Firebrand - Matt Gaetz - Episode 47 LIVE: Recordings From Hell – Firebrand with Matt Gaetz

On today's show, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Florida) is joined by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R) and Rep. Jared Polis (D-Ohio) to discuss the latest in the ongoing saga of Rep. Kevin McCarthy's ouster as Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the fallout from it. They also discuss the ongoing investigation into whether or not the White House will ever get a full transcript of the tape, and why it's important to have a full investigation into the matter. They also talk about the impact the scandal is having on the country, and what it could mean for the future of the Republican Party and the country as a whole. And, of course, there's a special guest appearance from Michael Sussman, former partner at the Perkins Cooey Law Firm and current partner at PerkinsCooey, a law firm that represents some of the most powerful people in the Democratic Party, including Hillary Clinton's former campaign finance lawyer. Also, a special thank you to our listeners for all the support we ve gotten so far this year, and we hope you continue to do so in 2020 and beyond. Make sure to subscribe to our new podcast, however you're listening, and remember to leave us your thoughts and opinions in the comments section below. We'll continue to update you on all things politics and politics in general. Thank you for all of the support you've shown us throughout the past week, and stay tuned for more episodes in the coming weeks and months. - Your continued support is greatly appreciated. Thank you, and your support is so appreciated! -Your continued support will be greatly appreciated, and so we can keep on keeping us up to date with all of our efforts to keep us in the fight for our movement. . -Cameron McCarthy and his team! -R.J.C. & his team -PSA to the movement! -JOSH W. M. MCCARTNER - R.A. MCDERMAYOR - JOSH MILLER, R.S. (R. S. BONUS EPISODES, JOSH WALLER, D. CASTILLO, JAMES KELLY, JOSEPH WELCOME, M. SUSSMAN, R-GAETTE, J. J. AND KEVIN M. LYNNE, KAVANAUM, MARYLEAU, JORDAN WALLACE, AND MORE!

00:00:00.000 Thank you.

00:04:58.000 Matt Gaetz was one of the very few members in the entire Congress who bothered to stand up against permanent Washington on behalf of his constituents.

00:05:06.000 Matt Gaetz right now, he's a problem in the Democratic Party.

00:05:08.000 He can cause a lot of hiccups in passing applause.

00:05:12.000 So we're going to keep running those stories to keep hurting him.

00:05:15.000 If you stand for the flag and kneel in prayer, if you want to build America up and not burn her to the ground, then welcome, my fellow patriots!

00:05:24.000 You are in the right place!

00:05:26.000 This is the movement for you!

00:05:28.000 You ever watch this guy on television?

00:05:30.000 Like a machine, Matt Gaetz.

00:05:33.000 I'm a canceled man in some corners of the internet.

00:05:36.000 Many days I'm a marked man in Congress, a wanted man by the deep state.

00:05:40.000 They aren't really coming for me.

00:05:42.000 They're coming for you.

00:05:44.000 I'm just in the way.

00:05:46.000 You know what?

00:05:51.000 McCarthy, though.

00:05:52.000 He spoke at the rally last night in Casper.

00:05:57.000 And he got booze.

00:05:59.000 And he got booze.

00:06:00.000 Hello, Wyoming. 0.89

00:06:01.000 I'm Cameron McCarthy, and I'm the Republican leader of the United States House of Representatives.

00:06:06.000 I'm from Bakersfield, California, and many of the challenges we're addressing in our Central Valley are similar to the most important issues facing you in Wyoming.

00:06:15.000 Because people in that audience heard the audio tapes that we have from our book, which does capture the Kevin McCarthy, who is actually the real Kevin McCarthy.

00:06:23.000 I just got something to say now about a newsman from Matt Gaetz where he's calling people's names out saying they're anti-Trump in this type of atmosphere.

00:06:35.000 And some of the other places.

00:06:37.000 This is serious stuff people are doing that has to stop.

00:06:40.000 So I'm calling Gates.

00:06:42.000 I'm explaining to him.

00:06:43.000 I don't know how to ever say, but I'm going to have some other people call him too.

00:06:46.000 But the nature of what, if I'm getting briefing, I'm going to get another one from the FBI tomorrow. 0.97

00:06:52.000 This is serious shit to cut this out. 0.97

00:06:57.000 Yeah, that's potentially illegal, what he's doing. 0.99

00:07:03.000 Well, he's putting people in jeopardy, and he doesn't need to be And that was the leader of the Republicans in the House of Representatives getting booed in Wyoming.

00:07:25.000 I'll note that when my video played in Wyoming, I think it was a markedly different reaction.

00:07:30.000 But what does it mean when the leader of our movement is in fact unable to stand before some of our most enthusiastic and inspired activists without getting a strong reception?

00:07:44.000 What does it mean when some of the only audiences that would give Kevin McCarthy a standing ovation would be audiences in Washington, D.C., with lobbyists, with political action committees?

00:07:58.000 You know, when the days after January 6th started to unfold, at a Trump

00:08:28.000 rally if you hadn't heard those tapes probably, and yet he received that very strong, very negative reaction.

00:08:37.000 We are going to cover specifically what that means for the House Republican Conference moving forward.

00:08:43.000 Is it tenable to have a Speaker of the House for the Republicans or even a leader of the Republican caucus So, unwelcome in some of the audiences that are curated by the true leader of our party, Donald Trump.

00:08:59.000 Will Kevin McCarthy continue to get standing ovations from Republicans in Congress when he receives a very different reception throughout the country?

00:09:09.000 The American people are a lot smarter than politicians give them credit for.

00:09:14.000 Those who are paying attention, showing up at Trump rallies, seeing who's in the fight, Those are the folks who are going to carry us to ultimate success for our legislative agenda because you have to have the inspiration of the American people ignited and enthusiastic.

00:09:32.000 You have to have engagement.

00:09:33.000 You have to have passion behind our agenda for it to be successful.

00:09:40.000 Make sure you are subscribed to our podcast however you're listening and And thank you for everyone in the comments section.

00:10:01.000 I love that we got folks from, gosh, North Carolina, Indiana, Georgia, Kuala Lumpur.

00:10:07.000 Welcome from Kuala Lumpur.

00:10:09.000 And, of course, plenty of folks from my beloved state of Florida.

00:10:13.000 We'll continue to watch these leadership developments, and there's no question that our movement needs leadership, but it needs leadership that can inspire and that can activate and that can motivate people in a positive way.

00:10:26.000 Other big news that we got, Michael Sussman, a former partner at the Perkins Cooey Law Firm, which is, of course, the favorite law firm of the Democratic Party.

00:10:36.000 Their clients include Michael Sussman, who was a partner there, was just found not guilty of concealing his employment with the Clinton campaign when he lied to the FBI. And that verdict was rendered by...

00:10:59.000 A jury of his peers or maybe I should say fellow travelers.

00:11:03.000 I mean, folks, I'd like to say the House always wins, but this trial wasn't even a gamble.

00:11:11.000 The jury that acquitted Sussman included multiple Hillary Clinton donors, an AOC donor, a juror whose husband worked for the Clinton campaign, a juror who believed that the legal system is racist and police departments should be defunded, And a person whose daughter was on the same rowing team with Michael Sussman.

00:11:38.000 Again, jury of his peers would be the least of it, I would suggest.

00:11:43.000 Now, in the prosecution's defense, they did object to some of these jurors.

00:11:46.000 One Clinton donor suggested that he could strive for impartiality the best he can.

00:11:51.000 The prosecution objected to this juror, but the judge, Christopher Cooper, Who's an Obama appointee overruled them.

00:11:59.000 It's also noteworthy that Judge Cooper is married to the lawyer for Lisa Page.

00:12:04.000 Remember the FBI lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page who were so biased, so against Trump, That's right, Lisa Page's lawyer married to the judge in the Sussman case.

00:12:15.000 I mean, it's almost like this stuff is predetermined before it even happens.

00:12:20.000 Now, another juror and donor of the far-left AOC was told by the Sussman defense lawyer that neither Clinton nor Trump were on trial and then asked if she could be impartial as a consequence.

00:12:30.000 She responded, quote, Yes, knowing that.

00:12:35.000 So this response suggests that she would not have been impartial if the campaigns were part of the trial.

00:12:41.000 Hmm.

00:12:43.000 Lucky her. 0.95

00:12:44.000 As George Washington law professor and constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley points out in a recent essay, the treatment of Michael Sussman is a far cry from the treatment of Roger Stone, who, despite whatever you think about him, faced serious juror bias.

00:12:58.000 And look what happened to General Flynn, whose judge accused him of treason before any finding of fact.

00:13:04.000 And even when the Department of Justice wanted to abandon the prosecution of Flynn, the judge was so biased he didn't even want to let that happen.

00:13:13.000 It's crazy this is happening in the United States of America, but it shows what I've been saying for quite some time.

00:13:19.000 There are two justice systems in this country, one for the left and one for us.

00:13:25.000 Think about the pain that's been inflicted on a lot of the January 6th detainees for the sake of politics.

00:13:31.000 So what does it mean?

00:13:32.000 For starters, it means that every card-carrying liberal and media anchor in the country will arrogantly proclaim That Sussman's acquittal exonerates not only him, but the Clinton campaign, Perkins Coie, the FBI, the DOJ, the Mueller team.

00:13:51.000 Sussman won his case.

00:13:53.000 So now they'll say there was no collusion and the FBI was doing its job.

00:13:59.000 Shoot, if Sussman had lost, if he'd have lost this case, then they would have just said he was a rogue actor who lied to the FBI. So really, either way, This trial went, the ultimate result wasn't going to be, I think, what the American people really deserve to get to the root, the core root of the Russia hoax, which, of course, had its origins in the Obama White House.

00:14:23.000 But that was all shielded off.

00:14:25.000 That was all protected.

00:14:26.000 Now, two weeks ago, I predicted the outcome we got in a discussion with Darren Beattie.

00:14:32.000 Take a listen.

00:14:35.000 I do not believe that the Durham trial of Michael Sussman is about convicting Michael Sussman at all.

00:14:43.000 I think the entire purpose of this trial is to inoculate the FBI and the DOJ against the charge that they were in on it.

00:14:54.000 If you believe Durham and his presentation, the argument goes that the FBI was lied to.

00:15:01.000 The FBI were the victims.

00:15:02.000 You had these evil Democrats and their lawyers scheming and obfuscating and trying to get this political dirt in, but oh my goodness, the FBI was just a victim of this. 0.57

00:15:14.000 And the reality is, the FBI was part of the supply chain of bullshit that ran from Russians and the DNC through the Perkins Law Firm and to the FBI DOJ and then out through their distribution system in the mainstream media they don't want a conviction of Michael Sussman they want an exoneration of the FBI and whether Sussman is convicted or not that's probably what they're gonna get in the game you're watching is not the game being played a lot 0.80

00:15:49.000 of havoc on our country It was a crime against the presidency itself, against the American people. 0.87

00:15:55.000 Certainly President Trump bore the brunt of a lot of that corruption.

00:16:00.000 And in these recent developments we see what we suspected all along.

00:16:05.000 Now John Durham says he respects the verdict and thanks the jury for their service.

00:16:10.000 This was the statement from John Durham While we're disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury's decision.

00:16:20.000 Thank them for their service.

00:16:21.000 I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case.

00:16:31.000 It's basically everything other than Durham saying, tip your waitresses on the way out.

00:16:34.000 And it's this type of attitude that shows why we lose this. 0.66

00:16:40.000 We can't roll over when we get screwed over.

00:16:43.000 And maybe one day we'll have justice.

00:16:45.000 But until then, we are going to keep fighting.

00:16:48.000 Because at this point, if you want accountability, Increasingly, we're not seeing it from these trials.

00:16:56.000 Now, just because Durham appears to be giving up based on that statement doesn't mean we will.

00:17:02.000 I make you this commitment.

00:17:03.000 When Republicans retake the majority, Jim Jordan and I will use the Judiciary Committee.

00:17:10.000 We will use the subcommittees of the Judiciary Committee To continue to expose the rotten corruption that still exists today that at one point manifested in the Russia hoax.

00:17:22.000 We cannot let this go because if we do, it absolutely will happen again.

00:17:28.000 We also want to talk about a few issues regarding our military.

00:17:31.000 We have a ton of active duty military who watch our reports.

00:17:35.000 I am so grateful whenever I'm out in Northwest Florida and our active duty military say, hey, we love firebrands, so know that we make the show in large part for all of you because we're inspired for what you do for the country.

00:17:46.000 And the military should not become this homogenized, monolithic tool of the political left in our country.

00:17:54.000 And increasingly, we are seeing purges that harm our military Next week there will be key votes in the House Armed Services Committee to abolish the military vax mandate and restore the rank and pay of those who have been forced out.

00:18:12.000 I will force these votes through amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act.

00:18:16.000 So this would be a great time to look at who's on the Armed Services Committee And to contact them if you're an active duty service member.

00:18:23.000 Let them know that these mandates are hurting our readiness and they are purging our patriots.

00:18:29.000 But the legislative process is painfully slow.

00:18:32.000 It's especially slow to advance liberty in a House of Representatives run by Nancy Pelosi. 0.98

00:18:38.000 I think you get that.

00:18:39.000 So my amendments may all fail.

00:18:41.000 They did last year.

00:18:43.000 Even Republicans opposed my anti-vax amendments last year.

00:18:47.000 So we need solutions for our troops that have a more immediate impact.

00:18:51.000 And that's where the legal process, where federal judges can issue binding injunctions, comes into play.

00:18:58.000 It becomes necessary.

00:18:59.000 That's why we have Article III courts.

00:19:02.000 Currently, I'm tracking lawsuits across the nation fighting for the rights of the unvaccinated to keep their jobs. 0.95

00:19:09.000 Most recently, I'm excited to hear that the Liberty Council has joined this cadre of brave, principled lawyers who are engaging in the battle over our natural liberties.

00:19:20.000 The Epoch Times has a great piece on this, entitled, U.S. Military Intentionally Purging People of Faith.

00:19:28.000 Now, traces of this crackdown can be looked back to all the way to like February of 2021, when Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin directed military leaders to address extremism within our military.

00:19:41.000 It sounds to me like this was the precursor of things to come, including purging members of the military for dangerous rhetoric or for activity that they don't like, but that isn't necessarily criminal, or even now, Having a religious belief that would normally justify an exemption from a vaccine.

00:20:02.000 You see, these things are connected.

00:20:04.000 The wokeism manifests in the vaccine mandates, manifests in the extremism snipe hunts, and it is scary to see our patriots punished by totalitarian decree like this from Lloyd Austin.

00:20:19.000 The mandated compliance to Big Pharma is not something that should append to someone's service to our country in uniform.

00:20:28.000 So this Epoch Times piece, it chronicles the significant lifestyle disruption, harassment, coercion endured by the brave women and men who have made the decision to stay steadfast in their belief that they should not have to take this vaccine.

00:20:45.000 A one-star brigadier general with more than 20 years' experience faces a loss of benefits, any dishonorable discharge, big league cancel culture, in military terms, if she does not get the jab.

00:20:59.000 Military members who are deployed abroad are locked down.

00:21:02.000 Some in the country are not eligible for deployment.

00:21:05.000 Imagine that.

00:21:06.000 Having the U.S. taxpayer train you up, get you ready to be in the fight, and then because of your choice on vaccines, you're somehow not eligible to be deployed.

00:21:16.000 It does not make America stronger.

00:21:18.000 That makes America weaker.

00:21:19.000 It hurts our readiness.

00:21:21.000 And there's even a circumstance where if you are deployed, you're not able to return home to see your family without getting the jab.

00:21:28.000 It's heartbreaking to see these like grown service members unable to visit their newborn children, aging or sick family members.

00:21:37.000 All for what?

00:21:38.000 This isn't creating a better military.

00:21:40.000 It's creating a weaker one.

00:21:42.000 Maybe that's the point all along.

00:21:44.000 So Matt Staver, who is an attorney and chairman of the Liberty Council, Had a great quote in this Epoch Times piece.

00:21:52.000 Quote, Close quote.

00:22:09.000 Worse yet, Biden and the Democrats want to continue to use woke-ifying our military as they deliberately walk them into another foreign war of drastic proportions with serious consequences.

00:22:22.000 You know, you saw Obama try to destroy our military by defunding it, by subjecting it to sequestration.

00:22:30.000 And you almost think what Biden's doing to it is far worse because it's fundamentally trying to transform the military into this monolithic tool of the left.

00:22:39.000 Another great piece in National File website you should definitely go to.

00:22:43.000 You should definitely check out frequently.

00:22:44.000 They've got a lot of great breaking news and investigative reporting.

00:22:49.000 And in the National File, we learn of news surrounding the effects of Biden's mismanagement of our military.

00:22:56.000 Now, at Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany, they have just decided to cancel Drag Queen Storytime, which was scheduled to occur today.

00:23:05.000 I am not kidding about this.

00:23:06.000 Drag Queen Storytime at a foreign military base.

00:23:10.000 I think Ramstein, by personnel, is the largest Air Force Base in the world.

00:23:13.000 The largest Air Force Base in the world by geography, of course, Northwest Floridians know, Is Eglin Air Force Base.

00:23:18.000 But in terms of personnel, Ramstein is massive.

00:23:21.000 So if you were looking forward to the Ramstein drag queen storytime, you will be disappointed, but it was able to be exposed.

00:23:29.000 So that's right.

00:23:30.000 They were going to do this in a military-based library.

00:23:33.000 They're planning on hosting this event for young children of service members on your dime, on the taxpayers' dime, to articulate issues that I would suggest belong in the American household between parents and their children.

00:23:47.000 Look, I don't hate anybody.

00:23:48.000 I don't hate the gay, the trans, whatever.

00:23:51.000 I can't keep up with how many letters there are now, but I am a person who does not use someone's identity as a basis to hate them.

00:24:02.000 I don't think that you should hate people based on immutable traits.

00:24:06.000 But shouldn't we agree that these issues are better discussed among family with church groups rather than having like the drag queen experience curated by the United States military?

00:24:19.000 Last I checked there was a war going on in Europe and at Ramstein Air Force Base we're doing drag queen shows for kids.

00:24:25.000 So before the plug was pulled on this ludicrous idea, there was a Facebook advertisement for it that read, quote, So,

00:24:42.000 in less than a generation, the military went from not allowing long hair To having drag queen stories for children funded by taxpayers.

00:24:59.000 It is quite the evolution.

00:25:01.000 You don't have to go back to the great ones, but you look at George Washington, Dwight Eisenhower, General Patton, General MacArthur.

00:25:08.000 They didn't train men at bases that would tolerate this.

00:25:12.000 They were too busy preparing their troops to save America, not destroy it.

00:25:17.000 They were winning wars against strong empires.

00:25:21.000 Not losing wars to goat herders. 1.00

00:25:24.000 I respect and am thankful to all of the men and women serving at Ramstein Air Force Base and all military bases anywhere in the world for that matter.

00:25:33.000 But Joe Biden needs to wake up.

00:25:36.000 A true American president would not tolerate this nonsense.

00:25:40.000 Joe Biden is asleep at the wheel.

00:25:43.000 And the people driving the action are fundamentally like men in dresses over at the Pentagon.

00:25:52.000 But it's not just in our military where this wokeism seems to be a little bizarre and in our face in kind of the strangest of ways.

00:26:00.000 It's striking again this time in the UK where a woman's statue has been unveiled in Summertown, Oxford.

00:26:09.000 But this is no ordinary statue.

00:26:10.000 This is no ordinary woman. 0.77

00:26:12.000 This is supposed to be the, quote, woman of our times statue.

00:26:18.000 And it has...

00:26:20.000 An obvious male appendage. 0.99

00:26:23.000 Are we living in a world where now to celebrate women we have to have male genitalia in the picture? 0.98

00:26:27.000 You would think that would offend some feminists. 1.00

00:26:30.000 Even some transformative so-called radical feminists. 0.87

00:26:34.000 The woman is just a totally specific thing from a biology standpoint and this seems to blur those lines bizarrely and I would suggest probably intentionally. 0.91

00:26:48.000 It's another example of liberals trying to shove their wokeism and ideology onto society. 0.63

00:26:54.000 And it's bad enough that they want biological males to use female restrooms and play in women's sports. 0.99

00:26:59.000 We heard at a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee that they think men can get abortions and now women's statues have to have male genitalia.

00:27:06.000 How long until we're walking with our families and our kids in front of these very statues in the United States?

00:27:14.000 Probably not too long.

00:27:16.000 Heck, we might even see one right in front of the Capitol building.

00:27:19.000 Each state sends two statues to the Congress to represent some of the best contributions of the citizens of that state.

00:27:27.000 One of them, of course, from Florida is Dr. Gorey, who invented the air conditioning.

00:27:32.000 I mean, in Florida, air conditioning is probably a big deal.

00:27:35.000 But, like, how long until we would see a statue like this submitted by some woke state where, like, celebrate women with male genitalia? 0.90

00:27:42.000 So weird. 0.95

00:27:43.000 So bizarre.

00:27:44.000 But, you know, we see these things abroad and sometimes they tend to come home.

00:27:48.000 Earlier this morning, we actually got some commentary on the activities of Congress from former House Speaker Paul Ryan.

00:27:54.000 Let's take a listen.

00:27:58.000 What I think has changed is in the old days, like 10 years ago, if you wanted to do really well in Congress, if you wanted to succeed, you climbed a meritocracy.

00:28:06.000 The measurement of success was policy and persuasion.

00:28:09.000 Could you persuade your colleagues, your country, your constituents, this is the right way to go?

00:28:13.000 Here's a solution.

00:28:14.000 That's not necessarily what motivates people anymore.

00:28:17.000 There's a lot of entertainers in Congress on both parties.

00:28:19.000 So we have an entertainment wing of the Republican and Democratic Party.

00:28:22.000 And so the old meritocracy that takes 10, 20 years to climb of being a good policymaker, you can just leapfrog that whole process, be a really good entertainer, have an incredible presence digital, and forget about policymaking and curate a brand for yourself.

00:28:38.000 And so you have entertainers in Congress now.

00:28:43.000 So Paul Ryan tries to juxtapose legislation and entertainment.

00:28:48.000 And I think the viewers right now who are tuning in realize this is not entertainment.

00:28:53.000 I'm giving you information you need to know that oftentimes is filtered through big tech, through big media, even big government entities that try to control your access to information.

00:29:04.000 But in this world where you're either an entertainer or a legislator, Paul Ryan was kind of neither.

00:29:11.000 Paul Ryan did not have the ability to ignite and inspire people as a national candidate.

00:29:18.000 He and Mitt Romney lost.

00:29:19.000 I would suggest in large part because they were kind of like milquetoast Republicans trying to explain to people that the zombie of Ronald Reagan was somehow going to emerge and save them through a series of very old Republican, Inc.

00:29:33.000 talking points, largely drafted up by lobbyists and special interests.

00:29:37.000 So Paul Ryan wasn't entertaining.

00:29:39.000 And when you look at the legislative side, the principal promise that we made our voters over and over again when Paul Ryan was in the House before he became Speaker was that we would repeal Obamacare.

00:29:53.000 And in the weeks leading up to Paul Ryan releasing his Obamacare repeal bill when we got in the majority, He took like so many, I think it was more than like $14 million from the PACs and the HMOs and the lobbyists who wanted to not repeal Obamacare but who wanted to reposition it for their benefit.

00:30:16.000 In the past, Paul Ryan has called me an entertainer, not a legislator.

00:30:20.000 Well, Paul Ryan was little more than a vessel for the special interests to operate through.

00:30:25.000 And there was nothing sincere about that, nothing entertaining, and certainly not nearly enough that was productive for the American people.

00:30:31.000 If Paul Ryan wanted to legislate, if he was this great legislator, why the hell didn't we secure the border when we had the House, the Senate, and the President?

00:30:40.000 How come we didn't do asylum reform?

00:30:42.000 How come we didn't deport more people that weren't here legally with authorities in the law that would have permitted that?

00:30:49.000 No, Paul Ryan was just not a fighter.

00:30:51.000 That's his problem.

00:30:53.000 And he was only willing to go to battle for the people that were funding campaigns, not the people who were actually out there winning them, not the activists, not the very people who were just booing Kevin McCarthy and Casper, Wyoming.

00:31:07.000 Thanks so much for joining us on Firebrand this week.

00:31:10.000 We hope you stay connected.

00:31:11.000 We hope you stay informed and engaged.

00:31:13.000 And you know what?

00:31:14.000 If you're entertained a little bit along the way, we won't begrudge you that either.

00:31:19.000 Roll the credits.

Firebrand - Matt Gaetz - June 02, 2022

Episode 47 LIVE: Recordings From Hell – Firebrand with Matt Gaetz

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript