On today's episode of Long Live Canada, we celebrate the anniversary of the Battle of Vimy Ridge and remember all the other important events that took place on that day in Canadian history. We also talk about the Carleton government, the floor crossers, the Carney government, and much more!
00:04:21.200i hope everyone had a restful week got to spend some time with family uh i know i got to to catch
00:04:26.880up on some sleep which was uh much much needed um so fix this job by the way fix the shop page
00:04:34.640we're working on it we'll be dropping a new line of merch soon soon guys yeah daniel is ascending
00:04:40.720yeah i'm working on it we all have to become the best versions of ourselves guys right you are the
00:04:46.480the nation. I am the nation. The people are the nation and our health reflects the health of our
00:04:52.000society. So we got to be the best versions of ourselves. We got to look smacks. I'm not into
00:04:56.860bone smashing all this stuff, but working out and eating right are important. Okay. So before we
00:05:05.800dive into things, I do want to talk a bit about Vimy Ridge. So today, April 9th is what we call
00:05:15.600Vimy Ridge Day. It's what the 109th anniversary of the battle at Vimy Ridge, which was fought
00:05:22.400between April 9th and April 12th on back in 1917 during the First World War. You guys might have
00:05:31.060seen my video I posted earlier today, but I really think it is important that we recognize
00:05:36.160these important dates and remember our heritage because Vimy Ridge was an important moment in
00:05:43.060Canadian history. It was a hugely galvanizing moment for the country. This is back in an age
00:05:49.300where we were still very much growing up out of our kind of colonial mindset. And these trips back
00:05:55.700to Europe, that may be a silly way of putting it, but the First and Second World Wars, when the
00:06:02.560Canadians returned to Europe, they really got that experience that they had been forged into
00:06:09.020something new and different and unique. We still had those European roots, but we had been defined
00:06:14.860over generations as settlers here in Canada. So Vimy Ridge was a critical point in the turning
00:06:25.340of World War I. It was a German controlled post in France and the French had not been able to
00:06:31.020retake it over years. The British had failed to take it, but the Canadians got involved and we
00:06:36.460took back that point really quickly uh canada does have an incredible military history and it does go
00:06:43.500back to right to our roots that define us as as canadians this goes back to something i was
00:06:49.500talking a bit about a couple weeks ago it goes right back to those selection events right we had
00:06:55.100these kind of two three main selection events we had you know uh the selection event which was
00:07:02.540who was brave enough to get in a or or uh risky enough to to get on a rickety ship
00:07:11.100risk their lives crossing an open ocean to start settling a hostile wilderness and there's that
00:07:16.860second selection event if you were able to survive in canada against the harsh climate against uh
00:07:24.300warring bands of of savages of natives uh there's that section selection event and then third was
00:07:32.380the American Revolution. The people, the liberal-minded people stayed down south to form
00:07:38.060America. And the more hierarchical, the more traditional, those are the Canadians. And what0.96
00:07:43.340was founded, I mean, you have to remember, Ontario, upon its founding by the United Empire loyalists,
00:07:50.780was pretty much just a military state. Ontario almost didn't exist until that wave of
00:07:59.500migration of settlers from America up to Canada. Before that, the Canadian territory was pretty
00:08:04.940much just all Francophones, Quebecers. But this new province of Ontario that would be founded by
00:08:13.580this United Empire loyalists was pretty much just a military state, right? It was parceled out lands
00:08:19.020to soldiers with a commitment to protect that territory against the potential invaders of
00:08:26.220the Americans so we had this big militaristic culture that really started to come into its own
00:08:32.380once we we traveled back to Europe to start uh participating in the world wars and we saw that
00:08:37.980right in in world war one incredible uh Canadian soldiers and Vimy Ridge was a a special battle
00:08:47.180because it was the first time that all the Canadian divisions were uh parceled together and led by a
00:08:54.220canadian arthur curry as the general and we were able to take vimy ridge this this impossible this
00:09:01.020this point that was seen as impossible to to take the canadians were able to do so through diligent
00:09:08.700tactics and new age warfare at least for the time things that might be simple today but arthur curry
00:09:15.660he was not a he was not a trained military man he he came at it uh from a volunteer as a
00:09:22.140as a militia man out in uh out on the west coast in bc he was not trained he didn't come through
00:09:27.500the military academies he didn't have a large family history as a military man he was just a
00:09:32.860natural talent a brilliant tactician and strategist and uh i mean if you're not familiar
00:09:39.740with the story he he led the canadian troops very diligently he drilled them made sure everyone knew
00:09:47.500every square inch of the terrain he had people running uh their different positions he everyone
00:09:54.140had to practice their routes in advance they were they were reviewing maps and aerial footage so
00:09:59.580that everyone could follow within this system and as well they perfected this tactic which
00:10:05.900they called the creeping barrage which was an advancing line of um uh the word is escaping me
00:10:14.060uh of cover fire which the canadian soldiers would advance behind pushing the germans back0.51
00:10:19.740as the canadians advanced it was a brilliant tactic and was ultimately that turning point
00:10:25.820in this battle and allowed us to capture this point that was previously thought impossible
00:10:31.020but but this occasion bringing all the canadians together juxtaposing them with their the their
00:10:38.220you know the french and the british are our colonial parents it gave them a chance not only
00:10:44.460for for canadians across the country east west english french all to to coalesce together to be
00:10:50.700juxtaposed against these other europeans to see that they were truly unique and to to to conquer
00:10:56.620a big accomplishment as a group under canadian leadership so it's a really important date
00:11:01.500I don't think it got enough fanfare today I saw like the the sea and towers being lit lit up pink
00:11:09.520for for pink day to to oppose homophobia and transphobia and whatever blah blah blah when
00:11:14.760we should really be talking about the great stories of Canada's past Vimy Ridge is a very
00:11:20.980important moment in Canadian identity and forging the Canadian nation as as unique from our our
00:11:27.520colonial parents so I think it's important as nationalists that we don't just talk about you
00:11:32.120know ethnicity and identity and immigration but I think we have to understand and remember our past
00:11:37.840because you really have to understand where you came from to know where you're going so these
00:11:42.280stories are very important it's there's all these notions that get sort of tiresome I'm sure you
00:11:48.180guys are bored of this too of Canadians as peacekeepers as nice polite but the truth about
00:11:56.060Canada is we're incredible warriors and that was buried it started with Trudeau who really
00:12:02.540started to reinvent our military and simplify it and and kind of kill off these distinct
00:12:07.940cultural identities within each of the different wings of our military and reinvent Canada's
00:12:13.200peacekeepers but all of these notions of this liberal multicultural post-national identity all
00:12:19.300all really just go back to Pierre Trudeau. It's not really an accurate depiction of what Canadian
00:12:27.840history and what Canadian identity is. So we have to push back on these notions. We have to remember
00:12:32.240who we are, and we have to be proud of our stories. And I think that starts with understanding
00:12:38.200the world wars from an authentically Canadian position. So we have to take some time today.
