Based Camp - September 02, 2024


Communism's Age of Consent Problem (Why Were So Many Communists PDA Files)


Episode Stats

Length

44 minutes

Words per Minute

176.67735

Word Count

7,791

Sentence Count

527

Misogynist Sentences

22

Hate Speech Sentences

30


Summary

In this episode, Simone and I discuss communism and the age of consent, and how it deals with class differences. Simone is a writer, activist, and feminist, and she has been a long-time member of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) and the Communist International (CIT). She's also a frequent contributor to the New York Times, and is a regular contributor to The Huffington Post.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Wherever you have socialists or communists, you have a push to erode and decrease the age of consent.
00:00:08.720 Wow. Okay.
00:00:10.620 So I'll just go over some examples here.
00:00:12.480 The Communist Party of Great Britain, this party supported abolishing the age of consent altogether.
00:00:17.160 The Italian communists, in 1985, the Italian communists attempted to lower the age of consent to 12.
00:00:22.560 Woo! Yay!
00:00:24.520 The Dutch Pacifist Socialist Party, which is a communist-slash-socialist group, in 1979, they supported a petition to lower the age of consent to 12.
00:00:35.040 And I have read that in parts of the USSR, it was 12.5 years.
00:00:40.860 Now-
00:00:41.440 Oh, 12 and a half, those prudes. Lord almighty, can you believe? That's, I mean, that's young.
00:00:48.360 You are intrinsically creating a class distinction by denying sexual access.
00:00:54.080 Would you like to know more?
00:00:55.400 I'm excited for this. You have me so intrigued. I have no idea how this, what? And how do you learn of these things?
00:01:03.360 Hello, Simone. I'm excited to be here with you today.
00:01:05.600 Hey, this episode was inspired by a question that you had asked me before.
00:01:12.340 And we had done an episode on this, which is the concept of a classless society and its intrinsic
00:01:19.620 impossibility because there are certain assets that humans desire, which are not in infinite supply
00:01:28.040 and intrinsically cannot be made in infinite supply, with the key one we focused on there
00:01:34.540 as being the attention of other human beings. Some humans will always have more attention than
00:01:40.100 other humans. And that allows them access to certain privileges and abilities. And we see this
00:01:46.880 in our world right now. Like, what do the young people want? It's attention. That's what they want
00:01:51.420 the money for. That's what, that's why being a YouTuber is like one of the most desired career
00:01:56.820 trajectories these days. It is because of the value of other humans' attention, which of course
00:02:04.080 cannot be communalized, not without serious human rights violations happening and removing
00:02:09.800 most of humanity's free will. Well, in that conversation, I began thinking about other things
00:02:19.060 that humans desire. And of course, you know, when people talk about communism, they're usually
00:02:24.520 thinking about things like food and housing. But in terms of our like evolutionary pressures,
00:02:29.980 food and housing were always an ins to a mean, which was breeding. Right. Food and housing is what
00:02:35.700 you do to reproduce successfully. So one of humanity's strongest built-in desires is to breed,
00:02:46.780 to have sex with individuals. And with men, this desire, I argue in a previous take,
00:02:52.260 the barbarians versus wife sexuality framework, likely bifurcated. So you have one form of sexuality
00:02:59.820 for somebody you see as a close long-term partner. And then you have one form of sexual profile for
00:03:05.780 the people you see as disposable conquests, likely mirroring the way that you ancestors would have
00:03:11.500 treated people and spread their genes when conquering territories, which of course was a major way to,
00:03:17.620 you know, get a lot of babies in a short period of time.
00:03:19.960 Well, when you look at human genes, it appears that that indeed was the case. Like it shows up in
00:03:26.140 our genetics.
00:03:28.140 But then so does, how does communism deal with the fact that people can decline consent?
00:03:33.760 Right. At the end of the day, is not a woman's body the highest all means of production? You know,
00:03:39.900 if you want to seize the means of production that is controlled by one cast of people so that other
00:03:45.880 cast of people cannot freely access it, well, that puts women in a very precarious position because
00:03:52.140 they are born as a group of people with access to a resource, one of the most critical resources in
00:03:59.280 society that another group of people is not born with. Therefore, they are born with an intrinsic
00:04:05.360 privilege. Like somebody, one, somebody sexually might be more desirable than other individuals.
00:04:12.900 Yeah. Which inherently, I guess, is anti-communist because it creates class, to your point.
00:04:19.380 Well, I think in a way, this is what this movement that you see among women, where they will say all
00:04:25.520 women are equally attractive.
00:04:27.420 Yeah. It's a very communist kind of take. Yeah.
00:04:30.320 Well, they, they believe that, and you see this, this is, this is actually how they deal with this
00:04:36.300 particular problem. And it's, it's been very fascinating to watch the Hays, the healthy at
00:04:39.680 every size movement and other like fat acceptance movements, try to convince us men that the reason
00:04:47.180 we prefer skinny women to obese women is because we've been socialized to prefer skinny women to obese
00:04:53.980 women. And actually I've sort of seen this across the board within online socialization.
00:05:00.320 Circles is this idea that the things that some humans find attractive, they only find attractive
00:05:07.560 because of socialization and not because of an inherent desire for X or Y to be attractive or X or Y
00:05:15.840 being a sign of fitness. I think the extreme form of this we're seeing now is the idea of lady dick,
00:05:22.020 as you've heard. Girl dick, yeah.
00:05:23.800 Yeah. You know, trans women who have not undergone surgery and still have male genitalia say it's not
00:05:30.260 male genitalia, it's female genitalia. And if you lesbian won't have sex with me, it is because you
00:05:36.000 are transphobic. You learned from society what women are supposed to look like, but actually if you
00:05:41.580 remove the socialization, you are equally attracted to everyone is sort of the, the idea behind this,
00:05:48.000 which is really interesting way to relate to sexuality and obviously very problematic because
00:05:53.180 it is not at all correlated with actual human biology and fundamentally overrides the concept
00:06:00.180 of consent. Right. But it goes further than that. So I began to dig deeper to try to get in mind
00:06:07.220 communist founding fathers, what did they think about sexuality? What did they think about sexual
00:06:10.520 consent? Okay. And what did they think that that consent could happen? And one of the things-
00:06:14.200 Did they talk about sex? Oh yeah. Yeah. Foucault talked a lot about sex.
00:06:18.520 Wow. Okay.
00:06:19.200 We'll get into it in just a second. Is sort of wherever you have socialists or communists,
00:06:24.240 you have a push to erode and decrease the age of consent.
00:06:31.200 Wow. Okay.
00:06:32.940 So I'll just go over some examples here. The Communist Party of Great Britain,
00:06:36.360 this party supported abolishing the age of consent altogether. The Italian communists in 1985,
00:06:41.580 the Italian communists attempted to lower the age of consent to 12.
00:06:44.880 Woo! Okay.
00:06:46.860 The Dutch Pacifist Socialist Party, which is a communist socialist group, in 1979,
00:06:54.020 they supported a petition to lower the age of consent to 12. And I have read that in parts of
00:06:59.900 the USSR, it was 12.5 years. Now-
00:07:03.760 Oh, 12 and a half, those prudes. Lord almighty, can you believe? That's, I mean, that's young. I can
00:07:11.040 understand. That's prepubescent.
00:07:14.580 Yeah. You know? Yeah.
00:07:17.120 But hold on. We're going further.
00:07:20.200 Hmm.
00:07:21.080 We are now going to talk about the French intellectual petitions, because this is where Foucault and some
00:07:27.200 other really famous early communist thinkers were involved in one of these petitions. So I
00:07:32.220 mentioned three, but I haven't mentioned the French one yet.
00:07:34.400 The French.
00:07:35.040 So this one has a lot more theory to talk about here. So I'll be reading a perplexity answer on
00:07:40.460 this. Okay.
00:07:41.680 In the late 1970s, several petitions were signed by prominent French intellectuals calling for
00:07:47.440 reforms to or abolition of the age of consent laws. These petitions were driven by a mix of legal,
00:07:53.580 philosophical, and sociopolitical arguments. The 1977 petition, a petition published in La
00:07:59.000 Monde, criticized the detention of Monde for nonviolent sexual offenses involving children
00:08:05.920 aged 12 through 13. In May 1977, another petition addressed the French parliament calls for the
00:08:13.140 equalization of the age of consent for homosexual and heterosexual relationships, arguing against the
00:08:18.780 discriminatory nature of the existing laws, which I actually agree for. So during this time period,
00:08:23.380 the age of consent for gay sex was higher than the age of consent for straight sex.
00:08:26.500 Oh, that's interesting. I do not agree with the 12-year age of consent law here.
00:08:32.240 Oh, I thought it was like a man-boy-lover thing.
00:08:34.540 The 1979 petition, a controversial petition published in Liberation in 1975, defended a man
00:08:41.660 arrested for sexual relations with girls aged 6 to 12, arguing that the children were quote-unquote
00:08:47.500 happy with the situation.
00:08:48.920 Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
00:08:50.640 This petition was signed by notable figures such as Simon Ife and Jean-Louis Borey and others.
00:08:57.380 But let's talk about the specific intellectuals involved. The intellectuals involved include
00:09:01.980 Michael Foucault, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Jacques Doreta, often argued from the perspective that
00:09:08.600 questioned conventional understanding of maturity. Foucault, for instance, viewed consent as a
00:09:14.020 contractual notion and argued that it was not sufficient to measure whether harm was being
00:09:19.220 conducted. So he was against consent more broadly. This perspective is part of a broader critique
00:09:25.820 of societal norms and moral structures, which these intellectuals saw as oppressive and overly
00:09:31.260 rigid. From a Marxist viewpoint, some arguments against fixed age of consent laws stem from the
00:09:38.060 belief that the laws are idealistic and do not account for the material conditions that allow
00:09:42.640 individuals to truly understand and consent. This perspective suggests that maturity and the
00:09:47.800 ability to consent are not strictly tied to age, but to one's lived experiences and material
00:09:52.440 conditions. So that's sort of the context we're looking at here. So let's talk about why you would
00:09:58.560 want lowered age of consent if you are a communist, right? Yeah. Well, first, it is the core of
00:10:07.940 everything in communism is I want what I want. Like there are things other people have, I want those
00:10:16.220 things. The rich have things I don't have. I should have those things. Okay. And so it makes a lot of
00:10:22.640 sense to say, well, I want this person for sexual access. Therefore, how dare the government, especially
00:10:29.720 if they are not complaining about my, you know, grooming them or whatever. But I also think it brings a lot
00:10:36.100 of the modern grooming conversation into new light because it was normalized in their mindset. They're
00:10:44.320 basically like, if this person can make decisions like sentient decisions, there's no like gradient
00:10:51.760 of intellectual development within this system. The reason the age 12 was chosen, because I was
00:10:57.440 looking at this, is they argued that was the earliest a person might go through puberty. And
00:11:02.380 therefore, as soon as a person has gone through puberty, they should be able to be like, well, I guess
00:11:07.520 nobody's going to want to have sex with a prepubescent person. That seems to be the theory here,
00:11:11.300 but they may want to have sex with somebody after puberty. And so there's no understanding of
00:11:16.860 continued intellectual development. But I think that we see this again with stuff like the puberty
00:11:24.000 blocker argument we're seeing in our society now. Oh, a new age of consent argument.
00:11:28.520 12 year olds. Yeah. And they're arguing they're allowed to make this choice. What makes them less
00:11:34.480 capable? And society snaps back and says, they're not fully myelinated. They're not sexually mature.
00:11:40.460 They're not whatever. And I guess they're very similar arguments. That's, oh, goodness gracious.
00:11:45.660 Yeah. A lot of this comes from the concept of does a family, like when does a child that leave
00:11:52.220 their family's intellectual protection? Yeah. Right. Or control. I mean, it can be viewed as
00:11:58.600 positive or negative, protective or harmful. Yeah. And far progressives, you know, want to take
00:12:06.160 the perspective that because they have kids at much lower rates, um, that, you know, how do you get
00:12:12.900 access to children? If you're not having them yourself, you need to take them from other people.
00:12:17.800 And so it causes them a lot of problems that when people aren't properly, fully thinking,
00:12:24.140 like they're not properly myelinated, they're not, sorry, people should, I should explain what I mean
00:12:28.140 when I say somebody's not fully myelinated. So myelination is what allows neuron,
00:12:32.220 like action potentials to travel down our neurons very quickly. It's, it's the key thing that allows
00:12:38.040 human ends to think at all. If you look at non-myelinated species, the only way they can
00:12:44.060 increase the speed of the action potential is by making the actual neuron larger. So if you get to
00:12:50.120 things like, you know, people will talk about cephalopods, like octopus and squid being really
00:12:53.820 smart, but they actually have axons that get up to like half a centimeter wide. A lot of people
00:13:00.700 don't know this. That is, that is massive. You could never get, you could never evolve intellect
00:13:05.620 if that's the tactic you're using for increasing the speed of the, the action potential. So it's
00:13:12.600 not like myelination is like a small boost. It's actually critical for human understanding.
00:13:17.820 So you're saying it's like equivalent to upgrading from gravel roads in your mind to
00:13:22.720 paved freeways. Yeah. Full myelination doesn't happen until you're late teens.
00:13:27.940 So it was mid twenties. Yeah. Yeah. It might be mid twenties. Yeah. Mid twenties is you're
00:13:33.120 right. I'm wrong. Mid twenties. I'm going from memory here. But the point being is when
00:13:37.080 you are talking to a 12 year old, you actually have the ability to convince them of some really
00:13:42.800 crazy stuff quite easily because they're not a fully thinking human being yet. And so if you
00:13:48.860 are a, you know, a communist PDA file and you want access to children, you know, why not?
00:13:57.460 And even if you don't specifically want access to children, they are easier to access, especially
00:14:01.800 in times of poverty, which is, you know, what a lot of these times were, you know, you go
00:14:07.000 to the poor kid, you offer them, oh, you get to hang out with this famous French intellectual.
00:14:12.120 That's what I see there. What were you looking up?
00:14:13.760 I was looking up when myelination is complete. It can go up to until you're 30. And yeah,
00:14:20.540 I think it's, it's one of those things where it starts another thing. What are your thoughts
00:14:27.920 on age of consent laws, Simone? When do you think consent should be?
00:14:33.880 Yeah, that's, that's tough. I think it really depends on the context of your society as well.
00:14:39.540 And the, the presence of witnesses, I think affects things too, you know, when a guy's
00:14:45.500 like, oh yeah, they consented, you know, I think that there's a certain point at which,
00:14:52.080 and this can apply to adults too, consent or confessions only really makes sense in the
00:14:58.300 presence of like impartial witnesses who are like, yeah, there's no coercion here. There's
00:15:04.740 no, well, I mean, that's the way a lot of society used to be. So Puritan society.
00:15:09.540 Women would always have their minders with them.
00:15:11.420 We're just going to leave you two alone.
00:15:13.660 I am never alone in the company of men. I even refuse to feed my roosters without a chaperone.
00:15:21.240 Come in silence.
00:15:25.720 Sage choice, which will make our gathering a blessed evening.
00:15:29.220 I will be gone by evening. Those who court when the sun descends,
00:15:33.460 court the devil's design for certain.
00:15:35.400 Yeah. They would court with, yeah, with, with, well, they didn't call them.
00:15:38.880 But we don't have that in our society.
00:15:40.820 Yeah.
00:15:41.080 So here would be my take on existing age of consent laws. Cause I do think that there is
00:15:44.620 definitely room for modification. And I think some States have good age of consent laws and
00:15:48.440 some States have bad age of consent laws.
00:15:50.220 Oh, there's differing law in United States states.
00:15:56.040 Yeah. Yeah. When I grew up in New England, I had to be pretty aware of them because some States
00:16:00.420 have age of consent laws that are like way too easy to trip. So there were some laws in New
00:16:07.080 England when I was growing up and I don't know if they've been reformed since then, where like when,
00:16:10.880 if you were dating somebody and you had a sexual relationship and you were like both 17 or
00:16:17.420 something, right. One day when one of you would go above the age of consent and the other one was
00:16:22.220 below it, like suppose your birthdays were like three, four months apart. That'd be three,
00:16:26.480 four months where you could be charged with statutory rape and they, because the way it
00:16:31.420 worked is people over X age can't sleep with people below. Yeah. You have to stick in your
00:16:36.460 zone. Okay. Stick in your zone. That is really stupid. That is a stupid law because. Yeah. I feel
00:16:44.000 like a more consistent law would be to accuse both underage parties of. No, no, that is actually true.
00:16:50.440 In some States, both of you, if you're both under age, both violated, both the other person.
00:16:56.040 So I, I think that that is, am I okay with that? Yeah, I am okay with that. I think the banded
00:17:03.440 range is the best way to do it, which is to say if one party is below X age, the other party has to
00:17:11.220 be within X many years of them. The half plus seven rule. Or should we just, should we just legalize
00:17:17.880 the half plus seven rule? Actually. Just keep it even for fully like super old adults, you know?
00:17:25.460 I don't know if I mind doing that. That's actually probably. So if you're, if you're 40 years old,
00:17:29.240 you can't date someone who's younger than 27. So explain the half plus seven rule. The half plus
00:17:34.820 seven rule is a rule of thumb rule that at least exists in the United States as like a social
00:17:40.060 convention that you start hearing about in high school, where it's okay to date someone as long as
00:17:45.680 they're older. Like basically if they are half your age plus seven years, that's, that's sort of the
00:17:52.020 difference permitted. So if let's see, I'm 36. So the youngest I could date would be, I'm so bad at
00:18:01.940 math on the spot. Half of 36 is 13 plus 20. I can date a 20 year old boy and not be super creepy.
00:18:11.660 Yeah. Am I getting that right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, also I think another thing to talk about
00:18:17.620 is it was in communism and classless societies is the dissolution of the family as it relates to sex
00:18:26.380 and sexual access. Well, yeah, it reminds me a lot when you first started talking about this
00:18:30.660 in terms of the way that a lot of communist states or communist aspiring states, I should say,
00:18:36.540 because real communism hasn't been tried is the loss of religion, the removal of religion. And I feel
00:18:43.240 like this feels similar to that. When I read Brave New World, the one thing that seemed kind of weird to
00:18:48.320 me was, I mean, it's a communist future, like Brave New World by Aldous Huxley actually does describe a
00:18:57.340 communist world because it is like post-scarcity. Everyone has enough food. Everyone, you know, does their
00:19:02.620 job or whatever, but they also get everything they need and live in luxury. And they have one of their
00:19:08.780 many sayings is everyone belongs to everyone else. Something along those lines. You are not allowed to
00:19:13.940 be exclusive sexually with anyone. Like it's super not okay. If you're like, well, I don't really feel
00:19:19.860 like having sex with you. Actually, this is true. And we see this within modern socialist circles.
00:19:24.200 I think this is where polyamory and this idea of it becomes politicized within socialist circles.
00:19:30.040 Because I've definitely seen the politicization of polyamory. But how dare you think you own
00:19:35.880 another human being? This is, this is one of those situations where like, I feel it kind of works in
00:19:41.220 Brave New World. But to your point, Brave New World is a futuristic communist post-scarcity high-tech
00:19:47.760 utopia. And what makes this sexual element of this, we'll say like sexual communism make sense and
00:19:54.800 work. Is it one, you're only mixing within people of your social class, like alphas and betas and,
00:20:01.860 you know, whatever, like these groups that are have, like they have different levels of IQ,
00:20:06.420 different levels of interest and aptitude. They're only mixing with each other. So I think one of the
00:20:11.560 big issues that people encounter now, when they refuse sex to other people, it's like they're refusing
00:20:16.880 sex because they feel like someone is of a lower social class than them. And then there's this big,
00:20:20.840 like, oh, you don't think I'm good enough for you. And like, I think there is a distaste,
00:20:25.560 especially for women, for sleeping with people who are in some ways, like, or in multiple ways,
00:20:32.680 lower, you know, like both in looks and in social class.
00:20:35.620 Well, actually, that's a really good point. You are intrinsically creating a class distinction by
00:20:40.660 denying sexual access.
00:20:42.560 Yeah. And, but, but within Brave New World's world, you're only mixing, like if I'm a beta,
00:20:46.900 I'm only mixing with other betas. So like I'm, I'm only having sex with all betas.
00:20:51.740 I'm not like in far progressive communes and stuff like that, which is, which is what I've heard
00:20:56.640 because I read a lot of Tumblr back in the day, a lot of Tumblr in action, got a feel of the culture
00:21:01.600 that was created among the online leftists. And they definitely did have an attitude that it was
00:21:07.340 quite a thing to decline consent, especially if the person you're declining consent to is of a higher
00:21:14.540 caste than you within the, the leftist caste system. So like a white person declining consent
00:21:21.680 to a black person or a disabled person was considered particularly egregious or a-
00:21:27.140 Oh, because in leftist circles, those are of higher class.
00:21:31.820 Well, yes, they, they, they, they don't see it that way, but they're like, how dare you
00:21:36.020 decline consent to someone of my group? I'm the priest caste, right? Like I should be able to get
00:21:41.180 what I want when I want, which is interesting that they do already. They built this new caste system
00:21:46.100 that they hold to very rigidly while trying to remove class, but you see within their circles.
00:21:51.240 And I've heard this from people who have like detransitioned. One of the things that they say
00:21:55.520 that people try to do beforehand is to really make women sort of hate their bodies because they get
00:22:01.740 used sexually by the community so frequently that they begin to look upon their own bodies was
00:22:07.240 discussed. And they felt that that is what motivated transition for them. If they just felt like their
00:22:12.740 body had become so disgusting for such frequent public use and that everyone else had access to
00:22:19.020 their body when they wanted to, and that to decline consent is in like to invoke a contract. Like I have
00:22:24.600 this, you don't have this. And it's quite sad, but like, I can definitely see how that is part
00:22:28.900 of the memetic package, which helps the idea of the surgical genital mutilation spread. Like, well,
00:22:37.340 if I do this, then I'll won't be, you know, used this way anymore. And another thing that I wanted
00:22:44.480 to highlight here is the dissolution of the family unit. In many ways, a family identity is a class
00:22:50.320 identity, right? It's, I am X group. I have X hereditary connections. And that differentiates me
00:22:58.900 from other people. The goal of, you know, a classless society is to break down that connection
00:23:05.300 you have to your ancestors, that connection you have to your parents. And this is why you see,
00:23:10.460 even in like mainstream leftist movements, like BLM, the dissolution of the nuclear family as being an
00:23:15.900 important goal for them, because they see it as an intrinsic hurdle in what they want to achieve.
00:23:23.360 And if they can use, you know, a 12 year old sexuality as a bait to achieve that, then they
00:23:30.480 will. And this is where I think banded systems are really important for consent.
00:23:37.160 Banded systems. What's?
00:23:38.420 Banded systems. Below.
00:23:40.040 Oh, I see. The half plus seven rule.
00:23:42.640 It's important to pronatalism more generally. So, you know, if you look historically, you know,
00:23:47.640 I was just talking with a guy recently and he was, he said that he met his wife when they were 13
00:23:51.800 in chat rooms. Right. You is true that like your sexual system begins to come online in like this
00:23:58.360 12, 13 age range.
00:23:59.940 Yeah. And there's loads of, I mean, it's considered actually quite sweet to marry your high school
00:24:04.120 sweetheart. Right.
00:24:06.020 Right. And, and I think that, you know, we need to provide an environment where, you know,
00:24:11.660 a 13 year old can flirt online with another 13 year old without like this idea that you shouldn't
00:24:17.900 start dating until you're in college, which is basically the, the norm within the dominant
00:24:23.020 social group in our society makes it very hard to have a lot of kids because you're past most of
00:24:27.660 your peak fertility by then, you know, the age historically, you know, when most people would
00:24:32.800 have been getting married was 20 in the United States. Well, if you're getting married at 20 and
00:24:37.520 you don't start like seriously dating until 18, you, you just don't have a lot of time to figure out
00:24:44.480 what you're doing or how to secure somebody or to see a large pool of partners. But I think
00:24:48.560 realistically, like when did I really start dating, dating around 16, 16. I think that's
00:24:55.180 reasonable in general. I think the rules should be made less restrictive around regular childhood
00:25:02.440 dating stuff. For example, in many States right now, if people are going out and they're in high
00:25:09.060 school and they text each other nudes of each other. Now, both of them is in possession and can
00:25:14.720 be charged with the creation of child corn. And that is like, that's not the same thing. Like you
00:25:22.320 shouldn't have to your entire life deal with the same stigma because you did something stupid when you
00:25:32.680 were, you know, young and horny that somebody does that is like victimizing a minor. And that is like,
00:25:41.440 you know, this is also true in, in, in kid dating where I think the, the, any, any punishments
00:25:46.620 around, like if you do have a form of statutory grape for this age range, it should be far lower
00:25:54.660 punishments. If it's high schoolers and high schoolers, for example, I think that the real
00:25:59.800 evil here comes when somebody who is at a much later state of myelination is manipulating somebody
00:26:08.820 of a much lower state of myelination. And I would also notice here that nature sort of makes this a
00:26:15.340 bit fairer because the male is often going to be the pursuer in this situation. And even in an
00:26:20.280 environment like high school, be dating people slightly younger than him, but females myelinate
00:26:25.300 and develop much faster than males do. So they're always going to be at a slightly higher mental
00:26:30.620 age, but in this dangerous period. And all of this for me is really downstream of not making kids
00:26:37.740 terrified of the opposite gender and dating because you do that, then they're, they're not going to
00:26:46.000 start, you know, seriously dating or engaging with the other gender until college. And it's, it's,
00:26:53.420 that gives them an incredibly short time window to figure out the most important choice they're
00:26:58.240 going to make in their life, which is who they marry. I wouldn't encourage my kids to be necessarily
00:27:03.500 having sex in high school. However, I wouldn't want them to go to jail if they do.
00:27:09.820 Another reason why I like half plus seven as a rule is that you cannot date someone older than you
00:27:16.180 until you're 14. So like that, that seems reasonable to me. And that's what 12 just seems so
00:27:23.660 wildly inappropriate. Yeah. Like even though you may be sexually coming online when you're like 12,
00:27:29.760 13 years old, I get it right. I mean, especially because people are having earlier and earlier
00:27:33.560 puberties now, you are still just getting on your feet. You don't want to start messing around that.
00:27:40.020 Like, you know, chat rooms, great, you know, but yeah, more than that. Well, I mean, it, it,
00:27:47.000 this reminds me of a, one of my good friends who is from an Indian family and we worked together when
00:27:54.180 we were at a hospital. Right. So I'd be a part of my career. I was working in schizophrenia research
00:27:59.240 and I knew him then. And so he was, you know, in college at the time and I, you know, asked him
00:28:05.160 about dating and stuff like that. And he goes, Oh, and my family, we just have this rule from his
00:28:09.560 culture. You don't date until you've got your first job until after college. You don't date in
00:28:14.480 high school. You don't date in college. You just focus on grades. And I can understand how that
00:28:19.120 would be useful in terms of accumulating like social status and wealth. But in the current
00:28:24.280 environment, like given when you exit college these days, especially if you're on a medical
00:28:29.020 trajectory, that makes finding a wife incredibly difficult. And that's one of the things I've always
00:28:34.380 worried for my kids is how do I ensure that they are dating within a safe environment,
00:28:40.500 i.e. intellectual peers. And I think that this is the thing about people when they're myelinating,
00:28:45.000 right? I don't mind, you know, a 16 year old daughter of mine or a 15 year old daughter of
00:28:52.200 mine dating a, you know, 16 or 15 year old boy, right? Like that's not something that worries me
00:28:56.940 because this person doesn't have some giant cognitive advantage that they can use to manipulate the
00:29:02.500 other person. And I think if I'm overly strict in banning them, then groups like these communist
00:29:07.740 groups and stuff like that. Like if you disallow your kids from, from flirting or safe childhood
00:29:13.800 dating, you provide an outlet for people who are promoting dangerous childhood dating where they go
00:29:21.280 further than they should for their particular age range or where they're dating outside of like
00:29:25.180 cognitively safe pools to come in and target those kids because the kids it's like, well, with my
00:29:30.780 parents, it's all or nothing. So, you know, if I'm dating anyone, it's the same as dating anyone,
00:29:35.140 you know, everyone. And so the only way you can prevent that is by putting reasonable restrictions
00:29:40.700 around what they're doing there. This, basically the way that we have planned on doing this is we've
00:29:46.160 built this network that we've talked about for our kids where we have other families with kids around
00:29:51.500 their age range. And we want to create an online community where they can chat with those kids
00:29:57.300 and, and, and get to know these kids with the understanding that unlike other online communities,
00:30:01.180 if they make a friend or they make a girlfriend here, they can go do a sending out where they go
00:30:05.780 stay with that person's family for a couple months, or that person comes and stays with us for a couple
00:30:10.440 months as a way to get to know the person. But all of this is obviously with the presumption of heavy
00:30:17.340 parental supervision, but this, this allows them, you know, if they have access to this, then they're less
00:30:23.920 likely to be forming attachments to random strangers online, which is, you know, I think where the real
00:30:30.020 danger comes into play, especially with online influencers. Cause I can only imagine if I was
00:30:35.440 like an online influencer when I was like 18 or something like that, at like peak, like a sexual
00:30:43.060 desire, that is definitely a position I would have been like, Oh, I have all these girls throwing
00:30:48.220 themselves at me. I'm just going to use this position to, you know, get whatever I want in
00:30:54.100 the moment. Like it's, it's, it's, I understand how so many people at those ages end up getting into
00:30:58.980 trouble. Yeah. But do you have any final thoughts on communism and age of consent laws?
00:31:08.200 Yeah, I think I'm just going to say, I think brave new world got it right because it's the only
00:31:12.980 scenario in which I could really see the free sex that would be required of communism to work.
00:31:17.640 And this is a world in which humans are engineered. So also like everyone's at the equal level of
00:31:22.500 attractiveness. Everyone's kind of a clone, you know, they all look the same. So you're not even
00:31:26.400 dealing with like, Oh, like you're kind of gross. You know, everyone's totally in the same league
00:31:31.260 socially, cognitively and attractively. And they all share exactly the same culture. So there's not
00:31:39.300 even an issue there. So I'm saying that like, there are, there is a scenario in which it could work.
00:31:44.480 Well, I know, but I mean, I'll give you my scenario for a good word, but here's what I
00:31:49.440 would put as age of consent. Okay. Oh, age of consent. I think seven, that's it. Well, yeah.
00:31:55.900 Okay. Half plus seven. We know, but I think you need the banding other, otherwise you, you don't.
00:32:03.740 Okay. You could do a half plus seven. Then it is the older person because it isn't actually encoded
00:32:08.260 into law in a lot of places. The younger person and the older person are both considered violating
00:32:11.860 graping the other. Yeah. The older person who's committing the grape. That is the way I would
00:32:16.540 handle it. Now in a future society, how would I handle this? I would say that we should just
00:32:21.700 remove sexual impulses. I think that they are most useless of all of humans' desires. They are,
00:32:28.900 I mean, it was to ensure that our ancestors who couldn't figure out to put the thing in the thing,
00:32:33.880 and that makes babies and babies are good to make babies through like pure biological impulses.
00:32:40.540 I want to enter a world where when people have kids, it's because they have chosen to have kids.
00:32:45.280 And there is no accidents. There is no anything like that. It is.
00:32:49.680 In addition, this would do wonders to the quality of partnerships that people were forming,
00:32:54.960 because there isn't this externality that's not really tied to the quality of a relationship,
00:33:00.680 i.e. how hot you found someone. In general, this is going to be how I'm going to teach my kids to
00:33:05.600 think about looking for partners. And if any of our audience isn't married yet, it's how I would
00:33:09.900 encourage you to think about looking for partners. What you are looking for is the mother or father
00:33:17.020 of your children. Every criteria you're using to judge whether or not you should date someone,
00:33:22.440 and then whether or not you should escalate that relationship, should not be how turned on by them
00:33:27.140 you are. It should be, is this person going to be a good mother or father to my children? And then
00:33:33.360 secondarily, a good partner to me. And I guess I didn't really, when I was younger,
00:33:37.420 realized that that was the choice I was making. You know, every time I see Simone interacting with
00:33:41.980 our kids, and I see what an amazing mother she is, and I'm so grateful for the choice I made,
00:33:46.560 I realized I didn't understand the weight of the choice when I was making it. I, I, I, even me,
00:33:52.880 I was, you know, it was 50%. You know, how much do I like dating this person? How much do I like
00:33:59.380 being around this person? How much do I like sex with this person? How hot is this person?
00:34:03.700 How much is she going to augment my status within the communities I'm in? And that was just a huge
00:34:08.800 mistake, because that wasn't what I should have been. I mean, I, I locked into a good choice, but
00:34:12.920 I would encourage our listeners to really, really, really discount how the, the whole, how much a
00:34:21.340 person turns you on part of dating. Also, living was in a community that had had its arousal pathways
00:34:27.860 removed, or did not use them when it was choosing partners, would have two really, really huge
00:34:32.260 positive externalities. One is that men would no longer have the incentive to signal to women that
00:34:39.400 they were interested in longer term relationships than they really were to gain sexual access,
00:34:44.380 because men have higher value within the marriage marketplace, and women have higher value within
00:34:49.040 the sexual marketplace. So men will often try to convince a woman that they're interested in
00:34:53.860 something more serious than they are to get her to put out, which is really bad for women. But then men
00:34:59.420 have this, the inverse problem, which is a lot of women come to believe that their value on a marriage
00:35:05.180 marketplace is their value on a sexual marketplace, when it just isn't. A woman can get a much more
00:35:09.940 attractive, wealthy, competent guy to sleep with her than she can get to settle down with her for.
00:35:14.860 I think what should be obvious reasons, but if you removed recreational sex from the community,
00:35:21.900 or at least the desire for recreational sex, the, is anything other than like a training to get good
00:35:28.440 so that it can be, I guess, used to manipulate communities that still have their arousal
00:35:32.840 pathways, it would, it would really help fix a lot of the problems of modern dating.
00:35:38.740 Well, so if you would remove sex, would you also remove food? Because it's, I feel like they're very
00:35:44.600 much the same thing, you know, it's a survival instinct. And, you know, assuming we live in a
00:35:49.360 future where you could probably have like some kind of internal IV drug.
00:35:51.840 Oh, absolutely. I, I, I, yeah, that'd probably be the next one. It would, it would be, uh, arousal
00:35:56.280 pathways I'd remove. And I would remove the desire to eat, but not taste pathways. I think
00:36:02.420 taste pathways are enough to, you know, appreciate interesting dishes and stuff like that. But the,
00:36:09.100 the desire for food for the sake of like calorie type food, like differential calorie load.
00:36:15.580 yeah, I would remove that. I mean, I think from my perspective, all non-reproductive sex is a sin.
00:36:22.660 So it is something that I would definitely want to get rid of. Like I, I, I don't, I just don't see
00:36:30.900 the advantage. Like what's the utility of arousal? Yeah. What's the utility of eating either? And both,
00:36:38.160 when you think about them, can be pretty gross. People smacking their lips.
00:36:41.920 Except for when you eat, the sound that you make when you eat.
00:36:47.320 Well, I mean, I actually think when you speak about getting rid of eating, you're probably right.
00:36:51.360 I imagine in the future, you know, if you think of something like an infant, the way that the
00:36:56.380 mother's body is adapting nutritionally to be giving them directly in their blood supply, like the most
00:37:02.220 optimal nutrition. I think the way that we would probably want society to be structured in the future
00:37:08.360 is humans to essentially have like small backpacks that essentially. Placenta backpacks.
00:37:13.760 Yeah. Placenta backpacks. It's like optimized nutrients for their state level of health,
00:37:18.840 everything like that directly into their bloodstream. And that eating itself would be merely an artistic
00:37:25.320 experience, you know, to. Like smoking. Yeah.
00:37:28.740 Like what? Like smoking. Smoking? Yeah. But not like smoking.
00:37:34.400 Social. It's a break. You enjoy it. It's stimulating.
00:37:38.100 But it's not something that you have to do, you know, if you don't want to do it. Because eating
00:37:42.860 takes a lot of time. I mean, three meals a day that some people do. I do one meal a day. I don't
00:37:46.680 know how anyone has time for three meals a day. But it just seems like such an indulgence.
00:37:50.920 Would you agree or? When I am sleep deprived, breastfeeding or pregnant, I need it, but not
00:38:02.640 normally. Yeah. And it's a hassle. I mean, and with sexuality as well, it's one of these things
00:38:09.380 where when people are like anti-porn or anything like that, I'm like anything that can be used to
00:38:16.380 ensure that my sexuality takes up less of my mental capacity or less of my day, I think it's a good
00:38:23.260 thing. You know, I, I do not think movements that end up redirecting attentional.
00:38:29.340 Attentional.
00:38:31.300 Not attentional. More. How do I say more? Additional.
00:38:35.480 Additional mental processing to sexual thoughts, which I think things like NoFap ultimately end up
00:38:41.080 doing. It's a negative thing because it ends up dedicating more of, you know, the thing that I
00:38:47.080 am, my mental processing. To me, NoFap is a lot like Alcoholics Anonymous, right? NoFap is,
00:38:53.540 is stopping. It's, it's not like an addiction. It's worse because, you know, like I think men's need
00:39:02.460 for, we'll say release is similar to a hunger, you know, like you can't go without food. So you can't
00:39:10.420 go to like, you know, you can't go cold Turkey on food or, I mean, I would argue on any sort of
00:39:17.100 sexual related activity, especially as a man. And so then you just end up getting obsessed with it.
00:39:23.000 And then you think about it too much. It's like when you're starving, I know what it's like when
00:39:26.160 you're starving, like all you can think about is food. It's, it's literally like the only thing
00:39:30.700 that's on your mind. When am I, where can I get, what can I eat? You know, when is, when is my next meal?
00:39:34.640 And I imagine that's what it's like for people on NoFap. Maybe it's not, and hopefully it's not,
00:39:41.320 but it just seems just like AA where like, now you're stuck thinking about it for the rest of
00:39:45.560 your life. And you just have to live that way. It seems so unproductive, like all the things you
00:39:49.140 could do if you weren't focusing on not fapping. And to be clear, I don't want a brave new world,
00:39:57.880 free sex society. I'm just saying, if you have to make free sex work, that's the way to make it work.
00:40:03.540 Will it first remove arousal or to make it work?
00:40:06.260 No, I mean, that's, you don't need free sex if you don't have arousal. In the brave new world
00:40:10.040 scenario, if you have a world in which people have arousal and need sex, then a world in which people
00:40:15.800 are isolated within their own social class, bred to all look similar, think similar, and act similar,
00:40:22.960 then, you know, it's okay. It's fine. It'll work. It won't be too problematic. Although even
00:40:31.120 Huxley in the book suggests it's somewhat problematic, so whatever. But yeah, that's
00:40:37.680 age of consent at 12, too, too low. And I, I only have to add that I hope that we get to do more
00:40:45.940 episodes where you reference French works and philosophers, because again, there's nothing.
00:40:51.100 Yeah, but I also think we need to be diligent about not overly banning our kids from dating and stuff
00:40:57.480 like that. Oh, obviously not. Yeah. But again, I feel like the, the, the tacit social norms of a high
00:41:06.120 school social set, the half plus seven rule are more practical than our actual laws, which is insane.
00:41:13.340 I think a lot of what life is about and where we've kind of become derailed as a society is we've
00:41:20.660 built all these really weird complications instead of just doing kind of what makes sense. You know,
00:41:27.560 how we had like all these, there was the food pyramid and then there's, what do we have now?
00:41:32.440 It's a food pile. I can't remember. Food pile. Food box. We had the pyramid. Now it's a pile.
00:41:38.720 Like all, I can't, I don't know what it is now, but it's complicated. Can you believe that the food
00:41:43.120 pyramid, like when you think back, so people who are younger who don't know the food pyramid,
00:41:47.060 this is something that like in school I was taught, this is what you need to eat to be healthy.
00:41:50.860 And the thing it said you needed the most of was like carbs. Yeah. Like pasta. Like bread.
00:41:57.040 Now we know that you need like none of that. Yeah. Well. And it was like bread. The answer is in the
00:42:03.780 pyramid. The pyramid. That's ancient stuff you're talking about. What is it? What is it?
00:42:08.620 Fuck. We built the pyramid a long time ago to illustrate how much people should eat of the
00:42:12.720 four basic food groups. It's upside down. What? Sir, the pyramid is upside down.
00:42:19.340 Turn the pyramid upside down. It can't be serious. That would put butter and fat at the top of the
00:42:24.240 damn food pyramid. Sir, we've got a match. Didn't want you to know that. Tons of pasta.
00:42:34.960 Oh my God. I'm being so good. I'm eating my pasta. I always felt like I was being healthy when I would
00:42:40.540 eat like pasta or like French fries or like, you know, cause I needed to get all my carbs and I
00:42:47.040 just wasn't getting enough carbs. It's so hard to fit in all the carbs. Yeah. And then I think it
00:42:52.560 was, it was at the bottom bread, then vegetables and dairy. Then there, then there were fats and
00:43:00.480 meats and then just at the very top of sugar. So sugar was bad, but now we live in this world
00:43:06.000 in a society in which sugar and carbs are considered exactly the same thing. Oh yeah. Fruit was in there
00:43:12.440 somewhere. I think it was like middling. Yeah. Fruit. Middling is fruit. Who cares? Who cares
00:43:19.240 about fruit? It's the nineties. Eat your fruit loops, kid. It counts as a, as a bread. It's good.
00:43:24.900 Better. I love you, Simone. You are a spectacular wife and I am fortunate to be married to you.
00:43:30.420 And I hope that our listeners like, and subscribe. If you enjoy our content, it would mean a lot to us.
00:43:37.000 It's actually interesting. Our viewer counts have been like shooting up and like in terms of watch hours
00:43:41.220 and views for a video, our subscriber count barely budges. But I think it's because we don't ask,
00:43:46.080 you know, maybe that's what we're supposed to do if they're like, I can't subscribe.
00:43:49.900 Yeah. And we ask our son Octavian to ask our audience. And he just says that they need to
00:43:54.600 life and describe, which is not very helpful. So I guess everyone's just
00:43:58.060 life and describe people living and describing. And that's why we're not getting any more subscribers.
00:44:03.480 Very problematic. Please help us.