Firebrand - Matt Gaetz - Episode 151 LIVE: Dead Bill Walking – Firebrand with Matt Gaetz

Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney, two people we used to believe were Republicans, speak on the Senate floor about their desire to spend $95 billion not for the benefit of the American people or our citizens, but for Ukraine and all sorts of ambitions all over the world they have no pay for. They want to act as though that's the most important vote, that that's what America will do to save the world from peril, just to put the world's debt on our balance sheet. If anyone thinks that the right answer for you is for you to assume all of their debt, I think that you ought to have a good amount of suspicion. That's what you get when you're just basically a debt brokerage firm masquerading as a country in the vision of these America Last politicians. And when we're just a debt broker firm, that's who you get. And here's the news: House Speaker Mike Johnson is doubling down on his commitment not to bring the $95B deficit-spending forever war bill to a vote in the House, and it's a Democrat bill. And we're going to do something about it. We're back broadcasting live in Room 2021 of the Rayburn House Office Building here in the Capitol Complex in Washington, D.C., and you'll get the news right here! Subscribe to Firebrand to stay up to date on all things going on in Firebrand. Firebrand is a production of The Firebrand Report. - Firebrand's Firebrand Radio is produced and produced by the Firebrand Media and is produced by Firebrand and is a proud supporter of conservative causes and causes. If you like what you hear here, please consider becoming a patron patron. Subscribe, share, and subscribe to our new podcast, and tell a friend about our new show on Apple Podcasts, wherever else you get your favorite podcast listening to it. Thank you for listening and sharing it! - Thank you, Firebrand! Tom and Brent and Brent are always grateful for all the support we can manage to get across the word out there. . - Tom Tillis and Mitch McConnell and McConnell, and we hope you enjoy this episode of Firebrand on your social media platforms. Thank you so much for all your support and support our efforts to fight for freedom, liberty, and freedom, thank you for all of our efforts, and keep up the fight for liberty, liberty and justice for the planet, everywhere.

00:00:00.000 Thank you.

00:02:06.000 You're not taking Matt Gaetz off the board, okay?

00:02:09.000 Because Matt Gaetz is an American patriot and Matt Gaetz is an American hero.

00:02:14.000 We will not continue to allow the Uniparty to run this town without a fight. 1.00

00:02:19.000 I want to thank you, Matt Gaetz, for holding the line.

00:02:23.000 Matt Gaetz is a courageous man.

00:02:25.000 If we had hundreds of Matt Gaetz in D.C., the country turns around.

00:02:30.000 It's that simple.

00:02:31.000 He's so tough, he's so strong, he's smart, and he loves this country.

00:02:35.000 Matt Gaetz.

00:02:36.000 Wow!

00:02:37.000 It is the honor of my life to fight alongside each and every one of you.

00:02:42.000 We will save America.

00:02:44.000 It's choose your fighter time.

00:02:46.000 I'm sending the firebrands. 1.00

00:02:48.000 The vote we will soon take to provide military weapons for Ukraine is the most important vote we will ever take as United States senators.

00:03:05.000 Today, the future of the world I've just described is in question.

00:03:11.000 The endurance of an order in which American support is craved and American strength is feared is in doubt.

00:03:20.000 And we, the United States of America, have the most to lose.

00:03:29.000 Welcome back to Firebrand.

00:03:30.000 We are live.

00:03:31.000 That was Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney, two people we used to believe were Republicans, speaking on the Senate floor about their desire to spend $95 billion not for the benefit of the American people or our citizens, but for Ukraine and all sorts of ambitions all over the world.

00:03:46.000 They have no pay for.

00:03:47.000 There's not a single dollar that they sought to reduce.

00:03:51.000 American spending in some other way.

00:03:52.000 Maybe they wanted to reduce some other foreign aid.

00:03:54.000 No, they wanted to deficit spend every bit of it.

00:03:57.000 They wanted to go borrow money from China so that we could give it to other countries.

00:04:02.000 And they want to act as though that's the most important vote, that that is what America will do to save the world from peril.

00:04:10.000 Just to put the world's debt on our balance sheet.

00:04:12.000 If anyone thinks that the right answer for you to be good to them is for you to assume all of their debt, I think that you ought to have a good amount of suspicion.

00:04:20.000 And when we're just basically a debt brokerage firm masquerading as a country in the vision of these America Last politicians, that's what you get.

