Based Camp - June 17, 2026


Did Spencer Pratt Really Lose? (Making Sense of Election Fraud Claims)


Episode Stats


Length

41 minutes

Words per minute

172.66

Word count

7,236

Sentence count

92

Harmful content

Misogyny

14

sentences flagged

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 hello simone i'm excited to be here with you today today we are going to be discussing the
00:00:04.380 latest la election and the shenanigans that may or may not have occurred around that
00:00:09.100 shenanigans were like this is the most blatant cheating i have ever seen in an american election
00:00:13.840 and they wanted us to look into it and i will say that this is an interesting thing for me to look
00:00:19.100 into because i really don't know like obviously if there was election fraud that happened the new
00:00:27.700 york times npr all the major leftist sources are not going to admit it because they didn't want
00:00:33.600 pratt to win right well and what i did hear from my broad leftist news sources was
00:00:39.360 yeah you gotta go buddy but i heard from my broad leftist news sources was something along the lines
00:00:47.500 of the republicans are butt hurting because spencer pratt didn't even come close to winning
00:00:53.800 but he never would because he's a republican running in la and that seems totally reasonable
00:00:57.180 so i didn't think to look further how can this be a thing i don't understand why there could be any
00:01:02.920 yeah and then the secondary thing is obviously and i you know i hate to say this about our side
00:01:07.780 but our side like if he if there was actual election fraud they would all be saying that
00:01:12.920 regardless so we don't actually gain any new information from what they say there
00:01:16.340 but we don't gain a lot of new information from our side because obviously no matter what happened
00:01:20.740 if he legitimately lost at the last second our side would of course come out and say there's
00:01:26.580 election fraud right so that doesn't exactly give me additional information so what we're going to
00:01:32.360 do is we are going to review from both sides pieces on this particular alleged fraud because
00:01:39.980 you had told me earlier that you thought that the issue was i mean it's inevitable that a democrat's
00:01:45.360 going to win in los angeles no there was a two-tiered runoff okay this is the gist of it
00:01:50.940 right so there's this runoff system it's called like a jungle primary where they decide who's
00:01:55.340 going to run and it means you can have multiple dims running against each other or a dim versus 0.97
00:01:59.760 a republican the leading candidate was this terrible dim candidate the the black woman 1.00
00:02:05.800 whatever her name is anyway she she was coming in first then pratt was coming in and then there 1.00
00:02:12.020 was a third democrat that had about half the votes that pratt had in terms of sentiment polling in 0.70
00:02:18.960 terms of what they were able to measure in terms of like at the ballots bold voter exit polling
00:02:24.420 and then at the very last moment all of a sudden this flips and all of a sudden pratt's getting
00:02:32.480 no more votes and all the votes are going to the third candidate this is something that the
00:02:38.200 narrative of i have laid it out is the narrative that even the left disagree with everyone agrees
00:02:42.880 pratt was demonstrably in the lead in terms of spot number two and then now was he ever going
00:02:49.980 to win the full election i probably not but the having him be in the final runoff was scaring
00:02:56.560 people right so pratt was demonstrably in the lead then all of a sudden this socialist candidate
00:03:03.240 flips it up right doesn't have to do more with the fact that mail-in voting was very heavy in
00:03:08.880 the los angeles election that ballots could be posted quite late and that it could be that this
00:03:13.820 particular third candidate had a really heavy and also late mail-in voting campaign push
00:03:18.280 well that is the only plausible thing except from at least my reading of this they didn't have a
00:03:28.340 heavy and late mail-in voting push so the explanation that leftists have been using
00:03:34.940 okay the explanation that leftists have been using for this is that okay yes she didn't have
00:03:43.320 a coordinated mail-in voting campaign that could explain this but mail-in voters are overwhelmingly
00:03:49.720 democratic in nature right and so if the mail-in voters are overwhelmingly democratic in nature
00:03:55.740 i don't even remember what i was saying so i had asked you it what i had heard was
00:04:01.380 oh the republicans are butt hurting about spencer pratt being in a minority lead for a little bit
00:04:08.060 and then losing a bunch of ground all of a sudden seemingly but what they're missing is that
00:04:12.960 republicans are heavy with in-person voting democrats are heavy with mail-in voting and in
00:04:18.100 los angeles and in california in general i think even postmark maybe even possibly up to the day
00:04:23.740 of the election you can still submit mail-in ballots and that what is happening is it possibly
00:04:28.320 this third candidate or democrats in general were just doing their last minute thing and sending in
00:04:34.080 their mail-in ballots yes so we will explore this theory but there's a problem with it okay
00:04:39.360 The problem goes that in this last minute push that happened all of a sudden for this Democratic candidate, the votes should have, right, like if it had been like a normal election, should have continued to go disproportionately to the Democrat who looked like they were going to win the first place, right?
00:04:58.940 The voting shouldn't have shifted between Democratic candidates late in the process like this.
00:05:05.020 That doesn't make mathematical or narrative sense.
00:05:08.660 So we're going to get it because, yeah, it could just be that a bunch of Dem votes came in at the last minute, right?
00:05:14.580 But then those votes would presumably proportionally still be for the person who won top ticket first and then for the person who ended up beating out Pratt second.
00:05:24.660 Not almost all exclusively for the person who edged out Pratt.
00:05:28.940 So we're going to look into both of these explanations because there are, you know,
00:05:33.600 plausibles and then it's like, okay, yeah, but what's really happening here?
00:05:36.160 Yeah. Like my, my standing plausible theory is that whatever that third candidate that got a
00:05:40.760 surge after, you know, the, the then overtook Spencer Pratt was just one who heavily focused
00:05:46.740 on last minute mail-in ballot. Yeah. So we're going to see if that's true. And we're also
00:05:52.020 going to go into what the leftist counter narrative is. So I'm going to start with a
00:05:56.140 leftist counter narrative okay the leftist counter narrative goes like this and i'll be reading from
00:06:00.840 a piece how a misreading of data fueled false claims about la mayoral vote count okay
00:06:06.440 late on election night an update of vote counts in los angeles mayor's election appeared on
00:06:14.480 electoral results pages of various media outlets including the los angeles times it showed leading
00:06:20.440 democrats mayor karen bass and council member naida ramen receiving tens of thousands of new
00:06:25.480 votes and leading Republican former reality TV star Spencer Pratt from receiving no new votes.
00:06:32.000 So basically on the screen, there was this big, like, huge number of votes to these two Democrats
00:06:36.480 and then literally zero votes for Spencer Pratt. Some voters, observers of the vote tally,
00:06:42.140 immediately took the screenshots with some shouting fraud. I mean, that looks a lot like
00:06:46.960 fraud. Others ran statistical analysis that showed it would be impossible for a candidate such as
00:06:51.620 Pratt running second in the race to receive zero votes in such a large batch of ballots. In fact,
00:06:57.700 the update that showed zero Pratt votes was followed one minute later by another update
00:07:01.900 that showed tens of thousands of votes for Pratt and none for Basa Raman. There was no batch of
00:07:07.000 votes that included zero votes for any candidate in LA County's own data shows that plainly,
00:07:12.860 but the claims fit was the broader false narrative being pushed relentlessly by Trump and other
00:07:18.920 Republicans in recent days, the California Democrats were cheating. Voter data pushed out
00:07:24.020 by the Associated Press came as two separate updates one minute apart, with Bass and Rama's
00:07:29.280 votes in the first and Pratt's in the second. The AP vote count receives updates as provided by
00:07:35.100 election officials and adds them to our vote count. What happened in this case is that there
00:07:39.620 was some log in an automated update, such as that one candidate's vote were added in an update and
00:07:45.420 the other candidates were followed about a minute later the associated press told the times
00:07:49.400 specifically an elect electronic update from the los angeles county website pulled in votes from
00:07:56.040 only one group of candidates including karen bass and rama exactly one minute later the electric
00:08:02.100 the electronic update picked up votes from another group of candidates including spencer pratt
00:08:07.400 taken together the updates included the 21 000 votes from pratt the 12 000 etc etc etc
00:08:12.740 Okay. Does that sound plausible to you?
00:08:18.040 I don't know what this election stuff, like the way stuff is counted and the way stuff is reported
00:08:24.060 to me feels very opaque, even though it's designed to allegedly be trackable and transparent. And I
00:08:31.120 know that there's a ton of shady stuff and also very inconsistent stuff that comes with mail-in
00:08:35.140 ballots. For example, we just voted in the Republican primary election in our local area,
00:08:41.140 right and we had requested due to sometimes unexpected travel to have mail-in ballots
00:08:47.120 you received your mail-in ballot i did not even though i requested mine and i know that i had
00:08:52.320 requested one because a lot of when you say i received you didn't receive your mail-in ballot
00:08:56.200 what we've seen and somebody might have voted under your name by the way just so you know
00:08:59.640 what's been a common form of voter fraud recently is going around houses and taking the mail-in
00:09:04.100 ballots as they come in yeah and then using them to vote and people have been filmed doing this
00:09:08.320 this isn't a conspiracy. On Tuesday, just before midnight, David Sprouse's surveillance cameras
00:09:13.500 captured this man stealing not just his mail, but his neighbors as well. It was a younger looking man
00:09:19.300 happened to come down the sidewalk. He was wearing a ball cap, face mask, gloves,
00:09:24.960 carefully opened up our mailbox, took out all of our mail. Yeah. And yeah, it's, this is,
00:09:30.200 this is nearly possible because in the last election, your ballot was missing. Remember
00:09:35.920 and you had to fill out the provisional because I then I went to the polling station this year
00:09:39.300 I had to go to and I was like well okay maybe I forgot to request my mail-in ballot maybe it was
00:09:45.120 my mistake so I'll just go and vote so I go and vote they're like well you requested a mail-in
00:09:48.620 ballot so now you have to fill in a provisional ballot instead and so I did that and remember
00:09:52.660 last time we voted you had to do that because your mail-in ballot went mysteriously missing
00:09:57.540 so if you and I are experiencing this but the point being is that it's happened in multiple
00:10:04.560 election cycles with our house which makes it to me seem highly plausible that we are looking at
00:10:11.780 systemic electric fraud happening in this way in our area given that the the their systems all show
00:10:18.220 the vote went out right like that's why we're having to fill in these provisional ballots it's
00:10:21.600 not like a mistake that we made or something like that and it's happened multiple times so
00:10:27.420 and we do know that the the wider philadelphia area is one of the areas where that has had
00:10:33.320 serious allegations of this and no now for the people who are like election fraud never happens
00:10:37.880 we now have videos what oh the kids we now have videos of people stuffing the ballot boxes and
00:10:47.000 stuff like that in some past recent american elections this surveillance video showing a
00:10:51.520 supporter of mayor joe ganim and a city hall employee stuffing envelopes into the drop box
00:10:56.760 outside the bridgeport government center now the other investigation will look into the use
00:11:01.440 distribution and possession of absentee ballots at the fireside apartments which is a senior
00:11:06.320 disabled public housing here in the park city the commission says even before last tuesday's primary
00:11:11.460 there was a significant attention and allegations of ballot abuse yeah have you seen these simone
00:11:17.180 they're crazy no and also like these days i don't know what's fake and what's real and well i mean
00:11:23.860 like when i ran when i ran for office here remember like i spoke with a lot of people who were super
00:11:28.940 involved in elections were getting out the vote who are trying to help the in my case of course
00:11:33.360 since i was a republican candidate i was talking with people doing the republican stuff and they
00:11:37.900 were talking about their experiences watching elections watching the votes come in and then
00:11:41.840 seeing these strange and sudden changes in vote count and jumps in favor of a different candidate
00:11:48.800 at the last minute but again like i don't know you know in the end like no simone what i'm telling
00:11:56.120 you is there have been confirmed videos of people stuffing vote mailboxes this is not a maybe it's
00:12:03.740 ai generated or something like that this is a this is coming from police who have gone through
00:12:09.600 security videos that have shown people showing up in the middle of the night with big bundles of
00:12:14.880 ballots looking really shady both ways stuffing them in the box then coming back 30 minutes later
00:12:20.560 and doing it again there have been elections in the united states where this has happened we know
00:12:27.440 from the texas issues that there were i think it was well it was at least like 50 000 100 000 fake
00:12:33.100 votes and this is just in texas that were confirmed so like we know that this is happening in the
00:12:38.800 united states like these are questions the idea that you should never question an election i think
00:12:43.000 as soon as trump won again that went out the window because then all the democrats started
00:12:46.140 saying well hey let's see trump is just doing god's work all right he's getting them to be
00:12:50.980 critical of election integrity they i mean i can't like it's it's so funny i grow up thinking like
00:12:56.700 of course vote by mail is fine of course we don't need voter id and i'm like wait a second like
00:13:02.540 this is actually super shady like i i even don't like the idea that again like when i went to the
00:13:09.200 polling station to do my provisional ballot this year i i was like oh crap i don't have my id with
00:13:14.980 me like of course i assumed as any like normal person that if i'm going to vote in an election
00:13:21.100 and if this is something where it's like oh you know i verified this verified that like they're
00:13:25.120 gonna ask me for my id and yet no it's just like your your name and a signature or something
00:13:31.720 yeah so the the biggest counter to this piece is that it doesn't focus on the core
00:13:39.820 instance of election fraud that republicans are claiming right it doesn't explain either of the
00:13:46.800 it basically focuses on one glitch that would make anyone suspicious right why why were the
00:13:53.680 two democratic candidates in one grouping and the republican candidate in a different grouping in
00:13:57.760 the way that they were handling the ballots in the first place right like presumably they would
00:14:02.100 all have their own groupings if that's the way it was being done where they would be updated
00:14:06.600 individually not in groupings like that that makes very little sense i can see why people
00:14:11.400 were suspicious of that but then it doesn't even mention the other claims that people are talking
00:14:16.280 about with the skid row boast harvesting so we're going to get into that in a second but i also
00:14:21.380 wanted to before oh they're going to like vagrants living in tents and stuff and getting them to
00:14:26.900 yeah and paying them to vote oh and there has been lots of people have reported on this there's
00:14:34.460 been a lot of on the ground reporters who have gone and asked the people yeah that's just the
00:14:38.460 sort of thing that would be great for youtube views i could totally yeah yeah they're they're
00:14:43.320 all saying like oh yeah of course like i got cigarettes for voting this year i got i got
00:14:46.700 two dollars for voting this year you know but for filling out these forms you know and people have
00:14:51.520 been saying in the comments and stuff like this this is actually a very old practice in la county
00:14:57.100 that they use specifically things like teachers unions and stuff like that use it whenever they
00:15:01.680 to get something through you know like it's it's like well what's wrong buddy
00:15:12.000 friend friend okay here we go
00:15:18.080 friend did we we're not missing any threads i think he just like deep throated a thread and
00:15:24.640 then it came out and ignited his gag reflex you okay now buddy he wants it back immediately
00:15:31.680 Now that he's choked on it.
00:15:37.320 Going straight at it again.
00:15:44.160 Choking on voter fraud.
00:15:45.580 So what we're going to go on, and I will put some of these videos in here.
00:15:49.340 Yeah, I would, yes.
00:15:51.280 But the problem with this is, like, nobody cares.
00:15:57.160 And it's been interesting, Jimmy, because we can see this vote buying happening.
00:16:01.280 everybody knows that democrat like on the ground people would do this it doesn't even need to be
00:16:06.960 institutionalized but this wouldn't explain the last minute change in mail-in voting right because
00:16:12.640 the skid row voters are not the mail-in voters you you don't have a lot of mail-in voters who
00:16:17.680 are homeless people right the homeless people who are being paid to vote are coming and voting in
00:16:21.860 person likely so that doesn't really fit the broader narrative here but let's go into this
00:16:28.440 here we have a piece called spencer pratt pack uncovers disturbing new mystery in skid row
00:16:34.820 okay and this is from the new york post a spencer pratt volunteer team has claimed they found lots
00:16:40.880 of ballots that were sent out to skid row but few were actually voted in the mayoral race the
00:16:46.760 california post joined four members of the pratt pack on sunday as they spent hours touring the
00:16:52.220 rundown neighborhood. Former California State Senate candidate Susan Collins interviewed a
00:16:58.180 resident on Skid Row. They asked dozens of local about voter registration, mail-in ballots,
00:17:03.740 and the petition gatherers who had worked in the district for years trying to get them to vote.
00:17:08.500 It comes just a week after Pratt was dumped out of the race for mayor after Karen Bass won and
00:17:14.660 Nyantin Ramu received a huge pile of mail-in ballots that saw her dramatically overtake him.
00:17:19.580 Susan Collins, a former California State Senate candidate who was part of the Pratt Pack on Sunday, told the Post, we're finding a lot of people being registered to vote, a lot of ballots being sent out, and nobody actually voted.
00:17:33.380 Oh, so that would explain how they did it.
00:17:38.000 Okay, so this is what basically is being alleged, Simone.
00:17:41.620 it's that they are going in and paying these people to register to vote and then basically
00:17:49.720 keeping their information and because these people are homeless anyway like the vote's not
00:17:53.480 going to go to their house they just send it to their own houses and then mail on behalf of these
00:17:57.760 people i think the no one can hear you you're muted you're muted okay so i am me whatever right
00:18:06.020 i and i care about getting x candidate registered so i just walk along skid row and i'm like hey
00:18:11.400 can i can i register you you can just use my address and they don't even necessarily know
00:18:15.300 what i yeah and then i give them a pack of cigarettes probably just a cigarette maybe
00:18:20.220 three i don't know whatever and then i just get their their thing i i i forge their signature i
00:18:27.560 mean they do this weird thing where like the signatures are supposed to match so how do how
00:18:31.340 do you think that would work i don't think they check or care if it's a democratic candidate i
00:18:35.680 mean come on they're not they're not really checking right now the thing that people keep
00:18:39.120 asking for Republicans keep pushing for is the voter rolls. And the fact that they are not
00:18:45.540 releasing the voter rolls, like I can understand if they believe that there is fraudulent voting
00:18:49.620 going on, why they wouldn't release these voter rolls, right? Because it would look really bad
00:18:54.140 for them to do. Yeah. And I point out here, you're like, yeah, LA is heavily Democrat leaning,
00:18:59.460 which is true. But Pratt's campaign was astonishingly good. And Democrats have done
00:19:04.320 an astonishingly bad job running la for a while at this point we're getting pretty fed up
00:19:09.360 please i'm begging you there's homeless drug addicts in front of the schools my children 1.00
00:19:22.000 aren't safe look if you were a transgender migrant i could get you a free pussy 1.00
00:19:28.340 Let's move the drug addicts closer 1.00
00:19:31.180 Bass already solved crime 1.00
00:19:33.620 I endorse her 1.00
00:19:34.620 Next!
00:19:50.280 Please
00:19:50.840 I just want to rebuild my home
