01:29:53.840um and many of the examples that they have in there like we're going to get to one next time
01:29:59.540it's uh called the vanishing country it's clearly written by a liberal um and he's describing it's
01:30:08.540like we don't want to become too close to america because they don't believe in climate change
01:30:12.000they don't believe them i'm like they don't believe in multiculturalism intolerance like
01:30:17.900we do it's like okay okay yeah and they said that what did he say well i'll get into more detail
01:30:25.760when we cover it but he was saying that um annex the people pushing annexation by america are far
01:30:34.960right and he was saying like jean chretchen was a far right radical just like because he defines
01:30:42.440far right is just economic libertarianism but then you can tell this is written by just a
01:30:47.880some pot-smoking pinko commie liberal as my dad used to say um hero was going to jump right in
01:30:55.000this book in an interview in the centennial canada issue of the country's leading magazine mclean's
01:31:02.600then prime minister conceded that canada was indeed a political satellite of the united states
01:31:09.000in discussing canada's position on the war in vietnam mr pearson that was the prime minister
01:31:15.000in question warned that we can't ignore the fact that the first result of any open breach with the
01:31:19.400united states over vietnam which their government considers to be unfair would be more a more
01:31:24.360critical examination by washington of certain special aspects of our relationship the links
01:31:29.560of trade referred to by mr pearson in large part arise from the operations of american-based
01:31:35.400corporations in canada there are manifestations of a new mercantilism of corporate empires which
01:31:42.260cut across boundaries of national economies and undermine the national sovereignty of the
01:31:47.900hinterland countries in which their subsidiaries and branch plants are located for canada the
01:31:54.940concern about the degree of control exercised by the u.s uh in former corporations was first
01:32:01.700expressed when the euphoria engendered by the boom of the 1950s was followed by three years
01:32:07.680during which per capita income didn't rise at all at the same time u.s economic control
01:32:12.960continued to grow and there was a dramatic series of purchases of canadian businesses especially
01:32:18.720old established businesses expressions of concern however were limited to a handful of public
01:32:23.980personalities largely dismissed with scorn by business government and the academic community
01:32:30.880so this was during a period in the 50s where there was a massive expansion of
01:32:38.080not only american corporations setting up what they term branch plants in canada but also either
01:32:45.120buying up corporations or taking a significant stakeholder position in them and allowing
01:32:51.280american ceos to run them now these numbers have ebbed and flowed over the years the numbers cited
01:32:58.560here are probably bigger than what they are now but the issues remains that you know it's
01:33:07.920specifically through corporate control and you know the larger argument it gets to later or
01:33:13.520i didn't care it might be a guy or a girl i don't know what was that the the multinational corporation
01:33:21.440is was not generated within canada we didn't come up with it we had a different type of
01:33:26.560mercantilism in here we liked more european style of businesses we like small businesses but we
01:33:33.200liked these public corporations the idea of just a huge multinational corporation was sort of an
01:33:40.160alien concept to us and it it's probably not the natural way to do business in a nation like this
01:33:48.480which has so few people and it's so far spread out you need a different type of economy up here
01:33:54.000and so that's saying that we it was inevitable once we started allowing these corporations in
01:33:59.120that they would just steamroll and dominate everything so he says economists have become
01:34:06.080increasingly vexed by internal consistencies and the credibility gap between their textbook
01:34:11.520propositions and the reality of the contemporary economic and polity the recent authors of the
01:34:18.960The authors of a recent study of international trade, international migration of U.S. industry
01:34:23.100concluded that neither the theory of the firm nor the theory of international capital movements
01:34:28.260has much to offer an explanation of managerial decisions and investment facilities abroad.
01:34:34.020The central thesis of our argument is that the subsidiaries and branch plants of large
01:34:40.340American-based multinational corporations have replaced the operations of the earlier
01:34:45.400european-based mercantile venture companies and extracting the staple and organizing the supply
01:34:51.460of manufactured goods in this new mercantilism as is in the old the corporation based in the
01:34:59.040metropole directly exercises the entrepreneurial function and collects a venture profit from its
01:35:04.960investment canada was discovered explored and developed as part of the french and later british
01:35:11.140mercantile system it grew to independence and nationhood in a brief historical era in which
01:35:16.820goods capital and people moved in response to economic forces in uh free international markets
01:35:23.140present day canada may i love this line president canada may be described as the world's richest
01:35:29.460underdeveloped country and so that's that's one of the themes of the book that this is a
01:35:35.380economic system that might not even benefit canada and this is a point i made in the
01:35:43.620vanguard journal article which is forget the government siding with you for ethnic nationalism
01:35:52.020they won't even side with you for civic nationalism the idea that canada ought to
01:35:58.180exert pressures internationally or have some internal consistency when it comes to
01:36:05.380national sovereignty that threatens the current system which is that we want to
01:36:11.320make ourselves attractive for foreign capital now that's shifting against america but
01:36:17.480maybe not china maybe not europe like it does canada does does our does our state have an
01:36:28.080interest in exerting any sort of national sovereignty or does it just want to be attractive
01:36:32.000to investment it we've soured on america but are we just up for sale to anyone and the argument
01:36:39.280in the book is that we've been selling off our nation wholesale for generations
01:36:48.080and as much as a pivot mark carney might represent i don't think it's that substantial
01:36:55.040because i've read his policy for what he wants to do for canada strong and a big part of it is still
01:37:01.120making canada very friendly to direct investment on the world stage and that includes real estate
01:37:07.400that includes corporations that includes public institutions includes fucking everything
01:37:11.740there's it is your national sovereignty a higher priority to this class of people
01:37:20.980than a deal to be made is is that is the question like and what what would they how much
01:37:29.720national sovereignty would they sacrifice to prop up the gdp that's really and that ties
01:37:37.220into mass migration as well you know mass migration is falling out of favor with them
01:37:42.940slightly because it's just become too toxic but you know selling your fucking factories off to
01:37:49.940china no one gets no one's raped by that yet right uh it says there's a widely held belief
01:37:59.780that canada needs foreign investment because the country is quote capital hungry and domestic
01:38:06.580savings are inadequate to finance expansion while it may be advantageous to borrow portfolio capital
01:38:12.660which does not transfer control there's no conclusive case for the view that foreign direct
01:38:18.260investment constitutes the only way in which sufficient savings can be mobilized in fact the
01:38:24.100inflow of direct investments funds the the direct investment funds constitutes a small fraction of
01:38:30.500the total gross national savings in 1965 for example which is the year of relatively heavy
01:38:36.340foreign investment the flow of new funds in the canadian subsidiaries was 500 million or less than
01:38:42.340five percent of the total canadian domestic savings so really what they're saying there is
01:38:48.820there's a misconception that we need money flowing in just to support ourselves or there
01:38:55.620there was a time when we could have done this ourself and we're gonna get into this more
01:39:01.380on the next episode but there's so many cases of where america has like handicapped us
01:39:08.820you want to remember this one of our earliest episodes the avro arrow yeah that's a classic
01:39:17.460did you want to give a brief just a recollection of that because i mean i've gone over it so many
01:39:24.420times but the the very very broad strokes is that we at the time had and i'm not saying it was the
01:39:30.900greatest project ever but we had a cutting edge project for a jet it was completely developed
01:39:36.100within canada and through some political finagling with the us we were convinced to shut the project
01:39:41.780down and then under our noses american companies branch plants effectively went in bought all of
01:39:49.060the patents bought all of the jets all of the technology they brought it over to the us and
01:39:54.180then they essentially burned it so that they could have total control of the market and the
01:39:59.620the only reason i bring it up all the time because not because it's supposed to be this
01:40:03.060great canadian heroic story because honestly the everywhere it might have sucked if we actually had
01:40:07.460produced it but the point is it would have been hours those that would have been our money and
01:40:11.220our jobs and our production facilities in canada right they do this they have been doing this with
01:40:17.460every one of our industries for generations yeah it's big industries too um here's an example it
01:40:25.140says an instructive example of unsuccessful american intervention against strongly organized
01:40:30.580canadian interests was provided by the mercantile bank affair in this instance a sharply worded
01:40:36.740diplomatic protest was delivered to auto informing the canadian government that's banking legislation
01:40:41.940was unacceptable to the government of the united states neither this intervention nor the threat
01:40:48.020by american commercial banks to withdraw clearing facilities from canadian banks was successful in
01:40:53.620securing entry for the first national city bank into the canadian banking system they wanted to
01:40:58.820bring a new bank into canada citibank had purchased a controlling interest in the mercantile bank of
01:41:04.820canada after being warned that canadian banking legislation will not permit the acquired bank
01:41:10.020to be expanded into a larger operation sovereignty is not compatible with branch plant status
01:41:16.660the greater the degree of foreign ownership and control of canadian industry the narrower the
01:41:22.260freedom of choice and economic as well as political affairs and we're citing canada as
01:41:27.860the main example here this is true across the world you know foreign investment in anything
01:41:33.620and it doesn't need to be america if this was the saudis if this was russia china it doesn't
01:41:40.260fucking matter you know it just turns out that it's mostly been america doing it but
01:41:46.420the truth holds that if you are actually especially for a country like canada which is
01:41:52.260such an expansive land mass and up until recently relatively low i would say normal but others would
01:41:58.500say low population that's very very spread out there's only a few key like urban areas
01:42:07.300the landscape for business is radically different than in the uk where everything is much much more
01:42:13.380congested even in the rural countryside same thing with america so you can you can only have
01:42:19.780certain types of companies here i think but that means they're there if you start selling those off
01:42:26.260it doesn't take a lot to sell off before everything's gone and you're completely
01:42:32.260controlled by a foreign entity which of from that point on can rig up whatever contracts
01:42:41.060needs whatever trade agreements so you've got a foreign you know it's not even like they need to
01:42:46.580pull the levers of a giant machine and say okay we have these ceos that are a elite allied to a
01:42:53.460foreign entity like you say about jews too if you want to and now they staff all the business
01:42:58.260councils and the business councils advise the prime minister so it's it's a couple degrees
01:43:04.100removed from just you know mad villainy but it's the same effect largely uh he goes here
01:43:11.460Here, efforts to discourage takeovers or to repatriate some of the foreign-controlled sectors of Canadian industry are widely regarded as misguided nationalism, likely to benefit greedy and lazy Canadian capitalists at the expense of the consumer.
01:43:27.960This is what I was saying where a lot of academia and the business class, they agitate against nationalism for this reason.
01:43:35.420Using the apparatus of standard textbooks, Canada's economists have long argued the case for the unrestricted flow of goods, capital, and people between the two countries.
01:43:46.480They have, in the main, opted for continentalism against economic nationalism.
01:43:53.320For a decade or more, Professor Johnson led the crusade against Canada's nationalists.
01:43:58.440despite the glaring gap between contemporary economic theory and reality there's an evident
01:44:04.980reluctance on the part of economists to undertake major renovations of an intellectual apparatus of
01:44:10.300elegance and academically accredited validity there's no doubt that the construction of a new
01:44:15.780political economy and this is what i like that the book was getting at it was discussing
01:44:19.580ideas and solutions as big as we need an entirely new political economy for canada and anyway i
01:44:29.560think that's the discussion that we could have continuing on here is going to be an intellectually
01:44:33.640messy and very difficult task doing this political economy the prime difficulty lies in the fact that
01:44:39.380despite all the efforts of positivists and econometricians to sweep its valuations under the
01:44:45.680rug the discipline of economics remains deeply rooted in the utilitarian calculus of pleasure
01:44:51.560and pain and the victorian myth of the harmony of interest so they call back to you know the
01:45:01.420former economic or mercantile system being i think it would be more if not state run than state funded
01:45:09.520now what do you think about that like what do you think do you think let's say just canada need
01:45:16.280more homegrown corporations or would we return to again more european model where maybe there is
01:45:24.040more state funding and state control for some of these very very large industries let's say mining
01:45:29.900let's say tech development you wouldn't get something like a silicon valley without government
01:45:35.840investment in that framework i don't like state control of corporations and it's not because i
01:45:42.060don't like the state for trying to protect the interests of the nation it's just because the
01:45:48.340state sucks at it they're objectively bad at it anybody who thinks the state's capable of running
01:45:53.020a corporation should jump in the pit voluntarily because they're retarded they can't do it but we
01:45:58.200should we should have our own corporations and the reason we should have corporation our own
01:46:02.560corporations is as you said this myth that we need outside investment and we take the outside
01:46:07.940investment but that's a two-way street once you get the outside investment the money and the product
01:46:13.140and the ip and everything else eventually leaves and you're left with nothing you you've now been
01:46:17.920exploited so you wait you play the long game you know the time preference game and you you do the
01:46:25.260internal investment and what that results in is more jobs and more wealth and more ip and more
01:46:32.320industry and you have larger families and all of the things that these other nations have we could
01:46:36.540have it too if we had our own corporations i think that the role of the state is to keep the branch
01:46:42.020plants out and to encourage the growth of our own local corporations but not not to not to do it
01:46:48.220themselves like we should have tons of mining here the job of the state should be to steamroll
01:46:52.940the fucking greens and aboriginals aboriginals out of the way so that the mining companies can
01:46:56.920do their job yeah we talked about this last time with uh you said the ring of fire ring of fire
01:47:01.940yeah like i i don't like look what's i guarantee you what's going to happen is eventually enough
01:47:06.580money is going to get in there that the government is going to steamroll the aboriginals aboriginals
01:47:10.900out of the way and they're going to do it because the chinese gave them a trillion dollars and
01:47:15.540they're going to line their pockets and then the chinese are going to mine the ring of fire and
01:47:18.820they're going to use it against the u.s and then the u.s is going to stop us for letting the chinese
01:47:22.820in and we're going to be caught between mom and dad fighting again yeah it should just be us mining
01:47:27.700it and then we can sell it to whoever we want but until our government hangs it's not going to
01:47:32.420happen yeah the chinese have been buying up or just funneling money into these aboriginal reserves
01:47:39.080it's like yeah that was such an obvious pain point too i'm surprised they didn't do it sooner maybe
01:47:46.180they were um continuing on here says it can in an economic in an excellent survey rather in an
01:47:53.080excellent survey article on the staple theory of economic growth. Professor M.H. Watkins notes
01:47:59.700that the decline in the influence of Innes, Harold Innes, in Canada has been paralleled by the rising
01:48:05.360interest in his theories among Americans. What is more, Innes was the chronological antecedent
01:48:11.060of the Latin American economists in developing a metropolis periphery approach to American
01:48:18.820staple economies the old mercantilism which began with european colonization
01:48:24.020and exploration at the end of the 15th century gave birth to a new world of the americas canada's
01:48:30.260contemporary problems cannot be understood without the dimension of historical perspective
01:48:35.620any more than can structural problems of latin america or those of the caribbean plantation
01:48:41.060economies in canada the large centralized organizations characteristic of the fur trade
01:48:46.660had their political counterpart in centralization and bureaucratic government the paternalism of
01:48:52.420old france was reinforced by the fur trade throughout history canada has been an economic
01:48:57.460satellite of both britain and the united states and that that's a hard truth that's an uncomfortable
01:49:03.460truth but even in the last episode we talked about how even within that conflict between
01:49:08.340america and britain can i think really think canada found its identity in between that conflict or
01:49:15.300asserting itself against at times both entities if you're including quebec in that and i i think
01:49:24.980that conflict could help forge a canadian identity now like if you just chose not to make yourself an
01:49:31.620economic zone and chose to act like you know the more i talk about mark carney i don't love mark
01:49:36.900carney but i kind of do like that they're standing up to america and it's making everyone suffer we're
01:49:43.780paying higher prices for things but but what else what else do you it's not enough of course
01:49:51.340but it is something would you agree or am i just way off yeah yeah yeah no i agree because if not
01:49:58.820that just telling america to go fuck itself once in a while and okay yes you're trying to broker
01:50:04.060new deals with other nations but like what do you want them just acquiesce immediately no
01:50:09.720fuck off well it's gonna suck for a while but it's gonna have to suck because we become so
01:50:15.760riddled with cancer you know like make ourselves uninvestable i don't give a shit just get these
01:50:23.400motherfuckers out of here yep like we don't we all canada does is make american cars and
01:50:30.140cars from other countries you don't make a single thing here ourselves we're just again that's where
01:50:35.980branch plant comes from think of the automotive sector that employs so many canadians so he says
01:50:46.220he kind of builds on that and says the imperatives of modern technology increase both the amount of
01:50:51.340capital committed and the time for which is committed further the commitment of time and
01:50:56.140money tends to be ever more specific to a given task contrary to the postulates of economic
01:51:02.540doctrine it follows that the initiative in deciding what is produced comes not from the
01:51:06.720sovereign consumer who issues instructions to the market but rather from the great producing
01:51:12.560organization which reaches forward to control the markets that it presumes to serve it's well known
01:51:17.440that personal savings are a relatively unimportant source of finance compared with the internal
01:51:22.760savings of business so he's just saying there that you know the american traditional american
01:51:31.500model of this would be like you know the customer is always right the consumer creates the demand
01:51:36.060and the demand is serviced by the business uh they're saying that well the demand oftentimes
01:51:40.940is driven by these large corporations that have the foresight to open up markets and dominate
01:51:46.460markets and kind of create the products that people buy it's not bottom up it is more top down
01:51:52.380i can find examples of both frankly but really what he's saying is what canada needs
01:52:00.140is uh for its new political economy is if not multinational corporations then businesses at
01:52:07.420scale you need something at the size of a multinational corporation at least because
01:52:14.780and maybe maybe you push back on this if you feel it but i i don't think you can really contend
01:52:21.980against multinational corporations with just small businesses you know even if they work together
01:52:28.060right no no no you have to have that like that's what i'm saying about using the power of the
01:52:32.860state like you would at least want to have something the size of a national corporation
01:52:36.620not one that's run by the one by the government but it's run by the nation it's like essentially
01:52:41.180a national monopoly but it's a monopoly not because of state interference but because it
01:52:46.060is a very strong corporation and it has a natural monopoly and then beyond that the state should get
01:52:51.020involved and the government should get involved and say you know we're literally going to use
01:52:55.740our police and our military to keep everybody else out we're gonna tilt the scale so that it's this
01:53:01.660this major national corporation that always wins yeah because if you open it up if you
01:53:06.540want to play free trade with it like i'm all for the the concept that it's very lovely you know
01:53:11.180like the the concept of socialism is lovely on paper the concept of free trade is lovely on
01:53:16.220paper so long as your nation your neighbors are nice but what always happens is your neighbors
01:53:20.700use larger neighbors use the trade as an opportunity to to weaponize the trade they
01:53:28.020weaponize business investment in order to exploit your resources so you can't do it you could like
01:53:33.300the america the only place on the earth that on earth that can actually have free trade really is
01:53:37.940the united states if they wanted to because they can they're always on the on the winning side of
01:53:42.520that argument exactly um i'm always thinking back to that book we covered free trade doesn't work
01:53:49.460or global trade doesn't work and said like there's really only a handful of companies that
01:53:53.720actually participate in free trade free trade within a within a walled city works yeah as long
01:53:59.800as you have if you have a consistent consistent labor and consistent controls within that
01:54:04.420environment you can have free trade within that environment yeah i got into a debate that made me
01:54:09.460sound like a libertarian capitalist because i was defending capitalism for a moment where um it was
01:54:16.480some it was one of those effective or altruistic accelerationist guys the eacc ones and uh he was
01:54:24.360defending offshoring jobs and he'd said the thing you've heard a hundred times before where he said
01:54:30.160you know no one here was willing to work the job for the least amount of price and under capitalism
01:54:37.300i'm supposed to find the person who's going to do the best job for the least possible uh amount of
01:54:43.900money and i said well no you can't keep just blaming the markets like capitalism to me it's
01:54:51.280that you're operating within a market and within that market you're trying to locate you know the
01:54:57.160best job and pay everyone is sort of competing for the most most pay against i want to go at least
01:55:04.320of course it's a negotiation is a transaction but i said it's not necessarily the role of capitalism
01:55:10.160to crack open new slave classes internationally capitalism is a fucking economic system it's not
01:55:18.100a political system capitalism is a system that provides for the wealth of a nation but it's
01:55:24.500downstream from the nation the first question is how do we organize the nation what is important
01:55:29.600what are our goals your goal isn't money if your goal is just money you're just a fucking jew dude
01:55:33.680i'm sorry if your goal is just money you've turned capitalism from an economic system into a political
01:55:38.860or a spiritual system and you are you're fucking wrong and you don't belong here okay that was
01:55:44.800what milton freeman was always advocating for because yeah but milton freeman was a fucking
01:55:48.600jew though exactly that's what i'm saying he was a jewish he's very popular libertarians because he
01:55:54.240was proselytizing about how there should be no borders we should just have international free
01:56:00.720trade and let the invisible hand of the globalist market decide and most capitalists probably
01:56:07.480wouldn't even agree with that you know i'm not even trying again i find myself defending capitalism
01:56:11.620but i'm like you know the the market exists but you can control the borders of that market yeah
01:56:18.820right but yeah and in this case it's like well why not just let international corporations come in
01:56:25.580and this is just a level playing field but that's that's not the case because you need to start from
01:56:30.000the position of what's best for my people so if you have sort of nationalist capitalism or any
01:56:36.640political economy at all that's your first question is this the best for my people why is
01:56:41.980direct investment from foreign countries good for my people it's good for a certain political class
01:56:48.340and it's good to make line go up on certain graphs but you cannot make the argument that's actually
01:56:54.220better for people and in fact i mean within these books when this one exactly it seems that
01:56:59.860the first thing they do when they take over these companies is they destroy their competition they
01:57:05.160put so many other canadian businesses out of work they conglomerate and they lay people off and start
01:57:09.880hiring more americans like walmart for example this is a common thing now in canada it's essentially
01:57:14.840it's over now because they've been doing it for 20 years but when walmart came in one of the first
01:57:18.360things that they did is they would target local businesses that were competing with them and they
01:57:22.520just lost lead like they would actually sell the competing product at a significant loss they would
01:57:28.200be burning cash just so that they could sink local canadian businesses they did this across the board
01:57:34.120in every province in canada they did it for decades and now most of those companies unless
01:57:38.900they have a really really tight local market where they're more nimble than walmart because walmart
01:57:42.660walmart actually fucking sucks their products are shit their prices are bad and they have
01:57:47.140their inertia is so high that they just literally cannot they can't shift gears right so there's
01:57:53.480some places that can compete but you're right that's what they do like they're they're absolute
01:57:57.820you know it's dog eat dog with these motherfuckers yeah there's nothing sadder than a walmart
01:58:03.260electronics section what are you doing yeah no one's in this yeah bitch um just to build on that
01:58:11.660i know we gotta get going soon but i just wanted to say this he says oh while we have seen the
01:58:15.580close relation between government and the economic aim of the multinational corporation an entirely
01:58:20.700different set of effects and relationships prevails in the hinterland or host country
01:58:25.740where the multinational corporations operate we have seen we now have a system of corporate empires
01:58:32.140most of them centered in the united states they extend into the hinterland countries through
01:58:36.140branch plants and subsidiaries is widely believed that countries benefit from metropolitan direct
01:58:42.540investment because they thereby acquire entrepreneurship as well as funds the
01:58:47.020entrepreneur operating in a well-developed branch plant economy is increasingly confronted with an
01:58:53.180organizational institutional complex which presents him with a choice of either joining his resources
01:58:58.940with the corporation as an employee or uh contenting himself in a very limited role
01:59:04.780a branch plan economy dependent on imported technology is assured of a perpetual technological
01:59:12.300backwardness vis-a-vis the metropolis furthermore dependence is addictive and the dynamics of
01:59:17.740dependence are cumulative so what's he saying there what he's saying is that what canada became
01:59:22.460was sort of a net exporter to the us of resources and most importantly a net importer of technology
01:59:31.260that over the decades canada lost the ability to do r d basic r d it relied on research and
01:59:38.780development from america so that makes you addicted to whatever technological development
01:59:45.340comes from america you can't control it yourself and so you become even more beholden to
01:59:52.140trade agreements that advantage america who basically controls the entire conversation on
02:00:00.140mining and mineral exports and these basic extraction things like we we don't control
02:00:05.340that conversation at all anymore uh which is unfortunate again maybe that changes in the
02:00:10.220coming years but um how can you how can you have entrepreneurship at all within that framework
02:00:17.260um so we'll just end on this i like this part it says the international corporations have
02:00:24.140evidently declared ideological war on the antiquated nation state george grant's charge
02:00:31.100we know george grant around here that materialism modernization and internationalism is the new
02:00:36.700liberal creed of corporate capitalism is a valid one the implication is clear the nation state as
02:00:43.740As a political unit of democratic decision-making must, in the interest of progress, yield control to the new mercantile mini powers.
02:00:51.400The suggestion that countries might negotiate international agreements for the control of corporations has come from a number of sources.
02:00:58.880The difficulties experienced by the U.S. government in imposing voluntary restraint on their corporations for balance of payments reasons indicate that, as Professor Miskell has said,
02:01:10.280quote a rational solution achieved through international arrangements will not readily
02:01:15.020be welcomed either by international business or by most sovereign states so you know what he's
02:01:21.060saying there is that you know these corporations can operate independently and the the the host
02:01:27.720nations don't necessarily need to rein them in even though they seem to be operating within
02:01:33.260their interest in every single instance um now again this was written at a time when i think
02:01:42.220corporations were still emerging it was still a new thing so the corporate model that's being
02:01:47.980referred to here has changed slightly over the years um but i i don't think it's fundamentally
02:01:54.700changed really um and you're seeing the emergence of something even more interesting especially we
02:02:00.940mentioned palantir before you you had sort of an inversion where these corporations especially
02:02:06.620silicon valley corporations especially these social media platforms where they began to
02:02:12.540lead the conversation to their host countries right so the idea was that all these corporations
02:02:18.700are acting within american interests the government's interests right but like meta
02:02:25.340an alphabet it's like their act some by some trickery by by i guess under the nose of the
02:02:34.860government they they began leading the conversation on research and development in totality which
02:02:41.020means that in many instances it seems that the governments are just serving these corporations
02:02:46.380and but are these corporations that beholden to american interests right so the idea was
02:02:52.540that the corporation was just a conduit or a way to launder american influence and now the american
02:02:58.060government is becoming a way to launder the influence of these corporations now i don't
02:03:04.860does that sound like it could be the gays or am i just getting conspiratorial no no that's
02:03:09.420reasonable man yeah so i don't know if that's better or worse it sounds worse to me but that
02:03:15.340is the complete removal of nationalism from the conversation like what what is what does the
02:03:22.860american interest sound like if not peter thiel's interest if not elon musk if not elon musk's
02:03:29.100interest yes so anyway that's the end of that basically saying that um this was the story of
02:03:37.260the mid to late 20th century um military expansionism was off the table diplomatic
02:03:45.900expansionism was off the table it became corporate manifest destiny which again persisted up until
02:03:53.260recently i i have no reason to believe it won't continue on in some form because i i don't know
02:03:59.100that the canadian state has an interest in the type of nationalism that we're talking about i
02:04:06.380i think it's a lot of elbows up and no no because one would say that okay what steps are you taking
02:04:13.980to reassure our manufacturing to assert control as we just discussed over our mineral rights and
02:04:21.020things like that i don't see any of that on the table in in light of c3 having just passed which
02:04:25.580was just pure electioneering the canadian state only exists to our political elite insofar as it
02:04:31.380is a tool for them to win elections and maintain a democratic mandate that's it that's it it's that
02:04:36.680simple there is there's absolutely no thought it is is a it's a total afterthought they just have
02:04:42.940to they have to at least appeal to us every couple of years in order to continue making money on the
02:04:50.300company store that is canada that's a great place to end i know i've kept you for quite some time
02:04:56.000uh great episode i'll talk to you next time yeah for real man i'll see you
02:05:01.380oh boy here we are i'm very excited to have this guest who needs no introduction but he's
02:05:23.660gonna get one anyway i'm gonna pull up your sub stack right here just so here we go i'm
02:05:30.760talking to Morgoth who doesn't know Morgoth Morgoth and I go way back Morgoth is one of the original
02:05:39.060friends of the show I'm going to start with that I'm going to start saying that Morgoth did
02:05:43.420me a kindness the show a kindness quite some time ago he was one of the first guys
02:05:48.520of consequence that shouted out blood satellite and a great many of our listeners came to us
02:05:55.640from that endorsement so as i say morgoth is good with the house forever morgoth could come
02:06:03.800up to me and he could carve his name in my forehead and i'd say great point may i have
02:06:11.320another even i got a comment here that's that's lovely let me just pull this up from the chat
02:06:15.800uh he says told my wife to watch told told my wife to watch the kid because dimes is interviewing
02:06:22.980Morgoth and she said it sounds very important
02:06:25.080why don't I try to explain that to somebody
02:15:02.480Batting average refers to the game of baseball.
02:15:04.600I don't think you have that over there.
02:15:06.640And I don't watch baseball, so I don't really know what it means, but I'm pretty sure it's the amount of balls that you can hit.
02:15:14.960But the digital ID thing, that would have been condemned as conspiratorial maybe 10 to 15 years ago.
02:15:22.460An interesting, you talk about nudge units, we actually covered the book Nudge quite some time ago, went into great detail about what nudge units are.
02:15:31.980One, and you can say this is a strategy, I tend to think it does.
02:15:36.040it's that if you get the public talking about something long enough and they're negative
02:15:42.640towards it they'll eventually just get sick of it so we've been talking about digital ids
02:15:47.680complaining about its inevitability for like a decade it seems to the point where even the people
02:15:53.960that don't like it just want to stop talking about it you kind of saw this with ufo disclosure i don't
02:15:58.820know where you land on that but the american government just started admitting ufos and
02:16:03.940people have been talking about for so long no one cares anymore it's you get an alien could show up
02:16:09.420tomorrow an extraterrestrial and i bet most people wouldn't care they've just been so inundated with
02:16:16.060the discourse that they become numb to it so i tend to think even those there's the rare people
02:16:22.200like us who are still seething mad about it and trying to ring the alarm bells but the average
02:16:26.180person i did just like with cctv i'm old enough to remember when there was when cctv was a thing
02:16:34.140that was being rolled out and everyone complained about it for a bit but then they just started
02:16:40.260putting up with it seems that any sort of surveillance apparatus that's the first thing
02:16:46.120that they make a they don't even try and sell you on it narratively they just do it and then people
02:16:51.520kind of get used to it and i don't know what to do about that frankly like and to me saying it's
02:16:57.620a conspiracy it is true but conspiracies do happen but i just at this point i don't know
02:17:03.220what to do about it what do you think yeah i remember on the the mobile phones when people
02:17:10.340used to say i think my mobile phone might be might be listening to what i'm saying and now we
02:17:16.640you just kind of you know you can just it's just a fact and we all know that it does and it's it's
02:17:22.160listening all of the time and it's just it's just become normalized it's just become this i mean i
02:17:29.120i've been i'm kind of strange because when the the i was paranoid about this stuff like five years
02:17:36.640ago especially during covid and um it didn't actually happen and i was kind of sort of like
02:17:43.120well maybe you know maybe i did get a bit carried away maybe i did and i did all of this kind of
02:17:47.920content about how we were there was going to be like this gamified society and that the there's
02:17:54.800an inherent logic to the digital which is now going to map itself onto the real world
02:18:01.360um and everything and there's something within the digital technology which always creates a
02:18:07.280gamified system and so i was like sort of exploring what that would be like in the real
02:18:12.560world and everything and i had all this content on it and it never actually happened and it just
02:18:17.920it just it just didn't i did the same thing i feel you and and then there was like this
02:18:26.400what was it this summer i think it was when just out of the blue they announced that we were going
02:18:33.040to have digital ids and it was going to be mandatory and then that's that and everybody
02:18:37.840was sort of digging through all of these old videos that he says that i had on where i was
02:18:43.760and i was like i don't know what to say anymore i've said it so i put together a sort of compendium
02:18:49.120of me paranoid technocracy stuff and posted it on substack all together for everybody
02:18:55.680um and obviously we're going to see how it goes i've been surprised at the amount of pushback
02:19:02.080that there's been um i think it's endless fear where it's it's um there's certain aspects of
02:19:10.400things which people are a bit jittery about talking about i mean i just posted a video
02:19:15.760today about the discourse with uh fuentes and took a carlson and this kind of podcast network
02:19:23.600and israel and all of this and there's people who i mean obviously the whole point of that is that
02:19:29.920people are getting less shy uh about talking about that in particular and i get into why on that
02:19:37.920video actually um but there's other things which are more low-hanging fruit and i think that like
02:19:44.880weff and klaus schwab became like a kind of facebook meme for boomers and and it wasn't edgy
02:19:53.760and this this was part of the problem with the discourse at the time was that people are thinking
02:19:58.640well look you're not going to get banned from talking about klaus schwab or the world economic
02:20:04.400forum or digital ids and and it's a kind of off-ramp from radicalism i mean that wasn't
02:20:11.980actually true there was a ton of people getting banned for the covid stuff and all of that but
02:20:17.960but i do take the point i i do i do get what they mean you're not actually pushing an envelope
02:20:24.500that much but it is actually true and so you you get into this problem where you've got to do
02:20:32.020a kind of backtrack and you've got to think actually you know some some of those cringe
02:20:36.840sort of takes and that you that you saw going around that they actually were correct after all
02:20:42.920um and i i think it does seem like they're going to kind of give up on the climate change craziness
02:20:49.080to a degree but one of the things that you have to remember you know if you we go back to the
02:20:55.320web stuff which people don't talk about is that it was always the deadline was always 2030.
02:21:01.960it was it was always if if you're going to go along with this narrative this conspiracy if you like
02:21:07.640the the they had set themselves a deadline and it was 2030 agenda 2030 and all of that
02:21:13.560um and i think it got derailed for various reasons but there's elements of it are they're
02:21:20.800still going to push through with one of the problems they've got with the climate change stuff
02:21:25.080is that these ai data centers are just requiring absolute colossal amount of energy to power them
02:21:33.260along and so at some point they've been like you know you're going to have to make it you're going
02:21:38.760to have to decide whether you want to have a digital gulag or the green agenda you can't have
02:21:44.040both one cancels the other out and they've decided well we'll go for the digital gulag then we'll go
02:21:50.320we'll go for the we'll go for the we'll go for they really do seem to be moving away i'm curious
02:21:57.540to see if they'll actually embrace nuclear because that used to be the biggest uh the biggest opponent
02:22:02.940to nuclear energy seemed to be these environmentalists and they were allowed to control that
02:22:06.220narrative but it would seem to me that nuclear energy and oil of course but that would be the
02:22:11.240most effective way to fuel these grandiose dreams and so maybe you'll just see that like shuffled
02:22:17.420off the stage people just stop giving a shit about nuclear energy even though it takes like
02:22:21.140i don't know 9 000 years to build one but uh you know what i mean but um no i agree completely
02:22:27.480i'm just looking at some of the comments here wf is to liberal technocrats what comic-con is to
02:22:33.600furries with some great skiing um i want to point out that you do have your arms around
02:22:40.160the central problem here which is that we can always get caught up in making predictions for
02:22:46.720the record most people i've seen on our side of the political spectrum have not made a single
02:22:52.320correct prediction uh ever it doesn't matter if it's economically doesn't matter if it's about
02:22:57.680war. It's just we're not very good at it. But so handing out dates and precise agendas gets us
02:23:04.060into trouble. But really, it's undeniable that you are pointing to a group of highly influential,
02:23:11.800highly resourced people who are very open about what they want to do. And I give the
02:23:16.600example of Palantir in the US. Okay, what is Palantir? Palantir wants to be something of a
02:23:22.420parallel cia um and that intersects with every concern you just said with with data security
02:23:29.540with i don't know what what peter teal's up to he seems to love naming his companies after the
02:23:35.760villains in lord of the rings i don't know what that's about but here's what we know about
02:23:40.240palantir first of all it's run by a gay jewish transhumanist okay and that's what gets a lot of
02:23:45.440people fired up because they hate that guy what i would say is if it wasn't run by a jewish guy a
02:23:51.740gay guy or a transhumanist it would still be bad now that conglomeration of identities has a wide
02:23:59.600appeal in our space but if there was just a white protestant guy running it it you can make the
02:24:06.000argument that it would be just as bad an increased surveillance state or even if it was just a white
02:24:12.560transhumanist guy like this whole thing is tied up in nefarious agendas and and that's a very hard
02:24:19.220thing to sell many of these audiences on and like you had said it's more controversial than you might
02:24:25.380think um and i think you're like many in our space you're able to hold multiple ideas in your head
02:24:31.780at the same time a lot of people can hold one there's just one there's one agenda there's one
02:24:37.300topic whereas you can say okay this is bad but here's seven other things that are causing modernity
02:24:43.860or causing the modern malaise and that really jumbles a lot of people's wires from what i've
02:24:50.100seen because they'll try like you can watch them in real time try to redirect it back to your thing
02:24:54.980like like in canada i'll give you an example a lot of people in this country they'll point to you
02:25:00.260know indian migration or the ngos that are driving migration which might receive funding from alex
02:25:06.180sorrows connected to israel connected to various groups okay yeah it is yes problem however
02:25:12.760there is a fentanyl problem in north north america not just canada north america is being
02:25:19.020funneled in through china produced in chinese factories through the hong kong triads and i
02:25:25.840believe uh china is directly responsible for something like 90 of the fentanyl within north
02:25:32.780america which is the most it might as well be biochemical warfare every organized crime syndicate
02:25:39.240does their own thing um china's got fentanyl and i'm just gonna say jews have nothing to do with
02:25:45.080that and people get mad at me when i say that i'm like they just don't that is just a thing and that
02:25:51.840is poisoning us that is that is ruining lives that is get i do interpret it as something like
02:25:58.440chemical warfare so i'm like it i've encountered that's very difficult for people to see these two
02:26:04.300opponents it needs to be one at the top of the pyramid you know i mean otherwise they won't take
02:26:09.520it seriously and that's i don't know what to do about that either that's that's a communication
02:26:14.000issue um but yeah you're just going to get a lot of heat from these people well it seems to be more
02:26:21.300crossover uh when you bring palantir in because back in the the kind of the the wef sort of
02:26:29.380covert wars on the right that we had about five years ago it was seen that if you were talking
02:26:35.540about claus schwab uh or the wef or bill gates it was less edgy and it was a distraction from
02:26:44.740talking about you know that that group in the middle east particularly zionist power and stuff
02:26:49.860and what we find now is i've noticed a couple of the people who pushed back the hardest against me
02:26:56.820are now like panicking because it turns out like you've got larry ellison involved these kind of
02:27:03.460billionaire zionists in the actual construction you've got palantir involved with killing
02:27:10.100palestinians like marking them up and they've got these horrible names for like they call it
02:27:15.320lavender or something and that's how they're gonna um find out who hamas were but what they'll do is
02:27:22.560just run it through kind of ai aggregator and take out a whole building because there's one
02:27:28.160hamas foot soldier in there or something but the point is that you find that actually it wasn't an
02:27:35.200either or that much and all of a sudden like like one of the things you know i don't want to sort of
02:27:42.100rehash old arguments and stuff but i was accused of being libertarian and i and people were saying
02:27:48.920like you you've got and one of the things that i found like interesting is that everybody's
02:27:55.960sort of a libertarian when your enemies are in charge and so all of a sudden the people
02:28:01.720i've noticed a few people who were calling me a libertarian back then are now like sort of
02:28:06.820shitting their pants because their enemies are going to be in charge of the surveillance grid
02:28:12.340their enemies are going to be programming the digital like the people they fear the most
02:28:17.300and as you were saying it's inherently bad no matter who controls it and that was kind of
02:28:23.380what i was trying to get across at the time was like i don't really care um who is running this
02:28:30.440who is in charge of implementing it, it's still bad.
02:54:02.760it's one of those facts that reveals how unequipped i am to discuss this matter with
02:54:09.520the average person you mentioned uh the hatchling and also i believe millennial woes just recently
02:54:15.500he's had a tweet go viral which basically explains what you mean by hatchling which is
02:54:20.020you know he was the example of a leftist they said they just pretend not to know what anything is
02:54:24.840thus rendering discourse impossible so you can show what london has become and you'll be talking
02:54:30.900to people and they'll say well what's wrong with that explain to me why that's wrong and
02:54:34.260and then i just gotta start blasting i just gotta you know i mean like you're you're an enemy i
02:54:39.560don't once they start pretending not to know what you mean or say asking why is that why is anything
02:54:46.740bad you know you you were you were everyone's an immigrant so what's wrong with this then i i think
02:54:53.560that people say the assassination of charlie kirk did this but i think they've been trending that
02:54:57.880way for quite some time where you know as uh bombastic as it might sound discourse is dead
02:55:03.780but i mean it in the sense that you just can't talk to people you can just broadcast your ideas
02:55:09.500but i don't know who's interested in debating with a shit lib anymore on these issues you know i mean
02:55:16.000like you're not going to convince them they have their tactics they have their defenses up they
02:55:20.780think they got you but what their defenses are just i refuse to accept your premise and i say
02:55:26.940okay well i guess we're not i guess we're done talking i guess you know what i mean like and
02:55:31.560that was the last thing we thought we could do these people but uh as i said before i'm putting
02:55:36.200an article up on vanguard's journal maybe today about how you know people misunderstand the friend
02:55:43.040enemy distinction i believe and it has them shopping around for one-way friendships but
02:55:49.200really you need to understand that there's there's many many people even of your kinfolk
02:55:55.160that they're effectively your enemy in the sense that not only do they not have any self-determination
02:56:02.300for their survival, they want to attack your will to self-determination. It's a downward spiral into
02:56:09.540civilizational suicide. And again, if you say it like that, people think you're blackpilling,
02:56:15.440but I think you need to be realistic about what's at stake. Certain things have never been worse.
02:56:21.560And we were talking about before this idea of it's very hard to mount a rebellion against modernity through aesthetics because people will say just make beauty, make beautiful things, and that will repel the forces of this fallen state.
02:56:39.480But I tend to think that it's more reflective of the society you have, like you need to have that vitality first to produce the art. Otherwise, you just produce beautiful propaganda and beautiful propaganda can be fine on its own. But it really is utilitarian in that sense.
02:56:56.280but if you don't have a sense of beauty to express you can't just make it if you are if
02:57:04.180everyone is just depressed and dying and they hate the world and they understand it's not
02:57:09.500it's never been this bad it is very difficult to make anything substantial i think and so and that's
02:57:16.780so you you know everyone says politics is downstream from culture i tend not to think
02:57:21.460of it that linearly you know i tend to think of it that you know to produce beautiful culture you
02:57:26.200need you need people to not want to fucking kill themselves otherwise you get the media that we
02:57:31.320have now which in in so many words can be described as very nihilistic especially in music right it's
02:57:37.880a it's a very nihilistic time we're in and i the the causes of that are so multitudinous i don't
02:57:45.040know if there's one response to that and perhaps that is blackpilling but anyway i'm in a very
02:57:51.220long-winded way saying i'm agreeing with you yeah and it's i've tended to um i mean the last week
02:57:59.960i've done an article about the sort of the discourse with uh you know the fuentes took
02:58:05.400our sort of stuff but by and large i uh and i did a video today as well but by and large i
02:58:12.460focus on those things exclusively these days on britain because i feel like there's it's there's
02:58:19.240something visceral about it there's so there's something immediate about it and I find like you
02:58:25.960know you get into this when you focus too much on America and you get into this kind of big pomp and
02:58:31.540it's all of this this big show because I'm not in America and I'm sure that there's like if you're
02:58:38.260actually in America and you're you're kind of grinding it out on like the subway in Chicago
02:58:44.440or whatever it will be similar sort of experience to the the uk it's just that you know i'm not there
02:58:51.400and i think there is something to be said like you you do have to kind of stare these things
02:58:56.600in the face as they are in in its seediness and and its grottiness there's there's a kind of
02:59:03.800very hard realism to life in in britain in england and in in england more than the rest of the united
02:59:14.200kingdom i would say as well though it's creeping in elsewhere like life in england is hard and
02:59:19.980like there's a there's a kind of grit and a grime and a squalor to it which is really hard hitting
02:59:26.480these days and it's fascinating it fascinates me to sort of explore it and it's all of it as well
02:59:34.300like you've actually got the kind of the routine murders and stabbings and weird things that go on
02:59:41.340on a weekly basis there's there's like a there'll be like a rape from an asylum seeker almost every
02:59:48.620day now um and and you get these whole storylines and sagas where there was one in epping the
02:59:57.700migrant hotel there where like i mean it just it's before it happened i have to be i'm hoping
03:00:06.960that i get the details of this correct but they were told that they were going to have to house
03:00:12.960they were going to have like an asylum seeker hotel i mean even then right from the beginning
03:00:18.080how insane is it that the just the very idea of asylums these men rock up in boats and that
03:00:27.280they're put in these hotels um and the the locals they said we don't want them here we don't feel
03:00:34.240safe with our kids don't feel safe it was right next to a school and they were ignored and then
03:00:41.200once the the the hotel filled up there was an actual case of a girl being touched up
03:00:47.920by one of the men she was 14 and she was sexually i'm not i'm not sure how far but it was pretty bad
03:00:56.000um and then it turned out well this looks this is an optical problem for the regime
03:01:01.600so there was a cover-up operation put into motion and then the the locals began protesting
03:01:09.120against it like out on the streets doing these rallies and then the government bust in sort of
03:01:17.840shit-lib activists that they've got on speed dial from ngos to counter protest
03:01:23.120and then eventually the the fella who did the sexual assault he went to jail and then they
03:01:31.600tried to transfer him or something and he they released him from jail and then on top of that
03:01:37.180they gave him 500 pounds so he's wandering around i think i saw this is that the one where they're
03:01:42.160like he was released by mistake and there was just video of him wandering the streets yeah
03:06:15.560Yeah, I think you can use AI to, like, if you have something that you actually want to accomplish or making your own documentaries is actually good.
03:06:23.820Or here's an idea. If you want to get into AI slop and be good at it, start looking for content that you like. I'm not even saying blood satellite, but how many sub stackers out there have really great written content that needs a visual representation?
03:06:43.260think of your favorite creator that just mainly writes you know i'm thinking of john carter i
03:06:49.040like john carter there's a dozen dozens you can think of and say well what if i take their writing
03:06:53.620animate it in some way add a narration or something add some music and then put that
03:06:59.660up on tiktok see if it has legs you can do a lot with ai slop to give a different form to something
03:07:05.440that you like experiment with that if it fails don't blame me and that's not just for canada
03:07:11.040that's everywhere else did you have any does that sound like something good morgoth or am i just
03:07:16.860out to fucking lunch um i don't know i don't know because it's kind of bypass it it's kind
03:07:26.000of creating an incentive where people just won't read that is true that is true
03:07:30.560but i mean just before you know one of the things that i thought was hilarious uh that i saw which
03:07:39.660was ei last the last week or a few days ago was when you had this uh the sydney sweeney interview
03:07:46.600and everybody was doing their things on it everybody who's getting their takes in and
03:07:51.540i saw one video where you know like the dd i'm gonna assume you saw the clip the you had this
03:07:59.020kind of horrible shit lib sort of american what do they call it that the valley the valley girl
03:08:04.740accent where it goes up at the end of every sentence this was this was a woman who was
03:08:10.260ugly her entire life and adopted the mannerisms of what she thinks hot girls do
03:08:15.400yeah and one of the the edits that i saw it had her head but i know it's cruel as well like but
03:08:25.080and it had her head but they made her head look like really huge and bulbous um and she they did
03:08:32.020the bit she did the the bit would you like to explain yourself or whatever it was she said
03:08:38.260i'd give you the opportunity to explain that but then it cut to sydney sweeney and you had like the
03:08:45.540lasers go in the eyes and there was this kind of aura around her um and this kind of heavenly aura
03:08:54.500and they had summer came in from as if like there's this kind of deformed shit woman and
03:09:04.280then you've got this kind of arian goddess holding the lane with these uh and it was all
03:09:10.480like to a degree it was like i'm gonna assume the ai was involved with that i just thought it was
03:09:17.360hilarious i just thought i just thought it was so funny i would say as someone with darker hair
03:09:22.140myself i got brown hair that meme was highly destructive to the brunettes of the world
03:09:29.500yeah so yeah it's one now and then you but mainly i'm down on it and somebody in the chat could say
03:09:37.820that you probably don't even need ai to do that exactly hey back in my day we used to do that by
03:09:42.940hand we had to forge our fucking memes in in adobe premiere um here we go louis shaw with another
03:09:51.9005 whatever that is gbp i don't i don't fucking know uh who recalls the political polarization
03:09:58.200stuff in the 2010s the end point of discussion if it was to happen it had to happen back in the
03:10:02.98070s and 90s i'm sorry i'm not getting these when they're posted it might sound utterly incoherent
03:10:08.120i want to get back to because i know we actually have to get going before long but you were
03:10:14.880touching on what was supposed to be the topic of this before i led us astray it was the grooming
03:10:20.160gangs all throughout the united kingdom maybe even broadly europe but you have done such
03:10:26.320important writing on this topic um and the most recent if i can pull it up it was um what was it
03:10:35.480called like the nuclear it's number five uh how multiculturalism consumes everything do you recall
03:10:41.700the name of a the i think the one you look i did an audio recently about the the inquiry the one
03:10:48.460you i think you're looking for is that our multicultural yes multicultural reactor five
03:10:52.660because that was one i was looking at we're looking at oh this is the audio for people
03:10:57.220grooming inquiry the fixes and i highly recommend looking into this and uh it's easy found on the
03:11:04.640search the search bar of sub stack where it's great so you our multicultural reactor five is
03:11:11.300what that one was called um and basically i mean this is separate from what i was talking about
03:11:17.960before which is the sort of the the random kind of rapes which are the asylum seekers are doing
03:11:25.120the grooming gangs is slightly different because then you've got these mainly pakistanis um you
03:11:32.180know one of the things that you when you talk about these things you've got to bear in mind
03:11:37.960that you're being watched and you know you can't make blanket statements about a group
03:11:43.660so you'll see it mainly Pakistanis and all of it and all of this kind of language and all of this
03:11:49.920these this kind of coping is kind of what led us to the grooming gangs situation in the first place
03:11:57.560it's and the reason why I called it our I mean I've wrote so much about this and spoken about
03:12:04.100this over the years and it's because as the title suggests I think in a way this is the equivalent
03:12:11.940to the Chernobyl disaster in the Soviet Union
03:12:18.420where what you get is kind of the failure of a regime
03:12:24.160and a system and another managerial system at that
03:12:28.080which is built on lies and built on corruption
03:17:23.320It is meant to soften the truth of what was going on.
03:17:26.520Because when news began to slip out, the regime didn't really have appropriate language to describe what it was.
03:17:37.840They could have called it just sort of sexual abuse gangs or rape gangs, which is kind of weird because a lot of the girls are actually going along with them, if you know what I mean.
03:17:51.860And so there was this phenomena that was happening, and they didn't have the language to deal with it, and they knew it was bad news.
03:18:02.180And so they opted to have it as a politically correct term, which was soft, called grooming gangs, which everybody hates.
03:18:11.180Everybody thinks it's a cop-out, and correctly so.
03:18:13.460now what happened over the years is that people began to understand that the term grooming gang
03:18:22.720that just came to what that was just a pakistani rape gang that's what that meant and as the
03:18:30.380horrors of what was going on slipped out more and more remember it was covered up um people just
03:18:36.800began to associate grooming gang with something truly truly appalling true on a massive scale
03:18:44.840and so this little problem because the original term which was there meant to be a politically
03:18:51.460correct term to soften what was actually going on went full circle to where people just associated
03:19:00.620that with something these inter-ethnic rape gangs that were being covered up so it went all the way
03:19:07.380back around to being a toxic term again and what began what the regime began doing is to lump in
03:19:19.200um white pedophiles with the term grooming gang to once to want to once again change i've seen
03:19:27.520that yeah and this so this is what uh this is what that me the one the audio that i did a week or two
03:19:34.740back um with jeff jess phillips this is what they're trying to do so there was a huge outcry
03:19:41.000at the beginning of the year about this when elon musk was hammering it they got pressure into doing
03:19:46.640an inquiry and then the inquiry itself became this sort of well we're going to bring in more people
03:19:52.300onto the panel and it'll be women who are young young women and girls who have faced abuse
03:20:02.060they've been molested they've you know but but it'll be maybe their uncle or their cousin now
03:20:08.940here's where you get to the sort of the kind of attitude to this which makes it all worse
03:20:15.660And it's because what they're going to then do is say, well, a crime is a crime, a rape is a rape, and you being this kind of far-right racist, you only care about this because you can blame Pakistanis or Bangladeshis or the immigrant communities, these Islamic communities.
03:20:43.040it's this is the kind of shit yeah i'll go one further what they'll say is and if you really
03:20:48.480care about them you would pay for free abortions like this is what they say on fucking x all day
03:20:54.760which is like like you don't even care about this one if you did you'd give them a million dollars
03:20:59.180and because you're not giving them a million dollars you don't care about them being raped
03:21:03.320i'm like okay uh counterpoint um die counterpoint fucking die you know what i mean like i'm just
03:21:11.280it's so like you it's just like the thing that you're seeing a lot of indians do now uh on x
03:21:17.580and that's relevant to where i am in canada or we talk about these rave games we talk about these
03:21:21.500gangs and then they've got because the the word went out in all their group chats saying like oh
03:21:27.140here's some instances of white people doing it so hit them with that so it's like oh you all yeah
03:21:31.720you think indian people eat poop well here's an article i found from 1978 about a woman that ate
03:21:37.100her own poop and guess what she's right and i go uh-huh okay you know what fuck you like i'm just
03:21:42.440i'm done with the because they're saying like oh you care about this well now you can't care about
03:21:47.120it at all yeah and it's well in in so when they do that they're deliberately trying to muddy the
03:21:54.880waters but he has the thing the the british sort of material state is built on racism it's baked
03:22:03.920into law there is a huge amount of laws in this country which state specifically that crimes
03:22:11.940involving race are more serious so that when you do when it's one race attacking another because
03:22:21.340of its race you you'll go to jail for much harder it'll be trekked much more seriously
03:22:26.840and that's the but they see all of this was built on the assumption that it would be whites
03:22:33.360attacking non-whites and in one case in particular which is the Stephen Lawrence case which is why
03:22:39.740the police ended up being broken by this was that um a couple of white lads stabbed a black
03:22:47.140young black lad to death at a bush way back in the early 90s and then they decided the police
03:22:53.100was institutionally racist and then all that stuff comes in so on the one hand it's like all
03:22:59.780these racial crimes are much much more serious but then when whites are actually the victim
03:23:06.360they tell you that a crime is just a crime and you only care about race because they're white
03:23:12.720so it's it's it's it's just it's it's and it does affect the judges just absolutely
03:23:18.660it affects the just for people who think this is just online discourse we're talking about this
03:23:23.660sort of mentality impacts the judges and informs judges decisions and in canada where we're at
03:23:29.200a lot of really the decision making is left to individual judges. American law is very,
03:23:35.880very different. And so in most cases, judges can unilaterally just decide that someone deserves
03:23:42.980more time because they perceive racial animus in it. So it's an easy way to 2x or 3x your
03:23:50.020sentencing. If whatever the judge was reading that morning on the state run media or their
03:23:56.540their niece was talking about you know maybe it's starting to turn the other way but i don't think
03:24:01.860so so really when you enter into a court here in canada you're you're battling that the zeitgeist
03:24:09.420and wherever it's at whether or not you maybe you look like someone who would do that maybe you
03:24:13.760remind someone of the way someone looks in some article they read once about a skinhead or
03:24:19.400something they're like okay and maybe you're just bald maybe you're not a skinhead maybe you shave
03:24:23.940your head because you don't have any fucking hair too bad now you get three times the sensing
03:24:28.380because you you represent something sort of abstract that individual who is constipated
03:24:36.060and they're in a bad mood you know it's you're taking your life in your own hands
03:24:39.920and it's i mean i've read the court records this way back it was of there's been many cases have
03:24:48.260come out since but it's one of the reasons why i ended up radicalized if you want to call it that
03:24:52.400But it's clear in the court records that there's a racial component. The girls are being targeted because they're white. And while it's happening, they're getting racial abuse.
03:25:04.380But then it's like all of a sudden, well, they become these kind of classic liberal sort of, you know, Jordan Petersons where we're all just individuals again.
03:25:15.440So having actually built up this massive amount of regulatory bloat and this entire sort of colossus of legal jargon based on race, when whites are the victim, it's just not there.
03:25:28.760we all we all magic we all just magically transform back into race-blind classic liberals
03:25:36.000where a crane is also when it comes to white girls getting raped all of a sudden they pretend to
03:25:41.740understand what per capita is all of a sudden they say well i mean they're just in a white area
03:25:45.800there's more white girls why wouldn't they do that you know and then you realize oh you're
03:25:49.880actually defending this and they always cross that rubicon they always end up having to defend
03:25:55.800and they do this by condemning white girls you see it makes you fucking sick i'm sure you've
03:26:01.020seen it where it's like well you know what in their culture they're not a slutty in their culture
03:26:06.400maybe these girls are asking for like they eventually they're doing the they were asking
03:26:10.460for a thing and you know hey i'm a pretty far-right guy we're all misogynist here why is it that we're
03:26:16.460the only ones saying that these women aren't asking for it you know what i'm saying like
03:26:21.880and that's why when you deal with these people like you don't have values you don't principles
03:26:25.740you just have the script you have the script that was updated and you have the consensus now
03:26:30.000you have like what pickup artists would do it's like oh you have the new icebreaker line deploy
03:26:35.620get this to trip them up but i'm like you've gone to the point where you are in so many ways
03:26:42.600saying these girls deserve what and and it's again you can't talk about this without getting
03:26:47.220utterly furious yeah um and so the the idea of it being an in-group and out-group issue
03:26:56.660which is what i'll argue because it is um but this this gets back to the the article about
03:27:04.800chernobyl is that what you actually get to is the lie at the heart of multiculturalism itself
03:27:12.520where we're not just all these kind of individualistic consumers
03:27:20.880who just work and contribute towards the GDP.
03:27:25.580What this reveals is that there's kind of tribal hatreds,
03:27:32.660genocidal in nature, have been imported into the country.
03:27:36.580And if the government acknowledges that,
03:27:39.180then the next step on from that is to that people are going to have demand policies to change it
03:27:45.760so in the last inquiry that came out the the results of it were the i think it was the casey
03:27:54.260report and she actually said there is a ethnic sort of ethnic on ethnic issue here the girls
03:28:03.100are targeted because they're white and the government covers it up because they're white
03:28:07.880and this has to be taken into account so then it becomes this kind of i just saw the word like
03:28:14.780hot potato in the article as you are scrolling it where how the government's like well okay so
03:28:20.080we can't actually sort of admit to the lie
03:28:23.920we can't actually admit that all of the the the kind of the entire worldview in the country that
03:28:32.640we've made is a lie it's it's built on nonsense um in the same way that they'd say in genoble
03:28:39.740the incentive structure was to get cheap bore on rods because that was the way it was all skewed
03:28:46.020another another element to this which goes into the bureaucracy itself is that there's a fascinating
03:28:51.940adam curtis documentary one of the the older ones called the trap um and it focuses on tony
03:29:00.780Blair knew labor quite heavily and it's all about these so it's basically the um the game theory
03:29:09.180of that mathematician what what was he called again um he was kind of weird and autistic
03:29:14.820but the the the thief's dilemma or something is it the dual thief's dilemma
03:29:20.560basically the idea is that um you could you can't trust anybody and you only have to think for
03:29:29.040yourself now the tony blair sort of regime baked this into the bureaucracy into the system itself
03:29:38.060and it became all about these outcomes and giving people bonuses and um basically if you toe the
03:29:46.540line and you get these quotas met you will be rewarded on the individual level and what you're
03:29:54.900seeing on the screen there is an example of the perverse outcomes because what they did it's i
03:30:00.460know this sounds all very boring and banal but what actually happened as one example of this
03:30:06.240is that the nhs were under they had to abide by these quotas so if the nhs was running out of beds
03:30:17.700or bed space they had a problem so one of the things they did in order to meet their quotas
03:30:24.540in the hospitals was to saw the little wheels off the bottom of the trolleys that people were being
03:30:31.200brought in on and then reclassify them as beds and another thing they did was that you had all
03:30:37.860of these people piling up in the corridors waiting to go in and so they just pulled a curtain across
03:30:43.600the corridor and then um renamed the corridor a ward so on paper it looked like this is doing
03:30:53.100gangbusters this this is just amazing where the nhs has never been better but the actual lived
03:30:59.740reality was a total horror show and when you go into the local councils and the local sort of
03:31:06.400bureaucracies or the child protection services they got that as well but what it meant was that
03:31:14.060you couldn't actually have an overarching morality because everybody's just an individual thinking
03:31:21.080only about their own career and their christmas bonus uh and and a raise and a you know getting
03:31:27.800ahead in the system without thinking so everybody becomes a kind of reptile and when you've got a
03:31:35.880problem which is systemic this becomes a nightmare to deal with so if you then have a girl walks in
03:31:43.900and she's got blood on her jeans and she's been beaten up and she says there's five pakistanis
03:31:50.800around the corner in a car waiting for me i need help and then they were repeatedly turned away
03:31:58.180from police or child protection services and ended up straight back in those cars
03:32:02.720how does that happen well how that happens is that the incentives of the system were that
03:32:08.080if i report this i'm going to get passed over for promotion if i report this i'm going to end up in
03:32:15.480trouble what if she's wrong what if i come across like a racist and so all of a sudden you see
03:32:20.740that the entire system is riddled with perverse incentives.
03:32:24.120Also, we have a comment here from Padfa saying, look up home office counting rules as opposed
03:32:58.420But if you look at it, it's just part-time jobs.
03:33:00.640And actually, if you look at full-time jobs, they've decreased significantly.
03:33:04.460But it's like one of these little sleights of hand that they do, which to me comes across as malicious.
03:33:10.100And that's why I wanted to ask you this earlier, but I completely forgot maybe now's the time because we have to get going soon.
03:33:16.940But one thing I noticed, I'm sure you've seen the same videos about British police officers, because it seems that the police in the UK more than anywhere else seem to hold actual contempt for the people that they're visiting.
03:33:31.760Like I've seen videos in America, Canada, Australia, where the cops are told to go and, you know, get someone because of a post or something.
03:33:42.420And sometimes they seem almost apologetic.
03:33:45.340But when I see videos of British police officers, whatever ridiculous, whatever law they're enforcing, because it's always, I've got your social media posts here, and it's just frivolous nonsense.
03:33:57.680But they seem to take it very, very seriously.
03:33:59.660It seems that this grooming inquiry, you might call it, has been going on for so long, but I haven't heard any leaks from the police. I haven't seen a single police officer admit that anything went wrong. Of course, there's the blue wall of silence, but I guess the question is, does it seem like the case to you that the British police seem to have particular contempt towards the public?
03:34:24.620yeah they do um and basically they've just had their brains fried with regime propaganda since
03:34:34.440what i was talking about earlier um with the stephen lawrence case there was a there was a
03:34:40.520huge investigation into that that was called the mcpherson report that was when the police was
03:34:45.240sort of classed as institutionally racist and they basically purged the entire police they just
03:34:50.620relentlessly came down on the police but in more recent years something even more sort of insidious
03:34:56.680is happening where the the actual kind of um good policemen are leaving the force in droves by the
03:35:05.520thousands now that's actually a bit we had because i think they signed up for a few years at a time
03:35:11.460um so so you tend to get like every so often there'll be like 10 000 leave in a year or
03:35:17.620something and what they're doing is filling this up filling up those placements with feminists and
03:35:26.860and girl bosses and bug men they're luring the bar and the people who are they're bringing in
03:35:33.400are they're basically they're they're regime friendlies they're being vetted on that basis
03:35:39.480this is how you end up with kind of scrawny little 20 year old girls who are five foot two and and
03:35:47.500but with like a head full of self-righteous dogma but the man who was 45 years old
03:35:56.340uh and still fit but with a lot of experience and sort of empathy he's he they're on the outs
03:36:03.360not just because they're being pushed and passed over which they are but because they're just
03:36:08.800getting out because it's a thoroughly miserable existence yeah that's that's why i don't know if
03:36:14.060there's, you know, someone made a comment earlier in the chat that says the police investigated
03:36:18.680themselves and found that the police did nothing wrong. So I think we need to end it right around
03:36:24.620there. But I want to see if you have any closing thoughts. I know this is such a big topic. You've
03:36:30.540been covering it for as long as anyone I've known. I know Patriot Alternative have probably been on
03:36:36.180this tip for quite some time and others. But I think of you when I think of someone who's been
03:36:40.780staying on this topic for so long is there any cause for optimism have you seen things get better
03:36:48.420worse stay the same is there any light via this tunnel as far as you can see um one of the things
03:36:56.980are changing very fast in britain because what's happened is i mean i've wrote about this as well
03:37:03.040but what's happened is that the multicultural sort of third world biomass and its barbarism
03:37:11.200is becoming too much for the regime to handle there's there's a there's a there's a certain
03:37:16.980amount of buy-in that any political system has to have a certain amount of buy-in from most of the
03:37:24.720people most of the time um and ours doesn't and this this is where you get into some some dangerous
03:37:31.640territory this is where you get into the disconnect um and the the state of the country
03:37:39.020is just shocking so we'll we'll see that there there's a little bit of hope there
03:37:46.920uh i'm i'm not known for my optimism but i'm not i'm not just i'm not just pessimistic because
03:37:54.060that's my brand i'm not just like sort of shilling despair i just try and be realistic about it
03:38:01.640and to be honest is i can't but what i do see just the sheer sort of scale of the anger
03:38:08.600in the country um there's a little bit there there's a there's a little flicker of light there
03:38:15.380and that is a good place and i wanted to show people you need to check out his youtube page
03:38:20.880more goth's review um i neglected to mention this at the start but you host a show with