Based Camp - August 22, 2025


Why Did Only Some Countries Have A Baby Boom?


Episode Stats

Length

44 minutes

Words per Minute

172.82878

Word Count

7,755

Sentence Count

571

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

30


Summary

In this episode, Simone and I talk about the post-World War II baby boom and why it may not have been caused by decreased child mortality. We also talk about why the baby boom didn't happen in every country, and why there may have been no boom in some countries.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, Simone! I'm excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be talking about
00:00:05.120 the post-World War II baby boom. We have done an episode of this in the past, and the thesis that
00:00:10.780 we came to in that episode was that the post-World War II baby boom was predominantly about
00:00:18.460 decreased child mortality. And this is true. A lot of it can be just pinned on the head of,
00:00:26.020 if you think about that period, if you go to the beginning of it, it was something like half of
00:00:29.540 babies died. Then at the end of it, it was something like 2% of babies died. It was pretty big.
00:00:36.500 A very big jump. It was like, you're doubling the number of babies out of nowhere. But that can't
00:00:42.580 really explain everything because it didn't happen the same amount in every country. And if it had
00:00:50.600 just been medical technology, then it would have been based on how developed a particular country
00:00:54.240 was at the time. And that's what would have led to the baby boom. And you get a little bit of that,
00:00:59.060 but not a lot of that.
00:01:00.080 And the baby boom is incredibly important to study because if you look at this graph here,
00:01:03.660 when we're talking about fertility collapse, it really started in the U.S. around 1835.
00:01:08.620 And the only persistent reversal you get of it from that time period is the baby boom. And it is a
00:01:14.460 significant reversal of it.
00:01:16.660 It appears to, when we go through, and we're going to go through now, the country that happened in the
00:01:21.020 country that didn't happen in, when you go through that list, you can begin to try to build a thesis
00:01:27.660 on what caused this. All right. So in Italy, you had no boom or a very small boom. Okay.
00:01:38.820 Okay. In Greece, you had no boom. In Portugal, you had no boom. In Spain, you had no boom. All right.
00:01:48.700 In Poland, you had no boom. In Bulgaria, you had no boom. Throughout most of the Soviet Union, you had
00:01:56.980 no boom. Estonia, no boom. Lithuania, no boom. Brazil and Latin America, no boom. Argentina, no boom.
00:02:07.240 Uruguay, no boom. India, no boom. So is this a lack of economic thriving in these countries? That's
00:02:14.040 my first intuition. Most people commenting are going to be like, well, that's because they were
00:02:17.180 struggling economically. So what's the difference? Yeah, but all of Europe was struggling economically
00:02:21.200 post-World War II. A lot of places were struggling economically post-World War II without having the
00:02:27.400 boom. Okay. So now let's go. Okay. Where do we get a boom? All right. You get a boom in the United
00:02:34.620 States. All right. You get a boom in Canada. You get a boom in the United Kingdom. Okay.
00:02:41.720 You get a boom in France. You get a very large boom in Australia. You actually get an even larger
00:02:49.640 boom. The largest of the big booms happened in New Zealand. You get a very big boom in Norway.
00:02:55.620 You get a moderate boom in Sweden, but it began before the war started. In Denmark, you have a weak
00:03:04.660 boom. In Finland, you had a significant boom. In Iceland, you had a very significant boom.
00:03:12.420 In the Netherlands, you had a weak boom. In Belgium, you had a weak boom. In Switzerland,
00:03:18.360 you had a weak boom. In Austria, you had the strongest in Europe.
00:03:24.120 Whoa, Austria. Okay.
00:03:26.780 In West Germany, you had a boom, but in East Germany, you didn't have a boom.
00:03:31.700 And in Ireland, you didn't have a boom. You also didn't have booms in... Oh, interesting. You had a
00:03:38.940 very short one in Japan, but then it disappeared. So you had a non-Western boom in Morocco.
00:03:48.360 So again, keep in mind, like economic developments and stuff like this. And you had a boom in Mongolia.
00:03:55.620 You had a boom in Turkey. Not a big one, these non-Western ones, but you had them.
00:04:02.200 Okay.
00:04:02.600 All right. So trying to build a pattern here. Initial part of the pattern, really easy to see.
00:04:08.920 Anyone who's under Soviet communist rule did not have a boom. However, I didn't mention this one.
00:04:14.760 You did get a big boom in China, but Chinese communist rule, you get a big boom. Okay.
00:04:20.920 So first note here. Second, if you were part of the allies, you get a very big boom.
00:04:27.720 Okay. So it helps if you're a winner.
00:04:30.440 Right. Well, I mean, some people like technically won by not having the war ravaged their countries,
00:04:35.880 but we're not part of the allies. So an example of this would be Ireland. Ireland didn't have a boom
00:04:41.560 and refused to join the allies. Irish bastard. What's that? McCarran. That's an Irish name.
00:04:48.760 Save the Blarney for the Killeens, Patty. What? Archer, what are you? He's the target. What?
00:04:54.280 Yeah. I just remembered from the dossier. You know what, Patty? Hang on.
00:04:59.000 Lana, shut up. God. So where did you get access power?
00:05:04.120 Ireland? And Ireland was not an access power.
00:05:08.920 Are you sure? They were neutral. Oh, that's right.
00:05:13.960 Oh yeah. Whereas France got pommeled. It was not pretty, but.
00:05:19.800 Right. And it's not just the countries that were personally like, like hit by the effects of the
00:05:25.640 war because the North America and Canada and New Zealand and Australia, where you saw booms many
00:05:32.280 times bigger than the European booms, they were not actually like, they didn't see all the devastation.
00:05:37.080 So we've talked about, if you have a tsunami in an area, you'll have a higher fertility rate after
00:05:41.160 the tsunami than in surrounding areas. So like mass death can cause fertility growth. Maybe it triggered
00:05:47.000 something in these men's heads that they were at war and they saw all this. Maybe, maybe. So we'll
00:05:52.280 get to that. But then you've got other countries that maybe make less sense. Okay. Um, I also think
00:05:58.200 that things like, if I remember like Morocco, can you check this on AI was weekly allied with the
00:06:03.560 allies in World War II. So that could explain their boom, but not all allies have a boom. India doesn't
00:06:09.480 have a boom. Okay. So, so we've got to look, okay, what, what does India have in common with
00:06:16.360 the Soviet Union? And yeah. So Morocco was under French colonial rule and part of the French
00:06:21.480 protectorate. So yeah.
00:06:23.320 Yes. That could explain a weak boom. Then you, you have a weak boom in Switzerland as well. So,
00:06:28.920 so in Europe didn't participate. Right. But you could say, well, what about the access powers?
00:06:36.360 You had a big boom in a few of them. You had a very big boom in Austria, which was an access power.
00:06:42.680 And you had a very big boom in Western Germany, but not Eastern Germany.
00:06:47.640 So check something for me. Austria was not under communist rule, right? Also was Turkey under
00:06:53.560 communist rule? Can you ask any of this? Because I don't remember these ones, but like, why is Turkey
00:06:58.920 seeing a boom? Also ask, was Turkey an access or allied power? I don't remember that one.
00:07:03.080 In World War I, Turkey was access because they were under the Ottomans.
00:07:06.680 We're asking about post-World War II though, weren't we?
00:07:09.480 Yeah. So, so ask in World War II, which side was Turkey on? And did Austria see direct
00:07:17.400 fighting in its territory? Because I don't remember much.
00:07:21.640 Yeah. I thought Austria was just sort of taken by Germany.
00:07:26.040 It willingly joined if I remember. Turkey remained officially neutral for most of World War II,
00:07:31.480 and it had diplomatic and economic relations with both access and allied partners. But in February
00:07:39.000 1945, Turkey declared war on Germany and Japan as a symbolic gesture to secure a seat in the United
00:07:44.600 Nations, but it did not engage in any significant military action. So it was, it was looking out for
00:07:52.280 number one. No, I remember Austria being quite enthusiastic about joining Germany.
00:07:56.440 I said Turkey.
00:07:57.800 Yeah. And I said, and you earlier, you said Austria did not experience significant
00:08:01.320 fighting on its soil during World War II. After the Anschluss in 1938, Austria was annexed by Nazi
00:08:06.760 Germany and became part of the Third Reich. Can you ask how enthusiastic, because Hitler was Austrian,
00:08:12.760 right? So I don't know if I would be that upset being Austrian and joining the, the,
00:08:18.200 like, I wouldn't have seen it as a wound to national pride.
00:08:22.760 Yeah. Maybe I've watched The Sound of Music too many times. So I'm, I'm, I'm too affiliated with
00:08:32.520 just like one family's approach to it. A notable portion of Austria welcomed the Anschluss. Many saw
00:08:39.160 it as fulfillment of a pan-German nationalism, uniting German speaking people. Yeah.
00:08:44.440 So it was mixed, but an enthusiasm appears to have been a little varied. So there, there was some
00:08:52.040 coercion, there was some pragmatism, but there were some people who were stoked about it. It seems.
00:08:58.520 And so if we, if we go through these countries and we're trying to, to fill this out, I can,
00:09:05.240 I can draw another, I'm actually going to see, do you note the other big thing that seems to cause
00:09:09.720 fertility booms or that seems to be the differentiator between the countries that had it
00:09:12.840 in the countries that didn't. It's, I'll just give it to you. Yeah. A distinct sense of national
00:09:19.560 identity. So, and not just national identity, but with us versus them propaganda. So if you look at
00:09:29.720 West Germany. A little bit of xenophobia, are you saying like even that far?
00:09:33.880 Yes. If you look at West Germany versus East Germany, very famously, the United States was
00:09:38.920 constantly dropping propaganda flyers into West Germany. But keep in mind, West Germany wasn't
00:09:44.840 like under the United States or something like that. And the way East Germany was under Russia,
00:09:50.120 the communist empire. It, it felt like those propaganda posters are saying, isn't it so great
00:09:56.680 to be West German and have this West German identity and be free as a West German. If you look at the
00:10:03.880 allied countries like throughout this entire area, all of them were subject to lots and lots of
00:10:09.000 propaganda about how great it was to be a member of their national identity. If you were an American
00:10:16.120 at this time period, you would have constantly be told, not only is being America the best and the
00:10:21.560 American way of life, the best and the greatest, and that everybody wants to be American because
00:10:26.520 America is the greatest, but you're getting this in New Zealand as well. You might check out,
00:10:29.720 you're getting New Zealand best and the greatest, right? Interesting. Okay.
00:10:33.800 But in, in what, which of the allies, like which part of the allies wouldn't have gotten this?
