Based Camp - May 28, 2024


We Went Viral for "Child Abuse"


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 26 minutes

Words per Minute

191.8731

Word Count

16,607

Sentence Count

1,000

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

31


Summary

In this episode, we discuss the controversial topic of corporal punishment and how it affects our children, and why it s a form of human rights abuse. We also discuss the science behind why we shouldn t spank our kids.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 We can't do it, man. That's discipline.
00:00:03.120 We don't believe in rules like we gave them up when we started living like freaky beatniks.
00:00:09.760 Yeah, you've got to help us, Doc. We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas.
00:00:15.120 Most, perhaps all, the blame rests with the parents.
00:00:19.040 Have you ever tried simply turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?
00:00:30.000 These people, you must have lost your goddamn mind.
00:00:33.440 I guess I just hate to see a child go unbeaten.
00:00:36.000 Now I need to talk for a few minutes about why I find the research so distrustworthy in this space.
00:00:41.520 One, you're proceeding into the research from a prior that this is a human rights abuse.
00:00:45.760 Whenever anyone says every expert in a field agrees on something,
00:00:49.920 I pretty much immediately dismiss it.
00:00:51.840 Because I'm like, that just doesn't happen in science when there's no nuance.
00:00:55.280 Yeah, there is always more when science is happening correctly.
00:00:59.040 If you look at what the research is saying, if this has a massive IQ effect,
00:01:02.960 this has a massive effect on aggression, these people become antisocial and aren't able to-
00:01:06.960 They hate their parents, et cetera.
00:01:08.880 If these things were true at the levels that they're saying these things are true,
00:01:14.960 every single long-lived culture on Earth would not have convergently evolved this method of
00:01:22.320 interacting with children during this developmental stage.
00:01:26.000 What is really negative and what we are against is any form of punishment where the pain is the point
00:01:32.880 of the punishment.
00:01:34.240 What happens during a bop?
00:01:35.440 It is a light slap on the child's nose or face that is meant to shock and redirect and refocus attention.
00:01:44.240 The reason we do the face is because it requires much less pain to get the same reaction than
00:01:50.960 doing something like slapping the wrist.
00:01:52.960 We don't really do this for four-year-olds and up with our kids.
00:01:55.360 Yeah, because you can talk to them.
00:01:56.720 With a two-to-four range, because with my four-year-old, I could say,
00:02:00.400 this could kill you, and he can begin to cognitively understand that.
00:02:03.600 Two-to-four, you don't really get that.
00:02:06.000 And so when you need to denote, no, this is an extra level of don't do this when compared to
00:02:12.160 other things I have told you not to do, the only way to denote that other than physicality
00:02:19.280 is by emotionally elevating the conversation.
00:02:22.960 And I think that causes more emotional damage.
00:02:26.160 If you read the article, it says exactly what happened in the context.
00:02:29.440 He was about to push over a table.
00:02:31.520 I did the bop to reorient him because he knew he wasn't supposed to be doing that.
00:02:35.200 But then I immediately tell him I love him.
00:02:37.120 Now, this isn't something I can do if I'm punishing him through the emotional means.
00:02:40.800 Exactly.
00:02:41.200 If I had elevated the conversation emotionally, now I need to say,
00:02:44.480 daddy's mad at you, instead of saying, bop, you crossed a line, but daddy loves you.
00:02:50.640 And this is the problem, right?
00:02:52.080 So the urban monoculture would say to us, what you're doing is culturally non-normative.
00:02:56.960 Stop it.
00:02:57.920 And I'm like, I have seen the results of your normative parenting style.
00:03:02.880 These kids are miserable, anxiety, depression.
00:03:07.040 Illiterate.
00:03:07.840 You know, great messes.
00:03:09.600 Look at the ban, the rate of corporal punishment in the United States.
00:03:13.760 It pretty much directly correlates with the rise in depression among youths and the rise of
00:03:19.600 anxiety among youths.
00:03:20.640 God.
00:03:21.680 Hello.
00:03:22.320 I'm Dr. Richard Shea, here to tell you about my exciting new drug-free treatment for children
00:03:27.120 with attention deficit disorder.
00:03:29.440 Watch closely as I apply treatment to the first child.
00:03:32.320 Sit down and study.
00:03:34.960 If you would like more information on my bold new treatments, please send away for this free
00:03:38.640 brochure.
00:03:39.360 Thank you.
00:03:39.840 We no longer spank our children's butts because now we can spank their brains.
00:03:43.840 Would you like to know more?
00:03:45.200 So how do we feel being the new public face of child abuse?
00:03:48.320 Yes, we have gone viral yet again for punishing our child in front of a reporter in a way that
00:03:57.440 she interpreted as a form of corporal punishment and would technically be a form of corporal punishment.
00:04:03.600 Now, this gets really interesting because the internet went completely apoplectic when they
00:04:08.880 heard that this happened.
00:04:09.680 They could not believe that in the modern age, anyone would touch their child.
00:04:15.680 They're like, anyone who practices any form of corporal punishment is basically an animal
00:04:22.400 and inhuman.
00:04:24.160 And I'm like, that is a little concerning of a thing to say because according to a 2011 study
00:04:31.120 by Gorshoff, 89% of black parents practice corporal punishment and 80% of Hispanic parents practice
00:04:39.360 corporal punishment.
00:04:40.960 And then they're like, oh, obviously I need to add some caveats to what I said there.
00:04:45.280 No, actually what happened, this is one of my favorite instances of media baiting
00:04:48.720 or being attacked by all these progressives online.
00:04:51.280 And one of them immediately shoots back.
00:04:52.880 This just proves my point.
00:04:54.480 Blacks have more violent communities than whites.
00:04:57.040 There's a lot of backpedaling in that.
00:04:58.960 It's like one of the sharks got wounded during a freeding fencing and then all the other sharks
00:05:03.840 turned on it because now there's shark blood in the water.
00:05:06.880 Then it was, whoa, yeah, but it is true.
00:05:11.200 And it's something that is downstream of why we actually do this because a lot of people are
00:05:16.640 going to be like, haven't you seen the research on corporal punishment?
00:05:21.440 Why did you engage in corporal punishment knowing that so much of the research shows it's so negative?
00:05:29.920 And the answer here is a few things.
00:05:34.720 First, I do not believe the research is relevant to the type of corporal punishment that we are
00:05:41.200 enacting with our kids.
00:05:42.800 If you look at the research, it is predominantly looking at delayed ritualized punishment where
00:05:51.920 the purpose is inducing pain in the child as a punishment for something negative that the
00:05:59.600 child had done.
00:06:00.480 Yeah, I think when most, at least when I think of corporal punishment, I think,
00:06:04.240 wait until your father comes home and you get spanked or something.
00:06:09.200 Yeah, but we know from animals, so anyone who's just any familiar with dog training,
00:06:13.200 for example, or any form of mammal training, delayed negative reinforcement doesn't work.
00:06:18.880 Like it just causes behavioral problems.
00:06:21.440 This is something we see in any mammal that it's used in.
00:06:25.280 So I shouldn't expect anything different in humans.
00:06:28.720 Yeah, it would be inane.
00:06:30.800 Inane.
00:06:31.360 But then it has led to this problem in the field where there's these two starting assumptions.
00:06:38.640 One is this has been studied for a long time and everyone agrees on it.
00:06:42.800 Now, this is a problem.
00:06:43.680 Whenever you get a field and somebody says everyone agrees on it, no edge cases,
00:06:47.520 because at that point you have created a dogma within a scientific field.
00:06:51.120 Yeah.
00:06:51.520 And worse, if you look at what's being put out there about who and UNICEF and stuff like that,
00:06:57.600 they're like, this is a human rights violation.
00:07:00.000 They view spanking as a human rights violation.
00:07:02.560 Well.
00:07:02.880 And I will put up maps of countries on the screen where any form of spanking or anything like that
00:07:08.960 for kids is considered illegal in these countries.
00:07:12.960 They've been able to convince a number of countries to make this illegal.
00:07:15.760 And I think there's also, this is one of those things like with pregnancy and alcohol that,
00:07:22.160 especially depending on your genetic makeup or whatever, in Europe, this is more normalized too.
00:07:29.120 It's okay to have a small amount of alcohol while pregnant, but it seems very irresponsible
00:07:37.200 from a research perspective to tell anyone that because this is one of those issues of extreme
00:07:42.880 moderation that yes, only a very small amount is okay.
00:07:46.560 And frankly, it's safer for people who may not be able to control themselves to just say,
00:07:51.280 never do it.
00:07:52.080 And so people say, just never do it.
00:07:54.640 You're the worst person ever.
00:07:55.520 If you ever have any drink.
00:07:56.720 Although now people are starting to loosen on that, even in the United States.
00:08:00.400 And I think it's very similar with things like corporal punishment, because while if any study
00:08:05.680 comes out saying that some level of physical intervention that's not pleasant in immediate
00:08:11.520 response to bad behavior is okay, then you are going to get people who, instead of lightly,
00:08:18.480 lightly tapping or slapping or whatever purpose and the mechanism by which the form of correction
00:08:25.280 that we have works with our kids, because what is really negative and what we are against
00:08:30.080 is any form of punishment where the pain is the point of the punishment and that the pain is seen
00:08:37.520 as proportional.
00:08:38.800 If you are more mad at the parent or the child, extra broke a rule that deserves even more pain,
00:08:44.240 which is really different from what we're doing.
00:08:46.800 No, it is, frankly, we see the boys playing every single morning and the amount of pain they inflict
00:08:54.640 on each other while laughing and smiling the entire time.
00:08:57.840 It pales in comparison to essentially the taps or light slaps that we call a bop.
00:09:05.440 Actually, on viewing this, I decided to ask our kid if he felt that it hurt him.
00:09:10.320 And here is his response.
00:09:12.080 Did he ever hurt you?
00:09:13.120 No.
00:09:13.680 What, you sure?
00:09:16.960 Does it hurt when I bop you?
00:09:18.240 No.
00:09:22.000 Octavian, what are you doing? Are you strangling me?
00:09:24.640 Yeah.
00:09:27.680 Torsten, do you think daddy loves you?
00:09:29.280 Yeah.
00:09:29.760 Yeah.
00:09:31.600 I do.
00:09:34.960 It makes sense when you contextualize what he feels during a bop with what he feels during
00:09:41.680 regular play with his brother. And I think a lot of people complaining about this are people who
00:09:45.680 have never raised a child or at least never raised a group of boys.
00:09:49.280 So what happens during a bop?
00:09:50.720 And so I know I need to be clear, like the purpose of it, it is a light slap on the child's
00:09:55.520 nose or face that is meant to shock and redirect and refocus attention to something more productive.
00:10:04.000 So to anyone who's actually been around toddlers, and I know a lot of people haven't, they have this
00:10:11.040 phenomenon where they'll get locked in a mental loop that they can't easily escape.
00:10:17.200 It could be like they're in this mindset where they're just really wanting to push boundaries
00:10:21.520 and you say no, and that doesn't really register with them in the same way it normally would.
00:10:26.400 Or they're in a mindset where they really want something. And this creates this cognitive loop
00:10:32.560 that can be very difficult for them to escape. And they need to be snapped out of it to refocus
00:10:37.760 and reorient themselves, which is humorous even in the moment when a kid's in one of these cognitive
00:10:42.960 loops. You are often leading to less pain within the next 20-minute period for that child by snapping
00:10:50.320 them out of this cognitive loop.
00:10:51.760 So to be clear, we only get physical when we feel like they're safety or someone else's safety.
00:10:57.040 Yeah, that's really the only time we do this is when one of these cognitive loops is putting
00:11:00.560 them in or others in physical danger. But we'll get to the-
00:11:05.280 I was just going to say back to my point to close it up, tie a bow on it. It feels irresponsible,
00:11:11.200 and it would seem irresponsible to a peer-reviewed journal, to a researcher, to say this is okay
00:11:17.040 when you know that someone's going to take that information and they're going to backhand their
00:11:20.880 kid at full strength, or they're going to start beating their kid or punching them in the face
00:11:24.240 because they're like, no, research supports it. So I understand why there isn't research that says
00:11:30.000 that this is okay, because I too would worry about that. And we take abuse really seriously.
00:11:35.280 So the fact that Malcolm did this in front of a journalist and a bunch of people now think,
00:11:40.400 they think, because they're not reading the article, they're not looking at the context,
00:11:43.760 that you have backhanded your kid with the pictures wind up and they flew against the wall
00:11:48.320 and cracked the wall and just, she's looking in horror.
00:11:51.360 Hold on, we should clarify, why the face? Because this is an interesting point.
00:11:55.200 It's like somebody who's like, why don't you? And other people in the comments were sharing this
00:11:59.600 style of punishment is actually very common. Like it is the ancestrally convergent evolutionary,
00:12:06.800 if you're talking about cultural groups that have been successful, a lot of them do this.
00:12:10.480 So when they talk about like the way their grandparents would punish them, it was a slap
00:12:14.400 on the wrist, basically meant to like shock and reorient them. And they would often say,
00:12:19.840 I actually appreciated this to other forms of escalation. But when a child is in one of these
00:12:25.680 loops and you need to denote that something is actually, because when you're talking between,
00:12:30.480 we don't really do this for four year olds and up with our kids, but when you can talk to them,
00:12:35.120 two to four range, there isn't a way to explain the seriousness of a situation or denote this.
00:12:41.840 Because with my four year old, I could say, this could kill you. And he can begin to cognitively
00:12:45.680 understand that. Two to four, you don't really get that. And so when you need to denote, no,
00:12:50.320 this is an extra level of don't do this when compared to other things I have told you not to do.
00:12:57.760 The only way to denote that other than physicality is by emotionally elevating the conversation.
00:13:05.520 And I think that causes more emotional damage because then it's daddy is mad at you. You are
00:13:13.040 being rejected. No, 100%. When our kids, even by mistake, when our kids think that you are
00:13:20.480 like actually mad at them or rejecting them in some way, the hysterionics are like through the roof.
00:13:27.200 This is a level of punishment that is far above a bop, this emotional punishment, which, and people
00:13:32.720 can see, they're like, what do you mean? If you read the article, it says exactly what happened in
00:13:37.120 the context. He was about to push over a table full of food and drinks and utensils and all that.
00:13:43.200 And he was trying to push it over. He was having fun. It almost fell. It came inches from falling
00:13:47.120 over. Not inches, but maybe less than like centimeters, millimeters. And I then immediately
00:13:52.960 addressed it. I did the bop to reorient him because he knew he wasn't supposed to be doing that.
00:13:57.200 But then I immediately tell him I love him. Now, this isn't something I can do if I'm punishing him
00:14:01.680 through the emotional means. Exactly.
00:14:03.200 If I had elevated the conversation emotionally, now I need to say, daddy's mad at you, daddy's
00:14:08.160 something else. Instead of saying, bop, you crossed a line, but daddy loves you. And then I explain,
00:14:14.640 in restaurants, we need to be nice. And so I am giving him the context. Don't push boundaries in
00:14:20.400 this way within this environment. And I don't think that there is a kinder way that I could have elevated
00:14:28.240 that. And I think that this is a really interesting thing that people miss. There was actually,
00:14:32.000 because in Japan, it's been made illegal to do this kind of corporal punishment now.
00:14:36.080 And there was a great recounting on Reddit of this that I wanted to read.
00:14:39.680 Really?
00:14:40.080 Which was, I was an exchange student in Japan years ago, and a bunch of Americans and Japanese
00:14:44.480 students were sitting around talking about our childhoods. All the Americans made jokes about
00:14:48.960 the various implements our parents smacked or swiped or spanked us whiz.
00:14:53.280 See, that sounds though delayed punishment, I'm just saying.
00:14:56.480 It is delayed punishment, but hold on. And they were cracking up about it while our Japanese
00:15:00.720 friends were horrified. Japanese, our parents would never lay a finger on us like that,
00:15:05.200 indignantly. Americans, what did your parents do?
00:15:08.560 Japanese, mostly they told us they didn't love us, or that we didn't love them,
00:15:13.520 or that we'd ruined their lives and brought shame on our families. Americans, I'd rather be slapped.
00:15:19.920 And I think this is true. This is what you have to resort to when you remove this from the table.
00:15:30.320 Because in that two to four range, you can't really use the consequences of an action
00:15:35.520 to elevate it. You could really only elevate things emotionally, elevate the emotional states.
00:15:40.560 And then you need to ask yourself, realistically, do you think that's in the best interest of the child?
00:15:45.600 So if I go back to that 2011 study, something that you need to point out is even when we talk about
00:15:51.280 the other ethnic groups, even if we're talking about whites and Asians, which I ignored because
00:15:54.960 people don't care about those numbers, but 79% of white parents practice some form of corporal
00:15:59.200 punishment and 73% of Asian parents. The safe majority of Americans practice some form of this.
00:16:06.720 And you can be like, if everybody knows that this, because everyone is told when they're young,
00:16:10.960 don't do this. Why even I, like I went into parenthood saying, I'm definitely never going to do that.
00:16:16.240 Never.
00:16:16.640 And some parents can get away with not doing it because they have one girl or two kids or something
00:16:21.680 like that. But most families, when they get to four and above kids are like, I was wrong in thinking
00:16:27.280 that it was realistic to raise kids without this. And I think that the reason is, and the thing you
00:16:31.920 immediate really quickly, if you engage in it is all of these negative effects that researchers said it has
00:16:38.240 don't, I'm not noticing them. They're like, oh, it makes the kids hate you. Do you notice the kids?
00:16:43.520 They don't register it as like a, they register it as boundary setting. As you've pointed out,
00:16:49.440 it's sort of Roomba, right?
00:16:51.040 Yeah. My whole thing with kids and this is something that we've realized with play behavior. And I think
00:16:56.080 a lot of people have this theory around play behavior that it is, it exists to help kids learn
00:17:01.120 how to set boundaries with themselves, with others. It shows you where the boundaries are. So when you get
00:17:05.920 too rough, someone starts crying. Okay. You've learned that you get in a fight. Someone gets
00:17:09.600 hurt. You understand where the boundaries are. So you know how to push your own boundaries
00:17:12.880 and you know how to push other people's boundaries and you know when to go too far.
00:17:16.160 And this first came up as a concept that I heard about discussed when people were talking about why
00:17:22.320 do younger generations now constantly appeal to authority whenever something goes wrong because they
00:17:27.920 were never let to play by themselves with other kids and work it out among themselves when they could,
00:17:33.920 could not share a toy or whatever when they got in a fight. And so similarly, the way that we look at
00:17:38.960 kids, especially when they're young growing up is that they're a lot like a Roomba. Like they're just
00:17:42.320 flying blind, bumping into a wall, you hit the wall and then you course correct and go in the right
00:17:47.120 direction. And sometimes because the wall turns out to be a cliff or a stairway, we as parents try to
00:17:54.960 create a fake wall and that is where bobs show up. And if you don't do that as a parent,
00:17:59.920 then in the future, let's say your little Roomba is in a new house and you're no longer there to
00:18:05.200 catch it when it's about to roll off the staircase, they're going to get really hurt. They're going to
00:18:10.640 get really screwed over. I think something that's really important with this analogy,
00:18:14.640 like when we're talking about how our kids relate to their environments is I don't think that a parent
00:18:20.160 punishing their kid should ever be like an act of anger or an act of if you're ever doing that.
00:18:26.080 And it's very clear from the article that I like wasn't angry. I was just setting a boundary.
00:18:29.920 I do not get, and this is why I really don't want to go the emotional route was creating these
00:18:35.040 boundaries is because the emotional route indicates to my kid that there is some disapproval
00:18:42.560 of them pushing boundaries. Yeah. I liked that he was pushing boundaries. I like, you're like,
00:18:51.120 you punish your kids when you do something that you like. I can tell him, look, I love that you're
00:18:57.440 pushing boundaries. I love that you're vivacious, but here is where you have hit the Roomba has hit
00:19:02.800 the wall. Yeah. It's like a safe word. It's like a safe word. And yes. And kids, you can tell very
00:19:10.080 easily from my interaction with my kids, they understand this. The punishment is not an act of
00:19:16.640 rejection. It is an act of you've hit the wall here. You need to course correct. This isn't
00:19:22.720 appropriate. Yeah. We were all happy. This was all okay. And now I actually mean it when I say no.
00:19:27.040 Yeah. And this is another thing to understand about the piece, a really great thing to point
00:19:31.200 out in the piece is this same child. When we say we reserve this for only things that could hurt
00:19:35.840 themselves and others. At another point in the piece was running around with poo in his hands.
00:19:39.840 He did not get bopped for that. In another part of the piece, he was running around the restaurant
00:19:44.480 and he only got threat for a bop when he ran towards the door because on the other side of
00:19:49.200 the door, there was a street. With the table, he only got the bop because knocking over tables or
00:19:53.920 learning that behavior in a house where you have infants can lead to somebody getting seriously
00:19:58.240 injured or dying. Exactly. And so somebody can say, and I think that one of the reporters that I was
00:20:04.000 talking to, I was talking to a reporter today about this. She was really surprised. She was like,
00:20:06.800 so you weren't like angry at him for doing this wrong thing for almost knocking over the table. And I was
00:20:12.160 like, no, it's probably the first time he realized that he could knock over a table and he's like
00:20:16.640 exploring his environment. Huh? What happens when I knock over tables? My dad said no, but sometimes
00:20:22.640 he says no and I do it anyways. And there isn't some extreme repercussion to that. So let's try it.
00:20:28.320 Somebody can be like, never say no with your kid unless you mean it. That's absurd.
00:20:32.240 But there is a literal like movement among some parents to not use the word no, which I think also
00:20:38.080 shows how far in the extreme and the other direction we've gone.
00:20:41.440 And I think that, and I'll put the article about this on the screen that you're talking about,
00:20:44.720 because we have seen this. We've entered an environment where what happened was,
00:20:49.600 and I think accurately is research pointed out that delayed ritualized corporal punishment
00:20:54.960 had negative effects. Research in the space began to categorize this as a human rights abuse. So you
00:21:00.640 really couldn't be on the other side of the issue anymore. And it caused sort of a virtue spirals in the
00:21:05.840 space where now you have parents saying you should never say no to your kids. Because when you take
00:21:13.200 this angle of punishing my kids is bad, like any form of punishing my kids is that puts them in a
00:21:20.000 negative emotional state or that shocks them in the way that we do when we're punishing our kids.
00:21:25.200 And I don't know if I got to this, but the reason we do the face is because it requires much less pain
00:21:30.880 to get the same reaction than doing something like slapping the wrist. If you are slapping the
00:21:36.400 wrist and I want the same level of attention refocusing as the face or the nose, I actually
00:21:41.600 need to hurt them to get their attention. And I don't want the pain to be the point of this action.
00:21:47.120 It is the shock that is the point of this action, which helps reorient them, which the face does.
00:21:52.720 And if you look at animal training models, like dogs or something, you bought the dog on the nose.
00:21:56.800 That is the consistent way of doing it. And animals, when we first came to this model,
00:22:00.720 one of the things we always note is we were on a safari and anyone who's ever been on a safari,
00:22:04.720 you're sitting in a truck watching animals all day, like without music or anything like that,
00:22:08.400 just getting to think and talk. And as we were watching lions play with their cubs for a five hour
00:22:14.640 period. And so we got to really study the play behavior. And we noticed this pattern where the baby
00:22:21.200 cub would paw at the lion or do something. And the lion would growl or be a little angry.
00:22:28.480 We're doing that. We're saying, no, don't do that. But the baby cub would keep doing it.
00:22:32.480 And then it would get to the point where the lion would just swat the baby's cub face.
00:22:36.400 And the baby cub would look a little annoyed at a bit and then walk off. It understood this action
00:22:41.920 as different from other types of punishment. I should note here that some people have been like,
00:22:46.240 well, the lion has its claws retracted and you clearly injured your kid because the reporter
00:22:52.560 said she could hear it on the recording. And it's like, look, the reporter has to sell the piece.
00:22:57.200 Okay. She also mentioned that the kid was back to laughing and watching his iPad within 30 seconds.
00:23:03.040 And when I asked the kid the next day, does daddy ever hurt him or do Bob's hurt? He doesn't appear to
00:23:09.360 think they do. And even if you read the piece, honestly, it's pretty obvious the child was not
00:23:15.520 injured. The reaction we've seen in our kids, like when reporters are over, one of the things they
00:23:20.000 often comment on is how unusually well-behaved our kids are. And other people have commented on this as
00:23:24.880 well. I genuinely think because I was not at well. Okay. Not well-behaved, polite and kind. They say,
00:23:32.160 please, thank you. It's nice to meet you. They're regarious, but they're not. And sometimes I wish they
00:23:38.320 would be, but I also don't want them to be from a raising humans, but from a mother,
00:23:42.720 like not having to deal with things perspective. They're not the kids who like line up behind their
00:23:46.640 parents in airports and are quiet and compliant. And no, our kids are very rambunctious, but they're
00:23:52.640 very polite and kind. Like whatever it is, it seems to be working within the boundaries we're setting
00:23:59.520 for them. And that is being a polite and kind and thoughtful person. And then the danger with a
00:24:04.560 system like this is you teach them that violence resolves conflict. And so what's really heartening
00:24:10.960 to me is I see my kids when they quote unquote bop each other, right? Because they're developing this
00:24:16.000 behavior pattern and they're like, okay, this is how I tell someone that they've crossed a boundary
00:24:20.400 with me. And what they do is they just tap the other person on the head like this. And so it's clear
00:24:27.600 that in their mind, what is happening to them is not designed to be painful. It's about touching the
00:24:34.000 other person on the head. And so clearly this is in their world perspective, how they're observing
00:24:39.120 this. But now I need to talk for a few minutes about why I find the research so distrustworthy
00:24:45.520 in this space. One, you're proceeding into the research from a prior that this is a human rights
00:24:50.640 abuse. Like when they did that research on whether torture was effective, did anyone given that
00:24:54.960 torture is categorized as a human rights abuse by the dominant cultural group in our society,
00:24:59.520 did anyone really believe they were going to come back with an answer that's like,
00:25:02.720 yeah, torture, super effective. And with huge organizations just saying that it's been done,
00:25:08.000 that the data is sealed, nobody talk about this issue anymore, without really exploring where
00:25:14.160 the edge cases are. There just isn't that much research into exploring the edge cases here.
00:25:18.000 And again, it's so understandable because
00:25:21.920 abuse is a very serious issue. It is terrible.
00:25:25.440 It is. It is. But then we have to come to this question where this just gets absolutely insane to me.
00:25:30.400 If you look at what the research is saying, if this has a massive IQ effect, this has a massive effect
00:25:35.760 on aggression, these people become antisocial and aren't able to-
00:25:38.720 They hate their parents, et cetera.
00:25:39.760 They hate their parents. And then it's if these things were true at the levels that they're saying
00:25:46.880 these things are true, every single long-lived culture on earth would not have convergently
00:25:54.000 evolved this method of interacting with children during this developmental stage. There is not a
00:26:00.960 single, like when I look anthropologically, but historic Chinese or Japanese or European or
00:26:07.440 the large successful African groups, none of them have a ban on corporal punishment around kids.
00:26:12.880 All of them engage in some form of corporal punishment around kids.
00:26:15.440 When I mentioned this, some people were like, well, you know,
00:26:17.520 we used to do bloodletting, but we don't do bloodletting anymore. And I'm like, okay,
00:26:22.400 if every single human culture on earth had done bloodletting and we were the one culture
00:26:29.360 that didn't do bloodletting and we had only stopped it like 10 years ago, yeah,
00:26:33.360 I would probably look into that and be like, there is probably a reason that everyone was doing that.
00:26:38.160 The level of arrogance that goes into this position is almost astonishing.
00:26:43.360 To believe that you are the one culture in human history, this nexus of human morality that has
00:26:50.640 figured out something that everyone else got wrong. To have no humility when you realize how
00:26:56.000 rare this position is cross-culturally. It just astonishes me. But I guess a lot of people, they
00:27:01.520 just, this is a culture I grew up in. Therefore I am at a moral nexus in history and everything we
00:27:06.160 believe now is correct. And I will not be seen as having been abusive to my kids for not setting
00:27:11.760 physical boundaries with them. This is why we have this huge problem in the United States,
00:27:15.920 where when families are coming into this country, it's like all of the immigrant families do this.
00:27:20.240 Immigrants are coming from a lot of different places. All the immigrants do this because
00:27:23.520 everywhere else in the world used to do this before they started listening to these organizations that
00:27:28.640 are like, oh, this is always negative, never do anything like this. And what that means is this is
00:27:35.680 a very modern experiment. And throughout this video, I'm going to be playing clips because it used to
00:27:41.520 be, even 10 years ago, our society broadly thought of the parents who didn't do any form of corporal
00:27:46.880 punishment with their kids, like corporal punishment, as the selfish and abusive ones. The ones who did
00:27:52.720 not care about the long-term outcomes of their kids. Whether you're talking about the Simpsons.
00:27:56.880 I'm afraid young Ned is unusually aggressive, but I can't seem to find a cause for it.
00:28:02.400 We can't do it, man. That's discipline. I'm beginning to see the problem.
00:28:07.360 We don't believe in rules like we gave them up when we started living like freaky beatniks.
00:28:14.000 Yeah, you've got to help us, doc. We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas.
00:28:19.520 Or South Park.
00:28:22.160 Hello, I'm Dr. Richard Shea, here to tell you about my exciting new drug-free treatment
00:28:27.120 for children with attention deficit disorder.
00:28:29.200 This treatment is fast and effective and doesn't use harmful drugs.
00:28:34.640 Watch closely as I apply treatment to the first child.
00:28:36.960 I want a horse. I want a big brown horse with a fluffy black tail with a diamond charm.
00:28:40.640 Sit out and study!
00:28:45.600 Sit out and study!
00:28:49.760 Hey, stop crying until your schoolwork!
00:28:51.920 If you would like more information on my bold new treatments, please send away for this free brochure
00:28:58.800 entitled, You can either calm down or I can pop you in the mouth again. Thank you.
00:29:03.040 Or Futurama.
00:29:04.480 Most, perhaps all, the blame rests with the parents.
00:29:08.240 And so I ask you this one question.
00:29:11.920 Have you ever tried simply turning off the TV, sitting down with your children and hitting them?
00:29:18.960 Uh, or boondocks.
00:29:21.520 So, girls, you, for these people, you must have lost your goddamn mind!
00:29:28.400 I guess I just hate to see a child go unbeaten.
00:29:30.880 I'm not a spanker, okay? But if you can bring discipline back into our school,
00:29:35.360 then I am behind you 100%. I wish I had the guts you do, sister.
00:29:40.080 And that's why we signed that petition in support of paddling pigs.
00:29:43.600 And this is a very modern, and even when that was happening, everyone was like,
00:29:47.680 hey, if we keep not enforcing boundaries on our kids, this is what basically all those shows
00:29:52.720 predicted. We're gonna have a society where kids, um, cannot deal with challenges anymore,
00:29:58.800 that they have an extreme amount of emotional fragility. And this is what we've seen as a
00:30:02.720 consequence of this. It very much reminds me of, it's like an obvious thing if you think about it.
00:30:07.360 Um, why would every culture on earth convergently evolve this? And people can be like, that doesn't
00:30:11.680 mean anything. Just because you did something in the past doesn't mean that it's still good to do
00:30:16.320 now that we have additional research. And it's like, ah, this isn't something like sunblock or
00:30:21.600 something like that, where you get this delayed effect that would only happen to adults above
00:30:25.520 a certain age. What is being predicted in the research is that these people are going to have
00:30:30.080 significantly lower IQs and significantly higher amounts of antisocial behavior and significantly
00:30:36.080 not like their parents. So if you had just one subgroup within a population that wasn't practicing
00:30:41.520 this, presumably you're going to get higher cultural transfer within that subgroup because
00:30:45.680 they're going to have higher cultural fidelity because they're going to have a higher opinion
00:30:48.720 of their parents. Um, and you are going to have a better performing cultural subgroup.
00:30:54.080 So you would have just naturally in certain places in the world had subgroups within a population
00:31:00.720 or populations with different child rearing practices living next to a population out
00:31:05.280 competing them if these effects were true, which just means it's completely implausible
00:31:10.560 that at least at whatever way this was normatively practiced in history, which I don't think was the
00:31:16.080 extremely formalized spanking system adopted during the Victorian period that this actually had
00:31:20.880 deleterious effects. And if you look at the ban, the rate of corporal punishment in the United States,
00:31:27.200 it pretty much directly correlates with the rise in depression among youths and the rise of anxiety
00:31:33.600 among youths. Though it also correlates possibly interesting with the rise of kids feeling like
00:31:40.400 they're best friends with their parents. Yeah. When you could say, why is this leading to this rise
00:31:46.000 in depression and anxiety among kids? What would be the correlation here? And it's when you teach
00:31:52.160 kids boundaries, you are teaching them specific things they have to learn self-restriction around
00:31:57.840 and a varying degree of self-restriction around different things. When a kid isn't regularly
00:32:02.320 encountering social boundaries, they do not as strengthen the inhibitory pathways in their prefrontal
00:32:08.400 cortex, which makes it very hard to shut down thoughts and wants. Like I have a want,
00:32:13.760 but I'm not going to do that thing. That's actually like a muscle in your brain. It's a pathway in
00:32:18.640 your brain that needs to be regularly exercised to properly work. If you are not regularly exercising
00:32:23.760 that pathway, you can't shut down intrusive thoughts, right? Leads to obviously lower rates
00:32:29.840 of mental health. The funny thing, the ironic thing, and this is part of that larger microcosm of how
00:32:36.160 the urban monocultures key value proposition of removing in the moment pain is counterproductive,
00:32:42.080 that parents who don't, who in the end, like parents, most parents say, I just want my child
00:32:49.120 to be happy. I just want my child to be happy. And so they do all these things to remove in the
00:32:52.640 moment pain for their children. And then in the end, they get children who are a lot less happy.
00:32:57.280 And if we had to choose between our children liking us versus our children being thriving,
00:33:02.000 happy, productive people, in a hot second, we choose for them to hate us if that's what it took.
00:33:07.200 Yeah. I think that this phenomenon is very analogous to the Hays movement, which we're always ragging
00:33:12.480 on, the healthy at every size movement, which is promoting the idea that is not unhealthy to be
00:33:18.160 obese. And obviously it's unhealthy to be obese, but telling somebody that in the moment causes
00:33:23.200 emotional pain. And therefore, by the urban monoculture standards, you're breaking a major
00:33:28.560 tenant of theirs. And they have adopted this position of, well, we'll say this. And then
00:33:34.560 you're like, you should restrict food to some extent, especially if you have a problem there.
00:33:38.720 In the same way that I don't think every child needs this, but I think some children do. Some
00:33:42.160 children dispositionally need this. And they're like starving yourself. Like anorexia is, has all
00:33:47.680 these negative effects. Look at this. And I'm like, I'm not talking about anorexia. I'm talking about
00:33:51.760 mild boundaries, mild self-restriction. And this is what it's become with spanking.
00:33:57.040 You point out that there's this method of course correction with boundaries that are
00:34:02.080 enforced physically rather than emotionally, that likely has healthier outcomes. And they're like,
00:34:08.960 maybe I'm just the kind of person who needs to have it all or nothing.
00:34:12.800 Nah, all or nothing is easy, but learning to drink a little bit,
00:34:16.240 responsibly, that's a discipline. Discipline come from within.
00:34:21.120 What's really funny to me is just for diets, now we have Ozembic. Just take a medication.
00:34:25.040 Don't be disciplined. Just take a medication. And similarly, there's the whole South Park joke
00:34:29.520 about Ritalin.
00:34:30.080 Yeah, Ritalin. Don't discipline your kids. Just give them amphetamines.
00:34:33.920 That's definitely safer. And we normalized that as a society. Keep in mind, at the same time as a
00:34:39.600 society, we were normalizing to not spank our children, to not engage in any form of corporal
00:34:47.040 discipline. We began to instead said, well, we'll just give them amphetamines. And there was a great
00:34:52.800 old Daily Show joke when the Daily Show was still like fun and kind of bass at times. And
00:34:57.600 Jon Stewart still says some really bass stuff. He goes on other shows and he doesn't follow the
00:35:01.200 script. And he's like, oh yeah, I think this trans stuff with kids is going overboard. And they're
00:35:04.320 like, whoa, I can't remember. He said something like that. But so he said, we no longer spank our
00:35:10.800 children's butts because now we can spank their brains.
00:35:13.280 No, that's great. And I think that's so true. That's where we have had, there's other ways to
00:35:20.000 solve this. And it's clearly, you don't think that if you have normalized giving kids amphetamines as
00:35:25.520 a society. But that's our approach now. Our approach to discipline and that that's dietary,
00:35:31.280 that's behavioral is now just medicate it. Well, and this is the problem, right? So the urban
00:35:35.920 monoculture would say to us, what you're doing is culturally non-normative. Stop it. And I'm like,
00:35:41.520 I have seen the results of your normative parenting style. These kids are miserable,
00:35:48.560 anxiety, depression, messes that are hirkle-dirkling under their covers because they're
00:35:55.440 afraid to engage with the world. When the average product of a culture, the dominant culture in a
00:36:02.080 society is bad, like it's not good for the kids. It is to me, a sign of parental neglect and that you
00:36:09.760 do not truly love your kids and that you are not willing to go against the social grain for what
00:36:14.400 you think is in their best interest. And I think that the cultures that don't do it won't exist
00:36:20.320 anyways. The society is kind of clearing itself out. And then a lot of people can say, why would the
00:36:25.040 urban monoculture evolve this very bizarre practice? Because as we pointed out, like almost
00:36:29.200 nobody actually does this once they have kids. Like some families stick to this when they're very low on
00:36:33.600 the number of kids they have. Lower or they just, some people have very compliant children.
00:36:38.400 True. But the, and we take a very unique child-rearing approach where we go with zones
00:36:44.880 of influence. Like if you, we had the Jordan Peterson will raise Sims where we talked about
00:36:49.440 this bopping practice before, if you watched that episode, but some parenting styles like his are about
00:36:54.480 imposing a dominant figure's domain over an entire household or environment. And the kids just must obey
00:37:00.800 that. We don't take that approach. We see everyone as an independent sort of sphere of
00:37:06.880 will and that bopping only happens when the kids put themselves in danger. It is not me enforcing my
00:37:13.840 will on them. It is a sign that they have just crossed a certain boundary and that is leading to
00:37:19.360 consequences from the individuals in their environment. And so that is really important to me. But why did the
00:37:24.640 urban monoculture evolve this? Because it can seem very odd, but it makes perfect sense. If the urban
00:37:29.360 monoculture doesn't have any selective pressures around raising its own kids because it doesn't
00:37:34.400 raise its own kids, it's a very low fertility group, it doesn't need to evolutionarily care
00:37:40.960 about the negative psychological effects of the parenting techniques that is championing. However,
00:37:46.560 if its primary source of recruits is people who are raised in often more healthy cultural groups,
00:37:54.560 it needs a tool in all cults do this to convince individuals that their parents abuse them. If you
00:38:01.600 go to a Scientology session, that's one of the first things they'll try to convince you of is that your
00:38:05.360 parents abused you. They're looking for this original, like how did the original thetans get in you?
00:38:09.920 And it needs to do that because they cannot distance you from your birth cultural group without
00:38:15.520 severing ties with your parents of their outside of the urban monoculture. And so it uses this
00:38:21.120 recontextualization of a normal part of child rearing that basically all cultures everywhere on
00:38:27.200 earth do, almost directly in line with how distant they are from the urban monoculture,
00:38:33.040 is this evil abusive practice. It's just a really great tool for it. So of course it hammers it home.
00:38:40.080 And it's in line with this core value proposition. Anything that is emotionally negative or emotionally
00:38:45.360 trying is a sin. When they saw that we had enacted a negative emotional state on our children,
00:38:52.160 they were like, you have committed a sin by our cultural framework. How dare you do that? But from
00:38:57.520 our cultural framework, this is just absurd because we're like, but it's obviously in their long-term
00:39:01.120 best interest. And this is where it gets to this thing. We're like, why is it that everybody,
00:39:06.800 even from our own culture, understood that the parents who weren't doing this historically were the
00:39:10.480 selfish ones. The classic story of how did Ned Flanders become like Ned Flanders are parents who
00:39:17.200 were beatniks and who were like, we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas. We don't believe in
00:39:23.440 rules like we gave them up when we started living like freaky beatniks. Yeah, you've got to help us,
00:39:30.480 doc. We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas. There is an experimental therapy that might help
00:39:36.160 Ned contain his anger. It was known as the University of Minnesota spankological protocol.
00:39:41.520 And it's true. You see these in these episodes and we've recognized that how do you create like
00:39:46.560 polite, disciplined people. Now in the episode, he was spanked too much and obviously eventually
00:39:51.040 in the episode, it leads to a mental breakdown from him. But it admits in the episode, yeah,
00:39:55.040 this does lead to polite, disciplined people. He is one of the most morally upstanding people
00:39:59.920 and one of the most pro-social people in the entire Simpsons universe. And I also think it's
00:40:07.040 really funny that we have this horrified progressive reporter, and I can only imagine like most black
00:40:12.160 families reading this and they're like, oh, this is just like white people problems. You've got that
00:40:16.080 classic scene from Boondogs where you need the wise black man to come in and show the white mom who has
00:40:22.080 the undisciplined child how you're supposed to. What bizarre white people things to think that you should
00:40:27.760 never ever practice corporal punishment of any sort when your kid is putting himself or others at risk.
00:40:34.800 I want candy! Damn it, I hate you! You're ruining my life! Please, Herbert, remember our agreement.
00:40:41.840 We have an agreement about how we behave in a store, Herbert. When it gets like this,
00:40:45.280 I just don't know how to make him stop!
00:40:47.280 Get my marshmallows!
00:40:48.880 Have you ever tried beating his ass?
00:40:50.560 Oh, don't kill me!
00:41:00.560 So there's that, but then the other thing I wanted to elevate here is what this creates.
00:41:06.480 Because when you as a parent become afraid of setting uh physical boundaries, like you cannot
00:41:12.400 escalate to this highest level of like actually you cannot do certain things in this environment,
00:41:17.920 then you stop bringing your kids with you. So people are like, why did your kids have iPads at
00:41:22.960 the restaurant? It's because you can't have a bunch of kids at a restaurant without iPads.
00:41:25.680 It just doesn't work at this age range. Anyone can tell you that. And then they're like, you shouldn't
00:41:29.680 take them to the restaurant. Like why take them to an environment where you might need to punish
00:41:32.800 them? Where you need to lean on technology that can sometimes have deleterious effects?
00:41:36.560 And that's the core problem. The solution when you follow all of these parenting guidelines
00:41:41.840 is just don't have your kids shadow you all day. But that obviously creates bigger effects in terms
00:41:48.320 of preventing the kids from being in an enriched environment and learning in the way that kids
00:41:52.720 traditionally learned. Yeah. And by the way, we should do a whole separate video on iPads and screen
00:42:00.000 time. I am constantly blown away by the things that our kids are learning because we let them have
00:42:08.080 some screen time. Last night, Octavian was talking to me about hydraulics. And I'm like,
00:42:14.880 what? You are four years old. How do you know about hydraulics?
00:42:18.400 I love watching factory videos.
00:42:19.760 Yeah. That's a new thing. It's all about factories.
00:42:21.840 Yeah. You need to change to the type of content they're consuming for something that is
00:42:26.640 relative for their age. And if you can get them into right, like good loops outside of what we call
00:42:31.600 a form of cheese pizza. Young person.
00:42:36.160 But we call it that not because it's of children, but because it's that for children.
00:42:41.440 Yeah. It is simple, repeated. Anyone who has a kid who's they've let on YouTube for a little bit
00:42:46.960 will know that they have found that kid watching videos of a car being dipped in paint and then
00:42:51.280 dipped in another paint. Like it's clearly hijacked some part of their brain that adults don't have.
00:42:57.040 Yeah. And it's a very dangerous for kids to just let them on these systems unrestricted.
00:43:01.680 Yeah. So the screens can be very dangerous and they can be mindless, but they can also be amazing
00:43:07.360 and empowering. So we're not totally against screens, but also like people need to get off
00:43:11.440 parents on restaurants. Do you want the kids screaming in the right? Like most parents who
00:43:15.280 give their kids screens at restaurants almost never have their kids on screens at home, but it's a,
00:43:20.960 you know what? Like you get to choose.
00:43:22.400 It's a necessary.
00:43:22.960 And this is one thing I love about the boondog scenes when the kid's being really disruptive and he
00:43:26.720 finally gets punished. And you can see everyone who was watching in horror before is now like
00:43:31.280 really pleased at the turn of the events. And I think that this is true. Like you have these
00:43:36.800 pearl clutchers on Twitter who are freaking out about this, but most people are like, yeah,
00:43:40.320 sometimes kids need to get bopped in there. I wish as Richard Anania said, he's like, yeah,
00:43:44.480 sometimes kids need to get bopped. This is a thing. Not every kid does, but some kids definitely do.
00:43:51.040 And we take no pleasure in this.
00:43:53.520 Hold on. I had gotten to the full end of what I was saying here. So you end with this environment
00:43:56.960 where you can't set this higher level restriction. The problem is that most environments where our
00:44:01.520 kids would play require them learning these extreme levels of restrictions. Our kids outside
00:44:06.800 encountering a bat that we ended up finding out had rabies, allowing our kids to play outside is
00:44:12.960 exposing them to insta-death risks within a rural environment. Letting our kids play in the woods
00:44:17.280 where there are snakes and there are potentially rabid bats and there are streams that they could fall in.
00:44:22.000 When you get five kids wandering around out there, there is a way I can protect them
00:44:26.160 and fit with all these progressive cultural norms. It's to prevent them from playing in those
00:44:30.720 environments. And that I think has much larger deleterious consequences. The people who fight
00:44:38.720 for these sort of restrictions on any form of corporal punishment, what they are imagining in their head
00:44:44.320 is the alternative to that is that they just sit down and have a logical conversation with a two-year-old
00:44:51.760 where that two-year-old understands don't touch bats because they might have this interesting thing
00:44:57.280 We do that when Torsten took like his poop out and all the time we sit down and we have a conversation
00:45:03.040 about it and there's a lot of repetition and there's a lot of why do you think this is bad and
00:45:06.880 what is it bad. But the poo isn't the same thing. I'm saying that often when we have to resort to
00:45:14.720 bopping, it's because we are not in an environment where that's possible. Was Malcolm in a position
00:45:19.440 where he could take Torsten to a quiet area where he wasn't overstimulated and have a calm conversation?
00:45:25.280 Other kids wouldn't be charging for the bat. Exactly. And I actually didn't need to bop any
00:45:30.640 of them in that instance. I just said, if you move closer to the bat, I'm going to bop you.
00:45:35.280 The restaurant. What? No ability to have a quiet reason conversation with Torsten in the restaurant.
00:45:41.600 Yeah, with multiple kids at the table in the restaurant, there was just no ability to have
00:45:45.680 that conversation. And so they're imagining the alternative is this quiet reason conversation.
00:45:52.400 When that isn't the actual alternative that they're choosing between the real alternative
00:45:57.120 to not bopping is depending on the kid. Some kids just don't need this at all. As we've said is
00:46:03.440 either you get emotionally elevated with the kids, which I think is infinitely worse. Like you
00:46:07.600 emotionally reject the kid or you show some level of emotional distress. And I never want my kids to
00:46:13.680 think that the correct reaction to somebody doing something bad around you is emotional distress.
00:46:18.960 Because then they get in these cycles of emotional distress. Like we're seeing with all these
00:46:22.080 progressives today. If you read the article, there was no level of heightened emotions. This
00:46:27.040 wasn't me getting mad or losing my cool or anything like that. I never want one of my kids to see me
00:46:32.080 act like that. That is incredibly important for me. Yeah, emotional regulation is so much more
00:46:37.680 important to us. And this is the thing where progressives are like, oh, you get these negative
00:46:42.960 outcomes from this style of parenting. The other alternative is to just not let them interact with
00:46:48.160 potentially dangerous environments or environments where you can't take them aside by themselves
00:46:53.280 with a large group of siblings. And that forces them into highly restricted,
00:46:58.320 unenriched environments, which is going to have massive deleterious effects. And this is a really
00:47:04.480 interesting thing. When you look at this child research, there is just not a lot of great research
00:47:10.560 around how do I create these dynamic, energetic leaders that are filled with vitality,
00:47:19.440 that meet the exact, that are opposite of what society wants today, that are polite, that are,
00:47:26.000 it looks around things like, what was the measure that they kept using? It was like self-satisfaction.
00:47:31.840 Self-esteem.
00:47:32.480 Self-esteem, which then in later studies, like this is the main thing that these studies sort for is
00:47:36.960 self-esteem, which we have found has no correlation with anything meaningful in adulthood in terms of
00:47:42.400 outcomes or anything like that. Just a lot of child psychology, it's basically junk. And if people
00:47:47.440 are like, no, a psychologist wouldn't lie about this stuff. It's been shown in the gender scientists
00:47:52.400 that over 50% of scientists are willing to not publish or occlude data if they think it could
00:47:58.160 reinforce the idea that men and women have different psychological profiles.
00:48:02.720 Now, do you not think that they're going to do the theme around this other field and people are
00:48:07.600 like, well, you couldn't get these big data sizes. You can manipulate data pools to say basically
00:48:13.280 whatever.
00:48:13.600 Well, especially with something like corporal punishment, it's so easy to pull data that in
00:48:20.160 the end is real abuse and in the end is really bad stuff. So I think this is uniquely difficult to
00:48:25.200 research because how do you control? First off, you can't even ethically do this as a researcher because
00:48:31.120 you can't ethically be like, you, hit your kid, but at this level, and also it's impossible at
00:48:35.840 this level of strength, because what if someone is just everything they touch is a little too rough?
00:48:40.480 I don't know. So this can't, I don't even know if it was, if ethics boards would permit research on
00:48:46.000 this if they- Well, and that's the other problem is that you have a lot of genetic effects. So they're
00:48:50.080 often not doing controlled studies when you're doing this area, i.e., oh, parents who are more likely
00:48:55.840 to practice some form of corporal punishment. Also, their kids are more likely to be violent,
00:49:00.720 of course, like the heritable trait, of course, especially if the adult is practicing it because
00:49:05.360 they lack self-control rather than because they have self-control. And that is a huge, and I just
00:49:10.560 can't go back to this point enough, a huge fear I have is that my kids will learn that the way you
00:49:15.520 react to somebody doing something you don't like is emotionally heightening the situation,
00:49:21.440 is an emotional plea. That is, from my family's perspective, so much worse, because you begin to
00:49:28.000 actually feel that as a kid. Like, you then enter this higher emotional state, and it causes these
00:49:33.920 really negative downstream reactions. And I suspect that when we took them out of daycare, this is why
00:49:38.000 all that behavior stopped, why all of the tantrums stopped, why everything stopped, which you'll see
00:49:42.480 in an episode that unfortunately I haven't released yet, but we had a bunch of graphs on this, and it was
00:49:46.080 really interesting for us when they were just in our environments. The other thing that I wanted to
00:49:50.880 note here is the cultural differences within America. Like, that a lot of cultural groups
00:49:59.040 practice this, just not the urban monoculture. I point out that American Asians practice this at
00:50:03.040 really high levels. American Hispanics practice this at really high levels. American Blacks practice
00:50:06.480 this at really high levels. But also different American white groups. So if anyone has read Avalon
00:50:12.160 Seed, and by the way... Albian Seed.
00:50:14.160 I'm sorry, Albian Seed. If you are a fan of the channel and you haven't read this book, it's probably the
00:50:19.440 book I would most recommend after our books. It's a great book about the four founding cultural
00:50:25.600 groups in the United States. And I think it can help a lot of Americans who might not realize that
00:50:30.560 they actually do have a cultural ancestry and where they got their ideas. Because you'll read the book
00:50:35.120 and you'll immediately be like, oh, my family was this group.
00:50:38.240 Yeah, I'm this team.
00:50:39.600 You're in Ravenclaw, or in Hufflepuff, or in Griffin?
00:50:44.160 Yeah, you can ask, where are you going to get a bizarre culture that would not allow the punishment of
00:50:50.720 children? Because it's weird. From most cultural perspectives, the idea that you wouldn't set boundaries
00:50:54.480 around children... And one of the things I love, and I hear some people argue, they're like, I wouldn't treat
00:50:58.080 an employee this way. And it's like, you wouldn't sit an employee and time out either. The way children's brains
00:51:04.320 process the world is different from the way adult brains process the world. And you, as an adult,
00:51:09.360 are biologically designed to interact with them differently than the way you interact with the
00:51:14.640 adults. And you have different impulses in the way that you're interacting with them,
00:51:18.400 often that were selected for by your cultural group.
00:51:20.800 This is one of those things that just baffles me. When I talk to people who are otherwise totally
00:51:25.680 logical, sane people who believe the research on this, and I'm like, wait, you understand that every
00:51:32.640 cultural group that we are aware of, almost every cultural group in human history practices this
00:51:36.720 form of corporal punishment. And you think that this is causing massive IQ effects, massive effects
00:51:43.600 on bonding with parents, massive effects on aggression, and that none of this would have been selected out
00:51:50.800 for in our species. That like, the way that everyone is interacting with kids, if it was causing these
00:51:56.880 massive negative effects, that it wouldn't be selected out in our species. Worse than that,
00:52:02.560 it's like, how do they think that in an ancestral context, people communicated with pre-verbal
00:52:08.800 children, or like children who were just coming into verbiage, but didn't understand concepts like
00:52:12.880 death? Like, obviously, this is a way that we evolve to interact with our children. It's,
00:52:18.560 it's one of these, like, just so obvious things. It's baffling when it's like puberty blockers or
00:52:25.600 something. When, like, for a while, this, the quote-unquote science was like, puberty blockers
00:52:29.920 have no long-lasting effects, and it's like, well, no, obviously they do. How could anybody think that?
00:52:35.840 How could anybody think that the way that you communicate with kids, when they're not fully
00:52:43.120 verbal and understanding concepts like death, is physically? Like, that that wouldn't be the
00:52:49.200 natural evolved way to interact with them. It is just bizarre and outlandish. Actually,
00:52:54.800 one of our watchers was talking in the discord, and she was like, you know, when I was young,
00:52:59.360 I was very severely abused, so I was against any form of corporal punishment. But then I started to
00:53:05.120 have a lot of kids, and I eventually reached a point where I was like, oh, obviously I need this.
00:53:10.000 And I got to it too late. She saw a huge improvement in behavior. And that's the other
00:53:15.040 thing was this, where, you know, the scientists can say whatever they want, but there's a reason why
00:53:22.800 the vast majority of Americans end up converging on this same behavioral practice,
00:53:28.320 because it's an evolved instinct in us and our children, and it works. It works so obviously
00:53:36.320 and loudly that when they're like, no, the data said it doesn't work, they immediately discredit
00:53:41.840 themselves. I mean, there are ways that they could argue against this. If they said something,
00:53:45.760 because, you know, if you read the research, it's like, it never works. And it's like, well,
00:53:51.040 now you've just immediately discredited yourself, because it obviously works. And everyone who does
00:53:55.120 it knows it obviously works. So if one of the things you're saying, if you're like,
00:54:00.160 oh, it has this long term consequence, like, okay, it may work for like five years,
00:54:04.000 but then it has this massive negative IQ effect. Okay, fine. I'd be like worried about it then.
00:54:08.800 But that's not what they say. They say it doesn't work at all. And it obviously works. And this is
00:54:13.920 why everyone ends up throwing out the science the moment they have a ton of kids. So anyway,
00:54:19.280 everyone knows that we have this theory, or a lot of people know that the urban monoculture
00:54:23.120 actually evolved out of a split was in the Quaker movement. And we have a lot of receipts for this.
00:54:28.160 But I think that this is a further example of this, of the cultural groups that I'm aware of
00:54:32.560 in the world, like in terms of historic cultural groups, pretty much the only one I can think of
00:54:36.560 that cheats children as sacred, like as higher order morally than adults, is Quakers. It would be
00:54:43.440 seen as really weird in any other culture to be that freaked out about this. But if you're thinking
00:54:48.560 like Quakers, of course, it makes sense. You might as well be slapping a Buddha statue.
00:54:52.880 Yeah, they are the sacred cows of, yeah, at least at that time, especially.
00:54:57.440 Weird practice within the Quaker cultural group of having children morally lecture adults. And we
00:55:02.560 point out that you actually see this within the urban monoculture, which is one reason why we think
00:55:05.520 the Greta Thornburg thing is bizarre. Having a child morally lecture adults from most cultural
00:55:11.520 frameworks is just an insane thing to do. If it's a child, obviously they have less moral knowledge
00:55:17.600 than adults. They have less self-control than adults. The adults should not be viewing them
00:55:23.200 as like their tether to like supernatural ideology or like a higher order of truth. But then secondly,
00:55:29.040 if you look at the cultural group that we come from, which is the Calvinist iteration of the
00:55:32.880 backcountry people. So we have elements of our culture from the Calvinist cultural group,
00:55:36.720 but also a lot of elements from the portion of the Calvinists that went to live in the back cultural
00:55:41.040 group, backcountry and part of that environment. We talk a lot more about this in the
00:55:44.480 The Pregnant Side of Crafting Religion if you're interested in this. But that's a little,
00:55:47.200 that's a group that grew up that evolved terms like little shits, which I grew up hearing all
00:55:51.600 the time. And it's a term of endearment towards children, but it gives the perspective of the
00:55:57.440 child status within the community. And the way that this cultural group would raise children is the
00:56:03.120 children would follow the parents everywhere they went. Within Quakers, the children were basically like
00:56:08.080 kept isolated, alone, given a fairly strict rule set, but not really punished that severely.
00:56:14.160 Within the backcountry thing, they just follow the parents around with whatever they're doing and
00:56:19.040 get bopped like this. You can read, like when you're reading about these backcountry people,
00:56:23.520 they bop their kids all the time. Like this is very clearly the traditional way that this culture
00:56:28.880 would enforce a value system. You weren't trying to hit the kid, hurt the kid, but you were trying to
00:56:34.320 shock and reorient the behavior. The Calvinist cultural group, which my family also does to some
00:56:39.600 extent, had different, they were extremely strict. And they would also try to enforce value systems
00:56:45.360 through emotionally shocking the kids. Yeah. Like having them stare into open graves and contemplate
00:56:51.120 like this will happen to you one day. Think on that young man when you are deciding like your moral
00:56:56.960 actions. Yeah. See, that's the emotional type that we're not so keen on. Yeah. No, it's not really the
00:57:01.920 emotional type. And I think that our family culture has a strong amount of recognize your mortality.
00:57:07.120 You're a hell of a lot more cheerful about it though. Yeah. I also, I need to show my son like
00:57:13.080 violent videos so that he understands the consequence. Like the oldest, when they moved
00:57:16.480 to the category of now they can understand that they could die. He now was like, oh,
00:57:20.480 I'll turn into a meatball or he'll go, oh, Torsten will turn into a meatball if he goes to the road.
00:57:24.560 No, he says, you're going to die, Toasty. You're going to die, Toasty.
00:57:27.840 That's what inspired, are you going to die?
00:57:30.480 Yeah. He had this great moment where we told him, you need to put on this life jacket or you're going to die.
00:57:36.720 And so he understood that and he put on the life jacket. And then we tried to get Torsten to do it.
00:57:40.480 And Torsten was like, no, I'm not going to put on the life jacket. And then Octavian turns to Torsten
00:57:43.600 and he goes, you're going to die, Torsten. You're going to die, Toasty. I love Octavian.
00:57:48.720 But that's also very, a back country way to talk and everything like that, which is to say that you're
00:57:53.520 not always fronting with heavy words and everything like that. Culturally even within our country,
00:57:59.040 there just isn't a respect for cultural diversity anymore at all. That this culture might have a
00:58:04.000 different way of relating to children and a way that I am continuing to adopt because I believe
00:58:08.800 it genuinely, like when I look at the breadth of evidence, people can wave these studies in my face
00:58:14.480 as much as they want. But I'm like, but I also see what would happen to researchers if studies that didn't
00:58:19.920 show this got published. And it's so easy to bias the stats when studying this particular field,
00:58:25.840 as Simone has pointed out. So I just don't engage with these. And if people are like,
00:58:29.840 he doesn't love his kid. This was a kid who was born early. And I, for months, every day would go
00:58:35.920 to the hospital and spend all day holding him against my chest. Because when I went over the
00:58:39.920 research, it looked like that had the best outcome for this kid. You know, the idea that-
00:58:45.680 This kid is not afraid of you. He loves you. He runs up to you all the time. He wants to spend time
00:58:51.520 with you. He's the one who snuggles with you all the time. This is not, and this is what would make it
00:58:55.920 extra heartbreaking and probably hurtful to him. If our form of punishment was getting mad,
00:59:02.000 it would break his heart. And every time, like there was even with his younger sister,
00:59:06.000 the other day, you moved her from climbing up the stairs to at the base of our kitchen,
00:59:11.440 because you didn't want her to be afraid. And then went upstairs to get something that you needed.
00:59:14.960 And she thought for a second that she was being rejected by you. And she was devastated. Like our
00:59:19.360 children definitely take the concept or the prospect of rejection so much more emotionally
00:59:26.080 seriously than any form of physical correction we've ever used on them.
00:59:30.400 Well, and that's because of how we use emotions in our household and how we have chosen to use this
00:59:35.360 form of punishment. Because they understand that the highest form of emotional punishment is like,
00:59:41.360 you've really disappointed me. That is a bop. I don't jump straight to that. I don't jump straight to
00:59:47.360 losing my cool or losing emotional composure. They have, I think, a much stronger emotional
00:59:54.480 connection to me than they would if I chose one of these alternative systems for delineating the
01:00:00.880 highest category of you are doing something that's dangerous or that you shouldn't be doing and you
01:00:06.720 are not listening to me. And this is actually, I actually think it's where a lot of physical abuse
01:00:11.360 in relationships comes from is our relationship does not contain any physical abuse in part.
01:00:17.680 And we did a video on this, like maybe men should hit their wives or something like that. In part,
01:00:22.560 because I am able to logically communicate with you and we are able to come to mutually beneficial
01:00:28.960 outcomes where we're like, okay, we have this difference of opinion, but we both care about the
01:00:33.520 same outcomes. So it's never a place where we're ever going to be at odds. Truly the only place where we
01:00:38.480 may be temporarily at odds is in knowledge. So we just have to resolve that.
01:00:42.400 So we just have to decide who has access to more knowledge. Whereas I think where a lot of physical
01:00:47.680 abuse in relationships often starts is one person is just not able to communicate the severity of
01:00:56.240 something they believe to another person. One instance I'm aware of is the wife who wasn't managing
01:01:01.760 the finances or anything like that would just gone out and gotten an expensive purse and they were
01:01:06.880 already broken in a ton of debt. And she had done this recently and he had told her not to.
01:01:11.760 I should say, I'm not saying that abuse is justified in that instance, but I am saying that this is
01:01:18.800 logically what leads many people down this pathway is I can't communicate with this person in any other
01:01:24.000 way. The problem with young children is that there is an age range where you need to communicate a
01:01:30.480 high level of threat from the environment and you need to choose the least painful option for communicating
01:01:37.120 that. And I believe the least painful option is a bop. And I should note that I actually think the kids are
01:01:44.240 pre-programmed for this because we bop our kids very lightly, but they take it much more seriously than I
01:01:49.920 would anticipate they would given that it doesn't actually cause any physical pain and it's very clear to
01:01:55.600 them that they don't internalize as causing much physical pain. And I think it's because they're
01:01:59.680 pre-programmed to be like, oh, whoa, something has happened that puts them into this sort of mental
01:02:07.360 restart mode. And I would say to an adult, if somebody lightly bopped you on the face like that,
01:02:13.440 would the pain be what shocked you? Or would it be the invasion of the personal space of your face?
01:02:19.760 It's the invasion of the personal space. That is the purpose of the bop.
01:02:23.440 And another reason why we choose the face, and I think why in nature the face evolved to be the
01:02:27.840 location that this works for, is that it's the most accessible spot if you're trying to make sure
01:02:34.000 the negative feedback is immediate, which in all animal models. And somebody's like, why are you
01:02:38.160 looking at animal models? Like your kids aren't animals. I'm like, we use animal models because they
01:02:42.400 correlate with human patterns, okay? If something is common across social mammal groups, it's likely going to be
01:02:50.800 a common behavior in our early ancestors, right? And we are likely going to have some pre-evolved
01:02:57.440 components there still operational. And yeah, I actually find it's interesting that this bop saying
01:03:04.240 was something that I grew up thinking was normal. This was something that my cultural group was like,
01:03:09.600 oh, of course you do it this way. But different cultural groups punish in different ways. And if
01:03:13.520 you look at the way corporeal punishment is administered in the South Park episode,
01:03:17.200 it's administered in a way that is similar to this. And when I look at Matt Stone and Trey Parker,
01:03:21.600 they seem one of them is Jewish, but the other one comes from a cultural group that's very similar
01:03:24.480 to my own. So I imagine that in terms of value sets, in terms of how they relate to kids. So I
01:03:29.200 assume that this is how corporeal punishment was practiced within their community, which I suspect
01:03:34.080 is much more likely to, at a lower pain threshold, be more effective. That's why we choose to face,
01:03:38.160 because it's the lowest pain threshold area. Do you have any final thoughts on this?
01:03:41.600 Corporeal makes it sound ethereal. Funny. I would just say
01:03:50.240 that eight passengers need to write us a check. You're welcome.
01:03:55.600 No, but look, that's clearly an instance where it's gone overboard and it's having a negative.
01:04:00.320 No, seriously. And yeah, for us, I want to emphasize that when we say we are against delayed
01:04:08.720 punishment, we really mean that even if we, like the time it would take to go and get a spoon to
01:04:13.200 hit someone with is too much time. And a lot of the punishment that you saw, even before the
01:04:18.880 passengers had the fallout of the post channel closing and the taping to chairs and all the
01:04:23.920 really terrifying stuff, there was still delayed punishment that was insane. Oh, you're not going to
01:04:28.800 have your bed for a month or your bedroom or whatever. Things would be permanently taken away.
01:04:33.280 Oh, and we should note that we don't do punishments other people think was normal. We've never put our
01:04:38.320 kids in timeout, for instance. We never socially isolate. We never say, oh, you don't get your
01:04:44.480 dinner now or anything like that. With this fairly mild form of punishment, we've been able to cover
01:04:50.880 pretty much all of our punishment bases without needing to go to delayed punishment, which I don't
01:04:55.360 think is effective. Timeout, stuff like that. Yeah. And this is precluding the frontline of defense,
01:04:59.760 which is always just talking with our kids. And this is something I would ask people to
01:05:04.000 seriously consider if they have a strong emotional reaction to this. Why is lightly slapping a kid in
01:05:09.840 the face abuse to you, but timeout is not? Why is timeout a lower order punishment? And you can be
01:05:17.200 like, well, because it doesn't involve physical contact. But why does that make it a lower order?
01:05:24.080 If the child finds timeout to be more concerning or more emotionally elevating, why is that? It is
01:05:30.400 just a societal thing which you have accepted is true without analyzing. That's the truth of it.
01:05:37.760 That's why you find one to be crossing a boundary and the other to not be crossing a boundary,
01:05:42.000 because you haven't thought through what was likely real punishments in our evolutionary context,
01:05:50.400 and the way we likely evolved to learn information was in this age range.
01:05:55.360 But that's obviously not realistic in a high fertility environment when you're in a dangerous
01:05:59.680 context. The funny thing, though, is like back to the lion example on Safari, because people on
01:06:04.640 Twitter, for example, when they bring that up, they're like, lions don't have words. They can't
01:06:10.560 use words. No, they totally would growl and warn them.
01:06:13.600 Yeah, they do have words. Lions used words first.
01:06:15.760 Little woman knew it was stepping over a line, but it was testing. Where are the boundaries?
01:06:20.720 This is the point of play behavior. And this is also a problem for kids,
01:06:24.320 as Simone has pointed out, because now we don't let kids test each other's boundaries.
01:06:27.920 One kid gets mad, they test the other kid, I'm not doing this anymore. We mostly let our kids work
01:06:32.640 this out by themselves.
01:06:33.760 Yeah, they're like, so-and-so's not sharing, or so-and-so hit me, and we're like, work it out.
01:06:38.080 Because they need to learn, yeah, boundaries.
01:06:40.480 And so one thing we often ask, actually, for example, if they're playing on their couch fort,
01:06:44.240 which we make for them, and then, oh, Toasty hit me on the couch fort. And I'm like, okay,
01:06:47.600 so do you want to stop and no more couch fort, or do you want to get over it and work it out? And
01:06:51.200 they're like, oh, I want to work it out. It's really, kids also, I think, want to work it out.
01:06:57.680 They want to play, they want to push those boundaries, and they're going to whine and cry about it.
01:07:02.400 Another thing we've noticed about the way that kids react is because if they're playing in a room,
01:07:07.360 and we don't have, we're not physically there, they're on camera and on mic, and we are watching
01:07:11.760 them still. And the amount of performative crying or whimpering or complaining or tattling that goes
01:07:19.360 on when parents are around or when adult authorities are around is insanely high compared to when they're
01:07:25.120 just amongst themselves. And they absolutely police each other when they think that they're not being
01:07:30.160 observed.
01:07:31.040 Here, when we're talking about this cultural subset, another thing that's really important within our
01:07:34.480 cultural background is that, and I mentioned this before, but I want to elevate it and put
01:07:38.960 a song here because it's, or a portion, let me see what I can get away with. But I would recommend
01:07:42.960 people listen to this song, He's Mine. It's a country song.
01:07:46.480 He had them by the collar, said he caught them shooting beer bottles down in a holler.
01:07:51.600 And I said, is that right? He said they won't speak when spoken to.
01:07:55.680 So which one here belongs to you? Left him in the eyes.
01:08:00.160 He's mine, not mine. And if you knew me then, there'd be no question in your mind.
01:08:07.120 Even though he's mine.
01:08:09.120 And it is about this way of relating to kids, which is to say,
01:08:13.280 our child breaking a rule gives me pride. It gives me pride that they're the type of people who test
01:08:19.040 boundaries. That doesn't mean I'm not going to set those boundaries and enforce those boundaries.
01:08:24.240 In one part of the song, the kids were drinking and shooting something out by a holler, which is
01:08:29.760 like a pit. And the neighbors brought them over and they're like, which one of these boys is yours?
01:08:35.040 And he's taking pride. He's mine. He, no, what's not said in the song, but it's very obviously true
01:08:40.480 because I grew up in these types of families. That kid is still punished at the end of the night.
01:08:44.080 The dad can be proud at his kid for being the rebellious sort of a person,
01:08:49.520 but you still get punished when you get caught. And that goes forwards into parenting as well.
01:08:55.200 And I think that to me, this is really emotionally healthy for somebody growing up is separating the
01:09:00.960 idea of repercussions for crossing certain boundaries and pride in my kids for being
01:09:09.360 willful and energetic. And I think that a bop system allows me to separate these two things
01:09:15.760 very effectively. But I think the real tragedy of all this, the real tragedy of all this,
01:09:21.280 oh, the research says this is they've gone so far in the other direction that now we have a
01:09:27.520 generation where kids are, we can't let our kids play outside. We can't let our kids explore the woods.
01:09:33.760 We can't, all of the things that kids used to do are now just genuinely not safe to allow kids to do.
01:09:41.200 I think if you are attempting with a large group of kids to practice this style of parenting.
01:09:45.520 And like when large by six kids of this young age range. And to me, that is heartbreaking
01:09:53.040 because I think that those things outweigh any of the negatives that may be incurred from this sort
01:10:00.000 of punishment. And a lot of people are like, do you really want like the pro natalist movement
01:10:04.960 associated with this? And I'm like, yes, I like couldn't want it associated with anything more.
01:10:10.080 The urban monoculture imperiously attempting to take our children away from us from breaking
01:10:16.720 a cultural norm that almost no ethnic minority group has within this country. So they're basically
01:10:22.640 saying we plan eventually everyone to be like us. When I tell somebody from this very small group of
01:10:28.480 wealthy white people who live in cities mostly, who have this extremist view around punishment and
01:10:34.720 kids. Most people in Africa do this. They're secretly thinking, yeah, they won't for long.
01:10:39.760 One day they'll all think like us in our culture, because it has this manifest destiny component to it.
01:10:45.440 It is the descendant of the old European imperialist mindset. And it's such a good framing
01:10:52.880 where when they're like everyone who practices, this is a monster. And then I'm like most black Americans
01:10:58.560 practices like the overwhelming majority. You're aware of that.
01:11:01.280 And then they have to walk that back because they haven't they haven't like there isn't there's
01:11:06.480 this cognitive dissonance in we want cultural diversity, but we don't actually want cultural
01:11:12.080 diversity and we want everyone to behave exactly like us. And they pretend or live in this world
01:11:17.840 where those two things are possible in the same world when they're just not cultural diversity means
01:11:24.400 OK with child rearing practices that are different from your own, which is what we fight for. While
01:11:30.160 we don't approve of stuff like spanking, I fight for a world where that is OK, because the person who is
01:11:37.040 in a best position to judge whether spanking their child is an OK way to relate to that child is somebody
01:11:43.520 who was spanked themselves as a kid. Yeah. But I think here's I guess here's one more thing that's
01:11:49.520 on my mind is a lot of people on Twitter who are horrified by the fact that we practice this
01:11:57.440 themselves were some were probably just we're going to say beaten, like actually hurt. But then I think
01:12:04.880 some were probably bopped and then they entered a culture in which a therapist or a friend or just
01:12:11.200 contextualization and seeing other people talk about these things made them retroactively see
01:12:17.200 it as abuse. And that's how the urban monoculture got them. It got their hook for them. It separated
01:12:22.800 them from the people who loved and cared about them most because that's a hard thing to do. How
01:12:27.040 do you separate someone from their family? Like most people should realize these are the people who
01:12:30.480 love and care about me most in the world. Like most parents, there's some bad parents out there. I
01:12:33.920 understand this. But generally, like often unless you're dealing with like genuinely narcissistic or
01:12:38.480 sociopathic parents, that is a true statement. And so you need to and I think tragically convince
01:12:43.840 people that their parents and and this is one of the things I said one of the true tragedies is one
01:12:47.600 of the ways that the urban monoculture enforces this culturally normative stance the most is through
01:12:52.560 divorce law. Because if you side with the urban monoculture on anything, you can utilize that to
01:12:58.160 take parents from the other parent in a divorce proceeding. Like if one parent spanks and the other one
01:13:02.800 doesn't, the non spanking parent can utilize that to get the kid. And often if the non parent wasn't even
01:13:07.920 non spanking before that, now they can become non spanking and use that to get the kid. I mean,
01:13:12.000 you see this with gender transition stuff, you see this with all sorts of stuff where the urban
01:13:16.400 monoculture, you just side with it and you get auto custody, which is horrifying. And I think that
01:13:22.720 people from the urban monoculture, they so dehumanize other cultural groups, they are genuinely
01:13:28.560 incapable of realizing that when other people are doing this, very few people want to hurt their kids,
01:13:34.480 hurting their kids. They are doing this because they believe it's in the long-term best interest
01:13:38.560 of their kid. And often with some reason that the urban monoculture is just dismissing out of hand.
01:13:44.800 The studies don't say so. The studies have been wrong about a lot of things recently. Okay.
01:13:49.680 And I can understand when I look at the nature of this deal, how the studies could have come to be
01:13:53.760 wrong on this issue. So I dismissed them. And it's because the anthropological evidence for me
01:13:59.760 seems to suggest that it does work. And the evidence within my own household, like I have seen
01:14:04.000 how my kids have reacted to this, what has happened since, because we didn't engage all our kids with
01:14:08.640 this. With the first kid, we have this mindset, we're never going to do this. We're never going
01:14:11.760 to do this. You know, by the time we're kids three, we're like, whatever. And so I've seen other kids
01:14:15.440 grow up with this and without this. And just the level of like awesomeness of them to each other
01:14:23.200 into outsiders has increased dramatically. So I also think it's really messed up to equate something
01:14:29.520 like this with actual abuse. And that's the other thing is just the extent to which the
01:14:34.160 controversy that has arisen because of this article trivializes real and actual abuse. It makes me
01:14:42.560 worried and sad because that is such a big issue. And to equate them, and it's hard because it's one
01:14:50.480 of those things where it's hard to know where the line is, but we know people and care deeply about
01:14:56.880 people who have been. Aila, for example, has talked about this a lot publicly, and I think she went
01:15:02.880 through it actually in abusive childhood. Yeah. And it's heartbreaking and horrible.
01:15:07.600 I think that's heartbreaking and I would not wish that on anyone. And it is absolutely messed up that
01:15:12.880 people equate a light bop on the nose to like reorient a kid's direction, like just restart their
01:15:19.120 system that doesn't hurt them. It's clear in the article, he was back to laughing and doing what
01:15:22.640 he was doing before within 30 seconds of the event. It's very clear. This was not painful to him.
01:15:27.280 It was like somebody being taped to a chair and beaten. That is absolutely insane. And that a person
01:15:34.000 online is like, you just never hit a kid. And I'm like, that is your cultural perspective.
01:15:37.840 And I don't think the cross-cultural evidence supports your position.
01:15:41.760 Well, especially when abuse and neglect is sometimes defined at least by the Department of Health
01:15:46.640 and Human Services in the U.S. is sometimes a failure to act in an effort to protect a child.
01:15:52.240 Sometimes you have to... From our cultural perspective, not employing this practice
01:15:56.000 is a form of abuse. Or whatever is effective. We're not saying you always have to bop. We're
01:16:01.760 just saying if you fail to do what's effective in protecting your kid, that also is abuse. Some kids
01:16:08.400 only respond to this in certain situations. Other kids... And I'd ask people what they need to change
01:16:14.000 their mind on this particular issue. Because, you know, we always talk about how like...
01:16:17.200 Yeah, because we changed our minds. We both came into becoming parents saying zero tolerance,
01:16:22.000 never know nothing ever like this. Yeah. I mean, so there's the Amy Chua,
01:16:26.640 this whole tiger mom thing, which was a big thing when I was growing up.
01:16:30.000 And people who don't know what happened, she did the type of punishment that I would say falls
01:16:33.840 well into the abuse category. But she did practice corporeal punishment with very aggressive,
01:16:38.800 high expectations for her kids. And everyone told her, in the public media and everything like
01:16:43.520 that, because she had two kids, that they were going to hate her and they were going to be
01:16:47.200 failures. Like, this wasn't going to work. Yeah. Which we see... Right now, a lot of people are
01:16:51.360 saying exactly the same thing. Your kids are going to hate you. Your kids are going to fight back.
01:16:56.240 Your kids are going to... Whatever. Yeah.
01:16:59.360 But what happened with her two kids? Remember, we talk about shotcalling. Like,
01:17:02.560 this is why Lazlo Polgar matters. Shotcalling is not anecdotal evidence.
01:17:05.840 Predicting that an unusual way of doing things will lead to an extremely unusual result.
01:17:12.560 Two kids both being successful and having a good relationship with their parent.
01:17:17.040 Predicting that is incredibly unlikely, statistically speaking. So it's not anecdotal.
01:17:21.840 So now we know what happened to her two kids. They grew up to become a Yale lawyer and a Harvard
01:17:26.640 lawyer and they're on good terms with their mom. They're like, I had some of the things I wouldn't
01:17:31.360 do with my own kids and stuff like that. And I have some reservations about this, but broadly,
01:17:35.360 they're on good terms with their mom. Like almost nobody says everything about my parents and my
01:17:38.960 childhood I love. Even ones who were in like the most hippie-ish style.
01:17:41.920 And some people have been like, yeah, but she later said she regretted her parenting style.
01:17:45.760 And I'm like, well, whether she regretted it or not really has nothing to do with the
01:17:49.440 outcome. The point is, is that she did do it. The kids did end up successful and the kids did not
01:17:57.200 end up estranged from her. So if you're saying, if you do this, your kids will not be successful
01:18:02.560 and will not end up liking you as an adult, at least in the one shock calling case that we had
01:18:09.280 exposure to was in my childhood, that is provably wrong.
01:18:13.360 So I think that even going much further than us, when I'm looking at the evidence I have that doesn't
01:18:19.120 come from these extreme filters, seems to support that, no, you're not destroying your kid's life
01:18:24.960 by raising them in a culturally unique way. And I think that I wouldn't do it that way,
01:18:30.800 but I think that there is potentially positive outcomes for even much more than what we as a
01:18:37.520 family are willing to do. And I think it'd be really cool if I could know that there was some
01:18:41.920 unbiased research in this. And something that's interesting to ask yourself is, would you change
01:18:46.160 your mind? Like we are going to have five or six kids at least, right? If all of these kids end up
01:18:52.320 successful and we do this whole weird thing that we did. Okay. Is that going to be enough evidence
01:18:58.720 for you to change your mind about us being right about these things? Or is it just no, because the
01:19:05.200 studies in that case, I think you're really just obeying a priest cast and not paying attention to the
01:19:11.360 disincentives within the academic bureaucracy. And we're also not saying this is right about,
01:19:15.680 this is right for everyone. But yeah, no, I think different cultural groups actually,
01:19:19.120 I think have, I wouldn't encourage every parent. In fact, I can think of many parents who I would
01:19:24.640 definitely not encourage to do this. Especially if a parent doesn't have emotional control,
01:19:29.280 I think that this leads to very negative results. If you are ever punishing your children
01:19:35.120 with anger, you have failed as a parent. But there are also some parents that we know that
01:19:39.360 are just, they're emotionally composed very different where they could in a sober-minded
01:19:44.000 way do this, but it just wouldn't hit right with the kids, poor word choice. But it just wouldn't,
01:19:51.520 it would come across as like, why did you do that? Because there are some parents who are,
01:19:57.120 I'm thinking about some very emotionally sensitive and attuned people who themselves would find this
01:20:05.360 very like too distressing. We already find it distressing, but they would find it very distressing,
01:20:09.280 to implement. And their kids would not, they would not see it the way our kids do.
01:20:16.160 Our kids are very rough and tumble.
01:20:17.360 Yeah, they think of a violation of the relationship they have with their parents.
01:20:20.720 Yeah. And that they need that delicate talking. They need their kid, their parent to just talk to
01:20:24.400 five or sorry, count to five. And just the thought of their parent potentially at the end of five,
01:20:28.800 being slightly disappointed in them is such an emotional and distressing thing that they
01:20:32.160 immediately halt at four. But so they should not, they should not bop because bop would be just
01:20:37.280 counting is enough to distress these children. So there's some delicate children for whom I would
01:20:41.600 totally not recommend this. Our kids are not those kids.
01:20:44.480 Yeah. And our kids and Simone, you've been around our kids. I think most people who know us know that
01:20:48.960 we are very considered parents and how we do things. Our kids do not register this
01:20:55.120 as like adversarial or me.
01:20:57.360 There are kids who would, there are kids who would, and this is not right.
01:21:00.560 There are kids who would. And in that instance, they might need a different strategy, but for our
01:21:04.480 kids, it's more just like a fact of life. When I do certain things that could be dangerous,
01:21:09.840 like I've just noted like the room, but oh, here's the wall. I need to turn around.
01:21:13.520 Yeah. It's like bumper cars. Here's bump. They bump right off. It's almost like they
01:21:17.920 literally like a bop is almost like the bop is here. Our kids just go right into it. And then they go off.
01:21:24.240 That's it. It's almost like they, they bring it on. I'm not saying they, they ask for it.
01:21:28.480 Yeah, but it is actually very interesting how they emotionally relate to it and how
01:21:34.080 little it is seen as something like spanking or something like that, where there's this fear
01:21:38.720 going into it, which I think is often worse than the spanking or something.
01:21:42.320 I think it's probably part of the psychological torture.
01:21:44.880 Yeah. I had some nannies and stuff from different cultures that would do things like spank me when I
01:21:48.240 was a kid or do different forms like ear bopping or something like that, different forms of punishment.
01:21:51.920 And in spanking, you get the emotional roll up to it. That's so worrying.
01:21:56.560 Literally, when I think about all the types of punishments I got when I was a kid,
01:22:00.560 of all of them, the least painful is bopping. Bopping is so much less painful than a parent
01:22:05.760 telling you they're disappointed in you or they're angry with you. It's so much less painful than a
01:22:10.160 spanking and all the lead up to it. It's so much less annoying and anger inducing than a timeout.
01:22:16.080 It is of, I could choose among all the punishments in the world that I could get as like a, okay,
01:22:20.800 you crossed a line here. It isn't one that I, as a kid would choose. And not everyone would do this,
01:22:25.040 but I think it's pretty clear from our kids that they're the same way. And I really like
01:22:28.240 how it's a way to signal that they've gone too far without putting any emotional wall between us,
01:22:34.240 without the first thing I'm saying when I bought my kid is I love you, but this is not the way we act
01:22:39.520 in this environment. Yeah. I love you, Malcolm. I love you too. And I'm glad that we're able to
01:22:44.720 stand up for this and fight for differing cultural practices. Leave no child unbopped.
01:22:52.560 Bop all the children. Bop all the children. We literally just said not that, of course,
01:22:57.440 but yeah, I don't like being the advocate for this. I wish this weren't a hill that we were
01:23:04.720 apparently dying on right now. Yeah. We do not advocate for general corporeal punishment.
01:23:09.680 We do not advocate for any of that stuff, but we do advocate for bopping. I do advocate
01:23:17.680 for some forms of physical contact in terms of- I just wish it didn't have to be us advocating.
01:23:24.320 But it does, because if we're going to, if we are going to be fighting the urban monoculture's
01:23:29.600 imperiousness in terms of how people raise their kids- Wait, no one else is going to stand up for this,
01:23:33.920 aside from Richard Hanania, who's the only other person who has balls in this world.
01:23:37.440 Along with some of our listeners, you know who you are. So, yeah.
01:23:41.760 The number of death threats we get are, oh, I'm going to go up and kill those people and take their kids and-
01:23:47.120 The most specific threats this time around.
01:23:50.480 Yeah. Like, you better be watching the news. I'm going to get those Collinses.
01:23:53.680 Yeah. In Valley Forge, we're going to come watch the news. Interesting.
01:23:58.880 I wonder how the devil people threaten to attack us with is going to hold up against the AR-15.
01:24:03.600 But no, but here's what I'm thinking when I hear something like that. I'm like, oh,
01:24:07.360 this is the consequence of not bopping a kid. He never learned personal boundaries.
01:24:11.840 Your first thought is, oh, this person who just gave us a death threat didn't get beaten enough
01:24:16.400 as a kid. I don't know.
01:24:17.680 No, I do not think that their parents raise them well, or that they understand what good parenting is,
01:24:22.000 because they appear to lack emotional control or the ability to soberly analyze the situation.
01:24:27.520 No, the progressives would just be like, no, he was beaten as a kid, because all the research shows
01:24:32.000 that when you were beaten as a kid, you're violent. I'm just saying. But anyway, let's go get our kids.
01:24:37.360 I love you, and you are amazing. Let's go find our children.
01:24:39.680 Oh, and one thing I'd say, if people are like, how do you choose when you accept the science and
01:24:44.880 when you're really skeptical of the science? Whenever anyone says every expert in a field agrees on
01:24:50.160 something, I pretty much immediately dismiss it. Because I'm like, that just doesn't happen in
01:24:54.480 science when there's no nuance. There is always more when science is happening correctly.
01:24:59.840 If something is a, everyone agrees on this, like climate change or something like that,
01:25:04.240 I'm all of a sudden, okay, press F to doubt. That's major sus. Because it's just, you don't
01:25:09.760 get that. And I will say that at the end of this, it's all about moderation. Because it's really bad
01:25:15.840 if because you equated lightly tapping a child's face with beating them, that your child ends up
01:25:21.920 emotionally fragile, depressed, and then ends up committing suicide or something.
01:25:26.320 Okay, let's go get the kids. Okay, these things have consequences. This isn't happening in a vacuum.
01:25:30.880 I love you, Simone. I love you too.
01:25:32.160 Most, perhaps all the blame rests with the parents. That's right, you. And I asked you this one question.
01:25:42.080 Have you ever tried simply turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?
01:25:50.000 I wrote about this. And it's number two on their site all day.
01:25:56.240 Oh, my God.
01:26:01.520 But anyway, what is really flattering is that as someone who, before meeting you, minored in photography
01:26:09.040 in school and everything, right, never expected my photos to be in the Daily Mail and the Guardian.
01:26:17.280 I'm like a top billing photographer, you guys.
01:26:20.240 Yeah.
01:26:20.960 Anyway, we'll get started.
01:26:22.720 This is going to be at the end, obviously.
01:26:24.320 Oh, I wasn't counting that for.
01:26:27.280 Oh, yeah. Okay, hold on.
01:26:28.640 I've got to think about how I start this, because I want to start it with one over.
01:26:31.360 Sure. Well, I can, I'll throw out a pitch.