Based Camp - November 09, 2023


The Two Enemies of Pronatalism

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Techno-Feudalism & the Post-Collapse Network Empire What's Going to Happen to East Asia as Civilization Begins to Collapse?

Episode Stats


Length

33 minutes

Words per minute

178.88

Word count

6,044

Sentence count

370

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

30

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, we discuss the two enemies of pronatalism: the urban monoculture and the "urban cult" and how to deal with them. This episode is a bit of a follow-up to the previous one, but it's also a standalone episode, so you can watch both in either order.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 One, increases fertility on its own, like xenophobia increases fertility on its own.
00:00:04.280 But in addition to that, it also lowers the economic potential of a group, further increasing
00:00:09.340 its fertility in that direction, which means you're getting this cluster of strategies,
00:00:14.520 low economic output, high xenophobia, high technophobia, which cluster together into
00:00:21.380 one branch of winning cultural strategies, which by far today is the cultural strategy
00:00:27.840 which is out-competing all others in terms of fertility.
00:00:30.240 A lot of them believe that at the end of the day, there's just going to be one religion,
00:00:34.780 one culture in the world.
00:00:35.780 That's it.
00:00:36.380 There can only be one.
00:00:37.960 As we say, they are highlandering it.
00:00:40.540 And so essentially, the true enemy of the pronatalist cause, not the immediate enemy, the urban monoculture,
00:00:49.840 which is serving as a very simplistic villain for us right now, a villain on easy mode that
00:00:56.120 is meant to prepare us for the true danger which comes after us, which it is to a large
00:01:01.880 extent protecting us from, which is a world full of technophobic, aggressive, ultra-religious 0.99
00:01:10.220 extremists that want everyone who's not them dead.
00:01:14.880 Would you like to know more?
00:01:17.160 Hello, Simone! 1.00
00:01:19.500 Hi, gorgeous.
00:01:20.580 Too much energy?
00:01:21.860 Never.
00:01:22.280 So this episode is going to be a bit of a follow-up from the last episode, but it's
00:01:28.820 also going to be a standalone, so you can watch these likely in either order.
00:01:33.440 And they're going to touch related to, but divergent concepts.
00:01:38.060 And you'll include a link to the first one in case people want in the description?
00:01:41.940 Yeah, I could actually do the thing in YouTube where I, like, tag the first one.
00:01:45.560 Do that, you young technophilic person.
00:01:49.600 There's a little button here.
00:01:50.560 Right here.
00:01:51.260 This is where it appears.
00:01:52.420 And you push the button, and it will, like, open a thing where you can then click and,
00:01:56.360 like, open it in a different tab to watch after you're done with this one.
00:01:59.680 Okay?
00:02:00.300 Great.
00:02:03.020 So with this episode, what we are going to discuss is the two enemies of pronatalism.
00:02:09.780 So let's talk about sort of what pronatalism is more broadly.
00:02:14.340 It is a movement dedicated to ensuring the preservation of a pluralistic and diverse human
00:02:22.680 species.
00:02:24.360 And people would be like, well, why that?
00:02:26.320 Why not just, like, increasing birth rates?
00:02:28.440 Because if we do nothing, what's going to happen is we're going to have a crash in human
00:02:34.360 fertility rates.
00:02:35.020 We're going to have a crash in the world's economy.
00:02:36.600 Both of which are things that are still going to happen if we do something.
00:02:39.920 But a few groups will come to power and basically erase everyone else.
00:02:45.480 That's what it looks like is the path that we're going on.
00:02:48.240 We're going on sort of a monoculture of a species where, like, one or two or maybe three,
00:02:53.660 if we're lucky, if our group just completely fails, cultural and ethnic groups will be the 1.00
00:02:59.240 only things left of our species and they will wipe out the rest.
00:03:03.140 And that is absolutely terrifying to us because I think that one of our greatest strengths is
00:03:09.380 our diversity.
00:03:10.300 And I also think that in this unengaged world, the groups that end up wiping out most of the
00:03:16.340 other groups are going to be quite technophobic, i.e.
00:03:19.060 we are moving back to a dark ages of extremist religious tribalism.
00:03:25.460 Yep.
00:03:25.620 And that is not great, not great at all.
00:03:30.120 And so what we are trying to do is build an alliance of the individuals that are high
00:03:36.220 fertility and do want to exist in the future and the cultural groups that are high fertility
00:03:42.460 and do want to exist in the future.
00:03:44.140 And this alliance means something.
00:03:46.400 If you are a culture that is high fertility, sort of axiomatically, you differentiate significantly
00:03:52.220 from the dominant culture in our society right now.
00:03:54.700 It is a very low fertility cultural group.
00:03:57.800 This is what we call the cult or the urban monoculture or the virus, whatever you want
00:04:01.120 to call it.
00:04:01.880 It is this large culture that exists in pretty much every major city in the world today.
