Based Camp - Bill Gates Funded Orgs Now Recognize Fertility Collapse, Excited to Fight Over African Immigrants

00:00:00.000 While the scenario may sound alarming, the paper describes the collapse in global birth rates as

00:00:04.780 a quote-unquote success story. Fewer humans means less carbon emissions, the paper observed.

00:00:11.820 Urged readers to prepare for a rapidly shrinking global population where most newborns worldwide

00:00:17.000 are in sub-Saharan Africa, where wealthy countries compete fiercely for immigrants to prop up their

00:00:23.480 economies. This is a vision for the year 2100 provided by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

00:00:30.000 Would you like to know more?

00:00:31.320 Okay.

00:00:33.140 What?

00:00:34.260 I was just clicking through to the Research Square article.

00:00:39.460 Withdrawn, the association between adult penile length and IQ, evidences from 139 countries.

00:00:46.160 Why is that? Why would they withdraw it for that reason?

00:00:48.760 22 February 2024. Research Square has withdrawn this preprint due to the problematic nature

00:00:55.440 of the topic concerning race and intelligence. We acknowledge the sensitivities involved and the

00:01:00.980 potential for misrepresentation or harm. This decision reflects our commitment to disseminate

00:01:06.280 disseminate, withdrawn research that meets our rigorous standards for integrity and respect for

00:01:13.400 all individuals. Please refer to our-

00:01:15.900 So people who know what this article was on, it correlated IQ with penis lengths? 0.88

00:01:22.840 Yeah.

00:01:23.140 And it did obviously break its cohorts by ethnic group. And unfortunately, this ended up showing

00:01:29.160 IQ differences in ethnic groups, which led to the paper being-

00:01:31.820 Yeah, but the results are still posted.

00:01:33.820 I'll read the results. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between flaccid penile

00:01:39.060 length and IQ, indicating higher IQs in individuals with shorter penile lengths and notable ethnic

00:01:44.720 differences were observed. Oh, no. And so it's so funny, though, because you'd think that this would

00:01:50.120 be retracted because it's about wee-wees, but it's not. It's retracted because it's about race group

00:01:57.880 differences. But I was just reflecting on the fact that you somehow, despite all this, get to buck the

00:02:04.780 trend and you've got both the big package and the big brain. I hope you appreciate what you have.

00:02:10.180 Too crude for this podcast, Simone. I didn't put disseminated in this. I didn't put withdrawn.

00:02:18.240 No, we need to talk about a really fascinating article today that I was going over because

00:02:23.220 progressives are now beginning to admit that we've got a problem. Well, not that we've got a problem,

00:02:31.940 but that global fertility is crashing much more rapidly and much faster than they thought before.

00:02:37.660 They are. It's exciting. And there was an article where I was like,

00:02:40.700 okay, what I'm going to do is I am going to read segments from this article like we usually do when

00:02:45.420 we're going over articles, just like the important points. But I just went through it. I was like,

00:02:49.100 every line in this is worth reacting to because it is so fascinating. So what we're going to be

00:02:55.740 going through and talking through is not the original article, but the Breitbart article that

00:03:02.540 takes out the important points, because this gives us an opportunity to, one, already have all the

00:03:07.160 important points condensed, but both react to the extreme leftist position on this and the extreme

00:03:13.600 rightist position on this. Now, for context, though, the original article is a Lancet article,

00:03:19.160 right? That's a very respected journal that was published sort of per the prerogative of

00:03:25.260 Bill Gates. Well, we'll just go through. So the article that we'll be reading from is titled,

00:03:30.500 quote, dramatic decline in global fertility, end quote. By 2100, developed nations will fiercely

00:03:36.760 compete for migrants, Bill Gates' funded Lancet article predicts. Quote, open immigration will be

00:03:42.760 vital to maintain population size and economic growth, unquote. A Bill Gates-funded study published in

00:03:48.660 The Lancet this week claimed predicting a grim future where people having children in developed

00:03:53.360 countries becomes rare. So woohoo, they're validating us, right? I mean, this is- Yeah, even

00:03:58.440 progressives now admit that we were right about all of this and we were crazy. We fight for open

00:04:03.020 immigration of competent people who want to come in. I will continue. The future is difficult to

00:04:11.340 predict, the study conceded, but nevertheless urged readers to prepare for a rapidly shrinking global

00:04:17.240 population where most newborns worldwide are in sub-Saharan Africa, where wealthy countries compete

00:04:23.300 fiercely for immigrants to prop up their economies. This is a vision for the year 2100 provided by a 1.00

00:04:31.400 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded study from the University of Washington, Seattle's Institute for

00:04:36.460 Health Metrics and Evaluation, IHME, published in the increasingly woke Lancet journal. The council's birth

00:04:44.200 control for Africa and open borders for Europe to survive the coming decades. You can tell that this 0.70

00:04:49.700 is a Breitbart article. Hold on, you got to read the tweet thing here. Okay. So here's the tweet that

00:04:57.920 they released. That is to say that the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation released. Explosion

00:05:04.180 emoji. Traumatic. Declines in global fertility forecasted to transform global population patterns.

00:05:10.520 Fertility levels significantly below replacement levels by 2100, with only six countries able to

00:05:17.140 continue maintaining population size over time. Hashtag GBD 2021. Then they link to their Lancet article.

00:05:24.940 It is wild. Hold on, and the Lancet article is titled, in 2100, half of the children born on the

00:05:30.060 planet will be in sub-Saharan Africa. And, but they're admitting it. They're, they're, they're, 0.99

00:05:33.920 it's not really. They're, they're, they're a stolenness. They're like, all of the world will

00:05:37.340 be fighting over these people born in sub-Saharan Africa. And it's like, no, like, okay. First of all, 0.86

00:05:46.800 there, we have said this in op-eds that we wrote that like the progressive plan around this is racist.

00:05:52.020 They basically want to treat Africa like a human farm because they will only be fighting over

00:05:56.640 people in these countries. If these countries are unable to achieve the economies that lead to

00:06:03.080 below fertility replacement rate, even in Africa, when a country goes above 5,000 USD per year in

00:06:08.420 their, their average GDP or average, you know, yearly income per family, sorry, not GDP, they fall below

00:06:14.180 replacement rate. So they have to keep these countries poor and then they want to use them like 0.94

00:06:18.820 human farms and bid over the people who are being shipped from them to support their economies.

00:06:25.940 Yeah. They're banking on poverty. They're banking on continued impoverishment for

00:06:30.540 very deserving nations. That is to say very deserving of development nations.

00:06:35.220 Yeah. But also I want to be realistic. Like, what do we think? Like we often like laugh at the

00:06:40.180 progressives for saying, ha ha ha, you know, they're banking on poverty, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:06:44.880 But like, let's be realistic. Our country's actually going to be fighting over immigrants from 1.00

00:06:49.240 Sahara and Africa, not, but a hundred years from now, not 50 years from now, because people 1.00

00:06:55.620 misunderstand, like throw out any of the, the, the accusations of like different IQs among different

00:07:04.940 asset groups, right? Like just ignore that. Okay. If you have a population, okay. Like Haiti is a great

00:07:13.140 example of this happening. And intergenerationally, you remove 85% of the people from that country

00:07:18.840 who graduate with college degrees, every single generation. And you do that for like four or five

00:07:25.620 generations, even throw out the genetics part. Culturally, you are going to have a population

00:07:33.320 in that country that is incredibly hostile to education because you have intergenerationally.

00:07:40.700 So you don't even need genetics to play a role here. You are creating pools of people that are

00:07:46.340 going to be, and if you have a country where every single time somebody in that country makes a lot

00:07:51.080 of money, they leave, which is also what happened in Haiti. So Haiti is a great example of what's 1.00

00:07:55.760 going to end up happening to these places. So every single person who makes over a certain amount of

00:07:59.760 money and wants security for their family leaves every C or not every single person, but let's say 85%

00:08:03.780 of the people who make a lot of money want security for their families leave. And 85% of the people who get

00:08:07.920 college degrees leave. Intergenerationally, culturally speaking, that country is going to produce less

00:08:14.920 people like that. And this is going to lead to environments where even though they're producing

00:08:21.180 a lot of people, these people do not fit the economic hole that is left by the lack of people

00:08:28.400 in the developed world. They are not useful economic input.

00:08:31.640 Well, because as we've said many times before, what nations really need, especially, so, okay,

00:08:36.120 in terms of butt wipers, fine, maybe, maybe. But what nations also really need, aside from labor, 0.99

00:08:42.920 which I think many people miss in these discussions about demographic collapse, is taxpayers because

00:08:47.580 someone has to hold up the pensions. Someone has to pay taxes to maintain schools and roads to make sure

00:08:53.960 city infrastructure doesn't crumble, to make sure governments still are stable. And so if you don't bring in

00:08:59.120 people who are economic producers, who are smart enough to move an economy forward to innovate,

00:09:04.860 you're in a pretty bad position. And other people in our general sphere have recently been

00:09:09.400 tweeting about how, oh, actually, Moore Births, who was on our podcast recently, recently tweeted a really

00:09:16.160 interesting graph arguing how demographic collapse hurts the most innovative countries right now, the most,

00:09:22.860 you know, like the, the most quickly innovating, amazing, technologically advanced cultures and

00:09:29.280 nations are going kaput. If you don't find a way to make more of those people somehow, it's, uh,

00:09:36.040 it's bad. And then people really, like, we are, like, fundamentally, it doesn't exactly matter that

00:09:43.040 the number of humans is collapsing, okay? Yeah, we're not fighting for endless humans.

00:09:47.500 And we always talk about this. We're like economically productive cultural groups,

00:09:52.000 like in here, keep on, we're not even talking about genetics, just cultures, right? Economically

00:09:56.040 productive cultures. And this is true within countries and between countries. So if I'm going

00:09:59.960 to sub-Saharan Africa, the more economically productive an individual is, the more likely they

00:10:04.560 are to either leave and then have their fertility crash or have lower fertility within their own

00:10:08.140 countries. And so people hear economically productive and they don't understand what I mean by

00:10:12.340 this. So to word this another way, the problem is, is we don't have taxpayers anymore.

00:10:17.500 It's not that we don't have humans anymore. It's that we don't have taxpayers anymore.

00:10:21.540 And taxpayers are what you need for all of these progressive solutions you have to things like

00:10:28.340 poverty and homelessness and people starving and single mothers.

00:10:35.560 Yeah, these aren't immigrants that countries are scrambling to, to bring in just so they can be on

00:10:39.880 social services and not work. And yeah, I think that's also another big misconception is there's this

00:10:45.940 weird dichotomy in progressive talk between, you know, you know, we will take your tired masses,

00:10:51.940 right? We will take care of them. We'll help them get back on their feet. Whereas really what they're

00:10:56.300 saying they need from immigration, when they talk about immigration in the context of demographic

00:11:00.780 collapse as a solution is, oh no, no, we're going to brain drain all of your productive workers,

00:11:06.060 leaving you with nothing in your own home nation. And we're totally not going to let in anyone who 1.00

00:11:10.200 doesn't contribute to our tax base.

00:11:11.700 Yeah, this is a really twisted thing. So suppose progressives implement this perfectly. So at least

00:11:16.620 for our lifetimes, it'll probably work out okay. If you just take everyone from sub-Saharan Africa 1.00

00:11:21.640 who is economically productive or educated, and we just do that. Don't ignore that this isn't a long-term

00:11:29.700 solution, right? Like ignore the cultural effects this is going to have on everyone involved in this

00:11:36.280 triangle trade the progressives are trying to set up. But just consider the effects that this will have

00:11:44.200 within our lifetime. When I ask a progressive, and I point to, you know, a homeless person, right? And I go,

00:11:50.400 do they deserve some of the income from like the economically wealthy of our country to not live in

00:11:56.280 circumstances like this? And they'll say, and I'm like, what about their kids? Do they deserve that we put them

00:12:01.540 into schools and gives them a chance? And the progressive say, of course they do. And I'm like,

00:12:07.580 then why are you stealing the people who would be paying that money if that person lived in Africa? 0.89

00:12:14.060 Is it because African homeless people don't matter to you? Is it because you don't give a shit about 1.00

00:12:19.580 black homeless people? Okay? Is it because you don't care about Latin American homeless people? 1.00

00:12:25.960 You only care about homeless people if they happen to be born in the United States? The people that we

00:12:31.460 are robbing these countries of are the people who pay into their tax base and allow them to support

00:12:40.860 their own struggling classes. This is catastrophic and it creates all sorts of horrible disincentives

00:12:49.400 for these countries. Because now if these countries had systems where they were paying for people to get

00:12:53.440 college degrees, for example, and a huge portion of people getting college degrees are leaving the

00:12:57.560 country, well, now they have an incentive to not pay for college degrees anymore because they're losing

00:13:03.380 all that investment to the U.S., which is basically robbing them of it. This system is horrible.

00:13:10.980 But it also reminds me of a joke I told you earlier today, whereas people know we're generally,

00:13:18.000 we're not super antagonistic to immigration as long as it's of economically productive individuals.

00:13:23.440 However, you know, we have to put this in the context of history and it's like,

00:13:27.640 I feel a bit like I'm hearing from people. Well, the sea people are mostly productive tradesmen

00:13:32.820 and when they come to our country, do you not think a sea person can be a potter just as well as an

00:13:39.580 Egyptian? Sea people can be potters too, okay? They're not leaving their countries because they want to.

00:13:46.520 It's due to climate change, which actually most historians do believe is that the sea people are

00:13:52.080 moving due to a climate change event. And if anything, we as Egyptians are, we have the most

00:13:58.060 important gods in our country, so we likely weren't worshiping them correctly, which led to this climate

00:14:02.120 change. So how dare you keep the sea people out of our country where they don't want to displace us, 1.00

00:14:11.720 okay? They don't want to cause any sort of turmoil in our civilizational system. They'll come and

00:14:19.580 they'll take the jobs that Egyptians and Hittites don't want. Yeah. And frankly, sea people as a term, 1.00

00:14:28.520 I find a little bit dehumanizing, okay? I mean, I can't remember what they're actually called

00:14:36.560 because we didn't record that, but I just find your use of the term sea people, why can't we just call them

00:14:43.200 extra people? Either, they're extremely human. In many ways, they're more human than us because they've

00:14:49.460 undergone so much.

00:14:50.420 There you go. I mean... Okay, sorry, I had to do my sea people rant, but continue to sit on.

00:14:57.560 All right, I will continue to read. While the scenario may sound alarming, the paper and a hefty

00:15:03.080 press release accompanying it describes the collapse in global birth rates as a quote-unquote success

00:15:09.060 story. Fewer humans means less carbon emissions, the paper, which also received funding from the

00:15:14.740 British, Norwegian, and New Zealand governments, observed. Here's a quote from the paper itself in

00:15:19.540 the Lancet. Although sustained below-replacement fertility will pose serious potential challenges

00:15:25.560 for much of the world over the course of the century, it also presents opportunities for

00:15:30.240 environmental progress. Alongside strong pro-environmental regulations, a smaller global

00:15:36.180 population in the future would alleviate some strain on global food systems, fragile environments,

00:15:41.680 and other finite resources, and also reduce carbon emissions. So, they're happy about it.

00:15:47.720 Oh, yeah. No, keep reading. Keep reading.

00:15:50.180 According to the paper's co-author, the facts of life will require explicitly left-wing solutions,

00:15:55.360 and society will have to be rebuilt to suit. Land research scientist from IHME, Dr. Natalia,

00:16:03.820 butchering her name, I'm not even trying, said, quote,

00:16:06.660 the implications are immense. The future trends in fertility rates and live births will completely

00:16:11.760 reconfigure the global economy and the international balance of power, and will necessitate reorganizing

00:16:17.540 societies, unquote. That is horrifying. So, they now admit that this is happening, and they're like,

00:16:26.040 hmm, now our global cabal can have even more power than they previously had.

00:16:31.220 That they don't somehow think that, at least among their little network of nations, including those

00:16:38.300 that funded this Lancet paper, that they aren't already pretty left-leaning? I mean, I guess they're

00:16:43.640 not universally left-leaning, and there have been right backlashes.

00:16:47.060 No, no, no, no. So, their plan is to extend the control of the organizations that they already own,

00:16:52.680 like the UN, the World Health Organization, and then other billionaire-controlled organizations,

00:16:56.800 and then use those organizations to enhance further control over this new triangle trade of 0.76

00:17:01.980 humans. They're like, oh, yes, we're going to start using African as a human farm, and we are going to 1.00

00:17:09.120 use this Africa human farm and distribute its resources to our will, and we will have to exercise 1.00

00:17:16.140 even more control over the governments that we do control to allow, you know, less dissent, less thought,

00:17:21.260 less. You know, this is a fantasy in which, as the number of humans declines, they have even more

00:17:28.080 power. The problem is, is within their own countries, the groups that are still breeding, 0.99

00:17:33.220 even the intelligent, economically productive groups, like you and me or Elon, are extremely

00:17:39.280 hostile to their interests. The people who are doing these studies, the people who are writing these

00:17:44.840 Lancet reports, I bet they don't have kids, not above replacement rate at least, and that's the key to all

00:17:50.320 of this, is they think that we will continue to go along with this, and they think that even Africans,

00:17:57.000 that Africans are going to be okay with their countries kept in intentional poverty so that 0.97

00:18:01.420 they can be farmed by Europeans for humans. No one is okay with this solution, except for this small 0.99

00:18:10.080 group of ivory tower elites who literally have never spoken to an African immigrant, because the funny 1.00

00:18:16.800 thing is that a lot of the perennialist movement is actually this first wave of African immigrants

00:18:20.560 that's, like, super competent, and a lot of conservatives are not aware of, like, how smart

00:18:26.500 a lot of the African immigrants to our country are in the first wave of African immigrants, or the first

00:18:30.960 few waves of African immigrants with this immigration cycle. They are incredibly competent,

00:18:35.180 industrious, entrepreneurial people, and they are not excited about shipping everyone else from their country 1.00

00:18:42.580 over here. They left for a reason, okay? They're like, yeah, now I'm in the land of the free. Let's leave behind

00:18:48.600 what I left behind, and let's make sure that this country doesn't destroy itself so that my kids can, and let's

00:18:55.360 keep the progressives from converting my kids, because when the progressives bring them over here, they're like, 1.00

00:18:59.460 okay, well, now we need to work on your homophobia, and the Africans are like, like, fuck if you are, 1.00

00:19:05.940 okay, buddy? I came over here for the economic advantage and to be around other Christians 1.00

00:19:12.820 or believers if they're Muslims, you know, not to be around people like you, and even us as people who

00:19:20.040 are pro the gay community, even though I'm pro the gay community, I don't think that we have a right 1.00

00:19:24.500 to erase the cultural traditions that most Africans have, i.e. not American Africans, but Africans who

00:19:32.800 are immigrating from Africa, around how they relate to gender and relationships. It is their right to keep 1.00

00:19:38.740 their traditions, and we don't get to impose our theological, cosmological, our moral systems on them

00:19:47.600 as if ours are innately superior to theirs. Anyway, continue. Okay. I'm going to skip the tweet

00:19:55.900 that they posted because it's just promoting their own. So this is a continuation of a quote from that

00:20:02.620 woman. Quote, global recognition of the challenges around migration and global aid networks are going

00:20:07.820 to be all the more critical when there is a fierce competition for migrants to sustain economic growth,

00:20:13.240 and as sub-Saharan Africa's baby boom continues apace, she added. The press release on the study

00:20:19.700 predicted that by 2100, quote, half the children born on the planet will be from sub-Saharan Africa,

00:20:25.560 primarily in western and eastern sub-Saharan Africa. So, I mean, yeah, they're not wrong about 1.00

00:20:30.840 that. It's just their plans on what to do with it. Pretty messed up. Again, your human farm thing. 1.00

00:20:37.540 Quote, in low fertility, hi, I'm in... Sorry, again, I was just thrown by what I'm reading because it's

00:20:42.980 so crazy. Quote, in low fertility, high-income economies, policies that support parents and

00:20:49.400 open immigration will be vital to maintain population size and economic growth, it continued.

00:20:54.500 In these locations, populations will shrink unless low fertility can be offset by ethical

00:20:59.100 and effective immigration, unquote. Far from western nations arguing over how to...

00:21:04.440 Actually, before you go further, I want to note something because this is the very first time

00:21:07.680 we've seen progressives note this. Ethical immigration. They're beginning to realize that

00:21:13.520 coercive immigration is something that their policies are going to begin to coerce and encourage 0.99

00:21:23.520 and reward. And I wonder what they consider ethical. Is ethical that we take a slice of the entire

00:21:29.060 population of a country? Is ethical that we don't just take their best and the brightest? Because at the

00:21:33.540 end of the day, people might notice this from our videos, I care about what's happening on the global

00:21:38.020 stage, but I'm still an American patriot first and foremost. And that's why I'm okay with immigration 0.96

00:21:42.740 of the best and brightest because I like what's good for America. And I like creating America as a home

00:21:50.300 to the globe's most adventurous, most ambitious, and best and brightest. But I, unlike them, recognize

00:21:58.500 that this is, that this comes at a severe cost to the people that we're, the countries that we're taking

00:22:05.300 these people from. And that when we bring these people over here, we need to find a way to not erase their

00:22:10.980 cultural background so that they can stay high fertility.

00:22:13.020 Mm-hmm. Yeah, seriously. All right. Far from western nations arguing over how to best manage migration, the paper

00:22:22.840 prognosticates a future where states fight each other to get their hands on as many migrants as possible.

00:22:28.680 And according to the IHME's modeling, the only six nations on the earth that will have above

00:22:35.320 replacement fertility rate by 2100 will be Samoa, Somalia, Tonga, Niger, Chad, and Tajikistan. Any hope of 1.00

00:22:45.060 countering these issues by encouraging growth and fertility rates in developed countries, for instance,

00:22:50.120 is close to pointless, the paper assured. Discussing the total fertility rate, TFR,

00:22:55.180 which in general means 2.1 children per women in a society to achieve self-sustainment,

00:23:00.060 the IHME professes to have determined, quote, that even under optimistic assumptions, unquote,

00:23:06.060 the impact of pronatal policies will be low. They're not wrong. Abortion is inevitable too, 1.00

00:23:11.520 the paper noted, so don't try interfering with that either. Quote, there is no silver bullet,

00:23:16.820 unquote, caution. I love this. I love this so much that they have come to all the conclusions we

00:23:23.740 have. It's like, well, the pronatal policies that they would like to implement, i.e. cash handouts,

00:23:28.600 that's what they mean. Pronatal policies don't work. They don't mean protecting diverse conservative

00:23:34.180 groups that already exist within their countries, i.e. the various different conservative religious

00:23:39.700 traditions that exist within the United States, within Canada, within the UK, because of course,

00:23:44.960 they have a right to those cultures' children. They just need to ship in more for their unsustainable 1.00

00:23:50.480 human farming practice. What is this other than that, right? That's how their culture survives,

00:23:56.780 is by taking children from nearby demographically healthy cultural groups or shipping them in,

00:24:01.460 and that's what they're saying here. And I love how they're also like, oh, anything that goes against,

00:24:06.200 but I would note that generally abortion restrictions within a country, we did a piece on this,

00:24:10.860 like if you look at graphs of Europe by how strict they are on abortion policies, there's a pretty 0.52

00:24:16.540 strict overlap between that and how low their fertility rate is. So just at a functional level,

00:24:20.820 it doesn't really work, but it is, you know, I hate agreeing with these people on anything,

00:24:25.360 but they're right about that. No, they're not. They're not wrong. Although Breitbart, of course,

00:24:30.080 being very antagonistic to them, immediately below this shows a tweet of theirs mentioning Hungary's

00:24:36.300 pro-family policy is working, births up 9.4%, pointing to a recent uptick in fertility in Hungary,

00:24:43.520 which does have many pernodilus policies. So Breitbart's trying to say they're obviously wrong,

00:24:48.220 but oh my gosh. Shall I continue? Yeah. The distribution of births in the future is going

00:24:54.420 to be very uneven, it predicted. While the total TFR is thought to be around 1.6 and around 1.5 across

00:25:01.200 much of Europe and the United States by 2100, areas like South Korea and Eastern Europe are said

00:25:06.880 to be looking at a real demographic winter, with TFRs heading toward one child per woman.

00:25:11.540 In other words, the natural-born population of such areas would have every generation.

00:25:17.600 Batajari explained, most countries will remain below replacement levels, and once nearly every

00:25:24.080 country's population is shrinking, reliance on open immigration will become necessary to sustain

00:25:28.680 economic growth. Sub-Saharan African countries have a vital resource that aging societies are

00:25:34.640 losing. A youthful population, unquote. They only have that because of extreme poverty. They are

00:25:41.240 literally laying out their plans to keep these countries in poverty, to use them as human farms. 0.74

00:25:48.280 Oh my god. While the IHME warns of high migration in the future, where policies to encourage births in 0.86

00:25:55.300 the developed world would have failed to do anything but take the edge off, the body does concede such

00:26:01.720 long-term forecasts are difficult. Indeed, German newspaper DeWalt, totally messed that up, cited the

00:26:10.320 Berlin Institute for Population and Development, which notes, quote, projections that go more than 25

00:26:15.340 years into the future are super uncertain, unquote. Given the sheer number of unpredictable factors,

00:26:21.840 one of these factors, as the IHME itself noted, is changing technology. Acknowledging the impact of

00:26:29.920 artificial intelligence and robotics is, quote, difficult to predict, unquote. Nevertheless,

00:26:35.360 they could, quote, reduce the economic effects of changes in age structure, unquote.

00:26:41.200 That's such a scientific way of putting it.

00:26:43.060 And then under it, there's another quote from Bright, or another tweet from Bright wrote,

00:26:46.620 deaths of UK born overtake births of UK born.

00:26:50.180 Yeah. We're seeing that all over the place.

00:26:53.280 Yeah. So, I mean, I think, and you can see why I wanted to read the whole article. There was

00:26:57.460 nothing in that that wasn't completely insane. These people are like, yeah, it bothers me that people

00:27:05.960 are always like, why are you so antagonistic to, you know, it reminds me of my ancestors, right? Like,

00:27:12.460 you know, when they were fighting against slavery, I'm sure many of their neighbors would be like,

00:27:16.500 these people are your friends. Like, why are you not friends, but like friends of your parents and stuff

00:27:20.400 like that? Or like, like, you know, you guys are part of the same cultural group. Why are you fighting

00:27:24.880 against them so ardently? And it's like, because of the slavery thing? The, the, the, that, that's why

00:27:32.220 the slavery thing, that's a big deal. And they're like, well, come on. I mean, it's an economic

00:27:37.080 system and everyone benefits to some. No, there are some positions that some people are pursuing

00:27:45.300 that are so completely indefensible. And even during the slavery thing, a person might be like,

00:27:51.940 well, look, I don't support slavery myself, but I do have to fight for the Confederacy or I do have

00:27:57.420 to vote for, you know, democratic politicians. The pro-slavery politicians, of course, they'll pretend

00:28:03.800 that, well, I don't remember that the Democrats used to be. I mean, we do have to vote for the

00:28:08.700 Democrats, of course. And they're like, well, I mean, no, no, no, no, no. Just because you don't

00:28:14.780 support that. If you vote and support a political ecosystem that leads to this as a result, you are

00:28:24.160 supporting it. And if a person says, oh, well, what's happening now is not comparable to that.

00:28:30.040 Maybe what's happening in the world today. But the future that this article lays out is not that

00:28:38.940 much better than slavery. Intentionally keeping African countries in extreme poverty so that they 0.99

00:28:46.960 can be used as human farms. And do you think that they intend on these people they ship over to

00:28:53.200 displace them in leadership positions? No, they do not. They want to use them as economic fuel, 0.97

00:29:00.160 like a resource is the way they talk about them, like their oil or something, a disposable resource.

00:29:06.580 And when I say disposable, I mean disposable in their mind, because when immigrants come to the 1.00

00:29:11.460 United States, the average fertility rate of immigrants, and this was last I looked, so it's

00:29:14.640 probably much lower now. It's 1.7. So at the time that was measured, that was about the average

00:29:18.780 fertility rate of the average American citizen. So it falls to about the rate of the average

00:29:24.320 citizen of a country. So this is not a resource that you can like ship over and it repopulates

00:29:30.320 itself. You need to keep these countries in poverty, keep shipping them over. But as you do that, let's 0.94

00:29:35.380 ignore the genetic effects of this. Culturally, these countries are going to become less and less

00:29:40.060 productive over time in terms of the utility of the immigrants to the tax base, which is the whole

00:29:45.680 purpose of this. It's not humans. It's tax base that you're shipping over. It's economic productivity

00:29:49.900 that you're shipping over. What are your thoughts? Well, I think this goes back to the very common

00:29:56.640 theme with demographic collapse and pernatalism of this being a litmus test for anyone's worldview and

00:30:01.100 values. And so, of course, when you look at this from this perspective, the Gates Foundation has been

00:30:07.640 very involved in Africa and very involved in helping various African populations with, I think,

00:30:13.940 malaria, right, and various forms of development. They're trying and they care. And I think part of

00:30:19.120 this is them trying to say, look at how great Africa is. We're going to be scrambling for these 0.99

00:30:24.260 amazing people that we care about a lot and we're trying to help a lot. And they just don't think

00:30:28.800 through the consequences of what they're suggesting, which in the end are very detrimental and sort of

00:30:35.760 the opposite of everything they've been working toward, all the development and health improvement

00:30:40.420 that they're working towards. So there's a lot of irony that I see here because this is a group

00:30:45.560 that deeply, deeply cares about African populations. I disagree. I think that you haven't read some of

00:30:51.660 their papers recently. So if you look at a lot of their papers, they will brag about how their

00:30:55.880 interventions lower fertility rates in these countries. Well, I mean, to a certain extent,

00:31:01.140 and again, this is something that we've even held. We don't mind the fact that as demographic

00:31:05.360 transitions take place, that there are fewer disastrous teen pregnancies where people are

00:31:11.560 having kids without being ready for them. We're not arguing against that. And I think that that's

00:31:15.920 what they're trying to fight for. They're saying, look at all these people who are having kids who

00:31:19.460 don't want the kids, who can't take care of the kids. We don't want that to happen.

00:31:23.500 That's not what they're saying. They are thrilled about a world in which African humans become a resource. 0.80

00:31:29.640 I mean, again, I just don't think you're able to model them maybe because you weren't raised in

00:31:35.860 woke culture. But when I read this using previous models that I had in my head, the conclusion is

00:31:43.080 that as you can see, Africa is the future. We're all going to be scrambling for these amazing people

00:31:50.860 that everyone now, everyone is ignoring.

00:31:53.200 Look at this resource of Africans I have procured. 1.00

00:31:57.820 They don't get it.

00:31:58.900 All of the countries are going to be lining up to buy them. We can ship them to you.

00:32:02.820 Well, you know, that's, it's all very, as they would say, problematic. But I do think,

00:32:09.560 and this is very common. I mean, listen, everybody is trying to do what's best given the information

00:32:15.760 they have on hand. They have not thought through a lot of what they're doing and what they're saying.

00:32:21.340 And so when you look at it through our lens, it's very, very bad. But it, I'm just trying to say.

00:32:30.020 What is ultimately going to happen here, if they have their way, if they're able to treat human

00:32:37.100 populations this way, is on a scale. Because I think people are often like, yeah, there were

00:32:42.660 people in the past who did things so totally indefensible that nothing that anyone is striving

00:32:47.920 for today comes close to things like slavery or the Holocaust in terms of the human tragedy that

00:32:54.720 will be imposed by it. The world that they are setting up will be on that scale of human tragedy.

00:33:03.600 And that is why I fight so hard and why I feel so strongly about this.

00:33:08.240 Yeah, I mean, I don't fault you for that. And I don't think that their policies are correct. And I

00:33:19.800 don't think they're looking at this from a very healthy perspective, although immigration policy

00:33:23.740 is going to matter a lot in how demographic collapse plays out. So their right to highlight

00:33:28.840 that is something that's important. Their right to highlight that a lot of the policies that even

00:33:33.400 the Breitbart authors and editors involved in creating this story didn't seem to get, you know,

00:33:39.000 Breitbart clearly thinks, well, let's just ban abortion. That's going to solve it all. That's

00:33:45.100 really going to solve problems. Government handouts.

00:33:47.340 Yeah. So they, you know, they're wrong too. Okay. I think that it's nice to see that there are people

00:33:54.400 pointing to important things that we should be debating and thinking about. So I will try to look at

00:33:59.640 this optimistically and think of it as part of a productive public discourse.

00:34:06.240 I always appreciate your optimism. The ability to see the humanity and even the most monstrous

00:34:12.060 individuals while still fighting against what they stand for. And I really appreciate that.

00:34:17.520 And you're like, oh, I shouldn't be the politician of the two of us. And yet, you know, I was just at

00:34:22.340 a radio show where they had interviewed her recently and they, they, they like having me on more than

00:34:25.840 her because I'm more of a fire brand, but they're like, you, she is the better politician. She is

00:34:30.640 the one who I would rather have representing me. And she is always the one I'd rather have was my

00:34:34.960 finger on the button. And so when you run for president, I know you think it's something to me.

00:34:39.940 Yeah. So don't worry about me because normally you have to worry about, you know, a female 1.00

00:34:43.620 president, you know, who's on her period. I don't get those because I broke my body earlier.

00:34:48.660 So. And because you're always pregnant. 1.00

00:34:50.640 Yeah. I'm effectively not actually female. So don't worry.

00:34:53.600 Besides I'm backed by my husband and I do whatever he says. So I think that's why people

00:35:00.000 really want to vote for me. Well, I think that's the type of female president everybody wants. 1.00

00:35:03.800 Right. I I'm really, I would love to see that. I would love to see. I'm just here to do what my

00:35:08.900 husband says. Press conferences. Well, I'm going to have to ask my husband about that first.

00:35:14.120 I don't know. I suddenly choose the Southern. I'm sorry, but no, I mean, I think that that would be

00:35:19.980 great. I would definitely pull that where I, the type of person who could get elected to such

00:35:25.060 positions, but I have my doubts. So we shall see come November. I love you. I love you too, Malcolm.

Based Camp - April 08, 2024

Bill Gates Funded Orgs Now Recognize Fertility Collapse, Excited to Fight Over African Immigrants

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript