Sean Davis of The Federalist joins me in Kansas City, Missouri to speak at the Hillsdale s Conservative Political Action Conference. We discuss the latest in the Trump administration and the future of the conservative movement. We also discuss the impact of the Supreme Court ruling against Trump's travel ban and the potential impact on the midterms.
00:01:32.380He's going to be here tomorrow morning.
00:01:33.300So, Sean Davis, you're in narrative wars over at the Federalist.
00:01:36.300You've been doing this for a decade there.
00:01:39.520You've worked with Tucker and the guys over at Daily Caller.
00:01:43.720The narrative war we have today is the left understands that their shot here is through this radical neo-Marxist judiciary.
00:01:52.700And there we just had at the beginning of the show, top of the show, we had the first hour, a federal judge just came in and reversed President Trump's thing on IDs for voters.
00:02:03.580We also had a very interesting, the Daily Signal, Rob Bluey's site, they've got this poll and analysis, 75% of the administrative state personnel working in Washington, D.C.
00:02:18.680So these are the people that would be up to the SES, the mid-managers and above.
00:02:23.00075% of those that voted for Harris, which is like 90% of them, have said that if it was a legal executive order or presidential memorandum, legal, that they would not – if they thought the policy was bad, they would not implement it.
00:02:39.260This is what Trump's up against, the administrative state and particularly the federal judiciary.
00:02:43.380How successful do you believe they've been so far because to delay is to deny, sir?
00:02:51.040I don't think the administrative state this time around has been all that successful.
00:02:59.980I think Trump coming in, understanding the nature of the beast and kind of chopping it off at the head right out of the gate was really important.
00:03:39.080That's what the Democrats and that's what the Marxists are pushing towards is they want to stymie him as much as possible and give themselves the option of taking over the House in the midterms, which I think they have a very good chance of doing.
00:04:08.340It's just utterly rudderless, kind of just, you know, waiting, treading water, hoping something happens.
00:04:14.980So they're not giving people a great reason to vote for them.
00:04:17.240So the left understands that if they can just drag everything out and delay as much as possible until November 2026 and they win the House, they think that's all they need.
00:04:28.180Because once that happens, Trump's getting impeached again by a completely deranged Democrat House.
00:04:33.260And this is where we start the whole cycle over again.
00:04:36.440Once they win, they'll raise a billion dollars.
00:04:39.900It'll come down to a handful of seats in New York and California that could easily flip, right?
00:04:45.040They've got ground troops, you know, shock troops all over from these NGOs.
00:04:49.360And as you said, even people are not citizens of this country.
00:04:53.280And they flip a handful of seats, five or six seats.
00:04:57.180Hakeem Jeffries is Speaker of the House.
00:04:59.080Do you believe, not your readers, but do you believe a greater expansion of Republicans?
00:05:07.160Because what we said at the time, look, November 5th, it was one of the most magnificent turn around, you know, come from behind.
00:05:38.880Do you think the greater – because one of the problems we have is we've turned this into a working class and middle class party, but we still have not solved that part of the equation, as we saw in Wisconsin, where if Trump's not physically on the ticket, we'd still have a tough time getting those low information, low propensity voters to turn out.
00:06:00.520But do you think we can do that understanding, and do you think you're seeing an expanded knowledge base of that in our ecosystem of new media as we try to promulgate this message out there?
00:06:11.100Yeah, I think you hit on the number one long-term problem for the right is that Trump is such a unique figure.
00:06:18.340He's able to get people to come vote who wouldn't have ever wanted anything to do with the Republican Party, and he's able to get them out in droves.
00:06:26.060And the reason is it's not because he's a Republican.
00:06:31.920It's because people trust that he has their best interests out for him.
00:06:35.640They trust, and it's fascinating, that the real estate investor from New York City, this big bombastic guy with the gold letters everywhere, is the best champion for the working class that we've seen on the right in 50 years.
00:06:48.880And you can't just take the policies that he's pushing and somehow transfer that to another character.
00:06:56.580As great as J.D. Vance is, he has real blue-collar roots, and he clearly has a heart for working-class people.
00:07:04.200There's something there that the party has to capture and make its own permanently before people are going to trust it.
00:07:10.600When you say make it their own permanently, let's go back to the comment you just made about the House because that's – look, the founders set it up that the House was supposed to be the one closest to the people, and it would be hot, and the Senate would be deliberative.
00:07:24.880You would think – and with the fire breathers, you would think you would start seeing a turnover of more populism and nationalism there.
00:07:31.560You see it on somewhat, but it's not through the 218 people.
00:07:34.980I mean a lot of President Trump's policies, the populist and nationalist policies, would not get a majority – the HACET rule.
00:07:41.700If you get a majority of the conference, we're still not there.
00:07:44.720How do you solve that part of the equation?
00:07:46.980Yeah, and that's the nut we haven't cracked yet, and I think it has to do with just how entrenched incumbents have become.
00:07:53.060Each new class that's come in really since 2010 – it kind of started with the Tea Party – is better on average for Republicans than the class it replaced.
00:08:03.880But you still have – how many new people are we getting every two years?
00:08:53.540So you agree overall with President Trump's – the arc of his strategy of all these commercial relationships, since we're paying for their defense, that we take a hard line.
00:09:02.700They're either going to pay a premium to get into this market and or move your manufacturing here.
00:09:06.420You believe in the actual underlying theory of his case?
00:09:11.160Oh, 100 percent, because let's look at Europe and let's look at China.
00:09:18.280It was with our money taken out of our pockets that resulted in our middle class and our manufacturing base being hollowed out that built the Chinese military, number one.
00:09:27.920Number two, our money built the European welfare state because we decided we're going to take you all under our wing.
00:09:34.080It wasn't enough that we helped you win the First World War and the Second World War.
00:09:59.060Our currency isn't as strong as what it was.
00:10:00.980We're almost $40 trillion in debt and the debate that's happening in Congress now is, hey, we should increase spending by a trillion instead of like $1.2 trillion.
00:10:10.360And they pat themselves on the back and call themselves fiscal conservatives.
00:10:18.980What is it about the mindset when we have – we're going off a fiscal cliff?
00:10:24.200Like yesterday, I talked at this World Economic Conference, the summer of what it puts on.
00:10:27.520It's all the globalists, the financiers.
00:10:29.980And I said when people criticize President Trump, the strategy of trying to bring jobs back to – I said tell me what the alternative – the plan A, your plan is not sustainable.
00:10:38.080We're $2 trillion in deficits every year.
00:10:40.360We're $37 trillion, adding a trillion dollars about every 150 days.
00:10:44.300You've got to now refinance 10 to 12 trillion of that every year.
00:10:52.660And there's no – in their model – and this is what gets me.
00:10:56.120There's no urgency about cutting spending.
00:10:58.700They have a $900 billion defense authorization, which is outrageous.
00:11:04.240And in this reconciliation, the big, beautiful bill, they're adding $150 billion of additional defense – this is not the $170 for the border.
00:11:13.400It's like they're living in detached reality.
00:11:15.820And when I talk to these people individually, they acknowledge it.
00:11:19.060But as a group, they sit there and they come back and they give these 10-year budgets.
00:11:23.580They said, well, Steve, by law, it's got to be 10 years.
00:11:59.980Congress sat there and they thought he was going to be doyce ex machina, that he was going to come and save them with a trillion dollars a year in fraud.
00:12:23.180I worked for Tom Coburn for many, many years and fought his spending battles with them and was just dumbfounded by – they would – these people would sit in a meeting with you and tell you, oh, it's totally unsustainable.
00:12:34.820And, no, no, no, I'm not going to vote for your amendment to cut spending 1 percent.
00:12:39.620And this was back when the budget was $2.5 trillion and $2 trillion.
00:13:18.780But then the other problem, which I think is much bigger and I think it is an American problem, is as pioneering as we are and individualistic and entrepreneurial, we lack imagination for what actually happens with human history.
00:13:38.420Ever since we started, we've been great and it happened really fast.
00:13:42.480And so we assume, well, America has always been big and strong and great.
00:13:46.220Therefore, we will always be big and strong and great.
00:13:48.780And we've never had a currency crisis and we've never had riots for food.
00:16:13.340What was the problem back when you started writing in 2007 to 2008?
00:16:17.340Well, I think the big underlying problem was the demographic problem, which is that the populations of the Middle East and North Africa were growing much faster than Europe.
