Candace Owens - PROVE ME WRONG： Tyler Robinson Is A Patsy. ｜ Candace Ep 319

00:00:00 After 19 years, they're back.

00:00:04 Frankie Muniz, Bryan Cranston, and the rest of the family reunite in Malcolm in the Middle, Life's Still Unfair.

00:00:09 After 10 years avoiding them, Hal and Lois demand Malcolm be at their anniversary party, pulling him straight back into their chaos.

00:00:16 Malcolm in the Middle, Life's Still Unfair.

00:00:19 A special four-part event, streaming April 10th on Hulu on Disney+.

00:00:22 All right, you guys. Happy Tuesday, indeed.

00:00:27 I really did have the best day ever yesterday.

00:00:31 I mean, foremost, the news broke about the Freemason hit squad in France.

00:00:37 Then we wrap up the episode yesterday and the Internet explodes because the ATF and the Tyler Robinson case cannot connect the gun to him.

00:00:45 Oh, OK. Interesting.

00:00:48 What does it all mean?

00:00:49 You have a bunch of people racing.

00:00:51 Oh, could you imagine the PR cash they are spending right now racing to tell you this is a big nothing burger?

00:00:57 Who cares if we can't connect the gun to the bullets or fragments?

00:01:02 OK, we care. I care because we were right.

00:01:06 And we wanted to make sure that we took the time to actually read through the court filings.

00:01:10 And we're going to take you through them.

00:01:12 And if I'm being honest, there is something that is buried in these filings that not even Tyler Robinson's defense team caught.

00:01:20 And we did.

00:01:21 And in my opinion, it is definitive proof that Tyler Robinson is a patsy.

00:01:25 The feds are just putting this on him.

00:01:26 And I do mean the FBI.

00:01:28 From JFK to MLK, now to CJK, this is, in my opinion, an undeniable state killing.

00:01:37 Welcome back to Candace.

00:01:49 allow me to be the first to say it if the gun does not fit you must acquit okay now before we

00:02:01 address these court filings and take you through them line by line so you are educated you can go

00:02:06 out into the world you can say you know you read through them yourself it's only 28 pages

00:02:09 and then you can look at the people that are trying to manipulate you and to lie about to

00:02:14 you about what's in the filings i at first want to transport you back to the beginning

00:02:18 because some time has passed and the story that we were told has changed so many times that you

00:02:24 actually have to go back to the beginning to fully comprehend how this case fell apart so quickly

00:02:30 for Turning Point USA, for Erica Kirk, and what I think is fair to refer to as their also their

00:02:38 federal accomplices because that's what it looks like to me. Charlie Kirk was shot on September 10th

00:02:43 12.23 p.m. in the afternoon mountain time.

00:02:47 Now, a mere, what was it, four minutes after Charlie's bloodied body was carried to the SUV,

00:02:54 Terrell Farnsworth, the man who runs the audiovisual company that Turning Point employs,

00:02:59 they've used them for over a decade for their big events, and he never goes to these college

00:03:04 events, but they were trying something different that day, he says, like an assassination?

00:03:09 I don't know.

00:03:10 Anyways, Terrell Farnsworth raced down from his nearby grassy knoll where he was recording himself.

00:03:18 And what does he do when he races down?

00:03:19 He returns to the crime scene and violates it.

00:03:23 More specifically, he grabs the very chair that Charlie Kirk had just been sitting in,

00:03:29 the chair that Charlie was murdered in, and he takes it over back to the camera,

00:03:35 and he stands on that chair, that bloody chair,

00:03:37 and removes specifically the SD card from the camera

00:03:42 that was behind Charlie's head, okay?

00:03:45 Now, later, Andrew Colvett is going to explain

00:03:48 that Terrell was acting heroically

00:03:51 because he was afraid that students

00:03:53 were going to steal stuff from the table.

00:03:55 There were people that were grabbing hats,

00:03:57 and Terrell thought, let me spring into action

00:03:59 and rescue this SD card.

00:04:03 Yeah, we know Andrew Colvett's lying

00:04:04 because Terrell did not take the expensive camera.

00:04:06 If you were afraid about things being stolen

00:04:08 that were of value,

00:04:10 you wouldn't remove the SD card

00:04:12 and then leave the expensive camera on the table.

00:04:16 The SD card is $15, okay?

00:04:19 The camera's pretty expensive.

00:04:21 Terrell Farnsworth seemed to be moving with precision

00:04:24 as if he were acting on some sort of instruction,

00:04:26 am I right?

00:04:27 But to what end, I wondered.

00:04:29 Why that camera?

00:04:30 Why specifically the one behind Charlie's head in particular?

00:04:33 And because I was wondering, I decided on September 17th, exactly one week after Charlie's

00:04:38 assassination, to reach out to him. I called him. And he was exceedingly nervous. He stammered

00:04:43 through a great many nonsensible excuses. Oh, I did it to protect Erica, he said. I wanted to

00:04:52 secure the footage for Erica so that she wouldn't have to see the footage of Charlie being shot in

00:05:00 24K, okay, clocks you on another lie. Because that was already a foregone conclusion. The entire

00:05:07 world had just witnessed Charlie Kirk bleeding out. Okay, you can't save Erica from the internet

00:05:13 already circulating these clips to the tune of billions of people who watched it worldwide.

00:05:19 More crucially, if he was actually worried about Erica seeing the footage, common sense to me says

00:05:26 that he would have grabbed the camera that was like, I don't know, a yardstick away from Charlie's

00:05:32 face. Oh, yeah, that camera that we've circled right here, that would have grabbed the action.

00:05:37 That would have been the real up close shot of Charlie bleeding out. So he lied. The camera from

00:05:44 behind, making matters worse, once I actually saw the footage, it had no blood. We revealed that on

00:05:50 this show. So now you can think through that. He was telling me he was trying to save Erica from

00:05:54 seeing her husband die, but yet this was the most mild shot of all. There was not a drop of blood on

00:05:59 Charlie's back as he went down. So what exactly was it that Terrell was racing to hide? What they

00:06:05 were hiding, and I am going to speculate this boldly now, having read through these files and

00:06:11 thought through everything that has happened, they were hiding was the fact that the bullet did not

00:06:14 go through, did not pierce through Charlie. I believe that that was supposed to remain a state

00:06:18 secret. The public was never supposed to have that piece of information. I feel pretty certain about

00:06:23 that, because after being told that the .30-06 was fired from a rifle a mere 150 yards away

00:06:31 into the most delicate human neck, the assumption, all of us made the assumption, actually, we never

00:06:37 even asked the question. Our assumption was just that it had gone through, of course.

00:06:41 And I believe that that is the true reason why they moved to pave over the scene so quickly,

00:06:46 because that was supposed to be the narrative. We've got the gun. We're going to say it was

00:06:50 30.6. We're going to say it passed through. We collected the evidence. Now it's paved through.

00:06:54 Nobody can look. It's gone. But something happened. There was a divine intervention.

00:07:01 Terrell showed me the back footage two days later on September 19th because I kept pressing him.

00:07:05 Why are you being so weird? Why are you acting so strange? Why are you giving me so many excuses?

00:07:09 Why are you telling me you're scared to send the footage because Google might hack you? That's

00:07:13 bizarre. Why are you telling me you don't know how to send footage? You are an audiovisual company.

00:07:17 you should know how to send big files. And so he eventually said, hey, I'll FaceTime you. I'll

00:07:24 just FaceTime you. I'm not going to send you anything, but I'll FaceTime you. And on September

00:07:26 19th, he did that. And gratefully, I moved to record that FaceTime call because his energy made

00:07:31 me uncomfortable. And later that day, I informed the public on my show that the bullet didn't go

00:07:38 through. I said the oddest thing. It's like there was no blood in the back of Charlie. That's so

00:07:41 strange. And this public revelation caused a mass internal panic at Turning Point USA.

00:07:48 Do you want to know how I know that it caused panic? Because the very next day on September

00:07:52 20th, Justin Strife was contacting my husband several times while asking him if I had recorded

00:07:58 that FaceTime call with Terrell. It came across like an urgent matter. I was sitting in the living

00:08:02 room. George came to me. He's like, hey, I don't know what's going on. But like, Justin Strife

00:08:05 is hitting me up. He's asking me if he recorded. What was he talking about? I said, why does he

00:08:10 care? Why is this urgent? Why are they following up with you? What's up? And he's like, I don't

00:08:14 know. And then I explained to him what happened. And I said, honey, don't answer the question.

00:08:18 I find the question in and of itself to be weird. Why do they care if I recorded and have the back

00:08:25 footage? And guess what? I found out why. I found out. Do you want to know why they were feeling a

00:08:31 bit of pressure? Who it was in particular that was placing pressure on Justin Strife and Frank

00:08:35 Carney to determine whether or not I had recorded that back footage? The feds were. The FBI was on

00:08:44 the phone with Justin Strife, Frank Carney, and they were apparently speaking to the feds that

00:08:48 day about whether or not I had recorded the footage. Now, why do you think this information

00:08:55 was so important to the FBI? Why would the feds be concerned about whether or not I had the back

00:09:03 footage. I'm recording. I'm screen recording a FaceTime call. They've got it in 4K. They're not

00:09:08 protecting Erica. It's everywhere. Unbeknownst to me at that time, this was also the exact day

00:09:17 of Charlie's private burial, and yet this is what they were consumed with. Erica was highly

00:09:23 concerned about the back footage as well, so much so that rather than attending exclusively to her

00:09:29 husband's private funeral. The higher priority for Erica on that day was to curate a response

00:09:36 to the public regarding why the bullet had not gone through. I want to say that again. Responding

00:09:43 to my episode where I simply told the public the truth that there was no bullet that passed

00:09:48 through was deemed a higher priority than Erica being fully emotionally present at her husband's

00:09:54 funeral. Her and Andrew were discussing this. They peeled off to the side, and they conferenced

00:10:01 the surgeon on the day of Charlie's actual funeral. They conferenced and called Dr. Lee Trotter. This

00:10:08 is the single biggest lie that Erica Kirk would later tell me. She would insist to my face, and

00:10:13 I did not believe her for one second, and I politely pushed back, that Andrew went rogue that

00:10:17 day, that the surgeon went rogue too. The two of them had a discussion that she did not authorize,

00:10:22 discussion that she was not privy to. The surgeon violated HIPAA. Andrew violated her privacy. And

00:10:29 after that discussion, Andrew went double rogue and he tweeted about the nature of this discussion

00:10:34 that he could not have had with the surgeon without Erica's permission. Erica lied. Erica

00:10:42 and Andrew colluded on how to message to the public about this little fact that was never

00:10:47 meant to be known to us. Dr. Lee Trotter did not violate HIPAA. In fact, he could sue her for

00:10:52 defamation in my personal opinion. She was the one that was on the phone with Andrew and they

00:10:57 were asking the doctor what they could tell the public and it was Erica Kirk that said that Charlie

00:11:03 ate healthy and she bet he had a neck like Superman. Pretty obvious if we just pause and

00:11:10 think about it. It was pretty girly and emotional. Man of steel. He just eats healthy. That's not how

00:11:16 serious trauma surgeons communicate, okay? It's just not. But the crucial point of Andrew's tweet

00:11:21 that people are forgetting and why I'm taking you back through this as before we get into these

00:11:25 filings is that on that day, as they were freaking out, feds calling me, my husband, feds calling

00:11:31 Turning Point USA, Turning Point USA, putting pressure on me and my husband, Erica and Andrew

00:11:34 on the side trying to figure out how to message. The crucial part is that then when they did deliver

00:11:39 this information to the public, they declared that the coroner found the bullet. The bullet,

00:11:47 not a fragment, the bullet. On September 20th, after the autopsy and the death certificate were

00:11:53 issued, they communicated to the public the bullet was found beneath Charlie's skin, okay?

00:11:58 We're gonna, we can read that statement together. They want you to forget these things. Andrew

00:12:03 tweeted, I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie.

00:12:08 I'm usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter,

00:12:11 and I apologize that this is somewhat graphic.

00:12:13 But in this case, the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle,

00:12:18 and I want people to know.

00:12:19 I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital.

00:12:22 He said the bullet absolutely should have gone through,

00:12:25 which is very, very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round.

00:12:30 I've seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they always just go through everything.

00:12:34 This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.

00:12:38 But it didn't go through.

00:12:39 Charlie's body stopped it.

00:12:41 I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests

00:12:46 standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent.

00:12:49 And he replied, quote, it was an absolute miracle that someone else didn't get killed.

00:12:53 His bone was so healthy and the density was so, so impressive that he's like the man of

00:12:58 steel.

00:12:59 It should have just gone through and through.

00:13:00 It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.

00:13:03 end quote. Andrew then concludes

00:13:06 in the end, the coroner

00:13:08 did find the bullet just beneath

00:13:10 the skin. Even in death

00:13:12 Charlie managed to save the lives of those around

00:13:14 him. Remarkable.

00:13:16 Miraculous.

00:13:18 Foremost, why would a coroner be finding

00:13:20 anything? A coroner is not even

00:13:22 a health, they just

00:13:24 say this person's dead,

00:13:26 park out of sight to Andrew Cole that

00:13:27 let's assume they met the medical examiner

00:13:29 and

00:13:31 And again, the bullet was found beneath the skin, not a fragment.

00:13:40 It was recovered, and that was similarly echoed to me in the days that followed.

00:13:46 But three days beyond that, I had a long conversation with Andrew, and I was very grateful for it.

00:13:50 On September 23rd, he provided me with even more details about that Man of Steel tweet,

00:13:56 because I was going, it doesn't sound real, Andrew.

00:13:59 and I took meticulous notes

00:14:01 and I would be willing to testify under oath

00:14:03 regarding what I was told from Andrew Kovat.

00:14:04 He told me that the bullet traveled,

00:14:07 and I'm going to show you this

00:14:08 in case you're like me

00:14:09 and you don't know about the vertebrae in the neck,

00:14:11 that it traveled from C2, okay?

00:14:15 Think about the entry point.

00:14:16 It's almost upward down to C6

00:14:19 and then it moved downward into Charlie's thorax

00:14:24 where it was shattered.

00:14:27 Okay.

00:14:28 another adjustment okay another adjustment because first they found the bullet beneath his skin now

00:14:37 suddenly the bullet is fragmented in his thorax then we're going to get brian harpole who's going

00:14:41 to say no it fragmented in his stomach thorax whatever he says these are very important and

00:14:48 relevant changes that they are making because they're realizing that their story is not going

00:14:54 to work. So why that change? Why did we go from, we got the bullet, coroner got the bullet, to

00:15:00 actually, you know what, it's ricocheting and it shattered. I'll give you my best guess.

00:15:07 It's because at some point the feds realized that their initial plan was completely ruined by the

00:15:11 back footage that they had to pivot. And at first they pivoted, but it was sloppy. They had 24 hours.

00:15:16 Andrew tweeted that they found the bullet. But the reality is, as my source, who's close to the

00:15:20 Robinson family told me that that family heirloom gun takes special bullets. In fact, I was told that

00:15:26 there was no way the prosecution was going to be able to connect the bullets to that gun. I think

00:15:32 the feds then realized that. First, we got the bullet. Then they quickly pivoted. There's no

00:15:36 bullet. It's just a small fragment. Problem solved. Now we can have ATF say that it's inconclusive

00:15:43 later down the line. There's another part of this that everyone is missing, and I want to stress it

00:15:47 you. They cannot even prove that the gun was fired. Say it again. They cannot even prove that

00:15:54 the gun was fired. Why is the media not telling you this? Have you guys realized that there's a

00:15:59 big piece missing from the evidence? Where is the basic GSR test? Okay. Testing to see if you fired

00:16:08 a weapon. It's a test that like it puts some stuff on, then it turns your hands purple or

00:16:13 bluish purple under the light, GSR test. Did they conduct that 33 hours later to see if Tyler

00:16:18 Robinson had fired a weapon? Right? They could have actually brought in a bomb dog for that.

00:16:25 No, they didn't do that. You remember the bomb dogs went into the field where the weapon was

00:16:30 found. I broke that story and they didn't find the weapon. That is literally impossible. It's

00:16:37 literally impossible. There's no one that will get up there and tell you anything different that a

00:16:42 trained bomb dog, if they are taken into a field where there is a gun that is sitting that was

00:16:47 recently fired, they will find the dog. They will find the gun. But apparently the bomb dogs missed

00:16:52 it. And the gun that was eventually found, which my sources say they are convinced that the feds

00:16:59 planted it when they arrived, was not fired on September 10th. Okay? Were. And they knew Tyler

00:17:05 Robinson fired it. They would have taken the bomb dogs, had them smell the dog. They would

00:17:08 have him smell the weapon, find the weapon, smell the person, and tell you that it's connected to

00:17:12 him. The canines would have done that for them. They didn't do that. And the last thing I want

00:17:17 to reiterate to you before we get into what these filings reveal is that there are a bunch of frauds

00:17:22 right now that are telling you that they found Tyler Robinson's DNA on the gun, okay? What they

00:17:27 keep conveniently leaving out is that they found a total of six sets of prints on the gun. It is

00:17:33 not shocking that Tyler Robinson's gun had Tyler Robinson's prints on it. That's not shocking.

00:17:40 The question is, who took Robinson's gun and placed it into the field unfired? That's where

00:17:48 we are at in this case. So the big news yesterday was that the bullet, which has now been conveniently

00:17:54 reduced to a fragment, happened very quickly over a couple of days, has come back and the ATF has

00:18:00 concluded that they can't connect to the gun. It's inconclusive. And now the prosecution

00:18:08 wants the corrupt FBI to conduct their own analysis. And I'm going to tell you what is

00:18:13 very wrong with that, because I think it's pretty clear that the feds are working with

00:18:19 Turning Point USA. And all evidence points to the fact that the feds are dirty in this case.

00:18:25 Like I said, I have spoken to SWAT, local police departments, sources close to the accused,

00:18:29 UVU students, people that work at UVU, everyone is saying the feds are a part of a broader

00:18:35 conspiracy and based on the evidence that I am seeing and based on these filings, which I am

00:18:39 about to show you, I believe that. So while the people who are racing to delude you about this

00:18:45 case are making tons of claims about the recent filing, we're going to actually take you through

00:18:49 it. Tyler Robinson's team in this filing, just, you know, what we're looking at is they are

00:18:53 asking for an extension and we are going to show you the extraordinarily valid reasons as to why.

00:18:59 You know, at first, I just want to say off top of this,

00:19:01 I think we can all readily dismiss the repeated lie

00:19:04 that Tyler Robinson confessed to his crime, right?

00:19:07 He's asking for a continuation.

00:19:10 A man who confesses a crime and says, I did it,

00:19:12 does not request a continuation

00:19:14 so that he can gather evidence.

00:19:16 If he was admittedly guilty and so overwhelmingly guilty

00:19:19 that he turned himself in and said, I did it,

00:19:22 he would not be trying to win the case, okay?

00:19:26 And why are they requesting the continuation?

00:19:28 continuation, they make it very clear because discovery is missing. Discovery in a case is when

00:19:32 you accuse me of something, and then I say, okay, I want to see your text messages from September

00:19:37 10th. I want to see your text messages from September 8th, and you have to give them to me,

00:19:42 right? I'm the defense. You got to give those to me. They're saying that they can't prepare a defense

00:19:47 until they receive all of the items that they have requested from the prosecution. They haven't

00:19:52 delivered them to them, okay? Requesting a continuation is so beyond standard in proceedings.

00:19:59 I have filed for them myself. I filed for them in the Brigitte case. It is so beyond standard

00:20:03 that it is, you should be offended to any person who is trying to make that scandalous or purport

00:20:10 otherwise. So we're going to go through this filing together, essentially 28 pages plus a ton

00:20:14 of exhibits. Let's look at this document, okay? And Skye, I'm going to pull it up on my page just

00:20:19 so I don't have to squint and read since I feel like my eyesight is getting worse and worse with

00:20:23 every child. Okay, so we're starting up here with the introduction, and I've highlighted the portions

00:20:27 that you can take a look to. We learned that Mr. Robinson seeks to continue the preliminary hearing,

00:20:32 which is scheduled for May 2026, to a setting that allows him and his council to receive

00:20:38 discovery that is necessary for preliminary hearing preparations. Okay, then it is going to

00:20:45 state that on March 12th, 2026, the council for the parties they met and they conferred regarding

00:20:52 discovery issues and the evidence the state intends to present at the preliminary hearing.

00:20:57 Based upon the state's representations at this meeting, the state intends to present these

00:21:02 discrete buckets of evidence through three identified law enforcement witnesses. So they're

00:21:08 saying, we just met on the 12th and they told us that they're going to, when we have this

00:21:14 preliminary hearing, they're going to bring three witnesses to the stand. This is going to include

00:21:19 conclusory forensic DNA and ballistics reports authored by the FBI and the ATF, phone and social

00:21:27 media data testimony by law enforcement officials about the crime scene and search locations,

00:21:32 and testimony by Mr. Robinson's parents and roommate, okay? Conclusory is the key word here.

00:21:40 I'm going to explain to you why this is exceedingly problematic that they are going to present conclusory evidence that they have not actually given beyond the conclusions to the defense.

00:21:53 And to the point about Mr. Robinson's parents and roommates that are going to be that they want to bring up, that means nothing.

00:22:00 You can bring up whoever you want to the stand.

00:22:02 And because Matt Robinson says, this is my gun that I gave to Tyler Robinson, it is common sense to me that they would put him on the stand and they say, do you recognize this gun? Yes, I recognize it. Can't lie about that. Is this your gun? Yes. You're going to contain your questions just to get him to identify that that's his son and that it is his gun and that he gave his gun to his son. That's my guess. And they're going to try to scandalize that. Some people are saying he's testifying for the prosecution. No, he's not testifying for the prosecution.

00:22:31 They are naming him as a witness

00:22:32 and he is going to be forced to answer questions

00:22:34 under oath, likely, I would assume, about the gun, okay?

00:22:38 So then they go on and they say

00:22:39 the state intends to offer a significant amount of hearsay

00:22:42 identified in the Utah rule of evidence

00:22:44 at a preliminary hearing.

00:22:47 Namely, they're just going to get up there

00:22:50 and they are going to tell you

00:22:52 that they've made these conclusions,

00:22:53 but we can't tell you how they got to these conclusions.

00:22:57 That's what they're saying.

00:22:58 They're telling us that this is inconclusive

00:23:01 and it's not attached to the gun,

00:23:03 but we want to see how they arrived at that

00:23:06 because that could be very important for us, okay?

00:23:09 Okay, we can scroll down here,

00:23:11 and this is where it is wild,

00:23:14 and this reveals the prosecution strategy.

00:23:16 I want you to go back into your mind

00:23:17 when Erica got up and she did this news clip

00:23:21 and she was like, I would like this to be rushed.

00:23:24 Like, I want the case to go by quickly.

00:23:26 I want a right for this to go.

00:23:27 And we were like, what's that about?

00:23:29 And I will also remind you that when I sat down with Erica, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don't have any evidence.

00:23:40 The way this works is that now the prosecutor, the state's going to go out and they're going to find the evidence.

00:23:45 And then once we have the evidence, they're going to give it to Tyler Robinson's team, who's going to be able to draft some sort of a response to the evidence.

00:23:53 And then we have the preliminary hearing.

00:23:56 OK, so that is what they are going to say. They're going to tell you what Erica's team did, what the state did. In total, they and they're referring to Tyler Robinson's team has received approximately 20,000 files, exclusive, excluding digital electronic discovery, which was provided on a hard drive during that meeting on March 12th.

00:24:15 when they were conferring, and suddenly they gave them another drive, okay? Now, initially,

00:24:23 they had files, which were 61,500 pages in total before that March 12th meeting. They had audio

00:24:29 files that were 31 hours in total length. They're going through all that. They were also given more

00:24:33 than 5,000 video files containing more than 700 hours of video until March 12th when they conferred.

00:24:40 and then they handed them this little drive.

00:24:44 And guess how much was on that drive on March 12th?

00:24:46 It amounts to approximately 12 terabytes of data

00:24:50 and over 600,000 files.

00:24:55 So they have less than two months to go.

00:24:59 They've had all this time since September

00:25:01 to deliver them all of this data for them to go through.

00:25:03 And they waited until March 12th

00:25:05 and they handed them a drive

00:25:07 and they said, here are 600,000 files.

00:25:12 See you in May.

00:25:13 That is a strategy, okay?

00:25:15 That is a dump when you know

00:25:17 they are not going to be able to go through everything

00:25:20 and see what you have.

00:25:22 You're giving them so much.

00:25:23 And it is a strategy people do.

00:25:24 When people are subpoenaed and they fight

00:25:27 and they fight the subpoena, they fight the subpoena.

00:25:29 Like, oh, I get your text messages for two years.

00:25:32 Remember when Blake Lively requested that for me?

00:25:34 And I'm like, I don't want to give, I don't want to give it.

00:25:36 and then the judge says, no, you have to give it,

00:25:37 they will then give them more than they even asked for.

00:25:40 I'll give you every email, text,

00:25:42 because somewhere buried in there is what you need,

00:25:44 but you're not going to have the time to find that.

00:25:46 You don't have the force behind you.

00:25:48 This is going to take 800 paralegals

00:25:51 working for 800 hours each

00:25:55 in order for you to go through all of this.

00:25:57 That is what this looks like to me.

00:25:59 Why are you waiting until March 12th?

00:26:01 This is a very bad strategy.

00:26:04 I mean, I'm actually going to say it's an immoral strategy to dump this on them.

00:26:08 OK, 600,000 files after first giving them 20,000 files until March 12th.

00:26:15 Stunning.

00:26:17 On that bottom paragraph, which we have highlighted orange, it says, what is known at present is that Mr. Robinson has not received the forensic case files and the data necessary to investigate through the use of qualified experts, the scientific reports that the state intends to introduce at the preliminary hearing.

00:26:34 Mr. Robinson has diligently requested the disclosure of forensic case files and the data underlying the laboratory reports in effort to get these materials to the defense.

00:26:43 And he's been doing that since September 30th.

00:26:45 OK, so they've just been giving him conclusions and they were like, how'd you get here?

00:26:50 We have his text messages. OK, can we see how you got those?

00:26:54 Can we see the dates? Can we see the chain of custody?

00:26:57 Can we see how you pulled it off? Who signed off on it?

00:27:00 Nope. They're just giving them conclusions. And what they're saying is, we can't even determine

00:27:05 if they're fake or they're real until you give us what we are asking for. We need to get in the

00:27:12 weeds. We need to see effectively the metadata. Who pulled this information off the server?

00:27:16 We want to see the chain of custody. How did this happen? How did this file get created?

00:27:20 You can't just send us a PDF conclusion. That is what is in these documents. They are playing

00:27:27 games. They're playing games. It's very obvious. We're going to keep going here.

00:27:32 It then tells us that during the hearing, which was held back in January, the Council

00:27:35 for the Parties discussed the status of the lab files, and UCAL, that's the Utah County

00:27:40 Attorney's Office, informed the defense that they, too, were awaiting the files. And we

00:27:45 memorialized that for the state in our February 3rd letter, that we still don't have these

00:27:50 lab files. We're looking for how they are saying they got the DNA. They're just telling

00:27:54 us conclusions and we can't prod narratives, right? And so that's a problem. They're not

00:28:00 being allowed to do that. And then if we scroll down to the bottom of page six, it's telling us

00:28:05 like, hey, there has not been a prior request to continue the preliminary hearing. And I'd like

00:28:12 to remind you that back in December 11th, we raised this issue with you. When you set this date

00:28:16 for the week of May 18th for the state, we said in response, this isn't going to work. We need to

00:28:23 make sure we have the stuff that we need. And what did the court tell us? The court said, and they're

00:28:27 quoting, I do not find there's any prejudice in setting a date for a preliminary hearing. It's

00:28:32 not set in stone. It certainly can be moved. This is the judge. I recognize the parties have a lot

00:28:36 of obligations, but I also want to recognize the importance of this case moving forward.

00:28:40 And if nothing more, then this is just a goal for a preliminary hearing. If it needs to be changed,

00:28:44 the court understands that. The court already told Tyler Robinson's team, we just want to get

00:28:49 something on the calendar. We understand it might need to be moved and it might not be practical.

00:28:53 So they're like, hey, can you honor that now that we have the proof that this is not practical? You can't just drop 600,000 files on us on March 12th and tell us to be ready by May 18th? Does everybody agree with that? I think we all agree with that. We're all sane people. We agree with that.

00:29:07 okay now if we scroll down then they're going to kind of make more arguments and they're going to

00:29:13 bring in some you know some jurisprudence meaning like past cases that uh demonstrate the points

00:29:18 that they're making and why this is like totally par for the course and we should they shouldn't

00:29:22 even they should just be like yeah of course you get a continuance you got 600,000 documents but

00:29:25 you still have to do this you have to point to cases and proof of why this is okay and Skyler

00:29:30 on page 11 now. And they write here, there are materials that are known to the police prosecution

00:29:37 team that have not yet been provided to us. While it is anticipated that discovery in this case will

00:29:43 be ongoing throughout the duration, the defense is seeking the materials that are known to be

00:29:49 reasonably available to the prosecution, materials that are known to be in possession of law

00:29:53 enforcement partners identified by the state. Both the UCAO and Mr. Robinson continue to weigh

00:29:58 a vast amount of information relevant to a review of the FBI's and the ATF's DNA analysis,

00:30:06 including, but not limited to, validation studies, crucial electronic data files,

00:30:12 the reports, the case file for comparative bullet analysis, the bullet-led analysis that

00:30:19 is still in progress at the FBI, and the case file and protocols for a comparative bullet

00:30:24 analysis that's been conducted by the ATF. Okay. Now, here is where it is going to be very

00:30:31 interesting. Okay. And I want to see, is this the page where we highlighted? Let me just go

00:30:36 and make sure I found this where they get into the ATF. Oh, actually, let's go to bottom of page 18.

00:30:43 This is an example of how much they're just giving absolute BS and they're trying to run

00:30:47 the clock, essentially. It tells us that, for instance, on March 12th, that's when they had

00:30:52 it meaning to confer, the state indicated that it intended to introduce the autopsy report into

00:30:57 evidence without any supporting expert testimony. So that was going to be a part of what they were

00:31:01 going to present on the stand if this went through in May. The autopsy report, which was completed on

00:31:06 September 16th, 2025, was not given to the defense until November 13th, 2025. Gets worse. So a two

00:31:15 month delay to give them something they already had done. The autopsy paragraphs, photographs,

00:31:20 pardon me, which were taken on September 10th, 2025, were not produced to the defense until

00:31:26 March 18th, 2026. They just gave them the photographs. Why? Make that make sense outside

00:31:35 of trying to run the clock down so somebody cannot get another expert to look at everything

00:31:41 and prepare arguments. Why would you have something available to you on September 16th

00:31:47 and not hand it to them until March 18th.

00:31:50 There is no excuse for that.

00:31:52 There is no excuse for that.

00:31:54 Outside of you do not believe you can win this case honestly.

00:31:58 This is legal maneuvering.

00:32:00 You're hoping a judge is going to be corrupt,

00:32:02 is going to hear the cry of this widow.

00:32:04 Please, I just want the case to be fast, she said on Fox News.

00:32:07 This is hard.

00:32:08 I'm asking them to move along fast.

00:32:11 The widow wants to put this chapter behind her. 1.00

00:32:14 Judge?

00:32:14 normally the public doesn't read through legal files so they're not going to see the 600,000

00:32:20 documents that we just dropped on them they're not going to see that like okay we haven't even

00:32:24 given them the autopsy report and stuff until like you know now it's March the widow she's

00:32:30 grieving she's asking can't we at least do that for her she doesn't have her husband 1.00

00:32:34 that is their manipulative strategy and you can see it in these documents okay and then it says

00:32:41 even more substantial discovery issues exist with respect to the DNA and the ballistics report that

00:32:46 the state has indicated it intends to offer at the preliminary hearing without any supporting

00:32:53 expert testimony. The summary, again just summary, DNA reports produced by the FBI and the ATF

00:33:01 indicate that both agencies recovered minute quantities of DNA on various items of evidence

00:33:07 which the reports opine

00:33:09 consist of mixtures

00:33:11 of up to five or more individuals.

00:33:14 It's five individuals that are on this.

00:33:15 And yet all I have is an analysis,

00:33:17 I mean, a conclusion.

00:33:19 Can I get more?

00:33:20 Can I understand more

00:33:20 about these five sets of prints

00:33:22 that are on this?

00:33:23 Who are these people?

00:33:24 Do we know these people?

00:33:26 No, they're not giving them anything.

00:33:28 They're not giving them anything

00:33:30 but the conclusion.

00:33:31 And they're expecting them

00:33:32 to be able to present this

00:33:33 during the preliminary hearing.

00:33:35 Now, this next portion regarding the firearm evidence is an absolute bomb.

00:33:42 In fact, I might just pivot to break because I think we're running out of time.

00:33:45 Pivot to break, Dom.

00:33:47 And then when we get back, I'm going to explain this, why not even Tyler Robinson's defense

00:33:52 caught what was in this paragraph.

00:33:54 So we'll be right back after a quick break.

00:33:57 All right, you guys, thanks to you, last year, Preborn helped rescue over 80,000 babies.

00:34:01 And today you can help save even more.

00:34:03 Every single day, thousands of women hear the same devastating lie

00:34:06 that abortion is their only option, that they're alone, and that there's no hope.

00:34:09 But everything changes the moment a mother in crisis walks into a pre-born network clinic 0.93

00:34:13 and sees her baby on an ultrasound and hears her baby's heartbeat for the first time.

00:34:17 That one moment doubles her chance of choosing life

00:34:20 because she realizes that there is an actual life growing inside of her

00:34:22 and it's not a problem that needs to be solved, but a life that needs to be protected.

00:34:26 So let's be there for her in that beautiful moment with love, prayer, and support.

00:34:30 For just $28, you can provide one life-saving ultrasound and $140 provides five ultrasounds

00:34:36 and five chances for life.

00:34:37 This year, let's make it the biggest baby-saving year in history.

00:34:40 Take a stand, be bold, speak for those who can't speak for themselves, donate, dial 0.99

00:34:44 pound 250 and say the keyword baby, or visit preborn.com slash Candace.

00:34:50 Again, that's preborn.com slash Candace.

00:34:53 I also want to tell you guys about kickoff because right now tax refunds are hitting

00:34:57 bank accounts.

00:34:58 But before it's gone, there's a fast, simple way to turn that money into something that actually

00:35:02 grows your financial future. That's where Kickoff comes in. Kickoff is the number one credit

00:35:06 building app in the App Store and plans start at just five bucks a month. There is no credit check,

00:35:11 no hidden fees and zero interest. Users with credit scores under 600 see an average increase

00:35:17 of 86 points just by making on-time payments. It's simple. You pay on time. Credit Bureau

00:35:22 sees that positive behavior and your score can go up fast.

00:35:26 Plus, Kickoff even lets you build credit with rent

00:35:29 that you are already paying.

00:35:30 So every on-time rent payment gets reported

00:35:32 to help boost your score.

00:35:34 You can start building credit immediately

00:35:35 for just $1 your first month,

00:35:37 and then you can set up auto pay

00:35:38 so that you never miss a payment

00:35:39 and sign up in minutes right from your phone.

00:35:43 Start building credit with Kickoff today

00:35:44 and get your first month for as little as $1.

00:35:47 That's 80% off the normal price

00:35:49 when you go to getkickoff.com slash Candice today.

00:35:54 That's kickoff, K-I-K-O-F-F without the C, 0.99

00:35:58 getkickoff.com slash Candice.

00:36:00 Must sign up via kickoff.com slash Candice

00:36:02 to activate offer.

00:36:02 Offer applies to new kickoff customers

00:36:04 first month only, subject to approval.

00:36:05 Offer subject to change.

00:36:06 Average first year credit score impact

00:36:07 of plus 86 points between August 2024 and August 2025

00:36:10 for kickoff credit account users

00:36:11 who started with a score below 600,

00:36:13 who paid on time and who had no delinquencies

00:36:14 or collections added to their credit profile

00:36:15 during the period.

00:36:16 Late payments may negatively impact your credit score.

00:36:18 Individual results may vary.

00:36:19 I also want to tell you guys about red light life

00:36:21 because we are seeing a massive rise in autoimmune issues,

00:36:24 cancers, thyroid problems, hormone imbalances,

00:36:26 and chronic fatigue.

00:36:27 That's why the work of investigative journalist

00:36:29 Jonathan Otto is so compelling.

00:36:31 His research into red and near-infrared light therapy

00:36:35 shows how wavelengths from 630 to 1,016 nanometers

00:36:41 can boost cellular energy, reduce inflammation,

00:36:44 and support your body's natural repair systems.

00:36:46 The results are very impressive.

00:36:47 Some reports show protocols becoming up to 70 times more effective

00:36:51 and 96% of women with enlarged thyroids returning to normal size in just weeks.

00:36:56 There's also growing research showing powerful results

00:36:58 in cancer treatment support using photodynamic therapy,

00:37:01 but not all devices are the same.

00:37:03 Red Life by Jonathan Otto uses nine targeted clinical grade wavelengths,

00:37:07 which is far more advanced than most consumer options.

00:37:10 It's also one of the most affordable long-term therapies available

00:37:12 with payment options that can save you thousands over time.

00:37:16 To learn the exact protocols, go to MyRedLight.com for free training while it's still available

00:37:21 and use code CANDICE25 and you'll get 25% off singles or CANDICE30 and you'll get 30%

00:37:28 off bundles. Again, that's MyRedLight.com before it sells out.

00:37:34 Here is actually the craziest part of the filing that I don't think anybody noticed. Okay,

00:37:40 everybody's talking about the ATF, but the devil is always in the details. The feds are always

00:37:45 in the details, okay? Now, I'm going to read this. Regarding the firearm evidence, the defense

00:37:51 has been provided with an ATF summary, again, just a summary report, which indicates that the ATF was

00:37:57 unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson.

00:38:04 Although the state has not indicated an intent to produce this report at the preliminary hearing,

00:38:11 the defense may very well decide to offer the testimony

00:38:13 of the ATF firearm analyst as exculpatory evidence.

00:38:17 Okay, so they met, they conferred,

00:38:19 and they're like, okay, we haven't even received,

00:38:23 we got a summary that, like, this is not matching,

00:38:26 but we want to see the whole report.

00:38:27 We want to see how they got there,

00:38:28 because the report will show us how they conducted this.

00:38:30 We'll actually be able to see that bullet fragment,

00:38:33 how big it is.

00:38:34 I don't know.

00:38:34 We know nothing.

00:38:36 And then Erica's team comes in,

00:38:39 the state comes in, and they're like,

00:38:40 it doesn't matter we're not going to we're not even going to bring up the atf thing so you have

00:38:44 our word so we're good they're like well first off why aren't you bringing that up and uh it's

00:38:49 not about whether you're good it's about whether we're good because that's pretty exculpatory for

00:38:54 us if you know the gun does not fit you must acquit this is the purpose of a preliminary

00:38:59 hearing is to get a judge to just unilaterally dismiss something as an option uh so what's up

00:39:05 with that why are you not giving it they're like oh because we're going to do some other testing

00:39:08 down the line. Here is where it gets crucial. Pay attention. Look alive, okay? It goes on and it

00:39:13 says, in order to make this determination, it is necessary for the defense and its firearm expert

00:39:20 to review the ATF case file and the protocols relating to this examination, which have not

00:39:25 yet been provided. The state has also indicated that the FBI is in the process of conducting a

00:39:32 second comparative bullet analysis, as well as a bullet lead analysis, that these analyses are not

00:39:38 yet complete. Okay, pay attention, Tyler Robinson's defense team. I'm about to help you out in a big

00:39:43 way. They told you that you conferred. They said, okay, don't worry, we got it. We got this. We're

00:39:48 going to do a secondary thing with the feds. And like me, I'm nosy. I'm like, wait, what do you

00:39:52 mean? The ATF is alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. That's the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and

00:40:00 firearms. If they couldn't do it, what extra power does the FBI have to do it? If the firearm

00:40:06 people can't do it, why is this going to the FBI? So I said, what is a comparative bullet

00:40:11 lead analysis? What is that? I need to know things. I like to learn. And lo and behold,

00:40:17 we find out that the CBLA, the compositional analysis, is a discontinued forensic technique

00:40:27 that analyzed trace elements, copper, arsenic, in lead, to link crime scene bullets to suspects.

00:40:34 It was primarily used by the FBI from the 1980s until 2004, but it was then abandoned in 2005

00:40:41 due to flawed scientific, statistical, and interpretive validity. Wait, they just continued

00:40:48 this like 20 years ago, 21 years ago, because they said it was flawed? And sure enough,

00:40:56 Schuyler starts looking through and he's like, yeah, no, the innocence, people have been freed

00:41:01 because of how flawed this was. They literally put the wrong people in prison using this

00:41:06 technology until it became so obvious that nobody would even stand trial and back it anymore. So

00:41:11 they just got rid of this analysis. It's been gone for 20 years. Wake up, Tyler Robinson's

00:41:16 defense team. I know it's a lot going on, 600,000 files. This is them telling you they're going to

00:41:21 make this bullet fit no matter what. The feds will do it. If ATF isn't going to be corrupt,

00:41:25 will be corrupt. And they've been corrupt since the beginning of this. Look at this news clip

00:41:30 explaining further why and how this technique that they're not going to employ got discredited

00:41:37 historically and is no longer in use. Here are the reasons why it got discredited. Take a listen

00:41:43 to this local Atlanta news clip. FBI agents swore by it in courtrooms across America for decades,

00:41:50 a type of forensic science called bullet-led analysis. This was used in thousands of cases,

00:41:55 and hundreds of trials, but the FBI stopped using it over flaws in the science.

00:42:00 Now at least one man is free as another fights for his freedom.

00:42:04 National investigative reporter Chris Nakamoto looks into the tainted testimony.

00:42:08 It was definitely a shot to the whole community.

00:42:11 In 1991, 45-year-old Norma Jean Aids was found inside this home, shot to death seven times.

00:42:22 The house set on fire.

00:42:23 Mayor. She deserved better than that. Her death, a defining event in the life of her husband,

00:42:30 Jimmy Yates, because six years later, a jury convicted him of her murder.

00:42:35 It's his first sit-down interview after being released in 2021. Did you kill your wife? No.

00:42:44 I have maintained it all these years. Police found a bullet in his vehicle,

00:42:49 which they said matched the lead and bullets at the crime scene that science

00:42:55 the jury trusted when it ultimately convicted eights no longer used by the

00:43:00 FBI when a weapon is missing or a bullet too damaged the FBI claimed at the time

00:43:06 their science can match bullets to ammunition through the lead alone our 0.91

00:43:11 national investigative team found the FBI admitted to using this science in

00:43:15 2,500 cases, and was introduced in hundreds of trials across America. But in 2005, the FBI

00:43:23 pulled the plug on this practice. Their admission, neither scientists nor bullet manufacturers are

00:43:29 able to definitively attest to the significance of an association made between bullets in the

00:43:35 course of a bullet-led examination. They discontinued this because not even the scientists

00:43:44 or the bullet manufacturers would testify

00:43:48 that that made any sense.

00:43:52 Not even the scientists or the bullet manufacturers.

00:43:54 We don't know how you're doing this.

00:43:57 You're just saying that you have

00:43:58 some special scientific technique

00:44:00 that the scientists are saying is not so scientific

00:44:03 and the bullet manufacturers are saying,

00:44:04 yeah, this doesn't make any sense.

00:44:06 And so they just quietly stopped doing that in 2005.

00:44:10 But guess what, guys?

00:44:12 Cash's boys are going to dust that off, pull it back.

00:44:16 Because ATF probably said, a little too obvious and corrupt for us.

00:44:22 Okay, best we can do, like, you know, we're the feds, we're the fed boys, love you.

00:44:26 But can we give you an inconclusive?

00:44:29 Can we just say inconclusive?

00:44:30 It probably doesn't even match.

00:44:32 Inconclusive is the best I can do as your homie.

00:44:35 You guys are on your own if you're going to be that corrupt, despite this history of the strategy being corrupt.

00:44:41 And because scientists and you put a lot of people in jail wrongly and the feds are like, yeah, that's what we're trying to do. We're trying to put somebody in jail wrongly. So that's what we're doing. We need to bring back the technique that's been discontinued for 20 years.

00:44:54 incredible bombshell should be on the cover of every mainstream news reporting that the fbi

00:45:03 is bringing back an already debunked technique so that they can give erica the evidence she needs

00:45:10 to connect this gun which hasn't even been fired to tyler robinson again ignore the people that

00:45:16 are telling you over and over again that his printer on his gun that's common sense people

00:45:20 if somebody comes to my house and steals a gun, it's going to have me and George's prints on it

00:45:25 and DNA on it because our prints carry oil and that's our DNA. It does not mean that we then

00:45:31 took this gun and killed somebody. You got to connect the bullet. You got to connect the person.

00:45:36 You got to conduct these tests to make sure they fired a weapon. They're doing none of that.

00:45:40 All they're doing is spending an offensive amount of money on PR for people to convince you that

00:45:45 This is an open and shut case, and it's not even open.

00:45:48 It shouldn't even be open, okay?

00:45:53 I am just so stunned that they're doing this.

00:45:55 I can't even believe how openly corrupt the feds are being.

00:46:00 Please, guys, in your capacity, share this.

00:46:02 Share that portion that they are bringing back.

00:46:05 Make it viral, okay? 0.51

00:46:06 The feds are so corrupt.

00:46:08 Truly, I am like fed up, literally fed up.

00:46:11 Federal Bureau of Investigation, we have had enough, okay?

00:46:15 Now to finish some other things that I highlighted here, just that you have this, as we're on page 22. They're basically saying, asserting their amendments, like in a capital case, a state cannot, consistent with federal due process, the Fourth and the Eighth Amendments and separation of powers and principles declare that hearsay reports, you're just going to sit people.

00:46:37 This is a show trial. You're going to sit people and we can't prod their narratives because you haven't actually given us the evidence. You're giving us summarized reports. They want theater. They want to put theater on the stand and they are saying we want science. We want scientific discovery, which we have been asking for and we have been consistent in asking for this, which is what he attaches into the exhibits, is how many times they have asked for this information, how many people they have been in touch with saying we need this information to go through.

00:47:05 And they've done a very good job, by the way, I will say.

00:47:08 This is a thorough case.

00:47:09 Sometimes I read lawyers and it's like, oh, this is a really bad lawyer they have.

00:47:12 This is a job well done, actually.

00:47:14 This is a job well done.

00:47:16 It's very descriptive.

00:47:17 It tells us on the bottom of 25, at the top of 25, excuse me, that this is not our fault.

00:47:23 We did not contribute to the delay resulting in the request.

00:47:26 You can see through the pages we have been diligently processing and reviewing all of

00:47:31 this discovery that has been received in this case.

00:47:33 We have made efforts from the outset to procure not only the reports from forensic testing, but also the underlying materials that are needed for expert review.

00:47:42 And they keep we have communicated verbally and in writing our concerns regarding these materials over the last several months.

00:47:49 The delay here does not fall at our feet.

00:47:51 We have no reason, we have no understanding as to why we were not given the autopsy report,

00:47:56 the summary, until November, and then given the photos and the complete report package

00:48:02 to be able to give to somebody else until March.

00:48:05 That makes no sense outside of a despicable strategy from the state here.

00:48:13 And then it says, where the evidence that has not yet been produced is both highly technical

00:48:17 and scientific and is the basis for expert opinions that will be proffered only through

00:48:22 reports deemed reliable. This is hearsay under Utah rule of evidence. You can't just

00:48:28 give us summaries and that's what they want. They want a show trial. And they are now asserting

00:48:33 in conclusion that unless the materials that we are requesting have been produced to us by April

00:48:40 17th, 2026. And if that does happen, then we can set a hearing, you know, six months out.

00:48:50 Otherwise, we want a hearing date to be completely vacated. We don't want to even talk about a

00:48:54 hearing date right now. It doesn't even make sense. OK, we've got 600,000 documents to go

00:48:59 through. We have not received our discovery requests. We are basically they're playing a

00:49:04 PR game, and we deserve to have an opportunity to understand how they received these

00:49:10 communications. You're saying these are his texts, okay? You don't just send me a PDF of text. When

00:49:17 I saw the text, I was like, are these dated? What time did they come in that's missing? What time

00:49:24 did they come in? How did they pull this off of the server? Did you contact T-Mobile? How did you

00:49:28 get this information? You can't just send a PDF and then say, we got them. You can't just have

00:49:34 cash patel throwing up 33s and say that's enough you can't just have uh governor cox up there with

00:49:40 the fed saying oh we got him this is real this is a court case give up tell us how you received

00:49:46 these technological communications otherwise this is just show and they called them out on that and

00:49:53 so i just i have to say um this was an extraordinary filing and extraordinary in that it only further

00:50:00 to me undermines the state's case you don't have to play these games if it is on your side if truth

00:50:07 is on your side you do not need to play these games if truth is on your side you immediately

00:50:11 give them everything they need without delay um and you say okay here you go we should be able to

00:50:16 make that deadline in may because we're giving you everything here's the autopsy here's this

00:50:20 here's that here's the prince that we said that we found because your interest should be finding

00:50:23 charlie's true killer not trying to stick it onto a patsy which is what tyler robinson is in my

00:50:29 opinion, having investigated this case, having had communication with Turning Point USA with

00:50:33 their former employees about the lies that they were told, with the way that they are behaving,

00:50:37 with the way that they have edited their story, the panic because of the back footage.

00:50:43 Everything that they are doing is signaling to me that this is a fed job from start to finish,

00:50:50 just like JFK, just like with MLK. And I am entitled to that opinion unless they give us

00:50:55 something concrete and there is nothing that a single shred of this case that they have delivered

00:51:00 that has been concrete. They still have not demonstrated even if the tech messages are real

00:51:05 to the defense. They can't even demonstrate that or they have not demonstrated that yet and I see

00:51:10 no reason unless they aren't. We'll see. Anyway, I wanted to also tack on here that yesterday I had

00:51:16 received an email that really touched me. It was the context of the email was there was a woman

00:51:20 and she was responding to the APB that I put out yesterday regarding Erica's flight on July

00:51:25 14th. It's a crucial date to me on my timeline because of Tuckergate on July 13th. I feel very

00:51:31 much that between June and July 13th is when they made a decision to kill Charlie on the basis of

00:51:37 the Iran war and further on the basis of what Tucker Carlson said on stage questioning Bibi

00:51:42 Netanyahu, his network of people, the Epstein files, where people's money was coming from.

00:51:47 And that flight she took with Catherine LoCastro and Derek Neekirk and Jonathan Barcelo.

00:51:53 and she wanted, the woman who's emailing me,

00:51:56 wanted to make me aware that a flight to Long Beach,

00:51:58 I was wondering, what's this about?

00:51:59 What's in Long Beach?

00:52:00 And she made me aware

00:52:01 that there's actually a joint Air Force base

00:52:04 that's about 15 minutes from the airport.

00:52:06 It was really the second part of the email

00:52:07 that really touched me.

00:52:08 She wrote this.

00:52:09 She wrote, FYI, the Long Beach airport

00:52:11 is a quick 10 to 15 minute drive

00:52:13 to a small military base in Los Alamitos.

00:52:17 It is the Joint Forces Air Base.

00:52:20 Oh, JTF, Fort Huachuca.

00:52:23 It's not a very busy base, although it is secure.

00:52:26 It also is not visible to heavy traffic as the entrance to the base is located in a housing subdivision.

00:52:31 It would be easy to move in and out of there without much notice from the public.

00:52:35 The flight from Phoenix is just over an hour.

00:52:38 She continued, it is common for U.S. government officials to fly in and out of that base when coming to Southern California and then driving to fundraising events, etc.

00:52:47 The California National Guard also uses that base as well

00:52:50 as fighter jets fly in and out when doing the annual air shows.

00:52:54 She continues, not sure if this helps with the big picture

00:52:57 or pertains to what you find out about July 14th,

00:53:00 but I wanted to pass that along in case it is another piece of the puzzle.

00:53:04 She then writes, Candace, I pray that you eventually find peace.

00:53:06 It has been heartbreaking to see glimpses of your stages of grief

00:53:09 as you produce your show.

00:53:10 My heart does ache with you in your pain.

00:53:13 Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

00:53:16 You have really met Jesus in his suffering

00:53:18 since September, 2025, as this is so painful,

00:53:21 how much more was his pain to die on a cross

00:53:25 for the sins of this world?

00:53:26 May you never forget that Sunday came

00:53:28 and he triumphed over evil.

00:53:30 In this world, you will have many trials,

00:53:33 but take heart that I have overcome the world.

00:53:37 God makes us in his image

00:53:38 and one of his attributes is justice.

00:53:39 Some of us bear that image more than others.

00:53:41 It is both a blessing and a burden.

00:53:44 You mirror the image of his justice,

00:53:45 but may you rest in knowing that God is in charge of ultimate justice.

00:53:50 I was very touched by that, and I wanted to share that because I felt like as we are ending

00:53:54 at the end here of Lent, just being reminded of that, no matter what you're going through,

00:53:59 no matter what suffering you're going through, and it has been a lot of suffering, and it has

00:54:02 been a lot of hurt to go through, and it hurts every day to see the people that Charlie catapulted

00:54:09 into the positions that they have today turn on him for money, because that's what we're seeing.

00:54:12 We know that's it. They turned on Charlie for money. And some days it felt really lonely. But

00:54:18 then I realized that the whole world is actually rooting me on. They're rooting the truth on.

00:54:25 They're rooting Tucker Carlson on and Megyn Kelly on when they told the truth about the

00:54:30 usual thing. They're seeing what they have gone through for simply telling the truth about how

00:54:34 much Charlie was going through in the end. But I think we all need to be reminded of that,

00:54:38 that whatever you're going through,

00:54:40 like his burden was greater, you know?

00:54:42 Not Charlie's, obviously, but Jesus Christ,

00:54:44 his burden was greater.

00:54:45 And there is something beautiful about that

00:54:48 to think that we are enjoined in suffering with him,

00:54:52 that we are made in God's image.

00:54:55 And part of that, of course, is suffering.

00:54:57 And she is correct that justice,

00:55:00 like vengeance, belongs to the Lord.

00:55:02 And, but, you know, truth, it belongs to all of us.

00:55:05 And I just cannot overstate to you guys that the second that Charlie was killed, I knew that he was betrayed and it could very well be that deep sense of knowing came from the fact that he had so carefully explained to me that he was going to die.

00:55:22 but it also woke something up in me that had been dormant and it's like it's just a god mission

00:55:30 it's bigger than me i i can't let it go i won't let it go i don't care uh if people call me

00:55:37 obsessed i i under i appreciate that they had a real hope that the world would turn the chapter

00:55:43 on this and i will not let it happen uh because none of us are safe if a person like charlie kirk

00:55:49 who lived his life very admirably,

00:55:52 who worked hard and who helped put the people

00:55:57 who have betrayed him into positions of power.

00:55:59 If he can be betrayed, assassinated in front of the world

00:56:01 and people can collude to lie

00:56:03 about everything that he represented

00:56:05 and what he was going through,

00:56:09 then I feel like none of us are safe, right?

00:56:11 And I like to believe that he was correct

00:56:14 in his assessment that it was going to,

00:56:16 his death was going to contribute to something greater

00:56:18 in many ways it already has I think I think it already has people we are understanding real

00:56:23 evil in a way that we needed to remember um to see I guess what the world of politics is capable of

00:56:30 I'm I'm trying to find comfort in that I think so I just wanted to share that because it made

00:56:36 me feel happy um and at peace in a way like just being reminded of Christ's suffering uh and yeah

00:56:41 Anyways, beyond that, gosh, we are already at the hour mark. I don't know where the time goes. I do have an update for you guys on the Timpanagos staff at the hospital. And I saw Elizabeth Lane saying that, talking about the other hospital and the strange lockdown that I have maintained from the beginning that there was more evidence that Charlie was at Utah Valley initially and then at some point got transported to Timpanagos.

00:57:08 but we will have to wait until tomorrow

00:57:11 because we are already up for an hour

00:57:12 and I haven't even done comments.

00:57:14 So we will take another quick break

00:57:15 and I'll get to some of your comments.

00:57:18 We'll be right back.

00:57:19 All right, you guys,

00:57:19 have you heard about this $17 million fraud scheme

00:57:23 that targeted elderly homeowners in Los Angeles?

00:57:26 A ring of 11 people, including two foreign nationals,

00:57:28 used fraudulent identities and public title records

00:57:31 to forge documents and take out loans

00:57:32 against these LA properties.

00:57:34 And the homeowners didn't even know anything about it

00:57:37 despite multiple arrests, the homeowners are left to clean up the legal and financial nightmare.

00:57:42 If you're a homeowner without protection in place, this could be you. That's why I've partnered with

00:57:46 Home Title Lock. You can find out today if you are already a victim and protect yourself or your

00:57:50 loved ones against this growing crime. Visit hometitlelock.com and use promo code KANDICE

00:57:55 and you'll get a free title history report plus a free trial of their million-dollar triple lock

00:58:00 protection. That is 24-7 monitoring, urgent alerts, and if you're a victim of fraud, they will spend

00:58:05 up to $1 million to fix it for you.

00:58:07 So don't wait, visit hometitlelock.com

00:58:10 and use promo code Candice or use the link below.

00:58:13 I also wanna remind you guys about American Financing

00:58:16 because between groceries, travel, and higher prices,

00:58:18 it is easy to feel overwhelmed,

00:58:20 especially you're already relying on credit cards

00:58:22 to cover the basics.

00:58:23 If that debt is piling up,

00:58:24 you should know that you are not alone.

00:58:26 If you're a homeowner,

00:58:27 you might have considered reaching out

00:58:28 to American Financing but maybe hesitated

00:58:30 because you don't wanna give up your low mortgage rate.

00:58:32 Well, that's why American Financing

00:58:33 has now created the Smart Equity Loan.

00:58:35 which is a simple, smart way to get your finances back on track

00:58:38 without giving up your low mortgage rate.

00:58:40 Unlike a HELOC, which can fluctuate with the market,

00:58:42 the smart equity loan offers a fixed rate.

00:58:44 You'll have one predictable monthly payment.

00:58:46 It lets you use your home's equity to pay off high interest debt,

00:58:49 free up your cash flow, and still keep your existing mortgage intact.

00:58:52 There are no upfront fees to find out if you qualify,

00:58:55 so call American Financing today at 800-795-1210.

00:58:59 Again, that's 800-795-1210,

00:59:02 or visit AmericanFinancing.net slash Owens.

00:59:05 Again, that's AmericanFinancing.net slash Owens.

00:59:09 Okay, so top comments from yesterday's episode.

00:59:11 This was another really funny thing about Frank Tarek

00:59:14 and his very over-dramatized telling

00:59:18 of what happened at the hospital.

00:59:19 Like I said, they're all very bad actors,

00:59:21 not even on the D-list.

00:59:23 Kim Haven wrote,

00:59:25 as a nurse, I can absolutely say

00:59:27 that doctors do not come out and announce,

00:59:29 he's dead, he's dead. 0.67

00:59:32 They pulled the next of kin in a separate room

00:59:34 and talk to them privately. 0.98

00:59:35 Frank Turek is absolutely a liar, she asserts.

00:59:39 Now, another thing that my producer Ashley broke up 0.84

00:59:41 was she was like, and then the next sentence he says is,

00:59:43 he's dead, I need to talk to Erica.

00:59:46 And Ashley sort of asked the question,

00:59:47 this happened like 30 minutes after,

00:59:49 like Charlie's being rushed to the hospital.

00:59:51 Within 30 minutes, they tell us that he's declared dead.

00:59:54 How do you know Erica was his wife's name?

00:59:56 Like, there are so many questions that we have there.

00:59:58 Like, I need to talk to Erica,

00:59:59 like they're on like a first name basis.

01:00:01 Charlie is not from Utah.

01:00:02 He does not know this man.

01:00:03 Yes, it was a very, you know, obviously a very big deal, but the surgeon was pretty busy, right?

01:00:07 Because he's dealing actually with the body.

01:00:10 So it is, sounds like he's kind of writing a Western, which is kind of what it feels like.

01:00:16 It feels like somebody is writing a script and they keep editing details and trying to fit things in.

01:00:20 And now we've got, he's dead.

01:00:22 He's dead.

01:00:23 He's gone.

01:00:24 I need to speak to Erica.

01:00:25 It's just, you're right.

01:00:26 It did not feel true.

01:00:28 Did not ring true.

01:00:29 Chewing the Void writes,

01:00:30 what kind of widow is afraid of a thorough investigation? I will leave that as a rhetorical 0.98

01:00:36 question. I will leave that as a rhetorical question, because I believe that we will

01:00:41 inevitably receive a final answer on that. Comments from today's episode, Seven Sheets

01:00:48 writes, Charlie calling you his David still gets me emotional, yet the ones around him are not

01:00:52 interested in delving into these things. You speak for millions, and we all hope we have a David like

01:00:56 you go maxer in faith and prayer yes i have started a novena uh and it helps praying helps

01:01:04 setting your intentions really does help and i feel like you know goodness is always on our side

01:01:09 but it just feels that they are just getting caught every single second of every day and they

01:01:16 they can't get ahead you know and we it's it is a we thing like we all did this like i said it has

01:01:22 been a group project and um couldn't have done it without everybody ever all of the uh youtubers

01:01:28 the smaller youtubers from uh nisi baron coleman everybody everybody just just gave something you

01:01:35 know what i mean and it's been really amazing and deeply appreciated it's so many people that i

01:01:39 could name obviously uh natty nicole writes the defense needs to utilize ian carroll's ap web yes

01:01:46 it will organize the discovery files analyze them in no time yes ian carroll um who has been so good

01:01:50 and meticulous about organizing everything.

01:01:53 Just everybody's playing a different role.

01:01:54 It's been like an orchestra.

01:01:57 And we are, it feels like we're at the gates,

01:02:01 like I keep saying.

01:02:02 And you can sense that in their panic

01:02:04 and their misdirection

01:02:05 and the sloppiness of their attacks

01:02:07 and trying to distract us with crazy attacks.

01:02:09 But we remain focused.

01:02:11 Kevin Hunts writes,

01:02:12 I threw up from a goyslop never again.

01:02:16 Seriously, I do not recommend a goyslop.

01:02:18 Fed slop, actually worse, I would say, and it's all over this case.

01:02:22 Han Solo writes, I am so curious how this investigation will end.

01:02:25 Will anyone break at some point?

01:02:27 How exactly do the Turning Point heads benefit?

01:02:29 Will Andrew get fed up with Erica making him out to be a liar?

01:02:32 Where does this all come to a close?

01:02:34 No, because I think he has been willing to play that person.

01:02:38 You know, if what we sense is correct and this is a massive cover up and Turning Point

01:02:45 is complicit in that cover-up for various reasons,

01:02:49 then they're all tied to each other, right?

01:02:51 Baron Coleman does a very good job of explaining that.

01:02:53 There's like a line you can't cross

01:02:55 and you all have to collude together

01:02:56 and whoever's got to be the bad guy that day,

01:02:58 it is whatever.

01:02:59 You just got to say, okay, I'll catch the strays today

01:03:02 because you go down, I go down.

01:03:04 We're tied to each other, right?

01:03:05 It's like we're all handcuffed together here.

01:03:08 So it doesn't benefit one of them more than the other.

01:03:13 make him Andrew the Dunce

01:03:16 and say, oh, he doesn't know what he's doing.

01:03:18 I'm interested in why

01:03:20 Lee Trotter,

01:03:22 like I said, he could have probably had a good defamation 1.00

01:03:24 case, saying something that's stupid, 0.99

01:03:26 saying you violated HIPAA. I guess they didn't technically 0.99

01:03:28 tweet that. She told me that,

01:03:30 but

01:03:31 that she had no part in it, and so

01:03:33 that probably would have been her defense.

01:03:37 Jay Lopez writes,

01:03:38 My sister in Christ, Samia

01:03:40 Zuma, for being such a great

01:03:42 soul. She gifted me one of your

01:03:44 I told my priest that I would chill gear. I love

01:03:46 it. And I love you, Candice. You are such a gifted soul.

01:03:48 Blessings for eternity. I do love that.

01:03:50 I told my priest I would chill. Great time

01:03:52 to tell you guys about. The updated merch is on

01:03:54 our website. It is the easiest way to support us.

01:03:56 Go to CandiceOwns.com. Buy some

01:03:58 merch. Buy some Shabbat Shalom and merch.

01:04:00 Buy yourself a hat. I forgot

01:04:02 to ask George about the

01:04:04 restock. I forgot. I got you tomorrow.

01:04:06 I won't forget about the CIA restock

01:04:07 of the

01:04:09 Sandus Cups. I got to get that coming for you.

01:04:12 Otherwise, yeah, there's tons of stuff.

01:04:14 You can also join the book club

01:04:15 where we're getting a lot deeper

01:04:16 on this Freemasonry stuff right now

01:04:18 as we are reading

01:04:19 The Secret Founding of America

01:04:20 by Nicholas Hager.

01:04:21 And it's been illuminating for me.

01:04:23 Like I said, I didn't know

01:04:24 that Freemasonry began in France.

01:04:25 So that has been very interesting.

01:04:28 Other than that,

01:04:29 I hope you appreciated this breakdown.

01:04:31 Now you can go online

01:04:33 and appreciate all of the people

01:04:36 who are just shameless shills

01:04:38 and lying to you about the filing 0.59

01:04:39 and pretending that it's nothing.

01:04:41 and actually it reveals to you the strategy of the state.

01:04:47 So they're not going to get away with it.

01:04:49 I keep telling you guys that.

01:04:50 I have a deep sense of knowing.

01:04:52 They've made mistake after mistake after mistake.

01:04:55 And if nothing else, every room that they walk into,

01:04:59 they're going to feel suffocated because everyone will know.

01:05:02 Everybody knows what they are and who they are.

01:05:04 And that's almost a worse sentencing if you think about it.

01:05:08 Anyway, we will see you guys tomorrow.

01:05:11 We'll see you next time.

`witch hunt`	Both words, anywhere in the episode.
`"witch hunt"`	The exact phrase.
`witch OR hunt`	Either word.
`"alpha male" -"high value"`	The first phrase, but not the second.
`(feminist OR feminism) AND (marriage OR divorce)`	Parentheses group alternatives.
`"decline civilization"~5`	Both words within 5 words of each other.

`misogyn*`	Any word starting with "misogyn": misogyny, misogynist, misogynistic…
`feminizm~1`	Words one letter off: catches typos and transcription errors.

`person:"Andrew Tate"`	Episodes where they host, guest, or are mentioned.
`host:"Glenn Beck"`	Episodes they host.
`guest:"Jordan Peterson"`	Episodes they appear on as a guest.
`mentioned:"Andrew Tate" -host:"Andrew Tate"`	Talked about on other people's shows.
`show:"Bannon's War Room"`	Episodes from one show.

`topics:abortion`	Episodes tagged with a topic (see the Topics page).
`summary:"Andrew Tate"`	Words in the episode summary. Summaries are machine-written and can be wrong.

`"great replacement" AND episode_date:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW]`	From the past 12 months.
`lockdown AND episode_date:[2020-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2020-12-31T23:59:59Z]`	From one year. Dates need the full time, as shown.
`"high value" AND misogyny_count:[100 TO *]`	Episodes with 100 or more sentences flagged as misogynistic. Also: hate_speech_count, toxicity_count, word_count.

Candace Owens - April 01, 2026

PROVE ME WRONG： Tyler Robinson Is A Patsy. ｜ Candace Ep 319

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript