Flaawsome Talk with Kjersti Flaa - NEW SHOCKING TEXTS Reveal EVERYTHING !!

00:00:00.000 Everything that she didn't want us to see has now been unsealed.

00:00:04.880 And it's even worse than we thought.

00:00:12.100 Hi and welcome to Blossom Talk.

00:00:13.780 I'm Sashdi Floor, journalist, Hollywood truth teller,

00:00:16.260 and your voice of reason in a town built on delusion.

00:00:20.340 What do you think, Magnus? Is it a town built on delusion?

00:00:23.080 No shit. 1.00

00:00:24.180 Okay, so there's been a huge dump of new unsealed filings this weekend. 0.99

00:00:32.740 So Blake Lyley was told by the judge, you need to unseal everything.

00:00:36.800 Everything that she didn't want us to see has now been unsealed.

00:00:41.600 And it's even worse than we thought.

00:00:44.160 This is such a bombshell, Magnus.

00:00:47.520 I can't believe this is her evidence.

00:00:49.480 I mean, it's insane.

00:00:51.340 So I can't go through all of it in this episode.

00:00:54.180 obviously because it's a lot but I will go through some of the stuff that I find or we found to be

00:00:59.760 the most damaging for Blake. So according to these new text messages, Blake Lively asked Sony to

00:01:08.080 delete evidence. Also we have to talk about in this episode the the YouTube video that a lot of

00:01:16.140 you guys sent me where Brian Friedman is talking about his key witness. Do you know who that is

00:01:21.040 magnus i think it's you yes it seems like it okay so let's get into it i have to say also there's

00:01:28.920 some really shocking new text messages that we're not going to talk about now that i'll talk about

00:01:33.240 tomorrow probably about how ryan reynolds was involved in blake's editing process that this

00:01:39.240 wasn't really her cut of the movie it was his cut of the movie it's get this gets wilder and wilder

00:01:46.620 Yes, and also how Justin's cut kept scoring better than Blake

00:01:50.760 and at the end she actually had to admit

00:01:52.980 and bring some of his scenes back into the movie.

00:01:56.320 There's so much to talk about.

00:01:57.780 But we have to talk about this evidence

00:02:00.080 that she asked Sony to delete.

00:02:03.740 So here is the text message.

00:02:06.200 Do you want to read it, Magnus?

00:02:07.100 This is from Anj Giannetti, a Sony executive,

00:02:12.140 sending this to Josh Greenstein at Sony.

00:02:15.400 and this is what she's saying.

00:02:17.920 Call when you can, not urgent,

00:02:19.520 but Blake asking us to destroy some of the dailies.

00:02:23.120 Want to tell you what we will and won't do.

00:02:26.140 Also going to ask Bridget to contact all vendors

00:02:28.640 and ask them to delete all dailies

00:02:30.860 and need them to prove, okay?

00:02:33.280 First time ever I've been asked to do this

00:02:35.380 in a movie with no nudity, but okay.

00:02:38.360 This is pretty crazy.

00:02:39.680 So this was sent on August,

00:02:41.680 August now on September 3rd 2024 and Giannetti saying to Josh Greenstein that she's been asked

00:02:51.160 by Blake personally it seems like here to delete dailies what are the dailies Magnus for the people

00:02:56.720 yeah this stuff you shot that day so everything you're not going to use basically or use I mean

00:03:03.480 both things some of it ends up in the movie and all this stuff yeah they already used it so yeah

00:03:08.680 yeah so she's saying get rid of it and this is a woman who claims to have been sh right and

00:03:15.920 why won't why would you want proof destroyed i don't know do you remember that dancing scene

00:03:23.000 when she first said oh my god what a mess that is or that argument is yeah but then we got to see

00:03:28.580 that dancing scene and then i can't remember how it was did she say yeah but because there was no

00:03:33.240 audio you you guys aren't grasping the whole picture basically that's you know that's the

00:03:37.480 argument right yeah she said that there's no audio so you know because justy baldoni came out

00:03:42.840 remember when he came out with all his evidence saying you know there wasn't any sh we were just

00:03:48.540 playing a couple falling in love and we just did what was on in the script and she said no no no

00:03:53.520 that's not what's going on and you don't have the audio because at that point she didn't know that

00:03:58.420 they had the audio we still don't know if actually if sony actually deleted the dailies as they were

00:04:04.100 asked. We don't know that yet. But this is where it becomes really interesting because this is

00:04:11.740 from Blake Lively's deposition. So do you want to be Blake Lively again, Magnus? Okay, so I'll ask

00:04:19.220 you. This is the attorney asking Blake under oath. So you never asked or had anybody on your behalf

00:04:26.380 ask anyone from sony to destroy the dailies is that correct blake no i never asked anyone to

00:04:34.660 destroy the dailies no what about did you ask anyone on your behalf to contact sony to destroy

00:04:39.580 the dailies to destroy the dailies yeah no really how blake are you going to how are you going to

00:04:50.840 explain this on the stand in front of a jury you are going to say that and gianetti lied

00:04:56.500 apparently yeah that's the only that's the only answer now right so now it's up to the jury to

00:05:01.840 decide who they believe hey do they believe break lively who says that she never asked anyone or do

00:05:07.660 they believe and gianetti from sony who actually forwarded this message from blake saying that we

00:05:14.520 are asked to delete all these dailies and also she's asking the um the vendors to delete all the

00:05:22.260 dailies as well so they want to delete all tracks of anything that she according to herself would

00:05:30.780 have used to prove that there were sh that there was sh on that set why did she want to and this

00:05:37.180 apparently coming from a woman who's accusing the other side of using signal to yeah delete

00:05:43.080 text messages or to hide yes as you know Blake's team has accused Baldoni's team here of using

00:05:51.860 Signal an app where they have this auto delete function on so she's saying that they destroyed

00:05:58.640 evidence and here we have it this I mean if this isn't proof if you ask me what is real proof

00:06:05.220 I mean this is crazy so here comes another interesting part because this happened as I said

00:06:11.780 on september 3rd and guess what happened around the same time magnus i'm sure you will tell us

00:06:20.080 now according to brian friedman who did this sworn testimony back in february he said that during a

00:06:30.200 call with someone very close to taylor swift who we now know is according to a lot of sources is

00:06:37.360 her dad around this time Blake sent a message or asked Taylor Swift to delete text messages

00:06:44.660 it says here on point five in his sworn statement to the judge it says during the same February 14th

00:06:53.560 call the individual told me they had been informed that four or five months earlier which will since

00:06:59.840 this was in February means in September Miss Lively had requested that Miss Swift delete her text

00:07:06.320 messages with miss lively i mean and also something that someone pointed out i don't

00:07:17.640 remember where i saw this if it was on reddit or someone else somewhere else people are so good at

00:07:22.180 investigating this case also someone pointed out that in one of lake lively's exports report

00:07:28.420 they're mentioning Ange Giannetti specifically to try to discredit her.

00:07:34.360 So they're saying that she was part of the team from Sony

00:07:39.060 who made it possible for all this behavior to go on on the set of It Ends With Us.

00:07:45.800 It says in her expert report that it is my opinion

00:07:49.580 that this institutional hierarchy allowed Wayfair to engage in unchecked misconduct

00:07:56.160 facilitated by Sony,

00:07:59.000 leaving Ms. Lively with little to no recourse.

00:08:04.120 So why isn't she going after Sony? 0.99

00:08:07.560 Yeah, exactly.

00:08:08.660 That's a very good point.

00:08:10.460 She's going after, actually, Ange Gianetti in this report.

00:08:13.560 This is from an expert who she invented DARVO,

00:08:18.780 which is deny, accuse.

00:08:21.300 Now, what is it again?

00:08:22.140 Deny attack, right?

00:08:22.920 deny attack reverse victim offender and she's never met blake lively this woman her name is

00:08:29.800 jennifer frayed and she's never met blake but she wrote this long report of how you know all of this

00:08:36.680 stuff happened on this set when she was never on the set either i mean it's so insane to me what's

00:08:42.760 going on right now and this is going to be i mean and the fact is this is blake lively's evidence

00:08:48.400 keep in mind that she wanted hidden that she wanted hidden she wanted and also all these new

00:08:56.060 unsealed documents that we've seen so far is all so terrible and it's all coming from her side

00:09:03.620 things that she's she's you know going to use at court in court and it's just proving the opposite

00:09:10.340 happened but i don't get it but but let's let's try to look at it from her side now yeah since

00:09:15.180 you have followed this case so closely for so long why do you think first of all i mean that's

00:09:21.140 the obvious question why do you think she wanted it sealed because she didn't want us to look at it

00:09:26.520 because she's going to of course take this apart and use pieces of it in her uh in her narrative 0.69

00:09:35.120 to convince the jury that there was some kind of smear campaign but of course this part of it 0.52

00:09:40.480 with Sony, of course

00:09:42.560 she wanted that sealed because

00:09:44.360 she knows that

00:09:46.280 it's certainly going to, it won't

00:09:48.420 look good for her future

00:09:49.940 sort of

00:09:51.000 dealings with Sony, will it? No.

00:09:55.100 Well, they're doing 12 more

00:09:56.420 movies with her, according to

00:09:58.360 the Sony. That's what you said, did you say 12 or 10

00:10:00.340 or something? Yeah, we want to do 12 more movies.

00:10:02.260 I look forward to hearing about those 12 new

00:10:04.360 movies that Sony are going to make

00:10:06.540 with Blake Lively.

00:10:08.220 But what's interesting though is that

00:10:10.060 And anyone who's looking at this from the outside and certainly from the industry, we hear that they call it a PR battle, right?

00:10:15.920 This is a battle of PR and perception of how they are perceived.

00:10:19.980 So if you want to sort of, you know, convince people of your side of the story, then you want the evidence out there, wouldn't you?

00:10:28.460 Exactly.

00:10:29.060 That it can help you to win this PR battle.

00:10:31.840 But here she's hiding everything.

00:10:33.440 Yeah. On top of this, this is also interesting because this happened at the same time or just a few weeks before Blake and Ryan filed that Van Zandt lawsuit, that sham lawsuit to get hold of Justin Baldoni's publicist phone legally so they could give it to the New York Times.

00:10:52.500 there's also been talk I've seen I don't know if there's any real sources to it but there were also

00:10:58.200 talks that Blake Lively threatened Sony to go to the New York Times with these SH claims unless

00:11:06.300 they gave her her own cut of the movie so I don't know if that's true or not but it does make a lot

00:11:12.540 of sense to me now when we see how they planned everything so carefully how to build this case

00:11:19.160 against Justin it's so revealing I mean it's crazy to me anyways and again it puts some

00:11:25.740 put some light on the New York Times and it it's not flattering is it for sure I mean they they

00:11:33.160 claimed in that in that face so so-called famous article that they had read thousands of messages

00:11:38.980 yeah then the question so that sort of I want to ask is did you read all of these and and you

00:11:45.200 still made that piece did you sort of did you choose not to yeah did you just i don't know put

00:11:52.420 a blind eye to it and i mean that is a big question how much did actually new york times see

00:11:57.440 and i think what they published yesterday says a lot oh yeah about them so yesterday the new

00:12:04.060 york times did this story of robert f kennedy jr the secretary of health and what is it health

00:12:11.140 Health and Human Services.

00:12:12.420 Health and Human Services in the U.S.

00:12:14.860 So they did this headline saying Kennedy consulted with scandal PR firm

00:12:20.140 while seeking cabinet nomination.

00:12:22.460 And then they said an associate of the firm which has been accused

00:12:26.400 of running a smear campaign against the actress Blake Lively

00:12:30.060 promised to suppress negative stories about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. records show.

00:12:36.820 It didn't work so well, though, if you want to take a look.

00:12:39.620 no they didn't do a great job but what i find so interesting about this is like all the stuff that

00:12:45.960 we've seen that's been unsealed in this because all this happened at the same time they dumped

00:12:50.960 all these documents at the same time and this is the angle that the new york times choose to do so

00:12:56.200 it was a deposition of jed wallace amongst the things that were unsealed and he has been fighting

00:13:01.680 to keep his clients or his potential clients sealed because he doesn't want that to become

00:13:08.360 public who has actually reached out to him for crisis pr which is very understandable when you

00:13:13.160 do when you run a business that you know people expect you to keep certain things secret and now

00:13:19.580 it's been revealed through his deposition that they were in talks of talking of actually

00:13:25.440 representing or working with robert f kennedy jr and they never did uh but now they're but it's

00:13:34.360 It's still a story.

00:13:35.460 But that's the story.

00:13:37.400 And like, what do you think politicians do?

00:13:40.580 Turn on the TV and you see these commercials about the political enemies, so to speak, right?

00:13:47.940 You have a guy who wants to be elected and then he runs a smear campaign against the other guy.

00:13:52.660 I mean, it's there in black and white every day, every hour of the day on TV.

00:13:58.000 Right now we're watching like the new mayor.

00:14:01.720 Oh, the mayor's race in L.A.

00:14:02.840 Yeah, the mayor's race in L.A.

00:14:04.360 They smear each other on TV every day talking about how terrible the other candidates are.

00:14:10.300 So this is just like, who doesn't do this?

00:14:12.900 This is politician.

00:14:14.240 I mean, this is politics like every day.

00:14:17.380 Yeah, basically regular Tuesday.

00:14:20.600 Why would anyone be like shocked?

00:14:22.740 Like, oh, RFK Jr. hired someone to suppress negative stories and push positive stories.

00:14:28.980 Like, seriously?

00:14:30.400 Isn't that what crisis PR do?

00:14:31.540 they push positive stories about yeah isn't that what politicians do every day they push negative

00:14:37.360 stories about their enemies yes so i mean this is just so silly and the thing is i know the reason

00:14:43.700 why they did this because they want they're they're they're afraid now because they're afraid

00:14:50.180 of what's going to come out in this trial and they're gonna and they're afraid that people

00:14:54.180 are going to start to know how much they actually knew before they published that story and that's

00:14:59.100 why they're like doubling down here saying we were on the right side because we you know we

00:15:04.040 reported on this smear campaign that we knew happened from all the evidence that we have and

00:15:09.040 look here's more evidence that that's what they're doing don't you think it's got to be the yeah i

00:15:14.380 don't know i mean that's that's a conspiracy theory well why would they pick this story out

00:15:19.680 of everything yeah no one else picked this up it's not interesting i mean it's like it's just

00:15:25.880 like it's a non-story and it says everything that we need to know about and we know and we've not

00:15:31.880 and we know that they've been very selective in the past when they pick and choose messages that's

00:15:36.680 for sure and then we of course have this story the these text messages which is a part of a bigger

00:15:42.120 thread that i will go through in other episodes this week but here is a text exchange a very short

00:15:48.240 one that i have picked out here between melissa nathan who is the crisis management team that

00:15:54.640 Justin Bolden hired and Melissa and Jennifer Abel who was his or is his publicist and they are

00:16:01.800 sharing the story the Daily Mail did about my video on August 14th which is the same day that

00:16:10.500 they sent my video to Jed Wallace which is the same day that Blake Lively claims that they started

00:16:17.300 amplifying my video and that it went viral and here jennifer abel says magnus what does she say

00:16:25.040 when she sees this article she says oh my god then melissa nason responds not us so saying we

00:16:34.860 didn't do this we had we had nothing to do with this this story is in the daily mail which is

00:16:40.840 basically isn't it the world i think it's the biggest media site yeah biggest media site in

00:16:45.240 the world and they're saying that that didn't have anything to do with this video my video

00:16:50.180 going viral no no no it was jed wallace bot factory it's so obvious at this point it's insane

00:16:59.180 anyways let's jump to this story or this video that so many people sent me thank you so much

00:17:05.480 for sending it to me so this is a story where or that an interview that brian friedman did with

00:17:11.680 And two of his kind of colleagues, I would say, Mark Geragos and Matt Murphy,

00:17:17.560 who's also both really established and very successful attorneys.

00:17:24.740 And he was on their podcast and the podcast said,

00:17:28.720 Justin Baldoni's lawyer, Brian Friedman, reveals the key witness who will testify against Blake Lively.

00:17:36.220 Who was the key witness, Magnus?

00:17:40.200 Drum roll.

00:17:41.680 Yeah, I guess it's you.

00:17:45.960 I mean, they didn't say in the video that I'm the key witness,

00:17:49.260 but the video title said that I'm the key witness,

00:17:52.200 and it was on their MK True Crime podcast.

00:17:57.040 So this is quite interesting.

00:17:58.980 They were discussing my video,

00:18:00.980 and they were asking the same questions to Brian Friedman,

00:18:04.020 as I think everyone has been asking at this point.

00:18:06.960 Like, how can you sue someone over things that you said or did?

00:18:10.260 Yeah, basically saying, how can you sue someone for something that already exists on the internet?

00:18:17.540 Because, you know, it's her own words.

00:18:20.720 You know, they didn't understand the logic either, obviously.

00:18:23.360 No one understands the logic here.

00:18:24.920 It's a quite interesting interview, actually, where they're talking.

00:18:27.660 They're asking Brian Friedman all these questions, like, how could this even be a case?

00:18:34.720 And, yeah, I don't think anyone's understanding it.

00:18:37.240 And also, how are you going to explain to a jury that this is actually a case that deserves to be in federal court?

00:18:44.380 But this is so interesting to me, though, because obviously we are talking about some of the sharper legal minds in the U.S. here, sitting here, not understanding how you could sue someone for this, how you could use this as a legal argument.

00:18:58.440 And at the same time, Blake has, you know, a whole army of lawyers basically saying that, oh, this case is like, you know, it's a slam dunk, basically.

00:19:13.520 Mountains of evidence.

00:19:14.880 They do have mountains of evidence, but that evidence, that mountain of evidence actually proves the opposite.

00:19:20.760 It points in the wrong direction.

00:19:23.880 They have thousands of evidence that they've given to Balzodi's team

00:19:26.840 because what it actually all proves is that she took over the movie. 0.98

00:19:32.080 She made up all these S.H. claims.

00:19:34.040 She didn't make up the claims.

00:19:35.620 The claims are there.

00:19:36.700 And I do believe that she believed these things happened to her.

00:19:39.580 But for the rest of the world, hugging people on a set

00:19:42.940 or saying someone's one C is sexy is not considered S.H.

00:19:46.960 And I also believe that she does not believe that it's possible for her

00:19:52.380 to receive so much criticism online unless it is from bots yes so much exciting stuff going on this

00:19:59.160 week as i said please make sure you are subscribed to my channel and if you haven't yet also hit the

00:20:04.720 notification bell so you know exactly when i will post new updates there's a lot of new stuff coming

00:20:09.840 out this week and i will cover everything for you guys and thank you again magnus for being here

00:20:15.320 and I hope you're having a lovely Sunday

00:20:18.400 and we'll see you soon

00:20:20.340 bye

Flaawsome Talk with Kjersti Flaa - May 04, 2026

NEW SHOCKING TEXTS Reveal EVERYTHING !!

Episode Stats

People

Summary

Transcript