STOP EVERYTHING. They FINALLY Mentioned ME In The Blake Lively Lawsuit! ｜ Candace Ep 152
Summary
Candace breaks down her name checked in Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds' recent lawsuit against Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios. She also explains why she chose to take the day off of work and why it was so important that she did so.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Want to own part of the company that makes your favorite burger?
00:00:04.580
With partial shares from TD Direct Investing, you can own less than one full share.
00:00:17.580
So we took a one day break yesterday and we somehow time traveled to Christmas morning
00:00:22.280
over here because I was recently name checked in Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds' recent
00:00:27.560
filing against Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios.
00:00:33.340
All of the haters out there who doubted me are now asking for forgiveness.
00:00:37.040
And I just want to say thank you to all of you who believed in me, who believed in us,
00:00:42.640
So grab your effing florals and welcome back to Candace.
00:01:00.720
So at first, let's just address the elephant in the room.
00:01:04.580
I announced on my Instagram yesterday that I had to take the day off because someone spoke
00:01:10.660
to me improperly on the phone and I was deeply upset by this conversation and I was therefore
00:01:16.500
I could not trust myself to go live or I would have just been naming names and I would have
00:01:22.160
And then one of you guys kind of rather hilariously pointed out to me on Instagram that my post
00:01:28.320
Like I could have just said, oh, I'm not feeling well today.
00:01:35.720
OK, I'm now at the phase of pregnancy where I'm just like a toddler, toddler honest or like
00:01:43.320
She says whatever she wants, like in Wedding Crashers.
00:01:49.340
And so, yeah, yesterday I got a phone call and it just sent me on a war path.
00:01:53.740
It wasn't even that serious in the retrospect, but I was just like Suge Knight.
00:01:58.380
I turned into Suge Knight yesterday and I was just going to thug some people and say things.
00:02:03.980
I was like standby people to people that were just going to catch stray bullets.
00:02:09.000
I was like pulling up old emails that upset me, old text messages like, you know, and that
00:02:16.200
My husband's looking at me like, you know, sweetheart, maybe we just don't do your show
00:02:22.020
And so I took a chill pill, guys, and that's why we had to go off air.
00:02:31.200
We're just like someone deeply upset me and I cannot perform my duties today.
00:02:39.620
Like I said, I am not involved in this lawsuit, or at least that's what my lawyer kept telling me.
00:02:45.940
Well, joke's on him because I have now been name checked in this lawsuit.
00:02:50.900
So let's back it up and I'll explain how we got here.
00:02:56.760
So Judge Lehman, don't forget, the parties all met, kind of a preliminary hearing.
00:03:02.940
And Judge Lehman of New York instructed both of the parties of the suit to submit a proposed
00:03:09.580
I think the deadline he gave them was March 10th for a proposed protective order because
00:03:14.700
both teams agreed that some kind of a protective order would indeed be appropriate for this
00:03:23.580
Now, as we reported, Brian Friedman and Wayfarer wanted essentially a model protection order,
00:03:30.160
which is indeed standard, which is standard protection order.
00:03:33.060
But on the 20th, which was, I think, last Friday, Blake's team filed for a slightly modified
00:03:40.820
type of protection order that would include increased protections to third parties.
00:03:47.240
I told you that essentially what was buried in it was what I would describe as the Taylor
00:03:53.900
I'm just calling it the Taylor Swift clause, essentially allowing the respective lawyers to
00:04:00.100
just deem anything that they want attorney's eyes only, right?
00:04:04.280
So they're like, they get a document that and they're just like, you know what, this
00:04:07.580
one, you can see it, Brian, but it's attorney's eyes only.
00:04:10.900
You can't show you can't show that to anybody else.
00:04:13.100
So it's really important that you guys understand this differentiation.
00:04:15.660
Like we have to distinguish between the two what a standard court protective order is and
00:04:20.380
what Blake Lively's team is asking for, which is an attorney's eyes only designation.
00:04:25.300
So the standard model one is referred to as a model protective order, a court model protective
00:04:31.460
order is something that they had previously agreed to.
00:04:34.720
It just means keeping some of the material that will come out through the course of a
00:04:38.640
high profile lawsuit away from the general public, most importantly, because it's just
00:04:43.600
irrelevant stuff that has no bearing on the legal consequences of the case, but might
00:04:49.840
Example, they subpoena my financial records because I'm alleging that something was done
00:04:55.640
that led to severe financial consequence in my life.
00:04:59.020
So the other side says, OK, we're going to subpoena your financial records.
00:05:02.040
And in the process, they become privy to things that might embarrass me, like the fact that
00:05:07.100
yesterday when I was in a bad mood, I ate two bagels in the morning.
00:05:16.160
And a standard protective order would keep how many bagels that I ate yesterday morning
00:05:25.380
But of course, the opposing side to the suit, plus the witnesses and the jurors would be
00:05:32.660
OK, so that's just like too much for the public.
00:05:35.060
But yes, we've got this because it's relevant to the case.
