Based Camp


The Immorality of Weakness: Nietzschean vs. Collinsian Philosophy


Summary

In this episode, we discuss the immorality of weakness, and the ways in which people use it to exert power over others, and how this leads to a permanent infantilization of the masses. We also discuss the role of the media in conditioning us to believe in a false sense of morality, which is to say that we are conditioned to believe that people who do good things in order to make things right are good people. But in reality, by attempting to save the bad guy, you often cause much more harm in the long term than you do good.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 hello simone today we are going to be talking about the immorality of weakness and i would
00:00:08.180 note here that we are not going to be talking about this from the perspective of niche but we
00:00:15.180 will be talking a lot about frederick nietzsche throughout especially at the end of this episode
00:00:20.160 to differentiate our views on why weakness should be scorned versus nietzsche's views
00:00:28.120 on weakness leading fundamentally to immorality because they're actually distinct but not as
00:00:34.960 distinct as i thought when i went into this subject and i would say that me studying nietzsche
00:00:39.500 very sad it's just a bunch of instances of me being like i don't want to be basic but he actually makes
00:00:44.080 a lot of good points very prescient about woke people but we'll get to that in a second okay
00:00:48.960 that well that people will use the sympathy of others to try to exert power over them and that
00:00:55.840 people will manipulate others by acting sympathetic to them to keep them in a permanently infantilized
00:01:01.620 state that glorifies themselves i.e the person doing the infantilization but before we get to
00:01:08.420 all of that where this was highlighted for me was two things one is a recent evolution in my
00:01:15.740 understanding of our wider world perspective which has become a lot more clear to me in sort of how i
00:01:21.400 view clan-based structures and how i view morality um at the wider societal level than at the individual
00:01:26.560 level but also a clip that we ran in a recent episode that's a famous scene from trigon or i don't
00:01:35.100 know if it's a famous scene but it's a scene that always hit me hard as a kid because in it there are
00:01:42.660 two characters arguing and the character who is the villain says you have to kill the one character is
00:01:50.560 trying to save a butterfly the good guy and then the villain says well you just need to kill the
00:01:55.480 spider then basically because it's a butterfly caught in a web for those yeah because because
00:02:00.120 if you free the butterfly then the spider will eventually starve you can't you're not doing a
00:02:06.600 good thing by freeing the butterfly you're just consigning the spider to a slow death and the good
00:02:12.060 guy character says no there's always a way oh that was the easiest way to stop him i didn't want to kill
00:02:23.460 the spider unless the spider caught the butterfly it would die of starvation you can't save both it's
00:02:28.320 not right to make that choice so easily so you should but i'm not wrong about this rem wanting to
00:02:34.100 save both is just a naive contradiction and what would you have rather had us do just think about it
00:02:39.360 in the meantime while we do that the spider eats the butterfly i wanted to save both of them you
00:02:44.860 and the entire trigun series is based around this philosophy of no matter how bad things are there is
00:02:52.620 always a way to save the bad guy there is always a way to make things right when in reality by attempting
00:03:00.460 to save the bad guy you often cause much more harm in the long term you are masturbating your own
00:03:07.800 sense of justice like you being a good person usually because you don't have to deal with the
00:03:12.800 risk that that bad guy poses to society the famous example here of course i'm thinking of is the woman
00:03:18.180 who had a person murder her mother and everyone was like this is a really bad dude she petitioned to
00:03:22.940 get them released from prison early hired them and then they murdered her when she fired them for
00:03:27.580 stealing from her which is to say that a lot of people when they take this benevolent and
00:03:33.000 magnanimous looking position they're doing it just to heighten their own sense of i'm a good person
00:03:37.880 without really thinking about the other harm that this person is going to cause uh which is what
00:03:43.080 often happens if you look at statistics and i'll add some in post here the vast majority for example
00:03:49.280 of thefts are caused by a very very small majority of thieves who just do it over and over and over again
00:03:53.840 right it's the same with just about any crime um right very small number of people actually do it
00:03:58.700 which i think also just to be fair explains the behavior of people who want to give people the
00:04:04.700 benefit of the doubt because the vast majority of humans deserve the benefit of the doubt it's a
00:04:09.680 very very small percentage that really just needs to be distrusted and removed from mainstream society
00:04:15.640 the the the problem here is i think that we as a society have been conditioned to not believe this
00:04:23.780 by media and i'm going to call this the tie hot maru problem what's on your mind lieutenant
00:04:29.540 the kobayashi maru sir lieutenant you are looking at the only starfleet cadet who ever beat the no
00:04:37.940 win scenario how i reprogrammed the simulation so it was possible to rescue the ship what he cheated
00:04:47.900 changed the conditions of the test i don't believe in the no win scenario now for people who don't
00:04:55.020 know what the tie hot maru is the tie hot maru is a famous test from the star trek universe that you
00:05:00.080 are supposed to be unable to pass and it's supposed to show what do you do in an unwinnable scenario
00:05:05.620 and yet our society and media constantly says when the hero is given an unwinnable scenario save this
00:05:12.620 person or this person save your love or like this group of citizens the answer is always supposed to
00:05:18.840 be there is a way to save both and that is not true fundamentally right there is not always a way to
00:05:27.300 solve both and it creates a really toxic mindset around morality for a lot of people because they
00:05:33.360 believe that any decision that leads to harm for some group of people is fundamentally an immoral decision
00:05:42.080 regardless of the necessity or long-term good of that decision and so here what i wanted to dig into
00:05:50.280 was your response to the trigun video because i think it's accurate and it encapsulates our view
00:05:58.260 of morality that we will go into and why this view of morality leads downstream to some very perplexing
00:06:06.180 beliefs that we have for example a lot of people can be like wait you guys think that there's
00:06:10.900 differences between cultural groups so if you think that there's differences between cultural
00:06:15.280 like groups then why don't you think that like the europeans are the good guys and like the the jews and
00:06:21.560 like the the blacks are the bad guys when it seems that you actually have a great deal of derision
00:06:26.200 for northern europeans and even more derision for anti-semites and yet you hold very pretty neutral
00:06:32.680 views to groups like the hispanics and really really confuses and it's like well there's actually a
00:06:38.360 logically consistent reason for all of these beliefs but you just assume that the reason is that we're
00:06:44.000 capitulating to the urban monoculture without realizing that the position that we're taking
00:06:47.780 is actually even harder to hold than the just generic sort of racist person position because
00:06:53.860 we don't have some big community that's going to back us up for it
00:06:57.460 more based than this other position because it is more unique and out there but simone go through
00:07:05.280 what your thoughts are to the the spider in the web yeah i mean i i think that there's an obvious
00:07:10.900 correct answer for the spider in the web which is you leave them alone and if the butterfly is a strong
00:07:17.680 and resilient butterfly it will get out of the web if it is a smart and resourceful and healthy spider it
00:07:24.180 will eat the butterfly and you don't want to release the butterfly as if it's a weak butterfly and it
00:07:31.020 continues to reproduce and produce other hapless butterflies it will hurt all butterfly kind
00:07:37.560 ditto with the spider so you just kind of have to let them duke it out and you shouldn't be intervening
00:07:41.980 and nature will run its course which i guess makes us bad people but it's very consistent with our
00:07:48.680 calvinist inspired views right of like it is not our job to intervene you are saved or you're not
00:07:56.880 saved you you are fit or you're not you're going to matter or you're not you're going to change
00:08:00.700 history or you're not and that is not within our control we have free will 100 but we've been dealt
00:08:07.380 the cards we've been dealt does that make sense yes and i would say that while you can talk about
00:08:12.740 this at the level of the spider and the butterfly where this matters more when we're making cultural
00:08:17.480 decisions about the cultural groups we admire and that we look to and we tell our kids these are good
00:08:22.700 cultural groups these are cultural groups you should model yourselves after these are groups you can learn
00:08:26.380 from um are the cultural groups that are thriving and in an upwards trajectory so i'll note here when
00:08:36.360 i say in an upwards trajectory the unique amount of derision we have towards things like european
00:08:41.220 cultural groups or americans who are born into positions of relative privilege but haven't been able
00:08:46.980 to secure a family is downstream of the belief that they should have had access to all sorts of
00:08:54.580 advantages and yet they are still failing why are they failing despite their historic position of
00:09:00.800 strengths that must mean that their culture is uniquely ill-fitted to our time and place essentially
