Based Camp - May 13, 2026


The Left's Plan To Win A Civil War ... Is Not Terrible

Hosted by
Malcolm Collins Simone Collins
Mentioned
Scott Alexander Scott Pressler Secret Service Nick Fuentes Simone Trump Wally
Great Feminization Theory： Did Women Break Society？ Ben Shapiro's Crumbling Empire： How The Daily Wire Lost its Audience

Episode Stats


Length

44 minutes

Words per minute

165.11

Word count

7,374

Sentence count

102

Harmful content

Toxicity

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

24

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, we dive deep into the mind of an individual who some right wing figures have covered recently for his crazy comments he made about going back to the 17th century, and why the left would win in a civil war.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00 Hello, Simone! I'm excited to be here with you today.
00:00:03 Today, we are going to be diving deep into the mind of an individual
00:00:07 who some right-wing figures have covered recently for his crazy comments.
00:00:13 One of the crazier ones that happened recently is he said that if he transported back to the Pilgrim era,
00:00:21 and obviously I'll play the clip here.
00:00:22 You suddenly wake up in the 17th century on a ship headed for New England.
00:00:25 As soon as we landed, I would use the money to bribe the bosun to look the other way while I stole all of the muskets and powder on board. 0.98
00:00:35 And then I would march immediately to the nearest indigenous settlement, give the guns out like candy, 0.97
00:00:40 and make it my mission in life to murder every single white man, woman, and child on the eastern seaboard of the continent. 0.99
00:00:47 that he would kill any white women and children that he found after betraying the pilgrims and 1.00
00:00:55 giving away all their guns to indians because apparently this makes sense to him and he's also 0.99
00:00:59 gone viral which we'll talk about later in this you know sterilizing himself but with all of this
00:01:04 stuff yes i could go over how crazy this guy sounds which is i think we all know but as people
00:01:11 who watch our channel i try to bring a unique perspective to what i'm covering so i decided
00:01:16 to go through and watch his videos so oh you went down the rabbit hole yes okay and one of his
00:01:25 videos which is the one i really want to talk on in this is why the left would win an upcoming civil
00:01:33 war um and he basically lays out the plan that his side has for winning an upcoming civil war
00:01:43 and really as insane as you would think oh they have a shot
00:01:48 so it's something that we need to to talk about we need to engage with and more than just engaging
00:01:58 with it the reason why i think it's so important to engage with is i think it makes it clear when
00:02:04 the right-wing alliance thinks about the elements of the alliance that are actually important to
00:02:12 both its long-term viability and its immediate security on in the moment of like crazy revolution
00:02:20 type stuff right it is massively misunderstanding where it should actually be focusing focusing way
00:02:31 too much on armed groups of rednecks which he points out realistically aren't particularly
00:02:38 relevant if a civil war did break out and he goes through historic civil wars to make this
00:02:45 argument no i don't think that that's i i i don't think the way he presents his argument is powerful
00:02:50 because i'd be like yeah but the technological context is entirely different now they didn't
00:02:53 have like fully automatic weapons back then and stuff right um but the the he does he doesn't
00:03:00 notice things that i think a right-wing person would notice so let's go into this and he also
00:03:04 goes into how how probable it is okay so broadly his worldview goes like this if you look at
00:03:13 historic civil wars what actually ended up determining who won and how well sides were
00:03:20 able to sort of field their assets it largely came downstream of the existing bureaucratic
00:03:28 and civilizational infrastructure that allowed them to recruit and command troops at scale
00:03:35 as well as manage industry at scale um that so if you if you think about something like the
00:03:44 revolutionary war or something like this the troops that we had fighting for us were not
00:03:51 just you know people who we had raised out of nowhere these were pre-existing military regimens
00:03:57 often uh or they had elements of pre-existing military regimens within them if you look at the
00:04:03 you know civil war both the south and the north had sort of large-scale economic and sort of
00:04:11 civilizational infrastructure that they could call on random rebels have a very hard time doing
00:04:19 anything other than just holding land and would they even be able to hold land in an existing
00:04:26 context so to give it an understanding of like how he's thinking about a civil war
00:04:30 but he was praising mandami for and apparently a lot of leftists see this is a major betrayal
00:04:38 and he was saying that this was actually very shrewd immediately burying the hatchet with the
00:04:43 nypd as soon as he was elected and he's like look if we want to prevent ice like federal government
00:04:53 troops from operating effectively in new york we are going to need the nypd on our side we are 0.51
00:05:01 going to need our own thugs with guns to be fighting their thugs with guns oh
00:05:09 oh i mean i guess the police need their pensions to be paid and who who controls the pensions so
