In this episode, Simone and I discuss religion, mysticism, monotheism, and the three faiths. We also discuss the implications of our new religious system for our family, The Three Faiths, and what it means for the future of the world.
00:02:02.600I am so excited to be here speaking with you again, Simone. This is going to be track three
00:02:07.040from sort of just like me writing things about religion and then us going over it together.
00:02:13.120Simone asking dumb questions. No, you always have great insights, but this is something,
00:02:19.060this is quite different from the other two tracks. And then I wrote it very recently,
00:02:22.340not when I wrote all the other tracks. Most of them were written over a period of like a week or
00:02:26.120something. And this was more recently, but it's sort of in response to a lot of the ideas that we've
00:02:30.820had come back to us in comments and emails since doing the first two and in video reviews of them.
00:02:37.060So I'm just going to jump right into it. I like it.
00:02:41.180Track three, the three faiths. I love watching videos, analyzing and criticizing our project to
00:02:47.820create a new religion for our family. The most common complaint is just to point out the audacity
00:02:52.360of a project like this. After all, how often is a new religious system really founded?
00:02:57.000The obvious reply to this is how often does a person really try to create a new theological
00:03:01.700structure not dedicated to self-glorification or the extraction of resources from others?
00:03:05.720Our motivation for this endeavor is to create something to protect our children
00:03:09.560in this cultural sandstorm, which is ripping the flesh from the traditional cultural systems.
00:03:15.340If we can't create a high fidelity system for intergenerational cultural transfer that
00:03:19.700synergizes with science and plurality, I am throwing my kids into the sandstorm with only
00:03:25.440borrowed rags to protect them. Our only motivation for sharing these ideas is to create enough of a
00:03:31.080community that my kids can build on this culture and improve it themselves.
00:03:34.680However, I also think that calling this a quote unquote religion is a bit of a stretch and that
00:03:40.520it's more like a new denomination similar to Lutherism or Calvinism in that we have no special connection
00:03:46.260to divine knowledge and we are just applying a new interpretation of old texts. The only odd thing
00:03:53.760about it is this denomination is applicable across Abrahamic faith systems, allowing for a Jew to hold it
00:04:00.700and stay Jewish or a Christian to hold it and stay Christian. Finally, calling it quote unquote new is also
00:04:06.700quite a stretch. The ideas we have on theology are ideas that lots of people are having right now. One of the most
00:04:13.660common comments on our track of videos is quote, this is what I have been thinking of for ages. So to say that we came up
00:04:22.700with these ideas as a bit like saying Darwin discovered evolution, when in truth, the idea of evolution was had by a collection of individuals around the same time, and was merely attributed to Darwin, because we as a society love a simple story.
00:04:36.700And here I'd note to the story. And here I'd note to the side also was the Gurren Lagann episode that we did this Wednesday, the philosophy and theology of that world is almost like exactly in line with ours so much as I could say it's canonical.
00:04:51.700So these ideas are going around all over the globe right now. In fact, to claim that these ideas are new is also an absurd claim, given that we have repeatedly pointed towards Wynwood Reed, who developed a near identical cosmological and theological system hundreds of years ago. In fact, I would go further and say that there have only ever been three faith systems in the world. And all we are doing is disentangling those systems, which have become intertwined in many of the world's major religions.
00:05:19.700I mean, the people, you know, when they watch us, they'll be like, oh, but you know, some people have tried to do this before, you know, they'll point to someone like Spadoza or Wynwood Reed himself, right? But the problem with these is, there's a group of people who tried something similar to this and failed. And these were the, I call them like secular deists that were common during the Enlightenment, or right after or before the Enlightenment. And they essentially tried to completely secularize religion, instead of and really break from the traditional religious
00:05:49.620system. But I think their problem is they did it not realizing the importance of hard culture. So it was done with the assumption that Enlightenment was just the right path. Whereas it turns out, as we can see in hindsight now, which I don't think they could have seen because they hadn't really seen a secular culture before, that when you drop hard cultural traditions, you end up not being enlightened and disciplined like they were because they grew up in hard cultures, but rather descending into
00:06:18.500super soft culture, super soft culture, and also being incredibly vulnerable to basically what you're going to say are like polytheist concepts.
00:06:26.340And this is, I mean, it's probably the closest would be something like Maimonides, in so far as he posited the idea that was early Judaism, instead of trying to completely secularize all the myths and all the things that happened to different groups, he would say, well, in the God was always trying to reveal his fullest self, but people were not particularly advanced at the time. So within early Judaism, he had to extra
00:06:47.220really anthropomorphize God for people to understand it. And now, you know, we're more sophisticated, and we can have a better understanding of God than that. And his ideas have caught on. In fact, I'd say, if you discount people who were founding, like, like actually sophisticated and useful interpretations of old scriptures, like new, new interpretations, and you discount people who were just secularizing it, like like happened during the Enlightenment, and you take out people who are doing it for personal benefit of some variety, almost every effort I can think of was actually
00:07:17.140successful. So I'd actually say the odds are kind of in our favor as somebody who really likes to study religious history, which is which is not something that a lot of people think of when when when they're thinking of this. Another thing that people will point to is what people need ritual and your system doesn't have enough ritual and you stripped all the ritual out of everything. And we do have rituals, you know, we've had a series of like holidays and stuff like that, that we've created for our family that are meant to reinforce these cultural traditions. And they're like, well, they're not old rituals. And and old rituals,
00:07:46.900well, there, you're just sort of getting this veneer of antiquity equals correctness. And we do that through Wynwood Reed through appealing to his writings, because fortunately, someone a long time ago did have a lot of these ideas. But I think that when we're talking about like, we're not out to to talk to everyone, we're not out to deconvert religious people, we are out to create a system that is useful to people who right now are atheistic or secular, but desperately, desperately want a system that they can just like plausibly really get behind.
00:08:16.040And that are otherwise really smart and mentally disciplined, and that can find ways to follow a system without tons and tons of tons of community ritual and stuff like that. So in a way, we sort of see that as testing potential people who are interested in this.
00:08:34.780I agree. And well, and I would also point out, like, we're still playtesting, you know, it's not like traditions and rituals come out of nowhere. And, and I would also point out, like, when you look at many newer, but sort of famous and old religious traditions, you know, they they had an origin, like there was, you know, a day where it was really meaningful, where something was done, and then you repeat that thing, or you you pay homage to that day that was very indicative of the values of that culture.
00:09:00.780So it's odd to think that new rituals couldn't be created. It is a natural matter, of course. And while we may not have completely solidified all of the appropriate rituals of this tradition, and while maybe many of the most famous ones will only begin 17 generations in the future, that doesn't mean that, like, we don't believe in them. I think they're not powerful.
00:09:23.380So, if you remember where I left off, I was saying that I actually think only three real face systems have ever existed. And now I am going to go further on this rather bold claim.
00:09:35.500And I just want to like highlight for listeners, I find this super interesting. And I think Malcolm is spot on here. And what's interesting to me about this. Yeah, what's interesting to me is what Malcolm is about to categorize, is not something I've heard before, because typically categorization systems go off sort of historical roots. So like, oh, these are like the Asian traditions, or these are the, you know, whatever, they're sort of grouping them in the way that you would probably group historical trends or historical movements,
00:10:02.540rather than by the function and outcome of the religion. And that is where Malcolm is focused here, which, of course, makes a lot of sense, because we're so focused on pragmatism.
00:10:18.340So the three religious systems are policyism, mysticism, monotheism. So policyism is characterized by elaborate just-so stories explaining natural phenomenon, intricate, complicated cosmologies filled with layers and interacting parts,
00:10:31.660an entire zoo of supernatural forces that often has an internal caste system and roles, divine entities that combine animal and human features, or have extra body parts that represent places slash things in our world, or that body parts do, and stories about how these entities interacted in history, divine entities that interacted with man, making deals and having conversations,
00:10:55.180include either reincarnation after death, afterlives where people fade away, or afterlives where people repeat something they did in life, lean heavily on magical thinking, like numerology and sympathetic magic.
00:11:07.760These are gods that when you look at, you can talk to, and you can have sex with.
00:11:13.040The core value of these systems is duty.
00:11:15.540Mysticism is characterized by systems that believe there to be some supernatural or ultra-natural phenomenon behind the fabric of reality, or that is the fabric of reality, which connects all things.
00:11:31.400God is essentially a sentient medium or substrate.
00:11:35.060The belief that the goal of humanity is to reconnect with this ultra-reality or thing behind the nature of reality,
00:11:41.380at this point, reality as we understand it either ends or merges with this thing.
00:11:46.180The belief that the divine can be contacted or otherwise interacted with by pushing all the thoughts from one's mind or by only thinking about it.
00:11:54.880Practices that involve actions and rituals like chanting, spinning, narcotics, taking odd poses, and sleep deprivation, which called altered states of consciousness.
00:12:04.240The belief that experiences had an altered states of consciousness contain more information about the true nature of reality.
00:12:10.060The belief that reality does not exist as we perceive it and is in part an illusion.
00:12:16.140The belief that emotional states hold some intrinsic supernatural value, e.g. God is love.
00:12:22.300And the elevation of emotional states over logic.