In this episode of the FMK regular edition of the show, we sit down with VivaFryman and talk about a variety of current events and upcoming events. We also talk about the upcoming Rumble event on June 28th in Las Vegas, Power Slap, and the upcoming Yacht Party on June 29th in San Francisco. We hope you guys enjoy this episode and don't forget to subscribe to FMK on your favorite streaming platform so you don't miss out on the latest episode of FMK! FMK is a sports streaming platform that focuses on competitive video game streaming and has been around since the early days of the gaming industry. We are a proud affiliate of Rumble and host a live event on the 28th at the PowerSlap venue in Vegas. Tickets for the Rumble event are available for purchase at $35 at the point of purchase and are still available at the price of $35.00 for VIP tickets at the time of this episode. You can't go wrong with those tickets, you have to be 21+ to secure a ticket. If you're a fan of the game and want to support Rumble, you can't ask for a better experience, and we'll make sure to give you the best experience possible! We're here to help you guys have the best time and place to experience the best gaming experience in the best possible way possible. Enjoy and spread the word to your friends about what's going on around the gaming and social media! Cheers, Cheers! - The Frustrated Podcast. -Jon & Viva Fry - Jon & Vinnie Jon and Viva & Vicky Don't Tell a Friend of the Podcast, Viva Friesen and Jon's Money Monday! Jon's Podcast, Jon's PODCAST: Viva's Podcast: . Jon talks about the future of the podcast and much more! -Jon talks about his future plans for Rumble, and how he's going to be hosting a live show in Vegas, and much much more. Jon gives you guys can't wait to go to Vegas, so much more!! Jon also gives you all the details on what's to expect from Rumble, so you can be sure to come to the show! and more! Thank you for listening to this episode, Jon gives us some tips on what you can expect from this episode! v=PODCAST!
00:07:52.000We're going to be breaking down a couple of things, some current events, some past events, but we got some stuff to talk about.
00:07:56.000Before we get into it, guys, CastleClub.tv, as you guys know, that is where we post all of our content now.
00:08:01.000Mo did a fantastic job, and he organized all of the videos on Castle Club into playlists, whether it's After Hours, Frank Castle's, guest interviews, etc.
00:08:09.000A lot of the interviews that we had to take down off of YouTube, guys, because as you guys know, we had to take down a bunch of videos.
00:08:52.000You're going to see it organized and it's going to be easy to find for you guys.
00:08:55.000Yeah, and we'll actually, what we'll do is, in the middle of the broadcast here, we'll pull it up and kind of show you guys what it looks like, how we organize it for y'all, but Castle Club is going to have everything there, guys.
00:09:03.000I think the best ones are the most random ones, though, where it's like traveling, having fun with the guys.
00:09:08.000Yeah, so we will go ahead and have that ready for y'all.
00:09:12.000But what I was saying was, also, rumble.com slash FreshFit, guys, that is the home base, man.
00:09:16.000Also, Viva Fry is also on Rumble, so make sure to check them out on there.
00:09:19.000But that's the home base for us, guys.
00:09:21.000You know, some haters out there trying to say, no, it's that we don't necessarily prioritize YouTube as much as we used to, guys, because unfortunately...
00:09:28.000They can demonetize you and cancel you at any time, guys.
00:09:31.000So you gotta go ahead and set up a structure somewhere else where freedom of speech is allowed and you're not necessarily censored.
00:11:06.000We're trying to make it exclusive, and that's what it is.
00:11:08.000Obviously, you have to do that with certain price points.
00:11:10.000If you can't afford it, that's totally fine.
00:11:12.000We'll have other events that will be cheaper, and we'll have other meetups that are going to be absolutely free, but this one is going to be more of a...
00:11:18.000It's not just going to be a party, but it's going to be a networking event.
00:11:20.000You're going to be able to meet certain people, high net worth individuals that are going to be there because if they can afford that, clearly they've got their money together.
00:11:26.000And we're going to be streaming it as well.
00:11:28.000So you'll be able to come on the yacht, collab with us, get your stuff shouted out, which that might be in itself worth it.
00:11:34.000So, you know, like I said before, that's how we're going to do it.
00:11:37.000Link is pinned in the comments on Cals Club.
00:11:39.000We only have it open up for Cals Club members right now at this moment.
00:11:41.000It's not open up to the general public.
00:11:43.000I think the biggest thing is being in the right room at the right time.
00:11:45.000And that's the right time to be in the room because we're going to be with all creators in there as well as millionaires.
00:12:02.000Haters want to go ahead and pocket watch us and everything else like that because they can't necessarily, you know, provide that kind of value.
00:12:08.000So they're over here saying it's all a scam or whatever, but haters are going to hate, right?
00:12:11.000If I was just making reaction videos all day, I'd be mad too because I don't teach my people anything besides talking shit.
00:12:16.000People forget, we sold out all our parties so far.
00:12:30.000Before, when I was coming down here, I like to Google who I'm going to do an interview with and scandal or controversy, and that was one of them that came up.
00:14:04.000You don't get access to people for free, nor do you get to fault them for pricing it at what people are willing to pay, nor do you get to fault people for spending the money the way they want to spend it.
00:14:12.000You wouldn't find me on that yacht because nothing good happens after midnight.
00:14:16.000I got my dogs to take care of, but it sounds like it's going to be a party.
00:15:13.000We have a good family, but we don't see eye to eye on politics.
00:15:16.000And you just don't talk about it at Christmas.
00:15:18.000Ended up in Florida because the world went batshit crazy with COVID and I realized that Canada, not sure if it's a sinking ship that can't be, you know, salvaged or can't be righted, but I think the battle to fight right now is more effectively waged in the beautiful free state of Florida than the censored country of Canada where it will be soon outright illegal.
00:15:40.000I'll be put in jail for some of the tweets that I put out in Canada if I stayed there forever and it wasn't a life for raising a family anymore either.
00:16:14.000We've entered a realm of reality where certain types of discussions, however offensive they are, are promoted and others, however realistic they are, are demoted.
00:16:46.000There's a certain debate that I don't like getting into just because it never goes anywhere productive, but I don't believe in shouting people down who want to criticize the state of Israel.
00:16:54.000I don't believe in, not boycotting, in illegalizing boycotting of Israel.
00:17:00.000Do what you want to do, say what you want to say, so long as it doesn't materialize into action.
00:17:04.000But if it materializes into action, it's not the words that are the problem anymore, it's the action.
00:17:07.000And I listen to people, people call me all sorts of names, and I don't give a sweet bugger all, so long as it ends with the words.
00:17:14.000But if it goes beyond words, it's not the words that are the problem, it's the actions.
00:17:18.000And I know people are very sensitive to words lead to action in real time, violence, yada, yada.
00:17:26.000I mean, it all happened prior to the internet.
00:17:27.000So clearly, free speech on the internet is not the issue.
00:17:30.000And it's not even clear that free speech is the issue.
00:17:32.000I believe, genuinely, it's suppressing the free speech that exacerbates all the problems, as opposed to letting people say stupid, offensive things.
00:17:39.000And if they're stupid and offensive, they will be outed and countered.
00:17:42.000And if they're not stupid and offensive, if they offend you, you might have to deal with it nonetheless.
00:18:05.000Until I voluntarily relinquished my license because I live in Florida and didn't want to pay $3,000 a year so that random idiots on the internet can file ethics complaints against me because they don't like my tweets.
00:18:46.000And I had my first kid, and I said, I hate everything about this life.
00:18:50.000I get to the office before my kid's awake, I get home when she's asleep, and I don't know if it was a mental breakdown, but one Friday afternoon, after my wife said, you know, you know what you have to do, and I quit.
00:19:01.000And then I was ready to go back to commercial photography because I've always been into video, videography, you know, camera stuff.
00:19:07.000Applied at a place called Dawson College.
00:19:09.000Before I could get rejected, I was put on the waiting list.
00:19:11.000I'm like a 35-year-old man with a kid.
00:19:14.000And they're saying, you really want to go back to commercial photography?
00:19:16.000You have a law degree and you've been practicing.
00:19:19.000I started getting calls and started my own law practice in the basement of my parents' house at the time.
00:19:24.000I forget where I was living, but that was the address at one point.
00:19:28.000And then I just rented a small office, built up a small practice for myself in a 700-square-foot place into a good boutique, Freiheit Legal.
00:19:35.000But I never loved it, and I never liked one day more than the day before.
00:19:39.000And I said, if I'm doing this when I'm 50, I'll probably be dead of a heart attack and unhappy.
00:19:43.000And so 2016, give or take, I had discovered YouTube, made a few viral videos like, oh, you can make a few hundred bucks a month, a thousand bucks a month.
00:20:38.000The deposition was three and a half hours.
00:20:40.000And so I listened to this whole thing for three and a half hours time stamping where I think the lawyer asking the questions made mistakes.
00:20:46.000And then I did a breakdown analysis on the roof of my house at the time wearing sunglasses, cringe as hell.
00:20:52.000And that video sort of went quasi-viral.
00:20:54.000It got like a quarter of a million views on YouTube, which is kind of interesting for a legal analysis.
00:20:58.000So I was like, oh, this is what I can do.
00:21:18.000And so I said, okay, I'm going to dedicate it to this, niche down on that.
00:21:22.000Then YouTube took down that video, gave me a strike for violation of terms of service for hate speech.
00:21:27.000And then I realized, what the hell is going on?
00:21:29.000I didn't even play any portions of the deposition where Alex Jones said anything bad.
00:21:34.000Just so I get this straight, they took down your video and gave you a strike for hate speech for giving legal background on a deposition that is public record in a court proceeding in a civil case.
00:22:04.000Although some people might think I engage in hate speech by saying there are only two sexes and things are mental illnesses to be treated and not encouraged, but we'll get there probably at some point.
00:22:14.000I was like, I'm not putting up with this.
00:23:55.000People are getting strikes and getting penalized for stuff which has now been proven to be true, contrary to what it was flagged for as misinformation at the time.
00:24:03.000But I've always long believed that other than the argument of unjust enrichment, where YouTube says, come to the platform, you're going to bring traffic here, we're going to use you for as much as we can, then we're going to kick you off once we've gotten the traffic, the eyeballs that you brought.
00:24:16.000I think that's a case of unjust enrichment.
00:24:18.000The only issue is the contractual link because you're not a consumer, you're a merchant, not a consumer.
00:24:27.000The unjust enrichment presumes sort of an absence of a contract and an absence of the enrichment for the company.
00:24:32.000But false or deceitful business practices, where they say, your video's good, we've monetized it, you've approved it, and we've given you the go-ahead, and then later on we say, no, we're demonetizing it.
00:24:43.000And I say, that's a deceitful business practice because you've made money off of me and then you penalize my ability to continue making money and risk my entire business after you guys have made your buck.
00:24:52.000And I say, I don't know why in, say for example, California where they have these good, it's not so much consumer protection laws, but rather business practice laws, no one has gone with that angle.
00:25:08.000I don't even think it's about money anymore.
00:25:10.000It's about narrative control and politics, even if it means losing money.
00:25:14.000But for what YouTube has done, Rumble wouldn't necessarily be what it is today.
00:25:18.000They've created the Rumble monster by virtue of their own wrongdoings.
00:25:23.000Yeah, I mean, and then the terms and service are extremely vague and, you know, nebulous.
00:25:27.000Like, you don't even really know, because it's like, it can, the thing is, is that it's written a certain way so that it can be enforced at any time or not be enforced at any time.
00:25:35.000Yeah, that's called law, it's lawlessness.
00:26:46.000Well, that was, I believe, to pat myself on the back and my law partner, Robert Barnes, Viva Barnes Law, when we drafted the Rumble Terms, I said, it makes no sense you can have a warning forever.
00:27:36.000Yes, and she's a beautiful woman who was trying to work in Hollywood and trying to work in music, and luckily, I say escaped that vortex of degeneracy.
00:27:46.000And she's got a great channel, L-O-E-L-O-V-E-U-T, Savoir, S-A-V-O-I-R. So she sued, and she got a good judge.
00:27:55.000I don't know where he's from, but he definitely has an Eastern European last name who might have had some experience, you know, immediate with himself or with his family of communism and censorship.
00:28:04.000And he said, YouTube moved to have it dismissed, said, no, you can't sue because of whatever the reasons.
00:28:10.000He says, no, she's made allegations to the effect that it could reasonably...
00:28:15.000Lay a basis of acclaim, the class of people that she's seeking to represent, content creators who are censored wrongly, or content creators who are censored, and viewers who are deprived of listening to, to define classes, and she's able to move forward with this class action out of the province of Quebec.
00:28:33.000If the judge finds in her favor and rules that they did wrongly censor her and gave her a strike or whatever it may be, will that set case law in the United States where creators that got strikes and or...
00:28:46.000Because that strike might have been the stone that led to them being canceled or terminated.
00:28:51.000Would that set case law where people in the United States can get their channels back?
00:28:55.000I don't think so, because Canada and America are different when it comes to YouTube.
00:28:58.000Well, I mean, even from one state to the next, I think they call it persuasive but not binding.
00:29:03.000International, it's even less persuasive and even less binding.
00:29:06.000But YouTube is an international organization, right?
00:29:08.000Well, what it might show is I suspect other provinces have similar class action rules as Quebec.
00:29:13.000I mean, they're basically the same throughout Canada.
00:29:15.000So I think if this stands in Quebec, you could have potentially a national class action, like they sort of banned all of these lawsuits together.
00:29:23.000And you're going to inspire other lawyers to take the same chance elsewhere.
00:29:27.000I really wish I could remember the basis of...
00:29:29.000They were saying that they were not applying any of their rules with any logical consistency.
00:29:35.000And so, the idea being also that it's not just the creators who have the right to speak, but people who have the right to listen.
00:29:41.000And if the judge says, if it turns out they were applying their rules wrongly or arbitrarily or capriciously, They might be entitled to nominal damages, but nominal damages of like 500 bucks a plaintiff.
00:29:51.000Anyone who created videos on YouTube who was a resident of Quebec between 2021-2024, you're talking big numbers.
00:30:35.000Real quick is, in theory, the immunity in the United States comes from a piece of legislation that immunizes, shields the companies from lawsuits.
00:30:44.000That's in the PREP Act, and whether or not they were fraudulently misrepresenting their data, fraud vitiates everything, but bottom line...
00:30:51.000All things being proper, they had legislative immunity shielding them from suit.
00:30:56.000In Canada, I believe also, I want to say South Africa, Australia, they didn't have immunity shielding them from suit.
00:31:02.000What they had is indemnity clauses, meaning if they get sued, then the government has to hold harmless or indemnify the pharma companies by virtue of the contract.
00:31:12.000So they say, the government says, if you guys get sued, we will hold you harmless.
00:31:17.000So whatever you order to pay, if you are, we'll pay it.
00:31:20.000Oh, so the government steps up and deals with it.
00:31:23.000So that's where it's much different to the extent there is no legislative immunity, but only indemnity clauses where, okay, you can sue them, and they'll say, they'll call the government in, and they'll say, government, assume my defense.
00:31:51.000This is my prediction, and if it happens, I'll be the smartest guy in the room, but maybe only in five years.
00:31:55.000This is where you get the government to say, well, holy shit, we're not going to pay out a billion dollars for your, even if we agreed to that, we're going to go in there and find out where you lie to us about your data so that we can get out of the indemnity clause.
00:32:06.000And say, now you guys are up Poop Creek, you lied, and we would indemnify you if you told us what you were doing at the time, and now, oh, look, we never knew, we didn't know at the time, so we're getting out of our indemnity clause because fraud vitiates everything.
00:32:19.000What is the Canadian government's benefit of taking on that huge liability, though?
00:32:24.000Why are they basically just suiting up and defending these pharmaceutical companies where they're opening themselves up?
00:32:46.000They call the government and say, you take care of that.
00:32:48.000Well, on the one hand, it's not the government's money.
00:32:49.000I'm trying to think if there's a way that they could get out of it by like sovereign immunity, but I don't think there is.
00:32:54.000If you were to ask the politicians at the time, I'm sure they would say the pharma companies asked for it and we were not in a position to negotiate.
00:33:01.000They wouldn't have brought it to market otherwise.
00:33:03.000So there actually was, if you, I don't know how, if anybody can pull up videos in real time, there's a guy named Anthony Housefather.
00:33:11.000Anthony Housefather was a liberal politician who basically explained in a two-minute video that I keep posting periodically to remind the world.
00:33:18.000Explaining how they entered into these contracts and why there's NDAs around them and why the employees of the government can't disclose the terms of the agreements above and beyond what's been publicly ordered under basically the equivalent of FOIA requests.
00:33:30.000And he went on for a minute and a half and he said, look, we were all in a panic.
00:33:33.000And the pharma company said, we wouldn't bring it to market unless you agreed to hold us harmless.
00:33:37.000We were rushing through development, we were rushing through research, and we weren't prepared to bring it to market unless you gave us these terms of the contract.
00:33:44.000And the guy said, and we needed them, and we agreed to it, and we got a vaccine to market.
00:33:49.000But that's a good, I mean, I have to think about that.
00:33:51.000If there's a way, I don't think there could be a way for the government to raise sovereign immunity for a claim that it has to pay out on behalf of a corporation that it agreed to hold harmless.
00:34:03.000Okay, yeah, because I was like, in my head, I'm like, What is their incentive?
00:34:05.000That's an enormous amount of liability.
00:34:08.000And then especially with something as new as the jab, where you only had a year to really get it out, you know that there's going to be a bunch of side effects.
00:34:16.000Most vaccines take the better part of a decade to actually be formulated, tested, tried, proven to be safe.
00:34:23.000And they're over here saying within a year, it's safe and effective.
00:34:27.000I'm convinced, well, I think we all are convinced, they knew it was neither safe nor effective when they were saying it was safe and effective, because I always say that there's two types of lies.
00:34:35.000One is saying something that you know is false, and the other is asserting something that you have no reason to believe is true.
00:35:05.000I've probably gone on something of a big arc that anybody following me for the last five years would have seen, but in the beginning, people were saying the mask is a symbol of social compliance.
00:35:15.000And look, at the time, you know, the same logic.
00:35:17.000Well, a mask they wear during surgery, so it must do something.
00:35:20.000I, at the very least, said, it can't hurt you.
00:35:44.000When they started using it as an avatar, that is your public display of good citizenry, compliant citizen.
00:35:49.000I didn't know at the time that not only are they not effective, which we all suspected, but they are actually also potentially very damaging in terms of cavities, in terms of respiratory issues.
00:36:02.000You're supposed to change those disposable ones every eight hours and you've got kids keeping them in their pocket for five days.
00:36:08.000In Quebec, I don't know if you knew this, CBC really ran a massive article on it that the government recalled tens of thousands of potentially toxic face masks because they contained microscopic parts of graphene.
00:36:21.000And this is one of the moments which I remember at my kids' daycare, one of the daycare teachers who at the time liked me, I don't think the person likes me anymore, came up to me sobbing and saying, did you hear the news?
00:36:43.000And then meanwhile, this same person will now follow what the government says on other issues, which is an anomaly.
00:36:49.000So potentially toxic masks, plastics now being found deep in the lungs, mask mouth, mask knee, cavities, and they knew at the time that they didn't do jack squat.
00:37:06.000Unless a Trump comes into power, and even if Trump comes into power now, he hasn't reversed course on the frickin', he's still taking credit for Operation Warp Speed.
00:37:39.000Operation Warp Speed was only intended to be for those who were most vulnerable while continuing the search and permission of therapeutics.
00:37:46.000It was never intended to be a blanket mandate for children six months and up.
00:37:50.000They lied to me, and now I know, and let's get JFK, not JFK, RFK Jr.
00:37:58.000But to keep saying Operation Warp Speed was a great success to try to cater to the left vote, it's crazy.
00:38:03.000And I think with Trump, and I talked about this on a Twitter space when it comes to the whole Operation Warp Speed, I don't think, because here's the thing people got to understand, when you're the president, right, you don't know everything.
00:38:12.000You got your cabinet, they're telling you what it is, you're getting advised by a doctor, we can do this, etc., etc.
00:38:18.000Fauci's telling him we can do this, etc.
00:38:20.000I think in Trump's mind, and I'd love to get your guys' take on this, in his head he was like, okay, Because if you guys remember, he was reluctant to shut the country down.
00:38:29.000When this was first breaking out in November of 2019, like that's when the first, you know, signs of this Wuhan thing is starting to pop off in China.
00:38:37.000And then next thing you know, it's February, January and they're shutting down Italy.
00:38:41.000I remember Italy was the first major country to shut down.
00:38:44.000And then Spain, then like clockwork, the rest of Europe shut down.
00:38:46.000We're one of the last countries to shut down.
00:38:48.000And Trump was very reluctant to shut down.
00:38:59.000Because I've noticed with Trump, he's really big on being able to say, I did this, I did that, etc.
00:39:03.000This is what I did when I was in office.
00:39:04.000You watch any of his interviews, he's very quick to talk about what he accomplished when he was in office, right?
00:39:08.000And all the trials and tribulations he had to deal with while accomplishing these things.
00:39:11.000I think Warp Speed in his head was more about getting the country back open as quickly as possible so that we can continue commerce.
00:39:20.000That's what I think, why he, in his head, he was like, what's the fastest way to get the country back open so that we got these businesses going?
00:40:11.000They all did something, you know, they all had a knee-jerk panic reaction in the beginning.
00:40:15.000The issue with Trump, I'm thoroughly convinced he was probably under the impression he would be impeached and convicted of crimes against humanity if he didn't promote lockdowns.
00:40:35.000But the legal argument is he didn't close down anything, you know, with the exception of, I don't know, some federally regulated industries, which it was the states that chose to do it, and some states did it harder than others, and so he could wash his hands.
00:40:45.000At the beginning, he said, you know, we better be careful.
00:40:52.000But the Operation Warp Speed, it's a very easy thing for him to reframe in a way that is accurate and allows him to stop doubling down on promoting the...
00:41:19.000And I think there's going to be a reckoning someday where they're going to have to blame the toxic effects of the vaccine on Trump.
00:41:25.000And if he doesn't distance himself from this now, all of his taking credit for Operation Warp Speed and that wonderful miracle jab, they're going to say, look, you killed however many millions of people they suspect this jab actually killed.
00:41:49.000I'm going to look up this class action lawsuit and see because a lot of people lost their channels and or got strikes because of COVID, man.
00:41:56.000And the bottom line is they're going to say the same thing.
00:42:28.000Owned by Google, the biggest search engine in the world.
00:42:29.000I put out my Sunday afternoon talkie video where I talk about the upcoming live stream.
00:42:35.000That's how people on YouTube are going to discover Viva on Rumble.
00:42:39.000But the easiest thing to do, you've got to start and really support the parallel economy, both by platforms and by products, and wean yourself off of YouTube while using it for what it's good for.
00:42:53.000And that's really what it is, is more of a marketing thing.
00:42:55.000But I genuinely do believe in the next five to ten years, Rumble is absolutely going to explode because I don't see censorship going backwards.
00:43:47.000And I'm concerned also, after Alex Jones is liquidated and they say, well, he can't make money anymore and he's not making enough money that we can garnish.
00:43:57.000By way of, like, you know, satisfying the judgment, anybody monetizing his content on any other platform, we get to seize that.
00:44:03.000Like, I'm trying to think of how they can possibly do that.
00:44:08.000He or anybody who's been deplatformed or whatever has a judgment against them, can't raise money on other platforms so they can go after those other platforms.
00:44:15.000It's lawfare not just against the creators, but it's overt lawfare against the platforms and, well, not Chris directly, but Rumble.
00:44:23.000Yeah, no, and that's a good point, and they could do that.
00:44:27.000I mean, for those that are unaware, okay, so as you guys know, the Sandy Hook school shooting occurred, what, back in 2011, 2012.
00:44:35.000Alex Jones, you know, famously denied it, said it was crisis actors, etc.
00:44:39.000He's come out since and apologized about it, said he made a mistake, but he got sued in the state of Connecticut for, I think, $1.5 billion?
00:44:45.000Well, he got sued for, in Connecticut, it was like unlawful corporate practices, unlawful business practices.
00:45:56.000I mean, I've practiced for 13-plus years.
00:45:59.000We had one case that, oddly enough, came from America of a defendant who misbehaved so badly, they said, you have to sit in the court, shut your mouth, you don't get to defend yourself, but the plaintiff has to make their case.
00:46:09.000In Alex Jones, they said, you defaulted so badly on your discovery obligations, as in you didn't produce documents that he didn't have.
00:46:17.000You didn't produce records that didn't exist.
00:46:20.000They say, you behaved so badly, you're not only defaulted from pleading, We're finding you liable.
00:46:53.000There's also the question when you're talking about defamation, whether or not it was when you're dealing with a public figure, whether or not the statements were made with actual malice.
00:47:02.000In the Jones case, the question of law becomes, are these public figures, there's a term called Single-purpose public figures.
00:47:10.000Nicholas Sandman, you know, the Covington kid, was never a public figure until that video.
00:47:14.000But he only becomes a public figure for the purposes of that video.
00:47:17.000People can talk about it, say things about it, and they treat him as a public figure for the purposes of that incident.
00:47:22.000And if someone says something wrong, defamatory, to the extent he's a public figure for that particular issue, they've got to prove actual malice.
00:47:29.000That was a question in Sandy Hook as well.
00:47:31.000The question was also whether or not Alex Jones sincerely believed what he said.
00:47:36.000None of this, they didn't deal with any of these legal questions, they bypassed all of them.
00:47:40.000And the judge in Connecticut said, you defaulted so bad that we're finding you liable as a default verdict.
00:47:48.000So let me ask this, did they even serve him though?
00:47:54.000The proceedings were going on, but from what I recall, they were asking for things like lists of videos that you had on YouTube.
00:48:01.000After he had been deplatformed and all the videos basically removed from his accessibility, they were asking for money that they think he made from the specific reporting on Sandy Hook.
00:48:11.000Bear in mind also, he said stupid things, and I don't apologize for him, but I don't think it leads to this.
00:48:18.000Over the course of 10 years, I think it's like 16 minutes of separate video clips.
00:48:23.000In that, multiple times, he said that the incident occurred, the kids were killed, it's a horrible tragedy, but it's going to be politicized.
00:48:31.000And he said, you know, when you talk about something being a hoax...
00:48:35.000A hoax as in it never happened, a hoax as in it did happen but it's been weaponized, or a hoax as in it's a false flag performed by an op and whatever.
00:48:45.000The bottom line, he said 16 minutes of things over a decade which they put into a montage like they did with January 6th and turned it into what you would think was his bread and butter of broadcasting for a decade.
00:48:59.000So he said stupid things, but they were asking for things that didn't exist or things that he didn't have access to, but they were convinced that they existed and they were convinced that he had access to them.
00:49:06.000And then they said, well, you're not giving it to us.
00:49:10.000It's so absurd that at worst, like imagine someone just destroys evidence to the point where they prevent the plaintiff's ability to make their case.
00:49:37.000What else would they have possibly made?
00:49:39.000But the amazing thing is, so they defaulted him in Connecticut, they defaulted him in Texas, and the trials that we saw were- Did he have two separate cases?
00:49:47.000So he had an open case in Connecticut.
00:49:49.000Open case in Connecticut with the Connecticut plaintiffs, then he had a case in Texas with the Texas plaintiffs.
00:50:16.000But the trial that people saw that they think was the trial was only the trial on the quantum after liability had been found as a matter of default verdict.
00:50:25.000So at that point, what were they actually litigating for?
00:50:28.000Were they litigating for how much he would owe at that point?
00:50:30.000Yes, how much they suffered by way of damages.
00:50:42.000I mean, it was literally a show trial where Alex Jones was forbidden, precluded from asserting his innocence, stating that he apologized because he did.
00:50:50.000He was prevented from raising any of the grounds of defense, saying that he didn't have the documents, saying that he was prevented from literally saying things on the stand.
00:50:59.000And then the judge accuses him of saying that this is a show trial as if it could be any more of a show trial.
00:51:03.000But what people saw was not a trial on the merits.
00:51:06.000It was a trial only on the quantum because liability had been found as a matter of default.
00:51:09.000So he was already guilty by the time he was sitting there.
00:51:11.000They're just trying to establish how much money they're going to get out of him.
00:51:19.000And I went down to Texas to document it, and the questions they were asking the jury when they were selecting jury for the purposes of establishing quantum were like, you know, do you think $50 million is too much?
00:51:54.000And people were still doubting the outcome of what they ran through by way of default verdict.
00:51:59.000So it's like people who watched that show trial on The Quantum were convinced of his innocence in the long run, but that wasn't even the object of that trial, which is how absurd and bad the case was.
00:52:09.000Because I did watch portions of it, and I remember him famously going back and forth with the Connecticut lawyer about this, and the lawyer tried to say, well, you gave us your phone, and it actually had everything in there, blah, blah, blah.
00:52:19.000I remember them going back and forth on that.
00:52:20.000Yeah, there was an incident with the lawyer who accidentally...
00:52:25.000Was it Alex that gave his phone and everything on there?
00:52:27.000Or was it the lawyer that gave everything?
00:52:28.000It was Alex who gave it to the lawyer and the lawyer who accidentally transmitted it to the other party.
00:52:32.000I'm going to get mixed up on which state it was.
00:52:44.000And then they got documents, text messages that they then said, oh look, he concealed this from us.
00:52:47.000He's like, no, I gave it to my lawyers and there was a question of whether or not you're even entitled to it.
00:52:50.000There was another issue where they accidentally communicated, Connecticut communicated to the Texas lawyers medical records by accident because they were apparently included in like these tens of thousands of documents that were digitally preserved that they transmitted.
00:53:04.000And then they sanctioned Norm Pattis This lawyer out of Connecticut suspended his license, and that suspension was overturned.
00:53:13.000But the people who watched that said, oh my goodness, how was he even found guilty in the first place?
00:53:17.000And then they came out with that award.
00:53:19.000The FBI agent, who had no kids, no family killed in Sandy Hook, who just responded, he was awarded $90 million.
00:53:29.000Because he gets up on the sand and he's rightly traumatized.
00:53:32.000He's rightly re-entering that level of trauma from the incident.
00:54:19.000I just understand when people see a father laughing off camera and then tearing up when he knows the camera's rolling, you know that people either maliciously or sincerely but misguidedly are going to say crisis actor because crisis actors have been used in the past to stage other events.
00:54:35.000And so people, you know, it's called like the sort of the conspiracy trauma.
00:54:39.000Once you understand the degree to which the government has staged things, false flags, lied to in the past, you look at something that happened and you don't even believe your own eyes anymore.
00:56:43.000Doing nothing to succeed on the merits, and then they just come in with this show trial for Quantum, where they have one parent after another come in.
00:56:59.000I mean, you've got to get the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court to get in at some point and say, due process violations and send it back for trial.
00:57:08.000See if they'll even want to go through a trial on the merits on this.
00:57:11.000It wasn't all of the families of the Sandy Hook victims that sued.
00:57:14.000It was actually just a small amount at the nudging of the FBI. So...
00:57:34.000I think this was like last year when this was always going down, where he was in Connecticut, and they were showing out on Law& Order, the Law Network channel, him testifying and everything else like that, going back and forth with the lawyer.
00:57:45.000People get their clips, whatever the fuck.
00:57:49.000He's doing Infowars, and apparently they break into his place and try to say, shut it down, etc.
00:57:55.000So, yeah, a little more complicated than that, and if anybody thought the first part was complicated, wait until we get into bankruptcy law.
00:58:01.000So, I did a little bit of bankruptcy up in Canada, and once you get involved in bankruptcy, A very litigious creditor can tear open every orifice of your body looking for money, looking for wrongdoing.
00:58:14.000So it's not even clear that getting into bankruptcy was a wise protection, but again, I know, what do I know?
00:58:20.000And I would not give advice for second-guess lawyers.
00:58:22.000He filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, which is reorganization, personally and through InfoWars.
00:58:28.000That's the most common type of bankruptcy, right?
00:58:39.000Let's just see if they'll settle for X amount of dollars over a certain amount of time so we can forgive it and move on and the business stays a going concern.
00:58:46.000Chapter 11 is restructuring, not liquidation.
00:59:03.000So he files for Chapter 11, and they try to negotiate a settlement with these judgment creditors, as we call them.
00:59:09.000They don't outrank secured creditors, so there might be some judgment creditor malpractice lawsuits against their lawyers for pissing away a multi-million dollar settlement that was on the table, from what I understand.
00:59:19.000But so they try to say, like, we're never going to be able to pay you $1.5 billion.
00:59:23.000I said the victims of the Armenian genocide, I believe, were asking for $3 billion by way of reparation.
00:59:29.000So let's just contextualize the astronomically insane award in this case with the reality of the horrors and how that's been quantified in the past.
00:59:38.000So they're trying to restructure, say, like, okay, we'll pay you, I don't know, tens of millions of dollars over 10 years and whatever.
00:59:43.000And that goes on for a while, and then it becomes clear...
00:59:51.000They just want to shut Alex Jones up, shut him down.
00:59:53.000And, as I discussed yesterday with Robert Barnes on our show, or as he elucidated, they wanted to own, basically, Alex Jones' personal rights.
01:00:02.000His social media accounts, his literal rights.
01:00:04.000That came out a couple days ago, yeah.
01:00:05.000So that's what they wanted as part of the bankruptcy, to go down to the plaintiffs for the purposes of liquidation.
01:00:10.000So personal social media accounts so that they could do whatever they want.
01:00:15.000Tweet out different stuff for Alex Jones' account.
01:00:18.000It became clear that at least some of the judgment creditors were not interested in a wildly insane settlement structure.
01:00:27.000And from what I understand, what happened is the CRO, the court restructuring officer, the guy named McGill, who's being paid $50,000 a month.
01:00:36.000Everybody's sucking at the teeth of this lawsuit.
01:00:37.000It's exploitation of the highest order.
01:00:54.000Then what happens on Sunday, and I don't know if this is the initiating factor that we only found out about afterwards or if it was a response.
01:01:01.000The supplement company, which is controlled by his father, came in and filed an emergency order that said, we want to dissolve as well.
01:01:41.000But the bottom line, they went to court on Friday where the judge was determining, do they go to Chapter 7 for both free speech and for Jones?
01:01:49.000And the judge said, no, we're going to keep Infowars running because it's a money-making industry business.
01:01:55.000But Alex Jones, we're going to go into liquidation, sell all of his assets, and that's it.
01:03:20.000And whether or not it's a coincidence that this all happened after Trump got elected and many people, and I suspect the Clinton war machine, blames Jones for Trump getting elected.
01:03:41.000Beyond that, it's about appropriating his voice so they can do whatever the hell they want with him.
01:03:44.000Because I look at it like, if you're actually incentivized to get your money back, why would you destroy the business that generates the income that would pay you back what you're seeking?
01:03:55.000Not just that, they had a wildly, they might not like it given the amount of the award, but they had a wildly, what's the word, favorable, generous settlement offer from what I understand.
01:04:10.000And from what I understand and from what I heard during the court proceedings, or at least as far as I understood it, there seems to be friction between the Connecticut plaintiffs and the Texas plaintiffs.
01:04:18.000Because I don't know who gets paid first between the state of Texas and Connecticut.
01:04:21.000But some are saying, you know, we wanted that settlement from what I understand.
01:04:25.000And others are saying, we don't want it.
01:04:26.000And now what's going to happen is they're not going to get it.
01:04:29.000Like, they're not going to get the amount that was on the table.
01:04:31.000And I am predicting that there's going to be malpractice lawsuits or lawsuits from some of the plaintiffs against their lawyers for allowing their lawyers to exact their own politics in this as opposed to representing the best interests of their clients.
01:05:33.000The Trump lawsuits, the Trump indictments, they don't understand everything they're doing highlights their corruption and amplifies the voice of the person they're trying to suppress.
01:06:02.000I predicted this last year, and not because of the indictments.
01:06:06.000It might be superficial to say, well, he's gotten charged, and so now he's going to get the black vote.
01:06:11.000I kind of find that not trivializing what's happening, but what's clear is he's getting the minority vote in a way that he's not gotten before.
01:06:21.000I read a poll today that said he's up to 21% of the black vote, which I predicted last year, but he's quite clearly exposing...
01:06:28.000The corruption of the system and people can empathize with him now, anybody who's ever gone through this, because he's not the first person that this has been done to.
01:07:36.000But it's a system that's been broken this way forever.
01:07:38.000And it's just that the people who've been the victim of it, sitting in jail wrongly convicted for 25 years, were poor, disfavored, didn't have the bullhorn, and nobody saw it, nobody cared, and those who did said, well, they must have done something to deserve it.
01:07:49.000And now they understand what's been done to Donald Trump has been done to Hundreds of thousands of other Americans.
01:07:55.000And those are the people who are going to relate to Trump.
01:07:59.000Yeah, the Great Awakening, as Alex Jones' book is.
01:08:04.000Alright, so I can read some of these chats.
01:08:05.000Speaking of awakening, we have a yacht party.
01:08:08.000In July, man, if you want to stay woke, have fun at the party, and actually enjoy people of success and of greater bounds, creators, type into the actual yacht party.
01:09:18.000People are going to say and do whatever they want to do.
01:09:20.000To young Cliff, I would also take it from the other way.
01:09:24.000Imagine how miserable that person's life is who's shitting on you on the internet to be sitting there shitting on someone on the internet and empathize with how miserable their lives must be in order to get over it and also maybe even feel bad for the person.
01:09:38.000The best revenge for haters is to live a good life.
01:09:43.000Honestly, I don't even know that these idiots make videos on us unless you guys bring it to our attention.
01:10:29.000So when people sit there and criticize you and try to say you're a scammer or a liar, when you've done everything in your power to be as transparent and as honest with the people as possible.
01:10:38.000I mean, hell, I talk about my real estate.
01:10:39.000I've been doxxed on the real estate that I have just because I share how much money I make, how I do my deals, etc.
01:10:45.000Come back to bite me and I'm like, okay, so I'm honest and these idiots want to use that against me and say, oh, I'm pocket watch and stuff.
01:10:51.000And it's like, I'm just trying to help people to teach you guys how to invest in real estate.
01:10:53.000All my people I've met over the years, bro, if you don't have a better life than me, you can say whatever.
01:14:22.000The public sentiment has to be a massive blowback to say free speech is cool again and censorship is not cool and if it hurts my feelings, grow the F up and deal with it.
01:14:34.000We're not yet there, but I think we're getting there in the States.
01:15:21.000It only occurs to people when they are the ones getting censored.
01:15:24.000When it's their political adversaries, it's all fun and games, and it's the rules of the game, and then it bites them in the ass, and I'm like, oh, that's not fair.
01:15:30.000So it's got to get everybody personally before they get personally invested.
01:15:34.000I just find it interesting how when Elon Musk took over Twitter, he even said that conservative voices were being restricted 10 times more than the left.
01:15:44.000And he wanted to create a platform for free speech.
01:15:46.000And I applaud him for that because X now is a lot better than it was.
01:15:49.000I'm very active on X now, whereas a couple years ago I wasn't because you would literally get banned for anything on X. It was really annoying.
01:15:56.000And then you've got platforms like Rumble.
01:15:58.000And it's interesting, too, that when I look at Rumble, every big conservative creator is on Rumble, every single one.
01:16:04.000And there's even some liberals on there as well.
01:16:08.000I just think in the next, again, I think in the next five to ten years as...
01:16:12.000Because I think censorship is only going to get worse.
01:16:14.000I think it's honestly just going to get worse.
01:16:29.000You know, when they froze bank accounts in the absence of any conviction, in the absence of any court order, when they deplatformed people, I mean, they did in the States a little bit as well, but...
01:16:40.000It's the digital control is going to ensure full compliance, and so you need to have sort of a digital charter of rights, which we don't seem to have yet.
01:16:47.000I think the number one thing, banking should be deemed to be a utility that cannot be denied from somebody.
01:18:00.000I mean, I remember the video where he was talking about stuff about Hillary that sort of others who were ahead of the curve knew already.
01:18:06.000Worse, though, than just demonetizing Russell on YouTube, they then went after Rumble.
01:18:11.000And they said, are you allowing this guy to monetize on your channel because of out-of-court statements that have nothing to do with the content?
01:18:18.000It's selective prosecution of sorts, applied mutatis mutatis, but it's lawlessness.
01:18:42.000Merrick Garland refuses to abide by a subpoena, gets found in contempt, and then the assistant attorney general says, yeah, well, we're not going to press charges because, you know, we don't have to supply this.
01:18:54.000You didn't have a legislative need for the documents.
01:19:02.000It is weaponizing the law to go after your political adversaries, your ideological adversaries, your corporate adversaries.
01:19:08.000And it's working surprisingly well, but hopefully, you know, everyone's getting fed up.
01:19:12.000If they don't get you that way, they lobby to silence you.
01:19:14.000Like, what I've noticed, you know, and Chris talked about this on A Space one time.
01:19:18.000Different governments do different approaches, right?
01:19:20.000So in some places where free speech is not a thing, they just turn you off outright, right?
01:19:24.000They're just like, whatever, it is what it is, we're going to just silence you, right?
01:19:27.000But in America, what they do is they have these companies like the ADL and Media Matters or whatever, and they just write a hit piece on you.
01:19:33.000And they say, did you know that XYZ platform allowed this individual to say this comment about these people and promoting hate speech and they're monetizing on that platform?
01:19:42.000And these platforms get terrified because that looks bad for advertisers.
01:20:31.000That is the fastest way to confirm in the minds of those people who would say those things that they're right in their beliefs and they're right for saying it.
01:21:51.000Media Matters was the one that ran the...
01:21:53.000They basically falsified the results, or at least inorganically generated results to make it look like it's a widespread problem to get people to pull advertising dollars from Twitter, and they're going to trial soon.
01:22:04.000They deserve to be bankrupted, and they deserve to be held personally liable for tortious interference with contracts.
01:22:10.000It's like the Oberlin case where you're basically calling someone wrongly a racist just because you can get away with it, interfering with their business, trying to get them shut down, and then they get caught, and then they complain.
01:22:21.000No, this is Elon weaponizing his big machine against us, small little 501c3 horse crap.
01:22:27.000They know what they're doing when they do it, and they deserve to get...
01:22:29.000Not only that, they go the next level.
01:22:32.000What they purposely did was they went on Twitter and they took accounts that were Nazi accounts allegedly to them.
01:22:38.000And what they did was they would look at the thing and look at what advertisements would show up.
01:22:42.000Then they would refresh the tweet and see what other advertisers came in and they just went ahead and did that multiple times.
01:22:48.000And they contacted all those advertisers.
01:22:50.000Are you aware of the fact that your advertisement appears next to this Nazi propaganda?
01:22:55.000I think it was even more insidious than that.
01:22:57.000They took newly created or fresh accounts that I think didn't have certain restrictions on them, or ad restrictions, or they just followed these wildly offensive accounts and big brand accounts.
01:23:09.000And you do that and then just refresh, refresh, so that you artificially, because nobody acts like that on Twitter.
01:24:03.000You know, it's crazy to me because it's like, did they not learn from Gillette when they did that whole toxic masculinity push back in 2019, 2020?
01:24:11.000Did they not learn from Budweiser's mistakes of bringing Dylan Mulvaney in to try to push it and ostracize their entire customer base?
01:24:21.000Like, are advertisers not waking up and realizing that Americans are sick and fucking tired of being censored, being told to be politically correct, etc.?
01:24:28.000Like, people don't want to sit there and be told what they can and can't say all the time.
01:24:33.000Like, advertisers need to wake up, grow a set of nuts, and realize, hey...
01:24:37.000It doesn't matter where the fuck you put your ads at if the content creator is generating views.
01:24:42.000You're gonna go ahead and be able to make some money off of that.
01:24:44.000But they're sitting here saying, oh, we don't wanna...
01:24:47.000Because if you look at it, who are they targeting most of the time saying that they're bigots and offensive and all this other stuff?
01:24:51.000It's most of the time conservative creators.
01:24:54.000But they've been exploding in popularity the past five to 10 years.
01:24:57.000Since Trump took office in 2016, I've seen an explosion in people going more and more conservative.
01:25:02.000And it's not necessarily that they're going more and more conservative.
01:25:04.000I think it's that the left continues to go more left.
01:25:15.000I think anybody who speaks, by definition, you become ultra, far-right, MAGA, Republican, if you say you can't chemically castrate children.
01:25:42.000No, but they themselves partner with some of the most scandalous perverts on Earth and then just want to wash their hands when they do it.
01:25:50.000But the second anybody says something remotely controversial, they then pretend that they're ideologically aligned with the people who they advertise.
01:25:57.000I mean, it's such a stupid idea to say that I am somehow morally and contractually obligated to adhere to the ideology of someone I'm advertising with.
01:26:06.000You're not talking about a brand sponsorship where, like, the spokesperson becomes the face of the company.
01:26:11.000You're talking about a passive ad on a chain.
01:26:16.000We'll get there, but the problem is we might have reached something of a critical mass where when Bud Light went stupid with Dylan Mulvaney, even if it was an insignificant...
01:27:20.000The First Amendment is very important and we need to stand by it, but what's ended up happening is these platforms become monopolies and then they say, well, we're a privately owned business, we do what the fuck we wanna do, which I guess I understand, but at some point, you have a duty to uphold, if you're an American business and you have the monopoly on people being able to create content,
01:27:39.000et cetera, and reach a bunch of people, You got to have some level of duty to be able to adhere to certain amendments and certain laws.
01:28:22.000That's called doing the government's bidding.
01:28:24.000And so when you have a private enterprise doing the government's bidding, they become government agents and they become subject to the Constitution.
01:28:31.000That's so true because, I mean, when I was an agent, right, let's say I have an informant, he can't entrap people.
01:28:36.000Like, if he does something and he entraps them, well, even though he's not a government employee, he's acting on the behalf of the government.
01:28:41.000He's still considered a government agent.
01:28:44.000If you're over here doing the government's bidding and doing what they say and suppressing certain things or whatever, you've effectively become the government.
01:29:21.000When it comes to the Jan Sixers and the ones who take their own lives because of the process, These evil scoundrels are sitting there laughing and saying that's one less ideological adversary that we're going to have to deal with.
01:29:33.000They've written so many hit pieces on Rumble.
01:29:34.000They've written hit pieces on us, Russell Brand, Sneeko, Nick Fuentes.
01:30:38.000No, I think he said, well, I think he has to go, and then he was going to try to record it, but I don't think he's going to get to do that.
01:31:08.000And they'll call that, at some point in time, they'll call that promoting genocide.
01:31:14.000I say it, it's almost like a sick joke.
01:31:18.000Well, people consider that to be a form of genocide.
01:31:20.000And we talk about genociding the transgenders by not recognizing pronouns.
01:31:26.000And Canada is putting up this bill now called the Online Harms Act, which seeks to increase the penalty for certain hate crimes to life in prison.
01:31:36.000There's one where if you promote or advocate genocide, you could be punishable by life in prison.
01:31:43.000But by their definition, simply not using a pronoun is promoting genocide.
01:31:47.000Who the hell knows how it's going to get interpreted?
01:31:49.000And the unpopular argument that I've been raising is some people are using the from the river to the sea expression, and others are going to say, well, that's promoting genocide.
01:31:57.000So the very same, you know, to some extent you're going to have these overlapping forces where other people are going to say, yeah, I'm for censorship, but now I want to say something, and holy shit, from the river to the sea might be promoting genocide.
01:32:27.000That means whatever you said in the past, Canada will be used against you in the future.
01:32:31.000And that's one of the provisions of the law, where it said if you have access to delete a post or a social media post and you don't, and it gets re-shared, that counts as republication for the purposes of the law.
01:33:59.000We've seen it happen with people like Russell Brand, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate, Donald Trump, etc.
01:34:06.000I mean, if you don't believe that having certain viewpoints puts you under the crosshairs, I don't know what to say because it's definitely real.
01:34:14.000I believe in the future is going to be Foson Counts.
01:34:18.000Cell phone is going to be watched, can't travel, and as well, social media.
01:34:33.000Well, I think they would rather you turn into the monster that they wanted you to be from the beginning so they can then say, look at these.
01:35:18.000Maybe not this election cycle because we're focusing on getting Trump in, but after that, etc., people are waking up and realizing that the bullshit is going on.
01:35:25.000And platforms like Rumble and X are helping that.
01:35:28.000We can absolutely get these clowns out of office and get the guys in that we need to get if we're able to build up enough influence, unite people that way because they want you to do the stuff on January 6th, call you a violent insurrectionist, put you in jail, et cetera, and silence you because they know once they put you in jail, you can't say nothing.
01:35:43.000So you don't give them what they want.
01:35:44.000You use your influence, you use your mouthpiece, you use your brain, and you get these guys out of office to put the people in that we need to put in legally.
01:36:46.000Also, you've got to watch for the Operation Co-Intel Pro type.
01:36:51.000Anyone that's advocating for violence, like they're an idiot.
01:36:53.000Advocating for violence or creating infighting.
01:36:57.000You don't have to agree with everything everybody says in order to be ideologically aligned on the most important things.
01:37:03.000Creating infighting among ideological allies is something they've been doing forever, something the FBI and CIA has been doing for a long time, and I see a lot of it today.
01:37:22.000You watch people scratching each other's eyes out on the internet, and then you have fights between...
01:37:30.000Big, influential individuals, influencers, platforms, and then when it says, look at these people, they can't even get along among themselves.
01:38:12.000But yeah, we were flooding down here in Florida.
01:38:15.000Can you ask Vivo about the Citizens United case and how the Clintons won a case of paying someone off while they're convicting Trump for the same thing?
01:38:24.000Citizens United, I can't comment on it.
01:38:32.000Well, I'm not sure if that's referring to the Steele dossier, which is Hillary Clinton and the DNC literally did what they accused Trump of having done with Stormy Daniels.
01:39:06.000Yahoo publishes it so the FBI can say, oh look, this steel dossier shows Trump connections to Russia so we can go get a secret FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.
01:40:48.000And he had to pay him more because it was going to be looked at his income.
01:40:51.000Yeah, and there was his bonus in there.
01:40:52.000He stole $30,000 from that, which was 30 of the 50 that he was supposed to pay to the tech company.
01:40:58.000So his theory, and the jury bought it, is that Trump organized, orchestrated this payment, from which Michael Cohen admitted on the stand he stole $30,000.
01:41:08.000It makes no sense because it would be like Trump authorizing him to steal his own money, which he didn't do, which is patently evidence that he never authorized the payment in the first place.
01:41:16.000Michael Cohen did it, stole from it, admitted it on the stand, and he's off scot-free and he's the star witness.
01:41:22.000He's a criminal, he's a perjurer, he's a liar, he's a thief.
01:41:26.000He admitted to all of this on the stand and Trump is the one that gets convicted for the acts of his criminal lawyer.
01:41:31.000I mean, the actual criminal who happens to be a lawyer.
01:43:07.000Viva, thank you so much for coming down to hang out with us, brother.
01:43:11.000Can you tell the people where they can find you and, yeah, any new projects coming up?
01:43:16.000I'm going to go live and rant and scream tomorrow throughout the week.
01:43:19.000Viva Fry on Rumble, YouTube, but we favor Rumble.
01:43:23.000The Viva Fry on Twitter and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com where there's a ton of exclusive stuff for supporters and we have an amazing, massive community on Rumble.
01:44:17.000It's like, they basically sent a letter saying, we need this crater gone, and Rumble says no, and then they're like, well, whatever, and then Rumble says, you know what, fuck you guys, and they pull out the country.