.220But again, it's necessary, but it's not sufficient because what can be put into the Constitution can slip away from you very quickly.
00:11:36.520And the greatest example going on right now before our very eyes is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which they're just disappearing with a magic wand as if it doesn't exist, even though it could not be clearer what it's stating.
00:11:49.740And so they want to kick it to Congress, so it's going to be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified.
00:12:00.320And then we need bodyguards for everybody in civil war conditions, all because the nine justices, not all of them, but these justices who have not many cases to look at every year, not that much work to do, a huge staff, great protection, simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th Amendment means.
00:12:22.560And I'm glad that Sherilyn's creating her new center so we can bring that back to life, even as we're continuing to amend the Constitution, as Professor Hassan has invited us to do.
00:12:58.960Yeah, I mean, there's no upside, right, to underestimating the force that these people operate with.
00:13:04.820And they're not just, you know, isolated, siloed entities of people.
00:13:08.740They work in convergence to the point that they're all busy hosting special secretive Zoom calls and events with active secretaries of states who are responsible for overseeing the votes of millions of Americans.
00:13:22.000But in case the audience didn't pick up on that pretty blatant and, dare I say, bombshell buried lead in that clip we just played, he says, it's going to be up to us on January 6th, 2025, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs he's disqualified.
00:13:40.520I mean, not only imagine the double standard that you would hear had President Trump said that.
00:13:44.900But look, Steve, I think it also goes to something that we saw in the second iteration of the Transition Integrity Project, which you didn't get the first time around, which is this idea of seeking pre-commitments to essentially hold the line against Trump post-electoral victory, which is a change of tone and tune than what we saw in 2020.
00:14:06.860And there's been extensive reporting and profile pieces about how election officials at the local and state level are not necessarily just going to cooperate or go along with certifying election results.
00:14:19.980And I think in some ways, though it's great that we've seen so much momentum in terms of the grassroots, particularly down in Georgia, right, pushing to extend the deadlines for ballot certification, in some ways I could also see how narrative-wise that comes and ends up kind of, you know,
00:14:36.340biting us and not hurting us, it's a noble charge to make, but you could see how Jamie Raskin, right, will weaponize these concepts that election integrity activists have been fighting for for so long.
00:14:48.240And the last and most important point on this, which I think I would bring Jeff in on, is, right, you're seeing DHS memo after DHS memo saying that, you know, foreign disinformation is the number one threat.
00:14:59.720But of course, disinformation, or rather domestic extremists here at home in the form of MAGA, you know, that's what we're focusing all our resources on, particularly people who want to question the results of elections.
00:15:12.400And I think it's really interesting when you see the entire apparatus of the Biden regime going after people like that, because in the same news cycle, the stories that you think they would be amplifying, whether it's the fact that ballot boxes are burning in the Pacific Northwest, or Democratic Senate operatives are being caught tampering with ballot boxes in Montana in the dark of night, they're giving absolutely zero coverage to any of that.
00:15:39.380And the people who are playing around with ballot boxes, they can't say they're doing it because they're concerned about election integrity, they set up a whole outpost at the DOJ under Pamela Carlin to go after people who dared to stand outside, right, these ballot boxes, the same Pamela Carlin, whose Stanford Center just got, I think, $30 million to lead the charge in concert with the Transition Integrity Project to work to reform the Supreme Court.
00:16:04.260So, Jeff, I'm just curious to bring you and your thoughts on the severity that these comments by Jamie Raskin pose.
00:16:23.880And according to leaks to the New York Times, to Liptac, the reporter there, you know, they were essentially, you know, trying to close this off back in March.
00:16:34.720And it seems like, you know, several of the justices in the in the five to six justice majority got off of that train.
00:16:43.020And so what they did was they said they couldn't take Trump off the ballot in Colorado.
00:17:08.780But, you know, that would have been a much more opportune time to close this off.
