Flaawsome Talk with Kjersti Flaa - May 30, 2026


JUDGE'S NEW ORDER !! Get BACK To Court, Blake !!


Episode Stats


Length

27 minutes

Words per minute

167.1426

Word count

4,546

Sentence count

209

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

7

sentences flagged

Hate speech

8

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Guess what? We have a new filing today.
00:00:08.000 Hi and welcome to Flossom Talk. I'm Jashti Floor, journalist, Hollywood truth teller and your voice of reason in a town built on delusion.
00:00:16.560 Guess what? We have a new filing today.
00:00:20.100 It's been a while since May 11th, actually, since anything happened in the Lively versus Boldoni case.
00:00:27.800 And now we're talking about the Boldoni Wayfair Party versus Blake case,
00:00:33.700 because that is the reason she's asking to get these attorney's fees covered.
00:00:38.720 So on Monday, there's going to be a hearing in New York City
00:00:42.880 where both parties are given 30 minutes to argue their case
00:00:46.840 of why Blake should or should not get these attorney's fees
00:00:51.600 and why this Me Too law 47.1 should be valid or not.
00:00:58.300 This could be quite interesting.
00:01:00.220 Also, I noticed something really funny this morning.
00:01:02.680 If you watched my episode yesterday, I reported on Blake Lively
00:01:05.860 posting on her story on Instagram a photo of her and Ryan Reynolds together
00:01:10.520 where she zoomed in on different body parts, especially his arms,
00:01:15.160 accompanied by this song Yummy by Justin Bieber, amongst others.
00:01:19.300 and of course today the media picked it up but what's interesting about this is how the media
00:01:26.660 presented this. This to me is the proof that they were sent an already done press release. Let's
00:01:34.240 compare these two articles People Magazine and New York Post. This is shocking to me. Also I have to
00:01:42.180 mention this really funny story that I read this morning. Brad Pitt is being sued by a penis cream 0.99
00:01:48.900 company. This is just hilarious and a good way to start the weekend. Also there's more news to this 0.91
00:01:55.580 Tom Hardy being fired story. Apparently he's not fired after all. This story in Variety is quite
00:02:04.220 interesting. And also let's talk about how Helen Mirren has been accused of being the reason for
00:02:09.580 him being fired which I find absolutely horrendous. Anyways let's look into it. So as I said on Monday
00:02:17.000 there's going to be a hearing. The judge just filed a document in the docket saying that both
00:02:22.520 parties should prepare a maximum of two pages for him to read of their arguments before this hearing
00:02:29.160 in New York City on Monday. It's funny to read because he's obviously really tired of all this
00:02:35.700 mess back and forth between these parties. So he emphasized in this letter that they can only write
00:02:41.680 two pages and no footnotes are allowed. And it has to be single spaced and limited to listing
00:02:48.520 cases the judge should review. So this hearing is not about whether Blake Wiley should get these
00:02:55.000 fees or not. As you know, she's asking for attorney's fees for the count to sue that the
00:02:59.860 Wayfair parties did against her, Ryan Reynolds and Leslie Sloan after she sued them first. And
00:03:06.420 she's saying that I should get my attorney's fees covered because there's a new law in California
00:03:10.620 now called 47.1 which is basically this me too law that I've talked a lot about here on my channel
00:03:16.700 and now the judge is put in a position where he actually has to rule on this and this is a new
00:03:23.000 law so he doesn't want to make any mistakes here so he's basically asking both parties here to give
00:03:28.040 him the legal arguments on why this law should be used in this case and also who has the burden
00:03:36.220 of proving this. Is it up to Blake Lively's team to prove that this law should be applicable
00:03:41.960 or is it up to Baldoni's team to show that this shouldn't be applicable? So that's what they have
00:03:48.100 to argue on these two pages that he's going to read before Monday. I don't think any ruling is
00:03:53.520 going to happen on Monday, but it's going to be interesting to see how both parties here are going
00:03:58.880 to argue this. As I said in my episode yesterday, referring to Eumonia Dike's expose of Ryan Reynolds
00:04:04.660 and how he wanted to be shielded by this Me Too law.
00:04:09.400 I hope the judge actually read that article
00:04:11.940 because all of these things that is happening right now in this case
00:04:16.300 will be used in future cases for other people who are involved in similar cases
00:04:21.540 when they speak up and they feel that they've been retaliated against.
00:04:25.260 So I'm sure that a lot of lawyers are paying a lot of attention to what's happening right now.
00:04:30.580 And I can assure you if Blake Lively gets a single cent out of the Wayfair parties for covering these attorney's fees, you know, she's also asking for triple damages and punitive damages just to like make it sound more dramatic.
00:04:45.740 I doubt she's going to get any of that.
00:04:47.680 But if she gets as much as a single cent, she is going to spin this in the media to say she won and this is all she ever wanted to prove.
00:04:56.800 and you know the whole drill. This whole shenanigan with these attorney's fees that she's 1.00
00:05:01.940 claiming is not about the money. It is all about the last attempt to portray Blake Lively as a
00:05:09.240 winner. Anyways let's look into these two articles. As I mentioned yesterday Blake and I think actually
00:05:15.960 Ryan also reposted this this photo of the two of them looking happy together and Blake thirsting
00:05:23.700 over her husband like look we have this hot marriage and I think he's super sexy and that's
00:05:29.780 why I posted this and zoomed in on both his arms anyways this made me laugh so hard when I realized
00:05:37.260 what had happened here because first I read this people magazine article and I was like okay of
00:05:42.460 course they're gonna write this blah blah blah they didn't mention the lawsuit once it was all
00:05:47.220 about Blake Lively sharing this photo and thirsting over her husband.
00:05:52.680 And then I read this New York Post article and I was like, oh, I think I've read this before.
00:05:58.000 And then I realized these two articles are basically identical.
00:06:04.540 So I assume what happened here is that Leslie Sloan, Blake Lively's publicist,
00:06:10.840 sent an already done article to these magazines.
00:06:14.260 And then they just rewrote a couple of things here and there to make it seem authentic.
00:06:19.720 Because when you look at the wording and exactly how the two different articles are laid out word by word,
00:06:28.320 this is not a coincidence.
00:06:31.020 Okay, so People Magazine had this headline saying,
00:06:33.700 Blake Lively shares yummy thirst trap photos of husband Ryan Reynolds.
00:06:38.920 Page six had this headline,
00:06:41.820 Blake Lively thirsts over husband Ryan Reynolds' bulging biceps in flirty snap.
00:06:48.760 Basically saying the exact same thing with using the word thirst and thirsty, both of them.
00:06:55.640 And then the beginning of these articles is when I was like, oh my God.
00:07:00.300 So this is People Magazine's first sentence here saying,
00:07:04.620 Blake Lively's latest baking creation comes with a side of muscles.
00:07:10.460 New York Post, or page six, first sentence in this article, saying,
00:07:15.760 Blake Lively is loving her husband, Ryan Reynolds, jacked arms.
00:07:20.740 People Magazine continues, on Wednesday, May 27, the actress shared an outdoor selfie with her husband, Ryan Reynolds,
00:07:28.640 who was wearing a white tank top and holding a plate of handmade cookies and raspberries.
00:07:34.960 Here is page six.
00:07:36.520 The actress posted a snap of her husband, of her and Reynolds on her Instagram stories Wednesday in which he is holding a plate of cookies and raspberries.
00:07:47.860 Then they're quoting the story in People magazine saying delicious advanced sanity Reynolds wrote lively across the Instagram story snap of the pair sitting on a patio furniture tagging her husband Reynolds 49 or tagging her husband 49.
00:08:05.160 Page six, also quoting the story, delicious advanced sanity Reynolds, she wrote over their
00:08:11.160 sunny outdoor selfie. Then in the following slides, Lively zoomed in on the cookies followed by
00:08:18.160 both of her husband's bare arms. People Magazine said, New York Post said, she then posted a close
00:08:26.000 up shot of the cookies followed by the close up of Reynolds buff arms, which were especially visible
00:08:31.880 in the plain white tank top.
00:08:34.360 I mean, they are using a little different wording here,
00:08:36.880 but the structure of the article is exactly the same.
00:08:40.920 No journalist thinks exactly the same like this.
00:08:44.040 Then, next sentence in People magazine.
00:08:47.240 The selfie was set to Ohio Express 1968 song, Yummy, Yummy, Yummy,
00:08:53.120 while one of the close-up of Reynolds' arms featured Justin Bieber's track, Yummy.
00:08:59.080 Next sentence on page six.
00:09:01.880 To make her thirst for her husband more obvious, Lively set her post to Ohio Express 1968 song,
00:09:09.400 Yummy, Yummy, Yummy, and Justin Bieber's 2020 hit, Yummy.
00:09:13.380 Then it's very obvious that People Magazine is the direct mouthpiece of Blake and Ryan
00:09:19.600 because they just skip the whole thing about this legal battle.
00:09:23.200 They don't mention it at all.
00:09:25.820 They just jump to the fact that Lively's post come just weeks after she appeared at the Met Gala
00:09:31.460 on May 4th, where the year's theme was costume art.
00:09:36.260 Like, that has nothing to do with whatever they're saying in this article and the headline.
00:09:40.600 While Page Six, who's been much more balanced in this reporting to begin with,
00:09:45.940 says that Lively and Reynolds have been married since September 2012.
00:09:50.460 They share four children together, daughter James, 11, Enes, 9, Bedding, 6, and son Oli in 3.
00:09:56.500 That exact same sentence comes a little further down in the People magazine article.
00:10:01.560 And they are saying here that Reynolds stood up, stood by his wife throughout her lengthy court battle
00:10:07.020 with her, it ends with us, director and co-star Justin Baldoni, which they settled earlier this month.
00:10:14.020 They do actually mention that there's a major lawsuit and that's why these people are in the news all the time.
00:10:19.320 Then People Magazine writes about the Met Gala, which I'll get back to in a second.
00:10:24.400 But first I wanted to compare exactly what they did the same here.
00:10:27.280 where People Magazine points out that days later, Reynolds celebrated his wife on Mother's Day
00:10:33.620 with a tribute on his Instagram stories.
00:10:37.200 Then Page Six mentioned that all 10 of Blake Lively's 13 claims were tossed out by the judge.
00:10:43.280 Bravo to Page Six before they get into this again, saying exactly the same as People Magazine said.
00:10:49.820 The Deadpool actor later shared a Mother's Day tribute to Lively on Instagram,
00:10:54.140 calling her the love of his life.
00:10:56.400 and then page six is quoting ryan reynolds post to blake on mother's day saying i appreciate this
00:11:01.980 mother beyond measure he wrote she's kind she's fearless she's an absolute love of my life
00:11:06.160 to our four little kids he continued she's the life of uh of their love and people magazine
00:11:12.400 same thing they just quoted that as well and new york post mentions here lively also hasn't
00:11:18.860 away from the spotlight since her settlement she attended the 2026 mets gala just hours after news 0.92
00:11:24.680 So the settlement broke, blah, blah, blah.
00:11:26.720 She also went to the Fendi store.
00:11:28.640 And then they added this at the end,
00:11:30.500 we're told the actress was in good spirits
00:11:32.360 and thanked everyone who came up to meet her,
00:11:34.800 chatting with fans and taking selfies with her.
00:11:37.300 So People Magazine went a little more into details
00:11:40.320 about her appearance at the Met Gala.
00:11:44.000 And this is where you know for sure that this was planted.
00:11:48.540 They added in this story,
00:11:50.200 The actress attended the Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute's annual fashion event,
00:11:56.200 taking to the iconic Met Steps in an archival atelier Versace gown from spring 2006,
00:12:05.420 accessorizing with custom Lorraine Swartz jewelry and an exclusive source told people
00:12:11.000 that Lively seemed strong, confident, and fearless on the red carpet.
00:12:16.480 She smiled and she looked comfortable, they added.
00:12:20.200 And then this comes, Lively was an invited guest of Vogue at the Met Gala and was seated at Anna
00:12:27.960 Winter's table inside the event. You know, there were a lot of speculations out there that she
00:12:34.160 paid $100,000 to attend and they quickly came out and said that, oh, that's not true. She was
00:12:40.180 invited and Anna Winter loves her, blah, blah, blah. So yeah, I mean, what do you think? Do you
00:12:46.140 think this is a coincidence that these two articles are lined up and written basically this exactly
00:12:51.900 the same way they just changed out a few words here and there isn't that really suspicious and
00:12:57.440 i think it's really embarrassing to see how the media is just eating up these press releases
00:13:02.800 from blake lively's camp and just printing it without even having any second thoughts about it
00:13:08.840 anyways a quick shout out to glenn who sent me this another example of how tone deaf blake
00:13:15.840 Lively is. He sent me this reminder of what Blake said in this Vogue interview. She was a lot younger
00:13:22.680 than when you answer a question like this. What are you most excited about in life right now? Oh I'm so
00:13:28.900 excited about my company that I'm launching. What's your favorite movie? Wizard of Oz. Movie you laughed
00:13:34.560 the hardest through? Shawshank Redemption. Yeah the movie that Blake Lively laughed the most about
00:13:39.860 was Shang-Shu Redemption. And as this person pointed out in the comment section saying she
00:13:46.480 probably laughed through the Shang-Shu Redemption because she thinks it's funny when the story is
00:13:51.740 about a man who's been falsely accused. She's an expert at doing it and finds it laughably
00:13:57.480 entertaining. As the two next people here are commenting well spotted. Wow truth bomb. Yes
00:14:04.720 thank you for that reminder another example of how sick their sense of humor is both her and ryan
00:14:10.840 anyways let's get back into this tom hardy story i find this really fascinating i've been following
00:14:16.400 it online and i've been following it in the media the last few days since i reported on it so at
00:14:22.660 first the report was that tom hardy was fired from mob land it's been on for two seasons and
00:14:28.980 according to an article in Puck, he was fired due to creative differences, I guess you could say,
00:14:36.060 that he was basically being difficult on set, that he kept changing the script up and that the other
00:14:41.700 actors had to keep waiting for him. But now, according to Variety today, he is not fired after
00:14:48.900 all and they're trying to work things out with him. I don't know if the reason for that is because
00:14:55.180 it was so much backlash online. People seem to really love Tom Hardy. And that is also the reason
00:15:01.520 why there's been a lot of conspiracy theories out there trying to blame other people for Tom Hardy
00:15:08.340 being fired. One of them being Helen Mirren. And that makes me actually pretty angry. Helen Mirren
00:15:15.340 had nothing to do with Tom Hardy being fired, which he is not anymore. And I have to say that
00:15:23.020 reading this article I'll mention some of the things that they talk about here makes me think
00:15:28.180 about what if Tom Hardy was a woman would people react the same way would people just say that oh
00:15:34.640 he's difficult but he's just a creative genius so we have to accept this kind of behavior would that
00:15:41.320 happen if he was a woman I mean there was a lot of things here that shows a lot of similarities 0.61
00:15:46.960 on how Blake Lively behaved on the set of it ends with us but of course that doesn't mean that he's
00:15:52.240 the same kind of person as she is and I don't think Tom Hardy means any harm. I don't think
00:15:57.660 he's a malicious person. I think he's just a person with a lot of demons and sometimes he's
00:16:03.040 not really in touch with reality. He's had a reputation for being difficult to work with for
00:16:08.460 a long time and the executive producer and the production company behind this show really had
00:16:15.860 challenges making things work with him. And also it's been known that Helen Mirren and Pierce
00:16:21.720 Brosnan got really frustrated with him because they had to wait for him constantly. Because for
00:16:27.600 Tom Hardy it's really important to get into his character and he spends a lot of time doing that
00:16:33.620 and then he expects everyone else to just hang around and wait for him to be ready. And I
00:16:38.920 understand that that's really upsetting for the other actors who are there. I hate when people
00:16:44.180 are late. I think it's very disrespectful for the people who have to wait for you and that's why I
00:16:49.340 also find it so insane that people started blaming Helen Mirren's political views on why Tom Hardy
00:16:56.040 was fired. These conspiracy theories gets legs really fast and then she received a lot of hate
00:17:03.040 online. I don't know if she had closed off her comments on Instagram already or if that's something
00:17:09.520 she just did but I went into her Instagram this morning to check it out and she has comments
00:17:14.560 limited. I also noticed when I was on her Instagram that she posted a photo of Tom Hardy back in
00:17:22.700 December. Things I love. Christmas for obvious reasons, Tom Hardy for his brilliance on screen,
00:17:29.680 his dedication off screen, his good heart, and especially the hearty hugs I get when on set with
00:17:35.680 him, which is not nearly enough in my opinion. Does that sound like someone who hates Tom Hardy
00:17:41.060 and wanted to get him fired.
00:17:43.080 This is just six months ago
00:17:44.520 and they already worked on two seasons at that point.
00:17:48.180 Then yesterday, I think that Helen Mirren
00:17:50.560 felt the pressure to remind everyone
00:17:52.860 that she doesn't have anything against Tom Hardy.
00:17:55.800 She just gets annoyed when he's laid on set.
00:17:58.380 And I really respect people who actually speak their mind
00:18:01.640 because in this article in Variety,
00:18:03.760 Helen Mirren is quoted when she's saying to Tom Hardy,
00:18:06.880 hello, let's get on with it.
00:18:08.520 We've been waiting for you for so long.
00:18:10.840 Can you please, like, let's get this thing rolling soon?
00:18:13.880 I prefer people like that a lot more than people who just don't say anything
00:18:17.600 and then go and talk behind your back or leak things to the media or whatever.
00:18:22.560 So yesterday she posted this on her Instagram,
00:18:25.660 a photo of Tom Hardy saying, love you now and always, Helen.
00:18:30.220 So yeah, I really don't appreciate the way people have tried to spin this
00:18:34.020 and blame this on a woman.
00:18:35.840 Like, why? 0.99
00:18:36.540 Just because Helen Mirren is married to a Jewish man and she's been pro-Israel and we 0.70
00:18:43.200 know that Tom Hardy has been actively supporting Palestine, it doesn't mean that she got him
00:18:49.780 fired from a movie. 0.96
00:18:51.500 That is so ridiculous. 0.98
00:18:54.240 I don't think you should ever judge people on their political views. 0.96
00:18:57.640 I think everyone has their personal reason for believing things they believe in.
00:19:01.720 But I do judge people who are not good people and people who are malicious.
00:19:06.540 people who are mean, people who are bullies.
00:19:10.240 But don't go after people just because they don't agree with you politically.
00:19:14.180 Anyways, they're mentioning in this article that also Guy Ritchie is an executive producer on this movie
00:19:20.580 and he loves working with Tom Hardy.
00:19:22.880 And he might be the person who can glue this project back together with Tom Hardy on board.
00:19:29.500 And there is a source here with a lot of information
00:19:32.280 also pointing out that political views has nothing to do with it.
00:19:36.280 They're saying here, while Hardy's lateness was frustrating for Helen Mirren and Pierce Brosnan's,
00:19:41.880 any actor is frustrated when they're made to wait a couple of hours.
00:19:46.020 The second source says, there was specifically no friction between Mirren and Hardy.
00:19:51.360 I know she said to him a couple of times, come on, Tom, we've been here for ages, let's get on with it.
00:19:57.940 But she's never appeared to be anti-Tom, the source said.
00:20:01.580 They dismissed any suggestion that the actors have fallen out over politics.
00:20:06.280 I've never heard of anything political, the source said, sounding surprised by the suggestion.
00:20:12.520 I think that's probably wildly unhelpful and untrue.
00:20:16.120 Helen is not that kind of person, they're saying here.
00:20:18.340 If she had a problem with Tom, she would have said that to his face.
00:20:22.720 Like, look, come on, let's just stop wasting everyone else's time and let's get on with it.
00:20:27.420 But that's probably as far as it went.
00:20:29.820 She's not the sort of person who's going to get involved in a whole political situation. 0.87
00:20:34.760 She just isn't.
00:20:36.280 She certainly isn't going to be the one who stamps her feet and says,
00:20:40.240 well, I'm not coming back if he is in it.
00:20:42.940 It's just not her. 0.52
00:20:44.740 Yeah, I believe that too.
00:20:46.140 I've never heard anyone say anything bad about Helen Mirren
00:20:48.960 and what she's like to work with.
00:20:50.680 I don't know.
00:20:51.240 Of course, I don't know her personally, but I've interviewed her many times.
00:20:54.680 Once I interviewed her with Bruce Willis,
00:20:57.300 who's also known for being very difficult to work with.
00:21:01.060 And she was so sweet to him and she was so helpful,
00:21:04.500 helping him even answer the questions.
00:21:06.840 Bruce Willis wasn't known to be easy to interview.
00:21:09.040 I had a great experience with him.
00:21:10.440 I thought he was very sweet.
00:21:11.620 But my point is, Helen Mirren was paired with him for this movie, Red 2.
00:21:17.460 And the two of them seemed to get along really well.
00:21:19.580 And that's also why they paired them together.
00:21:22.120 And I had the impression when I had the two of them together
00:21:24.780 that she was really there to support Bruce Willis.
00:21:28.740 And she made this really funny joke, by the way.
00:21:30.860 I have to show you this.
00:21:31.780 That's the brilliant fun of being an actor, is you can pretend to be things that you're not really.
00:21:38.780 Is that it?
00:21:39.780 No, come on, we'll give you another one. Come on, what's your best question?
00:21:42.780 Okay, my best question is, I want to know, when your daughters bring home their dates, what kind of father are you?
00:21:51.780 I'm a great father. I'm a great friend to everyone. I haven't had to beat up any of these boys ever.
00:21:59.780 They must be so frightened, though. Aren't they terrified?
00:22:02.460 All they want to do is talk about Die Hard.
00:22:05.740 So I can't really scare them that much.
00:22:10.140 But they're all very nice guys.
00:22:12.080 Die Hard and Die Per are very close together, aren't they?
00:22:15.740 That's right. 0.99
00:22:17.420 Die Per! 0.99
00:22:19.280 Die Per 2!
00:22:20.280 Yeah, so let's hope that this mess is sorted out
00:22:22.960 and that Tom Hardy can get back to work again.
00:22:25.740 And people love him and people love the characters that he's playing.
00:22:30.980 But I think we always have to remember,
00:22:33.020 we have to separate the characters someone's playing
00:22:35.540 and who they are in real life.
00:22:37.940 And I'm sure that Tom Hardy is not a mean or bad person,
00:22:41.660 but it's also very frustrating for all these people
00:22:43.960 who have to sit and wait for him to get into his character.
00:22:46.940 And also for all these script notes that he gave to the executive producer,
00:22:52.600 according to the story as well,
00:22:54.280 he kept wanting to change the script and the executive producer was not on set all the time
00:23:00.560 so there was a clinch there but it seems like from this story and what I've read so far
00:23:05.640 what happened here was a conflict between Tom Hardy and the executive producer and the production
00:23:10.680 company and Helen Mirren really had nothing to do with it. Anyways let's get into this lawsuit
00:23:16.240 against Brad Pitt that made me laugh so hard this morning. Okay so Brad Pitt according to page six
00:23:22.260 brad pitt is sued by penis cream company in bizarre lawsuit listen to this the makers of 0.95
00:23:28.880 a high-end penis cream are accusing brad pitt of being a d by changing the name of his own
00:23:35.900 skincare line to something allegedly similar i do not understand why brad pitt would want to get
00:23:43.900 his skincare line associated with a penis cream but what do i know anyways it continues a malibu
00:23:50.340 based brand beauty launched in 2020 with a luxe lip salt and a so-called d cream we'll let you
00:23:58.760 guess what the d stands for but the indiscreet outfit has now filed legal docs against pitt's
00:24:05.580 skincare line beauty domain pitt's french skincare brand quietly launched in 2022 in partnership with
00:24:12.380 a famed winemaking family adding whitner like twist to its beauty products so basically it's
00:24:19.560 trying to add some antioxidants i think from grape wines and anti and mix them up with anti-aging
00:24:27.840 molecules or something like that but anyways then they're talking about this company here saying
00:24:31.980 that's that's when beauty created by a former men's vogue and teen vogue staffer reportedly
00:24:38.000 made three failed attempts at a private settlement before suing for false designation of origin
00:24:45.280 and common law unfair competition under California Business and Professions Codes.
00:24:51.400 So the makers of this $56 decree, the company website has a sperm-shaped cursor,
00:24:58.840 are shooting for damages of over $75,000,
00:25:03.480 and they want Pitt's line to stop using the BUE domain name altogether.
00:25:08.720 I think, honestly, that it's good for this company to be associated with Brad Pitt,
00:25:14.700 why wouldn't it be this to be just looks like a desperate attempt to get some pr which is kind of
00:25:21.280 working because i'm talking about it here here comes the fun part what this cream actually does
00:25:26.120 the cheeky company claims that cream cream pennies as it calls the stuff puts power in your package
00:25:35.780 and then the the founder here brandon palace explains that it will help to bring plumpness
00:25:42.560 to that skin-inspired collagen production and slow down the process of aging. I wonder who's
00:25:50.980 going to buy that cream and actually believe in anti-aging cream for down there for men. I don't 0.90
00:25:56.160 know. I don't know much about that industry, I have to admit, but I found this really funny.
00:26:00.720 And here they've asked some legal experts actually about this, and it doesn't seem like beauty has
00:26:06.380 really caught Pitt with his pants down. Either way, a rep for the F1 star declined to comment
00:26:13.480 when page 6 reached out. Yeah, good luck to these people who are suing Brad Pitt. Yeah,
00:26:21.080 I think I remember I spoke about this once before on my channel that Will Smith told me once how
00:26:25.940 many times a year he got sued by just random people who wants to take advantage of his celebrity
00:26:32.660 status or just wants a lot of money. Anyways, that's it from you guys. I hope you enjoyed this
00:26:39.160 episode. Thank you so much for watching and I hope everyone's gonna have a wonderful weekend.
00:26:44.880 I probably won't be posting this weekend either because I need some time off but I'll be here on
00:26:49.820 Monday reporting on that meeting and probably these two letters that both parties have filed
00:26:54.320 by then. And a special thanks to my executive producer Oscar whose butt is over there. He made 0.91
00:27:00.240 sure I didn't do any script changes to this episode. Anyways if you haven't subscribed yet
00:27:05.700 please do hit the notification bell so you never miss an episode of Flossom Talk and I'll see you soon!