New DRAMATIC Turn !!
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
160.82649
Summary
It turns out that Alexa actually smeared Blake Lively. Also, a new fake romance in Hollywood has backfired on Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi and we re not buying it anymore. And a new expose about me on Reddit has me almost speechless.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
When you let aero truffle bubbles melt, everything takes on a creamy, delicious, chocolatey glow.
00:00:06.320
Like that pile of laundry. You didn't forget to fold it.
00:00:12.080
Feel the aero bubbles melt. It's mind-bubbling.
00:00:15.340
It turns out that Alexa actually smeared Blake Lively.
00:00:27.520
I'm Kersti Floor, journalist, Hollywood truth teller, and your voice of reason in a town built on delusion.
00:00:34.880
Okay, so last week I spoke about this new lawsuit filed by the ex-Nickelodeon star Alexa Nicholas.
00:00:43.900
She is suing Justin Baldoni's attorney, Brian Friedman, and Melissa Nason, his PR crisis expert,
00:00:51.260
claiming that they're a part of a smear campaign against her.
00:00:55.660
Now, it turns out that Alexa actually smeared Blake Lively.
00:01:05.260
Also, I read this really fascinating story in the Times in the UK this weekend.
00:01:10.700
It's about the villain publicist Judah Engelmayer,
00:01:14.140
and how much money he says that publicists are paying content creators to talk positive about their clients.
00:01:26.180
Also, now there is an expose about me on Reddit.
00:01:31.400
You won't believe what the Blake Lively supporters came up with this time.
00:01:38.940
Also, let's talk about the new fake romance in Hollywood.
00:01:43.240
If you missed it, Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi have been all over each other during the promotion of the movie Weathering Heights.
00:01:54.840
They call it showmance, and we're not buying it anymore.
00:01:59.020
Okay, so let's get into this article first that I saw in the Times in the UK this weekend.
00:02:05.240
I also noticed that the New York Times did an interview with the same guy last summer.
00:02:14.240
And the reason why I wanted to mention this article is because he's talking about how he is paying influencers to talk positively about his clients.
00:02:30.000
He's representing the Alexander Brothers, those real estate brokers from New York who is accused of a lot of horrific things against women.
00:02:39.600
So his clientele is obviously the people that most publicists don't want to touch.
00:02:44.640
But one thing he's quoted saying here is what caught my attention.
00:02:48.440
So Judah Engelmayer is quoted here saying when they talk about how he is employing influencers,
00:02:54.720
he's saying you look for key placements, people who have a certain amount of followers, he said,
00:03:01.100
paying them between $5,000 to $100,000 for a series of videos supporting his client's case.
00:03:11.220
As you probably noticed as well, as he's mentioning in this article, there were a lot of content creators starting to question Harvey Weinstein a while back and if he was really guilty or not.
00:03:23.480
And of course, this makes me think of all those content creators that are pushing positive content for Blake Lively.
00:03:31.600
There are about four or five content creators who doesn't really have a big following that are pushing against all the facts that we have right in front of us in all these legal documents.
00:03:43.040
And they're trying to spread misinformation about this as much as possible.
00:03:47.900
And I've been wondering, like, what's in it for them?
00:03:52.980
Because as you know, Leslie Sloan did push and terrorize a lot of journalists to change headlines in articles,
00:04:02.760
to remove quotes from Justin Baldoni's team in articles,
00:04:06.500
to basically make every article in traditional media favor Blake Lively.
00:04:13.960
So would we be surprised if she did the same thing to content creators?
00:04:19.660
And one thing that we can't forget here is that Blake Lively hired an ex-CIA agent.
00:04:25.840
So Variety reported how Blake Lively was quietly working with Nick Shapiro,
00:04:31.280
the CIA former deputy chief of staff and senior advisor to former director John Brennan.
00:04:37.780
It's quoted here saying the litigation team for Ms. Lively retained Mr. Shapiro to advise on the legal communication strategy
00:04:44.820
for the ongoing S-agent retaliation lawsuit occurring in the Southern District of New York,
00:04:53.400
So why would they need a CIA agent for legal communication strategy?
00:05:02.180
We also know how far Ryan Reynolds was willing to go to make people like his wife again.
00:05:12.680
All these text messages are proving how far he went and was willing to go to ruin Justin Baldoni
00:05:23.820
And we also know that the Wayfairer did not pay anyone to talk badly about Blake.
00:05:29.380
Blake subpoenaed 107 content creators and found nothing, including me.
00:05:35.880
And we also know that both party, it's undisputed from both parties that I had any contact with any of the parties
00:05:44.720
and still don't have any contact with any of the parties.
00:05:48.120
And my little bump video was posted by me independently from everything else that's going on.
00:05:54.260
We also know that Blake manipulated the other cast members to go against Justin
00:05:59.260
and that they followed her lead and that they all agreed to unfollow him at the same day.
00:06:06.180
And also that she refused to be next to him at the red carpet.
00:06:11.480
He had to stay in the basement and all that stuff,
00:06:13.740
which also was so thoroughly planned so that the media and social media would start speculating.
00:06:20.840
Why else would they all unfollow him at the same time?
00:06:26.500
So let's talk about how all of this relates back to this article in The Hollywood Reporter
00:06:32.320
and this new lawsuit that was filed by Alexa Nicholas.
00:06:40.900
And the other day, The Hollywood Reporter did a big story,
00:06:44.280
a really big expose, if you want, about the smear machine in Hollywood.
00:06:49.720
And they based a lot of it on her newly filed lawsuit.
00:06:54.120
So she is suing Brian Friedman, who is Justin Baldoni's attorney, and Melissa Nathan,
00:07:00.940
although she has zero evidence that they ever did anything to harm her reputation.
00:07:06.320
She's claiming that they created a smear website to harm her.
00:07:10.880
And the reason for that is because she basically read Blake Lively's lawsuit.
00:07:18.180
And the fact that Brian Friedman used to represent her husband, the musician Michael Milos.
00:07:29.380
They used to be married for basically doing terrible things to her.
00:07:36.960
And he ended up suing her lawyers for suing him.
00:07:41.100
And then she ended up dropping her lawsuit in 2022.
00:07:50.220
So for some reason, she just dropped this lawsuit.
00:07:53.580
We don't know what happened there, if this was true or not.
00:08:02.080
Because it turns out that Alexa was going after Blake Lively when she was promoting It Ends With Us.
00:08:15.640
I can't say enough how disappointed I am in Blake Lively and It Ends With Us movie.
00:08:21.860
Not only has your rollout of this film been a complete disaster and shame.
00:08:26.560
But you also put a well-known, blah, blah, blah, read it here, person's music in your film.
00:08:34.520
There is physical evidence of him grooming me when he was 33 and I was 16.
00:08:44.000
Sadly, since I had to also take on the emotional labor of exposing Rye, which is the band her ex-husband is a part of,
00:08:52.780
with evidence, it was also a very public lawsuit that goes into great detail what he did to me.
00:09:04.820
So looking at this, isn't this exactly what Blake Lively calls a smear campaign?
00:09:16.880
And also because this tweet was picked up by traditional media.
00:09:29.960
Nickelodeon star Alexa Nicholas slams Blake Lively for shameful move in It Ends With Us.
00:09:40.460
Alexa Nicholas calls out Blake Lively for including groomer Mike Milosz in It Ends With Us promo.
00:09:47.340
Not only has your rollout of this film been a disaster, but you also included blah, blah, blah in your film.
00:09:53.680
So just look at all the irony here that this person who Blake Lively would categorize as part of a smear campaign
00:10:06.000
And guess what? The Hollywood Reporter forgets to mention that in their article that they published
00:10:12.680
that Alexa herself was part of what Blake Lively calls a smear machine.
00:10:19.220
There is a quote in the article from Brian Friedman who denies his clients are the authors of this site.
00:10:24.980
As I said before, I spoke about this article because it's claiming that he was part of making the smear site against her.
00:10:31.580
These smear websites are not that rare, to be honest with you.
00:10:36.640
And the thing is, when you're a celebrity, people love you and people hate you.
00:10:40.820
And some people are really passionate about how much they dislike you.
00:10:44.900
So these could might as well just be fans being annoyed with you about something.
00:10:49.720
Or it could be someone that you're wrong in your life.
00:10:52.920
But just suing someone because you have some kind of feeling that they're behind it, it's ridiculous.
00:10:59.240
And it's really disappointing as well that the Hollywood Reporter is reporting on this as kind of facts.
00:11:06.180
Well, anyways, Brian Friedman is quoted here saying,
00:11:09.020
There is no technical data, no forensic support, no factual basis linking anyone retained by the Wayfair parties to the websites.
00:11:18.720
The forensic analysis commissioned by Stephanie Jones identify no author and no connection to any party.
00:11:25.200
What remains is speculation presented as facts.
00:11:28.320
After more than a year of litigation and no credible evidence, they are attempting to replace evidence with headlines.
00:11:36.400
Well said, as you know, Stephanie Jones, the publicist who owned the company who Justin Baldoni hired for the PR for him and this movie,
00:11:47.760
she claims they're also behind a smear website against her.
00:11:54.080
So it's so easy here to find someone to blame and they're all ganging up against them.
00:11:59.400
And this whole thing, to me, feels very coordinated.
00:12:03.600
And I think now they've been trying to find dirt on Justin Baldoni, in his past, on whatever, for so long and they haven't been able to find anything.
00:12:14.520
So then they need to go after all the other players surrounding him.
00:12:19.840
Because this, as you know, is all about optics.
00:12:30.840
So someone is doing the same thing to me today on Reddit.
00:12:37.700
And you have to keep in mind how important my little bump video is in this litigation.
00:12:43.480
Because Blake Lively really has to prove here that the reactions to that video was not organic.
00:12:50.140
And that the Wayfair party somehow was behind pushing this.
00:12:58.060
And so this Reddit post is saying seven things in Kjæshti Flå and the Blake timeline.
00:13:06.840
The interview was in 2016 when reporters were asked not to comment on women's bodies.
00:13:18.000
This person was obviously also a reporter in 2016.
00:13:25.960
And also, when you're congratulating someone on their pregnancy, it's not commenting on their body.
00:13:32.560
But anyways, the video was pretty inconsequential.
00:13:37.660
And then number two here says most comments on the original with big letters 2016 video are mostly calling out flaws and professionalism and not bashing Blake.
00:13:57.760
I did not publish this video until 2024 on YouTube.
00:14:02.440
And where is this person getting this information from?
00:14:05.940
The original and calling out flaws and professionalism?
00:14:10.840
The scary thing about this post, it's got like 300 comments on it and everyone's agreeing with this person.
00:14:21.760
Where can we see all the comments that were bashing her and not Blake?
00:14:33.640
And then it says in August 2024, she edits and reports the 2016 interview with a salacious, salacious new headline.
00:14:46.160
And she doesn't or this person doesn't mention what my old headline was.
00:14:51.860
And it says that Blake Lively made me want to quit my job.
00:14:55.540
It actually says the Blake Lively interview that made me want to quit my job.
00:15:00.280
I didn't say Blake Lively wanted me to quit the job, but the interview did.
00:15:05.260
The situation I was in in that interview made me want to quit my job.
00:15:16.460
That could be they were hired in early of August.
00:15:18.860
So yes, that is a fact, maybe, that they got right here.
00:15:25.380
And then point number four, Justin's PR team loves the video, but it's not getting much traction.
00:15:31.580
Sent to Jed Wallace to boost an artificial manipulates views.
00:15:40.040
Well, the thing is, when you look at how my video grew on YouTube, it shows every sign of how a video becomes viral.
00:15:50.560
And the most view this video got is not from my original video on YouTube.
00:16:02.240
And that's where most people actually watch the video.
00:16:04.940
But if they pushed my video, I have no idea if they did.
00:16:09.980
But when I looked at the scale, I think the next day, my video had about 30,000 views, which to me was like, wow, that's a lot.
00:16:24.080
I watched it happen from the beginning when I posted the video.
00:16:28.460
And on top of that, as I said before, I received so many DMs from people supporting me.
00:16:33.220
But in Blake Lively's world and these people, the supporters world, those were probably just bots or brainwashed people who thought that they saw a bully.
00:16:47.240
And then number five, she deletes the original 2016 video off YouTube.
00:16:53.740
Where did this person get this information from?
00:16:58.580
So why has no one else talked about this earlier if there was an original video where people were bashing me and not Blake?
00:17:06.000
No one else found out except this person on Reddit, apparently.
00:17:12.340
Flo interviewed Blake again just two years later in 2018.
00:17:20.140
Where did I ever say I was traumatized for life after that interview?
00:17:24.980
I said in interviews, I said on my channel that it was a traumatizing experience, but I wasn't traumatized for the rest of my life.
00:17:34.740
I'm not giving Blake that much credit for being a mean girl in that interview.
00:17:39.080
And I never said that I was traumatized for life.
00:17:41.860
What did they expect that I'm in some psychiatric hospital because I was so traumatized by that situation?
00:17:49.360
And then number seven, Flo goes on to make 500 Blake bashing videos along with a merch store.
00:17:56.660
And she makes estimate of five to ten thousand a week.
00:17:59.880
Wow, that's a lot of money in income for trashing Lively across social platforms.
00:18:05.220
The real bully appears to be, in fact, Miss Flo.
00:18:09.740
First of all, I have to say, I'm not bashing Blake Lively.
00:18:15.800
I am a reporter and I'm reporting on a legal case.
00:18:20.200
If I want to make a 500 or 1,000 videos on Blake Lively, I can do that.
00:18:26.120
And it's so interesting to me that the people who are accusing me of bashing Blake are doing exactly the same thing to me.
00:18:34.240
So this person continues to say, in my opinion, she's been in coordination with Brian Friedman for a while.
00:18:43.360
Well, in her or his opinion, I've been in coordination.
00:18:47.840
Well, even Blake Lively's team has admitted that I've never been in coordination.
00:18:53.500
So, but this person, she has or he has an opinion that she or he is guessing that it must be like this.
00:19:03.260
And then she adds, here's a TikTok video with Flo smugly boasting it's all organic.
00:19:12.020
She's an opportunistic grifter spewing false narratives for clicks, said the person who is spewing a false narrative for clicks on Reddit.
00:19:22.280
Anyways, this is not really helping Blake making up alternative facts like this to bait people into believing that Blake Lively is a victim.
00:19:35.380
And you can't just make up facts, even though you think that you love Blake Lively for some absurd reason.
00:19:41.280
An intelligent human being with critical thinking skills can see through all of this.
00:19:46.700
Yes, if you watch this and you've seen that thread and you think that there's any truth to it,
00:19:51.080
you should ask this person where they got this information about this old interview that I allegedly posted.
00:19:57.200
That they're the only person in the world that knows about it.
00:20:01.780
It's also interesting to see how they are using the exact same tactics that Blake Lively is accusing Justin Baldoni of doing.
00:20:09.880
Yes, so because of all of this, that's why that article in the Hollywood Reporter really bugs me.
00:20:15.820
Because it doesn't take into consideration that there is no evidence here.
00:20:19.740
All of this is based on assumption of allegations that's not been proven in court or proven anywhere yet.
00:20:26.980
And I know because I see what they're doing to me.
00:20:32.480
Because as I mentioned, I think it was in February last year,
00:20:36.400
they attacked my Wikipedia page trying to change the narrative,
00:20:44.580
trying to make, take away my credibility as a journalist,
00:20:53.540
It got changed about a hundred times every single day and it went on for weeks.
00:20:58.280
And it's interesting because Jed Wallace was talking about this in a recording.
00:21:06.320
So he's saying here, now Wikipedia, I don't know who exactly he said this to.
00:21:13.660
He said that Wikipedia, and I think we shared this very early on,
00:21:19.600
So the way it works is even if it's your own page,
00:21:24.820
which is what they determine which editors who have been editing Wikipedia the longest
00:21:30.060
have the most traction and their editors stick, right?
00:21:34.260
So anybody that's in there vandalizing pages is likely somebody,
00:21:38.900
it's most likely somebody that has, and this is the conundrum with Wikipedia,
00:21:45.480
because it's such a corrupt, fraudulent space and it's connected with SEO and Google.
00:21:51.540
But when the interesting thing is that people that are vandalizing your page have more leverage in you.
00:21:56.880
So all they're going to do is see that you're trying to change things
00:21:59.840
and you're trying to change a story that, again, is not to be changed yet, blah, blah, blah.
00:22:05.100
And then he's saying, we're just going to let it unfold.
00:22:08.360
So it's obvious that they attacked the Wayfair Party's Wikipedia pages as well.
00:22:12.700
Why would anyone have any interest of going in and attacking my Wikipedia page full-time?
00:22:22.960
But luckily, some people came in and corrected it back to the way it was.
00:22:30.260
I've said that so many times before, but that was amazing.
00:22:40.860
He's saying here that we want them to continue doing this,
00:22:46.660
because then we can prove that they're smearing us.
00:22:50.120
He's saying these people are going in and smearing everybody.
00:22:53.500
Now it's not even, they're not even pretending that they're not.
00:22:57.020
So it's something important for legal to keep in mind.
00:22:59.840
But more importantly, it's for us, the impulse is to stop it and fix it.
00:23:04.040
And the reality is like, you just don't, you just can't, because we need to bait them.
00:23:09.880
We need to establish that we're not getting engaged in this,
00:23:13.020
but that we're actually victims in these things.
00:23:18.200
So I didn't know that they were doing the same thing to their Wikipedia pages.
00:23:22.340
I find it so fascinating that Blake Lively has all these people working for her,
00:23:27.620
this army of so skilled people working for her,
00:23:32.580
and she's still not able to change people's opinions about her.
00:23:35.980
But she's claiming that Justin Baldoni could do it like this.
00:23:39.140
Okay, I wanted to talk quickly about something else.
00:23:41.260
Some people have said, oh, we want you to talk about other things too.
00:23:44.120
So I'm going to try and start doing that as well.
00:23:47.840
I've been seeing a lot of content creators talking about this.
00:23:51.080
The backlash that has come after the promotion of the movie Weathering Heights
00:24:01.840
And it just reminded me of how cynical this whole PR game really is
00:24:07.420
and how they're trying to trick us into buying their products
00:24:12.160
by pretending that the real world is something very different than it actually is.
00:24:21.660
showmance, which I think is a great word to explain exactly what happened here.
00:24:26.500
So last year, we saw the same thing with Pamela Anderson and Liam Neeson
00:24:36.260
And everyone was really disappointed because they really wanted them to be together.
00:24:39.980
The same thing happened with Sidney Sweeney and Glenn Powell.
00:24:43.100
I don't know if it was actually just pretending in their case,
00:24:46.220
but they were promoting anyone but you, the movie.
00:24:51.180
I think she was engaged at the time and he had a girlfriend.
00:24:54.260
And I think, I don't know what happened there, but they broke up after that.
00:24:57.480
But we also saw it so clearly with Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga for A Star Is Born.
00:25:08.520
It makes people interested and it makes people speculate about their personal life.
00:25:15.580
And that's exactly what Margot Robbie and Jacob Allurety did with Weathering Heights.
00:25:23.620
So BBC is noting some of the things that they said in interviews
00:25:28.420
and how they have appeared together on the red carpet that people have reacted to.
00:25:34.040
And you also have to keep in mind that Margot Robbie's husband here, Tom Ackerley,
00:25:46.040
So I'm also thinking that she brought her baby with her because her husband was there too.
00:25:51.040
So all of this is a little like, I don't know, tasteless.
00:25:54.380
In January, it says here that Robbie told Fandango that when her co-star wasn't close by,
00:25:59.360
I felt quite lost, like a kid without their blanket or something.
00:26:04.040
In the same interview, Allurety confessed he and Robbie had a mutual obsession,
00:26:12.780
And then they did this steamy photo shoot in Vogue, Australia with the title Pure Obsession.
00:26:22.200
Robbie described how Allurety made her almost weak at the knees
00:26:25.960
when he lifted her with one arm during one scene.
00:26:29.380
Then there was Allurety's romantic gesture for Robbie during filming on Valentine's Day.
00:26:35.120
You made my day and as Hathcliff filled my room with roses and it was so cute,
00:26:42.940
Robbie told Allurety during a conversation with her co-star.
00:26:46.700
So Hathcliff is his character's name in the movie,
00:26:50.120
but apparently he filled up her room with roses on Valentine's Day.
00:26:54.660
And then she said, I remember thinking on Valentine's Day,
00:26:57.820
oh, he's probably a very good boyfriend because there's a lot of thoughtfulness in this.
00:27:03.200
And then this reporter who wrote this for BBC said that she asked him this question on the red carpet.
00:27:08.660
And he was like, he looked a little startled and paused for a period before answering, oh, yes, yes.
00:27:14.960
And then there are the matching signet rings Robbie gifted to Allurety.
00:27:20.460
And the rings were words from Bronte, the author of the original book saying,
00:27:27.660
whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same.
00:27:32.180
And they were posing with these matching rings saying that.
00:27:38.440
I also thought about the idea if it was a man who had a newborn basically at home,
00:27:44.360
if it would be okay for people to speculate if there was something going on romantically there.
00:27:50.360
And why do they want to plant these ideas in our heads just to sell movie tickets?
00:27:59.840
I also hate when they're trying to trick us into watching their movies.
00:28:03.900
And I think sometimes when they are pushing the movie like this and they're trying to make up a story behind the scenes,
00:28:11.740
that's usually when the movie is not that good.
00:28:15.520
And I've heard a lot of people, I haven't watched it myself yet,
00:28:18.760
but I heard a lot of people trashing this movie saying it's awful.
00:28:21.880
But apparently the box office numbers are good.
00:28:27.600
But I just feel like I'm kind of tired of people in Hollywood trying to trick us
00:28:37.760
She'd be cheating on her husband with Jacob Elordi while she has a little baby at home.
00:28:42.760
That wouldn't be a great look for Margot Robbie.
00:28:45.220
I remember, by the way, when I did these press junkets myself,
00:28:48.440
if they knew that the movie wasn't going to be a hit,
00:28:51.760
it was kind of obvious that the talents, as we call them,
00:28:54.860
didn't want to talk about the movie necessarily.
00:28:57.080
They were more interested in talking about other things,
00:29:00.520
things that maybe could go viral so they would get some attention around the film.
00:29:05.260
Because if the critics didn't like it, people might listen to the critics.
00:29:09.680
So instead, they wanted to plant other stories out there
00:29:12.980
so that the movie would get attention in another way.
00:29:15.560
Anyways, I also saw a lot of people talk about this,
00:29:18.320
which is something that I'm quite passionate about as well.
00:29:23.900
She's a 35-year-old actress and this character is supposed to be between 16 and 18 years old.
00:29:33.060
Another thing is, her skin is flawless, her teeth are pearly white,
00:29:42.800
her forehead is filled with Botox, her brows are perfectly shaped,
00:29:54.840
Another problem is when you're trying to portray someone that's so tormented and traumatized
00:30:01.620
and in so much pain, and you can't move your face to show your feelings
00:30:09.300
You could maybe sell a story that's based in today,
00:30:15.080
And I'm not bashing people doing Botox or doing anything to their face.
00:30:18.360
I'm just saying that if you take a person from today with that kind of look
00:30:22.240
and put them in costumes from 1790 or 1800s, it looks really weird.
00:30:31.500
They actually put real people in there with real bad teeth
00:30:34.840
that look like they could have belonged in that era.
00:30:37.620
I actually asked ChatGPT what Margot Robbie's character would look like
00:30:49.980
I think that's what she should have looked like in that movie.
00:30:53.180
But then again, she was not 35, this character.
00:30:59.280
So then she probably should look more like this,
00:31:05.840
And when you put her next to what Margot Robbie looked like,
00:31:13.380
Yes, and how can we relate to her pain when we can't see her pain on her face?
00:31:19.260
I love how Amanda Seyfried put this when she was interviewed
00:31:22.480
about the role that she had in the movie called The Testament of Anne Lee,
00:31:27.580
a movie that's directed by a Norwegian director, by the way.
00:31:31.820
And she told Amanda, you can't do Botox for a year when you're playing this character.
00:31:39.120
And Mona didn't want a Botox face in her movie because she wanted the expressions.
00:31:50.100
And Amanda actually admitted in interviews that she loves Botox
00:31:55.440
But she also feels like you need to do some sacrifices for a role.
00:32:00.760
As I said before, it's really hard for me to watch a movie with Nicole Kidman these days
00:32:08.740
She can't play anything else than a privileged white woman with first world problems.
00:32:13.800
I also, by the way, had to ask Chatubiti what Nicole Kidman would look like
00:32:23.660
I don't know if you put the pictures next to each other.
00:32:27.700
I'm not saying that people shouldn't do Botox or fillers or whatever you feel like.
00:32:33.320
But if you want us to go and watch your movie and believe you in that movie,
00:32:40.880
And if your face is not moving, we're not going to believe you.
00:32:48.380
And if you haven't yet, please subscribe, hit the notification bell