In this episode, Myron and Andrew discuss numerology and astrology. How do they work? What are the differences between them? How can they be reconciled? What is the role of astrology and numerology in our understanding of the world? Is there any truth behind it?
00:01:48.000Gary the Numbers Guy, and I'm the one who made numerology and astrology mainstream.
00:01:53.000As a person, I'm a father, been married for 20 years, and quite frankly, I'm the only person, I'm the Michael Jordan in my game, so I'm looking forward to this.
00:02:11.000Andrew Wilson and Andy are both streaming this as well.
00:02:14.000So multi-stream, get as many eyeballs here because this is definitely going to be a good discussion.
00:02:17.000So give you guys a little bit of the parameters of how this is going to work.
00:02:20.000Each party is going to get a preamble where they're going to state their position, what they disagree with in the other position, and kind of give you an idea of what their worldview is.
00:02:29.000That's going to be five minutes uninterrupted.
00:02:31.000Then we're going to get into round one, where it's going to be open dialogue for approximately seven minutes.
00:02:35.000And then from there, depending on how the discourse goes, we'll either continue to do it that way, where it's free flow conversation, or we go and do time rounds like you guys have seen me do before.
00:02:44.000So prior to us starting this thing, Andrew said he would go first.
00:03:09.000Through misdirection, cold reading, vagueness, and universalities of outcome.
00:03:13.000Meaning simply the outcome which was dubiously predicted based on the vagueness of language has a post hoc justification.
00:03:20.000Post hoc meaning an inference of a logical relationship between events after the event is done, even if the events themselves are not particularly related.
00:03:31.000Take, for instance, me, Andrew Wilson.
00:03:34.000I have made failed political predictions, and I've made accurate political predictions based around educated guesses going on around political events at the time.
00:03:42.000I, like most others, analyze evidence for a predictive model and often get things wrong.
00:03:47.000Now, there's no shame in that for a political analyst.
00:03:50.000We are going to get things wrong a lot because human behavior is complicated, and the systems they create are also very complicated.
00:03:57.000In the end, I'm dealing in educated guesses along with personal bias and a specific worldview which come together to form an analysis.
00:04:38.000I have predicted, using post hoc justification to retroactively apply your numerology to whatever event to convince you that your predictions are solid, and then...
00:04:49.000Add vagueness as to the future outcome of an event in order to take credit for the said event regardless of the outcome.
00:04:56.000In other words, I predicted X thing would happen, and that gives me credibility that the future thing I predict will also happen.
00:05:03.000Why do people turn to such idiocy, you ask, when it's obvious this model can't really make predictions any better than just educated guesses?
00:05:13.000There aren't any Gematria followers, numerology professionals, etc.
00:05:19.000that I've seen anyway that don't seem to always have their hands in sports betting.
00:05:23.000Remember, sports are games of chance where there's an almost always higher than zero chance of getting it right.
00:05:29.000Sports bettors play odds and look for any edge to hedge their bets, and many turn to the supernatural for helping these bets because they are gambling addicts or themselves running a tiered scam for pulled sports betting.
00:05:40.000Today I'm going to show how to easily dismantle this particular worldview, and it's very easy.
00:05:45.000In fact, the debate doesn't even really need to go on for very long.
00:05:49.000I am asking if my opponent today will make a hyper-specific prediction based on his numerology model.
00:05:55.000This is the enemy of all people who practice this form of sorcery.
00:05:59.000An experiment was developed for just this purpose to separate the wheat from the chaff.
00:06:03.000Simply, in the next 90 days, tell me an event with a high degree of specificity that wouldn't ordinarily be predicted.
00:06:10.000This can't include sports, as there's a higher than 0% chance you can just guess correctly.
00:06:15.000Give us instead specific names, dates, times, and locations for the said event, and not vagueness, which can be interpreted.
00:06:21.000Example, a man named Toady Edgar will kidnap a girl named Samantha Bright in New York City on the 7th of March.
00:06:28.000There is so much there that is predicted specifically, it would be impossible for us to cast doubt on the prediction.
00:06:44.000You can just make this prediction with some degree of chance it'll happen just based on how many men with beards are in the United States.
00:06:50.000What Max will say, I believe, is that numerology doesn't work that way, and he can't make those types of predictions.
00:06:57.000And that's how you know, by the way, the entire thing is phony because specificity is the enemy to the system, making it a bad predictive model no better really than human intuition and observable behavioral patterns.
00:07:10.000So that you understand, my opponent will likely yell at me.
00:07:15.000Attempt to obfuscate away from this point.
00:07:17.000He'll shotgun points as fast as possible, personally probably attack me, or attempt to attack my credibility.
00:08:06.000It went like five seconds over, but it's fine.
00:08:08.000And the way I do it is if the other party is okay with it, I'll let them continue on, and then I give that identical time to the other person.
00:08:14.000So real quick, Andrew, if you don't mind, because obviously you said a lot there, I want to summarize it for the audience that's listening in.
00:08:19.000So some of your points were you want a specific prediction within 90 dates, it's all chance-based outcomes, it's sorcery, and it's typically nebulous to garner credit for future events that are almost inevitable because it's not specific.
00:10:24.000That the Great War, World War I, ended on 11 to 11 at exactly 11 o'clock.
00:10:30.000Not 1055, but exactly 11. And at that point, I didn't know what was going on.
00:10:35.000But I saw smoke and I started looking for the fire.
00:10:40.000And then I understood that these people that we talk about that run the world, the cabal, all these people, the Illuminati, I started understanding what they were doing.
00:10:50.000They were actually using numerology and astrology against the people.
00:10:54.000While they're telling the people to look into Korans and Bibles and Torahs and Talmuds.
00:11:00.000Because they want to keep the knowledge to themselves and they want all the quote-unquote sheep goyim to look at the religion.
00:11:07.000So what I basically started discovering was, okay, if this is just one thing, it doesn't mean anything.
00:11:12.000But then I found out that Al-Qaeda was founded on the 11th.
00:11:16.000And then I found out Al-Qaeda's three biggest attacks.
00:11:31.000So at that point, when you start seeing all these events happen synchronistically on the same day, you start understanding that people are actually doing stuff.
00:11:44.000And the fact of the matter is, if you take it from a mathematical statistical probability, we're talking in the millions that all that stuff would line up.
00:11:51.000So then I'm starting to think, okay, maybe it's just one thing.
00:11:55.000And then I started looking at the events.
00:11:57.000I wanted to know why some of the richest people in the world had money.
00:12:00.000And then I discovered 28th number of wealth.
00:13:16.000If someone's born in the 5th, 14th, 23rd, there's a high chance they're going to be extremely good looking because five is the number of looks.
00:13:23.000And you don't have to take my word for it.
00:14:17.000There are connections that are inevitable concerning 9-11.
00:14:20.000You used the event of 9-11 to substantiate that, and you gave many different instances where 11 came up.
00:14:25.000Then you talked about the number of wealth Elon, Bill Gates, and then basically that religion is a grift to keep people from the power of numerology.
00:17:20.000When you do this, you live in the vagueness.
00:17:22.000When you make a political prediction like this, right, there's enough background where I think that most people are making the affirmative political prediction that Trump may get thrown out of office.
00:17:31.000What I'm asking you for is not for that.
00:17:39.000So what I'm asking for is if you can give us a hyper-specific prediction based on people you don't know and events that we would ordinarily be unable to predict.
00:17:50.000How exactly do you want me to take Joe Schmo off the streets?
00:20:33.000If it's true that you can only make a vague prediction that, well, I don't know, Jake Paul, bad thing going to happen to Jake Paul this year, a vague prediction, right?
00:20:42.000Anybody can make that vague prediction.
00:20:44.000Also, people who do not utilize numerology in any way, shape, or form also, I'm sure, won $1.2 million in casinos around the same time you did.
00:20:54.000You are using a correlative fallacy in saying that because I won X amount of money, this is due to my system of numerology.
00:21:01.000However, other people win money and use no such system of numerology.
00:24:01.000If it can make a prediction like that, why can't it give you specifics?
00:24:05.000And if it can't, then it's a really bad predictive model.
00:24:08.000That intuition itself and predictive prowess should be able to trump with ease just based on following the career of this particular celebrity.
00:24:16.000If he can give you nothing better, no specific, no date, no time, if it's catastrophic, non-catastrophic, the specific of what catastrophic means, the model is worthless, right?
00:24:28.000And there's no reason for anybody to follow it.
00:24:30.000Why would you ever follow such a model?
00:25:28.000So I can make a prediction in 2025. Which is a universal nine-year, that wars will end based off what I have just shared with you guys now.
00:25:40.000So I can make a prediction right now that the war in Ukraine and the war in Gaza will end in 2025 because it's a universal nine-year and a snake year, and I've shown you the past correlations.
00:26:19.000I can make a prediction that wars which political analysis already is making the prediction is going to end in 2025. That Zelensky is already suing for peace.
00:26:30.000That the likelihood that when Trump comes in in the administration, he's going to sue for peace between these two nations.
00:27:10.000Oh, it's going to ramp down and then retroactively and post-hocs say, well, see, I predicted it was ramping down, and so it did technically end.
00:28:16.000And then you can just retroactively go back and say, but based on this, I can say, well, this war ended and this war ended and this war ended.
00:28:33.000So just so I can recap because I see that the views are coming up and a lot of people join in the middle if you guys don't mind me doing a quick recap.
00:28:40.000If you're just joining the stream, guys, welcome to the stream.
00:28:42.000We have Gary, the numbers guy, and Andrew Wilson having a fantastic debate on numerology and astrology.
00:28:46.000We started with a preamble where they both gave their positions.
00:28:49.000Andrew's position is numerology and astrology is sorcery.
00:28:53.000It's based on chance outcomes, and it is not specific.
00:28:57.000Gary retorted with the number 11 and how things are connected and how it's irrefutable to see all the connections from certain events.
00:29:05.000Then we went into round one, which is a seven-minute open dialogue where Andrew asked Gary to make a specific prediction.
00:29:13.000Gary made the prediction that Trump will get rid of Elon before the end of this year.
00:29:18.000And then we just completed round three just now.
00:29:21.000They're going back and forth in regards to specificity.
00:29:24.000So, Gary, I'll give it to you, and I think this is going to be the top of the fourth round here, if I'm not mistaken.
00:30:34.000I gave specific predictions that the war would end in 2025. Now, we're just here, and you haven't heard me before, but I said this last year, and I said the year before that.
00:30:45.000I said Trump would win an alliance slide.
00:30:51.000What I'm telling you is going to go on next year is, specifically, people who were born in 1989, 2001. 2013. They will have positive years because snakes do well in snake years.
00:31:07.000Now, people who are born in 71 are going to have off years.
00:31:11.000Justin Trudeau, born 1971, the year the pig, has just announced he is resigning as Prime Minister of Canada.
00:31:19.000If you understand how the system works, he is born in the pig year.
00:32:05.000I'll put two minutes on the clock and then this will be the top of the fourth round.
00:32:09.000So, notice again that this is a rhetorical flourish, but it doesn't really tell us much.
00:32:15.000He says, guys like this, they want you to put it to the decibel.
00:32:18.000No, I didn't ask you to put it to the decibel.
00:32:20.000I just asked you for a little bit more clarification on what these terms mean and what you're actually predicting here so that you can't hide in the vagueness, and he refuses to do so, and the reason is because he can't do it, and the reason he can't do it is because this predictive model doesn't predict shit.
00:32:38.000He says, I can predict who can win a game, but I can't give you any specifics about the game.
00:35:38.000They both chose a woman born in 1980 and their marriages failed accordingly.
00:35:43.000So you can say there's nothing to that, but what I would tell you is take the statistical probability that two of these guys born in 1977, year of the snake, made it big in the year of the snake, and that is my whole system.
00:38:34.000He says, Myron's literally a 22 life path master builder and was born on the first, meaning he's a good debater and has natural leadership skills.
00:38:39.000Can you talk about this for a bit, Gary?
00:38:55.0002-1-1-9-9-0 adds up to 22. So if you're born a 22, if your total number adds up to 22, Or you're born on the 22nd, you're a person who builds other people up.
00:39:06.000Example, George Washington started America.
00:40:47.000So again, so what happens here is we draw...
00:40:51.000Multitudes of unrelated events and then kind of pretend, again, post hoc or ad hoc justification, whichever way you want to phrase it, that these things are interrelated and that we can make a predictive model based on them.
00:41:02.000But remember this, like I said in my opening statement, here we are still.
00:41:08.000Not really giving any specifics, but pretending like he's giving specifics.
00:41:12.000So, for instance, he says to Myron, here's the predictive model of your entire life based on some numerology nonsense that he came up with.
00:41:22.000But when I asked him a specific question, which was about people who he claims are going to have a good year based on their year date...
00:41:30.000Are any of these people going to get cancer?
00:41:32.000Are any of them going to have the worst year of their lives?
00:41:34.000Are any of these people going to go bankrupt?
00:45:31.000like donald trump who was a four life path so what you're gonna have to understand is most of the people who are listening to this right now if your numbers total numbers add to four you're going to be a conservative you're going to be a hard-working person and you're also always going to have to outwork other people that's what you have to do andrew you have to outwork everyone else to get anything in life nothing comes easy for you now let's go more specific since your birthday hit this year money hasn't been too good has it sir
00:45:59.000As a matter of fact, you've been getting your ass handed to you.
00:46:02.000Finances have been very bad since your birthday hit.
00:46:24.000Okay, I would love to see you actually prove that.
00:46:25.000And if you can prove that and you actually have money now, then I implore you to take some of that money and put your money where your mouth is and show people that I'm a fraud.
00:48:28.000Well, lie to Gary, and I do this to psychic frauds all the time, and watch them give out these predictive models, which they are trying to tailor to me via a cold reading, and it turns out that no matter what date I would have given them, they would have given me the exact same thing.
00:48:57.000This to all these guys every single day.
00:49:00.000So here's what the experiment ought to be.
00:49:02.000The experiment actually ought to be, if these predictive models work, it's not that we just go up to random people, but we go up to some people who are not random as well.
00:49:10.000So we have the game fixed, and we see how close these predictions become when we have the precognitive information as to whether or not these people are telling the truth or they're not telling the truth.
00:49:22.000How much is a placebo effect versus how much is not.
00:49:25.000On top of that, let me just kind of point out how easy...
00:49:31.000It's easy to do this to all of these guys because the non-predictive models that they have are always tailored to a person interpersonally.
00:49:38.000That's how they try to convince you that their models are correct.
00:51:13.000And nothing you say anymore has any value whatsoever because you couldn't even stick with the program and give me your honest birthday so you could honestly evaluate my skills at doing what I do.
00:54:48.000I think he'll be pretty honorable about it.
00:54:50.000Yeah, but the problem now with giving it is he can just tailor it how he wants to.
00:54:56.000Again, it would be post hoc justification.
00:55:02.000So the thing is, I'll give it to you, but I just want to tell the audience that now you'll have post hoc justification and he'll say, no, no, no, I was wrong.
00:55:10.000If I'd had this information, I would have known it was the best year that you've ever had, Andrew.
00:55:14.000So here's the information that you want.
00:55:16.000My birth date, actual birth date, honestly, to you is 123-84.
00:56:31.000You still got like a little over a full minute.
00:56:33.000People who are ones tend to be extremely argumentative.
00:56:37.000people who are ones have that debating mental style so it makes sense why he likes to debate he likes to run his mouth and things like that attorney first file a lawyer first file a what do they do they argue the law a so people who are ones are extremely argumentative And another thing about this man over here, he learns things the hard way.
00:57:19.000This is what frauds do when all you had to do was give me the real birthday from the very beginning and we wouldn't even go through this stuff.
00:57:26.000But I'm going to say this one more time.
00:58:48.000I do enjoy having a drink, but I'm most certainly not an alcoholic and never have been, though I do like to occasionally have a drink on stream.
01:03:19.000I don't know if you guys want to go into religion here, but, you know, we'll do as many rounds as you guys feel comfortable with.
01:03:26.000So it's going to be the best year of my life.
01:03:28.000I'm sure that there will be catastrophes, which happened this year, like last year, and the year before that, and the year before that, and the year before that, and every fucking year that I've been alive, because that's what happens, right?
01:03:38.000People have catastrophes in their life.
01:03:41.000And you can't account for everything, unfortunately.
01:03:47.000Perhaps I'll be diagnosed with a disease that's happened to me before.
01:03:50.000Perhaps somebody else that I know will be.
01:03:52.000In fact, chances are pretty good that something bad this year will happen to me because every single year that I've been alive and every other human being that I'm aware of, something bad that year happened to them at some point that year.
01:04:14.000Post hoc justification will be, I don't know what'll happen.
01:04:17.000Perhaps I'll make a post on the internet where I say, oh man, a family member of mine died and I'm really, really sad about it and it sucks.
01:05:00.000To wish harm on anybody, ever, and I don't wish any harm on you, and I don't wish any harm on Myron or anything like that, and I wish you much success.
01:05:07.000I don't want you to get success at the expense of other people, but I do wish you much success in your life.
01:05:13.000Ultimately, though, again, what are the specifics behind these bad things that are going to happen to me?
01:05:19.000What he's banking on is, like, me, like every other human being, has a bad event which happens in their life, and then he can then point to it and say, see, I told you!
01:07:10.000If you want to better your life, if you want to find the right person, if you want to have kids, making sure they're healthy kids, you do things based off numerology and astrology.
01:07:22.000The royal family in England, for some reason, they keep having kids who are 11 life paths.
01:07:30.000The mathematical chances of any one number coming up in numerology are 1 and 9. And half the royal family is 11s, like Prince William, Prince Charles.
01:11:16.000Whether he thinks it's right or wrong is a different story.
01:11:21.000So I'm not making the claim that he doesn't believe in this stuff.
01:11:24.000I'm making a different claim altogether.
01:11:27.000My claim is that as a predictive model, it's a failure because it does not pass the realm of specificity.
01:11:32.000And it does not go past the occurrence of chance.
01:11:36.000And whenever we try to get down into any type of actual specifics or clarification, any time in this debate, and I actually had a notepad up for my audience to see the entire time so that they could see, as I predicted, the evasion of each time I asked for specificity.
01:11:52.000It's very simple to go through these over and over and over.
01:11:55.000You, the viewer, should remember a couple of things.
01:11:58.000The first thing is that most people who claim that they have some predictive model that nobody else has, don't.
01:12:06.000And that through just a little bit of logical testing, you can compare it to just basic intuition or analysis based on evidence and find that you come to various chance encounters.
01:12:16.000We actually have predictive models based around this of people doing experiments like the Townsend experiment, for instance, where they made sure to put it up against whatever the chance ratio would be and found that it really doesn't go above chance, right?
01:12:32.000When a person starts to say, though, things like, just look at my life versus his.
01:12:49.000Even if all of it's true, and I'm just going to concede that it is, that in every conceivable way, this guy is way more successful than I'll probably ever be.
01:13:25.000There's a testament to how many people get rich on frauds or pyramid schemes or marketing scams or various things.
01:13:32.000Just because they have success does not mean that their system is in any way, shape, or form true.
01:13:36.000And most people bank on the fact that because you want to be like them or you want to win the big game or win the sporting events or things like this, and look at me, I've done it after all, that you will move towards that system without applying basic logic to it.
01:13:51.000It doesn't know the laws of logic, and yet he says the system is logical.
01:13:55.000It's so bad, in fact, he said that his laws of logic are supply and demand, which doesn't mean anything.
01:14:44.000And you can use basic conductive reasoning to figure out very quickly this is all nonsense.
01:14:49.000We should follow anything as a predictive model other than this because ultimately your own intuition is probably going to lead you better than anything which is stated here.
01:15:00.000Again, let me just tell you one more time.
01:15:02.000I asked for so many specifics, and I wasn't asking even for grandiose specifics.
01:15:08.000And every single time, things like, well, you've had problems with women in your life, or you've had alcoholism problems, or you've blah, blah, blah.
01:16:16.000Gary, I'll give you the same amount of time as well.
01:16:18.000So I'll turn the clock on once you start going.
01:16:22.000Andrew said that if I'm more successful, if I have more money, none of that means anything.
01:16:29.000So according to him, Michael Jordan, just because he's the best basketball player in the world and he won six titles, that doesn't mean anything.
01:16:38.000Just because Elon Musk has $400 billion, that doesn't mean anything.
01:16:42.000Just because Donald Trump is President of the United States, that doesn't mean anything.
01:16:47.000Because these are the top people at their profession, and he's trying to tell you all of their success means nothing.
01:16:54.000That's basically what this man just said.
01:16:56.000And he said it over and over and over.
01:17:39.000People at the top of their profession know stuff that you don't.
01:17:45.000And if you're so ignorant to think that you know more than the people who are at the top of their profession, well, maybe that's why you're in the position you're in right now.
01:17:55.000I'm going to make this abundantly clear.
01:18:04.000The smartest people in the world back up what I say, including the CIA. So I'm going to make this abundantly clear.
01:18:10.000The only thing that works in this virtual reality, the cheat codes in this virtual reality are numerology and astrology, not the shit you see in the yellow pages.
01:21:08.000If you want to be a Bible thumper like my friend over there, more power to you.
01:21:12.000But if you actually want to do what the elite do and understand how this word works, I implore you to take your time, look into this, and understand that you never follow the crowd if you want the real truth.
01:21:28.000I yield All right Good closing statements guys.
01:21:33.000I Very interesting debate very very two different worldviews man Where can the people find you guys and just so the chat knows guys stay where you're at?
01:21:41.000I'm gonna go ahead and continue the commentary We're gonna give you guys updates I won't went down with the whole terrorist attack in New Orleans got some updates on that And then we'll follow this up with money Monday.
01:21:49.000I'm fresh and fit But we're all going to shift to the Myron Gaines channel, guys, right now.
01:22:57.000You know, like bad blood with anybody.
01:22:59.000You can find me over on The Crucible, and I'm the host of The Crucible, a political analyst, political satirist, and also I do debates all over the world, and I thank everybody for their time, and thank you, Myron, for hosting this debate.
01:23:18.000And for all the people who know who I am, GG33, Gary Numbers Guy, you guys know that I've been saying for a long time that 2025 is the year of the occult.
01:23:27.0002025 is when numerology and astrology becomes even more mainstream.
01:30:41.000The only thing I ask is that you follow this channel because after this week, I am going to be going live only on this channel, on Rumble and on YouTube.
01:35:39.000So now, since these assholes always want to talk, what I'm going to do is I'm not going to mention you losers by name unless you're bigger than me.
01:38:18.000And I truly mean that from the bottom of my fucking heart, guys.
01:38:22.000Because, to be honest with y'all, from a financial standpoint, for us, and a time standpoint, it doesn't make sense for us to do Money Monday.
01:38:28.000If we're going to look strictly at numbers.
01:38:55.000We've been demonetized for almost two years now.
01:38:57.000We got demonetized in August of 2023. That's why I can say whatever the fuck I want to say while you're censoring yourself like a coward for your YouTube Slave Masters.
01:39:07.000All the YouTube channels that talk shit that say we fumble the bag and shit like that?
01:39:38.000They rationalize their pussiness by saying, I'm stupid and I crashed out.
01:39:44.000So I'm not going to lose my revenue income like this idiot.
01:39:47.000To cope with the fact that they're fucking cowards.
01:39:50.000They won't step up and talk about what's going on in Gaza.
01:39:53.000They won't step up and talk about how this country is run by a certain class.
01:39:57.000They won't step up and tell you guys the truth about Historical events like the USS Liberty JFK. They won't tell you guys about the vaccine.
01:40:05.000They won't tell you guys about the shots, the beer bug virus, the election, January 6th.
01:40:12.000They won't talk about any of that stuff.
01:43:29.000We fucked ourselves up talking about a certain topic.
01:43:34.000I would rather make this amount of money and have my soul and my principles and be able to say what I want to say than make a hundred million and be terrified to talk about anything real.
01:43:51.000Our authenticity and polarizing nature is how we got here.
01:43:57.000So I'll be fucking damned if we're going to water our shit down when we've been keeping it real with you guys the whole time.
01:44:02.000We keep it real with you guys on money, on women, on fitness, on geopolitics, on culture, foreign policy, everything we keep it real with you guys.
01:44:12.000Networking, buying cars, getting your credit off.
01:44:16.000So I want all of my haters, if you're watching right now, some of you bitch-ass niggas are probably watching this right now, trying to get a clip to put in your stupid-ass video, where you're gonna use jump cuts and stupid editing to make us look crazy, show this.
01:44:29.000Because 99% of my detractors that talk shit don't make this kind of money.
01:46:16.000And also, I wanted to say the most important thing.
01:46:19.000For all you guys that have been watching us for a while and didn't believe the bullshit rumors and everything else, I wanted to say thank you to you guys from the bottom of my heart.
01:46:27.000Because the only reason we're able to do what we do is because of awesome supporters like you guys.
01:46:32.000That's why I fight so hard to never fucking sell out.
01:46:37.000That's why I fight so hard to tell you guys the truth, no matter the cost.
01:53:11.000Are all ships at sea being activated here to make sure that this upcoming series of events, which there's a number of them, we're coming into that season here, are all hands on deck and is everybody pulling in the same direction?
01:53:23.000Paul, we're four years now, tomorrow, January 6th, 2021. Tomorrow will be January 6th, 2025. We still don't know why there were 26 Confidential, human sources on the ground there at the Capitol.
01:53:38.000Are we ever going to get any answers on that?
01:54:15.000You had over two dozen sources, right?
01:54:18.000That argues that at least 26 different FBI agents were handling these sources for God knows for how long at how much expense.
01:54:27.000How did they not pick up that this was going to happen?
01:54:30.000If that's how I ran my unit and I had that level of penetration in place and I got no indicia of the fact that something like what occurred was coming, I would have been walking a footpost.
01:54:41.000I think that's a really salient question we have to ask ourselves.
01:54:44.000I don't like treating counterterrorism and this kind of prophylactic work as zero-sum.
01:56:03.000You know, Paul, from the information that we've gathered, whether it's accessing ISIS paraphernalia online, purchasing material for IED, and now this new information about his recent travel, what do you make of it?
01:56:15.000So the travel is concerning, obviously.
01:56:17.000The first thought I had when I saw Idrit was that it's very close to Gaza, all right?
01:56:21.000And so, you know, is there any indication that he was in Gaza at any point or anything like that?
01:56:46.000This is where I come down to the idea that I was saying earlier about it's tough to hold the counterterrorism operators to a zero-sum standard.
01:56:55.000Because, you know, if he took two trips that were relatively benign, if he was very cautious about how he bought what he bought, and if he used some encrypted apps, etc., because of our First Amendment system, it's very, very tough to pick these kinds of things up.
01:57:09.000Yeah, guys, encrypted apps, as much as people think, are actually really hard to crack, man.
01:59:15.000All right, so this is what a cellbrite looks like, right?
01:59:17.000So what this thing basically does is, right, is it extracts data from a phone.
01:59:22.000Right, it dumps, it's called a phone dump.
01:59:24.000We used to call that in law enforcement.
01:59:25.000So you attach the phone to it and extracts all the data, text messages, pictures, video, contacts, social media profiles, logins, all this shit, right?
01:59:33.000And it puts it, what ends up happening is a subwrite extracts all the information and it puts a nice little report for you so you can go through and look at everything, right?
01:59:43.000So a certified forensic agent, aka a CFA, will use a subwrite, extract the data, and then And then he'll go ahead and give it to the case agent, right?
01:59:53.000So, like, if I had a case, I had a phone that I seized from a bad guy, I'd bring it down to the computer lab, there'd be certified forensic agents that are there, they typically don't carry cases, and they just do this shit all day.
02:00:02.000So I give him that, he extracts the data from me, and then he gives me a report that has everything there, right?
02:00:07.000So I go through the report and get all the information.
02:01:19.000As you guys know, most phones have an auto-locking or auto-wipe feature where if you put in the code 10 times, the phone starts to wipe itself.
02:01:26.000So what Cellbrite does, it's such a sophisticated piece of technology, it does that, but secretly.
02:01:33.000But the caveat to that, though you're able to extract it without getting the phone deleted, the caveat to that is it's extremely fucking slow.
02:01:46.000That is how the feds get into phones, and that is how it's very difficult.
02:01:50.000If they don't have the passcode for the phone, it takes them a while.
02:01:53.000This is the problem they encountered with Matthew Crooks.
02:01:55.000So they were able to get into Matthew Crooks' phone, but they had to send it to Quantico.
02:01:59.000Matthew Crooks is the guy that tried to kill Trump, by the way, in Butler, Pennsylvania.
02:02:04.000They were able to send it to Quantico to get it looked at, but it took them days to be able to get the phone unlocked and look through everything.
02:03:53.000That's the local PD. But it seems like the intelligence gaps, if he was accessing any of this online, which it seems like that's how a lot of people get radicalized.
02:04:56.000And we're also following the explosion outside the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas.
02:05:01.000An ex-girlfriend of the Green Beret who allegedly blew up the Cybertruck says he struggled with injuries and was depressed.
02:05:08.000And according to a U.S. Army spokesperson, the suspect frequently used the Army's mental health resources, adding, quote, You know, this is so different, Paul.
02:06:15.000One of the facts that's undeniable here is that there does seem to have been a triggering event, and that was a relationship, which is very often the case.
02:06:23.000Yeah, they're alleging that the kid, his kid, didn't match his DNA. And they're saying that might be the reason why he did what he did.
02:07:39.000Which, if you guys saw my episode of Sean Ryan, we talked about this.
02:07:42.000The first thing I thought of was the Major Nadal Hassan event in Fort Hood, where the Bureau, the local JTTF, and, by the way, the Army investigators had indications of his radicalization.
02:07:55.000This was during the Obama years, and they stepped back from it for PC reasons.
02:07:59.000Can't afford that kind of thing anymore.
02:08:01.000So I don't know that that's what went on here, but I just hope going forward, the Army is sensitized to the idea of people who are maybe struggling, and they leave where they are, they go home because he was on leave, right?
02:08:12.000Maybe you've got to make sure somebody knows, somebody locally, make sure you stay in touch with them.
02:08:16.000I don't know if the Army has a program like that, but it looks like he was suffering, and then he was on his own.
02:08:22.000WE ALSO HAVE TO IMPROVE THE CULTURE THEY COME HOME TO, IMPROVE THE VA SYSTEM AND STOP ALLOWING PEOPLE TO KNEEL WHEN YOU HAVE THE NATIONAL ANTHEM AND STOP HAVING DEFUND THE POLICE MOVEMENTS AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT COMES ALONG WITH IT.
02:08:34.000THEY GO -- SHE WAS GREAT -- TRUDEAU RESIGNED AS WELL.
02:08:37.000CANADA FINALLY TAKING THEIR COUNTRY BACK.
02:08:40.000I MEAN, LOOK, I DISAGREE WITH But it is the freedom of speech, and that means you have to protect freedom of speech and expression even if you don't like it.
02:08:48.000But I do think it's deplorable to do that.
02:08:50.000So, alright, so, this girl comments this shit, right?
02:08:54.000And she's all over the news right now.
02:08:55.000Apparently, Fox Sports Joy Taylor slept with an NFL star Emanuel Echo and network exec, right?
02:09:01.000This comes from the Daily Mail right here.
02:09:04.000We'll read this, then we'll react to this video.
02:09:07.000FS1 host Joy Taylor, your sexual relationship with an ex-NFL star co-host Emanuel Echo and network executive Charlie Dixon to further her career, according to the bombshell lawsuit facing a number of sports media biggest names.
02:09:44.000What's more, the glamorous 37-year-old broadcaster allegedly schemed to protect their job at the network by fabricating a sexual misconduct allegation against Dixon, a FWAC sports executive vice president in charge of talent.
02:09:58.000Once Mr. Dixon was no longer useful to Taylor, she would follow through on her plan to tell the company that he forced himself on her, reads a portion of the lawsuit filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of ex-FS1 stylist Nusheen Farage.
02:10:11.000Taylor Dixon, former FS1 host, Skip Bayless, and the Fox Corporation are named in Farage's lawsuit, much of which focused on allegations of sexual harassment, sexual battery negligence, supervision, retaliation, and other hostile workplace issues between 2012 and August 2024. Bayless is accused of offering $1.5 million to Farage for sex, while Dixon is accused of groping the Stalin's buttocks.
02:10:38.000Taylor herself is accused of dismissing Farage's complaints about sexual harassment against Bayless addiction, telling this hairstylist to get over it.
02:10:44.000But in addition to those allegations of Farage's claims, that Taylor leveraged sex to advance her career, first with Dixon and then with Eiko, the retired NFL linebacker.
02:10:55.000Holy, this is a fucking mess, isn't it?
02:10:57.000With Dixon, Farage began to suspect that he and Taylor were having an affair in 2016 despite both being married at the time.
02:11:03.000In approximately May 2016, Ms. Taylor asked Ms. Farage, To meet her for a drink.
02:11:10.000In Santa Monica, read the lawsuit obtained by DailyMail.com.
02:11:14.000When Faragi arrived, she found Ms. Taylor with an older man, Fox Sports Executive Vice President of Concept, Mr. Dixon.
02:11:22.000As Executive Vice President, Mr. Dixon is responsible for overseeing all concept production on FS1. Ms. Faragi, however, did not know Mr. Dixon.
02:11:31.000Mr. Bayless later disclosed to Ms. Faragi that he did not want Ms. Taylor on the show, but Mr. Dixon was adamant that Ms. Taylor should start the filing reads.
02:11:38.000At first, Mr. Dixon arranged a dinner between Mr. Bayless and Ms. Taylor, where she arrived in provocative clothing and acted in a provocative manner.
02:11:47.000When that did not change Mr. Bayless's opinion of Ms. Taylor, Mr. Dixon asked him to approve of her as a favor to him.
02:11:53.000Reluctantly, Mr. Bayless agreed to do so as a favor for his friend.
02:12:00.000Taylor was still split with her husband, Richard Giannotti, who is not named in the lawsuit.
02:12:05.000According to Faragi, it was because Taylor's now ex-discovered proof of her infidelity around August 2016. Ms. Faragi attended a dinner with Ms. Taylor and her husband and Mr. Dixon and his wife.
02:15:10.000I don't have a problem with the guy, but if you guys want to talk about someone that's, like, super fucking politically correct, and, like, my only intention is to make money doing podcasting, I'm not going to give no real takes, that's this nigga right here.
02:15:26.000This guy, again, not coming from a position of hate, I'm just being objective and calling it like it is, bro.
02:15:35.000When I think NPC, this is what comes to mind.
02:15:39.000This is a dude that will never talk about feminism.
02:18:03.000Like, mainstream platforms are gonna be really scared to have me on.
02:18:07.000The only way a mainstream platform would have me on is they would need to bring someone that's an antagonist and have us debate, right?
02:18:14.000So like, you basically get put like in your bad guy arc, right?
02:18:18.000Then, you got people that are huge, that are very politically correct, that got publicists, they don't say nothing off script, they stay away from politics, they stay away from Hot button topic issues like abortion or religion or feminism or any of this other shit, right?
02:20:09.000There's people you go to for advice, and then there's people you go to just for some of their commentary, but they're not gonna have any serious takes.
02:25:33.000These Me Too cases always end up the same.
02:25:35.000Especially when it's like a situation like this where they're trying to make an argument that some person of power levers their power for sexual favors.
02:26:33.000The reason why this Me Too era is so fucking popular and why so many women do it is because they don't get held accountable for doing it, Chad.
02:26:43.000They almost never get punished for this shit.
02:26:49.000If you're a woman in 2024, you can literally make egregious allegations towards any man, slander him, file a lawsuit, let it hit the news, destroys reputation, And you're not going to deal with no criminals fucking...
02:27:03.000You're not going to deal with any criminal liability.
02:27:08.000And if the dude that you accused has money, and he's petty, he'll come back and sue you.
02:27:15.000But that doesn't make sense because we all know lawsuits are expensive, and a lot of times these women that make these accusations are broke.
02:27:21.000So it's not even worth it to go after them for destroying your reputation.
02:27:29.000Because I guarantee you, when Johnny Depp went to his lawyer and said, look, I want to sue this girl or we got this situation, he knew he was not going to profit from suing Amber Heard.
02:27:43.000And very few men, let me make this explicitly clear, very few men that have the ability to fight these MeToo cases, excuse me, very few men that get hit with these MeToo cases have the ability to actually fight off these MeToo cases.
02:27:57.000Let alone do it for sport like Like he did.
02:28:43.000So if Johnny Depp wasn't profitable doing this shit, and he has all the money to get the best lawyers, what the fuck makes you think you're gonna fight a Me Too case?
02:28:56.000And that's why broads like this come out with me too, because they know at the end of the day, if they don't win and get the money, nothing's going to happen to them.
02:30:22.000And you get access to High Value Academy absolutely free.
02:30:26.000And if you're not in Castle Club or Castle Club Premium, 900 bucks, you get both services, the DMs, the High Value Academy, and you get access to all the Zoom calls.
02:30:35.000If you're a regular Castle Club, you get access to all the content and the Zoom call, one Zoom call per week, open Q&A, typically after our Wednesday show.
02:30:43.000Premium, you get an extra Zoom call where we talk about certain topics, whether it's real estate, getting money, getting girls.
02:30:50.000Fucking dating, Instagram, whatever you guys want.