Based Camp - December 29, 2025


What Really Happened Before the Viral Interview


Episode Stats

Length

59 minutes

Words per Minute

184.03514

Word Count

11,018

Sentence Count

10

Misogynist Sentences

29

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

In this episode, we discuss the controversy surrounding a viral film clip that went viral and went viral. In this episode we cover the context of the clip and what we were trying to say in the film clip, and how we got into a debate against a straw man of myth.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 what we see is a turning point culturally and that's what this interview represents a turning
00:00:05.000 point culturally with the right becoming the party of science it's science and the left becoming the
00:00:10.780 anti-science theologically motivated party would you like to know more hello simone i'm excited to
00:00:17.360 be here with you today we recently ended up getting in a debate against what i can only describe as a
00:00:23.180 literal straw man of myth and it went viral super viral i think the video is at 9.5 million views
00:00:29.160 now one person was was adding it up across the sites so really really big and what we wanted to
00:00:35.740 take this episode to do was to go over what you're not seeing from this film clip and the context of
00:00:42.320 what we were thinking in this film clip and how we were trying to talk was here because i think a lot
00:00:46.720 of people get the impression that i walked into a room with a cnbc telemundo reporter right and i sat
00:00:54.660 down and she just started asking me questions and immediately i was like what what are you talking
00:01:00.460 about for yeah for context it's paola ramos she's yes like she's she's not she's she's not unknown okay
00:01:08.680 she's 193 000 followers just on instagram she has she worked in the obama administration she worked in
00:01:15.840 the clinton administration her dad is a very famous banker at telemundo and like one of trump's arch
00:01:21.960 enemies she is very like this is the environment she grew up in this is her religion it very much
00:01:29.220 reminded me of me talking to people who have been in scientology and grew up in scientology
00:01:34.380 just their conviction that their weird world beliefs are completely normal and we'll play the
00:01:40.400 clip in a bit but most of you have probably already seen it so i'm not gonna go into that that much
00:01:44.180 actually sargon of akkad did a full episode dedicated to a breakdown of it because it was so
00:01:49.220 emblematic of this i think you should start with the clip i think you should start with the clip the
00:01:53.580 point i was making is we didn't just sit down and this was filmed this was after a full day of
00:01:58.340 shooting it was it was actually near the end of the shoot that day so we had had her at our house we'd
00:02:04.420 been talking with her in a number of different environments is the way it works you go to one
00:02:08.060 room you go to another room you do some filming you talk about this you talk about this you talk about
00:02:11.920 this and and before i i play the clip i'll give you context when she started talking about this
00:02:18.720 up until this point while she had been like a little woke about some things it was like normal
00:02:23.920 like let's discuss this like let's find common ground let's this was when i think she decided like
00:02:29.920 oh i've got this gotcha planned for them right and immediately her gotcha fell apart because she
00:02:36.080 didn't seem to understand very very basic biology and she didn't she thought that we were like
00:02:41.420 racist or racial supremacist when in the very clip we make it clear we're like difference
00:02:45.760 doesn't mean better we're just saying that there are differences with specifically the one that i
00:02:52.460 really couldn't get over with her and to give you a context of how we got there was that well at the
00:02:57.480 very least the genes that code for our skin color are different right like we can at least agree on that
00:03:04.300 i didn't jump there because i was trying to jump to a non-sequitur i jumped there because i was sort of
00:03:09.280 like okay you disagree that there are any genetic differences between black and white people
00:03:14.120 like presumably you at least agree on this and then we can sort of work on okay well then maybe
00:03:20.040 other genes have associations due to similar sort of ancestral environmental conditions leading to
00:03:26.680 them being selected for but no we got to the do genes cause skin color differences and her answer was
00:03:33.940 and the other thing about this clip is this was not the full debate or like us pushing back and
00:03:39.040 forth it probably went on i want to say for 15 minutes or significantly i don't know it's hard to
00:03:46.360 tell how long something was but what i can say is this was just a little bit of it and it doesn't fully
00:03:51.980 show how crazy her position was her position was just for people who don't know in the context
00:03:58.500 all differences between black people and white people are due to conditions that they experience
00:04:07.580 in their life such as discrimination so she would say the reason why and this is a contributory factor
00:04:14.060 that black women have more fertility complications or enter menopause earlier than white women and
00:04:19.560 we'll go into both of these claims because this is what i was talking about in context the reason
00:04:22.660 why i brought up that they like it came up that they were different at all is because i was talking
00:04:26.180 about what we need to understand this as a society that like we are actually different because of a
00:04:31.180 black woman tries to have kids at the same timeline as a white woman having kids she will not have as
00:04:37.580 many kids successfully due to biological differences and this matters in the bigger debate of demographic
00:04:43.640 lapse of pernatalism because the primary driver of falling fertility rates is not people not having kids
00:04:49.220 at all it's people starting families later and the problem is that many including many of our black
00:04:54.220 female friends are doing what everyone's doing the responsible things starting their families later
00:04:59.320 no one tells them that like on average the fertility windows of black women and the fertility of black
00:05:04.440 women in general is different from um the rest of the population which often is more represented
00:05:09.480 in scientific research in in western society anything from their perspective we were arguing against a
00:05:17.440 eurocentric medical perspective exactly exactly what which is so funny because in some woke circles it's it's
00:05:23.140 really commonly discussed how there's not enough medical research that is specifically for women or
00:05:28.740 specifically for certain racial groups that are on average different from other groups like it's fully
00:05:33.540 recognized there but like in the context of this it's and in the in the longer conversation we go into
00:05:41.420 this and she goes no all of these differences are entirely and 100 even though there is voluminous
00:05:48.000 evidence this is the case which we'll go into not they're due to discrimination in some way and i was like
00:05:52.900 well you know if you have interracial couples you still see the difference but only when it's women
00:05:56.620 and i like went into this and i was like and if you control for wealth which studies have done you still
00:06:00.600 see the differences and she just would not have it and it's interesting to me because if you actually
00:06:04.960 go downstream of her perspective what she's arguing is that like black people become black not due to
00:06:11.660 genes or like even even more than that black people are let's say taller on average not due to genes
00:06:17.400 but because of the discrimination they face and i and i'd point out another thing that we'll get into
00:06:23.400 later in this is a lot of people are like well black isn't a race or whatever and i'm like i never said
00:06:29.840 black was a race like i was not saying i was merely saying if you're looking at this one phenotypical
00:06:35.140 characteristic it is associated with specific other characteristics that may have medical implications
00:06:41.420 whether it be sickle cell anemia or diabetes or the way you process vitamin d like that that was the
00:06:49.140 point i was making i would not and i even clearly state this in the place i say i'm not saying we're
00:06:53.340 better i'm not talking about iq here and i'm not like i i there was no like and i'm not even saying
00:07:00.020 like this race or this race or arguing for the concept of race or ethnicity i was just saying that
00:07:06.180 you can look at one phenotypic thing and this matters a lot in hospitals like people die when
00:07:11.600 you don't do this in a hospital context because if you if you try to for example like even just
00:07:17.860 looking at somebody broadly do a blood donation like i can i can have a well let's go from blood
00:07:22.780 donations bone bone marrow donation you know if i have like a black wife and i want to donate bone
00:07:27.740 marrow to her i just can't because we are biologically incompatible in that context and so it's more common
00:07:34.180 like just how do you explain this if this isn't true example that was brought up in discussions
00:07:40.260 around this clip online was just then how do you explain sickle cell anemia anemia sorry and that's
00:07:48.060 just a really easy go-to like there's it is there's some populations that need to deal with sickle cell
00:07:54.580 anemia and there are other populations that don't have this i mean like same with things like if you're
00:07:58.380 a hemophiliac it's probably like how do you explain these things i don't know so so it's
00:08:04.160 two things to bring up in this context there's actually a reason why as the debate got longer
00:08:08.260 i did not bring up sickle cell anemia and i tried to keep it incredibly narrow and first when it
00:08:12.200 happened when i was like hey do you want to check this on ai i was still sort of in a phase of this
00:08:17.600 isn't a debate this isn't a gotcha moment she just doesn't know what she's talking about and we
00:08:22.200 just need to make sure that we're on the same page so we can create high quality news media for the
00:08:26.620 general public right like that wasn't me being like oh let's use ai to end a debate or something like
00:08:31.620 that i was just like hey like maybe we should come to some sort of common ground or or look at a
00:08:38.460 third party because what you're saying is just like factually in like the broadest possible sense
00:08:43.740 deeply deeply untrue and it's not like it's one field like genetics this is important for
00:08:49.980 criminology anthropology forensics like it's it's the basis of like multiple academic disciplines
00:08:57.620 disciplines that this is untrue and for many people who don't know my background i actually
00:09:01.680 worked in the department at the smithsonian at one point i was the the only staff still in this
00:09:06.940 department it was never used for crime at that point but because everyone else was on a dig
00:09:09.800 at this period not because i was senior or anything that bones is based off of and some people were like
00:09:14.640 you know if you've seen bones you know that you can tell like the ethnicity of a person
00:09:19.340 bones not the objects it's the show bones from like dna or from physical morphology like the bones
00:09:28.840 themselves or from various other things that are that are tied or downstream of genetics and so for
00:09:34.860 me i'm almost like a nerd who is working in the bones lab and then somebody is like you can't tell
00:09:38.780 the race of somebody by you can't tell or more importantly because we're not even talking about
00:09:43.180 race here you can't tell the color of someone's skin by their dna because that's specifically what i was
00:09:48.460 arguing and the person in the bones lab would just be like what what are you talking about
00:09:53.280 but i'll play the clip here because you want to play the clip and i know many people have seen it
00:09:57.560 and it's short it's like a minute 30 so we'll play it
00:09:59.800 you've said things like black women are biologically different than white women
00:10:05.320 they they yes they have uh different fertility windows they have a higher rate of fertility
00:10:10.540 complications 50 because there's no scientific evidence to prove that a black woman and a white
00:10:15.840 woman are genetically different right this is like what are you talking about no no no
00:10:20.660 literally there are genes that code for their skin color there are genes again this is i mean this is
00:10:25.760 like government data this this is emmy right this is the national institute of health this is the
00:10:29.680 american medical association like there there is no scientific evidence to prove that and that's a
00:10:34.660 problem right because no no no no no no there's no scientific evidence to prove that right and as
00:10:50.860 people that no no no i'm sorry i'm stating do you want to ask an ai if there's scientific evidence to prove
00:10:55.360 that no i want to ask just factually incorrect humans are genetically diverse it's not a bad thing
00:11:03.020 that humans i'm not saying it's a better or a good thing i'm saying there is no scientific evidence
00:11:08.060 and i'm saying that is a factually saying that there is scientific there is scientific evidence
00:11:12.260 there is overwhelming scientific evidence in this basics no no no this is like saying the sky is not
00:11:17.900 blue like it is genes that code their skin color right those genes are obviously different in them
00:11:24.560 than they are in us how is that not science that's just like a basic fact the genes that code their
00:11:30.100 skin color their level of melanin production are different from my genes and that's precisely why
00:11:35.620 i was asking this question because i think for some people that do believe like you that people are
00:11:40.240 genetically different that has historically been used to promote racial hierarchies right and that's
00:11:45.540 why i'm asking you because so because you do
00:11:47.960 anyway i'm not going to go through it and do a play-by-play like sargon did i want to go through
00:11:56.520 oh yes the second part of the clip that i didn't get to mention is as soon as i realized that this was
00:12:00.900 actually like a gotcha moment i went into this mode of oh my god how do i get her to not cut this in
00:12:06.600 editing so you'll notice this clip just came out as a teaser trailer she put it on her own instagram so
00:12:12.220 like clearly she's proud of it so this clip right was filmed back when simone was pregnant so
00:12:19.400 months ago let's provide more context this was filmed the day before our scheduled t-section i was
00:12:26.720 sick as a dog you can see me like trying to keep snot from falling out of my nose halfway through the
00:12:32.240 interview part of the interview consisted of me driving with them in our car as i went to get pre-op
00:12:38.540 blood work done at the hospital speaking in spanish as they interviewed me live during the drive
00:12:44.160 and yeah they were filming us literally all day from a morning walk to me going to the hospital
00:12:49.800 to being there for a long time to them coming back and then you're interviewing us together then
00:12:53.620 filming us around the kids it was a long ass day and we barely had a chance to even talk about it after
00:12:59.720 it happened like we had this short conversation of like did she actually did she did she say we
00:13:05.640 actually like i like got simone aside i was like did that really just happen like we didn't even
00:13:10.160 like have time to talk about it because then you know like we were getting the kids in order i was
00:13:17.080 you know getting ready for surgery we we you know we we went to the hospital for a c-section and then
00:13:23.740 then text ended up in the in the nICU like we basically forgot about this interview like i did not
00:13:29.320 forget about it i mentioned it in just a video a couple days ago like in the johnny anomaly interview like
00:13:33.020 i i remember this because i remember just like what a gift to us it would be if it didn't get
00:13:38.000 cut in editing because like midway through the argument after the ai thing and i realized oh
00:13:42.560 she's not just being naive she thinks she has us in some big gotcha moment my immediate thought was
00:13:48.960 oh my god i need to argue in a way that is entertaining and gets the point across to like
