Based Camp - May 24, 2023


Based Camp: Why Life Extension is Evil


Episode Stats

Length

31 minutes

Words per Minute

171.90886

Word Count

5,369

Sentence Count

1

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary

In this episode, Simone and Malcolm discuss immortality, life extension, mortality, and technology, and why they don't want to live forever. They discuss the pros and cons of both of these ideas, and how they differ from the typical intuition about mortality.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 would you like to know more hello malcolm hello simone it is wonderful to be here with you today
00:00:06.460 what are we talking about on a scale of one to ten how excited are you to die
00:00:12.600 today we will talk about life extension mortality and immortality and i think it's a uniquely fun
00:00:24.780 conversation for both of us because we have a view that deviates from the typical intuition that
00:00:31.540 people have about mortality because we are genuinely not in favor of life extension we're in
00:00:39.900 favor of health span expansion so we like the idea of having longer productive years longer years when
00:00:47.180 our bodies are fully functioning both from a reproductive but also mental standpoint we believe
00:00:52.680 in longer periods when people are able to work and contribute to society 100 what we aren't in
00:00:58.680 favor of is indefinite life and there are some very concrete reasons why we hold that near indefinance
00:01:04.120 let's say 500 years yeah like we're okay we're okay with some life extension but living forever
00:01:12.780 causes some serious problems and i think people don't realize that and i would also point out that
00:01:17.960 we aren't against this at a government level like i would not promote anyone limiting access to this
00:01:25.120 technology we are against it at a family and cultural level and i think we think that our family will
00:01:32.900 always be better off if we focus on intergenerational improvement instead of intra-generational improvement
00:01:42.560 yeah well i think you make a really important point here though is that with this and pretty much every
00:01:48.100 other stance on what people do with their bodies and a whole lot more for that matter we may have our
00:01:54.700 own stances on what we think is best for us but we think that any stance that is coercive or that would
00:02:01.100 impose rules or restrictions on other people especially against their will that is the height of evil
00:02:07.780 absolutely the height of evil one of the reasons actually why we don't like life extension
00:02:13.540 philosophically speaking is that we actually think that it puts more people in positions where they will
00:02:18.680 want to impose their will on others against their consent i would say that even goes to the core of why we
00:02:24.320 don't like life extension but go on so there's a growing antagonism was in the tech
00:02:30.880 accelerationist communities between the life extensionists and the pronatalist faction it
00:02:38.420 surprises a lot of people that there is such such a level of antagonism but it makes sense
00:02:43.820 in that really only one of the factions can win at the end of the day if all the technology that we
00:02:50.660 both hope is realized the life extensionist faction there would just be too many people in the world if no one
00:02:55.660 ever died and so they think they can solve the problem of falling fertility rates by extending
00:03:01.400 the lifespan of the existing people whereas if you talk about prenatalism as a philosophy is often
00:03:08.220 predominated by the idea that it is the height of arrogance to think that you are the cumulative
00:03:14.660 of all human cultural and evolutionary improvement that is to me to believe that you are a superior
00:03:25.200 race like you think that you can't do better than who you are and so we believe very strongly in okay
00:03:32.260 creating another generation but the problem is there is always a vested advantage that people have
00:03:39.940 if they have been in the system for longer if you look at the world today this is why you often have
00:03:46.260 these old stogy people in positions of power it's why when you look at the congress and the senate and
00:03:50.660 the president it's increasingly an aging demographic do you really want these people living forever do you
00:03:58.220 really want the boomers potentially control human civilization for the rest of human civilization
00:04:04.800 they might be doing that whether or not we have life extension if they screw up enough
00:04:09.360 the way we view life extensionists versus non-life extensionists
00:04:15.200 is that they are individuals if their job is to maintain an ancient athenian fleet
00:04:23.160 their plan to do that is to take every board of the fleet dip it in resin have it stay exactly the way it
00:04:31.860 is for five thousand years whereas the intergenerational improvement people they see the job is to
00:04:39.100 regularly replace the ships with new models and what that means is that when you go 500 years into the
00:04:45.100 future one is a fleet of athenian warships and the other is a modern war flea with submarines and
00:04:52.300 aircraft carriers and yeah so what you're missing is what a life extensionist would say is oh you're
00:05:00.680 implying that i who plans to live forever will not be iteratively improving myself i will be improving
00:05:08.980 my biology i will be improving my mind but the problem with that kind of stance is ultimately if that's
00:05:16.000 what you're doing you are changing so much that ultimately biologically and mimetically you will not
00:05:22.140 be the same person we are not for the most part the same people we were when we were five years old
00:05:27.700 that person is long gone and so the idea that you wouldn't just follow a far more efficient pathway
00:05:33.600 and have kids or pass on your ideas to other people and let those ideas strengthen themselves
00:05:40.640 through different perspectives and different bodies is ridiculous like why would you why would
00:05:46.400 you undergo these crazy interventions to somehow iteratively improve technically in the same body or
00:05:53.120 technically in a discontinued string when you could just do the system that has worked i love that
00:05:59.120 point so much and so to use the analogy i was using before it would be like the person who's no i'm not
00:06:05.020 dipping all the boards in resin what i'm doing is like technologically upgrading the ships and everything
00:06:09.400 like that so in 500 years the ship that used to be a trireme will now be a modern submarine or an
00:06:16.040 aircraft carrier exactly your point being so you've functionally done nothing you haven't preserved
00:06:20.820 anything so why are you so afraid to give another generation a shot and i think the answer is
00:06:26.640 transparent the answer is that they don't really plan to change that much they want to maintain
00:06:33.040 some level of continuity with who they are today and if we look historically generations just don't
00:06:38.560 do that people very rarely after and i don't expect to myself after i'm 50 or 60 do i really expect
00:06:46.260 myself to change or update my beliefs that much no hold on we actually we have plans for that like
00:06:52.060 we plan for example when we feel like we are starting to memetically and mentally ossify that's
00:06:58.080 when we go hard on psychedelics because that's when the gullibility versus open-mindedness trade-off
00:07:04.220 starts to be worth it for us and when in which we're okay with being a little bit more gullible
00:07:09.740 absolutely and i think there are ways around this and this is one of the things that life
00:07:16.120 extensionists will say they'll say you extend young age until later in life people's mental
00:07:21.860 ossification won't happen in the way it happens with existing people today and i think that is a
00:07:27.560 hypothesis but i think we will find that hypothesis is wrong as soon as life extension is invented and i'd
00:07:34.060 actually love it if life extensionists could take a stand if it turns out that people don't actually
00:07:38.620 update their beliefs that much when they're able to stay young for longer do you then say okay in
00:07:45.080 that scenario life extension is bad and we should stop it and the answer is no you don't because you
00:07:50.040 don't really believe that but welcome you're focusing on the wrong thing completely this is not about
00:07:55.340 mental ossification this is about adverse incentives the primary reason why life extension is
00:08:02.560 non-beneficial to populations is the cumulative power wealth and advantages that someone gains with
00:08:10.560 time so the more you are alive the longer you are alive especially if you're successful and wealthy
00:08:16.600 enough to afford life extension which let's be clear this is something that only the wealthy are
00:08:21.560 going to be able to afford we're seeing in the united states we're seeing false economy i don't
00:08:26.340 we're seeing lifespan fall down um right now i think only if you are wealthy and educated let's say
00:08:32.420 okay let's say that anyone's able to do it but the longer you are living the more you have to defend
00:08:38.960 the more stuff you have the more incentive you have to take what you've built and keep it so now
00:08:46.100 it's you versus a bunch of other people who might supplant you who might take you know things you
00:08:51.740 want who might use up resources that you want access to who might take attention that you want
00:08:55.760 who might erode your political influence what are you going to do you are going to try to shut them
00:09:01.340 out the reason why we have a gerontocracy now is that the people who are in power now have been
00:09:07.160 defending their positions of power they're not letting new people come in and take their place and when you
00:09:13.040 have life extension you have people who are very strongly incentivized to prevent younger generations
00:09:18.800 new ideas new perspectives people also who very importantly have grown up in the new modern world
00:09:25.780 of that time and know better than those who grew up in a different world what that new world needs
00:09:30.880 those people are being kept out of positions of power and influence they're being prevented from
00:09:35.940 building new solutions and that is extremely dangerous to human society so as much as i am against
00:09:42.280 coercive measures to stop people from doing what they want to with their bodies i do think that
00:09:47.620 society on the whole is made much weaker if you have a ruling class of very old people i think that's a
00:09:55.020 really excellent point and i want to expand on it because i think a lot of people can look at this
00:09:59.920 and they're like that's not intrinsically true but it is intrinsically true if you have built your power
00:10:04.720 within an existing social or economic system you built your wealth within an existing social or economic
00:10:10.720 system you lose if that system changes you are always and intrinsically or almost always intrinsically
00:10:20.020 motivated to prevent improvement of the social and economic systems within which you reside whereas
00:10:27.120 the youth are always motivated to change those systems because they benefit most from those changes and that is
00:10:35.880 what allows for civilizational advancement in addition when people say you'll be able to stay mentally
00:10:43.480 younger forever that is true but to simone's point you never get to grow up again within the new
00:10:52.380 iterative social system that has been built you can really only have one set of formative years one set
00:11:00.280 of five to the age of 15 you might be able to stay 20 forever but you're not going to want to
00:11:07.180 increasingly revert to the age of five and then start over again i don't think that's a society that any
00:11:11.760 life extensionist is looking to create when we see the way that our kids are engaging with technology
00:11:18.640 like ai it gives them a perspective of ai that we could never replicate in ourselves even if i was able to
00:11:26.800 stay 20 forever a five-year-old growing up alongside ai is going to have an understanding for how that
00:11:34.660 technology can change our society that a permanent 20-year-old vampire person is never going to
00:11:42.300 and when you prevent this intergenerational baton passing of power
00:11:50.920 what you're really preventing is societal advancement and social experimentation and the
00:11:59.160 motivation for those things at the structural level of society yeah and what we've seen a lot of
00:12:06.180 people say on the life extension side because i'm trying to present their arguments as best i can
00:12:11.040 it's not fair for us to just straw man them is okay i will admit that maybe we're not going to
00:12:18.280 completely memetically and biologically replace ourselves the whole point of life extension is we
00:12:22.680 want to keep some element of ourselves as continuous okay grant that and we also admit that being very old
00:12:29.760 will lead to some adverse incentives that people will be incentivized to accumulate power accumulate
00:12:34.180 influence and entrench themselves in these strongholds of power and prevent new generations from coming
00:12:39.540 into influence things but don't worry we'll just create laws that force essentially term limits and
00:12:46.840 positions of power or after a certain number of years you have to give all your wealth to the next
00:12:51.400 generation and i think it's very naive to hold those views because when has that ever worked when
00:13:00.420 has power ever been passed to people and those people promise oh yeah no we promise this is just
00:13:07.100 temporary maybe there's some precedent for it but yeah
00:13:11.680 it's really hard to imagine i'm even trying to think of maybe there's some kind of
00:13:18.120 blockchain connected to whatever like life extension biology they have where if literally
00:13:25.840 their wealth doesn't transfer out of a certain account by a certain age then like their biological
00:13:32.320 anti-aging thing turns off but they would find a way around that you know they would find a way to
00:13:38.460 create shell companies that hold the money i just it's the incentives are too strong and that's the
00:13:46.320 those are the only arguments that i've seen that come close to defending this position and also i just
00:13:52.540 can't understand how somebody could think it's better than the system we have now especially with
00:13:58.520 the genetic changes that are happening in that system so when you have a kid you know a lot of that
00:14:04.140 kids sociological profiles influenced by your genetic makeup but you're getting to choose
00:14:08.740 anyone you want in the world to because unless you think you're perfect which i don't i chose a
00:14:16.340 partner based on somebody who filled the flaws that i felt in myself so i get to one mix my dna
00:14:22.660 with anyone i was able to convince to marry me in the world the person who is infinitely better than me
00:14:27.860 and then i get to have this next iteration of myself give them any childhood i want to give them
00:14:33.620 hopefully give them access to a better education than i had access to prevent them from having any
00:14:39.060 of the hang-ups that i may have developed in my own childhood by giving them this better childhood
00:14:43.720 and then better than all that throughout their childhood they get the chance to say hey dad
00:14:50.940 this thing that you've come to believe is wrong they are not affected by my biases
00:14:56.800 and one of the great things about research into biases that you see over and over again is knowing
00:15:04.500 that you have biases does not prevent them from affecting you knowing that something is like a
00:15:10.840 psychological trick in your brain doesn't make you immune to it and so you have all these rationalists
00:15:15.680 and aaa people who are like oh i've studied all the way people come up with biases and it's like
00:15:19.740 yeah but did you also study that knowledge doesn't protect you from those biases hardly at all because
00:15:23.680 that's in the research as well what protects you from them is the intergenerational way
00:15:28.580 that we transfer identity which is to say you're not clasping too hard to identity and i i think this
00:15:36.140 is another really important thing that you are not afraid of death you understand that your life
00:15:42.340 is to build a better future for the next and for future generations
00:15:47.160 that you have a purpose with this life to prepare the future generations to be better than you
00:15:54.040 and and to understand and have the humility to understand that i will never be able to improve
00:16:00.580 on myself as much as my kids can because i can't see my own flaws in the same way that someone you
00:16:07.160 tried to raise can see your flaws and my god we all see our parents flaws
00:16:10.580 yeah we also see ourselves becoming our parents which is terrifying so i don't know but i think a lot
00:16:20.800 of it comes down to how we perceive the concept of self and when you choose to define yourself
00:16:27.520 more broadly by your your family or your community or your children whatever it might be
00:16:36.180 that is where you become less afraid of death and i wonder if we were to pull and i'm sure people
00:16:41.760 have actually be fun to look at this research communities that are more family oriented like
00:16:46.280 in latin america there's so much more identification with family i am my family we are we are together
00:16:51.880 if you were to compare interest in life extension across those cultures i think you would see
00:16:57.860 especially very atomized cultures that are highly individualistic as being the most interested
00:17:04.300 in life extension because they don't see their descendants as them they don't see their family
00:17:09.320 members as them they don't see their culture as them they don't see their religions as them if they
00:17:13.180 have religions at all so the only thing they can cling to is themselves and so i think in the end life
00:17:19.200 extension is more it reveals more about how someone views themselves than it reveals about like their
00:17:25.420 interest in technology or their interest in the future or their interest even in being in the future
00:17:30.200 i think that you and i feel just as connected to the future and just as excited about the future a
00:17:37.540 thousand years on as someone in the life extension community who genuinely believes that they the
00:17:44.220 continuous they will exist in that future the great thing about advancement in ai and stuff like that is
00:17:50.420 our descendants it doesn't mean that we really totally die when we die if our descendants really wanted
00:17:57.300 to ask for any sort of advice we had to give them they could just ask an ai model trained on our books
00:18:01.540 or depending on how people end up getting digitized with computers and stuff in the future
00:18:06.060 you don't lose really information when people die you lose this like broad sense of information and broad
00:18:14.980 sense of perspective but hopefully if they had something useful to say and they were smart they found a way to
00:18:20.320 condense that information into something that could be passed forward into future generations
00:18:23.760 but i think realistically what we have to say probably won't matter to future generations that
00:18:29.940 much how much do you care to ask your great great grandparents about what you should do today or where
00:18:35.300 society should go their world perspective was so different from ours why are we trying to ossify that
00:18:41.620 yeah and there's there's another part of it too which i think is how we perceive
00:18:48.500 our lives now like i see every day as a different existence and we've talked about this before like i sort
00:18:58.040 of see every iteration of myself as a standalone extremely ephemeral blip of consciousness that is
00:19:06.040 going to disappear and be replaced with time and every new experience every cell that is sloughed off and a
00:19:13.540 new one that is regenerated that is a death and a new beginning and the person that i was even five
00:19:20.080 years ago like i we can go back and look at old youtube videos of us talking and i feel like i'm
00:19:25.460 looking at a complete stranger i am definitely not the same person and so to me even if i didn't have
00:19:33.240 this view about being part of a long unbroken chain of ancestors and descendants that i'm excited to be a
00:19:39.060 part of i think i would still see life extension as a bit of a farce because even within a normal
00:19:46.500 human's lifespan totally in the absence of any technological intervention there is constant
00:19:52.620 death and rebirth and we are definitely not the same people we are definitely not an unbroken chain
00:19:57.300 so this idea that somehow we ever could be it's chasing after something entirely impossible when this
00:20:04.720 comes to how you see continuation or the existence of a thing and the ship as easiest example is one
00:20:09.480 we always used to love to use here which is you have this old wooden trireme traveling around the
00:20:14.240 mediterranean and boards keep rotting and it keeps replacing them with new boards and then people ask
00:20:20.300 okay at the end of the journey it's all new boards is it the same ship and then they ask okay suppose
00:20:24.960 somebody had been following the ship of ccs and taking all the boards that were thrown overboard
00:20:28.260 and then rebuilt an exact copy of that ship with those boards now which is the real ship
00:20:32.960 and your body is doing this with memories with cells with perceptions the real answer is it depends on
00:20:39.520 which definition you've used for continuation which is the real ship and to some extent it doesn't matter
00:20:43.960 which is the quote unquote real ship right things change iteratively over time yeah then the question
00:20:50.900 becomes okay how do you really define the ship of theses the ship of theses is defined by its purpose
00:20:57.400 why it exists a thing to move people in the same way that fleet was defined by its purpose and that
00:21:04.140 the person who decided to preserve every aspect of the fleet instead of iteratively improve it over
00:21:09.360 generations defeated the purpose of the fleet by trying to maintain a sense of continuity within it
00:21:16.360 and it's the same with identity why do you exist you exist to create a more prosperous future for our
00:21:25.300 species your existence is defined not by your ability to indulge in the self but by your ability to
00:21:34.460 contribute to the collective human tradition and identity and that is always best done through
00:21:41.780 intergenerational improvement in the same way that the ship of theses as soon as you let go of the idea
00:21:49.000 that who you are the continuous entity really exists in any meaningful context to begin with
00:21:54.900 then you can say oh then what i am is my purpose and if what i am is my purpose do i better serve that
00:22:03.940 purpose by living for a really long time or do i better serve that purpose through intergenerational
00:22:09.280 identity transfer yeah or through creating a new culture or through creating a business or fueling a
00:22:17.880 political movement if what we're describing doesn't feel intuitive to you at all what i would encourage
00:22:23.180 you to do if you're watching this or listening to this is write yourself a letter in the future or
00:22:29.600 leave yourself a voice memo for the future so all the time i do this all the time it's really fun i think
00:22:35.800 the whole like my sense of continuous identity fell apart the first time i did this to myself and it was a
00:22:42.480 school exercise in our freshman year of i don't know actually it was in middle school it's like when i was 13
00:22:49.640 years old we were supposed to write a letter to ourselves that we would open just as we were about to
00:22:55.260 graduate from high school and either enter the career world or go to college and reading letter from
00:23:01.620 myself around 10 years in the past made me realize just how much i really wasn't the same person anymore
00:23:08.900 and i could understand the interests of that person i could understand that we were both in the same
00:23:15.180 kind of boat and interested in a lot of the same aims which of course was selfish betterment right oh
00:23:20.480 i hope these things for myself and i hope those things for myself we just weren't the same person so
00:23:24.640 try doing that like honestly a voice memo a letter a video you will find that this may change the way that
00:23:31.620 you view life extension and i honestly wish i could model the other side better i don't like when we
00:23:37.040 have just a sort of one-sided it's more they think that they can always do better for themselves i can
00:23:43.280 continue to improve and the more time i have the better i can make things and also free humans from
00:23:47.900 the suffering of death death to i i think people with a limited perspective is the worst thing that
00:23:53.440 can happen to a human and i think that the foregoing of sort of self-identity as something that's
00:24:01.280 meaningful was a really big shift for me that i didn't make fully until meeting you simone and it was one of
00:24:07.020 the big changes that you had on me i completely shed my identity when we married and that gave me
00:24:12.380 the opportunity to really redefine for myself and my family what identity means and the way that we see
00:24:21.860 it culturally our family the way we raise our kids seeing it the way that we see it ourselves
00:24:25.780 is that when you are young you are at the lowest level of identity which is to be an individual
00:24:34.060 and that is the weakest most pathetic form of identity then as you get older you get married
00:24:42.840 and you become something more you become a partnership and your identity combines with
00:24:48.500 another person and i think this is something that people we in emails we often get each other's emails
00:24:53.660 and we interchangeably use each other's names and it's the same with our twitter account and the
00:24:57.900 same with our authorship and the same as the way we do ceoship because we really consider ourselves
00:25:02.420 as two faces of the same identity in a very meaningful sense that i think other people
00:25:07.320 may underestimate and then you become a family which is a different form of identity you move away from
00:25:14.840 even the idea of a partnership and you become a guide to something bigger but without controlling or
00:25:22.200 directly influencing that thing and then you pass on to the highest form of identity
00:25:27.840 identity which is to be a memory and the impact you had on your family and society
00:25:33.380 so life is a transition away from being trapped in this singular meat shell
00:25:39.500 to being a more expansive concept and it is almost like a being foridianly trapped in a early stage of
00:25:50.420 development from the perspective of our family culture to genuinely fear your own death outside of
00:25:57.840 your own death happening before you can complete what you wanted to complete in life
00:26:02.920 and that is something i fear constantly but that fear goes away with everything i complete every kid i have
00:26:08.980 every time i put together some aspect of their education system so it can function even after i die
00:26:14.460 another one of our books that we put together so that they would have some guidance if we died
00:26:19.240 i see it as a list of tasks i have to do before i am free to die without consequences
00:26:26.520 yeah it's but it's also very i think very comforting i think it's difficult and scary to be afraid of death
00:26:34.100 i wouldn't even say it's like an important ending i would just say it's almost ridiculous
00:26:38.860 the transition in a cycle it's not even that much of a transition it's just it's it's irrelevant
00:26:44.380 um it is just it is something but i think that's also folds into our mechanistic view of the universe
00:26:52.400 that everything that will happen has already happened and everything that has happened is
00:26:56.160 happening that'd be a fun one to talk about in a video in the near future
00:26:59.220 germanism yeah with that kind of view it's weird to be afraid of any single moment that may
00:27:06.940 have happened or that has happened and i guess that view combined with our sense of self
00:27:12.480 makes us very unafraid of that fleeting nature of life but what i think is also interesting
00:27:19.280 is that despite that you very much struggle like many ambitious people do with what you've accomplished
00:27:27.760 so far in your life like i think you are it's a tickle clock you're very yeah you're very aware of
00:27:33.480 your mortality i'm very aware of my mortality i'm more concerned about but if i need to play
00:27:39.220 with cheat codes to complete the things that i want to complete then maybe i'm not good enough
00:27:43.600 to properly judge what needs to be completed yeah yeah but so you think you like the artificial
00:27:51.840 we don't have to say artificial but you like the constraint you think that it's useful because you find
00:27:57.440 it motivating i guess there is that studies have found that when people are given a deadline
00:28:01.100 when people every person could enact everything they wanted to upon the world there's a bunch of
00:28:06.120 people with different hypotheses about what's best for the future of our species and everything like
00:28:09.920 that if everyone could just enact whatever they wanted to there would be a lot of conflicting things
00:28:16.720 so to an extent it's a competition of ideas and cultures to say that you get this sort of limited
00:28:22.920 time here very limited time here and if your ideas are good presumably you will be more effective
00:28:30.040 at seeing them enacted on the world or within your family in the same way that if we aren't creating
00:28:35.620 a good culture for our kids they can leave it and that's a beautiful thing that's a great thing about
00:28:40.620 intergenerationalism yeah i also think that studies have shown that when you give someone two weeks to
00:28:49.380 complete a project they complete it in two weeks when you give them two years to complete the exactly
00:28:54.460 same project they take two years so yeah having infinite time doesn't necessarily help you if
00:29:01.640 anything it delays society's receipt of your hard work that's a really interesting point i just noticed
00:29:07.600 all of my friends who are life extensionists after they became art at life extensionists they have
00:29:13.500 achieved almost nothing in their lives oh no interesting oh a number of them were successful ceos
00:29:19.600 before they jumped on the life extension train but after they jumped on the life extension train very
00:29:24.980 few of them have started successful companies or movements or ideologies do you think the assumption
00:29:31.780 is i'll just create that after i figured out life extension it's like that thing with genies my first wish
00:29:37.380 is to get infinite more wishes yeah and then your wishes get terrible
00:29:41.480 yeah because when you only have three wishes you've got to make them count
00:29:45.800 yeah interesting well i love chatting with you simone and i love that you have enlightened me so
00:29:51.660 much on this topic because this is one of the areas where you have really influenced my world
00:29:55.380 perspective and it was not like this before i was very much a life extensionist sort of person before
00:29:59.920 meeting you and i pulled you into the death cult you uplifted me into the death cult
00:30:05.100 um but the death cult will win because these crusty i mean if it's mortals versus immortals we're not
00:30:12.780 the mortals the mortals will always win because we're not afraid of change we're not afraid of death
00:30:17.840 and they are and it's fundamentally their fears that limit them i love that and and i mean it's also
00:30:27.420 fundamentally supremacist movements always fail they think they're better than anything that they could
00:30:34.020 create and to me that is the the height of arrogance um and and and it is that arrogance
00:30:42.820 that will blind them and why the mortals will always crush them then may we burn bright and die young
00:30:51.760 but live to speak another day the flame that burns half as bright burns half as long
00:30:57.260 twice as bright burns that the flame that burns twice as bright burns half as long
00:31:03.020 beautiful that's blade runner he says that in that anyway i love that note you're amazing i love you too
00:31:12.820 i love you too