00:17:13.160If we get to the point where Trump wins and Jamie Raskin pulls this dangerous maneuver where he recognizes he's even going to have to have protection and guards, you know, which I think, you know, he doesn't really have as big a threat as he thinks he does.
00:17:26.560But that he wants to portray it as MAGA, you know, wants to to kill him in his bed.
00:17:31.580Then, you know, we're we're we're in a world where the Supreme Court's going to have to decide an emergency case.
00:17:37.580And they could have decided this back in March.
00:17:39.900And particularly Amy Coney Barrett, she wasn't even happy with the fact that they said a new statute would have to be passed in order to operationalize Section 3 under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment.
00:17:59.100How does it tie to their first effort to take Trump off the ballot?
00:18:02.600And what Raskin says, well, you took him off the ballot, but that doesn't mean he's actually certifiable to be president of the United States.
00:18:20.740What does Section 3 of the 14th Amendment say that's so explosive?
00:18:25.420It says that, you know, if you have engaged in insurrection and you're on a certain list of officials, that then you are barred from holding office under the United States.
00:18:37.100The problem is that the president, one big problem, and I wrote about this and appeared on your show about it, is the president is not on the list.
00:18:44.780So it talks about senators, it talks about representatives, and, you know, the president's absent from that.
00:18:50.700There are a lot of different arguments that President Trump employed.
00:18:53.480The argument that the Supreme Court ultimately adopted to, you know, invalidate what Colorado had said to try to keep him off the ballot was if a state can decide for its own sake that it thinks an insurrection happened and it stops someone from running for president, you're going to have a patchwork where President Trump is on some ballots and not other ones.
00:19:15.400And all of the justices agreed with that point.
00:19:18.580That was not 9-0, which is a tremendous victory.
00:19:21.900Then five justices said that in order to actually try to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment that has this insurrectionist bar in it, under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, Congress would have to pass a new statute.
00:19:38.000And that's what peeled off Amy Coney Barrett.
00:19:40.180She's like, we don't need to reach that question.
00:19:44.020But then there's a further question, which is what happens on January 6th of 2025?
00:19:48.500And if Hakeem Jeffries controls the House, what Jamie Raskin is signaling is that they're going to say, well, we are Congress, we are the House, and we are going to not vote to allow him to be certified as president because he's an insurrectionist.
00:20:05.980We're interpreting Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for ourselves.
00:20:09.240That's clearly going to lead to a major emergency Supreme Court case.
00:20:13.800And what I was trying to point out is that the bud on this could have been nipped back in March.
00:20:19.320But in not doing it, Roberts, these guys are not dumb.
00:20:24.180Roberts knew this was going to come up.
00:20:26.540He's signaling that – isn't he signaling that he's open to this, open to this argument?
00:20:30.720I think he's signaling that he's open to the argument and the others –
00:20:34.560Isn't that pretty scary in and of itself?
00:21:02.560Well, she's one of them, but you'd have to have one other person at least who was kind of leery and wanted to peel off, and we don't know who that is.
00:21:11.620I want to go back to the 14th Amendment for a second.
00:21:14.440The movie Lincoln, I think it was about the 13th and 14th Amendment.
00:21:18.100The Reconstruction Amendment is the 13th, 14th, and 15th.
00:21:29.940The fighting of the armies ended in Appomattox.
00:21:32.660But as we study war, World War I or II, you realize there are many things in putting together, quote-unquote, the peace that either extend the war or the issues they thought were solved by armed conflict turn out to come back.
00:21:47.300Lincoln principally wanted to do this because – and people don't understand this.
00:21:53.180That's why I think the movie Lincoln was so powerful.
00:21:54.920The Emancipation Proclamation was just an executive order.
00:21:59.700So when Trump is doing his executive orders on the border and Biden comes in and the first day takes out all the executive orders because they only go for the term of the president, and he's opened the border and we have 15 million, this is what Lincoln had to deal with in his efforts to have freed the slaves, right?
