In this final chapter of the book of Romans, we are dealing with the final words of Paul's epilogue to the Church in Rome. There is so much to be learned from this last chapter, especially about women in ministry and the church in general.
00:09:13.800I think there's 29 different references in the Bible.
00:09:17.880But just to give you a quick reference, it's not always,
00:09:21.240and in fact, it's actually rarely talking about the office of deacon.
00:09:24.240It's almost always talking about the role, the servant role of being a deacon.
00:09:30.480And so if you look to Romans 13, 4, it says the civil magistrate is called God's diakonos, God's servant for your good.
00:09:39.660It's the whole justification why we say, well, if the government is God's servant, then he ought to do God's will.
00:09:46.080It's the reason that we actually can have a moral justification for political theology in the church.
00:09:51.580Now, it goes on in 1 Corinthians 3, 5, and it's Paul and Apollos are described as, quote, the diakonos, those whom you believed, or servants through whom you believed.
00:10:05.900But Paul never calls himself an actual deacon.
00:10:08.860Paul is certainly a servant, but Paul has never called himself in the office of a deacon.
00:11:03.300This is an interesting one because this is actually speaking to the office.
00:11:06.600And you can see the distinction here that is being made.
00:11:09.000We see Paul address the formal office and he says, quote,
00:11:12.140Paul and Timothy, slaves of Christ to Jesus, to all the saints that are in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi,
00:11:17.720with the overseers and the deacons okay so there he is speaking specifically to the office
00:11:24.040not just speaking to the role and so there's a classification of a deacon and it's not just that
00:11:32.500at some degree we're all servants of the lord jesus christ at some degree we all participate
00:11:39.180in the work of servitude we would all serve one another and we are at that particular point
00:11:45.920maybe a deacon acting as a deacon, but that is very different than the distinction of the office
00:11:50.880of deacon. And we're going to see that here in just a minute. The central question becomes this.
00:11:56.360Is Paul affirming Phoebe in a role of service to the church or in the ordained office as deacon?
00:12:07.500That's the question that we need to answer. And if he is affirming her in the ordained office,
00:12:12.680does that affirmation align with his instruction for qualifications for deacons in 1st Timothy
00:12:19.060chapter 3? Now, some people have suggested that 1st Timothy 3 presents three separate categories
00:12:27.180of people. And if you want to turn there for a second, it might be helpful because I'm going to
00:12:31.180kind of have you look at some verses as we pop through this. 1st Timothy 3, some people present
00:12:37.600that there's three separate categories of qualifications. They would say elders, and that's
00:12:42.880verses 1 through 7. They would say male deacons, and that's verses 8 through 10. And then some
00:12:50.460people would say female deacons, which is verse 11. Now, what they like to point out is that verse
00:12:56.70011 says likewise. Now, if you're reading the ESV, it might say women. It might say wives.
00:13:04.120depends on the translation that you're actually looking in but the word agunika or gunike is
00:13:10.560actually the same word for women and wives so you have to understand if it is uh if the intention
00:13:19.080of the author is to say wives or women based on the context it's the same thing in first corinthians
00:13:24.440chapter 11 when it's talking about head coverings is it wives who only need to cover their heads
00:13:29.000or is it women that need to only cover their heads is it women that need to only cover their heads
00:13:33.160or is it females and girls that need to cover their heads? So there's a big discussion around
00:13:37.700the definitive understanding of this particular Greek word. Now, so it says, likewise, women or
00:13:47.120wives must be dignified, not slanderers, but temperate, faithful in all things. So if we
00:13:52.580take that as to be women, it's just talking about women. So it gave the qualifications for male
00:13:57.220deacons. Well, and it says, well, likewise, women, if they're going to be deacons must be dignified,
00:14:02.780not slanderers, but temperate, faithful in all things. So this is how they would view this
00:14:09.240particular passage of scripture. And there's, you know, I would say it's a minority view within kind
00:14:14.980of the biblical expositional position. I mean, they exist. Even interestingly, John MacArthur
00:14:21.600holds this position, but he is like extremely rare in this particular position. And he would
00:14:29.120argue it away and say things like, well, you know, I'm okay if you hold a different position.
00:14:34.240I'm not going to white knuckle this passage of scripture, but this is kind of my take on it.
00:14:38.460But the vast majority in his camp, the vast majority in the reform camp are all on the
00:14:42.760other side. Let me explain why. This verse here in verse 11 faces some pretty major grammatical
00:14:49.560and contextual hurdles in the next verse. If you look to verse 12, it says, quote, let deacons
00:14:56.320be the husband of one wife managing their children and their households well and in fact you know
00:15:06.660john macarthur's translation the legacy standard bible which is the lsb uh he actually translates
00:15:11.880the first verse 11 uh gunakai to to women uh but he he actually transfer or translates
00:15:20.280verse 12 as wives, because you just can't escape the reality that it's talking about a wife here.
00:15:27.840And so what this does is that it clearly refers to a spouse, not a general woman, but a spouse.
00:15:34.680And the phrase husband of one wife clearly limits the office to qualified men. In other words,
00:15:40.180if Paul had intended to establish an office of a female deacon, a formal category, we would expect
00:15:47.940him to use some sort of inclusive or parallel language in this verse. Something like, you know,
00:15:53.060let each deacon be faithful to their spouse or managing their household well, or let male deacons
00:15:58.160be husbands of one wives and female deacons be wives of one husband. You would expect some sort
00:16:02.520of language there if that was the intention of Paul. But Paul doesn't do this. And so he explicitly
00:16:08.440frames this passage of scripture in masculine terms and assuming a male subject with wife
00:16:14.480and children. So that's where this argument, the larger discussion goes, and that's why the vast
00:16:20.320majority of scholars and interpreters, unless you're liberal, you know, and you're looking for
00:16:25.720some sort of, you know, scapegoat or loophole to make your square peg theology fit in that round
00:16:30.620hole, that's really the justification here. Now, even the early church where the word deaconess
00:16:36.860was used, and we see this in early church history, it's never referred to an office, but it's actually
00:16:44.280referred to a role. In fact, if you look to the Council of Nicaea, this is really great church
00:16:49.480history, because if you look to the Council of Nicaea, that's AD 325, Canon 19, so they have
00:16:56.080notes that came out of these councils, Canon 19 states, quote, we mean by deaconesses such as have
00:17:04.740assumed the habit, but who, since they have no imposition of hands or laying on of hands, like
00:17:12.200ordination, are to be numbered among the laity. They're to be numbered among the laity, not the
00:17:17.080clergy. In other words, the view of deaconesses were not to be counted among the offices of the
00:17:24.560ordained. For example, we may in the future here at Kingsway appoint a particular woman
00:17:32.200as a point of contact for women's ministry. It just makes sense, right? You want to eliminate
00:17:39.760opportunities where men have to communicate with women in situations especially of counseling that
00:17:45.300are difficult or maybe more feminine needs. And if we were writing in Koine Greek, we would
00:17:53.760describe this person as a servant of the ladies at the church here at Kingsway. And we would
00:18:00.380probably use, if we were writing in Greek, that word diakonos. She is a servant, a deaconess.
00:18:06.560Now, again, that would be her role, but that does not necessarily mean that she is an ordained officer of the church, according to 1 Timothy chapter 3.
00:26:41.420The more accurate translation and the reason that the vast majority of Bible translations on earth, all throughout history, have not rendered it that way, is they would say, well, she's well known among the apostles.
00:26:53.020Now, this is the more reliable translation because, one,
00:26:59.140Junia is only mentioned once in the entire Bible.
00:27:01.820There is no biblical or historical pattern for female apostles.
00:27:06.080The qualifications for apostleship are laid out in Acts 1, verse 21-22,
00:27:11.080which say that they must be eyewitnesses of the resurrected Christ
00:27:13.560and that they must be appointed to him directly by Jesus.
00:27:17.420so um again it's pretty amazing that people do this you're going to hear somebody on the internet
00:27:24.460like oh well you know even junior was an apostle and you're like it's an amazing uh you know thing
00:27:31.180to to think and i want to talk about this kind of movement of this common error among progressive
00:27:39.480and i think roman catholics do this as well um they refuse to let the plain reading of scripture
00:27:45.760interprets scripture and instead they take isolated and ambiguous passages of scripture
00:27:52.820or just some disputed detail in church history and they allow it to overturn the consistent
00:27:59.560uh clear repeated teaching of god's word they take some sort of allegorical and spiritual
00:28:07.860interpretation instead of the historical the grammatical the real interpretation
00:28:12.580and it's it's it's it's incredibly frustrating i'm actually i have a friend of mine who's
00:28:19.600who's investigating roman catholicism to convert and every argument that they send to me is just
00:28:25.820like this overreaching stretch it's like they take the most unclear passage of scripture
00:28:31.660and they build this massive doctrine on it while totally ignoring the clear pattern of scripture
00:28:37.480this is like hermeneutics 101 you never take a unclear passage and let it supersede all of the
00:28:45.700clear passages it's it's it's just it's unfaithful interpretation and and so doctrine must be built
00:28:56.420on biblical grammatical historical and contextual clarity now why now let me let me explain this
00:29:01.000there are two camps of hermeneutics hermeneutics is the science of interpretation the art of
00:29:06.260interpretation. There are two camps of hermeneutics, and it is the historical, grammatical, contextual
00:29:12.000hermeneutic, or it is the allegorical and spiritual hermeneutic. This goes all the way back to the
00:29:16.240early church. And we need to be very careful that we do not fall into the allegorical and spiritual.
00:29:26.360Now, here's why. Because Jesus and the apostles prove in their own use of scripture, in their own
00:29:33.620interpretation of the Old Testament that they use the historic grammatical contextual method of
00:29:40.260hermeneutics. And so people go, well, you know, I interpret it this way. And you're like, well,
00:29:44.820you're interpreting that allegorically, typographically, spiritually, with a very
00:29:49.620unclear way to interpret that passage of scripture. And you go, well, well, you know,
00:29:54.300here's our justification. It's like, but that's not how Jesus interpreted it. It's not how Paul
00:29:58.420interpreted it. It's not how Peter interpreted it. It's not how the prophets interpret it.