00:04:08.620 And when we say that, what I mean is if I look at the culture in London versus New York
00:04:17.600 versus Boston, they're all going to be much more similar to each other.
00:04:20.760 Or Paris, more similar to each other than they are to just like, I go a few hours to like
00:04:25.180 the Amish or like the Hasidic population or something like that.
00:04:28.340 These high fertility populations almost definitionally need to differentiate.
00:04:34.000 And our culture, the culture, our family practice, it differentiates a lot from the urban monoculture.
00:04:37.460 And what this means is that the first enemy that the pronatalist movement is facing is this urban monoculture.
00:04:48.380 And that is because the urban monoculture, being very low fertility, can only replenish its ranks by converting 0.99
00:04:55.940 the children of nearby demographically healthy cultural groups.
00:04:59.680 And those are becoming increasingly rare.
00:05:01.680 So it is becoming increasingly aggressive in these convergent policies.
00:05:07.100 And these convergent policies are a danger to every single high fertility cultural group,
00:05:14.660 because those groups, you know, almost the more high fertility they are, the more they
00:05:18.720 differentiate from the cultural group.
00:05:20.060 And the more they are producing something of value to that cultural group, which it wishes
00:05:23.920 to mine in a way that destroys.
00:05:26.760 I mean, we often liken it to cultural genocide, but it's not really traditional cultural genocide.
00:05:32.700 Yes, it is driven by a hatred and dehumanization of these cultural groups.
00:05:37.900 You know, they see them as deplorable and savages, as most people do in committing cultural genocide.
00:05:42.140 But it's also a necessary genocide.
00:05:45.100 It is a parasitic by design cultural group that cannot survive without cannibalizing its neighbors. 1.00
00:05:56.600 And so you can almost think of it like, you know, it's not that we hate this cultural group, right? 0.57
00:06:04.200 But if you're going to save the fly, you kill the spider.
00:06:07.460 If you save the flies without killing the spider, eventually the spider dies anyway, you know?
00:06:14.240 And so all of us, all of the perinatalist communities are banding together right now to defend ourselves
00:06:23.160 against this one cultural group.
00:06:24.580 And we frame it very much as the enemy.
00:06:27.020 The important thing to note is, one, it is the lesser of the two enemies that the perinatalist 0.77
00:06:32.860 movement is bound to face.
00:06:33.920 It is the kinder of the two enemies we are bound to face.
00:06:38.000 And it is an enemy that when it dies, and it will die, because if you look intergenerationally,
00:06:42.980 things like Amish communities, you can look at their, like, deconversion rates. 1.00
00:06:45.580 They've gone down over and over again.
00:06:47.060 Communities that live next to it are getting better and better at defending themselves.
00:06:49.820 And that's one of the reasons it's so pro-immigration right now, because the only way it can get new 0.99
00:06:52.980 children is by importing them from cultural groups that aren't quite as wary.
00:06:57.680 But even recent immigrant populations are becoming incredibly wary of it.
00:07:00.460 Like, if you look at the perinatalist movement, many people are surprised at how heavy it is
00:07:04.900 in first-generation immigrant families.
00:07:06.920 And it's like, yeah, because they are often the most perinatalist, because they are recent
00:07:11.000 immigrants from high-fertility areas, and they understand the value of their own culture,
00:07:14.380 and they want to preserve it.
00:07:15.460 And they like the idea, which is what America told them it was.
00:07:19.940 You know, when America said, come over, it goes, oh, come here, you'll get riches.
00:07:23.100 We're realistic.
00:07:24.320 You know, many different cultures exist alongside each other.
00:07:26.660 And then they get here, and they go, okay, well, now that you're here, your children are
00:07:32.720 going to have to go to a school where their history and traditions will be erased.
00:07:36.140 They will learn that they are allowed to identify however they want.
00:07:39.220 They can identify as your ancestral culture, but they are not allowed to differ in their
00:07:42.740 beliefs around sexuality, around gender, around morality, around what should be the future
00:07:47.480 of our species, on how we should relate to the environment, on the way you should interact
00:07:52.020 with other religious and cultural traditions.
00:07:54.000 And they're like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
00:07:55.600 I came here because I heard that we could, like, be different and all work together while
00:08:00.040 maintaining our differences.
00:08:02.040 And then they look at the peronatalist movement, and they're like, oh, you guys are what America
00:08:05.740 was telling everyone it was.
00:08:07.640 Yeah, let's join that thing. 0.98
00:08:09.660 That thing looks like what I signed up for. 0.61
00:08:13.300 So anyway, to the point here, this enemy is, to some extent, witless.
00:08:19.320 When it takes over an organization or a community, it typically makes it very ineffective.
00:08:23.380 We can look at the large companies that have been infected by it.
00:08:26.780 One of the things we've pointed out on this show is that once a community adapts racist
00:08:33.020 belief systems, economically, it tends to undercompete its neighbors and undercompete what it did
00:08:39.240 historically.
00:08:40.340 And this is seen in the virus or the cult communities.
00:08:45.940 Wokeism, and what they call anti-racism, it just labels everything the exact opposite of
00:08:51.040 what it is, is, like, one of the most racist widespread philosophies in the world today.
00:08:57.500 And we will see what we always see with racist communities, which is a collapse economically
00:09:02.300 of the individuals who hold it.
00:09:03.500 When people say, go woke, get broke, what they are saying is that when you become racist,
00:09:08.760 you end up economically undercompeting your neighbors, whose minds are not blinded by this
00:09:16.520 sort of systemic elitism and prejudice against this specific cultural group.
00:09:22.200 Right.
00:09:23.140 Anyway, so, but who is the other enemy?
00:09:26.360 What is the real enemy that we are terrified of?
00:09:29.360 The real enemy we are terrified of comes from the fact that the two dominant cultural strategies
00:09:35.560 right now for high fertility are disengaging with the economy, either preventing your members
00:09:41.860 from working or doing something that lowers the economic potential, like preventing them
00:09:47.540 from getting a traditional education.
00:09:49.580 And anything that decreases an individual's economic potential is going to increase the
00:09:53.760 fertility of a community.
00:09:55.260 The other thing is to increase restrictions on how your community engages with technology.
00:09:59.540 The more your community disengages with technology, the higher fertility.
00:10:02.280 And this is true within communities.
00:10:03.300 So you look at like Amish or Mennonite or the general Anabaptist sphere of communities,
00:10:07.440 the ones that are the most disengaging of technology are the highest fertility rates. 0.85
00:10:11.820 And the ones that are the most using of technology of fertility rates that are about the same as
00:10:15.600 the English, i.e. people who are not Anabaptists.
00:10:17.840 And this matters because it means that anyone who is trying even a lightened form of one of
00:10:22.600 these cultural strategies, the iterations of their movement that try the most extreme forms
00:10:27.080 of these cultural strategies will out-compete the lighter forms of these cultural strategies.
00:10:30.740 Unless the lighter forms of these cultural strategies maintain complete cultural isolation from the
00:10:36.180 more extreme forms of these strategies, which is unlikely because typically the groups practicing
00:10:39.960 the lighter forms of these strategies are these softer cultural groups.
00:10:43.900 This requires some unpacking.
00:10:45.320 Do you want to explain what I just said, Simone?
00:10:46.880 Repeat your statement just so I make sure I talk about the right circle of things.
00:10:53.240 Okay.
00:10:54.520 What I was saying was, is that incrementally, any collection of groups, like related family
00:11:02.780 of cultures that increases its fertility rate or protects its fertility rate by disengaging
00:11:09.040 with technology or economically crippling its own members, the iterations of that culture
00:11:14.540 that do that more extremely, fertility-wise, out-compete the ones that do it less extremely.
00:11:19.980 Right, right.
00:11:20.560 The problem being is that you could have some intergenerationally stable, yes, lower fertility,
00:11:28.040 but still isolated, less extreme version of one of these.
00:11:31.520 The problem being is that the less extreme versions are often soft in cultures, which means that
00:11:36.440 they either bleed out into the main culture or bleed into the more extreme versions.
00:11:42.540 You said it really well, do you?
00:11:44.140 Okay, I guess I don't need to ask.
00:11:45.620 I just want to get you more engaged so people don't feel like I'm not giving you a chance
00:11:49.200 to comment on this.
00:11:50.240 I mean, do you have any comments on what I've said so far?
00:11:52.900 No.
00:11:53.420 I mean, this is just how we see things playing out.
00:11:57.160 I can't really-
00:11:58.000 It seems really obviously true so far, I think.
00:11:59.280 Yeah.
00:11:59.520 I mean, especially given the data that we've seen, both in terms of who we know is still experiencing
00:12:05.740 high birth rates now, and plus who we've seen in the history of the human race having
00:12:10.760 high birth rates in the past.
00:12:11.940 It checks out.
00:12:12.860 The other thing we've seen is a cultural strategy and likely even a genetic strategy
00:12:16.640 because this does have a genetic link, which is the far-right authoritarian personality
00:12:20.240 cluster, which has nothing to do with right-leaning politics.
00:12:23.320 It's found in left-leaning individuals as well.
00:12:24.880 It's what you would see in an Antifa member or something like that.
00:12:26.940 It just means an extreme tendency to dehumanize people who aren't in your cultural group and
00:12:31.960 an extreme tendency to prefer extremist hierarchical structures.
00:12:36.540 So this strategy, like xenophobia basically, is a winning cultural strategy. 0.93
00:12:40.500 That is the one thing I will say for it.
00:12:41.880 It does increase fertility rates.
00:12:43.940 And it's not necessarily like crazy evil xenophobia.
00:12:49.060 We've noticed that in more diverse nations, birth rates seem to be higher than in really homogenous
00:12:55.080 nations.
00:12:56.200 And these aren't diverse nations that necessarily have huge levels of intergroup, either culturally
00:13:01.640 or ethnic antagonism.
00:13:03.160 However, there could be some xenophobia that motivates groups to kind of subconsciously feel
00:13:08.960 really excited about kind of representing themselves more.
00:13:11.660 Like maybe there's something that kicks in when you feel like you're surrounded by others
00:13:14.940 that makes you want to grow your own community.
00:13:18.160 That is likely true.
00:13:19.360 However, and I would ask you to just search your brain to see if you can think of any
00:13:22.800 counterexamples to this.
00:13:23.820 Outside of East Asian cultures, they are unique and they have different practices.
00:13:29.840 The more xenophobic a cultural group is, the higher their fertility rates.
00:13:33.420 Yeah.
00:13:33.620 I mean, it seems that way.
00:13:35.480 Okay.
00:13:35.860 So I'm talking about even extreme xenophobia.
00:13:38.200 So if you're talking about extremely xenophobic cultures, they're extremely high fertility.
00:13:42.300 Yeah.
00:13:43.300 Okay.
00:13:44.260 So that means it's a winning, like it will increase in the future, right?
00:13:48.800 Yeah.
00:13:48.960 For obvious reasons, you know.
00:13:50.420 As we've mentioned again and again, it also lowers the economic potential of a community.
00:13:55.500 Was that in the last one?
00:13:57.080 Anyway, the point being is that in many ways, the reason why, so racism, one, increases fertility
00:14:03.800 on its own.
00:14:04.840 Like xenophobia increases fertility on its own.
00:14:07.060 But in addition to that, it also lowers the economic potential of a group, further increasing
00:14:11.860 its fertility in that direction, which means you're getting this cluster of strategies,
00:14:17.840 low economic output, high xenophobia, high technophobia, which cluster together into like
00:14:25.440 one branch of winning cultural strategies, which by far today is the cultural strategy,
00:14:31.660 which is outcompeting all others in terms of fertility. 0.98
00:14:34.060 And I would say that this is accurate.
00:14:37.140 This seems accurate on average, but actually like when I think about Japan, for example,
00:14:42.020 it is...
00:14:42.460 I said, except for East Asian. 0.99
00:14:44.000 East Asian.
00:14:44.520 Oh, thank you.
00:14:45.200 Okay.
00:14:45.440 Yeah.
00:14:45.660 With that big exception.
00:14:46.720 We're going to talk about East Asian cultures in a separate video because a totally different
00:14:50.720 thing is going to happen over there.
00:14:52.160 Okay.
00:14:52.200 Yeah.
00:14:52.420 We just don't need to talk about it right now.
00:14:53.920 Okay.
00:14:54.860 It's going to be equally interesting and a bit harder for us to predict, but most of us have
00:14:59.220 lived in East Asian countries.
00:15:00.260 So we're going to be, I guess, better at predicting it than other people might be.
00:15:04.840 So what this means, and a lot of people look at this and they go, oh, all of this is code
00:15:11.580 for Muslims.
00:15:15.760 They're talking about Muslims.
00:15:17.280 And no, there are Jewish groups and there are Christian groups and there are even Buddhist 0.98
00:15:23.800 groups that are highly xenophobic and technophobic and murdery. 0.96
00:15:29.860 I guess I'd call them.
00:15:30.620 And that's another thing about this cultural cluster is they have a practice which makes
00:15:36.140 them axiomatically impossible to ever integrate with the pronatalist agenda, which is that they
00:15:43.280 believe often, this is very common within these cultural traditions, but it's not true
00:15:48.260 amongst all of them.
00:15:48.900 Like it's not true amongst the Amish, which would be very good allies to the pronatalist 0.98
00:15:52.260 movement, which we can talk about later.
00:15:53.620 But a lot of them believe that at the end of the day, there's just going to be one religion,
00:15:58.620 often one ethnicity and one culture in the world.
00:16:01.840 And some of them will just say one religion, one culture in the world.
00:16:04.460 That's it.
00:16:05.060 There can only be one.
00:16:06.640 As we say, they are Highlandering it. 0.85
00:16:09.260 So in the short term, they work as allies with us because we have the same enemy, which
00:16:15.080 is the urban monoculture.
00:16:16.220 But in the long term, they will be at odds with us and all of the other, we would call 1.00
00:16:23.280 them symbiotic cultural groups, which do not believe it is their job to wipe out all
00:16:26.720 other cultures in the world.
00:16:28.120 And there are various levels of potential allegiance.
00:16:32.140 There are some cultures which say they eventually want to wipe out all other cultures in the world,
00:16:36.740 but they just don't ever seem to act on it or they don't seem to be able to motivate
00:16:40.720 action on it anymore.
00:16:42.700 And so they are safe-ish to work with in the short term.
00:16:47.680 There are cultures that will say, okay, but we can work with other groups because we are
00:16:58.140 such a minority right now and we will only become dangerous when we become the majority.
00:17:02.980 And so you need to keep an eye on those groups.
00:17:05.260 But again, this isn't a one religious thing.
00:17:07.220 You know, there are examples of Buddhist cultures, Jewish cultures, Christian cultures, Muslim cultures
00:17:11.900 that fall into this category.
00:17:12.900 And there are iterations of all of those traditions which are able to be genuinely pluralistic
00:17:18.060 or at least sort of detente pluralistic, meaning that-
00:17:21.360 Right, right.
00:17:22.180 Yeah.
00:17:22.980 For now.
00:17:24.340 And this is important because a lot of people, they're not aware.
00:17:26.400 Like they don't know about like the really bloody like Buddhist revolts in places like 1.00
00:17:31.800 Sri Lanka and stuff like that.
00:17:33.160 And like, they don't know, you know, if you look at the prenatalist movement, we actually
00:17:36.600 have a lot, not a lot, but I'd say a number of Muslim cultural groups that are allied with
00:17:42.400 the movement.
00:17:42.880 Most of them are African immigrant populations that are not, and you might ask, well, why 0.85
00:17:47.560 are they not as, because they have sort of more of a, I guess I call it a tribalistic
00:17:53.760 mindset that is okay with intergenerational alliances with people who are different from
00:17:57.920 them, which is not true, which of some other Muslim cultural groups, which are just, you 0.91
00:18:05.620 know, like, like some Christian cultural groups, there can only be one.
00:18:08.420 And, and one of the interesting things when we talk about the two enemies is some Christian 1.00
00:18:13.380 cultural groups think that they're signaling, I especially see this with some groups of,
00:18:17.920 of tradcasts and stuff like that, how like cool they are by saying there can only be
00:18:22.600 one to like other pro natalists in like a multicultural pro natalist environment, like
00:18:27.800 they'll, they'll be going to like the natalist conference that we're going to.
00:18:30.400 And it's like, look, this is a conference being put together by Mormon separatists, the Desnat 0.70
00:18:36.620 Mormons are the people who are putting it together.
00:18:38.420 And we are, you know, technophilic, like secular Calvinists.
00:18:42.980 You were saying to the two people who are like the most dominant individuals within this 0.99
00:18:48.180 cultural context, we plan to kill you one day. 1.00
00:18:50.660 Hey, let's come together and all work out or deconvert your children or, you know, whatever 0.99
00:18:56.800 these individuals are, obviously you're like that individual in a D and D group that is
00:19:02.240 all aligned good.
00:19:03.140 And you're like the one aligned evil person.
00:19:05.160 And they're like, obviously working with you in the short run, but in the long run, you
00:19:09.000 are very obviously a threat and they are aware of that. 0.89
00:19:12.020 And they are planning for that, which is, you know, I, I, I thank God that they are so witless
00:19:17.520 right now.
00:19:18.000 I suspect that some of the individuals who claim to be interested in multicultural pluralism
00:19:24.060 are just smarter iterations of them that know to not loudly broadcast it all the time and
00:19:29.800 only talk about it privately behind closed doors.
00:19:32.640 And at the very least I can appreciate their shrewdness.
00:19:35.980 I don't know.
00:19:36.260 To me, there's something very gentlemanly about it.
00:19:38.540 Like, it reminds me of some, you know, historical action novels where, you know, you have two
00:19:44.600 enemies who respect each other as rivals that are like, well, I'm going to try to destroy
00:19:49.540 you, but I, you know, I admire your form.
00:19:51.480 And, you know, like for a moment they may come together to fight some impediment to their
00:19:55.600 larger shared battle.
00:19:57.660 I don't know.
00:19:58.100 So I, you can also look at it in a more.
00:20:00.160 Yeah.
00:20:00.800 Well, and I think where this question is going to become more interesting to us is what happens
00:20:04.500 when one of these dominating cultural groups is also attempting a technophilic strategy.
00:20:10.520 Right.
00:20:11.240 Currently, none of them are.
00:20:12.400 Not a single one of them is a technophilic.
00:20:13.700 Oh, yeah, right.
00:20:14.520 I mean, we'd hardly be dominant, but we are very technophilic.
00:20:17.880 But yeah, we're not dominating, but we're technophilic.
00:20:19.820 If you look at the other technophilic cultural groups, they typically are not dominating as
00:20:24.840 cultural strategies.
00:20:25.960 Well, I mean, you, the, the, the cult, essentially the, the woke virus riddled cult that runs society
00:20:31.820 now is both dominating and technophilic, but because it's low fertility.
00:20:35.600 Yeah, it is both dominating and technophilic.
00:20:36.960 That is a good point.
00:20:37.920 It is an example of a dominating technophilic cultural group.
00:20:40.340 And the only reason we don't take it very seriously is we, we understand that most other
00:20:44.620 cultures that it uses to get fodder, to get human capital will eventually become resistant
00:20:50.000 to it.
00:20:50.480 So we don't think it has long-term potential.
00:20:52.960 Yeah.
00:20:53.100 And so essentially the true enemy of the pronatalist cause, not the immediate enemy, which is the
00:21:02.240 urban monoculture, which we sort of see like the God Emperor of Dune, the, the threat that
00:21:07.980 brings us all together.
00:21:09.300 Or if you've seen Code Geass, the emperor that, that acts fascist at the end to bring everyone
00:21:15.080 together of different, different cultural groups to finally put aside their, their differences
00:21:19.920 is that they can intergenerationally work together.
00:21:23.460 That is what it is serving us.
00:21:25.240 It is serving as a very simplistic villain for us right now, a villain on easy mode that
00:21:31.600 is meant to prepare us for the true danger, which comes after us, which it is to a large
00:21:37.360 extent protecting us from, which is a world full of technophobic, aggressive, ultra religious 1.00
00:21:45.620 extremists that want everyone who's not them dead.
00:21:49.920 And in the other video, similar to this, we talked about sort of a network of haven states.
00:21:55.880 These are small technophilic cultural groups, which are communicating with each other, trading
00:22:01.080 with each other, and that work together and that respect their, their cultural differences
00:22:05.280 and are working to bring back civilization after we enter this next dark age.
00:22:09.900 And that is sort of the, now we can try to predict what that network is going to look
00:22:16.320 like, who are going to be the important players in it, but it's difficult right now.
00:22:21.820 If I, as an outsider was going to say, who is obviously going to be the biggest player
00:22:25.640 in it, Israel, Israel is just obviously going to be the bigger Israel, maybe some of the
00:22:30.640 transhumanist Mormons. 0.70
00:22:32.700 That's more speculative.
00:22:33.760 And even Israel speculative.
00:22:35.120 So Israel would be, and that it is already a city. 0.55
00:22:39.300 It's already technophilic.
00:22:40.140 It's already happening.
00:22:40.680 Well, I guess, but the highest growing populations within Israel are not technophilic, right?
00:22:44.840 They're technophobic populations.
00:22:45.920 So that's the problem.
00:22:47.020 Yeah.
00:22:47.520 And so Israel might be, if it can develop a technophilic iteration of the traditions, 0.86
00:22:56.900 which are growing really quickly within it.
00:22:58.900 And I believe it can, and I believe the key to doing that is going to be a variety group
00:23:04.940 that embrace genetic selection technology.
00:23:08.140 I think that's really going to be the thing that throws some of them over the edge, but
00:23:12.620 it's difficult.
00:23:14.760 And you can look at our video on, we have a video where we explain Jewish sort of cultural
00:23:19.500 evolution.
00:23:20.460 It's very different than other cultural groups.
00:23:22.340 It's very bottom up, i.e., well, it's better than the video that we talk about it.
00:23:27.140 And I don't want to go deep into it in this one.
00:23:28.900 So it's possible that something evolves, but it won't look exactly like any of the dominant
00:23:34.180 cultural traditions within Israel right now.
00:23:36.800 Right.
00:23:36.920 But I do think it is the biggest likelihood to be sort of the beating heart of the nexus
00:23:41.920 of haven states.
00:23:43.060 Yeah.
00:23:43.420 It could fall.
00:23:44.080 It could fall to technophobic extremists just as much as anyone else.
00:23:48.640 Yeah.
00:23:48.840 But to your point, if a variety group did get super technophilic, at least when it came
00:23:53.980 to reprotech, they would clean up.
00:23:56.700 I mean.
00:23:57.000 Yeah.
00:23:57.960 And they're already, as a sort of center for haven states, have the industrial capability
00:24:03.880 to produce advanced weaponry, which will be one of the things that is most necessary
00:24:09.360 among the other haven states.
00:24:11.600 Right.
00:24:12.900 Things like Iron Dome technology and stuff like that would be very, very relevant wherever
00:24:17.380 you are, whichever haven state you're in.
00:24:19.540 So it would already, like it's already culturally specializing in the types of exports that are
00:24:27.180 most relevant in this future that we're heading into, which a lot of people are like, oh, why
00:24:32.880 do you guys simp for Jewish cultural groups so much on your show?
00:24:36.660 It's not just because like we think they're doing the right thing. 1.00
00:24:39.560 It's because we would be stupid. 0.99
00:24:41.260 And anyone who is sort of declaring war on them right now in their, in their, what's 1.00
00:24:47.740 the word I'm looking for? 1.00
00:24:48.900 In their broadcasts is just being incredibly stupid because then who, who do you ally with 0.98
00:24:55.920 in the future? 1.00
00:24:57.360 You know?
00:24:57.840 Who are you going to buy your tech from?
00:24:59.040 Who are you going to turn to for protection and solutions?
00:25:02.180 Yeah.
00:25:03.460 Now what could happen, and this is actually really possible is some of the Muslim cultural 0.99
00:25:08.900 groups that have a ton of money right now could set themselves up like the UAE or Saudi
00:25:15.440 Arabia.
00:25:16.320 And they are very intentional and very specific about how they do this as technophilic elite
00:25:22.480 organizations that oversee a non, a larger non-technophilic population that could happen.
00:25:29.620 And those could become really useful groups to buy technology from.
00:25:34.740 I could see that happening, but they have to play their cards very, very intelligently.
00:25:39.140 And in truth of all of the Muslim populations, those are the least directly anti-Semitic, the 1.00
00:25:47.000 high technology ones, like the ones in the UAE or the ones in Qatar or the ones in Saudi
00:25:52.200 Arabia.
00:25:53.060 So even then, you know, you're likely not really shooting yourself in the foot by allying with
00:25:58.420 Jewish cultural groups in this, this future.
00:26:01.120 Right.
00:26:01.580 Well, but I also, I don't think people are expressing anti-Semitic views because they,
00:26:09.060 you know, don't expect to ally with, no one's thinking long-term like this.
00:26:14.460 They're just being reactionary.
00:26:16.100 So it doesn't even matter.
00:26:17.060 I mean, it's not like they're like, oh, well, the Saudis are going to be the ones I'm going 1.00
00:26:20.060 to need to partner with in the long-term future.
00:26:22.280 No one thinks in the long-term future.
00:26:23.700 You're like one of the few things, like people in the, in the world who's thinking about
00:26:27.280 this stuff.
00:26:28.160 Well, I'm trying to think other cultural groups.
00:26:29.420 As you said, I think the Mormons, I do not think the Mormon transhumanists will be a 1.00
00:26:32.560 relevant group.
00:26:33.020 I think the Mormon separatists would be a relevant group.
00:26:35.360 Oh, I think they both have potential.
00:26:38.800 Yeah, but Desnats for sure.
00:26:39.900 Desnats for sure.
00:26:41.040 They have potential.
00:26:41.760 Not necessarily, but they have potential.
00:26:43.420 Well, I mean, here's the thing though.
00:26:44.420 So like the whole point of why I think desert nationalists have a lot of potential is they 0.99
00:26:49.700 represent an attempt to return to hard Mormon religion.
00:26:54.480 And basically, you know, if you're going to look at hard versus soft, hard is going to
00:26:58.980 be more pronatalist.
00:27:00.500 It's going to last longer.
00:27:01.880 It's going to stay more disciplined.
00:27:03.060 It's going to be less subject to the harms of soft culture.
00:27:08.460 That's to say like failing mental health, failing physical health, et cetera.
00:27:11.640 So like, I don't know, it seems pretty straightforward to me unless they go off the rails with a bunch
00:27:15.700 of weird stuff and go soft in their own way.
00:27:17.840 Well, yeah, I know.
00:27:19.280 And I think that the tradcasts are also likely, there is some iteration of tradcasts that will
00:27:24.240 stay intergenerationally like alliable with, but of all the cultural groups, they are the
00:27:30.580 one to most likely go around and being like, we plan to kill all our allies one day.
00:27:35.400 And it's like, maybe stop saying that.
00:27:38.420 Even if you believe it, you probably want to be at least, I guess I'm just, I like that
00:27:43.700 you see it as like a gentlemanly thing, but yeah, it's, it's not a, a great long-term
00:27:48.500 strategy, but there are iterations of that movement because of all the movements is one
00:27:52.200 of the most likely to be intergenerationally a liable with.
00:27:55.520 And then there's other cultural groups that just like, I guess the, like theologically
00:27:59.900 and culturally seem like they should be dominating cultural groups.
00:28:02.920 It just aren't like we recently got back from being around British individuals and they 1.00
00:28:07.420 are very clearly, I think a Hindi cultural group is definitely going to be one of the major
00:28:12.180 players in the future.
00:28:13.600 They are dominating or not dominating.
00:28:16.700 Yeah.
00:28:17.080 They, they are a non-dominating, very likely to take technophilic strategies, higher fertility
00:28:22.580 than most other technophilic cultural groups.
00:28:25.760 Now they are lower fertility than groups that take technophobic strategies.
00:28:30.060 That is true.
00:28:30.920 But among the technophilic cultural groups, they're one of the highest fertility and they
00:28:35.440 are a very good group to signal alliances with.
00:28:38.960 Yeah.
00:28:39.480 So I'm trying to think what other groups do I know?
00:28:42.900 I guess the next thing to talk about is what ends up happening to East Asia.
00:28:45.880 Well, yeah.
00:28:46.360 I mean, I would, I would wonder if there, like when I was in Japan, there were some cult.
00:28:52.080 We're going to do a different video in East Asia.
00:28:54.660 To talk about the technophilic.
00:28:56.780 Like what happens during the collapse cycle in East Asia.
00:29:00.140 Okay.
00:29:00.860 Because it's not worth talking about in this, this video, but yeah, so this is what the
00:29:05.560 pronatalist movement is really all about.
00:29:07.420 It is about taking this period of safety to build intercommunity and intercultural connections
00:29:14.240 in ways of working with each other to protect our descendants from the, basically the religious 1.00
00:29:26.480 extremists who want to kill them all. 0.89
00:29:28.720 The xenophobic, technophobic, economically unproductive religious extremists who will make up the majority 1.00
00:29:37.120 of the future world's population.
00:29:39.200 And they won't be from any one religious group.
00:29:41.500 They will be from all cultural groups.
00:29:43.820 There will be factions of them from all cultural groups because it is a successful strategy,
00:29:47.600 no matter what cultural group you're from.
00:29:49.280 And there are potentials for technophilic strategies, no matter what cultural group you're from.
00:29:53.320 And it is worth it for the technophilic pluralistic groups to ally together to attempt to preserve
00:30:00.040 what we think of as sort of pluralistic human civilization.
00:30:03.860 What are your thoughts, Simone?
00:30:08.380 People probably may hear this and think that it sounds outlandish and sci-fi and weird,
00:30:15.200 but just look at how things have played out in history and look at the trends.
00:30:19.780 And we challenge you to come up with some other theory that seems more reasonable and predictive.
00:30:26.240 So just because something sounds weird and just because something sounds very, very different
00:30:30.820 doesn't mean that that's never going to happen or it's relegated to fiction.
00:30:34.720 Yeah, things have changed before.
00:30:36.560 And a lot of people think that they're like, oh, well, all of your predictions are requisite
00:30:42.460 on demographic collapse causing an economic collapse of our current economic system, but AI could save us.
00:30:47.700 And as we've mentioned before, no, AI frees the bourgeoisie from the proletariat permanently.
00:30:54.040 They don't need you anymore.
00:30:55.780 And it is not worth it for them, as we have seen in places where collapse has already started, like South Africa.
00:31:02.420 The wealthy are not like giving their money out to the masses to placate them anymore.
00:31:07.360 That made sense in a past global system where there was a large middle class.
00:31:12.820 When the middle class begins to dissolve, it is more economically efficient for the wealthy
00:31:17.320 to not pay for things like UBI, but instead put all of their money into defending their
00:31:21.980 compounds and their own way of life.
00:31:25.120 And that is going to lead to an economic collapse, even if we are dealing with, for the vast majority
00:31:31.060 of people in the world.
00:31:32.380 And I don't think that's through any lack of attempt to first try to make UBI work.
00:31:36.700 But you also have to look at how right now non-billionaires regard the philanthropic work
00:31:43.220 of billionaires.
00:31:44.880 Yes.
00:31:45.300 Whenever billionaires basically try to fix things or try to make things better, it's always
00:31:49.240 how dare you?
00:31:50.400 You're doing this wrong.
00:31:52.180 You know, the nerve of you're trying to come and intervene or, you know, affect our lives.
00:31:56.960 Basically, every time a billionaire tries to make things better, especially for people in
00:32:00.520 a more developed society, they get they get completely demonized for it.
00:32:04.800 So I think after a while, and especially when it comes to like sort of will billionaires
00:32:09.340 survive or not, surviving billionaires and billionaires who actually get more out of life
00:32:13.360 are going to be the ones who fortify their own defenses, partially because the very people
00:32:18.120 that could really benefit from their patronage are going to basically, you know, alienate
00:32:24.120 themselves from them.
00:32:25.900 Well, I also think that billionaires, there's sort of two paths for billionaires, and we've
00:32:30.200 already seen this in the one with three paths.
00:32:32.180 One is they will try to ingratiate themselves with the current cult or virus or whatever
00:32:38.340 you want to say, and they end up just getting disregarded by the public and hated.
00:32:42.140 Examples of this would be like Mark Zuckerberg or Bill Gates.
00:32:45.940 Two is they end up just indolently living their lives as wealthy as possible and sort of
00:32:51.560 gated compounds, and they won't end up mattering in the future.
00:32:53.900 And three is they, with this, they might like create compounds that matter for a generation
00:33:00.460 or two, but they're really personality cults, and these will ultimately collapse.
00:33:05.040 And then the final one is to ally themselves with an intergenerationally durable cultural
00:33:11.700 group, whether it's like ours or tradcasts or something else, and they will exist in the
00:33:15.940 future.
00:33:16.180 And I think that that is going to be the winning strategy for billionaires going forwards, is
00:33:22.080 what it was historically, which is to ally yourself with one of the religious and cultural
00:33:26.860 traditions of the world.
00:33:28.360 And obviously, if you want to have the biggest outside impact, you typically want to focus
00:33:31.460 on a very competent and small one like ours.
00:33:35.040 Yeah.
00:33:35.900 Just saying, if anyone in their world is thinking here.
00:33:39.640 Anyway, love you, Simone.
00:33:41.100 This was great.
00:33:42.100 And let's do the next one on East Asia.
00:33:44.420 What happens there?
00:33:45.320 I'm excited for that.