China's Real Population Numbers are Shocking (Demographic Collapse is More Advanced than we Thought)
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 9 minutes
Words per Minute
174.33867
Summary
In this episode, Simone talks about the shocking revelation that China's fertility rate is much lower than the UN estimates it should be, and how this could have massive implications for the future of the world's most important economy and the stock market.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, Simone. I am excited to be talking to you today. Today, we are going to be talking about
00:00:05.820
China and recent information that has come out through multiple angles that leads people to
00:00:14.900
believe that China's total population, a lot of people know their fertility rate was lower than
00:00:20.980
the official figure said it was. And so they did all of this, oh, we got it wrong. We're readjusting
00:00:26.060
our population numbers. We're readjusting our fertility rate numbers. Turns out that their
00:00:31.700
total population is still being represented as dramatically higher than it really is. And this
00:00:38.280
has major implications because it means that one, their entire stock market might be vastly overvalued
00:00:44.640
right now, even given how fragile it is. And two, for people who are thinking about global population
00:00:52.900
numbers right now, they might be way lower than we think they are. And this isn't just a China
00:00:58.040
problem. I've also mentioned a lot recently, it's a Nigeria problem, which is another very populated
00:01:01.520
country. A lot of people don't know, but Nigeria gives out oil money dollars to different provinces
00:01:07.820
based on their reported population. And there's nobody overseeing the populations that the individual
00:01:14.420
provinces are reporting. So there is always a huge incentive to lie in the extreme. And I mean,
00:01:19.100
it's Africa, right? How corrupt are these numbers going to be?
00:01:20.900
So this is very similar to the blue zone scandal, which came out whereby they found that all these
00:01:25.340
supposedly very old people that lived in countries were not actually alive. It was their family members
00:01:30.440
collecting their pensions and lying about them being alive. And here's just another issue of incentives
00:01:35.120
being misaligned. People are lying about their populations because they get more money when they
00:01:39.440
say that these people are there, they aren't there.
00:01:41.960
Yeah. And I think that globally speaking, we may have to do a re-pledgering that's going to have
00:01:48.860
people realize that the total global population is dramatically lower than anyone thinks it is,
00:01:54.180
especially if you're looking at UN numbers. There was a case recently where somebody sent an email to
00:01:57.680
the UN saying, Brazil's own tabulation of their population shows it's 10 million less than yours.
00:02:03.440
And the UN in response, they go, why don't you update it? And they go, we don't want to alarm anyone.
00:02:08.480
I'm like, and that's over a double digit off from where their fertility population actually is.
00:02:17.980
Percentage, double digit percentage off. So the UN is just lying through their teeth at this point
00:02:23.700
So it turns out after recording this, this situation was astronomically worse than anyone anticipated.
00:02:29.560
This first series of graphs I'm showing you, the red line is the actual fertility rate of these
00:02:34.100
countries. The blue lines is UN's repeated projections of the fertility rate of these
00:02:39.980
countries. What's interesting here, as you can see with some like Columbia, it never even was
00:02:44.380
really attached to the real fertility rate. With others like Korea every year, they just expected
00:02:48.960
to stop going down anymore, which is just, well, negligence. They're lying to people. If we go to this
00:02:55.740
next set here, you can see what's happening throughout Latin America. The red line is the real
00:03:00.900
fertility rate. And all of the other lines are the UN every year saying, stop worrying about this.
00:03:06.960
This is why the world's not panicking. If the world saw these red lines projected forwards by any
00:03:14.140
reasonable equation, they would be shitting themselves right now. Look at this even in Africa
00:03:20.520
and the Middle East. So here you have Tunisia and Turkey. The same thing is happening. And it's not
00:03:26.280
just the UN. You also have IIASA and IHME. Every major organization is attempting to gaslight people
00:03:34.460
about the severity of this. We're going to have a different episode where we go over this, but
00:03:37.980
wow, I am shocked to see this coming out in a mainstream newspaper. Now here, I'd like you to
00:03:44.220
take a moment to think, okay, if the UN is lying about all these other countries' fertility rates
00:03:49.940
and these countries' own governments are like, hey, actually you are hugely over-representing
00:03:54.440
our fertility rates. Imagine what's going on with China right now when their government doesn't
00:03:59.620
want people to know how bad things are and has been famously able to push around the UN.
00:04:04.940
So specifically, China doesn't have a 1.4 billion person population. Their population is probably
00:04:11.180
below 1 billion people and fell below 1 billion people a while ago.
00:04:15.400
Hmm. So out of all the places, this is the place that I'm worried about the most.
00:04:21.000
Why? Just the way they live. They're different.
00:04:27.180
They just wreck everything. They make everything weird. That's what I'm worried about.
00:04:31.180
To you, to you, everything, chicken. Why is it orange in Chinatown?
00:04:35.180
The way they write, the letters are weird. Their alphabet's not like ours. Their's like
00:04:41.020
someone testing out a biro. Everything's, there's no logic to anything that they do.
00:04:46.860
There is. There is. Of course there's a logic to it.
00:04:49.860
The way they read a book, it's all the other way around. From back to front instead of from
00:04:52.860
front to back and up and down. And everything that we've done, they've gone, right, we're
00:04:57.380
But let's talk about this. A lot of this episode, and I always want to give credit when a lot of it
00:05:02.940
comes from somebody else's research, came from a show called Lei's Real Talk. Or Li's Real Talk.
00:05:08.680
Anyway, pretty decent China watcher show. It's certainly not as good for me as like China's fat
00:05:14.340
chasers. But she does real solid work. And she sometimes breaks stories. And it's definitely a
00:05:20.820
source that I think people should have in their back pocket if they are doing China stuff. But
00:05:25.080
everything that she's talking about here is data that can be independently checked.
00:05:28.760
So first, there's an argument that China's birth statistics are inflated as evidenced by the
00:05:34.660
discrepancy between reported births and the number of BCG vaccinations administered. Logic. In China,
00:05:41.780
the BCG vaccine is mandatory and given to newborns within 24 hours of birth. Therefore,
00:05:46.860
the number of BCG vaccines should closely match the number of births. A Chinese researcher conducted a
00:05:52.860
study comparing the official birth data to BCG vaccine administration records from 2008 to 2021.
00:05:59.480
The study found each bottle of BCG vaccine can vaccinate between one to five babies with an
00:06:05.660
average of 1.35 babies per bottle. Using this average, the calculated number of births based on
00:06:11.420
BCG vaccine usage was consistently lower than official birth statistics. Over the 14-year period from 2008 to
00:06:18.160
2021, the discrepancy totaled 58 million births. Extrapolating this trend back to the 1980s when
00:06:25.520
China's economic reforms began, the total overestimate could be as high as 178 million people.
00:06:32.420
This research argues that this discrepancy suggests systematic overreporting. And I will have a
00:06:37.900
link to this study in the description. It's in Mandarin, so be aware of that.
00:06:42.480
Wow. Then there's data from the Lunar New Year Travel Study. A significant decrease in Lunar New
00:06:50.120
Year travel between 2019 and 2023 suggests a potential population decline, particularly among
00:06:56.380
lower income groups. Logic. Lunar New Year is the peak travel period in China with almost everyone
00:07:02.220
traveling to visit family. A large decrease in travel numbers, especially among lower income groups,
00:07:06.800
could indicate population decline. Data and source. Official data from Xeonoon News Agency shows in
00:07:14.660
2019, 2.984 billion person trips during the 40-day Lunar New Year period. In 2023, 1.556 billion trips
00:07:24.700
during the same period, which represents a 47% decrease overall. So these might be representing
00:07:30.880
very large population drafts. Breaking down the data, air and rail travel is typically used by more affluent
00:07:37.920
travelers, decreased by only 15%. Bus and road travel, typically used by lower income groups, saw the largest
00:07:44.620
decrease. Calculation. Assuming 422 million people, 30% of the official 1.4 billion population, didn't travel due to
00:07:52.500
poverty or old age, in 2019, 986 million people made 2.984 billion trips, an average of three trips per person.
00:08:00.240
In 2023, assuming 2.5 trips per person due to economic factors, this suggests a potential population
00:08:06.780
decrease of 556 million people who didn't travel in 2023. Something ain't right. Yeah. I'll explain what
00:08:15.780
would cause this. And she's actually done a different piece where she goes into this in a lot more
00:08:20.540
detail. But she argues that this unexplained decrease is due to unreported population decline
00:08:26.300
due to COVID-19 fatalities. So not only is the overall population really less than they're reporting, but they're
00:08:31.520
hiding a huge chunk of the population that died during COVID-19. She has a different episode where she goes into
00:08:37.760
kindergarten closures because there was a sudden increase in kindergarten closures where 20% closed year over year
00:08:43.300
this last year. And she says this indicates that a lot of people were either died during COVID or something like that or
00:08:49.900
etc. And they decrease in specific regions at really high levels, particularly smaller towns. And we don't have the
00:08:55.460
rural data. But she argues that the country could have lost more than 20% of its population in COVID.
00:09:01.280
And from simply from deaths, from death. And some of the CCP's behavior indicates that this is the case. By that, what I mean is
00:09:10.580
right now, they've had a mandate to destroy records of deaths during the COVID period in a lot of hospitals. And we'll go into more
00:09:18.620
data that the COVID deaths may have been dramatically higher than they're reporting. But so not only is their overall
00:09:24.020
population lower, because they were lying about some stuff, but their overall population is higher, lower, because of
00:09:28.920
people dying. And keep in mind for the flight thing, it was the low and middle class numbers that dropped this huge
00:09:36.100
amount, not the upper class numbers that didn't drop that much at all.
00:09:38.560
And theoretically, people who were uniquely hurt in a disease outbreak would be those who can't go to a
00:09:47.660
private hospital, for example, and get better treatment. So that could be the play. I see.
00:09:52.820
Or were more likely just to be shipped to one of the, I forgot what they call them, not concentration camps.
00:09:57.380
Really, yeah, scary isolation zones where you just went to a cell.
00:10:01.180
Yeah, really bad situation there. And the next is the salt consumption analysis. This was an analysis of
00:10:10.660
regional salt consumption data, which suggests China's population is significantly lower than
00:10:14.960
official figures. Salt consumption per capita is relatively stable. By analyzing regional salt sales
00:10:20.160
data and known per capita consumption rates, one can estimate the population. A Chinese researcher
00:10:26.040
conducted a comprehensive study of salt consumption data from 2000 to 2022. The methodology
00:10:31.120
involved collecting regional salt consumption data from various news reports over 20 years.
00:10:36.180
Using known daily salt intake figures for different regions, ranging from 8.5 grams to 11.5 grams per
00:10:41.800
person per day, they calculated the estimated population based on salt consumption data and
00:10:46.280
compared it to official census data. Findings. From 2000 to 2014, calculated population was 19.29%
00:10:53.820
lower than the official data. In 2015 to 2022, calculated population was approximately 31%
00:11:01.040
lower than official data. So again, the huge chunk disappeared there. So they've been overreporting
00:11:06.540
for a while, but now they're not even reporting what happened with COVID. Applying the 31% discrepancy
00:11:12.060
to the official 2022 population figure of 1.4 billion yields an estimated population of 986 million.
00:11:19.980
The full study will be linked to in the description. What's interesting here is the arguments are supporting
00:11:25.200
from multiple directions. So it's not just one study. They're all showing this huge,
00:11:30.200
like 31% lower number. And then she ran a different set of math, just for another set of math you can
00:11:36.440
run here, where she looked at the reported fertility rate of China versus India and starting populations of
00:11:43.800
the two countries. And then showed that China showed a much higher growth than it should have in overall
00:11:50.520
population when contrasted with India. And then people can be like, that might be because they
00:11:55.100
have better medical care. And so then what she did is she looked at, okay, what was the lifespan
00:11:59.380
increase between China and India during those periods? And India had a larger lifespan increase
00:12:05.320
over that period than China had, which implied that the numbers should have favored India further,
00:12:10.080
which implied we are seeing systematically wrong numbers here.
00:12:13.920
Wow. What good sleuthing on her part. This just sounds, these are such amazing questions. I'd be so proud of
00:12:19.760
one of our kids if they looked at a problem from this many different angles. I really respect her.
00:12:29.360
Yeah, I really respect her as well. Yeah, there was also a Russian and a Japanese study that put their
00:12:34.940
population at around 800 million. Specifically, the Russian expert's name was Viktor Mikov, and he
00:12:42.220
concluded China's population is not the official, the number that's nearing 1.5 billion.
00:12:46.900
This seems like a classic China problem in terms of the way that rewards or funding is dealt out to
00:12:55.640
different regions causing major problems. I recall this being an issue in the height of early
00:13:04.300
This is really interesting. So Russians gathered Chinese urban populations, added them up, and then
00:13:10.160
arrived at a total urban population at 280 million. And assuming the rural urban populations have a
00:13:16.920
one-to-one ratio, then China's actual population should be around 500 million.
00:13:22.780
Why should they be one-to-one? That doesn't make sense to me.
00:13:25.800
But if total rural population carries a higher weight, it may not be one-to-one, but they said that
00:13:33.720
China's total population should not exceed 800 million. I'd expect their urban population to be
00:13:43.980
That is fascinating. So we've got more stuff here. Here's an article. And so just in terms of like
00:13:51.220
China having a lower population than it otherwise might've had. One here, for people wondering how
00:13:55.680
big this difference is, it could be. So they did two different calculations here. So what you might
00:14:02.480
have is a real population of, oh yeah. So this was just a 944 million number I already said. Okay.
00:14:07.700
Now in terms of who is saying that more people died during COVID than official numbers, this is not
00:14:13.480
an urban monoculture coverup. There was an article by the CDC on this topic. And there was an article in
00:14:19.100
Nature on this topic. And the Atlantic did a piece called, can a million Chinese people die and nobody
00:14:24.340
know? Official statistics on COVID can't be trusted because they share Beijing's political interests.
00:14:29.060
Making the dead disappear is only part of it. And then evidence of underreporting satellite energy
00:14:35.120
revealed heightened activity at crematorium centers during the outbreak. Domestic footage of
00:14:41.300
overwhelmed hospital wards circulated on Chinese social media before being censored a morning and
00:14:47.660
funeral index based on online search volume for related terms indicated 712,000 excess mortalities.
00:14:55.420
So nearly a million excess mortalities from December 2022 to February 2023.
00:15:02.960
That's recent. That's after the pandemic. 2022 to 2023 is when the pandemic is very quote unquote
00:15:09.580
over. Whatever the case may be, over a million more people died. So basically they're just hiding their
00:15:15.580
deaths. They're fudging their births. The whole Chinese situation is not only paper-tigered. It's a
00:15:25.420
Petumpkin village. It's fake. It isn't an actual economic superpower in the way that we believe that
00:15:33.400
it is. And I think that right now, another thing that she's been arguing in her recent videos,
00:15:39.360
and I actually think she's right about this, is when we ask why is Xi Jinping not doing logical
00:15:44.780
things to protect his economy or his people right now, given how bad things are, the answer could be
00:15:51.320
that he's trying to transition into a wartime economy. And a wartime economy is not going to
00:15:56.140
be driven by consumer demand. It's going to be driven by centralized production cues.
00:16:03.420
Are there signs that they are centralizing their production?
00:16:07.220
Oh yeah, absolutely. Keep in mind, all the billionaires have been like disappearing. They've
00:16:10.220
been centralizing all the major industries. Remember when, what's his face, Alibaba guy disappeared,
00:16:14.400
right? That's very much a move to a... How does that have to do with... What does that have to do
00:16:20.020
with centralizing production? Okay. Remember how we have defined in other videos the difference between
00:16:26.440
a socialist state and a fascist state? Yes. Whereas a socialist state puts the state industry,
00:16:33.440
like the economic means of production, under the state for the purposes of distributing wealth as
00:16:38.540
equally as possible. Whereas a fascist state puts the means of production under a state for the
00:16:44.300
purpose of spreading a particular ideology or worldview in keeping existing oligarchs in power,
00:16:50.040
i.e. what the Democrats are doing. That's why the Democrats are fundamentally a fascist party.
00:16:53.320
A lot of people don't understand this. They think I'm like exaggerating when I say that.
00:16:56.460
Anyway, that's what China is doing right now is they're transitioning to a fascist economic system
00:17:02.000
where they are putting the means of production under the authority of the existing power
00:17:08.160
structure to heighten the power of the existing oligarchical structure because they think that
00:17:12.800
they know that an economic collapse is impossible. Basically, the entire economy there has been
00:17:17.180
more of a Ponzi scheme than the rest of the world's economy for a while. It's like foreign investors
00:17:22.880
come in, foreign investors come in, your money will always grow. Look at how many people we have,
00:17:27.740
imagine how big this could be. And I think very similar to what happened in Japan in the 80s,
00:17:41.220
And if they're transitioning to a wartime economy, do we have good reason to believe,
00:17:44.540
therefore, that they are going to come for Taiwan faster?
00:17:48.800
Oh, I think they meant to go for Taiwan by now, but Russia's F up in Ukraine has significantly
00:17:56.500
lowered their desire for that particular conflict. That's my read of it. All of this, I think,
00:18:03.920
started before they saw what happened in Ukraine. And right now, there's an ongoing conversation.
00:18:10.800
Because I thought it's more of just a siege scenario. And Taiwan, from an energy-independent
00:18:15.120
standpoint, is so screwed that all you have to do is just besiege them.
00:18:19.860
Do you know how much our GPUs that we've been buying up? Simone and I have been buying up GPUs
00:18:28.100
We're going to get a very good resale value on those. By the way, one of the things we're
00:18:31.620
looking for right now is a CTO for the companies. If anyone's like a GPU specialist or running data
00:18:36.160
center specialist, let us know. We'd really be interested in working with you or has a good
00:18:40.420
technical resume otherwise for a position at a startup. But yeah, so the implication could be that
00:18:48.000
they're going for Taiwan. I don't know. It's just such a dumb decision if they do,
00:18:51.660
but it could be with the goal of securing the existing administration, knowing that an economic
00:19:00.560
collapse of the region is not going to happen, but already underway.
00:19:07.240
Yeah. I was reading in totally outside of, let's say someone wants to write all this off as
00:19:16.300
conspiracy theorizing and they choose to not believe any of the stats presented. I was just
00:19:20.820
reading that China's getting to the point that for every child born, six people are dying. It's that
00:19:30.060
Yeah. Let me make sure I have that right. Okay, here we go.
00:19:34.380
A demographer warns that if China's fertility rate remains on its downward trajectory, eventually
00:19:39.160
six people will die for every newborn. This was from an article called China's pro-birth policies,
00:19:45.880
not yet enough to counter demographic crisis, expert warns published in the South China Morning Post.
00:19:51.240
So that's mainstream, not question, people talking about just how bad things are,
00:19:58.600
how their fertility rate dropped to 1.09 in 2022, but that's likely highly overstated. We don't have
00:20:03.800
numbers for 2023 officially. And to your point about this, anything they do send to us may be
00:20:09.880
very highly overstated. Even in China's best possible, most enthusiastic and optimistic number
00:20:16.940
presentation, we're still looking at an extremely dire scenario. If things are even worse and as bad
00:20:24.020
as you describe and as bad as people are seeing through things like baby vaccinations and salt
00:20:29.960
intake and vacation travel and mourning, it's bad. It's also very concerning that apparently excess
00:20:38.580
deaths are so much higher, even between 2022 and 2023. It implies...
00:20:44.020
What gets me on this? And I think that a lot of people... What were you going to say it implies?
00:20:46.940
It implies that it's not just a COVID thing and it's not just people
00:20:53.280
being hopeless and not having kids anymore thing, that people... The country may also be deeply unwell
00:21:02.580
in other ways that we aren't fully aware of. Yeah, I guess my takeaway from a lot of this is one,
00:21:10.280
India is likely a bigger player in the global future than we think. China has long... Basically what this
00:21:16.520
means is India's population is higher than China's population and going forwards for the rest of
00:21:21.600
human history we can project right now will continue to be higher. But in addition to that,
00:21:26.920
it just means that China is... When people are predicting future events, do not over-index China's
00:21:34.080
role in those events, I guess I would say. When I talk to a lot of people, I would say this is one of the...
00:21:40.120
In terms of smart people who I talk to, like really smart people, consistent mistakes that they
00:21:46.180
make in the single most consistent mistake I see they make is believing too much that China has a
00:21:52.340
future. Seeing them trying to play out the roles and the moves that they make 50 years from now,
00:21:59.460
100 years from now, thinking that they are going to find a way to fix this quickly when they should
00:22:06.360
have already done that. Like it's basically too late for them at this point. Even if they start going
00:22:12.240
on a forced birth campaign or something like that, I just wouldn't expect that much benefit from it,
00:22:20.180
given that it would need to admit things that mainstream Chinese officials just aren't admitting
00:22:25.040
right now. Keep in mind, they were one of the first countries to jail someone who was doing gene
00:22:30.740
editing in humans very publicly, right? Like they made it clear, we don't do genetics here. We don't
00:22:35.900
believe in genetics here. All humans are exactly the same. And that's going to make any sort of a
00:22:41.380
campaign they do to try to increase fertility rate, likely create an adverse outcome. So I just
00:22:47.380
don't, I do. And it also means that their existing power on the world stage might be being overstated.
00:22:53.760
And a lot of China's existing power, people misunderstand. They're like their existing
00:22:57.520
power is due to what they produce. And I'm like, that is not true. Their existing power is due to
00:23:03.460
the amount of money American and European investors have poured into China. That is where their
00:23:10.120
valuation comes from. Obviously China is... So you mean people buying companies, putting companies
00:23:17.220
in... People buying stock, investing in, etc. Interesting. Investing in China is why China has
00:23:24.140
a high valuation. Like when you're looking at like Chinese GDP or like the share of the global market
00:23:27.980
and blah, blah, blah. A lot of this is like basically fudged numbers due to the people who have put money
00:23:34.120
into that. And that's also why you don't get this counter narrative of actually China is not that
00:23:39.700
relevant, politically speaking, because nobody benefits from this. The wealthy oligarchs who run
00:23:45.560
our society, they have tons of money invested in this that they can't quickly get out. And so they're
00:23:51.480
not going to want it widely disseminated that actually China is already over. So they don't publish it in
00:23:59.340
their newspapers. They don't talk about it. They don't promote people who are talking about it.
00:24:03.180
It's the same with the political apparatuses. It neither serves the conservatives nor the Democrats
00:24:09.440
well to say China is not particularly relevant as a power player. Because people want to focus on
00:24:15.620
what do we do if Taiwan gets attacked? And as I've always said, what we do if Taiwan gets attacked is
00:24:19.480
nothing. Because Taiwan won't exist in 100 years at their current fertility rate. We are not
00:24:25.340
saving a thing of persistent value by saving Taiwan at this point. If Taiwan can get their fertility rate
00:24:31.620
up, I would commit American force to help them. But at their current fertility rate, you are just
00:24:37.440
delaying their death by a century. There is no point. It's very seriously, a country with a fertility
00:24:44.160
rate that's hovering around one, halving their population every generation. Why would I have our
00:24:51.160
either capital or actual human beings dying to defend that? That's insane.
00:24:59.720
Yeah. But by that logic, are you trying to argue that we should only fight for countries with high
00:25:04.160
birth rates? So if someone invades a high birth rate African country, defend them.
00:25:09.500
No, it's not just based on the birth rate. It's based on their relevance in a future Earth scenario.
00:25:15.060
That's Africa. They're the ones who are going to decline last.
00:25:18.200
I don't think that you are actually really helping that much in terms of the future trajectory of
00:25:22.840
Earth by committing tons of resources to preventing random groups in Africa from attacking each other.
00:25:29.400
Whether or not it just all comes out in the wash there because the infrastructure and the economic
00:25:35.380
infrastructure in that region is so poorly developed that you're just really not getting
00:25:40.040
much of an outcome from that. But if somebody was to say, oh, would you care? Like, where would
00:25:45.260
you care about defending if they were attacked? What's a country where you're like, this country
00:25:48.820
is going to have an outsized, a level of impact in the future. When I look at current.
00:25:56.600
Oh, Israel's a big example here. Technologically, they're going to matter in 50 to 100 years.
00:26:02.440
Fertility wise, they're going to matter in 50 or 100 years. In terms of who is it worth investing
00:26:08.100
to protect, Israel is who it's worth investing to protect. Taiwan is not particularly worth investing
00:26:13.920
to protect. In terms of the Ukraine, I thought that it was worth it to just show that Russia
00:26:19.280
couldn't push people around in the beginning. I no longer think it's worth it. Now they're just
00:26:23.300
fighting over land and neither country is going to matter much in the future either. And Russia has
00:26:30.740
Yeah, I guess if this were like an elimination based reality TV show and you're trying to decide
00:26:35.660
to who to ally yourself with, if there's someone who's just clearly tanking, they lack the charisma
00:26:41.100
or physical prowess or whatever the show's based on, cooking ability, baking ability to hang in there.
00:26:48.640
Yes. You really need to look at someone's ability to be there in the future. And it's not just
00:26:52.520
whether you like them or whether... I like Taiwan a lot.
00:27:00.480
Yeah. Yeah, but they're just not a contender. And it's the same with China. So keep in mind,
00:27:06.540
like China and Taiwan are enemies. I am very pro-Taiwan. I am very anti-CCP, but I admit that
00:27:11.940
they both are dealing with this population problem and there really isn't an out for them at this
00:27:17.080
point that I can see. And so when people are like, oh, what do you think that China is going to be
00:27:22.680
doing in X mini? I'm like, they're not going to be doing anything that matters. Now this does have
00:27:27.520
impacts on like semiconductor production and everything like that. But I think we'll be
00:27:31.340
able to offshore Taiwan semiconductor production, at least the relevant parts before things go tits
00:27:37.040
up. Keep in mind that because we've hit a Moore's law sort of ceiling now, we are entering optimal
00:27:43.460
semiconductor world at this point. Do you understand what I mean by that, Simone? So historically,
00:27:48.420
if one company was like really ahead of other companies in semiconductor production,
00:27:52.700
it didn't really make sense to try to compete with them because it's, you've got
00:27:57.520
you want to try to catch up with this company, but every year they're improving so much. They're
00:28:03.300
like 30% better every year. So even if I figure out how they're making the semiconductors they're
00:28:07.460
making this year, I'm not going to be able to compete with them economically by the time I get
00:28:15.100
that up. Because by the time I get that fab up, by the time I get all that up, it's going to be five,
00:28:19.560
10 years from now. And they're going to be like a generation, not one generation, like 10 generations
00:28:23.640
ahead of me, right? Like I will be able to make very simple semiconductors, but nothing particularly
00:28:27.500
impressive. But now the advancement in semiconductor production has lowered dramatically. You are
00:28:35.180
getting very small increment because we've reached the edges of what physics can do. And so this gives
00:28:40.900
other companies and countries a long time to catch up with this. And I think the next major advancement
00:28:48.340
in semiconductors that we should focus on from a human civilizational perspective is how can we,
00:28:55.100
one, lateralize semiconductor production? Right now it takes 40 different countries,
00:29:00.360
all developing. The lasers are developed in Norway and the plans are developed in California and the,
00:29:06.960
you know, the end products developed in Taiwan. How can we lateralize this process and how can we
00:29:13.100
microtize this process? I.e. I think we're going to need to focus on more modular and smaller
00:29:19.740
semiconductors as global supply chains as global supply chains begin to break down. Even if they are
00:29:24.980
slightly slower, it's going to be equally useful given the way that cloud networks work and the way
00:29:32.020
that you can just chain like GPUs together. Hmm. If you were living in China right now, let's say in a place like
00:29:41.680
Shanghai where the birth rate is so low, where would you move? If Shanghai's fertility, by the way,
00:29:52.780
is 0.6 as of 2023. So not even this year, lower than. I get out. I don't think that there is a way
00:29:58.840
to, to, I think that China is internally burning itself. I think that the situation in China is going
00:30:04.300
to get astronomically worse than it is today. I think they're going to start blocking emigration
00:30:09.160
though. I feel like they already stopped. They stopped it like five years ago. They put major
00:30:13.680
bans and restrictions on people out migrating. Yeah. So then that's not a realistic, you're just
00:30:21.100
saying figure out how to, you know, essentially figure out, figure out like you're running from a,
00:30:25.980
a Holocaust that's about to happen. Like figure out, like you don't get how bad things are going to
00:30:31.920
get. That's my read of China right now. You do not know. You cannot comprehend you. If you want
00:30:39.060
to know how bad things are going to get in China in the future, ask your grandparents about the
00:30:43.820
great famine. Okay. That's the scale things are going to in China right now. What does worry me
00:30:50.260
is again, those excess deaths between 2022 and 2023, like we're not in the middle of the pandemic
00:30:55.680
anymore. And to my knowledge, there've been no immense natural disasters in China though. Okay.
00:31:03.160
I'm not following the news that closely. I do wonder, especially after all these stories of
00:31:09.700
people being like buildings, collapses or infrastructure, not really working well.
00:31:14.260
And I guess it's just so hard to trust what you're hearing because then when you hear
00:31:17.740
from anyone who is in any way proud of China, and I think there's a lot to be proud of in China.
00:31:24.860
I think the Chinese people are awesome. And I've traveled through China
00:31:27.640
in a decent amount, not an amazing amount, but I've been to like Zhangjiajie and Changshan,
00:31:35.060
not like your typical, just Beijing and Hong Kong and Shanghai though. I've done those too.
00:31:39.920
It's an amazing place. But when you talk with anyone who has pride in China,
00:31:44.320
then it's just propaganda talking points. So I don't know who to consult, right?
00:31:50.000
Well, I'll tell you to consult. And this is the thing also about out migrating from China.
00:31:57.400
Historic and real Chinese culture is better preserved in the immigrant communities than
00:32:03.520
it is preserved within CCP China. If you're like, I want to get in touch with my Chinese traditional
00:32:09.760
roots, you are better off living in one of the American Chinese immigrant communities than you
00:32:14.440
are under CCP China, because they often were founded by individuals from before the cultural
00:32:21.020
revolution. And they maintain more true uninterrupted through lines to traditional Chinese culture.
00:32:28.940
I do think that's really interesting that when in some countries, you get these selective pressures
00:32:36.300
where people with a certain fidelity to a certain culture just leave en masse. And then anyone who
00:32:44.420
stays basically gets completely changed through those same selective pressures. And then the
00:32:49.920
original country is somewhere else now. And you can even see this in not necessarily in holistic
00:32:56.580
cultural sets or cultural, mimetic, religious, whatever sets, but even just in accents. Like I've
00:33:02.020
heard it argued that the true British accent of we'll say before the American revolution may be more
00:33:11.340
alive in some versions of American speech in like the 1900s than even the modern British accent,
00:33:17.160
which is an interesting, yeah, because like certain groups migrated and like things evolve. It's not
00:33:23.980
like after a point of great migration, do things stay the same in the original home country? No,
00:33:30.120
things change. In fact, often when there is a great migration, it's because there's significant
00:33:34.140
change in the home country. So I like that point about cultural fidelity, maybe not even being in China.
00:33:41.000
And if you really love China, and if you believe in China, you maybe need to rebuild that somewhere
00:33:47.220
else. Uh, yeah, I like that way of looking at it rebuilt, but I don't think it can be rebuilt in
00:33:54.140
China. Not so long as Xi Jinping is in charge. Now, if, and this is one area where I realized I have a
00:34:00.020
big difference between my friends who believe that China has a future in me, is they're like,
00:34:03.560
Xi Jinping, he won't be in charge for long. He's got replacements in the wing. As soon as he Fs up
00:34:09.060
enough, they're going to replace him. And my belief is, uh, the opposite of that. I don't think
00:34:15.080
they have real replacements lined up for him. I have looked into these people's, they've said,
00:34:19.600
Oh, this guy is competent. I don't see it. I don't see it. I don't think that they have a good
00:34:23.940
replacement for him. If I were him, I would not want to take, or if I were anyone else, I would not
00:34:28.420
want to take his place. I would be terrified to take his place. I, I don't think that they, I think
00:34:34.140
that he's for a long time purged everyone competent who might take his position. I don't think that
00:34:39.960
there is somebody who can competently take his position. I think when Xi Jinping falls, a lot of
00:34:46.460
people think, Oh, this is when things begin to fix themselves. No, I think that's when warlords begin
00:34:51.300
to take over. I think that's when things begin to fracture or they go incredibly stupid a la Venezuela,
00:34:57.640
like a bus driver taking over. I think that as much as Xi Jinping is a problem, he's also the
00:35:04.480
bulwark against complete idiocy. And I have intense fear around what happens when he does fall,
00:35:12.240
because I think people think some competent bureaucrat is going to take over. And that's
00:35:15.860
not the tea leaves I'm reading. The tea leaves I'm reading is some idiots going to take over who
00:35:21.660
we would never have assigned power with intention. And if I'm wrong about this, if the system is still
00:35:27.520
working, if they still can get a competent person in there and they can get rid of Xi Jinping,
00:35:31.880
China has a chance. But it's got no chance under Xi Jinping. Or the Dowager Empress, as I call him.
00:35:39.800
The Dowager Empress. He reminds me of the Dowager Empress in the last fall of China.
00:35:45.580
The scary dragon lady. I guess everyone calls Dowager Empresses or any mean woman dragon lady. But
00:35:50.480
yeah, the one with the really young son who just killed a bunch of people, that one?
00:35:56.340
Yeah. In fact, if I was in office, I would always call him the Dowager Empress.
00:36:03.260
Because I think people need to draw this connection more to, one, understand just how much he's hurting
00:36:08.860
the country. And to, two, through a historic parallel, and to, two, understand just how long
00:36:14.800
within the Chinese bureaucracy, somebody who is that toxic to the country's long-term best interest
00:36:20.600
can stay in power if people don't take care of them.
00:36:24.820
Take care of them. If you were, let's say, someone incredibly competent, the right person for China,
00:36:33.320
were suddenly installed and given autocratic power, what would you have them do? What would
00:36:39.840
you encourage them to do if they came to you and asked you for a fight?
00:36:42.660
The first thing they need to do is become completely transparent about all of their records.
00:36:46.620
Their economy, their population, their fertility.
00:36:49.020
I've heard of me wonder, so what if Xi Jinping doesn't even know the gravity of this and can't
00:36:52.980
because there are so many adverse incentives at play where a province is not going to tell you
00:36:58.240
because then they won't get their tax revenue? I feel like there's a crisis of reality.
00:37:01.540
You can put in place independent departments, independent branches of government using things
00:37:06.500
like AI and satellite images, all the stuff that foreigners are using. And then they get
00:37:11.020
commendations and wealth for finding areas where people are fudging things.
00:37:16.080
All right, so let's say, first thing, you establish the Department of Truth, and they go out
00:37:21.740
and their job is to just find out what's going on.
00:37:24.220
Department of Transparency. Then you need to reinstitute goodwill among investors that if they invest
00:37:31.420
in something, they will be able to get their money into and out of the country easily.
00:37:35.260
That's one of the big things that's going to drive down investment right now, right?
00:37:38.380
As people are terrified that if they put money into China, that the money's never going to be
00:37:42.740
able to come out of China. And because that's true right now, China's basically realized like
00:37:49.500
What if suddenly you do that and all of the money-
00:37:51.860
A lot of the money, this is all going to cause short-term pain.
00:37:55.700
But you're saying within China's autocratic system that apparently can think long-term,
00:38:00.500
No, no, no, you are a long-termist autocrat suddenly.
00:38:03.220
You need to, you need to, basically all of this is around developing investor confidence.
00:38:08.020
You need to develop investor confidence, long-term investor confidence with foreign investors.
00:38:14.820
That is the first core thing you need to do. So everything involved in that,
00:38:19.300
not jailing, making things. If somebody achieves a certain level of wealth,
00:38:23.100
you're not just going to go after them. You're not going to, all of that stuff.
00:38:25.780
So investor competence is thing number one. Thing number two is fertility collapse is a
00:38:31.620
national security issue right now. And I may even put it under the purview of the military,
00:38:47.540
Right. But what good will artificial wombs do you if no one wants to have kids anyway,
00:38:51.860
whether or not they get pregnant? You have the state raise them.
00:38:55.860
So you would encourage the first ever government-funded human production plan.
00:39:02.980
I think if you do those two things simultaneously and big enough.
00:39:09.460
I guess you could, would you, this is very dystopian, but would you
00:39:14.100
offer to pay women a, a living wage to carry pregnancies to term? And then if they don't want
00:39:22.340
No, but I wouldn't disallow anyone from a high level government position with less than four kids.
00:39:29.060
So to say, I know the anti-cat lady tenure policy.
00:39:35.780
But that's nobody, because no one has been allowed to have a lot of kids.
00:39:40.580
No, it's been long enough under the three-child policy and loosen one-child restrictions.
00:39:52.900
Because it was still culturally so discouraged. They're basically no.
00:39:57.940
The policy was formally passed into law by the National People's Congress,
00:40:01.780
the National Legislature of China on August 20th, 2021 was the three-child policy.
00:40:08.900
Simone, the one-child policy was loosened in 2016.
00:40:15.540
You can say, this is the thing, and this is where everybody gets things wrong.
00:40:21.060
But the problem is that fertility rate now in China is lower than it ever was under the one-child policy.
00:40:28.900
Listen, you shouldn't penalize people for not having a lot of kids under Xi Jinping in China,
00:40:37.940
No, you would be shouting, we are the last generation, along with everybody else.
00:40:48.820
You shouldn't penalize people who are making smart and logical decisions.
00:40:54.020
That's the only way you create a cultural change.
00:40:57.860
I may disallow salaries above a certain amount to people who have less than a certain number of kids.
00:41:03.860
I would tap your max possible salary to the number of children you have,
00:41:08.980
which will quickly create the perception that more kids means more wealth.
00:41:14.900
No, I would, that's a fun, that's a fun concept to reconnect from a, just from a policy perspective in general.
00:41:24.100
Because the thing in the past and why people would have a lot of kids, aside from other cultural reasons,
00:41:29.220
was the more kids you had, the more wealthy you were.
00:41:32.580
And if we just reconnect those in some way, either, of course, through progressive tax breaks for the more kids you have,
00:41:42.100
Yeah, the more kids you have, the more money you're allowed to earn or something.
00:41:45.380
It's just the level of dystopian control that you have to have over a people to do that is too much.
00:42:01.060
Okay, so yeah, you're trying to come up with a solution that certainly doesn't fit with our cultural values,
00:42:06.900
that is more coercive, that is more, I'm not going to say evil, that is just creepy,
00:42:11.540
because you're like, this is going to work for them.
00:42:16.740
You're saying, if I was in China, what would I do?
00:42:19.060
Like, you know, the person who's like, I'd start a democracy is an idiot.
00:42:32.660
Yeah, I could see a kind of China making human production army thing with artificial looms.
00:42:50.100
Did I tell you about my five-hour bus ride to Zhangjiaojie from Changsha?
00:42:59.060
Like, some guy had this cell phone that constantly kept ringing,
00:43:02.500
and it was just children's choirs singing Christmas songs in English.
00:43:07.140
And they were chewing this thing that smelled incredibly strong, like throughout this bus,
00:43:14.100
that just made me want to vomit the whole time.
00:43:19.540
So I'm just hearing children's choirs singing Christmas songs and smelling this putrid smell
00:43:24.660
of whatever it is that people are chewing and spitting out on the bus.
00:43:32.580
Betelnuts are an addictive stimulant that's chewed in parts of China,
00:43:36.260
particularly the southern provinces such as Henan, Henan, Zhangjing.
00:43:48.580
I've had good moments and I've had bad moments.
00:43:50.420
But like, good moment just before that bus drive,
00:43:52.820
the taxi driver, or the taxi cab driver who took me to the bus station where I took that bus,
00:43:57.940
was so concerned about me that he got in to the bus station and helped me buy a ticket and told me where to sit.
00:44:11.140
So they're really, they're awesome, cool bro people who help out total nonsense idiot foreigners
00:44:18.420
who are kind and hardworking and enterprising and creative.
00:44:25.540
And it makes me so sad to think that they're under this level of threat.
00:44:32.980
Oh, I wish there were a less dystopian way to do this.
00:44:39.220
But you've got to, I think that the less dystopian ways of handling this are going to be handled in the immigrant communities.
00:44:46.820
You can't find a new, like in the US, I'm like experiment with new ways of having your family culture work.
00:44:52.980
New traditions, new holidays, new ways of relating to things.
00:44:56.580
What can China do right now that other countries can't do?
00:45:01.220
So if suddenly you become transparent and you're like, okay, guys, now I'm in charge.
00:45:11.700
You can leave and enter the country as desired.
00:45:18.460
Peter Zion talks about their natural resources being not great.
00:45:26.940
I would make them like a nuclear hotspot fast, like small.
00:45:31.900
That was the thing I was talking about was transparency and everything like that and taking a short term hit.
00:45:35.740
The big problem China has now is they got so used to that period where they were a growing power instead of a weakening power that they've built this idea of we'll always be bigger tomorrow and therefore let's bully the neighboring countries.
00:45:51.180
They need to understand that they are in a position of short-lived power right now and they need to be doing everything they can right now to build goodwill among their neighbors.
00:46:00.540
That nine dot line that they've drawn, that's not going to hold for 50 years and when it stops holding, the people who they were bullying are going to be awfully mad at them.
00:46:12.700
They need to walk back all of this stuff they've been doing in the local region.
00:46:16.860
Okay, so start playing nice with others, but then what will a admittedly smaller going forward China do to build prosperity and.
00:46:29.020
They need to, as I said, one, forcing competent people to have more kids, culturally speaking, through the way that you influence them.
00:46:38.120
Okay, incentivizing, not forcing, incentivizing through cultural means.
00:46:43.220
The state-raised kids, state-produced kids, that could be an option that they have access to that we don't really have access to.
00:46:48.740
And they, I think, right now, something that is being understated in the investment world is how much of a problem it is that nobody trusts Chinese stock market or wants to put money onto it.
00:47:03.000
It's because the government has basically said, okay, now you put the money in, now we're going to keep it from going out.
00:47:11.800
If you create state-created humans and state-raised humans, maybe China, because China also has an international reputation, I think, of producing very smart, competent, hardworking people.
00:47:29.640
To, with your army of government-creative people, like, because we are the intellectual mercenaries of the world.
00:47:42.360
We will build, and then they just start investing in all of the type of human infrastructure that will matter in a post-AI world.
00:47:50.540
Because the rest of the world is too indolent, probably, to raise the sort of disciplined, smart person, practical person, not hedonic person, to thrive in a post-AI society and still matter in a post-AI society.
00:48:04.960
So maybe if China did that, and they continued with the same, oh, America, you suck with your titty-tainment, like, you go and enjoy your hedonism, and we're going to produce our competent, hardworking, tight-lipped people who we will produce and train, then maybe they can just be, like, the one non-idiocracy.
00:48:25.900
No, that would really be cool if they could do that.
00:48:28.000
And I'd also say that one of the core things that people get wrong when they're predicting future world events and stuff like that is how cheesed America is from so many perspectives.
00:48:42.440
We are moving into a world in which America is dramatically more dominant than it is today.
00:48:47.120
And I think a good book to start, if you're interested in this subject, is Peter Zeihan's book, The End of the World is Just the Beginning.
00:48:53.360
He talks through in a very sort of guns, germs, and steel kind of way just why America has the tailwinds that will give it a huge advantage in the instance of a world in which there is no more support for international trade.
00:49:07.720
So, one, as globalization and global economic systems begin to break down, yes, that is part of why America will be strong, is we are the most self-sufficient country in the world by a dramatic margin, whether it's energy or food or any of the things that civilization needs to survive.
00:49:23.060
But in addition to that, we also have a weirdly high fertility rate for our level of prosperity and output.
00:49:31.600
And it's because America has what it turns out is the greatest resource any country can have in the 21st century, which is we have religion and a lot of it, a lot more than any other developed country.
00:49:43.780
And it turns out that a lot of these countries, when they were modernizing and got rid of their religions, did a great harm to themselves.
00:49:53.000
And when I look to the future, when people are like, future world polarity-wise, where are you looking at world power centers?
00:50:01.120
One, people are hugely sleeping on how much power America is going to have.
00:50:04.720
The other area that they're hugely sleeping on is Israel.
00:50:07.680
Like, no matter how positive you could be about Israel, you need to be 10x more positive than that.
00:50:15.120
Yeah, I guess if we were to look at any country that actually was producing some kind of hyper-competent workforce that is famous for going out and getting a lot of things done and that doesn't focus on hedonism over everything else,
00:50:29.020
it was so weird how in your class at Stanford's Graduate School of Business, one of the most difficult schools to get into in the entire world, there were so many Israeli students.
00:50:51.240
They all had businesses and they were going through school.
00:50:54.380
They were like so much more on top of their lives than anyone else.
00:50:58.440
And even though they worked harder and even though they were incredibly conscientious, they all just seemed very happy.
00:51:05.460
There were a lot of tortured souls at your school, but they weren't among them.
00:51:10.840
A lot of the American Jews were among the tortured soul category that you're talking about.
00:51:16.480
And actually, Simone, we have an invitation to go to Israel and meet Wiz and live with some of these Haradi families for a bit.
00:51:31.260
Has invited us to stay with some of the Haradi families in Brooklyn in the next couple weeks because he's going to be there and he's going to be...
00:51:43.440
In future years, I really want to, but not right now, unfortunately.
00:51:49.300
They do not understand how much fertility rates in technophilic regions matter.
00:51:55.120
And I think that's the cool thing is that China has the building blocks.
00:52:03.500
I just love how modern so many of the things there are.
00:52:06.300
Another big advantage, which is they don't have the bureaucratic bloat of other regions.
00:52:15.720
Like, October 7th seems to have been largely a product of the government not having...
00:52:20.220
We were going to do an episode on this, but we can just briefly mention this now.
00:52:23.360
I have looked at their competence since October 7th in terms of essentially wiping out all of Hezbollah in Palestine.
00:52:31.060
No, but keep in mind, that groundwork was laid well before October 7th.
00:52:36.840
And the problem is, Simone, which you might not be considering, that groundwork was weighed before October 7th.
00:52:44.540
They wouldn't have been able to execute on that groundwork if October 7th hadn't happened.
00:52:51.140
Why were they making plans for how they were going to take out Hezbollah that they obviously, from a geopolitical standpoint, couldn't execute on unless...
00:53:01.340
I used to think October 7th, I was like, they must have some level of impossible stupidity here.
00:53:06.580
I am now leaning towards the, oh my god, this was all planned from the beginning.
00:53:12.200
I'm leaning toward, they put so many resources into embedding devices with Hezbollah and getting intel from Hezbollah that they snoozed on Hamas, just being like, you guys are so incompetent.
00:53:26.380
Hezbollah wasn't attacking them as aggressively as they are right now.
00:53:28.880
Do you think they could have had all those things explode?
00:53:32.180
Oh, you mean just from a diplomatic standpoint, because they would have put so much hate on it?
00:53:35.800
I think it was an insurance policy, because keep in mind, they weren't just incendiary devices or explosive devices.
00:53:47.540
So I think it was about optionality to have that there.
00:53:52.460
They knew that Iran was probably going to get more resources at some point.
00:53:57.460
Obama had started that trajectory, and that's about when they started doing this.
00:54:01.260
So I think they knew it was going to be a rising threat.
00:54:03.100
And I don't think they could have anticipated or even encouraged October 7th.
00:54:09.480
I think it's more of a just, they thought that they knew what they were doing.
00:54:19.040
It seems plausible to me that just what Hamas did was so out of...
00:54:28.700
So British intelligence, when they looked at this, there was an ex-British intelligence guy,
00:54:33.060
and he was saying, it is shocking that Israel accomplished more in a year and a half than we accomplished during the entire war on terror against the Taliban.
00:54:42.960
He's like, if we could have dismantled the Taliban to the level that Israel dismantled Hezbollah,
00:54:48.760
this would have been, this is like 99% more than what we did.
00:54:51.860
Like, it was stunning, stunning that they were able to accomplish it.
00:54:57.880
We need to get, like, spy novel writers in the same room as, like, government officials or, like, sci-fi writers
00:55:07.000
Get drunk, and then just start making some plans.
00:55:11.520
we should consider ourselves very fortunate of the Secret Service agencies
00:55:15.840
that apparently are actively attacking us now, which is the British one.
00:55:20.440
Yeah, we should be glad that of the ones most likely to support us,
00:55:28.140
You wouldn't, but here's the thing about Mossad.
00:55:30.720
You won't know that they're out to get you until you're dead.
00:55:39.440
But, yeah, I guess we just did a surprise attack.
00:55:49.720
It's like when I'm thinking about, like, world players who matter.
00:55:54.260
Israel literally, like, in my future calculations of geopolitical politics,
00:56:01.560
Yeah, they're kind of in the potential to have outsized influence,
00:56:05.200
very similar, in my mindscape, to the UK or Britain
00:56:11.920
before they became the British Imperial Empire.
00:56:17.200
Rome didn't even want to hold on to them, right?
00:56:24.200
Like, you said in that other episode on your one civilization theory.
00:56:29.000
I identify too much with you, Malcolm, but I'm not trying to take credit for it.
00:56:36.480
Nobody really helped inspire it by telling me that I should think more of ancient Chinese civilization.
00:56:40.580
That was really the thing that got me investigating, and then I was like, no, actually, they suck.
00:56:49.860
I'm trying to point out things that I love about China.
00:56:58.400
Most people in Szechuan province are just genuinely awesome people and really cool.
00:57:04.320
I think that the whole, like, a lot of the Chinese people I know are some of the smartest people I know.
00:57:12.660
Anyway, so, yeah, we love China, but I can't remember where I was going.
00:57:15.820
It doesn't matter because we need to make dinner.
00:57:17.640
But I'm sorry to anyone who came here just wanting to hear about China and there we go on Israel again.
00:57:25.500
So, yeah, no one thought, yeah, Britain was backwater.
00:57:30.040
Relatively small population, and yet so much influence in the entire world.
00:57:35.700
And I think it's, yeah, it's easy for people to write off Israel to be like, it is a tiny postage stamp of land within a hostile area.
00:57:49.040
Before the rise of the British Imperial Empire, I would have wanted to know what was going on with these guys, see how I could work with them.
00:57:56.340
So, I guess I see your point in that we have to look to the future and look for their potential.
00:58:00.820
Yeah, don't make big sacrifices to make alliances with the Ottomans.
00:58:09.820
But I think what also gives me hope at the end of this, and I want to end with this because it's where there's hope for China, is that China isn't in China anymore.
00:58:20.120
We know through our travel agency, which works with a ton of Venezuelans, that all the Venezuelans are in Spain.
00:58:36.920
We are going to hell so many times over, Malcolm.
00:58:45.340
And that is a theory that gives me a lot of hope because when I hear about new news with China's demographic collapse, I just think, I weep for China, and it makes me very sad and scared.
00:58:55.900
But then I think about, yeah, all these amazing Chinese immigrant communities throughout the world, and you've got stuff.
00:59:03.760
Populations can move and build something even better.
00:59:06.660
And as we've talked about in other episodes, the more that you evolve and move around and play jazz with other cultures and take the best from them and do it better yourself.
00:59:17.360
The more you will thrive and know in the future.
00:59:19.880
And I will say that China is not the most effed world power right now.
00:59:31.080
But the thing is that Latin America has cultural enclaves in other countries that have decent fertility rates.
00:59:38.640
If I was a German that wanted to maintain German culture, there's nothing left.
00:59:46.200
You will believe Amish people are church enclaves, but.
00:59:51.620
We watched the video of them, like them talking about Trump.
01:00:04.780
And then if you just drop them off, I'll play with them while I cook food.
01:00:12.780
And let me know what we're getting for replies on this.
01:00:15.020
This is a long and spicy thread with Lyman's Dog.
01:00:25.440
Remember, I thought that someone had closed, somehow closed their tweet to replies.
01:00:30.660
And I just didn't know I was blocked because I'm so old.
01:00:43.200
We're definitely at an age now where there's things I don't understand and things I make
01:00:50.180
AI is something I'm like, I've got to be up to date.
01:00:58.500
You're seeing that that thing else came out that.
01:01:01.780
So today, anti-natalism documentary, which I actually loved.
01:01:13.660
This is the guy who's done some other like really big documentaries.
01:01:19.740
His storytelling is top drawer, like the way he, but the problem is that it includes
01:01:25.780
stories of conditions that cause babies to die terrible deaths.
01:01:29.640
I, and then, so of course I'm crying first thing in the morning while watching this fricking
01:01:34.740
And then the Lime and Stone thing happened today.
01:01:42.740
So much reading and so much, I don't know, felt like disingenuousness.
01:01:46.320
He posted the thing where he's like, why are they attacking me out of nowhere?
01:01:49.600
This is the guy who runs the Institute of Family Studies thing.
01:01:51.540
And we're like, he does the whole, whoa, whoa, hold on in his whole, you haven't even
01:01:55.540
He's like, I don't run the Institute for Family Studies.
01:01:57.940
This is just 10% of their spending that I'm involved with.
01:02:04.260
Well, he just out of the blue, he's like, they just attacked me out of the blue.
01:02:08.380
And I'm like, it may have been that article that you wrote on us that was really long
01:02:13.000
and compared us to Nazis and eugenicists and said that you should be running the pronatalist
01:02:18.240
movement and not us and that we shouldn't even be considered pronatalists and tried to
01:02:22.240
throw a, that might've mischaracterized everything we've ever done.
01:02:27.440
Like they only care about people in their community.
01:02:33.920
I'm all about freedom and I'm going to give everyone freedom.
01:02:36.280
And not only is my movement about freedom, but how dare their movement allow people to
01:02:44.180
And I'm like, you're like contradicting yourself here.
01:02:50.000
But I'm not going to attack him anymore because I said I'd stop attacking him after this.
01:02:57.720
If he doesn't try to undermine the big tent pronatalist movement again, to try to take it over.
01:03:03.960
We honestly could have been a lot worse than him.
01:03:05.680
I had a much meaner episode planned about him, but we ended up just talking about it in the
01:03:09.840
episode where we were talking about, what was it?
01:03:12.660
When it is not true, because this is something he believes that more wealth doesn't lead to
01:03:18.760
And I'm like that belief continually arguing that, which he does persistently throughout
01:03:23.900
And he's like, why are they telling reporters not to talk to me?
01:03:26.580
I'm like, that's like an environmentalist arguing that like industrial logging doesn't hurt the
01:03:33.520
rainforest because one person is like planting trees or like they can find this one study.
01:03:38.680
Like broadly, everyone who's sane and knows that industrial logging hurts the rainforest and
01:03:44.300
other environmentalists aren't going to send reporters to talk to you.
01:03:47.980
Like obviously, if you're the pronatalist version of a flat earther, when a reporter comes to me,
01:03:53.500
I'm like, yeah, don't talk to the guy who doesn't think that wealth causes lower fertility rates.
01:03:57.860
That's a pretty insane position when you can just Google any graph on this and you will see it as
01:04:05.620
But yeah, I don't want to go too deep on that particular thing.
01:04:09.480
He said there was something else that came out today that was stressful.
01:04:22.920
Yeah, the parents who beat their children and want everyone to have children.
01:04:33.920
It was like, oh, I wonder if there's a more diplomatic way that this is written in Swedish
01:04:42.760
Was this somebody who came to our house or were they writing about somebody else?
01:04:49.960
Oh, I like that they included a lot of our full arguments in that piece.
01:04:57.860
We're always like, be controversial, but the famous as villains.
01:05:01.780
And I'm glad she did it because it made the article more interesting.
01:05:05.000
But it's always stressful reading those and being like, wait, my house is dingy.
01:05:11.860
Broadly, I thought it was a good article and it's the type of article that I would want
01:05:15.160
No, but it's always stressful for anyone to talk about, like to read.
01:05:41.280
Do I have any debris on me or anything like that?
01:05:53.720
Is wiping your nose on it going to make it go away?
01:05:56.440
I'm trying to lick it off, but it sounds scary.
01:06:03.940
I brought a bunch of shirts and pants down for you to wash.
01:06:09.060
I hope you didn't put them in the clean laundry basket.
01:06:17.760
You know what would be really cool if you learned how to make?
01:06:29.080
I will make corn tortilla taquitos using your slow cooker beef.
01:06:41.700
I don't know exactly how they're properly cooked.
01:06:43.460
I'm just going to first lightly fry corn tortillas and butter.
01:06:48.240
Then I'm going to roll them in the meat, which I will saute ahead of time with some pumpkin.
01:06:59.340
And then I will cook them further in the air fryer.
01:07:06.880
Let's see with maybe some melted cheese on top.
01:07:11.000
I haven't gotten there yet, but we're going to see how that goes.
01:07:22.020
By the way, the episode we did today on the spy, it got demonetized.
01:07:27.440
And I think it's because we were talking about things that we aren't allowed to talk about.
01:07:31.940
No, even saying we aren't allowed to talk about something.
01:07:49.220
One of the comments that somebody had that got to me is they were like, they did arrest
01:07:52.700
like random women who nobody follows for questioning their school board.