00:10:39.160 India, because India is under British rule at this time and, and wanting to escape a British rule at
00:10:45.640 this time. So Britain is not going to attempt to foster pan Indian nationalism while they are under
00:10:52.200 British rule. So this basically explains it. And this is, I think is a huge, it also explains why
00:10:59.080 Austria had such a fertility boom, because when they were under the Nazis, they saw a pan German
00:11:04.120 identity, which they were a part of. And after the Nazis, you would have continued to check again,
00:11:10.040 Austria, was Austria taken by the communists? No, no. Haha, Simone was wrong here.
00:11:17.800 Austria was divided just like Germany was divided. And just like in Germany, further strengthening our
00:11:24.600 point, the side under communist rule did not have as much of a baby boom as the side under
00:11:30.680 capitalist rule. Okay. So after the war, you then had, of course, given how close they were to the
00:11:38.360 communists, we would have been showering them with propaganda about how great it is to be Austrian and
00:11:42.920 not be a part of the communists. Now, many people note that the baby boom started before the war,
00:11:47.880 and it did start before the war, in large part because of medical technology. We've already
00:11:52.120 talked about this. But the big boom that happened after the war, I'm going to argue is directly
00:11:57.800 downstream of nationalism. But didn't nationalism peak before and during the war as they're trying
00:12:04.840 to win it, not after when they were like, okay, let's get back to normal life. No, because after the
00:12:11.000 war, we immediately went into the Cold War. I'm here arguing that the early stages of the Cold War,
00:12:16.360 before it became, you know, like long Vietnam drawn out national pride, the youth is rebelling,
00:12:22.280 blah, blah, blah. Everyone was fairly on board with the idea, right? Like, where are the good
00:12:27.400 guys? They are the bad guys. And better than that, for most people, they had just had it validated in
00:12:32.520 their minds. It's like, look, there really are bad guys. We really can go out and oppose them.
00:12:37.640 Like, let's work to do that. And what doesn't work is globalism for fertility rates.
00:12:44.760 You can see communism in Russia, and it was practiced in Russia versus how it was practiced
00:12:50.040 in China, as proto-globalism. Be proud to be a human. Don't be proud to be an Estonian. You know,
00:12:57.960 don't be proud to be, you know. So I think that in a big way, what's causing our current fertility
00:13:07.080 collapse could be downstream of what caused their fertility collapse during, or I mean,
00:13:15.800 caused the communist fertility to not go up in the way that the other countries did.
00:13:19.800 Because they didn't have this degree of national identity to pair, because they were getting just
00:13:26.520 as much propaganda as everyone else. I know, but I'm just thinking about communist propaganda,
00:13:31.000 and it's all about being so proud to be contributing to your country. You don't think
00:13:35.720 that that counts? I mean, I get this sense as an outsider looking in that there was this really
00:13:41.000 strong sense of here's who we are, and you will pay the price if you don't identify that way,
00:13:47.800 by the way. Well, it's be proud to be a member of our collection of countries, which again, the point
00:13:53.000 that I'm making here is for this sort of nationalist propaganda to work. It needs to be a little more
00:13:57.560 granular. There has to be like, there's no Borg. You can't be the Borg. You have to be like
00:14:05.160 a Kardashian. You have to be a Klingon. Yeah, you have to be one in a Kardashian. Did you mean
00:14:14.360 Kardashian? Sorry, Kardashian. Listen, why did, why? But yes, I mean, Kardashians also have high fertility
00:14:25.240 and a lot of pride. So yeah, I guess either way works. But pride in a distinct identity. And so I
00:14:32.040 think you could see this, like have lots of kids to serve the collective better doesn't work. And
00:14:37.320 it's what the EU is still trying to push, right? Like, yeah, I started trying to push in terms of
00:14:42.760 how they're handling this. And I think it's only going to make the problem worse for everyone involved.
00:14:47.080 Hmm. I disagree with you.
00:14:51.960 So I think, and this is why I promote with a lot of the ideas. At the end of this,
00:14:57.000 we talk about the speech that we're putting together. And in it, one of the things that I
00:15:00.600 talk about and why I want to work to do this is put together some sort of like Japanese perinatalist
00:15:05.960 event so that we can do it as like a joint, like we are doing this for self-defense, but what's the
00:15:13.000 word like national defense reasons, right? National security.
00:15:16.200 And the reason I really want to do that is to freak out the media. Because if you
00:15:21.720 host a US-Japan national security conference, you could invite some other countries, New Zealand,
00:15:27.160 Australia, which you're really doing is why are those countries getting together to talk about
00:15:31.560 fertility rates? Well, the core national security threat to all of them is China. And China is going
00:15:36.440 to immediately realize this. But what it's also going to immediately frame is how strong all of our
00:15:41.080 countries are vis-a-vis China. For people who don't know, China's fertility rates are like around
00:15:45.640 one now. New Zealand's is like 1.5 to 1.8. Australia is at like 1.5. The United States is
00:15:52.440 like 1.6. Japan's at like 1.3, one of the strongest for an economically developed country in
00:15:57.640 the region. So China's going to freak out. A bunch of media is going to freak out because they're
00:16:01.240 going to be like, hey, why are you doing this country? And I'm going to be like, well, you know,
00:16:03.880 we've got to figure out what we're going to do with China when there's no Chinese people left.
00:16:07.400 What we're going to do with Korea when they're all gone. You know, just things that'll really
00:16:10.920 freak people out and get them angry. And then the media does the whole thing on this.
00:16:15.400 And we can use that to get in front of people, one, a very vitalistic message, like us versus
00:16:20.680 them. But then two, frame it in a non-racialized context because, you know, this is, we're looking
00:16:26.840 here at the Pacific theater, right? And then three, I can combine a lot of the art and promotional
00:16:35.000 material with the event with anime and have that be very germane to the setting that we're in,
00:16:40.280 right? And so the media will pick up this over the top, very anime inspired, very sort of like
00:16:45.480 man's world inspired art style as the sort of pro natalist art style. And people will see that and
00:16:53.160 see the vitalism that is inside of it and want to replicate that. It's a very easy way. Like if you
00:17:01.160 want people to like, I'm not, I don't think I'm going to get the government to put pro natalist
00:17:05.480 posters in every classroom in the United States. No, that's not happening.
00:17:10.680 But what can I do? Oh, actually we should add to the speech. The thing about the baby toys.
00:17:16.120 You're half, you have that in there. It's in there.
00:17:19.000 Oh, it is. The people who had the baby toy. I mean, I can put in the actual stats,
00:17:23.080 but I'm going to put that just in the report and we can just talk.
00:17:25.400 No, no, no. I'm talking about when people were given babies by the government.
00:17:29.160 Yeah. And I'm saying I can put the actual stats in the PDF report, like the extent to which they
00:17:35.400 affected fertility and the treatment versus control groups.
00:17:38.680 Yeah. Because when people were given those little babies to take care of,
00:17:40.920 they ended up having more kids. And so maybe that's something.
00:17:42.760 Malcolm's referring to a baby simulation program that was tried in Australia in which adolescents were
00:17:51.480 given actual baby dolls. This was done to dissuade them from teen pregnancy, but it actually
00:17:58.200 increased incidence of teen pregnancy and having kids quite young. So.
00:18:05.080 But I think all of this is upstream of a very simple framing, right? The way you actually achieve
00:18:11.640 pronatalist outcomes, the way you actually get people to choose to have children is to have a
00:18:17.800 cultural identity, like believe they are a something and want more of that something to exist in the
00:18:25.160 future because they think the future is going to be bright.
00:18:27.160 Yeah. The way you put it really well is convincing people to have kids isn't about convincing people
00:18:33.960 that kids are great. It's about convincing people that they themselves are great, which is
00:18:39.720 the perfect way to put it.
00:18:40.840 Yeah. And if you, what a lot of groups attempted you to do this is to say, and we're great because we
00:18:48.040 were great in the past, which super backfires. We're always noting like very low Catholic fertility rates.
00:18:54.680 And I think that one of the reasons why Catholic and Catholic countries have such low fertility is
00:19:00.040 because their intuition immediately around fertility. Like whenever I talk with a conservative Catholic,
00:19:04.440 at least is restrictions. We need to restrict lewd images. We need to restrict gay marriages. We need to
00:19:13.000 restrict masturbation. We need to restrict like just restriction, restriction, restriction,
00:19:19.080 restrict abortion, restrict this. And they're basically chaining like a person's humanity and
00:19:27.160 expecting that person to flourish, I think. And I think what we're seeing is, is attempting to increase
00:19:33.880 fertility rate by adding restrictions does the exact opposite of the intent. One of the jokes I always
00:19:39.880 make when I went to AI to double check that this is true. And it was true up until 2023, where, you
00:19:45.880 know, somebody is like, well, you know, we can get fertility rates up if we basically banned immigration
00:19:50.120 and we banned gay marriage and we banned abortion and we made pornography illegal. And I was like, great.
00:19:55.400 All of those things were true in South Korea up until 2023. And the only one that I think is now not
00:19:59.480 true. It's abortion. 2021 I think was when abortion was somewhat legalized in South Korea. That doesn't
00:20:06.360 change the fact that it's still quite difficult to get an abortion in South Korea. Just FYI.
00:20:12.200 Yeah. And the point here being is that the countries with these incredibly strict restrictions have
00:20:19.480 incredibly big problems with fertility rates. I mean, the countries with incredibly loose restrictions,
00:20:25.720 and even the cultural groups with loose restrictions have much higher fertility rates,
00:20:30.680 or at least when the restrictions are expected to be self-imposed. So consider something like the Jews.
00:20:36.200 Jews, Orthodox Jews have tons of restrictions. They're just like restrictomania in terms of all their
00:20:41.160 rules. But the Israeli state, being a soft theocracy, literally enforces none of them.
00:20:50.440 Yeah, the rules have to be endogenous, not exogenous.
00:20:59.720 And I think that this is something that like, people just actually, I should mention that as a
00:21:06.360 contrast with Korea, because I think that's really good. Oh, Israel versus Korea. Yeah,
00:21:11.080 that's a good way of putting it. But yeah, I think that that's what we need to get back to. And that's
00:21:17.080 what every family should be promoting with their kids. And at the national level, get back to and I
00:21:23.480 think it's a conservative party, like we're already in a place where we're really close to being able
00:21:27.400 to do this. Because if you went to the conservatives of the 90s, they wouldn't be able to do this. They
00:21:31.480 had no vitalism to the party, right? Like they were restrictomania as well back then. They were like,
00:21:36.120 let's just go back to the past, create a bunch of restrictions, etc.
00:21:40.360 Well, and the idea also among the conservative party was to impose morality on people because
00:21:47.000 they couldn't be trusted or be seen as capable of imposing it on themselves.
00:21:51.960 Right. And we've talked about this before. The core reason why the conservative party stopped
00:21:55.960 doing that was because they used to be the party of the dominant cultural group,
00:21:59.480 which was sort of this Judeo-Christian alliance. And so they could attempt to impose their morality
00:22:03.960 on the population. But now because they're in the minority and the urban monoculturism majority
00:22:08.600 within this country, the urban monoculture attempts to use the progressives to project
00:22:13.000 moral authority through restrictions on individuals or on threats to companies and a broad alliance,
00:22:19.640 including like gamer bros and tech bros and conservative Christians are all like, no,
00:22:26.280 stop restricting my ability to have a culture that's different from your culture. But what that means
00:22:32.760 is that a big part of the cultural framing has become ultra vitalistic.
00:22:36.520 Mm hmm. And you see this in a lot of the art. If you look at our episode on like the aesthetics
00:22:41.480 of the new right, you see this with, you know, mixing in, you know, anime themes. One of the things
00:22:46.840 I think is incredibly vitalistic that we see in conservative art that you don't see in as much
00:22:50.520 progressive art is the competent and lauded use of AI is both in terms of video creation to create like
00:22:59.560 shorts and in terms of art or like thumbnails or like, whereas in progressives, you get your head
00:23:04.760 spit on off for using that much AI art. I mean, like our videos just use constant AI art in terms
00:23:10.440 of like the videos. We do AI songs in a lot of videos. We, you know, very, very lean into AI.
00:23:15.880 And this is because we don't allow, like they, they, they using their position of cultural dominance
00:23:21.800 want to restrict what we are allowed to think looks good. What we are allowed to, and you, you actually
00:23:27.560 know this of the anti AI community because there's that famous study done that when people didn't know
00:23:31.880 that art was AI art, even if they said they didn't like AI art, they preferred AI art.
00:23:36.600 So it means that the, the stated preference of, I don't like AI art is downstream of knowing that
00:23:41.640 it's created with AI, meaning that these people actually do have a preference for this art.
00:23:44.920 They're just forcing themselves to engage with it through disgust. And, and as such,
00:23:49.800 there is a level of beauty that is like vulgar to them that we can celebrate, right?
00:23:55.720 What you're looking for. And I think that this, this is how you really capture vitalism the most
00:24:01.160 is you look for things that are considered vulgar within the elite society of our age, but not for
00:24:11.160 actual vulgarity, i.e. not because they actually like damage an individual, but because there is some
00:24:19.720 other interest at play like status signaling or something like that. A great example here is anime.
00:24:24.600 I mean, this is why you see anime and anime related stuff so much in sort of new right art
00:24:29.320 and memes and everything like that is because there's this hard lean into. So that's why you
00:24:33.160 see a lot of means in, in mainstream new right art, you know, very, very low culture considered
00:24:38.760 vulgar by mainstream society. The government literally created a department named after a doge, right?
00:24:44.440 Like, but what's the post-World War II nationalism driven element of the baby boom also driven by
00:24:54.920 generally vulgar cultural amenities? Because I didn't, okay, how so?
00:25:00.200 So it was driven by the, the nationalism of the 1950s and post 1950s when you have this boom period,
00:25:08.040 right? Was absolutely driven by was what was at the time considered low culture and disgusting,
00:25:15.320 i.e. what dominated pop media at the time, comic culture, penny mag culture, the early science
00:25:22.680 fiction retrofuturism culture. I mean, today we call it retrofuturism. All of this stuff to your,
00:25:29.240 you know, opera goers at the time to your people.
00:25:31.960 Well, yeah, that's fair. Yeah. Sci-fi books and comic books. Yeah.
00:25:35.640 What we're seeing is very low culture, right? Yeah.
00:25:40.120 And people were taught to, you know, admire their ancestors through what the Western,
00:25:45.320 right? Like the Western, which was popular during these time periods and said, you know, America,
00:25:50.520 great. Awesome. We, we, we, we certainly didn't do anything wrong. I mean, there were Indians here.
00:25:55.560 We had the us versus them, cowboy versus Indian. You as a kid, you'd run around and play this game,
00:25:59.800 you know, but you, you, you, you can't do that anymore. Like you couldn't, you know,
00:26:03.560 take pride in the Cowboys today. Like what? Everybody would, would freak out. Right.
00:26:08.280 Sean, why is there a giant hole in my front yard? The hole was my grave. Gus made me dig my own grave,
00:26:18.200 then shot me and stole my boots. Oh, so you, uh, you were playing Cowboys and Indians, huh?
00:26:25.720 Just Cowboys. Playing Indians is offensive. And then the buzzers ate your entrails. That's awful.
00:26:31.640 Yeah. It was a tragic end to our adventure, but it's the realism that makes it fun.
00:26:36.280 But you couldn't. I guess the last big cowboy film we, no, we've had a,
00:26:39.960 actually there's, there's been a decent number of films romanticizing Cowboys.
00:26:46.840 Which one? Not, not versus Indians though. Yeah. Not versus Indians.
00:26:50.840 But the point here being is that in the 1950s, the culture that was lauded, think back to,
00:26:57.960 to the 1950s cultural boom. And what do you think of if you are imagining like what people are doing
00:27:06.360 or where they're gathered, right? It's at a diner, a very low culture restaurant or at a soda shop.
00:27:13.560 Oh, soda fountain or soda parlor. Yeah.
00:27:16.920 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You're not imagining, you know, big glamorous restaurants or anything like that.
00:27:22.360 Right. Um, which is if I go back and I try to imagine, you know, other periods,
00:27:26.360 like say the 1920s, I am imagining that. I am. Yeah. Well, and today what is considered
00:27:31.320 aspirational are these jet set lifestyles such that people are literally buying, renting time on a
00:27:38.760 private jet set just to fake it to people that they're on a private jet. Yeah. That they're that
00:27:45.960 what is now aspirational is unsustainable. Whereas during these times of nationalism,
00:27:49.400 you're right. Low culture is framed as more celebrated.
00:27:54.520 I know what she's talking about here. What she means, because this is actually crazy to me that
00:27:57.640 this is a thing is you can rent private jets. You don't take off. You don't fly anywhere in them.
00:28:03.480 They're set up so that you can take lots of selfies in them.
00:28:05.960 It's I don't, I don't even know if it's a real private jet. There's this one in LA that you can
00:28:09.720 spot as soon as you see what it looks like on like the rental site. And then as soon as you see it,
00:28:15.080 you can tell which social media people are renting like an hour on it.
00:28:20.360 That's wild. Yeah. But yeah.
00:28:22.440 So people, I don't know if other, other evidence of this, just in case you find this amusing,
00:28:26.680 people literally buy things like Hermes bags on eBay. So they can look like they've purchased
00:28:33.240 a bunch of things from designer shops. And there's also this really huge issue of
00:28:40.200 What do you mean? Do they like go to the designer store and take pictures like walking out with it?
00:28:44.120 No, they typically just show the pictures in their apartment, but it makes it seem like they went
00:28:48.120 shopping and they're like, Oh, this is, you know, just so busy. And then people also buy and return
00:28:54.120 clothes so much so that retail stores are suffering and they're needing to change their policies because
00:28:59.960 so many people are just buying and immediately returning outfits to make it seem like they
00:29:04.920 are having these huge clothing hauls that they ultimately can't afford.
00:29:08.120 And in the 1950s, you didn't have this.
00:29:10.520 No, no, people value thrift. And it, yeah, what was aspirational was more that you had the perfect
00:29:19.400 wife and the perfect family and the perfect kids and that you entertained. Well,
00:29:23.720 you had your barbecue. You could make a good burger. You could make a good jello dessert,
00:29:30.920 but you had your car in the garage, but it wasn't that you went on fabulous vacations or bought a ton
00:29:36.680 of stuff. I mean, it, there were consumerism was big, but it was consumerism on a slightly more
00:29:41.560 sustainable level. And it was like, do you have the top of the line kitchen?
00:29:45.400 No, it wasn't that there wasn't a wealthy elite culture of the time period. It was, it was that
00:29:50.520 there was outside of that, a mainstream cultural perception of an ideal to strive for that was not
00:29:57.960 that culture. And, and if anything, the highest form of culture you could ascribe to was the not
00:30:05.240 elite culture version. And if you look at, I mean, we try to do this within the way we, we, we promote
00:30:10.680 things like people notice I wear Amazon essentials in every episode. Simone got her dress on Etsy,
00:30:16.520 you know, like we're, we're not coming at this, like trying to show, oh, this, this glamorous life.
00:30:22.920 We talk about being a Kikomori all the time. Like we never leave our house. We don't bother
00:30:27.080 entertaining people. We don't do, you know, birthdays for our kids. We don't do, you know,
00:30:32.040 big Christmases or anything. And, and we, we brag about this because it sets a norm,
00:30:39.960 which is the norm that you need, which is a patriotism in whatever you are and how that's
00:30:45.400 different from other people, which obviously we have a lot of pride in and in sort of wholesomeness,
00:30:50.360 I think as well, like the, the, the culture that was sold was wholesome. But then as I also mentioned,
00:30:55.480 very important, there was, it was a forwards looking culture. It was not a culture trying to recapture
00:31:02.920 a past. So what's really ironic is the people who, you know, do the cargo cult of the 1950s and,
00:31:09.320 and do the child wife dress up and everything like that. They're missing the spirit of it,
00:31:13.320 right? The spirit of the 1950s, which was retro futuristic, which was, which is progress,
00:31:18.280 which is look at how great it's going to be in just a few years. Yeah. Like we split the atom.
00:31:22.360 We're in the atomic age now. It was so, you know, retro futuristic that everything was called like
00:31:28.920 atomic at the era. Like, like the, the, the entire art style that you associate with like 1950s ads
00:31:33.960 is called the atomic art style. Like that might actually be really cool to make that like slang
00:31:38.920 in our family, like atomic, but to mean like, cool, but yeah, like every, everything was about
00:31:45.880 the atom, you know, and when you'd go buy toys, they'd be like, what do we, what do we call our
00:31:51.320 wagon? Well, what's like cutting edge radios and flying. Okay. The radio flyer.
00:31:57.640 That was sort of a bit earlier era, but it was still an era that looked ahead. And now so much of
00:32:01.960 conservative culture are parts of it really. I'd say the, probably the, the, the backseat
00:32:06.920 part of it, like the part of it that's sort of, I think right now filtering out of the party
00:32:11.320 after sort of the MAGA coup wants to pearl clutch and go back to an earlier way rather than embrace
00:32:17.240 vitalism and look to the future. And it's, well, it's not working. It's, it's not working for them.
00:32:23.400 In fact, most of the influencers I know of this persuasion don't have a family and kids.
00:32:28.360 I mean, I think it's because it's just not fun to tie your life to somebody like that,
00:32:31.320 right? Like that, that could be a big part of it. Like what, why, why, why does nobody,
00:32:36.280 you know, want to marry Nick Fuentes, right? Like if you have this, let's go back to this
00:32:41.480 earlier era and then maintain it in, in stagnancy forever, who wants to, who wants to sign on for
00:32:47.640 that? Right. But if you're like, look at this bright future, look at the future, look at the
00:32:52.840 talking, the future of talking machines that we have now, right? Like this is amazing.
00:32:56.760 Right. And yet so much of society, interestingly, not as much the conservatives, much more the
00:33:02.520 progressives have a shoot it. They're like, ew, I hate AI. It's so gross. It's so icky. It's so
00:33:09.720 terrible. I only can see how it's, it's bad. And then you have the, the much more common on the
00:33:15.160 conservative side, which I think surprised a lot of people that the conservatives became the party
00:33:18.200 pushing for like regulation against regulating AI. And the progressives were pushing for the regulation
00:33:24.200 of AI, but it's because they, they, they maintain norms through this pearl clutching. And so everybody
00:33:30.680 who wanted to pearl clutch about AIs naturally found allies among the progressives.
00:33:36.920 Yeah. It didn't occur to me until you mentioned it, just how pessimistic about the future
00:33:44.040 the progressive party is. And also the urban monoculture in general, that, that enthusiasm
00:33:49.000 and excitement for the future is totally gone. And it does seem to be playing a major role in
00:33:55.160 the depression and lack of vitalism in younger generations. They're like, why should I bother?
00:33:59.320 I'll never have the same level of wealth as my parents. I'll never have this or that. It's really
00:34:03.160 frustrating. Yeah. And I think that, you know, I, and my kids talk like that. I'll be like, bro,
00:34:11.640 you're growing up with talking machines. Like, do you understand how cool what you can do is you
00:34:19.960 can go to one of these AIs and just type in a question and it will give you an answer that you
00:34:24.840 can chat and have interactive worlds with them. Like we're building with our fab.ai to make better
00:34:29.400 that you can like just the future to me looks so infinitesimally bright compared to previous
00:34:36.280 generations. If, if we do this right. But that was also true in the 1950s. I mean, this was the
00:34:42.360 era where it was very much a, the future might be bright if you put everything in to make it awesome,
00:34:47.080 but also, Hey, stick your head in the locker in case the atomic bomb explodes and kills everyone.
00:34:51.640 You know? Well, yeah, it was, yeah, I guess. So what you're saying is the right
00:34:57.560 mood for a baby boom is one in which you are very proud of your group and you think the future is
00:35:05.080 bright, but there is an existential threat and victory is not guaranteed. Yes.
00:35:13.080 Yeah. I think, yeah. I think feeling like you've already won or that's what Israel has right now.
00:35:17.960 All of those things you just mentioned. That's a really good point. Yeah. Okay.
00:35:23.240 I actually think that this is part of why Muslims have struggled so much with their fertility rate
00:35:28.200 is they force other Muslims into a pan Muslim identity over pride in their own group. Whereas Jews,
00:35:34.760 Jews have much more pride in their own sect of Judaism often than they have over
00:35:40.440 Jewish identity. Yeah. This is something else I hadn't really thought about. Cause I was just
00:35:45.080 assuming for example, that Soviet Russia or the USSR more specifically would just have this,
00:35:53.160 that there would be no difference between pride in the USSR versus pride in like your specific
00:36:00.760 Orthodox Jewish sect. But what you're saying is you really do need much more localized communities
00:36:07.400 to feel excited about their own identity and they can be loosely allied. So it doesn't have to be
00:36:13.720 that you are as an autonomous country, a small thing that's proud of your small group. You can be part of a
00:36:20.280 big country, but you do need to also be part of a small group and really proud of it. Meaning that the
00:36:25.720 diversity or variety of the United States is helpful and important insofar as we're allowed to celebrate
00:36:31.880 it and let it be distinct. Right. And we'd probably be worse off without it. Cause it was something that
00:36:38.200 happens a lot in the comments as people are like, no diversity is terrible. And it doesn't seem intuitively
00:36:44.520 right to me. Help you see your own group as more different. Like there's a ton of diversity within
00:36:51.000 Israel, for example, right? Huge Muslim population, huge Christian population. As Curtis Yervin suggested
00:36:57.240 we, we use instead of diversity is variety, which I think is, is a pretty good way to put it because
00:37:02.280 diversity has been somewhat ruined as a term. Yeah. Anyway, that's, that's my new take on what we need
00:37:10.040 to be leaning into more. I like it. I like it. Variety, pride, a feeling of existential threat,
00:37:19.160 but a feeling like beyond that existential threat is a future so bright and exciting that you are
00:37:24.280 so stoked to fight for it. Exactly. Beautiful.
00:37:31.400 All right. I love you, Simone. Alexander is actually religious. He identifies as Jewish. And then I
00:37:36.920 remember when I went to their house, one of the times that they were doing a Jewish celebration,
00:37:42.840 one of those meals. I want to say, I don't remember which one it was. Was it a Shabbat dinner? Yeah,
00:37:48.120 you might've been a Shabbat. Yeah. But I didn't contextualize it as religious in my head because
00:37:52.200 there were so many, obviously non-Jewish people there, but of course, how is someone obviously not
00:37:56.920 Jewish? Because their affiliation was clearly rationalist above all else or, or not rationalist,
00:38:04.440 but you know, the wider like EA community. So I thought of it as like an EA meetup in my head
00:38:08.680 more than a Shabbat dinner. But I was like, oh, of course. Yeah. So they are raising their kids.
00:38:14.040 Religious. So, yes. Any comments on today's episode were very mean when I checked them.
00:38:22.040 I didn't check them. I was so busy trying to get the slide deck and started and...
00:38:26.840 Yeah, we're going to speak.
00:38:28.760 I don't know if we're able to say that. Oh, we're not? Yeah. Well, don't screw it up. Just
00:38:34.360 don't mention anything about it until... Until it's done.
00:38:38.360 Well, or yeah, or maybe we won't like that. We could be invited back if we keep our mouths shut.
00:38:44.040 So, you know, there, there's one of these...
00:38:50.920 Oh, let me get my ethernet cord one second. This is one of these things where I want you to keep
00:38:55.080 your mouth shut until we know it's okay. Don't make them regret inviting us when we could...
00:39:00.280 I mean, you're trying to pitch a conference. You're trying to pitch all these other things.
00:39:03.160 You're not going to get them. You read the new... You read the new write-up?
00:39:10.360 I did. Yeah. I'm... You're not making this easy to set up. You're not like...
00:39:17.880 Like, I'm just going to write a book and that's going to be easy. And I'll just memorize the book.
00:39:22.520 And like, no, no, you should have just made a simple outline, but you are incapable of doing that. And so
00:39:28.440 somehow on top of everything else that I have to do this week, I need to... So it's just going to take
00:39:34.600 longer because you decided to make this impossibly difficult. And of course not ordered. And I get
00:39:40.040 that you're like ordering it from a like narratively rich standpoint, but you like keep jumping around
00:39:46.520 from like causes to significance to solutions in a way that doesn't work well with slide decks or
00:39:53.320 outlines unless you're doing like a Ted talk. And I get that you're trying to keep it narratively
00:39:57.880 engaging. So like, I'm trying to accommodate that while also like giving materials that are
00:40:01.800 professional and usable after we leave. The burden I place on you... That's my job.
00:40:08.920 In case you can't tell, because it does have a structure to it, is to start with why is this
00:40:15.800 important? Then to transition to all of the things... What are the causes? What are not the causes?
00:40:21.800 And what are solutions? I know, I get it. And that's good. You just jump around.
00:40:27.880 I do not. And you're not exactly like thorough. And you just jump to like the solutions that
00:40:33.720 are the most self-promotional and like not evidence-based, but fun.
00:40:40.920 That's the real solution, as we'll learn in today's episode. The real solution to fertility
00:40:46.360 collapse is promotional sort of nationalism, futuristic nationalism, I guess I'd call it.
00:40:51.960 And you, you know, a lot of people, when they come to this, they want to do it from the perspective of,
00:40:57.560 you know, cash handouts or regulation or, and all of that stuff seems to make things worse.
00:41:03.880 In the, in the slide deck I put together, if you look, for example, at Europe and you look at
00:41:09.240 the, the amount of contraception laws that are in a country, and you look at the fertility rates,
00:41:15.000 a strong correlation to more contraception laws leading to lower fertility rates.
00:41:19.320 And so like, I, I get, I, I, I don't know. I just, I, I don't, the self-promotional ones are the
00:41:28.040 ones that work. You need to create promotion. You need to create pizzazz. You need the public
00:41:32.360 talking about it. That's the one thing that nobody has really tried yet.
00:41:36.360 Oh, wouldn't you say Hungary and Turkey have tried it pretty?
00:41:42.280 No, no, they, they, so if you, if you look at what they did, they made like a number of
00:41:47.720 politicians went around and talked it up and everything like that, but they didn't create
00:41:51.640 like a branded movement. They didn't create like a, oh, and you can identify as one of these things
00:41:57.640 and dedicate your life to this. And this can be like an active choice that you make.
00:42:01.640 They didn't do that. It was just like, go back to sort of an older Hungarian identity,
00:42:07.800 which is what you see a lot of traditionalist conservatives innately wanting to do when the
00:42:12.440 point that I'm trying to make here is don't do that. It makes things worse. So if your intuition
00:42:19.320 is we should look to the past to make this like, like be more like we were in the 1950s or something
00:42:26.840 like that instead of become this new, amazing what it is to be American thing, because in the 1950s,
00:42:32.600 how did they contextualize themselves? Well, you know, because you can just read like the,
00:42:36.680 the comic books of that time period, it was retrofuturism, right? It was all like, we're
00:42:41.000 going to go to space and we're going to conquer the universe. And we're going to, which is ironic
00:42:45.720 that people would be like, go back to the 1950s when in the 1950s, everything was futurism
00:42:50.840 or, or like over the top, bigger than thou sort of like superheroism and stuff like that. Not,
00:43:00.360 you know, broody superheroes like we have today, but like the, we're great kind. So I'm, I'm promoting
00:43:07.080 this stuff because I think genuinely it is the stuff that works. Not that it doesn't also help us, but
00:43:14.840 you think it's too self-promotional? I'm going to
00:43:24.360 like adjust things a little bit just to add professional polish. But I, I think it's,
00:43:30.920 I think it's great overall. Okay.
00:43:33.000 Nobody survives!
00:43:38.520 Everybody!
00:43:43.240 Oh no, he's got a shield!
00:43:44.760 Oh no!
00:44:00.200 Get me!
00:44:02.360 Come on and get me, monster!
00:44:06.200 The pain!
00:44:12.240 Everybody!
00:44:14.900 Let me in!
00:44:15.940 Let me in!
00:44:45.920 But now who saved you?