00:11:10.300This is another controversial point of this bill
00:11:14.000that they're whining about in the star.
00:11:16.820I'm just trying to find the quote here now.
00:11:19.760there's so many hilarious lines in this article if the government has no shame about ignoring the
00:11:26.660UN Human Rights Committee then what does it say about Canada and this government committing to
00:11:31.960upholding international human rights law oh no they're not going to uphold international law
00:11:36.960oh no they don't respect the United Nations like they're really trying their hardest to make me like
00:11:42.060mark carney here but wow we're enforcing our borders wow it's so unacceptable
00:11:57.980here we go bill c-12 would also give the government the power to stop accepting new
00:12:01.980immigration applications or cancel existing application when it decides it's in the public
00:12:06.620interest. Immigration Minister Diab and the department officials have previously said the
00:12:12.940public interest is kept intentionally vague in the bill, which has yet to become law to give them
00:12:17.580to give the government leeway to approach a range of future situations such as pandemics or
00:12:22.980espionage threats. Like this is a good piece of legislation. And think about the hypothetical,
00:12:31.000Like if a more anti-immigrant party were to come to power subsequent to Mark Carney, they wouldn't even have to advance new legislation in order to quickly clean up our asylum system.
00:12:43.860They could simply deem, they could use this very intentionally vague language, rethink how we consider the national interest, and completely shut down pretty much everyone in the asylum system.
00:13:01.540this is a bold piece of legislation and i think it's like when we put forward these pretty
00:13:09.900new and radical reforms on the immigration system people people like to to fear monger and say oh
00:13:17.000people will never put up with that people will never accept it but like bill c12 is a perfect
00:13:20.920example like this is this is a great example of legislation that a nationalist government could
00:13:26.900could advance and look at the public sentiment no one even cares no one's paying attention to this
00:13:31.180at all yes the un's shrieking but like is there any like do do average canadians out on the street
00:13:37.900even know about this like this is just going on in the background no one cares it's they're going
00:13:43.200to clean up the system people will be happy for it inflation will go down government spending will
00:13:48.060go down it's all it's all heading in the right direction and like just to compare how scared and
00:13:56.480cowardly the conservatives are on this issue because they're so worried of the way that it
00:14:02.700will be perceived in immigrant communities. They're so concerned about backlash from the media.
00:14:07.300Whereas the liberals just plow ahead with much more radical policy than what the CPC advances.
00:14:13.320In fact, the CPC has criticized the liberals for this very piece where they can en masse
00:14:20.120cancel people in the refugee system. Let's watch this clip I have from Michelle Rempel
00:14:27.360grilling Lena Diab on this very topic.
00:14:30.620The ability to kick mass groups of people out, undefined, who they don't like. That's what it
00:14:39.680sounds like to me. You're not being specific with regard to safeguards here. You're literally
00:14:43.920asking parliament to circumvent laws that allow that protect charter rights and to mass cancel
00:14:51.060entire groups of people who could be here and you can't say who how could i go to like ethnic
00:14:56.680groups in my community and say that i could vote for this this is actually bananas and so anti
00:15:02.360canadian so what are those specific safeguards you haven't defined it in the legislation you're
00:15:07.220sitting here blathering and like you're literally asking us to say yeah we should give the government
00:15:12.260to write, to just cancel PR, mass PRs.
00:15:16.920Like, imagine you sitting on Red FM tomorrow.
00:15:20.000Are you going to be saying the same thing to them
00:37:24.860So these people, they claim to stand for Canadian values.
00:37:31.600They claim to stand for Canadian values.
00:37:33.240What we stand for, individual liberty, rule of law,
00:37:35.600democracy, human rights, common sense. They say, allies for a strong Canada unites Canadians of
00:37:42.540every background who share one belief, our freedoms and democracy and our national character
00:37:47.020are worth fighting for. So they're basically this like civic nationalist group, I guess,
00:37:53.040like I guess they're a similar kind of pressure advocacy group, nonpartisan group.
00:37:57.960But we stand with communities targeted with hate, especially the Jewish community,
00:38:02.620which today faces threats not seen in decades. So I guess they're like some sort of civnet group,
00:38:08.820critical of immigration, but mostly focused on Muslim immigration. I feel like we see groups
00:38:13.780like this all over the world. But like, I've never heard of them. I don't think they're
00:38:18.980particularly impactful, but I guess they have more connections behind the scenes than someone
00:38:22.840like me, an actual dissident. So let's, with that in mind, with Ms. Brar's identity in mind,
00:38:30.820with her affiliations in mind let's look at her her big article so in the context of their
00:38:38.940of her connection with uh these pro-zionist pro pro-israel groups the title is very obvious
00:38:45.860blood and soil versus post-nationalism mrs kend is real identity uh immediately trying to like
00:38:52.180associate me with with nazism even though she she tried to like make a big show about how she's not
00:38:57.480calling me names or anything but like you start throwing around blood and soil and it's pretty
00:39:01.100obvious what they're trying to do what the implication there is so this is a direct response
00:39:05.700to my what is a canadian article and you can tell right from the start right from the dark start
00:39:11.120that she's just seething like this is the type of thing where i'd where i'd write out an article or
00:39:17.060an email or whatever and then maybe i like take a few minutes an hour or whatever then go back to
00:39:22.260it's like i can't send this this is just me crashing out um i need to to have some more
00:39:28.900substance i need to have some actual uh academic basis for this or else i shouldn't send it at all
00:39:34.500uh but like look right through this you begin with a confession of decadence you do not understand
00:39:41.060what is a canadian um no i this is an important question in this day and age and if you don't
00:39:45.940think so, then you're in denial. A serious nation does not pose this question itself like a neurotic
00:39:52.740teenager in front of a bathroom mirror, she says. A people that still knows its purpose does not
00:39:59.840pause mid-stride to define itself. But that's exactly the problem that I completely agree with.
00:40:06.920We don't understand who we are anymore. If you ask people this question, they can't answer it
00:40:11.880Because they've been brainwashed for generations to believe that we don't have an identity, that it is just liberal multiculturalism, that to have any sort of actual identity to culture history is racist and unacceptable.