Bill Gates Funded Orgs Now Recognize Fertility Collapse, Excited to Fight Over African Immigrants
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
170.31071
Summary
In this episode, we discuss an article that has been retracted from the Journal of Psychiatry and Neurology, and a Breitbart article that takes out the important points from the original article. We also discuss a Bill Gates-funded article that argues that open borders are the key to population growth in the coming decades.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
While the scenario may sound alarming, the paper describes the collapse in global birth rates as
00:00:04.780
a quote-unquote success story. Fewer humans means less carbon emissions, the paper observed.
00:00:11.820
Urged readers to prepare for a rapidly shrinking global population where most newborns worldwide
00:00:17.000
are in sub-Saharan Africa, where wealthy countries compete fiercely for immigrants to prop up their
00:00:23.480
economies. This is a vision for the year 2100 provided by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
00:00:34.260
I was just clicking through to the Research Square article.
00:00:39.460
Withdrawn, the association between adult penile length and IQ, evidences from 139 countries.
00:00:46.160
Why is that? Why would they withdraw it for that reason?
00:00:48.760
22 February 2024. Research Square has withdrawn this preprint due to the problematic nature
00:00:55.440
of the topic concerning race and intelligence. We acknowledge the sensitivities involved and the
00:01:00.980
potential for misrepresentation or harm. This decision reflects our commitment to disseminate
00:01:06.280
disseminate, withdrawn research that meets our rigorous standards for integrity and respect for
00:01:15.900
So people who know what this article was on, it correlated IQ with penis lengths?
00:01:23.140
And it did obviously break its cohorts by ethnic group. And unfortunately, this ended up showing
00:01:29.160
IQ differences in ethnic groups, which led to the paper being-
00:01:33.820
I'll read the results. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between flaccid penile
00:01:39.060
length and IQ, indicating higher IQs in individuals with shorter penile lengths and notable ethnic
00:01:44.720
differences were observed. Oh, no. And so it's so funny, though, because you'd think that this would
00:01:50.120
be retracted because it's about wee-wees, but it's not. It's retracted because it's about race group
00:01:57.880
differences. But I was just reflecting on the fact that you somehow, despite all this, get to buck the
00:02:04.780
trend and you've got both the big package and the big brain. I hope you appreciate what you have.
00:02:10.180
Too crude for this podcast, Simone. I didn't put disseminated in this. I didn't put withdrawn.
00:02:18.240
No, we need to talk about a really fascinating article today that I was going over because
00:02:23.220
progressives are now beginning to admit that we've got a problem. Well, not that we've got a problem,
00:02:31.940
but that global fertility is crashing much more rapidly and much faster than they thought before.
00:02:37.660
They are. It's exciting. And there was an article where I was like,
00:02:40.700
okay, what I'm going to do is I am going to read segments from this article like we usually do when
00:02:45.420
we're going over articles, just like the important points. But I just went through it. I was like,
00:02:49.100
every line in this is worth reacting to because it is so fascinating. So what we're going to be
00:02:55.740
going through and talking through is not the original article, but the Breitbart article that
00:03:02.540
takes out the important points, because this gives us an opportunity to, one, already have all the
00:03:07.160
important points condensed, but both react to the extreme leftist position on this and the extreme
00:03:13.600
rightist position on this. Now, for context, though, the original article is a Lancet article,
00:03:19.160
right? That's a very respected journal that was published sort of per the prerogative of
00:03:25.260
Bill Gates. Well, we'll just go through. So the article that we'll be reading from is titled,
00:03:30.500
quote, dramatic decline in global fertility, end quote. By 2100, developed nations will fiercely
00:03:36.760
compete for migrants, Bill Gates' funded Lancet article predicts. Quote, open immigration will be
00:03:42.760
vital to maintain population size and economic growth, unquote. A Bill Gates-funded study published in
00:03:48.660
The Lancet this week claimed predicting a grim future where people having children in developed
00:03:53.360
countries becomes rare. So woohoo, they're validating us, right? I mean, this is- Yeah, even
00:03:58.440
progressives now admit that we were right about all of this and we were crazy. We fight for open
00:04:03.020
immigration of competent people who want to come in. I will continue. The future is difficult to
00:04:11.340
predict, the study conceded, but nevertheless urged readers to prepare for a rapidly shrinking global
00:04:17.240
population where most newborns worldwide are in sub-Saharan Africa, where wealthy countries compete
00:04:23.300
fiercely for immigrants to prop up their economies. This is a vision for the year 2100 provided by a
00:04:31.400
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded study from the University of Washington, Seattle's Institute for
00:04:36.460
Health Metrics and Evaluation, IHME, published in the increasingly woke Lancet journal. The council's birth
00:04:44.200
control for Africa and open borders for Europe to survive the coming decades. You can tell that this
00:04:49.700
is a Breitbart article. Hold on, you got to read the tweet thing here. Okay. So here's the tweet that
00:04:57.920
they released. That is to say that the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation released. Explosion
00:05:04.180
emoji. Traumatic. Declines in global fertility forecasted to transform global population patterns.