00:19:53.040 It's been over a year
00:19:54.340 This is a machine if we want to burn this town to the ground
00:20:24.340 There was a lot of smear campaignage
00:20:50.740 to try to make Pratt look bad, of course, as well. 1.00
00:20:54.340 but yeah sure also to your question of whether she did some big genius last minute mail-in campaign
00:21:01.420 what ai said is no she didn't it said the most realistic answer is rama is a sitting council
00:21:07.800 member who is well known among progressive la's her base younger more liberal urban democrats is
00:21:13.060 much more likely to vote by mail closer to the deadline yeah the problem again is why did they
00:21:19.180 switch from voting from the front runner to her all of a sudden the moment it looked like the
00:21:24.380 front runner was going to beat pratt maybe because once you know they're going to win why give them
00:21:29.920 pity votes when you could show support for an underdog that you really like
00:21:35.220 that's a good possible explanation there like i could see myself doing that as a
00:21:40.440 young los angeles voter trying to i guess she gets nothing out of it but she has a less
00:21:47.460 a less embarrassing loss and and certainly getting more votes it could be a starting point to future
00:21:52.840 campaigns you know it shows future campaign donors that she has the capability of gaining traction 0.89
00:21:57.860 even when running up against better funded more famous opponents right so yes so to go back into
00:22:05.100 what's fuzzy here a few of public records identified more than 7 600 registered voters
00:22:10.960 linked to shelters supportive housing projects addicted to their treatment centers and social
00:22:16.020 services agencies including one of 160 registrants contacted to the midnight mission in skid row
00:22:23.120 one long time local told volunteers on sunday he personally knew the mariana del rey woman
00:22:29.520 recently charged by federal prosecutors was paying homeless people to register to vote 0.94
00:22:33.920 brendan lee brown armstrong also known as annika was charged in may was paying another person to
00:22:39.880 register to vote so people have been charged over this as well this isn't just a conspiracy theory
00:22:44.280 the question is are they still doing it according to federal prosecutors armstrong worked for years
00:22:48.820 as a paid petition circulator collecting signatures for california ballot measures
00:22:53.220 and has agreed to plead guilty she was right on this corner they said this was her area
00:22:57.900 sidus brown told volunteers brown claimed people were routinely offered money or cigarettes to
00:23:02.720 sign forms she gives them three to five dollars some of the cheap people should give two dollars
00:23:08.140 in a cigarette he alleged but brown dude that's so little our elections are being sold for very 0.78
00:23:15.120 little but you know they pay more per vote if you're talking about like the main elections in
00:23:19.700 the united states yeah for sure throughout the years residents remembered registering to vote
00:23:25.460 they remember petition gatherers what many didn't remember was actually casting a ballot
00:23:30.260 which is interesting they remember people coming around and trying to get them to register they
00:23:35.160 just don't remember then voting. Videos posted online by L.A. needs Spencer Pratt shows multiple
00:23:41.420 Skid Row residents claiming they received around $2 in exchange for voting in the recent Los Angeles
00:23:46.920 election. Karen Bass or Nithya Rahman? Karen. Karen, they told you to vote for Karen? Yeah,
00:23:53.980 they had to sign the little thing. And how much did they pay you? Just like two bucks. Two bucks?
00:24:00.360 I would sign off on a thing to vote for her. 0.99
00:24:03.120 Yeah.
00:24:03.940 And so they do this for everybody out here?
00:24:06.000 Yeah, they come out here all the time.
00:24:07.660 Several residents made similar claims.
00:24:10.120 One man alleged he was not registered to vote in Los Angeles County,
00:24:13.640 but was still encouraged to complete paperwork.
00:24:16.620 Not in this county. I'm in San Bernardino County.
00:24:18.940 But they just said, who cares? They gave me a name to write.
00:24:21.280 They gave me a name to sign.
00:24:22.260 They gave me everything to sign.
00:24:23.540 They gave me a whole paper of what to write and who to sign and everything.
00:24:27.400 So another resident alleged people were sometimes instructed how to complete voter paperwork and ballots.
00:24:34.520 But we know that they got to answer to somebody by what they said.
00:24:38.180 It's not off any. I don't want to have to scratch it out.
00:24:41.020 And don't let your signature look like the other signature.
00:24:43.580 Can you use your other hand or can you write with your foot or your nose?
00:24:47.140 I'm serious.
00:24:47.900 They ask you to do that?
00:24:48.840 Yeah.
00:24:49.440 And I did just so I could get the money.
00:24:51.580 The volunteers move through the tents, shelters and service centers, sidewalk encampments,
00:24:55.460 interviewing people residents about their experiences with the drives a lot of people
00:25:00.580 never voted brown said they did register but they just wanted the names that's interesting
00:25:06.080 for collins and apparently this was still happening in this election and they know people
00:25:10.900 have been arrested for doing this in past elections so it sounds like it's still operational
00:25:13.960 for collins who had spent the year raising concerns about ballot collection practices