00:13:54.260 a general sane person but won't trigger her to actually google this and potentially cut this
00:13:59.860 after the interview is over there's no way though that they didn't fact check this they ran it anyway
00:14:04.740 because the other thing we were constantly doing while they were visiting us all day as we do with
00:14:09.300 every single visiting documentarian or journalist is please make this controversial please make this a
00:14:15.320 hit well but the thing is this isn't just controversial this is controversial making them look like
00:14:20.580 oh yeah yeah normally it's it's just them making us look bad right like so this has been filmed and i went and i
00:14:28.360 talked to her afterwards and i said like can you please like keep that in the piece oh you talked
00:14:34.360 to her about it oh yeah yeah i had a conversation with her and she was so she was just her christmas
00:14:39.340 gift to you how was it bro right no she's like i i don't and part of me like i don't even know if
00:14:45.260 she kept it in due to her own integrity or she just was really so dense that she didn't think to google
00:14:50.260 this or walk by no maybe she knew it would go viral she knew the people on her side would stay
00:14:57.520 on her side anyway and also truly and they did on instagram lots of people probably also still truly
00:15:01.840 believes it but she was probably also being a bro to us and she's like well they said they want it i
00:15:06.160 bet this is going to go pretty viral because i know the other side believes this and in her per her
00:15:10.940 view all of the evil online racists are going to jump on this and make it go viral and x is dominated
00:15:17.680 for example by evil online racists so it'll go viral there it'll make me look great everyone
00:15:23.640 on blue sky is going to defend me we have no idea if this has even come up on blue sky but like
00:15:27.480 basically like all my allies are going to defend me and it's going to drive more attention to this
00:15:32.000 story which you know they spent money putting together you know they sent they sent great for
00:15:38.200 this i'm excited to see the story i have no idea where they're going to take this right you know
00:15:41.940 i don't know yeah i saw that first part i was like this is great yeah so it's something to to be
00:15:46.920 important to understand that a lot of the comments are like hey why did you take this interview to
00:15:52.240 begin with right you know first this is what we do we get people like her who think oh this is going
00:15:58.720 to make me look really good this is going to make them look completely evil oh there's so much more
00:16:03.520 to it than that though no actually no so her producer is is from grace from telemundo yeah this was
00:16:10.620 our first time where a major spanish language latin american not spain-based outlet reached out to us
00:16:20.380 about covering demographic collapse we were absolutely thrilled what doesn't show up in this
00:16:25.320 is that a huge portion of this interview was filmed in spanish with me speaking in spanish with their team
00:16:32.140 so like i think a huge portion of this is going to run in spanish on spanish language outlets and like
00:16:38.100 our audience doesn't speak to me she's not going to see it but like no but like the larger context
00:16:42.840 of us trying to do this too was that demographic collapse is a really big issue in latin america
00:16:46.660 and it's not really being discussed that's not the point i'm making here okay so the point i'm making
00:16:51.520 here is that when we go into a context like this and are trying to create a viral moment like this
00:16:59.180 right the the you have to remember they have editing power on this okay so you need to lure
00:17:07.100 them into a scenario where they come away feeling like you look bad but the average person watching
00:17:15.040 this thinks they look bad this means there are many things that are suggested of us that are just
00:17:21.280 completely off the table right like people are like why don't you just stand up and walk out of the
00:17:25.780 room that would have one made us look absolutely terrible right that would have been very easy for
00:17:31.260 them to spend it would have looked completely like us losing our cool two is why don't you just be
00:17:35.860 completely deadpan about this and start citing studies and start going through you know sickle cell
00:17:42.620 everything like that in a way she's so boring yeah one it would be boring two if we actually broke
00:17:49.920 through her and she to a point where she thinks to google this no i don't want to drink this
00:17:55.300 sweetheart she actually thinks to google this it's gone it's dead that's not going out to the general
00:18:00.280 public right she needed to think she looked good but in reality did not look good to some extent now
00:18:07.180 there was also the secondary thing where she might have known that she looked terrible i don't think she
00:18:11.180 did but somebody might have known that and it's just went live anyway because we had the conversation
00:18:16.700 with her afterwards where i literally pleaded with her i said please please include that clip
00:18:23.000 like you know and she was so certain of herself that she was just like yeah of course like she
00:18:27.400 clearly thought like oh please don't throw me in the buyer patch was sort of her response to this
00:18:32.000 but i want to be clear that there was a context and a conversation after this and everything like
00:18:36.520 this this wasn't an isolation and the reason that we do this people are like why do you try to create
00:18:41.100 these viral moments it's this is how you spread information within the modern digital economy
00:18:46.840 if i went out there and i did something like you know an inconvenient truth on demographic collapse
00:18:53.140 which by the way already exists the birth gap right it'll do well but it won't do amazingly you
00:18:59.020 know it's not going to do these types of numbers and that's because that's not how people share
00:19:03.060 information anymore they share them in shock outrage bites right and what this moment did was two
00:19:10.380 things simultaneously and i think we saw this on the sargon of a cod clip we'll get into specifics in a
00:19:15.340 second is it one acted as an indictment of the way the media acts you know this is the way of an
00:19:20.860 educated woman she has a graduate degree from the harvard kennedy school right somebody educated in
00:19:25.520 the mainstream system and under her comments there were people like i bet these two people homeschool
00:19:29.240 their own children and i'm like damn right this is why we do because this is what's coming out of
00:19:33.040 the harvard kennedy school right i mean it's a scam degree if somebody's able to have this world
00:19:38.000 perspective and have it but sargon of a cod is able to watch this and be completely generous to us
00:19:42.260 he just called us normal people and i know god thanks for normal people that is honestly my
00:19:49.200 first time hearing that maybe ever are we new normal conservatives is is jd vance a normal guy
00:19:57.680 now are we just like are they are the tech conservatives normal i'm happy for that i'm here
00:20:03.400 but i want to go further here so one thing that was interesting that she did oh simone did you want
00:20:08.200 to say anything about this more broadly because you were really excited to talk about
00:20:11.140 it being the first spanish language the anything you want i said what i wanted to say about that so
00:20:17.820 so so first the sky is blue thing i love that so many progressives are like well the sky isn't
00:20:24.540 technically blue and i'm like that's an idiom you know right like you're aware when somebody says
00:20:30.500 it's raining cats and dogs they don't literally think that cats and dogs i don't know why progressives
00:20:35.580 got so excited about that that the sky isn't literally blue and it's an illusion created by
00:20:40.120 the way the light refracts in the atmosphere i am literally using an idiom for something that anyone
00:20:46.900 can just observe right and it's a common idiom right it's not like an uncommon idiom or anything like
00:20:52.640 that the other thing i thought was really interesting is her repeated use of the same phrase like there
00:20:58.160 are studies that show this when in actuality there was actually a great paper that went over all of
00:21:04.080 the data from the studies that she claimed to cite like from the nih or whatever and every organization
00:21:10.060 that she cites as proving her position in fact argues the exact opposite of her position and it's
00:21:16.560 interesting that they didn't check this like i wonder if that's even like a legal liability for them
00:21:20.820 to do that and so zero hedge did a piece on this it was near the top and they go meanwhile in in the
00:21:27.260 science or in actual science both the national institute of health and the american medical
00:21:31.240 association have published and hosted studies articles and policy statements that acknowledge
00:21:35.160 genetic differences between human populations the nih for a number of them here genetic structure
00:21:40.900 self-identified race and ethnicity and confounding in case control association studies then the
00:21:47.280 quagmire of race genetic ancestry and health disparities then all of us research programs study
00:21:52.920 on race ethnicity and genetic ancestry then for ama race genetics and health care racial essentialism in
00:22:00.620 the medical in medical education and there's also a study published in nature 2021 african americans and
00:22:06.760 european americans exhibit distinct gene expression profiles like you really do not get clearer than that
00:22:12.180 from the mainstream research are you being too late you know we're on air and you cannot squeal
00:22:17.380 and you cannot scream
00:22:19.260 i can't shake a baby but i can't shake a toddler
00:22:25.040 i can shake a toddler
00:22:27.920 turkey turkey are you gonna quit gobbling and goobling
00:22:34.480 hello
00:22:35.880 so anyway the point i'm making here is she's literally just factually wrong in the thing she's
00:22:43.920 saying and i know she's factually wrong in the thing she's saying like that's why i was like
00:22:46.320 like you could tell i was about to and i love what other people also pointed out is your first
00:22:52.780 intuition simone especially because you were so sick you were about to give birth the next day in a
00:22:57.100 major surgery your own all sorts of meds and you're just like well okay like maybe we can come to some
00:23:02.140 sort of a compromise is where you were right instead of me where i'm trying to find a point of
00:23:05.880 agreement like well at least you know genes code for skin color the other thing that i thought was so
00:23:10.800 funny in many of the things that tried to attack us or say we didn't understand what we were talking
00:23:14.520 about because i want to go over a few of them because i found them very interesting attacks
00:23:18.520 they were like sorry phenotypical traits are caused by alleles and not genes and it's like
00:23:25.500 okay what causes allele genes what causes phenotypical traits genes i am using the word that the general
00:23:36.140 public is most likely to understand because that is who i am communicating with and note here i didn't
00:23:41.240 say like the gene for coding skin color or the gene for coding melanin production i said the genes for
00:23:48.800 coding skin color and the genes for coding melanin production so i thought that that was very
00:23:54.400 interesting that they like knew one what they think of as like a fancy word and they're very excited about
00:23:59.120 it the other one is they're like well race isn't a thing now note here i wasn't even arguing that race
00:24:03.160 is a thing so it's weird that they go into this either because you know well it's not a distinct thing
00:24:09.220 right like you can't say exactly where like
00:24:11.000 white ends and black begins and it's like well you can't tell a red
00:24:18.500 you can't tell where red ends and blue begins that doesn't mean that red and blue are not colors
00:24:26.080 right like they can blend together but they're still distinct and meaningful categories right and
00:24:31.180 this matters in a medical context because that's what i was talking about in terms of predicting
00:24:34.860 things like fertility complications which again we'll get to in a second next i wanted to talk
00:24:39.580 about um the weird statement which of course anybody who watches our show knows that we have
00:24:44.740 said there is especially within african populations that's where the most human genetic diversity is
00:24:49.840 that doesn't mean when you're talking about american black populations that there aren't specific
00:24:54.920 things you can note about american black populations and say oh this leads to this outcome or this
00:25:01.860 leads to this outcome and we're talking about american black population fertility collapse it's
00:25:04.640 really important because this last year we have a video on this they fell below white fertility rates
00:25:08.820 if you if you look at the native born american blacks not propped up by immigrant blacks they might be
00:25:13.720 at around 1.35 by some estimates which means they're basically at extinction level fertility rates
00:25:18.380 like these are super low super low compared to native white populations as well and they're basically
00:25:23.240 being replaced with with black people we're importing into the country and so it is useful to
00:25:27.320 understand you know if you are a black woman that you need to start having kids
00:25:32.080 faster and that despite that you also have some advantages that white women don't have you can
00:25:38.520 have kids in faster succession because your gestation cycle is shorter but anyway well uh no not
00:25:44.900 not really no what it's like by one by like two weeks one or two weeks matter
00:25:51.400 i mean like not not if you're having like four kids if you want to have 10 or something sure
00:25:59.340 makes a difference adds up but like you know another interesting fact about black women's pregnancies
00:26:06.100 is they are shorter and they go through menopause earlier but they also go through puberty earlier
00:26:12.740 okay but i want to to go into some other counter arguments here and i want to go into some more of
00:26:18.220 the science here because i think it's really interesting like the conversation that happened
00:26:20.660 around this okay do you think andy wants to play yeah just go play yeah kill yourself
00:26:26.800 all right so i'll keep an eye on her she starts killing herself we'll get on that okay okay so
00:26:33.940 this one was posted by alonso gromendy and he said and we actually saw this a lot quote genes
00:26:40.280 determine skin color end quote yes but they also determine height moles and hair color but we don't build
00:26:46.440 social hierarchies around that that doesn't mean races are genetic it means that you ring fenced
00:26:53.720 some genes and attribute moral social value to them we call this racism this is really like
00:27:00.100 spectacularly stupid because what i was talking about was in the context of medical diagnostics
00:27:05.780 i.e you can look at if somebody comes into the hospital and they appear black you can know that
00:27:10.880 they have a higher probability of some fertility complications which was the actual topic of
00:27:15.860 conversation here but two even outside of that two black people might be able to have like i i think
00:27:21.500 like if you if you are let's say true bright like you don't have other ancestral traditions mixed in
00:27:27.400 with your tradition when you are just japanese all the way down you're never going to have a black kid
00:27:32.380 if you're black all the way down you know you're not going to have a white kid and this is actually
00:27:36.160 true but this but this isn't true for let's say handedness or height or something like that right
00:27:42.180 and that's because those are single phenotypical expressions as opposed to ethnic groups which are
00:27:49.240 a group of convergent phenotypical expressions that are tied to ancestral closeness and and this really
00:27:57.520 matters right like this this this matters from a diagnostic perspective but it also doesn't mean
00:28:02.320 that we don't one rope off these other things people have clearly i mean look bumble sorts by height
00:28:08.080 you have height filters on bumble that is clearly i i'd say height is is is probably as big in our