00:05:38.660
Her financial records are relevant to the case.
00:05:41.700
So attorney's eyes only is a different designation.
00:05:45.340
It's essentially a request for documents that could indeed be extremely relevant to the
00:05:52.480
And they're saying we only want this to be shared between the attorneys, not even with
00:05:58.340
So that means, you know, Brian Friedman can see it.
00:06:03.220
But we're talking like not even Melissa Nathan or Justin Baldoni could see it because it might
00:06:12.340
So to give you an example, if Brian Friedman subpoenas Taylor Swift's text messages, wink,
00:06:21.020
And it reveals that actually Taylor Swift was LOLing with Blake Lively about being a
00:06:28.760
And she was like plotting the takeover of the movie because she's bored and it's Tuesday
00:06:32.640
and Joe Alwyn isn't responding to our text messages anymore.
00:06:36.440
Well, Blake Lively's team is essentially requesting the rights for their attorney to
00:06:42.660
just designate that AEO, attorney eyes only, because that might unfairly harm the reputation
00:06:49.260
So to be clear, if the judge actually grants that kind of a protection order, the attorneys
00:06:54.780
would become the judge of what exactly could be designated AEO.
00:07:02.060
I used a lot of examples there that were very strong examples.
00:07:04.560
So let's revisit the language from Blake's initial filing, asking to strengthen the
00:07:12.060
So they filed this on February 20th, like I said, and it says the proposed PO defers from
00:07:18.800
this court's model PO primarily by adding the following and attorney eyes only category,
00:07:25.500
which applies to confidential discovery material of such highly confidential and personal, sensitive
00:07:31.660
or proprietary nature, that the revelation of such is likely to cause a competitive business,
00:07:38.300
commercial, financial, personal, or privacy injury.
00:07:42.420
Specific examples of categories of discovery material that may qualify as confidential or
00:07:47.480
AEO discovery information in a case of this nature, including, for example, previously non-disclosed
00:07:54.620
information unique to the entertainment industry, such as, for example, creative ideas or client
00:08:01.400
relationships or information of a personal or intimate nature in a case involving high
00:08:07.460
profile individuals and allegations of sexual harassment.
00:08:14.380
But they're also kind of saying that people are high profile, but also kind of trying to slide
00:08:19.480
this idea that we're also protecting these because these are other victims of sexual
00:08:31.780
Justin Baldoni's attorneys got back regarding that filing and they basically called them out,
00:08:40.340
They said, given how actively the Lively parties have publicized and litigated Ms.
00:08:45.860
Lively's claims in the media, we are surprised to now learn how vehemently she wants to prevent
00:08:51.280
the public from accessing material and relevant evidence.
00:08:55.140
The Lively parties provided The New York Times with Ms.
00:08:58.040
Lively's otherwise confidential administrative complaints filed with the California Civil Rights
00:09:03.680
Department and thousands of pages of original documents, including including text messages
00:09:13.980
So that's kind of like a pretty strong argument because they're saying we're just like to
00:09:19.380
remind the public that it was clearly her team who leaked private text messages and leaked
00:09:24.380
emails without any due process at all to The New York Times.
00:09:27.660
So why are they coming at us pretending that like, oh, such a thing could potentially ruin
00:09:33.100
careers when it seems like that's exactly what you were doing when you released these
00:09:41.380
And you're alleging that you received some of this via subpoena, whatever it is.
00:09:48.080
Lively's counsel and spokesperson routinely attempted to rehabilitate her tarnished image with making
00:09:54.220
bold statements to the press, such as characterizing the wayfarer parties as, quote unquote, another
00:10:01.000
chapter in the abuse playbook, or trying to convince the press that her amended complaint
00:10:05.240
saves her meritless claims by referencing other purported victims, although she fails to name
00:10:14.480
Worst of all, in a planned skit on NBC's Saturday Night Live 50th anniversary special, which attracted
00:10:20.520
15 million viewers, Ms. Lively's husband, Ryan Reynolds, stood up and made a joke about
00:10:24.520
her claims for sexual harassment and emotional distress.
00:10:29.080
Now you're saying like anything being revealed to the public would be too much.
00:10:32.240
But weren't you guys the one that like made like a whole movie, Deadpool, about what was
00:10:39.260
You know, it's giving like a never ending publicity tour.
00:10:41.620
But I want my privacy, Meghan Markle type vibes.
00:10:43.900
Like, is there a little bit of a conflict between the words coming out of your attorney's
00:10:52.100
And I want to say this, what he should have included, since I have now appointed myself
00:10:55.140
a lawyer in the suit, not just a party and not just somebody who's a victim, but also
00:11:03.940
I also find it interesting that they're trying to pretend that it's a case that they're
00:11:08.420
essentially trying to protect people who may have been victimized by sexual harassment
00:11:13.320
when it was actually Blake Lively in that initial filing that said everything but the name,
00:11:23.040
Like when she was trying to imply like, wink, wink, I'm not going to name Lily Bloom.
00:11:31.400
She's like, I'm not I don't want to name anybody else in the suit.
00:11:34.120
But if you actually go back and review her initial filing from December 31st or December
00:11:38.760
20th, also her CRD complaint, she lets us know that it is Isabella Ferrer.
00:11:46.720
I mean, look at this point, point 54 from her original filing.
00:11:49.720
Mr. Baldoni added a detailed scene to the film in which the underage version of Miss Lively's
00:12:00.180
In both the book and the script, there was no sex scene.
00:12:02.920
Instead, the details about this moment were left to the audience's imagination.
00:12:06.540
But Mr. Baldoni added in considerable details, including both dialogue between young Lily and
00:12:11.160
her boyfriend about the loss of her virginity, as well as a simulated sex scene in which Mr.
00:12:15.900
Baldoni filmed and included in his initial cut of the film, a close up of young Lily's
00:12:21.180
face accompanied by an audible gas at the moment of penetration.
00:12:24.860
Miss Lively was informed when this scene was shot.
00:12:28.640
After Mr. Baldoni called cut, he walked over to the actor's chair and said, I know I'm not
00:12:41.460
Then another point in the suit, she mentions a mutual friend.
00:12:45.900
A quote unquote, another female cast member that's friends with Jamie Heath and Justin
00:13:00.760
But I'm not going to tell you who it is, but it rhymes with schmiz schmella schmarrer and
00:13:07.580
So it's ridiculous for her to pretend that she was trying to protect these women.
00:13:10.600
And she was desperately trying to signal to the public by dropping not even Easter eggs,
00:13:17.740
The point of this filing is supposed to be for Taylor Swift.
00:13:21.360
Again, I'm showing you that point when she talks about Liz Plank and her filing, making
00:13:26.320
It says here in point 10 on May 24, 2023, Ms. Lively confided in a text to a woman who
00:13:34.040
Baldoni and Mr. Heath, quote, I was going to invite you to set tomorrow.
00:13:43.180
I mean, it's been present today, but I came home and cried.
00:13:46.800
And so she talks about how she's creeped out, whatever it is.
00:13:49.780
I don't want your male gaze or your words or your tongue or your videos or your naked
00:13:55.820
And Liz Plank obviously was friends with Jamie Heath and Justin Baldoni because they had the
00:14:02.740
So it's very obvious who she is referring to in all of these filings.
00:14:07.340
And it is just pointedly ridiculous that she's pretending that the nature of these filings
00:14:11.180
has anything to do with sexual harassment or sexual abuse and rather has to do with her
00:14:19.800
OK, so anyways, getting back to the response to this.
00:14:30.780
So they then file also yesterday and they are basically arguing to their argument.
00:14:37.860
They're saying, like, actually, here's the issue.
00:14:43.460
So essentially, again, that is what Brian's team is saying that the court model P.O. is
00:14:49.520
And they're saying the model P.O. defines parties or parties as those who are parties
00:14:56.520
It does not reference third parties or expressly apply its process to them.
00:15:06.460
I'm not familiar with that language, obviously.
00:15:08.740
But then they go on to say that the opposition ignores that the proposed P.O.
00:15:13.140
would extend the right to designate materials as AEO to parties and third parties alike,
00:15:20.380
some of whom have already faced online harassment, threats and attempted intimidation.
00:15:25.040
So she's like, we need to extend these third party protections because some of these people
00:15:29.520
are already getting threats and intimidation and they're being bothered online.
00:15:34.340
Hey, genius lawyer, that defeats your whole argument.
00:15:37.580
It means the public already knows who these people are.
00:15:40.100
OK, so you're sitting here saying you've got to protect them.
00:15:44.280
So if they're already being like if you file this order, it's not going to stop millions
00:15:48.620
of people in the world for saying from saying Isabella Farah, you should speak up.
00:15:56.840
Again, she has terrible emotional lawyers who don't think through the arguments that
00:16:01.860
And then it says counsel for wayfarer parties recently public.
00:16:06.120
They have to drop at least once in every filing that they're women.
00:16:11.360
Counsel for wayfarer parties recently publicly stated in an interview with TMZ that wayfarer,
00:16:16.800
Justin and their representatives have no ill will nor vendetta against anyone who speaks
00:16:21.340
up in any circumstance and have firsthand experience with and empathy for the struggles
00:16:26.080
of going against incredibly powerful individuals.
00:16:29.100
The moving parties respectfully suggest that the wayfarer parties can actualize those professed
00:16:35.560
That is to facilitate the pursuit of truth and to empower third parties, including the victims
00:16:41.740
of sexual harassment, to stand up to incredibly powerful individuals.
00:16:46.620
I find this to be hilarious because they are doing the exact opposite.
00:16:50.780
They're actually protecting incredibly powerful individuals.
00:16:54.360
Like I said, I see right through this, this is the Taylor Swift protection order.
00:16:59.840
We're not, I'm not calling it anything different is a Taylor Swift protection order.
00:17:06.500
It is her is the only relationship that they want to actually protect.
00:17:10.260
Like I said, everyone else was just on the chessboard.
00:17:19.200
I mean, really, do we need an expert on what a bromance is?
00:17:22.040
These people were just like useful idiots to them.
00:17:25.380
But Taylor Swift for a narcissist, for two narcissists, they're like, that's what we
00:17:32.580
So we're going to file this, pretend it has something to do with something else that
00:17:35.940
we can then go to her and say, we got you, babe.
00:17:42.240
Then they go on and they start to argue about the specific tenets of paragraph nine of the
00:17:48.760
PO and they basically say that this designation is moot because if he's already said, basically,
00:17:56.320
Brian Freeman has already said that he doesn't believe Blake Lively and that she thinks that
00:18:00.780
she wants publicity and that she's proven that she wants publicity.
00:18:04.600
And so if we do the model PO, the two of us attorneys will have to go to the judge if
00:18:09.180
we have a disagreement, because in the model PO, you guys can look at the documents.
00:18:12.640
You can say, oh, this is Taylor Swift's text messages.
00:18:14.560
The lawyers from both opposing sides come together, look at the messages and they say,
00:18:21.920
Well, her lawyers are saying they're never going to agree because Brian Friedman's just
00:18:26.120
And so what then would happen is each time we'd have to go to the judge to make a decision.
00:18:35.620
Sweetheart, this entire lawsuit is a waste of court resources.
00:18:40.740
Let's let's stop pretending that like this part right here is where it gets bad.
00:18:49.360
OK, until you guys scream uncle and realize that we're not going to let you out of this.
00:18:55.480
Let's not pretend that you care about that now.
00:19:10.860
OK, so they wrote in the last paragraph, certain online content creators who frequently parrot
00:19:18.060
the Wayfarer Party's line, at least one of whom, at least one of whom just so happens
00:19:25.080
to be a client of Wayfarer's counsel, Brian Friedman, have used similar misleading accusations.
00:19:32.240
So that little that little petty betty was a mention for Perez Hilton.
00:19:37.860
They want the public to know that Perez Hilton, who has been covering this extensively, has
00:19:41.120
a conflict of interest because apparently he was a client to Brian Friedman.
00:19:45.060
But there's a little bit of dirt thrown on me here because I'm the only other person
00:19:50.560
They said at least one of whom just so happens.
00:19:54.220
So they're like kind of trying to signal like, oh, but Candace could be too.
00:19:56.840
So let me clarify, I am not I have never spoken to Brian Friedman in my life.
00:20:04.400
As I said to you guys, like he he and I are connected in the stars or something like, you
00:20:09.680
know, he might be my brother from another mother.
00:20:14.620
OK, so we're talking about a family that's been torn apart.
00:20:21.020
So don't you try to put this little this little maybe even other people.
00:20:24.260
Then they mention me and they say they quote my tweet.
00:20:28.240
And I'm not sure what argument they're making because I'm not sure what argument they're
00:20:31.420
ever making because their entire lawsuit is just filled with contradictions.
00:20:38.220
Late last night, which is what I said, I tweeted this late last night while we all slept, Lake
00:20:42.060
Lively and Ryan Reynolds filed a protective order.
00:20:43.900
The guilty as sin couple is asking a judge to protect from the public some confidential documents
00:20:49.760
and names that will be gathered in the discovery process.
00:20:53.480
And then after they put my tweet, they write predictably the media outlets picked up the
00:21:05.520
Leading the pack of people like because like what we're psychotic and we're checking your
00:21:11.480
And we said, oh, look, yeah, she's filing for more protection to protect.
00:21:19.960
So I don't understand why I got name checked here.
00:21:22.900
And then just to say predictably, the media outlets picked up the same narrative.
00:21:27.840
They're like, they got me out here looking like Regina George when she cuts her shirt.
00:21:31.500
And then everybody just starts cutting their shirts.
00:21:36.260
And I don't understand what your problem is with me other than the fact that I am under
00:21:50.360
I am going to be put not just in the Deadpool movies, but all over that next Taylor Swift
00:21:56.820
I'm going to be you guys are going to be Easter egg hunting.
00:22:04.520
Yeah, there's going to be a whole song and teenagers are going to be singing in the air.
00:22:18.080
And I'm going to go to the concert because I told you my little girl, she likes Taylor
00:22:25.180
But the point of the fact of the matter of everything that is going on is no.
00:22:36.600
But I am the the public jury lawyers, both lawyers, both parties.
00:22:43.040
I have to be able to make a decision on my own show.
00:22:44.740
And I'm telling you that we are not accepting this.
00:22:51.900
OK, I've worked incredibly hard for the Taylor Swift text messages.
00:22:56.040
OK, not years, but like everyone can see that I have made a real effort.
00:22:59.020
And now that you have name checked me and I'm under your skin, I'm going to be there
00:23:08.340
We're trying to make people think that I'm somehow connected to Brian Friedman when I'm
00:23:15.520
And you're messing with my cousin and I'm pregnant.
00:23:20.840
You guys, look, you didn't run into me yesterday.
00:23:23.140
There would have been problems, problems in these streets.
00:23:26.140
And that's all I'm going to say about that topic.
00:23:31.620
You know, we have so much in part of the pro-life movement that we do to kind of conquer Planned
00:23:36.240
Parenthood, spending so many millions to target what we deem to be vulnerable women, convincing
00:23:40.300
them that the abortion pill is a quick, easy solution.
00:23:42.320
But what actually happens afterwards is that there's so much devastation that follows.
00:23:47.360
And they sometimes really come to terms quickly with the reality that they have ended a life.
00:23:51.200
And that's why Preborn is stepping in through innovative technology.
00:23:53.740
They are reaching abortion-determined women before they take that pill, before it's too
00:23:58.580
In fact, to date, Preborn Network of Clinics has rescued over 300,000 lives.
00:24:03.080
And they have seen over 90,000 women come to Christ.
00:24:06.680
Preborn Network of Clinics are with these moms every step of the way.
00:24:09.640
They offer counseling, maternity supplies, and the support that they need to choose life.
00:24:14.840
So I always ask that you give $28, provides an ultrasound to a woman in a crisis.
00:24:21.080
And it helps her see her baby and choose life instead.
00:24:23.880
So to donate, just dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby.
00:24:29.760
Or you can donate securely at preborn.com slash Candice.
00:24:35.560
Also reminding you guys of Home Title Lock for you guys who are homeowners, because there
00:24:40.060
They can literally steal your home right out from under you.
00:24:44.900
And it's a growing real estate scam that targets American homeowners.
00:24:49.880
Criminals can forge your signature on one document.
00:24:54.960
And they file it with your local recorder's office.
00:24:57.240
And just like that, your home title has been transferred out of your name.
00:25:00.720
So let me ask you, when was the last time that you even checked your home title?
00:25:05.580
And that's exactly what these scammers are counting on.
00:25:09.580
Their million-dollar triple lock protection helps keep your home and equity safe.
00:25:12.840
With Home Title Lock, you'll get immediate 24-7 monitoring of your property,
00:25:19.820
And if fraud should happen, their U.S.-based restoration team will spend up to $1 million
00:25:24.040
to fix the fraud and restore your title at no additional cost.
00:25:27.900
I've teamed up with Home Title Lock to give you a free title history report that you can
00:25:32.220
find out if you're already a victim and access your personal title expert.
00:25:38.740
So go to HomeTitleLock.com and use promo code KANDICE250 or click on the link in the description.
00:25:48.440
Promo code KANDICE250 to get the protection and peace of mind that you deserve.
00:26:00.600
You get these people into office and they just start getting weird.
00:26:03.580
And one person who's gotten a little strange is Dan Crenshaw.
00:26:06.880
So we should discuss him all together because I think in my political career, I don't know
00:26:10.980
that I have ever been more wrong about a person.
00:26:15.120
So I'm hoping that something just happened along the line because when Dan Crenshaw first
00:26:19.820
appeared on the scene, he seemingly had it all, definitely checked all the boxes for
00:26:24.300
conservatives because we're like, he's a veteran and he truly sacrificed his health to
00:26:30.420
And he also seemed to have a really good sense of humor and he wasn't exactly polarizing,
00:26:36.480
It was kind of nice to have a non-polarizing person.
00:26:39.140
If you guys don't remember him, there was this notorious moment when Pete Davidson went
00:26:44.300
on to SNL and he made fun of Dan Crenshaw because he had an eye patch.
00:26:49.740
And then there was like a conservative backlash against SNL and Pete Davidson came under like
00:26:56.960
And rather than like adding to the hate campaign against Pete Davidson, Dan Crenshaw did this
00:27:02.880
He teamed up with Pete Davidson and they did a skit together on SNL.
00:27:07.140
It was like, OK, we can only take a brief pause on hitting each other and we can all
00:27:10.400
agree that it's cool that they have come together.
00:27:15.960
And I was thinking at that time he was presidential material.
00:27:22.400
You don't get it right all the time, but you don't always get it that wrong.
00:27:26.680
OK, so fast forward for those of you that don't follow conservative politics that much.
00:27:34.660
OK, and I mean, like, can't answer a basic question about your ideas without snapping
00:27:42.560
There was this town hall, a tea party town hall.
00:27:46.060
And this young teenage girl asked him a question, as you are allowed to do at town halls, you're
00:27:52.840
And she was particularly concerned about something that he had said on a podcast about Jesus
00:28:01.340
So just look at how young she sounds and looks and how politely she asks the question and ask
00:28:07.440
yourself if Dan Crenshaw's response makes you comfortable.
00:28:12.220
Crenshaw said, quote, the most important thing here is that we have important hero archetypes
00:28:31.080
Put a period out of the word Jesus and don't question my faith.
00:28:51.740
People in the background are just like, don't talk to a kid like that.
00:28:57.280
There's just been a lot of that like bubbling anger over the years.
00:29:01.220
You're not allowed to ask Dan Crenshaw any questions about what he believes or what he
00:29:05.400
You're not allowed to ask him about the contradictions of saying you're America first, but also giving
00:29:09.460
money overseas to never ending wars, especially Israel.
00:29:15.580
But I think that that that really demonstrates I just feel like you should have this natural
00:29:20.260
male instinct when someone that young steps to you with a voice like that and sounds so
00:29:25.300
innocent and is asking a genuine question of what you said.
00:29:33.580
So recently he was interviewed by a journalist named Stephen Eddington, who works for GB News
00:29:40.780
And when the interview had concluded, he was still mic'd up, obviously, because he doesn't
00:29:52.260
And Stephen asks him if he's ever met Tucker Carlson.
00:30:23.020
Well, Stephen Eddington, the journalist, said that he was not.
00:30:32.640
But at the time that he shared it, he said that he kept receipts of the remark.
00:30:36.080
And he also claimed that Crenshaw told him when he laughed, which we didn't get to see,
00:30:42.400
Like he's just going to kill Tucker Carlson, which is like it's a bit extreme.
00:30:46.200
Anyways, this is now the deleted tweet right here.
00:30:53.940
Now, some people were asking, is that fair game?
00:30:59.200
And those people clearly have not been following Dan Crenshaw because there doesn't need to be
00:31:06.360
He represents himself as someone who's really angry, who just wants to maybe hurt people
00:31:14.560
There was a time that he freaked out when someone questioned him regarding a spending
00:31:22.480
I don't know if you saw this, but someone had put out a tweet saying Dan Crenshaw is
00:31:26.000
pushing for this bill because it includes a 40% pay raise for a member of Congress.
00:31:29.760
And Dan Crenshaw had recently been complaining that like, oh, we don't make enough money.
00:31:35.920
So he responds to this guy on X and he says, you lying piece of.
00:31:39.140
But hey, whatever gets you pathetic bottom feeders, clickbait, you incel.
00:31:43.680
So now if you're against Dan Crenshaw's spending bill, you're like an incel or something.
00:31:49.340
Dan Crenshaw obviously is not emotionally prepared to lead anything.
00:31:55.720
And I think that he's a really volatile person.
00:31:59.520
But, you know, he's also a pretty sinister person, I would say, whose priorities are
00:32:02.860
not aligned with this party's voters, but also have kind of nothing to do with the United
00:32:14.640
It's a lot of the leadership of that party just doesn't put the United States first at
00:32:22.400
I don't know if you guys are comfortable with that, but I don't think that any sitting congressperson
00:32:25.700
should be responding with such volatile and anger and like wanting to challenge people
00:32:30.900
to fights if they have a disagreement or a question about a spending bill.
00:32:35.960
People are allowed to question you and question how you're voting.
00:32:40.540
And if you're ill-equipped emotionally to be able to respond to those questions, maybe
00:32:46.700
Anyway, Tucker replied to his little death threat or whatever it is, whatever you want
00:32:50.420
to call it, whether you want to take it seriously or just think of it as just another
00:32:53.580
unhinged Dan Crenshaw moment because he just says stuff because he's angry.
00:32:57.180
And Tucker offered for him to come on his show.
00:32:59.160
He said, why don't you come sit for an interview and we'll see how you do it.
00:33:11.160
Did you guys used to have the cafeteria O in middle school?
00:33:14.840
Like for no reason at all, because we're just like effing around.
00:33:17.820
And you just one person goes, oh, oh, just like hype.
00:33:26.560
He's like, why is he homicidal against Tucker, Tucker Carlson?
00:33:30.540
And it's going to be interesting to see how Crenshaw responds to this.
00:33:34.080
Hopefully he does a little better than what he did when Marjorie Taylor Greene asked if
00:33:38.400
he threatened to kill Tucker, even though we all heard it and watched it with our own
00:33:45.340
Marjorie Taylor Greene said, did you threaten to kill my friend, Tucker Carlson?
00:33:50.820
I respect it because when politicians lie, they do it so boldly that you do have to have
00:33:56.180
a little bit of respect for that level of lying.
00:34:00.920
Anyways, you guys just wanted you to know that this seems to be boiling over.
00:34:05.240
This is a little montage of Tucker Carlson and Dan Crenshaw.
00:34:10.700
But I think things are really reaching a fever pitch.
00:34:19.820
Why is it that Republican states tend to have the least sincere Republican?
00:34:25.300
Dan Crenshaw, apparently still a member of Congress.
00:34:28.180
And the next time Dan Crenshaw stands up and says, but you don't understand the threat.
00:34:35.480
Neocon Congressman Dan Crenshaw, Nikki Haley of Texas.
00:34:38.980
The single most left-wing member of Congress I've ever met personally is a Republican from
00:34:44.580
this area who has no interest in the United States whatsoever and does not even pretend.
00:34:51.680
The most liberal, most left-wing person I've ever met.
00:34:55.360
And so they're easily bullsh**ed by the posturing jackasses in Washington.
00:35:01.800
You, Dan Crenshaw, you're the one whose own children languished and died while you focused
00:35:09.620
That person is an enemy of everything that you voted for.
00:35:14.580
I just love the part there where he just says, I'm not going to name names.
00:35:23.140
I'm not going to, I'm actually going to say it as Dan Crenshaw.
00:35:26.800
And I love people who have the courage to critique their own side or, you know, what's
00:35:33.180
I'm a huge fan of Tucker Carlson because he remains principled.
00:35:36.260
Whether you like him or you don't like him, if you look throughout the years, he admits
00:35:39.940
when he's wrong and he remains principled and he's willing to stand up when people
00:35:47.080
I think irrespective of how we feel about politics, Dan Crenshaw just seems to be having
00:35:54.200
I've heard weird rumors about him flirting with the Turning Point USA girls at events,
00:36:03.980
Anyways, I wanted to show you guys one more clip because when I was in a really bad mood
00:36:07.220
yesterday, Theo Vaughn, there was a, it just appeared on my Instagram and I was cry
00:36:17.960
He just says things that are all over the place.
00:36:21.420
Like, I don't know, I don't know what's happening in the headquarters of Theo Vaughn's brain,
00:36:24.740
but it's, I want to hang out there for a day to just see why, why he thinks the way
00:36:30.400
What was that quote he said that you were quoting Skylar about?
00:36:34.420
I like raisins because they're grapes that have been through like, that's like, that's
00:36:38.880
the Theo Vaughn statement where you're like, what, Theo Vaughn, what are you talking about?
00:36:43.420
Anyways, give you the background of this clip before I show it to Theo Vaughn.
00:36:48.360
He, I would not categorize him as left or right.
00:36:51.700
He used to be on real world road rules and a lot of show game shows, and he does a lot
00:36:56.520
And now he has a podcast, which has grown very popular.
00:36:59.540
And it's one of the podcasts that Donald Trump went on, which made it even more popular,
00:37:02.940
where he just didn't really speak to Trump much about politics.
00:37:06.100
And he spoke to him more about just like who he is as a person, which was much more relatable
00:37:10.080
than hearing people who hate each other, shout at each other throughout an entire interview.
00:37:15.660
And anyways, for that reason, Donald Trump invited Theo Vaughn to the inauguration, which
00:37:21.960
And Theo Vaughn was sitting at the inauguration and his chair broke.
00:37:25.160
Like, I guess they had some ghetto chairs and Theo Vaughn got lucky number, ghetto chair,
00:37:29.900
whatever, and he just, the chair legs just gave out.
00:37:33.440
So first, I'll show you him falling in the chair, and then I'll show you what he, how
00:37:48.760
OK, now listen to Theo Vaughn describing what he now refers to as chair gate.
00:37:57.140
I just couldn't believe that I'm sitting in there.
00:37:58.920
And I'm at the damn, they're doing the inauguration.
00:38:12.640
And you're on the floor, and you're like, oh, this isn't good.
00:38:20.000
And then you just, I thought I'd, I was like, please let me fall through to another world
00:38:25.020
Like, I looked over at Sam Altman, and I was like, designer, you know, I was like, send
00:38:31.480
You know, don't make me have to just get up and just be human.
00:38:41.180
And the best part of it was some rich lady scoffed at me.
00:38:53.460
You know, those people that are really rich, they have someone else walk their dogs, so
00:38:58.120
they never really know that their dog's s**t or whatever.
00:39:24.360
I just love the sound effect for a really rich woman who's offended that you've just
00:39:31.860
And she's just like, no, I don't know why this person's sitting near me.
00:39:39.280
I got to tell you, that literally put me, I watched it like 10 times yesterday.
00:39:43.820
It puts me in a great mood, so I just had to share it with you.
00:39:45.620
I had to sprinkle some good mood on you guys because it's Wednesday.
00:39:48.660
You're almost at the halfway or more than the halfway point of the week.
00:39:55.280
So I'll tell you guys about American financing and then I'll jump into some of your comments.
00:40:01.280
OK, I know the average person today is feeling the financial strain more than ever.
00:40:06.900
And many people are finding it nearly impossible to make ends meet.
00:40:09.840
Not the person, the rich lady in front of Theo Vaughn, but the rest of the world.
00:40:13.280
With little left over after covering the basics, it's no surprise that many are resorting to
00:40:17.640
credit cards just to get by, often carrying high balances and interest rates in the 20s
00:40:22.680
So if you're a homeowner and you're stuck in the cycle of mounting debt, you need to call
00:40:26.300
my friends at American Financing because they're salary-based mortgage consultants
00:40:29.520
are saving homeowners an average of $800 a month, helping you put your hard-earned money back
00:40:35.260
Plus, if you act now, you might not even be able to skip, you might be able to, pardon,
00:40:41.620
There are no upfront fees, so it costs you nothing to find out how much you could be saving
00:40:46.100
It's time to break free from the stress of debt.
00:40:48.240
Talk to American Financing today and take control of your financial future.
00:40:57.000
Or you can visit AmericanFinancing.net slash Owens.
00:41:03.040
All right, guys, let's see what is on your mind.
00:41:09.040
There's going to be a new Shot in the Dark episode up on the website.
00:41:14.120
That's a really important one for parents to watch because that's the one that they do all
00:41:28.800
If you watch no other episode, watch the polio vaccine episode.
00:41:32.180
You are going to come out of it shaken because that is always the one that people on autopilot
00:41:41.720
Like I said, if I didn't get personally injured from Gardasil, I would have been one of the
00:41:50.080
Also, guys, if you're watching this live on YouTube, subscribe.
00:41:56.220
Everyone watching right now, hit and get me to 4 million so we can celebrate and drop a
00:42:02.420
And thank you for all of you guys who were at the book club yesterday.
00:42:12.680
And it's just interesting to talk about concepts and to really be able to go down the rabbit
00:42:16.440
hole and be a conspiracy theorist in the comfort of our own little book club.
00:42:22.700
I think I had one more announcement, but I can't remember it.
00:42:24.720
Oh, I have solved the little legal hurdle that was making me have to kind of delay the
00:42:34.100
I can tell you a lot more about that series, more about the phone calls that I've had with
00:42:38.380
So I'm really excited to spill on that and start activating the TikTokers and the sleuth
00:42:45.800
moms and sleuth dads to take a look back into that case.
00:42:51.220
We have Jesse who writes, Candace, I shot you an email.
00:42:54.440
I'm $400 confident it's worth your attention if you see this.
00:42:59.020
Absolutely love your show and congrats on the new CBS deal.
00:43:07.160
That me and Megyn Kelly did not sign a deal with CBS.
00:43:11.020
There's like these Facebook accounts that just like create memes and they pretend that
00:43:13.940
it's like breaking news and it's never happened.
00:43:17.860
Unfortunately, I will be continuing to speak to you guys in my podcast where I'm comfortable
00:43:23.200
Dahlia writes, Cousin Candace are lively and Reynolds name dropping you because they're
00:43:27.160
shook by your ability to stir the pot without breaking a sweat.
00:43:30.120
Or is this their slick way of asking you to narrate the Netflix doc?
00:43:34.360
I don't know what they're thinking, but I was excited.
00:43:38.720
Like I said, I actually I believe the purpose of that was just to kind of throw a little
00:43:43.400
dirt to try to imply something like, oh, there's probably something there with Candace.
00:43:50.740
OK, I'm interested in this case because I really think Blake Lively sucks.
00:43:56.820
And I have just written myself into this narrative.
00:44:08.520
I think many would agree that your ops have increased significantly lately.
00:44:11.840
If possible, having someone from your team check in when you go MIA like yesterday would
00:44:20.900
I posted on Instagram that I I couldn't I couldn't come to the phone right now because
00:44:31.000
I, you know, it was just a rare sugar night breakdown.
00:44:33.700
Sometimes people have a little sugar night breakdown.
00:44:58.720
Dahlia writes, are crying, Ryan and Lively mad that you got a hotter take on their drama
00:45:05.800
Yeah, probably maybe because people know that they're lying and that they have obviously
00:45:10.080
firms, PR firms that are trying to change the narrative and encourage us not to read
00:45:19.740
Look at me, look at the notes, tations like we are here.
00:45:35.220
She writes, Candace, your next bagels are on me.
00:45:41.340
Yesterday was a bad day and I shouldn't have eaten two bagels, but I don't want that to
00:45:47.020
So I don't want to mention it anymore beyond this episode.
00:45:49.440
OK, don't talk to me about these bagels anymore, guys.
00:45:52.460
Skad Kooey writes, Candace, can you shed light on what Israel is doing in South Syria or of
00:45:56.780
course the mainstream media is not covering it?
00:45:59.040
You know, I should have back on a couple of people that were experts in that region.
00:46:02.240
It's the only one that I feel that I am not educated enough to speak on, like the backstory
00:46:09.180
And that's why last time I had somebody on who was extremely educated to talk about Syria,
00:46:16.700
And he I think he did recently message us and say, can I come back on the show?
00:46:20.640
So we should definitely do another deep dive on everything that's happening in the Middle
00:46:28.000
If you're looking for that episode, it was it was a sit down between me and Scott Horton
00:46:30.600
and I did most of a listening and he did most of the speaking.
00:46:33.760
And it was just very educational for me because, you know, I don't claim to be a geopolitical
00:46:39.260
And I try not to speak until I know more about the backstory of certain things.
00:46:43.440
But I definitely can host people that know a lot more and hopefully awaken a lot of people
00:46:49.580
Right now, obviously, I am and I'm deep in a lawsuit that I'm involved in no matter what
00:47:01.740
OK, I'm telling people that I'm a party to the suit and that's how it's got to be.