00:25:18.460 the most striking part of sunday's visit was hearing the same story repeated block after block
00:25:23.200 so what i've been hearing from a lot of people is that they're registered to vote colin says
00:25:27.480 i've not found anyone anyone who has actually voted wow the big question is what happened to
00:25:33.020 all those ballots people remember getting them they don't remember voting so where do they go
00:25:37.220 and julio who was visiting skid row for the first time described the experience as eye-opening
00:25:41.980 and said it strengthens her determination to be involved rather than watch from afar
00:25:45.400 it was really intense juliano said we saw a guy chasing another guy with a shovel and attack him
00:25:50.900 juliana said she came to skid row looking for answers and convinced there was more to the
00:25:56.300 election story than the voters were being told i guess i was part of trying to figure out what
00:26:00.580 happened the numbers just don't make sense that's why i'm digging deeper into the sidelines one
00:26:05.320 thing i would like to say is i think this election frog has forever changed los angeles she said
00:26:09.740 at least that's my hope that people will feel empowered to talk about the truth and keep
00:26:14.500 looking for the truth and there have been other reporting on different types so from a different
00:26:19.420 new york party's bombshell photo unveils damning nithin ramen link with homeless voters as fury
00:26:25.820 erupts over la vote count thousands of homeless voters are registered to vote in la shelters
00:26:30.380 and the spritzer pratt was eliminated by natin raho so that they they then did a review here
00:26:37.180 and it said the so here they're looking to see yeah this seems to be it seems to be the same
00:26:44.460 thing they're just going over video evidence of this that they found so here's where i come
00:26:49.020 at the end of this like what what do i think on all of this did democrats do this in the past yes
00:26:55.580 we know they did and they've been charged for it in the past is it the type of thing that democrats
00:27:01.620 would do like consider the size of like antifa and stuff in la you're not asking did the democrats
00:27:08.780 organize this from the top down right you're asking was there any rogue group of democrats
00:27:15.460 extremist leftists in LA with motivation and means and opportunity to do this. There was
00:27:22.560 definitely manifold of those. Well, okay, here's where I'm going to push back, right? So the person
00:27:29.380 who got the surge in votes was someone who wasn't going to win anyway. And it was very clear that
00:27:34.500 they weren't going to win, correct? Yeah. And then suddenly these votes appeared. When you do
00:27:41.340 pay someone to buy you votes, right, illegally. Sure, this person, you know, people like this
00:27:49.720 are paying one or two cigarettes, three bucks per person, but they in turn are charging probably
00:27:55.540 quite a lot per voter because of the legal liability to which they're subject, as is shown
00:28:00.900 by the convictions we see here, right? People are doing time. People are really paying a lot in terms
00:28:05.800 of when you get caught so when they're weighing the odds of getting caught they're they're ultimately
00:28:12.100 going to charge a lot more so why would this one particular candidate or people supporting this one
00:28:17.600 candidate pay that much for votes that weren't going to help them win anyway that doesn't make
00:28:25.340 sense to me i'm more likely to believe what do you mean they did help them win i'm confused
00:28:29.920 my understanding sorry it's the fragility company so anyway what was the point you
00:28:37.040 were making what why do you not believe that there you you said the search of votes that
00:28:42.480 came in that were presumably bought were for a candidate that was never going to win in the first
00:28:46.060 that was not the democratic front runner right right so why would someone pay the non-trivial
00:28:53.420 cost to buy voters because what you're paying you know the people to commit a crime is pretty high
00:28:58.820 like the premium is hot yeah but what you are forgetting is that the crime was already committed
00:29:04.540 either way so presumably the way that this works given the various points that we've heard
00:29:11.340 is i a democrat go and i ask homeless people to sign up to vote and i give them my address right
00:29:19.420 so it's like a subscription it's like i i have on offer every single voting cycle these are my
00:29:26.420 homeless people would you like yes every single voting would you like i have one offer a list of
00:29:31.320 votes that i can choose how they go and then who knows how it's administered right it could be like
00:29:36.080 i'm this one person this crime boss of democratic politics or whatever paul like who knows it could
00:29:42.420 be apolitical who's just like i'm gonna decide how i deal with these votes it could even be someone
00:29:47.640 who's not paying someone else it could be a totally third party who's like who do i want
00:29:51.720 to have my votes go toward yes this is my crime would have already been done they would have been
00:29:56.060 sitting on votes that they have to cast either way they're like how do i want my votes to go
00:29:59.900 they could have decided well i know that the the there we don't have to worry about spencer pratt
00:30:05.440 this democratic front runner is going to win i want to place this this up-and-coming democratic
00:30:12.500 candidate it would be i want to make sure that spencer pratt isn't in the final election because
00:30:17.160 that's what would have happened otherwise oh i'm sorry i totally missed that so if he
00:30:23.560 had not been surpassed by this other democrat he would have been on the
00:30:28.200 yeah he would have been on the ballot for the final and then there actually was he would
00:30:33.120 actually have a shot instead of just two democrats yeah oh okay well then okay yeah
00:30:39.640 the incentives are more clear then okay yeah so basically i'm in a position of
00:30:45.640 the people who are saying like basically at this point we're at a point where i say
00:30:51.080 demonstrably we know that voter fraud happened the question is the scale of the voter fraud
00:30:55.260 correct and the the it really bothers me that like we're seeing mainstream democratic outlets
00:31:02.420 that are supposed to be like out there searching for truths completely uninterested in this
00:31:09.380 despite the overwhelming i mean we've got a conviction already right like the right well
00:31:14.680 the problem is all sides do it i mean even arguably sides that people who don't have a side
00:31:20.420 people who are just making money because it's the way to make money you're doing it like
00:31:24.020 it's one of those things where i think a lot of people are concerned also journalists are
00:31:29.700 journalists in mainstream media have this there's like there are two tiers right of like is this a
00:31:33.620 good story will us perform well but also they have this whole like you know i i need to decide what
00:31:39.540 the people can handle or not right like i'm not going to touch this conspiracy theory because it
00:31:44.740 it might incite racism or conspiracy thinking one of our friends couldn't believe the conspiracy
00:31:50.500 theory that michelle obama was a man yeah i'm like simone there's a lot of evidence
00:31:55.440 there's not that that that dance there's nothing in her pants you guys don't know female slack 0.97
00:32:00.840 i'm sorry but like women's pants are weird there is something hitting her pants from behind there's 1.00
00:32:05.380 nothing hitting her pants from behind there's nothing it's the way they grease you don't know
00:32:10.680 what flowy pants men don't wear pants like that they don't understand how they
00:32:14.040 anyway anyway so i feel like this isn't necessarily people trying to cover something up i think that
00:32:36.080 there's this journalistic like i decide what the public can and cannot handle and i believe
00:32:43.160 that the public cannot handle this therefore I'm not going to cover it because the nuance will be
00:32:48.440 lost and they'll just you know they will undermine democracy and I'm not going to play a part in that
00:32:53.260 and I think that a lot of people see us as being irresponsible for feeding in
00:32:57.400 and it's like is there are really serious issues of voter fraud but I also see the point of
00:33:03.060 journalists like I'm not going to bother covering this because what are you going to do Malcolm
00:33:07.200 like we can't uncover these people like we can't find them this is a lot harder to uncover than
00:33:11.980 like daycare fraud you know like this is much more hidden much more insidious people have been trying
00:33:17.420 to find this forever it's really difficult to uncover because of the way the systems work
00:33:21.420 because there's no voter id because you can just take a ballot out of a a thing and like it like
00:33:27.880 even if even if every signature is checked for a match you can easily find what someone's signature
00:33:31.460 looks like like this is one of those very difficult situations you know i don't i don't think it is i
00:33:38.440 i think we're dealing with a scenario where i mean i understand why they're doing what they're
00:33:44.340 doing like every i think sane american knows that even if there was demonstrable and large voter
00:33:49.820 fraud they wouldn't cover it because it goes against their political interest right like we
00:33:53.900 haven't really seen them cover many things that go against their political interest i mean it goes
00:33:58.080 in their political interest when it's about like a republican candidate winning oh yeah a republican
00:34:02.500 candidate yeah but the point being is you're like both sides are i don't think in la spencer pratt
00:34:07.760 or even the la republican party has enough institution to commit voter fraud at this size
00:34:13.640 right right but i mean i'm sure there's republican voter fraud in other areas look it's it's
00:34:18.820 it's at the same scale highly i don't know i mean it's it's there it's just when we look at and and
00:34:30.120 the reason why i doubt so strongly it's at the same scale is if you look at the republican apparatus
00:34:36.140 because we've been involved in it at like the ground roots level right they are fighting
00:34:41.820 rapidly for stricter observation and oversight to prevent voter fraud if they were the ones
00:34:49.880 still committing voter fraud they wouldn't be doing that and that's pretty damning that's the
00:34:55.880 louder damning thing is that the left has been fighting rapidly against investigation of voter
00:35:02.500 from that is moderately suspect okay more than moderately suspicious that's a really good okay
00:35:06.660 did that show you yeah not just someone who's like our country act or whatever let's be more
00:35:11.080 careful on the other side being like no what do you mean careful yeah if i have one team out there
00:35:16.640 who's like we should have id in person only voting and then another group out there that's like
00:35:20.940 that would be an end of american freedom right like i'm like what are you talking about when
00:35:26.320 you put it that way the look is not good it's a bad look yeah so my general takeaway from this
00:35:34.220 is it's happening it's probably pretty big there isn't a lot you can do once they capture a region
00:35:41.140 just based on the evidence that we have access to i mean it seems that like everyone who's
00:35:45.220 involved is saying it's happening just what's the scale right and i think the scale is probably
00:35:50.240 pretty big if you look at the and here i'm not even looking at like the observed statistics
00:35:55.600 i'm just thinking about the number of radical leftist groups in la that don't care a damn about
00:36:00.920 the law and would have motive means opportunity and time to do something like this if they have
00:36:07.420 time to like stage these giant protests somebody in the org has time to do something like this
00:36:12.840 and then i think what we learn about this is you can't let them win ever right this is the thing
00:36:18.880 with like nick fuentes's dumb strategy of like let the left win and then the right will get
00:36:25.420 angry enough that it right generally when the other side wins our side moderates that's how
00:36:31.260 it works if you want our side to become more extreme what you need us to do is win a number
00:36:35.740 of times in a row not lose because the average republican voter doesn't then say i guess we need
00:36:40.380 to be more extreme the average republican voter says i guess we need to be more moderate to pick
00:36:44.780 got some of those swing voters right so but it's not just that it's that once we lose an area when
00:36:51.620 you look at the map and i'm going to put the two maps here of states where you are allowed to vote
00:36:56.480 without an id and states where democrats win or won in the last election it's like one for one at
00:37:03.620 this point right i think that we're entering a place where we cannot give an inch of ground
00:37:10.460 because they're realizing that the demographics are shifting against their favor and there will
00:37:17.040 be a point you know once we have the 2030 redistricting where it essentially becomes
00:37:21.260 impossible for them to win going into the future and after that what do you do right when you look
00:37:29.340 at the the higher fertility rate among republicans when we look that people vote like their parents
00:37:33.340 vote when we look at the shifting right-wing vote in the youth these days you know if these trends
00:37:38.260 continue this is it's over it's game over for the left and i think that they're behaving in a way
00:37:44.240 that seems rational to them and and ethical to them because they believe that the right are
00:37:49.520 literally nazis that's why it's important that they define it that way because it gives them
00:37:53.620 what's called a psychological license to do whatever they want to combat it
00:37:56.920 yeah okay i i yes you you've also changed my view on this it is worth covering this because
00:38:08.280 it is worth to explain why it's very important to push for voter id laws
00:38:12.700 no election is unimportant not your local elections not your national elections every
00:38:20.760 election matters and if you vote by mail like us try to make it easy just keep in mind you're
00:38:26.900 gonna have the person drive by and steal your ballot not great not great but that's that's you
00:38:34.760 know just just the state of america right now and why we need to be so overwhelming in the legitimate
00:38:40.160 votes that we're putting out there well friends be careful and make sure your idea is current
00:38:46.280 anyway love you simone have a fun day at the dentist and thank you for your time
00:38:56.900 love you you're beautiful but that just means no surprise nice one tex nice one
00:39:12.260 okay um camera all right can you hear me okay i can however i need
00:39:20.900 I do feel good being able to do this with you again today I know I miss it and that's you 1.00
00:39:49.660 know why i oh we got a close-up of a baby oh no oh no all the women out there now need the babies
00:39:59.340 i don't know i don't know if close-ups help or hurt got me in my pirate shirt today
00:40:04.700 no i actually wanted to get a proper like mr darcy shirt
00:40:09.860 context i'm so sorry someday you'll look back on this fondly or not mr demycin
00:40:19.120 i don't know i like either i'm still with you or the thought of losing you has destroyed me
00:40:24.860 someday what do you mean why i wouldn't look back on this because i will just go talk to you
00:40:31.720 person actually i'll just let it
00:40:33.400 back
00:40:40.840 hold it away from me so you don't get hurt all right take it come back
00:40:48.120 no don't play do not do that towards in Octavian come back here if you were if
00:41:02.700 you do not let that touch anyone or it'll hurt them
00:41:11.740 Titan do not let that touch anyone or you will never get to play with these
00:41:15.440 again. Tosti, why are you putting it on the deck? You're burning the deck. That's bad, Torsten.
00:41:24.000 You have to hold it up in the air. Octavian, come here. That's why there's the metal part 0.92
00:41:30.560 at the bottom. There you go. See, look, it stops at the end right there. Can I try again?
00:41:37.920 When you're done, you can give it to me. You'll never put it on the deck. Oh, it's empty. No,
00:41:42.160 we're done oh octavian you got yours
00:41:51.360 what do you think professor