00:22:15.340The Emancipation Proclamation was – if they had lost, he realized that it was going to have to – it would run out.
00:22:24.080He needed an amendment to the Constitution and slavery.
00:22:28.060The 14th Amendment was then about the Reconstruction itself, correct?
00:22:32.880And the main things it guarantees are a due process and equal protection for people, right?
00:22:38.800So this is the source of not being able to discriminate against people because they're freed slaves, they're blacks, and then ultimately the Supreme Court would extend that to no discrimination against people for their gender.
00:22:48.540And also discrimination against all other kinds of racial groups like the Chinese with the railroads in the 19th century.
00:22:54.700But this is also the controversy of – you talk about the insurrection.
00:23:49.680That section says that Congress can enforce the provisions of the 14th Amendment by passing new statutes.
00:23:55.880So it's that provision that the Supreme Court hangs its hat on to say if you're going to try to disqualify someone like President Trump from running for the presidency, you're going to need a statute to do that.
00:24:08.180And you're going to need essentially a due process finding that he qualifies as an insurrectionist, and you don't have any of that.
00:24:45.760And why wouldn't Jack Smith come out on November 6th, the day after the election, if Trump wins and give a superseding indictment that had Trump for a thing?
00:24:56.740Then he gets Jamie – my point is the part about they have to pass other legislation is not – is take it – is not operational because Jack Smith's –
00:25:08.960driving the narrative, and President Trump won't be seated, won't be the president until noon on the 20th, if then, because Raskin said that's not going to happen, but you indict him for – you broaden out in a superseding indictment.
00:25:20.740And Jamie Raskin just points, well, hey, a grand jury indicted Trump on three counts, right?
00:25:27.380And Jack Smith's gone back with a superseding indictment, has got more charges, and they indict him because there's a D.C. grand jury, and he's got to go to trial.
00:25:35.520So I think Lord knows what Jack Smith will do.
00:25:39.480I think that he will be off the chain if Kamala Harris looks like she has some shot of this through.
00:25:49.080What I'm saying though is if there's some chance that Kamala Harris could squeak in because of the Raskin maneuver, then he might be led off the chain.
00:25:56.960He might do another – he's already done one superseding indictment.
00:25:59.860He might do another one, and yeah, I think that would give like some extra oomph to Jamie Raskin arguing on January 6th that he could – that the House can refuse to certify Trump.
00:26:11.240Look, this whole theory of the insurrection goes back to the second impeachment.
00:26:15.000They found essentially that Trump engaged in insurrection there.
00:26:18.380So the House has already done this, right?
00:26:20.440This would just be them doing the same thing again if Hakeem Jeffries is in charge.
00:26:24.540And so I think in terms of what Jack Smith is up to, right, it's – the problem he's going to have, Steve, is the Supreme Court's immunity decision.
00:27:22.380They now want to use the technology behind Bitcoin for their own Orwellian purposes, their gold to dominate our economy by forcing everyone to use central bank digital currencies, which they control.
00:27:34.940Imagine your every purchase being called into question, your every move tracked, like you live in a communist country.
00:27:41.840This is not the America we want, but it is the America they want to create.
00:29:37.460I want to warn you of a huge change that could be coming to our money in our bank accounts.
00:29:43.240First, think back to 9-11, shortly after the government pushed through the Patriot Act.
00:29:47.260This gave the government power to spy on innocent Americans by monitoring our phone and email and tracking our movement across the Internet.
00:29:56.120Now, Jim Rickards, editor of the independent financial newsletter Strategic Intelligence and New York Times bestselling author,
00:30:03.220is warning about a coming event that could elevate this governmental surveillance to a terrifying new level.
00:30:09.340In fact, some of the guests I've had on The War Room believe that the government will soon expand their powers to track our every move.
00:30:16.720If we say the wrong things on social media, donate to the wrong causes, buy firearms, or even vote MAGA,
00:30:23.760the government may be able to shut us out of our bank accounts.
00:30:27.760I can't say for sure if this will happen, but it's an interesting and dire warning.
00:30:33.280Fortunately, Jim Rickards, an American patriot and friend of mine, has made it his mission to educate us on what he believes is coming
00:30:40.020and how to protect yourself from the possibility of programmable money.
00:30:45.600Watch Jim's warning video now, before it's censored like I've been in the past.
00:30:53.380That's RickardsWarRoom.com now to see the video.
00:30:56.860All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth.
00:31:14.500War Room Battleground with Stephen K. Bannon.
00:31:17.080You are back in the War Room, where I think we're going to be at the tip of the spear when it comes to all things color revolution.
00:31:27.360I know some people want to downplay it, but like I said, there's no upside to doing that in the same way that I think it was Victoria Newland,
00:31:35.340the recent star on Rachel Maddow's program just this Monday, said F the EU and that leaked phone call.
00:31:41.560They want to do so much damn worse to the MAGA movement should they be reelected, right?
00:31:48.840And I think that what we're talking about right now, particularly what's going on in Colorado, this lawfare approach, it's laid out.
00:31:56.500And I want to just flag something, like I said earlier on War Room today, there was a very important story in the New York Times that was authored by two of the leading comparative politics professor types up at, of course, Harvard.
00:32:10.780And they went through basically the path that you can take to countering the authoritarian rise of dictators and the style of President Trump.
00:32:19.940And the first thing that they said they would do would be to try to keep them off the ballot.
00:32:24.100Obviously, that failed and make no mistake that what happened out in Colorado was ran through the Brennan Center, which is the same group that now hosts one of the leaders of the Transition Integrity Project, in addition to being one of the clients of Judge Juan Mershon's daughter.
00:32:40.000But then after they get basically people from, say, whether it's establishment wings of the Republican Party to come and join the opposition candidate, in this case, it's Kamala Harris, what they're left with and what they say their basically plan is to be to wage war against President Trump should he win.
00:32:57.260They're reliant upon civil society, religious institutions and labor unions.
00:33:02.680And I just want to link this back to a story that I'm sure this audience is very well versed in.
00:33:07.540That was the whole Time Magazine profile piece that said what we said for years.
00:33:13.220Of course, we were dismissed as conspiracy theorists, but it proved, right, that the labor unions, big business all conspired to prevent a Trump victory.
00:33:21.700And you think they're just going to let Trump win again?
00:33:25.540But you already are starting to see this, shall we call it, an insurrection materialize, right, in the sense that, remember, just a month ago, the labor unions, they failed to endorse any political candidate, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of their rank-and-file members, upwards of 60%, supported President Trump, right?
00:33:47.140You're already starting to see the sort of fractures within the window pane that is the establishment signal and indicate to you that they're going to support Kamala Harris, despite what their rank-and-file members say.
00:34:01.840So when you see all of these issues converge together, and now you have Jamie Raskin feeling comfortable to say out loud that we're heading towards civil war conditions because they're going to ignore what happened on November 5th.
00:34:15.120They're going to treat January 6th like their attempt to actually hold a coup, to actually stage an insurrection.
00:34:20.980I think we need to take these threats extremely seriously.
00:34:23.840And I'll toss it back to Steve and Jeff to either pick up where I left off or add some more.
00:34:29.940No, I think she – so as you look at the playing field, you're one of the smartest, toughest lawyers I know.
00:35:16.760But even if it's one seat, we have to control the House.
00:35:20.920If we don't control the House, tell me potentially what you believe he can do.
00:35:25.360I think that what he does is he works with Hakeem Jeffries, and when the joint session of Congress is called into session, gaveled into session under the new version of the Electoral Count Act on January 6th of 2025,
00:35:41.420you know, they would have a problem with trying to use the Kamala Harris maneuver, the same maneuver that they, you know, said couldn't possibly be used by Mike Pence.
