How to Actually Win The Political Game
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
171.86154
Summary
In this episode, Simone and Simone discuss the role of the state in shaping cultural values and the role it plays in shaping religious beliefs. They discuss the differences between dominant and hard-to-convert cultures, and how the government has a role to play in this matter.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Once you begin to normalize the psychological practices that people are supposed to learn
00:00:08.400
how to undertake on their own and are supposed to require mental fortitude to enact, you
00:00:19.580
If you have somebody and you impose restrictions at the government level, you make them less
00:00:25.380
likely to convert to your cultural group because the people in your cultural group will have
00:00:35.620
If you want to convert the maximum number of people, what you should actually do is impose
00:00:40.840
the minimum number of cultural restrictions on the outside population while putting the
00:00:46.020
maximum effort into controlling the education system.
00:00:49.520
And interestingly, this is to some extent what the progressive urban monoculture has
00:00:54.460
done in an environment that's devoid of a really strong religious base.
00:00:59.500
I feel like these political parties are more strong for people than than values.
00:01:04.060
People are literally living by the aesthetics of conservatism because there there is nothing
00:01:09.500
Just like these sort of hollow philosophical shells that are just following the trappings
00:01:21.300
Today, we are going to touch on a topic that's been bugging me recently because I think it
00:01:27.780
shows the extent to which our society has fallen that even within conservative circles,
00:01:36.840
there has been a clear confusion around the sort of point of conservatism, like actually
00:01:46.000
advancing conservative values and the aesthetic of conservatism, acting in a way that you
00:01:57.080
And it's not to say that you will not intrinsically appear aesthetically conservative if you are
00:02:07.040
Actually, here, I'll give a really great example of this that came from one of our recent videos
00:02:12.860
where we're talking about porn and I'm like conservative cultural groups evolved to have
00:02:17.880
porn restrictions because it led to people potentially better mental health, but also
00:02:21.980
having sex more frequently, leading to more kids, leading to more people within that cultural
00:02:27.300
And people were like, well, you know, aesthetically, like they still want the government to enact
00:02:32.600
And I think this is almost a perfect example because who are you helping if you do that?
00:02:36.860
If you have the government enact porn restrictions?
00:02:39.280
Well, it's not the people who naturally would have been able to resist porn due to the cultural
00:02:46.520
So if I'm a Catholic integralist and I'm trying to get the government to restrict porn, it's
00:02:50.900
not the other conservative Catholics at my church who are benefiting from this.
00:02:55.480
It is specifically the people who disagree with me.
00:02:59.340
It is specifically the people who are most culturally distant from me.
00:03:02.440
And worse, I am making whatever positive things my church is offering through this differential
00:03:10.460
cultural value set less because now everyone is practicing this porn restriction thing.
00:03:18.000
And in addition to that, people within my cultural institution, they are now no longer getting
00:03:24.440
any sort of psychological benefit from consciously choosing to resist this thing in their environment,
00:03:34.360
And I think what we may be looking at is an overlap of some what we call dominant cultures
00:03:41.680
and then conservative cultures, which are often harder cultures, right?
00:03:48.580
So in the Pragmatist Guide to Crafting Religion, Malcolm, you describe different types of cultures
00:03:53.620
in terms of how they relate to broader society.
00:03:55.500
With dominating cultures generally having the view that basically everyone should, in an
00:04:01.700
ideal scenario, follow this religion because if they don't, they're all going to go to hell
00:04:08.380
This is in contrast to cultures that we call in the book symbiotic cultures.
00:04:12.560
A symbiotic culture is more like the Jewish faith, Calvinists, people who are not like,
00:04:22.100
So these cultures don't have a mandate to force everyone to adhere to their rules, and
00:04:26.840
they don't have a mandate to try to proselytize or convert or save everyone.
00:04:31.320
So I think what you're talking about here is that there are many hard cultures that are
00:04:34.340
also dominating cultures that feel it is imperative for them to save people from damnation by imposing
00:04:46.460
Why imposing their rules doesn't actually have that effect if you do it at the state level.
00:04:49.920
So first, let's elaborate a bit more on this dominating versus symbiotic cultural view.
00:04:55.760
Symbiotic cultures ironically typically have a somewhat elitist attitude, as many would
00:05:00.260
argue Calvinist and Jewish groups do, which is to say they typically divide the world into
00:05:03.840
a chosen population or an elect population and a non-elect population or a non-chosen population.
00:05:09.520
And because of that, they don't think that everyone is meant to be saved.
00:05:12.500
And so they don't have a cultural, they culturally work much better with other cultures because
00:05:19.460
they can interact with someone of a completely different world perspective and have no interest
00:05:26.720
Whereas if you believe that everyone can be saved, you know, if you believe everyone can
00:05:32.220
join your cultural group, you always have a moral mandate to attempt to convert that person.
00:05:38.280
And this is something I really feel when I am, you know, when somebody like feels bad for trying
00:05:43.680
to convert me to their religion and I'm like, there's no need to feel bad.
00:05:47.620
I actually am a little bit more insulted when somebody doesn't because I'm like, you think
00:05:52.040
I'm literally going to be tortured for all eternity if I don't convert.
00:05:59.620
I also don't even understand how you know how interfaith marriage is within these cultures.
00:06:02.980
Like what, you think your spouse is going to be tortured for all eternity?
00:06:05.280
Well, I think, I think for many of them, they're just playing the long game.
00:06:08.100
Like the, the, the interfaith marriage that I know from childhood was one in which like
00:06:12.320
up until the very end, this man held out, but then he converted to the like LDS church,
00:06:17.500
which is great because then they can have, you know, eternity together.
00:06:20.880
But, you know, I do think that people hold out.
00:06:24.180
So, so these two cultures will act very differently in different societal contexts.
00:06:29.480
Dominating cultures typically have a behavior pattern where they will pretend to be victims
00:06:35.220
And as they get more and more social power, they'll try to move the society more towards
00:06:40.620
a theocracy, but they will do it in a really, this is also interestingly a huge change that
00:06:47.320
has happened within American Christianity, where American Christianity, when the country
00:06:51.940
was founded, they're based on the heritage foundation showing that the country was ever
00:06:55.300
50% Calvinist, which is why it was so easy for, for the founders to be like, oh yes, of
00:06:59.960
course we can have a multi-faith system here, but Arminianism grew and grew and grew within
00:07:07.160
That's the anti-Calvinist beliefs that there's no elect and unelect and everyone can be saved.
00:07:12.760
And, and as of that grew, this sort of new American Christianity does see a value in using
00:07:21.000
And so as dominating groups grow in power, they will try to enforce their values on other
00:07:29.640
Your real goal is to capture these people's souls, as we say.
00:07:35.120
And well, in the most like technical sense possible too.
00:07:42.620
So if you have somebody and you impose restrictions, let's say pornography restrictions or monogamy
00:07:48.820
or other things like that on a person and you do that at the government level, you, in many
00:07:55.140
ways, actually make them less likely to convert to your cultural group because the people in
00:08:02.040
your cultural group will have less of a differential societal advantage, right?
00:08:07.620
So what you're saying is, is basically if, if I'm in some special Simone dominating hard
00:08:16.140
culture and I try to impose my rules on other people without their consent necessarily, that
00:08:21.600
I'm going to also lose the edge that the people in my culture have by imposing this on other
00:08:27.580
people, making them less likely to want to join me because they're like, oh, I already
00:08:32.040
will live, live my, my wholesome life with my wholesome nofap life, you know, because
00:08:42.120
Historically, whenever a dominating cultural group has gained control of a society, it's
00:08:47.600
typically like innovation has collapsed really quickly and economics typically do very poorly.
00:08:53.700
It's, it's not a very historically, it hasn't been very successful.
00:08:58.200
Um, and it, it hasn't been successful for, I think, obvious reasons.
00:09:02.040
Once you begin to normalize the psychological practices that people are supposed to learn
00:09:10.400
how to undertake on their own and, and are supposed to require mental fortitude to enact,
00:09:19.800
And so I think this is what I mean by aesthetic conservatism.
00:09:22.800
I think within conservative circles, somebody can be like, oh yes, I resist porn, right?
00:09:29.140
Like they're showing how much they follow their cultural practices or within like their local
00:09:34.180
Oh, I resist, you know, their local Muslim community.
00:09:39.900
Um, and then somebody wants to show that they're even more conservative than that person because
00:09:45.000
that's how their local dominance hierarchy is sorted.
00:09:47.120
And so they're like, actually I'm against porn so much.
00:09:50.520
I think the government should ban it, which makes sense within this local dominance fight,
00:09:55.400
but it actually screws over your culture from the perspective of your cultural value system,
00:10:01.280
which is to convert the maximum number of people.
00:10:03.980
If you want to convert the maximum number of people, what you should actually do is impose
00:10:09.440
the minimum number of cultural restrictions on the outside population while putting the
00:10:14.620
maximum effort into controlling the education system.
00:10:17.200
And interestingly, this is to some extent what the progressive urban monoculture has done.
00:10:23.900
They impose almost no cultural restrictions and focus on controlling the educational system.
00:10:28.440
And they've done a good job of infiltrating even these, you know, conservative dominating
00:10:35.420
Like you're beginning to see a lot of woke stuff, you know, bubble up within like Catholic
00:10:39.600
schools, for instance, which should be one of the bastions, which is meant to serve the
00:10:44.520
exact opposite function because they are focused on the aesthetics of what they're doing, the
00:10:50.440
aesthetics of looking conservative and enforcing conservatism without focusing on one, why those
00:10:56.980
aesthetics evolved or the advantage those aesthetics gives them.
00:11:00.000
Well, what I think is interesting about this is the power of, I guess, cultural influence and
00:11:12.580
And by that, I mean, like just exposing people to culture as youth and showing them this is how
00:11:19.480
life can be, or this is how life is, can be so much more powerful than forcing people like, oh, you're
00:11:25.020
not allowed to get an abortion or you're not allowed to do this or that.
00:11:29.020
The much more powerful influencer is really just exposing people to ideas and lifestyles in a certain
00:11:35.260
way, and that people are, especially many conservative groups are misplacing their, their
00:11:42.700
What I thought you, you were going to touch on too, and maybe this is something to explore is also
00:11:47.660
just people who identify, for example, as Republican, but not actually ideologically
00:11:53.020
conservatively, like they more just are part of the team and they would be Republican no
00:12:00.000
I think abortion is a completely separate issue here because in that it's about, are they
00:12:05.760
It's about the definition of where life begins.
00:12:08.120
That's very different than something like porn restrictions or in the case of the Amish
00:12:12.460
So we did a video where we were explaining, you do not want to have the government keep out
00:12:19.360
If you look at really high fertility cultural groups, like the Amish, you know, they, they
00:12:24.000
do not need the government to do something like that for them.
00:12:26.720
And then somebody pointed out in the comments, they go, Oh, but the Amish are an insular community,
00:12:35.620
And the, the point of the Amish community is that they are able to maintain social cohesion
00:12:41.820
and social isolation without the government enforcing that they have a choice to leave.
00:12:51.340
And when you as a cultural group need the government to enforce that, because you can
00:12:56.160
no longer through whatever benefits you're providing people, get them to choose to stay
00:13:02.800
That is the first signs that your culture is actually falling apart.
00:13:07.040
And as the government begins to take more and more roles to hold your culture together
00:13:13.120
and to ensure people actually practice your culture, the culture itself is doing less and
00:13:19.180
It's, it's more and more relying on this government enforcement, meaning it's becoming exponentially
00:13:24.780
weaker and faster to the point you were talking about, about conservatism.
00:13:29.500
So I think it's important for people to remember what is actually the core of conservatism and
00:13:34.860
the core of conservatism is being part of a cultural group and wanting that cultural group
00:13:40.320
to exist in the future with intergenerational fidelity in terms of how it's, it's transferred.
00:13:47.360
One wants their culture and only their culture to be the culture that exists in the future.
00:13:51.820
And to us, there's like progressives in disguise because that's what the progressives want,
00:13:55.700
They just happen to be the dominant culture right now.
00:13:58.260
And the other wants to create an environment in which multiple cultures can continue to
00:14:03.760
exist together with some degree of autonomy from the government to the government's not
00:14:08.240
like, and, and, and some ability to, to operate their own government systems for their own
00:14:15.180
Which is to say a lot of conservative institutions, they're not against things like feeding the poor.
00:14:21.740
They just believe that their own soup kitchen should be doing this, not government.
00:14:25.700
You know, you go to conservative churches, they are offering a lot of what we think of
00:14:33.720
You know, historically the church ran basically all orphanages, for example, you were, you
00:14:40.400
Well, no, I just, I think that there are also really different types of conservatives.
00:14:44.940
So there are some people who are, for example, Republicans in the United States, because that party
00:14:51.940
in particular at this point in time is the best for protecting or in, in some ways, facilitating
00:14:58.760
their particular imperatives, like religiously, their inherent values, their doctrine, et cetera.
00:15:03.620
But then there are people who just seem to be Republican to be Republican.
00:15:07.740
And it's about playing in that particular dominance hierarchy.
00:15:10.780
And in many ways, they're more Republican than they are religious.
00:15:15.040
You know, they may, they may performatively go to church and stuff, but in many ways, it's
00:15:20.280
maybe because they identify as Republican and that's what Republicans do.
00:15:24.700
I don't know if I'm super off here, but I do feel like this is something that happens on
00:15:31.720
That there are some people who just, because they tribally choose to identify more with
00:15:36.120
that political party than any particular religious doctrine, doctrine or value sets, they just
00:15:42.560
Because I think to many people, especially in the United States, at least political parties
00:15:46.980
are more in your face and cohesive and easy to understand, and then also behave in line
00:15:55.880
I, I certainly, I will, I remember receiving in, when I still lived in California before I met
00:16:01.160
you like all of these letters and emails from the various nonprofits I donated to just being
00:16:10.160
You're going to vote for this person and this person and this person, because obviously you're
00:16:15.560
And so it's just given this whole way to live and in, in an environment that's devoid of a really
00:16:22.600
If you're not raised in that kind of world, I feel like these political parties are more,
00:16:31.380
So my, my question to you is, do you think that that's also an issue at play here too,
00:16:35.580
where people are literally living by the aesthetics of conservatism because there, there is nothing
00:16:41.120
So just like these sort of hollow, hollow philosophical shells that are just following the trappings
00:16:47.480
I think that is very common among progressives.
00:16:49.640
I think it is exceedingly rare among conservatives, really not exceedingly rare, but much more
00:16:56.360
I would agree that what you're saying is definitely, I think, yes, it is true that both sides to
00:17:02.800
some extent, see truth as a team sport, you know, and they're like, okay, which team am
00:17:08.620
I remember a woman and I was getting a notary in Philadelphia and this woman who did my
00:17:15.200
And I'm like, yes, and again, I say progressives do this a lot.
00:17:19.360
However, with conservatives, I think that their team is their cultural slash religious group
00:17:26.680
and the Republican party is just the, the, well, and this is the point I'm making when
00:17:33.720
I'm talking about this aesthetic form of conservatism is they forget that the reason that they are
00:17:40.900
conservative is not to be conservative, not to be a Republican, but to be a better, you
00:17:46.760
know, Catholic or a secular Calvinist or Jew, or, you know, it's, it's, it's to advance
00:17:55.600
I do think that you're right that there is this growing sort of hollow form of conservatism
00:18:00.240
where it's just, and I actually, it almost comes out of the manosphere to an extent
00:18:06.060
because people have realized that the progressive party is against them, right?
00:18:10.740
Like it, it treats men like shit, like just shit.
00:18:15.560
And so they're like, okay, well, they're not my team.
00:18:21.060
So I must be politically and like socially conservative.
00:18:25.700
But there's no understanding of why, like, again, to the point I think, why is the party
00:18:31.400
Well, I think traditionalism also falls into that category.
00:18:34.560
There's a lot of people who are like, oh, I believe in the ways of traditionalism, but
00:18:40.760
And if they actually, I think there are many strong religious arguments.
00:18:44.140
If you actually just looked at the doctrine for adopting quite a few changes in technologies,
00:18:48.140
because there are better ways to, to serve God than, than ways that people were able to
00:18:54.600
do in the past, given technological limitations, et cetera.
00:18:58.780
Well, what I'm saying is I think a lot of aesthetic conservatism has to do with doing
00:19:04.000
whatever the traditional thing is, going back to the old ways and, and not accepting
00:19:08.720
I think people like generally seeking, be specific, use an example.
00:19:13.620
I think an example would be accepting different relationship formats more openly if it can lead
00:19:25.740
to higher levels of, you know, good religious adherence or strong community cohesion or birth
00:19:37.820
Their culture does not believe these things are moral.
00:19:40.700
So yeah, they're against these things and that's fine.
00:19:48.220
If it turns out they're right, their culture will come to dominate in the long run.
00:19:51.920
When they enforce those systems on people who don't believe their culture, right, and aren't
00:19:57.500
ready to join their culture, all they do, assuming they are right in these different types of
00:20:02.720
relationship structures, turn out to be the correct ones, the ones that their culture asks
00:20:08.220
All they're doing is increasing the strength of their enemies.
00:20:12.800
So yeah, it's, it's, it's a terrible idea, but I want to come back to this Amish thing
00:20:18.240
here because I think this is, this is really an important thing to drill down on.
00:20:24.000
And this is also to me where I think that the, the immorality of this situation is horrifying
00:20:30.860
and, and the extent to which it shows people have lost their conservative roots is horrifying.
00:20:35.060
They can't even imagine asking somebody to show a little self-control and from a cultural
00:20:45.720
perspective and a person being able to do that without the government helping them.
00:20:52.600
That's what it signals to me when somebody says, I need the government to assist in this
00:20:56.480
because clearly they think it's helping people of their own, own culture.
00:20:59.620
They're not doing it to help other people, right?
00:21:01.680
They're not doing it to help their enemies better compete against them.
00:21:04.280
And if they're not doing it to help their enemies better compete against them, it means
00:21:08.260
that people within their culture need this help that they need this government help to
00:21:15.300
And then the value system just isn't very good, or it's not relevant in a modern context.
00:21:20.880
And, and that's really horrifying where the Amish elucidate this is this idea that they're
00:21:28.900
missing the, yes, the Amish socially isolate themselves.
00:21:36.280
Our culture, you, me, the people our kids engage with, we socially isolate ourselves to an extent
00:21:44.060
And yes, sort of, we, we, we preach to the public, but we maintain some level of a bubble
00:21:49.700
around our kids so that they are not polluted with this urban monoculture.
00:21:54.380
And they, you know, we really intentionally go out and we find other families that have our
00:21:59.920
weird value set and we have our kids play with their kids and go on trips with their kids
00:22:06.580
And we don't like, if the government started mandating this, I don't know what, that's
00:22:12.360
They're like, okay, you just interact with your cultural group.
00:22:15.520
We are doing all this for our kids because we think they're better off socially isolating
00:22:20.680
to some extent from these urban monocultures, as well as other conservative cultural groups.
00:22:32.220
And again, we're not pro like open borders or anything like that.
00:22:35.100
If you've watched our immigration video, we are pro skill-based immigration stuff, but
00:22:38.960
So I think your broad, your broad take on this is people who are trying to more broadly
00:22:45.960
impose their, their culture on other groups by using the government as an implementation
00:22:52.200
weapon or tool are ultimately doing themselves a disservice if they care about their culture,
00:22:57.440
if they care about winning people over and they should be focusing more on just improving
00:23:05.420
Well, I think if your intuition is because most hard cultures, most of these older conservative
00:23:11.880
cultures, they, they require a lot of restrictions for people, but the, the, the point of these
00:23:17.820
restrictions is that you're choosing to do them.
00:23:20.960
The point of Ramadan is that you're choosing to do it.
00:23:24.580
The point of Lent is that you're choosing to do it.
00:23:30.000
If a person feels that they need the government to help them with this, then they're
00:23:37.020
That is not a sign of being extra conservative.
00:23:40.660
That is a sign of being from a weak cultural group that is failing and likely won't exist
00:23:47.020
for long unless you personally can come up with a way to make it stronger, to make the,
00:23:53.760
the, the, the lessons it is using to tell you, you need to resist this thing, better lessons
00:24:11.440
I don't think anyone's going to change their behavior though.
00:24:15.080
And keep in mind, different cultures recommend different restrictions and what history is
00:24:22.520
And what we're going to learn from the world is which ones happen to be right.
00:24:26.440
My family has a lot of restrictions on the way we live our lives, the way our kids live
00:24:30.020
their lives, but they are not, they're very odd restrictions to other people.
00:24:34.220
They're not the same set of restrictions many older conservative groups may use, but they,
00:24:41.100
we designed them to specifically combat like internet and stuff like that and, and not fight
00:24:46.440
against battles that we don't think can, can win anymore.
00:24:49.160
I mean, you can watch our video on like masturbation, like should that be restricted from a cultural
00:24:54.120
perspective, but in a modern context, but we could be wrong.
00:24:57.900
And if we are wrong, then either the iterations of our cultures, i.e. our kids that adapt different
00:25:02.300
cultural practices, they'll survive and thrive and proliferate and invest, they'll win.
00:25:07.260
Or our entire family culture won't be able to motivate intergenerational fidelity and reproduction
00:25:13.720
And the, the different groups that are out there right now will end up dominating the future of the
00:25:20.000
human species, but the faster weak cultures can go extinct and strong cultures can proliferate,
00:25:26.400
the better giving, allowing weak cultures to hobble forwards by giving them or enforcing them to use
00:25:33.620
a few of the tools of harder, stronger cultures is not beneficial to anyone.
00:25:39.520
So I think also then a bigger issue is a culture that will withstand the test of time is going to
00:25:46.240
think intergenerationally and really you need to be thinking about, you know, how many of your
00:25:51.020
families now are going to have a bunch of kids and successfully give them such good childhoods that
00:25:55.380
they carry on that culture and have kids themselves and give them their kids, that culture, et cetera,
00:26:01.040
It doesn't really matter what other people are doing right now.
00:26:03.900
You know, if it lets, if you want to save as many souls as possible, like probably the best way to do
00:26:08.220
so is to ensure that most souls in the future, like are born into your religion and that your,
00:26:14.880
your religion inherits the future theoretically.
00:26:16.860
So you're saying people are also educational systems.
00:26:25.700
If we weren't creating a school system for our kids, you know, we would either be sending them to
00:26:29.760
the local Catholic or Jewish schools, obviously.
00:26:32.560
But I think that disproportionately religious school systems are, are, we're lucky as we always say
00:26:40.280
that our enemies are not as competent as they are malevolent.
00:26:43.060
They have provided you a easy pathway for new converts.
00:26:47.780
If you can ensure that these are well-run school systems that are out competing the traditional school
00:26:53.460
systems, not just in terms of how they introduce kids to your ideology, but in how they help those
00:27:00.680
So in the end, top pro tips for people building cultures that are designed to win are one,
00:27:07.620
just focus on creating a strong intergenerationally durable culture.
00:27:11.040
And two, if you want to be a dominating culture, focus on education, stop trying to impose rules
00:27:26.700
I guess we won't see, but our, our descendants will, and we'd identify as them anyway.
00:27:35.460
Or other people can, you know, probably no one will know what we wrote in the future.