00:28:14.460 society a factor in terms of discrimination as ethnicity it's like you earn imagine it's more
00:28:21.340 of a factor we we have we are at a higher rate of insofar as it exists interracial relationships
00:28:30.720 today than we ever have been like people really don't care that much i think it's maybe what like
00:28:37.200 25 my memory is so bad whatever it's really high now it's very low like no one no one cares basically
00:28:42.660 i think people are more likely to end up with their their own no no no we have an episode on this
00:28:47.540 interracial relationships are actually exceedingly rare they're they're way more common now in america
00:28:52.240 than they are but they are still exceedingly rare i thought it was in the 20s are you we didn't
00:28:58.100 just go to our episode on this the thing that i point out is that this idea because there is this
00:29:02.120 perception within the black community that like white people are like white women are stealing all
00:29:07.300 the black men or something like that or white men are stealing all the black women or whatever
00:29:10.500 and it's just like factually untrue it's it's not that common and and speaking here i'm just
00:29:16.320 specifically speaking of the black community but i wanted to to get to that another quote that i
00:29:21.400 thought was actually pretty insightful and sargon went over this one as well is by ubuzuvi
00:29:27.640 v3 where he said the required takeaway from genetic differences video is that your enemies do not
00:29:34.380 use words in the way you do they are not instruments for conveying meaning they do not eliminate mapping
00:29:40.060 from mental concepts to physical reality they are spells provide them provided to them by wizards
00:29:47.440 the purpose of the spells is to make you do what they want you may believe that you are having a
00:29:52.740 conversation but they know they are in a spell casting contest and their ignorance of everything
00:29:58.800 that is real provides them with absolute immunity to your spells there are millions of spell casters
00:30:04.000 out there i am not on twitter to talk to these people who cannot be reasoned with or bargained
00:30:08.920 with without any more than the tv can hear you i find i am here to find others who understand the
00:30:15.280 situation for what it is out of this there is only one way to ever going to take the country back from
00:30:21.580 the spell casters every day we spend casting our impotent spells at them is another day they further
00:30:27.240 consolidate their power recent u.s census bureau analysis for 2022 found that night around 19 percent
00:30:33.900 of married opposite sex couples were interracial okay so this is a little misleading because i went
00:30:39.740 to the stats again when you hear interracial marriage what most people think of is uh black
00:30:45.060 white marriages because that's specifically what i was talking about here and if you look at black
00:30:50.520 women married to white men it's only four percent while 12 are interracially married okay that's married
00:30:57.920 keep in mind like we're still dealing with married boomers who are way less likely to be in interracial
00:31:03.300 marriages and the fact that younger people are formally marrying much less and much later so it must be
00:31:11.420 much higher than 19 percent in terms of actual like functionally married couples so just keep in mind like
00:31:18.520 no one cares anymore height however huge area of discrimination i think way way like way more than
00:31:26.060 race i i i personally didn't give a rat's ass about what like what someone's heritage was when i was
00:31:35.560 doing my whole like dating thing and okay cupid i absolutely looked at heights but i i went on dates
00:31:42.580 with guys who were who were indian who were asian who were like everything but okay i did go on a date
00:31:51.180 with one really short guy but it was because he was famous because he was what famous oh yeah but
00:31:57.960 anyway simone right here black killing men thank you the base camp reddit which is now like even bigger
00:32:04.400 than when we did our like little episode i don't know like that's weird that it's gotten so big
00:32:07.860 but anyway what i would like it's way bigger than like the jordan peterson subreddit now i do not
00:32:13.120 understand what's going on not in terms of subscribers but in terms of activity and posts and
00:32:16.400 but anyway what i wanted to go into here was it is mostly like people complaining about like
00:32:22.240 relationship related stuff so so like women like simone women are terrible but i wanted to talk about
00:32:28.080 this guy's post because i actually think he's fundamentally wrong here right okay i agree that
00:32:33.160 they think that they're casting some sort of a spell and that this woman i was never going to convince
00:32:38.400 her of my perspective of course the purpose was not that it was to have her making this ridiculous
00:32:47.640 argument and what you saw and this was one of my favorite very highly upvoted posts on this was
00:32:53.780 somebody arguing that she worked for prager you was a plant and was trying to make progressives look
00:33:01.720 bad saying progressives do not actually believe this no large portion of progressives believe this
00:33:08.120 this is clearly a psyop and a lot of people said it was like a skit or a lot of progressives actually
00:33:12.920 thought it was a psyop what happens when progressives first think it's a psyop and then they're shaken
00:33:17.560 out of it to realize this person worked for the obama administration this person worked for the
00:33:22.440 clinton administration this person is she is earnest staffer at cnc cnn cnbc wherever telemundo
00:33:30.320 right like um msnbc welcome csnbc and this got through an entire editing pipeline right like when
00:33:37.880 they see that when they see the dark withered and me just being here being like they're casting a spell
00:33:45.020 do you see it they're casting a spell it wakes them out of this it's what what i've seen though and what
00:33:51.420 i think show i i would only say confirms this is people saying the exact same thing about us that
00:33:57.720 they thought we were borat style plants and that no one could possibly say what we said
00:34:03.940 and i just i think this goes to show i read hundreds of comments i never saw that once was it
00:34:10.300 i saw that it was on x weird because every time i go on x to make sure that there's no one like asking
00:34:16.880 us for something actually substantive i i see like the latest mentions of us in threads or discussions
00:34:23.680 of threads about us and that's where i saw it was it was it highly upvoted like no no no no i just i
00:34:29.660 just see our mentions i'm talking about had like 50 to 100 comments right i'm not saying this was like
00:34:34.480 a highly viewed comment what i'm saying is that there are absolutely people on the other side
00:34:38.760 who who really really hold that view who think that like we must be actors because no one could
00:34:46.960 possibly believe what we believe and and i think this just goes to show how divorced from reality
00:34:54.220 some subcultures of what i think it's very different so here's what you're missing simone
00:35:02.060 okay nobody who is mildly right wing who would vote for trump etc watches this video and has the
00:35:09.360 perception that we must be plants that no one could be as stupid as that's true well i mean i would say
00:35:15.160 anyone who's centrist or who has a degree in anything that required basic levels of science
00:35:21.720 education okay so where this is relevant is a lot of the people who watch this and thought
00:35:27.760 she couldn't possibly be real are democrats they are on the left okay yeah that is how you poison the well
00:35:36.760 you poison the well by having obviously there's going to be extreme responses on either side
00:35:41.540 but it's only the people who already agreed with her world perspective who are like oh can you
00:35:48.580 believe how silly these two are a lot of people and we we kept seeing this in the comments a lot of
00:35:53.420 people are like look i'm a scientist like you really shouldn't be saying this stuff other people on her
00:35:58.500 side being like hey like i hope you guys delete this you know it hasn't been up that long i guess
00:36:03.140 has been clipped but like you guys you can still take it down yeah a lot of people on her own side
00:36:11.580 were mortified about this and it did a lot to cause them to quite like i knew she was going to cast this
00:36:19.060 spell i knew exactly what was happening as soon as this started and i think as shown by the public
00:36:25.220 response to this if you just look at x's response to this i was 100 right that if i let her post this
00:36:32.500 braggadociously if i appeared animated enough to make this entertaining and make her feel like she
00:36:38.800 won that it was going to blow up in her face and on her side's face and draw more people to our
00:36:44.060 position a lot of people have been saying and i think this is worth repeating that this is very
00:36:48.260 similar to lithenkoism in communist russia where the russians hated everything associated with nazism so
00:36:55.320 much that they hated genetics and so they just said genetics isn't real and so they came up with an
00:36:59.420 alternate hypothesis um the problem is is it's meant that the scientists who then wanted to
00:37:04.860 recommend things based on genetics you know things tied to agriculture were not allowed to and it caused
00:37:10.180 this famine and i think hundreds of millions of people died at least millions of people died it was
00:37:14.220 terrible terrible phenomenon and it's not just that in terms of the ridiculousness of this there was a
00:37:19.600 chart that i saw tied to this that i thought was pretty interesting where people were like well you know
00:37:23.720 skin color isn't actually tied to anything else when we're talking about especially not anything
00:37:29.880 cognitive when we're talking about genetic differences and this chart here looks at where
00:37:35.160 skin color is in regards to genetic differences between groups versus things like genes tied to
00:37:41.120 pituitary gland development dorsal ventral neural tube patterning hind brain development positive
00:37:47.660 regulation of neuron differentiation all of which are much more differentiated between ethnic
00:37:53.700 groups than skin color is at the genetic level at least this to to continue here there's i love
00:38:01.520 the whole trust the science thing everybody was really excited about that where leftists are all
00:38:05.460 like science you know like the leftist redditor who's like science exclamation mark exclamation mark
00:38:10.680 exclamation mark it's science it's like oh not that science but it's actually interesting here
00:38:16.100 because when they say science they do not mean science what they mean is the academic classes which as
00:38:23.240 pointed out before serve as the priest class of the urban monoculture yeah i guess if you just
00:38:28.860 replace science like capital s science with the priest class then it makes sense yeah yeah whereas
00:38:36.020 you look at people like us i mean we're actual science fanatics right like not whatever is coming
00:38:42.080 out of academia but like replicable studies that can be used well it can include whatever's coming out
00:38:47.300 of academia if it's if it's well done like we don't inherently distrust everything from academia neither
00:38:54.440 do any of like the heterodox far-right people who we follow who often cover academic research they just
00:39:03.320 double check the methodology that's all well i mean i think what we're seeing here with this debate and
00:39:09.500 this moment is that the right is becoming the party of science and so what people said and this is
00:39:19.080 absolutely true i mean well in this conversation there were one side that was interested in being
00:39:27.300 moral right in saying what they believed was moral and there was another side that was interested in being
00:39:34.000 honest what science is is honesty and stating what is honest over what fits your moral convictions
00:39:42.380 whether those be blank sadism or creationism the but the reality is is that if you look at mainstream
00:39:49.480 figures on the right right now you are not going to get a right-wing creationist reporter who's just
00:39:55.900 going to be guffawed that somebody who they're talking to is not a creationist in fact i would be surprised
00:40:01.860 if there were many mainstream right-wing individuals anymore who are creationists yet you will find
00:40:09.360 many science deniers on the left like this individual and through that what we see is a
00:40:16.900 turning point culturally and that's what this interview represents a turning point culturally
00:40:20.660 with the right becoming the party of science and the left becoming the anti-science theological party
00:40:27.020 theologically motivated party why would you disagree with that you seem to have some
00:40:31.680 alternate perspective there are some they're anti-ai they're anti-facts there are some maha
00:40:42.820 policies that i wouldn't say work with the preponderance of like i severely disagree with
00:40:53.540 you here so what i have seen is i have seen people make that claim i've seen that people make that
00:40:58.680 claim about jfk's policies and i will say more than 50 percent of those historic cases where somebody
00:41:04.560 made that claim it turned out upon more evidence that he was right so when you say that i think
00:41:10.780 you're just talking about the stuff that we don't have the evidence on yet but in general when jfk has
00:41:16.620 said i want to question something i doubt that and we've even done episodes on this like the aspirin thing
00:41:22.780 right tylenol thing and we actually point out that jfk's position was the mainstream position in
00:41:30.080 academia it was just also but also nothing else is safer so we're going to recommend it um what his
00:41:36.660 position was basically like even though nothing else is safer it still needs to be publicly known that
00:41:40.780 you can't just take as much of this as you want right and and this is something and there are risks
00:41:44.800 to taking it which basically every academic agreed on until jfk said it and the left freaked out
00:41:50.140 a lot of the stuff that people see as anti-science from the right is not actually anti-science and i'm
00:41:56.040 talking like recent papers when we go into that there was like meta studies from like 2021 right
00:42:00.860 like even tylenol itself had corrected people's tweets on this like the corporate twitter account
00:42:08.200 right like this was not an out there conspiracy theory it's just that they rebrand a lot of this
00:42:12.620 as conspiracy theories and if you as a woman i do not mean to but it's true i mean you saw this
00:42:18.020 in the interview and you see this more broadly is women are about consensus making and they also
00:42:24.020 are more likely to believe the sort of consensus is put out there online and so if they see a lot
00:42:29.420 of elites saying maha is a bunch of conspiracy theories that includes conspiracy theories and
00:42:34.540 you haven't individually looked into it like i remember you thought the tylenol thing was a
00:42:38.580 conspiracy theory you thought the studies were bad until i pointed out to you actually this was the
00:42:43.440 mainstream perspective until fairly recently true so i think that that's your position when you're
00:42:49.860 looking at these maha things but anyway to continue here i i love something that a lot of people are
00:42:55.140 talking about is that the progressives treat truth like the demons do in friren which is an anime and
00:43:01.540 then to them words are merely a means to deceive humans another one that i find funny is they're like
00:43:09.120 you know we like we various human groups share more in common with each other than we do with like
00:43:16.300 other animals or we can interbreed now first of all look at our other humans are are there different
00:43:21.580 species of humans video in that video we point out it's very common for different species to be able
00:43:26.700 to interbreed the the prototypical example that everyone's familiar with is grizzly bears and polar
00:43:31.880 bears can produce grizzly bears and these bears can breed as well it's not that they always produce
00:43:37.140 infertile offspring so no that is not we also point out that they split apart from each other only
00:43:43.020 slightly earlier in the historical record than european populations in the cosine split off from
00:43:48.020 each other which is the distant african population we also point out that video if you're looking at
00:43:51.980 snp closeness while neanderthals did split from the european population earlier we are closer to
00:43:57.040 them in terms of like pure genes like snps than we are to the cosine people and this doesn't mean that
00:44:01.640 the cosine people are bad it doesn't mean that they're less human it doesn't mean that they're in
00:44:04.100 other species it just means that there is a great deal of genetic diversity within humanity yeah but
00:44:08.760 when they're like oh but like we are more related to each other than we are to like chimpanzees or
00:44:12.300 something that's a bit like saying you know humans and kangaroos are more related to each other than
00:44:16.140 either group is to trees that doesn't mean that kangaroos and humans aren't meaningfully different
00:44:21.880 categories of animals right but to continue here because i i one of the points that a lot of people make
00:44:28.340 here is they say well there's more genetic diversity in ethnic groups than between ethnic groups
00:44:33.380 now this is actually a really fuzzy thing so i'll get into the standard retort to it and then i'll get
00:44:40.000 into a better retort to it than even the standard retort to it so the standard retort to it is what is
00:44:45.640 called the lowenotin fallacy so yeah lowenotin analyzed variation locus by locus one gene at a time
00:44:55.100 where differences between groups are indeed small at a single site however genetic differences across
00:45:00.640 populations are correlated due to shared ancestry and history alleles tend to occur in patterns
00:45:07.840 specific to continental or regional groups when you consider multiple loci together e.g. via clustering
00:45:14.440 algorithms like structure these correlations allow highly accurate inference of an individual's
00:45:19.220 ancestral population even though single locus variation is mostly within group in short
00:45:24.820 the more within than between statistic doesn't invalidate population structure or taxonomic
00:45:31.520 classification because it ignores the inform informative correlation structure in full multi-locus
00:45:38.640 genotypes and then even if you're looking at pushback on this many scholars e.g. charles
00:45:43.260 roseman 2021 and ramses withers and adam hoshman have pushed back on this contending that loud
00:45:48.140 lowen himself did not commit this fallacy his argument was specifically about why traditional racial
00:45:53.980 taxonomy isn't justified by the low between group apportionment comparing it to other species
00:46:00.680 not a denial that populations are clustered they are argue that the original person who coined this fallacy
00:46:06.040 mischaracterized loenotin's claim that the two approaches variance versus clustering answer different
00:46:11.860 questions which is funny here because the people who like debunk this they don't debunk it as a
00:46:19.100 explanation against racial clustering they debunk it just saying that the original argument wasn't
00:46:24.840 arguing for or against racial clustering everyone who is educated has always been for that if you're
00:46:30.620 talking about like genes right like it matters right like when he's like there's no genetic differences
00:46:35.040 one thing i could have jumped into and this was one thing i specifically bit my tongue on was well i
00:46:38.880 mean how do you explain like european populations having neanderthal dna in them and african or some african
00:46:44.400 populations depending on which one you're looking at having an unnamed hominid species in them and
00:46:48.160 it fairly high amounts not not like super high but like a high minority like 15 or something
00:46:52.620 but for neanderthal you're looking at like three percent to i think 4.5 percent at the highest amount
00:46:57.420 but the point being is that okay that's how you go about this if you're just talking science science
00:47:04.160 science but what if you want to get into an easier way to understand why this is a really bad argument
00:47:08.680 okay so suppose i have two classes of students at a school each class had a different teacher
00:47:16.980 and then but they also studied on their own at home and everything like that and then both classes
00:47:22.340 went to take the sat now if you average the questions that they got wrong on the sat in the same way that
00:47:31.640 if you average like a huge number of people you get a very averagey looking face right
00:47:37.300 those two classes are going to be less distinct from each other than they would be any two people
00:47:44.720 within one class would be from each other right sure yeah two averages of the classes would be less
00:47:49.440 distinct than any individual student within the class that doesn't mean that i cannot look at the
00:47:57.020 individual questions that students within one class got unusually wrong or students within another
00:48:02.980 class got unusually wrong to see where each of the two teachers might have room for improvement
00:48:08.380 or might have been making a mistake in their teaching style like does this get through did that make
00:48:15.280 sense to you simone like have you heard that before did this better i've not heard this argument before
00:48:19.200 but okay so hopefully that that better explains that to you was they gonna say here oh yeah so the
00:48:27.060 final thing here i wanted to go into was the point that started all this in case you're unfamiliar with it
00:48:31.240 was the genetic differences between black and white when i say black and white i mean americans in a
00:48:36.440 medical context right because we do categorize people into black populations in america on medical
00:48:41.440 forms we do categorize people into non-hispanic white populations you do it all the time on medical forms
00:48:46.880 and it is important for medical diagnoses but anyway
00:48:49.760 there is evidence that suggests that genetic differences partially contribute to higher rates of
00:48:57.660 certain fertility complications among black women particularly through conditions like uterine fibroids
00:49:02.600 which are the leading cause of infertility and affect fertility by impairing implantation or causing
00:49:07.560 miscarriages fibroids are a heritable with genome-wide associations gwas identifying genetic variants more
00:49:13.880 prevalent in individuals of african ancestry that increase risk the instance admixture mapping
00:49:20.020 and trans ethnic gwas have shown that higher proportions of african genetic ancestry correlate with elevated fibroid risk
00:49:28.100 and this varies by regional african origin with west african ancestry linked to single fibroids and east african
00:49:34.440 linked to multiple transcropic and dna mesalination analyses also indicate that
00:49:41.180 myano trial tissue in black women may inherently be more susceptible to fibroid development black women are up to three times
00:49:48.420 more likely to develop fibroids than right women even after adjusting for confounds
00:49:52.880 which are with earlier onset and more severe symptoms now note here if you're talking and you include
00:49:59.620 differences in terms of health care access and well that matters more to black fertility but doesn't mean
00:50:05.000 that we don't have hard genetic evidence of these fibroid differences right next there is evidence of genetic factors
00:50:12.260 contributing to earlier onset of menopause in black women typically six to twelve months earlier than white women
00:50:18.220 which means around 48 to 50 years versus 50 to 55 years meta analysis of gwas in african women
00:50:26.300 have replicated several genetic loci associating with menopause timing originally identified in european populations
00:50:32.220 such as amhr2 rhbdl2 prim1 hk3 umc1 brsk1 tmem150b and mcm8 differences in allele frequencies
00:50:50.540 between african and european ancestors suggest ancestry specific genetic influences on earlier menopause
00:50:56.220 menopause her credibility is supported by twin studies showing higher concurrence for earlier
00:51:00.300 menopause and monozygotic twins and common variants also linked to premature ovarian failure risk
00:51:06.140 it may differ by race vascular motor symptoms aging hot flashes also show genetic influences that vary
00:51:12.220 across racial groups note here there this is another instance in which you have a lot of stuff that's not
00:51:16.540 coming from this if you want some studies around this you can look at a multi-stage gene-wide
00:51:20.300 association study of uterine fibroids in african-american women african genetic ancestry
00:51:25.660 interactions with body mass index to modify risk for uterine fibroids genome-wide meta-analysis
00:51:30.700 identifies novel risk loci for uterine fibroids within and across ancestry groups look you can just say
00:51:35.980 that there's a paper you can read it there's a paper no one first guys like i mean unless like i mean
00:51:42.380 obviously everyone should be asking ai with access to medical databases questions about risks that may
00:51:50.620 be unique to their ethnic group yeah ethnic group if you don't have your own polygenic risk scores which
00:51:57.340 you can also just get like that's the thing is i mean we can just go on nebula and look at our
00:52:01.900 polygenic risks like you personally for these things but a great proxy for that if you don't have that data
00:52:08.140 is just being aware of relative risks that your group might have what is in her mouth is there
00:52:14.060 something in her mouth that's her tongue oh it's just her tongue girl i love you turkey but anyway it
00:52:25.100 was really crazy that went went live and then i think the craziest thing to me is that she was arguing
00:52:33.500 a viewpoint that i've only ever really heard discussed in the context of people talking about
00:52:43.180 racial discrimination in a medical context that is to say like woke people on tiktok making shorts
00:52:51.660 about how it really sucks to be like black or asian or some other like non-white group in the united states
00:53:00.060 going through the medical system or being a woman because people aren't taking your conditions
00:53:05.020 seriously because most of the research has been done on white men for example yeah or like a lot
00:53:10.380 of the a lot of the samples that people have built medical standards around are white men this is also
00:53:15.180 something we've discussed in the context of sexuality that like a lot of the original sexual
00:53:19.180 research was done around men and in white men too um and so like a lot of our understanding of
00:53:26.380 sexuality is really limited because it was looking at from or looked at from just one direction and
00:53:31.420 it's just so funny to me that like i what had me flabbergasted was that i was hearing from someone
00:53:37.340 who was broadly progressive this view that i've seen argued against constantly by progressive people
00:53:43.660 so i at first i was shocked because i was like wait that's that's not what you're supposed to be
00:53:50.620 saying that's not what your side says but then i realized she was trying to have this gotcha moment
00:53:55.660 where she wanted to just say she wanted to say that we were trying to argue that people of
00:54:02.540 different ethnic groups have different iqs and are somehow inferior or superior because she's trying
00:54:08.300 to to imply that we literally say the exact opposite in the clip are white supremacists and the reason why
00:54:13.660 she couldn't actually ask us that as a gotcha was because we very clearly argue that that's not the case
00:54:20.540 and we don't argue that and so she couldn't get us on that because the only thing we've ever said to
00:54:25.740 her point right is that that that black women have different you know fertility issues and windows
00:54:32.620 than than other groups and that's all she could go on and and that's i i see what she was trying to do
00:54:37.900 she was trying to basically extrapolate from that to imply that we were white supremacists when we're
00:54:44.540 clearly not because she needs to have a straw man to attack what was crazy for us was that i think on
00:54:51.980 our podcast we often like kind of make fun of and and demonize woke people so much that sometimes i
00:54:59.420 just feel like we're making up straw men or like finding the most extreme examples online and being
00:55:03.740 like haha look at them they're funny and then we make fun of them and and but i also like i don't know i
00:55:09.900 i want to make the most charitable interpretation of reality and people and so i'm like but of course
00:55:14.220 no one actually acts like that no one would actually say that in the real world and then
00:55:18.380 like this was an instance of like us just derping through our lives and like literally a straw man
00:55:23.900 like jumps out of a cornfield and bites us and we're like wait what like it's real and that that's
00:55:30.060 what was most crazy about it for me was that maybe maybe this is more common and mainstream than i
00:55:37.020 thought but anyway i love you and i'm glad we're having our podcast again i love you too i i do not
00:55:42.780 think that's what this was for her i think sargan of a cod has a good point that she realizes and she
00:55:49.580 even says it at the end of the interview you know people who like believe what you believe this leads to
00:55:55.740 genocide and everything like that yeah she is letting the cat out of the bag she's saying if i admitted
00:56:01.500 she's basically saying even if what you're saying is right if we admitted this as a society we would
00:56:08.220 be forced to racially segregate people we would be forced to discriminate against people because to
00:56:14.140 admit that there are differences between people always leads to nazism racial segregation everything
00:56:19.580 like that that was the implication of the ending line for her that she thought was this great gotcha
00:56:24.220 line and this is actually what you see in the left which many people point out why does ethnic
00:56:30.300 diversity matter if we're all exactly the same yeah there's so many weird yeah catch 22s like like
00:56:39.020 blank slate ism but also like not having medical discrimination and yeah like your point too anyway
00:56:44.620 she's literally letting that out of the bag in her world view if she admits that jeans code for skin
00:56:51.740 color the next step like five steps down the road you know slippery slope is nazism yeah anyway
00:57:00.300 love you to death simone i love you too okay which one do you want is indy happy as a clam sitting with
00:57:09.020 you oh i can't hear you oh smile she's so smug but i i don't think your mic is is plugged in
00:57:21.340 i actually need to get a new mic i'm down to one working mic at this point
00:57:24.380 do you need to oh i got a lot of pain from where my son punched me the first time he punched me full
00:57:30.940 force i'm not mad at him at all we were i was pretending that i was going to leave him outside for
00:57:35.260 krampus because he was being bad and so he fought back and i'm like no you thought you're going to be
00:57:39.740 left outside you don't get something that's called fighting to defend yourself necessary obviously and i'm like
00:57:47.660 but wow that that is quite a hook little guy well you need you need a kid who knows how to fight i
00:57:53.980 it's all they ever do i feel like my my dinner making routine is you know boil water chop vegetables
00:58:01.260 step over the cloud of children that are wrestling on the floor it is it is it's like a tasmanian cartoon
00:58:08.460 or something like actually is i need to get some footage of it like they're just like in a ball like
00:58:13.980 this undulating ball of fighting wrestling children just it's just there it's like a tumbleweed a normal
00:58:20.620 part of the landscape is well that's the way they're with me too is fight me daddy fight me yeah well
00:58:27.020 that's that's the way we raise them that's gonna go anyway you've been jonesing to do an episode
00:58:33.260 again for ages as have i i've missed talking with you we're gonna see if we can make episodes
00:58:39.100 sustainable while we take care of the kids right so that will hugely increase the amount of time we
00:58:44.940 can do episodes but it means i need to have this one with me that'll endy all right but i think she's
00:58:52.300 into it so hey guys how's it going yeah i will octavian tell me about what you made here
00:59:09.100 so no but explain it to me how does it work
00:59:21.260 yeah yeah
00:59:23.980 yeah
00:59:45.020 um
00:59:50.140 so you can make a huge