January 6th has been used by the most powerful forces in America to smear and target a political movement that threatens them. They cancel us online, they persecute us in the flesh, and then we roll up our sleeves and develop the evidence. Just like the Russia hoax, then some story in a mainstream outlet confirms the contours of what we were saying all along. They are so worried about the power of America first, they are using January 6th to destroy and divide and extinguish us. They may be more culpable than they originally let on. Thanks for joining this week's show. Make sure to give us that five star rating! Let us know what you d be interested in for upcoming episodes today. You can read more about how this is being used by political forces against the silent majority on this week s episode of Conspiracy Theories, wherever you get your news. If you stand for the flag and kneel in prayer, if you want to build America up and not burn her to the ground, then welcome, my fellow patriots, you are in the right place. The failed war on terror is now coming home. Let s see how they use this failed-arm tactic in their hunt in the United States. And let s see them use this as a failed weapon on terror in their fight against freedom and freedom in the fight against tyranny and liberty. Subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Today on your favorite streaming service. It s going to help you see the future, not only against tyranny, but against freedom, not freedom, and not against freedom. Thanks for listening, you re gonna get a lot more of that, right here on the chance to be a chance to win it, no matter where they say it, right in the rest of it, and a whole lot of it. -- THE PODCAST -- FREE MODE TO SUBSCRIBE TO CHECK OUT THE LINKS TO REVIEW THIS EPISODE AND A LINK TO A LINKS AND A PATREON AND A PAPABOT AND A FRIENDS PRODUCER IN A PEDCAST AND A SUPPORTED LINKS THAT MAPPED IN THE PAPER AND A THIRD PLACE AND A FEDCAST THAT PAPAR AND A PLACE IN A GOT A PIE PIE AND A BED AND A PRIEMENT AND A CHIP AND A MONTH OF PIE CHIEFER AND A CRY AND A GIP AND AN APPEARANCE AND A TOTTER AND A SUPPORTER IN A CITY AND A VOTETION AND A LOT OF SOCIAL PRIE CORPRONE AND A SING OUT A PLASTORY AND A VIDEO AND A DEDCAST IN A PLOT AND AN AMOUNT OF A PLOTE AND A FACE AND A HEAD AND A SOCIETY AND AN ENTYTHING LIKE THAT AND A MEETING THAT CHEOTHE RAP AND A CHRISTIE AND ANOTHER THIEVOR AND A RELATIONSHIP AND A SCOTHE CHEARING THAT S NOT QOTION AND AN EGYOTIA AND A COURTEY OF A THIEPRISE AND A RIDE AND A FEEDING A BECAUSE A CHEER AND THOTHE HEAR THE S NOT A THOT TO A FOTOGROUP AND A JOTHE AND A MEDE AND A HEAR A FOTEH AND A VIOTION THAT FALLY AN EMBODY AND A KED AND AN OCAST AND AN ATL AND A Q AND A AND A SOMEDEA AND A FINALLY A LOW AND A BETTER THIRD THING AND A LOT OF THOTTER THEAISE AND AN FOT HER AND A THROW A FALLY AND A BLOT AND FALLY THOT OUT A SOME OF A ME AND A FOR A THEE AND A NA CHOT OUT AND A CEDOR AND AN THOT HEY AND FOT HE AND A TREEEE AND A MA THOT HER ... AND A YELL AND A THEM AND A TO A BOT AND LOT AND AND A NOT THAT AND AN A BODY AND AN ORALLY A THEDONE AND AN LOT TO FALLY A SOT AND FINALLY AN ME AND AN AND A BUTCH AND A FROT AND BALLYALLY A FID AND A THANKED THOTER AND AN ALL OF THEA AND AN ALOT OF ALL OF THAT AND THEA TO A S NOT THOT THAT TO THAT AND SALLY AND AN...... AND A MOVIE AND FAL AND A DELE AND A.........
00:00:03.000Matt Gaetz was one of the very few members in the entire Congress who bothered to stand up against permanent Washington on behalf of his constituents.
00:00:10.000Matt Gaetz right now, he's a problem in the Democratic Party.
00:00:13.000And he can cause a lot of hiccups in passing the laws.
00:00:16.000So we're going to keep running those stories to keep hurting him.
00:00:20.000If you stand for the flag and kneel in prayer, if you want to build America up and not burn her to the ground, then welcome, my fellow patriots!
00:00:58.000Let us know topics you'd be interested in for upcoming episodes today.
00:01:03.000Whether it is the Wuhan virus starting at the Wuhan lab or the Russia hoax or even the topic of today's show, January 6th, there is a pattern that repeats itself.
00:01:14.000And recognizing it will help you see the future.
00:01:18.000First, I tell you something that sounds crazy.
00:01:21.000Like our own government was illegally spying on the Trump campaign, or U.S. taxpayers were funding a Chinese bioweapon, or that our own government was involved in the attack on the Capitol.
00:01:33.000Then, the mainstream media says, I'm nuts.
00:01:46.000Then some story in a mainstream outlet confirms the contours of what we were saying all along.
00:01:53.000January 6th has been used by the most powerful forces in America to smear and target a political movement that threatens them.
00:02:03.000Nancy Pelosi, the mainstream media, corporate America, and even the FBI are so worried about the power of America first, they are using January 6th to destroy and divide and extinguish us.
00:02:18.000They may be more culpable than they originally let on.
00:02:26.000You know, for most Americans, January 6, 2021 probably isn't one of the first hundred things you think about when you wake up in the morning.
00:02:34.000But Pelosi set up a special committee to obsess about it.
00:02:43.000Regular folks all over this great country were concerned about jobs, public safety, health care, meeting the month's needs in the world of shutdown mania, schooling, mandates, freedom.
00:02:58.000On all those issues, Democrats are failing spectacularly.
00:03:03.000And they have unified control of the government.
00:03:05.000According to recent data reported in the Washington Examiner, a majority now believe that Joe Biden It's kind of an idiot.
00:03:13.000So January 6th is now the political cudgel in America, used by the powerful against the silent majority.
00:03:21.000Bank of America, they'll turn over your financial records with no warrant, notice, or due process.
00:03:28.000Nancy Pelosi might even demand the phone records of your duly elective representative in the Congress.
00:03:35.000Start the fishing expedition and never end it.
00:03:39.000The FBI might even show up at your home like they did to Paul and Marilyn Hooper.
00:03:45.000Imagine waking up on a beautiful morning in Homer, Alaska.
00:03:49.000The sound of your door is that of armed men kicking it in.
00:04:12.000At least not before they handcuff you, interrogate you, three hours, all while calling you a liar and asking who you're working with.
00:04:21.000Yeah, chasing down boomers in Homer, Alaska, and accusing them of being part of a larger conspiracy to steal Nancy Pelosi's laptop tells you all you need to know about how wide this net is being cast.
00:04:37.000You can read more about the horrors in Homer on Revolver News.
00:04:42.000The FBI has been the enforcement wing of D.C.'s anti-Trump political forces for some time.
00:04:48.000Even before Trump was elected, they had the Russia hoax brewing.
00:04:52.000Now the Biden regime is using January 6th to label their political opponents domestic terrorists.
00:05:01.000Let's see them ridiculously use this strong-arm tactic and these terrorism tools in their hunt in the United States.
00:05:11.000The failed war on terror is now coming home, and it's turned inward.
00:05:16.000The institutions that we were told would keep us safe if we would only give up a little freedom have now been weaponized against the American people.
00:05:27.000We never imagined the Patriot Act being used to harass patriots.
00:05:32.000The FBI has a history and a doctrine of deploying assets to infiltrate political movements that scare them.
00:05:39.000When the FBI was right-wing under J. Edgar Hoover, they used their tools to infiltrate and surveil civil rights groups.
00:05:47.000Because the growing popularity of people like Martin Luther King Jr. frightened them.
00:05:52.000The politics at the FBI have obviously changed, and so have their targets.
00:05:58.000In June, I pieced together explosive reporting from Revolver News and other information I had.
00:06:04.000Today's guest, Tucker Carlson and I, were making the serious charge that federal law enforcement was involved on January 6th.
00:06:23.000Groups like the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Three Percenters were infiltrated to some degree by the FBI. That doesn't necessarily mean badged agents were parts of those groups, but it does mean that people were providing information from those groups to the FBI. And if the very people who provided that information were accelerating the violence,
00:06:44.000were riling people up who might have otherwise just shown up on the Capitol lawn to peacefully protest and have their voice heard, well then, I think the FBI is even more culpable In the violence and in the most troubling parts of 1-6.
00:06:59.000That's why I've sent a letter to Director Wray seeking a full accounting of the FBI assets, the FBI operatives and even potentially the FBI agents that might have known what was going on and even might have participated in some of the worst elements of January 6th.
00:07:14.000The FBI was participating in the insurrection.
00:07:18.000That they now claim is an ongoing national security threat.
00:07:22.000Maybe the FBI is the ongoing national security threat, actually.
00:07:25.000When Revolver News put out this explosive reporting, the mainstream media went into full meltdown.
00:07:31.000Fox's BS ringmaster, Tucker Carlson, this week, breathing air into this false flag conspiracy theory that originated from a right-wing website that has been flagged by social media for being BS. This is Alex Jones Infowars.
00:07:50.000And yet, Beattie and Revolver News were the sources cited last week by Tucker Carlson, the highest-rated primetime host on Fox News, when he decided to give Beattie a platform and amplify this bonkers conspiracy to millions of his Republican viewers.
00:08:07.000A site run by this guy, Darren Beattie, former Trump speechwriter, left his post in 2018 after attending a conference with white nationalists.
00:08:16.000But forget about what kind of dirtbag he's getting his information from.
00:08:20.000No less than the New York Times has now confirmed the reporting of Revolver News.
00:08:25.000That's right, the New York Times has fessed up to the most milquetoast version of the FBI's involvement that they could present.
00:08:32.000But we're going to get the full story today from Dr. Darren Beattie from Revolver.
00:09:13.000We know how to find the truth and expose it.
00:09:17.000The FBI's involvement was first reported by today's guest, Dr. Darren Beatty, publisher of Revolver News.
00:09:24.000Revolver News is a premier source for daily news analysis and hard-hitting investigative reporting.
00:09:30.000Full disclosure, Dr. Beatty has previously served as a senior advisor to me, and I regularly seek out his perspective on a variety of issues to this day.
00:09:41.000Joining us now, the publisher of Revolver News, Dr. Darren Beattie.
00:09:45.000And as you heard, Darren, after Revolver News broke the story that the FBI had involvement in January 6th, you faced a lot of criticism from the mainstream media, including what we just heard from Chris Cuomo.
00:09:58.000And now, no less than the New York Times is confirming The reporting of Revolver News.
00:10:04.000How should people think about the way this story, before we get into the substance of it, just the way the story evolved.
00:10:11.000You went and analyzed documents, legal pleadings, indictments.
00:10:16.000You pieced that together with other open source information.
00:10:20.000And you built this case when you broke it on Revolver News.
00:10:25.000It really sent the mainstream media into a meltdown.
00:10:31.000How should we think about the ecosystem of a news cycle like this?
00:10:35.000Well, actually, it's quite remarkable, and it really shows the power of proactive narrative formation.
00:10:44.000And so before we talk about what happened in the mainstream media, I think it's worth saying what the landscape was like on the conservative media in terms of the narratives that we used to describe 1.6.
00:11:09.000There's a lot of truth to the selfies narrative, and there's probably some truth to the Antifa narrative.
00:11:16.000But it was sort of scattered, and we didn't really know how to think about it.
00:11:20.000And what the Revolver News piece did was really refocus the conversation really on the one place that the regime does not want it focused on, and that is, wait a minute, we just had this Michigan kidnapping plot that everyone was talking about as an example of how evil these right-wing Trump supporters are and how they're so dangerous.
00:11:46.000We just need to repurpose the entire national security apparatus to suppress them politically.
00:11:53.000And how it turned out that at the time we reported it, we knew that five of the Michigan plotters were actually feds.
00:12:01.000Now the number is 12. 12 out of the 26 plotters in the Michigan case turned out to be feds.
00:12:08.000And for your listeners who may not be familiar with this case, in short, the Michigan kidnapping case is actually much more than this so-called plot to kidnap the governor of Michigan.
00:12:20.000It also involved a so-called plot to storm the Michigan state capitol, a plot that involved one of the three main militia groups imputed to 1-6, and a plot that was infiltrated by the feds, as I mentioned,
00:12:35.00012 out of the 26. And just as the cherry on top, the head of the Detroit FBI field office at the time who ran this infiltration operation was, after the arrest of these plotters, promoted by Christopher Wray to the DC field office to oversee aspects of the 1-6 investigation.
00:12:56.000And so given that context and given the fact that, as we pointed out, looking at the charging documents of the people variously who were indicted in relation to 1-6 crimes and seeing there are a lot of names and people referred to Who pop up in these charging documents,
00:13:15.000who by the description seem to have done just as much and in many cases more stuff than the people indicted, and who occupy more senior positions in these militia groups that the government claims to be interested in.
00:13:29.000And so what's a possible explanation for this manifest selective prosecution?
00:13:37.000Given the context of the Michigan case, one compelling explanation in at least some of these cases of selective prosecution is that these people are being protected as a result of a prior relationship with the feds.
00:14:00.000It's the one little narrative spot that they didn't want us to talk about, and that's why they freaked out.
00:14:07.000So what you're saying, Darren, is that you believe there are senior people in some of these groups that have been bantied around as potential organizational nodes for January 6th, where the actual people, not in the rank and file, but in the leadership, were working with the federal government.
00:14:29.000What's your best evidence that's the case?
00:14:32.000Well, I'll be very happy to get to that.
00:14:34.000I just want to preempt some of the actually extremely weak criticism.
00:14:38.000So the media descended on this original piece, which was amplified by you and Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson.
00:14:47.000And so, you know, that's great, you know, and I'm very grateful for you amplifying this story and it helped to really break the sound barrier.
00:14:55.000But once that happened, the media, all the fact checkers in the media, they said, Hey, wait a minute.
00:15:01.000I know you're eager to write your 10th piece about how we need to put on a fifth mask for COVID, but why don't we get the fact checkers here to address this revolver piece, and then you can finish the COVID piece later.
00:15:16.000So every journalist in the country, it seemed like, descended on this piece.
00:15:21.000And given that level of resources, I would expect at least some kind of effective critique.
00:15:28.000But the best thing that they can come up with Is they focused on this technical term, unindicted co-conspirators, and they said, well, technically, they're not unindicted co-conspirators, which actually turns out to be false.
00:15:39.000There is use of this specific term, unindicted co-conspirator, in one of the charging documents.
00:15:47.000The issue isn't whether they use the specific phrase, unindicted co-conspirators.
00:15:52.000The issue at question Is whether any of the individuals referenced in the charging documents who are not prosecuted are being protected from prosecution or unindicted on the basis of a prior relationship with the feds.
00:16:23.000Well, I mean, it's a case-by-case thing.
00:16:27.000If they're referenced in the charging documents and they do things that they could be indicted by, by virtue of looking at other people who did the same thing or less who were indicted, there's an element of selective prosecution.
00:16:40.000There are various explanations for selective prosecution, One of which is that the person is an undercover agent or an informant.
00:16:49.000We just laid out the general thesis in this first position saying, look, there's a whole bunch of people here.
00:16:55.000A lot of them look like they did a lot more than the people were actually charged.
00:16:59.000This is a case of selective prosecution.
00:17:02.000Given the context of the Michigan case, it's very likely, or at least we should explore the possibility, that some of these people are being protected as a result of a prior relationship with the feds.
00:17:13.000Then what we did is we said, okay, we did a deep dive on one particular person who I think is probably the best case for this, who happens to be the founder and the leader of the main boogeyman militia group That the media and the government has imputed to all of the scary insurrectionist type behavior on 1-6.
00:17:37.000And that's person one in the charging documents is Stuart Rhodes.
00:17:42.000And look, we can't say definitively one way or another what he is.
00:17:47.000What we can say is, here's the head of the main militia group that's been imputed to the insurrection activities of 1-6.
00:17:56.000He has not been charged Eight months later with anything when there's clearly indictable offenses.
00:18:04.000And when I say there's clearly indictable offenses, is that my subjective view?
00:18:09.000That's actually the view of the government itself.
00:18:11.000because the government, in charging one of his underlings, in arguments saying why his underling should not only be charged but should be denied bail, they use his statements and actions to constitute a conspiracy in which they say the guy that they use his statements and actions to constitute a conspiracy in which they say the So they're using the words and statements of the militia leader to charge the underling when the leader himself is not charged.
00:18:41.000Well, Darren, if what you're suggesting is true, then the Oath Keepers, as an organization, is essentially a counterintelligence federal operation.
00:18:54.000If the leader and founder of the organization is working with the federal government, And informing to the federal government, then is that organization a sincere organization built on whatever its founding documents are?
00:19:06.000Or is it a setup to try to map out people who might have views that are uncomfortable to the ruling elite?
00:19:17.000And I can't say definitively one way or another.
00:19:22.000My strong sense based on research into this is there are a lot of Sincere people who join the Oath Keepers who are just misguided and they don't understand.
00:19:34.000We know in the intelligence world a common feature is to go set up an organization not for the purpose of executing on that organization's stated goals, but as a way to recruit people and then map them.
00:19:49.000Is the Oath Keepers a recruit and map?
00:19:51.000It's a perfect thing if that were the case because the whole idea is Basically recruiting people with military and law enforcement experience who are essentially willing to break laws, in a sense.
00:20:07.000The actual messaging, there's a lot of the messaging that makes sense, but that's kind of what could make it dangerous as a counterintelligence operation.
00:20:16.000I think a lot of the people who join are sincere.
00:20:21.000But as for the founder and leader, I think there's a lot of questions And there's a lot of questions because the guy who was charged that I mentioned, who's being charged really on the basis of statements and actions by the founder and leader, this guy, first of all, he was reported in the media as being a leader of the Oath Keepers.
00:21:06.000You see the feds do that, where they take all the electronics, they kick down the door, they do the whole thing.
00:21:11.000And yet, which is even more curious, because again, this head of the Oath Keepers who hasn't been indicted, he hasn't even been properly searched.
00:21:19.000As far as we know, the full extent of what search he's had Was that the Feds took a single cell phone from him four months after January 6th.
00:21:31.000That simply doesn't make sense to me if he were the target of a serious investigation.
00:21:37.000In fact, he doesn't even need to be the target of an investigation for a search like that.
00:21:40.000They just need to think, oh, maybe he has stuff on other people that they're investigating.
00:21:44.000And they've searched people on that basis, too.
00:21:47.000And so, again, I can't say definitively one way or another, but one possible explanation of this Is they don't want his full communications records because those might contain correspondence with an FBI handler And that's precisely the type of correspondence that blew open the Michigan case.
00:22:08.000And it's the correspondence that has become the basis of this New York Times article about the Proud Boy informant texting with his handler.
00:22:17.000And why is that coming out now, Darren?
00:22:19.000You know, I mean, you have essentially reported this information, this tactic of infiltration that, frankly, the FBI and DOJ have used back to the days of J. Edgar Hoover.
00:22:30.000But now using against right-wing groups instead of using against left-wing groups.
00:22:35.000Sort of the target has changed, but the Mad Lib stayed the same.
00:22:40.000I think that we need to catch the signal here, not the noise, in the New York Times reporting.
00:23:18.000They're not doing this to vindicate Revolver news.
00:23:22.000They're doing this because the truth is a lot worse and they're trying to get ahead of the narrative and massage the narrative because it's a damage control piece.
00:23:30.000So that's why I have every expectation that we're going to learn about more and more and more informants.
00:23:35.000Given the timing, why are we going to learn that?
00:23:37.000Again, this gets back to why if someone's an informant, the feds aren't going to want to seize all of their electronics immediately.
00:23:45.000And that's because there's a legal obligation on the part of prosecution to present any exculpatory evidence to defendants, which could include information about informants and communications by informants to their FBI handlers.
00:23:58.000So I think that explains the timing of why the New York Times feels compelled.
00:24:03.000Probably the feds told them, look, this is going to come out, get ahead of this for us, which they did.
00:24:09.000But the mere acknowledgement of informants puts the regime and the regime media in a very difficult strategic dilemma, which I would like to explain.
00:24:20.000So in that seminal Revolver News piece in which we broke up in the whole story, we actually began the piece with a clip of Amy Klobuchar making an inquiry to FBI Director Wray.
00:24:35.000Now, she sort of asked the question about informants, but she formulates it in a very careful fashion.
00:24:43.000She doesn't say, did you have informants?
00:24:48.000She assumes and said, Don't you just kick yourself for not having had informants, because if you had informants in place, you would have known what was going to take place, and of course you would have stopped it.
00:25:02.000So don't you just kick yourself that you didn't have any informants and therefore no visibility in what was going to happen, and therefore it's an intelligence failure that explains why you're not able to stop this in advance.
00:25:16.000And he basically gives a non-answer because she did him the courtesy of not posing the question directly.
00:25:22.000Now, why did she do him that courtesy?
00:25:25.000Why did she assume that there are no informants?
00:25:27.000Well, the no informants thesis was very important to the official position that this was all the result of an intelligence failure.
00:25:37.000Because if they had the intelligence and they did nothing, then the obvious question is, why did they let it happen on purpose?
00:25:43.000But now that we know for a fact that there were multiple informants, and as I pointed out, they're likely to be even more revealed, this notion that they couldn't have known in advance of plotting and conspiracy and so forth is really, really difficult to sustain.
00:25:59.000So in order to salvage this position that the feds didn't just sit back and let something happen for political purposes, they need a new narrative.
00:26:07.000And this is a new narrative that they're advancing with They're proxies in the media.
00:26:12.000And that narrative is, you know what, guys?
00:26:14.000After all, there was actually no pre-planning on the part of these insurrectionists.
00:26:22.000They were just there and it got out of hand.
00:26:25.000The reason they say that is that they could not be blamed for having foreknowledge and doing nothing if there was no foreplanning.
00:26:33.000If the insurrectionists had no foreplanning, The feds could not have had foreknowledge, and therefore they're absolved of having foreknowledge and doing nothing.
00:26:41.000The only problem with this is this really compromises another major pillar of the narrative that they're invested in.
00:26:49.000If there is no foreplanning, there's no conspiracy.
00:26:54.000And therefore, the entire conspiracy case against the Oath Keepers, which is the basis of this thing, goes out the window.
00:27:01.000The entire case against the Proud Boys goes out the window.
00:27:04.000The entire media narrative of of 1-6 as this pre-planned terrorist attack on the level of 9-11 goes out the window.
00:27:13.000The entire January 6 thesis goes out the window because Benny Thompson, the chairman of that commission, advanced his own personal lawsuit, a theory of the case that stipulates that 1-6 was a result of pre-planned coordination between the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and members of Trump's inner circle.
00:27:32.000So there's this really interesting situation where The Feds want to cover their asses, cover the downside by saying, wait a minute, now let's say there's no pre-planning, so we're not blamed for knowing in advance and doing nothing.
00:27:45.000But they do that at the expense of the entire narrative that's been concocted to advance this kind of political war on Trump supporters as the new domestic terrorists.
00:27:56.000So either way you go, one major pillar of the official 1-6 thesis goes out the window, And that, again, is leaving aside the big elephant in the room, is that it's probably a lot worse even than that they knew and didn't do anything.
00:28:14.000It's probably that some of the key instigators who had constituted the conspiracy were themselves feds, much like in the case of Michigan.
00:28:23.000So it's an interesting case, and I think this tension explains some of the mixed messaging you have in the media, because even though the media and the feds are on the same side, they kind of have different priorities in this case.
00:28:37.000The feds want to cover their downside with this new position that there is no pre-planning, but the media wants to take off and continue running with this narrative to demonize Trump supporters.
00:28:50.000I think it's only going to get worse for the regime, and we're not going to stop pushing.
00:28:55.000So Darren, let me distill what you just said there.
00:28:58.000The New York Times reporting really isn't intended to confirm your reporting.
00:29:04.000It's intended to lance the boil and to try to reduce the Intense exposure and embarrassment for the FBI if in fact their assets were doing more than merely infiltrating these organizations, but if they were animating a higher acuity of criminal conduct.
00:29:24.000And then similarly, you know, when they come out and say there's no organizing feature to this, there's no grand plan to storm the Capitol, well, they may be saying that because the grand plan was theirs.
00:29:37.000And if it is true that the grand plan was theirs, it wouldn't even be the first time they had that plan because it was part of the Michigan endeavor that resulted in the very person who put together the Michigan operation finding a big job in D.C.
00:29:53.000So is sort of, you know, infiltrate right wing group, animate criminal conduct, threaten some political figure or some political building.
00:30:03.000Is that the new deep state Mad Lib and whether it's Michigan or Washington, D.C. or something else, we have found the operation and the greatest version.
00:30:17.000The biggest opportunity for us to find the truth is to really get a full accounting of all of the federal assets who had infiltrated and then tie those assets to higher acuity of criminal conduct.
00:30:29.000I mean, is that the Darren Beattie roadmap for a Republican Congress once we get the gavels and have the power of oversight?
00:30:39.000I mean, that is the iceberg that sinks the Titanic of That is the false narrative of January 6th.
00:30:48.000And that's precisely why the media freaked out initially when our piece came out raising the general thesis.
00:30:55.000Now, I should say that even more remarkable and suspicious than the media freakout over our first piece was the complete media silence over our follow-up piece, which focused on a specific individual.
00:31:10.000That is the head of the Oath Keeper, Stuart Rhodes.
00:31:13.000None of the fact checkers wanted to touch that piece.
00:31:17.000They simply didn't want anyone to know about it.
00:31:19.000To me, that's even more damning than the reaction to the initial piece.
00:31:24.000Is this the first time Stuart Rhodes has sort of found himself in a circumstance where he's part of an organization or an entity that becomes subject to federal law enforcement interest and then he sort of disappears when the enforcement action arrives?
00:31:40.000No, actually, that's another interesting aspect.
00:31:43.000When you look into his biography and history, he's been involved in a lot of these things and been involved in Bundy Ranch and this or that.
00:31:51.000And going back, you can find witnesses and people saying, look, there's this weird thing where he gets involved in these flashpoints and a lot of people around him get indicted and he manages to go free and move on to the next thing.
00:32:07.000So, I mean, that alone doesn't prove anything, but it's an interesting additional point of context, you know, given what the evidence seemed to suggest in relation to 1-6.
00:32:20.000Darren, I can't let you go without asking you a question about another hot issue in the news, Julian Assange.
00:32:27.000There's a lot of analysis on Revolver News regarding the reporting we've seen, the CIA developing a series of severe options to invade the Ecuadorian embassy and take out Assange or kidnap him.
00:32:42.000How should Americans think about the fact that our government was making these plans?
00:32:47.000Well, I mean, I think it's part of the same conversation that we've been having before, and that is the problem of the national security state run amok.
00:32:58.000And Julian Assange really represents the ultimate conclusion of where that can lead.
00:33:06.000His great offense was he embarrassed the national security state profoundly.
00:33:12.000And he did so from the left, which Affords him some degree of protection, but he embarrassed them so much and so severely that he has to be punished severely from the standpoint of the security state.
00:33:29.000It's a demonstration of hypocrisy that severely compromises whatever kind of moral high ground we might pretend to have when engaging with other nations.
00:33:42.000Perhaps even more important from our point of view, it demonstrates what's really the lesson from the 1-6 conversation that I think is particularly hard for people on the right.
00:33:54.000I think the political psychology of people on the left is to be charitable.
00:34:00.000They want to critique unjust institutions of power.
00:34:06.000They want to challenge unjust institutions of power.
00:34:09.000I happen to think Nine cases out of 10, or maybe 99 out of 100, they unwittingly or otherwise actually serve those powerful interests.
00:34:18.000But they have to think of themselves as challenging, unjust, powerful institutions.
00:34:24.000People on the right, on the other hand, tend to have a very different political psychology.
00:34:29.000They want to think of themselves as venerating and defending just institutions of authority.
00:34:37.000And so it's much easier to go from the political psychology of the left to a critique of the national security state.
00:34:47.000And what I try to do with Revolver, I think, is what you do tremendously well as a representative and just as an observer and commenter on events and an active participant.
00:35:02.000But it's harder on the right because The psychology is wanting to venerate just institutions.
00:35:08.000But what do you do when these institutions are corrupt, including not only the national security state, but the DOD up to brass itself?
00:35:20.000It's a more difficult pill to swallow.
00:35:22.000But unless we orient ourselves to this new reality and address it, we're not going to get anywhere.
00:35:30.000Because the ultimate bottleneck to political effectiveness, I believe, is the national security state.
00:35:37.000Unless we address the problem of the national security state, bring it under control, bring it to heel, politics in this country will be pretty much fake and performative.
00:35:50.000As long as there's a national security state operating in the fashion it does now, politics will effectively be fake.
00:35:58.000It'll be easy for, you know, grifters to raise money ginning up, you know, issues that get people emotionally and go nowhere.
00:36:05.000But in terms of actually fundamentally altering the course of this country, it will not be possible.
00:36:11.000Until we address the question of the national security state.
00:36:14.000Well, and you're describing the status quo, because what I see is that far too many of my colleagues are merely the actors, and the scripts are written by others, the direction is provided by others.
00:36:27.000And that's why Sacha Baron Cohen is able to get so many members of Congress, because frankly, we're used to somebody just handing you a script, pointing you at the camera.
00:36:36.000And I am proud that he didn't get me, that I at least had the wherewithal to get past Borat in whatever incarnation I found him in.
00:36:46.000But I do think that we share the perspective that the greatest threat to our country right now is the inward turning of national security authorities against our people.
00:36:58.000And that is precisely why these January 6th detainees are still behind bars.
00:37:03.000They don't pose any ongoing threat to the ruling government of the United States of America.
00:37:08.000But if we face that fact, then those authorities that they want to use against MAGA, against America First, against people on the populist right, well then those wouldn't be attainable, accessible to them.
00:37:24.000My recommendation to folks is if you want to stay up on this, if you want the cutting edge news, go to Revolver and then you can see the future.
00:37:33.000Because if you're not going to Revolver News every day, all you're seeing is the CNN-MSNBC meltdown of the Revolver reporting.
00:37:42.000And then months later, you see the kind of sheepish confirmations from entities like the New York Times.
00:37:49.000But if people just read Revolver in the first place, you will literally be able to see the future.
00:37:53.000Darren, thank you for your analysis and your perspective.
00:38:15.000Last week, I gave you important information regarding the horrors and crimes that occur at foreign consulates operating within the United States.
00:38:25.000I called on the Secretary of State to close the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles and to get answers from Israel's consulate in New York.
00:38:36.000This man, Jake Novak, works at the New York Israeli consulate as the broadcast media relations director.
00:38:44.000It's a big job to be the media relations director for Israel in New York.
00:38:52.000Novak implicated himself as some sort of player in a criminal extortion plot against me.
00:38:58.000That criminal scheme has already resulted in one indictment.
00:39:03.000The Israeli government has now responded to the news that one of their employees has been involved in something so terrible.
00:39:11.000And they have confirmed a number of very revealing things.
00:39:15.000Quote, The Consulate General of Israel in New York and the State of Israel are not involved in any way, directly or indirectly, in this issue.
00:39:24.000The relevant employee is a staffer at the Israeli Consulate in New York and is not serving in any diplomatic capacity.
00:39:30.000His correspondence mentioned in recent publications was not in any way, shape, or form a part of his role at the consulate.
00:40:12.000If this were a righteous, honest act, they'd probably say so, rather than focusing on downplaying their connection to Novak, who's, by the way, still their employee.
00:40:23.000Finally, the government of Israel knows more about the origins of the lies about me than I do.
00:40:53.000This tweet statement is helpful, but it's not enough.
00:40:58.000The one thing I won't be able to pursue anymore is Twitter engagement with the man involved in pricing a shakedown of my father, Jake Novak.
00:41:07.000He has blocked all of my accounts and the accounts of my congressional staff, maybe because I've repeatedly exposed that he was doing exactly what it looks like he was doing, even according to the government of Israel's confirming statement.
00:41:23.000Jake Novak recently tweeted, Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
00:41:30.000I replied, can we believe everything you admitted via text to Scott Adams regarding the extortion plot against my family?
00:41:37.000Awaiting response from Ambassador Erdan.
00:41:42.000I don't know how to feel about being blocked by an employee of a foreign government after that person was lying about me to the brilliant Dilbert cartoonist.
00:41:59.000But it's hard to imagine Israel's New York consulate overly sensitive about the exercise of trolling when the tweet pinned to the top of their Twitter timeline is a call to troll Ben& Jerry's ice cream.
00:42:14.000Quote, If social justice, diversity, peace, and tolerance are important to you, show your support for at BenJerryIsrael by tweeting at Ben& Jerry's and urging people over politics.
00:42:29.000I'll reiterate, I'm a friend to Israel.
00:42:31.000A far better friend than the Democrats who voted to defund the Iron Dome, for sure.
00:42:36.000I even support their trolling of Ben and Jerry's ice cream.
00:43:32.000Running interference, it seems, for someone or something.
00:43:35.000The Jerusalem Post falsely reports, quote, This is the correspondence that was the pricing of the extortion, checking in on the extortion exercise.
00:43:50.000And I know it would be convenient for the consulate to distance themselves from Novak to say that he did all these things when he wasn't in their employ.
00:44:06.000In early March, Novak tweeted a story about the new hires in February and said that he was one of them.
00:44:12.000Lastly, take a look at Jake Novak's LinkedIn profile.
00:44:15.000If I'm correct, I see that he began working in the New York consulate for Israel February 2021. Be better, Jerusalem Post, and correct your false narrative-conforming reporting.
00:44:29.000And until then, everyone can find the truth on Firebrand.