Based Camp - August 20, 2025


Why Do We Throw & Bite Babies? (Other than them being delicious)


Episode Stats


Length

44 minutes

Words per minute

178.96182

Word count

8,033

Sentence count

573

Harmful content

Misogyny

17

sentences flagged

Toxicity

12

sentences flagged

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Simone and I discuss the bizarre phenomenon of people biting infants and throwing them in the air as a sign of affection. We discuss the science behind this behavior, and why it may not be as cute as it sounds.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hello, Simone. I'm excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be talking about
00:00:04.760 the bizarre phenomenon of people, cross-culturally, it appears, bite infants as a sign of affection.
00:00:11.520 And another thing that people often do with young children as a sign of affection is toss
00:00:15.840 them in the air. These are both things that I have personally witnessed. And I think even with
00:00:21.560 biting gently an infant's hand, it's an instinctual saying, for me at least. My infant instinctually
00:00:27.300 puts their hand towards my mouth. Oh, and they laugh and are just so delighted if you pretend
00:00:31.820 to bite their hands or even bite them softly. Yeah. So weird. And so I was like, first, I was
00:00:38.640 like, is this just like a weird thing from maybe my family or my genetic line? So I go to look up
00:00:44.940 if this is, because I also have seen people in my family toss toddlers. And I also want to see,
00:00:50.000 is this something other people do? Do other people, because that seems like the opposite of what you
00:00:53.780 would want to do as a toddler, if your goal was to keep something who is genetically close to you
00:00:57.900 alive, is toss it in the air. And I go up and I look into it and there's a bunch of conservatives
00:01:10.480 who I guess have never had kids or been around kids a lot, or maybe they're from cultures that
00:01:14.500 just don't do this, freaking out over Joe Biden, like biting infant's feet. So apparently this is so
00:01:20.500 common that even Joe Biden did this. Now I would say that they are right. You don't do that to
00:01:25.520 other people's babies. I would never think to bite a stranger's baby. Or throw a stranger's baby.
00:01:31.160 Yeah. 100%. That feels like really over the line. Yeah. It's like, it's, it's an intimate act,
00:01:36.840 even if it's just playful and silly, you know? Yeah. In the same way, I wouldn't toss a stranger's
00:01:41.860 baby. You don't, you don't, you don't do that. Yeah. Obviously we'll go over some cultures where they
00:01:46.560 do do that. There's a ceremony in India where they'll throw babies off of a roof. Wait, what? 0.94
00:01:50.940 Into like a, a ball pit? No, no, no, no, no. They like hold the sheet like taut to make like a
00:01:57.680 trampoline that they can like catch it in. And they'll throw it off the roof.
00:02:06.340 It's an annual tradition in India where babies are tossed from a rooftop. The practice known as
00:02:12.460 Oakley involves priests tossing babies off the roof of the temple onto a sheet held by the people
00:02:18.760 below. Prosperity, apparently. So. Prosperity. Well, I mean, at this point, you know, if only the
00:02:27.680 really fittest survived. But we did mention that toddler tossing is a uniquely, like the way that
00:02:33.940 I have seen it for practice. It's a uniquely European and white phenomenon. They do it more than 1.00
00:02:39.420 other groups. There aren't a lot of other groups. It'll do like the five foot in the air toddler
00:02:43.020 toss, which I've definitely seen. Yeah. So we're going to go over the scientific research that
00:02:48.420 exists on this. Just, you know, like how common this is. I found an article here I can share
00:02:53.740 in Motherly. It's science. Wanting to eat your baby makes you a better parent. 1.00
00:02:59.940 No. Okay. Well, no, think about it. You hear this all the time. Like, I just want to eat him up or
00:03:06.320 something like that. That's a common thing of, and you don't just see this with, with biting and
00:03:11.480 tossing. A form of this that is not common within my culture. I've literally never seen anyone in my
00:03:16.380 family unit do this, but I've seen people do it on shows is pinching infants. Yeah. Yeah.
00:03:22.800 So we're going to go into why I think people actually do this, what the scientists say about
00:03:27.400 this, which I think that they're wrong about it and what's going on here. All right. So the science,
00:03:32.760 this behavior is linked to a psychological phenomenon known as cute aggression,
00:03:36.920 also called playful aggression or dimorphous expression. I'm sorry, wait, cute aggression
00:03:43.580 is a scientific term? Yes. This world is beautiful. Positive emotions towards something adorable,
00:03:51.300 such as a baby, trigger seemingly aggressive, but affectionate impulses like wanting to squeeze,
00:03:56.180 pinch, or bite. It serves as an emotion regulation mechanism, helping individuals cope with intense
00:04:02.100 feelings of adoration to enable better caregiving. Do you think a playful butt slap or the punch on
00:04:08.380 the shoulder, is that cute aggression too? No, I think a scientist who believes in this theory may
00:04:14.300 argue that, but I'm going to argue that cute aggression doesn't exist at all. And that this
00:04:18.980 is something totally different, but I'm going into it first. Okay. Okay. Because I think the scientists
00:04:22.740 are just wrong on this one. They, they noticed a collection of behaviors where you toss a baby or
00:04:28.900 lightly bite a baby or pinch a baby's cheeks that all appear aggressive. And they mistook these
00:04:35.420 behaviors is all being caused by the same impulse. When I actually think that they are each caused by
00:04:40.720 a different and unique impulse that better explains them than what the scientists say.
00:04:46.220 So scientific basis and prevalence research since 2015 led by psychologists like Irena Aragon has shown
00:04:52.880 that cute aggression is experienced by about half of adults when viewing or interacting with cute stimuli,
00:04:57.040 including infants. Brain imaging studies, e.g. using EEG and fMRI revealed heightened activity and
00:05:04.140 reward in emotional centers like the orbitofrontal cortex when people encounter cuteness leading to
00:05:09.720 these paradoxical urges. For instance, one study found participants reported stronger aggressive
00:05:15.020 expressions, e.g. I want to bite it! Exclamation mark. Towards more infantile looking babies compared to
00:05:22.100 less cute ones, mediated by feelings of being emotionally overwhelmed. It's not driven by harmful
00:05:27.880 intent or neurohormones, but by neurohormones like oxytocin, promoting affection and vasopressin
00:05:33.160 linked to protective aggression, which evolves to enhance bonding or protection of vulnerable osprey.
00:05:40.680 So I note there that the only evidence that they have of this is you get what they consider an
00:05:46.200 aggressive sentiment. I want to bite it when the thing is more cute, but I'm going to argue there's
00:05:50.940 something else that could lead to that. It's so cute I could crush it! Exclamation mark. That's the
00:05:56.700 name of a study. Understanding neural mechanisms of cute aggression. Catherine K.M.,
00:06:01.220 Stephopopoulos, and Laura A. Alba, 2018. Using EEG to measure brain activity, this study found that
00:06:07.300 cute aggression correlates with heightened neural responses in emotional salience, larger N200 amplitude
00:06:13.240 for cuter stimuli, and reward processing. Repu amplitude. The relationship was mediated by feelings
00:06:20.060 of being overwhelmed and a desire for caretaking. The explanation posits cute aggression as a
00:06:25.680 bottom-up neural mechanism to balance intense positive emotions evoked by quote-unquote baby
00:06:31.080 schema features, e.g. large eyes and round faces exceeding beyond humans to animals. It prevents
00:06:37.340 emotional paralysis, enhancing adaptive behaviors like nurturing. Strongly disagree with this. I think that
00:06:43.320 it is actually a nurturing behavior and there is a reason for it, and I do not agree that what they
00:06:48.880 find, i.e. this correlation with the N200 amplitude, couldn't be used to argue that. Also, as a side note
00:06:55.140 here, the neural mechanism that they're displaying here that we have in relation to baby faces, you know,
00:07:00.540 larger eyes, sort of cute-looking face, that is humorously triggered by killer whales, which is one of the
00:07:08.940 reasons why. Why we like them so much, even though they're freaking terrifying and horrible. They're
00:07:13.420 horrifying. They like to, like, play whiz and torture things before killing them and everything 1.00
00:07:17.600 like that. Toss them in the air if you see them, like, tossing seals. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
00:07:24.200 That's sealed by the 80 feet up in the air. Really some of the most aggressive and brutal killers in the
00:07:30.820 animal world, and yet our brain often categorizes them as, like, cutie matuties, because they've got those 0.98
00:07:36.420 giant eye spots that make it look like they have big, cute anime eyes. You know, so I've always
00:07:42.420 found that to be a really funny way that, like, we're accidentally hacked by nature. So let's look
00:07:47.380 at a cross-cultural example of this. In the Philippines, it's called Gigiel, describing the
00:07:52.020 urge to pinch or bite something cute, like a baby's chubby cheeks, as an expression of endearment.
00:07:57.000 Studies in the United States and South Korea show similar patterns with no significant gender
00:08:00.900 differences, though cultural norms may influence how openly it's expressed, e.g. more verbal in the U.S.
00:08:06.420 subtler in East Asia. In some Thai, Japanese, and Hindu-influenced groups, gently nibbling or
00:08:12.600 pretending biting is noted as affectionate play with infants. Broader anthropological observations
00:08:18.500 suggest this akin to social biting in primates, testing bonds without harm. So note, this is
00:08:22.980 something primates will do, is gently bite each other to, like, see if their friends. We'll get back
00:08:28.660 to this in just a second, because I think that this is a much better explanation. So in, then I asked
00:08:33.380 it about baby tossing, because I want to know, do other cultures toss babies? And they're like,
00:08:38.940 in non-Western cultures, similar physical play exists, but there are even ritualistic forms of
00:08:44.180 baby tossing for symbolic purposes, such as in parts of India, where babies are dropped from temple
00:08:48.440 roofs, caught safely in sheets, to invoke good luck, health, and prosperity. This 700-year-old
00:08:54.400 tradition occurs in places like solopar marasustra, practiced by both Hindu and Muslim families.
00:09:01.560 However, this Indian practice is a communal ritual rather than everyday parental play,
00:09:06.000 and playful tossing, as in gentle repeated throws and catches, is less emphasized in
00:09:10.060 collectivist societies like India, Taiwan, and Thailand, where RTP is overall reported at lower
00:09:15.180 frequencies. This is called rough and double play, compared to individualistic Western societies.
00:09:19.680 In hunter-gatherer groups, such as the Aka Bofi foragers in Central Africa, father-infant physical
00:09:25.480 play is common, and includes things like holding, bouncing, or wrestling, but not high tosses. So
00:09:31.720 this behavior is done pretty much exclusively by males. First of all, rough and double play is three
00:09:37.080 to six times more common in males than females, that is play that could potentially hurt an infant,
00:09:41.740 and is really predominant in Western societies. And if I could break it down, which I'd really love to
00:09:48.100 be able to break it down, it may just come from one cultural group. Like, it could come from just
00:09:52.100 the backwoods tradition. It could come from just the Puritan tradition, the two that I'm descended from.
00:09:56.040 So in the comments, if you are from a different Western country or a non-Western country, let me know
00:10:00.620 if your family throws infants. Keep in mind, the age of the children that are thrown are typically older
00:10:06.280 than infants. Did you see this in your family, by the way, throwing infants, like toddlers, typically around
00:10:10.860 two or three to like four or five? I mean, I didn't have peers that were younger than me,
00:10:17.840 so I wouldn't have seen it. Yeah, I saw it at family gatherings mostly. I know you don't see
00:10:25.220 this in public if you don't have like a large family, because it's something you typically only
00:10:30.460 do in an affectionate context. And it'd be seen as, I don't know, kind of vulgar to do like in a
00:10:35.560 subway station or something, right? Oh yeah, no one would, no, of course not. You do it when you're
00:10:40.760 all out back at a barbecue or something, right? Like that's where this behavior is undertaken if
00:10:45.620 your family doesn't engage in it. All right, so explanations for the various behavior on display
00:10:51.740 here. First, we need to talk about showing vulnerability as a sign of affection, because
00:10:58.680 this is something that actually adults do as well. It is why women, when they are attracted to a man, 0.99
00:11:06.580 will expose their neck to him. And it's why one of the most common reasons to be kissed is on the
00:11:12.180 neck, because it demonstrates sort of like a, if you wanted to, you could kill me or seriously injure 0.94
00:11:18.520 me. And that signaling from both parties, from an evolutionary perspective, it's like a very,
00:11:24.220 it's the woman showing their willingness to put themselves at risk of the man, like this is how
00:11:32.960 much I trust you, which is important to signal from a societal bonding perspective. And it's the
00:11:38.600 man signaling, and I would not take advantage of this opportunity to kill and eat you, I guess. 0.80
00:11:45.600 Well, no, I mean, you know, in a historic context, that's a real potential risk when you're talking 0.61
00:11:50.140 about like early evolutionary ancestors, when this behavior was evolving. And that is likely why
00:11:55.400 monkeys do it as well to be like, look, I could hurt you if I want to. But now you know that even
00:11:59.740 in an environment where I could hurt you, I won't hurt you. And it's a way of establishing trust at a
00:12:07.380 very deep level. This is also where a number of rituals come from that are designed to establish
00:12:13.440 trust. So the key ones here, well, no, kneeling and bowing your head is meant to know that you
00:12:20.800 would be willing to have them chop your head off. Like if they have a sword, they could cut 0.99
00:12:24.040 your head off. Like you're basically getting into a position like, see, cut my head off if you want 1.00
00:12:28.560 to. Right. And hadn't you said that prayer, like prayer hands? Yeah, praying often this as well. 0.99
00:12:33.140 So the way that you used to show vassalage is you would bind your fingers like this. I don't know
00:12:37.280 if anyone's ever done this in like a children's game, but they're the children game, but one person
00:12:40.540 binds their fingers like this and another person will put their hands over the person who's done
00:12:43.840 this and you just cannot get out of this. Even if the person is significantly weaker than you,
00:12:48.620 it's very, very difficult to break. And this was done during vassalage ceremonies to show one person's
00:12:55.620 beneath the person who they're pledging to serve. Like I, you can control me, right? Like in this
00:13:00.400 moment, you can control and do whatever you want to me. And that when we developed ways of to God
00:13:08.180 saying like, I am your vassal, you are my Lord, the ceremony used, the bowing of the head and the
00:13:16.240 hands together symbols were two different symbols used in vassalage ceremonies, which is, I mean,
00:13:23.040 there's nothing perverse about that. That's, I suppose, fairly befitting. That's what the person is
00:13:28.780 saying. And if you're in a medieval context, obviously that's what you're going to have around
00:13:32.360 you. How do I show someone more powerful than me that they are more powerful? Well, there's these
00:13:36.580 ceremonies. Now they may not have understood why those ceremonies had the things that they had
00:13:41.420 was in them. This is why hand up like this is a sign of peace across many different cultures,
00:13:46.540 because it's a way of showing that you don't have weapons in your hands. Now these don't seem to
00:13:50.520 trigger as much of a evolved response as the showing the neck response does. But I think that that's part
00:13:57.160 of what we see going on here is the parents sort of hijacking. And after all, somebody can be like,
00:14:01.780 well, why would an infant, because our infants will put their hands out, like without understanding
00:14:08.800 our culture, without any cultural backing, will put their hands towards our mouths if we're
00:14:14.620 interacting with them. And this has happened with multiple infants we've had. And the question could
00:14:21.060 be, well, why would an infant put itself in a dangerous situation like that, right? And the answer is a
00:14:26.700 fewfold. The first is, and another thing you'll note with infants is when they're doing the baby
00:14:32.320 toss game, I have never seen an infant distressed by this game. Typically, they think it is like the
00:14:36.660 best thing in the world when they're being tossed. 100% laughing crazy. Laughing like maniacs. It's the
00:14:43.480 same with the mouth thing. Like if you actually like take the child's hand and gently bite it, the kid will
00:14:50.560 just delight and start laughing a ton. So you've got to keep in mind what's going on with the child here. If the
00:14:55.560 child cannot trust a parent to not kill it, it's as good as dead. So it's actually not really making a
00:15:02.080 calculated risk in either instance. It has to be like, if my parent is interacting with me in a way
00:15:08.240 that's dangerous, they are showing me affection. In a way that's like controlled dangerous and not
00:15:12.660 likely to actively immediately hurt me. So they take it. It was in an evolved context as a sign of
00:15:17.840 affection. But you have the secondary thing here, which is children when they are in the first year of
00:15:24.540 development, or really two years of development, are overly focused on the parent's mouth, because
00:15:30.580 it's when they're learning to talk. And so they have a huge fixation with mouths and paying extra
00:15:38.740 attention to mouths and wanting to touch or be close to mouths. And so I think that that's the secondary
00:15:46.340 thing that's going on here is children have a natural, like if there's a part of my face they
00:15:51.420 want to interact with, it's the mouth, right? So that's why you would have this interaction
00:15:56.760 between babies and caregivers. Now, what's interesting is most interactions that you have
00:16:02.400 between babies and caregivers were later picked up by our sort of romance system when humans began to
00:16:10.520 find a pair bonded partners later in their evolution. So if you look at our writing on this,
00:16:14.120 we argue that a lot of the behavior, whether it is laughing, whether it is love, or like the broader
00:16:21.040 emotional like affection and attachment that we associate with the word love that we argue doesn't
00:16:25.460 exist like a separate concept, that a lot of this stuff originally evolved only for parent-child
00:16:30.020 interactions. And then it was later adopted by sort of stolen where we are with evolution to cheat
00:16:36.060 programmer. When we started creating long term monogamous pair bonds with other partners are the
00:16:41.760 primary form of relationship in human societies, because it helps facilitate that. Because before
00:16:46.880 that, the only long term relationship you would have definitely had is with your kids. And now
00:16:50.380 you've got this new long term relationship. It's like, let's just borrow, you know, oh, you originally
00:16:55.020 evolved kissing for children, but then it gets borrowed in a romantic context for partners. You know,
00:17:02.040 you initially, and you see this was most affectionate displays. If it's done with a kid, it's done with an
00:17:06.540 adult. Why hugging, for example, with kids, you do this with romantic partners. So the question is,
00:17:13.280 I don't even know how universal kissing and hugging is among romantic partners. It's not that universal,
00:17:19.900 is it? They're fairly universal. I can check in post. Okay, checked in post. Approximately 46% of cultures
00:17:26.660 practice romantic kissing as a form of affection. Hugging, by contrast, is near universal human behavior
00:17:31.860 across cultures, with rare exceptions, the Himbu people of Nambia. While the frequency and social
00:17:37.400 contacts of hugging vary, such as being more common in high contact cultures like those in Latin America
00:17:41.660 and the Mediterranean, and less frequently in low contact cultures like Japan or the UK, hugging is
00:17:47.020 a gesture of affection, greeting, or comfort is present in virtually all human societies.
00:17:51.060 Yeah. Yeah. Not totally universal, but just very frequent. Yeah. So as an adult, first, I would
00:17:59.120 know, actually, because they're like, well, why isn't this a romantic display in adults like all
00:18:03.640 these others? And the answer is, it may have been in fairly recent history. We know from fairly recent
00:18:09.900 history, a man kissing a woman on the hand was seen as a sort of progenitor to anything more in a
00:18:18.260 relationship. You know, it goes hand-holding, kissing on the hand. This is, if you read romance
00:18:23.100 manga, which I do, this is something that happens frequently in these sorts of stories. It was common
00:18:27.940 in sort of a medieval context. So we do know that some societies did adopt like a proto-version of this.
00:18:34.560 Secondly, why would it be less common than the other signs of affection? I'd argue because it's more
00:18:40.300 likely to transmit dangerous diseases. In an infant, I can be fairly certain that I have made a strong
00:18:46.500 effort to have its hands not touch anything that are going to get me sick. In your average working
00:18:51.960 adult, now, where you didn't see this was in nobles during the medieval period because they would have
00:18:57.120 been the one class that like didn't have to do manual labor, its hands were less likely to have a lot 0.99
00:19:01.300 of germs on them, and that women often wear gloves. So you could have had this ceremony, but then as
00:19:07.260 society began to, you know, become more working and social customs began to drift up from the working
00:19:12.660 classes to the upper classes. This, you know, you don't want to be working at a factory all day
00:19:17.080 or in a farm and then kiss someone's hand. That's, that's, that's going to be worse than kissing
00:19:22.740 their lips. Um, obviously kissing lips can also transfer diseases, uh, prize that it has become as 0.67
00:19:29.800 common, but it's, it's only likely to transfer diseases that you already have and are suffering
00:19:34.620 from not random things you picked up in your environment, like licking a doorknob or something
00:19:38.800 or, or biting a hand more broadly. Like even if you're not kissing lightly, biting a hand.
00:19:42.960 Although I think even in a romantic context, if you did that to an adult partner, like gently bit
00:19:49.100 their hand, I think it would be immediately interpreted as romantic. Like anyone would be
00:19:54.520 confused about what's intended by that. So it is an intimate thing to do. Yeah. It's an intimate
00:20:00.820 thing to do. If you did that with somebody who wasn't a partner, they would freak right the F out,
00:20:05.280 which is why it's weird that Biden is doing this to other people's kids. It shows a lack of,
00:20:10.240 I can see why people are thinking he's crossing some sort of like, and I know they don't want to
00:20:14.000 be like a sexual line because it's something that people do as kids, but it's because so many of
00:20:18.480 these things are things that we normally only do as romantic partners in our own children.
00:20:22.620 Okay. So that explains the hand biting. All right. So what about pinching cheeks? Well,
00:20:29.120 remember people think that infants are cute when they look more infant to eat. Even adult women 0.88
00:20:35.040 in an attempt to look younger, often put blush upon their cheeks to make their cheeks lighter.
00:20:41.160 Pinching cheeks, if the baby is healthy, will cause a flush response, which makes the baby appear
00:20:47.140 cuter and also is a way to test the health of the baby. So that is what is going on with cheek 1.00
00:20:52.540 pinching. I find it odd that it's not done, that that's not done in any of my cultures. And I have
00:20:57.840 never had an impulse to pinch my baby's cheeks to the extent where I would feel uncomfortable if you
00:21:02.980 pinched a baby's cheeks. I'd be like, doesn't that just hurt the child? Like that, you know,
00:21:07.220 the reason it's causing the flush response is because you're breaking the capillaries. Like
00:21:10.980 that's, you know, I don't, I don't, I obviously some cultures do it, whatever. Right. But I,
00:21:17.920 and it's not going to cause permanent damage or anything, but you know, the, the next one is,
00:21:22.820 is baby tossing. Well, one, I can say this is probably not a biological impulse because it doesn't
00:21:30.200 really exist cross-culturally. It is predominantly a Western, potentially even American thing sound
00:21:35.200 off in the comments as to why men do it. Some men have sounded off in, in comments that they only
00:21:43.800 really do it when the child's mother is around and that they don't do it in private. And they've
00:21:49.720 argued that it might be an attempt to get a rise out of the wife, that that might be the, 1.00
00:21:55.920 the true intention of the behavior, that the actual biological drive that's leading to the
00:22:02.240 behavior is wanting to get a rise out of your partner. It's like keeping women in check being 0.98
00:22:08.240 like, I could, I could do this maybe what's going on. So a lot of our kids have a very strong impulse.
00:22:15.520 So it's clear that this is within our cultural group to break rules and watch your face when they
00:22:22.240 break rules. They really like this. Our kids really, I told this story before. One of my
00:22:27.120 favorites was Titan is I'm eating macaroni and cheese and she walks over and she pours the bowl,
00:22:32.640 like off the edge of this, this balcony thing. And I was like, well, that was a jerk thing to do 0.97
00:22:38.400 Titan. Like, why'd you do that? And then she goes down to where it all fell. And she's like two at the 0.99
00:22:44.820 time. So very young. This is not like a behavioral impulse. She learned from us picks up all the macaroni.
00:22:49.440 I'm like, oh, that's so sweet. Like, obviously I'm not going to eat it now because we've been on the
00:22:52.240 floor, but you know, she's picking it up. She's bringing it back to me. She picks it all up
00:22:56.080 very diligently, walks it back to me. And then right before handing it to me, it slowly puts it
00:23:02.000 over the edge again. And then slow motion turns it upside down just to watch me guffaw at this.
00:23:09.680 She just wanted to bring back the moment. It was so pleasant.
00:23:13.440 To get my hopes up that she was actually a sweet girl, just so she could be like, no, 0.96
00:23:19.280 I'm just farming your frustration. Just to dash them again. Yes.
00:23:23.840 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And she thought it was so funny. I think that that's what it is here.
00:23:31.280 I think it is that combined with something similar to bops, as I've heard that many parents also engage
00:23:38.160 in, in toddler tossing when toddlers are throwing tantrums, um, or other tantrums. I feel like they'd
00:23:44.960 flail too much then. No, they start laughing immediately as a response or, well, because
00:23:50.240 it's, you've changed the context, the physical context of what's happening.
00:23:53.600 Yeah. Yeah. That makes sense. Yeah. So just like, yeah, bopping is sort of to reorient.
00:23:57.360 This would be talking reorient. Yeah. Yeah. Huh? Huh?
00:24:01.360 Somebody today said that one of our kids beat our other child. And I was like, what are you talking
00:24:09.680 about? And they were like, well, when he was trying to run away from the park and I was like,
00:24:13.600 dude, I saw that incident. The kid brought him over, our older child. He said, do not run away
00:24:19.440 again. You cannot leave the park or I'm going to bop you. And then the little one got a big smile on
00:24:24.160 his face and attempted to run away again. And so the other one grabbed him and lightly bopped him on the
00:24:29.280 head because he had been warned. I didn't punish him for this because he had been warned. It was a
00:24:34.560 reasonable and good assumption. People are like, how dare you let your kid's parent. And it's like,
00:24:39.360 you need to eventually put trust in your older children to be able to lay out basic rules,
00:24:47.360 especially around things like safety related stuff, or your younger kids are going to get hurt.
00:24:52.160 But I want to hear your thoughts on all this. Are these impulses you saw growing up? Are they
00:24:59.760 impulses that you have in interacting with the kids, et cetera?
00:25:03.280 These are definitely things that I saw take place growing up and also in media. It's not like it's
00:25:08.800 something we've only observed privately. So I know it's pervasive.
00:25:12.720 The handbiting you do not see in media as common as-
00:25:15.600 Handbiting, no, but the throwing is more common.
00:25:18.640 The fact that Biden thought this was a normal thing to do and it's not a huge scandal to me
00:25:23.200 indicates that it's a very common behavior.
00:25:28.880 Well, and I've always just been so confused by why our kids think it's so funny to stick
00:25:34.400 their hands in our mouths. And then even more funny if we pretend to bite them.
00:25:38.800 So I think it's along your lines also of your theory of humor, which is when something is
00:25:45.760 surprising, but it makes sense. And especially if kids are really focused on mouths and they discover
00:25:53.040 that their hand can go inside the mouth, this thing that they find so interesting, it's just like
00:25:59.040 wild. Like, whoa, I'm obsessed with this thing and the sounds and the shapes that it makes. And now
00:26:04.560 I can stick my hand in it. This is crazy. I'm kind of wondering if that's also a fact.
00:26:10.320 Yeah. Well, I mean, keep in mind, as we pointed out, the obsession
00:26:13.680 babies have with mouths is super normal. Like it is a really high stimulus for them. And so,
00:26:20.640 yeah, I think that you've hit on something there. To note this theory of laughter that she's talking
00:26:27.200 about is one that I came up with. I was going to say we came up with, but I guess I came up with it.
00:26:30.720 It really was. I never would have thought of this.
00:26:34.400 To say that laughter likely originally evolved to promote. So babies have very few ways to 0.53
00:26:41.760 communicate with their parents. They can cry to show distress and they can laugh to show that they
00:26:49.600 liked a thing. Laughter is basically how babies say, do more of that thing you just did. So, you know,
00:26:56.720 if you're, if you're lightly biting a baby's hand and the baby laughs, like if it sticks your hand in
00:27:01.440 near your face and you, you, you lightly bite and it lasts, it's saying, that's what I wanted you to
00:27:05.920 do. Like, that's why I did that because that, that positive emotional stimuli do that again. Because
00:27:11.520 when a parent sees their child laugh, they get this positive emotional stimulus,
00:27:15.600 right? Which causes us to repeat the behavior patterns that lead the child to laugh in the first place.
00:27:20.640 So what, what laughter likely originally evolved with was for that. It was so that when a baby was
00:27:29.760 attempting to learn something and it felt like it was beginning to get a concept, but needed it to be
00:27:34.880 repeated because some parts of it were still surprising to them. They would laugh to get you
00:27:40.320 to repeat what you just did. Think of this like peekaboo, like object permanence, right? Like
00:27:44.880 the baby's like, well, part of me thinks that they're not there anymore because they can't see
00:27:51.040 me, but I guess it does make sense that they're still there, right? You know, they're, they're
00:27:55.920 learning the concept of object permanence and they find that very funny because they are trying to get
00:28:01.600 you to repeat the thing that you just did. This is true with like jokes or behaviors with the kid.
00:28:06.960 The kid's like, I almost got it. So basically the, the code under this is that think you, you did
00:28:15.280 almost made sense to me. Like it made sense in context, like understand how that could happen
00:28:19.280 in context, but it was still surprising. So I need to be trained on that again. And you actually see
00:28:24.160 this was in other token predictors, not just humans. Humans are token predictors. You can see our
00:28:28.000 episodes on this or a large parts of our brains are, is that if you are training them, what you do
00:28:34.720 is to, to train them better is you take the data sets that were most surprising to them,
00:28:40.880 and then you retrain them on those data sets. This is a technique in AI training. It's basically
00:28:46.240 you take the data sets that the AI laughed at that made sense in context, but were surprising.
00:28:51.440 And then you run those data sets again, which is exactly what the baby is prompting you
00:28:55.680 into doing with its interaction. Exactly.
00:28:59.920 So then, then why in adults? Well, because a lot of these systems is specifically in romance is where
00:29:08.000 you see laughter being most important is, and we're able to show certain types of verbal intelligence
00:29:16.000 through making somebody laugh and, and demonstrate that in a way that like couldn't easily be faked
00:29:22.320 to women. And so women then sort of like how, you know, your, your, your ability to process milk in 1.00
00:29:30.000 human evolution was supposed to turn off after infancy and really only evolved to beyond fairly
00:29:35.440 recently. By the way, people are wondering why her eyes are closed. She has really bad allergies right
00:29:39.760 now. Yeah. I'm just trying not to sneeze. I'm sorry. You can sneeze. I can edit this. No.
00:29:45.440 Okay. Sorry. I was saying, oh yes. So milk, lactose tolerance, we, we, at the evolution,
00:29:53.360 it dropped what's supposed to happen, which is it's supposed to turn off after infancy,
00:29:57.440 when some people began to become like herders and were able to eat, you know, milk and cheese again.
00:30:02.560 And then it spread from the two populations that that happened in. Now I'm basically arguing earlier
00:30:09.040 in our evolution. The same thing happened, but with humor is humor was supposed to turn off after
00:30:15.600 infancy, but then it became hijacked and readopted by the system associated with romance and partner
00:30:21.760 selection as a way. And this is why when a woman likes a guy, she's likely to laugh at the things 0.99
00:30:27.280 that he does, even if they're not actually funny, because that is her signaling to him that she thinks
00:30:33.200 he's funny. So he thinks, oh, I look good in this person's eyes, right? Like you see this, uh,
00:30:39.280 with other traits, like women's eyes dilating when they look at a man or a man's eyes also dilate when 1.00
00:30:43.600 they look at a partner that they find attractive. Which is why people would use things like belladonna
00:30:50.880 to dilate their eyes artificially because it made them look more attractive. Yes. That's, that's a
00:30:55.760 nightshade, definitely nightshade. Well-known fact, but you recently learned that that started
00:30:59.920 for a different reason. Yeah. Because they were likely using it as a treatment for conjunctivitis,
00:31:05.600 pink eye. Oh, I thought you said it was because of syphilis. No, sunglasses started with people.
00:31:12.400 Oh, so you're going to have to explain that one now too. Apparently syphilis makes your eyes a little
00:31:17.120 bit more sensitive to light. So the first people wearing sunglasses tended to be wealthier people
00:31:22.560 who had syphilis and were trying to just be more comfortable. So I could see why it would make
00:31:28.160 sunglasses kind of cool because only fairly wealthy people. Wealthy studs, what wore them?
00:31:36.640 Yeah. Wealthy, wealthy, wealthy studs with syphilis. So yeah. So letches really. Yeah. 0.87
00:31:44.720 I mean, I, well, and then yeah, I wonder, sunglasses used to be way more popular when we were younger.
00:31:52.320 And I wonder if it was because marijuana was more popular when we were younger. And part of
00:31:56.320 of sunglass culture came downstream of not wanting to show that you were high.
00:32:00.640 Yeah. I don't know. You're right. I, yeah, I used to wear sunglasses a ton or is it just a young
00:32:07.040 person thing? We don't see it as much because we don't hang out at college campuses and at high
00:32:12.960 school anymore. You know, I get, I drive through college campuses to pick up girls, Simone.
00:32:19.440 Uh, I'm in, I'm in college campuses all the time. I'm joking. I don't ever go to college campuses,
00:32:25.520 except for more giving speeches. So yeah, that, that's all I can think to say about that.
00:32:31.040 I always wondered about that. It, I just found it so odd. Cause I don't like putting things in
00:32:37.200 my mouth and then we've always like babies shoving their hands on my mouth. Like I'll play along,
00:32:43.120 but this is weird. If you want to hear some studies on play fighting, you've got the relationship
00:32:49.840 between father child rough and tumble play and children's working memory 2022 frequency and
00:32:55.520 quality of father child RTP rough and tumble play observed in games like wrestling was linked to
00:33:01.840 better working memory and children age three to five, explaining 35% of the variance in cognitive
00:33:06.720 outcomes. What benefits included improved executive function and fewer behavioral problems.
00:33:11.920 How and why? Well, I wrestle with our kids a lot. I know. Why would that improve memory function or retention?
00:33:24.400 I, it might be part of, I mean, finding an increased modeling, right? So, cause you're, you're,
00:33:31.920 you're thinking your next movie, you have to think very carefully about what they're going to do.
00:33:35.200 Well, I think children may, especially male children may not feel secure if they're not
00:33:39.680 engaging in rough and tumble play with a parent because they don't, may not feel that the parent
00:33:43.280 really cares enough to train them to protect themselves, which is why I think it's really
00:33:47.520 bad. These parents who, who get mad at us for being rough with our kids, they, because we do lots of,
00:33:52.640 of, of wrestling and sock and boppers. And on the weekends, I'll set up a blow up castle to have the
00:33:57.040 kids fight in or fight me. And, you know, some people are like, this is real. Why are you doing this?
00:34:03.360 Right. And it's like, it's actually really cognitively good for the kids. And, and,
00:34:06.720 and how do I know it's cognitively good for the kids? Cause they laugh when it happens.
00:34:11.040 Well, they seek it out. They, they do it whenever they can.
00:34:14.640 Then we've got child. Oh, hit me, daddy, hit me. The Titan, our youngest daughter will do this, 0.98
00:34:20.720 run up to me and start yelling, hit me, daddy, hit me. And then I get up and she'll start running 1.00
00:34:25.920 away and laughing like a maniac. And I'm like, oh my God, that kid is going to have problems when she grows up. 0.90
00:34:31.840 But anyway, so child gender influences parental behavior, language, and brain function.
00:34:38.400 Fathers of sons engage in more rough and tumble play and used achievement oriented language brain
00:34:43.760 scans showed stronger responses and reward slash emotion areas to sons neutral faces correlated with
00:34:50.000 rough and tumble play. Fathers of daughters were more attentive and emotional in language.
00:34:55.200 Mothers were not directly compared, but prior research notes,
00:34:57.840 fathers differentiate by child gender more than mothers do, which is interesting.
00:35:02.640 This is interesting. So the fathers seem to be more bonded to their children.
00:35:06.320 If they engage in rough and tumble play with sons specifically play fighting,
00:35:10.560 rough and tumble play in children, developmental and evolutionary perspectives.
00:35:15.040 Rough and tumble peaks in middle childhood promotes emotional control, social competence,
00:35:19.040 and bonding. Father,
00:35:20.240 child rough and tumble play is more common than mother child with evolutionary roots in mammals
00:35:24.640 for skill building and stress coping. Gender differences was more, more was boys,
00:35:30.160 but less segregated and hunter gatherers. So hunter gatherers do it more with both genders.
00:35:35.360 Measurement of father child rough and tumble play and its relation to child's behavior.
00:35:42.000 Developmental tools were used to measure rough and tumble play quality and frequency.
00:35:46.480 High quality rough and tumble linked to better child self-regulation and less aggression.
00:35:50.960 Includes physical elements like tossing in some studies. So tossing a child makes them less
00:35:56.320 aggressive. I think it's because they're able to get their aggression out within a play context.
00:36:01.440 And then finally here, we've got proximate and ultimate mechanisms of human father and
00:36:06.400 child rough and tumble play rough and tumble activates a child risk-taking and competitive
00:36:11.280 adaptive for survival skills. Fathers predominate with hormonal e.g. testosterone
00:36:15.520 neural mechanisms e.g. fathers with more testosterone engage in more rough and tumble play with sons.
00:36:20.880 Oh, that is interesting. I also wonder if it just correlates with like there being an outlet for
00:36:28.240 physical
00:36:28.720 expression and that if you feel really
00:36:34.720 suppressed around that and you, you also don't contextualize it as just this positive fun thing
00:36:38.960 that you do, then you're going to have a negative, you know, physical reaction.
00:36:45.680 Yeah. Yeah. I don't know.
00:36:48.960 No, I mean, I think that I suspect that it does differ across culturally, right?
00:36:52.800 Like there's probably a culture that does none of none of these three things.
00:36:56.720 And there's going to be some cultures that do all three of these things.
00:36:58.800 Yeah. But if you associate rough and tumble play with like a hug,
00:37:02.400 you're probably not going to hug people when you're angry, you know?
00:37:06.960 Yeah. When you, when you see it as being the same kind of a thing, like a fun
00:37:10.960 and loving thing you do with your family, well, it also teaches you better emotional control.
00:37:14.160 That's why I'm like you, you, emotional control is very important in young kids and our society just
00:37:18.720 ignores it. It's just like never put them in a situation where they must, might need to exercise
00:37:23.280 emotional control. And I'm like, that's really bad idea. Yeah. Yeah. Love you to Decimo.
00:37:30.880 Me too. This is so interesting. Thank you for sharing that with me. It's sort of,
00:37:35.760 it makes things seem less confusing, which I really like as a parent.
00:37:38.960 Yeah. There was an article recently that was like, they picked up their parental discipline from
00:37:43.040 studying animal behavior. And I was like, I mean, yeah, we did. Cause I don't really trust the science
00:37:48.240 anymore. So I was like, well, how do other mammals do this? Yeah. Yeah. It's otherwise
00:37:54.880 just so divorced from reality. And they certainly don't want to trust societal standards. So this is
00:37:59.760 great. Well, when they go against the urban monoculture, which has never exposed kids to
00:38:03.680 any challenging emotions. Totally. That's probably not great. Probably not. So now let's see how evil
00:38:12.320 we look to, to the people who hate us. We, we bite our children. We toss our children. We don't love
00:38:18.800 our children. We didn't have our children for love. We had them for instrumental reasons.
00:38:23.200 The nerve of it. We beat our children, as they say. I mean, barely, but you know,
00:38:29.040 still by societal standards, you know, so trifecta there, right? Truly an evil family.
00:38:35.840 Well, don't forget, we also, you know, select based on genes when choosing birth order. So
00:38:41.920 there are so many more things we do. Yeah. We're just the worst.
00:38:45.440 As soon as we can. Gene edit children. Oh no. Oh no. I mean, I've realized that we are probably the
00:38:54.080 most, and this has been really groundbreaking to me recently, the most prominent influencers
00:39:01.440 who are of this like techno accelerationist, capitalist, Darwinist type perspective,
00:39:08.320 like sort of wristless Darwinism in terms of the humanity's future. And it's weird to me because
00:39:14.160 like, obviously Elon is bigger than us, but his primary job is in an influencer and he's at the
00:39:17.920 same mindset. But being like that, the full-time, like talking heads who are the biggest into this
00:39:23.600 perspective, it's weird for me because it's such a common perspective in TV and media. Like as a trope,
00:39:28.880 it makes a lot of sense and like anyone would follow it. But when I think about, you know,
00:39:32.640 any of the other influencers I can think of, you know, Tim Pool, Matt Walsh, you know, Crowder or
00:39:39.360 progressives, you know, the young Turks guy or shoe on head or, you know, so many people out there
00:39:48.480 and just none of them really take this like pro future perspective, at least not in a way that's
00:39:53.360 serious, like involved with a lot of kids and everything like that. The more that's just like
00:39:57.600 a cover on the urban monoculture. So that's been, that's been surprising for me. And I guess
00:40:02.240 that's sort of our role was in the ecosystem. So if you want to see the, the ruthless
00:40:10.160 tech, tech bros, tech lords, I don't know. Technofascist takeover is what Mother Jones called us. 0.99
00:40:16.800 The child tossing, finger biting, bopping, genetically selecting technofascist parents. 0.65
00:40:27.280 That's us.
00:40:27.760 Yeah. When we have a robot to help raise our kid, we'll make sure it hits them, you know,
00:40:32.400 when they act out. The AI is going to be like that.
00:40:35.280 I feel like it won't be the same, you know, but it's okay. Our children hit each other so much.
00:40:42.480 It's fine.
00:40:43.840 I think, I think that that's, you know, we'll have the family AI butler in the future
00:40:49.680 be like, knock it off. You little, the people who don't know, even in Albion seed,
00:40:53.920 you little s is something that I heard frequently growing up. We don't use it with our kids mostly
00:40:58.080 because I don't want the media to freak out, but it's a classic backwoods Americans term for a child.
00:41:03.440 Yeah. Which I never heard of it before I met your family though.
00:41:08.720 So well, well documented in like the 1800s and the 1700s from this cultural group. Well,
00:41:13.600 that's because it's only from the backwoods cultural tradition. That's, that's where it comes from.
00:41:17.440 But yeah. Anyway, love you to death.
00:41:19.520 I love you too. Gorgeous.
00:41:21.440 So people were pleased with the last episode?
00:41:24.080 I think so. Yeah.
00:41:26.160 They like, they like things that show that women are terrible. This is the one on women. 1.00
00:41:32.560 Women will like you less if you apologize and progressives will like you less,
00:41:35.840 but conservative men care less, which is interesting phenomenon.
00:41:40.880 Yeah. I mean, I haven't looked at the history of apologies though, but it,
00:41:45.680 I kind of get the impression when I think about it, that apologies aren't even
00:41:51.360 really a thing. I mean, they don't do anything. And biblically speaking, if you did something wrong,
00:41:55.600 you had to pay for it. Like you'd, you'd give someone a goat. If you maimed someone's child,
00:42:02.160 you know, like there were, there were exchanges. It wasn't, oh, I'm sorry. You know, you had to pay
00:42:06.080 the price. There were consequences. And this concept of apologizing seems more just like an act,
00:42:13.040 like a modern version of prostration. That's just purely symbolic and about power plays and
00:42:19.040 dominance hierarchies and not actually about writing a wrong. It's not about like restorative justice or
00:42:26.080 actually I think when people use that term today, they mean something that's like extended long
00:42:31.360 apologies. It's completely feckless, but you know what I mean, right? Like it's not justice and it doesn't
00:42:36.240 make anything better. Actions are really all that matter, but. Well, you, you described it as like
00:42:41.360 prostrating yourself in front of somebody. Yeah. It's a modern version of prostration.
00:42:46.560 It doesn't, it doesn't fix anything. It doesn't make it better. Anyway. All right. I'll get started.
00:43:09.440 Octavian, what are you up to?
00:43:16.560 Octavian, these aren't sea creatures. This is a little stream.
00:43:30.560 They're just aquatic animals. What are they called actually? Aquatic animals, not sea creatures.
00:43:35.920 Wait, that's an aquatic animal. Yeah, that's an aquatic animal. Right, Twisty?
00:43:42.080 Yeah. And they live in the water a long, long time ago.
00:43:47.600 They live in the water a long, long time ago.
00:43:51.120 Well, they live in the water today too, my buddy.
00:43:53.360 Hi, food. Hi, daddy.
00:43:59.600 There's a small fish.
00:44:01.440 Can you catch it?
00:44:02.800 I don't think I can.
00:44:06.480 Whoa, this is a slippery rock.
00:44:09.040 Don't pick up rocks.
00:44:10.000 Don't pick up rocks. Sometimes bitey bugs live under them.
00:44:17.040 Bitey bugs.
00:44:17.600 You look bitey bug.
00:44:22.000 What bitey bugs look like under them?
00:44:24.720 Bitey bugs live under rocks sometimes.
00:44:26.640 Yeah.
00:44:27.600 That's good.
00:44:28.160 Thank you.
00:44:28.480 That's a good sign.
00:44:28.880 Don't pick up rocks.
00:44:29.360 Yeah, first of all Hong Kong is around the sky.
00:44:30.640 Like comic books Leo, where'd they find myself?
00:44:32.720 No.
00:44:36.480 Right then?
00:44:39.280 Oh.
00:44:49.440 Bueno, Dana?
00:44:49.840 See you soon.