Based Camp - Wait—The Men's Rights Movement is WORKING？？

00:00:00.000 hello malcolm i'm so excited to be speaking with you today because we are going to talk about men

00:00:04.840 striking back that didn't come across striking back yeah well they're they're fighting for their

00:00:12.000 rights and and they're finally making progress all right men have been basically wait men's

00:00:17.060 rights is actually making progress now like that's a crazy thing is that for the past 15 years

00:00:24.480 the concept of men's rights has basically been like men being angry about the fact that they

00:00:30.780 don't have any rights i guess it this might have been how it was for like women's rights for the 1.00

00:00:34.920 longest time of like well ain't that cute you guys are so disgruntled about your lack of rights

00:00:39.980 it's never gonna change sweetie no and i love what they would always then say they'd be like

00:00:45.440 well that's actually a feminism issue don't you understand i'm like well then how come the 1.00

00:00:51.100 feminists never fight for it and they're like oh once you're in cages then we'll fight to 1.00

00:00:56.640 loosen the the what do they call that zip ties yeah i just basically i i was operating under the

00:01:04.620 assumption that nothing would ever change but things are actually starting to change and this is big

00:01:09.680 it's huge and so what we're going to do is look at two major areas where finally the dam is beginning

00:01:15.820 to break and i think momentum is only going to build from here we're going to start with

00:01:20.240 divorce laws in various united states states where by the the new default is the new default

00:01:27.800 shocking men get 50 of mature of custody in divorces which is so are you going to talk about

00:01:36.520 like what states this is happening if it's actually happening and not just like in the law

00:01:40.380 yeah okay and it's also just crazy to me that that like isn't always the default like the assumption

00:01:44.780 that like well of course each parent shares custody by default right unless there's a good reason not

00:01:50.540 to but no that wasn't the case and it's being resolved it started with kentucky now it's happened

00:01:54.880 in more states we're going to look at sort of what's going on there and then we're also going to look at

00:01:59.080 the texas heartbeat act which is this really interesting form of what you could call vigilante based

00:02:05.960 law justice which has both made it harder for groups to use like a supreme court case to take

00:02:13.760 out because it's based on individual action you'll explain more explain the law it allows it allows

00:02:22.080 men or allows anyone to to sue in relation to the we'll say wrongful termination of a baby's an unborn

00:02:32.000 baby's life after they have a heartbeat like if they didn't consent to it and if they felt that

00:02:36.980 they were damaged by it so okay so who what men can do this what men in relation to this the men who

00:02:42.980 were the fathers of the baby the fathers of the baby but i thought also like parents can can sue

00:02:49.040 sometimes no but parents can be liable friends can be liable doctors can be liable so all sorts of

00:02:54.740 people can oh yeah and then we're also going to go through some additional little wins and like

00:03:01.080 other little signs of hope that not just in these areas but in other men's rights adjacent areas we're

00:03:06.540 seeing successful pushback and momentum building and then at the end i'm going to highlight an area

00:03:11.760 of for improvement that i find to be uh important that many people in the comments of our videos have

00:03:16.760 said hey like please highlight this issue of the men's rights sphere which we'll see if you can guess

00:03:22.700 so let's get into it starting with the kentucky divorce laws and and just so you know there's a really

00:03:27.920 good wall street journal article talking about this titled divorce plunged in kentucky equal custody

00:03:33.680 for fathers is a big reason why a law setting 50 50 shared custody as the state standard was has was

00:03:40.760 hailed as a victory for fathers but critics say it puts mothers and children at risk so basically what

00:03:45.760 happened in kentucky and this is important because it happened in 2018 so we have enough time to see

00:03:50.800 what has happened since this legislation was passed but kentucky in 2018 became the first state to pass

00:03:57.380 a law making equally shared custody the default arrangement in divorces and separations and

00:04:03.680 since that happened four other states so this is arkansas west virginia florida and missouri have

00:04:10.260 passed their own versions of this this custody bill in around 20 more states keep in mind there are only 50

00:04:17.080 u.s states are considering or close to passing similar laws according to analysis by national parents

00:04:23.700 organization that is big i mean if this quickly we're already getting right so how quickly did

00:04:30.420 the first one go to passing to 20 states being considering it now well i mean it's 2025 now and

00:04:35.140 that was 2018 so like six years seven years yeah like this is pretty it's it's fast i mean from a

00:04:42.800 from a legislative standpoint it's kind of like are we seeing a changing in outcomes though like do you

00:04:48.360 see any we are oh we are and i'm also going to compare sort of this this changing outcomes to

00:04:54.180 china because we did do an episode on like china trying to reduce divorce rates and increase fertility

00:04:59.000 rates through regulatory shifts akin to this and i think you'll also find that quite interesting but

00:05:04.720 let's just start with what happened in kentucky and what's interesting is since because now in kentucky

00:05:12.240 we have enough data the divorce rate plummeted between 2016 and 2023 it fell 25 whoa so it's not

00:05:21.100 just outcomes are changing divorce rates when you make women responsible they stop getting divorces 0.86

00:05:27.960 20 reduction just because 50 50 custody law so it's 25 now that this is tempered by the fact that there

00:05:37.160 has actually been a nationwide decline in divorce of 18 so you know we're talking about a marginal

00:05:44.660 7 but that's meaningful that's huge and this is this is above and beyond men just getting equal

00:05:54.840 custody which is huge for them well it shows how many women just view divorce as a i don't have to do 0.97

00:06:01.580 anything and i get you know a check for the next 18 years right yeah because one of the things about

00:06:06.220 equal custody is i'm pretty sure it's like way harder to get a good alimony yes so yeah that it

00:06:13.400 that kind of happened actually a little bit after this legislation was passed because again men have

00:06:17.600 no rights haha it's nothing's gonna ever could change but but fortunately recently kentucky's

00:06:22.920 legislature did decide that parents who spend more time caring for their children should also pay less

00:06:28.680 child support so to be fair in these divorces men still often are saddled with child support however

00:06:37.140 at at least now the state's like oh wait a second you have 50 custody what's going on here and i've

00:06:45.460 actually seen this show up organically in like financial audit interview youtube channel shows where

00:06:53.300 mothers who are used to getting child support are complaining about this yes they're freaking out 0.99

00:07:00.720 they're like what i well what am i supposed to do get a job they're like and now my child support's gone

00:07:06.140 down because my husband is you know has 50 so this is 100 showing up like in the wild and naturally

00:07:13.020 i think that that's really for pronatalism this is something we should push much more i think forced

00:07:18.940 equal custody and forced no child support when there is equal custody because there shouldn't be

00:07:23.440 child support in equal custody cases i mean i i get i get child support in the event that a woman

00:07:29.640 like completely dropped yeah no i agree like she she went into the marriage to be a homemaker and 0.74

00:07:36.400 never had a job i get that even in equal custody but i i think that the the sort of the worst you make

00:07:42.520 divorce the less divorce we're gonna have right and kind of but we'll see a comparison there actually

00:07:48.960 i'm just gonna jump to it because we should we should compare how this how this is is related to

00:07:54.600 china so while this reform obviously is focused on first and foremost creating a fairer system like

00:08:02.000 this legislation wasn't passed with the knowledge that it was going to reduce divorce rates it was just

00:08:07.140 to it was it was it was creating an a system that incentivized less adversarial breakups

00:08:12.260 so there's like less money spent on lawyers less fighting less people just divorcing to try to get a

00:08:18.480 bunch of stuff out of their partner and in contrast china's policies which we did go over in an episode

00:08:23.940 a while ago focus more on slowing or preventing divorce by regulation and delay i remember i thought

00:08:30.380 it had a positive effect it had a negative effect so both have reduced divorce rates but china's approach

00:08:36.540 also appears to have discouraged both marriage and childbearing which is an effect that is not seen

00:08:42.840 why is it i don't understand how this could affect marriage and childbearing the the chinese policy

00:08:47.260 well so the chinese policy is different since 2021 china requires a mandatory 30-day cooling

00:08:53.640 off period for couples seeking an uncontested that is to say mutual consent divorce and either party can

00:08:59.480 withdraw during this time which halts the process and the cooling off period did lead to a drop in

00:09:05.660 divorce but honestly it's lower so their divorce rate fell from 3.4 percent in 2019 to around 1.8 percent

00:09:15.940 in 2023 i think that's lower i think our legal change is much better so then at the same time marriage

00:09:22.720 rates declined as well and the birth rate continued dropping which suggests that more people now are just

00:09:28.380 avoiding marriage entirely possibly to sidestep the difficulty of divorce and there has been no

00:09:35.440 measured decline in marriage or birth rate so i'm gonna push back on the cause here um i suggest people

00:09:42.700 watch our video on nobody wants to marry chinese woman anymore there is a chinese cultural change

00:09:47.780 around women where there's that too yeah it's been like women in the united states yeah and they're just 1.00

00:09:53.380 nobody wants to marry them anymore uh and so i don't think i i think that that's what we're seeing

00:09:58.440 is an increasing degradation of what it means to be like a male and dating in china and that's leading

00:10:02.140 to the lower marriage rate in terms of the divorce rate changes i mean contrast the implications on the

00:10:08.640 decision in china it's just giving you time to cool off if you have like a hot head but in the united

00:10:14.820 states there's many women who get divorced and just feel like it's nothing but positives for them

00:10:19.160 they get to 100 they get the guys who are dating to help support them they get to you know have

00:10:26.100 their old partner have paid them a ton of money every month or something like that yeah and they

00:10:31.420 get full control over the kids so you know they don't even have to worry about like any sort of

00:10:35.780 compromises they were making in terms of child rearing you know they want to transition them just go

00:10:40.220 ahead which which happens a lot in these cases well yeah and there has been i forget exactly where this

00:10:45.720 happened but wasn't there legislation in some states that would actually put your odds of getting

00:10:51.400 any custody at risk if you were documented as fighting a child's transition well there was a

00:10:57.580 true everywhere there was a common divorce tactic is the mom would try to convince the kid that they 1.00

00:11:02.140 were trans or at least question the thing and if the dad was not 100 on board it's very easy to get

00:11:08.120 custody taken away from him and i would argue that a huge chunk of child transitions come from that

00:11:14.060 specific scenario because it is so common in court cases which of course think about it from the

00:11:19.600 perspective of like a sociopathic mom right like well if i can convince them they're trans and the dad 1.00

00:11:25.380 or even just to question things and the dad is like no she's just doing this as a tactic in court or

00:11:30.660 something you know which is what a sane dad would do it's easy to win that particular case exactly but i

00:11:37.220 think that like women just had it so easy and now they're like oh this is hard now why isn't this leading 1.00

00:11:42.140 to a reduction in divorces in the united states because i think that this is a mindset that women 1.00

00:11:46.020 often adapt long after they get married i think very few women in the united states go into a 0.98

00:11:51.920 marriage with the intention of eventually getting a divorce i think that they are expecting even if

00:11:58.540 the guy's like rich or something they expect him to die they don't like him that much they i think

00:12:02.160 very few are like okay i'm just gonna go in i'm gonna wait till i can get a divorce and then i get this

00:12:06.120 sweet alimony payment or anything like that they think things are going to work out so they do not

00:12:09.740 consider the implication of the changed laws the changed laws just make it easier for their group

00:12:15.720 of divorced friends to tell them how great it is to be divorced yeah that's not at least the people

00:12:22.020 interviewed in the wall street journal article covering this don't cite that exactly they in terms

00:12:28.460 of like these these are lawyers and stuff who are talking with their clients about it many of them are

00:12:33.600 choosing to not get divorced because they're like well if i have to share custody 50 50 anyway i'm

00:12:38.940 basically seeing my partner all the time and i might as well just work it out so it's even a little

00:12:45.000 bit scaled back from that like if we're talking about the acts of reasonable people which is

00:12:50.000 sometimes the case in divorce right they're just like like if i can't just walk away entirely very

00:12:57.100 conveniently i might as well work this out and i think that's that's meaningful and interesting and

00:13:05.060 i think a lot better for kids to have a father but the of course the critics are are concerned that

00:13:11.740 people aren't leaving abusive partners in order to protect their children like oh my husband hit me

00:13:18.940 i can't let him have half custody because he'll hit my kid and there were cases in which mothers were

00:13:27.600 subject to domestic abuse but because the children were not abused the the children still got

00:13:32.360 like we're with 50 50 custody i i think that's fine and in the law i just want to point out that

00:13:38.580 that if one parent is subject to a domestic violence order so this is even from a mother

00:13:43.100 the presumption of 50 50 custody is is automatically overturned so it really depends on the case and i

00:13:49.620 think that the these cases in which women are like but i was abused and now i have to share custody

00:13:54.960 are not actually representative of what the law actually says and i think it's really similar to how

00:14:00.180 things like the don't say don't say gay legislation was framed where it was framed as oh you literally

00:14:06.120 can't mention the concept of same-sex attraction when it really was something very different