00:12:44.560remember remember those great men that that fought on behalf of canada remember those who who died
00:12:50.240there was 10 000 casualties there in at bimmy ridge 3 500 dead we have to take some time uh to
00:12:57.200remember those brave men and everything they sacrificed uh so that canada could could remain
00:13:03.600free and i i think they'd be rather disappointed to see what what our country has become so we it's
00:13:09.600not enough to just pay lip service and to remember them we must we must actually actively fight to
00:13:14.240bring back the the canadian identity that's been lost over the last 40 50 years so i just want to
00:13:20.640take a few few minutes uh to to remember that important battle it's important to understand
00:13:27.360who we are and uh and what we're defending uh i do want to say thank you for the the super chats
00:13:34.240from uh northwest manny two dollars we love our military heroes don't we folks we absolutely do
00:13:39.920and five bucks from another remember who you are chat remember who you are
00:13:44.480who we are um so uh a big praise to the to the to the brave canadians that that sacrifice their
00:13:52.720lives um but the the big thing i want to talk about today is uh the canadian kind the canadian
00:14:02.640political spectrum what it means to be left and right in canada um i i was actually planning to
00:14:12.080uh speak on this since since this weekend i think it ties in nicely with the developments that we've
00:14:17.840seen this week um with the floor crossing and the emergent kind of carny majority government
00:14:23.920but i was actually initially inspired to do this um by one of my favorite haters maybe my favorite
00:14:31.520hater, Wyatt Claypool. If you guys are terminally online and live on Twitter like me, you guys will
00:14:40.880know that me and Wyatt frequently butt heads and Wyatt often likes to criticize me and the
00:14:49.920Dominion Society saying that we're not even conservative, we're not even right-wing. Wyatt's
00:14:56.000kind of uh positioned himself as this kind of policeman for what is conservative what is right
00:15:03.360wing in canada uh and if if uh if you follow if you've seen some of these arguments some back and
00:15:10.240forth between wyatt and i you'll know that he says that i'm i'm not even right way the dominion society
00:15:16.560sometimes he'll say well we're woke right but oftentimes he'll say we're not even right wing
00:15:21.760because to why um uh right wing left wing this is all decide this is all determined by your
00:15:28.320position on like individualism uh versus statism or collectivism authoritarianism however you want
00:15:34.240to put it uh the left is the for big government the right is for small government individualists
00:15:40.560and i have in the i've in the past defined myself as an identitarian uh i believe that we need to
00:15:46.480have a rising kind of collectivist notion a nationalist notion to see us to see ourselves
00:15:51.600not just as individuals not just as abstract economic units but to see ourselves as part of
00:15:57.040a greater nation as a greater cause and i think this is a a real shortcoming of the canadian right
00:16:02.400in general uh why it sees this and tries to police me out of the the right in at all saying that
00:16:07.840since i'm uh since i define myself as an identitarian the collectivist i'm inherently
00:16:11.840on the left um and why didn't i have gone back and forth on this a few times um but this weekend
00:16:21.400there was a broader argument outside of just of just uh me and the dominion society um
00:16:28.360uh that kind of perpetuated this whole thing so let's uh let's see what happened on on twitter
00:16:37.360so you might have seen this from anthony coke so anthony um you you guys might know he's a
00:16:43.360conservative strategist he worked on pierre paulio's campaign he's currently the communication
00:16:47.840director for carolyn elliott out in british columbia and he tweeted the canadian conservative
00:16:54.480movement has been profoundly damaged by its outsized obsession with classical liberalism
00:17:00.240And I think Anthony is absolutely right. I think that the Conservative Party in general has been captured by very American notions of liberalism.
00:17:16.860And that's a that's a serious problem. It's out of it's out of sync with Canadian temperament.
00:17:21.080So I completely agree with Anthony here. But he, you can see this got 70,000 views. It started a big discussion across X over the weekend. Anthony followed it up with a similar tweet. Quebec is the most conservative province in the country properly understood. Too few people understand this because they think exclusively in economic terms.
00:17:42.640So again, I think he hits the nail on the head. It is kind of complicated. We'll get into the
00:17:48.600nuance of left-right in a moment. I just want to kind of run you guys through the argument before
00:17:53.900we dive into the details. So Wyatt kind of responded to this. It's the new performative
00:18:00.700edgy position to claim classical liberalism is somehow bad. Apparently Barry Goldwater,
00:18:05.720Ronald Reagan, John Diefenbaker, Margaret Thatcher, et al. are a bunch of classical
00:18:10.340liberal sellout hacks i mean yes they they are i would only propose to change the name to
00:18:15.620classical conservative since liberal labor parties have done a lot to ruin the word liberal and turn
00:18:21.140it into a big government modern liberal form you can already see how confused things get because
00:18:26.980of the the kind of big c conservative versus big l liberal for small c conservative or small liberal
00:18:33.620things get very confused in canada very fast wow wow at juh 70 70 25 with the 100 super chat
00:18:45.460wyatt and clive do something uh do something are schrodinger's racist southeast asians are0.70
00:18:51.620off limits but natives are fair games why the hypocrisy yes they don't have thank you for the0.98
00:18:57.300huge super chat um but yes they do these guys do not have any sort of consistency in uh in in in0.96
00:19:05.460their views so he thinks this is just kind of us trying to be edgy instead of rediscovering a more
00:19:12.820deep understanding of what the left-right divide is i just have one more tweet here i guess it's
00:19:17.380pretty much the same uh he says that quebec is not among is amongst the most socialistic provinces
00:19:24.420on a provincial level anti-liberty uh look at the lockdowns uh but again he doesn't kind of
00:19:32.180understand the cultural side of the political spectrum so you can see why it's kind of positioned
00:19:38.500himself as this as this policeman anyone that's not for small government isn't a conservative but
00:19:45.380as it's properly understood the political spectrum isn't just a line right it's not just
00:19:51.540federal elections aren't just a referendum on the size of government it's a it's a decision
00:19:58.020a collective decision on the direction of the country uh how power is exercised within our
00:20:03.620society the direction we want to go in the projects we want to focus on the the kind of
00:20:10.100temperament we want in a leader on the national scale and to just oversimplify this into a
00:20:15.540decision of small government or big government is such a failure to understand the broader
00:20:23.480philosophy behind the political divide. So in preparing for this, I started to think a bit
00:20:31.780about the political spectrum. And I started, I wanted to bring up some visual aids for you guys
00:20:38.580so we could properly understand this. So I started just looking for a good graph. I'm sure you've
00:20:44.760seen them on the political spectrum um so so first i found this funny let's just look at this uh so
00:20:52.600i just googled political compass and this is the first thing that comes up political compass.org
00:20:56.280and you'd expect political compass.org to be you know somewhat neutral right uh and this is the
00:21:03.120graph that they have from the canadian federal election just made last year during the election
00:21:08.220and look how ridiculous this is this this political uh i want to say that this political
00:21:13.680this typical political compass to me it's just like libertarian propaganda it's like
00:21:18.760it's an effort to to insert libertarianism and to highlight its differences from the rest0.62
00:21:24.480um but this one is so clearly made by some sort of like communist homosexual i would assume they0.53
00:21:34.420have it as the the left right divide on the economic scale versus the authoritarian libertarian0.58
00:21:40.620divide for the social scale and like i i think that's a pretty weird way to pick things up
00:21:48.600like authoritarian versus libertarian is not really a a dichotomy for social values um but
00:21:55.900this is clearly people that are just thinking in terms of like whether or not like abortion
00:22:00.400and homosexuality are legalized they they have the conservative party as far right authoritarians
00:22:08.960I don't know what that's based off of. They have the Green Party here as you know far right
00:22:15.360somewhat authoritarian and they have the NDP over here as left libertarian. This is not
00:22:22.240an accurate outlook on the Canadian political divide at all. I thought it was just kind of
00:22:29.460bizarre in my quick research for this episode so I thought we'd look at that.
00:22:35.280um a very strange breakdown uh since i couldn't find a very good one i decided to make my own
00:22:42.400um so here's what i put together here's what i put together we're in canva today can you guys
00:22:51.380see that good i'll zoom in a bit more uh i guess i can't um try and make it as big as possible for
00:23:00.560you guys here we go so I think this is a better breakdown of things if we're taking a very high
00:23:06.080level look at things another big super chat here five dollars from gman 8573 conservatives are far
00:23:12.520right in heavy government and the liberals biggest NDP supporter reveal LMAO yeah exactly I totally
00:23:18.700agree um so here here we have it I think this is a better breakdown for like a a basic normie
00:23:27.180friendly political spectrum and i've broken it down i have the economic scale on the uh uh on
00:23:33.420the up down here that and i've broken out as statist to libertarian and then we have the
00:23:39.100social scale down here and it's conservative to progressive i think this is a a much better way
00:23:45.260of breaking up the the outlook in uh in in modern times and i thought we'd take a moment this because
00:23:53.340this is a better way to capture the the political divide here in canada um so i have the the leaders
00:24:02.860i thought we'd take a moment and and kind of start to place them here on the uh the the political
00:24:08.940divide this isn't well this isn't there we're not abby lewis is left of pierre no he's just
00:24:14.460left appear in the ordering guys we haven't placed them on the spectrum quite yet um so i wanted to
00:24:21.340start with trudeau because i think the big the biggest one of the biggest developments here that
00:24:24.940people are especially highlighted in this week's floor crossing news is is the transformation of
00:24:31.420the liberal party from um from the trudeau era to the carny era so i think we can pretty safely
00:24:38.380put trudeau up here right he's uh a big he was for a big government a statist approach to economics
00:24:48.060he was hyper progressive he spent his whole time as prime minister apologizing for the past
00:24:53.660crying about colonialism uh pushing for dei um uh you know walking in pride parades all this stuff
00:25:04.380very a very progressive notion socially very statist and uh pierre would be kind of the
00:25:13.260the response to trudeau now was pierre really conservative like no not really like he's
00:25:21.900definitely for a smaller government like he's definitely here towards the libertarian quadrant
00:25:26.940but like he still believes in a role for the state right he wants to accomplish things but
00:25:33.500more for through uh tax credits and and cutting regulations and stuff like this
00:25:40.300but he's still rather progressive right like he was he was ardently pro-abortion during the
00:25:45.020uh during his time as as leader he doesn't want anyone to bring forward any any motions on on
00:25:50.220social conservative stuff he doesn't really talk about social conservative issues uh euthanasia
00:25:57.180same-sex marriage any of these stuff he's still largely progressive right uh avi lewis you know
00:26:03.100he's probably still up here with Justin Trudeau um Max Bernier you know he's he's more libertarian
00:26:11.500um you know maybe he's a bit more conservative because you know he'll talk about those there's
00:26:16.860there's two genders he wants to reduce immigration he's a bit more over here let's say and then
00:26:23.500there's Carney and I think that Carney's development has been rather interesting right
00:26:28.140um because he's he's a little bit less progressive right he's he he's he wants to put the woke away
00:26:38.280he doesn't want to he he has he doesn't want to make his whole focus about uh social issues and
00:26:45.120and dei and all that stuff he's he's willing to talk about uh canada's founding peoples he wants
00:26:53.240to forge he's anti-american he wants to forge closer relationships with with europe um and he
00:27:00.600is but he's still rather status compared to to pierre but on social values they him and pierre
00:27:05.720pretty much line up right they pretty much line up it's more on the role of government that they
00:27:11.880differ so even this is a rather simplified version of things like you can break out the right the
00:27:19.400left right spectrum into many different axes and i decided on those because i think those are a very
00:27:24.840normal way for people to understand um modern politics but really you could break this out into
00:27:31.160so many different spectrums right uh pretty much any issue you could map on a on a right left divide
00:27:39.480there but they're like to to simplify things as why it continues to do to make it just a a
00:27:46.680a dichotomy between small government and large uh it completely misses
00:27:54.280all sorts of issues and it doesn't capture people like me like to just throw nationalists to say
00:28:00.280we're all left-wing because we we we view things more collectively kind of failures to to see the
00:28:06.280the nuance of of modern politics so we could we could sort all sorts of different issues on this
00:28:11.000on this divide right like the and i think there are far more important aspects to this dichotomy
00:28:20.360that really capture people's personal opinions on a better on a better level um yeah there is
00:28:29.080no right-wing party that's exactly what i'm i'm pretty much getting at my audio is lagging that's
00:28:34.680strange i don't know what caused that um so like there's there's all sorts of different divides
00:28:47.720here and like to understand canadian politics properly like there's all sorts of kind of
00:28:52.920serious divides that break people up i think that they're like uh in modern politics it's
00:28:59.480incredibly important to understand the kind of nationalist versus globalist divide right
00:29:04.360that's kind of what Trump put on the map with his initial campaign there in 2016.
00:29:09.240Are we going to be governed through this like globalist, multilateral organizations like the
00:29:15.800UN and the WHO and all these things? Or are we going to be more nationalist focused? Are we going
00:29:21.160to be pro-free trade? Are we going to put our own countries first, right? This new nationalist,
00:29:26.280globalist divide is very important and it gets completely lost if you reduce things to simply
00:29:31.800about size of government um also like in canadian politics there's issues like the english french
00:29:39.240divide like where where do there's a sliding scale of bilingualism how how do we incorporate
00:29:43.880bilingualism into our identity um there there's the kind of federalist separatist divide right
00:29:50.120people fall all along this line but uh like in between there there's there's a kind of autonomous
00:29:55.960positions that have more autonomy for the provinces uh before uh maybe a full kind of
00:30:01.480separation so we could have it gets very difficult for people to conceptualize beyond the the straight
00:30:07.400line or beyond the axes once you get into these like three-dimensional four-dimensional five-dimensional
00:30:12.280models it gets very difficult for people to comprehend but really politics is this like
00:30:16.680people's political views is this intersection of all these different issues to really understand
00:30:21.160people's viewpoints and i completely agree with anthony coach there that a problem with conservative
00:30:30.280politics or canadian politics in general is that is that it's been completely captured by this kind
00:30:35.800of by by these very liberal notions which are inherently very american which is very much
00:30:42.920against canadian identity because you have to understand that while it's not a complete
00:30:47.400understanding of what canadian identity is very much much of what we stand for is in juxtaposition
00:30:52.760to america right we we fundamentally exist as a rejection of the american political ethos
00:30:59.720or else we would just be american states right we are the people that rejected uh americanism so
00:31:06.200that so this drift of canadian politics towards liberalism is really a betrayal of our founding and
00:31:12.680And that exists in people's political instincts in ways that people like Wyatt Claypool and a lot
00:31:20.980of conservative strategists don't seem to understand. I think if we're breaking it down
00:31:26.580to just a simple line, it shouldn't be about size of government. I think this is very out of touch
00:31:34.400with how most people, most Canadians, most average voters kind of think about things. Like people
00:31:39.920don't really think about things in in kind of macroeconomic terms like this they don't think
00:31:45.680about how government should uh approach that i think i think a much like i think people's political
00:31:53.040differences exist on a much more fundamental level i think a better divide and just on a very like
00:32:03.520basic historical level what why it's kind of putting forward here is a misunderstanding of
00:32:08.000the history of the right-left divide. Not a lot of people know this but this kind of terminology
00:32:15.760right-left goes back to the French Revolution. During the revolution their house of government
00:32:22.400was divided into two. You had the people on the right who were traditional monarchists
00:32:30.560and then you had the people on the left who were republicans pushing for change. So this is the
00:32:36.000this is the origin of the right-left divide and on this right-left divide people who believed
00:32:42.960in tradition and hierarchy monarchy are on the right and the people who believe in democracy
00:32:48.400republicanism liberalism are on the left so like this this just displays claypool's kind of
00:32:57.120complete misunderstanding of these political dynamics if anything he's the one that's on
00:33:02.400on the left as a classical liberal classical conservative whatever he wants to call himself
00:33:08.080technically speaking historically speaking that's the left hand of the the divide people that
00:33:13.360believe in hierarchy are uh monarchy are would be the the the right now obviously this we live
00:33:22.320within a democracy at this point it's not it's not so much about the difference between republicanism
00:33:30.400and monarchism but i think a much better way of understanding things is this
00:33:38.560so we have the left and they believe in change equality and universalism they view things through
00:33:47.760very egalitarian internationalist viewpoint where everyone is an abstract economic unit
00:33:55.200we have to make things fair we can't have any discrimination and and so on and so forth whereas
00:34:01.360the right is what stands for continuity hierarchy and particularism so particularism would be the
00:34:08.960the juxtaposition of universalism so instead of viewing everyone as abstract liberal economic
00:34:14.560units everyone's the same no matter where they come from and so on we view things as different
00:34:21.440um be that you know in nationalist terms canadians versus foreigners um between genders men and women
00:34:29.920uh we we see the differences in society and i think this much more accurately
00:34:35.360captures how people think about things on like a gut level on an instinctual level of course
00:34:40.960your average person doesn't really think about these terms universalism particularism hierarchy
00:34:46.000egalitarianism most people don't even understand these terms but this is the kind of fundamental
00:34:52.400difference in people's kind of voting behaviors whether they want change and progress or whether
00:35:00.720they want to slow things down and make sure we maintain continuity so really i think this is a
00:35:06.560much better way of looking at things and then you quickly see that everyone's very very much on the
00:35:12.800left in politics right like this guy is all the way over here he wants dei he wants uh pure
00:35:20.960liberalism um this guy's also right over here i don't even know why i'm including him but you know
00:35:27.040he just got elected so i thought i'd throw him in here um max is probably you know closer to the
00:35:33.280right right he's willing to say there are differences between men and women um he wants
00:35:37.920to see restriction on immigration and so on um and then these guys are you know pretty much
00:35:44.640hanging out around the same the same place but everyone's very much on the on the left hand side
00:35:49.200of things we haven't really seen real political representation on the right in generations in
00:35:54.160canada and that's what i think is lacking and you it results in this kind of politics where
00:36:01.360people are quibbling over these minor differences over size of government over the role of
00:36:05.520government instead of offering a significant philosophical alternative to the status quo
00:36:12.640and as such people that have these more like right-leaning proclivities that want hierarchy
00:36:19.360and order are just completely unserved in the Canadian kind of mark political marketplace
00:36:25.440um maybe they'll latch on to to the conservatives and Pierre Polyev just because like they're the
00:36:31.200other option but they're not really truly motivated because that's not what they represent
00:36:37.440and i think you can i think issues like um like dei and the gender ideology stuff
00:36:46.960make this very clear for example um while conservatives big c conservatives might offer
00:36:55.680criticisms on these issues they only ever approach them from a very liberal uh perspective for
00:37:04.400example you'll have on the gender ideology stuff the the the right-wing position the the particularist
00:37:13.120position isn't is is that men and women are different they have different skills they're
00:37:19.360complementary they have different gender roles that would be a more traditionalist right-wing
00:37:24.240perspective but that's not what the cpc offer right the left will push this notion that men
00:37:29.680and women are the same and they can they can switch and and whatnot um and conservatives
00:37:36.080will criticize it by being like it's not fair to women uh it's not fair in women's sports it0.93
00:37:42.720it compromises women's safety in places like bathrooms that's that's the only areas where
00:37:47.840conservatives will be comfortable pushing back on this notion but they don't go and take the
00:37:53.440the right-wing stance, which would be, no, men and women are different. They're both good. They're
00:37:58.840both important for society, but they are different. They're not comfortable with that. They can only
00:38:04.620criticize it from a liberal standpoint. And we see the same thing when it comes to DEI. You see guys
00:38:09.780like Jamil Giovanni in the Conservative Party, and they say, the libs are the real racists, right? DEI
00:38:15.100is racist. We should make everyone equal. And the liberals, people will call them like authoritarian
00:38:21.940or whatever for these DEI measures, but they're also approaching it from a very liberal perspective.
00:38:28.560They see discrimination or difference in racialized outcomes or stuff like this as a systemic
00:38:38.720problem. And in order to maintain fairness, in order to maintain an egalitarian kind of space,
00:38:46.940they they say we need dei we need you know hiring benefits to to certain sexualities or races or
00:38:55.340whatnot so again we see the liberals and the conservatives having these these uh
00:39:02.140these disagreements but purely within this liberal framework and that just doesn't appeal
00:39:09.000to people because people's divides actually fall along this kind of left-right divide this
00:39:15.020this egalitarian versus hierarchy and you know the the actual hierarchical position on this would0.82
00:39:21.640be no we need to put our own people first right the Canadians are different from the foreigners0.91
00:39:26.720and we need to make sure Canadians are put in a position in positions of power that they have0.86
00:39:33.400the economic opportunities like this is the nationalist perspective the the the traditionalist
00:39:39.000the hierarchical perspective but it's just not offered within the the kind of political marketplace
00:39:44.200so this is what you need to understand like these guys like wyatt there's this whole kind of
00:39:52.520increasingly in the mainstream conservative space there's this identity crisis in how they kind of
00:39:59.200play out these directions and the problem is fundamentally that the entire political spectrum
00:40:05.540has been captured by this kind of liberal framework and it's fundamentally anti-canadian
00:40:11.340um canadians like on a basic level were a very collectivist kind of communitarian people and
00:40:20.740it comes back right to the roots that we were talking about at the beginning with vimy ridge
00:40:24.240the people that came here they they needed a level of collectivism a level of state intervention
00:40:31.240is simply necessary in canada both economically and socially the people that came here like you0.53
00:40:38.100can't survive in Canada as an early settler unless there is collective action, right? If you just go0.99
00:40:44.440out on your own, you're just going to die. So like there is a kind of evolutionary generational
00:40:50.280kind of perspective that in order to survive and thrive on this landmass, we need to be able
00:40:56.740to work together. We need to take on our own particular... The dog's shaking off a bit. You
00:41:03.140guys probably heard that uh um where was i um there is a need for a natural kind of hierarchy
00:41:11.300there is a need for a communal kind of collective perspective in order to to for for our society to
00:41:17.300thrive but then more on the economic side of things in order for canadian business to to exist and
00:41:23.060not be completely absorbed by you know american corporate interests in order to have projects
00:41:29.780like a railway connecting the can uh canada from coast to coast you need a strong state
00:41:36.020to protect those interests or else everything would go north south right and that's very much
00:41:40.340how it was before the canadian state started to intervene like um the trade between um trade
00:41:48.020between uh uh whether it be like the maritimes was much more linked with maine and the in the
00:41:54.900southern the northern american provinces out there there there needs to be a level of state
00:42:00.100intervention in order to create this kind of uh in canadian can the economy so so to just reduce
00:42:07.220things to liberalism kind of uh can we see the pup another super chat there from nutter can we see the
00:42:13.780pup i don't know do you want to come over here do you want to come over here maybe he'll come over
00:42:18.100here later he's uh he kind of wants uh uh we'll see if he'll he'll make an appearance a bit later
00:42:22.900um uh so it just doesn't it's it displays a complete misunderstanding of Canadian history
00:42:32.020Canadian heritage and and the the active proclivity of voters and I think this is why
00:42:37.400Pierre is going to continue to fail because he does he offers a view on in a a a vision for
00:42:45.100Canadian society that's just very out of sync with um what Canadians actually want based off of our
00:42:52.680history and our heritage uh and in the generations of living here in canada in a hostile wilderness0.92
00:42:59.860and i think this leads pretty well into the news of the week which is the floor crossers0.69
00:43:06.640and what this means for the canadian political spectrum in general
00:43:09.360um so let's go where do we start man it's such a crazy week
00:56:20.380Like he was attacking Trudeau, uh, his very legitimacy as a leader.
00:56:25.660Whereas now he talks about Carney, if you follow through his international tour, it's like, oh, I'm sending my text updates to Mark Carney.
00:56:33.780Oh, I can't insult Mark Carney on foreign soil.
00:56:38.020Like he does, he needs to be much more careful with how he attacks Carney.
00:56:43.380And that's because Carney has a big appeal within the conservative movement, right?
00:56:47.480but if Pierre isn't if the conservatives is the main alternative option to the liberals isn't able
00:56:55.840to brazenly attack the leadership of the liberals then he's just not the guy for the job right
00:57:03.780so I think that completely captures this this this this new kind of transforming political
00:57:11.420dynamic I got a lot of flack for that tweet there people started framing me as a liberal or
00:57:16.600or someone but so many people seem lost in the past they've they've been they they they're still
00:57:23.680opposing the kind of Trudeau era liberal party uh when people were listing to me the differences
00:57:30.740in the response to those tweets it was all about kind of how how the Trudeau liberals were different
00:57:35.420than the Pierre conservatives but the Cardi liberals are a different beast and the conservatives if
00:57:40.400the conservatives aren't there to meet the moment if they're if they're not there to go back to that
00:57:44.580other political divide that we offered, if they're not able to offer an authentic right-wing
00:57:49.340criticism of the government, then they're not going to be able to pick up support. And they're
00:57:56.540not going to be able to differentiate themselves from the liberals. And they become quickly,
00:58:00.600very quickly irrelevant. So I've seen people talking about how I'm not the only one saying
00:58:06.080that the conservative party is on pace for collapse. Sorry, I need to let my dog out. He
00:58:38.160And unless Pierre can find avenues to actually attack Carney's credibility beyond we need to cut taxes, beyond we need a smaller government, some angles that really resonate with the average Canadian, they're not going to be able to grow.
00:58:56.380they're not going to be able to, they're going to continue to lose support. Because even people
00:59:02.340like Marilyn Gladue, you have to view things from her perspective. She could be the kind of
00:59:09.240further right conservative MP and be completely ignored within her own party, or she could be a0.95
00:59:15.080further right liberal MP and, you know, at least be part of government, but still not be able to1.00
00:59:19.700advance any of her social issues. Like, what's the difference really from her perspective? And0.92
00:59:25.200And if Marilyn Gadu can make that change, I think you'll see a lot more liberals making0.90
00:59:32.160that, conservatives making that swap to liberal.1.00
00:59:35.200It's so hard to keep them in check nowadays.
00:59:39.460And people are talking about how this is unprecedented, but like this was always so inevitable from
01:03:13.380People knew that Pierre was in the rings.
01:03:15.380There was someone to rally around quickly.
01:03:18.240But there is not that kind of alternative leader anymore.
01:03:20.540Who's going to take over the conservative party?
01:03:21.900Jamil Devani, Melissa Lantzman, Michelle Rempel. None of these are any better than Pierre Polyef
01:03:30.780really in any way. So, but we need to, this is precisely why we kind of need to be thinking
01:03:44.480in meta-political terms. We can't just be looking to hijack political parties or infiltrate
01:03:50.940political parties or whatnot. We need to take a step back. The conservative party is not the
01:03:58.140only vehicle for our views. In fact, we've seen Mark Carney is very pragmatic. We've seen him
01:04:12.340completely kind of transform his political views in order to capitalize and maintain power.
01:04:20.580So, I mean, during the Trudeau era, he started to, like, soft launch his political career, right, with his book there, Values.
01:04:29.940And if you read Values, it is a very left-leaning tone about government involvement, about all these kind of social values and so on.
01:04:38.660But it's completely not in line with, and I mean, like even during the Trudeau era, you had him appearing as a delegate, head of committee, counter-signaling things like pipelines.
01:04:52.280Now you have him in government signing an MOU with Daniel Smith in order to get a pipeline built, a memorandum of understanding in order to accomplish a pipeline project.
01:05:04.280you've seen him completely contort his views and pitch the party to the center in order to
01:05:10.320capitalize on a shifting Overton window and you can give Pierre Polyev some credit for that like
01:05:14.760he did play an important role in shifting the Overton window back towards the right you can
01:05:21.640also give Pierre I mean Justin Trudeau some credit for that for kind of destroying the kind
01:05:28.120of leftist brand and of course there is also kind of global factors at play this kind of shift back
01:05:33.840towards a more nationalist ethos that has shifted the Overton window in such a way. But Mark Carney
01:05:40.200has proven to be very malleable to that. He's shifted the liberals in a much more immigration
01:05:46.340restrictionist position, right? We've gone from, you know, over a million a year coming into now
01:05:51.920a net negative immigration rate last year. Massive cutdowns in foreign students, new bills to revoke
01:06:00.020status from asylum claimants and so on he's completely outflanked them on on on the immigration
01:06:05.740issue so this is why i don't think that's why we founded the dominion society right we founded
01:06:11.200this non-partisan entity in order to advance nationalism and re-migration meta-politically
01:06:18.720we're open to any political party adhering to our views we need to be thinking above politics like
01:06:26.420People don't understand what I mean when I say metapolitics, I think.
01:06:29.840And it's this concept that real change happens above politics, right?
01:21:54.620talked about doing something this summer have you thought about inviting all these groups to come
01:21:57.660attend and speak or will this be focused on the dominion society i think bringing popular front
01:22:01.820ideas is as important uh this will be pretty focused on the dominion society i am looking to
01:22:07.500to bring in some international speakers that are in line with the kind of nationalist movement
01:22:11.180the re-migration movement and we really want to keep things focused on um on on re-migration um
01:22:17.740and nationalism but uh we we're still having some problems uh we still need to nail down a venue
01:22:33.420would you also push for recent european or american re-migration as well as other groups
01:22:38.060we can agree on i mean you can find our full re-migration plan on our website um we're very
01:22:43.260focused on like we're primarily focused on things like illegals and criminals people that are
01:22:49.020manipulating the system through things like asylum claims and birthright citizenship um uh in groups
01:22:54.940like this people that are actively incompatible with our society and working against our national
01:22:58.940security and the and social cohesion groups like this uh uh we don't say that everyone who is not
01:23:07.100a heritage canadian needs to go like obviously there are successful immigration stories that
01:23:11.260people that have uh assimilated well into integrated well into our society1.00
01:23:18.860um these guys are not the priority we need to we need to get out the the more dysfunctional aspects0.95
01:23:23.660as a priority so as a federalist you support the foreigners who block separation um no i want to
01:23:35.020re-migrate the foreigners um i just think re-migration is the the priority over separation
01:23:49.180another uh super chat there from not sorry canadian i really appreciate it uh if you
01:23:54.940if you do want to give financial support i do encourage you to go to our website and donate
01:23:58.460there youtube takes a huge chunk over every super chat so if you want to if you want to give
01:24:03.020financial support i do encourage you to head over to our website and donate through our donation page
01:24:15.820on that line of thinking why does quebec get to steal so much hydro electricity and that's just
01:24:19.740a result of the i don't think they steal hydroelectricity it's just a matter of the the
01:24:24.220the equalization formula, it doesn't count certain resources, which again, it obviously
01:24:34.660needs to be reworked to be more fair and equitable to the provinces in the name of national
01:24:39.840unity. I'm not taking one side or the other.
01:24:47.060can you break down your re-migration idea yeah yeah i mean re-migration to simply put is just
01:24:55.700the reversal of uh it's it's it's policy changes to to reverse the flow of recent immigration
01:25:01.540training so mass immigration is when people are coming here re-migration is when they're going
01:25:05.140back so we've offered a kind of 11 point policy plan you can find it on our website dominion
01:25:10.020society.ca slash remigration. We've kind of identified the major issue areas where people
01:25:17.380should obviously, where we can build a large mass movement of people in support of the types of
01:25:23.640people that could go back. We're talking about getting rid of all the illegals. There's millions1.00
01:25:28.940of illegals here in Canada. We're talking about shutting down the temporary foreign worker program
01:25:33.120and sending back temporary foreign workers. We're talking about completely reformatting the asylum0.97
01:25:37.640claim system and and sending back you know the 400 000 people that are waiting there in queue
01:25:43.000uh for their fake asylum claims to be processed and even going back and revoking status that
01:25:48.280shouldn't have been given um through that kind of asylum process shutting changing how birthright
01:25:53.560citizenship is done so that you need at least one canadian citizen to pass that on to the child and
01:25:58.520then again revoking citizenship from people who abuse birthright citizenship through anchor babies
01:26:04.600and stuff to facilitate chain migration like we need to we need to take a look at all the major
01:26:11.960flaws in our immigration system because it's not just the big numbers of people coming in as
01:26:16.520permanent residents right it's all these kind of edge cases of people that have been abusing the
01:26:21.400system through foreign students through temporary foreign workers the international mobility program
01:26:25.160birthright citizenship asylum claims like this is the big issues in our in our society that just
01:26:30.680is just inexcusable even even for more moderate people they can understand that this is just not
01:26:36.520acceptable by any means so you can find our full re-migration plan there but there's there's a lot
01:26:42.680of policies that can be changed in order to to reverse these these flows and ultimately we just
01:26:50.680need to be we just need to take a more cultural perspective on our immigration policy it can't
01:26:55.720just be all about uh economic perspectives and making gdp go up that's not acceptable we need to
01:27:02.200be able to preserve our identity and culture as canadians and at this rate to do that the
01:27:08.040only way to do so is to reverse the flows of of migration um we need remigration
01:27:16.360yes your secret's safe with me western loyalists
01:27:19.560any meetup in ottawa um yeah i'm trying to plan something actually for may
01:27:25.580uh it's just all about finding the right venues all about finding the right venues we're kind of
01:27:30.520uh controversial um so it's been a bit of a bit of a challenge but i'd like to host something here
01:27:35.700in May. Go camping together or have a jamboree. Yeah, yeah, we're actually planning some stuff
01:27:54.640like this for the summer question should domsock advocate for issuing special priority cards to
01:28:07.880true heritage canadian similar to the cards issued to first nations i don't think we need to create
01:28:12.620these new hierarchies racialized hierarchies within our society i think we just need to get
01:28:17.200rid of people that shouldn't be here and shouldn't have been extended uh um in the first place
01:28:24.640Will Fortasax be our king? Maybe, maybe. A new Canadian monarchy? Repatriate the monarchy? Maybe.
01:28:42.460What changes would you make to CBSA and other institutions in order to report a larger
01:28:46.400average of people per week? Yeah, I mean, the CBSA just needs to be massively expanded, right?
01:28:54.220We need to either massively expand CBSA or form a new government department.0.54
01:29:01.080We need some sort of re-migration enforcement agents in order to...
01:29:04.280Right now, the CBSA largely relies on voluntary deportations.
01:29:10.100People just leaving because their temporary social insurance numbers have expired and stuff like this.
01:29:15.920We need an actual agency that's going to track who should be in our country and who shouldn't0.99
01:29:20.420and facilitate and remove people from our country.
01:29:24.220if they're not able to right now CBSA does almost nothing right so I mean massive expansions you
01:29:30.100know hiring a new department hiring remigration agents and and giving them the authority to
01:29:37.060remove people from our society what do you think of Muslims praying in front of Notre Dame and
01:29:49.000Montreal. I don't like to see these kind of foreign religions, these massive kind of obelisks1.00
01:29:56.240to foreign religions, foreign cultures. All of this is just a kind of display of dominance0.99
01:30:02.440over our culture and society. I think Quebec recently made a move to ban public prayer
01:30:08.720in the province, something that will no doubt go up to the Supreme Court and be challenged
01:30:14.900is unconstitutional, because as we were talking about a couple weeks ago, the Charter of Rights
01:30:19.360and Freedoms kind of prevents, gives too much power to our courts to prevent parliaments from
01:30:25.800deciding what's best for our society, which is the way Canada's supposed to function.
01:30:30.740So it looks like Quebec's already pushing back on this to preserve their culture, because to go
01:30:35.020back to that Anthony Koch tweet, like there, this is another kind of access to the political
01:30:41.260spectrum right the the identitarian versus multicultural access right and we're very
01:30:47.660everyone's very much on the multicultural side it's only Quebec that's on the identitarian side
01:30:52.660and from that kind of perspective Quebec is the most conservative project province on this kind
01:30:58.920of identitarian multiculturalism axis they're the only province that has consistently stood
01:31:07.000for a coherent national identity um so in that respect even though economically they might be
01:31:13.920left-wing um uh from a from our cultural perspective they're they are the most right
01:31:20.680leaning province it's kind of a a funny juxtaposition but this is exactly enforces
01:31:25.340what we were talking about early how how uh a left-right divide only focused on size of
01:31:32.480government misses crucial aspects to the broader conversation. We need Dom Sock green ties. You
01:31:39.220don't like my green tie? It's looking pretty good. Dom Sock green? Yeah, yeah. Official
01:31:43.700merch ties. I'll add it to the list. I'll add it to the list, guys.
01:31:55.220A bunch of K halves. I like that. Canadian halves. I give a new definition to Wang half. If you know,1.00
01:32:01.960you know you guys active in quebec we still have a pretty small organization in quebec uh everything
01:32:08.920we do is is unilingual right now um i've had a lot of people offer to translate our website and
01:32:15.560our content and stuff like this but right now the the kind of fundamental problem from my perspective
01:32:20.040is our leadership team is completely ankle phone like it was founded by greg ken and i were all
01:32:25.960you know we all speak a little bit of french but not not not fluently not enough to be able to
01:32:30.520properly communicate with francophone members so until i i do want to bring a francophone onto our
01:32:36.040leadership team uh before we start a kind of uh aggressive expansion into into quebec so uh quebec
01:32:42.760is definitely lacking behind because uh um because we're just not doing things in french yet um but
01:32:50.200we'll get there we'll get there i think we'll expand really quickly once we're able to communicate
01:32:54.360properly in that province did you see martin sell their latest tactic for public speaking
01:33:00.040they shut down his meeting so he scheduled one on public transit through a diverse area maybe ts
01:33:05.080could too yeah yeah i've seen him had to do a lot of things to use book readings um there's
01:33:09.800definitely some interesting inspiration there i i think we still need to test the limits of
01:33:14.760what's possible here in canada before we can start getting uh too too too um too creative
01:33:33.720question two what is your deadline for achieving anything meaningful in re-immigration so if you
01:33:38.280don't meet the deadline you can say i am useless and took your money for something
01:33:42.360for nothing so i resign um i i don't i think the next uh three to five years
01:33:50.280are are critical in order to have a chance at solving this um
01:33:57.240politically metapolitically democratically um i can only do my uh my best and i'll do
01:34:03.640everything in my power to make that happen um if we eventually get a base government how much do
01:34:16.040how much institutional resistance will they face that's a great problem that's a great question
01:34:20.360and the answer is a lot right the the this is why it's so important to take this meta-political
01:34:26.840approach so we can have this kind of society-wide change because you're going to see incredible
01:34:33.000pushback from the bureaucracy and from the courts in particular um we have to use um everyone needs
01:34:40.920to to to read um lament for a nation uh the george grant's book on on the failures of the last big
01:34:51.720canadian nationalist john dieffenbaker um one of the reasons that dieffenbaker was ineffective at
01:35:00.200making at putting forward the reforms in Canada that he was given the mandate to do was because
01:35:07.960he faced so much institutional pushback. A disunited party, an economic elite that was
01:35:16.120Americanist, a hostile bureaucracy after 50 years almost of liberal governments.
01:35:25.080all of these factors resulted in him being ineffective so we need to create a movement
01:35:33.480that will avoid these things we need to have a a coherent prospective counter elite economically
01:35:42.000speaking that's aligned with the government we need to be willing to push back on the courts to
01:35:48.120to to change our constitution to to avoid these problems to impeach judges to move them out of
01:35:54.940the way if they're offering pushback that's not in the best interest of the Canadian people.
01:36:00.360Because right now, a lot of our remigration plan would be contested in the courts and put forward
01:36:08.620as discriminatory. Now, in Canada, we're lucky enough to have the notwithstanding clause to
01:36:14.880shut down the courts and to maintain power within the parliament. But ultimately, we're going to
01:36:23.300have to make structural reforms we need we would we will need to have a cohesive movement a counter
01:36:30.060elite a a united party um we need to purge the bureaucracy we need to be willing to push out
01:36:38.700um judges if they're working against the interest of our people um the politics is only a piece of
01:36:45.480Like we need to have the United Party, a mass movement democratically on our side in order to do the reforms that are necessary.
01:36:56.340So we need to be taking a big picture approach here to create these reforms necessary.
01:37:01.700Remember, we're not a political party.
01:37:03.400We're not looking to just seize power and implement these things.0.66
01:37:07.520We're looking to create the conditions through which re-migration is inevitable because it is so popular that people in the bureaucracy, people in the political parties, people in academia all support it.0.97
01:54:40.920he could threaten that status quo. And as a result, he didn't have to conform himself to
01:54:47.980the Republican Party. He could define it himself. If we're going to do that in Canada, we need to
01:54:53.920build a self-sufficient network that's completely independent. People don't understand how the
01:55:01.260Conservative Party operates. Like, do you know how the Conservative Party is structured? Do you?
01:55:07.220Did you know there's multiple corporate entities that make up the modern Conservative Party?
01:55:10.920that there is the political party the conservative party and there's a separate
01:55:14.060corporation called the conservative fund of canada that controls all the money
01:55:17.740like did you know that when maxim bernier was running for the leadership he ended up in a
01:55:26.300meeting with harper harper loyalists where they they wanted him to conform to their ideas and
01:55:32.060when he refused to do so they apparently orchestrated his his failure and fixed the
01:55:39.940vote to make sure that he couldn't run again. The Conservative Party is not controlled by the
01:55:44.120leader. The Conservative Party is controlled by backroom interests that control the purse strings.
01:55:49.420So if you wanted to have a hostile takeover of the Conservative Party, what you need is a
01:55:56.020leadership candidate who is completely independent of the Conservative Party,
01:56:02.100that wasn't dependent on the Conservative Party for membership lists, that wasn't dependent on
01:56:06.580the Conservative Party for fundraising, that wasn't dependent on the Conservative Party for
01:56:11.180political organizers or strategists or academics. We need to have a hypothetical leadership candidate
01:56:19.920that had this whole network built already, that had an independent fundraising force, that had
01:56:26.040an independent organization, so that he could go up to the Conservative Party and say, yes, I want
01:56:31.980to lead the conservative party. I want to lead Canada in a distinctly different direction.
01:56:37.560We're going to have a re-emigration program. This is our comprehensive nationalist program.0.96
01:56:44.400And I'd like to take over the party. I'd like to win. And I'd like to take this country back
01:56:49.760in a right-wing direction. But if you guys are going to screw with me, then I'll start my own
01:56:54.820party. And for that to happen, we need a network of financial interests that are backing us. We
01:57:01.680need to have an a counter elite an economic elite backing us we need to have guys in every single
01:57:09.840riding that would be prospective candidates we need to have organizers all over the country to
01:57:15.520that we need to have volunteers across the country we need to have a completely independent network
01:57:21.200and that's what we're building through the dominion design and yes short term our goals
01:57:25.840are meta-political we just want to promote the concept of re-migration we want to host events
01:57:31.120and protests and hand out flyers and put up posters and put out media content and inform
01:57:37.200the public on the immigration disaster and the solution which is re-migration that advance of
01:57:43.360the conversation puts pressure on existing parties in the short term but it also puts the nationalist
01:57:50.000movement the movement at large in a stronger position to form our own political party to put
01:57:57.680to take over a political party it puts through this meta-political challenge
01:58:04.480we are doing things correctly in the short term but we're also building up this organization that
01:58:10.000can threaten the existing power structures put pressure on them and take them over or
01:58:17.040put them in a position where they can't just kick us out without uh blowing us up even larger so you
01:58:23.920You guys, we're not just thinking in the short term.
01:58:28.020This problem is not going to be solved tomorrow.
01:58:30.460The average Canadian has never heard the word re-migration.
01:58:33.020They're not going to vote for it if they don't know what it means,
01:58:35.300if they've never even heard this word before, right?
01:58:40.000We need to take the next few years to prepare, to normalize this idea,
01:58:43.940to build out our resources, to build out our network, to build up our war chest.
01:58:48.140and then at that next moment after that next election during this chaotic environment when
01:58:55.360things are falling apart when everyone's like wow the modern conservative party has failed right
01:59:00.060that's what Pierre Polyam is like Pierre Polyam is he is the last he's the prodigal son of Stephen
01:59:06.620Harper right he is the conclusion of the modern conservative party Stephen Harper brought the
01:59:12.440parties together it only worked under Stephen Harper ever since then they've been failing
01:59:16.640And now Pierre Polyev, he's their golden boy. He was the test tube baby grown from Harper's DNA or something, allegedly. Don't quote me on that. To bring this party to success. And he is failing. He is conclusively proving that the modern conservative party with this classical liberal ethos, with this small government mindset, is out of touch with Canadians.
01:59:44.360And what is necessary is a new alternative that's willing to put forward a collectivist,
01:59:52.700communitarian, statist solution with a more culturally conservative grounding.