00:04:30.000 So we're going to dedicate a good amount of today to what the Senate's trying to do, what we're trying to do to stop it.

00:04:36.000 We are back broadcasting live in Room 2021 of the Rayburn House Office Building here in the Capitol Complex on Washington, D.C. We thank our terrific hosts at Rumble.

00:04:45.000 They've got their new studio in Washington, and you'll see us from that platform with a lot of innovative discussions.

00:04:51.000 I encourage you to Look at the chat we had with Kurt Mills just yesterday, editor-in-chief of the American Conservative.

00:04:57.000 And the best way to consume all this content is to download the Rumble app, turn the notifications on.

00:05:03.000 That way every time we go live, because we go live at different times, you will be notified.

00:05:07.000 You'll get the news immediately.

00:05:09.000 And here's the news right now.

00:05:11.000 House Speaker Mike Johnson doubling down on his commitment not to bring the America Last $95 billion deficit spending forever war bill to a vote in the House.

00:05:22.000 And it's a Democrat bill.

00:05:23.000 Here's the tell.

00:05:24.000 Every Democrat voted for it in the Senate, along with a little cobbling of Republicans that they were able to get together, led by McConnell and Romney and Senator Tom Tillis, who you'll hear from in just a moment.

00:05:38.000 So they've got that going on.

00:05:39.000 It's a Democrat bill principally supported by Democrats.

00:05:42.000 Democrats are making the major contribution to the vote share for the bill.

00:05:47.000 And we don't have a Republican House majority to hear Democrat bills and move Democrat bills. 0.98

00:05:53.000 And by the way, we shouldn't even be considering Ukraine and Taiwan and U.S. stockpiles in Israel on the same bill anyway.

00:06:00.000 They should be reviewed independently.

00:06:02.000 If you want to take a vote on those independently, let's go and proceed ensuring that we don't roll the majority of the majority with Democrats on substantive issues like foreign aid.

00:06:14.000 Now, one of the America last Republican senators...

00:06:19.000 Who advocated vociferously for this legislation was Tom Tillis of North Carolina, and his staff actually made this.

00:06:27.000 What you're going to hear is not a full clip of any speech that Senator Tillis made, but his staff on his social media platforms created a Tillis supercut of what they perceived were all of the best arguments in favor of this Ukraine aid.

00:06:46.000 And so you're going to hear from Senator Tillis of North Carolina.

00:06:49.000 Then I'm going to rebut those arguments.

00:06:52.000 On the other side, take a listen.

00:06:55.000 A lot of people, when they hear senators speak, they believe that it's the truth.

00:07:00.000 They've heard somebody say that if we pass this bill that we're all going to go ride to Kyiv with buckets full of money and let oligarchs buy yachts.

00:07:08.000 I wonder how the spouses of the estimated 25,000 soldiers in Ukraine who have died feel about that.

00:07:17.000 I mean, really guys?

00:07:20.000 Sending billions of dollars to Ukraine so Ukrainian oligarchs can buy yachts? 0.69

00:07:26.000 Is that the best you've got?

00:07:29.000 A lot of people say we're sending 70, 80 billion dollars to Ukraine.

00:07:33.000 Really?

00:07:34.000 Well, last time I checked, about half of it's going to the military industrial base here to replace the inventories that we've sent to them to replace and to aid our modernization of our arsenal.

00:07:46.000 Hell no, thank goodness this is not against the NATO ally because we would be desperate Trying to actually support an all-out war.

00:07:56.000 Putin is losing this war, folks.

00:07:58.000 This is not a stalemate.

00:08:01.000 This guy is on life support.

00:08:04.000 He will not survive if the 50 nations who have come together in the Rammstein process to support Ukraine stick together.

00:08:13.000 NATO allies and 25, some two dozen other countries have come together And made it very clear that Putin's desire to reestablish the Russian Empire is inconsistent with a democratic world order.

00:08:27.000 And we are the beacon of hope for democracy.

00:08:32.000 When we step away, who fills the void?

00:08:38.000 You'd be hard pressed to find any nation that has the scale and the ability to do it but the United States.

00:08:44.000 With all due respect to my friends, why am I so focused on this vote?

00:08:48.000 Because I don't want to be on the pages of history that we will regret if we walk away.

00:08:55.000 You will see the alliance that is supporting Ukraine crumble.

00:09:02.000 You will ultimately see China become emboldened.

00:09:07.000 And I am not going to be on that page of history.

00:09:10.000 But let's let this chamber be the chamber that stands with the free world.

00:09:20.000 We're back live, so let's deal with these arguments that Senator Tillis is making.

00:09:24.000 The first is, there will be no buckets of cash in Ukraine?

00:09:27.000 What is everyone talking about?

00:09:29.000 Yachts and cash?

00:09:32.000 It is an uncontroverted fact that the wife of a former senior defense official in Ukraine was literally caught with millions of dollars.

00:09:42.000 It was more than $10 million in U.S. cash at the border with Poland.

00:09:48.000 So literally buckets of cash are being found in the possession of the family members of the people connected to the Ukraine defense apparatus.

00:09:57.000 Mike Lee put out a report that the CIA had to directly confront Zelensky about his own personal corruption.

00:10:06.000 Does Senator Tillis have any response to that?

00:10:09.000 Does he think it didn't happen?

00:10:11.000 Is there any evidence to the contrary?

00:10:13.000 No.

00:10:13.000 When we find the cash, and when we see that people like Zelensky are able to convert materiel into cash, because in the world right now, far too much of this is fungible, then yeah, there's a real problem.

00:10:26.000 Second argument Tillis makes, Putin's losing the war.

00:10:30.000 That's his argument.

00:10:32.000 You know he's losing this war?

00:10:34.000 The people were dying in it.

00:10:35.000 Principally, that's Ukrainians. 1.00

00:10:37.000 And we want to see less war and less death.

00:10:40.000 But what does winning and losing this war even really mean to Senator Tillis and the rest of the neoconservatives?

00:10:45.000 Because I know what it means to the Ukrainians.

00:10:48.000 When Ukrainian officials come and brief members of Congress, you know what they say?

00:10:53.000 Every inch of our territory back.

00:10:55.000 The entire Russian-speaking portion of eastern Ukraine in the Donbass and Crimea?

00:11:02.000 Crimea has been in Russian hands for quite some time.

00:11:04.000 There's not a serious person who actually believes that this war is going to resolve with Crimea being returned to Ukraine.

00:11:11.000 Anyone who says that is lying to you.

00:11:14.000 And they're doing it in order to extend a war where the people who are actually losing it are the ones who are losing their lives and their families and their homes and their businesses and their prospect for any future whatsoever.

00:11:26.000 Putin's losing the war.

00:11:29.000 Maybe.

00:11:29.000 But what are we winning?

00:11:30.000 What are we even trying to win?

00:11:32.000 That's something that Tillis can't define.

00:11:35.000 Third, he says NATO is coming together.

00:11:37.000 The US has to fill this void.

00:11:39.000 This is this great moment.

00:11:40.000 And if we don't continue to serve as a blank check for all of it, then we will be the cause of its collapse.

00:11:48.000 Here's the truth.

00:11:49.000 This war in Ukraine can end whenever Europe wants it to.

00:11:53.000 Whenever they want to stop buying cheap Russian gas, whenever they want to enter into a serious European security agreement that would naturally have to contemplate Russia, hopefully it would include Russia on areas of agreement where we're fighting radical Islamic extremists. 0.82

00:12:09.000 Hopefully we could include Russia on non-proliferation, on nuclear weapons destruction. 0.77

00:12:15.000 There are certain things where cooperation between the United States and Russia make the world and everyone here safer.

00:12:20.000 And that's not to say that we're saying they're nice guys or inviting them over for Christmas dinner.

00:12:27.000 But they're a nuclear power.

00:12:29.000 And in Europe, I think there's an ability to negotiate and reach a conclusion that is considerably less bloody than the present that we currently face.

00:12:40.000 Fourth argument.

00:12:42.000 The face of history.

00:12:44.000 We can act, so we must act.

00:12:47.000 This is essentially Tillis' argument that because the United States is strong and powerful, then might makes right, and we are obligated to take action anywhere in the world where our values are in any way diminished by the rising hegemony of some other entity, or even the declining hegemony.

00:13:06.000 Just the hegemony period.

00:13:10.000 Here's what I don't think history will judge well.

00:13:13.000 If our tinkering around over with Russian tanks and European boundary disputes leads to some sort of catastrophic accident or escalation As I've said many times, I don't worry about broke-down Russian tanks in the Donbass so much as I worry about some crazy Russian general believing that they have the authority to execute some sort of launch that then we would have to retaliate against. 0.53

00:13:35.000 You would activate the entire nuclear triad.

00:13:37.000 We could melt the globes, put all of human existence asunder under a nuclear winter.

00:13:43.000 What?

00:13:44.000 What?

00:13:44.000 So that we can take the perspective that Crimea has to be returned to Russia?

00:13:48.000 Is that worth it?

00:13:51.000 History.

00:13:53.000 I hope history doesn't judge us for the mistakes that these neoconservatives would make.

00:13:57.000 Fifth and final argument that Tillis makes is that China will be emboldened.

00:14:03.000 Do you know who we're borrowing the $95 billion from?

00:14:07.000 China? 0.73

00:14:07.000 When we suffer inflation because this type of unpaid-for spending is inherently inflationary, you know who benefits? 0.73

00:14:14.000 China!

00:14:16.000 With Russia entangled in this battle, there is a leveraged buyout of the Russian farms in East Russia.

00:14:24.000 The Chinese are benefiting from that, and as Russia is bogged down in Ukraine, they are selling off assets in Cuba, where these broke-down Russian spy entities are being converted into high-end Chinese intelligence signals collection capabilities for our true adversary, an adversary that wants to dominate us, not one that wants to join NATO with us. 0.58

00:14:48.000 So I think that it is foolish to suggest that the way to be stronger toward China is to become deeper indebted to China. 0.61

00:14:58.000 And when we borrow money from China to give it to another country, we just look like fools. 0.96

00:15:03.000 We don't look like leaders. 0.97

00:15:05.000 Speaking of fools, we get a report from the Calvin Coolidge Project that Republican Senator and neoconservative Mark Wayne Mullen is meeting with folks to consider a discharge petition. 0.96

00:15:17.000 And here's the report. 0.97

00:15:18.000 Senator Mark Wayne Mullen has spoken to House lawmakers about a discharge petition.

00:15:22.000 A discharge petition would bring the $95 billion overseas aid bill to a vote in the House of Representatives if Speaker Mike Johnson doesn't introduce it.

00:15:31.000 So here is the real-time You've got Mike Johnson taking the right position that we're not going to consider this crazy bill on the terms that the Senate has sent it over.

00:15:45.000 And then you have Mark Wayne Mullen trying to encourage Republicans to go sign a discharge petition with Democrats.

00:15:54.000 To force this America last bill forward.

00:15:56.000 And Mark Wayne Mullen didn't even have the guts to vote for it.

00:15:59.000 That's what's crazy about this.

00:16:00.000 Mullen votes against the bill because he's afraid that his constituents in Oklahoma will know how he actually feels about these questions.

00:16:07.000 And then he goes and tries to get some Republicans in the House to do an end run around Mike Johnson.

00:16:12.000 I will fight against that.

00:16:13.000 I will stand with Speaker Johnson to stop This terrible, unpaid-for, $95 billion aid bill, and I'm glad the Speaker is staying strong on that.

00:16:22.000 Another little dispute we see going on on social media is between a terrific Attorney General in the state of Texas, Ken Paxton, and John Cornyn.

00:16:31.000 Let's get those tweets on the screen.

00:16:33.000 Attorney General Paxton takes a shot at Cornyn, says that he's willing to stay up all night to defend other countries' borders, but obviously there's a sensitivity to that in Texas because the Texas border is not being defended.

00:16:47.000 Cornyn replies with just an ad hominem attack.

00:16:50.000 Saying that, oh, Ken Paxton's under felony investigation and there's a grand jury looking at him.

00:16:56.000 And it is just such a weak play for Cornyn to ignore the substance of Paxton's argument that Cornyn seems to be more worried about borders oceans away and not those among the Texans who elected him and were hoping that they would serve.

00:17:11.000 There were some good arguments made in the Senate, notably by Missouri's Josh Hawley.

00:17:15.000 I thought he nailed it in debate.

00:17:17.000 Take a listen.

00:17:20.000 My goodness, we have enough money to make hundreds of millions of dollars of our taxpayer funds available to the private sector in Ukraine.

00:17:30.000 We are now literally funding their businesses, their banks.

00:17:35.000 Lord knows what!

00:17:37.000 We've got money without end.

00:17:40.000 We've got enough money to pay for bureaucrat salaries. 0.87

00:17:44.000 We've got enough money to pay for Ukrainian government officials' pensions.

00:17:48.000 We've got enough money for so-called humanitarian aid that gets funneled away from, siphoned off into any manner of corrupt uses.

00:17:58.000 We won't know because we don't have a Special Inspector General to oversee this money, but that's a different story.

00:18:02.000 Oh no, we've got plenty of money!

00:18:04.000 And I have listened carefully, carefully, to colleague after colleague of mine come to this floor and stand where I am now and say, it's so important that we spend this money On these overseas wars, we must spend the money.

00:18:22.000 If we don't spend this money now, why, it may cost us more money in the future.

00:18:26.000 No, it's imperative.

00:18:28.000 It's imperative that we spend this money.

00:18:32.000 Meanwhile, these same people turn to the citizens of Missouri and say, you're not worth a dime.

00:18:40.000 They say, you can't have a penny.

00:18:43.000 They turn to the residents of Kentucky and Tennessee and Alaska and New Mexico and Arizona and Utah and Texas and they say, we don't care that you are poisoned.

00:18:55.000 We don't have a dime for you.

00:18:56.000 We have unlimited money for Ukraine.

00:18:58.000 We're going to rebuild the borders of Ukraine. 0.84

00:19:01.000 That's in this bill, but we don't have anything for you.

00:19:05.000 Nailed it.

00:19:06.000 We, in fact, are paying for the pensions and salaries of Ukrainian officials that have nothing to do with the war.

00:19:12.000 And in a way, the impeachment trap that we talked about on the program yesterday seems to be an effort to really create a yellow brick road for more war and more funding of it, and actually all of it, when what we need is peace.

00:19:28.000 A point made quite well by our good friend from Kentucky, Senator Rand Paul.

00:19:33.000 Take a listen.

00:19:37.000 So I, for one, think that the American people are opposed to this bill.

00:19:41.000 I think they're opposed to the concept of Ukraine first and America last.

00:19:46.000 And I predict that this issue doesn't go away.

00:19:50.000 I predict that the House of Representatives is not going to take up this bill.

00:19:54.000 I predict that the vast majority of the Republicans in the House of Representatives are more conservative than the Republicans in this body.

00:20:02.000 And I predict that this fight is not over.

00:20:05.000 During this debate and the fact that we were able to delay and talk about this for five days, five and a half days, the Speaker of the House spoke out.

00:20:16.000 And I don't know that he would have been prompted to speak out, although he has spoken out previously against this.

00:20:21.000 But the Speaker of the House spoke out today and said he's not taking this bill up.

00:20:25.000 See, they've put together Border reform that actually would transform things.

00:20:31.000 Border reform that acknowledges that it's an emergency.

00:20:33.000 So I will be a no and continue to be a no on this bill because I think it puts Ukraine first and America last. 0.99

00:20:40.000 And with that, Madam President, I yield my time.

00:20:46.000 Senator Paul did a terrific job.

00:20:48.000 We also saw harrowing work by Senator Mike Lee of Utah.

00:20:52.000 And at the end of the day, the Senate did advance this legislation.

00:20:55.000 And the work we're doing right now is to ensure that Speaker Johnson continues to block the consideration of this disparate, omnibus, unpaid-for bad bill.

00:21:07.000 So good work on the Speaker.

00:21:09.000 Good work, Senator Paul and our Senate allies.

00:21:11.000 And you Senate Republicans like Mark Wayne Mullen trying to get a discharge petition or Senator Tillis trying to get another blank check for a corrupt country, it's disappointing and it's not something that your constituents would ever approve.

00:21:24.000 So there's a certain hubris to all of it.

00:21:26.000 We want to make sure we do focus on America's border in this program and I want to bring you up to date on legislation that I'm filing.

00:21:33.000 This exclusive comes from Henry Rogers at The Daily Caller.

00:21:36.000 Matt Gaetz introduces bill to protect states' right to defend the southern border.

00:21:40.000 Now, this speaks directly to the litigation that's ongoing between Texas and the federal government.

00:21:46.000 Texas has put up barricades.

00:21:48.000 I observed those barricades.

00:21:49.000 They were effective.

00:21:50.000 They were a deterrent.

00:21:51.000 People were moving around them to other places like Lukeville, Arizona, and to California because Texas actually started standing for its own sovereignty.

00:21:59.000 but then the Biden administration's Department of Justice tried to do everything possible to litigate against Texas to get injunctions against barricading their own border from the invasion that is coming over as high as 10,000 people a day.

00:22:14.000 So Senator Vance came up with this idea originally.

00:22:16.000 He filed it in the Senate to create within federal law a permission structure for exactly what Texas is doing.

00:22:22.000 We would hope other border states would then follow suit under that permission structure.

00:22:26.000 Vance has got it in the Senate.

00:22:28.000 I've got it in the House of Representatives, and I'm excited to work with Senator Vance on that important priority.

00:22:34.000 And really, we shouldn't be voting for government funding bills without it.

00:22:38.000 We shouldn't be voting for government funding bills without appropriate demands on the border.

00:22:42.000 And this is one way we could work together to create that sovereignty for our country and we could actually leverage the power and capability of our states that are indeed willing to help.

00:22:54.000 One power that's been abused, we've talked about it a lot, is the spying power of the federal government.

00:23:00.000 And where we've seen the most egregious abuses are in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

00:23:05.000 Now, there's a reauthorization for that coming up.

00:23:08.000 We had punted it previously.

00:23:10.000 My conservative colleagues and I are actually working with some very liberal Democrats to try to get a warrant requirement, to try to get more oversight, and to not let the deep state just continue to target Americans in the absence of the constitutional protections that we all hold so dear.

00:23:26.000 Bob Good, Chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, held a press conference on our intentions and our demands.

00:23:31.000 I spoke at that press conference moments ago.

00:23:33.000 Take a listen.

00:23:36.000 I can't imagine that when a prior Congress passed the Patriot Act that they expected that its provisions would be used against patriots or even BLM rioters for that matter.

00:23:47.000 That's what's so interesting about this issue.

00:23:50.000 We've seen these authorities abused against the right, the left, the middle, the rural, the urban, certainly people all over this country.

00:23:58.000 And don't take my word for it.

00:24:00.000 When the Inspector General for the Department of Justice, appointed by President Obama, did an analysis of the utilization of these FISA authorities, they found that our intelligence community had violated the law and the regulations 278,000 times.

00:24:19.000 They were breaking the law 38 times an hour for the period that was being reviewed.

00:24:24.000 I don't think it makes us unreasonable to suggest that if there's a law being violated 38 times every hour, that it should not just be expanded without some sort of curtailment or enforcement when those violations do occur.

00:24:38.000 And that's why we want a warrant, because it creates a process by which our constitutional norms can apply to something that has broken bad.

00:24:46.000 And it is helpful that we have a real U-shaped coalition here, where it's folks on the populist right aligned with those on the populist left, and we are fighting against the establishment of both parties who seem all too willing to do whatever the national security state wants of them.

00:25:05.000 So our plea to Speaker Johnson is not to just continue to punt on FISA. That's what we did previously, and it's unacceptable.

00:25:13.000 It's no fun watching a team whose best play is the punt.

00:25:16.000 That's what we did previously, and we shouldn't do that again.

00:25:19.000 And if we're going to make changes to FISA, rather than expanding the authorities, as Chairman Turner and some on the Intelligence Committee want to do, so that they can be weaponized against anybody with just access to Wi-Fi at a Starbucks or a McDonald's, they should be curtailed.

00:25:38.000 And if they are not curtailed, if there is not a willingness in the Senate to curtail these authorities, then we should allow them to expire.

00:25:45.000 Yeah.

00:25:46.000 As is contemplated originally in the Patriot Act.

00:25:51.000 We will still fight for those constitutional Fourth Amendment principles, but the fight is on and our adversaries are doing everything they can to maintain that power among a select group of people in Washington, D.C. to be able to do an end run around the Constitution.

00:26:06.000 The Fourth Amendment shouldn't be up for negotiation and it shouldn't be for sale.

00:26:10.000 Thank you so much for joining me today on Firebrand.

00:26:13.000 Make sure that you give us a five-star rating, especially if you're listening to the program on Apple.

00:26:17.000 And we would love it if you shared the show with someone who needs to know more about what's going on in Washington.

00:26:22.000 We appreciate your participation and your feedback.

00:26:25.000 Roll the credits.

Firebrand - Matt Gaetz - February 13, 2024

Episode 151 LIVE: Dead Bill Walking – Firebrand with Matt Gaetz

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript