Based Camp： How Religions Rank Competence (Jews vs Catholics)
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
177.69264
Summary
In this episode, Simone and I discuss how different cultural traditions sort their power hierarchies, and how that affects their success and failure. We talk about the pros and cons of different methods for determining this hierarchy, and the benefits and disadvantages of each one.
Transcript
00:00:03.360
This is an episode I was so excited to record because what we had done an episode on how
00:00:10.300
our mainstream society and how the virus or the urban monoculture, how it sorts the intellectual
00:00:18.680
And we had people say, that's a really interesting topic.
00:00:25.660
And what really got me excited is some conversations we had had afterwards with people from different
00:00:31.060
cultural traditions, because different cultural traditions do this status sorting quite differentially
00:00:39.920
And I think that's a really interesting thing to dig into because it allows you to hypothesize
00:00:45.660
on the pros and cons of these different methods for determining this.
00:00:52.860
So in other words, what we're going to explore is the ways in which different cultures sort
00:00:59.040
for leaders and how that could affect their success, their vulnerability to memetic viruses,
00:01:05.960
their overall long-term potential, and all sorts of other factors.
00:01:14.440
And I think the first place you see this is in where you get long-tail results, like where
00:01:19.660
certain cultures seem to perform unusually well or unusually poorly.
00:01:25.060
So an example that I often mention, which I think is a very interesting and telling example,
00:01:30.280
is that when you're talking about the conservative intellectual movement, like if you look around
00:01:34.160
at most, almost all of the mainstream conservative intellectuals today, like I'd say like 95% of
00:01:38.400
the well-known ones, they are typically from Jewish backgrounds or Catholic backgrounds.
00:01:46.500
And yet the majority of conservatives in the United States are from Protestant backgrounds.
00:01:59.020
And part of it has to do with how the Jewish and Catholic groups sort their internal power
00:02:06.060
hierarchies, which are, and one of the things we always say is, so if you're talking about
00:02:10.840
really progressive Jews or really progressive Catholics, they all just buy into this mainstream
00:02:17.660
So there isn't as much difference in how their power hierarchies work.
00:02:21.080
But when you're talking about very conservative iterations of each of these, there's actually
00:02:28.060
So do you want to jump into, we were talking with a Haradi rabbi friend recently around how
00:02:33.040
he said his culture was sorted for internal intellectual hierarchy?
00:02:36.500
Yeah, I think what we found was really striking about it is it did not sort based on credentials
00:02:44.980
It was sorted based on demonstrable knowledge that was easily verifiable.
00:02:51.260
So if you came in to a group of people and you were able to refer to and quote a text really
00:02:57.020
eloquently, but also accurately, then you were able to do so better than the other people
00:03:02.740
You would climb above in the hierarchy and it was really easy to verify the eloquence and
00:03:08.520
accuracy with which someone quoted and therefore understood a certain text because you could
00:03:15.180
And so it allowed for this really interesting phenomenon where when you were meeting with
00:03:20.220
another person, like another Jewish man in one of these communities, you could say, what
00:03:26.600
And from the text, they said they were studying.
00:03:28.680
You could know approximately how advanced that they were in their general knowledge of this
00:03:34.860
And then you could test them on that by saying, oh, well, page 56 or whatever.
00:03:41.860
And they need to know how this quote was sourcing other material, how it interlinked to other
00:03:46.960
And it's a quick way for you to determine where they are in the hierarchy relative to you.
00:03:51.440
It's almost like, let's say, let's take the religion out of this and let's pretend that
00:04:00.220
So if, if you were trying to gauge using the same general system and framework, you would
00:04:05.200
ask, oh, like, well, have you read this fan fiction?
00:04:07.780
Well, what did you think about when the werewolf like hooked up with the confederate vampire in
00:04:14.740
this particular alliance to destroy this weird faction?
00:04:19.140
And then if, if they didn't really know how to comment on it eloquently, you would understand,
00:04:22.960
well, they haven't gone that deep into the canon.
00:04:26.820
Therefore, I am above them in the status hierarchy.
00:04:29.060
And they would understand that they are below me because they haven't read that book yet.
00:04:33.020
Or they didn't, they said that they did, but they don't really know the lore that well.
00:04:38.400
And a really interesting phenomenon you can get with this and a really interesting advantage to
00:04:42.480
this system is it allows for different subgroups within the wider ultra-Orthodox Jewish
00:04:51.640
So some groups might believe that one text is like a more important thing for a learned
00:04:57.240
And because of the way this power hierarchy structure works, these groups will begin to
00:05:01.660
interact with each other less and less because there isn't a cross communication between their
00:05:08.700
Like the way that they have dedicated their time doesn't cross to status within another community.
00:05:13.740
Yeah, it's almost like Fifty Shades of Grey fanfiction community branching off from Twilight
00:05:19.540
And at first they were the same base, but then they steered in so many different directions
00:05:23.420
that they could no longer really be interchangeable in terms of merit.
00:05:28.180
So one leader from one advanced version of that group couldn't immediately go over and
00:05:34.660
But what this allows for cultural evolution-wise is it allows for the texts that end up being
00:05:43.340
more important in terms of resisting the social virus right now.
00:05:46.900
Those communities will naturally out-compete the ones that are following groups of texts that
00:05:54.820
Or texts that are more useful at, say, making the group uniquely good at surviving and competing
00:06:03.640
Those groups will naturally out-compete the other groups.
00:06:06.240
And one of the very interesting things about Judaism that quite differentiates it from many
00:06:10.380
other traditions is most Jewish groups can reintegrate with most other Orthodox Jewish
00:06:19.020
And why this is the case is actually fairly memetically complicated.
00:06:23.300
And we go into detail in the Fragmentist Guide to Crafting Religion, and it's not totally
00:06:27.320
But it's something worth noting here, because what it allows for is the less successful
00:06:32.580
groups, the groups that are studying texts that turns out to be less competitive in current
00:06:36.820
environments, can then reintegrate even when they don't do as well.
00:06:40.980
They just reintegrate as lower status because they don't know as much about the texts that
00:06:46.000
But where this gets really interesting with a Catholic comparison here, because we're going
00:06:50.120
to get to that system next, is it allows for a Jewish individual.
00:06:55.480
And this happens with rabbis in ultra-Orthodox communities, where a rabbi might be giving
00:07:00.400
a speech to a group, and if a younger individual essentially shuts them down, like they show they
00:07:12.360
And that's a really interesting phenomenon, because that really contrasts with the Catholic
00:07:18.140
So one, I hope broadly you can see how this Jewish system would encourage people who are
00:07:25.060
intellectually inclined to move into philosophical pursuits.
00:07:30.420
And that's why you will often see them in the political space disproportionately, because
00:07:34.460
if you are intelligent and in a conservative Jewish community, you are rewarded pretty dramatically
00:07:44.080
So this is really interesting in how it contrasts with the Catholic community.
00:07:51.620
So the Catholic community also really rewards people who are uniquely intellectual or uniquely
00:07:59.480
intelligent from engaging disproportionately with philosophy and theology.
00:08:04.720
But the status of individuals within the Catholic community, like how smart they are,
00:08:10.180
isn't determined using one of these organic systems that you see within the Jewish community.
00:08:15.240
Instead, it's determined by a central bureaucracy, which then determines, okay, who below me in
00:08:21.100
this bureaucracy, who below me in the hierarchy am I seeing is high, like high quality in terms
00:08:26.700
of their intellect, and then let's raise them higher within the hierarchy.
00:08:30.940
So within a Catholic sermon, you would never have somebody who is being preached to show the
00:08:37.440
person up and then say, okay, now I'm the, I'm the preacher.
00:08:41.280
Now I'm the high status individual now, because these are two different systems for sorting for
00:08:48.820
It's actually the audience that's sorting for intelligence.
00:08:51.880
Whereas in the Catholic system, it's the broadly agreed upon more intelligent people who have been
00:08:58.020
certified by the central bureaucracy who are sorting for intelligence, which creates, it's a really
00:09:04.260
good system if it, and like, it's, it's not, it can sound like it's an easily abusable system,
00:09:09.660
but it's actually really good at sorting for genuine intelligence and preventing weird little
00:09:16.860
One of the problems with the Jewish system is because you can get like one group focused on
00:09:20.900
this book and one group focused on this book and one group focused on this book is you can get
00:09:24.580
esoteric cult-like buds almost forming that become quite different from what most people would think of
00:09:30.900
as mainstream Judaism. Whereas within the Catholicism, you have this centralizing force.
00:09:35.940
And because also there's not the only culture that, that, that operates this way. You also see this
00:09:40.320
within like, for example, the Mormon community uses a somewhat simpler status sorting mechanism.
00:09:46.420
What I think is interesting here, when I'm thinking about these scenarios, the scenario in which
00:09:51.940
someone stands up and is like, hold on. And the conditions in which that person is actually given
00:09:57.620
space or given respect in contrast with other groups. So with some Jewish groups, and I would
00:10:03.940
say some, not all, I would say more Orthodox Jewish groups. If you stand up and you're like, hold on,
00:10:08.860
you are given a platform and you are given status. If you are able to back up your statement with true
00:10:16.700
demonstrated knowledge in, in the Catholic systems, you describe it. If you stand up and you say,
00:10:21.780
hold on, well, first off, like you probably shouldn't do that. Cause you should respect your authority
00:10:25.880
more that you should be scouted based on your merit. And based on that, then you're given the
00:10:30.820
right. So you have to be scouted and you have to show your merit by basically participating in the
00:10:34.840
system, but more through a back channel kind of way. And then I think about, in contrast,
00:10:39.120
a lot of other cultures, both secular and religion in which people who stand up and say, hold on,
00:10:45.860
are given respect, not because they show their merit genuinely through their actual argument in the
00:10:50.720
moment and knowledge in the moment, but literally because of their status and often because of their
00:10:56.440
victimhood status, which I think is really interesting. So in, in these, in these Catholic
00:11:01.820
and Jewish examples that you present presenting a victim or someone who has been disadvantaged in some
00:11:08.640
way is going to have zero privilege and perhaps many disadvantages because they don't have the
00:11:13.580
knowledge. They don't have the ability to show people up. So they're not given a, they're
00:11:17.060
systematically continue to be disadvantaged. Whereas in these other groups, they're given a lot
00:11:20.900
of voice, but is that voice helpful to those groups? And I think that's the sort of really
00:11:24.980
controversial question. Like, should we be giving voices to people who have victim status because
00:11:29.360
are they even capable or in a position of doing good for the organization and the people on the
00:11:33.980
whole or not? I don't know. What you just mentioned is actually one of the dangers of the Catholic
00:11:39.260
system is the Catholic tradition has long lauded people who undergo suffering on behalf of the
00:11:46.440
church. But some people have confused that with victimhood status, which are actually two
00:11:52.660
different things to suffer for your faith. It's very different than to give somebody status
00:12:01.400
I feel like martyrdom or other forms of sacrifice actually have to come from a position of privilege
00:12:08.400
because you have to have something that you're giving up. And if you don't have anything that you
00:12:13.280
give up, then you can't, you literally can't make that sacrifice. So literally like the ultimate
00:12:18.020
victims can't even be a martyr or a sacrificer in the Catholic system.
00:12:23.940
Well, and I think that the iterations of the Catholic tradition, which make this differentiation
00:12:28.520
are going to be the ones that survive this period. Another really interesting thing about the Catholic
00:12:34.240
system for sorting hierarchy is its biggest flaw. Its biggest flaw is that it doesn't allow for
00:12:39.580
quick cultural evolution. So you look at the Jewish system and we talked about this budding
00:12:43.560
dynamic system within the Catholic system or the very closely related Mormon system, the people
00:12:48.880
in power are almost always going to be older individuals, very much older individuals. They're
00:12:53.660
going to be from previous generations and they're going to be hugely incentivized to largely keep
00:12:58.460
things the same. Now, unlike Mormons, Catholics are one of the longest surviving continuous cultural
00:13:04.460
traditions. So the question is, how did they survive this? Because that's a very interesting problem to
00:13:10.400
have. And they survived it through this really beautiful mechanism, which is essentially creating
00:13:18.280
new deviant subcultures within the central Catholic organization. And that is what the religious
00:13:26.240
orders are. The religious orders allow for sort of an internal incubator within the Catholic church,
00:13:34.060
where a group has a slightly different culture than the mainstream church, a slightly different way
00:13:39.380
of doing things in the mainstream church, and is often more fervent and lives in a very different
00:13:44.300
lifestyle than the mainstream church, which brings in the sort of rebellious, pushing, cultural limits
00:13:51.180
type people. And what's really fascinating is most of these orders, as they get older, they then become
00:13:56.920
more opulent, more hedonistic, and they become less cool and they fall apart. And then you've got the
00:14:02.080
other, the new order. But what these orders allow the Catholic tradition to do is to almost like
00:14:07.980
taking stem cells from like a younger tradition, they can take the individuals who have honed
00:14:13.920
themselves within these orders, and then re-inject them into the top of the Catholic hierarchy in a way
00:14:20.560
that keeps the tradition acting much younger than it actually is, and much more dynamic than should be
00:14:27.640
possible, given the hierarchical system. So it sounds almost like a skunkworks or like innovation or VC
00:14:36.500
branch of a business that's trying to stay fresh, where they will spin off businesses, and maybe those
00:14:41.540
businesses ultimately will be strategically useful to... Exactly, but it's like a skunkworks, but like
00:14:46.540
having multiple skunkworks departments that are competing against each other. Yeah, which is ideal. Yeah. Which is
00:14:51.480
ideal and a really fascinating cultural solution. Another big problem that you're going to have with
00:14:57.700
the Catholic system is, okay, you've got this system, you're going to end up with nepotism is going to be
00:15:02.120
a major problem. Right. Because people are going to be disproportionately motivated to promote their
00:15:05.580
kids. I mean, that happens in any system like this. So how does Catholic tradition deal with that?
00:15:11.180
Another really interesting solution, which likely has, I think, more probably long-term negative
00:15:16.280
consequences and positive consequences, which is to say that if you're entering the central hierarchy,
00:15:20.520
you can't have kids. Now this had some really interesting effects. One, if you look and you
00:15:27.200
can look at the Wikipedia article on this, it's really fascinating. I think it's something like
00:15:30.160
40% of Catholic clergy is same-sex attracted. And this is one of those things that I talk about when
00:15:35.820
I say that becoming gay is just the progressive solution to being same-sex attractive. Different
00:15:42.300
religious traditions have come up with different solutions to this historically. In many ways,
00:15:47.460
it was understood if you were like really intellectually gifted and same-sex attractive
00:15:52.540
and you were born in a Catholic culture, you would go into the priesthood. It's almost like a
00:15:56.920
ethically sourced eunuch. Now, of course, there's many downsides to this cultural solution that I think
00:16:03.800
we've seen fall out from the many downsides of this cultural solution, but it is a very interesting
00:16:09.460
cultural solution. Actually, one of the biggest downsides to it is one that people don't think of,
00:16:14.240
which is where the Catholic tradition is dominant. These regions didn't need to evolve culturally as
00:16:22.020
many protections against nepotism, specifically family-based nepotism, because they would have
00:16:27.900
people in the church often running governmental organizations historically. As these regions
00:16:32.340
secularized, because they didn't have as much protection against familial nepotism, you see familial
00:16:39.320
nepotism way, way, way, way, way, way, way, way higher in these regions. So if you look at majority
00:16:45.320
Catholic regions, politics in those regions typically have way more familial nepotism than regions that were
00:16:51.720
historically Protestant, which I think is a really interesting outcome from this.
00:16:56.440
That is, yeah. Well, what could Protestantism do or shift about its culture? Like, let's say that
00:17:04.220
you're part of a Protestant faction and you're like, well, I would like my group to have more influence
00:17:11.480
in business, culture, politics, media, whatever. How would you change its meritocratic or whatever,
00:17:21.620
Yeah, so this is really fascinating. So the Protestant tradition should also not be thought of as a
00:17:26.040
monolith. No, definitely not. I'm going to contrast two Protestant tradition solutions to
00:17:32.140
this. Okay. The Calvinist solution and the Quaker solution. So now I've got to go back to how these
00:17:37.620
two cultures understand truth, which we've talked about in other videos. To Quakers, truth is something
00:17:42.520
that comes from within. That's why in their meetings, in one form of their meeting, you will have people
00:17:48.160
just stand up when they feel internally moved, because truth is this internal emotional thing that
00:17:53.420
bubbles up within you. Within the Calvinist tradition, even having a preacher was in more
00:17:59.020
strict Calvinist face standing in front of the room. If you read things out of order, that could
00:18:04.160
incept people with your way of looking at the text. If you read things with an inflection that could
00:18:08.200
incept the way people are looking at the text. If you add any commentary, if you do a play, all of that
00:18:13.760
is highly sinful. It's supposed to be just completely logically self-determined in the moment.
00:18:19.980
Like IE, I need to study my natural environment. I need to study the Bible. And that is where I can
00:18:25.880
determine truth. Now, both of these lead to very different types of status hierarchies within the
00:18:32.340
Calvinist tradition. And you saw this from our cultural perspective in the video on like, how do
00:18:37.580
we determine who we view intellectually? We're both from a Calvinist tradition and the Calvinist
00:18:42.620
tradition historically views a person's ability to compete in real world environments, like their
00:18:48.560
ability to actually like do well in the world as a sign of their competence. And that is why often
00:18:57.220
when you have leaders in Calvinist churches, they're often people who have been successful in other
00:19:02.180
endeavors before they moved into that movement. And in addition, it's pretty common within Calvinist
00:19:08.460
churches to have church leaders historically. Now the new Calvinist church is a different species in the
00:19:14.380
old Calvinist church that's wearing it almost like cosplay. It was historically common for them to
00:19:19.060
have jobs outside of running the church, because that is how you showed like that you were a competent
00:19:24.000
individual, but also that your loyalties weren't divided, that you weren't reliant on the church for
00:19:28.540
money, because that's another thing that could corrupt you. The Calvinist tradition is very focused on
00:19:32.420
all of the things that can corrupt a source of truth. And this leads to many negative
00:19:37.040
externalities. The biggest negative externality is that they distrust everything. And if you look at
00:19:44.240
a lot of the traditions today, like QAnon and stuff like this, these definitely evolved out of the
00:19:49.100
Calvinist tradition. This, everything's a conspiracy, only trust yourself. I can provide you with some
00:19:55.300
clues like look here and here, but at the end of the day, truth can only come from you logically looking
00:20:00.600
at the world. The Quaker tradition did something very different and we'll argue in other longer videos
00:20:06.020
that you can guess what evolved out of Quaker tradition, but they have always, if you read
00:20:10.160
the LBMC to the very good sort of analysis of early Quaker tradition, their internal hierarchy was based
00:20:17.000
on virtue signaling from even the early Quaker tradition. Showing that you were a good person
00:20:23.060
through what you were saying was the way within these, these settings were like you had God speak
00:20:29.780
through you. So you would stand up when you felt moved to say something. Well, how do you show your
00:20:32.620
status vis-a-vis other people? You show things that seem more Christ-like and what that meant
00:20:40.340
within the Quaker tradition began to deviate more and more. Today, we know how virtue signaling goes
00:20:45.680
wrong, but historically they would have said, well, we don't judge people by how smart they are.
00:20:50.580
We judge people by the quality of their character. That's how we sort our internal hierarchy. And that
00:20:56.260
actually sounds really smart and enlightened. It just leads to negative externalities after it's been
00:21:01.400
allowed to like run on its own for a really long period of time. Well, because in the end, charisma
00:21:06.220
is, is not always right. It's not always correlated with, with output or outcome or ability to build
00:21:14.240
things. Right. And also there's the, the, the sort of inverse correlation between people who are willing
00:21:20.540
to sit around and politic and signal and people who are willing to sit in, in churn and build. Right.
00:21:27.120
And, and so when you have a system that sorts more for the signaling and the politicking,
00:21:32.200
you're sorting for leaders who are good at signaling and politicking rather than building.
00:21:38.320
Yeah. And that's one of the reasons why we're so obsessed with slash interested in this topic is
00:21:42.880
we think constantly about, well, how, how do we put people at the top who are genuinely most able to
00:21:49.600
build things in a way that's really meaningful without necessarily sorting for people who are good at
00:21:54.860
politicking. Although you need a little bit of that because any leader also has to be able to lead
00:21:58.920
other people and convince them to do things. And so politicking is important.
00:22:02.940
Well, so another Calvinist thing that was used to sort internal hierarchical structures that had
00:22:06.980
nothing to do with a person's competence, but led to a lot of stereotypes about Calvinists was the level
00:22:12.360
of personal suffering that you were willing to undergo to achieve something. So Calvinists would often
00:22:19.200
try to show off to other Calvinists, how austere their lifestyles were or how intense their daily
00:22:25.960
suffering was. And this is why in, in, in many Calvinist stereotypes, you see them being visibly
00:22:32.360
disfigured. Like they would show off more than other people, their, their physical disfigurement
00:22:37.040
or ailments, like walking with a cane or something like that. So you look at Calvinist stereotypes
00:22:42.660
throughout media, like Scrooge is a great Calvinist stereotype, right? He's a guy who's hoarding his wealth,
00:22:47.120
like he's very wealthy. Like that was always a traditional Calvinist stereotype is they're very
00:22:51.100
wealthy because that's how they determine their, their position within their local status hierarchy,
00:22:54.680
but he didn't spend his wealth even within his daily life. They talk about in the story that he
00:22:59.900
would eat gruel, that he had no servants who worked for him, that he wouldn't heat the house,
00:23:04.440
which is something that even Simone and I do. So he wasn't like saving money to spend it on himself,
00:23:09.820
which I think a lot of people read the story today to know actually Scrooge is a very interesting
00:23:14.500
story. It's a, it's a corrective rape fantasy about Calvinist moral values because Scrooge was
00:23:20.340
accurate. Giving the money to Tiny Tim's family was not the most effective use of charitable funds.
00:23:26.240
And it was, it was quite indulgent based on his sort of personal community to, to do that. That's
00:23:32.220
just not the way a good Calvinist would do that. And a lot of people today, because they're not
00:23:36.580
familiar with the Calvinist stereotypes, they read the story and they think Scrooge is a Jewish
00:23:41.360
stereotype. He was from Scotland. Like that's a classic Calvinist stereotype. He, he said,
00:23:46.160
bah humbug to Christian. Again, thinking holidays, obscuring holidays is another classic Calvinist
00:23:51.240
stereotype. Being tall and gaunt is another classic Calvinist stereotype. Thinking you're morally
00:23:55.760
superior to people is another classic Calvinist stereotype. But having your own moral framework
00:24:00.640
and not engaging with the world's moral framework is another classic Calvinist stereotype. And what's
00:24:05.020
really interesting is even though Calvinists aren't that common in the world today,
00:24:07.760
you still see this stereotype in media all the time. What are some other things you see?
00:24:10.880
Typically they wear red and black. They often wear vests or Scottish attire. They're often
00:24:15.960
physically disfigured in some way. And they are often seen as obsessed with pain to some extent.
00:24:21.720
So Scrooge, again, Scrooge McDuck-Donoff is Scrooge of the classic Calvinist stereotype.
00:24:26.320
Silco from Arcane is a pretty good depiction of a Calvinist stereotype.
00:24:30.080
I just find it really funny that Ebenezer Scrooge is like this, this, this caricature argument
00:24:38.120
against effective altruism you're saying. It's kind of true.
00:24:41.820
Well, it kind of is. What's another one I'm thinking of? Vader.
00:24:44.900
And Anakin to an extent. Because another, the flip side to the Calvinist stereotype is either
00:24:48.900
seen as being very like uncaring or sort of like manic. Like businessy, manic, and houses full of
00:24:57.580
inventions. That's another Calvinist stereotype is the invention thing and having houses strewn with
00:25:01.500
inventions that I know even some of my ancestors, when you go to their house, you would talk about like
00:25:05.580
all the little inventions they had everywhere. Because that was a way that you showed how your
00:25:10.980
intelligence had real world applicability to visitors to where you live, which was, was really
00:25:17.440
interesting. And a good list of these is actually found on a Puritan spotting by a star site codex.
00:25:23.080
He did a thing on these, these Calvinist stereotypes and I'll include a link to that.
00:25:26.380
The one interesting part of the Calvinist stereotype that he did not touch on in Puritan spotting
00:25:31.060
was the stereotype that if they have a SO or family, that they are almost always featured
00:25:39.980
as working together. Like the way that they emotionally relate to other people is through
00:25:46.860
their work. And when people look at Simone and mine's relationship, it can look really unusual in
00:25:52.740
that we run our companies together and stuff. But that was actually traditionally the way things
00:25:57.880
were done within the Calvinist tradition. And it's something that you will see throughout
00:26:01.700
Calvinist archetypes. Now, some people might say, oh, like George Lucas didn't say that this was the
00:26:07.080
stereotype he was going for, but he also didn't say that Jewish was the stereotype he was going for
00:26:11.640
with Watto or racist, just general racist was the stereotype he was going for with Jar Jar Binks.
00:26:17.280
He seemed to pull culturally evoked sets of things that seemed to go together in his mind
00:26:22.700
without realizing that these cultural sets came from like imprinted stereotypes because these
00:26:27.880
cultural groups existed in the world around him or had existed and therefore had imprinted
00:26:31.920
themselves onto media, even though now Calvinists are mostly extinct as a cultural group.
00:26:35.720
But anyway, something that you had mentioned about the way these different cultures differentiate
00:26:40.400
from each other that I found really fascinating. Yeah. Talk about the IQ shredder concept.
00:26:46.460
Yeah. I mean, you and I were talking at first about how we were like, wait, this meritocratic
00:26:50.780
sorting system in Orthodox Jewish communities is super awesome. Like the fact that, that there
00:26:57.940
is a provable way to, to demonstrate your merit, like, oh my gosh, these are exactly the sorts
00:27:04.260
of people I would want to have ruling my culture. And then we realized, oh, but wait, like these
00:27:10.880
are, these are people who are going in and spending all their time in deep, deep, deep esoteric
00:27:17.060
religious study. And per our cultural background, we're like, oh no, like we want them to like
00:27:23.680
build spaceships that take us to Mars. We want them to get us off planet. We want them to solve
00:27:29.980
like all diseases. And they're reading these. So we, we did find it really interesting where like,
00:27:34.940
this is a significant deviation from our culture and that our culture is like, okay, take these people
00:27:40.320
and like have them solve the world's problems. But I guess per the moral framework of many of these
00:27:46.580
very Orthodox Jewish communities, I mean, the biggest problems are delving into these deep
00:27:52.680
religious texts and the solution isn't necessarily to like go off planet because there's a lot of other
00:27:58.440
important religious stuff that's going on that they need to work on.
00:28:00.940
But there is a downside to what you're saying, right? And there's a reason that their culture
00:28:04.980
doesn't do that. So that is essentially what reform Judaism did is they said, we'll still
00:28:09.580
sort our status hierarchy by how intelligent a person is, right? But we'll, we'll outsource that
00:28:16.400
to a form of intelligence sorting that has more real world applicability, specifically the degrees
00:28:23.000
that people were getting. This is why you have the stereotype in traditional Jewish families of go
00:28:26.720
be a doctor, go to this fancy university because, and I also think it's why you saw Jewish families
00:28:32.000
overrepresented in Ivy league schools, partially because there is more cultural reward for Jews
00:28:39.420
going into Ivy league schools than there are, for example, for a person of a Protestant background.
00:28:44.240
In fact, I would be quite shamed within a lot of Protestant cultural circles for mentioning the
00:28:50.400
fancy schools that we went to. It's just seemed really negatively like, like as, as if you actually
00:28:55.840
weren't able to achieve things in the real world. Now, this outsourcing worked for a while.
00:29:01.600
The problem is, is it left a giant gaping back door for the virus to get through, which is as soon
00:29:08.620
as the virus took over the institutions, it specifically was sorted into positions of power
00:29:13.980
was in the reform Jewish movement. And it allowed the movement to be really quickly and aggressively
00:29:20.980
corrupted by the virus as happened to all cultural traditions that sorted for intelligence by degrees.
00:29:29.700
We also saw this within the Unitarian Universalist movement, which, which did something similar.
00:29:35.720
And what was really interesting to me is this more orthodox approach to Jewish intelligence.
00:29:41.360
They now actively like look down on the university system in part because they see how
00:29:46.640
effectatious this has gotten and that they feel like the cultural winners here. Like we followed the
00:29:51.520
old way of doing things that may not have looked like, why are you doing things this way? It may have
00:29:56.360
seemed less efficacious, but in the long run, it's keeping their fertility rates up and it's keeping
00:30:01.880
their cultural identity strong in a way that you're not seeing as much in the, in the reform
00:30:06.820
community, which is becoming just like holiday traditions and a few other differential things,
00:30:12.140
but not so much a genuinely different, like moral framework than society writ large, which I think is
00:30:17.840
really interesting. So there are negatives, but you're, you're trading one thing for another thing.
00:30:22.400
We have to remember as much as we talk about like the Calvin, the Calvinists went extinct.
00:30:27.140
Basically, they used to be the time of the signing around the declaration, at least among white
00:30:31.800
Americans, they were well over 50% of the population. And now they're like 0.5% of the population.
00:30:37.820
So it is a failed system. It may have done a good job of sorting for competence. That's why you got the,
00:30:42.340
the stereotype of the wealthy Calvinist. But I think where it really failed people who wanted to stay in
00:30:47.920
the tradition. Well, I also, I would, and there of course are many exceptions here, but the stereotype
00:30:54.280
of the wealthy Calvinist is also not the stereotype of a very pronatalist Calvinist. They...
00:31:02.600
Yeah. Yeah. Because I mean, you don't want to have fun. I mean, the classic, who wants to marry
00:31:06.860
somebody who thinks that dancing is, is, is sinful and Christmas is sinful and, and having too much fun
00:31:12.800
is sinful, which is funny, which those are all things that you and I put music is sinful. Famously
00:31:18.340
like Geneva banned me after becoming a predominantly Calvinist band, all music that had words for like
00:31:25.180
a hundred year period or something, because they didn't want people to have too much fun. That would
00:31:28.740
be very, uh, corrupting, which is funny that that's still very much in our sort of secular tradition.
00:31:34.020
So one of the questions we have for ourselves is, can we create an iteration of this tradition,
00:31:38.520
which, which is able to both resist the virus and motivate high fertility rates.
00:31:44.060
But I mean, the jury's really out betting odds would be against us, but this whole,
00:31:48.880
the reason we're having this conversation is I think it's really important for people to note
00:31:53.160
that there are actually like systemically, the way they sort their internal hierarchy,
00:31:57.600
the way they see the world, there are really big differences in the way different cultures
00:32:03.040
approach things. And those differences lead to different long tail consequences. The,
00:32:08.880
the Catholic system for, for sorting IQ is likely why the last Supreme court, seven of the nine
00:32:16.040
justices had a Catholic upbringing. One had one Protestant, one Catholic parent. So you might not
00:32:21.180
count them. And the other two came from Jewish backgrounds. Not a single one came from a Protestant
00:32:25.980
background. That is wild when you consider the demographics of this country, right?
00:32:30.860
But it makes a lot of sense. When you look at how these cultures sort for status,
00:32:35.180
you simply aren't going to get up. Even I growing up, remember the shame that my parents told me I
00:32:41.960
would be looked at within the family. If I became something as low status as a lawyer, whereas in many
00:32:48.560
other cultures, a lawyer would be seen as a very high status profession. And this has to do with how
00:32:53.460
these cultures relate to truth within the Calvinist tradition. The lawyer is the steward of the
00:32:58.880
bureaucracy. What could be lower status than engaging with the bureaucracy? You've become
00:33:04.700
mentally addled. You, you, you become nepotistically polluted, but it's very interesting. And I think
00:33:12.440
that through understanding these genuine differences within our different cultures and through better
00:33:17.520
clarifying them and understanding the advantages and disadvantages that each have, we can better
00:33:23.840
appreciate why we are all better off of being in a genuinely culturally diverse environment.
00:33:29.660
Because one of the things that I've always found really laughable about progressivism is they claim
00:33:35.020
to want diversity. And then you're like, Oh yeah, diversity is great because different groups are better at
00:33:39.700
different things. That's the point of diversity. Being different is the point of diversity. If it's
00:33:46.120
superficial, if you are going to pretend that all diversity is actually just completely superficial,
00:33:52.020
and doesn't really affect how different groups perform at different things, then you've created
00:33:57.360
this, this mockery of diversity and, and worse when you can't explain why different groups are doing
00:34:04.200
better at different things, then the only explanation you conceivably have is they're cheating.
00:34:10.340
They they've rigged the system in their favor there. And that creates animosity between groups. And that
00:34:16.200
creates, I think really interesting phenomenons where groups begin to tear each other down or
00:34:20.720
try to frame other groups is doing better. And you get this whole system, which is really bad for
00:34:26.780
groups that actually lead to better outcomes, like Jewish groups and Catholic groups, which I think
00:34:31.440
disproportionately do really well in bureaucracies and academic settings.
00:34:36.540
But I think it's also really important to think about these dynamics, because it doesn't matter if
00:34:40.780
you're looking at a friend group somewhere, or a secular group, or a fan community, or a religious
00:34:46.720
group, or even a family, looking at how they sort for the people that they put in positions of
00:34:52.260
leadership, will enable you to kind of understand where that group is going to go and what it will
00:34:58.600
be able to do. So all groups will produce something, but what it will be able to produce, whether that is
00:35:05.060
like really esoteric, creative, amazing things, or real world, or we'll say larger society agency,
00:35:11.600
all sorts of things that that depends on how meritocratic sorting works. So look closely at
00:35:18.360
that, and you'll be able to discover a ton of other things much more quickly than by analyzing a lot of
00:35:24.040
other elements of the group that would take more time. Yeah, it's a really fun way to think about
00:35:29.640
things, but also think about what you're doing for your own family. I think to a lot of people of this
00:35:33.340
generation, they grew up without a culture, because they didn't know what their culture was. And when they
00:35:38.080
move back to cultures, and they're trying to choose which one they adopt, or trying to recreate some
00:35:43.820
iteration of what their family's historic culture was, they often think it's just the theology, when
00:35:51.060
there's a whole worldview that worked alongside this theology, and a whole way of sorting yourself
00:35:57.300
culturally, that led to these cultural differences. And you can make a much more informed decision as you
00:36:03.780
recreate your family culture in the light of a virus that has eroded and erased so many family
00:36:10.660
traditions. Yeah, absolutely. It was fun talking about this with you. I know we've been talking
00:36:17.080
about it for days now. Yeah, you've helped all of these ideas. I might talk more, but a lot of these
00:36:21.540
are just me parroting the ideas that Simone is telling me in private. More like I just ask you dumb
00:36:25.840
questions, but that's our tradition. And I absolutely love it. Yeah, that's our tradition. That's the way our
00:36:30.340
gender dynamics work. Yeah, I ask really dumb questions, because I'm like, so confused. And
00:36:37.500
he gives really smart answers. And they're like, so sexy. And I'm so like, hot for it.
00:36:44.620
That's how you incept me with your worldview. It's your womanly ways.
00:36:48.860
My yeah, my feminine, my sexuality, which is for wherever it is. This is a pleasure. I'm looking for
00:36:58.160
to our next conversation, because I've got a good one coming up. Yeah. All right. Love you, Malcolm.