00:05:10.520
Fertility levels significantly below replacement levels by 2100, with only six countries able to
00:05:17.140
continue maintaining population size over time. Hashtag GBD 2021. Then they link to their Lancet article.
00:05:24.940
It is wild. Hold on, and the Lancet article is titled, in 2100, half of the children born on the
00:05:30.060
planet will be in sub-Saharan Africa. And, but they're admitting it. They're, they're, they're,
00:05:33.920
it's not really. They're, they're, they're a stolenness. They're like, all of the world will
00:05:37.340
be fighting over these people born in sub-Saharan Africa. And it's like, no, like, okay. First of all,
00:05:46.800
there, we have said this in op-eds that we wrote that like the progressive plan around this is racist.
00:05:52.020
They basically want to treat Africa like a human farm because they will only be fighting over
00:05:56.640
people in these countries. If these countries are unable to achieve the economies that lead to
00:06:03.080
below fertility replacement rate, even in Africa, when a country goes above 5,000 USD per year in
00:06:08.420
their, their average GDP or average, you know, yearly income per family, sorry, not GDP, they fall below
00:06:14.180
replacement rate. So they have to keep these countries poor and then they want to use them like
00:06:18.820
human farms and bid over the people who are being shipped from them to support their economies.
00:06:25.940
Yeah. They're banking on poverty. They're banking on continued impoverishment for
00:06:30.540
very deserving nations. That is to say very deserving of development nations.
00:06:35.220
Yeah. But also I want to be realistic. Like, what do we think? Like we often like laugh at the
00:06:40.180
progressives for saying, ha ha ha, you know, they're banking on poverty, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:06:44.880
But like, let's be realistic. Our country's actually going to be fighting over immigrants from
00:06:49.240
Sahara and Africa, not, but a hundred years from now, not 50 years from now, because people
00:06:55.620
misunderstand, like throw out any of the, the, the accusations of like different IQs among different
00:07:04.940
asset groups, right? Like just ignore that. Okay. If you have a population, okay. Like Haiti is a great
00:07:13.140
example of this happening. And intergenerationally, you remove 85% of the people from that country
00:07:18.840
who graduate with college degrees, every single generation. And you do that for like four or five
00:07:25.620
generations, even throw out the genetics part. Culturally, you are going to have a population
00:07:33.320
in that country that is incredibly hostile to education because you have intergenerationally.
00:07:40.700
So you don't even need genetics to play a role here. You are creating pools of people that are
00:07:46.340
going to be, and if you have a country where every single time somebody in that country makes a lot
00:07:51.080
of money, they leave, which is also what happened in Haiti. So Haiti is a great example of what's
00:07:55.760
going to end up happening to these places. So every single person who makes over a certain amount of
00:07:59.760
money and wants security for their family leaves every C or not every single person, but let's say 85%
00:08:03.780
of the people who make a lot of money want security for their families leave. And 85% of the people who get
00:08:07.920
college degrees leave. Intergenerationally, culturally speaking, that country is going to produce less
00:08:14.920
people like that. And this is going to lead to environments where even though they're producing
00:08:21.180
a lot of people, these people do not fit the economic hole that is left by the lack of people
00:08:28.400
in the developed world. They are not useful economic input.
00:08:31.640
Well, because as we've said many times before, what nations really need, especially, so, okay,
00:08:36.120
in terms of butt wipers, fine, maybe, maybe. But what nations also really need, aside from labor,
00:08:42.920
which I think many people miss in these discussions about demographic collapse, is taxpayers because
00:08:47.580
someone has to hold up the pensions. Someone has to pay taxes to maintain schools and roads to make sure
00:08:53.960
city infrastructure doesn't crumble, to make sure governments still are stable. And so if you don't bring in
00:08:59.120
people who are economic producers, who are smart enough to move an economy forward to innovate,
00:09:04.860
you're in a pretty bad position. And other people in our general sphere have recently been
00:09:09.400
tweeting about how, oh, actually, Moore Births, who was on our podcast recently, recently tweeted a really
00:09:16.160
interesting graph arguing how demographic collapse hurts the most innovative countries right now, the most,
00:09:22.860
you know, like the, the most quickly innovating, amazing, technologically advanced cultures and
00:09:29.280
nations are going kaput. If you don't find a way to make more of those people somehow, it's, uh,
00:09:36.040
it's bad. And then people really, like, we are, like, fundamentally, it doesn't exactly matter that
00:09:43.040
the number of humans is collapsing, okay? Yeah, we're not fighting for endless humans.
00:09:47.500
And we always talk about this. We're like economically productive cultural groups,
00:09:52.000
like in here, keep on, we're not even talking about genetics, just cultures, right? Economically
00:09:56.040
productive cultures. And this is true within countries and between countries. So if I'm going
00:09:59.960
to sub-Saharan Africa, the more economically productive an individual is, the more likely they
00:10:04.560
are to either leave and then have their fertility crash or have lower fertility within their own
00:10:08.140
countries. And so people hear economically productive and they don't understand what I mean by
00:10:12.340
this. So to word this another way, the problem is, is we don't have taxpayers anymore.
00:10:17.500
It's not that we don't have humans anymore. It's that we don't have taxpayers anymore.
00:10:21.540
And taxpayers are what you need for all of these progressive solutions you have to things like
00:10:28.340
poverty and homelessness and people starving and single mothers.
00:10:35.560
Yeah, these aren't immigrants that countries are scrambling to, to bring in just so they can be on
00:10:39.880
social services and not work. And yeah, I think that's also another big misconception is there's this
00:10:45.940
weird dichotomy in progressive talk between, you know, you know, we will take your tired masses,
00:10:51.940
right? We will take care of them. We'll help them get back on their feet. Whereas really what they're
00:10:56.300
saying they need from immigration, when they talk about immigration in the context of demographic
00:11:00.780
collapse as a solution is, oh no, no, we're going to brain drain all of your productive workers,
00:11:06.060
leaving you with nothing in your own home nation. And we're totally not going to let in anyone who
00:11:11.700
Yeah, this is a really twisted thing. So suppose progressives implement this perfectly. So at least
00:11:16.620
for our lifetimes, it'll probably work out okay. If you just take everyone from sub-Saharan Africa
00:11:21.640
who is economically productive or educated, and we just do that. Don't ignore that this isn't a long-term
00:11:29.700
solution, right? Like ignore the cultural effects this is going to have on everyone involved in this
00:11:36.280
triangle trade the progressives are trying to set up. But just consider the effects that this will have
00:11:44.200
within our lifetime. When I ask a progressive, and I point to, you know, a homeless person, right? And I go,
00:11:50.400
do they deserve some of the income from like the economically wealthy of our country to not live in
00:11:56.280
circumstances like this? And they'll say, and I'm like, what about their kids? Do they deserve that we put them
00:12:01.540
into schools and gives them a chance? And the progressive say, of course they do. And I'm like,
00:12:07.580
then why are you stealing the people who would be paying that money if that person lived in Africa?
00:12:14.060
Is it because African homeless people don't matter to you? Is it because you don't give a shit about
00:12:19.580
black homeless people? Okay? Is it because you don't care about Latin American homeless people?
00:12:25.960
You only care about homeless people if they happen to be born in the United States? The people that we
00:12:31.460
are robbing these countries of are the people who pay into their tax base and allow them to support
00:12:40.860
their own struggling classes. This is catastrophic and it creates all sorts of horrible disincentives
00:12:49.400
for these countries. Because now if these countries had systems where they were paying for people to get
00:12:53.440
college degrees, for example, and a huge portion of people getting college degrees are leaving the
00:12:57.560
country, well, now they have an incentive to not pay for college degrees anymore because they're losing
00:13:03.380
all that investment to the U.S., which is basically robbing them of it. This system is horrible.
00:13:10.980
But it also reminds me of a joke I told you earlier today, whereas people know we're generally,
00:13:18.000
we're not super antagonistic to immigration as long as it's of economically productive individuals.
00:13:23.440
However, you know, we have to put this in the context of history and it's like,
00:13:27.640
I feel a bit like I'm hearing from people. Well, the sea people are mostly productive tradesmen
00:13:32.820
and when they come to our country, do you not think a sea person can be a potter just as well as an
00:13:39.580
Egyptian? Sea people can be potters too, okay? They're not leaving their countries because they want to.
00:13:46.520
It's due to climate change, which actually most historians do believe is that the sea people are
00:13:52.080
moving due to a climate change event. And if anything, we as Egyptians are, we have the most
00:13:58.060
important gods in our country, so we likely weren't worshiping them correctly, which led to this climate
00:14:02.120
change. So how dare you keep the sea people out of our country where they don't want to displace us,
00:14:11.720
okay? They don't want to cause any sort of turmoil in our civilizational system. They'll come and
00:14:19.580
they'll take the jobs that Egyptians and Hittites don't want. Yeah. And frankly, sea people as a term,
00:14:28.520
I find a little bit dehumanizing, okay? I mean, I can't remember what they're actually called
00:14:36.560
because we didn't record that, but I just find your use of the term sea people, why can't we just call them
00:14:43.200
extra people? Either, they're extremely human. In many ways, they're more human than us because they've
00:14:50.420
There you go. I mean... Okay, sorry, I had to do my sea people rant, but continue to sit on.
00:14:57.560
All right, I will continue to read. While the scenario may sound alarming, the paper and a hefty
00:15:03.080
press release accompanying it describes the collapse in global birth rates as a quote-unquote success
00:15:09.060
story. Fewer humans means less carbon emissions, the paper, which also received funding from the
00:15:14.740
British, Norwegian, and New Zealand governments, observed. Here's a quote from the paper itself in
00:15:19.540
the Lancet. Although sustained below-replacement fertility will pose serious potential challenges
00:15:25.560
for much of the world over the course of the century, it also presents opportunities for
00:15:30.240
environmental progress. Alongside strong pro-environmental regulations, a smaller global
00:15:36.180
population in the future would alleviate some strain on global food systems, fragile environments,
00:15:41.680
and other finite resources, and also reduce carbon emissions. So, they're happy about it.
00:15:50.180
According to the paper's co-author, the facts of life will require explicitly left-wing solutions,
00:15:55.360
and society will have to be rebuilt to suit. Land research scientist from IHME, Dr. Natalia,
00:16:03.820
butchering her name, I'm not even trying, said, quote,
00:16:06.660
the implications are immense. The future trends in fertility rates and live births will completely
00:16:11.760
reconfigure the global economy and the international balance of power, and will necessitate reorganizing
00:16:17.540
societies, unquote. That is horrifying. So, they now admit that this is happening, and they're like,
00:16:26.040
hmm, now our global cabal can have even more power than they previously had.
00:16:31.220
That they don't somehow think that, at least among their little network of nations, including those
00:16:38.300
that funded this Lancet paper, that they aren't already pretty left-leaning? I mean, I guess they're
00:16:43.640
not universally left-leaning, and there have been right backlashes.
00:16:47.060
No, no, no, no. So, their plan is to extend the control of the organizations that they already own,
00:16:52.680
like the UN, the World Health Organization, and then other billionaire-controlled organizations,
00:16:56.800
and then use those organizations to enhance further control over this new triangle trade of
00:17:01.980
humans. They're like, oh, yes, we're going to start using African as a human farm, and we are going to
00:17:09.120
use this Africa human farm and distribute its resources to our will, and we will have to exercise
00:17:16.140
even more control over the governments that we do control to allow, you know, less dissent, less thought,
00:17:21.260
less. You know, this is a fantasy in which, as the number of humans declines, they have even more
00:17:28.080
power. The problem is, is within their own countries, the groups that are still breeding,
00:17:33.220
even the intelligent, economically productive groups, like you and me or Elon, are extremely
00:17:39.280
hostile to their interests. The people who are doing these studies, the people who are writing these
00:17:44.840
Lancet reports, I bet they don't have kids, not above replacement rate at least, and that's the key to all
00:17:50.320
of this, is they think that we will continue to go along with this, and they think that even Africans,
00:17:57.000
that Africans are going to be okay with their countries kept in intentional poverty so that
00:18:01.420
they can be farmed by Europeans for humans. No one is okay with this solution, except for this small
00:18:10.080
group of ivory tower elites who literally have never spoken to an African immigrant, because the funny
00:18:16.800
thing is that a lot of the perennialist movement is actually this first wave of African immigrants
00:18:20.560
that's, like, super competent, and a lot of conservatives are not aware of, like, how smart
00:18:26.500
a lot of the African immigrants to our country are in the first wave of African immigrants, or the first
00:18:30.960
few waves of African immigrants with this immigration cycle. They are incredibly competent,
00:18:35.180
industrious, entrepreneurial people, and they are not excited about shipping everyone else from their country
00:18:42.580
over here. They left for a reason, okay? They're like, yeah, now I'm in the land of the free. Let's leave behind
00:18:48.600
what I left behind, and let's make sure that this country doesn't destroy itself so that my kids can, and let's
00:18:55.360
keep the progressives from converting my kids, because when the progressives bring them over here, they're like,
00:18:59.460
okay, well, now we need to work on your homophobia, and the Africans are like, like, fuck if you are,
00:19:05.940
okay, buddy? I came over here for the economic advantage and to be around other Christians
00:19:12.820
or believers if they're Muslims, you know, not to be around people like you, and even us as people who
00:19:20.040
are pro the gay community, even though I'm pro the gay community, I don't think that we have a right
00:19:24.500
to erase the cultural traditions that most Africans have, i.e. not American Africans, but Africans who
00:19:32.800
are immigrating from Africa, around how they relate to gender and relationships. It is their right to keep
00:19:38.740
their traditions, and we don't get to impose our theological, cosmological, our moral systems on them
00:19:47.600
as if ours are innately superior to theirs. Anyway, continue. Okay. I'm going to skip the tweet
00:19:55.900
that they posted because it's just promoting their own. So this is a continuation of a quote from that
00:20:02.620
woman. Quote, global recognition of the challenges around migration and global aid networks are going
00:20:07.820
to be all the more critical when there is a fierce competition for migrants to sustain economic growth,
00:20:13.240
and as sub-Saharan Africa's baby boom continues apace, she added. The press release on the study
00:20:19.700
predicted that by 2100, quote, half the children born on the planet will be from sub-Saharan Africa,
00:20:25.560
primarily in western and eastern sub-Saharan Africa. So, I mean, yeah, they're not wrong about
00:20:30.840
that. It's just their plans on what to do with it. Pretty messed up. Again, your human farm thing.
00:20:37.540
Quote, in low fertility, hi, I'm in... Sorry, again, I was just thrown by what I'm reading because it's
00:20:42.980
so crazy. Quote, in low fertility, high-income economies, policies that support parents and
00:20:49.400
open immigration will be vital to maintain population size and economic growth, it continued.
00:20:54.500
In these locations, populations will shrink unless low fertility can be offset by ethical
00:20:59.100
and effective immigration, unquote. Far from western nations arguing over how to...
00:21:04.440
Actually, before you go further, I want to note something because this is the very first time
00:21:07.680
we've seen progressives note this. Ethical immigration. They're beginning to realize that
00:21:13.520
coercive immigration is something that their policies are going to begin to coerce and encourage
00:21:23.520
and reward. And I wonder what they consider ethical. Is ethical that we take a slice of the entire
00:21:29.060
population of a country? Is ethical that we don't just take their best and the brightest? Because at the
00:21:33.540
end of the day, people might notice this from our videos, I care about what's happening on the global
00:21:38.020
stage, but I'm still an American patriot first and foremost. And that's why I'm okay with immigration
00:21:42.740
of the best and brightest because I like what's good for America. And I like creating America as a home
00:21:50.300
to the globe's most adventurous, most ambitious, and best and brightest. But I, unlike them, recognize
00:21:58.500
that this is, that this comes at a severe cost to the people that we're, the countries that we're taking
00:22:05.300
these people from. And that when we bring these people over here, we need to find a way to not erase their
00:22:10.980
cultural background so that they can stay high fertility.
00:22:13.020
Mm-hmm. Yeah, seriously. All right. Far from western nations arguing over how to best manage migration, the paper
00:22:22.840
prognosticates a future where states fight each other to get their hands on as many migrants as possible.
00:22:28.680
And according to the IHME's modeling, the only six nations on the earth that will have above
00:22:35.320
replacement fertility rate by 2100 will be Samoa, Somalia, Tonga, Niger, Chad, and Tajikistan. Any hope of
00:22:45.060
countering these issues by encouraging growth and fertility rates in developed countries, for instance,
00:22:50.120
is close to pointless, the paper assured. Discussing the total fertility rate, TFR,
00:22:55.180
which in general means 2.1 children per women in a society to achieve self-sustainment,
00:23:00.060
the IHME professes to have determined, quote, that even under optimistic assumptions, unquote,
00:23:06.060
the impact of pronatal policies will be low. They're not wrong. Abortion is inevitable too,
00:23:11.520
the paper noted, so don't try interfering with that either. Quote, there is no silver bullet,
00:23:16.820
unquote, caution. I love this. I love this so much that they have come to all the conclusions we
00:23:23.740
have. It's like, well, the pronatal policies that they would like to implement, i.e. cash handouts,
00:23:28.600
that's what they mean. Pronatal policies don't work. They don't mean protecting diverse conservative
00:23:34.180
groups that already exist within their countries, i.e. the various different conservative religious
00:23:39.700
traditions that exist within the United States, within Canada, within the UK, because of course,
00:23:44.960
they have a right to those cultures' children. They just need to ship in more for their unsustainable
00:23:50.480
human farming practice. What is this other than that, right? That's how their culture survives,
00:23:56.780
is by taking children from nearby demographically healthy cultural groups or shipping them in,
00:24:01.460
and that's what they're saying here. And I love how they're also like, oh, anything that goes against,
00:24:06.200
but I would note that generally abortion restrictions within a country, we did a piece on this,
00:24:10.860
like if you look at graphs of Europe by how strict they are on abortion policies, there's a pretty
00:24:16.540
strict overlap between that and how low their fertility rate is. So just at a functional level,
00:24:20.820
it doesn't really work, but it is, you know, I hate agreeing with these people on anything,
00:24:25.360
but they're right about that. No, they're not. They're not wrong. Although Breitbart, of course,
00:24:30.080
being very antagonistic to them, immediately below this shows a tweet of theirs mentioning Hungary's
00:24:36.300
pro-family policy is working, births up 9.4%, pointing to a recent uptick in fertility in Hungary,
00:24:43.520
which does have many pernodilus policies. So Breitbart's trying to say they're obviously wrong,
00:24:48.220
but oh my gosh. Shall I continue? Yeah. The distribution of births in the future is going
00:24:54.420
to be very uneven, it predicted. While the total TFR is thought to be around 1.6 and around 1.5 across
00:25:01.200
much of Europe and the United States by 2100, areas like South Korea and Eastern Europe are said
00:25:06.880
to be looking at a real demographic winter, with TFRs heading toward one child per woman.
00:25:11.540
In other words, the natural-born population of such areas would have every generation.
00:25:17.600
Batajari explained, most countries will remain below replacement levels, and once nearly every
00:25:24.080
country's population is shrinking, reliance on open immigration will become necessary to sustain
00:25:28.680
economic growth. Sub-Saharan African countries have a vital resource that aging societies are
00:25:34.640
losing. A youthful population, unquote. They only have that because of extreme poverty. They are
00:25:41.240
literally laying out their plans to keep these countries in poverty, to use them as human farms.
00:25:48.280
Oh my god. While the IHME warns of high migration in the future, where policies to encourage births in
00:25:55.300
the developed world would have failed to do anything but take the edge off, the body does concede such
00:26:01.720
long-term forecasts are difficult. Indeed, German newspaper DeWalt, totally messed that up, cited the
00:26:10.320
Berlin Institute for Population and Development, which notes, quote, projections that go more than 25
00:26:15.340
years into the future are super uncertain, unquote. Given the sheer number of unpredictable factors,
00:26:21.840
one of these factors, as the IHME itself noted, is changing technology. Acknowledging the impact of
00:26:29.920
artificial intelligence and robotics is, quote, difficult to predict, unquote. Nevertheless,
00:26:35.360
they could, quote, reduce the economic effects of changes in age structure, unquote.
00:26:43.060
And then under it, there's another quote from Bright, or another tweet from Bright wrote,
00:26:53.280
Yeah. So, I mean, I think, and you can see why I wanted to read the whole article. There was
00:26:57.460
nothing in that that wasn't completely insane. These people are like, yeah, it bothers me that people
00:27:05.960
are always like, why are you so antagonistic to, you know, it reminds me of my ancestors, right? Like,
00:27:12.460
you know, when they were fighting against slavery, I'm sure many of their neighbors would be like,
00:27:16.500
these people are your friends. Like, why are you not friends, but like friends of your parents and stuff
00:27:20.400
like that? Or like, like, you know, you guys are part of the same cultural group. Why are you fighting
00:27:24.880
against them so ardently? And it's like, because of the slavery thing? The, the, the, that, that's why
00:27:32.220
the slavery thing, that's a big deal. And they're like, well, come on. I mean, it's an economic
00:27:37.080
system and everyone benefits to some. No, there are some positions that some people are pursuing
00:27:45.300
that are so completely indefensible. And even during the slavery thing, a person might be like,
00:27:51.940
well, look, I don't support slavery myself, but I do have to fight for the Confederacy or I do have
00:27:57.420
to vote for, you know, democratic politicians. The pro-slavery politicians, of course, they'll pretend
00:28:03.800
that, well, I don't remember that the Democrats used to be. I mean, we do have to vote for the
00:28:08.700
Democrats, of course. And they're like, well, I mean, no, no, no, no, no. Just because you don't
00:28:14.780
support that. If you vote and support a political ecosystem that leads to this as a result, you are
00:28:24.160
supporting it. And if a person says, oh, well, what's happening now is not comparable to that.
00:28:30.040
Maybe what's happening in the world today. But the future that this article lays out is not that
00:28:38.940
much better than slavery. Intentionally keeping African countries in extreme poverty so that they
00:28:46.960
can be used as human farms. And do you think that they intend on these people they ship over to
00:28:53.200
displace them in leadership positions? No, they do not. They want to use them as economic fuel,
00:29:00.160
like a resource is the way they talk about them, like their oil or something, a disposable resource.
00:29:06.580
And when I say disposable, I mean disposable in their mind, because when immigrants come to the
00:29:11.460
United States, the average fertility rate of immigrants, and this was last I looked, so it's
00:29:14.640
probably much lower now. It's 1.7. So at the time that was measured, that was about the average
00:29:18.780
fertility rate of the average American citizen. So it falls to about the rate of the average
00:29:24.320
citizen of a country. So this is not a resource that you can like ship over and it repopulates
00:29:30.320
itself. You need to keep these countries in poverty, keep shipping them over. But as you do that, let's
00:29:35.380
ignore the genetic effects of this. Culturally, these countries are going to become less and less
00:29:40.060
productive over time in terms of the utility of the immigrants to the tax base, which is the whole
00:29:45.680
purpose of this. It's not humans. It's tax base that you're shipping over. It's economic productivity
00:29:49.900
that you're shipping over. What are your thoughts? Well, I think this goes back to the very common
00:29:56.640
theme with demographic collapse and pernatalism of this being a litmus test for anyone's worldview and
00:30:01.100
values. And so, of course, when you look at this from this perspective, the Gates Foundation has been
00:30:07.640
very involved in Africa and very involved in helping various African populations with, I think,
00:30:13.940
malaria, right, and various forms of development. They're trying and they care. And I think part of
00:30:19.120
this is them trying to say, look at how great Africa is. We're going to be scrambling for these
00:30:24.260
amazing people that we care about a lot and we're trying to help a lot. And they just don't think
00:30:28.800
through the consequences of what they're suggesting, which in the end are very detrimental and sort of
00:30:35.760
the opposite of everything they've been working toward, all the development and health improvement
00:30:40.420
that they're working towards. So there's a lot of irony that I see here because this is a group
00:30:45.560
that deeply, deeply cares about African populations. I disagree. I think that you haven't read some of
00:30:51.660
their papers recently. So if you look at a lot of their papers, they will brag about how their
00:30:55.880
interventions lower fertility rates in these countries. Well, I mean, to a certain extent,
00:31:01.140
and again, this is something that we've even held. We don't mind the fact that as demographic
00:31:05.360
transitions take place, that there are fewer disastrous teen pregnancies where people are
00:31:11.560
having kids without being ready for them. We're not arguing against that. And I think that that's
00:31:15.920
what they're trying to fight for. They're saying, look at all these people who are having kids who
00:31:19.460
don't want the kids, who can't take care of the kids. We don't want that to happen.
00:31:23.500
That's not what they're saying. They are thrilled about a world in which African humans become a resource.
00:31:29.640
I mean, again, I just don't think you're able to model them maybe because you weren't raised in
00:31:35.860
woke culture. But when I read this using previous models that I had in my head, the conclusion is
00:31:43.080
that as you can see, Africa is the future. We're all going to be scrambling for these amazing people
00:31:53.200
Look at this resource of Africans I have procured.
00:31:58.900
All of the countries are going to be lining up to buy them. We can ship them to you.
00:32:02.820
Well, you know, that's, it's all very, as they would say, problematic. But I do think,
00:32:09.560
and this is very common. I mean, listen, everybody is trying to do what's best given the information
00:32:15.760
they have on hand. They have not thought through a lot of what they're doing and what they're saying.
00:32:21.340
And so when you look at it through our lens, it's very, very bad. But it, I'm just trying to say.
00:32:30.020
What is ultimately going to happen here, if they have their way, if they're able to treat human
00:32:37.100
populations this way, is on a scale. Because I think people are often like, yeah, there were
00:32:42.660
people in the past who did things so totally indefensible that nothing that anyone is striving
00:32:47.920
for today comes close to things like slavery or the Holocaust in terms of the human tragedy that
00:32:54.720
will be imposed by it. The world that they are setting up will be on that scale of human tragedy.
00:33:03.600
And that is why I fight so hard and why I feel so strongly about this.
00:33:08.240
Yeah, I mean, I don't fault you for that. And I don't think that their policies are correct. And I
00:33:19.800
don't think they're looking at this from a very healthy perspective, although immigration policy
00:33:23.740
is going to matter a lot in how demographic collapse plays out. So their right to highlight
00:33:28.840
that is something that's important. Their right to highlight that a lot of the policies that even
00:33:33.400
the Breitbart authors and editors involved in creating this story didn't seem to get, you know,
00:33:39.000
Breitbart clearly thinks, well, let's just ban abortion. That's going to solve it all. That's
00:33:45.100
really going to solve problems. Government handouts.
00:33:47.340
Yeah. So they, you know, they're wrong too. Okay. I think that it's nice to see that there are people
00:33:54.400
pointing to important things that we should be debating and thinking about. So I will try to look at
00:33:59.640
this optimistically and think of it as part of a productive public discourse.
00:34:06.240
I always appreciate your optimism. The ability to see the humanity and even the most monstrous
00:34:12.060
individuals while still fighting against what they stand for. And I really appreciate that.
00:34:17.520
And you're like, oh, I shouldn't be the politician of the two of us. And yet, you know, I was just at
00:34:22.340
a radio show where they had interviewed her recently and they, they, they like having me on more than
00:34:25.840
her because I'm more of a fire brand, but they're like, you, she is the better politician. She is
00:34:30.640
the one who I would rather have representing me. And she is always the one I'd rather have was my
00:34:34.960
finger on the button. And so when you run for president, I know you think it's something to me.
00:34:39.940
Yeah. So don't worry about me because normally you have to worry about, you know, a female
00:34:43.620
president, you know, who's on her period. I don't get those because I broke my body earlier.
00:34:50.640
Yeah. I'm effectively not actually female. So don't worry.
00:34:53.600
Besides I'm backed by my husband and I do whatever he says. So I think that's why people
00:35:00.000
really want to vote for me. Well, I think that's the type of female president everybody wants.
00:35:03.800
Right. I I'm really, I would love to see that. I would love to see. I'm just here to do what my
00:35:08.900
husband says. Press conferences. Well, I'm going to have to ask my husband about that first.
00:35:14.120
I don't know. I suddenly choose the Southern. I'm sorry, but no, I mean, I think that that would be
00:35:19.980
great. I would definitely pull that where I, the type of person who could get elected to such
00:35:25.060
positions, but I have my doubts. So we shall see come November. I love you. I love you too, Malcolm.