00:16:32.500That is the part that I think has abated a little bit.
00:16:35.340But the outright population pressure from the Muslim world has – is not as serious as it was.
00:16:42.840Because their birth rates are declining or European birth rates coming up in Africa?
00:16:47.600I mean, I think that the population of the West Bank, for instance, and I had this number when I wrote the book, but it had increased something like fivefold between 1967 and the first decade of this century.
00:17:06.860So, I mean, you're talking about a real powerful thing.
00:17:11.700And I think there was a great sociologist who just died a year or two ago, a German sociologist named Gunnar Heinsohn, who wrote a great book called Sons and World Power.
00:17:26.980And he said, you know, like all the expansion of cultures, including the European cultures that settled the New World and things, had to do with families having eight or nine children.
00:17:38.740And having three or four or five sons.
00:18:35.580What – so that – so in the arc of it, you don't think the pressure – because you look at Sweden, you look at what's happening, you look at now, the Rotherham cases are now coming up in England.
00:18:46.320You know, our guy Raheem Ghassan focused.
00:18:48.960But a lot of this is coming back up to the surface.
00:18:51.740I thought you were talking about the migration pressure has diminished.
00:20:07.740Was that pressure from the right to, say, get our sovereignty back and from the Viktor Orbans and the Salvinis and the Le Pens who were not taking over governments but at least enough political pressure on the globalists to stop that?
00:21:05.440He himself is such an interesting guy because he had a great combination, a kind of Reagan-esque combination of being really populist but also having grown up among businessmen in Milan.
00:21:37.520And the website, his webmaster said to him, you know what, you're talking about how our civilization is collapsing, we're being invaded and stuff like that.
00:23:02.220Salvini only got about a sixth of the vote.
00:23:04.220But once they were governing, then the thing that people really loved was the Salvini immigration policy.
00:23:11.760And he got up to like 45 percent in the polls to the point where if they had an election the next day, he would have had a non-coalition government.
00:23:22.280He would have been able to rule by himself.
00:23:25.040The problem is he didn't have those votes in the parliament, and he just lost track of that, and he got booted out.
00:23:35.420Why is it the elites – it appeared that the elites in Europe at the time looked the other way, or particularly even the business elites, wanted this.
00:23:43.300I don't know if for bigger consumer markets or whatever, this invasion.
00:23:46.200They never really took a hard line against it, much like the business elites here in the United States.
00:23:53.060What is it about capital markets, the city of London, Wall Street, Frankfurt, that has no problem with mass immigration?
00:24:00.540Well, I don't know that they have no problem with it, but they do benefit disproportionately from it.
00:24:11.100I think the best quantitative account of that that's been done is in the Harvard economist George Borjas' book.
00:24:19.740Maybe you've talked about it on the show, but he did a study in around 1995 where he looked at some of these claims that immigrants add a trillion dollars to the economy, and they do.
00:24:39.220But it all goes back to the immigrant countries.
00:24:41.540It's the immigrants themselves who benefit from immigration.
00:24:45.760However, that zero difference in the country disguises a big immigration – disguises a big, let's say, income transfer from the people who compete with immigrants to the people who hire them.
00:25:05.600We've got about a minute here on this side, and we're going to take a short commercial break.
00:25:09.160Make sure – by the way, Birch Gold, it's not the price of gold.
00:25:13.000It's the process, why are the central banks buying more than ever, why is the dollar, why is the Chinese Communist Party's central theory of the case here is de-dollarize the world economy, make sure they break Bretton Woods.
00:25:34.160It's modern monetary theory, the idea that broke the world.
00:25:38.260We want to make sure we're big name and putting out concepts and ideas for you and see how they work out through reality, how they manifest themselves.
00:28:38.660Criminals forge your signature on one document, use a fake notary stamp, pay a small fee with your county, and boom, your home title has been transferred out of your name.
00:28:48.820Then they take out loans using your equity or even sell your property.
00:28:53.980You won't even know it's happened until you get a collection or foreclosure notice.
00:29:00.860So let me ask you, when was the last time you personally checked your home title?
00:29:06.760If you're like me, the answer is never.
00:29:09.800And that's exactly what scammers are counting on.
00:30:53.680Welcome back here with Chris Caldwell.
00:31:10.360Well, no, we were just talking between the break.
00:31:12.320Our audience is one of – we sell a ton of books here because our audience are book readers, which is kind of a lost art.
00:31:21.540We started an imprint with Tony Lyons and the guys over at Skyhorse after – I don't know.
00:31:26.120We sold – Kennedy's book sold I think over a million copies, and War Room sold half of them.
00:31:31.240So the Tony Fauci book, but we started an imprint a couple of years ago, and I think we published 10, 12 books, and we've had one book into the New York Times top 10 bestseller list, Jack Posobiec's Unhuman, talking about the communist revolutions, different revolutions of the day.
00:31:47.100So we're – your writing process because your books are – have big impact.
00:31:53.500They're very serious, but they're spread apart.
00:31:55.640You're not a guy that's cranking out a book every two years.
00:32:36.600Which means that I get to, you know, go really in-depth on a lot of subjects, and so, you know, at the end of a few years of procrastinating, there are actually a handful of things that I actually can talk reasonably, knowledgeably about.
00:32:54.280And if they come together into a book, that's great.
00:32:57.260And then just spend a lot of time thinking and then outlining and then a little more procrastinating and then the title process.
00:33:27.560And it's more definitive than a newspaper article or something else you're doing.
00:33:32.540Yeah, you know, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, the novelist, said that he was totally unable to write novels until he took a job at a Colombian newspaper like El Espectador or something and started, you know, sort of writing about, you know, murders and traffic accidents and things like that.
00:33:52.500And it took away his kind of like reverence, his undue reverence for the blank, you know, for the printed page.
00:35:17.040They were so big and powerful that they were able to arrogate resources from their elders and from their offspring to build up their own lifestyle.
00:35:26.620And so that struck me as really interesting.
00:35:28.620But it's so hard to get at because you've got two things that are moving at the same time that it didn't really make much of a narrative.
00:35:35.720But in looking at that period, I then discovered that the paradigm for almost everything that happened politically between the Kennedy assassination and the Trump nomination was civil rights.
00:35:49.560It's basically a – it's like a second constitution thanks to which a usually judicial but also kind of regulatory elite gets to have a second look at democratic decisions.
00:36:07.820And so in that civil rights style of government, although it had a lot of like moral prestige behind it, really actually traveled very far from the sort of like moral causes that gave it its impetus.
00:36:23.900From the original civil rights movement.
00:37:56.880I will also say another thing for you guys in Boston, particularly in Cambridge, if you have even a hint of a southern accent, they literally think you're the dumbest cracker in the world.
00:38:06.180It is the most prejudiced city in the world if you're from the south, if you're from the south.
00:39:03.140And – but we – but in retrospect, you can see very clearly that there were a lot of things that were really keeping us cosseted.
00:39:10.820And one of the things was the Cold War.
00:39:13.280There really was not a lot of variety in the strategic predicaments that a global power would face.
00:39:22.380You know, we just had to mind the Russians.
00:39:24.180It was not like a big ricocheting multifactorial world, you know.
00:39:30.540But I think that also the stability of large corporations or the seeming stability of large corporations meant that a lot of people, you know, in the 60s and 70s could imagine navigating their whole lives within one building, you know, which is harder to do today.
00:39:53.280That's impossible today with these young people.
00:39:56.320I mean, it's the gig – I mean, even a job.
00:39:58.400It's all gig economy and coming together.
00:40:01.120Do you think – one of the things that strikes me in coming to politics late and coming after doing a number of things and coming to D.C. with the leadership, I'm shocked for a country that has been a hegemon up to here recently and it's now that's being questioned.
00:40:15.520The lack of seriousness of people – D.C. is a very provincial town, right?
00:40:22.280It doesn't come across as a global capital.
00:40:25.020And the lack of not just sophisticated kind of people that seem to be on top of like this massive budget crisis we have, the financial crisis we have and all these different crises, you don't have a lot of – particularly in political and almost cultural leadership.
00:40:41.560Is that just my own prejudice or do you think we – as a global power – when I look back at the British and the Romans and maybe it's just the way the books are written.
00:40:50.000But it seems like – but you look at their decisions and how they thought things through.
00:40:53.520It was just at a much deeper level of seriousness than the leadership.
00:40:58.640You know, like even today, it doesn't compare – and this is not about President Trump but just the general environment of D.C.
00:41:05.260It doesn't compare to like World War II when it seemed to me you had almost giants that were making these decisions.
00:41:10.640Am I just – is that just the way history is written?
00:41:15.780We have a very unusual kind of empire, world civilization, whatever you want to call it.
00:41:21.640There are a few factors I think that have kept us from being more Machiavellian.
00:41:32.640There's a certain sort of like an ability that leaders have always had to sort of like ruthlessly make a big decision and decide.
00:41:41.420And one of them is that we've always been an extremely rich country and we've developed this habit of buying off people rather than laying down the law.
00:41:52.180We're a very – we're a very feminist country.
00:41:57.840We have a lot – women have a lot more of a role in this country than they did in the leadership of any other country.
00:42:07.800There are just a number of – there are a number of factors involved.
00:42:10.180Do you think the fact that we became so rich so quickly that in even the trauma of the Civil War and things like the Great Depression were not cultural ending, right?
00:42:23.600Do you think that had anything to do with maybe the lack of seriousness that we haven't had?
00:42:27.760Like today, I happen to think in the convergence of these crises that we have and the lack of kind of leadership we have at so many different levels, this thing is going to metastasize.
00:42:37.720And one thing will build on – the crisis will just build.
00:42:40.740And we haven't had to go through long periods.
00:42:44.200We had 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 years of hard decisions, tough decisions and tradeoffs.
00:42:51.280I think that definitely – I think it's where we're going.
00:42:52.940But it's just when I look at the different trend lines and I see people, they're always looking for a fairy godmother like Elon Musk to come and find a trillion dollars of fraud.
00:43:02.120And so all of a sudden you wouldn't have to cut the budget.
00:43:17.920I mean, in that light, one of the things that interests me most now is the way we're operating at two different timescales.
00:43:26.640I think that Trump has probably convinced most of the country – the way he convinced most of the country on China.
00:43:34.360He's probably convinced most of the country that in the long term our dependence on foreign manufacturing is unsustainable, that our trade deficits are unsustainable as well.
00:43:52.760So I feel like you could ask almost anybody, even in Cambridge, and they'd say, yeah, it probably is – it would be nice if we were able to – if we had factories that we could convert to making artillery shells, et cetera, et cetera.
00:44:07.200But there is this nearer term problem of sort of like coordinating investment so that we don't find ourselves with nothing when we cut off the Chinese.
00:44:21.060I say this all the time, and I'm one of the guys that the architects are believing this.
00:44:26.580We're at a full embargo to the Chinese – they've been in economic war with us for a long time, stealing the $600 billion a year in technology.
00:44:34.120We've financed the whole thing, Wall Street and private equity.
00:44:38.680We're at a full embargo right now, and I tell people, we're at a full embargo with the Chinese, and in 90 days to 100 days, the shelves are going to start being empty.
00:44:46.240I mean, President Trump took that meeting the other day.
00:44:49.560It wasn't random that he had Walmart and Costco, and those guys said, hey, look, we understand what you want to do, and we want to get more American product, and we want to do this.
00:44:57.700But there's a lag time here on supply chains, and understand we're going to hit a wall.
00:45:02.540This is why I think just before he came on, President Trump keeps talking about, hey, there's some side meetings going on.
00:45:07.440And she kind of put it out, I ain't making any calls, and we're not having any meetings because these guys have been – look, from the time we brought them in to the World Trade Organization and the most favored nation in 2000, they have broken as they're supposed to because in their concept of war, going kinetic is like defeating itself.
00:45:25.920They never should have to fight the foreign devils with military equipment, and they know that we're better than that.
00:45:31.900So ever since then, when they gamed that system, the cyber deal they cut with Obama, they didn't live up to in 2015.
00:45:39.540A couple of years later, Hong Kong in 2019, they totally tore it up and took over Hong Kong.
00:46:27.740You have to, and I don't know if we've prepped people in doing it, but I think that's what President Trump looks at,
00:46:33.540is the cash from the external, from the tariffs, because if you're not going to manufacture, you are going to pay a higher toll for coming through here.
00:46:41.340Now, the question is, historically, we've seen with the Chinese when we added the tariffs there, it wasn't passed on the consumer.
00:46:47.400We'll have to see, because that's going to be a, is that a concern of yours?
00:46:51.140Well, that is a concern of mine, and I was, you know, hoping you could tell me how we were going to get to that, to that, get to the long term.
00:46:58.880Well, one way we can get to the long term is, first off, you have to do these deals with the East Asian countries.
00:47:03.780You have to do Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, and India.
00:47:10.220Europe, right before you came on, I was saying, Europe has notified us, or it's in the European press, that the EU has basically told people they are not prepared to decouple.
00:47:20.720Our deals do have a part of it that says, in these, because the deal is going to take a long time to work out.
00:47:28.600But the memorandum is to understand the architecture of it, is you're not, you're going to be more in our trading program with our laws and customs than these guys.
00:47:36.340And Beijing warns retaliation against nations doing U.S. deals.
00:47:40.040The EU has notified us that they're not going to decouple.
00:47:44.720They're not going to agree to anything.
00:47:45.640And this gets to my point about we're underwriting their security, and that's why the two battle groups in the Red Sea, although they're there clearly for the Houthis and the UAE and the Saudis and Israel.
00:48:13.300Yeah, well, and the interplay between, you know, what's going on in Silicon Valley and what's going on in the populist world and what's going on in the world of trade networks.
00:48:25.280Well, the oligarchs are totally out of control.
00:48:28.160The four guys control artificial intelligence, which is just one aspect of the singularity because we're hurtling towards a point that Homo sapiens is on this side and Homo sapiens plus is on that side.
00:48:38.860And that may only be a couple of years away, maybe three or four years away.
00:48:45.240And you have more regulations on a Korean nail salon in D.C. to get licensed to actually do people's nails and the makeup and other things than you have on the four oligarchs running all artificial intelligence, which is seen as already been a disaster.
00:49:04.880And Deep Seek today released that everybody that's using Deep Seek, all your information is going immediately to the Chinese Communist Party for manipulation.
00:49:12.860So artificial intelligence is a massive – I'm a Luddite.
00:49:17.100I would very much like to slow down artificial intelligence full max until we think it through.
00:49:22.300Now, there's this old Reaganite idea that you absolutely cannot slow the progress of technology.
00:49:29.740Do you have sort of pointers on how that could be done?
00:49:33.660I've got some of the top guys in AI are actually on our side.
00:49:37.020We're putting something together to at least slow the move to artificial general intelligence.
00:49:42.680Once you get to artificial general intelligence, it's – first of all, it's probably gone right now.
00:49:48.140It's probably too late to stop it, although we're going to try to put up something.
00:49:51.280But listen, technology from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, my belief is, did much to free men and women from the horrors of some of this labor.
00:50:02.820Now, with surveillance technology, we're going to apply – the increases in technology oppress individuals.
00:50:08.980I mean, we know this from – we're banned.
00:50:10.860This show is one of the largest shows in America.
00:50:13.240We're banned on virtually every platform.
00:50:15.200We're banned in perpetuity on Facebook, on Spotify, on Instagram, on Twitter, banned on all of it because we were Trump's site for the stealing of the election of 2020, and then we were the first ones on the pandemic.
00:50:29.700In the third week of January of 2020, we're the ones that came on, shifted – there was a war room pandemic.
00:50:35.060We shifted a war room pandemic and told them, hey, it's out of Wuhan, and here's what happened.
00:50:39.280And, of course, it was conspiracy theory and everything like that.
00:51:35.860We'll see you tomorrow morning live, 10 a.m. Eastern Day, 010, back here in Kansas City, Missouri, at the conference for Hillsdale College.
00:53:34.000I'm one of the co-creators of Sacred Human, and I wanted to share just a little bit more about our brand for those who may not know of us yet.
00:53:40.500But about six months ago, we decided to launch Sacred Human with really the simple mission being to provide American-made natural supplements without all the artificial nonsense.
00:53:50.780So, unfortunately, as many of you know, a lot of these big corporate supplements will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients, and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health.
00:54:02.200So, that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements.
00:54:07.420And, of course, the beef liver being our flagship product.
00:54:10.620For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc.
00:54:19.480And because it is 100% grass-fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general.
00:54:32.680So, we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com.