00:14:10.540 so we have an episode on this it's quite old at this point i only remember it had like a

00:14:15.180 an outline of a body on like the floor or something and it was something because i didn't want to put in

00:14:18.860 the title like stuff you're not allowed to talk about or the woman question or something and in this

00:14:24.780 when we go into domestic violence and i i would say it is it is really not a good sign for the woman if

00:14:32.600 there is domestic violence in the house and the woman is the only one who's subject to it and the 1.00

00:14:36.360 kids are not like that shows that it's not that the guy has a bad temper or something like that because

00:14:41.280 in the episode i pointed out there's been instances that i know of where domestic violence happened sorry

00:14:47.180 and i'll put this here so i can replace what i said earlier so no one clips me out of context

00:14:51.620 but what i'd say is sometimes domestic abuse is not as cut and dry as we make it out to be

00:14:59.540 societally speaking okay and what i paired this with in that episode was the statistics around domestic

00:15:05.720 abuse between female female couples male male couples and male female couples and if you look at male

00:15:12.960 female couples versus female female couples it's way higher in female female couples um i decided to go look

00:15:19.880 at the actual statistics just to make sure i was getting this right and yes what i remembered is

00:15:24.100 accurate if you're looking at overall violence in relationships for women it's 35 percent are subject

00:15:33.180 to it in heterosexual relationships and for men it's 29 percent what you'll see is male male gay 0.60

00:15:39.820 relationships have lower than either of those rates at 26 percent and female female have much higher than 0.99

00:15:46.660 either of those rates at 43.8 percent uh what's really interesting is that bisexuals in mixed

00:15:53.960 relationships have some of the highest rates of abuse with 61.1 percent in women and 37.3 percent in men

00:16:01.120 now if you look at physical violence here you see for females in a relationship it's 29.8 percent for 1.00

00:16:08.600 males in a relationship it's 26.3 percent male male it's lower than either of those 24 percent female female

00:16:15.040 it's way higher than either of those at 36.3 percent and then again for bisexual relationships

00:16:20.700 it's much higher than either of those at 55.1 percent for women and 27 percent for men

00:16:25.080 so it seems that the more women you have in a relationship the more abuse is going to be had within that

00:16:32.240 relationship the other takeaway i'd have for this chart which may be worthy of another episode later to dig

00:16:36.440 more into this is that bisexual people are extremely abusive with both bisexual men and women but particularly

00:16:43.580 bisexual men being so so like actually comically abusive that over half of them well over half of 1.00

00:16:54.260 them 61 are abusing their partner with physical violence 55.1 and then for severe physical 0.83

00:17:02.960 violence 49.3 of women who are married to a bisexual man have been subject to severe physical

00:17:10.800 violence that's wild and the the male male couples are sort of all over the place i've seen ones where

00:17:16.160 it's lower than heterosexual relationships and i've seen one where it's higher than heterosexual

00:17:19.420 relationships so i can't easily judge on that but it does look like broadly or sort of average male

00:17:25.260 male is lower domestic violence female male is medium domestic violence female female is very 0.55

00:17:30.780 high domestic violence which seems to say that the key inciting factor is the female 0.93

00:17:36.560 yeah not not a great look but in general laws just haven't really kept up with a lot of these

00:17:46.660 things and it's this is just huge i just i had no idea that it had already spread to more states so

00:17:51.980 this is this is really notable and hopefully will lead to much better outcomes for kids and lower

00:18:00.280 lower lower burdens on on men who are being unfairly treated in this case but let's switch

00:18:06.440 to men suing over abortions and the texas heartbeat act because this is also fascinating so in short the

00:18:12.660 texas heartbeat app enables any person including estranged partners like you know completely no contact

00:18:19.480 ex-boyfriend to sue those who quote-unquote aid and abet abortions post-cardiac activity so once you have

00:18:27.180 a heartbeat with the baby and men in several cases have leveraged this law to pursue litigation against

00:18:32.700 women's friends providers that is just like how they target their friends this is fascinating yeah

00:18:38.620 i'm gonna go i'm gonna go into some lawsuits to give you some examples but basically the as the wall

00:18:45.120 street journal reported on this quote the law's unique aspect is its enforcement mechanism it relies on

00:18:51.100 civil lawsuits brought by private citizens rather than government action allowing them to sue anyone who

00:18:56.320 performs or facilitates an illegal abortion end quote what i like about this what i think is really

00:19:00.900 elegant about this is i see this as a really cool tool of cultural sovereignty where it's not like

00:19:07.720 this state is going to sue and persecute you for getting an abortion it's more like okay well within our 1.00

00:19:13.480 culture this is not cool and i'm gonna go after you for it and i'm allowed to so explain how this works

00:19:19.700 because it's not the state okay so it's not like the state says abortion is illegal it's like it's

00:19:24.480 illegal from the perspective of the individuals involved in the case specifically the father

00:19:28.800 being wrong and so the father is the only one who's allowed to sue in these cases yeah like there

00:19:32.660 have been cases for example where oh let's see if i have this listed here because i read about this

00:19:36.240 was really interesting

00:19:36.960 sorry hold on

00:19:42.240 okay i didn't put it in my notes but there was a case basically of a doctor who in a newspaper

00:19:53.560 in a newspaper editorial admitted to performing basically like an illegal abortion or whatever

00:19:59.780 like without a father's consent on a woman in defiance of this act as like a legal act of protest

00:20:05.620 oh so now in texas you need the father's consent to get an abortion oh hold on let me just pull up the

00:20:10.880 actual thing editorial hold on hold on hold on just give me a moment so i want to i want to get

00:20:15.580 the facts straight on this an interesting example is the dr alan braid lawsuit dr alan braid a texas

00:20:22.940 physician publicly admitted to performing an abortion in violation of sb8 that's the texas heartbeat act

00:20:28.660 in a washington post op-ed as an act of civil disobedience anti-abortion activists tried to sue braid

00:20:35.860 under sb8 but a texas judge ruled in december 2022 that the plaintiff lacked legal standing to sue because

00:20:42.560 he suffered no personal injury from the abortion so again this is an example of a law that only can be

00:20:50.720 essentially enforced or like where someone can only be held liable if they are violating basically a couple's

00:20:57.860 cultural sovereignty or one member of the couple's sovereignty the ai whether or not people other

00:21:05.140 than the father i.e the father's parents are allowed to sue under this law or the girl's parents are

00:21:10.020 allowed to sue under this law okay and then also ask does does this mean that doctors in texas have

00:21:15.580 to ask the consent of the father okay so ask those two questions and let me know the answer per the texas

00:21:21.720 heartbeat act can anyone aside from the aggrieved father of the aborted child sue people who aided

00:21:30.160 the abortion under the texas heartbeat act practically any private citizen not just the

00:21:35.540 aggrieved father may bring a civil lawsuit against anyone who performs or aids and abets an abortion

00:21:40.820 after fetal cardiac activity is detected the law is intentionally broad and does not require the

00:21:45.640 plaintiff to have any direct connection to the woman the pregnancy or the family involved

00:21:49.360 the only statutory exclusions are that the state or local officers cannot sue and that the suits

00:21:55.300 cannot be brought against the woman who obtained the abortion herself oh interesting no so the judge

00:22:00.940 was sort of acting outside of the bounds of the case by saying that and that the parents could sue

00:22:06.540 even the girl's parents could sue yeah that's really interesting although no no it says however while

00:22:11.700 the law deputizes private citizens to sue courts have ruled okay so yeah this is this is like a sort of a

00:22:18.160 precedent-based pushback courts have ruled that some plaintiffs may lack constitutional standing oh so

00:22:24.260 they're using the constitution as a pushback on this constitutional standing if they cannot allege

00:22:30.040 a concrete and personal injury judges have discretion to dismiss cases where the plaintiff is not

00:22:35.660 personally harmed though the statute still allows nearly any third party to file suit the constitutional

00:22:42.080 issue of judicial standing remains hotly debated in summary anyone regardless of involvement can file a

00:22:48.060 lawsuit under sb8 except for government actors and the woman herself oh okay that that means that

00:22:53.600 the woman who got the abortion can't sue like her provider um it's not that the woman is is has immunity

00:22:58.680 um they're not all claims will necessarily succeed if the court standing requirements are not met

00:23:03.260 so yeah i mean that makes sense the constitution is one of those things we're like

00:23:06.680 you don't mess with it right so but i still think that this is super super cool as a form of

00:23:14.120 legislation because you know how we are we're like don't use laws to impose your culture on everyone

00:23:19.480 allow people to like basically enforce their own culture but this still gives people of specific

00:23:26.420 cultures a legal mechanism for recourse because sometimes you you need that you know like if

00:23:31.700 other other if you don't have that you're gonna have like honor killings and stuff

00:23:35.600 right and this enables us to maintain civil civil stability while also not imposing the same laws on

00:23:43.320 everyone yes and and i i will note that i totally understand from a guy's perspective it is feels very

00:23:49.920 unfair that the woman gets to unilaterally decide whether or not the baby is kept when and women are 1.00

00:23:54.800 always like but it's in her body she's the one that suffers and it's like brah a man suffers much

00:24:01.540 more over the course of his life with child support than a woman suffers over pregnancy the well that's 0.99

00:24:06.780 assuming that the woman like gives the baby up for adoption if that's the baby she doesn't want 1.00

00:24:12.120 my stance on it is if if a woman wants a an abortion and a man doesn't then the man has to accept full 0.84

00:24:19.720 custody and pay the going rate for surrogacy that that that no i don't think because they had

00:24:27.320 consensual sex so if a woman wants the woman may well have been on birth control there are so many 0.91

00:24:32.940 cases of women who go on birth control right but then i think that that's still the the the it's

00:24:38.600 it's not surrogacy you can say the full cost of the birth at the hospital that's no no i think full

00:24:44.700 cost of surrogacy is fair how is it is really expensive if it was consensual sex but the woman 1.00

00:24:53.120 was on birth control she clearly didn't consent to get pregnant and it's it should be on men equally 0.99

00:24:58.320 they both consented to have sex though yeah but but the woman didn't consent to get pregnant 1.00

00:25:03.240 potential consequence of sex regardless of whether or not you're on birth control this is this is what

00:25:09.520 can happen from sex accepting and on risk you are consenting to get pregnant when you have sex and i

00:25:16.460 note here that even if you do take simone's original i think i convinced her here perspective on this

00:25:21.740 the man then if sex consent to sex isn't consent to children the man then is not consenting to

00:25:28.240 children and should be able to demand an abortion of the woman if she got pregnant when he was on 1.00

00:25:34.700 birth control which i just think is absurd yeah i mean i guess the chilling effect of this which i

00:25:39.320 mean many women pointed out when dobs happened yes it was like it was like then i just am not going 0.99

00:25:45.080 to have sex which you're like and yeah that's great idea that stop being such a slut um no but i want 1.00

00:25:51.880 you to go to the second question i wanted you to ask ai in relation to this which is do doctors 0.99

00:25:56.940 generally in texas now proactively get the husband's consent or the the male partner's consent

00:26:01.720 oh because it said that he like intentionally did this so i'll let you ask it

00:26:05.720 following the texas heartbeat act do abortion providers in texas now by default ask for paternal

00:26:17.000 consent before proceeding with abortions no abortion providers do not ask for paternal consent before 0.91

00:26:22.620 proceeding with abortions even following the texas heartbeat act and subsequent state restrictions

00:26:26.680 under current texas law abortion is nearly prohibited except in cases of medical emergency

00:26:31.360 but consent requirements pertain only to the pregnant patient and in the case of minors

00:26:36.200 parental consent so the answer is basically no but let's go through some interesting lawsuits

00:26:40.420 because this shows who can be sued and it's not always the woman so we have some notable cases

00:26:46.020 marcus silva versus ex-wife's friends in galveston marcus silver sued his ex-wife silva sued his ex-wife's

00:26:55.980 friends for wrongful death after they allegedly aided her in obtaining abortion pills silva sought one

00:27:02.700 million in damages from each friend alleging their actions facilitated an abortion after silva's ex-wife

00:27:09.540 became pregnant during divorce proceedings and what was she doing sleeping with him during divorce 1.00

00:27:14.800 proceedings but wait explain this to me so she the the woman who was getting divorced with her husband 1.00

00:27:20.420 got pregnant during the divorce and then she had an abortion after that and she was sued for that 0.89

00:27:27.780 no she wasn't sued her friends were sued he he sought one million in damages from each friend how much

00:27:36.760 did he win no so the suit was was actually dropped without any damages paid but it did set a precedent

00:27:43.200 for potential litigation by men claiming harm from abortions performed without their knowledge or consent

00:27:48.480 and and while the ex-wife herself was not named in the suit she did provide text evidence suggesting

00:27:54.040 that silva threatened the lawsuit to exert control during the divorce but also like they were up to some

00:27:59.820 both of them shenanigans i mean who's you don't you don't sleep with the enemy when you're getting divorced

00:28:07.260 don't do it if you're getting if you're sleeping together work it out you know like you don't get to

00:28:14.040 and typically yes you can have your cake and eat it too but like this is one of those cases where i'm like dude

00:28:20.040 this is on you so we also have jerry rodriguez versus california abortion doctor in 2025 a houston

00:28:27.040 man named jerry rodriguez sued a california physician named dr remy coito allegedly for

00:28:34.500 well for allegedly mailing abortion pills to rodriguez friend so keep in mind like because abortions are

00:28:41.500 basically not an option in texas right now this is a california doctor mailing um so they were able

00:28:47.720 to sue a california doctor did they do it successfully so by the way this resulted in the

00:28:55.020 termination of two pregnancies that rodriguez claims were his so this this happened a lot

00:28:59.560 so just just for context that rodriguez accused the doctor not the woman and seeks damages as the

00:29:05.820 father of the unborn children aiming to set a national precedent for similar claims by fathers using sb8

00:29:11.120 federal law the case cites both texas heartbeat act and the comstock act testing cross states i think

00:29:17.440 it's still going on liability for abortion access i'll ask if it's ongoing was resolved settled is it

00:29:27.140 ongoing god i want my finger back my gosh there's a lot of news coverage on it it's ongoing as of

00:29:34.520 september 2025 which is when we're recording this i know we filmed this episode a while ago so that date

00:29:39.940 might have surprised you but i went over to see as of this morning if any information had come out

00:29:45.400 on the case yet and no so we don't know we don't know yet what's going to happen again this stuff is

00:29:50.840 new this is a new wave and that's why this is so exciting and then we have colin davis inquiry in

00:29:57.400 brazos county in a case highlighted by cnn colin davis sought a court order to depose a woman

00:30:02.960 who traveled to colorado to terminate a pregnancy after discovering davis was the father

00:30:07.720 burn davis claimed potential wrongful death and demanded records aiming to explore legal liability

00:30:15.080 for out-of-state abortions under texas sb8 though no damages or direct civil suit against the woman

00:30:20.680 herself was reported so this is also showing a rise in people basically trying to go after women who are

00:30:27.440 crossing state lines via mail or physically to get abortions of children that are theirs but again

00:30:35.700 anyone can sue over this as long as the court thinks that they're being my wider thing on abortion

00:30:40.640 if people are like what are your thoughts on when it should be like should states have the right to

00:30:45.260 make this illegal i absolutely do think states should have the right to do this but i think at a federal

00:30:50.160 level that's quite something different to me i'd think a federal abortion ban i would be pretty opposed

00:30:55.240 to i mean i want to highlight because this came up in the comments of our video that ran today

00:30:59.740 on harems and polygamy banning abortions is not going to increase the birth rate 0.95

00:31:04.680 all right did people say that that would increase the birth rate yes people still believe this i don't

00:31:10.260 know why people if you look at a map of europe and you look at a map of the fertility rate of each

00:31:15.600 individual country the more restrictive abortions are within a country the lower fertility rate it is

00:31:20.020 almost one per one yeah guys yeah we we may not be the hugest fans of abortion especially after

00:31:25.940 basically a an infant can feel pain you know like it's clear that they have a working brain

00:31:32.540 and nerves because we think that's going to solve the fertility crisis gee whiz people but what i would

00:31:41.020 say is that i think the states banning abortion is completely practical and that's just enforcing their

00:31:46.960 own cultural system and there's varying cultural systems and beliefs around when life begins

00:31:51.400 um and it's okay for for a region to exercise their norms around that and then somebody's like well what

00:31:56.980 if somebody from outside that region you know lives in that region right or somebody with a different

00:32:01.180 cultural value and it's like there are all sorts of cultural norms that i have to obey because of

00:32:08.160 the region i just happen to be in right this is i i mean a muslim said this really well in the you know

00:32:15.100 the one who was talking in canada he's like he's like oh well one day muslims are going to be a 1.00

00:32:19.720 majority here and then being gay will be illegal because we he goes it's your own statistics in 0.70

00:32:25.040 your face but he makes a point then this is the guy who just is so enthusiastically like we're just

00:32:30.420 going to replace you is he's like look you have laws that i don't always agree with that i have to

00:32:37.560 obey when i'm in your country when you guys are the majority why would you not have to obey the laws 0.96

00:32:43.540 when we become the majority in this country what would happen to a gay couple in gaza executed 0.89

00:32:48.780 according to islamic law islam doesn't endorse gays islam doesn't endorse homosexuality just like

00:32:54.860 canada doesn't endorse a lot of things so would you like to see sharia law in canada replace canadian

00:32:59.160 law at some point it will you know because we are we have families we are making babies you're not

00:33:04.700 your population is going down the slump right and by 2060 according to pure research institute

00:33:10.420 your research by 2060 muslims will be the biggest religious group the world over what are you going

00:33:17.020 to do then actually go post sharia is even then well you know what i'm very appreciative of the

00:33:23.140 honesty we don't usually get that one day we can have a muslim majority nation here in canada

00:33:27.300 right in your face like for example i do not i think you know piracy bans are far too restrictive or

00:33:35.560 something like that that doesn't mean i don't think that you should legally be allowed to have

00:33:39.280 you know internet piracy bans or when i was in you know korea right like pornography is illegal in

00:33:46.900 korea i don't think that that is something that a country should have the right to impose upon its 0.78

00:33:52.160 citizens or even within a state right because in some states now you have the weird like you know

00:33:56.700 they check your age and everything first i i wouldn't want that within my cultural system because

00:34:02.140 i think it can be used to track citizens and what they're doing still your id my god but but i

00:34:08.180 understand why that a state's allowed to implement that and i am supportive of that because if you

00:34:14.500 are not of that culture then you can move to a region people are like well not everyone can afford

00:34:19.000 to move not everyone can and it's like no most people can move it would require a drastic reduction

00:34:26.380 in lifestyle but homeless people move all the time so like clearly you can afford to move what you mean

00:34:32.560 is you don't want to deal with the hit to your career or lifestyle that a move would entail

00:34:36.200 well also i mean to go back to the the conduct kentucky divorce laws there was a man who was

00:34:43.420 interviewed in this who i think was an activist fighting for this legislation in the first place

00:34:48.060 who literally felt him because he loved his kids so much he moved to where his wife was living and got

00:34:56.900 the the only job he could get a really crappy job i think working at a soap factory yeah so he could

00:35:02.680 have a piddling amount of customers with his kids like spend a few days with them in in his sad little

00:35:11.520 house so we we we are putting a lot of attention to like oh here's what's being lost for for many