00:05:20 if we're talking about like national versus local control is that kind of what he's thinking about
00:05:27 so yeah basically the question is is if society were ever to fall into unrest how much
00:05:36 organizational control would leftists have we i mean like when we know the types of institutions
00:05:42 that leftists control today leftists control the huge parts of the judicial system and the most
00:05:49 economically prosperous parts of the United States, huge parts of the white collar job system
00:05:55 in the most industrious parts, you know, technologically industrious parts of the United
00:05:59 States. They control governments and the surrounding environments in stuff like cities.
00:06:06 So suppose we were having any form of a revolution or something like that. The NYPD is obviously
00:06:11 quite pissed at the way leftists have treated them. But you've also got to keep in mind how
00:06:17 long they have had woke hiring practices within their organization. So even though they have a
00:06:22 bit of a chip on their shoulder compared to other people, you've got to keep in mind their entire
00:06:27 architecture around them, right? You know, you've got everybody else in Manhattan, many of whom are
00:06:32 quite left-leaning, who could pressure them or make it difficult for them to act independently
00:06:38 in the case of any sort of serious split. Now, I'm just giving you guys his perspective. I actually
00:06:45 think it's massively wrong but i'm giving you his perspective right and then if i was going to
00:06:51 further steel man his perspective beyond what he has said because obviously being a modern leftist
00:06:57 he doesn't think ai is relevant but where do you fall on the luddite to accelerationist spectrum
00:07:03 uh i'm of two minds in my heart of hearts i think the agricultural revolution was a mistake
00:07:10 I think that any society with an agricultural mode of subsistence is necessarily imperial and hierarchical.
00:07:20 And I think that basically all of our problems come downstream from that.
00:07:24 I am arguing that the core thing of relevance in future battles, even six, seven years out, is going to be automated drone swarms.
00:07:34 You know, this matters.
00:07:35 Who controls the automated drone swarms?
00:07:38 Well, so far, the federal government is like leaps and bounds ahead of any private or state-based entity I'm aware of.
00:07:47 Does that mean the next thing I work on with RFAB is automated drone swarms?
00:07:50 Yeah, yeah.
00:07:52 Would fans pay for that?
00:07:54 Could we get funding for that?
00:07:55 Because I could do that.
00:07:56 I bet I could build automated drone swarms better than the government can.
00:08:00 Well, let's look into it.
00:08:03 I want a home defense swarm system.
00:08:05 so you can work on that one well so okay it's just a side note if i was going to focus on
00:08:12 automated drone swarms how like what would be our arbitrage play um so i'm just trying to think of
00:08:20 how you could do something significantly better than the existing systems so i've been watching
00:08:24 lots of film of like what's going on in ukraine right now and you have a huge
00:08:31 yes our fans will find this tangent interesting i i'm trying to think like do our fans care
00:08:37 about uh automated drone swarm technology yes they do yes no anyone who wants to survive in
00:08:43 the future and i mean our fans are not suicidal and self-terminating they do they want except
00:08:50 for the ones who said some naughty things about israel and i've and i've heard many of them have
00:08:55 been thinking about some end of life solutions uh yeah i i i say this of course for masad so that
00:09:05 they know i'm on team here okay a hundred percent on team so this speculative discussion into drone
00:09:11 design went on way longer than i anticipated so i moved it to the end and you can i guess just
00:09:17 skip to it with time stamps if you're desperate to hear me an uninformed person go on forever
00:09:23 about what would be an interesting drone design okay i gotta get back to the topic at hand
00:09:27 civil war so what actually happens and people can tell me their ideas of how you could make
00:09:35 drone technology better i'd be very interested in this so i can steal them because my idea is
00:09:38 probably stupid this was just off the top of my head idea but okay so this guy i think he's 0.55
00:09:44 fundamentally wrong about what a civil war would look like because he's thinking of a civil war 0.99
00:09:49 in the way that rightists think about a civil war so he's looking at the rightist militants fantasy
00:09:55 of the armed guerrilla civil war which i do not think is a realistic pathway for a near future
00:10:03 american civil war um what is a more likely pathway for a near future american civil war
00:10:09 i've said it before but let's let's go through what it would look like if it happened
00:10:14 one party gets into power and then the election results either through genuine fraudulence or
00:10:23 non-fraudulence says that they lost the next presidential election but they say we didn't
00:10:29 lose the presidential election in fact which is what you anticipate the primary means through
00:10:35 which this all happens yes and the reason i suspect that this is going to happen is both
00:10:40 parties have become razor thin close to doing this multiple times like every election just
00:10:47 seems like we're asking for it at this point well yeah it's almost like a pendulum that's swinging
00:10:52 but it just keeps swinging farther and farther each time and eventually it's gonna like hit this
00:10:56 ding like bell we've hit the civil war bell great or the one party put something in place that is
00:11:04 just so transparently cheating in the election system that the other party is just like no we're
00:11:09 not going along with this right yeah and obviously it got closer was like the the voter rights act
00:11:15 and stuff like this many leftists do not like that they do not get the racial seats that they
00:11:20 used to got which were obviously unfair and racist but whatever and then the virginia case when they
00:11:25 tried to cancel this getting struck down so they lost all the seats that they thought they were
00:11:29 going to get there did you see scott pressler's tweet about it it was lovely he he was he was
00:11:35 there he's still making things happen oh he was part of that how did he campaign to the uh i don't
00:11:42 know the full backstory i just know he was a part of it he was there and he tweeted a selfie of
00:11:47 himself and everyone celebrating it was lovely well that's lovely yeah um you know if they're
00:11:52 gonna play the gerrymander game you know let's let's do it right by the way fun thing i don't
00:11:57 know if you know this but the actual thing that that triggered the reinvestigation of the jury
00:12:02 the system and the court case that ended up causing the strike down of the voter rights act
00:12:08 was actually initiated by the biden administration against texas and then the trump administration
00:12:15 dropped it but texas said we're not dropping this we're taking this to court
00:12:19 they ended up being the case that got it overturned so it was actually a problem
00:12:24 initiated by democrats trying to be even overly aggressive with the system they already had
00:12:30 okay well interesting what happens if we'll go through each candidate let's suppose the
00:12:42 democrats win this next cycle and it's somebody like aoc i think she's actually the most likely
00:12:47 to win if i'm gonna be honest uh like i do not think gavin newton would win would aoc believe
00:12:54 that she needed to hold on to power if it looked like she lost to somebody she was really afraid
00:12:59 of right the answer is yes probably right i can i can totally see her doing something or
00:13:05 her supporters doing something to that effect okay so she says i'm not leaving what would be
00:13:11 her likely complaint she would say that like either it was too much gerrymandering or there
00:13:16 was something suspicious about the vote count or something like that right so what do we have in
00:13:21 place that could deal with this first you've got to remember dc is incredibly left-wing
00:13:27 are dc cops going to pull her out of the white house right no you would basically need the united
00:13:34 states military to attempt to do something this means the united states military somebody who is
00:13:41 in the military would have to decide to act against the commander-in-chief would they do this
00:13:47 and this is difficult because you've got to keep in mind not everyone in the military is going to
00:13:52 go on board with this right like the moment one person does this even though like technically it
00:13:56 would be AOC doing the coup, like they're doing a coup, like they're now starting a conflict of
00:14:02 some sort. They go to the White House, they attempt to arrest her. Okay, who's defending her?
00:14:08 Secret Service, right? Is Secret Service enough in the hands of the Democrats to go along with
00:14:13 something like this? Yeah, I think they are at this point, if I'm going to be honest. I still
00:14:18 think that the right has enough influence within the military to prevent a Democrat from doing this.
00:14:26 successfully it it would be tough but probably okay but let's assume that a rightist did this
00:14:33 let's assume trump does this this next cycle okay what happens there i mean the key would be for him
00:14:40 and the relevant people in his administration to make sure that they've gotten out of dc before
00:14:44 they attempt this if they're in dc if he tries to just stay in the white house that is incredibly 0.99
00:14:51 stupid um what he should do is operate something like this with key administrative officials 0.99
00:14:59 out of something like one of the presidential whatever retreats or something like this that is 1.00
00:15:05 in rural america where they are less likely to get significant pushback you would immediately have
00:15:11 a number of leftist cities basically secede to some extent the key to drawing them back in
00:15:21 is basically not confronting them with armed conflict. You could essentially just starve
00:15:27 them. If you just close off roads into any major city, they would have to capitulate in a very
00:15:32 short period of time, and it would be trivially easy to do, which is very different from rural
00:15:38 sections of America. To pacify a rural section of America, you really need to basically militarily
00:15:46 occupy it to pacify any american city you just need to block a few roads a really very easy roads
00:15:55 to block too and and and don't even do it like aggressively just be like look we're looking to
00:16:01 negotiate but for now we'll be blocking things off and you really want to lower their power
00:16:05 we'll be managing an evacuation of the city right to you know for people who are dealing with power
00:16:11 food everything like that because now you're moving people away from like their source of
00:16:15 ability to fight back in a situation like this. And this is what really matters, not the control
00:16:23 of the institutions, but control of the military. Really, whichever side the military backed when
00:16:29 one of these happens, that would be the side that won. And keep in mind that they would win
00:16:33 permanently. So like, suppose that AOC or Trump did this. If the military ends up backing the
00:16:40 other side the other side is not going to go back to free elections they're going to say that like
00:16:46 we can't do free elections anymore yeah fair the moment the conflict comes to a head basically the
00:16:53 american republic is over and we enter our imperial age which is why we named our first kid octavian
00:16:58 right you know i gotta gotta handle that transition maybe maybe born a generation we'll see when this
00:17:02 happens but thoughts simone before i go further this generally makes sense and i didn't know that
00:17:09 there were people who were actually thinking through the logistics of this, but, huh, I mean,
00:17:16 there are so many complications with interstate trade and supply routes and everything where I
00:17:25 just feel like there's so many more levels of vulnerability to, like the power grid that
00:17:30 different parties in this conflict could leverage against each other that just didn't exist at the
00:17:37 time of the u.s civil war where functionally civil war just isn't really possible in the
00:17:44 united states in any sort of full-scale you know city i mean the key is to do it in a way that 0.55
00:17:52 doesn't look like a civil war right which is it would look like a chop chas like a sort of this 0.97
00:17:59 this is their zone and we're just going to let them pretend that they have it and yeah so you 1.00
00:18:06 you like suppose you do this you are trump a number of cities say we're not going along with
00:18:13 this just you you you you do your best to not allow violence to break out right you say
00:18:19 unless their side is initiating it we if you are not part of america anymore we are blockading the
00:18:26 roads into these major urban centers and we are managing an evacuation for the people who don't
00:18:31 want to be part of your basically independent project right if you do that and the other key
00:18:39 is to work with companies on this right to make it clear to the major companies that there will
00:18:46 be some window upon which they can join this project and if they do not join it within x
00:18:54 potential window, then they, some form of, of repercussion, like they're, they're, they're
00:19:03 taxed in a different way or their assets are withheld or something like that, right? Like
00:19:08 basically you just put financial pressure on companies to go along with this. Cause a lot
00:19:11 of companies are going to want to reflexively, you know, do their, their sort of signal on this.
00:19:16 But the moment you put like international pressure on something like this, the big companies are just
00:19:20 going to go along with this. And that really hurts the city's ability to go along with this
00:19:25 themselves. So first you do something small where like companies basically just need to signal to
00:19:30 you and signal to the world, oh yeah, I'm moving ahead with this new accounting system or whatever,
00:19:35 right? And then you go into the second phase, which is to say, if they pay taxes to any of
00:19:42 the parts of America that are still in open rebellion, they are then put. So they've already
00:19:46 done the costly signaling of being like i'm okay with this and then you start to starve
00:19:50 the cities that are left of taxes
00:19:52 yeah that makes sense now how would the left just do it is it's way harder because they need to
00:20:02 power project from cities outwards which is just incredibly difficult to do
00:20:06 what if they just did what if like california succeeded you know that would be more feasible
00:20:14 california has ports they have more of an independent electricity grid they are a very
00:20:23 economically productive still state so ports are incredibly easy to blockade first of all like a
00:20:29 civilian port like san francisco port or something like that and with california you really only need
00:20:35 to block like two ports if you block the port in san francisco and la like you you they're cooked
00:20:42 they can import goods through other ports but if you then block the main arteries into those two
00:20:47 areas and there are not that many into like san francisco for example you're literally blocking
00:20:52 like four roads yeah i yeah most of california is red remember that like literally there's just a
00:21:06 you and you say okay you know you use the seed but like don't use our infrastructure
00:21:11 oh you mean even the fact that we defend the seas or something well no we built america built
00:21:20 your port infrastructure you are not allowed to use it oh that is what that would be my
00:21:26 justification for blockading the sea roots that's fair enough but yeah that's what a that's that is
00:21:35 what an american civil war is going to look like the next american civil war it's not going to be
00:21:40 fought by random guerrillas it's it's going to be fought by how do you control supply lines into
00:21:46 things like cities and how long are people going to throw a fit about this in other words it's it's
00:21:52 defined by institutions siding with one aggrieved party following a presidential election that was
00:22:00 very contentious and refusing to contribute taxes or enforce laws to the extent that it's a
00:22:10 functional civil war. But to what end? I just don't, I can't, in the, with the way that our
00:22:17 states run and the way our government runs, I cannot understand why even a very large group
00:22:26 of people who believe that an election was a fraud would successfully rebel or attempt to rebel
00:22:33 with any expectation of eventual success? I mean, what does eventual success look like?
00:22:38 They just think... So we've seen this. There was both... So a lot of people aren't aware,
00:22:42 but there was a protest that was about as big as January 6th protest that the left is held just
00:22:45 like a month and a half before where the president had to be taken to a secret bunker and they tried
00:22:50 to light the White House on fire. Well, I don't remember this at all.
00:22:54 because the left didn't report on it they didn't want to report on it they didn't want people to
00:22:58 know about it but yeah it was huge if you find photos of it like there's giant like bonfires
00:23:04 around the white house and stuff like right in front of the gates and stuff it was it was obviously
00:23:09 an extremely dangerous scenario the core difference is that the cia wasn't there to open the gates for
00:23:13 people you know but the point being is the other question you have around any sort of a protest
00:23:20 like this is the people who are resisting this right like especially if they're violently
00:23:26 resisting this would the military or any sort of military forces that you have be comfortable
00:23:33 shooting on a crowd of civilians that that often determines like if things go ahead and one of the
00:23:41 things that we've repeatedly seen recently in rebellions and stuff like this we saw this in
00:23:47 turkey for example is that if your military is drawn from rural or like conservative regions
00:23:58 and the protesters are incredibly far lefties like they're going out like the anti-ice protesters
00:24:04 looking like actually dangerous militant psychopaths which they often look like i mean
00:24:11 we've seen the people who are protesting ice like they're like the hoods that yeah the hoods they 0.73
00:24:15 look like a group that has othered themselves from the concept of civilians enough that i do
00:24:22 not think that they would actually care to shoot at a crowd which is unfortunate i mean it's leftist
00:24:28 trying to feel cool and everything like that but like it's also important when you do protest
00:24:34 something like this like suppose it's the leftist who have power when this is happening that you
00:24:38 don't go out there in outfits that other you go out there looking like normal civilians yeah that
00:24:45 is how you prevent that is how you get the military on your side again right going out there
00:24:50 and harassing the military by throwing bricks at them in a hood and hitting them was like that's
00:24:54 how you get them to feel like fighting back is on their side i think the lefts have really hurt
00:25:00 themselves so the final part of this video i wanted to address but any thoughts before we go
00:25:03 further no but i agree with you on that seems poorly thought through but i know they're not
00:25:09 exactly thinking from that perspective. Yeah. This guy's not wanting to have kids and leftists
00:25:15 not wanting to have kids more broadly. So I'll play the clip here. Earlier this year, I got a
00:25:20 vasectomy. When people ask me why I got snipped, I generally kind of gesture vaguely to fascism
00:25:27 and climate change and people go, oh yeah, totally understandable. But the truth is that whenever my
00:25:33 friends and family members get pregnant and I'm in my early thirties, so that's happening a lot
00:25:37 these days, I get a horrible weight in the pit of my stomach. Oftentimes I'm genuinely happy for
00:25:45 them. You know, sometimes I can even look them in the eye and say, you'll be a really great father
00:25:49 and mean it. But there's another part of me that can't shake the idea that in nine months,
00:25:57 another American will come into the world, another ravening cannibal who will spend the next better 0.62
00:26:04 part of a century, burning fossil fuels, housing cheeseburgers, and ignoring homeless people at 0.93
00:26:10 traffic lights. And you can say, oh, well, I'll bring up my kid to share my values and they won't
00:26:15 do those things. And I can respect that, but that's a hell of a gamble, right? I mean, you
00:26:22 could take your kid to school every day on your bike, but if every other parent has an SUV,
00:26:29 eventually your kid's going to get curious and want to drive a car, right? And then what are
00:26:34 you going to do? You know, forbid them? I mean, they're just going to do it anyway. What if my
00:26:38 pride and joy grows up to be somebody else's abuser? But the real kicker is that even if my
00:26:46 child has a great life, even if they cause no harm to others, they will still suffer. They will still
00:26:54 die. It is unavoidable, right? I will be inflicting this fate upon them without their
00:27:02 knowledge or consent. To me, the creation of human life is very obviously an incredibly selfish thing
00:27:12 to do under most circumstances. And what you really see from this is he's afraid above all
00:27:22 else that his kids may have different political beliefs in him and he's like no matter how much
00:27:28 i try to brainwash them they might not be vegans you know because he calls all non-vegans cannibals
00:27:33 right which yeah of course right like why wouldn't he and what's interesting is the lack of and i
00:27:40 noticed this was leftist one of the really interesting things i think on the right that
00:27:45 we repeatedly see is even when we have like radical beliefs there is a lot of intellectual
00:27:52 effort and this is something you see on our channel and stuff like that establishing why we
00:27:57 have the core beliefs we have that inform our downstream beliefs right like why do we have
00:28:04 the beliefs we have about the environment right like clearly he thinks that environment is like
00:28:08 an existential and immediate threat yet he never goes into why like he doesn't actually
00:28:14 investigate this which i'd be very interested to know i'm like okay i've dug into the data on this
00:28:20 and it just doesn't seem to be so like what's the counter to this right other than just like
00:28:25 i've been told so yeah there's that element the other is so like it's it's it's sort of that
00:28:34 there isn't an intellectual backbone to to what they're pushing here right it's just like i've
00:28:39 been told that this is a trendy thing like why do you hate white people right like this guy clearly 0.96
00:28:43 thinks it's cool to hate white people and stuff like this kill white children all that why does 0.86
00:28:49 he feel that this and obviously it is protected from his videos are still doing well he has half 0.99
00:28:53 a million subscribers you know he is a popular youtuber right oh absolutely so this this type
00:29:03 of content i'd actually say its videos aren't even that bad like when i was watching them they
00:29:07 really remind me of contrapoints where and i noticed this we actually had a leftist like trans
00:29:12 news team come here recently that we were like interviewing right and it really became clear to
00:29:16 me that like we were not able to successfully communicate with them we had perfectly ambiable
00:29:23 conversations and they understood and i was like i can't communicate with you because
00:29:26 effectively because everything they saw they saw in terms of narratives everything had to have
00:29:32 some sort of like, and this is the way he sees things. This is the way philosophy tube sees
00:29:37 things. This is the way I see a lot of counterpoints video sees things. The world is a
00:29:42 series of narratives in what is true is what is narratively true. So what I mean by this is if
00:29:50 we are doing something like having lots of kids, it must be because of either a kink or because 0.97
00:29:58 of something that happened in our childhood yeah and i'm like no we're doing it because of the data
00:30:04 do you want to look at the data right like you can do something for a reason other than a kink but 0.87
00:30:10 like this is just incongruent with because their entire world self and person is structured around 0.99
00:30:17 what gives them pleasure you think that's why oh yeah remember i said that like clearly pleasure
00:30:26 is not like the core purpose in life right remember he's like well that you know that's
00:30:29 for you right you know to this individual pleasure was the core purpose in life and so when they look
00:30:37 at why people are acting in a way that seems odd to them like why are we having a lot of kids 0.73
00:30:42 it must be because it's arousing to us right it must be some sort of kink scenario which i find
00:30:53 very interesting for a couple reasons one is like in case you're wondering 0.97
00:30:58 and and to to we have argued before that the only thing that isn't a kink is having kids right like 0.78
00:31:06 being turned on by getting somebody pregnant or being impregnated like that's literally what the 0.85
00:31:11 whole system is in place for yeah you know the fact that you that you would call that a kink is 0.92
00:31:16 bizarre right like you think you think using another human is like an oni hole is the non-kink 0.84
00:31:22 and doing sex for the reason sex exists is the kink only one normal version of it yes but this 0.98
00:31:31 scenario in terms of like erotic scenarios the idea of impregnation uh breeding kink you could 0.91
00:31:38 say that is is something that i personally do find arousing right like it's in my panoply of 0.95
00:31:45 like random things that arouse me the idea of this in terms of my life wife and kids absolutely
00:31:56 not is it arousing like it it just i was trying to explain this to them i'm like do you understand
00:32:02 like having a kid is a giant logistical process that takes months it's not like a sexual fantasy
00:32:09 right like people who have this sort of fetish aren't having children there are people who acted
00:32:17 out absolutely there are people who will even go on these like facebook groups for sperm donors and
00:32:24 actively seek out women who are willing to have sex with them in order to get pregnant and they
00:32:29 will fly all around the world they have thousands of kids they would count but like yeah that you 0.94
00:32:34 would create a whole new life and be responsible for them and raise them for like a couple minutes
00:32:41 of your fetish your arousal but it's not even an effective mechanism for okay i'll word this
00:32:52 a different way for people if anyone here is is listening has a beat a submission or dominance
00:33:00 arousal pattern right like you get turned on by role-playing a very dominant person or you get
00:33:07 turned on by role-playing a very submissive person right do you get turned on when you're a like
00:33:14 wage slave if you're turned on by being submissive probably effing not do you get turned on by being
00:33:21 a boss or managing a team if you're turned on by being dominant probably not right it's just there's
00:33:29 too much other stuff going on in those sorts of roles to actually activate those pathways
00:33:34 yes but i actually think that's a really good explanation for this right like
00:33:40 but it is what one i mean it it's sad to see that that level of sort of degenerate framing
00:33:48 of reality by these individuals but the thing to remember with any sort of civil war with the left
00:33:55 and everything like that is we really only need to wait them out at this point their fertility
00:33:59 rates are so low they are sterilizing themselves like literally there's these people out there
00:34:06 right now who hate you they want you dead they want everything you stand for destroyed
00:34:12 and you could be like oh my god like we need to get out all the guns we need to round these people
00:34:17 up we need to sterilize them and it's like oh no you don't need to do that and they're like why it's
00:34:22 like they literally have vasectomy fans go to like the dnc and offer free vasectomies at this point
00:34:29 it's not even a right-wing conspiracy they're handling it but for the same reason that's why
00:34:35 i find it so shocking the idea that there would be any form of civil war because i just don't think
00:34:39 that ultimately the left has the ability to take that level of organized initiative the left is
00:34:46 about degrowth it's about anti-natalism it's about stepping back relinquishing turning back
00:34:53 stopping stagnating it's not about organizing and building and you need to organize and build
00:34:57 in order to lead a civil war but they have tons of institutions under their control
00:35:02 i get that but those institutions are highly dependent on other factors in order to work
00:35:09 and being parasitoidal in nature culturally they've already weakened those institutions
00:35:15 so this won't work especially when isolated and rebellious they're not sufficient rebellious
00:35:22 entities and this is why i think america should conquer europe yeah it's there to be taken yeah
00:35:31 we're thinking too small with with greenland you gotta think bigger yeah greenland come on
00:35:37 you're thinking so small trump there's more out there some some nice ones to pick off
00:35:43 if we went out and we conquered greenland they would do nothing oh we should do a video on
00:35:49 whether nato is a bad idea that would be fun to do yeah i like that all right i love you
00:35:55 what a day what a day film film film got cruise over all day today and yesterday
00:36:03 such a a fun life actually in a way because it feels like we're celebrities but like without
00:36:11 like having to be film stars or something but like the news is like regularly interested in
00:36:16 like what are they doing today oh but like we don't have to memorize lines or something yeah
00:36:22 we don't have to i mean i wouldn't want to be a celebrity in the way that celebrities used to
00:36:26 exist i wouldn't want to be a celebrity in the way that kardashians are celebrities or the way
00:36:28 that ozzy osbourne is a celebrity we're like it's interesting because we're like celebrities but
00:36:34 people care about our political views like the antithesis of you know the historic celebrity
00:36:39 where it's like oh we're like okay yeah you would hate if they cared about what you wore
00:36:43 or something or who you were dating and you like that they actually care about a substitute
00:36:48 why would anybody well they are they are which is interesting because you know there's not uh i mean
00:36:55 i don't think there's any political provocateur that gets as much just like raw news coverage as
00:37:00 we get not even close like if there's some that are more famous than us like munchess mulbug or
00:37:05 scott alexander or something like that but they're they're much more private than us too
00:37:08 Nick Fuentes come on he gets more news coverage than us and is a provocateur so I will give you
00:37:17 that yeah thank you thank you I try um who else yeah but I mean it's interesting it's interesting
00:37:27 to play this this this game with the dying press era but yeah and you saw me in a music video today
00:37:35 which made me happy it had like 11 views but still you know we're getting in some of the you
00:37:40 know the wider universe of whatever it's called skybrow skybrow videos okay oh what are we doing
00:37:49 for dinner we're heating i'm going to be working it out i might do some i was thinking about doing
00:37:56 a mixture of some roasted brussels sprouts with butter and some like kosher salt dusting on the
00:38:02 top and then also some meat over some maybe like fried rice or something like i just kind of
00:38:10 i mean did we freeze yesterday's dinner do we haven't freeze frozen yesterday's but i'm not
00:38:15 going to just serve leftovers like to guess yeah you're right you're right yeah so we need to do
00:38:19 something new and cool and so i might take out some of our our batch prepped cool cool dishes
00:38:25 and zhuzh them off whatever you want rendang is something steve would minka would probably like
00:38:32 and that would require a new like coinage of of meat which i do not have no i mean we have one
00:38:40 frozen oh we might actually yeah yeah yeah yeah rendang over rice with roasted brussels sprouts
00:38:48 aside yeah okay i'll check with them i'll give them some options after seeing what i've batch
00:38:56 prepped and then go for it from there okay so anyway the the obvious like what i would think
00:39:04 initially is how inexpensive can i get them at scale right but the reality is is that the
00:39:10 inexpensive path is either you're just retrofitting existing drones which we're already
00:39:17 seeing people do pretty competently in environments like, you know, Iran was doing this pretty well,
00:39:24 was just like the lobbed systems, you know, you're getting this out of Russia. So then the 0.92
00:39:28 question would be, if I was going to build something, how would I make it meaningfully
00:39:33 differentiated from the other systems that are out there right now? And the way I would make it
00:39:39 meaningfully different is twofold. First, one of the big problems you have with the drone systems
00:39:47 out there right now is they've gotten pretty good at the ones that are designed at taking out tanks,
00:39:51 right? To the point where it doesn't even make sense to field tanks in the way that you
00:39:56 traditionally would have been fielding tanks in a war. And so that means you have much more
00:40:00 personnel movement and much more individual drone movement. So like small things where like just
00:40:05 lobbing an explosive isn't necessarily as useful now the idea of like the gun drone these do
00:40:12 exist right but the core problem with them is kickback right you you have a flying thing
00:40:20 minor difficulty yeah right minor difficulty and two all of the systems that are made to prevent
00:40:27 the sort of lobbed drones the explosive drones are also good at these right so if you're in
00:40:32 ukraine and you're trying to like find a path through the russians basically you're trying to
00:40:36 find like invisible corridors that don't have drone blocking setups around them that sort of
00:40:43 block where the drones are going right yeah okay so you got two problems right one is a good
00:40:50 kickback the second is the drone defense is it blocks radio signals so how can you get around
00:40:57 both of these problems yeah okay so problem number one is what if you had a drone that was
00:41:05 actually while it could fly its predominant strategy in terms of like the way it moves and
00:41:14 does it thing is landing and locking into ground for something like a more sniper rifle type
00:41:22 approach where it's it's got a a a weapon on it that isn't designed to fire it's a mobile firing
00:41:30 turret a mobile firing turret but then secondly that it had a a wheel based system as well so it
00:41:39 would be really designed to camouflage itself like the idea is is it gets itself in position
00:41:44 and it can stay there for a long time basically completely quiet to an enemy so they can reposition
00:41:50 there so like suppose you're losing ground in a territory or something like that you could just
00:41:55 leave these out the enemy moves their anti-air defense to the other side of them and you can
00:42:01 reactivate them and the important thing about the wheel system on them as well is the wheel system
00:42:08 plus an ai navigation system would be really good for when they're blocked it basically allows them
00:42:15 to drive through blocked territory
00:42:18 until it gets to a space
00:42:19 where you can reestablish radio connection
00:42:22 and then fly it into a place
00:42:25 where you would want to fly it into
00:42:26 to lock it into place.
00:42:28 Oh, Wally, the choots and flies.
00:42:30 Yeah, so the idea is it's a rethinking
00:42:33 of the way that a drone would work
00:42:35 in a military context.
00:42:37 Outside of these very simplistic ones
00:42:39 to basically one that's built around
00:42:41 camouflage, sniping,
00:42:43 and moving through AI drone detection systems.
00:42:46 And the idea is that if you could get it good enough
00:42:49 at long distance aim,
00:42:51 which I think you could with an automated system pretty well,
00:42:54 given what we have with things,
00:42:56 you wouldn't need to worry as much about counter drone systems
00:42:59 because it would be very difficult to detect.
00:43:04 Is the idea.
00:43:07 But we'll see.
00:43:09 One of the challenges of it would be uneven terrain.
00:43:13 so you probably need some sort of like but if you do take treads it's gonna be too heavy yeah
00:43:20 you could probably do some form of like a hovercraft
00:43:23 utilizing the same fans that are used to fly it to pump air out the bottom
00:43:32 i don't know i would look at kids toys really as a base because they're well that's why i was
00:43:37 thinking hovercraft because i had some hovercraft toys as a kid and they're really not that hard to
00:43:42 create you just need to create a suction padding at the bottom almost like a styrofoam which can
00:43:47 be very lightweight and inexpensive and then you blow up here and terrain what can hovercraft travel
00:43:55 on any very rough i mean that's the point of hovercrafts often i'm not i'm really not familiar
00:44:00 with hovercraft so basically you're just making it fly but at very low altitude yeah it was less
00:44:07 power yeah interesting obviously the challenge then is is is re-powering it how do you handle that
00:44:13 i need to think through anyway fun fun concept here
00:44:28 what would you like for dinner titan
00:44:29 We don't have any big pizza, but we can make macaroni and cheese.
00:44:36 No, we cannot.