00:35:50.160That's because of those changes to the Electoral Count Act, although I do think there are serious questions about whether –
00:37:11.020We've got to get on top of these seats in New York.
00:37:13.060That's one of the reasons Trump did the Madison Square Garden.
00:37:14.980And before we get to that, the certification process, what concerns you and what should we – let's triage this.
00:37:24.140What concerns you on the election integrity issues that they're going to try to do to try to either delegitimize Trump, nullify his election or, quite frankly, steal it?
00:37:49.260So the UOCAVA statute, this is a statute for – that was largely thought to be for military forces that were overseas.
00:37:56.700And if I take people back to the 2000 election, you know, with Bush v. Gore, you know, there were lots of allegations that they were trying to undercount the military vote in Florida so they could skew things in favor of Gore.
00:38:11.280Now things have gone in the other direction.
00:38:13.400They want to use UOCAVA and they want to have people vote who may not, you know, be able to be tied to a particular state.
00:38:22.980They're just sort of vouching that they have some kind of tie.
00:38:25.160Anyway, it's a system that needs to be reformed.
00:38:28.560And if President Trump becomes president, I think it will be reformed.
00:38:31.320But right now it's too loose of a process and it can be abused.
00:38:36.040And they always have new schemes, right?
00:38:38.860And they've definitely already made use of what we call Biden bucks, right?
00:38:42.800So in the 2020 election, there was Zucker bucks where Zuckerberg spends with his wife $400 million with this Center for Tech and Civic Life.
00:38:51.160And they go in and they essentially privatize, get out the vote operations, working largely with the blue cities.
00:38:58.560So they spread the money around to some red counties, but they focus the money on the big blue urban areas.
00:39:04.660And they drove, you know, turnout and votes, you know, in major numbers.
00:39:09.480And then third, you know, obviously we're still we still have all these mail-in ballot problems.
00:39:15.260And we did not have as, you know, was a big feature of my trial, actually see my bar trial.
00:39:20.640There was no signature verification done at all, with just a handful of exceptions, excuse me, in Fulton County.
00:39:28.280So, you know, people come in with mail-in ballots and, you know, once the connection is broken between the envelope and the ballot, you can't go back and undo that.
00:39:37.380You have to do the signature verification right at the point when that ballot arrives.
00:39:41.040There was also a lot of testimony of the fact that when the mail-in ballots came back and there was an audit of that process, there were entire stacks of ballots that had no folds, no creases, which meant they weren't mailed.
00:39:52.540Somehow they were injected into the process.
00:39:54.480I think they're going to use that old technique of fraud because we still haven't gotten full control over, you know, enforcing signature verification.
00:40:02.880And you have people like Mark Elias who's going to go screaming into court and saying this is a, you know, vote suppression operation if you complain about that.
00:40:10.100What is what is in the few minutes we got left?
00:40:12.200Mark Elias, he's now been retained by their campaign.
00:40:46.940Talk to me about your fear of the black box.
00:40:49.660Yeah, I mean, look, he has a massive team, right?
00:40:55.160He was at a big law firm and they basically kicked him out because he has issues, you know,
00:41:00.720but he is built using, you know, billionaire donor money, especially, I think, from Silicon Valley, a massive operation again.
00:41:08.000So he's got the equivalent of his own law firm plus NGOs.
00:41:11.600He can litigate in all of the battleground states simultaneously with massive teams.
00:41:15.600And one of the things they've done, Steve, obviously, with this weaponization of the bar process, they've gone after the conservative attorneys.
00:41:23.960None of the big law firms will work for Trump.
00:41:25.980They're all woke-ified or, you know, black rock-ified.
00:41:49.600Actually, I miss being at my big law firm where I could call on a team of, you know, some smart Supreme Court clerks and some smart trial lawyers, right?
00:41:58.700You know, the kind of structure that we have on our side, we're just woefully sort of outmanned and outgunned by Mark Elias and the money he has behind him, Steve.
00:42:08.380How do people keep up with you, social media, all of it?
00:42:10.720Because now, you know, you and McGinley are now going to come to the forefront.
00:42:14.080We've got the massive get-out-the-vote operation, the mass mobilization.
00:42:17.580But very quickly, in the next four or five days, we're going to shift the focus to you guys, the legal warriors that have to secure this and have to – we're going to have to close legally to get to high noon on the 20th of January.
00:42:33.140And, folks, to the opposition, they just look at 5 November.
00:42:36.620Tuesday is just another – that's kind of a day, but it's still the second quarter.
00:42:41.200We're not even at the halftime for those folks.
00:43:31.020Now, the thing is – okay, just to give you a quick preview, that, you know, what they're trying to say on the other side is, oh, you know, it doesn't authorize troops to use lethal force, but it authorizes military intelligence.
00:43:57.440One, it's quite funny that we bring up that story because in the Washington Post's long-form fact check trying to, I guess, shall we say pre-bunk Jeff Clark's forthcoming paper, guess who they cited to say that the story is completely bogus?
00:44:12.960None other than Rosa Brooks, the founder of the Transition Integrity Project.
00:44:18.360And this also goes back to a story that we broke, Steve, here on The War Room, I believe, two months ago.
00:44:24.600I think Jeff was actually in studio with me when I broke it, which had to do with changes that they had to Defense Department directives in 2016, 2020, and then just late September 2024, where it basically alluded to them in some specific cases authorizing the use of assassinations against American citizens.
00:44:45.680Of course, given what happened to President Trump, I would say the timing of that is particularly curious.
00:44:50.680But look, Steve, it goes back to what I think we've been really hammering on this show, especially in light of everything that John Kelly and Mark Milley have come out trying to smear President Trump as a fascist, right?
00:45:01.040They're giving you the signs right now that the military is an institution that they're extremely worried about handing over to President Trump, right?
00:45:08.880And should he win, I think that they will use stories like this, the John Kelly narratives, to sort of lay the pretext that President Trump shouldn't be allowed, shouldn't be empowered to choose who his generals are.
00:45:20.960And like I always say, they're not actually pissed off that President Trump wants generals like Hitler.
00:45:26.540They're pissed off that he wants his own generals to begin with, right, that deviate from the permanent political class, that deviate from politics as usual in Washington, D.C.
00:45:37.000That was why you saw the first impeachment of him to begin with.
00:48:19.920Because that will give us the victory that we then have to pass on to the Boris Epsteins, the Jeff Clarks, the Bill McGinleys, and the Mike Davises to close on.
00:48:31.260And, folks, it's going to be a fight, trust me, all the way to the end.
00:48:36.660Mike Lindell, tell me about the mass mobilization.
00:48:42.220Yeah, you know, Steve, when you were in, I don't know if you heard about it, but me and Mayor Rudy Giuliani, we went to the DNC.
00:48:49.920I actually shaved my mustache and went up and got inside there.
00:48:52.940I was on the war room when they attacked me.
00:48:55.080But the whole purpose of that was to get clips, everybody, of Democrats that were switching.
00:49:00.560They voted for Biden, and now they're voting for Donald Trump.
00:49:03.240We now have these all put together, and over the next four days or five days before the election here, we're going to be sharing them on every social media platform.
00:49:13.140So you can go to at Real Mike Lindell on Getter, Gab, True Social, X, Vocal, Frank Social, any of these, and share, share, share.
00:49:26.520We want an independence, Democrats, we want it to go far and wide because we're this close to the election.
00:49:33.220So all the work done back then is coming out now, and I encourage anyone going to church this Sunday, this is what you need to talk about, and you need to vote, vote, vote.
00:49:44.260So, Steve, there was a lot of stuff done, and you were a big inspiration, whether you were there or not.
00:49:50.000And people, your voice, they tried to stop your voice, but it wasn't stopped.
00:49:57.480And, like, it was expanded, I even think, because people were so upset.