00:09:06.280 and people get very surprised like but i thought you guys care about diversity and this is where you
00:09:10.680 need to understand the way we relate to diversity so if we care about cultural diversity we see every
00:09:16.340 individual culture as a hypothesis about how people might live and thrive and get through the current
00:09:24.580 challenges both technological and social that our species is facing right and if every culture is a
00:09:29.960 hypothesis a culture that is failing to thrive under these conditions is fundamentally an incorrect
00:09:37.540 hypothesis i do not care about incorrect hypotheses thriving i scare about the greatest diversity of correct
00:09:46.180 hypotheses thriving because the greater diversity of correct hypotheses we have the less of a monoculture we will
00:09:53.220 have and the more resistance we will have to unknown threats we humanity the species will have two threats
00:10:00.540 that may occur in the future so in other words we're looking at cultures and cultural technology that
00:10:07.160 produces human flourishing and if it fails to do that then we don't see the point in trying to intervene
00:10:15.600 and save it because in the end it is producing suffering it is producing harm it is producing death and it's causing
00:10:21.440 damage and it's holding humanity back well yes and this happens at two levels and there's two reasons to
00:10:28.140 have this derision one is for yourself and for your own culture and family so if i looked with admiration
00:10:37.060 for example we were doing the episode on on modern german culture recently that we were pointing out is
00:10:41.600 really really failing right now if i looked with admiration at the culture in germany right now and i told my kids
00:10:47.760 oh you should admire that you should follow that they would end up weaker because that culture is failing
00:10:54.140 i need to teach them to see that culture with a degree of disgust and if they can do that then they are less
00:11:01.100 likely to follow a culture that isn't thriving or pick up bad ideas but if they see a group that is doing
00:11:06.800 well a high fertility economically thriving cultural group it they should look at that group and be like oh for
00:11:12.760 whatever reason in our current cultural context this group is doing really well what can i steal from
00:11:18.480 them it reminds me of the clan people as i've mentioned who go into the the backwoods which can
00:11:24.320 help people understand pluralism at the cultural value system which is to say that when the backwoods
00:11:29.780 cultural group the greater appalachian group in america when they immigrated into this country and
00:11:34.720 they encountered the native americans they butchered lots of native americans when contrasted with the
00:11:39.880 puritans or the quakers or the other cultural groups in the region but they also didn't dehumanize
00:11:45.900 the native americans they married into native american families at very very high rates they
00:11:50.460 adopted tons of native american cultural technologies they basically saw the native americans as just a
00:11:56.520 another group in this inter clan competition you know if you have the hatfields and the mccoys the
00:12:02.220 native americans are just another group that we should try to take their stuff and learn what they're
00:12:06.260 doing that's working and learn what they're doing that's not working now i'm not saying that that
00:12:09.460 should work that that's like a good way to do things that's the way things should work in a
00:12:13.240 modern context and i'll discuss why this is is is uniquely bad in a second but i'm saying that it
00:12:19.100 epitomizes this view of diversity which is to say that when you see another group not doing well
00:12:27.760 you're like okay i'm going to take their stuff but like like i will out-compete them but when you
00:12:32.760 see a another group that is doing well in some way you're like okay what can i learn from them
00:12:36.820 everyone is equally human to you and everyone is part of this game to you whereas to groups like
00:12:43.560 the quakers the native americans weren't really human they were like the child or something that
00:12:48.380 needed to be protected and kept in a zoo but like there was obviously nothing to learn from them
00:12:52.740 there was obviously nothing uh no reason to respect them or marry into their families or etc right
00:12:58.740 uh and this is also a very interesting thing which is why people who have this pluralistic
00:13:04.400 cultural competition mindset end up being much more from stronger cultures because they believe
00:13:11.440 they have to be a strong culture it is a position of internal cultural weakness that leads to an
00:13:17.840 individual shying away from this world perspective because it means that when you look at other
00:13:25.520 groups you think if they could intermingle with my group or if we were competing within a fair equal
00:13:30.320 environment i would be out-competed when you are certain that you will out-compete others you always
00:13:36.060 want equality strong groups always fight for equality while groups that have an internal weakness
00:13:41.480 a fear yeah we did a fear of being out-competed they will always compete for isolation and either
00:13:47.500 you will think if you're in one of these groups you're really confident about that your group will just
00:13:52.160 take over all the other groups and make the world better or that in the end only the strong groups will
00:13:57.300 remain and the world will be better but either either perspective has an adherent believing that
00:14:03.200 the world will be better off especially if the weaker groups are allowed to run their course and stop
00:14:10.460 existing yes and an interesting thing about this philosophy and this is where actually something that
00:14:16.660 nicho talks about aligns with something that we believe which is he argues that being sympathetic
00:14:22.780 to someone who is suffering or i don't believe he uses the word sympathy what's the word he uses
00:14:27.900 here showing pity to somebody who is suffering is fundamentally to infantilize them and to prevent
00:14:34.460 them from rising up but this doesn't mean never help people who are suffering help them with magnanimity
00:14:40.060 and when you help another culture with magnanimity you are helping them with the intention of creating a
00:14:46.760 group that competes against your own and through that competition makes you sharper i like that and i yeah i think the
00:14:52.680 point isn't to say into the garbage like can these guys go or like maybe it would be better if we
00:14:59.120 just accelerate their demise no it's it's give them tools to maybe have them change because as they are
00:15:05.140 now isn't clearly sustainable and help them give them an out maybe offer them the chance to join your
00:15:13.220 group it's important to note that one of these tools needs to be derision and looking down on them
00:15:21.300 because if you accept another group for their failure as the progressives do handing out yeah
00:15:26.260 yeah then that evangelizes them and it insults them it doesn't just insult them it traps them
00:15:33.560 because it puts them at a local optimum where it is better for them to continue with their state of
00:15:39.460 non-contribution over exploring what potential other pathways might be available to them
00:15:46.300 well and another avenue or i guess arena or part of our lives in which we see this is that classic
00:15:52.080 issue with teachers where is a student sometimes it'd be really annoying if a teacher was really
00:15:59.200 critical of you or would like put a lot of time into showing you what an idiot you were with your
00:16:03.760 work or how much you could improve your form on something like in martial arts or in a sport
00:16:07.600 and you would complain to a parent and say like well why are they being so mean like can't i just
00:16:12.800 play and your parent would explain to you that teacher actually cares about you like they don't
00:16:18.220 give a shit about anyone else in the class they're just letting everyone else skate by and basically be
00:16:22.660 mediocre but they're investing in you because you have potential and i think that's the same kind of
00:16:27.280 dynamic here are you going to just let them slide by and feel bad for the fact that they're mediocre
00:16:32.880 and bad and not encourage them to improve or are you going to recognize the potential they have to
00:16:37.440 flourish and invest in it well and i think that this can be seen in the way that we approach things like
00:16:42.180 philanthropy you can look at the collins institute which is a institution that is designed to teach
00:16:47.560 people and be free and as an education source that we built for our own kids education primarily but
00:16:53.060 we made it free to anyone else who wants to use it to put all of human knowledge at their fingertips
00:16:56.780 and that uh this is fundamentally opposed to many of the progressive solutions to things like
00:17:04.760 poverty which is to say oh well we'll give them money oh well we'll give them houses oh well
00:17:10.560 we'll give them this and this and this which is a form of enablement but it also makes the
00:17:15.840 progressive dominated areas worse because they end up attracting more of these economically
00:17:20.260 unproductive individuals and so people can look like when a progressive looks at what we're offering
00:17:24.520 they're like well yeah but the homeless people may not want to use your education system they may
00:17:29.260 not want to attempt to educate themselves and it's like well that's a problem then isn't it and then
00:17:35.180 they're like well what if they have what if they have like severe mental illnesses and stuff like
00:17:39.360 that what if they've got all of these other you know problems and it's like well this is the thing
00:17:46.380 i believe that everyone is capable of economically contributing in this country unlike you progressive
00:17:52.060 i think that when you lower the amount of restrictions that people have on them there is always a way to
00:17:58.340 make a living i believe that everyone has some utility to society which is fundamentally different
00:18:03.900 than the view that you are espousing which is that these individuals must be permanently
00:18:07.860 infantilized and i believe that there is a class that is born with that level of mental disability
00:18:13.100 but i think it's a much smaller class than is functionally left disabled by the way progressives
00:18:19.660 handle things like homelessness
00:18:21.080 that and improvement requires tough love improvement requires being critical it's something also that shows
00:18:31.620 up a lot in your and my relationship right people think oh can you believe that they would criticize
00:18:37.220 each other or encourage each other to be better for me to be like hey malcolm you could do this better
00:18:41.620 you'd be like simone like this is a great meal but it needs more of this or that and by the way you're
00:18:45.780 totally right that price needed way more salt or like msg it just needed a kick but like the fact that we
00:18:51.660 do that it's because we care and it's because we love each other and it's because we respect each other
00:18:56.100 and we live in a culture now that sees criticism as an act of violence rather than an act of care
00:19:04.780 and i think it's that contextualization that needs a complete rebrand now and a complete overhaul
00:19:12.520 because we have to return to an age in which giving someone criticism giving someone room for
00:19:19.120 improvement is an act of and it's seen as an act of care and love we can we can get there and i think
00:19:26.620 people are ready for that but i think it's going to take a lot of work because we've been so
00:19:30.760 indoctrinated even from your and my childhood of thinking that critical feedback is violence
00:19:36.740 technically speaking yeah and so people will hear this philosophy and they'll think oh well this means
00:19:42.020 you think this the strong should lord over the week that the strong should push around the week
00:19:48.080 when instead we're saying the exact opposite anybody who knows us knows that we have a very
00:19:52.080 high opinion of ourselves and our family culture which i think all cultures should you don't have
00:19:55.760 pride in who you are then you know why are you existing why are you doing any of this why are
00:19:59.360 you passing on your culture to the next generation we have an incredibly uh high degree of pride in who
00:20:04.080 we are and yet we focus our efforts on trying to help other cultures and communities that are
00:20:09.500 struggling right now and making it through something like demographic collapse even cultures that are very
00:20:14.320 different from our own and we want that because we want our kids to have a diverse group of competitors
00:20:19.800 to further hone themselves if humanity becomes homogenous humanity has fundamentally failed because
00:20:26.440 we are no longer intergenerationally improving we are just a blob the same thing forever
00:20:32.500 so cast off your fears of age and blight in cutrescence find your true delight
00:20:43.820 for in my realm all i cherish so let my blessings upon you grow
00:20:51.980 embrace the rot let pestilence bloom
00:20:56.460 because we are no longer intergenerationally improving we are just a blob the same thing
00:21:18.740 forever and i think that this leads to conflict between us like some people are like why are you
00:21:23.300 so antagonistic to cultures that attempt to enforce their values on other cultures so for
00:21:29.920 example cultures that try to enforce oh anti-gay marriage all society shouldn't have gay marriage
00:21:35.040 and i'm like no the cultures that are against gay marriage can do better they should do better but
00:21:39.240 you can't enforce this on other people like sharia law is bad right and they're like no i think that
00:21:44.040 my culture needs to be enforced on everyone and then people who have this perspective you often see a
00:21:48.320 high overlap with this and things like anti-semitism and stuff like that and i think that there's this
00:21:52.400 influencer class who i'll move away from naming them specifically but who have an overlapping fan
00:21:58.460 base with our own who have a confluence of these sorts of perspectives and people are surprised by
00:22:04.000 the amount of intense derision we have towards these individuals and i think that they think that this
00:22:09.440 derision that we have towards these individuals is a capitulation to the urban monoculture
00:22:15.020 instead of literally for the exact same reason we have derision for the urban monoculture and
00:22:21.520 perhaps even in greater measure because when i look at the type of person who might be saved who
00:22:27.000 might be able to build a strong culture themselves who might be able to build some sort of level of
00:22:31.560 intergenerational thrivingness these types of individuals are drawn to right-leaning philosophies
00:22:36.800 like ours but they can also be lured by the siren calls of these other philosophers which wear the
00:22:43.620 aesthetics of the right-leaning community and people can be like what what do you mean like like
00:22:48.340 like be specific here and i'm like well i see no different from your standard anti-semite than i see
00:22:53.680 your average blm protester these are both individuals who are from one cultural group whether it's like a
00:22:59.580 black cultural group or whether it's from a a white supremacist cultural group who sees another
00:23:04.800 culture out competing them whether it's academically or in the number of famous people they have or in
00:23:09.580 the number of politicians they have or in the number because jews do very well in those categories
00:23:13.340 or in their economic success and they basically get angry and flip over the board like a child and
00:23:17.900 they're like you must be cheating instead of being willing to see any flaw in themselves and these
00:23:24.800 individuals are worthy of the highest level of score much higher than just a culture that's failing
00:23:29.020 because they're not just a culture that's failing they're a culture that is incapable of improving
00:23:33.960 itself because it is incapable of seeing its own flaws or when other people are out competing it
00:23:41.220 which means that when i'm you know interacting with my kid and i want to ensure really really really
00:23:46.020 stay away from values like this or people like this that's what we're looking at and the the highest
00:23:53.060 degree of toxicity in this comes from when we look at how to better our culture and i and i think that
00:23:59.160 these two cultural groups can really be seen here how they differ both blue groups might believe the
00:24:03.360 goal is cultural supremacy cultural supremacy through individual competition which is a little
00:24:08.040 different but we when we're improving our culture or i guess i should say both of these groups see
00:24:12.800 their goal as cultural improvement but when we're looking at cultural improvement we are looking at
00:24:17.540 other cultures and trying to see how they're doing well or hypothesize ways we can do our own culture
00:24:23.220 better while looking to our culture's history to see what parts of it worked in the past
00:24:28.060 they're looking to purify their culture by going back to some sort of cargo cult aesthetic of an
00:24:36.540 imagined past greatness which existed for almost no culture on earth yes and we need to see a return
00:24:42.940 to friendly rivalry and a good form which i i don't know reading jm barry's peter pan introduced me to
00:24:53.540 the concept of good form in a way that i just really loved because it it gave me a peek into how
00:25:00.200 people used to view healthy rivalry in the past which is and maybe i'm totally romanticizing this
00:25:07.860 and misremembering it but the idea is that you would compete with someone and you would compete along
00:25:13.800 i guess certain rules of like basically being a good sport or a bad sport and it is a rival was seen as a
00:25:22.060 good thing that you wanted in your life it was it was like a knife enjoys seeing something it can
00:25:27.220 sharpen itself on it and it knows that it needs it and right now when people see groups that are in
00:25:32.580 competition or even opposition that hold different values they see them as a threat that has to be
00:25:37.500 eliminated they see them as a thing that they should take out in using any means available including
00:25:44.340 very bad form whereas in the past i really love this concept of seeing opponents in life seeing rivals
00:25:51.580 as a source of improving your own fitness and when you lost you would lose in good humor understanding
00:26:00.780 that you've learned something from it and that you will become stronger through the act of losing
00:26:05.380 figuring out what you did wrong and then getting excited about having another round with this
00:26:11.620 opposing entity or person and hopefully winning next time but you can't get there if you don't engage
00:26:18.340 and if you don't take everything with good humor good sportsmanship in good form exactly well and and
00:26:26.020 you know this is where i get so high in my derision of these groups is they haven't the capacity to
00:26:33.060 improve anymore because of that because they see a group beating them as a group victimizing them
00:26:40.260 they are unable to believe because of this usually a lionization of a fictional historic past greatness
00:26:50.220 that their culture could lose in a fair competition and so they'll say well then the competition wasn't fair
00:26:57.620 and this matters to us because as soon as people realize that cultures are actually different and groups are
00:27:06.100 actually different they then want to say well mine's good but if you say yours is good not because of
00:27:11.620 you not because of your individual efforts to improve that culture but because historically it has some
00:27:17.220 claim to supremacy it will inevitably fail and is also uniquely tempting and dangerous to individuals who
00:27:26.580 are close to the path of i think cultural actual actualization uh which is again why we constantly
00:27:33.620 deride these groups so much and here i really want to highlight something that is often missed by
00:27:38.260 people but nazis really were just the we was kings for white germanic people if people aren't familiar
00:27:47.220 with the we was kings meme it is this joke around some people in modern black culture that will
00:27:54.740 try to take credit for all of these historic moments or characters in history saying oh ancient greeks
00:28:01.780 that was all black people or oh you know uh the first battery or the first you know they think
00:28:07.700 wakanda is real basically the original rulers of england and britain were black that's king george of
00:28:15.300 england a light-skinned black man you clearly see the vikings as black men do you see that with your
00:28:22.180 glasses these are black men jesus is a black man beethoven black mozart black henry the eighth black
00:28:31.620 william shakespeare undoubtedly black
00:28:36.260 it was canes and that's the truth we spent in his calm alexander too black as yeah they knew what's
00:28:42.660 true caesar napoleon all them cats black power homie we created that we started china japan and rome
00:28:50.820 india too man we claimed every throne built the great wall touch my hall no cap babylon's gardens yeah we did all
00:28:57.460 land we brought democracy math and science set the standards made the world reliant we was canes and
00:29:03.940 that's no lie yasuke the greatest samurai ever known his legend grew as black as all bone
00:29:09.940 aristotle socrates yeah they was black play-doh too that's a straight-up fact
00:29:14.580 and we laugh at them and are like oh that's so silly but that's exactly who both the nazis were
00:29:21.540 in a historic context but also a lot of the modern neo-nazi movement falls into this category uh in
00:29:27.140 that you know the nazis would say oh well buddha he was actually arian he wasn't indian of course
00:29:33.380 or you'll get not even exaggerating here i have seen this in our own comment section when we're
00:29:38.260 talking about oh the ancient greeks did stuff it wasn't the ancient kelts because it wasn't the
00:29:41.780 ancient northern europeans it wasn't the ancient germans and they're like oh don't you know just
00:29:45.700 like in the kings stereotype don't you know that like socrates and alexander and all that they were
00:29:51.140 actually northern european guys and all of the ancient greeks they actually used to be northern
00:29:54.900 europeans and it's like oh my god you sound exactly like a kings guy um and they would talk about how
00:30:07.300 great like german and aryan civilization was when anyone who studied roman history knows that they
00:30:12.900 were of the barbarians one of the most barbaric along with my own ancestors in in britain you know
00:30:20.980 these people were basically animals when the romans were building all of their great stuff when the
00:30:25.380 ancient greeks were building all of their great stuff and so i view both movements and individuals to
00:30:32.500 its equal derision in the same breath here if the progressive movement's goal is to force everyone
00:30:38.420 into the urban monoculture you have a number of ideological arguments against that like the clan
00:30:46.260 based argument that we're presenting here but in addition to these ideological arguments there is
00:30:51.940 aesthetic conservatives so in the same way that you know some progressives like to dress up like
00:30:58.340 furries and furries broadly are a progressive movement in the conservative movement we have
00:31:03.060 these people who like to larp in sort of this cargo cult of the 1950s trad family that they you know
00:31:09.140 got from hollywood not taking into account that if they saw something come out of hollywood today
00:31:13.140 they'd be like well that's obvious propaganda and not real and i'd be like yeah and what was
00:31:17.060 happening in the 1950s was hollywood propaganda heavily influenced by the legion of decency and it's
00:31:22.820 okay to have them in the movement like we we have many of the same goals but them attempting
00:31:28.260 to impose this larp that they're playing on other people hurts us in election cycles and is the
00:31:35.460 conservative version and should be treated i think with equal derision to when progressives do this
00:31:41.380 of you know the trans community trying to legally force people to use their pronouns
00:31:46.660 if if they can gain status within their own little local hierarchies for playing that larp fine if they
00:31:53.140 can gain status by signaling that they want to impose that larp on other people fine but they need to
00:31:57.620 learn that when they're hurting us in election cycles for something that is obviously has no
00:32:01.940 sort of philosophical backbone to it other than an aesthetic that's where we need to draw the line and
00:32:08.420 there needs to be some degree of pushback but now i want to go into niche because a lot of people
00:32:13.780 will hear this and see rhyming parts have you ever said frederick nietzsche's philosophy
00:32:19.460 nietzsche no just broadly before i go into it what do i know about his philosophy
00:32:25.380 there's the ubermunch there's a fairly black-pilled approach to humanity and society and there is a
00:32:37.300 deeply unhappy man who people have misframed as an incel just because he like never married but it's not
00:32:44.500 like he was actually an incel who was generally fairly unhealthy and didn't have very great relationships
00:32:51.060 in his life but had really great ideas and left behind that legacy that has since mostly resonated
00:32:56.660 with young men is how how accurate am i agreeing with him a lot no no we would totally end up agreeing
00:33:03.540 with him a lot because we take a very okay well here i'll ask you a different question what do you
00:33:07.780 think his view on the ubermunch was what what is your vague understanding of the ubermunch
00:33:13.140 if i were to frame it in our terms or state it in our terms it would be that some people really matter and
00:33:18.100 and the rest of people just don't no that's not it okay what is he believes the ubermunch is someone
00:33:22.500 who creates their own values and meaning in life rather than accepting pre-existing moral frameworks
00:33:27.140 oh wow so we totally like that because that's basically what the pragmatist guide to life is
00:33:30.820 all about is decide for yourself what you believe and why so this individual affirms life completely
00:33:35.940 saying yes to all aspects of existence including voice joy and suffering he believes that this individual
00:33:41.460 has to has overcome and have self-mastery a fundamental aspect of the ubermunch is the ability to overcome
00:33:46.340 oneself continually this involves mastering one's own instincts passions and even one's quote-unquote
00:33:51.540 evil tendencies the ubermunch strives for constant self-improvement and self-overcoming this worldliness
00:33:57.300 he positions at the ubermunch as a counterpoint to other worldly religious ideals the ubermunch is
00:34:02.660 focused on giving meaning to life on earth rather than seeking fulfillment in a spiritual or afterlife
00:34:08.020 realm creative power the ubermunch is described as a quote-unquote poet of life someone who creates and
00:34:12.500 destroys in the process of self-realization this creative power extends to the formation of new
00:34:17.700 values and the ability to shape one's own identity independence and responsibility and ubermunch takes full
00:34:23.300 responsibility for their life and choices not relying on external authority or scapegoats they are capable of
00:34:29.140 standing alone and embracing the freedom and responsibility that comes with self-determination embracing life's challenges
00:34:35.780 rather than seeking comfort or easy solutions the ubermunch welcomes challenges conflicts and adversity as
00:34:41.140 opportunities for growth and self-realization so the ubermunch is just a reasonable logical person who takes ownership
00:34:47.380 like hold on hold on i'm not i'm getting to the end here transcendence of common morality the ubermunch goes belong
00:34:53.060 conventional morality recognizing its socially constructed nature however this does not mean being a moral but rather
00:34:59.380 creating a personal ethical framework based on life-affirming values in essence nisha's ubermunch represents the highest
00:35:05.780 potential of human beings someone who has overcome societal constraints created their own values and
00:35:11.060 fully embraced the challenges and joys of earthly existence it's important to note that nietzsche saw
00:35:15.300 this as an ideal to strive towards not necessarily a concrete reality or call for a superior race so
00:35:20.500 continue your thoughts so this sounds like someone who just owns their own morality and lives life
00:35:26.580 according to it in accordance with their the values that they have decided independently for themselves
00:35:32.180 without being told what to do by society matter and that there's nothing exceptional about this
00:35:39.060 kind of person aside from the fact that it is fairly exceptional for what he thinks existed yet
00:35:45.940 wasn't he one of those people no so what you know because he doesn't seem to be the kind of person who
00:35:52.660 went by society's values were were influenced by the values of society and that other people's values
00:35:58.420 were influenced by the values of society and that these were not truly independently crafted values
00:36:06.340 okay well he's probably being a little hard on himself but i don't know simone i'd ask you this
00:36:13.380 other than us how many people do you know who created their own values a la like we go through in
00:36:20.020 the pragmatist guide to life how many have actually followed through with that i think i mean someone
00:36:25.380 obviously because we spoke with him recently give me a moment here monarchist curtis yarvin yeah i think
00:36:31.380 that what is this name again curtis yarvin sorry i think hold on hold on i'll add so this morning
00:36:38.340 simone and i were doing what we call a list of live players these are people we need to follow up with
00:36:44.180 and know so our list because basically they're acting this is this is cribbing from sam obersha's
00:36:49.380 concept of live players which is someone who is thinking independently and likely to change the
00:36:54.900 trajectory of of humanity because they're not going to act in the way that any other optimal
00:37:01.860 thinker would when placed in some kind of wind-up toy position exactly but the point i'm making simone
00:37:07.540 is that we made this list this morning so this is like a list of basically uber mentions you could say
00:37:12.900 yeah so on that list are people like ayla like curtis yarvin these people definitely are thinking how long is
00:37:20.500 the list it's a list it's like maybe 12 people it's like maybe 12 people the list is and i want
00:37:27.220 to make absolutely clear here not limited to the live players in our social networks it's not live
00:37:33.540 players we think we can build a connection with yes then some of these people are people we've never
00:37:37.380 had a conversation with they don't know who we are every live player on earth today that we could
00:37:44.580 identify simone with the internet how many more people do you think we know than nietzsche knew
00:37:53.220 within his lifetime okay touche he knew people who are maybe writing books within his lifetime and then
00:38:01.060 like people in his surrounding town the number of people that we see we are looking at cities of like
00:38:07.700 millions and millions of people and not like one city but multiple cities we are looking at like the
00:38:13.700 smartest of the smart people in our society who get together to hold private events where you know
00:38:19.060 we are picked for those events because like successful people think oh you guys are uniquely smart
00:38:24.580 and then we are we are we are leveraging those networks to find every other live player we can find
00:38:31.620 and there's just not that many like when you went to hereticon which is like some of the wealthiest
00:38:36.580 people in the world they go out and they find all of the greatest most heretical thinkers of our time
00:38:41.220 and the most common complaint among the live players there was it's just not that heretical here
00:38:47.140 yeah there's a lot of like we want more spicy conversations but part of that and part of the
00:38:51.780 discussion when people were saying that was have we just become desensitized at this point no no so
00:38:56.660 my point is simone if you look at if you assume that the rate of live players within niches like time
00:39:03.220 is the same as the rate of live players within our lifetime and ubermitch means live player
00:39:07.700 is it really that weird that he wouldn't have met anyone that fit that qualification in his life
00:39:14.740 okay you you make a strong point i and i'm probably
00:39:20.900 i'm i'm conflating his existence with the existence of that sort of vienna cafe culture
00:39:27.620 turn of the century social club of people who are all very influential intellectuals
00:39:33.060 but he wasn't in there but he wasn't in that and so that's that's my problem of just kind of
00:39:37.220 mushing history altogether and being like i don't know all smart dead people kind of hung out with
00:39:41.700 each other like live players throughout history but nietzsche was not in one of those communities
00:39:47.780 in fact his work was not recognized until after he died so he'd have no reason to think that he was
00:39:52.500 uniquely brilliant or anything like that yeah okay then totally understood and thank you for giving me that
00:39:59.300 explanation and it's interesting that this concept comes up again in samuel berger's work and comes up
00:40:04.820 again in what we're at least in what we're calling people to become in the pragmatist guide to life
00:40:10.820 i i didn't realize we were essentially asking people to become an yeah the pragmatist guide to
00:40:16.100 becoming an ubermitch that is what the book basically is yeah i really want to emphasize here how
00:40:21.860 rare people are who create their own value system even though simone was like but isn't that the basic
00:40:28.180 that's expected of everyone we have been environments that are supposed to be the
00:40:34.020 places where the best and the brightest of our society collate you know i have a stanford mba
00:40:38.580 she had the graduate degree from cambridge whatever you think of higher institutions utility it is true
00:40:44.420 that it can open some doors with you for you and definitely of the people who are going into higher
00:40:49.620 education the stanford business school is probably the hardest program to get into and cambridge is one of
00:40:53.780 the most classically prestigious graduate programs to get into and at neither did i meet a single
00:41:00.820 person i would put in this ubermitch category and i frequently like one of my go-to conversations is
00:41:07.300 okay what do you what do you want from your life like well it has value what's good and so few people
00:41:13.220 had anything other than like an aesthetic explanation for that like i want this aesthetic outcome or i want
00:41:19.700 this set of things that i was taught to expect from life instead of having some like underlying
00:41:25.780 logical explanation or you get pretty um you know childish life philosophies like oh things that
00:41:31.620 make me feel good are good and i should maximize feeling good among the population which is you know
00:41:37.700 what you normally get from somebody who just hasn't put a lot of thought into life i guess and so yeah
00:41:42.020 i was i was i i think that i would commend to people that if you're out there and if you're young and
00:41:46.500 you're like okay when am i gonna finally meet the intellectually active people i might give up on
00:41:51.940 that or not give up on that but understand that you're going to meet them by doing the types of
00:41:56.020 things that you as an intellectually active person would decide to do so like if i was at the pronatalist
00:42:02.260 convention which is coming up soon by the way uh you can check it out and the code word to get a
00:42:06.820 discount is collins you're probably going to meet a lot of people like that there just because if you're
00:42:11.380 looking at the world's problems today and you're not concerned about what other people think of you
00:42:14.980 you're probably going to be like oh fertility rates that's an issue i should probably be working
00:42:18.260 on that in some way or you know some stuff around ai you might see them in in higher numbers so it
00:42:25.220 like with the cafes of old that simone was talking about it is the places where the best and the
00:42:30.660 brightest coalesce to talk about the problems of the time and not the accrediting institutions
00:42:36.740 where you're going to find life players but i'm glad that we i mean i don't know i kind of
00:42:41.060 have insistently tried not to read nietzsche because i don't want to be one of those people
00:42:45.860 who is constantly influenced by i i personally and this is another thing about our our more
00:42:51.540 backwards influenced culture is that we we look down upon people who speak in the terms of other
00:42:59.620 philosophers and constantly refer to them oh i hate it as soon as somebody starts quoting philosophers
00:43:04.420 to me i'm like oh so you're an idiot yeah like just state things in simple terms and and stop
00:43:09.460 trying to front and show me how well read you are this really bothers me well and i think nietzsche
00:43:14.980 does a good job of this he's also very against like cruelty of the strong to the weak people think
00:43:20.740 no he'd view that as a form of weakness you know that's like the adult who plays children in tennis
00:43:25.140 to dunk on them oh well and i i can probably dig up this study and find it for you if you ask me for
00:43:30.900 it before you run this but i can share with you the study that showed that people in like a technical
00:43:37.140 academic field who are lower in status tended to use more jargon than people who are higher in
00:43:41.620 status because it's a way for if you actually are low status to try to puff yourself up if you're of
00:43:47.860 high status all you want to do is explain things in dumbed down terms that people can understand so
00:43:52.260 honestly the more dumbed down your terminology is the higher status you are and you know someone who's
00:43:57.380 really amazing at that is elon musk when he explains things he uses extremely simple terms he doesn't make
00:44:04.020 references he speaks in words that everyone can understand including children and i think that's
00:44:09.140 i absolutely agree you know who else is good at that is trump never never you know uses these like
00:44:14.100 obscure references or anything like that like he's interested in getting his point across now let's
00:44:18.980 talk about nietzsche's view of weakness because a lot of people are going to see it as correlatory to
00:44:24.660 our view of weakness when they are distinct but i'm going to say that his view of weakness is not
00:44:30.500 stupid so a lot of people would say that he argues that leaks weakness leads to immorality so he calls
00:44:36.100 this the the slave morality okay so oh no is this his term for sheeple or something is this just
00:44:45.940 maybe a little bit okay so there's this thing called slave morality in which the weak are unable
00:44:51.860 to assert themselves psychologically or socially they are developed so this is his word for lemmings or
00:44:59.060 sheeple or or or npcs it's a bit different it's a bit different than that oh okay they develop
00:45:04.660 resentment towards the strong they create a moral system that redefies weakness as virtuous traits like
00:45:11.700 humility meekness and obedience become quote-unquote good strengths pride and self-assertion become
00:45:18.740 quote-unquote evil so essentially what he believes is that when individuals are weak they redefine the
00:45:28.020 rules of the game to make weakness strengths and to look down upon and see with contempt the things
00:45:35.780 that some individuals have which give them strengths over of weak individuals so if i'm a weak individual
00:45:42.500 and i see somebody who has achieved things i can't because of their willpower or because of their
00:45:47.460 cunning i will redefine willpower or cunning as evil that's so interesting because i thought that this
00:45:54.500 behavior was a very modern phenomenon i thought quite frankly that those disempowered enough to
00:46:01.620 see themselves in these weak positions have only just recently been given the platform and ability
00:46:07.060 to shape culture what he's implying with this definition if you have it right is that the weak
00:46:12.980 for a very long time have had cultural influence and the ability to reshape narratives and have been
00:46:18.260 trying to do this since at least his lifetime which is surprising yes actually he saw the beginning of
00:46:25.700 this influence coming from a christian morality oh yeah which i mean of course like ever since the the
00:46:32.020 new testament ever since jesus this was the thing you know the meek shall inherit the earth right but
00:46:37.940 yes and i think that this is an over uh you know extrapolation of that line within christianity i do not
00:46:45.140 believe that this is i i think if you look at something like turn the other cheek and that
00:46:49.540 stuff that is not weakness it's about being tough and it's about being oriented around your values
00:46:56.900 rather than your values over other people's values it's about not responding not yeah if somebody is
00:47:04.180 attacking you you do not need to be baited into that yeah and i'd also say the same with the meekness
00:47:09.940 this is about social inversion it is not about weakness jesus didn't say the weak will inherit
00:47:16.980 the earth yeah it says the meek well i'll look up the definition of the word as jesus meant it in
00:47:22.180 the context because i think it's likely not oh yeah what the original word was yeah everything's
00:47:26.980 it's the meek blessed are the meek oh that's nice isn't it i'm glad they're getting something because
00:47:32.660 they have a hell of a time are you kidding me okay so i go up to look what does the word that is
00:47:39.620 translated into english as meek where jesus says blessed are the meek for they will inherit the
00:47:44.740 earth i was like okay cool well what's it mean it means having self-control the term is most frequently
00:47:52.100 used to describe a horse that is tamed that what it it means you are a being of great strengths but you
00:48:03.860 act with gentleness humility and self-control of course no one would want us to know what is being
00:48:12.100 said there are blessed are those with self-control for they will inherit the earth the one thing we're
00:48:17.700 not allowed to have i would note that when i had mentioned this before in videos that were actually
00:48:21.940 filmed after this video and edited after this video so i'm editing this sort of in post somebody was
00:48:26.900 like oh well if you look at this argument meek actually is better translated as gentle however
00:48:32.980 if you actually look at the instances in the argument that this person is providing it's very
00:48:39.220 clearly self-control fits better than the word gentle so i'll give you some examples here this is
00:48:44.740 from the nickmanian ethics from aristotle where he's using this word and we can try putting in the word
00:48:50.980 self-control and we can try then putting in the word gentle and you'll see that self-control just fits
00:48:55.860 better but it's pretty clear that this word meant self-control all right now we praise a man who feels
00:49:00.580 anger on the right grounds and against the right persons and also in the right manner and at the
00:49:05.700 right moment for the right length of time he may then be called self-controlled if we take having
00:49:12.420 self-control to be a praiseworthy quality for those with self-control really denote a calm temper not led by
00:49:19.460 emotion but only by becoming angry in such a manner for such causes and for such lengths of time
00:49:25.780 as principle may ordain although the quality is through rather to err on the side of defect
00:49:32.660 since the man with self-control is not prompted to seek redress for injuries but rather inclined to
00:49:39.700 forgive them now let's put gentle in here and you'll see that gentle just makes so much less sense
00:49:45.300 now we praise the man who feels anger on the right grounds and against the right person
00:49:49.540 and also in the right manner at the right moment and for the right length of time
00:49:53.380 he may then be called gentle-tempered if we take gentleness to be a praiseworthy quality for
00:49:58.740 gentle really denotes a calm temper not led by emotion is that what gentle indicates a calm
00:50:04.740 temper not led by emotion but only becoming angry for such cases um that have like a where principle
00:50:11.620 may ordain no that's not what a gentle person would do a person with self-control would only become angry
00:50:17.540 when their principle would tell them to become angry and not in reaction to things a person with
00:50:22.500 self-control would be a person who's able to restrain their temper and i should note what's really cool
00:50:28.340 here is we have aristotle here basically in long form defining what this word actually meant which is
00:50:33.940 so so cool that we get that but it means more than just a generic self-control it means very specifically
00:50:41.540 the ability to control the emotions that you are expressing to other people or experiencing yourself
00:50:49.620 in the face of something that might anger someone or something that might otherwise cause distress to
00:50:55.460 an individual so it's very specifically self-control over your emotional state or at least the emotional
00:51:01.300 state that you're expressing to other individuals and it makes perfect sense to me that people with
00:51:04.900 self-control and self-discipline would inherit the earth uh yeah of course how blessed are the sorrowful
00:51:09.540 they shall find consolation how blessed are those of gentle spirit they shall have the earth for
00:51:14.660 their possession how blessed are those who hunger and thirst to see right prevail what was that i don't
00:51:20.260 know it's too busy talking a big nose i think it was blessed are the cheesemakers special about the
00:51:25.860 cheesemakers well obviously it's not meant to be taken literally it refers to any manufacturers of
00:51:30.820 dairy products you hear that blessed or the greek the greek well apparently he's going to inherit the earth
00:51:37.780 did anyone catch his name the meek blessed are the meek oh that's nice isn't it i'm glad they're
00:51:43.780 getting something because they have a hell of a time people used parts of christian theology as early
00:51:48.900 as anisha's time and weaponized them however i would disagree with nietzsche in the way that this
00:51:56.740 plays out so in nietzsche's mind specific individuals see other individuals becoming strong or successful
00:52:05.300 and then to psychologically protect themselves they say oh the things that make them strong
00:52:08.980 and successful are the things that are bad about them i actually don't think it plays out that way
00:52:12.900 i think it happens at the level of cultural systems as i've mentioned before i.e you will have uh one
00:52:19.540 cultural system as we've noted in the united states that uh originally for example said oh if something
00:52:26.020 creates disgust within you then it is immoral whether that is you know a diseased person or two men
00:52:32.900 kissing or you know the poor right and then that began to create a lot of negative externalities
00:52:39.380 and then another cultural group was like oh we shouldn't be looking at things that way clearly
00:52:44.740 this leads to you know this is the mother theresa thing you know hug the lepers even if they create
00:52:49.380 an evolved sense of disgust in you because you know in an evolutionary context if you hug people
00:52:53.700 that leprosy you get leprosy and die right like there's a biological reason to not hug somebody who
00:52:58.180 looks horrifyingly sick you need to overcome that you need to learn to love them and this
00:53:02.180 appears on its surface to be a superior moral ideology and i agree that it is in so far as
00:53:09.300 it differentiates between the intrinsic disgust reaction but even to nisha that intrinsic disgust
00:53:14.100 reaction is something you need to learn to master with the mistake that this cultural group makes is
00:53:18.820 it begins to elevate the disgust reaction it begins to say the things that create disgust are the things
00:53:24.660 that are good at a cultural level and i think you see this in a lot of modern art i think yeah and
00:53:30.660 the uglification of so many things yes where they will take video game characters and they'll say
00:53:36.820 this character is rousing to look at or beautiful to look at then it must be evil and we must subvert
00:53:42.580 it whereas we need to yeah or we they would they will literally use attractive people as like
00:53:48.260 that's how you know they're fascists
00:53:49.780 absolutely and he thinks more broadly that what a lot of people consider virtue or morality
00:53:59.780 is just a system for affirming weakness and he focused a lot on this concept of being life denying
00:54:06.500 or life affirming as a value system which again i guess i'd say rhymes a lot with a lot of like
00:54:11.540 manosphere philosophies or even our philosophy if you look at our video of life levels of i think it might
00:54:19.620 be the video on the age of vitality or vitalism of vitalist based systems now here i'll note that
00:54:28.020 you might now say well if all of this is the case then how does nietzsche define good right like if he's
00:54:34.820 saying that weakness causes people to act in negative ways how is he like measuring these individual
00:54:41.860 actions as negative and i'll read a basic explanation of how he defines what's good and what's bad and this
00:54:48.580 might surprise you as well simon so he nietzsche defines quote-unquote good primarily in terms
00:54:54.420 of what promotes human flourishing and the realization of human greatness particularly for
00:54:59.220 those he considers quote-unquote higher types or quote-unquote noble he rejects traditional
00:55:05.780 morality's universal prescriptions in favor of a more individualistic and life-affirming approach
00:55:11.220 power and strengths nietzsche associates goodness with everything that heightens the feeling of power in
00:55:15.620 man the will to power and power itself life affirmation he values actions and attitudes that
00:55:21.460 affirm life embrace struggle and promote vitality rather than those that deny or diminish life human
00:55:27.860 excellence nietzsche prioritizes the cultivation of exceptional individuals and their unique virtues
00:55:35.140 over universal moral norms creativity and self-overcoming he emphasizes the importance of creating new values
00:55:42.660 and constantly striving to surpass oneself metrics for evaluation life promotion nietzsche asks whether
00:55:49.220 moral decisions are quote-unquote life promoting life preserving species preserving perhaps even
00:55:54.420 species cultivating now you can see how much this aligns with a lot of our philosophy flourishing of
00:56:00.340 higher types he judges moral systems by their capacity to facilitate the development of exceptional
00:56:05.300 individuals the perspectivism nietzsche advocates for recognizing the validity of different moral
00:56:11.780 perspectives was in their cultural context rather than adhering to universal standards so again
00:56:16.660 pluralism nietzsche argued for pluralism this is so unexpectedly pro natalist optimistic and vitalistic
00:56:23.540 when i've i'm used to being presented nietzsche as this very depressing dark black-pilled guy
00:56:33.300 and i think that what we're seeing here is why like and then finally here overcoming resentment
00:56:39.540 he values moral systems that avoid the resentment and reactive attitudes he associates with slave
00:56:46.340 morality by rejecting traditional morality's universal claims focus on altruism nietzsche aims to create a
00:56:53.620 space that is more nuanced individualistic and life-affirming in its approach to ethics that promotes human
00:56:58.580 greatness and cultural flourishing so you can see from this a lot of this aligns with our value system not
00:57:05.300 all of it and we're going to get into just a second why not all of it does but when you hear this i bet
00:57:09.700 you're thinking this is not the niche i was told existed why wasn't i told that this is what niche was
00:57:16.020 actually about nietzsche whatever i don't care what his real name is it's a different it's not a real
00:57:21.700 language there's english and then there's everything else i don't want to tell you my words
00:57:26.100 like drinking sewer water okay and again this is what we're talking about when we're talking about
00:57:30.820 cultural competition having a degree of humor in your cultural pride humor in your patriotism
00:57:37.700 can be great in terms of causing other people to lean into their cultural pride and patriarchy yes
00:57:43.220 yes yes but i think that the urban monoculture fundamentally hid people what this philosophy
00:57:50.820 was because they knew it would seem so he basically called out wokeism before wokeism came to exist
00:57:57.300 yeah and this is pretty mind-blowing for me thank you for calling me on this well i mean i i think
00:58:05.620 that the he's like oh yeah so in the future this group of people is going to use sympathy as a weapon
00:58:11.060 they're going to use it too they're going to begin to have contempt for everyone who's successful
00:58:15.220 everyone who's thriving they're going to try to spread this morality they're going to try to diminish
00:58:20.180 these people's capacity for exceptionalism he could be seen as a very like it's interesting if you if
00:58:26.260 you go over what niche thought it is very i'd say predictive and almost prophetic of woke culture
00:58:35.540 and the evils of woke culture and how woke culture acts and hurts people the evils of the culture that
00:58:42.180 creates basically roaming populations of homeless people who just get shipped between cities as soon
00:58:47.700 as any city receives sanity and then another city is like oh we'll be the good guys now and it is
00:58:52.980 is fundamentally evil and it is something that fundamentally we must fight against but
00:58:59.380 fortunately it is also self-extinguishing the slave morality that niche talks about i think spiraled out
00:59:05.460 of control within recent ages and is now the dominant cultural group in our society not in the way it was
00:59:13.940 during the christian period but in an even more true way we're in the christian period i think people were
00:59:19.780 twisting scripture to get slave morality where now i think slave morality is being worshipped
00:59:25.220 in and of itself any thoughts before i go into how we differentiate from each no i mean you you just
00:59:31.540 basically summed it up but that's still fascinating as as to how we differentiate from nietzsche which i
00:59:38.980 think is very interesting from our perspective which could be seen as very aligned with nietzsche
00:59:43.060 yeah we deride like nazis for the same reason we deride the blm movement which is to say nazis say
00:59:51.540 we are not thriving we didn't win the war because of this other cultural group that's making more
00:59:55.140 money than us it's doing better academically than us it's in higher paid professions than us the jews
01:00:00.100 a lot of people think they didn't like the jews because they thought the jews were like dirty or
01:00:02.740 something they they use that in some of their advertisements but that was in the same way wokes will call
01:00:07.620 like white people discussing most of the stuff on the jews that the nazi complained complained that
01:00:12.100 they out earned germans that they were taking money from germans that they had quote-unquote privilege
01:00:16.500 over germans if you translated it to modern words there's a reason you're not being told this but
01:00:20.580 that was fundamentally the way the ideology worked and that was why i deride that ideology so much in
01:00:26.180 but for the same reason that was like blm where they're like oh black culture isn't doing well
01:00:30.100 because white culture white culture is cheating white culture is victimizing us and i'm like it's not
01:00:34.340 and they're like no look at all these systemic and i'm like well there's look everything was taken
01:00:38.500 from us when we were slaves and i was like well everything was taken from the japanese much more
01:00:41.860 recently when they were put in the concentration camps and they bounced back pretty well i have a
01:00:47.620 lot of jewish internment camps but yeah whatever a lot of friends of mine families went through the
01:00:53.620 holocaust and they lost everything and the nazis took everything from them and they moved to the u.s
01:00:58.980 explain that you know it's cultural differences when you can accept that you need to learn from other
01:01:03.460 cultures you can improve quickly when you believe in a past and this is i think a danger for black
01:01:09.700 culture right now that it's facing is the wakandanization of ancient africanism which is to say that
01:01:17.300 they can just go back to some ancient way of being african and they'll be able to outcompete everyone
01:01:21.620 instead of needing to come to me is not ancient it's super high-tech that's what makes it so cool
01:01:28.340 no but it is based on the belief which has become quite common within some black communities
01:01:33.460 that they used to be this super powerful advanced civilization and that by going back to that they can
01:01:38.740 achieve greatness again and i look at the we was kings movements the same way that i look at modern
01:01:45.620 anti-semites or nazis more broadly it is a glorification of a past that never happened right because our our
01:01:52.660 key philosophy is is you don't go back you push forward taking what was best well no our biggest
01:01:59.140 key philosophy is the biggest deception you could ever have as a deception against yourself a belief
01:02:04.820 that you are strong where you are weak that you are succeeding where you are failing
01:02:10.980 but how are we different from each the core failure of niche's philosophy this isn't that big
01:02:16.740 a failure but it is a core differentiation we have is he saw individuals as being made up of like sort
01:02:22.980 of competing urges or components that fought against each other and while i think this exists to an
01:02:28.340 extent i think that the core unit of identity when we're looking at society is not the individual but
01:02:34.340 it's the intergenerational family unit and then the clan and then the individual if i'm sort of ranking
01:02:41.220 the importance of these individual things when i'm looking at the individual above the individual
01:02:46.580 is me in this exact moment of time or me as i exist as a combination of my genetics and the meme plexus
01:02:54.500 which are living on top of those genetics but me as an individual is just not particularly important
01:03:01.220 and i think a lot of our philosophy could be seen as now i'd never read niche before i didn't know that
01:03:07.060 any of these were ideas that rhymed with his ideas of taking some ideas that rhyme with his ideas and
01:03:13.140 applying them at the cultural level instead of applying them at the individual level i mean
01:03:18.900 wouldn't you say that there are some competing urges within every human with at least every human who
01:03:24.100 tries to rise above their base humanity like there's the part of you that just wants to eat and be lazy and
01:03:29.700 lie back and not work because we're designed to conserve energy and and maximize intake of calories and and
01:03:37.460 reproduce but then there's also our prefrontal cortex and this ability to rise above and reason and engage
01:03:44.420 with logic and think about things bigger than just our basic urges i think that's a fundamental internal
01:03:50.900 struggle that anyone who even sees themselves as part of a larger chain has to overcome every single day
01:03:56.900 don't you uh yeah i agree with that i mean i we we often talk about as a four-footed beast which is caged with
01:04:05.380 you have your human side and your animal side and they're both in a cage and you need to feed your animal
01:04:09.940 side just enough meat to keep it from getting strong or it will attack and kill you it will dominate you
01:04:15.540 uh but if you feed it nothing it goes rabid and attacks you or you end up spending all your time
01:04:20.260 mollifying it and petting it and being like it's okay buddy i know you know we haven't seen porn in
01:04:25.700 a year but you don't need to freak out when you see an attractive woman colonel these men have taken
01:04:31.300 a supreme vow of celibacy like their fathers and their fathers before them haven't seen a woman in
01:04:36.100 decades miss huddleston you say your war is over wherever you go you take the pain with you i know you
01:04:48.020 were hurt when that woman left but you're just using that to hide from who you really are thank
01:04:53.460 you next but yeah i i think that that we see that but i i take that not from nietzsche i take that from
01:05:00.660 winwood reed where he talks about these concepts and i think that also our concept of civilization
01:05:05.620 which is to say civilization or a civilized individual is someone who's better able to suppress
01:05:10.420 these pre-evolved needs and ideas for and humanity more broadly where you argued to me and i have
01:05:16.900 adopted this view is that the human is the part of ourselves that we choose instead of the part of
01:05:22.740 ourselves that we are born with and that people who are more human are the people who are better
01:05:27.860 able to suppress their pre-born instincts their animal side would you agree with that sorry i'm
01:05:34.100 trying to find like moments when i can talk when she's not winching i have a call in six minutes just as
01:05:40.180 a note great well then we use our time wisely today and i really appreciate you simone i it's
01:05:46.420 so cool to be potentially contributing to the philosophical canon of human civilization
01:05:52.580 but be able to do so was not living a shitty life like nietzsche did the amount of luxury that we enjoy
01:05:59.540 is humbling every single day i mean i'm just humble that we have hot water it is amazing running water
01:06:05.700 running water and hot water holy crap and drink drink a potable water that we can just drink the water
01:06:12.500 that we get in our faucets there are so many things that blow my mind every single day and yeah that
01:06:17.380 we get to it also that the average person in a developed country now who has access to an internet
01:06:22.740 connection and a phone can engage with the world's leading philosophers i mean this used to be something
01:06:27.780 where only the wealthiest and the most connected would have the shot at going to some university where
01:06:33.460 some major philosopher was pontificating in some large venue and you wouldn't really necessarily get to
01:06:39.460 to know them or have a lot of exposure to their ideas and now people can just go on youtube and
01:06:45.620 listen to it or like follow this person on substack and it's i love that we live in this age and i love
01:06:50.500 how democratized these great ideas are and to your point now i'm coming away from this conversation very
01:06:55.700 grateful for the fact that while nietzsche lived at a time where he thought that ubermunch the ubermunch was
01:07:01.380 like a theoretical figure that now pretty much everyone has the tools to become an ubermunch and
01:07:08.820 that there are a decent number of these people and that they are significantly changing the trajectory of
01:07:13.860 humanity at a time where we would argue this is one of those inflection points in the entire history of
01:07:22.180 humankind and intelligence in general that is really crucial and some some decisions made by a small
01:07:30.340 handful of people who choose to participate in the game and this is not about who is the most money
01:07:34.820 or the most iq or the highest iq that is it is about those who choose to show up and play this game
01:07:40.820 they're going to change the course of human history um and intelligence interesting thing is it to tell
01:07:47.140 nietzsche that we would eventually enter a time of such opulence of of of such abundance that because
01:07:57.140 pleasure was so everywhere for people that the only humans who are able to survive the only humans who
01:08:04.100 are able to make it through this crucible are the ones who trended towards the ubermunch that is
01:08:09.940 fundamentally what our philosophy of the garden of the lotus eaters is yeah to say that only those who
01:08:16.020 can master their own values and masters themselves are going to exist in the future we are we are
01:08:22.340 at a civilizational bottleneck where only the ubermunch survive yeah it's exciting it's exciting
01:08:28.660 it's scary but it gives me a lot of hope and i love the fact that so many people have a shot at
01:08:34.660 really mattering now and it doesn't come down to where you went to school or who you know or how wealthy
01:08:40.020 you are whatever like that that was in the past and i mean i think nietzsche did come from a position of
01:08:44.820 having enough money in his family and having enough family to support to to a certain extent to be
01:08:52.340 someone who had these ideas um now this is something that's a lot more democratized so it's cool thank
01:08:59.460 you this is a really interesting conversation i didn't think it would be because we've talked about
01:09:04.900 this so much and we're like i don't know this seems like a straightforward situation but yeah there
01:09:11.300 is and i was surprised because i had always sort of looked down on nietzsche's work as being like
01:09:17.060 try hard i sort of thought of it as like well maybe it's because so many try hard people started talking
01:09:22.100 about it and then you start to associate it with that and i think here's the problem here's what may
01:09:26.820 have completely broken his reputation is that a bunch of like incel red pillar types started quoting
01:09:32.420 his work way too much not way too much but like a lot and then all of those that the urban monoculture
01:09:38.820 enemies of those people then basically started blackballing nietzsche as a historical figure
01:09:44.980 because he was this this superhero to a particular class of human that they saw as subhuman and hateable
01:09:51.460 and and anything that they liked it had to be bad concept aesthetically aligns with some nazi ideals
01:09:58.660 when people hear it because they don't know what it means they don't know what it means people who
01:10:02.420 it's a german word and it implies some level of superiority it must be evil yeah and he was around during
01:10:07.940 the nazis and i've heard that some of his books were edited by somebody who had nazi sympathies
01:10:11.860 after he died because he sort of became famous after he died was he was he pre-naz i don't know
01:10:16.420 the exact timeline my understanding is he was sort of when the nazis were rising and his like sister
01:10:21.140 or cousin or something edited a lot of his works to include some like anti-semitic ideals when i think
01:10:26.820 that you know realistically if you're applying his ideals they'd be incredibly pro-jewish because which is
01:10:32.580 but i but i think that if if you look at our ideals i guess i'd say that our ideals are significantly
01:10:38.340 closer to the ideals of somebody like nietzsche than they are to your classic modern anti-semit or
01:10:44.660 racist or anything like that but they don't align completely with them yeah yeah well which is fair
01:10:50.900 because we live with a lot of additional information and what am i having for dinner tonight before your
01:10:55.620 call by the way so i'm kind of experimenting a little bit with something from the freezer and if it
01:11:02.260 doesn't work out i'm gonna have backup what are you experimenting with spit it out your your karai
01:11:07.140 spiced chicken i'm going to try baking and air frying different versions of it maybe with an egg
01:11:13.220 wash just to see if we can revive it because you don't want to deep fry it anymore you're concerned
01:11:18.340 about the carcinogenic elements of the oil so i'm going to try two different elements of baking it
01:11:23.300 simultaneously tonight and if neither of them ends up working out then you're going to have grilled
01:11:27.860 cheese sandwiches where's the karai spiced chicken it was in the deep freezer and we need to use it
01:11:34.500 or get rid of it so oh is it like deep frying yeah you had pre-prepared this for deep frying
01:11:41.540 you'd created karai spice right in a pan i don't want to deal with all the oil okay well we'll see how
01:11:48.820 it works yeah and if this doesn't work and you still think that it's worth reviving there's a lot
01:11:53.220 more of it there's a ton of it because you made a i will deep fry it then because i like the deep
01:11:57.380 fried correct okay then yeah but next time i will i will fill a large all right do your call you're late
01:12:02.980 thanks bye so this i really appreciate that simone you did a great job i hit order on amazon
01:12:13.700 i am skilled you acted with efficiency and urgency which is what was required of you
01:12:19.380 for this particular emergency simone make sure you're centered no just no what there uh no not
01:12:30.180 quite uh there you go thank you these things you're going to think of how we can start this
01:12:38.100 well you mentioned the star trek clip you have the clip from that anime what is star trek oh the star
01:12:44.020 track yes i mean there's so many like there this is one of those i think it keeps recurring in memes
01:12:52.820 as a trolley problem and in media and in shows because it's one of these problems that
01:12:59.540 we're fully aware of and we just don't like it but also social mores like tribal based intuitive
01:13:08.180 evolutionary traits that we have like that intuition toward fairness means that we can't
01:13:16.500 override logic without feeling an extreme pull like it's deeply unfair that this exists and we're
01:13:23.940 evolved to not accept the reality but at the same time we logically know that that is the reality and i
01:13:31.860 think that that tension makes this something that people keep bringing up and highlighting without
01:13:38.820 ever of course coming to a clear conclusion unlike us of course we just know exactly what's okay so
01:13:44.900 i'll get started so we can jump right into it go for it yeah
01:13:47.300 it's daddy the bone collector
01:14:09.780 you're not gonna get me
01:14:17.300 i don't think it hurt a lot buddy are you okay
01:14:45.300 i don't think it hurt a lot
01:14:46.740 are you okay
01:14:53.540 did you see what happened what happened oh he's me uh he hit my knee with his uh chin oh god
01:15:02.260 oh toast you want a hug hey move of course i got hurt he tripped
01:15:08.260 it hurt it yeah
01:15:10.100 listen come here and get a hug buddy
01:15:14.580 come here buddy come here
01:15:24.500 come here my love i got you