00:35:19.900 people in light of this new legislation without giving much thought to how much men and i mean

00:35:29.600 let alone the killed unborn children have been hurt before this was passed and i think that that that

00:35:37.240 needs more airtime yeah no i agree but the larger point i'm making are that people can be like well

00:35:43.840 why if you think something is immoral are you okay with people of different cultural groups doing it

00:35:47.500 i mean it's not that i think it's moral when those cultural groups do it it's just i think it is

00:35:51.740 impractical and it leads to really bad moral externalities to attempt to force your moral

00:35:58.180 system on the entire world you can watch our video where we discuss in pakistan the religious court like

00:36:03.860 the islamic religious court said that when the government you know under like western secular

00:36:09.800 scrutiny banned child marriages and they said this is islamic phobic and i'm like you know it may not be

00:36:15.580 true of every form of islam but certainly within their islamic culture that they the religious

00:36:19.460 leaders felt that way i mean that it was an attack on their communities now i do not think kids should

00:36:25.460 be forced to get married which is often what's happening in these instances but am i gonna you

00:36:30.100 know deploy a force to pakistan to force them to follow my way of living and everything you know no 0.86

00:36:35.140 there's a huge negative externality to do that right yeah but let's talk about beyond this

00:36:42.800 other instances of men actually successfully fighting back because beyond the 50 50 custody

00:36:48.340 advancements and and the heartbeat act there are several clear and concrete outcomes from men's right 0.95

00:36:54.680 advocacy in the united states that are blowing my mind because i just thought this would never happen

00:36:59.980 by the way funny funny side note here on abortion at one point we were approached by this guy

00:37:05.000 from like right-wing circles who was actually raising a pro-abortion fund because he was part of the

00:37:12.600 you know like scientific racism like actually racist view so for the same thing that planned

00:37:17.760 parenthood was all pro-abortion yes well originally yeah this was the same i mean and planned parenthood 0.53

00:37:22.940 is still i think 89 percent of them are in minority communities and i think the majority of are the

00:37:27.200 majority of abortions minorities like i think they're huge i mean historically they were pretty sure they 0.97

00:37:32.320 still are yeah and and that's specifically what he wanted to fund was abortion clinics in minority

00:37:37.400 neighborhoods and i'm like oh my god i mean it would be fire up the gas chambers i i i think it's a

00:37:44.240 a fun thing for somebody of their perspective to do no it's i mean it's it's the uh however

00:37:50.420 effective altruism of the we want to no but but the reason why is either it resolves with more minority

00:37:58.380 communities like actually grokking that abortion was actually trying to genocide them and like they

00:38:03.940 should be against it and make oh that's true yeah i mean you could even argue that someone who

00:38:08.320 basically i mean i think partisan was actually to to fund a lot of this and then be like surprise

00:38:14.200 yeah now do you do you get it now do you get it now yeah like do you get it now so you get to

00:38:20.420 choose either it's great what planned parenthood is doing oh that's some 5d chess right there 0.98

00:38:25.860 damn okay you know and and the cynicism to be like yeah i'll kill a few babies if it makes my 0.99

00:38:33.640 message if it makes my point yeah like if in the end it gets people to actually be like wait this was 0.99

00:38:39.000 another because i mean the black community has suffered so many genuine medical conspiracies

00:38:45.160 and if if this can finally be revealed as yet another of like hey you've been systematically

00:38:53.100 leading your children because predominantly white people want you to would be great i want that to

00:38:59.600 become a pervasive meme because however you feel about abortion it's pretty messed up understatement

00:39:07.460 but yeah any other instances of men fighting back because again this is mind-blowing i just thought it

00:39:12.060 would never happen there have been successful lawsuits on employment anti-discrimination against men

00:39:17.700 did you know that wait what i know so there was a supreme court do teams for only hiring women 1.00

00:39:25.560 yeah let me give you do that for that director team that came to our house and it was all women 1.00

00:39:30.220 well yeah but the thing is i don't think anyone knows these have been successful but i think there's

00:39:35.380 this like undercurrent and it's gonna bubble up like a giant geyser of freedom for men but so yeah

00:39:42.020 the supreme there's a supreme court ruling on on equal standards in 2025 the supreme court and this

00:39:47.760 that's this year's this is just happening the supreme court unanimously held that men and majority group

00:39:54.220 employees cannot be held to a higher standard of proof than other groups in employment discrimination

00:39:59.620 lawsuits this ruling set a nationwide precedent for fair and equal treatment entitled sorry entitled 12

00:40:08.320 claims brought by male employees then there's the reverse discrimination lawsuits there are multiple

00:40:13.940 seven figure employment law settlements involving men who won claims of being disadvantaged or terminated

00:40:21.420 during diversity initiatives due to gender for example in 2024 a white male executive won a

00:40:27.980 significant sum for being replaced by a less experienced woman under a corporate diversity plan

00:40:32.800 although punitive damages were limited by the court so progress yes and then there's also eeoc

00:40:39.940 enforcement actions the equal opportunity commission sorry equal employment opportunity commission the eeoc

00:40:45.220 has represented male workers and gender discrimination suits leading to company settlements that revised

00:40:52.140 internal hr policies ensuring men receive the same protection as women regarding layoffs promotions and pay

00:40:59.180 and this is meaningful because so many white men we know including you have been told like hey off the

00:41:08.180 record we can't hire you yeah even though you are more qualified than the other people were hiring

00:41:13.900 and it this was just i it was kind of understood among everyone this has happened to including you

00:41:20.800 that there's absolutely no way this is ever going to be stopped there's nothing you can do about it

00:41:25.100 basically like that career path is written off this is changing and then there are also some broader

00:41:31.840 legal and regulatory outcomes so the national center for men litigation is a group that is supported and

00:41:36.740 occasionally won cases regarding paternity fraud reproductive rights such as notification before adoption

00:41:42.300 and opposition to male only draft registration which is is influencing ongoing policy debates at the

00:41:49.540 state and federal levels so this is shaping new legislation and then there are some changing

00:41:54.700 alimony and child support guidelines so some states and courts have have had decisions basically that

00:42:00.500 resulted in more gender neutral alimony and support awards which is reducing the gender gap in post-divorce

00:42:06.760 financial obligations which is again huge because as you pointed out at the beginning of this like

00:42:11.320 there's there's this very like adverse incentive for women to just get divorced because it's kind of more 0.99

00:42:17.700 convenient for them in that case and we see this in the data too that when there's a divorce

00:42:21.600 you look at the well-being of men versus women post-divorce and men well men's well-being goes down

00:42:28.840 women's well-being goes up so well yeah who's paying who often you know i know exactly it's up 1.00

00:42:35.700 oh so here's where i think we have a lot of room for improvement because and this is something that has

00:42:41.120 been pointed out repeatedly by people who watch and listen to base camp and chime in in the comments

00:42:46.020 paternity fraud so i i asked how common paternity fraud is in the usa it generally that the population

00:42:55.940 estimate from most current studies and genetic analyses suggest it's between one and five percent

00:43:01.640 but i lean more towards the finding of a 2023 scientific study published in science direct which found

00:43:08.040 that about five percent of 23,196 family tree dna users discovered an unexpected biological parent

00:43:16.720 i love that way of putting it which highlights just how common such surprises have become five percent

00:43:23.820 no i thought it was five percent in populations already suspecting it no that's the thing because here

00:43:29.840 we're looking at so in in cases already expecting it it's way higher court order dna tests see super high

00:43:36.940 rates of this in cases where paternity is legally disputed and dna testing is ordered by courts

00:43:41.500 the exclusion rate is much higher between 12 and 30 percent so when i do i'm gonna do it suspect

00:43:47.160 but i mean i thought the five percent was of tests that were done

00:43:50.460 no so so that the 2023 study i cited looked at family tree dna users this is just one of those like

00:43:59.860 look at my ancestry websites wow yeah that's what i'm saying is this isn't cases in cases where there's

00:44:07.080 suspicion 12 to 30 percent it's not you're not the dad i've got to knock some other guys wives up like 1.00

00:44:13.820 that would be fun clearly there's a lot of i mean five percent five that means one in 20 kids that

00:44:21.300 means one kid in like our kids classroom but then here's here's also where like one i'm like shocked

00:44:27.620 by how many people don't have the dads they expect but the punishments are so

00:44:35.180 nerfed in most jurisdictions paternity fraud is generally treated as a civil matter

00:44:41.460 rather than a crime and and there are some exceptions severe crime i think it should be

00:44:45.980 treated as as grand theft yeah well where so like here's what what what in nevada which is considered

00:44:53.280 like a really strict state about this like nevada is all we're like we support the men no they don't

00:44:59.800 because they they classify it as a gross misdemeanor oh my goodness but what does that that what's the

00:45:05.780 punishable sentence is is 364 days in jail a year minus a day and a two thousand dollar fine oh no 0.66

00:45:14.980 two thousand dollars for cucking you i just i can't two thousand dollars you said two thousand

00:45:21.660 dollars and oh my god less than a year in jail which of course probably doesn't even get enforced 0.95

00:45:28.880 because oh she's a mother she needs to be there for the child of course it's it's basically a two

00:45:34.160 thousand dollar fine in the strict state okay in most cases it's just civil knowingly misrepresenting

00:45:40.860 a child's paternity may in some states constitute fraud and be subject to criminal penalties like

00:45:45.500 fines or imprisonment which is like what the case in nevada but again the imprisonment is basically not

00:45:50.200 going to happen basically criminal convictions are extremely rare given the burden of proving 0.92

00:45:56.120 deliberate intent to defraud like women could just be like oh i'm sorry i was just such a slut 0.96

00:46:02.480 i didn't realize yeah it's being a slut illegal now yeah sorry how do i keep track of it anyway 0.98

00:46:10.480 so it's also just really messed up how men get screwed over because in many states the defrauded 0.85

00:46:16.460 father must contest paternity within a certain legal time frame what and after this window closes it may

00:46:23.560 be impossible to pursue reimbursement or terminate support my understanding is after this time window

00:46:28.480 they actually are forced to pay child support yeah even in the case of a divorce yep yep yeah like time

00:46:35.000 the statute of limitations some some courts also in addition weigh the child's best interests

00:46:40.460 maintaining support and visitation even after the fraud is uncovered if a strong parent-child 0.69

00:46:45.500 relationship exists or if honestly they just think the child is better off so it's just really screwed

00:46:50.500 up so i mean what what malcolm does full transparency because some of the cases in which there's paternity

00:46:56.480 fraud it's not all just men being cucked by women who are sleeping with other people it's also

00:47:02.020 mix-ups at ivf clinics some intentional some unintentional like a sperm sample getting

00:47:06.140 this is why my dna tests well most of our kids like i sort of stopped doing it after a while

00:47:10.820 because there was never a mistake in all my kids very no you've done it with every single one of our

00:47:15.000 kids i have for the record yeah well because you think i won't really love them until after i've

00:47:21.300 gotten the test back no man you're like i'd feel more comfortable with it and then you always like

00:47:25.920 i don't you have this reaction when the infants come home watch it's going to happen again with text

00:47:30.900 next week next week where you're gonna be like i don't know what is that this is crying worm like

00:47:41.920 you're not a baby person and i feel like one of your mental coping mechanisms for not feeling a strong

00:47:47.940 bond to infants because not every man like 10 of men are like baby men they love babies let me hold the

00:47:53.680 baby i love babies and like the other men are like hand it to me when it's more baked but i think

00:48:00.780 that your coping mechanism is like i don't feel anything and i know that i should be feeling

00:48:05.880 something because society like lies to men about like oh no you'll be in love it's going to be the

00:48:09.800 most magical moment to you ever and they don't feel that so then you're like okay well it must be that

00:48:14.440 like i can intuitively sense that i'm not actually the father and then at that point you get the

00:48:20.040 paternity test and maybe it gives you some some comfort i'm not sure i think you're

00:48:24.920 yeah so this this this embryo comes from the same batch as titan and industry the odds that he

00:48:33.380 is not you know like the sperm was mixed up with that ivf batch yeah i mean after two of them have

00:48:40.580 been confirmed to be yours is pretty low i think you're safe maybe we can save the money if you're 0.96

00:48:46.360 up for it but i welcome it still so even even when there's no like actual cocking that takes place

00:48:52.980 again like legally men have so little discourse so i feel like this should be the next area where

00:48:59.140 i mean if we if we're getting this momentum right if men are you know the return of men they're

00:49:04.700 striking they're striking back they're they're the revenge of the man it let's focus on paternity

00:49:10.200 fraud because that's terrifying i love you to best simone i love you too malcolm and thank you for not

00:49:16.840 divorce graping me and taking all my stuff well i had the chance you have delightful kids

00:49:22.260 things are are weird so uh question yeah how did the episode do today the one on me getting a harem

00:49:30.720 the number of comments that it elicited blew my mind because it wasn't like in terms of performance

00:49:38.440 it wasn't our best episode of the past seven like it started out strong and now i think it's eight out

00:49:43.820 of ten and yet it has a ton of comments so if i look at comments relative to what we're used to

00:49:51.940 it's kind of mind-blowing to me people had a lot of fun discussing it clearly i thought it would do

00:49:59.400 well me too that's why i outlined it there it is sorry

00:50:03.880 yeah so it currently has 600 comments which is a lot for our episodes so our last our last episode

00:50:17.600 for jimmy kimmel had 573 but then there was 379 257 whoa the one on the trans community's involvement

00:50:28.120 has now 1916 comments okay so i guess after some days pass they rack up that's wild but what did

00:50:35.440 people have to say were there common they thought that the fight at the end was brutal and very

00:50:43.700 entertaining that was a brutal fight yeah terrifying they they were amused by our differences in opinion

00:50:54.720 about the merits of making our marriage into a harem marriage people like yeah malcolm get a get a

00:51:03.100 second and third wife oh and then i mean a lot of people i guess they didn't watch the video because

00:51:09.680 we fully acknowledge this in in our conversation that society is worse off with polygamy or without

00:51:17.760 talk about it a lot though like yeah we acknowledged it we didn't like make it the i mean i feel like it's a

00:51:23.680 truth universally acknowledged that societies are worse off they're polygamous but we're we're looking 1.00

00:51:28.960 at and maybe i should have made this point in the episode we're looking at a future in which regardless

00:51:33.300 most most people in society are going to be broadly disenfranchised so if we're looking at a future

00:51:41.280 where already people are screwed already people are free radicals and unmarried does it really matter 0.76

00:51:46.980 that much that we try to find solutions to collect more people that could have potential maybe not

00:51:56.140 because otherwise what i think the future is is just the same number of unmarried men and women who are

00:52:02.520 economically disempowered and disenfranchised and politically disenfranchised but maybe

00:52:08.480 some of those women god this sounds terrible could be put to use as 1.00

00:52:17.440 you're very incels members of a harem 0.98

00:52:23.220 i you know what we're not going to talk about this anymore i i don't i give up did you see the did you

00:52:30.820 see the attack thing that was found at the un today oh because unga is happening in new york remember

00:52:36.720 when we hosted parties in new york we didn't realize it was during unga and the traffic was

00:52:42.140 so bad you could basically not move anywhere in the city yeah so we they set up like a hundred

00:52:49.340 thousand like sim cards in a way that would have crashed new york's cell phone system and

00:52:53.260 well it's interesting work it didn't work i was trying to prep an episode on it i just couldn't get

00:52:59.120 enough information so maybe after more information comes out but what's interesting about it is it

00:53:03.540 appears that it was likely in preparation for something else because it required enough

00:53:08.960 sophistication that they said it was probably a state-level player but a state-level player

00:53:13.480 seems kind of assaulty if we're getting all high tech here well they don't just care about shutting

00:53:18.500 down all the phones in new york like that doesn't buy you that much disruption or anything like that

00:53:23.100 yeah that doing that in connection with something else is the thing is the point right yes so the

00:53:28.980 question is what was the else that they had planned an assassination a you know who knows but uh thank

00:53:36.460 goodness some unnamed jack bauer has just stopped all that from happening what what happened jack bauer

00:53:42.800 i don't understand you we're old do you remember the tv show 24 no i remember like dun dun and

00:53:50.560 yeah the best thing about 24 as a show wasn't actually the show itself which was just very stressful

00:53:57.200 this man like never had a chance to take a potty break but it was basically about him like saving

00:54:01.960 the world because he only had 24 hours to do it and i think he was working for the government

00:54:05.940 but there's this amazing like japanese song about him where they pronounce his name

00:54:12.140 and it's the best thing in the entire world and that's all i can think about

00:54:17.080 let's get into it i'll let you get started and i mean i'm just really excited to be pushing

00:54:30.900 forward with r5 just so people know on the r5.ai there's been a ton of improvements on the back end

00:54:35.580 but we're trying to sort of synthesize them all so we can get a new stable front end running which is

00:54:40.460 what you would have access to so your r5.ai but uh applying to andresen again both of our projects

00:54:44.920 made it to the final round last time to their speed run program yeah so we'll see i would by

00:54:51.120 the way if anyone's watching and you and you know people making judgments in the speed run program

00:54:55.380 you know say hey malcolm and simona pretty cool oh that would be that would be nice yeah right

00:55:01.020 just for people who are wondering this episode was recorded a while ago so the r5.ai stuff has mostly

00:55:07.120 been uploaded now we still have a number of bugs on the site that we're working through i mean i hope to

00:55:11.960 have it done by this weekend the most annoying ones for me are cloud saves being deleted but i think

00:55:18.400 local saves are still persistent in between updates oh and the pages that list all of the optional

00:55:24.740 scenarios you have to reload them for them to work sometimes but maybe we fix that so other than that

00:55:31.040 i don't know i'm impressed with what we've gotten together we didn't end up getting into the speed

00:55:34.640 run program so you don't need to put in a good word for us but if the project sounds interesting to you

00:55:40.160 or if you've tried it and you're like oh this is actually pretty good compared to the other sites

00:55:43.640 let us know oh and also to everyone who has taken the time to try it while it's been in this

00:55:48.440 developmental stage i know it's a pain i really appreciate it do you guys like playing in the rain

00:55:54.380 why 0.99

00:55:56.440 it's fucked 1.00

00:56:12.860 no you do not go into that puddle torsten do not you will get soaked 1.00

00:56:35.420 why how can it get soaked it's too deep it's not even a puddle it's like a lake

00:56:41.300 oh so it's a lake puddle yes oh yeah

00:56:47.040 no you will not go into it because you will sink

00:56:52.680 no you will not go into it because you will be able to sense from this side here

00:57:01.660 yeah

00:57:02.180 you know

00:57:04.400 online

00:57:05.420 online

00:57:06.520 online

00:57:07.740 yeah

00:57:08.520 it's

00:57:09.460 online

00:57:10.040 online

00:57:10.420 online

00:57:12.240 online

00:57:13.440 online

00:57:15.180 online

00:57:16.120 online

00:57:17.240 online

00:57:17.920 online

00:57:18.640 online

00:57:20.020 online

00:57:20.660 online

00:57:22.620 yeah you're not sinking in that one so you can jump

00:57:28.620 yeah because you were running and i told you to stop

00:57:37.580 because i didn't want you to fall and get muddy

Based Camp - October 31, 2025

Wait—The Men's Rights Movement is WORKING？？

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript