Bill Gates Funded Orgs Now Recognize Fertility Collapse, Excited to Fight Over African Immigrants
Episode Stats
Words per minute
170.31071
Harmful content
Misogyny
7
sentences flagged
Toxicity
7
sentences flagged
Hate speech
39
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, we discuss an article that has been retracted from the Journal of Psychiatry and Neurology, and a Breitbart article that takes out the important points from the original article. We also discuss a Bill Gates-funded article that argues that open borders are the key to population growth in the coming decades.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
While the scenario may sound alarming, the paper describes the collapse in global birth rates as
00:00:04.780
a quote-unquote success story. Fewer humans means less carbon emissions, the paper observed.
00:00:11.820
Urged readers to prepare for a rapidly shrinking global population where most newborns worldwide
00:00:17.000
are in sub-Saharan Africa, where wealthy countries compete fiercely for immigrants to prop up their
00:00:23.480
economies. This is a vision for the year 2100 provided by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
00:00:34.260
I was just clicking through to the Research Square article.
00:00:39.460
Withdrawn, the association between adult penile length and IQ, evidences from 139 countries.
00:00:46.160
Why is that? Why would they withdraw it for that reason?
00:00:48.760
22 February 2024. Research Square has withdrawn this preprint due to the problematic nature
00:00:55.440
of the topic concerning race and intelligence. We acknowledge the sensitivities involved and the
00:01:00.980
potential for misrepresentation or harm. This decision reflects our commitment to disseminate
00:01:06.280
disseminate, withdrawn research that meets our rigorous standards for integrity and respect for
00:01:15.900
So people who know what this article was on, it correlated IQ with penis lengths?
0.88
00:01:23.140
And it did obviously break its cohorts by ethnic group. And unfortunately, this ended up showing
00:01:29.160
IQ differences in ethnic groups, which led to the paper being-
00:01:33.820
I'll read the results. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between flaccid penile
00:01:39.060
length and IQ, indicating higher IQs in individuals with shorter penile lengths and notable ethnic
00:01:44.720
differences were observed. Oh, no. And so it's so funny, though, because you'd think that this would
00:01:50.120
be retracted because it's about wee-wees, but it's not. It's retracted because it's about race group
00:01:57.880
differences. But I was just reflecting on the fact that you somehow, despite all this, get to buck the
00:02:04.780
trend and you've got both the big package and the big brain. I hope you appreciate what you have.
00:02:10.180
Too crude for this podcast, Simone. I didn't put disseminated in this. I didn't put withdrawn.
00:02:18.240
No, we need to talk about a really fascinating article today that I was going over because
00:02:23.220
progressives are now beginning to admit that we've got a problem. Well, not that we've got a problem,
00:02:31.940
but that global fertility is crashing much more rapidly and much faster than they thought before.
00:02:37.660
They are. It's exciting. And there was an article where I was like,
00:02:40.700
okay, what I'm going to do is I am going to read segments from this article like we usually do when
00:02:45.420
we're going over articles, just like the important points. But I just went through it. I was like,
00:02:49.100
every line in this is worth reacting to because it is so fascinating. So what we're going to be
00:02:55.740
going through and talking through is not the original article, but the Breitbart article that
00:03:02.540
takes out the important points, because this gives us an opportunity to, one, already have all the
00:03:07.160
important points condensed, but both react to the extreme leftist position on this and the extreme
00:03:13.600
rightist position on this. Now, for context, though, the original article is a Lancet article,
00:03:19.160
right? That's a very respected journal that was published sort of per the prerogative of
00:03:25.260
Bill Gates. Well, we'll just go through. So the article that we'll be reading from is titled,
00:03:30.500
quote, dramatic decline in global fertility, end quote. By 2100, developed nations will fiercely
00:03:36.760
compete for migrants, Bill Gates' funded Lancet article predicts. Quote, open immigration will be
00:03:42.760
vital to maintain population size and economic growth, unquote. A Bill Gates-funded study published in
00:03:48.660
The Lancet this week claimed predicting a grim future where people having children in developed
00:03:53.360
countries becomes rare. So woohoo, they're validating us, right? I mean, this is- Yeah, even
00:03:58.440
progressives now admit that we were right about all of this and we were crazy. We fight for open
00:04:03.020
immigration of competent people who want to come in. I will continue. The future is difficult to
00:04:11.340
predict, the study conceded, but nevertheless urged readers to prepare for a rapidly shrinking global
00:04:17.240
population where most newborns worldwide are in sub-Saharan Africa, where wealthy countries compete
00:04:23.300
fiercely for immigrants to prop up their economies. This is a vision for the year 2100 provided by a
1.00
00:04:31.400
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded study from the University of Washington, Seattle's Institute for
00:04:36.460
Health Metrics and Evaluation, IHME, published in the increasingly woke Lancet journal. The council's birth
00:04:44.200
control for Africa and open borders for Europe to survive the coming decades. You can tell that this
0.70
00:04:49.700
is a Breitbart article. Hold on, you got to read the tweet thing here. Okay. So here's the tweet that
00:04:57.920
they released. That is to say that the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation released. Explosion
00:05:04.180
emoji. Traumatic. Declines in global fertility forecasted to transform global population patterns.
00:05:10.520
Fertility levels significantly below replacement levels by 2100, with only six countries able to
00:05:17.140
continue maintaining population size over time. Hashtag GBD 2021. Then they link to their Lancet article.
00:05:24.940
It is wild. Hold on, and the Lancet article is titled, in 2100, half of the children born on the
00:05:30.060
planet will be in sub-Saharan Africa. And, but they're admitting it. They're, they're, they're,
0.99
00:05:33.920
it's not really. They're, they're, they're a stolenness. They're like, all of the world will
00:05:37.340
be fighting over these people born in sub-Saharan Africa. And it's like, no, like, okay. First of all,
0.86
00:05:46.800
there, we have said this in op-eds that we wrote that like the progressive plan around this is racist.
00:05:52.020
They basically want to treat Africa like a human farm because they will only be fighting over
00:05:56.640
people in these countries. If these countries are unable to achieve the economies that lead to
00:06:03.080
below fertility replacement rate, even in Africa, when a country goes above 5,000 USD per year in
00:06:08.420
their, their average GDP or average, you know, yearly income per family, sorry, not GDP, they fall below
00:06:14.180
replacement rate. So they have to keep these countries poor and then they want to use them like
0.94
00:06:18.820
human farms and bid over the people who are being shipped from them to support their economies.
00:06:25.940
Yeah. They're banking on poverty. They're banking on continued impoverishment for
00:06:30.540
very deserving nations. That is to say very deserving of development nations.
00:06:35.220
Yeah. But also I want to be realistic. Like, what do we think? Like we often like laugh at the
00:06:40.180
progressives for saying, ha ha ha, you know, they're banking on poverty, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:06:44.880
But like, let's be realistic. Our country's actually going to be fighting over immigrants from
1.00
00:06:49.240
Sahara and Africa, not, but a hundred years from now, not 50 years from now, because people
1.00
00:06:55.620
misunderstand, like throw out any of the, the, the accusations of like different IQs among different
00:07:04.940
asset groups, right? Like just ignore that. Okay. If you have a population, okay. Like Haiti is a great
00:07:13.140
example of this happening. And intergenerationally, you remove 85% of the people from that country
00:07:18.840
who graduate with college degrees, every single generation. And you do that for like four or five
00:07:25.620
generations, even throw out the genetics part. Culturally, you are going to have a population
00:07:33.320
in that country that is incredibly hostile to education because you have intergenerationally.
00:07:40.700
So you don't even need genetics to play a role here. You are creating pools of people that are
00:07:46.340
going to be, and if you have a country where every single time somebody in that country makes a lot
00:07:51.080
of money, they leave, which is also what happened in Haiti. So Haiti is a great example of what's
1.00
00:07:55.760
going to end up happening to these places. So every single person who makes over a certain amount of
00:07:59.760
money and wants security for their family leaves every C or not every single person, but let's say 85%
00:08:03.780
of the people who make a lot of money want security for their families leave. And 85% of the people who get
00:08:07.920
college degrees leave. Intergenerationally, culturally speaking, that country is going to produce less
00:08:14.920
people like that. And this is going to lead to environments where even though they're producing
00:08:21.180
a lot of people, these people do not fit the economic hole that is left by the lack of people
00:08:28.400
in the developed world. They are not useful economic input.
00:08:31.640
Well, because as we've said many times before, what nations really need, especially, so, okay,
00:08:36.120
in terms of butt wipers, fine, maybe, maybe. But what nations also really need, aside from labor,
0.99
00:08:42.920
which I think many people miss in these discussions about demographic collapse, is taxpayers because
00:08:47.580
someone has to hold up the pensions. Someone has to pay taxes to maintain schools and roads to make sure
00:08:53.960
city infrastructure doesn't crumble, to make sure governments still are stable. And so if you don't bring in
00:08:59.120
people who are economic producers, who are smart enough to move an economy forward to innovate,
00:09:04.860
you're in a pretty bad position. And other people in our general sphere have recently been
00:09:09.400
tweeting about how, oh, actually, Moore Births, who was on our podcast recently, recently tweeted a really
00:09:16.160
interesting graph arguing how demographic collapse hurts the most innovative countries right now, the most,
00:09:22.860
you know, like the, the most quickly innovating, amazing, technologically advanced cultures and
00:09:29.280
nations are going kaput. If you don't find a way to make more of those people somehow, it's, uh,
00:09:36.040
it's bad. And then people really, like, we are, like, fundamentally, it doesn't exactly matter that
00:09:43.040
the number of humans is collapsing, okay? Yeah, we're not fighting for endless humans.
00:09:47.500
And we always talk about this. We're like economically productive cultural groups,
00:09:52.000
like in here, keep on, we're not even talking about genetics, just cultures, right? Economically
00:09:56.040
productive cultures. And this is true within countries and between countries. So if I'm going
00:09:59.960
to sub-Saharan Africa, the more economically productive an individual is, the more likely they
00:10:04.560
are to either leave and then have their fertility crash or have lower fertility within their own
00:10:08.140
countries. And so people hear economically productive and they don't understand what I mean by
00:10:12.340
this. So to word this another way, the problem is, is we don't have taxpayers anymore.
00:10:17.500
It's not that we don't have humans anymore. It's that we don't have taxpayers anymore.
00:10:21.540
And taxpayers are what you need for all of these progressive solutions you have to things like
00:10:28.340
poverty and homelessness and people starving and single mothers.
00:10:35.560
Yeah, these aren't immigrants that countries are scrambling to, to bring in just so they can be on
00:10:39.880
social services and not work. And yeah, I think that's also another big misconception is there's this
00:10:45.940
weird dichotomy in progressive talk between, you know, you know, we will take your tired masses,
00:10:51.940
right? We will take care of them. We'll help them get back on their feet. Whereas really what they're
00:10:56.300
saying they need from immigration, when they talk about immigration in the context of demographic
00:11:00.780
collapse as a solution is, oh no, no, we're going to brain drain all of your productive workers,
00:11:06.060
leaving you with nothing in your own home nation. And we're totally not going to let in anyone who
1.00
00:11:11.700
Yeah, this is a really twisted thing. So suppose progressives implement this perfectly. So at least
00:11:16.620
for our lifetimes, it'll probably work out okay. If you just take everyone from sub-Saharan Africa
1.00
00:11:21.640
who is economically productive or educated, and we just do that. Don't ignore that this isn't a long-term
00:11:29.700
solution, right? Like ignore the cultural effects this is going to have on everyone involved in this
00:11:36.280
triangle trade the progressives are trying to set up. But just consider the effects that this will have
00:11:44.200
within our lifetime. When I ask a progressive, and I point to, you know, a homeless person, right? And I go,
00:11:50.400
do they deserve some of the income from like the economically wealthy of our country to not live in
00:11:56.280
circumstances like this? And they'll say, and I'm like, what about their kids? Do they deserve that we put them
00:12:01.540
into schools and gives them a chance? And the progressive say, of course they do. And I'm like,
00:12:07.580
then why are you stealing the people who would be paying that money if that person lived in Africa?
0.89
00:12:14.060
Is it because African homeless people don't matter to you? Is it because you don't give a shit about
1.00
00:12:19.580
black homeless people? Okay? Is it because you don't care about Latin American homeless people?
1.00
00:12:25.960
You only care about homeless people if they happen to be born in the United States? The people that we
00:12:31.460
are robbing these countries of are the people who pay into their tax base and allow them to support
00:12:40.860
their own struggling classes. This is catastrophic and it creates all sorts of horrible disincentives
00:12:49.400
for these countries. Because now if these countries had systems where they were paying for people to get
00:12:53.440
college degrees, for example, and a huge portion of people getting college degrees are leaving the
00:12:57.560
country, well, now they have an incentive to not pay for college degrees anymore because they're losing
00:13:03.380
all that investment to the U.S., which is basically robbing them of it. This system is horrible.
00:13:10.980
But it also reminds me of a joke I told you earlier today, whereas people know we're generally,
00:13:18.000
we're not super antagonistic to immigration as long as it's of economically productive individuals.
00:13:23.440
However, you know, we have to put this in the context of history and it's like,
00:13:27.640
I feel a bit like I'm hearing from people. Well, the sea people are mostly productive tradesmen
00:13:32.820
and when they come to our country, do you not think a sea person can be a potter just as well as an
00:13:39.580
Egyptian? Sea people can be potters too, okay? They're not leaving their countries because they want to.
00:13:46.520
It's due to climate change, which actually most historians do believe is that the sea people are
00:13:52.080
moving due to a climate change event. And if anything, we as Egyptians are, we have the most
00:13:58.060
important gods in our country, so we likely weren't worshiping them correctly, which led to this climate
00:14:02.120
change. So how dare you keep the sea people out of our country where they don't want to displace us,
1.00
00:14:11.720
okay? They don't want to cause any sort of turmoil in our civilizational system. They'll come and
00:14:19.580
they'll take the jobs that Egyptians and Hittites don't want. Yeah. And frankly, sea people as a term,
1.00
00:14:28.520
I find a little bit dehumanizing, okay? I mean, I can't remember what they're actually called
00:14:36.560
because we didn't record that, but I just find your use of the term sea people, why can't we just call them
00:14:43.200
extra people? Either, they're extremely human. In many ways, they're more human than us because they've
00:14:50.420
There you go. I mean... Okay, sorry, I had to do my sea people rant, but continue to sit on.
00:14:57.560
All right, I will continue to read. While the scenario may sound alarming, the paper and a hefty
00:15:03.080
press release accompanying it describes the collapse in global birth rates as a quote-unquote success
00:15:09.060
story. Fewer humans means less carbon emissions, the paper, which also received funding from the
00:15:14.740
British, Norwegian, and New Zealand governments, observed. Here's a quote from the paper itself in
00:15:19.540
the Lancet. Although sustained below-replacement fertility will pose serious potential challenges
00:15:25.560
for much of the world over the course of the century, it also presents opportunities for
00:15:30.240
environmental progress. Alongside strong pro-environmental regulations, a smaller global
00:15:36.180
population in the future would alleviate some strain on global food systems, fragile environments,
00:15:41.680
and other finite resources, and also reduce carbon emissions. So, they're happy about it.
00:15:50.180
According to the paper's co-author, the facts of life will require explicitly left-wing solutions,
00:15:55.360
and society will have to be rebuilt to suit. Land research scientist from IHME, Dr. Natalia,
00:16:03.820
butchering her name, I'm not even trying, said, quote,
00:16:06.660
the implications are immense. The future trends in fertility rates and live births will completely
00:16:11.760
reconfigure the global economy and the international balance of power, and will necessitate reorganizing
00:16:17.540
societies, unquote. That is horrifying. So, they now admit that this is happening, and they're like,
00:16:26.040
hmm, now our global cabal can have even more power than they previously had.
00:16:31.220
That they don't somehow think that, at least among their little network of nations, including those
00:16:38.300
that funded this Lancet paper, that they aren't already pretty left-leaning? I mean, I guess they're
00:16:43.640
not universally left-leaning, and there have been right backlashes.
00:16:47.060
No, no, no, no. So, their plan is to extend the control of the organizations that they already own,
00:16:52.680
like the UN, the World Health Organization, and then other billionaire-controlled organizations,
00:16:56.800
and then use those organizations to enhance further control over this new triangle trade of
0.76
00:17:01.980
humans. They're like, oh, yes, we're going to start using African as a human farm, and we are going to
1.00
00:17:09.120
use this Africa human farm and distribute its resources to our will, and we will have to exercise
1.00
00:17:16.140
even more control over the governments that we do control to allow, you know, less dissent, less thought,
00:17:21.260
less. You know, this is a fantasy in which, as the number of humans declines, they have even more
00:17:28.080
power. The problem is, is within their own countries, the groups that are still breeding,
0.99
00:17:33.220
even the intelligent, economically productive groups, like you and me or Elon, are extremely
00:17:39.280
hostile to their interests. The people who are doing these studies, the people who are writing these
00:17:44.840
Lancet reports, I bet they don't have kids, not above replacement rate at least, and that's the key to all
00:17:50.320
of this, is they think that we will continue to go along with this, and they think that even Africans,
00:17:57.000
that Africans are going to be okay with their countries kept in intentional poverty so that
0.97
00:18:01.420
they can be farmed by Europeans for humans. No one is okay with this solution, except for this small
0.99
00:18:10.080
group of ivory tower elites who literally have never spoken to an African immigrant, because the funny
1.00
00:18:16.800
thing is that a lot of the perennialist movement is actually this first wave of African immigrants
00:18:20.560
that's, like, super competent, and a lot of conservatives are not aware of, like, how smart
00:18:26.500
a lot of the African immigrants to our country are in the first wave of African immigrants, or the first
00:18:30.960
few waves of African immigrants with this immigration cycle. They are incredibly competent,
00:18:35.180
industrious, entrepreneurial people, and they are not excited about shipping everyone else from their country
1.00
00:18:42.580
over here. They left for a reason, okay? They're like, yeah, now I'm in the land of the free. Let's leave behind
00:18:48.600
what I left behind, and let's make sure that this country doesn't destroy itself so that my kids can, and let's
00:18:55.360
keep the progressives from converting my kids, because when the progressives bring them over here, they're like,
1.00
00:18:59.460
okay, well, now we need to work on your homophobia, and the Africans are like, like, fuck if you are,
1.00
00:19:05.940
okay, buddy? I came over here for the economic advantage and to be around other Christians
1.00
00:19:12.820
or believers if they're Muslims, you know, not to be around people like you, and even us as people who
00:19:20.040
are pro the gay community, even though I'm pro the gay community, I don't think that we have a right
1.00
00:19:24.500
to erase the cultural traditions that most Africans have, i.e. not American Africans, but Africans who
00:19:32.800
are immigrating from Africa, around how they relate to gender and relationships. It is their right to keep
1.00
00:19:38.740
their traditions, and we don't get to impose our theological, cosmological, our moral systems on them
00:19:47.600
as if ours are innately superior to theirs. Anyway, continue. Okay. I'm going to skip the tweet
00:19:55.900
that they posted because it's just promoting their own. So this is a continuation of a quote from that
00:20:02.620
woman. Quote, global recognition of the challenges around migration and global aid networks are going
00:20:07.820
to be all the more critical when there is a fierce competition for migrants to sustain economic growth,
00:20:13.240
and as sub-Saharan Africa's baby boom continues apace, she added. The press release on the study
00:20:19.700
predicted that by 2100, quote, half the children born on the planet will be from sub-Saharan Africa,
00:20:25.560
primarily in western and eastern sub-Saharan Africa. So, I mean, yeah, they're not wrong about
1.00
00:20:30.840
that. It's just their plans on what to do with it. Pretty messed up. Again, your human farm thing.
1.00
00:20:37.540
Quote, in low fertility, hi, I'm in... Sorry, again, I was just thrown by what I'm reading because it's
00:20:42.980
so crazy. Quote, in low fertility, high-income economies, policies that support parents and
00:20:49.400
open immigration will be vital to maintain population size and economic growth, it continued.
00:20:54.500
In these locations, populations will shrink unless low fertility can be offset by ethical
00:20:59.100
and effective immigration, unquote. Far from western nations arguing over how to...
00:21:04.440
Actually, before you go further, I want to note something because this is the very first time
00:21:07.680
we've seen progressives note this. Ethical immigration. They're beginning to realize that
00:21:13.520
coercive immigration is something that their policies are going to begin to coerce and encourage
0.99
00:21:23.520
and reward. And I wonder what they consider ethical. Is ethical that we take a slice of the entire
00:21:29.060
population of a country? Is ethical that we don't just take their best and the brightest? Because at the
00:21:33.540
end of the day, people might notice this from our videos, I care about what's happening on the global
00:21:38.020
stage, but I'm still an American patriot first and foremost. And that's why I'm okay with immigration
0.96
00:21:42.740
of the best and brightest because I like what's good for America. And I like creating America as a home
00:21:50.300
to the globe's most adventurous, most ambitious, and best and brightest. But I, unlike them, recognize
00:21:58.500
that this is, that this comes at a severe cost to the people that we're, the countries that we're taking
00:22:05.300
these people from. And that when we bring these people over here, we need to find a way to not erase their
00:22:10.980
cultural background so that they can stay high fertility.
00:22:13.020
Mm-hmm. Yeah, seriously. All right. Far from western nations arguing over how to best manage migration, the paper
00:22:22.840
prognosticates a future where states fight each other to get their hands on as many migrants as possible.
00:22:28.680
And according to the IHME's modeling, the only six nations on the earth that will have above
00:22:35.320
replacement fertility rate by 2100 will be Samoa, Somalia, Tonga, Niger, Chad, and Tajikistan. Any hope of
1.00
00:22:45.060
countering these issues by encouraging growth and fertility rates in developed countries, for instance,
00:22:50.120
is close to pointless, the paper assured. Discussing the total fertility rate, TFR,
00:22:55.180
which in general means 2.1 children per women in a society to achieve self-sustainment,
00:23:00.060
the IHME professes to have determined, quote, that even under optimistic assumptions, unquote,
00:23:06.060
the impact of pronatal policies will be low. They're not wrong. Abortion is inevitable too,
1.00
00:23:11.520
the paper noted, so don't try interfering with that either. Quote, there is no silver bullet,
00:23:16.820
unquote, caution. I love this. I love this so much that they have come to all the conclusions we
00:23:23.740
have. It's like, well, the pronatal policies that they would like to implement, i.e. cash handouts,
00:23:28.600
that's what they mean. Pronatal policies don't work. They don't mean protecting diverse conservative
00:23:34.180
groups that already exist within their countries, i.e. the various different conservative religious
00:23:39.700
traditions that exist within the United States, within Canada, within the UK, because of course,
00:23:44.960
they have a right to those cultures' children. They just need to ship in more for their unsustainable
1.00
00:23:50.480
human farming practice. What is this other than that, right? That's how their culture survives,
00:23:56.780
is by taking children from nearby demographically healthy cultural groups or shipping them in,
00:24:01.460
and that's what they're saying here. And I love how they're also like, oh, anything that goes against,
00:24:06.200
but I would note that generally abortion restrictions within a country, we did a piece on this,
00:24:10.860
like if you look at graphs of Europe by how strict they are on abortion policies, there's a pretty
0.52
00:24:16.540
strict overlap between that and how low their fertility rate is. So just at a functional level,
00:24:20.820
it doesn't really work, but it is, you know, I hate agreeing with these people on anything,
00:24:25.360
but they're right about that. No, they're not. They're not wrong. Although Breitbart, of course,
00:24:30.080
being very antagonistic to them, immediately below this shows a tweet of theirs mentioning Hungary's
00:24:36.300
pro-family policy is working, births up 9.4%, pointing to a recent uptick in fertility in Hungary,
00:24:43.520
which does have many pernodilus policies. So Breitbart's trying to say they're obviously wrong,
00:24:48.220
but oh my gosh. Shall I continue? Yeah. The distribution of births in the future is going
00:24:54.420
to be very uneven, it predicted. While the total TFR is thought to be around 1.6 and around 1.5 across
00:25:01.200
much of Europe and the United States by 2100, areas like South Korea and Eastern Europe are said
00:25:06.880
to be looking at a real demographic winter, with TFRs heading toward one child per woman.
00:25:11.540
In other words, the natural-born population of such areas would have every generation.
00:25:17.600
Batajari explained, most countries will remain below replacement levels, and once nearly every
00:25:24.080
country's population is shrinking, reliance on open immigration will become necessary to sustain
00:25:28.680
economic growth. Sub-Saharan African countries have a vital resource that aging societies are
00:25:34.640
losing. A youthful population, unquote. They only have that because of extreme poverty. They are
00:25:41.240
literally laying out their plans to keep these countries in poverty, to use them as human farms.
0.74
00:25:48.280
Oh my god. While the IHME warns of high migration in the future, where policies to encourage births in
0.86
00:25:55.300
the developed world would have failed to do anything but take the edge off, the body does concede such
00:26:01.720
long-term forecasts are difficult. Indeed, German newspaper DeWalt, totally messed that up, cited the
00:26:10.320
Berlin Institute for Population and Development, which notes, quote, projections that go more than 25
00:26:15.340
years into the future are super uncertain, unquote. Given the sheer number of unpredictable factors,
00:26:21.840
one of these factors, as the IHME itself noted, is changing technology. Acknowledging the impact of
00:26:29.920
artificial intelligence and robotics is, quote, difficult to predict, unquote. Nevertheless,
00:26:35.360
they could, quote, reduce the economic effects of changes in age structure, unquote.
00:26:43.060
And then under it, there's another quote from Bright, or another tweet from Bright wrote,
00:26:53.280
Yeah. So, I mean, I think, and you can see why I wanted to read the whole article. There was
00:26:57.460
nothing in that that wasn't completely insane. These people are like, yeah, it bothers me that people
00:27:05.960
are always like, why are you so antagonistic to, you know, it reminds me of my ancestors, right? Like,
00:27:12.460
you know, when they were fighting against slavery, I'm sure many of their neighbors would be like,
00:27:16.500
these people are your friends. Like, why are you not friends, but like friends of your parents and stuff
00:27:20.400
like that? Or like, like, you know, you guys are part of the same cultural group. Why are you fighting
00:27:24.880
against them so ardently? And it's like, because of the slavery thing? The, the, the, that, that's why
00:27:32.220
the slavery thing, that's a big deal. And they're like, well, come on. I mean, it's an economic
00:27:37.080
system and everyone benefits to some. No, there are some positions that some people are pursuing
00:27:45.300
that are so completely indefensible. And even during the slavery thing, a person might be like,
00:27:51.940
well, look, I don't support slavery myself, but I do have to fight for the Confederacy or I do have
00:27:57.420
to vote for, you know, democratic politicians. The pro-slavery politicians, of course, they'll pretend
00:28:03.800
that, well, I don't remember that the Democrats used to be. I mean, we do have to vote for the
00:28:08.700
Democrats, of course. And they're like, well, I mean, no, no, no, no, no. Just because you don't
00:28:14.780
support that. If you vote and support a political ecosystem that leads to this as a result, you are
00:28:24.160
supporting it. And if a person says, oh, well, what's happening now is not comparable to that.
00:28:30.040
Maybe what's happening in the world today. But the future that this article lays out is not that
00:28:38.940
much better than slavery. Intentionally keeping African countries in extreme poverty so that they
0.99
00:28:46.960
can be used as human farms. And do you think that they intend on these people they ship over to
00:28:53.200
displace them in leadership positions? No, they do not. They want to use them as economic fuel,
0.97
00:29:00.160
like a resource is the way they talk about them, like their oil or something, a disposable resource.
00:29:06.580
And when I say disposable, I mean disposable in their mind, because when immigrants come to the
1.00
00:29:11.460
United States, the average fertility rate of immigrants, and this was last I looked, so it's
00:29:14.640
probably much lower now. It's 1.7. So at the time that was measured, that was about the average
00:29:18.780
fertility rate of the average American citizen. So it falls to about the rate of the average
00:29:24.320
citizen of a country. So this is not a resource that you can like ship over and it repopulates
00:29:30.320
itself. You need to keep these countries in poverty, keep shipping them over. But as you do that, let's
0.94
00:29:35.380
ignore the genetic effects of this. Culturally, these countries are going to become less and less
00:29:40.060
productive over time in terms of the utility of the immigrants to the tax base, which is the whole
00:29:45.680
purpose of this. It's not humans. It's tax base that you're shipping over. It's economic productivity
00:29:49.900
that you're shipping over. What are your thoughts? Well, I think this goes back to the very common
00:29:56.640
theme with demographic collapse and pernatalism of this being a litmus test for anyone's worldview and
00:30:01.100
values. And so, of course, when you look at this from this perspective, the Gates Foundation has been
00:30:07.640
very involved in Africa and very involved in helping various African populations with, I think,
00:30:13.940
malaria, right, and various forms of development. They're trying and they care. And I think part of
00:30:19.120
this is them trying to say, look at how great Africa is. We're going to be scrambling for these
0.99
00:30:24.260
amazing people that we care about a lot and we're trying to help a lot. And they just don't think
00:30:28.800
through the consequences of what they're suggesting, which in the end are very detrimental and sort of
00:30:35.760
the opposite of everything they've been working toward, all the development and health improvement
00:30:40.420
that they're working towards. So there's a lot of irony that I see here because this is a group
00:30:45.560
that deeply, deeply cares about African populations. I disagree. I think that you haven't read some of
00:30:51.660
their papers recently. So if you look at a lot of their papers, they will brag about how their
00:30:55.880
interventions lower fertility rates in these countries. Well, I mean, to a certain extent,
00:31:01.140
and again, this is something that we've even held. We don't mind the fact that as demographic
00:31:05.360
transitions take place, that there are fewer disastrous teen pregnancies where people are
00:31:11.560
having kids without being ready for them. We're not arguing against that. And I think that that's
00:31:15.920
what they're trying to fight for. They're saying, look at all these people who are having kids who
00:31:19.460
don't want the kids, who can't take care of the kids. We don't want that to happen.
00:31:23.500
That's not what they're saying. They are thrilled about a world in which African humans become a resource.
0.80
00:31:29.640
I mean, again, I just don't think you're able to model them maybe because you weren't raised in
00:31:35.860
woke culture. But when I read this using previous models that I had in my head, the conclusion is
00:31:43.080
that as you can see, Africa is the future. We're all going to be scrambling for these amazing people
00:31:53.200
Look at this resource of Africans I have procured.
1.00
00:31:58.900
All of the countries are going to be lining up to buy them. We can ship them to you.
00:32:02.820
Well, you know, that's, it's all very, as they would say, problematic. But I do think,
00:32:09.560
and this is very common. I mean, listen, everybody is trying to do what's best given the information
00:32:15.760
they have on hand. They have not thought through a lot of what they're doing and what they're saying.
00:32:21.340
And so when you look at it through our lens, it's very, very bad. But it, I'm just trying to say.
00:32:30.020
What is ultimately going to happen here, if they have their way, if they're able to treat human
00:32:37.100
populations this way, is on a scale. Because I think people are often like, yeah, there were
00:32:42.660
people in the past who did things so totally indefensible that nothing that anyone is striving
00:32:47.920
for today comes close to things like slavery or the Holocaust in terms of the human tragedy that
00:32:54.720
will be imposed by it. The world that they are setting up will be on that scale of human tragedy.
00:33:03.600
And that is why I fight so hard and why I feel so strongly about this.
00:33:08.240
Yeah, I mean, I don't fault you for that. And I don't think that their policies are correct. And I
00:33:19.800
don't think they're looking at this from a very healthy perspective, although immigration policy
00:33:23.740
is going to matter a lot in how demographic collapse plays out. So their right to highlight
00:33:28.840
that is something that's important. Their right to highlight that a lot of the policies that even
00:33:33.400
the Breitbart authors and editors involved in creating this story didn't seem to get, you know,
00:33:39.000
Breitbart clearly thinks, well, let's just ban abortion. That's going to solve it all. That's
00:33:45.100
really going to solve problems. Government handouts.
00:33:47.340
Yeah. So they, you know, they're wrong too. Okay. I think that it's nice to see that there are people
00:33:54.400
pointing to important things that we should be debating and thinking about. So I will try to look at
00:33:59.640
this optimistically and think of it as part of a productive public discourse.
00:34:06.240
I always appreciate your optimism. The ability to see the humanity and even the most monstrous
00:34:12.060
individuals while still fighting against what they stand for. And I really appreciate that.
00:34:17.520
And you're like, oh, I shouldn't be the politician of the two of us. And yet, you know, I was just at
00:34:22.340
a radio show where they had interviewed her recently and they, they, they like having me on more than
00:34:25.840
her because I'm more of a fire brand, but they're like, you, she is the better politician. She is
00:34:30.640
the one who I would rather have representing me. And she is always the one I'd rather have was my
00:34:34.960
finger on the button. And so when you run for president, I know you think it's something to me.
00:34:39.940
Yeah. So don't worry about me because normally you have to worry about, you know, a female
1.00
00:34:43.620
president, you know, who's on her period. I don't get those because I broke my body earlier.
00:34:50.640
Yeah. I'm effectively not actually female. So don't worry.
00:34:53.600
Besides I'm backed by my husband and I do whatever he says. So I think that's why people
00:35:00.000
really want to vote for me. Well, I think that's the type of female president everybody wants.
1.00
00:35:03.800
Right. I I'm really, I would love to see that. I would love to see. I'm just here to do what my
00:35:08.900
husband says. Press conferences. Well, I'm going to have to ask my husband about that first.
00:35:14.120
I don't know. I suddenly choose the Southern. I'm sorry, but no, I mean, I think that that would be
00:35:19.980
great. I would definitely pull that where I, the type of person who could get elected to such
00:35:25.060
positions, but I have my doubts. So we shall see come November. I love you. I love you too, Malcolm.